Seattle Republican

THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN NORTHWEST Price One Year, $3.00. Single Copies, 10 Cents. IN THE ELEVENTH LEGISLATURE. In the senate of the eleventh legislature there are a number of splendid speakers and some of them so good that to charge them with even being Brilliant Talkers brilliant would not be drawing on your imagination. Senator A. S. Ruth has some oratorical abilities a fine com- In The Senate. mand of the English language and a mannerism that always attracts rapt attention. His gift of gab and continued service has made a leader of him. The direct negative of Ruth's is Senator George F. Cotterill. He is a clever as well as a logical talker. He knows just what he wants to say and says it so plainly that he who runs may hear. He seldom repeats. While Senator Graves is something of an orator he has a vein of pleasing satire in him that flows so freely in opposing a colleague that compels all in the range of his voice to sit up and take notice. In Senator J. A. Falconer many of the members are of the opinion that all the elements of a real orator and debater are to be found. Without notes he disposes of his subject step by step finally reaching a splendid climax the same as one reading from manuscript. He is pleasing in his manner and yet satirical as a Graves if necessary. Senator Paulhamus is one of the most convincing speakers in the senate. He is as quick at repartee as he is witty and at times he is resplendent with biting sarcasm. He is one of the strong men of the legislature. There are, however, a number of senators who make brilliant short talks under pressure and among them might be named P. L. Allen, James W. Bryan, J. R. Stevenson, Robert F. Booth and others. While nothing as yet has sufficiently arisen to call forth the best oratorical abilities in the above named senators, yet things will be doing in the near future and then more will be said along this line. The ambition of his life has been realized—Samuel Goodlove Cosgrove has been inaugurated governor of one one of the great commonwealths of Cosgrove's Ambition Has Been Realized. of the United States, such good fortune, however, comes to but few men and while none would refuse yet so remote is the hope of getting it that the ambition finds lodgement in the bosoms of but one in a million. But it is now the Cosgrove administration and the progeny of Mr. Cosgrove can proudly boast of "my father was governor of the state of Washington." While the governor's stay in the state was of short duration it was of sufficient length to get control of affairs and though he may not worry over the detail while in California yet he will be kept in more or less close touch with affairs in general and to an extent have his way. From the amount of legislative activity along broad, liberal and progressive roads, he is endeavoring to push to the front, one would hardly suspect Hugh C. Todd A Liberal Democrat. audacity to tell you that he is. Mr. Todd began to make friends in the house of representatives the first day of the session by supporting Meigs for speaker despite his Democratic persuasions and subsequently strengthening his stand on voting for Meigs by voting for Jones for United States senator. In other words, though elected as a Democrat he has fallen in with the Republicans who are overwhelmingly in the majority, and is endeavoring to have beneficial legislation passed and to that end he has introduced many important as well as useful measures. There is no denying the fact that Senator Polson was voicing a large and growing sentiment in the state of Washington to the effect that there is Official Corruption Was Hinted At. doubt but the idea is based on misrepresentations. When therefore Senator Polson introduced a long list of preambles and resolutions asking that the senate appoint a committee of five to inquire into charges and intimation charges of official crookedness he believed he voiced that growing sentiment. The senate, however, acted wisely in indefinitely postponing the resolutions and expurging the whole from the records, because it had no right to try to investigate rumor. As was wisely said on the floor of the senate, if any one has any facts in his possession as to --- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, JANUARY 29, 1909. official corruption reduce them to writing and file them with the clerk of the senate and such will be investigated. It is simply a business proposition for the state of Washington to own its printing plant and for the governor to name a superintendent therefor, State Pays Large who will be compensated as are Margins to Printer. such other employees of the state. The office of state printer under the present system is more remunerative to the holder thereof than all of the elective state offices combined. If there be so much money in the position then why would it not be a business proposition for the state to save that enormous profit by operating its own plant? It is currently reported that the present state printer is only a figure head representing a company organized to control the printing of the state and the profits arising therefrom are divided among those financially interested. In most of the states of the Union the printing for the state is done by a plant owned by the state. In a new state in which the population is rapidly increasing by immigration in order to keep pace with the growing population those to whom the School Laws to law making is entrusted are frequently Be Re-codified. called upon to do, what seems to the lay citizens and even the lawmakers them- selves some very absurd things. The educational commission of this state has re-codified the school laws and that commission met with the legislative committee on education to go over the proposed law, which doubtless has many good features in it, but the teachers of the state are by no means a unit on it, yea, not only not a unit, but the most of the teachers in Eastern Washington are fighting it. It would seem that on such radical changes as the proposed law for the schools of the state the teachers would favor the greater part of them, but this does not seem to be a fact and until they are it appears that the legislature would be taking a long leap in the dark to tinker with the present school system. A bill has been introduced in the legislature, which has for its object the pensioning of policemen who have served a certain number of years on a Pensioning Police force in the state. There is no more Poor Policy. excuse or justification for the pensioning of policemen than there would be for the pensioning of farmers. Men in every city are always dead anxious to get on the police force of the city in which they live and they do so for the salary and the idleness there are in it to say nothing of the perquisites. Any man having an ounce of "get up," who has been on the police force in any of the large cities is worth anywhere from $10,000 to $100,000 and in some instances even more. That being a fact why should such men be placed on a perpetual public pension roll. A few years ago an effort was made in the legislature of this state to pension firemen, which failed of passage as should the effort to pension policemen. Appropriations Committee Against Large Increases. were told two years ago that there would be no more call from the various institutions of the state for new buildings for the next ten years and with that understanding large appropriations were allowed all of the state institutions. Just two years from that time—the very next session of the legislature—every institution of the state is asking for double its last appropriation and the committees in both branches of the legislature are inclined to say no with the accent on the no. The appropriations this year will be no larger than two years ago. Albert E. Mead has finally retired from the office of governor of the state of Washington and it can be said without fear of successful contradiction that he made more political enemies while filling the office than any other man who has held Mead Makes Enemies While Governor. the position. Gov. Mead's mistakes in the outset of his administration were many, but the most of them were excusable on the grounds of inexperience, but the mistakes of the dying days of his administration were not only disappointing, but absolutely disgusting. Regardless of the wishes of his successor it would seem that the man lost his reason when he removed Charley Gorham, even refusing to permit him to serve out his term or to remain LIBRARY SITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 Volume XV, Number 36 H. R. CAYTON, Publisher in office for ten days to straighten out his books and appointed a man, who had abused him, Governor Mead, like a pickpocket from one end of the state to another. Why he did not urge the confirmation of his appointees instead of having them referred to the incoming administration; why he did not name Judge R. B. Albertson for supreme judge instead of Max Gose are all things that only God Almighty and Mead can answer and neither of them seem inclined so to do. The "all work and no play makes John a dull boy" idea got the better of the members last Tuesday evening and a majority of them forgot the fiery protechnics they had hurled but a few hours prior and with their wives, daughters and sweet hearts After The Ball At the Legislature. attended the legislative ball last Tuesday, which to say the least was a brilliant affair and equally as pleasing. The whirl in the mazy dance never fails to drive dull cares away and it was a noticeable fact that the next day after the ball members of the legislature who had almost passed each other with no greater recognition than a mere nod of the head were seen pleasantly chatting with each other over something that happened at the ball. There is no doubt but that such social gatherings are mighty safety valves to prevent explosions when the legislative engine gets under high pressure. Senator Potts is fathering a real estate bill, which has for its object the putting out of business fake real estate men. Repeatedly persons selling Fake Real Estate parcels of real estate have been Dealers Under Fire. approached by fake real estate men demanding commissions out of the sale price on the grounds they either directly or indirectly steered the purchaser to the purchase. Potts' bill compels all persons desiring to do real estate to put up a $5,000 surety bond and to be publicly registered. If a person makes such a demand and goes to court and fails to substantiate his demands then the person sued can sue the surety company and collect the costs of the suit, his attorney's fees and all other actual and legitimate expenses he may incur in the defense of the suit. Now comes George U. Piper, a senator from King County, and petitions the legislature to make Kink and Kitsap Counties one judicial district. "I believe this to be correct on the grounds that Kitsap county does not have court business enough to keep one judge busy two months in a year and yet it is now a separate judicial district and the judge thereof gets the same salary as those judges who work ten months in a year. If the judge from Kitsap county crosses the bay and holds court in Kitsap county he makes oath that his expenses are $5.00 per day and being frequently called over to King his bills amount up to a considerable sum in the course of a year. It costs but twenty-five cents to cross the bay and a judge living in Kitsap county could hold court in King county every day he was not engaged in Kitsap." The inauguration of S. G. Cosgrove, which relieved Gov. Mead from further duty as chief executive of the state and his immediate departure for California took Lieutenant Governor Hay from the presiding officer's chair in the senate, and he became acting governor of the state. Mr. Hay presided over the senate but thirteen days, but he showed marked ability in that particular. He is affable, jocular, and has a pleasing mannerism, on the other hand he was quick to see the point and as positive as pleasing, all of which made him a splendid presiding officer. He will doubtless not have another opportunity to preside over the senate as he will in all human probability be compelled to perform the duties of governor for the next six months or until Gov. Cosgrove returns. Senator Ruth became the presiding officer of the senate. If the members of the eleventh legislature have any doubts that the Negroes of the state of Washington are not becoming substantial home owners and builders you are invited to Progress Number. carefully peruse the copy of the Northwest Negro Progress Number, which was issued by the management of the Seattle Republican in 1907, and be thoroughly convinced. That the black man on the whole is not possessed with the same degree of progressiveness as the white man is an undeniable fact, but he is rapidly coming to the front and with a bit of substantial encouragement will soon stand shoulder to shoulder with the white man. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE R.R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Century Furniture Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Alice Baldwin, Defendant.—No. ... Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King, ss. To Alice Baldwin: You are hereby notified that the Century Furniture Co., a corporation, has court which will come on to be heard at my office in room 210 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 25th day of January, A. D. 1909, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock. M. and unsee you the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff. The object and demand of said plaintiff Century Furniture Company is to recover of and from said defendant the fee Bargain of thirty-six and 15-40 dollars, in accordance with the complaint of plaintiff. Fled December 9, A. D. 1908. R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington, January 1-22, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. A. Hedger, Plaintiff, vs. Jessie E. Hedger, Defendant—No. 64731. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Leo E. Hedger, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of the complaint, and seven days after the 1st day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and see the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of complaint, which been filed with the clerk of court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce on the ground of abandonment and desertion for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action and for cruelty. I. T. SCHOFF. Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address: 503 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 1—February 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Joseph R. Dick, Plaintiff, vs. Alice Clark Dick, Defendants. No. 63586. The State of Washington to the said Alice Dick defendant; Alice you are hereby summoned to appear with sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this notice. wit: within sixty (60) days after the 27th day of the month, 1908, and defend the have entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and servant by your answer upon his or her insignored attorney and in at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of cruelty and drunkenness. ELIAS A. WINNERT Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, Room 629-631 Burke Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 27, 1908-Jan. 8, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Catherine Percy, Plaintiff, vs. George Percy, Defendant. No. — Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said George B. Lowe, hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action, the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, in case of your failure so that judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff, which has been filed with the clerk of salary court. The object of the above entitled action is that plaintiff may obtain a divorce from defendant on the grounds of defendant's desertion and failure to provide. H. E. SNOOK. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 540 Burke Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN JUSTICE'S COURT OF SEATTLE Precinct—Before Hon. John E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace in and for the Precinct of Seattle, King County, State of Washington Edward Vande Bande, Plaintiff, vs. T. T. Scudder, defendant. Summons for publication. No. 5919-20. State of Washington; County of King—ss. The State of Washington to T. T. Scud- You, Defendah, are hereby notified that Edward Vande has has filed a claim against hard at my office in Seattle, King County, Washington, at room No. 210 in New York Block in sale on the 15th day of February, 1909, at 8:30 o'clock a m., and answer you appear and then and answer the same, the same will be taken as confessed, and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The defect and demand of said claim is recover judgment against you, the sum of $50 alleged to have been loaned to you at your request, and to subject to said judgment of money owing from John Harrison to yourself, now in judgment in this court. under garrison, Complaint filed on Dec. 17th, 1908. JOHN E. CARROLL, J. P. January 8—January 22, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. JOHN E. CARROLL, Plaintiff, vs. Alfred Starr, Defendant. No. 64892. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Alfred Starr, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to will sixty days after the 5th day of January. A. D. 1909, and defend the above entitled court, and answer the above entitled court, and answer the day of your answer upon the signed attorney for plaintiff, and serve a below stated; and after his office below stated; and after will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff, which has been filed with the said action, set forth by the above plaint, as is followed to obtain an absolute decree of divorce from the defendant on grounds of abandonment and support and failure to makeitable provision for his family. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Solomon Hess, Plaintiff, vs. Bertha Hess, Defendant—No. 64704. Summons by Publication. State of Washington to Bertha Hess, defendant herein: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 25th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy, answer hereto upon the undersigned paper, the plaintiff at their address below given; in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above action is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of abandonment. Date of first publication, 25th day of December, 1908. CARRICO & DURK. Attorneys for Plaintiff. 603 People's Savings Bank Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Rhoda J. Stanley, an George E. Stanley, her husband, Plaintiffs, vs. Minnie W. Boaz, Defendant—No. .... Summons for Publication. State of Kashington, County of King, ss To Minnie W. Boaz, defendant hereina You are hereby not notified the nature of the complaint filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in room 210 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 25th day of January, A. D. 1909, at the hour of 8:30 clock you appear and you applaud and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said complaint is to obtain Complaint filed December 21, A. D. judgment against you for $54.40 for house rent, coal bill, lights and gas bills, 1908. R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. December 24, 1908—February 4, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Rose Zacharias, deceased. No. 9447. Notice to Creditors. By other of said court made herein on the 7th day of November, 1908, notice is hereby given to the creditors of and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate to present them with the necessary vouchers the under oath administrator of said estate his place for the transaction of business for said estate to.-wit; at room 8 UUnion Block, 713 First Avenue, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, with one year from and after the date of the first publication of this note on the same year from the 29th day of January, 1909, or the same will be barred. FRED KOHN, Administrator of said Estate. JOHN A PARKER, Attorney for said Estate. Room 8 Union Block, Seattle, Washington. January 29-February 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 62556. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim in and to their hereinafter described real property, are notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate, in the form of the City, State of Washington, dated the 13th day of April, 1906, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount in an Appalachian town in salt King County, described as follows, to-wit: White Brothers Addition to Kirkland, lot 7, block 2; certificate No. B49257; for the year 1904, $0.89. For the year 1905, $0.99. For the year 1906, $0.58 for the year 1907, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon their payment. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, except as otherwise specified. To-wit the days of the notice, to-wit 60th day after January 29, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned a copy of the plaintiff at his office below stated, or plaintiff at his office together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said property for the sums charged and due property for the sums charged and due taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayer in plaintiffs complaint, now on file in this cause, and AURORA LAND COMPANY, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff, Office Address, Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. January 29-March 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. H. F. Wahlenmayer, Plaintiff, vs. Emma K. Wahlenmayer, Defendant. Sum- The State of Washington, to the said Emma K. Wahlenmayer, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the hearing, to witness within sixty days after the 29th of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and answer the complaint of the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk or said court. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimoney existing between the parties hereto on the grounds of cruelty and inadduce to allqjqjqjqjqw E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney, PLLC Postoffice Address: 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington January 29-March 12, 1909. NOTICE STOCKHOLDERS MEETING General Offices Midas Mines Co., Limited. Seattle, Wash., January 29, 1999. First annual meeting of the stockholders of Midas Mines Co., Limited, a corporation formed and existing under the laws of New York, will be held at the General Office of the corporation, room No. 517 of the New York Building, City of Seattle, State of Washington, on Tuesday, the 9th day of February, 1909, at the hour of two o'clock in the section of trustees of said corporation, and the transaction of such other business as may properly come before such meeting. WALTER M. FRENCH, Secretary. IN THE SUPERIOR CURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. In the matter of the estate of Loina Tavine, No. 517. Notice of Sale of Real Property at Private Sale. Notice is hereby given that in persuance of an order of the above entitled court made and entered on the 28th day of January, 1909, the undersigned sell at private sale the signed notice of the 28th day of February 1909, New York Block Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 8th day of February 1909, the following described property, to-wit: The east one-half of the following described tract and parcel of land: Beginning at a point in the town range 4 east W. M., which point is 660 feet east of the northwest corner of lot 2; thence east along said north line 330 feet: Plaintiff's Attorney. Post Office Address: Rooms 36-7 Union Blk., Seattle, King County, Wash. January 8—February 19, 1909. No.65235 SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Theresa Boschert, Plaintiff, vs. Charles Defendant. The State of Washington, to the said Charles E. Boschert, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 29th day of January 1990 an application for a copy of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the court. That this action is brought to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant, and to secure a decree adjudging the property described in the complaint filed herein to the separate and individual property of the plaintiff; and to same to her as her separate and individual property for her sole use and benefit. MILO A. ROOT, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 630-631 New York Blk, Seattle, King County, Washington January 29—March 12, 1909. No. 63997 SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of Kearney, H. H. Eaton, Plaintiff, vs. Nellie P. Crowl, Carrie F. Ordway, Daniel O. Preston and Lettie J. Preston, Defendants. The State of Washington, to the said Nellie P. Crowl, Carrie F. Ordway, Daniel O. Preston and Lettie J. Preston, defendants: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the date of the first publication of the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be given to you in the form of the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court The object of this action is to recover judgment for the sum of Two Thousand Dollars due from defendants to this plaintiff with cost and interest to sell the interest of Nelle Nelle P. Crowl and Carrie F. Orday in lots 14, 15, 16 and 17, block 7 of Front St. Cable Addition to the City of Seattle, levied upon under writ of attachment issued out of above entitled court in this action to the SULLIVAN & STEVENS. Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 514 Balley Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. January 29–March 12, 1909. No. 64542 NOTICE AND SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. John Ballin and Jane Doe Ballin, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an intention to sue the defendant described real property, Defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, in the case of the plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate, BS2922, issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 11th day of August, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, 1904, in the following amount $1,000,000, real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Steel Works Addition to Kirkland, lot 5, block 7, Certificate No. B25222, year 1904, amount, $0.90. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent wars have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 5, block 7, Steel Works Addition to Kirkland, 36 cents for 1905, 50 cents for 1906, 60 cents for 1907. Your interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby free from any liability and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said publication to-wit: within sixty (60) days after Jan. 29, 1909. In the above entitled court and answer the complaint of said plaintiff answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the amount and amount against that charged each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AUVERNIA LAND COMPANY, corporation, Plaintiff. E. J. CARVER F. J. CARVER Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney to Northern Office Address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg., Seattle, Wash. January 29—March 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the State of Virginia, Probate. Notice is hereby given that in pursuance of an order of sale made and entered by the Superior Court of King County, Washington, on the 24th day of September, A. D. 1908, in the matter of the estate of Gus Strand, the two good administrator of said estate, will sell at public auction, subject to confirmation by said court, the following described real property, to-wit Tract twenty (20), Barto's Acre Tracts in Georgetown, King County in Georgetown, King County. Sale said Willem on the 12th day of September, 1908, at ten o'clock in the foremenon of said day at the front door of the County Court House in the said County of King, in the City of Seattle, State of Washington. Terms of sale, for cash, gold coin of the United States, ten per sale, and paid payable at the time of sale and the balance upon confirmation by said court. Dated September 24th, 1908. H. S. NOICE, Administrator of the Estate of Gus Strand, Deceased. September 25, October 23, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the Matter of the Insolvency of H. P. Gilbert, doing business as Richmond Beach Lumber Company. No. 60387. Notice of Assignment and Notice to Creditors. Note hereby given that H. P. Gilbert, doing business as Richmond Beach Lumber Company, has made an assignment of all of his property for the benefit of creditors to W. H. Schumacher as assignee, and the creditors hereby notified to present their claims against said insolvent debtor, under oath, to W. H. Schumacher at Rooms 615-616 New York Block, in Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of transacting the business of said insolvent estate, within three months from the first publication of this notice, to-wit, within three months from the 25th day of September, 1908. W. H. SCHUMACHER, Assignee of H. P. Gilbert, doing business as Richmond Beach Lumber Company, as an investment debtor. Date of first publication: September 25th, 1908. September 25, November 6, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR CURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, In the Matter of the Estate of Israel O. Negus, Deceased. No. 9259. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 10th day of September, 1908, notice to the undersigned administrator of said state, given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said state, given to the creditors of, and the place of business of said estate, in Seat- ville, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication: September 25th, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. J. W. Brown, Plaintiff, vs. Thos. Boyd, N. W. Chapman and all persons unknown, if any, having or having interest in the property, to the hereditary described real property. Defendants, No. 45451—Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above named defendants, including said Thos. Boyd, N. W. Chapman and any and every other person having or claiming any interest in the property hereinafter described: You and each of you are hereby notified and summoned, that the above named plaintiff, J. W. Brown, is the owner of the certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, Washington, June 6, 1908, for the taxes of 1898-9, 1900-1-2-3 and 4 inclusive, numbered B32269 and B32270, both of which are (1) block sixteen (16), Riverside Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington, assessed as the property of said defendants with the costs of this action $7.50), amounting to $12.00, of the taxes to date $1.60, in all to date aggregating $13.10 and bearing 15 per cent interest per annum, which are all the taxes due and delinquent and unpaid against said property and more than three years de You and each of you are further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after first publication of this notice and summons exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit 60 days after December 18, 1908 in above entitled court, and answer this action, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below given, or pay the above amount with interest, penalty, cost and accrued and accruing taxes. In the event that the plaintiff will be taken and decree rendered against said lot for the same and decree of foreclosure entered decreeing said judgment to be a first lien and forever barring you and each of you from having or claiming any interest adverse to this claim and ordering a lot to satisfy same and provided by law in such cases and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. J. W. BROWN. Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank Bldg., Seattle, Washington. First publication December 18, 1908. January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in the un- lafter described real property. Defend- ment. Notice and Summons. FRIDAY, JANUARY 29, 1909. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named holder in the following amount, and the delinquent tax certificate issued by the Trucker of King County, State of Washington, dated the 9th day of September, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and for the delinquent tax certificate issued by the King County, described as follows, towit: Kirkland Park Addition, lot 3, block 1; certificate No. 54312; year 1900; amount, $1.05. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said lot 3, block 1. Kirkland Park Addition; amount, $0.63 for 1902; $0.52 for 1903; $0.31 for 1904; $0.44 for 1905; $0.56 for 1906; $0.50 for 1907, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unpaid upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the publication of the exclusive notice of the day of said first publication, to-wait. Within 60 days after the 18th day of December, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of so plain and clear that oppose the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreseen in the order against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums obtained against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY. A Corporation. Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER. Office Address: Northern Bank & Trust Co., Bldg., Seattle, Wash. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Pacific Bottlers' Supply Company, a corporation, Plaintiff vs. Yawnrown District Defendant. No. 58723 - Order Directing Notice to Creditors. In the above matter, it is ordered that all creditors of said defendant and all parties interested in the estate prosecute and litigate their claims and demands against this defendant in this court and in this cause and to that end they are required to provide their claims before this court by filing same with the receiver or his attorney properly verified under oath, with itemized statements and other memoranda regarding same; and that said creditors set forth what, if any, security they hereby have provided, same, said claims to be filed on or before the fifteenth day of January, 1909. And the receiver is further ordered to cause notice to be given to the creditors herein by publication in the Seattle Republican once a week for three successive weeks, paid rented and by mailing to each of the known creditors at the last known postoffice address of said creditors, a copy of said notice. Done in open court this 12th day of December, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. E. E. MORRIS, Receler. LEOPOLD M. STERN. Attorney for Receiver. 705 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, Wash. December 18, 1908-January 15, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereto- ward estate of the late David dentants. No. ——Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property of an owner, the owner of the named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 9th day of September, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the follow-up upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, towit: Kirkland Park Addition; Lot 2, block 1; certificate No. B54311; year, 1900; amount $1.07. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent additions upon said above described real property, wit; Lot 2, block 1, Kirkland Park Addition; amount, $0.63 for 1902; $0.52 for 1903; $0.31 for 1904; $0.44 for 1905; $0.56 for 1906; $0.51 for 1907; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of the filing of the unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within six,/ days after the date of publication of the exclusive of the date or said first publication, to-wit: Within sixty days after December 18, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to, judgment will be rendered herein, for closing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said taxes and costs and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it, and the amount due upon and charged against plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. Office Address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg., Seattle, Wash. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Jessie White, Plaintiff, vs. Ward W. White, Defendant. No. —. Summons for Publication. for Washington to the said above named defendant, Ward W. White; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wt: Within sixty days after the 6th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for FRIDAY, JANUARY 29, 1909. REPUBLICAN ..... coop IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE Society of Shishigama, WK. King Catherine E. Wakefield, Plaintiff, vs. William H. Wakefield, Defendant. No. 64446 - Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said William H. Wakefield, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 19th December, 1908, defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against the complaint to the demand of the complaint, and with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of non-support. F. M. JEFFERY. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Fifth Street, Block in Seattle, King County, Wash. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Arthur Bastheim, Plaintiff, vs. American Produce Company, a corporation, Detroit, 68345—Order Directing Nice to Creditors. In the above matter, it is ordered that all creditors of said defendant and all parties interested in the estate prosecute and litigate their claims and demands against this defendant in court and demand that end they and hereby notified and required to prove their claims before this court by filing same with the receiver or his attorney properly verified under oath, with itemized statements and other memorandums and served with the court for forth what, if any, security they have for the payment of same, said claims to be filed on or before the fifteenth day of January, 1909. And the receiver is further ordered to cause notice to the creditors the creditors herein by publication in the Seattle Republican once a week for three successive weeks during said period and by mailing to each of the known creditors at the last known postoffice address of said creditors, a copy of said notice. Done in order court this 15th day of December, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. B. F. WOODS, Jr., Receiver. LEOPOLD M. STERN, Attorney for the Reeceiver, 705 Lowman Blk., Seattle, Wash. December 18, 1908-January 1, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR CORT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Thomas Mullen, Plaintiff, vs. Jenny Mullen, Defendant. No.——Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Jenny Mullen, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date first published of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 18th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer tiff, from the date of your complaint, at his office below stated and in case of your failure to do so judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to secure a division from the defendant, above named, for desertion. Postoffice Address: 45 Starr-Boyd Blds., Seattle, King County, Washington December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Detroit Simellii, Plaintiff, vs. Cerubium Simellii, Defendant. No.—Summons. The State of Washington, to the said Cerubium Simellii: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first审判 day, with sixty days after the 18th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and see a copy of your answer upon addition and addition for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in waste of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed derer in court. The object of said below entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of abandonment and desertion, and for a decree of salt court awarding said plaintiff and defendant, upon the property, described in the complaint. P. O. Address: 625-626 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE THE State or Washington for Kink County to be provided by the U.S. Commission, which, if not known, has, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herein-after described real property, defendants. No. 64514—Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above named defenders, including the Washington, W.C.邮 The Postman, Thomas and every other person having or claiming an interest in the property hereinafter described: You and each of you are hereby notified and summoned, that the above named plaintiff, J. W. Brown is the owner of the child or one deguised certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, Washington, for the taxes of 1898–9, 1900–1–2–3 and 4 inclusive, numbered B27050 and B53267 assessed as the property of said Chapman and Boyd respectively for 1898 and 1904 upon and against the Act of 23, and the tax of (1) the costs of the Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington, aggregating $11.90, including $7.50 costs in this action; That plaintiff is the owner of all subsequent taxes on said lot aggregating $1.60 in all aggregating $13.50 to this date and which bears 10 per cent. In each other, the sum of all the taxes due, delinquent and unpaid on said lot and more than three years past delinquent. You and each of you are also further notified and summoned to be and appear within 60 days after the first publication of this notice and summons exclusive of the notice and summons within 60 days after December 18, 1908. In the above entitled court and action and defend this action, and answer the complaint of plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney below for give or pay the above amount with interest, penalty and costs accrued and hereafter accruing. In case you fail so to do judgment will be entered and rendered satisfactory and sale will be made of foreclosure decreed forever barring and estopping you and each of you from having or claiming any title therein in adverse to this claim of plaintiff and decreeing sald judgment to be a first notice and summons to satisfy the same as provided by the law in such cases and as prayed in plain- Being an active attorney and from time to time having legal notices for publication, it is perfectly natural for you to want to get acquainted with those newspapers that do your kind of business. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Is just your size in this respect. It already has some notices for publication, as may be seen herein, but it needs more of them, and to that end your business is earnestly solicited. GHABLEY ON THE SPOT. Your notices are promptly called for; handled with care and accuracy. Affidavits delivered without delay. Charges reasonable from a hard times standpoint; everything done in a jam-up manner. TELEPHONE MAIN 305 When you have a publication, and if it happens to be a Divorce Summons or a Notice to Creditors, give us the facts and we will do the rest. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN 307 Epler Block. Main 305. Notices Received Up to Friday Noon. tiff's complaint now on file in the office of the clerk of this court. J. W. BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank Bldg., Seattle, Washington. First day of publication Dec. 18, 1908. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Mary Bell, Bell, Plaintiff, vs. Augustis Bell, Defendant. No.——Summons by Publication The State of Washington, to the said Augustis Bell, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-will. Within sixty days after the date of the day of December, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at this office below stated that judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: P. O. Address: Bldg., Seattle, County of King, Wash. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the matter of the estate of James Miller deceased. No. 8718—Notice to Creditor. By order o fsaid court made herein on the 5th day of December, 1908, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate. In Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication December 11, 1908. E. E. MORRIS, As Administrator of said Estate. E. B. PALMER. Attorney for Estate, 305 Lowman Building, Seattle, Wash. December 11, 1908, January 8, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Ella R. Zarek, Plaintiff, vs. John G. Zarek, Defendant. No. 64417—Summons. The State of Washington to the said John G. Zarek: You are hereby summoned to appear with you upon the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 11th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a signed attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of the above entitled action is to have lived alive within the matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant upon the ground of non-support and cruel treatment. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Marie Maud Ravey, Plaintiff, vs. Wilfred Ralston Ravey, Defendant. No.—Summons by publication. The or of Washington to the said Wilfred Ralston Ravey, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty (60) days after the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ATTORNEYS being an active attorney and from time to time ing legal notices for publication, in natural for you to want to get with those newspapers that do your k ess. TTLE REPUBLIC your size in this respect. It alre notices for publication, as may be s but it needs more of them, and to t business is earnestly solicited. BURLEY ON THE SPOT notices are promptly called for; he care and accuracy. Affidavits del out delay. Charges reasonable from standpoint; everything done in a j r. TELEPHONE MAIN 305 on you have a publication, and if it h have a Divorce Summons or a Notice , give us the facts and we will do SEATTLE REPUBLIC or Block. Main 3 Notices Received Up to Friday Noon --- of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which had been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of cruelty. EDGAR FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. and Office Address: 304 Metropole. Building, south corner of Second Avenue and Yasler Way, Seattle, King County, Washington. December 11, 1908-January 22, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for Kling County. James Milton Shaver, Plaintiff, vs. Evelyn Maud Shaver, Defendant. No.— Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Evelyn Maud Shaver, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: within sixty days after the 11th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the above cited copy. You answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clever. A said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of desertion. EDGAR FOSTER. P. O. and Office Address: 304 Metropole Building, southwest corner of Second Avenue and Yesler Way. Seat of King County, State of Washington. December 11, 1908—January 22, 1909. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL Estate—Sheriff's Office. State of Washington, County of King, ss. By virtue of a writ of execution issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 4th day of October, 1909, by the court the case of M. Seller & Co., a corporation, plaintiff, versus J. J. Brys, defendant, No. 62689, and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest prescribed by law for sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 16th day of January, A. D. 1909, before the court house dor of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, with interest, to the presided defendant, J. J. Brys, and to the following scribed property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Tracts twenty-three (23) and twenty-four (24), Fry's Addition to Columbia, levled on as the property of said defendant, J. J. Brys, and to the following amounting to ninety-one and 29-100 ($91.29) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 8th day of December, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By Edw. Drew, Deputy. December 11. 1908—January 8. 1909. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE—SHERIFF's Office. State of Washington, County of King, ss. By virtue of a writ of execution, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 8th day of December 1908, for the case in the case of J. A. Campbell Co. a corporation, plaintiff, versus Joseph Masero, defendant, No. 64439, and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to ask at public auction to the highest bidder of what I shall prescribe by law for sheriff's sales, to wit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 16th day of January, A. D. 1909, before the court house door of said King County, State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendant, Joel H. H. Smith, and following described property, situated King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot five (5). Block ten (10), Ralner Boulevard Fourth Addition to Seattle loved on as the property of said defendant, Joseph Masoero, to satisfy a judgment, amounting to two thousand three hundred seventy-four and 95-100 ($2274.95) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 8th day of December, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By Edw. Drew, Deputy. December 11, 1908—January 8, 1909. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL Estate. State of Washington, County of King, ss. —Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an alias execution, issued of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 31st day of December, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of J. E. Keefe, plaintiff, versus Charles S. Wangelin and Flora B. Wangelin, defendants, No. 6460, and to me, as Sheriff, No. 6461. Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-oat or oclock a 90m, on the 6th day of February at 90m before the Court House door of said King County, the State of Washington, all of the right title and interest of said defendants, Charles S. Wangelin and Flora B. Wangelin, in and to the following detailed property, situated in King County, at Washington, to-wit: Lots twenty-eight (28), Block eleven (11), Hillman City Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. six (6), levied on as the property of said defendants, Charles S. Wangelin and defendants, No. 6460, to satisfy a judgment amount of $2,000, hundred forty and 27-100 ($140.27) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 31st day of December, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. B. EDW. DREW, Deputy. January 1-29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. J. C. MacCallum, Plaintiff, vs. Maud MacCallum, Defendant. No..... Summons for Publication. State of Washington to said Maud Mac- Callum: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from the date of the first publication of this summons, to witness to you, on the 11th day of December, 1908, and defend they above entitled action in the above entitled action and answer the complaint of the plaintiff to see a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of plaintiff's claim, which has been filed with the Clerk of Court. This cause is brought by the plaintiff to obtain a decree of divorce from said defendant on the grounds of extreme cruelty, adultery and bigamy. C. E. PIPER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Rooms 36 and 37 Union Block, 713 1st Ave., Seattle, Wash. Dec. 11, 1908.-Jan. 22, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. In Addition to the Estate of Martin Adams, Probate. No. 1985. Notice of Sale of Property. 1985. Notice is hereby given that in pursuance with an order given by made and entered in the Superior Court, County, State of Washington, on the 28th day of December, 1908, in the matter of the estate of Martin Adams, deferred to the undersigned administratrix of said estate sell at public auction subject to confirmation by said Court the following described real property, toowit: Lots eleven (11), twelve (12) and the North half of thirteen (13) in block for Saint John's Saint Hill Addition to the City of Saint John's sale will be made on the 8th day of December, 1908 at 10:00 o'clock in the forement of said day at the front door of the county court house in said City of Seattle, King County, Washington. The terms of the sale will be cash, gold coin of the United States, the payment of the bid to be payable at the time of the sale and the balance eon the confirmation of the sale 'sale' by this Court. 3 Dated January 15, 1909. LILLY M. ADAMS, Administratrix of the Estate of said Deceased. Date of first publication Jan. 16, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Mary Williams, Plaintiff, vs. Emanuel Williams, Defendant. No. ____. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Emanuel Williams, Defendant; **dendant.** You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 1st day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled contract and answer the complaint of the plaintiff for the copy of your answer upon the undersigned at torneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant. **MILLION & HOUSER AND GEORGE FRIEND, Plaintiff's Attorneys.** Post Office Address: Room 916 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. **IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of B. O. Building, Seattle, King County, Washington.** **Appointing Day for the Order of Final Account and Distribution, and Directing Notice to Be Given.** Lillian M. Winslow, administratrix of the estate of B. O. Winslow, deceased, having rendered and presented for set and filed in this court her final account of the estate of said deceased, together with a petition for the distribution of the residue of said estate to the persons entitled thereto; It is addressed that Thursday, the 4th day of February, 1999, is the 900th clock a.m. be, and the same is hereby pointed for the hearing and settlement of said account and the hearing of said petition for distribution at Department 4 of said court; that the clerk of this court to be thereof by causing notice to be posted of the most public places in King County. Washington, and by publishing a similar notice for at least four consecutive weeks immediately before said day of publication and distribution, in the Seattle Republic newspaper printed and of general circulation in said King County, Washington. It is further ordered that all persons interested in the estate of said deceased appear before the said Superior Court at the house of the 4th day of February, 1909, at the house of the 9:30 day of said day, at the court room of Department No. 4 of said court house in the City of Seattle, Washington, to show cause why an order should not be made distributing said estate, as prayed for in the case. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be served upon all persons interested in said estate at least ten days before the day appointed for the hearing of said petition, or that a copy of this order be served on a for a least four consecutive weeks prior to hearing, in the Seattle Republican, a weekly newspaper published in King County, Washington, and of general circulation therein. Done in own court this 31st day of December, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. January 1—February 4, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Athens, Plaintiff, vs. Edna Kiefer, Defendant. No. —. Summons for Publication. Lie State of Washington to the said bob named a defendant, Edna Klefer; You are hereby directed within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: Within sixty days after the 1st day of January, 1909, and defend the bob named a defendant in the above entitled court, and answer the of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be held against you according to the demand of the plaintiff, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure a divorce from defendant on the grounds of desertion. KING DYKEMAN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P, O. Address: 502 Mutual Life Blade, Seattle, King County, Washington. 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of B. O. Winslow, Deceased. No. 8444. Notice of Settlement of Final Account and Hearing of Petition for Distribution Notice is hereby given that Lillian M. Winslow, administratrix of the estate of B. O. Winslow, deceased, has rendered and presented for settlement and filed in said court her final account of said estate, and that Thursday, 10th February, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock a.m. of the court at the court room of Department No. 4 of said court at the court house in Seattle, King County, Washington, has been appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which settlement of any person interested in said estate may appear and file exceptions in writing to said account and to contest the same. Notice is hereby further given that said Lillian M. Winslow, the said administratrix, has presented a petition for settlement of the residue of said estate and that Thursday, 10th day of February, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock a.sd day, at Department No. 4 of said court at the court house in Seattle, King County, Washington, has been duly appointed by said court for the hearing of said petition, at which time all person interested in said estate may appear and show cause, which order shall not be granted distributing said estate as prayed for in said petition. In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of said Superior Court this 31st day of December, 1908. LILLIAN M. WINSLOW. Administratrix. OTTO A. CASE. Clerk of said Court. By J. A. SIGURDSSON. (Seal of Superior Court) Reputy. "What are they moving the The coldest weather in the last three years is being experienced in Chicago. Telegraph wires are crippled in every direction, cutting communication with distant points, and a number of accidents due to the severity of the weather are reported. FRIDAY, JANUARY 29, 1909. The plank in the Republican's reasonable local option bill will be The unfair Anti-Saloon Option accepted by the lea Will Win. public. The super is as much a violate vote for any local option bill. The re-referring the anti-saloon bill is clearly that, the platform pledged bill passed. Congressman Cushman urging the passage of a reasonable interests of the state demand Anti-Saloon League be not pass-rated cities manage their own a people of Seattle at the last elec-VIDed for the regulation of the l Anti-Saloon League and its pr-make Seattle a dry town. It bel- welfare of Seattle to get a copy see for himself what the result of One feature is this, either Seattle forced in the district where now saloon. The people of Seattle an- handle the liquor traffic and show THE SEATTLE REPUBLIC From every direction words a constant or occasional readers of the office, all of which is highly but it's new subscribers that the women to read the hundred and publican each week contains, and will, The Seattle Republican with in the Northwest and you can no-five to ten times more general in- minded persons recognize merit w a fact there is no reason why you The Seattle Republican. Barring dianic each week takes in as wide does Collier or Leslie though its verified as closely. The Seattle Re- excellent when public excitement into a state of semi-inocuous d thought fifty-two weeks in every years old and therefore has outl Bank in the Republican platform will be lived in local option bill will be passed by the present. The unfair Anti-Saloon League bill will be cepted by the legislative members or public. The support of the Anti-Saloon is as much a violation of the platform as local option bill. The action of the senate on the anti-saloon bill to the judiciary committee the platform pledge will be redeemed and the Congressman Cushman telegraphed Senator passage of a reasonable local option bill, as is of the state demand that the Prohibition League be not passed. The proposition to manage their own affairs is both fair and battle at the last election amended the change regulation of the liquor traffic. And no League and its prohibition supporters can be a dry town. It behooves every man into Seattle to get a copy of the Anti-Saloon Leaf itself what the result of passing that bill will be this, either Seattle will go dry or the state district where now under the charter the people of Seattle and every other city can liquor traffic and should demand so to do. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IS PRAISEful every direction words of praise, from those who occasional readers of The Seattle Republic, all of which is highly appreciated by the subscribers that the paper needs most—mead the hundred and one good things The week contains, and then pay for it. Con Seattle Republican with any other weekly paper and you can not but admit that, it often more general information than any of sons recognize merit wherever they meet it and is no reason why you should not become a Republican. Barring special features the Seek takes in as wide a range of general interest Leslie though its editorial uettrances and closely. The Seattle Republican does not stricken public excitement is running rampant and of semi-inocuous desuetude, but is full of two weeks in every year. The paper is and therefore has outlived its "come to stay The plank in the Republican platform will be lived up to and a reasonable local option bill will be passed by the present legislature. The unfair Anti-Saloon League bill will not be accepted by the legislative members or the general Will Win. public. The suport of the Anti-Saloon League bill is so much a violation of the platform as a refusal to vote for any local option bill. The action of the senate and house in re-referring the anti-saloon bill to the judiciary committee shows clearly that, the platform pledge will be redeemed and a reasonable bill passed. Congressman Cushman telegraphed Senator Paulhamus urging the passage of a reasonable local option bill, and the business interests of the state demand that the Prohibition bill of the Anti-Saloon League be not passed. The proposition that incorporated cities manage their own affairs is both fair and just. The people of Seattle at the last election amended the charter and provided for the regulation of the liquor traffic. And now comes the Anti-Saloon League and its prohibition supporters and seek to make Seattle a dry town. It behooves every man interested in the welfare of Seattle to get a copy of the Anti-Saloon League bill and see for himself what the result of passing that bill will be in Seattle. One feature is this, either Seattle will go dry or the saloon will be forced in the district where now under the charter there can be no saloon. The people of Seattle and every other city can best locally handle the liquor traffic and should demand so to do. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IS PRAISED. GOVERNOR COSGROVE GETS BUSY. In naming Harry E. Gilham of Control to succeed Matt Pilgrim wisely and well, for in addition, best known men in the state he Lorton, another member of the board in perfect harmony in all matters the state. During the late camp in the interest of the Republican less active in party affairs for many years chairman of the Republic county, where he lived before co ing Harry E. Gilham as one of the members to succeed Matt Piles, Governor Cosgrove well, for in addition to Mr. Gilham being a men in the state he is a personal friend other member of the board, and being so the harmony in all matters pertaining to the During the late campaign Mr. Gilham was best of the Republican ticket and he has been party affairs for many years. He was first chairman of the Republican central committee where he lived before coming to Seattle. In naming Harry E. Gilham as one of the members of the Board of Control to succeed Matt Piles, Governor Cosgrove has acted wisely and well, for in addition to Mr. Gilham being one of the best known men in the state he is a personal friend of Eugene Lorton, another member of the board, and being so they will work in perfect harmony in all matters pertaining to the interests of the state. During the late campaign Mr. Gilham was very active in the interest of the Republican ticket and he has been more or less active in party affairs for many years. He was for a number of years chairman of the Republican central committee of Columbia county, where he lived before coming to Seattle. [Picture of a man in a suit with a tie]. KENNETH MACKINTOSH. Kenneth Mackintosh, who is superior court judges of King men in the county. For the past attorney, in which position he g and it is predicted that in his ne as successful as in those he has a On the tax commission, to a Cosgrove has named A. E. Cagv thought that T. A. Parrish wou seems that a cog was slipped son however, that T. D. Rockwell it be that Parrish will in Mackintosh, who will be appointed as court judges of King county, is one of the county. For the past four years he has been in which position he gained a most enviable deduction that in his new fields of labor he will as in those he has so recently retired from tax commission, to succeed J. H. Easterd, is named A. E. Cagwin of Kelso, Washing at T. A. Parrish would be named for that a hog was slipped somewhere down the line at T. D. Rockwell is slated to walk the that Parrish will then be named on the c Kenneth Mackintosh, who will be appointed as one of the superior court judges of King county, is one of the best known men in the county. For the past four years he has been prosecuting attorney, in which position he gained a most enviable reputation, and it is predicted that in his new fields of labor he will be equally as successful as in those he has so recently retired from. On the tax commission, to succeed J. H. Easterday, Governor Cosgrove has named A. E. Cagwin of Kelso, Washington. It was thought that T. A. Parrish would be named for that place, but it seems that a cog was slipped somewhere down the line. It is said, however, that T. D. Rockwell will be slated to walk the gang-plank and it may be that Parish will then be named on the commission. [Name not visible in the image] M. E. HAY, who is now Acting Governor, Mr. Cosgrove Having Been Given an Indefinite Leave of Absence. Capt. Maurace Thomson, who has been a deputy in the office of the clerk of the superior court of King county for the past four years, is to succeed Adjutant General Hamilton at an early date. mercializes love and family. The higher ward which we a THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN who is now Acting Gov Capt. Maurace Thomson, who of the clerk of the superior court years, is to succeed Adjutant Gene OUR SWEET TOOTH. The recent report issued by the Bureau of Statistics shows that the average American citizen consumes half his own weight in sugar every year, and that the sugar bill of the country aggregates $1,000,-000 for every day in the year. In 1907 the total consumption reached 7,089,667,975 pounds, an average of 82.6 pounds for each person in the country. It further shows that 21.3 per cent. of the sugar consumption was of home production, 17.7 per cent was brought from our insular possessions, and the remaining 61 per cent from foreign countries. Forty-three millions of pounds was the aggregate of the exportation of sugar from the United States. This is double the percapita consumption of thirty years ago, when it was twice what it is now. Some of the increase is probably due to the greater general prosperity prevailing during recent years, but the cheaper price has undoubtedly been the greater factor. An interesting feature of this year was the fact that the production of beet sugar in the United States for the first time exceeded the production of cane sugar, the product of the year being, beet sugar 967,000,000 pounds, while the production of cane sugar was 544,000,000 pounds. The world's production has practically doubled in the past twenty years, having grown from 17,000,000,000 pounds in 1887 to 32,000,000,000 pounds in ```markdown ``` 1907. According to indications then, the production of beet sugar bids fair to become one of our greatest industries. Since the sweet tooth is universal the industry will prove a source of vast income. THE MARRIAGE OF THE FUTURE. (By Mrs. Charlotte Perkins Gilman.) The industrial conditions of the modern home are such as to delay and often prevent marriage. Since "the home" is supposed to arise only from marriage, it looks as though the situation were frankly suicidal. So far, not seeing these things, we have merely followed our world-old habits of blaming the woman. She used to be content with these conditions, we say; she ought to be now. Back to nature! The woman refuses to go back, the home refuses to go forward, and marriage waits. The initial condition of ownership, even without servitude, reacts unfavorably upon the kind of marriage most desired. A woman slave is not a wife. The more absolutely a woman is her own mistress, in accepting her husband and her life with him, the higher is the grade of love and companionship open to them. Again, the economic dependence of the woman militates against a true marriage, in that the element of the economic profit degrades and com- mercializes love and so injures the family. The higher marriage toward which we are tending requires a full-grown woman, no one's property or servant, self-supporting, and proudly independent. Such marriage will find expression in a very different home. ITEMS OF INTEREST. At the present day there are two Catholic orders numbering almost 200 colored nuns laboring on behalf of their own people in this country. One of these orders, the Oblate Sisters, of Providence, has been in existence as a community since 1829. The congregation of the Sisters of the Holy Family was the second order, founded in 1842 for colored women. The British Atlantic and second cruiser squadrons will meet the American battleship fleet at Gibraltar, February 6th. The receipts of the Seattle assay office for the months ending with last October amounted to $17,202,704 or about one-fifth of the total production of the United States for an equivalent period. BUSINESS DIRECTORY Puget Sound National Bank. JACOB FURTH .....President J. S. GOLDSMITH .....Vice-President R. V. ANKENY .....Cashier CORRESPONDENTS IN ALL THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE. DRAFTS ISSUED ON ALASKA AND THE YUKON TERRITORY. 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Michelle A. Provo, Plaintiff, vs. Clara An- derson A. Provo, Defendant, No. 63770, Summons for Publication, State of Washington to said Clara An- derson Provo: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from the date of the first publication of the complaint, on the 30th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their offices stated below, on the 30th day of November will be rendered against you according to the demands in plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of the Court above stated. This case is brought by the plaintiff to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the fullful desertion. FREUDENBERG & HEATON. Attorney for Plaintiff. Attorneys for No. 610-611 New York Block, Seattle, Washington November 20—January 1, 190. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King George IV. Ina E. Foster, Plaintiff, vs. Norman B. Foster, Defendant. No. ..... Summons for Publication. State of Washington to said Norman B. Owens. We are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: on the 20th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action, the above entitled Court, the complaint of the Court, the plaintiff and serve a copy of our answer upon the underwritten attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk court. This cause is brought by the plaintiff to obtain a decree of divorce from said defendant on the grounds of willful desertion and nonsupport. FREUDENBERG & HEATON, Attorneys for Plaintiff. No. 610-611 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. November 20—January 1, 190 . NOTICE AND SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of King County. Washington, L. H., Plaintiff, vs. C. A. Cook, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants. State of Washington, to the above described and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified above informed offender the holder of certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 20th day of October, 1908, and numbered B45489 for the delinquent taxes of 1908 and 1909 in the amount of $3.89 and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Second class tide lands in front of SE% of SE% of Tww% of Ttww% of Ttww%. That the date for the year 1907 have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, in the sum of 49 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sale of 15 per cent. per annum to sale of unredeemed taxes are all paid and unredeemed taxes upon and against real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication to-wait; within sixty days after November 13, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of the proposed attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against the respect of the property the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against the respect of the provided, and as pressed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for a Plaintiff. Office Address 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wash. November 12, December 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Edna I. Brenner, Plaintiff, vs. George W. Brenner, Defendant.—No. 64990. Summons by Publication. The plaintiff action to the said George W. Brenner, defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 15th day of January and declare the first action against above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office and post-office address below designated, and in case of your failure to answer the request or failure against you according to the demand of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to secure a divorce from defendant, the custody of minor children and that the community property be awarded to plaintiff and for permanent allomany, attorney's fees herein and costs of this action. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: 55 Haller Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, January 15th, 1909. January 15—February 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. F. J. Carver, Plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, and all persons unknown if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants.—No. 62577. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: on and on behalf of as owners, claims or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated April 1909, numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year in the following amount and upon the real pron- erty situated in sald King County, described as follows, to-wit: White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland—Lot 6, block 2, B49256, year 1904, amount eighty-nine cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 6, block 2, White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland thirty-five cents (35c) for the year 1904, and fifty-eight cents (58c) for year 1906, and fifty-eight cents (58c) for the year 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and on the property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit; within sixty days after the fifth entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of any doubt concerning the evidence herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the demand it effectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation. Plaintiff. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Aurora Land Co., a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe his wife, his brother, his name is unknown and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.—No 62557. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendant in the case of the defendant and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate in the State of Washington, dated the 13th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows: For the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, tow- White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland—Lot 8, block 2, B42928, year 1904, amount, eighty-nine cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described property. Lot 8, block 2, White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland—35 cents for the year 1905; forty-seven cents (47) for the year 1907; and fifty cents (50) for the year 1908. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon an amount of $10,000. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said publication, with sixty days after the 15th day of January, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, due to the cost of case you fail so to, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale each parcel of said real property, each of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. MARKER AUTHORITY Attorney Bureau Office of Trust Co. Bldg. Trust Co. 1909 March 26, 1909 January 15—February 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King.—In Probate. In the matter of the Estate of Mary N. Mitchell, Deceased. No. 7527. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Jamestown N. Mitchell, administrator of the estate of Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, having filed in this court his petitio nsetting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts authorize distribution of the residue of estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of Washington, a way of Washington, at the court room of the Probate department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 25th day of February, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a.m. of said day, then and there to show the residue of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. This is further that a copy of distribution should once a week for four successive weeks before the said 25th day of February, 1909, in Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 22nd day of January, 1909. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington. I. D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 22nd day of January, 1909, in the matter of the estate of Mary N. Mitchell, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 22nd day of January, 1909. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS. (Seal) Deputy Clerk. January 22—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN State of Washington, for King County. D. J. Hanna, Plaintiff, vs. James B. Bradshaw and Dawson Bradshaw, copartners doing business under the firm name of Bradshaw Bros. Defendants.— No. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington the said James B. Bradshaw and Dawson Bradshaw, Defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first within sixty days after the 16th day of January, A. D. 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; the judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is to recover the sum two hundred dollars (55.00) dollars plaintiff from the defendants, as the salary of plaintiff for the month of December, 1908, under a certain contract of employment between the parties to this action, whereby plaintiff was to receive $225.00 per month for his services for defendant for defense and said sum defendants have failed and refused to pay. GRAVES & MURPHY, P. O. Address: Seattle, County of King, Washington, at 911 Lowman Building. January 15—February 26 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Mary C. Brydges, Plaintiff, vs. William R. Brydges, Defendant—No. 64925. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to William R. Brydges, the said defendant: In the name of the State of Washington, you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of your complaint, and serve the notice to-wit, within sixty days from and after the 15th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve the notice to-wit, within sixty days from and after the undersigned, the attorney for the plaintiff, at his offices below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of the said action set forth in the complaint is as follows: To secure a divorce for the plaintiff from the defendant upon the grounds of non-support and habitual drunkenness, and for other proper relief in the premises. F. B. WIESTLING, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 421 and 422 Boston Block, Seattle, King County, Wash. Block, Seattle, King County, Wash. Date of publication, January 15, 1909. 1899. NOTICE. SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE State of Washington, County of Knig. —ss.—Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an execution issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 18th day of January, 1900, by order of the Governor of Adolph Caudan, Plaintiff, versus Elizabeth Franklin, Defendant, Denant, 64908, and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by the law for sale by tendered to the book M. on the 27th day of February, A. D. 1909, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendant Elizabeth Franklin in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to On that certain lease and leasehold interest executed and delivered on May 27, 1907, by Adam Orth to Adolph Candau on the upstairs part of that building, built under the order of (1) in Block thirty-three (3) of D. S. Maynard's Plat of the Town (now city) of Seattle, situated at the Southeast Corner of Fifth Avenue South and Main Street, for the term of two years from June 1, 1907, and of record in the May 29, 1907, and of record in the Auditor's Office of King County, Washington, in Vol. 21, Leases at page 198 et seq., levied on as the property of said defendant Elizabeth Franklin, to satisfy a judge-gambling firm, to Ninety-five (7) of $95.67, Dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 16th day of January, 1909 ROBT. T. HODGE, Sheriff. BY JOHN STRINGER, Deputy. January 22-February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. W. J. Tower, Plaintiff, vs. George Wishard, George Fisher, Orlanda Draper, Bard, Elizabeth Draper, Lucinda Draper, Elizabeth Draper, Lucretia Draper, Mary Draper, Sarah Draper, William Wishard, Samuel Wishard, Martha Bridgefarmer, Emmaline Van Vagner, Josephine Wishard, Olyly Wishard, Barthe Wishard, King County, State of Washington, and Jane Doe Roscrace, his wife, and the unknown heirs of Martha Ball, and all other persons or parties, unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the application herein, Defendants, and the above named defendants, restraining. You are hereby summoned and required to answer the application of the applicant plaintiff in the above entitled application for instruction, and situate in the King County, Washington, to-wit: The East half (E½) of Block Twenty-eight (28). Bigelow's Addition to the City of Seattle, less the North five (N° 5) feet of the East five (N° 5) feet of the East and the South Thirty-five (S. 25) feet of the East Eighty (E. 80) feet of Lot Nine (9), and to file your answer to the said application in the office of the Clerk twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of such service; and if you fail to answer the said application within the time aforesaid the applicant will be required to situate in the court for the relief demanded in the application herein. Witness D. K. SICKLES, Clerk of said Court and the seal thereof at Seattle in said County and State this 20th day of January, A. D. 1909. Date of first publication, January 22, 1909. D. K. SICKLES, Clerk. By O. S. BRUNS, Deputy Clerk. Jan. 22- F. 5. 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Lloyd E. Dunning, Plaintiff, vs. Maude L. Dunning, Defendant. No. 65,071. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Maude Dunning, Defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 22nd day January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case whether the above action is rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk or sard court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce between the plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds of abandonment of the plaintiff by said defendant for the failure to pay your judgment of plaintiff by defendant, and personal indignities rendering his life burdensome. J. HENRY DENNING, Plaintiff's Attorney. Office and Post Office Address: 45-6 Starr-Boyd Bldg, Seattle, Wash. January 22-March 5, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Edwin J. Milling, Plaintiff, vs. Lucy Milling, Defendant. No. 65,099. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Lucy Milling, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summary, on the 21st day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve the copy of the indictment against the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the clerk of said court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony between the parties hereto on the ground of abandonment and desertion for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 23-March 5, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. 64.543. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby the holder of one delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 16th day of September, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the day, the year, and the year in the following amount and upon the real property situated in said King County described as follows, towit: 4 Forty Fourth (44), Block Two (2), Kirkland Park, King County, Washington, being certificate No. BS4314, for the year 1902, One and 4/100* ($1.04) Dollars. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff will be above described property towit: Lot Forty-four (44), Block Two (2), for the year 1003, Thirty-one cents; for the year 1904, Twenty cents; for the year 1905, Thirty-two cents; for the year 1906, Forty-four cents; for the year 1907, Forty-six cents; which scarcely sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, are all the unpaid and unrepaid taxes upon and against said property. You and each of you are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the 1st day of publication of this notice, exclusive of the notice within 60 days after January 22, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff office both with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon it, against the lien of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged against it, as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bld., Seattle, Wash. January 22-February 19, 1909. NOTICE OF STOCKHOLDERS' MEETING Seattle. Notice is hereby given that the regular meeting of the stockholders of the Alaska Central Railway Company will be held at the principal office of the Company at Room 502 of the office at Seattle and Avenue, Seattle, King County, Washington, on Tuesday, the 2nd day of March. A. D., 1908, at two o'clock in the afternoon of said day. JAMES A. HAIGHT. Secretary of the Alaska Central Railway Company. Jan. 22-Feb. 19. 1909. PROBATE NOTICE. PROBATE NOTICE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King. —ss. In the Matter of the Estate of James H Cameron, Deceased. No. 7000. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Homer E. Turner, the administrator of the estate of James H. Cameron, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said court his final account as such administrator, and that Thursday, the day of Election Day, 1999, will be at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said court for the settlement of any account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his excepcion to be said account, and contest the same. Witness, the HON, GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of Said Court hereto affixed this 21st day of January, 1909. D. K. SICKLES. Clerk. (Seal). By J. A. SIGURDSSON. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of James H. Cameron, Deceased. No. 700. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should FRIDAY, JANUARY 29, 1909. Not be Made. Homer E. Turner, administrator of the estate of James H. Cameron, deceased, having filed in this Court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed, and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law therefor, and appearing to the Court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of the said estate. Now, therefore, it is ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of said James H. Cameron, deceased be and appear before the Court of Washington, in the court room in the Probate Department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 25th day of February, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m., of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made by the heirs and persons among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 24th day of February, 1909, in the Seattle Repository, newspaper printed and published in said King County, and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 21st day of January, 1909. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. Jan. 22-Feb. 19, 1909. PROBATE NOTICE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King—ss. In the thirteenth State of Mary N. Mitchell, Deceased, No. 7527. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that James S. Mitchell, the administrator of the estate of Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, has renamed to and filed in said Court, the Probate Department and that Thursday, the 25th day of February, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock a. m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of New York, where he has been fully appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and count the same. Witness: Hon. Geo. E. Morris, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto affixed this 22nd day of January, 1909. R. K. F. MELLS, Clerk. BY PERCY F. THOMAS. (Seal) Deputy Clerk. January 22—February 19, 1909. SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE NOTICE. State of Washington, County of King, George, Sheriff, Office By virtue of an order of sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 12th day of November, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of James Dignan, plaintiff, versus Joseph Dignan, defendant, his wife, defendants, No. 60182, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours of the auction, at 10 a'clock a.m. on the 19th day of December, A. D. 1908, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the following described property, situated in King County, Lots two (2) and three (3) in block sixty-four (64) of Terry's Second Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure of mortgage amounting to $14,000,000, sixteen five and 88/100 ($24,565.88) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 12th day of November, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. November 13—December 11, 1908. SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. Osner & Mehlhorn, Inc., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Mary Augusta Thompson, R. G. Thompson, Jane Doe Thompson, his wife; Ovid A. Byers, Ella M. Cowling, and David B. Husband, his band; Island Lime Company, a corporation, Horace Allison and Jane Doe Allison, his wife; J. W. Bullock and Jane Doe Dullock, Defendants. pany, a corporation, Horace Allison and Jane Doe Allison, his wife; J. W. Bullock and Jane Doe Bullock, Defendants. The State of Washington, to the said Defendant, Mary Augusta Thompson: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to answer the complaint for the date of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, in the court in the county of judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of said action is to recover judgment in the county of Salmon Bay City, together with interest thereon at the rate of 8% per annum from the 3rd day of October, 1907, and $128.65, for taxes paid, and attorney's fees and costs and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the same, dated October 3rd, 1906, upon the same, dated October 3rd, 1906, upon Salmon Bay City, King County, Washington, and foreclose all right, claims or equity of redemption of each and all of said defendants in and to said property. Said mortgage was recorded on the date of October, 1906, in Vegetation 322 of Mortgage 128 of the records in the auditor's office of King County, Washington. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. December 4, 1908—January 15, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Nelson Miller, Plaintiff, vs. Grace Miller, DefendantNo. ..... Summons. The State of Washington to the said Grace Miller, Defendant: to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of being made against a defendant and answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his address below given. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered against you and decree of divorce made against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been served with the clerk of said court. This action is for the purpose of securing a divorce. Attorney for Plaintiff 314 Northern Bank Blde., Seattle First publication January 8th, 1909. Jan. 8—Feb. 19, 1909. FRIDAY, JANUARY 29, 1909. NOTICE—The stockholders of the Alpewa Mining Company are hereby notified that a special meeting of the stockholders of said company will be held at 305 25th Ave. South, in Seattle, Wash. on the 28th day of January, 1909. Respectfully, Alpewa Mining Company, G. G. Darrow and H. F. Detwiler, Trustees. January 8—22, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Alonzo Smith, Plaintiff, vs. James Thompson, Defendant. No. 64862. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said representative, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action, you are above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and case of your failure so to do, you will be rendered against you according has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure a judgment against you for nine hundred dollars balance due for hay so sold by plaintiff and bezzled by you and for which an attachment has been issued and levied upon your property. J. H. ALLEN, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address, 49 Maynard Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—Feb. 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. E. H. Armstrong, Defendant.— The State of Washington to E. H. Armstrong, Defendant: You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of service of this notice upon you by publication, exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the 8th day of publication, to court and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case you fail so to do judgment will be taken against you, accordance with the plaintiff's com-munity on file in this cause and court. The object of this action is to recover from you the sum of $513.86, together with interest from October 26th, 1908, at the rate of 10 per cent, and to foreclose against all your right, and interest in and to co-ordinate monies related to the Northern Bank & Trust Co. of, Seattle, Washington, together with the plaintiff's costs and disbursements expended. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg, Seattle, Wash. Jan. 8, 1908, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Charles H. Hancock, Plaintiff, vs. Alice Hancock, Defendant—Summons. The State of Washington to Alice Hancock, Defendant: You are summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 1st day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, and answer the complaint of case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce on the ground of desertion for a period of more than one year immediately prior to the commencement of this E. T. SCHOFF. Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address: 503 Ploeuer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 1—February 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Maggie W. Utterback, Plaintiff, vs. Charles W. Utterback, Defendant. No.... Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Charles W. Utterback, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication on this day. Within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case it fails to comply, and judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is a decree of absolute divorce from the above named defendant upon the ground of his failure to suitably provide for the plaintiff P. O. Address: 1263 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Fred Shields, Plaintiff, vs. Elizabeth Shields, Defendant—No. 64911. Sum-mount. The State of Washington, King County, to Elizabeth Shields, Defendant: You are hereby notified to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, and answer the complaint of January 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office address below. Do you believe your failure to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of the above Court. The object of this action is to procure a dissolution of the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and the defendant. EDWARDS, MEAKIN & CUSHING. Attorneys for Office and P. O. Address 403 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. The above summons to be published for six consecutive weeks, once each week in the Republican, begin- ning January 8, 1909. A. W. FRATER, Judge. Dated this 7th day of January, 1909. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Mabelle Pinnell, Plaintiff, vs. Seminus Pinnell, Defendant. No. ——. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the above named Septimus Pinell Defendant: named Septimus Pinnell, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the filing of the complaint, with; within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and, upon request, the judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between plaintiff and defendant on the grounds of desertion and failure to provide. H E SNOOK Postoffice Address: 540 Burke Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County Maude Moore, Plaintiff, vs. Frank A. Moore, Defendant. No. 64776. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Frank A. Moore, the defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear with sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 1st day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of your answer upon a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the clerk, which has been filled with the clerk of said Court. That plaintiff's cause of action against you, as set forth in the complaint, is for a decree of the Court dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between you and the plaintiff on the grounds of non-support and of abandonment of the plaintiff by you for a period of more than one year previous to the 1st day of April, 1908; and for the plaintiff of Coq, a person plaintiff the custody of Nada Vie Moore, the little daughter of yourself and the plaintiff. RONEY & LOVELESS. Attorneys for the University Office and Rock, Seattle, King County 07 October 2014 Washington, January 1—February 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Rasmus Madsen, Plaintiff, vs. The Dodd Adjustable School Desk & Chair Company, a corporation, Defendant— No. . . Order Directing Notice to Creditors. In the above entitled matter, it is ordered that all creditors of said defendant and all parties interested in the estate, prosecute and litigate their claims against the defendant in this court and in this cause, and to that end they are hereby notified and required to prove their claims before this court by filing the same with the estate, and to be notified by being fitted under oath with itemized statements and other memoranda, regarding the same, and that said creditors set forth what, if any, security they have for payment of the same, said claims to be filed in the court of the Court of Appeal 1909, and the Receiver is further ordered to cause notice to be given to the creditors herein by publication in The Seattle Republican once a week for three successive weeks during said period and to be notified by the Court of Appeal at the last known place of address of said creditors, copy of said notice. Done in open court this the 28th day of December, A. D., 1908. GEO. B. HERRIS, Judge. W. A. HANNAN, Receiver. HOMER E. TURNER, His Attorney, 745 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 36 Union Blk., Seattle, County of King, Wash. January 8—February 19. 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Amelia Arnold, Plaintiff, vs. Hans Arnold, Defendant. No. 64893. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Hans Arnold, Defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: Within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the compartment which has been filed with the clerk of the said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the grounds of abandonment and non-support and failure to make suitable provision for his family. E. PIPER. Plaintiff's Attorney. Post Office Address: Room 36-7-8 Union Blk., Seattle, King County, Wash. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. C. B. Niblock, now all persons unknown, if any, having or having not been the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. —. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants: And each of you, as owners or claimants of an interest in the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, and numbered B54778, date Oct. 19, 1908, and numbered B54778, date Oct. 19, 1908, taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of $1.26, and upon real estate situated in said King County, described as follows: The North 2½ acres of the South 7½ acres of the West one-half of the N. E. account of W. W. of Dec. 29, Tp. R. 6 E. That the tax of subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said real property, as follows: For 1905, 69 cents; for 1906, 76 cents, and for 1907, 89 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. Amount said date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes upon said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Nov. 1st; in the above entitled court and action; and answer the complaint of said plaintiff serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN due, together with interest and costs. 8 In case you fa" so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien N of said taxes and costs against said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, if now on file in this cause and court, w Office Address: 524 Bailey Building Seattle, Wash. November 20, 1908—January 1, 1909. PROBATE NOTICE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of Annie Scholin, Deceased. No. 8443. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Nels Scholin the executor of the last will and testament of Annie Scholin, has rendered to, and filed in said court his final account as such executor, and that Thursday, the 10th day of December, at 3:30 o'clock, a. m., at the observance of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. Geo. E. Morris, Judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said court hearto affixed this 16th day of November 1908. OTTEN A. CASE, Clerk. By J. A. SIGURDSSON, Deputy Clerk. November 20—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Lewis G. Kindred, Plaintiff, vs. Lena Kindred, Defendant. No. 64097. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Lena Kindred, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: already at his office below stated; and in case the complaint is denied, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce being the border of matrimony between the parties hearty on the grounds of cruelty and adultery. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. November 20—January 1, 1909. Before R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the County, State of Washington. Leon Cepparo, Plaintiff, vs. Francisco Glamietra, otherwise known as "F. Glamietra," county court, No. 16117 Summons for Publication, State of Washington, County of King. —To Francisco Glamietra, otherwise known as "F. Glamietra." You are hereby notified that the plaintiff has filed a complaint against you in court which will come on to be heard at my office in room 210 New York City, Washington, Washington, on the 21st day of December, A. D. 1908 at the hour of 8:30 o'clock, A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said plaintiff is to defend its goods against you for $27.70, being for goods and merchandise sold by Vito Vittl, Complaint filed October 29th, A. D., 1908. Dated November 17, 1908. R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. November 20—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. B. Eslon, Plaintiff, vs. Harry Hoffman, Demand. No. 64,021. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Defendant Harry Hoffman: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 20th day of November, 2004, you are entitled action in the above court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below given; and in case of interest so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint, has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to procure a judgment against you for the sum of $105.00 for services rendered with costs with interest and to sell the property of the plaintiff in King County, leveled upon under writ of complaint issued out of the above entitled court in this action to satisfy said judgment. THOMAS M. ASKREN and H. M. OWENS. Attorneys for Plaintiff. 911 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, 1-200-822-1000 November 20—Jawary, 1, 1990. State of Washington, County of King. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. John Winston and Clara Winston, his wife, Plaintiffs, vs. J. E. Whitworth, e. M. Dunn, his wife, Jane Doe Dunn, his unknown heirs, if any of Zeph Dunn, deceased, heirs, Davis, Lelia J. Davis, his wife, Rebecca Turner, John Doe Turner, her husband, Wilson J. King County, New England Mortgage Company, a corporation, Fred McCoy, his wife, Clyde C. Carr, Mille E. Carr, his wife, John F. Benson and Lulu Benson, his wife, and all other persons or parties, making any right, title, estate, len or intent in the real estate described in the application herein, Defendants. Application No. 21. S. E. % of N. E. %; all in Section Thirty two (32), Township twenty-three (23) N. R. Flive (5) E. W. M., and to file your answer to the said application in the office of the clerk of said court, in said county, within twenty days after the this summer, upon your exclusive of the day of such service; and if you fail to answer the said application within the time aforesaid, the applicant plaintiff in this action will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the application herein. Witness, Otto A. Case, clerk of said court and the seal thereof at Seattle, in said court and state this 18th day of Nv. A. D., 1908. (Seal): OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By MAURICE THOMPSON, Deputy. November 20—December 4, 1908. NOTICE SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE State of Washington, County of King—ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an order of sale, issued on January 1, 1908, by Superior County King County, on the 9th day of November, 1908, by the clerk thereof, in the case of Jos, Martin and Flora Martin, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. G. G. Fetterly and Rose Fetterly, his wife, defendants, No. 10 and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered. Notice is hereby given, that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheriff's sales, to-wit; December, A. D., 1908, before the court house door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit; Lots twenty-three (23), twenty-four (24), twenty-five (25) and twenty-six (26) all in Block forty-one (41) of the Plat of the Town of Des Moines, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure of a mortgage, seventy-six and 20/100 ($176.20) Dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 17th day of November, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. REVELLE, REVELLE & REVELLE. November 20—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Rosa Triest, Plaintiff, vs. Fred Triest, Defendant. No. 63,890. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Fred Triest; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this complaint, within sixty days after the 20th day of November, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment well, I will request your cooperation to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a divorce from the deefendant heerlin on the grounds of failure to support and on the further grounds of cruel treat- JOHN E. BYAN. 416 Globe Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. November 20—January 1, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of Martin Adams, Deceased. No. 9080. Order to Show Cause Why Order of Sale of Real Estate Should Not be Made. By the verified petition this day duly presented and filed by Lillie M. Adams, administratrix of the estate of Martin Adams, deceased, that it is necessary to sell the whole or some portion of the real estate of said decedent to pay the debts of the said decedent's expenses and charges of administration It is therefore ordered by this court that all persons interested in the estate of said deceased appear before the said court, on the 15th day of November, 1908, at the hour of 8:30 of clock A. M., of said day at the court room of the undersigned, or at such time as this matter can be called on thereafter, at the court in the City of Seattle County of King, State of Washington, show cause, why an order should not be granted to the said administratrix to sell all or as much of the said real estate, necessary, and that a copy of this order be published on consecutive weeks in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said county. Do not in open court this 15th day of November State of Washington for King County. Maria C. Gilbert, Plaintiff, vs. Al. McCoy and Emma McCoy, husband and wife, Defendants. No. 63653. Summons. The State of Washington to Al. McCoy and Emma McCoy, husband and wife: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty days after the 18th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the answer and serve a copy of your answer upon the indigent attorney for the plaintiff at his show stated, and in case of your failure to judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of sald court. The object of the action is to recover damages against you in the sum of $2500 and to sell real estate in Tacoma to satisfy the same. F. M. JEFFERY. Attorney for Plaintiff. 747 New York Block, Seattle, King County, State of Washington. December 18, 1908—January 28, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE PERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. James E. Phillip Plattman. W. Wood, and all persons unknown if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the heernafter described real property, Defendants. No. . . Notice and Ship. State of Washington to the above defendants and of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of two certain delinquent tax certificates, issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated the 25th day of January, 1994, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 10, Block 28, Replat of Green Lake Home Addition to Seattle, Certificate No. B45688, for the year 1904, Block 28, Replat of Green Lake Home Addition to Seattle, Certificate No. B45683, for the year 1904 in the sum of $2.50; that the 7 taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon each of said above described note, real property. For the year 1906, the sum of $1,845 for the year 1906, the sum of $1,77, and for the year 1907, the sum of $2,06, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unreimbursed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of publication, if any, and are exclusive of the day of said first publication, Nov. 20, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer he undersigned attorney for plaintiffs of the same amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. JAMES E. PHILLIPS, Plaintiff. KENNETH MACKINTON, First publication dated Nov. 20, 1908. November 20—January 1st, 1909. NOTICE. SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE ss--Sheriff's Office, County of King. By virtue of an order of sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 27th day of October, 1908, by the clerk thereof, in the case of employees Realty Association a corporation, plains-town Old phant, et al, defendants. No. 63866, and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours pre-ceeding the auction, for sheriff's sales, to-wit at 10 o'clock A. M. M. December, A. D. 1908, before the court house door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the following described property, situated in King County, state of Washington, to-wit: Lots eleven (11) of buildings (16) of block fifteen (15) of Byrons Addition to City of Seattle, King County, Washington, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure of mortgage amounting to one thousand hundred twenty-six and 41/100 $129,000, plus, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 27th day of October, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. Oct. 20—Nov. 27, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Bald Rains, Plaintiff, vs. Levander Rains, Defendant—No. 64162. Summon for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Levander Rains: You are hereby commended to appear within a day after the date of the first publication of this sunday's within sixty days after the 20th day of November, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- dicated court, and answer upon the com- plaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the demand of the torney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against according to the demand of the com- plaint, been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a divorce from the defendant herein on the grounds of failure to support plaintiff and on the further grounds of aban- dement of plaintiff. JOHN E. RYAN, Attorney for Plaintiff. 416 Globe Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, John A. Raymond, Plaintiff, vs. John W. Raymond, defendant. No. 64316 Summons by Publicant. The State of Washington, to the said John W. Raymond, defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear, within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, wif: within sixty days after the 4th of December, 1908, and defend the above action in the above entitled court, and serve the complaint of the plaintiff and serve copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their and postoffice address below designated, case of your failure so to do, judgment with the rendered against you according to the demand of plaintiff's complaint, which has been find in the office of the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to remove a cloud from plaintiff's title and to give title in her to lots one, two and three for forty (1.2 and 5. Bk. 40), plat of the Court, as addition to the Town (now City) of Seattle, as laid off by the heirs of Sarah A. Belt, as pleased; also lot 4, block 22 (Lot 4, Bk. 42) of the plat of an addition to the City of Seattle, as laid off by D. T. Denny, guardian of the estate of J. H. Nagle, according to the recorded plats on record in the auditor's office, King County, State of Washington, and never barring the defendant from claiming any right, title or interest in or to preamble and to determine any and all adverse claims of said defendant to said prosecution of war of plaintiff, and for a degree adjudication of plaintiff to be the owner of said real estate, free and clear of all claims or relief herein by said defendant, and for relief as prayed for in plaintiff's complaint as filed in the office of the clerk of the Superior Court of King County, Washington. MORRIS, SOUTHARD & SHIPLEY, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: 55 Haller Building, Seattle, King Co. Washington. for first publication December 4th, 1908 December 4, 1908, January 15, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Vashon College Association, and all persons unknowing any, having or claiming an interest in the case, the hereinafter described real property. Defendants.—No Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and you, as owners or claimants of an interstate hereafter described real property, are the said that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of December, 1904, B28593, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $4.63 and real property situated in said King County, as described as follows, to-write SE% of SW% of NW% of Sec. 5, Tp. 22 N.R. 3 E.W.M. 8 STATUTES ARE TRAVESTIES ON JUSTICE Unequal and oppressive."justice" for the rich and the poor was denounced the day before Christmas by Municipal Judge McKenzie Cleland, of Chicago, speaking at a luncheon given in his honor by the New Illinois Athletic Club, the Publishers' Club and some individual members of the Press Club. Judge Cleland took decisions rendered in Chicago within a few days as showing what he meant, and stirred his audience with the declaration that in Chicago men and women are sent to the bridewell, not because they are criminals but because they are poor. "The crowning injustice of our law is done to the poor, God help them!" declared Judge Cleland. "Last year in our house of correction there were locked up, with the scum of the earth, 8,326 men and women, not because they were criminal but because they were poor. "Of these, 1,173 men and women were too poor to pay a fine of $1, and 2,750 men and women were too poor to pay, or to borrow, $5 or less. "So we put them in the 'Black Maria' and hauled them away. We brought humiliation upon their suffering wives and misery upon their children. "Yesterday, in the United States Circuit Court, the Illinois Central Railroad—and I need not remind you that this road cleared $57,000,000 over all expenses last year—the Illinois Central Railroad was fined $700 for seven violations of the National law. "Probably Judge Landis gave the road what was coming to it. But there is too much difference proportionately between the rich and the poor in the administration of the criminal law. "It would be laughable, if it were not so sad, to see the way we send a man to school, to reform him. We send boys to Pontiac and lock them in cells and put guards over them to shoot them with rifles if they escape, and teach them arithmetic. What a travesty. "The other day in South Water Street a woman, the mother of seven children, was arrested and locked up for picking up decaying fruit. This mother, trying to feed her starving children, is treated as a criminal. "Of 1,231 prisoners whom I paroled at the Maxwell Street Station, 1,134 quit drinking, went to work, and became good citizens. Every man branded as a thief was engaged in lawful employment two months after I had released him on charge of petty larceny."—Chicago Orthalmologist. M. B. DR. CHARLES E. HOYE. During the death of Dr. Charles E. King he be pardoned for speaking from a paper ever had a true and tried friend. He was a man from whose heart he in copious quantities for his foe hereof will verily testify to. In prominently before the people in that time aught injurious to either has never been spoken by any one for the most part knew of his ill-ment of his death last Monday in the week and surprise to every one in the for he was known either personally King County. In chronicling the death of Dr. Charles E. Hoye, The Seattle Republican will be pardoned for speaking from a personal viewpoint, for if his paper ever had a true and tried friend it was the late Dr. Hoye. That he was a man from whose heart the milk of human kindness flowed in copious quantities for his fellow man many besides the editor hereof will verily testify to. For the past ten years he has been prominently before the people in a public capacity and during all that time aught injurious to either his character or his reputation has never been spoken by any one. He was dead before his friends for the most part knew of his illness and therefore the announcement of his death last Monday in the morning paper was a great shock and surprise to every one in the county. This is said advisedly for he was known either personally or otherwise by every person in King County. FORGET YOU ARE COLORED "Well, Seattle must have very rich colored folks to get out a paper like the Seattle Republican," exclaimed an aged colored man down in South Carolina. A copy of the paper was sent to that section of Uncle Sam's domain, and of course labeled, this paper is published by a colored man, and the father of the young white man, to whom it was sent, showed it to one of the colored men on THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN the plantation, which elicited the in the outset hereof. But not so, Uncle Jeremiah ored folk in Seattle or anywhere and property interests at their North Carolina and the states certainly do not have the oppo- property that they do down the caps they have accumulated a w Seattle in particular and the Nor Uncle Jeremiah had doubtl- men prior to seeing The Seattle Ri not only issued by colored men, but one else but colored folk. Colored along the very same lines as do Colored folk in the United States do the white folk, or they should the United States are just as dee- this entire country over as white time given marked evidence of a interested in all the things that w papers published by those in the from those published by white for all manner of man who read Engl Colored folk in order to be a every avocation of life and to be b up their list of employes for tru equip and fit themselves for the o gage in or undertake they must white competitors and co-workers factory, in the operating room, in pursuits, their work must have th When colored folk show a k keener desire to so beautify them if not more so than their more colored folk by skill and thrift m their white neighbors; when color as well if not better than white papers a bit better than white for more readable than white folk, a they do not from a colored man man's standpoint, then and not u as men instead of "just colored, that, whenever a colored man for it having the imprint of a color as he moves about and volumes about him. Nothing meets the e gardless of color, nationality or r tiveness and progressiveness in is "colored," what he does let attract the white man the same which elicited the rather philosophic reof. Uncle Jeremiah. We seriously like or anywhere in the Northwest interests at their command as they and the states in close proximity have the opportunity to accumulate a vast amount of color and the Northwest in general.iah had doubtless seen papers going The Seattle Republican, but the colored men, but were of no general folk. Colored folk in the U.S. lines as do white folk, or to the United States speak the same, or they should endeavor to do so are just as deeply interested in any over as white folk and they have evidence of it. If, therefore the things that white folk are, they by those in the business read or painted by white folk? They should man who read English. In order to be able to stand should life and to be recognized by who employs for trade and artisan themselves for the duties of life that take they must do it just a little and co-workers. Whether it be operating room, in the counting his work must have the ear-marks of men and folk show a keen desire to get so beautify them that they may be than their more pretentious white skill and thrift make their farms pjobs; when colored folk fit and fit better than white folk; when colored than white folk; when colored man white folk, and finally when on a colored man's standpoint, but, then and not until then will they of "just colored men." This is a colored man forges ahead and does print of a colored man he is sort and volumes of newspaper and meets the general approval, nationality or religion, so well asgressiveness in a man. Despite what he does let him endeavor to man the same as it does the bla the plantation, which elicited the rather philosophical remark quoted in the outset hereof. But not so, Uncle Jeremiah. We seriously doubt if the colored folk in Seattle or anywhere in the Northwest have the money and property interests at their command as the colored folk of North Carolina and the states in close proximity thereto. They certainly do not have the opportunity to accumulate money and property that they do down there, and yet despite their handicaps they have accumulated a vast amount of home property in Seattle in particular and the Northwest in general. Uncle Jeremiah had doubtless seen papers issued by colored men prior to seeing The Seattle Republican, but those evidently were not only issued by colored men, but were of no general interest to any one else but colored folk. Colored folk in the United States think along the very same lines as do white folk, or they should do so. Colored folk in the United States speak the same mother tongue as do the white folk, or they should endeavor to do so. Colored folk of the United States are just as deeply interested in good government this entire country over as white folk and they have from time to time given marked evidence of it. If, therefore, colored folk are interested in all the things that white folk are, then why should the papers published by those in the business read or look any different from those published by white folk? They should be published for all manner of man who read English. Colored folk in order to be able to stand shoulder to shoulder in every avocation of life and to be recognized by white folk in making up their list of employees for trade and artisan purposes, must so equip and fit themselves for the duties of life that whatever they engage in or undertake they must do it just a little better than their white competitors and co-workers. Whether it be on the farm, in the factory, in the operating room, in the counting house or in literary pursuits, their work must have the ear-marks of master hands. When colored folk show a keen desire to get homes and a still keener desire to so beautify them that they may be just as beautiful if not more so than their more pretentious white neighbors; when colored folk by skill and thrift make their farms produce more than their white neighbors; when colored folk fit and fashion their works as well if not better than white folk; when colored folk edit newspapers a bit better than white folk; when colored folk write books more readable than white folk, and finally when colored folk do all they do not from a colored man's standpoint, but from a world man's standpoint, then and not until then will they be treated only as men instead of "just colored men." This is so rarely the case that, whenever a colored man forges ahead and does things without it having the imprint of a colored man he is something of a show as he moves about and volumes of newspaper articles are written about him. Nothing meets the general approval of the public, regardless of color, nationality or religion, so well as punctuality, positiveness and progressiveness in a man. Despite the fact that he is "colored," what he does let him endeavor to do so that it will attract the white man the same as it does the black man. Just forget you are colored. NEARLY 1,000,000 DIVORCES Significant matter is contained Census on marriage and divorce in years from 1887 to 1906 inclusion number of marriages recorded w increased from 483,069 in 1887 to in the United States in 1900 was A matter is contained in a report by the age and divorce in this country, ceded to 1906 inclusive. During that images recorded was 12,832,044. T 3,069 in 1887 to 853,290 in 1906. States in 1900 was 93 per 10,000 po Significant matter is contained in a report by the Bureau of the Census on marriage and divorce in this country, covering the twenty years from 1887 to 1906 inclusive. During that period the total number of marriages recorded was 12,832,044. The yearly number increased from 483,069 in 1887 to 853,290 in 1906. The marriage rate in the United States in 1900 was 93 per 10,000 population, which is higher than the marriage rate in any other country from which reliable statistics have been obtained. To offset the foregoing, there were in the twenty years specified 945,625 divorces, compared with only 328,716 during the twenty years from 1867 to 1886 inclusive. That this increase was not wholly due to the growth in population is shown by the fact that in the period of 1870-1880 an increase of only 30 per cent. in population was accompanied by an increase of 79 per cent. in divorces, that in the ten years from 1880 to 1890 the increase in population was 25 per cent. and in divorces 70 per cent., and that from 1890 to 1900 there was an increase of 21 per cent. in population, but of 66 per cent. in the number of divorces, while from 1900 to 1906 population increased 10.9 per cent. and divorces 29.3 per cent. Thus, toward the end of the period of forty years, divorces increased about three times as fast as population. The divorce rate per 100,000 population was 29 in 1870, but 82 in 1905. The rate per 100,000 married population was 81 in 1870 and 200 in 1900. The data show that divorce is now two and one-half times as common as forty years ago, and that no less than one marriage in twelve is terminated by divorce. The divorce rate seems to be higher in the United States than in any other country furnishing statistics. Two-thirds of the total number of divorces granted in the past twenty years were secured by wives, men being more frequently violators of marital vows than women. The most common ground for divorce is desertion, which accounts for 38.9 per cent. of all divorces, the next most important ground being for husbands adultery and for wives cruelty. Only 15 per cent. of the divorce cases were returned as contested, and in many cases the contesting was merely a formality. One divorced wife in eight secured alimony. The average duration of marriages ended by divorce is about ten years. Sixty per cent. last less than ten years, and 40 per cent. last longer. Children were reported in 39.8 per cent. of the total number of divorced cases, and it may be inferred that the evils of divorce fall heavily on the little ones. FRIDAY. JANUARY 29. 1909. Scandinavian American Bank. Write Today for a copy of "THE BANK ACCOUNT" a new, neat little 8-page paper as full of good things as an egg is of meat. MAILED FREE. The Scandinavian-American Bank, Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. E. N. BROOKS & CO. For Frills For Men. HIGH CLASS HABERDASHERY 1331 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance 529 Colman Blk., Phone Main 695 TREEN SHOE COMPANY Always Carry the Best. Customers Carefully Cared For. 707 First Ave., Seattle, Wash. W. H. FINCK Pioneer Jeweler and Watch Maker. Our Holiday Specials Unequaled. 816 Second Avenue, Seattle, Wash. The Comfort. Newly furnished rooms. Walking distance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. L. ISBAEL WALKER, 1101-1103 Jackson Street. PURCELL'S SAFE COMPANY Halls Safe and Lock Co.'s Safes and Vaults. Phones Main 667; Ind. 3197 312 Occidental Ave., Seattle, Wash Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Electric Fixtures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. Stetson & Post Mill Co. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE CONNECTION Business Office. Third and Spring People's Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R. J. Reekle, Vice Presst. Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier. Incorporates Dec. 19th, 1918. Commercial Saving and Trust General Bank and Exchange. Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash Complete stock New Fall Goods, Ladies', Misses' and Children's Wear ing Apparel, Furs and Fine Coats. 820 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. E. W. WAY & CO. General Insurance Fire, Marine, Burglary, Accident Plate Glass, Employer's Liability. 619-620 Bailey Building Main 2115 Ind. L 3356