Seattle Republican

State Libraries SEATTLE REPUBLICAN VOL. XIV. NO. 42 POLITICAT POT PIE Of course Frank Cushmrn is a candidate for the United States senate to succeed Sam Piles, and he will do so if King county goes to fooling with the re-election os Levi Ankeny. If Piles should at any time cast his lot with Ankeny then his political goose will be cooked good and plenty, and if King county makes anything like a determined fight for Ankeny then Cushman will go to the southwest, the northwest and the cow counties of the state and sweep Piles off the face of the earth, just as Jones is going to do with Ankeny, and even to a greater extent, for the Ankeny folk will spend the money while Piles will not systematically let go; hence he will have no show of succeeding himself. Let the voters and business men of Seattle and King county not deceive themselves by playing Foxy Grandpa and think the voters of the other counties of the state are too blind to see through the little trick. What King county wants to do is to get in and drill for Jones, the man who is going to win, and thereby get the assistance of his friends when the time comes round to re-elect Piles. * * * While all of the aforesaid gubernatorial candidates have been doing missionary work in the interest of their respective candidacies for the past year or more, yet the Hon. Samuel G. Cosgrove has made a systematic campaign without exacting any pledges from any one, but has seen as many of the voters in as many of the larger towns of the state as a limited time therein would admit, and he believes that his manner of campaigning will prove effective. The people desire to see the candidates for governor before voting for any of them, and in view of the fact the bosses no longer do the work, but the people themselves do it, Mr. Cosgrove has taken pains to let the voters see him. He has shaken their hands and told them in plain words, "I am a candidate for the governorship." The plan has evidently worked well, for wherever you go and speak of the gubernatorial campaign some one will at once begin to tell you how strong Sam Cosgrove is and how close he is to the people all over the state. Even should he not be nominated as first choice candidate it is said that he is almost certain of getting it as second choice candidate. * * * The letter of Hon. John L. Wilson to to the effect that King county should not ask for a governor this year, owing to the fact that she already has a majority of the state officers, and that it would be good to let well enough alone, was timely and well received. In case King county goes in to hog the governorship, as well as a majority of the state officers, then she will stand a splendid chance of losing the United States senatorship—a thing she would not like to do. The letter meets with general approval, and in the face of it, it seems rather remarkable that Henry McBride, who is now a King county man, would announce his gubernatorial candidacy. Mr. Wilson's letter was to the point, and is so recognized by the leading politicians of the county and even by those who differ from him in many ways politically. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, Friday, March 13, 1908 His Excellency Albert E. Meade has also officially announced his intention of making the fight for the Republican nomination for governor and bases his claim for a second term on the record he has made while in office. There is no doubt but that Gov. Meade is going to poll a great many votes in the coming primary election, but with three other strong candidates in the field and one or two lesser lights claiming a part of the votes cast for the gubernatorial Republican nomination, it is not likely that he will be able to land the necessary 40 per cent. vote. The Piemaker is of the opinion that none of the aspirants will be able to do that; hence the nomination is going to revolve around the second choice candidate. Now, whatever votes Gov. Meade gets it will be first choice votes, and he will get but few if any second choice votes. Pretty nearly every one who votes for him will also vote either for Cosgrove or Atkinson for second choice, and none of those who vote for either of the above candidates will vote for him as second choice. If, therefore, Meade is nominated at all, he will be nominated as first-choice man; which, to the average politicians, seems quite improbable at this writing. * * * Politics has begun to warm up just a bit and the would-be governors on the Republican side of the house are beginning to crawl out of their holes. The latest to announce himself for the gubernatorial nomination is former governor Henry McBride, who was governor by succession and served three years. McBride has been threatening to announce his candidacy for some months, but hesitated from time to time while he felt the public pulse on the subject. He has done so, however, and he thinks the pubiic's pulse beat sufficiently warm for him to venture his candidacy for the nomination at this time. It is claimed by those who ought to know that McBride is being backed for the gubernatorial nomination by the Ankney folk of the state, and in fact it was the Ankeny boosters that first talked of his candidacy and spent several weeks last fall in Eastern Washington endeavoring to crystalize public sentiment in his favor. If this be a fact, then it begins to look as if the Ankeny folk propose to have a multiplicity of gubernatorial candidates, for it is claimed that it was men of the same political stripe that induced Judge Snell of Tacoma to declare his intention to be a candidate for governor, Charles Ridpath of Spokane to declare himself a candidate for the Republican nomination for governor, and finally John D. Atkinson of Chehalis to also declare his intentions to be a candidate for governor. If any part of the above be true then it would be wise for all of those who have been so induced to enter the gubernatorial contest to set up and take notice, as they are being played for suckers. * * * Hon. Robert Laird McCormick, Tacoma's leading citizen, is a candidate for delegate to the Republican national convention. Mr. McCormick is a Roosevelt man first, recognizes that the president is sincere in his refusal to again stand for the nomination. In that event Mr. McCormick is for Taft, or whoever the president, in his judgment, believes is best fitted to carry out his policies. That Mr. McCormick will succeed in his ambition to represent Washington at the national conven PRICE TEN CENTS tion is the belief of well informed persons. Tacoma Forum. * * * E. D. Reiter, of Davenport, announces himself in the Spokane Chronicle's Tuesday issue as a candidate for state senator from the fourteenth district. Mr. Reiter is not on our side of the house, but if ever a man earned promotion and gratitude from the Republicans of Lincoln county Mr. Reiter should be him, for his manly fight made in the interest of the railroad commission bill while serving as representative from this county. —Davenport Tribune. *** "I was approached the other day by a man for the purpose of getting me to lend my aid and influence toward nominating Henry McBride for governor of this state. I might have listened to his solicitations had I not have heard that self-same man only four years ago denounce McBride as the nost rabid anarchist in the Northwest," came from a well-known politician one day this week. "Yes, I know," he continued, "that Henry McBride will make an ideal governor and I knew it four years ago and endeavored to so inform the political bosses of King county, but they would not have it so, and now I am almost dumbfounded to hear these self-same retired bosses advocating the thing I advocated four years ago, and thereby give themselves the lie. As to supporting Henry McBride for governor at this time I feel a good deal like the story that is told of the old colored man down South who had, from time to time been importuning his old master to vote the Republican ticket. Finally the old master turned on the colored man and put the following question to him: "Now, Jim, suppose I and all the white men of the South should do as you ask me and vote the Republican ticket, what would you vote?" "The Democratic ticket the very next minute, sir, because I know that what all you white folks want is not the thing that the Negroes should work and vote for." Now, the rabid anti-McBride men having suddenly developed an abiding love for him I am inclined to think he is not the man for the people to support, and I will therefore be against him. * * * S. C. Cosgrove, of Pomeroy, candidate for the Republican nomination of governor, was in Tacoma a few days ago, following out his campaign tactics of shaking hands with all the old friends he could meet and making as many new ones as possible. Asked as to his prospects, Mr. Cosgrove declared with the utmost confidence that he was sure of the nomination and equally certain of election—and then he proceeded to figure out, confidentially, just how it was going to be done. He has only three planks to his platform—one is the square deal, another that Meade's term of four years is all he is entitled to by the constitution of the state, and the third that no other candidate for the office is better known or has as many staunch Republican friends as S. G. Cosgrove—Tacoma New Herald. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN, 307 Epler Block. Phone Main 305. CAYTON'S CURRENT COMMENT 2 There is a similar "flash roll" now operating in San Francisco that is deserving of a like dose as that the governor of New York has been asked to administer to Jerome, who is sailing under the cognomen of Francis J. Heney. That he has done some clever work in San Francisco is admitted, but that that work has so badly swelled his head that he is now an overbearing, intolerable blunderbus is also apparent. Until Heney got it into his head that he was senatorial timber for California he did do some very good work; but even in that his modus procedure was both crude and uncouth, as he rode over men on a moral hobby, no part of which in his private life did he practice. In his effort to overthrow the corruptable gang that has so long operated in San Francisco apparently he has had no greater object and ambition than, with the aid of Claus Spreckles, to form another ring or combination, if not as criminal in its nature as the Schmitz-Ruefe ring, at least as tyranical and intolerant. Heney, it is not believed, has any good intentions in his efforts neither in San Faancisco nor his land fraud cases in Oregon. William K. Jerome, public prosecutor of Greater New York, has himself been put on the defensive and is now battling for an existence before the governor of the state, his removal having been petitioned for by a number of leading citizens of New York on the grounds of neglect of duty verging dangerously near onto a collusion with evil doers. In defending himself it required a brief to the governor containing 25,000 words, which document his excellelency still has under advisement. That Jerome is a gallery player for public sentiment has been glaringly apparent for a number of months. No one of common sense now believes that Jerome has the good of the community at heart in performing his duty as a prosecutor—but only the good of Jerome as a future luminary is his sole aim and object. Jerome pawed the heavens and the earth prosecuting Harry K. Thaw, because he believed he was getting prominence by so doing but the minute public sentiment began to swing from him he ran to cover, and in the second trial he was perfectly willing to accept anything the judge saw fit to impose upon Thaw, not one single time asking for his electrocution as the penalty for Thaw's foul murder. The conclusion of the whole matter is Jerome is a "flash roll" and the governor of that state would do the public a patriotic service by removing him from office. Who was responsible for the burning to death of the 170 school children in Cleveland, Ohio, a few days ago, is still the all absorbing question. The children might have been saved had the doors been more modern; that is to say, the children themselves were not able to open the doors, and burned to death while trying to do so. Where was the janitor when the fire gong rang, and why was it not his duty to be as promptly at the main entrance of the school house door at the sound of the fire gong as the children themselves? Of what service is a day janitor about a school building if he is not useful as well as ornamental? It is not customary for the janitor on duty during school hours to do the cleaning of the rooms after school has closed for the day, and that being a fact, why should it not be a part of his duty to be as prompt in responding to the call of the fire alarm as the children themselves? If the janitor had have been on hand and thrown those doors THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN open the children could have marched out and not one of them would have been lost. With this idea thoroughly fixed in our minds we do not hesitate in saying that, either the janitor is guilty of criminal negligence or the board of education, the superintendent or the principal of the school, one or all concerned, are guilty of criminal carelesness in not either having the janitor or the custodian of the building so trained as to as quickly respond to the fire calls as the teachers; and in such case there is no other place for such persons to be except at the door—the place where, if any difficulty at all arises, is most likely to occur. Let the Cleveland holacust be an everlasting warning to school boards, superintendents and teachers all over the land, that in all cases of quick dismissal it shall be the duty of janitors, custodians or look-out men on duty to post themselves at the great doors of egress in order to throw them open at the proper signal that the children may pass out of the building without hinderance or delay. The state supreme court of California handed down a decision last Monday affirming the decision of the court of appeals which knocked out the decision of the lower court, which tried and convicted Eugene E. Schmitz, former mayor of San Francisco, for receiving bribes while in office. The trial judge after reading the opinion of the court of appeals, did a lot of scolding at the latter court and went so far as to say that the opinion was not based on the facts and the law, but on the blood relationship between the members of the court and many of the persons involved in the scandal. The matter was taken to the supreme court of the state and now it is unanimous in sustaining the court of appeals and practically ordering the release of Schmitz from jail, where he has been confined for the past nine months, thus branding both the trial judge and prosecutor, F. J. Heney as liars and persecutors instead of prosecutors. Sic transit gloria. HUMOR OF THE LAW. Chief Baron O'Grady was, for instance, a humorist of the first water, as the following stories will prove. One day a brother judge, who owed his promotion rather to interest than to brains, was boasting to O'Grady of the summary way in which he disposed of matters in his court. "I say to the fellows who are bothering me with foolish arguments that there's no use in wasting my time and their breath, for that all their talk only just goes in at one ear and out at the other." "And no wonder," quietly answered O'Grady, "seeing that there's so little in between to stop it!" A ingenius marriage contract not to be performed until the death of the young lady's mother, presumably to avoid any disagreeable interference by the mother-in-law with the connubial bliss of the wedded pair, is revealed in the case of Bailey vs. Brown, 88 Pac. Rep. 518. Judge McLaughlin, of the California court of appeals, who filed a concurring opinion in the case, intimates that a breach of such contract did not constitute a cause of action. He asked the question, "How could a contract to marry exist when the promisor might never be under an obligation to marry the promisee, and vice versa?" Friday, March 13, 1908 and continued: "If this good mother should live to a very ripe old age, as mothers sometimes do, no human could tell what might happen. Eeither of the parties might be waiting for the other, harp in hand, beyond this vale of tears, or both might pine away and die before this promise of future connubial bliss could rippen into a cause of action enforceable in earthly courts." Sir Joseph Jekyll was a born wit, of whom many amusing stories are told. Once when an attorney called Else, of small stature and poor reputation, addressed him thus in court: "My lord, I understand that you have called me a pettifogging scoundrel. Is that so?" "Sir," answered Jekyll sternly, "I am not aware that I have ever called you a scoundrel or a pettifogger, but I may have said that you are little Else." Very recently in the northwestern part of the state of Washington, a foreign born person, calling himself Col. Stark, applied to the judge of the superior court for naturalization papers. He had been in the United States for twenty years, most of which time had been spent in the state of Pennsylvania. A United States representative appeared in court to cross examine the applicant for citizenship, for the purpose of testing his qualifications and knowledge of American affairs, and among other things, asked the applicant who the President of the United States was at the present time. The applicant answer as follows: Cleveland was when I came to the United States, and afterwards I worked in the steel plant in Pittsburg, Pa., and I think at that time either Mr. Carnegie or Schwab was president of the United States. I know Mr. Carnegie was president at one time, but I am not sure whether he is now or not. Mr. Schwab was president of the United States for a short time. After declaring his love for American institutions, and his admiration for a country intelligent enough to elect such good men as Carnegie and Schwab to the position of presidency, the examining officer discharged him and called for one of his witnesses, who was sworn, and among other things was asked, if he thought Col. Stark was well enough qualified, and well enough acquainted with American institutions to make a good citizen, to which the witness said he thought he was, and then the examining officer propounded to the witness the following questions to test his knowledge of affairs: Who makes the laws of the United States? The answer was: President Roosevelt. Who helps him? was the next question. I never heard of anyone doing so, was the answer. Who makes the laws of the state of Washington? Governor Mead. Who helps him? Mr. F., who secured Gov. Mead his nomination is his political helper and may possibly make some of the laws. I think he does. The judge took the case under advisement. Friday, March 13, 1908 SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Published Every Friday at 307 Epler Block. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton .....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton .....Asociate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. One Year .....$2.00 Six Months .....1.00 Three Months ......60 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matter. Easter is coming and so is trouble for daddy. Senator Ankeny may do a great deal for Seattle, but unfortunately for him the other fellow always gets the credit. Ruef is probably a monumental liar, but we are inclined to think that he is not the only one in the world or even in San Francisco. Oh yes we need a business man for president, but is not even the professional politician a business man? He at least makes a business of it. A Japanese diplomat thinks Japan too poor to fight and if the billion dollar indebtness story of which he tells be true then we quite agree with him. Having been completely set free by the supreme court of the state, Eugene E.Schmitz, the Heney bubble has burst and gone the way of the world. Sic transit gloria. Seattle will give the Republican presidential candidate next November at least 20,000 plurality. Who said Seattle, so far as the state of Washington is concerned, is not IT? A financial wiseacre declares that the recent panic was caused by the shortage of morey and that the shortage of money was caused by the panic. So, there you are.—Ex. Graft has become of such common practices that it is nothing out of the ordinary for any one with an opportunity to resort to this easy method of getting hold of some extra coin, A Mr. Onion is a candidate for office in Texas, and a Mr. Stake is a candidate in Pennsylvania. Stake and onions would make an appealing combination for a presidential effect—Ex. When janitors in school buildings are made useful as well as ornamental then perhaps when the quick dismal alarm is given they will be ready to open the school doors if the children are ordered to march out. Whether the restricted district is or is not moved, a scandal, such as Seattle has never before been the recipient of, will be the result. Juggling in that direction has already begun to bob up its head and it now looks as if it will not down. The image provided is too blurry to accurately recognize any text. It appears to be a blank or heavily blurred background. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN "Old Farmer Cosgrove" sounds good to the Cosgrove workers, in view of the fact that the three otoo candidates for the Republican gubernatorial nomination or practicing lawyers, which to the ordinary person looks like too much lnwyer in the case. And now it transpires that one O. V. Hurt, who egged George Mitchell on to kill Joshua Creffield, did so for the purpose of becoming the leader of the Holy Rollers. If there is any truth in the statement Hurt ought to get badly hurt by the courts of the land. The fight between the Standard Oil folk and the Union Oil Company may result temporarily in giving the consumers a bit of cheap oil, but so soon as these public looters can get together then the public will be forced to more than twice over pay for the lossage. Organized labor may or may not be friendly towards the Hon. Wesley L. Jones, but it looks as though it will have to be "Hobson's choice" between Jones and Ankeny, organized labor having refused to work on the latter's newspaper on account of its unfairness. Who ever heard of John L. Wilson being a candidate for governor, asks the Seattle Daily Times. Why, bless you, Colonel, from the Times itself, in a purported dispatch from Port Townsend. But we should have remembered then that "saw it in the Times? Damn lie, as it is ever thus." Delaying, or holding, the mails in the Seattle psstoffice is becoming so annoying to the Post-Intelligencer that that newspaper has been compelled to register a protest. If the postmaster would place Republicans in charge of the office instead of Democrats, as his assistants, there would probably be no grounds for complaint. It would be a brutal shame if Uncle Sam should stand idly by and see Japan take another mean advantage of China, and in case hostilities should break out between the two oriental countries Uncle Sam should offer his services as mediator, and in case Japan refuses to accept the same then he should offer his cannons to China as a protector, and so inform the want-to-fight Japs to that effect. Warren W. Tolman, of Spokane, has announced his candidacy for congress from this district on the Democratic ticket. While a member of the legislature during the sessions of 1901 and 1903 he was the author of the Tolman railway commission bill, which fact he mentions as one reason why he should be sent to congress The fight promises to wax warm between Mr. Tolman and Mr. Goodyear for the nomination.—Colfax Gazette. One day Ben Gildersleeve, a local legal light, was brow-beating a witness—a frail and nervous little woman. Justice Hoopenheifer rebuked Gildersleeve once or twice, but the brow-beating process was immediately resumed. Hoopenheifer calmly arose, walked over to Gildersleeve, knocked him down with a well directed blow, then adjourned court. While Gildersleeve was being gathered up and carried home, Hoopen ```markdown ``` heifer swore out a warrant before himself, against himself, plead guilty, and sentenced himself to ten days' imprisonment. Then he walked over to the jail and had himself locked up. Regardless of the protests of the whole community, he stubbornly served his time. "When I deserve it, I'm a-goin' to take my own medicine, and nobody can't stop me," said Hoopenheifer. The old fellow had been in office some months before he was called upon to officiate at a marriage. The request came unexpectedly. He was holding court one day, when Sam Slack, the constable, edged up and whispered: "Say, jedge, that big woman what jist come in wants you to marry her." "Me?" exclaimed the justice. "Why, I'm married already." "I misspoke myself," apologized Sam. "She wants you to splice her to a little bow-legged cuss that's hangin' around outside—dassn't come in." "Dang such a man," growled Hoppenheifer. I'll marry 'em jist to punish him." Then, in a loud tone, the justice announced: "This court will take a recess of five minutes. Bring in the stalwart bride and the blushin' groom." The "happy pair" presented themselves—the bride, a six-foot Amazon; the groom, a timid pigmy, whose knees smote together. Hoppenheifer knew no wedding ceremony, therefore he was constrained to improvise. "Jine left hands," he commanded. The parties obeyed. "Raise your right hands and be swore." Up went the hands, the groom's trembling. The justice continued impressively: "Do you solemnly swear that you will take each other for husband and wife, to the best of your knowledge, information and belief, so help me God? Yes? Then go your way and sin no more." The brevity of this marriage ceremony led some good people to poke fund at it—especially the parson, who saw in Hoopenheifer a possible competitor. The justice said little, but diligently prepared for the future. He resorted to his library—a single book of obsolete forms—and from the framework of wills, deeds, bills of sale and other legal rubbish, enriched by his own invention, prepared a marriage service that he afterwards invariably used. It was as follows: "In the name of God, amen. This couple being of sound and disposing mind and memory, do hereby make, publish and declare their will as follows: that they hereby grant and convey themselves, each to the other, as man and wife, to have and to hold forever; hereby covenanting and warranting, each unto the other, that, at the date thereof, they are subject to any prior incumbrances whatsoever. Am I right?" (Upon being assured, he would proceed.) "Then, in the name of the people of the state of Michigan, and pursuant to the statute in such case made and provided; I pronounce you wed. If any one has objections, let him state them now—for it's too late." The publishers of the Seattle Republican handle with care attorneys' legal publications. Notices are called for and delivered. Phone Main 305. Office 307 Epler. 4 PERSONAL PARAGRAPHS. Col. W. F. Prosser has named George H. Appleton chief deputy in his office. There will be no further changes for the present. Persons desiring to subscribe for Central Law Journal need not trouble themselves about communicating with th ehead office, but call up the office of The Seattle Republican and an agent will call upon you. Judge Milo A. Root, of the Supreme Court at Olympia, has been taking a week off, but returns to his labors next Monday. Judge Root is considered one of the ablest jurists on the bench. Asia Jackson, who smashed a conductor in a street car altercation, was fined $25 and costs by Justice Gordon. Jackson claims he was protecting himself, while the car men and the bystanders claim he was abusive. Prosecuting Attorney Mackintosh has named George F. Vandevere as chief deputy to succeed John F. Miller. Mr. Vandevere has also announce dhis candidacy for prosecuting attorney, to succeed Mackintosh. Whether or not Mayor-elect John F. Miller will retain the present chief of police, C. W. Wappenstein, is a question, but whether he does or does not it is the consensus of opinion that Mr. Wappenstein has made the best chief Seattle ever had. Yes, indeed, The Seattle Republication will be pleased to get your publication notice if, for no other reason than because, it needs the money. Its rates are reasonable and its service perfect. Call Main 305 and leave your office number and it will do the rest. Hon, S. G. Cosgrove, of Pomeroy, who is sojourning in the city, has agreed to address the Sunday Forum, Sunday afternoon, March 22nd, inst. Mr. Cosgrove has given the mooted race problem of this country much thought and consideration, and will therefore talk along those lines. E. M. Rands, for eight years state senator from Vancouver, spent a couple of days of this week in the city and was in business up to his eyes while here. "No sir, I am not in politics and I do not believe any one man or crowd of men are strong enough to pull me back into the game. I am building a railroad in Vancouver and I propose to devote my entire energy to the accomplishing of that." Six superior court judges are to be elected in King County this year, and of the present roster all but one will ask for re-election. The King County Bar Association wants the selection of the judges left to its members, and to mary of their own. Whether or not the voters would ratify their actions is a question. Hon. R. A. Ballinger, who has been absent from the city for something over a year, is at home again, and has taken up his business as of yore. After retiring from the office as mayor of Seattle, Secretary Garfield named him as land commissioner, which place he filled with credit to himself. Judge Ballinger's name has been mentioned in connection with the Republican gubernatorial nomination of this state, but he will hardly consider the matter. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN RAYPOOBLICAN(t) katony SUMMERS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King, Susie S. Hamilton, plaintiff, vs. Patrick Stewart Hamilton, defendant: The State of Washington to, the said Patrick Stewart Hamilton, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first pub- lication of this summons, to write within sixty days after the 13th of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the com- plaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaint- t at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of abandonment and non-support. P. O. Address: Rooms 629-631 Burke Bldg., in Seattle, King County, Washington. March 13—April 24, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King, Otto C. Ehnsen and Marie Sophronia Ehnsen, Plaintiffs, vs. Robert Novarak and Julia Novarak, husband and wife, Defendants. The State of Washington to the said Robert Novarak and Julia Novarak, husband and wife, defendants: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 13th day of March. A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiffs' complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled Court. The object for which this action is brought is to foreclose a mortgage on certain real estate described, as follows, to-wit: Lot numbered thirteen (13) in block numbered fifteen (15) of Joseph R. McLaughlin's Water Front Addition to the City of Seattle, according to the official plat thereof as appears of record in the office of the Auditor of King County, State of Washington. MITCHELL & LAWRENCE Attorneys for Plaintiffs Office Address and Post Office Address: Rooms 611-612 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, State of Washington. (March 13-April 24, 1908.) (To be published for six successive weeks, or seven times.) In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of Jerry Perry, Deceased. Bridget Perry, as executrix of the estate of Jerry Perry, deceased, having filed her petition in this court, duly verified, praying for an order of this court for the sale of real property for the purposes therein set forth, and it appearing to the court from said petition that the personal estate in the hands of said administrix is not sufficient to pay the claims against said estate and expenses of administration, and the family allowance, and that it is merely paid out as a portion of the real property of said deceased, pay the claim against said estate, the family allowance made therein and the expenses of administration, and it appearing to the court that said petition conforms to and is in accordance with the requirements of law in such cases made and provided. It is now and here ordered, considered and adjudged by the court that all the persons interested in said estate appear before the said Superior Court on Thursday, the 16th day of April, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the foremono of said day, at the court room of the Probate Department of the Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, in the City of Seattle, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this court should not be granted to said executrix, authorizing and empowering her to sell the real property of said deceased or so much thereof as may be necessary to pay the claims against said estate, the family allowance and the expenses of the administration. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before the 16th day of April, 1908, in the Seattle "Republican," a newspaper published and printed in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 12th day of March, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. (March 13—April 10, 1908) No. 60366. No. 3559 SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. In the superior court of the State of Washington, for County. Dos Grellish, Plaintiff, vs. Patrick J. Grellish, Defendant. State of Washington, County of King—ss. The State of Washington to the said Patrick J. Grellish: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 13th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of the above entitled court divorcing the plaintiff and the defendant on the ground of abandonment for more than one year, and on the further ground for neglect and refusal of the defendant to make suitable or any provision for the support of his family. McCLURE & McCLURE, Atotnneys for Plaintiff. Post Office and Office Address: 1304 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, March 13, 1908. NOTICE TO CREDITORS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of King.—No. 50031 C. L. Robrer and M. L. Koerner, formerly doing business as Robrer Brothers, Plaintiffs, vs. Inter-State Live Stock Insurance Company, a corporation, Defendants. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned Receiver of the Inter-State Live Stock Insurance Company, a corporation, to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said Inter-State Live Stock Insurance Company, a corporation, to exhibit, and present them, with the necessary vouchers and duly verified on or before the date of April 1908, at room number 615 New York Block, Seattle, Washington, the same being the place for transaction of the business of said estate. WILL HANNA, Receiver of Inter-State Live Stock Insurance Company, a corporation. (March 13—April 19, 1908.) NOTICE TO CREDITORS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of King.,—No. 8708. In the Matter of the Estate of Gertrude A. Edwards, Deceased. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against Gertrude A. Edwards, deceased, or against her estate, to present the same, with the necessary vouchers, within one year from the date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit: within one year from the 13th day of March, 1908, to John Edwards, administrator of the estate of Gertrude A. Edwards, deceased, at the office of Reed & Hardman, 960 Empire Building, Seattle, Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of the business of said estate. Dated at Seattle, Washington, this 13th day of March, 1908. JOHN EDWARDS, Administrator of the Estate of Gertrude A. Edwards, Deceased. REED & HARDMAN. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. —In Probate. In the matter of the estate of James Cowley, deceased.—No. 8790. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given to all persons having claims against the estate of James Cowley, deceased, or against the community consisting of James Cowley and Matilda A. Cowley, to present the same, with proper vouchers attached, to the undersigned Administrator of the estate of said deceased, at his place of transaction of the business of said estate, namely, at the office of Douglas, Lane and Douglas, 204-209 Lumber Exchange Building, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, within one year after the first publication of this notice, to-wit: within one year after the 13th day of March, 1908, or they will be forever barred. WILLIAM M. COWLEY, Administrator of the Estate of James Cowley, Deceased. DOUGLAS, LANE & DOUGLAS, 204-209 Lumber Exchange Building, Seattle, Washington. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ON SALE OF REAL ESTATE. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate.—No. 8719. In the Matter of the Estate of Martha J. Whittier, Deceased. Merriel Whittier, the administrator of the estate of Martha J. Whittier, deceased, having filed petition in the Court, verified paying for the order of this Court for the sale of real estate of which the said deceased died selzed, for the purposes therein set forth; And it appearing to the Court from said petition that the personal estate of the said deceased in the hands of said administrator is not sufficient to pay the leams against the said estate and the expenses of the administration thereof, and said estate owns an undived one-fourth interest in and to lots three (3) and four (4) in Fostoria Garden Tracts, in said county; that it is necessary to sell all or a portion of the real estate of the said deceased to pay the said claims and expenses of the administration. And it appearing to the Court that said petition conforms, and is in accordance with the requirements of law in such case made and provided. It is ordered by the Court that all persons interested in the estate of the said deceased appear before said Superior Court on Thursday, the 16th day of April, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day at the Court room of the Probate Department of said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this Court should not be granted to said administrator authorizing and empowering him to sell the said real estate of said deceased, or so much thereof as may be necessary McCLURE & McCLURE, Friday, March 13, 1908 to pay the aforesaid claims and expenses of administration. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before the said 16th day of April, 1908, in the Seattle "Republican," a newspaper printed and published in said County of King and of general circulation therein. Done in open Court this 7th day of March, 1908, GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King—ss. I, Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King, County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 7th day of March, 1908, in the matter of the estate of Martha J. Whittler, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 7th day of March, 1908. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. BY J. A. SIGURDSSON. Deputy Clerk. ALLEN WEIR, Attorney for Petitioner. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of King. E. E. Van Hook, Plaintiff, vs. Fred Mauer, Defendant. The State of Washington to the said Fred Mauer: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 13th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. This action is in foreclosure of a chattel mortgage executed by defendant to plaintiff, and is brought for the purpose of foreclosing all of the right, title and interest of the defendant in and to one gasoline launch, known by the name of "Mink," the property of defendant. E. E. L. SANDERS, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Bldg., Seattle, County of King, Washington. (March 13—April 24, 1908.) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Georgiana Raven, Plaintiff, vs. George Raven, Defendant. No. 60267. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to said George Raven: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 6th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated. And in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this action against you is to obtain a decree herein dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant, on the statutory grounds of desertion for more than eight years last past, and that the following described real estate be decreed to be the separate property of plaintiff, to-wit: A tract of land in Sec. 24, Twp. 25 N. Range 3 East W. M., described as follows: Beginning 478 feet south and 37 feet east of the northwest corner of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Sec. 24, thence east 120 feet, thence south 38 feet, thence west 120 feet, thence north 38 feet to the point of beginning. The following described tract of land situated in the town of Hannibal, County of Oswego, New York, to-wit: Two parcels of land containing $ \frac{1}{4} $ of an acre each, being part of Lot 39; one hundred acres in Great Lot No. 39, part of Lot 39 of Great Lot 39, containing six and one-half rods. Also all that other parcel or parcels of land, known and described as one-half acre of land in the States. And the easterly 18 feet of Lot 21, Block 4, according to a plan of part of Lot 231, Group 1, Kamloops Division of Yale District, situated in the City of Kamloops, Province of British Columbia. And for such other relief as to the Court shall seem proper. GUIE & GUIE, Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. and office address: No. 615-16 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. March 6—April 17. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. SUMMONS. Benjamin F. Blair, Plaintiff, vs. Ada C. Blair, Defendant—No..... The State of Washington to the said Ada C. Clair. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the day of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 6th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The action is one for divorce. McBURNEY & CUMMINGS, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 414 Boston Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. March 6—April 17. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. E. M. Martin and Jane Doe Martin, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants—No. 59803. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the owner of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 18th day of October, 1905, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: 1st Add. to 2nd Plat of W. Seattle, the North $/ of lot 10, block 50, certificate number B35555, year 1903, amount $2.14. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: No. 1/2 lot 10, block 50, 1st Add. to 2nd Plat of W. Seattle, $2.86 for year 1906, $1.67 for year 1905, $1.48 for year 1904. Which several sums bears interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, sixty (60) days after the 7th day of Feby., 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said property for the sums and due upon it, charged against each parcel of said taxes. Interest and property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER. Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. First publication dated February 7th, 1908. Last, March 20. NOTICE SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King—ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an execution issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 14th day of February, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of George Olson, plaintiff, versus William Warren and Mattie Warren, his wife, defendants, No. 45677, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given, that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock a. m. on the 28th day of March, A. D. 1908, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendants, William Warren and Mattie Warren, his wife, in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-southwest quarter (SW¼) of Northeast quarter (NE¼) of Southeast quarter (SE¼) and North half (N½) of Southeast quarter (SE¼) of Northeast (NE¼) of Southeast quarter (SE¼) of Section twenty-nine (29), Township twenty-five (25), Range five (5) east, levied on the property of said defendants, William Warren and Mattie Warren, his wife, to satisfy a judgment, amounting to ninety-eight and 50-100 ($88.50) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 14th day of February, 1908, L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. Feb. 21—March 20, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. P. A. Hyman and Jane Doe Hyman, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereslafter described real property, Defendants. No. 60146. Notice and Simmons, State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them. You and each of your owners, claimants, or other interested or estate in and to the hereslafter described real property, the hereby notified that the above man plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 25th day of June, 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon real property situated in said King County, thecribed as follows, to-wit: Lot 5, block 58, Riley's Addition to Riley's Addition to Seattle; for the year 1902, in the sum of $3.02; certificate No. B27414. The sum of Nov. 22, 1904, the east 48 feet of land was redeemed from said certificate leaving said certificate still outstanding the remainder of said lot as follows: Lot 5, less the east 48 feet, block 58, Riley's Add, to Riley's Addition to Seattle; for the year 1902, in the sum of $2.93; certificate No. B27414. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by plaintiff upon said above described property, to-wit: Lot 5, less 48 feet, block 58, Riley's Add, to Riley's Addition to Seattle; for the year 1905, in the sum of $2.12; for the year 1904, in the sum of $2.96; for the year 1905, in the sum of $1.78; for the year 1906, in the sum of $4.05; for several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. taxes you and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified days after the date of first publication of notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days from Feb. 28, 1908, in the above entitlement and action; and defend this entitlement and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the undersigned plaintiff at his office stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to, judgment will be rendered herein, forecloser parcel of said real property or for all amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause Court. and Court. W. T. GAFFNER. Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle. Wash. Last Updated Feb. 28—April 19. '08. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN NOTICE TO CREDITORS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for the County of King. In the mater of the estate of Robert Beaury, deceased. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned executrix of the estate of Robert Beaury, deceased, to creditors of and all persons, having claims against the said deceased, to exhibit with the necessary vouchers within one year after the first publication of this notice, to executrix at Room 911 Lowman Building, situated in the southeast corner of First Avenue and Cherry Street, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of business of the said estate. Dated at Seattle, Washington, this 21st day of February, 1908. ELIZABETH BEAURY, executrix of the estate of Robert Beaury, deceased. Date of first publication, February 21, 1908; last, March 20. GRAVES, PALMER & MURPHY. Attorneys for Executrix, 911 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUNTY State of Washington. Morris Berger, Plaintiff, vs. Sarah Berger, Defendant. No. 60059. Summons for Service by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Sarah Berger, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 28th day of February, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case you fail to do the judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the above named defendant upon the grounds of cruelty and abandonment. P. O. Address, Rooms 210 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb. 28-April 10, 1908. SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King—ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an execution, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 13th day of February, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of W. H. Merritt, plaintiff, versus Abble Anderson and J. W. Anderson, her husband, defendants, No. 59943, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 28th day of March, A. D. 1908, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendants, Abble Anderson and J. W. Anderson, her husband, and to the following described property, situated in King County. State of Washington, to-wit: Lots fifteen (15) and sixteen (16), block ten (10), Cloverdale Addition; also, lot ten block eighteen (18) Glimman Park, located on as the property of said defendants, Abble Anderson and J. W. Anderson, to satisfy a judgment, amounting to seventeen and 35-100 (817.35) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. On the 23rd day of February, 1908. Dated this is 115 L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. Feb. 21—March 20. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for King County, Christine Deppman and Charles F. Deppman, by his Guardian and item, C. E. Deppman, Plain-Dilworth, Defendants, tiffs, vs. Richard G. Dilworth and Mary G. defendants, Richard G. Dilworth and Mary G. The State of Washington, to the above named defendants, Richard B. Dilworth and Mary B. Dilworth; You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 31st day of January, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to compel the said defendant to set forth the nature of the respective claims which they may have against all of lot one (1) section twenty-nine (29), north of range three (3) east W. M., in King County, Washington, except that ten (10) acres thereof, heretofore to-wit: on the 21st day of April, 1892, conveyed by said defendants to Amelia W. Buell by deed dated as of that date and recorded in Vol. 162 of Deed Records of said King County, at page 370 thereof, that each and every of said claims be declared of no validity, that the plaintiffs be declared to be the owners in fee simple of said premises, and that defendants have no claim against or title in or to said premises or any part thereof, and for such other and further relief as may be just and equitable. JAMES McNENEY. Attorney for Plaintiff, 514 Marion Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Jan. 31—March 13. SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for the County of King. J. W. La Mar, plaintiff, vs. Mabel H. La Mar, defendant. No. 60018. The State of Washington to the said Mabel H. Le Mon, defendant: La Mar, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 21st day of February, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in one of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: Divorce on the ground of desertion. Z. B. RAWSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address: 617 Pacific Block, Seattle, County of King, Washington. Feb. 21—April 3, 1908. NOTICE SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. J. E. Kruchon and Jane Kruchon, his wife, and all persons unknown, If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herelainfter described real property, Defendants.—No. 59802. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the herelainfter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 7th day of December, 1903, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Denny & Hoyt's Add. to the City of Seattle, lot 4, block 24, certificate number B24822, year 1902, amount $3.74. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 4, block 24, Denny & Hoyt's Add, to the City of Seattle, $3.06 for year 1903, $12.94 for year 1903, $3.84 for year 1904, $18.75 for year 1904, $4.02 for year 1905, $32.29 for year 1905, $5.26 for year 1906, $34.06 for year 1906. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to wit: sixty (60) days after the 7th day of February, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer to the complaint on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said real property, for the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle Wash. First publication, February 7th, 1908. Last March 20. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for King County. Order to Show Cause and Petition for Allowance. In the Matter of the Estate of George F. Smith. Deceased Ollie Smith, the executrix of the estate of George F. Smith, deceased, having filed her petition in this Court, duly verified, praying for an order of this Court allowing her the sum of $50.00 per month for her maintenance, as the widow of the said George F. Smith, deceased, during the administration of said estate, and it appearing to the Court from said petition that the deceased left no homestead or dwelling house for his said widow, and it appearing that the petitioner, Ollie Smith, the executrix of said estate, is the widow of said deceased and is a devisee under the will of said deceased; and that by said will no provision was made for the support and maintenance of his said widow, and that it is necessary that some provision be made for the support of said widow during the administration of said estate, and it appearing that said petition conforms to, and is in accordance with the requirements of law in such cases made and provided; and it appearing that notice of the time and place of hearing said petition should be given by publication: It is ordered by the Court that all persons interested in the estate of said deceased appear before said Superior Court on the 17th day of April, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day, at the court room of the Probate Department of said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle. King County and State aforesaid; then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this Court should not be granted to said executrix, authorizing and empowering her to pay to herself as the widow of said deceased, from the estate of said deceased, the sum of $50.00 per month for her support and maintenance, and charge the same against said estate. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks, before the said 17th day of April, 1908, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said County of King and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 4th day of March, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King—ss I. Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Su- prior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 4th day of March, 1908, in the matter of the estate of George F. Smith, deceased. Witness my hand and seal of said Court on the 4th day of March, 1908. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. (SEAL) By J. A. SIGURDSSON, Deputy Clerk. Date of first publication, March 6; last, April 3rd. IN PROBATE. In the Superior Court of the State of Wash- ton in and for the County of King.—No. 8731. No. 8731. Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Rode Vukojevie, Decensed. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against Rode Vuko- No. 8635 IN PROBATE IN PROBATE. Friday, March 13, 1908 jevie, deceased, or his estate, to present the same with the necessary vouchers, within one note from the date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit: within one year from the 6th day of March, 1908, to C. C. Emmons, administrator of the estate of Rode Vukojevie, deceased, at the office of John E. Carroll, No. 210 New York Building, corner of Second Ave. and Cherry St., in the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of the business of said estate. Dated at Seattle, King County, Washington, this 6th day of March, 1908. C. C. EMMONS. Administrator of the Estate of Rode Vukojevie, deceased. DECEASED. JOHN E. CARROLL, Attorney for Administrator, No. 210 New York Building. Seattle, King County, Washington. Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, March 6—April 3, 1908. SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for King County. James Callahan, Plaintiff, vs. Susan Callahan, Defendant. State of Washington to the said Susan Callahan, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 6th day of March, 1908, in the above entitled action, in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff; as its office below allows it to implicate your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. This action is brought to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the grounds of desertion and adultery. JOHN R. PARKER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: Rooms 98-32-32 Union Blk., Seattle, King County Washington. March 6 to April 17, 1908. No.3655 In the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. United States of America, Petitioner, vs. Pietro Sclaffani, Respondent. The United States of America to Pietro Sclaffani: You are hereby notified and required to appear in the above entitled Court within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication hereof to answer the petition of the United States of America, the petitioner herein. The object for which this petition is filed is to obtain an order from the above entitled Court for the purpose of vacating, setting aside and holding for naught a certain order heretofore made, to-wit: on or about the 2nd day of October, 1896, by the Court of Criminal Correction at St. Louis, in the State of Missouri, granting your petition and admitting you to become a citizen of the United States of America and for the further purpose of revoking, cancelling and holding for naught that certain certificate of naturalization issued to you under and by virtue of the aforesaid order of Court, upon the ground that the same was obtained fraudulently and by perjury. You are further notified and required to serve a copy of the answer upon the undersigned attorney for the petitioner at his Post Office address below stated, within the stated time of sixty days, and unless you so answer said petition and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned within that time, judgment will be taken against you in accordance with the prayer of said petition as confessed and by default. ANDREW J. BALLIET, Attorney for Petitioner. P. O. Address and Office Address: United States Court House, 4th and Marion St., Seattle, Washington. W. D. COVINGTON, Deputy Clerk of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Date of first publication, March 6, 1908; last publication, April 17, 1908. SUMMONS In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for King County.—Case No.……, Bertrand R. Benedict, Plaintiff, vs. Primrose F. Benedict, Defendant. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, Primrose F. Benedict: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 6th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and answer the copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office and Post Office address below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. This is an action for divorce on the grounds of abandonment for more than one year. E. M. FARMER, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. and Office Address: 609 Burke Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. Ina A. Whalen, Plaintiff, vs. John T. Whalen, Defendant. No. 59641. The State of Washington, to the defendant, John T. Whalen: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 31st day of January, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of said action, being to dissolve the bonds of matrimony between yourself and plaintiff on the grounds of your desertion and failure to support plaintiff. JOHN E. RYAN. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: 416 Globe Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Jan. 31—March 13 Friday. March 13. 1908 In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County, Rosa Kahlstroff, Plaintiff, vs. Arthur N. Hill and Jane Doe Hill, his wife, The City of Seattle and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herelinafter described real property, Defendants. State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners or reputed owners, or claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the herelinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of two certain delinquent tax certificate tax certificates, issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of March, 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following years, in the following amounts, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follow8. For the City of Seattle, of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle, the west 10 feet of Lot 11, Blk. 3, Cert. No. 25868. Issued for tax of 1902, Amt. .55. Int. to Sept. 1, '07. .28. Subsequent payments taxes for 1903, '04. int.; .02. ant.; .06. 1904, '05. int.; .01. ant.; .06. 1905, '04. ant.; .04. 1906, '11. int.; .01. ant.; .12. Total with int. to Sept. 1, '07. $1.11. Vacher's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle, the west 10 feet of Lot 12, Blk. 3, Cert. No. 25869. Issued for tax of 1902. Amt., .55. Int. to Sept. 1, 07., 28. Subsequent payments taxes for 1903, .4; int., .2; amt., .06, 1904, .5; int., .1; amt., .06, 1905, .04; amt., .06, 1905, .15; int., .02, 191. Total with Int. to Sept. 1, 07., 41. Amt., 17. This several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if anyy), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, January 31, 1908, in the above entitled Court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and Court. ROSA KAHLSTORF, Plaintiff. JOSEPH R. ANDERSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office R. Address: 309 Pioneer, Seattle, Wash. First publication dated Jan. 31, 1908. Last publication March 13, 1908. SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County, C. H. Lilly, doing business under the firm name and style of C. H. Lilly & Co., Plaintiff, jvs. Louis S. Sparks, Defendant. The State of Washington to the said Louis S. Sparks: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty days after the 31st day of January, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a judgment against you for goods, wares and merchandise sold amounting to one hundred eighteen dollars and seventy-two cents ($118.72). J. H. ALLEN, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 45 Maynard Bldg., Seattle, King County, State of Washington. Jan. 31—March 13. NOTICE OF SUMMONS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. M. J. Nist, plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No..... State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 3rd day of September 1907, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: City of Des Moines, lot 2, block 78, certificate No. B48591, year 1902, $1.11. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described lot of real property, to-wit: 51 cents for year 1903, 22 cents for year 1904, 20 cents for year 1905, 15 cents for year 1906. Which several sums bear interest of 15 per cent. on summ from said date of payment, and one all the undated and redeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, Feb. 21, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. M. J. NIST, Plaintiff. KENNETH MACKINTOSH, E. B. HERALD, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office address: 225-30 Colman Bldg., Seattle, Wash. First publication Feb. 21, 1908; last, April 3. 1908. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King. C. R. Collins, Plaintiff, vs. Morris Gross, Sophie Gross, his wife, and Leopold M. Stern.—No. .... Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to said Morris Gross and Sophie Gross, his wife, and Leopold M. Stern, Defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 7th day of February, 1908, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney's office in his office below stated, in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this action is to obtain a judgment against the defendants, Morris Gross and Sophie Gross, his wife, for the sum of $13,000.00, with interest thereon, from July 31st, 1907, at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum, together with an attorney's fee of $1,000.00, and costs of this suit, and to foreclose that certain mortgage given by Morris Gross and Sophie Gross, his wife, to the plaintiff, which said mortgage was recorded in Volume 355 of Mortgages, page 72, of the records of the Auditor's office of said King County, Washington, which said mortgage covers the following described property, situated in the County of King, State of Washington, to-will Lot seven (7), block four (4), of an addition down town (now city) of Seattle, Washington Territory, as laid off by the heirs of Sarah A. Bell, deceased, and for such other and further relief as shall be meet and equitable; also praying that said premises be sold to satisfy the judgment herein prayed for, and for general equitable relief. H. R. CLISE, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: Rooms 416-520 Globe Building, Seattle, King County. Washington. First publication, February 7th, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUNY, State of Washington—Department No. ... Mary M. Larson, Plaintiff, vs. August Larson, Defendant—No. ... Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said August Larson, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty (60) days after the 7th day of February, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office and postoffice address below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of the court aforesaid. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between the parties herein named, on the grounds of abandonment and non-support of plaintiff by the defendant; that defendant is a habitual drunkard, and has treated plaintiff with extreme cruelty, all out-cause cause from plaintiff for the object that plaintiff is to allow plaintiff to resume her maiden name, Mary Marla Jacobsen, and for general relief. J. E. McGREW. Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address: 419-20 Pioneer Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, February 7th, 1908. Last March 20. NOTICE AND SUMMONS. IN THE SEPERIMENT COUNTING TO THE STATE of Washington for King County W. T. Gaffner, plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No..... State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 7th day of December, 1903, and numbered as follows. For the delinquent tax certificate following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Denny & Hoyt's Addition to the City of Seattle. lot 13, block 62, certificate No. B24845, year 1902, $2.12. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said described real property, to-wit: Lot 13, block 62. Denny & Hoyt's Addition to the City of Seattle. $1.52 for year $192, $190 for year $2.01 for year $922 for year 1906. Several years bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the date of said first publication, to-wait: sixty (60) days after the 21st day of February, 1908, in the above entitled court and action: and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount for the settlement and interest and costs, if you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFNER, Plaintiff. Office address: 457 Arcade Building, Seattle, Wash. First publication February 21, 1908: last, April 3, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for the County of King. H. E. Pitcher, Plaintiff, vs. A. McConnell, Daisy K. McConnell, German Savings, Building and Loan Association, and W. D. McKnight and Peter, Dedrikson, Defendants: Bryant Lumber and Shingle Mill Co., a corporation. Intervenor.—No. 59255. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said A. McConnell, Daisy K. McConnell, German Savings, Building and Loan Association, W. D. McKnight and Peter Dedrikson. Defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait, within sixty days at the 7th day ofourt of trial, D. 2008, and defend the owntourt ofurtured action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure NOTICE AND SUMMONS. so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To foreclose a material man's lion on lots twenty (20) and twenty-one (21), of block three (3) of Hillman's Lake Front Addition, Division Number Three (3) to the City of Seattle, for the sum of $316.20, and for an attorney's fee of $150.00 and costs of this action. HOMER T. TURNER, Attorney for Intervenor. P. O. Address: 745 New York Blk., Seattle. County of King, Washington. Feb. 7—March 20. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. W. H. Thayer, Plaintiff, vs. Agnes E. Thayer, Defendant. No. 60153. Summons by Publication The State of Washington to the said Agnes E. Thayer, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 28th day of February, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney, certifying that you have been told to follow stated, and in case of your failure so do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said Court. A brief statement of the object of the said action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant, upon the ground of abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant for more than one year. Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: Suite 1308 Alaskan Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb. 28—April 10, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Geo. L. Hill and Jane Doe Hill, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants, No. 60145. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain amount of property, bequeathed by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 16th day of December, 1903, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 36, block 1, Madison St. Cable Ry. Add. to Seattle: for the year 1902, in the amount of $3.87; certificate No. B24601. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 36, block 1, Madison St. Cable Ry. Add. to Seattle, for year 1903, in the sum of $3.25; for year 1904, in the sum of $3.63; for year 1905, in the sum of $3.94; for year 1906, in the sum of $5.40. Which several years have interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to wit, within 60 days after Feb. 28, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each of said real property and amounts of said impost and charged against each, for said taxes, impost and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER. Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. First publication dated Feb. 28—April 10, '08. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Karl Maring, Insane. No. 8462. Order for Sale of Real Estate. Now on this 21st day of Feb., 1908, this cause comes on to be heard before the Court on the application of the Guardian for the sale of real estate, and upon the Guardian's report, and after considering the same and being fully advised in the matter, the Court finds that the personal estate of Karl Maring, insane, is insufficient to pay the expenses of administration, the taxes of the estate and claims allowed, and that it will be necessary to sell all the real estate and equally in real estate owned or claimed by the said Karl Maring, for the purpose of caring his interest therein. It is therefore ordered and directed that the Northern Bank & Trust Co., as guardian of Kirk Maring, insane, proceed to sell separately each parcel of real estate described in the Guardian's application for not less than the appraisement respectively. Sale to be made at the front door of the King County Court House in Seattle, Washington, by guardian, for cash, to the highest bidder at public auction, at ten (10) o'clock A. M. March 23rd, 1908. That due notice thereof shall be given by posting three (3) copies of this order in three (3) of the most public places in Seattle, Washington, and by publishing the same for at least three (3) consecutive weeks in the Seattle Republican prior to said date of sale. Done in open court this 21st day of February. 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS. Judge. Feb. 28—March 13. NOTICE AND SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, plaintiff, vs. Sarah McDonough and John Doe McDonaugh, her husband, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No..... State of Washington, to the above defendants, of them. You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the day of the year 1903, and numbered the following for the delinquent amount of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King county, described as 7 follows, to-wit; Denny & Hoyt's Addition to the City of Seattle, lot 21, block 27, certificate No. B24825, year 1902, $4.39. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 21, block 27, Denny & Hoyt's Addition to the City of Seattle, $4.67 for year 1903, $5.79 local assessments for 1903, $4.80 for 1904, $15.60 local assessments for 1904, $5.63 for 1905, $29.92 local assessments for 1905, $7.90 for 1906, $28.29 local assessments for 1906. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wi: sixty (60) days after the 21st day of February, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property or the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. First publication February 21, 1908; last, April 3, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for King County—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Karl Maring, Insane. No. 8462. Guardian's Notice of Appointment. Notice is hereby given that the Northern Bank & Trust Co., has been appointed legal guardian of the property of Karl Maring, Insane. That the business address of the guardian is at the Northern Bank & Trust Co.'s Building, corner of Pike Street and Fourth Ave., Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb. 28—March 13, 1908. NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE State of Washington, County of King—ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an Order of Sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 7th day of February, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of Michel Colusardo, plaintiff, versus Francisco di Napoll, sometimes known as Frank Napo, and Peppina di Napoll, his wife, defendants, No. 54381, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: written in the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit; at 10 o'clock a. m., on the 21st day of March, A. D. 1908, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot numbered six (6) in block numbered eight (8) of Rainier Boulevard Addition to the City of Seattle, together with all and singular the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure of a mortgage amounting to four hundred sixty (400,70) dollars, and costs of sixty, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 7th day of February, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. Feb. 14-Mch. 13. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County, W. T. Gaffer, Plaintiff, vs. P. A. Hyman and Jane Doe Hyman, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. 60143. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the heretoafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of June, 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, less the following block 58, Riley's Addition to Riley's Addition to Seattle; for the year 1902 and in the sum of $3.02; certificate No. B27403; That on Nov. 22, 1904, the east 48 feet of said lot was redeemed from said certificate leaving said certificate still outstanding against the remainder of said lot as follows: Lot 1, less the east 48 feet block 58, Riley Add. to Riley's Add. to Seattle; for the year 1902 and in the sum of $2.93; certificate No. B27403. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 1, block 58, less the east 48 feet of Riley's Addition to Riley's Add. to Seattle, for year 1903, the sum of $2.92; for year 1904, the sum of $1.86; for year 1905, the sum of $1.78; for year 1906, the sum of $4.05. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit within sixty days after Feb. 28th, 1908, in the above entitled court and action: and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in the plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. First publication dated 1 Feb. 28—April 10, '08. spares <->smmonssese-tJooeoe a's a am ae tei =A si iN ARO i ZA a ll a eee FN GR i FORUM. The program at Sunday Forum last Sunday was very interesting and in- structive. It was Charles Summer and Crispus Attuck’s Day and many things were said that should be ‘in- centatives to our young men. The program next Sunday will be rendered by the children, and the parents should encourage them by coming out early and giving them a hearty welcome on this their first effort. . On Sunday, March 22, the Forum will be addressed by Mr. S. G. Cos- grove, of Pomeroy, Wash. We be- speak for those who attend a most interesting and instructive talk, as Mr. Cosgrove is an “old timer” in the state and should know many things that will be of interest to us. Come early if you wish a seat in the hall. Beginning next Sunday the Forum will begin promptly at 4 o’clock. So come early if you wish to be at the opening. ee Mr. Ed. Meyer, chief in one of the departments at the Navy Yard, was visiting friends in the city this week. hae The Mt. Zion Baptist Chureh will hold a revival meeting next week. Rey. Parsons, of Everett, assisted by his wife, will have charge of the meetings. se # Mr. L. Anderson returned to the city Tuesday with his bride. Mrs. Anderson was a teacher in the schools of Louisiana. Mr. and Mrs. Anderson will reside at their home at 518 30th Ave., this city. ! +e 8 Mrs. Sarah Robinson and Miss Kate Lyons, of Spokane, spent several days in the city this week. They were en- route to Dawson, Y. T. They left Tuesday evening, on the ship Cottage City. * 8 # On Sunday afternoon the Elks turned out to the funeral of Mr, Will Collins. The exercises and parade were both very creditable to the Order. Mr. Collins was a young man who had lived in the city a number of years and was a brother to Mr. Oscar Collins of the firm of Walker & Collins. “What Women Will Do” is the prob- lematical title of a very pretty play running at the Seaiile Theatre this week. It is the modernized adaption of “Little Emily,” a play taken from Charles Dickens’ ‘David Copperfield,’ and it is easily one of the best that has been seen at the Seattle Theatre at popular prices for a” year. The scenes are laid among the rugged fishermen on the coast of England, and there are several strongly drawn character parts that are well played and richly deserve the applause they receive. Miss Bernice Howard's Little Emily could not be improved upon by Florence Roberts, while Gertrude Mudge, as Rose Dartle, is a clever foil. George B. Edwards, Carl Burch and Jacob White enact the leading male characters, and they are fully the equal of any actors seen here at any of the theatres this year. “What Women Will Do” runs all week. “The Denver Express.” Lovers of melodrama, of the strenuous kind, will find a real novelty in the big sensation at the Seattle Theatre next week, “The Denver Express.” As a melo- drama, the play has few equals, as a THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN scenic production, it is also complete. " will be presented by the same ex- cellent company now playing at the Seattle Theatre, augmented for the occasion. The eyes of the world have been upon Denver recently, and “The Denver Express” will draw big crowds at the Seattle Theatre next week,— because Messrs. Russell & Drew have a faculty of producing melodrama at the Third and Cherry Street playhouse, not only so that it holds their loyal clientele, but the jackies from the Navy Yard fill the theatre pretty well every night, even were there no other attendance there. Why? Because melodrama appeals to their nature, their lives being one of romance. THE BURGESS-BUNTING COMPANY COMING. Everybody who attended the theatre last summer, will be delighted to learn that Emma Bunting and the Burgess Company return here for a season of twenty weeks, commencing about April 12th. Emma Bunting is the most tal- ented actress this city has ever en- tertained. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. In the matter of the estate of Harry W. Fletcher, Decéased.—No. 8625, Notice to Cred: tors. Notiee is hereby given that the undersigned, Ww. W. Felger, has been duly appointed admin- istrator of said estate by said Superior Court that letters of administration have been duly NOTICE AND SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. W.T. Gaither, plaintiff, vs. H. W. Blaine and Jane Doe Blaine, his wife, and all persons unknown, If any, having or’ claiming an In- terest in and to the hereinafter deseribed real property, defendants. No... State ‘of Washington, to the above defend- ants and each of them! You sind each of soll, as owners, claimants or holders of an Interest or estate In and to ‘the hereinafter deseribed real property. are here- by notified that the above named plaintift is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate isstied by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 7th day of December, 1908, "and numbered as follows, for. the delin: quent texes of the following year, tn the fol- Inwing amount, and upon the real property siimated in said King County, deserived as fol- lows, to-wit: Palatine Hill’ Addition to the City’ of Seattle, lot 14, block 3, certifieate No. B2i521, year 101, $1.97. ‘That’ the taxes ‘for the following prior and subsequent years have been pald by the plalis {if upon said above described real property, t- wit: Tot 14, block 3, Palatine FIM Addi: ton io Seatile, $1.62 for year 1902, $1.52 for 1902, Sh.3 for 1903, $3.51 for 1906. Which several Suing bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per Anime trom said date ef payment, and are all the unpaid and tnredeemed taxes upon and against said real property ‘You and each of yout, (including sald persons anknown, if any), ‘are’ hereby further notified And stinmoned to’ be and appear within sixty Gays after the date of first publication of this notice, exchisive of the day of sald first publica: tion, roawit: sixty. (G0) days after the 21st day” of Febrnary, 1908, in the above entitled conrt and action: and defend this action and anawer' the comphiint of sald plaintif™ and Scive copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintit at his office below stated, or pay the mount de. together with interest and costs, In cise you fall so to do, Judgment will be rendered “herein, foreclosing the Men of sald faxes and costs against each parcel of sad real property for the. sums and amonuts due upon an deliarged against each, for sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering @ Sale of each par cel of said property for the satisfaction of the Sims charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintift’s complaint, now on ‘file in this eause and Court. W, T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office address: 457 Arcade Bullding, Seattle, Wash. First publication February 21,- 1908; last, April 3, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. B. M. Martin and Jane Doe Martin, his wife, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.—No. 59801. Notice and Summons. ‘State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: Yon and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest ‘or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notifid that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th day of May, 1905, and numbered as follows. for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows. to-wit: Jat Addition to 2nd Plat of W. Seattle, lot 9, block 50, certificate number BS3071, year 1903, amount $3.22, "hat the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by, the plain- {ih upon sald” above described real property, to- wit: Lot 9, block 50, 1st Add. to 2nd Plat of W. Seattle, $5.75 for year 1906, $3.34 for year 1905, $2.94 for year 1904. ‘Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and wnre- deemed ‘taxes upon and against sald real prop- erty. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and. summoned to’ be and appear within sixty Gays after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publica- tion, to-wit, sixty (60) days after the 7th day of February, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintif™. and serve a copy of your naswer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at lis office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be ren- dered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real. prop- erty for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a Sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by Jaw, nd es prayed in plaintif’s complaint, now on file in this cause and court. ~ W..T. GAFFNER, Plaintift. wwotice Address: “487 Ateade Bldg., Seattle, ash. First publication dated February 7th, 1908. Last March 20. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Edith Ayers, Plaintiff, vs. Harry Ayers, De- fendant. ‘Summons for Publication. No, —— ‘The State of Washington to the said Harry Ayers, Defendant: You are hereby sum- moned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty (60) days after the 2ist day of February, 1908, and defend the above entitJed action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to procure an absolute divorce from you on account of extreme cruelty and neglect. EDGAR FOSTER, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. ©. Address: Metropole Building, South- west corner Second Avenue and Yesler Way, Seattle, King County, Washingtoy. Feb, 21—April 3. Acme Publishing Co. 312 Marion Block BRIEFS OUR SPECIALTY Telephones: Sunset, Main 1997—Ind., 1306. The Comfort. Newly furnished rooms. Walking dis- tance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. 1. ISRAEL WALKER, 1101-1108 Jackson Street. Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialtye All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. WILLIAM WALKER. Complete stock New Fall Goods, Ladies’, Misses’ and Children’s Wear- ing Apparel, Furs and Fine Coats. 820 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Electric Fix- tures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. IRRIGATED LANDS We have 100,000 acres in the fam- ous SUNNYSIDE COUNTRY. Rates reasonable. Terms. WASHINGTON IRRIGATION co. Seattle, Washington. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE CONNECTION Business Office, Third and Spring McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance Colman Bldg. Main 695. Seattle : : : +: Washington Friday, March 18, 1908 pe eee ee Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. Scandinavian American Bank. OFFICERS: A. Chilberg, Prest. J. E. Chilberg, Vice Prest. John B. Agen, 2nd Vice Prest. J. ¥F. Lane, Cashier L. H. Woolfolk, Asst. Cashier. ‘Wm. Thaanum, Asst. Cashier F. P. Searle, Manager Ballard Office. Geo. H. Tarbell, Mgr. A. D. Hayden, Cashier Tacoma Office. Puget Sound National Bank. OF SEATTLE JACOB FURTH ..............President J. 8. GOLDSMITH ......Vice-President R. V. ANKENY .........++--.---Cashier CORRESPONDENTS IN ALL THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE. DRAFTS ISSUED ON ALASKA AND THE YUKON TBRRITORY. THE NATIONAL BANK OF COM- MERCE. United States peut With CAPITAL and SURPLUS..$1,500,000 And aggregate RESOURCES OVER 66 cece cten esc wnney oe 0Ghep500,000 Invite business on the most liberal terms consistent with conservative banking. ee Foreign exchange department espe- cially equipped for the conduct of Ori- ental business. M. F. Backus, Pres.; R. . Spencer, 1st Vv. P.; R. 8, Stacey, 2nd V. P.; J. W esrelt Cash. People’s Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R. J. Reekie, Vice Prest. . Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. Commercial Savings and Trust General Bank and Exchange. Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash. Seattle, Tacoma and Ballard. Capital Paid Up, $500,000.00. Suprlus, $350,000.00 Seattle Brewing & Malting Co. @ ; Seto BEER Its Purity Guaranteed Under the New Pure Food Law Sunset 27, Ind. 27. Claussen Brewing Association. Brewers and Bottlers of TANNHAUSER and WUERZBURGER BEER “Promotes Good Cheer’’ Bottled Beer Delivered to any Part of the City. Brewery at Interbay Queen Anne 1088 Ind. 7396 For ANTHRACITE COAL Phone THE PACIFIC COAST CO. Ind. 92. Private Exchange 99 Stetson & Post Mill Co. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. abn 1875. . Tel. Main 711