Seattle Republican

THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN [Portrait of a man with a mustache, set against a cityscape with buildings and a river.] Price One Year, $3.00. Single Copies, 10 Cents. Herewith is presented a picture of Washington College and President Bryan of the institution. Just now this institution and officials are very much in the public eye owing to the fact that the Post-Intelligencer has succeeded in showing some rather peculiar methods that have been used in the conduct of the financial affairs of the school. Already the legislative investigating committee has turned its attention to the affairs of that school, and it is said on good authority that a most deplorable state of affairs will be exposed before it will have completed its work. President Bryan is said to be a most esti- mable man and there are those in Seattle who believe that not only he has done nothing for which he will be consured, but that he has not permitted any of his subbordinates to do anything that will call for any censure from the legislative committee, all of which may be true, but if the figures shown up by the morning paper be but partially true, an awfully careless and lax system has been permitted to go on from year to year at the school and the carelessness may have cost the state many thousands of dollars. Judgment, however, should be witheld until a thorough investigation has been made and the correct facts given to the public. By all means however, let the searchlight of the law be turned on that the minutest detail may be carefully looked into. "Please explain to me if you can, why it is that Senator Piles seems to be opposed by almost every voter in King county at this time," came from a well known man of Seattle, and one who in the past has held a hand in the great game of politics. "Neither the business men nor the laboring men want to see Senator Piles return to the senate and so express themselves on the subject both in public and private. I confess, I myself am not for Senator Piles, and perhaps if I would study my own case I might be able to answer my own question as to why the voters seems to be unanimous in their opposition to Senator Piles succeeding himself in the senate. Perhaps I may have an eye single to the job explains my opposition, but even if I had no such intentions then I would be opposed to Senator Piles. As it now looks, I have no hesitancy in saying that John E. Humphries in a two handed contest would skin the senator by a two to one vote in King county, and so far as the state at large is concerned, the vote would be equally as decisive in Humphries' favor." The man who expects to be a candidate for the senatorship to succeed Senator Piles had better get busy even at this early stage of the game if he hopes to stand a ghost of a show of winning the fight. Had not the close political friends and followers of Senator Ankeny begun to do politics as soon as the tenth legislature adjourned and even before it did, he would not have had half as many votes as he did, and that is not saying but very little. His lieutenants worked like dick nailers in and out of season and so well did they do their work that it looked for a time that he had a show of winning, despite the combined opposition of the daily papers of the state and likewise a majority of the weekly papers. Let the work done for Senator Ankeny be a criterion to those expecting to be candidates for the senatorship next year. Much is being said on the streets and in the columns of the newspapers of the state as to whether or not Governor Hay will call an extra session of the legislature although the governor himself is quite silent on the subject. That he will call an extra session as soon as the investigating committee will have made its report to him is a foregone conclusion as he could not honorably do anything else. There is an unrest among the tax payers at this time concerning the financial condition of the state's affair and so many scandals are being unearthed that the tax payers in some instances are inclined to think, the house has been infested with a lot of grafters and public looters of the most unscrupulous stripe and they want the whole system looked into and this cannot be done by any other means except by an extra session of the legislature. How can the case against the insurance commissioner be thrashed out unless the investigating committee has the legislature to report its finding to? How can the Washington College affairs be gone into unless the committee has the SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, MAY 28, 1909 ```markdown ``` legislature to report to? And as in the above cases so with the hundred and one others that will have been gone into by the investigating committee. The fact of the matter is it would be money in the tax payer's pockets if the legislature met at an expense of $30,000 just so it looked into the entire workings of the state government and readjusted the whole. There is no doubt but that Governor Hay will call an extra session of the legislature and if he does not, then he should be severely criticised by the taxpayers and the press all over the state and especially those who want a square deal. It would appear that Dr. Beach's charges against the Washington College were well founded and that there is a "nigger in the woodpile" in the administration of the affairs of that institution. While the legislature was in session Senator Dick Hutchinson made similar charges not only against the Washington College, but against other state institutions, and Dr. Beach was one of those who denounced it as an outrage and a vicious and unwarranted attack on honorable gentlemen. He was afraid that the investigation would be ordered and some of his friends be caught in the drag net. In spite of the protest of Dr. Beach and those who thought as he did as to the investigation, a majority of, he members of the legislature voted for it and it finally began to investigate, and in spite of the prejudice of the chairman of the committee to the investigation, it was not long after the work was begun before a deplorable state of affairs was shown up and one state official forced o resign from an office to which he had only qualified a few months prior, another put on the run and still others under suspicion. After Dr. Beach's friends had been caught, and do not overlook the fact that the very men he was endeavoring to protect while sitting in the legislature were the very first onee to get caught in the investigating drag net, then he rushed in and announced that the others should be investigated and filed direct charged against the Washington College. It looks to the writer that Dr. Beach was of the opinion that the public interest be damned, but now that my friends have been caught I will try to get some body else's friends caught. In other words Dr. Beach seems to have had no objections to the state institutions and every body else in the employ of the state robbing her out of every dollar they could so long as his friends were left unmolested in their grafting operations. The man who protects the public from no higher motive than to play even is himself a criminal at heart. Its up to the Republicans of this state to see to it that an extra session of the legislature is called and for the purpose of cleaning up their own political house and if they do not do it then the people will elect a complete roster of Democratic officials at the very next opportunity to clean house for the criminal Republicans that have held office in this state. Of the officials of the state that have held office for two and four years and longer there have either been direct charges filed against them or there are ugly suspicions hanging over their heads and it is up to the Republicans of the state to clear the political atmosphere by burning up the rubbish in their party. Much complaint has been made against Mayor Miller for not having promptly dealt with the social evil problem. Until these fault finders find a solution of the matter they should refrain from criticising the mayor or any one else. The matter is a difficult one to deal with and if these people can give to the mayor a satisfactory plan he will gladly adopt it. It appears to APR 29 1952 Volume XVI, Number 1. H. R. CAYTON, Publisher me that under the present circumstances a plan adopted by a certain city in the state of Indiana would solve the question for the present at least. In that city they were very sorely troubled as we are—they had canvassed the matter thoroughly and finally the city purchased a tract of land adjoining the city limits, about three miles from the center of the city, laid it out into lots and charged the men who would build on them a big price as an annual ground rental. The "restricted" people were moved there, and no liquor sold, no gambling and no undue noise or disturbance. The city kept it well policed. The city was cleared of the "undesirable" women and when one came to the city she was either sent away on the next train or went to the "district." In my opinion this would be a partial solution of this vexed question. The city would issue no license or exact no money from the women, only relying on the ground rent from the men who built on the lots for a revenue. It occurs to me that this would be the better plan for Seattle until a better one could be projected. To stamp the evil out is utterly imsossible as long as men and women are possessed with sordid and wicked inclinations. A. B. BALL. While former Governor Albert E. Mead is not thought to be implicated in any of the many shortcomings of the various public officials during his administration, yet there is a general feeling that much of it happened on account of the lax methods that he permitted to creep into the affairs of the state while he was in office. There is no doubt but that Ortis Hamilton's peculations could have been headed off before they reached the four figure stage if care had been exercised in auditing his accounts. Because the man happened to be his appointee Mr. Mead seems to have concluded that he could be guilty of no wrong and his accounts were audited just as they were handed in without any questions. The institutions of the state were handled in a similar manner, the officials thereof spending as choose fit and the legislature urged to pass any appropriation they saw fit to ask for. The appropriations that the various legislatures of the state have made for the schools are simply astounding. Had Governor Mead instituted an inquiry system in every move made by the institutions and had he looked more into the affairs of the state instead of the political maneuvering there perhaps would have been less stealing done by the officials. Abner Giffin, who is suing King county for the payment of a tram way, which he built to a mine he is operating in the mountains, is but carrying out the idea, which was implanted in the minds of the people of the state by an act of the last legislature, when it voted to pay the builders of a bridge across the Columbia river at Wenatchee the fabulous sum of $190,000, probably $50,000 more than the bridge actually cost them. The bridge, mind you, was built for the purpose of the said company to put a water flume across the river, which flume made it possible for them to irrigate a large tract of land, which they are now selling at fabulous prices. This the bridge is still doing although the state has bargained to purchase it, and if done she of course will be compelled to keep it in repair and the builders will not only get more than the bridge cost them, but at the same time have a life lease across the river for their water flume. This man Giffin wants the county to pay for a tram wayhe has built to his own mine, and thinks the county taxpayers should be glad to get an opportunity to pay for it because it will be the means of seeing a mine operated in King county that will be turning out pay ore. Of course neither King county nor the taxpayers do not share in the output of the mines and yet they should be so glad that it is in operation that they would pay for a tram way that leads to his mine. This is a real sample of the graft spirit that is common to the country just now. When doctors do not agree who can decide? Equally apt may it be said of city officials, who fight over the matter of internsl government. What show has the people of getting a square deal? It seems that Chairman Thomson of the board of public works of Seattle, has seriously clashed with A. V. Boullion, superintendent of public utilities. Mr. Thomson declares Mr. Boullion unreasonable and Mr. Boullion intimates that Mr. Thomson unduly favors the local improvement contractors of the city, which has brought about such bitter feelings among the members of the board that the tax payers are bound to suffer thereby. In order that the tax payers get a square deal it seems that the city officials should work in perfect harmony, and if they do not then the officials to whom the various appointees are responsible should look into the matter and see to it that either the present officials work in harmony or get some that will do so, but always bear in mind that a public office is a public trust and the whole is greater than any part thereof, and especially that part that is endeavoring to rob the city either by graft or collusion. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Charles D. Brandes, deceased. In Probate. No. 10113. The auditors of and all persons interested in the estate of said deceased. Greeting: You and each of you are hereby notified, that the undersigned, F. W. Low, has been duly appointed by said Court as administrator with the necessary office, said deceased, and has duly qualified as such, and entered upon his duties thereof; and that all persons having claims against said deceased, or against his said estate, are required to present them with the necessaryouchers within one year past the deadline thereof, to-wit, on before the 14th day of May, A. D. 1210, to the undersigned as administrator of said estate, at the Canadian Bank of Commerce in the City of Seattle, and State of Washington, in place where he transacts his business; upon failure thereof, said claims will be F. W. LOW, As Administrator with Will Annexed of sald Estate, IRA D. BRONSON, Attorney for Estate, 614 Colonnade Building, Seattle, Washington. May 14-June 11, 1909. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—Before R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. George S. Bartels, plaintiff, vs. Detroit Tobacco Company, defendant. No. amounts for Publication. To Determine hereby notified that George S. Bartels has filed a complaint against you in said court which will come on to be heard at my office in room 210 New York Block, Seattle, King Washington, on the fourth of June, A. D. 1909, at the hour of 3:30 o'clock and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said complaint is to demand commissions earned by plaintiff in acting as your agent in selling cigars and tobacco September, October and November, 1908. Filed May 7th, A. D. 1909, R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Preclinet, King County, Washington, WARNING: JOHSTONT, Attorneys for Plaintiff, 425 New York Bldg.. Seattle, Wash. May 14-June 25, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of James Wilbur Jones, deceased. No. 6771. Notice of Sale of Real Property. Notice is hereby given that in pursuance of an order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County, on the 6th day of May, in the matter of the estate of James Wilbur Jones, deceased, the undersigned, the administratrix of the said estate, will sell at private sale to the highest bidder for cash, gold coin, United States, and supersuit to confirmation by said Superior Court on Wednesday, twenty-sixth day of May, 1909, all the right, title, interest and estate of the said James Wilbur Jones, at the time of his death, and all the right, title and interest in and to that certain cel of land situate, in that being in the County of King. State of Washington, founded and described as follows, to-wit: Lots four (4), and five (5), in Block one hundred and sixty-seven (167), Gilman's Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. All bids must be in writing accompanied with cash, or certified check for ten per cent of the amount bid, and must be filed with the undersigned on or before May 24, 1909, balance on confirmation of sale by said Superior Court. AMANDA L. JONES. Administrator of the Estate of James Wittman Jones, Deceased, 629 Burke Building, Seattle, Washington. May 7—May 21, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. In the matter of the estate of Sigmund D. Rosenbaum, deceased. In Probate No. 8297, order fixing time for settlement of final account. This cause having come on to be heard this 9th day of April, 1909, upon the petition of Julius C. Lang, the administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Sigmund D. Rosenbaum, deceased, who has this day resigned, presented and signed by the court his final account of his administration of the estate of said deceased, and the court being duly advised in the premises: Now, therefore, it is ordered and decreed that Thursday, the 20th day of May, 1909, at the hour of 1:30 o'clock p. m., on said day, or as soon thereafter as said matter may be heard, be, and same is hereby appointed to settle the time for the hearing of the settlement of the said courtroom in the court room of the Probate Department of said Superior Court, to-wit, in Court Room No. 7 of the Superior Court of the State of Washington in and for King County, the court house in and for King County; that notice of the said King County, of the hearing and settlement of the said account of the said administrator with the will annexed be given by posting up a written notice in each of the three most public places in said King County, at least before the said notice is printed for the settlement of the said account, and by publishing a similar notice once in each week for four (4) consecutive weeks prior to the said 20th day of May, 1909, in the Seattle Republican, a weekly newspaper, published in said estate each of which said notice shall be sent to the said estate, the name of the administrator with the will anexed and the day appointed for the settlement of said account, and shall give notice that any person interested in said estate may appear at said time and place and file his objections, and account and rest the same, and the person finds and adjudges such notice is proper and adequate in the premises. Done in open court this 9th day of April, 1909. A. W. FRATER. Judge. April 16-May 14. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Nettie Behrle, Plaintiff, vs. August F. Behrle, Defendant. No. 66131. Sum- The State of Washington to the sad August F. Behrle, Defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear warden of the State of Washington the date of the first publication of this summons, Northwest Negro Progess Number That will be issued in the interest of the Negroes of the Northwest on or before June 1st Next for Distribution at the A. Y. P. Exposition by THE SEATTLE REPULICAN Promises to be the most Attractive Number of any magazine ever issued in the United States and certainly in the West Make this edition contain facts and figures as to the Actual Progress the Negro is making in this section of the United States, which you can by reporting such holdings among the Afro-Americans that you are personally aware of Business Men Interested Just as in a similar number issued in 1907 by THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN the business men, of Seattle are much interested and are taking advertisement space to be inserted therein, which is greatly appreciated. It is the duty of every Negro in the Northwest to have some kind of an advertisement inserted therein in order that this section of the country make a good showing. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. County of King. Rozella Crawford, plaintiff, vs. J. E. D. Crawford, defendant. No. 66612. Summons. The State of Washington: To the said J. E. D. Crawford, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to within sixty days after 1961 of April, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon undersigned attorney for the plaintiff in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of so long. The above entitled action is an action for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and non-support. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Blair, Post Office address: 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. April 16-May 28. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Ethel Carruthers, Plaintiff, vs. Charles L. Carruthers, defendant, No. 67344. The State of Washington to the said Charles L. Carruthers, deefndant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to it: within sixty days after the 21st May 1984, defendant, in the entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment be made against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To obtain a decree of divorce upon the ground of a complaint of defendant; also to failure of defendant to make suitable provision for his family. JESSE A. WILLIAMS, Attorney for Plaintiff Office and Post Office Address: 217 218 Hinkley Block, Seattle, King County, Wash. May 21-July 2. 1909. NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF Real Estate State of Washington. County of King, ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an execution, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 10th day of April, 1909, by the clerk thereof, in the case of Blossom Provine Lumber Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. C. J. Davis and Jane, and to his defence, No. 66227, and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given, that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheriff's sales, to the 29th day of May, A. D. 1909, before the house door of said King County, in the THE SEATTLE REPUBL CAN SEATTLE. WASHINGTON THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN west Negro ess Numb interest of the Negroes of the Northwest or Distribution at the A. Y. P. Exposition by SEATTLE REPULIC the most Attractive Number of any magazine United States and certainly in the West Let Everybody Help btain facts and figures as to the Actual this section of the United States, wh by reporting such holdings among the Afro-Americans that you are personally aware of Business Men Interest or issued in 1907 by THE SEATTLE REP interested and are taking advertisement s associated. Are You In Business? Negro in the Northwest to have some kin and therein in order that this section of the make a good showing. THE SEATTLE RE SEATTLE, WASH Are You In Business? IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Thos. J. Edwards and Jane Doe Edwards, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claim- ing the right to inheritance thereafter described real property. Defendants. No. 64713—Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above de- State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of Kirk County, State of Washington, dated the 27 day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the follow-ward year for the following year upon the real property situated in said Kirk County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 14, block 25, Carmode & Adsit's First Addition to Kirkland, Certificate No. B49410, for the year 1904, amount $1.28. that the taxes for the following and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 14, block 25, Carmode & Adsit's First Addition to Kirkland: $0.68 for the year 1905; $0.71 for the year 1906; $0.87 for the year 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from the date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real estate. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any, are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of first publication, to the date of publication, 28.1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien on said taxes and costs against the amount of real property received in the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. ```markdown ``` IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. In the matter of the estate of Sigmund D. Rosenbaum, deceased. In Probate. No. 8297. Order to show cause why division should not be made. This cause saving comes to be heard on this 9th day of April, 1909, upon the petition of Julius C. Lang, administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Sigmund D. Rosenbaum, deceased, that an order to show cause be made to the petitioner has filed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution to the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth that the residence of the residue of said estate and the court being duly advised in the premises: Now, therefore, it is ordered and decreed and ordered that all persons interested in the estate of said Sigmund D. Rosenbaum, deceased, be, and appear before the alloy Court of State of Washington in and for King County in Department No. 7 in the King County Court House in the city of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, on the 20th day of May, 1909, at the hour of 1:30 o'clock, at the court of justice, as thereafter as said matter may be heard, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate to the successor in interest devise a legitimate trustee and foreign executors in said petition mention according to the provisions of the law. It is further ordered and decreed that a copy of this order be published once a week for four (4) consecutive weeks before the said 20th day of May, 1909, in the Seattle Republican, a weekly newspaper printed and published in said King County, State of Washington, and of other circulation therein. Done in open court this 9th day of April, 1909. NOTICE TO CREDITORS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. In the matter of the estate of Benjamin F. Lashmett, deceased. To the creditors of said deceased; All persons having claims against Benjamin F. Lashmett, deceased, are hereby notified and required to present them, with the necessary vouchers, within one year after the date of this notice, to Miles Bigelow administrator of said estate, at the address 723-3 Colman Building, in the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, being the place for transaction of business of said estate. MERCHMER Administrator Attorney for Administrator IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. In Reed, plaintiff, vs. James H. Reed, defendant. No. 66786. Summons. The State of Washington, to James H. Reed, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first day of April, 1909, and defend the above within sixty (60) days after the 30th day of April, 1909, and defend the above entitled action, in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your an- nouncement to the judge of the complaint, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be taken against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of sound court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant above named on the ground of willful desertion and non-support, for more than a year last past. R. E. HILBERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. Address: 409-10 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. No. 11-1909. April 130-June 11, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King George II. In the matter of the estate of Joseph Grealish, deceased. Notice of settlement of account and distribution of estate. No. 8822. Notice is hereby given that John Grealish, the seniorist of the estate of Joseph Grealish, has rendered presented for settlement and filing in said court his account of his administration to date of said estate, and his petition for a distribution of said estate; and that Thursday, the 3rd day of April, 1909, 2 and 3 of said court, in the court house in the City of Seattle, in said County, has been duly appointed by said court for the settlement of said account and the distribution of said estate at which time place any person interested in said estate may appear, and the his exceptions in writing to the said account and contest the same, or show cause, if any he have, why the court should not proceed to distribute the said estate among the persons whom by law are entitled there. Witness my hand and the seal of this court, the 24th day of April, 1909. Clerk of the Superior Court. (Seal of Court) By PERCY THOMAS. Dewey Clerk LOVEDAY, KELLEY & MECILLAN. Attorneys for Administrator. April 30-May 28, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Cora Lindaman, plaintiff, vs. Alvah H. Lindaman, defendant. No. 66952. Summons by publication. The State of Washington to the said Alvah H. Lindaman, defendant above named: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first designation of your to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 30th day of April, 1909, and defend the above entitled cause in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the first designation of your to-wit at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce on the part of plaintiff from said defendant, on the ground of abandonment of plaintiff by defendant and more than one year last past, and failure of defendant to make suitable provision for his family and for plaintiff. C. A. RIDDLE, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: Suite 655, Colman Building, Seattle, Washington. April 30-June 11, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Inga Marie Eddy, plaintiff, vs. Peter Eddy, defendant. Summons by publication. The State of Washington, to the said Peter Eddy, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to within sixty days after April 30, 1909, and defend the petition in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office at 214 City Hall; and in case he is denied the judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action set forth in said complaint is as follows, to-wit: To obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant herein on the ground of desertion. JOHN SLATTERY, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Room: 214 City Hall, Seattle, King County, Wash. April 8-June 11, 1909. NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King, ss—SheriFF's By virtue of an order of sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 13th day of April, 1909, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of Aurora Land Co., a corporation, plaintiffs in the case Marigre and Jane Doe Marigre, his wife, and the Boston Store of Seattle, a corporation, and Michael John and Jane Doe John, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, deferred and delivered to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered; Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to the highest bidder, on the 29th of May, A. D. 1909, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendant and, in the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lots Eleven (11) and Twelve (12), in Block Twelve (12), East Park Addition to the City of Seattle, levied on as the property of sale defendant, of a foreclosure amounting to four thousand two hundred and 40-100 $4200.40 dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff, Dated October 1, 1993 ROBERT T. HODGE, Sheriff. By RERT C. THOMPSON, Deputy. April 16—May 14. Have a Legal? Phone Main 305 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN BU iat. “cess, arenes RR eae paar asia GE FRIDAY, MAY 28, 1909 INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King, In the Matter of the Estate of Birdsey ‘Wetmore, deceased. No, 10200. No- tice to Creditors. Notice is hereby ‘given to all persons having claims against said deceased and against said estate, and to all creditors Of sai destate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned, executor of said estate, at room 625 New York Block, the plice of, business of said estate, in’ Seattle, in sad county and state, within one year from and after the date of the first publication Of this. notice or the same will be barred, ROY D. WETMORE, As Executor of said Estate. HIRAM J. JACOBS, ‘Attorney for Estate, ‘No, 625 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. Date of first ‘publication May 14, 1909. May 14—June 11, 1909, IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. —In Probate, In the Matter of the Estate of Arthur B, Lowe, Deceased. No. 10,136, Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 29th day of April, 1909, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to pre- sent them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of sald estate, at Rooms 618-19 California Bldg, Tacoma, Washington, the place of busi- ness of’ said estate, ‘in Tacoma, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred, ‘Date of first publication, May 7th, 1909. ‘A. GALLOWAY, As Administrator of said Estate. W.. McB, PERRINE, Attorney for Estate. 518-19 California Bldg,, Tacoma, Wash. May 7—June 4, 1909. NOTICE TO CREDITORS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County. of King. In the Matter of the Wstate of award P, Lowrie, Deceased, No. ——. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of Edward P. Lowrie, and to all persons paving claims against said Edward P Lowrie, now deceasec, to present such claims’ with their necessary vouchers within one year after the date of this notice, to-wit, within one year after the th day of May, 1909, to the under- signed, Ed. P. Lowrie, administrator of the estate of said Edward P. Lowrie, deceased, at Room No. 649 New York Bullding, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, that being the place gf transacting the business of anid 68- ie. qopited at Seattle, Washington, May 7, ED. P, LOWRIB, Administrator of said Estate. REVELLE, REVELLE & REVELLE, ‘Attorneys for Administrator. May 7—June 4, 1909. TIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State ot Washington for King County. Rebecca, May Kearnes, Plaintiff, vs. G. Prank Kearner, Defendant, No, 67067. Summons by Publication. ‘The Stats of Washington to the sald G. Frank Kearnes, Defendant: ‘You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after.the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 7th day of May, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintif, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at- torneys for plaintiff, at their office be- low stated; and in case of your failure 80 to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of’ the sald court A brief statement of the object of the sald action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony’ existing between the plaintitt and the defendant, on the ground of Abandonment, non-support and cruel treatment, CARRICO & DURK, Attorneys for Plaintift. Post Office Address: 60% People’s Savings Bank Bldg., Seattle, King Coun- ty, Washington. ‘May 7—June 18, 1909, IN_THE SUPPRIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, In the Matter of the Ustate of James Peceolo, Deceased. No. 9538. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given by the under: signed, John Oberto, administrator of the estate of James Peccolo, deceased, to the creditors of and all persons hav- ing. claims against sald deceased, to ex. hibit them with the necessary vouchers, within one (1) year after the first pub- Iieation of this notice, to-wit, within one (1) year after the 7th day of May, 1909, to the administrator as aforesaid, at Suite 655, Colman Building, in the City Of Seattle, County of King and State of Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of the business of sald estate, JOHN OBERTO, Administrator of the Estate of James Peccolo, Deceased. May 7-—June 4, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washmgton, in and for the Coanty of King. Carrie H. Tate, Plaintiff, vs. David Henry Tate, Defendant.No, '..... Sum- ‘mons and Service of Publication, The State of Washington to the said David Henry Tate, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty (60) days after’ the ist day of May, 1909, and defend the above entitled action fn the above en- itled court and answer the complaint of plaintiff! and serve a copy of your an- Swer upon the undersigned attorney for plnintifl nt hie office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint, Which has heen filed with the clerk of said court, ‘The object for which this Action is brought is to obtain a decree Gi divorce from, the defendant on the Mowing grounds: Ast. Because the defendant for eight Hoag lest ast has newlected and re- hised and still neglects and refuses to FAKE, suitable provisions for the plain- tiff and his family. 2nd. Because the defendant _ seven years ago abandoned the plaintiff, said ‘abandonment having been continuous and. for one year and more. ‘All matters herein complained of hav- ing oceurred without plaintiff's fault. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintim. +. P.O, Address: 429-80 Epler Block, 813 2nd Avenue, Seattle, Washington. ‘May 21—July 2. Being an active attorney and from time to time having legal notices for publication, it ts perfectly natural for you to want to get ac- quainted with those newspapers that do your kind of business. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Is just your size in this respect. It already has some notices for publication, as may be seen herein, but it needs more of them, and to that , end your business is earnestly solicited. P Your notices are promptly called for; han- dled with care and accuracy. Affidavits deliv- ered without delay. Charges reasonable from a hard times standpoint ; everything done in a jam- “up manner, i TELEPHONE MAIN 305 When you have a publication, and if it hap- pens to be a Divorce Summons or a Notice to Creditors, give us the facts and we will do the - rest. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN 307 Epler Block. Main 305. ‘Notices Received Up to Friday Noon. Attention ! IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. George’ Brazier, Plaintiff, vs, Mona Brazier, Defendant. No. ——. Notice, ‘The State of Washington, to the above named defendant: You are hereby notified and sum- moned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of rst publication, to-wit; sixty days from the 7th day of May, 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the com- plaint of sald plaintiff and serve a copy Of your answer on the undersigned at- torney for plaintiff at his office below stated and in case you fail so to do, Judgment will be rendered against you According Yo the demand of ‘the com- plaint which will be filed with the clerk ‘The object of this action is to obtain an absolute divorce from the defendant. of said court, F, J, CARVER, Attorney ‘for Piaintift, Office address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Building, Seattle, Wash. __May. 7—June 18, 1903. es NOvTICH OF SHBRIVINS SALE OF REAL BSTATH. State of Washington, County of King, ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an order of sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 6th day of May, 1909, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of C. Butkus, Plaintiff, versus Suwalk Min- ing Company, a corporation, Defendants, No. 66528, and to me, as Sheriff, direct: ed_and délivered: Notice is hereby given that I will pro- ceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to- wit, at 10 o'clock a.m. on the 19th’ day of June, A. D. 1909, before the court house door ‘of aid King County, in tho State of Washington, dll of the right, title and interest of the said defendants in and to the following described prop- erty, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit M. and D. No. Land A. and f. No. 2, and Extension No. 3, on Middlefork, southeast of Miller River, four and ‘one-half (444) miles from Great Northern Railway, on the west side of said river, all in’Granite Moun- tains’ Mining. District, King County, Washington, levied on as the property of said defendants, to satisfy a judg- ment of a foreclosure of a mortgage amounting to three hundred and seven and 60-100. ($207.50) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 6th day of May, 1909. ROBURT . HODGE, Sheritt, By JOHN STRINGER, Deputy. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King, George O'Bradovech, Plaintift, vs. George W. Hall, Mary V. Hall, Olive J. Stewart; and also all other persons or parties ‘unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the, complaint here- in, Defendants.—-No. 67323. Summons, ‘The State of Washington to the sald George W. Hall, Mary V, Hall, Olive J. Stewart, and also all. other persons or parties ‘unknown, claiming any, right, title, estate, lien ‘or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit, within sixty days after the 2ist day of May, 1909, and defend the above entitled action ih the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and ‘serve a copy of your an- swer upon the undersigned attorney at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be fendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has deen ‘Med with the clerk’ of the sald fourt. ‘This action is brought to quiet title in the plaintiff and to exciude the defend- ants and each of them from any interest or tien, claim or title in or to that plece oF paréel of tand Iving and being in the County of King and State of Washing- ton, particularly described as follows, to-wit: Lot four (4), Block thirteen (12), Division Six (6), Hillman City Ad- dition to the City of Seattle. J. W. JONES. Attorney. for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 740 New York Block. Seattle, Wn. i ATTORNEYS deemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to. be and appear within sixty days after date Of first publication of this notice, exclu. sive of the day of said frst publication, to-wit: ‘Within sixty days after Febru. ary 26, 1909, Im the above entitled court and action; ‘and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintift and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below Stated, of pay the amount due, together with Interest and costs. In case you fail $0 to do, Judgment will be rendered here- in, foreclosing the Hen of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due Upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of caieh parcel, of, sald Broperty for the Satisfaction of the sums charged and found againt it respectively is provided bylaw, and as prayed in plaints com: pining,’ now on'iie in this cause and our W. 7. GAFENER, Plaintift, Office Address, 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Washington, First publication, February 26. Paat Lublication, April 9. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF Th State of Washington for King County. W. . Gaftner, Plaintiff, ys. 8. B. Co. and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest’ in and to the hereinafter deseribed real property, De- fendants, No. ——. Notice and Sum. mons, State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you, as owners, claim. ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiit is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of Hing County, State of Washington, dated the ist day of Sune, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the teal property situated in'sald King County, deserined as follows, to-wit: ‘That’ the taxes for the following prior Town of Renton, 8. and B. of line of Renton Coal Co.—Lot 13, Block 2; Cor. tifieate Number B51258; year ‘1904; amount $1.87. and subsequent, years have been paid by the plaintift ‘upon said above des. eribed real property, to-wit: Lot 13, Block 2, ‘Town of Renton, 8. and’, of line of’ Renton Coal Co.—78 cents for year 1905; 87 cents for 1906; $1.02 for 1907, which several sums bear Interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and fre all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes Upon and agalnst sald real property, ‘You and each of you (including sald persons, unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be anc appear within sixty days after the date of first publeation of, this notice, exclu- sive of the day of said first publication, towit: Within sixty days after Febru- ary. 26, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; ‘and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer onthe undersigned plaintift at his office below Stated, or pay the amount due, together with Interest and costs. Tn case you fail Bo to do, judgment “will be rendered herein, foreciosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes, interest. and costs, ordering sale of ‘each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged 4nd found against it respectively as pro- Vided by law, and as prayed in plaintff's complaint, now on file In this cause and Court. W. T. GAFENER, ‘ Plaintift. Office Address, 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, ‘Washington, First publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Co., Inc.,, Plaintifts, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, Whose crue Chrisaan name 1s unknown, and all persons uaknown, if any, having or clalming aL. interest in and’ to the hereinafte: uescribed real property, Defendants. No. 62578. Ne tive and’ Summons, State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim. anis or holders of an. interest ' or es. tate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified, that the above mained plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the ‘Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 12th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows, forthe ‘delinquent taxes of the follow: ing’years, in the following amounts, and upon the’ real property, situated in said King County, described as follows, to- wits ‘White Brothers’ Addition to Kirkland Lot 8, Block, 2; Certificate Number 49259; for the year 1904; to the amount of 89 cents. ‘That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintif? upon said above described real ‘property, to-wit: Lot 8 Block 2, White Brothers’ Addi. tion to Kirkland96 cents for year 1905; 47 conts for 1906; 68 cents for 1907, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from Said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against sald real property. ‘You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are Rereby further notified and summoned to be ant Appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- Clusive of the day of sald first publl- cation, to-wit: Sixty days after the 26th day of February, 1909, in the above en- titled court and ‘action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of sald plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the, undersigned attorney for plain: Ufr at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail*so to do, juds- ment’ will be rendered herein, foréclos- Ing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real prop- erty for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, Interest. and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said’ property for the sat. isfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided. by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's com- plaing, now on file in this cause and jourt, AURORA LAND CO. Inc, Piaintirt. FJ. CARVER, Attorney’ for Plaintitt, Office Address, 314 Northern Bank’ & Trust Bldg. Birst publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintift, vs. "Mary 1, McPherson and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest’ in and’ to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No —. Notice and Suiamons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim. ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff s the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the ist day of June, 1908, and ‘numbered as follows, for the Gelinduent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in’gaid King County, described as follows, to-wit* Ople's Garden Tracte-—Lot 2, Bloch Ai Certificate Number B91979; year 1903} amount $30.45. ‘That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been, paid by the, plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 2, Block A, Ogie's Garden Tracts— $2.74 for year 1904; $2.48 for 1908; $2.17 for 1906; $2.41 for 1907, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of pay- ment, and are all the unpaid and unre. Attention IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. 'T. Gaffner, Plaintify, vs. ‘Terrace Land Co, and ail persons’ unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and’ to the hereinafter, described real property, Defendants, No. ——. Notice Pa’ Giamneneene State of Washington tv the avove de fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owner s, claim. ants or holders of an"interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby noffied that the above hamed piaintift is the holder of fa certain delinquent tax certificate issu by the ‘Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the Ist day of Tune, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the “aelinguent “taxes of ‘the following year, and the following amount, an upon the real property situated in said King County, deseribed as follows, to- wit Claremont Addition to Seattle—Lot 3 (ess East 33 fect), Block 8; Certificate Number 860166; year 1904; amount $1.67. ‘That, the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintit upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 8( less Mast 83 feet), Block 8, Claremont Adaition to Seattle—$1.04 tor year 1905; 79 cents for 1906; 88 cents for 1907, which several sums bear Ine terest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed iaxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including sald persons unimown, if any), are hereby urther notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of sald first, publi: cation, to-wit: Within sixty days after February 26, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; ‘and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plain iff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office be. jow stated, or pay the amount due, to- gether with interest and costs, In case you fail so to do, judgment will be ren- Hered herein, foreclosing the len of said axes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts die upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interests and costs, ordering a sale of ‘each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this eause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintitt, Office Address, 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Washington. First publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE Siale of Washington for Icing County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners’ and all persons, if any, having or claiming an ‘interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, De- fendants. No, ———. Notice and Sum- mons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim. ants or holders of an’ interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the Above tidmed plaintim is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of iting County, State of Washington, dated the ist day of Tune, 103, and numbered as follows, for the. delinguent ‘taxes of the following Fear, in the following amount, and upon the heal property” situated in’said King County, described ag follows, to-wit: W, 285 fect of W % of N. W. % of N, wee if of Section 12."1p. 21. of Ff By W. M; Certificate Number B52101- year 1904; amount. $1.66. ‘That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have beon, pald. by the plaintiit upon said above describe real property, to-wit: W. 285, feet of W. ¥% of N. W. % of N. W. 4 of Section i2, Twp. 21 N. of Ry 7B, W. M—08 cents for year 1005; $1.29 for 1906; $1.89 for 1907, which Several sums bear interest ai the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, dnd are ‘all the ‘unpaid ‘and unredeemed’ taxes upon and against sald real property. You and eich of vou, (Including said persons unknown, it any), are hereby further notified ad summohed to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first’ publication of this notice, ex. Clusive of the day of said first publica- tion, to-wit: Within sixty days after February. 26, 1908, in the above entitied court and action; and defond this action and answer the complain of said plain. Uff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office be- low stated, or pay the amount due, to. gether with interest and costs, In case Fou fail so to do, judgment will be ren, dered herein, foreclosing the lien of said faxes and costs against cach parcel of sald real property for the sums and f@mounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, Interest and costs, Ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums Ghatged and found against it respec. tively as provided by law, and as prayed in_plainutt's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court, W. T. GAPENER, Plaintirt, Office Address, 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, ‘Washington. First publication, Webruary 26. Last publication, April 9°. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. J, R. Fowler and M. E, Fowler, his wife, DP Ane vs. Birdsey Wetmore, Johh Wetmore, and Jane Doe Wetmore, whose true Christian name is to plain- tiff unknown, his wife, Bessie Wetmore Hendricks and J. K. Hendricks, her hus- band, Mary Wetmore Golden and Charles Golden, her. husband, Prank Wetmore and Jane Doe Wetmore, whose true Christian name isto plaintift un~ known, his wife, Ella Wetmore Wilson ana John Doe Wilson, whose true Chris- tian name is to plaintiff unknown, her husband, Jane Wetmore aoe and By- ron A. Young, her husband, defendants, ‘The State of Washington to the sald defendants, Birdsey Wetmore, John Wet-+ fore, and’ Jane Doe Wetmore, whose true Christian name is to plaintiff un- known, his_wife, Bessie ‘Wetmore Hen dricks and J. K. Hendricks, her husband, Mary Wetmore Golden and Charles Golden, “her husband, Frank Wetmore and Jane. Doe Wetmore, whose true Christian name is to plaintiff unknown, his wife, Ela Wetmore Wilson and John Doe Wilson, whose true Christian name is. toa paint unknown, her husband, Sane “Wetmore: Young and. Byran At Young, her husband. You" and ‘each of you are hereby summoned. to. appear within sixty days after the date of the first Publication of. this simmons, —to- wit: within sixty days after the 65th day of March, 1909, and defend the Above entitled action’ in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve @ copy of your answer upon the undersigned. attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand. of the coms plaint, which has been filed with the Clerk ‘of said Court. The object of this action is to quiet title to lots nine (9) Ruattion to. the City’ oF ‘Beatie, Bing ion Y of Seattle, Kin County, Washington, ie ELIAS A. WRIGHT, 4, Attorney for Plaintim. one ind BO ebdroes: 629 Burke uilding, le, Washington. arcing reatiles | Washing! 4 Seattle Republica Published Every Friday, 307 Epler Blk. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton.....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton.....Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. One Year .....$3.00 Six Months .....1.50 Three Months .....75 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mall Matter. Legal Publications a Specialty. Are the taxes paid by the rich? has been asked. Only when it is impossible to find the poor. When Turk met Turk then Abdul Hamid realized that he was down and out and he did not miss his guess. "President Eager to Visit Alaska," says a head line. Then why does he not do so since he is not indispensible at Washington City. Unless General Ortis Hamilton manages by hook or crook to employ a press agent he is going to have a hard time to keep out of the penitentiary. London Lancet is of the opinion that, the usual spring housecleaning is dangerous. Here is one danger in life that we will religiously steer clear of. Puget Sound holds the record for coal so comes the report from Washington City, and it occurs to us that it likewise holds the record for high prices for coal. Abdul Hamid might send a wireless to Castro to the effect that, they are two of a kind, Castro however, might not look upon that as either information or news. Senator Dick Hutchison may be a pessimist, but his allegation that the Washington College was rotten to the very core promises to prove the words of a prophet. _____ That Iowa's junior senator has his short Cummings those that know him best does not deny, and those who have watched his career in the senate are willing to admit it. Raising the Maine has again become a slogan. All this talk about raising the Maine is cheap sentiment for the Maine raised could be made neither useful nor ornamental. New York City, Mr. Justice Gaynor, is not the only city in the United States that is being bled in every pore by grafters, but it is true of every city and county in the country. Teddy's presence in Darkest Africa has caused all of the birds, beasts and reptiles of the forest to set up and take notice and a general immigration to a foreign land may be the result. Let us hope that the title of the Wenatchee bridge will be found so defective that it will be impossible for the state to purchase it for it was the monumental steal of the last legislature. Blowing the great tariff reform balloon up only to get punctured before it gets into good working shape will undoubtedly be the result of the alleged hard work congress is doing just now. Oklahoma is so often torn by tornadoes and floods that one is inclined to think that the very God of the Universe has taken umbrage at the class of cattle that has gone to Oklahoma to cast their lots and carve out of that sandy desert a state. Lady Granard may have been the direct outcome of the Mills of America, but whether of the mills or the mines she was full of fight and that bowing ape of England now knows it and he is doubtless a wiser, but sadder man for having found it out. Persons who insist on keeping vicious dogs in the city where they enjoy free mail delivery must take pleasure in seeing those whelps chase the carriers. Such dogs should be shot by the police and the owners made to pay heavy fines for having them. There should no longer be any doubt as to the rapid development Japan is making along the lines of civilization from a white man's standpoint as a graft scandal is being exposed in Japan that is involving a number of the leading officials of the country. Of course the coal operators want the tariff to continue on all foreign products for it means whatever the duty is that much gain to them, the same amount of loss to the consumer and not a penny's profit to the miner. Senator Piles' holding a large amount of common stock coal certificates of course is fighting to keep the duty on coal. Lumber is to remain on the free list if the actions of the senate one day this week stands for anything, as it voted by a two-thirds majority to continue lumber on the protection schedule. The lumber barons must have shown the senators that it was necessary to rob the common people out of a few million dollars before giving up such a soft snap and the senators evidently knew on which side their bread is buttered. A twenty-year-old father, who for the past five months has been a fugitive from justice, heard that his little son was seriously sick and jeopardized his liberty to see his little boy and wife, but was arrested a few hours after reaching his home. Though he is now resting in durance vile he is every inch a man and it would be a hard hearted jury that would send him to the penitentiary though actually guilty of embezzlement. OBSERVATIONS Only a fool will pay twice for the same experience. A Dreadnought is an indication of national alarm.—Memphis Commercial Appeal. Friend Adbul is not being troubled by persistent life insurance agents now.—Washington Post. A Kentuckian who committed a cold-blooded murder has been convicted and sentenced to a year in the penitentiary. The majesty of the law is looking up a bit down there. - Philadelphia Inquirer. THE SATTLE REPUBLICAN SEATTLE FLASHLIGHTS The order of the Seattle Electric Company forbidding their conductors to give two transfers for the payment of one five-cent fare has been countermanded and things will move on the same old way. As is the custom, the Grand Army of the Republic of this city detailed some of its members to speak at the various schools of the city today, Friday, which is the last Friday before Decoration Day. After reading the list of invited guests to the Wegert-Hemrich nuptials, which happy event took place last week, no one would doubt that it was a German wedding entertainment. A Seattle thief after breaking into a house staid long enough to take a hot bath. In this instance Mr. Thief had more consideration for the general public than some people who live where bath tubs go begging for users. Councilman Zbinden is absolutely correct in saying the clerks in public offices seek and study how to do just as little as is possible any yet draw their salaries, and it will continue that way until public offices are conducted as are business houses. Former Superior Court Judge W. R. Bell has been charged with issuing faulty checks with the intention to defraud, Judge Bell since he was elected has been giving John Barleycorn a merry chase and it looks as though he might overtake him in Walla Walla. Jean Fortier is to plead insanity as a justification of his act of killing his brother and his brother's wife some few days ago. Fortier may have been insane, but he will have a hard time establishing that fact to the satisfaction of a jury of twelve men good and true. William D. Haywood, the Socialist agitator, who at one time was charged with having killed Gov. Stuenberg, of Idaho, is touring the state with the view of educating the Socialist and the Socialistic inclined. Haywood had better go to work and stop trying to poison the minds of men against each other. Supt. Bouillion of the board of public works continues to file charges against Clarence Bagley, the secretary thereof. After listening to the hundred and one charges made by Mr. Bouillon as to Mr. Bagley's inefficiency one kinder wonders how the city has managed to pull through all these years without the assistance of Mr. Bouillon. From the amount of noise the travelling men of the city are making over their failure to land two of their number as deputies under the state hotel inspector, it looks as if there is a great big graft in the bill somewhere and the travelling men are sore at seeing that graft get away from members of their bunch. Am I right? Isaac Marshall, an Afro-American, was drowned in Lake Union last Saturday. The man had been living near the place, but had moved to Ninth avenue and Lenora street. He returned to his old home that morning for a plunge in the lake, remarking at the time to a man standing near if he got drowned for him to recover his body, which was as a joke, but became a sad reality. The printing concern of the Acme Publishing Company, which was the property of the Bushell Brothers, burned last Saturday afternoon. W. F. Bushell, the manager, has been in such poor health for the last two months as to have to give up business, while another brother is also seriously ill, which is another verification of the old adage, "that it never rains but it pours." Stop Wheat Gambling Wheat gambling in the United States is still at white heat and with no immediate prospects of its cooling off. Already the Texas wheat is being harvested and it is estimated that the yield will equal fifteen bushels to the acre, which if true, will be a great relief to the consumers of that now precious article of food. Despite the fact that the Texas wheat is being prepared for the market wheat sold in the gambling pit in Chicago this week at $1.35½ per bushel. To the wheat raiser and producer the prospect of getting such fabulous prices for the wheat he has in the fields is a flattering one and must give him great joy, but where he rejoices a thousand souls almost grow frantic at the outlook for bread in the coming months. Is it possible that both the state and national governments are powerless to put an end to the wheat gambling which will sooner or later cause bread riots in the United States? There is a sufficient amount of wheat raised in this country to supply the civilized world, but the pit gamblers keep it off the market. The matter has really become serious notwithstaneing the fact the wheat growers are making barrels of money on account of the speculation. Hill-Harriman Harmony There may be differences among the politicians of the Northwest, but there are none whatever among the railroad corporations and if in the past there have ever been all of them have faded away like a summer's dream or a snow storm in July, judging from the recent Hill-Harriman deal, who entered into an agreement that the trackage of the Northern Pacific between Portland and Tacoma is to become a common user for the three great continental systems—the Northern Pacific, the Great Northern and the Union Pacific. The citizens about these two cities had prepared themselves to see a great struggle between these great railroad corporations and the expenditure of large sums of money for locations, which they in some way would become beneficiaries, but both Hill and Harriman are too cute to get caught in any such jack pot as that and when they saw that that people were in line to get a few of the dollars that they are and have been daily filching from them they set up and took notice and at once began to get their heads together to shut off any possibility of any such mismanagement and as a result their troubles are now all little ones and the people be damned. FRIDAY, MAY 28, 1907 BORROWED THOUGHTS Another lion or are the correspondents?—Boston Transcript. $pring $tyles in feminine headgear are rather $triking.—Washington Post. In these high priced times, many $5,000 banquets to Taft may break the solid South.—Atlanta Constitution. In the neighborhood of Nairobi, British East Africa, shots are now being fired that are heard round the world.—New York Evening Post. Now the suffragette sisters are calling the Pope an old bachelor. Occasionally they do get hold of an indisputable proposition. New York Sun. Adbul Hamid of Turkey, Abdul Aziz of Morocco, and Abdul Castro of Venzuela are in a position to organize a new Order of Descendants. New York Evening Post. Out of the many wives of the Sultan, how many do you suppose there are who are telling him that if he had listened to her all this would not have happened.—New York Mail. To be able to talk to Mars would be cheap at $10,000,000. The Tribune will cheerfully agree to be one of the 10,000,000 contributors to raise the needed amount.—Chicago Tribune. There are some people who are more afraid that Mr. Roosevelt's sojourn in Africa will give this country the sleeping sickness, than that he will catch it himself.—Augusta Chronicle. Still, it doesn't look as if it would be absolutely necessary to establish postal savings-banks to take care of the money we're all going to save under the new tariff law. Ohio State Journal. Spain's hopelessly backward condition appears from the fact that her $200,000,000 loan is for agricultural improvement reforestation, and public works, and not for Dreadnoughts. - New York Post. Why They Took Stock Perhaps the reason why the teachers at the Washington College took stock in that bank was because the president of the institution insisted on them doing so and they concluded that it was cheaper to take the bank stock than to lose their official positions. That reminds the writer of the early Klondike days when the superintendent of a city school under whom there were a large number of teachers, organized an Alaska Gold Dredging Company. The tip was quietly passed around, so goes the story, that every teacher that did not subscribe for a certain amount of stock in the company in which the superintendent seemed to be the chief factotum, need not expect to get employment in the city schools next year. It is needless to say that every teacher and every teacher's relative took a block of stock in the company. Like all such concerns the dredging company only proved profitable to the man that sold the stock and the teachers that got bit buried their troubles in their boys and books. FRIDAY, MAY 28, 1909 BENCH AND BAR Attorney and Client—Disbarred Attorney Disqualified from Acting as States Attorney. — "The way of the trangessor is hard." Even so, is it true with the lawyer who tramples under foot the ethics of his profession. In an interesting opinion handed down by the Supreme Court of South Dakota in Danforth v. Egan 119 N. W. 1021, the right of a disbarred attorney to take office as state's attorney is considered. Defendant Egan received a majority of the votes cast for state's attorney in his county, and was given a certificate of election. He had formerly been a licensed attorney in the state, but was disbarred from practicing therein shortly before his election. It was practically admitted that the judgment of disbarment would prevent his appearance in the courts of record in the state, but it was claimed that this duty might be performed by a deputy. The court held, however, that defendant could not be allowed to dictate and oversee this important part of the work of his office while prohibited from performing it in person. It was also alleged that under the Constitution the only qualification imposed was that the state's attorney should be "learned in the law," and consequently need not be an attorney at all. But the court said that the use of the word "attorney" in the title of the office, "state's attorney," definitely indicated that the office should only be filled by one regularly admitted to practice in the courts. All of the grounds mentioned would seem sufficient to have conclusively determined the case, adversely to the defendant. But the court goes further to discuss another qualification for one holding the office of prosecuting attorney. The statute provides that he must be "learned in the law." What does the use of this high-sounding phrase, so often employed by attorneys, convey to the minds of even professional men? The court, in the principal case, furnishes an interesting argument on the meaning of this qualification. The court said: "It is the contention of the appellant that being learned in law, he meets the requirement of the constitution, and is entitled to hold the office in question. We have already shown that this phrase learned in the law is really mere surplusage as it is controlled by the more limited term attorney, yet we will consider briefly this phrase, and see whether the appellant could bring himself thereunder in view of the judgment of this court in the disbarment proceedings. To be learned in the law one certainly must be learned in all those branches of the law which have at all times been recognized as essential in order to qualify one to practice as an attorney, and to be admitted as such. He must notonly be versed in the books of law, such as those on contracts, torts, evidence domestic relations, etc., but it is even more important that he be well based upon those rules of conduct which as a lawyer and practitioner should control his relations with his fellow lawyers, his clients, witnesses, and jurors in court, and the public in gen- [Image of a man in a suit with a bow tie, facing forward. The background is plain and light-colored. The man's face is clearly visible, with a serious expression. The image is oval-shaped.] Who in spite of misrepresentation as well as vilification is building up a law practice in Seattle That will soon be second To none in the cTiy Judge Root saT as superior court judge pro tem one day This week in Seattle and showed his usual profound legal ability. eral. Knowledge of this branch of the law, commonly known as legal ethics, has long been recognized as the most important qualification for one who is to be intrusted with the sacred duties of an attorney at law, and our present statue recognizes this fact, and makes legal ethics one of the branches to be considered in passing upon the qualifications of one seeking admission to practice. Section 686. Pol. Code. This court has by its judgment held that the appellant has violated many of the ethical laws which should control the conduct of an attorney. We took no part in said judgmeni, but we are bound to take judicial notice of it, especially as it is referred to in the record in this case. We must as a matter of law, and we do presume that the decision of the court in the disbarment proceedings was just, and that everything stated therein was justified by the evidence. It appears, therefore, that prior to such decision this appellant had done many things which showed either gross ignorance of, or willful disregard of, the laws of legal ethics. When this fact has been judicially determined, as in this case, against this appellant, he will not be heard to claim that he knew his duties and the ethical rules which should have controlled his actions, and intentionally disregarded the same, but the law in its kindness will conclusively presume that he performed those acts which caused his disbarment in ignorance of his duties and of the rules of ethics, and will therefore say that no matter how well versed he may be in the many branches of the law, yet being ignorant in its most important branch, he is not learned in the law." THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN MILO A. ROOT tation as well as vilification is buildi in the cTiY Judge Root saT as super his usual profound legal ability. D. A. ROOT as vilification is building up a law practi- dge Root saT as superior court judge pro- ound legal ability. ? EX-GOVERNOR ALBERT E. MEAD Whose gubernatorial administration is being severely criticised throughout the state. With this judicial declaration in favor of legal ethics as the most important branch of the law, why is it that so many law schools fail to give it any sufficient attention and thus send out students, who, no matter how much informed on subjects of substantive law cannot be said to be learned in the law unless they are fully acquainted with these rules. in discussing the inviolability of the Code of Ethics says: "The public very wisely rates a lawyer by what his professional brethren think of him, and an advocate who, by his unprofessional tactics and conduct, assiduously invites and cultivates the enmity of the members of his own bar, will very quickly hit the bottom and stay there among the "snitches' and vagabonds of the pro- In Sec. 168 of Robbins on American Advocacy, the author --- in discussing the inviolability of the Code of Ethics says: "The public very wisely rates a lawyer by what his professional brethren think of him, and an advocate who, by his unprofessional tactics and conduct, assiduously invites and cultivates the enmity of the members of his own bar, will very quickly hit the bottom and stay there among the "snitches' and vagabonds of the profession until he comes to himself and by circumspecting his con- duct and courting the confider ce and respect of other lawyers, he finally wins the place to which his ability entitles him." Cen-Law Journal. The subject of judicial gowns has been under discussion considerably lately on account of the new law requiring judges of the supreme and superior courts to wear gowns. The law goes into effect in June. The concensus of opinion seems to approve the idea of the supreme court judges wearing robes, but there is much difference of opinion as to the wisdom of the law as applied to superior court judges. The judges themselves seem divided on the question. Judge Black of Snohomish county and Judge Frater of Seattle are much opposed to wearing gowns. The former expressed an intention not to do so; the latter probably will. Others dislike the idea, but will wear the gown because the law says so. The judges of the U. S. Supreme Court wear gowns or robes and so do the judges of many of the state supreme and appellate courts. In some states the trial judges wear them. It is commonly regarded as uplifting for judges of high courts to wear robes, but there is more inconvenience for a trial court judge to do so. However, it is believed that it will add to the dignity of the courts and this is desirable. At first it will seem amusing to see some of our superior court judges in such costumes. If their first appearance does not bring forth a smile, we are not good guessers. The item of cost is an important one to some of the judges. The gowns cost from $50 to $100 according to quality of material. The new law says nothing as to whom this expense shall fall upon. It would seem that as the law makes those gowns a requisite that the expense thereof should fall upon the state or counties just the same as office stationery, books, etc., required by law to be used in such offices. However, it has been suggested, that if some of the judges, after getting into their gowns, would put up a tent and charge admission to see their first maneuvers in the gown, their friends would gladly pay admission fees sufficient to more than defray all expenses of the gowns. Judge Yakey holding court in Seattle recently recorded a decision of considerable interest to the medical profession. Two doctors were arrested for practicing without a license under the law as it was before changed by the last legislature. Ex-Judge Milo A. Root and Attorney E. S. Hadley appeared as attorneys for the defendants and demurred to the information filed by the prosecuting attorney. They contended that the last legislative act was a complete law in itself and repealed the provisions under which the prosecution was brought. After argument Judge Yakey uheld this contention and sustained the demurrers. In announcing his decision the judge said he did not think there was anything at the present time to prevent any one from practicing without a license and would not be until the new board should be organized. The decision has created much comment among the doctors licensed and unlicensed. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Pobate notice. In the matter of the guardianship of James Elmer Galley, Lillian Galley and Edith Galley, minors. No. 10089. Notice of application for appointment of guardian. Notice is hereby given that D. A. Galley, and that the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, a petition praying that a guardian of the persons and estates of James Elmer Galley, Lillian Galley and Edit hGalley, be appointed, and that letters of guardianship be issued to D. A. Galley, at the court of the Day, May 1999, at 9:30 o'clock a.m., of said day, at the court room of the Probate Department of said Superior Court has been set for hearing said petition, may appear and show cause why the prayer of said petition should not be granted. Witness, the Hon. A. W. Frater, Judge of said Superior Court and the seal of said Justice, Dr. Francisco aixed this 1st day, or April 1999. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of Washougal State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the matter of the estate of John C. Morrow, deceased. No. 6819. Notice of settlement of final account. Notice is hereby given that J. M. Wilson, the administrator of the estat- of John C. Morrow, deceased, has re- dered to, and filed in said Court his final account as such administrator, and that t Thursday, the 6th day of May, 1909, at 2 o'clock p. m., at the court room of Jobbac Court, and in Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and in Witness, the Hon. A. W. Frater, Judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said Court hereto affixed this 1st day of April, 1909. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. BY JOHN M. WILMOT, Deputy Clerk. April 2-April 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the matter of the estate of William A. Murray, deceased. No. 9933. Notice to creditors. Of said court made herein on the 23d day of March, 1909, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the company said deceased, the company said deceased and Elizabeth A. Murray, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 709 Lowman Building, Seattle, Washington, the place of business of the company, and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, April 2, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Charles H. Page, deceased. No. 10001. Notice to creditors. Pursuant to an order of the Superior Court made herein March 26, 1909, notice is hereby given to the creditors of and all persons having claim against H. Page, deceased, or his estate, to present such claims with the necessary vouchers attached to the undersigned administrator of said estate at Room 10, Haller Building, Seattle, Washington within nine miles from after the date of the first publication of this notice, or such claims will be barred. Date of first publication, April 2, 1909. As Administrator of the estate of Charles H. Page, deceased. B. B. MOSER, Attorneys for said estate. April 2-April 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. In probate. In the matter of the estate of David H. Page, deceased. No. 9406. Notice to credit. Pursuant to an order of the Superior Court made herein March 26, 1909, notice is hereby given to the creditors of and all persons having claim against David H. T. Gage, deceased, or his estate. Please present claims with the necessary vouchers attached to the undersigned administrator of said estate at Room 10, Haller Building, Seattle, Washington, within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice, or such claims will be barred. Date of first publication April 2, 1909. E. E. SIMPSON. As Administrator of the estate of David H. T. Gage, deceased. R. R. MOSER. Attorney for said Estate. April 2-April 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. In progate. In the matter of the estate of Nancy W. M. Moore deceased. No. 10063. Notice to creditors. Pursuant to an order of the Court made herein on the 26th day of March, A. D. 1909, notice is hereby given to the creditors, and the court shall hold that most Nancy W. McLean, deceased, or against her estate, to present such claims with the necessary vouchers attached to the undersigned executor, said estate at the time of the date of the witt; Washington; said place being the place designated by said executor for the transaction of the business of said estate, within one year from the date of the witt; within one year from the second day of April, A. D. 1909, or such claims will be forever barred. BISAN S. McLEAN, As Executrix of Nancy W. McLean, deceased. McLean, deceased. E. E. SIMPSON, B. E. MOSER, Attorneys f. said Estate. April 2-April 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. E. B. Lyon, plaintiff, vs. L. Francis G. Bryant, Henry H. Baker, and Marie L. Baker, his wife, the unknown heirs of any of the above named defendants who are deceased, and all other persons or parties unknown, having or claiming any right, title, interest or lien in or the real property described in the com- plaint, herein, defendants. No. 66226 commons. The State of Washington to the sake Dr. Francis G. Bryant, Henry H. Baker, Joseph H. Baker, and Marie L. Baker, his wife, the unknown heirs of any of the above named defendants who are deceased, and all other persons or parties unknown to the interest or lien in or to the real property described in the complaint herein, defendants; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the written complaint; within sixty days after the 2nd day of April, 1995, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve copy of the complaint to the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their address or office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which you have been filed with the work of said court. Said action is brought to quiet plaintiff's title in and to the following described real property in the County of King, State of Washington, to-wit: lots 1 to 10 inclusive, being the whole of block 8 Bay View Addition to the City or Seattle. HOWELL & BENJAMIN, Plaintiff's Attorneys. P. O. Address: 340 to 343 N. Y. Blk. Seattle. Wash. April 2-May 14, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In probate. In the matter of the estate of Corliss P. Stone, deceased. No. 7500. Notice. Notice is hereby given that the Washington Trust Company of Seattle, as administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Corliss P. Stone, deceased and filed with the Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County, its 2—REPUBLIcan legals—Tomy first annual report and petition asking that the widow's portion of the said estate be segregated and distributed to and from her. The 29th day of April, 1909, at 2:00 o'clock p. m. at the Court of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court in the City of Seattle, King County. Witness is being held by said Court for the settlement of said account and the hearing of said petition, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and contest the same. Judge is Honorable A. W. Frater, Judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said Court hereto affixed this 1st day of April, A. D. 1909. April 2-April 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. In probate. In the matter of the estate of John C. Morrow, deceased. No. 6819. Order to show cause why distribution should not be made. J. M. Wrestling, administrator of the estate of John C. Morrow, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a court where deceased is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to au- disease distribution of the residue of said estate; It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said John C. Morrow, deceased, be and appear in the Superior Court, King County, State Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said Court in the City of Seattle, on the 6th day of May, 1909, at the hour of 2 o'clock, p. m. of that day, and there to show cause if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. If such order ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 6th day of May, 1909, in The Seattle Republican a newspaper printed and published in King County and of government circulation therein. Done in open court this 1st day of April, 1909. State of Washington, County of King, ss, I. D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of my account by said Court on the 1st day of April, 1909, in the matter of the estate of John C. Morrow, deceased. Witness my hand, and the seal of sald Witness my hand and the seal of sai Court this 1st day of April, 1809. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. In probate. In the matter of the estate of James Wilbur Jones, deceased. No. 471, Ordor Burlur Jones, the title of real estate. Amanda L. Jones, the administratrix of the estate of James Wilbur Jones, deceased, having filed her petition in this Court, duly verified, praying for an order of this Court for the sale of a part of real estate of which the sale was deceased real estate, for the purposes therein set forth; And it appearing to the Court from said petition that the personal estate of the said deceased in the hands of said administratrix is to be held by the Court that the said estate and the expenses of the administration thereof, and taxes and special assessments, that it is necessary to sell all or a portion of the real estate of the said deceased 9 pay the claims of the said deceased in the hands of the administration. And it appearing to the Court that said petition conforms to, and is in accordance with the requirements of law in such case made and provided. It is ordered by the Court that all persons interested in the case appear before said Superior Court on Thursday, the 6th day of May, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day 14 the court room of the Probate Department of said Superior Court in City, then and then to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this Court should not be granted to said administratrix authorizing and empowering her to sell the said real estate of said deceased in the hands of the administration necessary to pay the aforesaid claims and expenses of administration. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to slow cause be published at least four successive weeks before the said 6th day of May, 1909, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in the County of King and of general circulation therein. Done in open Court this 1st day of April, 1909. A. W. FRATER, Judge. State of Washington, County of King ss. 10. D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of the County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for the County of King, do hereby THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN certify that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of an original order to all show cause made by said Court on the 1st day of April, 1909, in the matter of or the estate of James Wilbur Jones, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said carr Court this 1st day of April, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Ed. Bleth and Jane Doe Bleth, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unk- nown, if any, having or claiming an inherent and to the best of their ma- sured real property, Defendants. No. 64.716. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the higher court described that the above named plaintiff is the holder of three delinquent tax certificates issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington dated April 29th, 1908, numbered as follows: For the delinquent taxes of the following year in and to the higher court described that the real property situated in said King County described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B49521 on Lot Five (5), Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. B49524 on Lot Five (5), Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle: B49527 on Lot Eleven (11), Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff on the above descent, and the amount of said lots for the year 1905, Forty-six cents (46c); 1906, Fifty-nine cents (59c); 1907, Fifty cents (50c), which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real prop- You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the indicated date, the day of the first publication, to-wit: 60 days after April 23, 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the under oath of the plaintiff at its notice below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property upon and charged against upon and charged against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporat- ion of the City of Aurora. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle Fash. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or otherwise involved in the certain inafter described real property, Defendants. No. 64,553. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 16th day of September, 1908, and numbered as follows for the delinquent taxes of the following year in and to the property upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot Thirty-five (35), Block One (1), Harry White & Co.'s 5th Addition to Kirkland, King County, Washington, being certificate No. B54890, for year 1003, the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said described real property, to-wit: Lot Thirty-five (35), Block One (1), Harry White & Co.'s 5th Addition to Kirkland, for the year 1004, Thirty cents (30c); 1005, Forty-four cents (44c); 1006, Fifty-three cents (53c); 1007, Forty-eight cents (48c), which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum for the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and sumoned to be and appear within sixty days after the publication of the first publication, to-wit: 60 days after April 23, 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the complaint of said plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each parcel of said real taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. been appointed and hereby naxe at the time, and at the court roon of Department No. 4 of the Superior Court of the State of washington in and for the County of Washington the place at which said application is to be heard. In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the Superior Court aforesaid this 20th day of April, 1909. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk of the Superior Court. (Seal.) By MAURICE THOMPSON, Deputy Clerk of the Superior Court. MoCAFFERTY GODFREY, Attorneys for Petitioner. The stockholders' meeting of the Consolidated Gold Mines Company will be held at the office of the Company, 312 Crazy building, Seattle, Wash., on June 1st, 1909, for the purpose of electing Directors for the ensuing year and to transact any other business that may come before the stockholders. N. A. THOMPSON, Secy. May 23d. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Aurora Land Compensation for the Bishop of Elgin, Schmidt and Jane Doe Schmidt, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. of persons charged with the State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby charged with the following amount and upon the certain delinquent tax certificate, issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 29th day of April, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 6, Block 5, Kirkland Keystone Addition; Certificate No, B43,620; for the year 1904, in the sum of 93 cents; that subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said described real property, to-wit. 6, Block 5, Kirkland Keystone Addition; for the year 1908, in the sum of 39 cents; for the year 1906, in the sum of 54 cents; for the year 1907, in the sum of 58 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unregemed taxes upon and against said real prop- You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the exclusive of the day or said first publication, to-wit, sixty days after May 21st, 1909. In the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint to said plaintiff by havevey foreclosed the unpaid undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the unpaid undersigned attorney for plaintiff each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction thereof, respectively as provided by law, and as payed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Building. May 21 - July 2, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR CURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. John Best and Jane Doe Best, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown and all persons unaware of his marital or claiming interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 67.022. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate, issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 18th day of April 1908, and numbered as follows the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 13, Block 9, East Seattle; Certificate No. B49,278; for the year 1904, in the sum of 87 cents; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said described real property, to-wit: Lot 13, Block 9, East Seattle; for the year 1906, the sum of 33 cents, and for the year 1907, the sum of 34 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of the bill of said first publication, to-wit, sixty days after May 21st, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy, of your answer on the unauthorized office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively, the law, and as such the plaintiff's complaint, now on file, in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Building. May 21-July 2, 1909. IN THE SIPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of John Nicklas, Deceased. No. 9028. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not be Made and Fixing Time for Hearing Final Account and Giving Notice. Magdalena Nicklas, executrix of the estate of John Nicklas, having this day rendered, presented and filed in this court her last account as a security estate and petition for distribution thereof, setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution according to the provisions of the will of the deceased. It is appearing that the facts set forth are sufficient to authorize the distribution of said estate. It is now ordered by the court that Thursday, the 24th day of June, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day be, and the same is, hereby appended to the order for the settlement of said final account and petition for distribution at the court room in Department No. 7 at the Court House of King County, in the City of Seattle, Washington. It is ordered that all persons interested in said estate appear before said court at said time and place then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be approved and why an order of distribution should not be made for the residue said estate in the manner provided by It is further ordered that notice of the time and place of hearing said final account and petition for distribution be given by posting a copy of this notice on the website and placing in King County at least four weeks before the said 24th day of June, 1909, and further that a copy of this order be given to the public for five weeks before said 24th day of June, 1909. In The Seattle Republican, a newspaper published in said King County and of general circulation therein and the MIDI and MIDI-HI court now finds and adjudges that the posting and publishing of this order as above set forth is a proper and adequate notice in the premises. Done a open court this 20th day of May, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Milton N. T. Seymour, Plaintiff, vs. Margaret R. Seymour, Defendant. No. —. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Margaret R. Seymour, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towelt, within sixty days after the 21st day of May, A.D. 1909, above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: Incompatibility of temper and cruel and inhuman treatment, as set forth in plaintiff's complaint. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Seattle, County of King, Washington. May 21—July 2, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Edna Gertrude Hart, Plaintiff, vs. Edward R. Hart, Defendant. No. 67,253. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Edward R. Hart, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 21st day of publication of the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you for plaintiff, at their office, the plaintiff, which has been filed on the clerk of the said court. Briefly stated, the object of this action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant and to grant the plaintiff a defense and to obtain the plaintiff's consent of non-support and failure on the part of the defendant to make suitable provisions for his family. BRADY & RUMMENS, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: Suite 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. May 21-July 2, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. The Southern Bank & Trust Co. a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. W. H. Hile and Margaret Hile, his wife, Defendants, AshlHassllocher Co. Inc., Garnishee Defendant.-No. 66226. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to W. H. Hile and Margaret Hile, his wife, defendants: You and each of you are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication, and within ten (10) days after the 21st day of May, 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and seve a copy of your answer upon the underwritten form of the plaintiff at the office held, state and case, fail so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this complaint is to have you on a promissory note issued by you, payable to the plaintiff herein in the sum of three hundred and twenty-one dollars ($321), with interest from June 10th, 1908, and costs and attorney's fees, out of which cause a garnishment may be issued against you, stock of the Ash-Hasslocher Co., Inc., attached by said writ of garnishment. F. J. CARVER Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address, 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington May 21—July 2nd. —ONE REPUBLICAN LEGALS so IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State, Washington, for King Coun- tier Pence. In the matter of the Last Will and Testament of Abbie Kennedy, Deceased. —No. 10208. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the petition of the court, hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to executor of will of said deceased, to room No. 518 New York Block, being No. .... Second Avenue, Seattle, King County, State of Washington, the place of business from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, May 21, 1909. ADELHIR BURRENS. As Executor Last Will and Testament of Abbie Kennedy, Deceased. S. D. KING. Attorney for Executor. 517 New York Block, Seattle, Wash. May 21—June 18. NOTICE OF SHERIFFS SALE OF REAL ESTATE-Sheriff's Office. State of Washington, County of King, ss. By virtue of an order of sale, issued on the Honorable Robert Rossell, King County, on 25th day of May, 1909, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of W. & J. Sloane & Company, a corporation, versus Roy Allen Roszell and Margaret C. Roszell, his wife; Frances A. Morgan, Dresden Investment Co., a corporation; Bertha Basye and J. K Basye, her husband; Emma, case and her husband, her husband, Defendants, No. 62657, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is Hereby Given. That I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 1 o'clock M on April 1, D. 1909, before the dayhouse door of a said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendants, Emma Clausen and H. J. Clausen, and H. J. Clausen, hershdriluupn, her husband Roy Allen Roszell and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot 1 and North half of Lot 2, Block 1, Young's Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, levied on as the property Roszell, Emma, H. J. Clausen, her husband Roy Allen Roszell and Margaret C. Roszell, his wife, to satisfy a judgment of a foreclosure a mortgage amounting to five hundred ($500.00) dollars, and costs of sult, in favor of the property Dated Rust 27th day of May, 1909. ROBERT T, HODGE, Sheriff, By BERT C. THOMPSON, Deputy. May 28-June 25, 1909. PROBATE NOTICE—IN THE SUPERIOR Court of the State of Washington, for the County of Kling. State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the matter of the estate of Gerard J. L. de Bruyn. No. 8333—Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Charles C. Pierce, Jr., Executor of the estate of Gerard J. L. de Bruyn, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said Court Final Account, as the executor, and 1099, at 2 o'clock, p. m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seat- lle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contests the same. With the Bills A. W. Frater, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of Said Court hereto affixed this 27th day of May, 1909. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy. May 28-June 25, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County In the matter of the Estate of Gerard J. L. de Bruyn, Deceased. No. 8333—Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Charles C. Pierce, J. Executor of the estate of Gerard J. L. de Bruyn, deceased, was killed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to constitute the distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Gerard J. L. de Bruyn, deceased, be and appear before the Superior Court of King County, the said Washington at the address of the Bureau of the Account of said Court in the City of Seattle, on the 1st day of July, 1909, at the hour of 2 o'clock, p. m. of said day then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in the petition mentioned, ac- It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the 1st day of July, 1909, in The Seattle Republic, a newspaper printed and published in the King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 27th day of May, 1909. A. W. FRATER, Judge, State of Washington, Court of King, as, D. K. Sickels, Court of King, Clerk of King County, and of Idaho Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Clerk on the 27th day of May, 1909, in the matter of判处 Gerard J. L. de Bruyn, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 27th day of May, 1909. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy. May 28-June 25, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Ed Bleth and Jane Doe Bleth, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the heresafter described real property, Defendants. No. 64717—Notice and Summons. 6411—Notice and Lines: The State of Washington, to the above each of them: The State named defendants and each of them: named defendants and each of them: and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of two certain delinquent tax certificates issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated April 1908, numbered as follows to-wit: B49536 on Lot Twenty (20), Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington, and B49539 on Lot Twenty-three (23), Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle. Each 98c That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff on the above described real property as follows: On certain rights of tenure in 1905 for-six cents (5c), 1906 fifty-nine cents (59c), 1907 fifty cents (50c), which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the publication of this notice, exclusive of day of publication, to-wait (60) days after the date of May, 1999, in view of entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the under- signed attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of the sums due upon and amounts due upon and charged against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the amount charged and insist it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff, F. J. CARVER, Attorney, for, Plaintiff. Office address, 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. May 28-July 9, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff vs. Ed Blethr and Jane Doe Blethr, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 65103. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above You and each of you, as owners, plaintiffs or holders of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of two delinquent tax certificates issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 29th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year in the following columns and upon the date situated in said King County described as follows, to-wit: Lot Nine (9), Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, being certificate No. B49525 for the year 1904, amount ninety-eight cents (89c) Lot Twelve (12), Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate Second Addition to Seattle, being certificate No. B49528, for the year 1904, amount ninety-eight cents (89c) That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real estate property: Lot Nine (9), Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, year 1905, forty-six cents; 1906, fifty-nine cents; 1907, sixty cents. Lot Twelve (12), Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, for the year 1905, forty-six cents; 1906, fifty-nine cents; for the year 1907, sixty cents. Which several saints bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from sale of property, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be an appear within sixty days of publication of the publication, to-wit: 60 days after the 28th of May, 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy your answer on the undersigned money for plaintiff's below stated or pay amount due together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, fore-against each parcel of said taxes and costs for the sums and costs due upon and for each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's court, now on file in this cause and court. AIRORA LAND COMPANY, a corporation. Plaintiff. Attorney Office address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. May 28-July 9, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora, Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff vs. Ed Blethin and Jane Doe Blethin, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming un- interest or estate in and to the de- scribed property, Defend- ants. 68106—Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or este- nity and to the herinafter stated that real property, are hereby notified that the above defendant is the holder of delinquent tax certificates issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 29th day of April 1908, and numbered as follows in the delinquent taxes of the following year in the following months and upon the real property situated in said King described as follows, to-wit: Lot eighteen (18), block four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition toattle, being certificate No. 49534; for the year 1904, amount ninety-eight cents (4) Lot twenty-one (21), block four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition, Seattle, being certificate No. B6537, for the year 1904, amount ninety-eight cents (98). (98c). That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described property: Lot eighteen (18), block four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, year 1905, amount forty-six cents (46c); year 1906, amount ninety cents (90c); year 1907, amount fifty cents (50c). (58c) year twenty-one (21), block four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's First Addition, Seattle; year 1905, forty-six cents (46c); year 1906, fifty-nine cents (58c); year Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum on sald date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unpaid taxes upon and in real property. against You and each of you (including said partners unknown, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be an application of this notice, excluding the day of publication, to you, days after the 28th of March, 1999, in the above enclosed court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of your plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the amount due, together with the cost and costs. In case you fail to do so, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. May 28-July 9, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Ed Blethin and Jane Doe Blethin, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described property, and hereinholiday that theboys and plaintiff is the holder of two delinquent tax certificates issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 29th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year in the following amounts and upon the date of the filing, in and to the King County described as follows; to-wit: Lot ten (10), block four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, being certificate No. B49256, for the year 1904, amount ninety-eight cents (98c). Lot thirteen (13), block four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, being certificate No. 49259, for the year 1904, amount ninety-eight cents (98c). That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real estate property: Lot ten (10), block four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, year 1905, forty-six cents (46c); year 1906, fifty-nine cents (59c); year 1907, fifty cents (50c). Which several of its sums bear interest at the time of its per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication, dewit, day after day of publication of 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with all due and costs, will be issued to do, assign, will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property to its issfaction if terms charged and found if respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER. Plaintiff. Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. May 28-July 9, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, plaintiff vs. Unknown Owners and all plaintiffs unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 64547—Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest in property and to the herinafter described real property, hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 16th day of September, 1908, and numbered as follows for the delinquent taxes of the following year in the following amount and upon the real property situated in said King County described as follows, to Lot forty-three (43), block two (2), Kirkland Park, King County, Washington, being certificate No. B54213 for the year 1902, one and 4-100 dollars. That the taxes for the year 1902, prior thus, were said above described and subsequent years have been paid by real estate property: Lot forty-three (43), block two (2), Kirkland Park, fifty-one cents (51c), for the year 1903; for the year thirty cents; for the year 1905, forty-three cents (51c); for the year 1906, fifty-three cents (53c). Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown) are hereby further notified, and summoned to be and appear at sixty days after the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication, to-wit: 60 days after May 28, 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned account for plaintiff at his office below state or pay the amount together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, agreement will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against the each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property on a salifaction of the sums charged and found against it respecting an provided law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. May 28-July 9, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants. No. 64718-Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above nursed defendants and each of them: Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby further within sixty days after the publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication, to-wit: 60 days after the 28th of May, 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due against each parcel of said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively and found and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 214 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. May 28-July 9, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR CURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners and all persons known if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. 64544—Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them. You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an apartment or estate, may be before after described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington and dated the 16th day of September, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent amount of the bowing in the following amount and upon the real property situated in said King County described as follows, to-wit: Lot thirty-four (34), block one (1), Kirkland, Harry White & Co.'s Fifth Addition, being Certificate No. B54307, for the year 1903, one and 1-100 dollars ($100). That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real estate property: Lot thirty-four (34), block one (1), Harry White & Co.'s Fifth Addition to Kirkland, for the year 1905, fifth-four (30c); for the year 1905, forty-four (30c); for the year 1905, fifty-three cents (33c); for the year 1905, fifty-three cents (33c). Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of (including said property) may be further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication, to-wit: 60 days after 4—REPUBLICAN—legals 20—COOCO the 28th of May, 1998 in the above title court and defend and defend this answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do judgment will be rendered and closing each parcel of taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and AURORA LAND COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg, Seattle, Wash. May 28-July 9, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. R. H. Binker, Plaintiff, vs. Joshua Oldham & Stinker a Corporation, Defend- No. 66,629 Summons. The State of Washington to the said Joshua Oldham & Sons, a Corporation, You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 23rd day of April, to appear before the three notice action in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office, so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of court. The object of this action is to recover from said defendant on breach of contract. CHARLES R. CROUCH, Attorney for Plaintiff. Address: 627 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 23—June 4, 1909. Jane Dee Davis his wife, to satisfy a joint amount to Forty-two and 22-100 ($42.22) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 12th day of April, 1909. ROBERT T. HODGE, Sheriff. By JOHN STRINGER, Deputy. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of Kink. Joseph C. Reiman, Plaintiff, vs. Ethel Reiman, Defendant—Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Ethel Reiman; You are here, summoned to appear within the (69) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 26th day of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above enclosed notice and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve oppose your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you due to the demand of the complain, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of the above entitled actio nis to dissolve the bonds of matriony now existing between plaintiff and defendant to the grounds of adulterous desertion and non-support. HERBERT E. SNOOK, Attorney for Plaintiff P. O. Address: 537 Burke Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. P. O. Address: 537 Burke Block, Seattle, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a Corporation Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all plaintiffs are known, and are claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. 64,549. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and for the State of Washington, theerty, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 16th day of September, 1908, and numbered as follows for the delinquent taxes of the following year in the following months and the real property situated in said King County described as follows, to-wit: Lot Forty-seven (47), Block One (1), Kirkland Park, King County, Washington, being certificate No B5431 for the tax, the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, for the year 1904, Block One (1), Kirkland Park, King County, Washington, for the year 1904, Thirty cents (30c); for the year 1905, Forty-nine cents (39c); for the year 1906, three cents (53c); for the year 1907, Forty-eight cents (48c), which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unrepaid taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you( including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the publication of the first publication, to-wit: 60 days after April 23, 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff and answer the complaint of said amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the len of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and against, respectively as provided by law and prayed in plaintiffs' complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporat- ion J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 314 Northern Bank & Office Bridge, Seaside cash. April 23 - April 24 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Ed. Bleith and Jane Doe Bleith, his wife, whose true christian is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, are the king's interest in and to the heroinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 64.715. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above number, and each of them You and each of you as agents or holders of an interest or estate in and to the heroinafter described real property are hereby notified that the named plaintiff is the holder of two named plaintiffs in the case of the Treasurer of King County, State Washington, dated April 29th, 1908, numbered as follows: For the delinquent taxes of the following year in the following year the real property situated in and King County described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B49530 on Lot Fourteen (14), Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Court (4), King County, Washington, and Seven (7), Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff on the above described real estate, on each of said lots for the year 1905. For each cost (46c); 1906. Fifty-nine cents (58c); 1907. Fifty cents (50c), which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and publication of this sixty days after the publication of this first publication of the day of the first publication days after April 23, 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the attorney for money for plaintiff at his office below or over the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against the sums and amount paid and charged against each parcel of said property for the sums and amount paid upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it rather than as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. A. BROAD COMPANY, a Corporation Plaintiff, Attorney for Plaintiff, F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff, Address, 314 North rn Bank 4 Trust Bills payer cash. April 23—June 4, 1900 A Bloody Ending In the first part of the week a Negro in Arkansas was hanged by a mob for having committed a felony in the shape of robbery, and subsequently a Negro in Georgia was mobbed because he had struck a white man, and thus does the work of the Southern white man in settling the race question go bravely on. The "unmentionable crime," such as blear eyed Tillman has told us that the Negro commits against the "innocent white woman," of the South, does not seem to be the only crime for which the black man is mobbed by the white of that section. We seldom ever read of those outbreaks in the South but that we think of the admonishment of Peter the Great when he marched an army of brave Russian soldiers into Sweden, where the Russian soldiers got licked clean out of their boots. As they returned crest fallen Peter addressed them and concluded with, "I knew those big Swedes would lick us, but they have taught us how to lick them." The world knows how prophetic were his words for Russia subsequently whipped the Swedes to a frazzle. We fear that there will come a time some day when all of these outrages will have to be talked over and while the Negro may even at that time lose the fight yet it be will an awful sacrifice of human souls. Housekeeper—Half the things you wash are torn to pieces. Washerwoman — Yes, mum, but when a thing is torn in two or more pieces, mum, I count them as only one piece, mum. ARE YOU A REPUBLICAN OR A DEMOCRAT? It Really Does Not Matter as What Follows May be Read by Prohibitionist or Woman Suffragist Its About This Thing Called "Protection" Most any man, either Democrat or Republican, would agree that protection was a good thing if he were the fellow that was protected. It is very simple and easy to understand, however, that protection may be had in other ways than the imposition of a Congressional tariff. Take for instance, any manufactured article that can be produced both on this coast and on the Atlantic coast at the same cost. It is as plain as day that now and for all time, the railroad freight charges on the hauling of the Eastern goods to this Coast is a perpetual tariff in our favor and that no living man can remove. Hence every Coast state, the Dakotas, Montana, the Rocky Mountain States, Western Canada and Alaska, will remain the perpetual market of Irondale. The steel mills at Irondale cannot hope of course to supply even a fraction of the enormous steel and iron demand of the Coast. The demand is increasing 10 per cent per annum. But this infinite demand does insure the operation of the steel mills at Irondale night and day, with big additions year after year. The Moore Investment Company 400 410 Arcade Annex, Seattle For Plats Prices and Complete Information Are the Taxes laid by the Rich Was much discussed in the senate not long since, and commenting upon the speech of Senator Root to the effect that, the rich really pay the taxes, the Springfield Republican advanced the following ideas: "Who eventually pays the tax is a different question from that of who originally pays it, to be sure, but it is of course a vital question to the controversy, and cannot be ignored without putting one into the position of begging the whole question. No truths in ecomics is better established or more generally recognized than that general property taxes can be, and are largely shifted from those who pay them in the first instance to those who appear not to pay anything. So much of these taxes as fall upon unimproved land are paid first and last by the owner, and so of taxes fulling upon real estate wholly consumed, as it were, by the owner—his dwelling place when no part of it is rented. But these properties constitute only a very small proportion in value of the total property subjected to the general property taxes. Upon practically the rest of the total the taxes fall only to be passed on to the renters of rooms and houses, to buyers of goods in the stores and to consumers in general of the things which make up the necesaries and luxuries of living. And the consumers are all of us, and consumption taxes for the most part are proportioned to numbers rather than to wealth. Therefore the non-property Therefore the non - property THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN owners pay a very large proportion of the costs of state and local governments—how large of course cannot of course be accurately known, but it must be fully one-half and is probably more. And the national government, with its indirect taxes on consumption as the whole source of its revenue, loads its cost burden also and to an even greater extent upon the people according to their needs and not according to their ability to bear the same. Seattle Theater Miss Selma Herman who has the part of the persecuted heroine in "Its Never Too Late to Mend" at the Seattle Theater this week, makes several clever changes of character, and she makes one of the best boys that has ben seen here for a long time. "Lena Rivers" will be Miss Emma Bunting's opening character in the play of that title at the Seattle Theater next Sunday. No actress who has ever appeared here for a lengThy time has so large a number of admirers as Miss Emma Bunting. Her diminutive size, vivaciousness and striking personality have proven to be an irresistable magnet. The fellow who has money to burn has no difficulty in meeting his match. The doctor may be able to cure himself, which is more than can be said of the political heeler. A salad always depends on the dressing, in which connection a woman is a good bit like a salad. A REPUBLICAN DEMOCRAT Not Matter as WHY Prohibitionist or WHY out This d "Protec ocrat or Republican, would agree that protected. It is very simple and even ways than the imposition of a C article that can be produced both o as plain as day that now and for Eastern goods to this Coast is a ate. the Dakotas, Montana, the Rocky, the perpetual market of Irondale. By even a fraction of the enormo using 10 per cent per annum. But at Irondale night and day, with that Irondale will employ events comprise the inhabitants of wha ing the steel mills on Port Townsend lots are worth in a large city? Residence Lots $100 to $200 re Investment 110 Arcade Annex Prices and Complete Scandinavian American Bank Choice 7 per cent First Mortgages on Improved Seattle Property Made by the bank and containing all the little safeguards that are so often overlooked by the inexperienced investor. Call or write. The Scandinavian-American Bank, Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Brooks&Co 1331 Second Ave., Arcade Bldg. Hatters and Men's Furnishers, Puget Sound National Bank. OF SEATTLE JACOB FURTH .....President J. S. GOLDSMITH .....Vice-President R. V. ANKENY .....Cashier CORRESPONDENTS IN ALL THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE CRAFTS ISSUED ON ALASKA AND THE YUKON TERRITORY. Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. Phone For a Case of Rainier Beer Delivered to any Part of the City Phone Ind. 5668. Main 5668. FRIDAY, MAY 28. 1909 W. H. FINCK Pioneer Jeweler and Watch Maker. Our Holiday Specials Unequaled. $16 Second Avenue, Seattle, Wash. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE CONNECTION Business Office, Third and Spring People's Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R. J. Reekle, Vice Presst. Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. Commercial Savings and Trust General Bank and Exchange. Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance 259 Colman Blk., Phone Main 695 STETSON & POST LUMBER CO. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. The Comfort. Newly furnished rooms. Walking distance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. L. ISBAEL WALKER, 1101-1108 Jackson Street. Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Electric Fixtures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. ---