Seattle Republican

Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE PUBLISHER'S NOTICE. The Seattle Republican is published on Friday of every week by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3.00 per year; six months, $1.50 postage prepaid. Subscriptions to all foreign countries included in the Postal Union, $4.00 a year postage paid. Sample copies, free. Single copies ten cents. Advertising rates made known on a application. Special rates to publishers. Entered a second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. Address all communications to The Seattle Republican 307 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. Make a checks, drafts, postal orders, etc., payable to "Cayton Publishing Company." CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. Telephone: Main 305. Publication office, 307 Epler Block. HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON - - - Published BUSIE REVELS CAYTON - - - Associate COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS When Mayor Hiram Charles Gill stood up in the regular meeting of the city council last Monday and called one of the members thereof a liar, he probably did something, the likes of which was never done before save in some rude mining camp just incorporated, when the mayor thereof was at the head of a vice syndicate and was being opposed by a member of the council at the head of another. Such language should be so far below the dignity of a mayor of a city occupying the position in the commercial world that Seattle does, that the mayor doing so, should be impeached at once. How much of the report made by the council committee is true it is not ours to say, but we do know, it is an old adage that says: "throw a stone in a bunch of canines and the one that gets hit always velps." The present mayor of Seattle is by the general public considered a man without a bridle to his tongue and from whose mouth the vilest language known to the preverted man flows without regulation, but the public was not prepared to listen to the mayor of Seattle give the lie in a public meeting of the city council, to a member thereof, however vulgar it had considered him to be, when not acting in his official capacity. It was in last Monday's evening's Times that Mayor Gill pronounced Rev Dr. Matthews either crazy or malicious, and added to this was a long string of abuse quite characteristic of His Honor, Mayor Hiram Charles Gill. Mr. Mayor, you are making a sad mistake by losing your temper. Mr. Mayor, you are digging HIRAM C. GILL your own political grave by losing your temper. Mr. Mayor, you are driving those persons away from you that were inclined to believe that you are bein imposed upon, by losing your temper. You may not be a dignified gentleman in your ordinary walks of life, but as mayor of Seattle you are not Hi Gill, but Mr. Mayor, and when you permit yourself to drop from that exalted position, you may expect every one else to treat you as you would be treated. You may not have done anything prior to last Monday evening that warranted your recall, but that one utterance directed to Councilman Kellogg, should be sufficient to remove you from the mayor's chair. After weeks of investigation the city council committee has made its final report to the council and it created furore from the opening to the closing of the council meeting. Strange to say the report was adopted by the city council with but two dissenting votes and those came from James Conway of the First ward, who seems to have been the spokesman of the vice gang from the very outset. Councilman Hart oppested the report only in part, and yet he seems to have believed everything it said. Nothing can come of the report and it will be filed away and be forgotten in less than ten days. Not because it, perhaps, does SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. FRIDAY, DECEMBER 23, 1910 not recite facts, but because nothing legal can be done. If there is sufficient evidence in the report to warrant the superior court to call a grand jury Mayor Gill, Chief Wappenstein and a number of others might be indicted and tried for malfeasance in office, and perhaps for accepting bribes. But though nothing can come of the report directly it is sufficiently strong to defeat Gill for re election, when he has to face the recall, which he will have to do within a few days from now. It looks as if public sentiment is sufficiently worked up to not only defeat Gill, but demand that every trace of his administration be wiped out. The committee handed Superintendent Arms a bunch, but the council would not accept that part of the report and voted to exonerate him from any evil intention, and attributed the demoralized condition of the city lighting plant to his lack of experience rather than a studied effort to wreck the plant in the interest of a rival concern. That the present administration in Seattle was chosen for the express purpose of making Seattle the dumping grounds for the renegades of the country there is no doubt, and the report of the committee fully jutifies such a conclusion. The whole escapade is a sad commentary on the civilization to which those responsible for the condition boast of being leading members, and it is high time that a recall be put in force to clean it up root and branch. LARGE ESTATES It begins to look as if your Uncle Sam is rapidly getting into the large estate condition and it will not be many years before the estates in the United States will be the most gigantic in all the world, if they are permitted to accumulate as they have within the past two decades. A few days ago the death of Michael J. Cudahy, the Chicago packing house king, was announced and last Monday his will was admitted to probate and it was found that he had left an estate valued at eleven million dollars, the bulk of which is to be held in trust by the executors of his estate for five years, when it will be distributed to the legal heirs, unless they, in the meantime, form a pool and incorporate the same with the view of permitting it to continue to pile up fortunes for generations unborn. The heirs of that estate, if they will only hold it together, cannot possibly use up the annual income much less disturb the principal. Such gigantic estates may be accumulated legitimately in so short a time as Mr. Cudahy was in getting his together, but it is very doubtful. We are of the opinion that such estates should be either taxed to death or the law regulate them in some way to prevent the accumulation. No one man can accumulate so vast a sum of money, in so short a time, if he deals squarely with his fellow man. It is the consensus of opinion that the founder and builder of that estate not only took advantage of the consumers of his articles of food and family necessities, but he robbed the workmen, that is to say, he forced them to work for starvation wages while he piled up a fortune that would bankrupt the general government to duplicate. While talking of big estates, we are reminded that Andrew Carnegie declared some years ago that he meant to give away all his wealth and die poor. He has given away a good many millions of dollars, and to the poor man, it looks as if he were making a big, bold stagger in that direction, but it is said by those who are in a position to know, Mr. Carnegie's annual income amounts to almost as much as all he has given away, and if he expects to give himself poor, he will have to make greater strides in that direction in the future than in the past. It was but last Monday that the Associated Press told of the completion of the resilience of W. A. Clark in New York city, which has cost its builder in round numbers seven million dollars, and the taxes on the same amount to $200 per day or $73,000 annually. There is no excuse for such mansions, and if the government would impose a heavy tax on them there LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 UBLICAN VOLUME XVII. NUMBER 30 would be no such mansions erected, and the owners of those ill-gotten gains that allow them to build such, would gladly distribute them rather than see them eaten up by taxes. Notwithstanding the fact that that mansion is reported to have cost seven million dollars, it is more than likely it is not assessed for over two million dollars, if that much. Say what you will or may, the men, who by chicanery and bribery, accumulate vast fortunes at the expense of the poor, do not pay their share of the taxes of the land, and unless some more decided steps are made in the equalizing of taxation in the United States, serious trouble will sooner or later arise over it. EDITORIAL EDICTS Twinkle, twinkle little Star, up above the city so high. Mr. Kleptomania is always worked overtime this season of the year and all because Christmas is so near. Jim Corbett might save time by ceasing to look for a man to whip Jack Johnson and try him a whirl himself. If the Insurgents in Congress will not grow too impatient they will soon see a complet change in the rules of the house of representatives. If restaurant waitresses will only marry the male customers that they make dates with, then let's encourage more girls to take positions as waitresses. Whether Mullen or Revelle got more election campaign notoriety out of that little tilt in the council remains to be seen, but the honors seems to have been about even. Senator Lorimer has been exonerated, so comes a dispatch from Chicago. The dispatch, however, was silent as to how much that exoneration had cost the Chicago pork packers. President Diaz is said to be afraid of being assassinated. The fear of his republic being overthrown should worry him more than himself being assassinated, for those fellows are after the real thing and not Diaz. Arizona is getting real anxious to become a state and to that end the governor is hurrying the election for the adoption of the constitution. Evidently the "interests" must think that they are losing something by being a territory instead of a state. Dr. Fake A. Cook is now in New York City and it begins to look as if he is going to work just as smooth a fake on the press of that city as he did on his return from the north with the discovery of the North pole lie in his mouth. Before a Chicago audience Jack Johnson offers to box with a local merchant of that city for sweet charity New Year's night. We believe that Jack did something like that the 4th of last July, only he felt himself the needy one. The United States wants the farmers of this country to raise a few more horses in connection with the other farm products. May perhaps a horse farm in Washington state would pay even better than an appld farm and it would at least be a diversion. Col. Lafe Young, a premature senator from Iowa, said in a speech in the senate not long since, "the press and not congress controls the destinies of this country." And just to think Colonel Blethem is a part of the press. If he is a sample of the press that controls this country we fear it will be an Arcade dance hall on a gigantic scale. Some time ago Jim Morrison announced that no more of the political game for him, even if the state went prohibition, and now he announces that no more refereeing prize fights for him. All these things make his friends think that Jim has reaped his harvest and is looking for no more worlds to conquer. WHAT PROHIBITION HAS DONE IN OKLAHOMA When those New York highwaymen held up and robbed a gambling dive, it was a case of diamond cut diamond or of a robber robbing a thief. The voters of Seattle may not recall Mayor Gill and send some one else in his place, but they are making a lot of noise trying to do it, and so much noise that it must be very disturbing to to the tenderloin touts. Cincinnati has sustained a three million dollar fire, and that, too, with Nick Longworth tied up on committee duty at Washington City. Now what on earth will the poor people of Cincinnati do for a protector? Grabbing islands that rose out of the sea after a severe earthquake will not be so eagerly done in the future as was the one that sunk a few days ago, taking with it some three hundred persons, who had located on it a few days after it rose. Because the constitution of New Mexico did not admit the initiative and lamely admitted the referendum, the Democratic territorial convention declared it a very bad document. If it's bad then do not adopt it and may perhaps you will be given an opportunity to do a better job. And now some unkind Democratic representative in Congress has introduced a resolution to inquire into the railway expenses of President Roosevelt Say, Mr. Representative Rainey, it will be rainy at your house the balance of your life if you go to monkeying with the buzz saw. Capital punishment is a relic of barbarism and should be cut out. Pardoning red handed murderers on the part of governors after they have served a few years in prison is a damnable imposition on the public, and that, too, ought to be cut out. The person found guilty of murder in the first degree ought to be sent to prison for life and with no hope of pardon unless it transpires that such person was not guilty of the crime for which he is being punished. Love of the truth prompts me to attempt to answer in part a very smoothly written article which appeared in Leslie's Weekly dated September 15th. The article referred to was written by I. T. Martin and is headed, "What Prohibition Has Cost Oklahoma." As a whiskey argument, brazen and deceptive, the letter referred to stands in a class approached only by the proposed amendment to Oklahoma's constitution. I. T. Martin assured Leslie's that the facts and figures were gathered from the official records of sixteen counties. In his letter Grady county leads off with the cost to the taxpayers of $21,717.73. That statement is absolutely false and as deceptive as the heading (local option) is in stating what the proposed amendment to the constitution really is. Below are the cold facts and figures, taken from the records of Grady County, and this writer defies contradiction by said records. From the advent of statehood until the first of June 1910, there has been paid into the county treasury or Grady county, for fines and forfeitures by bootleggers alone, the sum of $16,109.59. The bootleggers have built a great many small bridges and built the approaches to practically every bridge in Grady county, and have done thousands of dollars' worth of work on the public roads. The officers of Grady county have shipped $19,000 of confiscated liquor to Guthrie. The entire costs of running the courts of Grady county for the same length of time, including all cost, civil and criminal, has been $35,0000; and the cost of enforcing prohlbition in Grady county has not exceeded twenty per cent of said amount, or about $7,000, showing in round numbers $9,000 paid into the county by these law violators. When we add the benegt derived by the county from labor on roasds and bridges, and to this the $18,000 of confiscated liquor, the sum would aggregate an amount vastly more than the revenue received by the county if it were to receive the revenue from all the saloons that the county could have under the terms of the proposed amendment. Next comes Comanche county, with a net cost to the taxpayers of $28,022.74. Shades of Geronimo! Do figures lie or do men misrepresent them? Read this extract from a letter dated at Lawton, Oklahoma, July 9th, 1910, written by Hon. J. A. Fain, county attorney of Comanche county, to Superintendent Conger of the Anti-Saloon League: Now that sixty-three barrels of sauce has been dumped into the Sound no mistake is made in calling it catsup as the catfish ate it with a vengeance. Next Sunday is Christmas and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN wishes you and each of you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, but everybody else will do the same thing, and so this is nothing new. It has been stated on good authority that the grocery merchants of Seattle make more profit by short weighing their customers than they do by selling at an advance over what they have to pay the wholesalers for their goods. If it is true then such thievery ought to be punished by a term in the penitentiary. Cov. Woodrow Wilson of New Jersey, must have a most industrious press agent from the amount of publicity he is getting these days. If he continues getting as much publicity, then Dix and Harmon had better look to their laurels in their fight for the Democratic presidential nomination in 1812, because Woodrow seems to have an eye on the big gun his own self. Even J. R, Grant, one of the foremost men in the Gill campaign, cannot for the life of him, see why Gill hangs on to Wappenstein. "I believe Gill is absolutely honorable, but I cannot explain his holding onto Wappy against the advice of his closest political friends. It begins to look as if there really is a 'nigger in the wood pile.'" "Every one of you men that voted for Gill knew just exactly what he would do if elected mayor of Seattle. All of you knew that he had had as his clients for years the class of cattle that range in the tenderloin district, and you knew he was not going back on them if elected mayor. I am glad that he has done just as he has done, in order to give every one of you a big belly full of your methods of 'doing politics.'" came from a woman one day this week, who has been more or less associated with the political game in Seattle. "I have had the clerk make up and certify to a complete record of all the cases in the county court since statehood. This record and his certificate show that I have obtained 189 convictions and there have been only twenty-nine acquittals, and I have had assessed in fines against the bootleggers $20,624, and there has already been collected and turned into the county treasury the sum of 40,029.04. Out of these fines and costs assessed we will collect more than enough to defray all the expense of executing four hundred search waraants. I am pleased to say to you that conditions in Comanche county are most gratify- and that I can truthfully say that prohibition does and will prohibit." The above facts and figures are not obtained without some investigation, requiring no little time. Whether or not the writer could follow up the investigation in the other fourteen counties cited in I. T. Martin's letter and find his facts and figures to be as misleading and conditions as badly misrepresented as in the two counties—Comanche and Grady will be left for the reader to judge. Mr. Martin's letter says, in speaking of the financial situation in Comanche county: "It is doubtful if a school could be built, a bridge planned or a county building thought of if left to its own resources and hampered with the excessive cost of the prohibition laws." Now let us see to that. According to his own figures, the cost of enforcing prohibition in Comanche county, was only $28,032.74. Now, are we to believe that an expense of $28,000. would burden the taxpayers for two and one-half years, one's testimony can hardly be accepted. Grady county has built roads and bridges, and her towns have made all kinds of municipal improvements and her taxes are lower this year than last, I, T. Martin's letter says: "The resubmissionists in the proposed local-option amendment have drafted a most stringent law, one to which no law-abiding citizen could well take exception, and it has the advantage that it can be enforced, carrying with it the penalty of forfeiture of license in case any section of the law is violated." Some of the brightest lawyers practicing in the Oklahoma bar say of the proposed amendment that it is not a local option law, but a trap to deceive the vot- FRIDAY December 23.191 Accidents in coal mines about Christmas seems almost as sure to happen as Christmas time is to come round. The fools of the University have been demonstrating their unqualified right to the title for the past week. Olympia had a Snow fall last Thursday and Joseph, former highway commissioner, was an interested spectator. Senator Aldrich, he of tariff bill fame, was recently taken to a hospital for treatment His tariff bill is also in the hospital for repairs. If at any time a plot was formed to ruin Mayor Hiram Charles Gill it was done among those he befriended instead of those he has opposed. Is Helen Taft to become as famous in the White House as did Alice Roosevelt? If so, then the press of the country should lay in a few extra machines to handle the Helen Taft hot air. The white folk of the Uniten States may not favor miscegenation with the darker races, but the ladies are getting awfully close to the Chinamen these days, so close that, they entwine themselves in the hair of Chinks. When a Mr. Sherman got a verdict of $50,000 damages for a Mr. Silverstone having alienated the affections of his wife in the local courts, he got a verdict, if collectable, that a whole lot of fellows would like to exchange their wives for. According to the Seattle Star, Edmuns, just fifteen miles from Seattle, has a Socialist mayor. Are we to understand that the mayor of Edmuns is not a citizen of the United States, but a Socialist? If that be true then we always thought that an alien could not hold such a position in this country. IN OKLAHOMA ers, forfeiture of license is a farce and easily avoided, slickest joke they ever saw proposed in any one act. The writer declares that crime and law-breaking are constantly on the increase under statehood and prohibition. That cannot be preven, and I say that it is not true. The writer has lived here since Augnst, 1903, and has traveled over the state the greater part of the time and claims to know. Mr. Martin would have Leslie's readers think that what little whiskey the citizens of Oklahoma get from the bootleggers is making progressive criminals of them; that being true, five years of saloons with whiskey would send us all to drunkenness and debauchery.—By C. M. Davis in Leslie's Weekly. MORE CONGRESSMEN FOR WASHINGTON One of the features of the census returns showing the big gain in population that has been made in Washington, will be the addition of at least two congressmen to the state's representation at the national capitol. It is generally assumed the rate of representation will be increased to about one congressman for every 220,000 or 225,000 inhabitants. This will mean that Seattle will have a congressman of her own and it will remove the Seattle dominance from the Northwest. One alignment places the Northwestern counties, together with King county outside Seattle, as well as Kitsap, Clallam and Jefferson, in one district. This would make Snohomish the largest county in the district. None would dominate, but Snohomish, providing it would put up a strong candidate, would have a good fighting chance of naming a congressman, something it would never have so long as it was tied up with Seattle. Another change that must be made as a result of the election will be the new state senatorial and representative districts. It will mean a reapportionment of senators and representatives and a probable increase in their number, in whiche this county should substanshare. —Everett Herald. "Asylum Inmates Burst Into Print," is a headline. Let's hope that the print house inmates made no effort to argue the question with them or there would be a few printers less. THE GROWTH OF SOCIALISM IN 21 YEARS WOMAN SUFFRAGE DRAMATICALLY EXPLAINED FRIDAY December 23, 1910 THE GROW The name of the socialist party first appeared upon the ballot in the United States in 1888, when it polled 2,068 votes. In the 21 years which have since elapsed it has progressed steadily, showing these totals: 1890, 13,331; 1892, 21,157; 1894, 33,133; 1896, 36,-564; 1898, 91,749; 1900, 98,417; 1902, 225,902; 1904, 403,338; 1906, over 500,000; 1908, over 600,000. It will be some time before all the figures for 1910 are available, but it is known that the vote scored a large increase all over the country. In New York it grew from 33,000 to 65,000; in California, from 15,000 to over 60,000. It is probable that this year's total reached the million mark. Milwaukee elected the first socialist congressman on November the 8th. The thorough going socialist boldly declares that the earth and the fullness thereof was intended, not for the making of dividens, but for the satisfaction of human needs. His program is frankly revolutionary, though he prefers the ballot to the bullet as a means to the end. While the avowed advocates of socialism have worked with wonderful energy and persistency to promote the growth of their cause, they are by no means entitled to all the credit for what has been accomplished. The socialist has a partner who is working overtime to convince the world that there is no hope save revolution. The socialist's partner is no other than our old friend, the standpatriot—that is to say, the contented conservative, who, hardened by fat years, insists that "all's for the best in the best of all possible worlds." This man stands stubbornly in the face of all progress. He consistently opposes every human aspiration for better things. For money, he asks more and more; to men, he comcedes less and less. He demands higher rates for railroad service. He resists all attempts at the regulation of public service corporations. He regards the Wisconsin proposal for government railroads, docks and steamships in Alaska as unspeakable heresy. Now that the voters of Washington have extended the right of suffrage to the women of our state The Louuger feels that it is due to the cause of the suffragettes and other sufferers that we place before the world in general and the female portion of our fair state in particular our position on this momentuous question, and we feel that this can be better done by an illustration than by any argument that we can make. Shortly after the boys came murching home from the war in 1865, the question of an amendment to the constitution giving to the late slaves the right of suffrage was the all absorbing topic of conversation. Orators in our national congress, lecturers of national reputation discussed it from the platform; leading journals discussed it pro and con in columns upon columns of thundering editorials and the wise acres at the country grocery stores expounded either the virtues or the iniquities of the proposed act. Among those opposed to Negro suffrage there was perhaps no greater champion of the "white man's country" than George B. Kingsley of our town. He was, at that time, a radical among radical Democrats, and even the thought of placing a freeman's ballot in the hands of an ignorant Negro was sufficient to open the floodgates of oratory, and he was known throughout Southern Minnesota, as a talker from 'way back.' There was among the survivors of those who had fought from Chattancoga to Atlanta, and from Atlanta to the sea, that returned to the little town where we then resided, a fellow by the name of Humphrey Mount. Now Humphrey had been a good soldier. He was not a brilliant man—just one of the simple, honest souls with a limited education. One day while elucidating the iniquities of the Negro suffrage bill then before congress, to a crowd in one of the stores, Humphrey Mount walked in, took a seat on the counter and let his feet hang down. When Kingsley saw Humphrey, he paused, turned to him and in a minor-keyed voiced and a patronizing smile, said: "Now. Humphrey you are one of the brave boys --- WTH OF SOCIALISM IN He insists on higher rates upon all necessities of life every time the tariff is revised. With hundreds of thousands of children going to school every morning without their breakfasts, he declares that our trouble is not "high cost of living, but cost of high living." He is fighting now for a kind of "open shop" which would crush labor unions to the dust, leaving the workmen to deal in his naked individuality with organized dollars. He says that men shall work when and where he pleases for what he chooses to give them, or that they shall starve, with their women and children. The standpatriot is the greatest asset of socialism. If he has his way, the earth will be owned by fewer and fewer, the many will be more and more completely exploited—and the revolution will come the surer and the sooner. The growing strength of socialism in every election for the past 22 years means just this: We are going forwd. Most of us would prefer to progress by evolution, but if the standpatriot continues to stand pat long enough and hard enough he will probably succeed in giving us revolution instead.—Omaha Daily News. THE SEATTLE STAR STUNG The editor and the associate editor of the Seattle Star run up against a contempt proceeding wall last week, and after they had pulled themselves together and reconnoitered, the editor found himself in jail for four months with a heavy fine and the associate editor with a heavy fine. That the Star has done some splendid work in the interest of the people no sane person will deny, but that it has gone too far in its work is also an acknowledged fact. Whether or not Judge Gilliam was right or wrong in granting the injunction we verily do not know, but the editor of the Star is too well posted on the rules of courts to jeopardize his own liberty to even protect the interest of the people. The concensus of opinion, however, is that the Star was not so much in love with the people as it wanted FRAGE DRAMATICALLY BY THE LOUNGER IN LINCOLN COUNTY TIMES who have just returned from one of the greatest wars of either ancient or modern times; you have fought and suffered and many of your comrades have died in your country's cause. You, Humphrey, are an observing man; you have gone through the South with your eyes and ears open. You have seen the poor, ignorant Negro as he really is; you know his needs; you do not know to what plane of civilization and enlightenment he may climb through generations of the civilizing influences of education as to the duties and responsibilities of citizenship; but you do know by observation, his present deplorable ignorance and unfitness for an immediate elevation to that lofty position occupied only by the most favored of God's noble work—an American citizen. You, above all others, are able to settle this momentuous question and, now, I ask you to lay aside party prejudice and tell us honestly what is your candid opinion of Negro suffrage?'' During this eloquent appeal, Humphrey had sat open-eyed, understanding but little, but at its conclusion, he helped himself to a handful of crackers, spit at a crack, threw his head back, straightened up and said: "George, I believe a Nigger has got juft as much right to suffer as a white man. I know I've suffered for him; now let him take his medicine. If they want to pass a Nigger suffering bill I ain't a goin' to vote agin it. I guess them fellers at Washington know who's suffered and they know who ought to suffer if there's any more suffering to be done. Them's my sentiments." That setttled the Negro suffrage question in that town, and we believe that innocent but ignorant Humphrey Mount furnished an answer for us in this latter day suffrage question. If the women of our fair state of Washington want suffrage, let 'em suffer. The cause of woman suffrage has suffered recently by the intemperate action of the suffargettes and some of the more violent advocates are at present suffering in jail. Everybody knows what would happen if men should do what women did in London two weeks ago. Their violent efforts would be repressed, if necessary --- --- to increase its circulation, and if an editor cares to take such a method to increase the circulation of his paper then it is his business and no one else. There is a law in this land, and the people make the laws; and the people also choose the men to execute the law, and it has been but a short time ago that every one of those persons enjoined voted that Mitchell Gilliam should be one of the executors of the law. As a man, Mitchell Gilliam is the same as any of the rest of us, and off the bench he is deserving of no more consideration as a man than the most inferior bod carrier in the city, but as superior court judge it is a different story and no man should be more keen to uphold the dignity of the superior court than the editor of a metropolitan paper. The course that the Star has perused, has from time to time verged dangerously close to anarchism, and if it has not actually incited the citizens of the country to riot and bloodshed it has almost done it, and therefore the panacea administered to it by Judge Gilliam was not wholly out of place. We believe a majority of judges all over this land favor or are inclined to favor corporations at the expense of the poor people, but we vote for them with our eyes open, and let's take our medicine. If we do not like the men in office lets elect different ones when the opportunity comes round, but let us not turn anarchists because the men do not do as we want them to do after they have been elected. The State Insurance Department is a money-making institution. During the past two years it has cost about $23,000 to maintain the department and its income has exceeded half a million. These are figures handed to us from our Seattle correspondent, who has neglected, seemingly, to say anything on what might have been the revenue of that department under a more judicious head than the present insurance commissioner.—Wilbur Register. Evidently Mayor Hiram Charles Gill is not a lady's man as the women of the city are registering for the express purpose of signing his recall. with the truncheons of the police or even, as Gladstone ordered in Ireland, with buckshot: and that action would be approved by right-minded thinking citizens. If unhappily murder was committed, the penalty would be paid on the gallows. It would seem to many persons shocking to employ these methods toward vote-seeking women, many of whom are of refinement and culture and gentlness of heart. Yet a statesman may be kicked and trampled to death by a mob of "gentle dames" as surely as by a mob of male ruffians. We all know how impartial in its severity the law in other cases. Women have been sent to the gallows in England and in America for ordinary murders. If the assault on Mr. Birrell had resulted in his death, which it potentially involved, would it have been passed over as merely "pretty Fanny's way?" The question of woman suffrage is not involved in this. It is the question of law and order, and also of that very equality before the law for which the suffraggttes profess to be clamoring. Entire equality does not now exist. Women undoubtedly suffer what they regard as a disadvantage in the electoral law. They just as certainly enjoy marked advantages in other important laws, particularly those relating to property. They are denied certain privileges, but they are invested with others and with various important immunities. It is not necessary to discuss the striking of a balance in the account in order to determine whether on the whole women are favored more or less than men before saying that it does seem as though the time may be at hand when it will have to be carefully considered whether exception is to be made to the laws against rioting and murder in favor of wowomen who are inclined to such methods of demonstrating their fitness for participation in government. What a striking contrast is presented between the campaign now being waged by the suffragettes of England and the campaign for women suffrage just closed in our own state. The women of Washington have demonstrated their intellectual fitness for the ballot by the "gentlemanly" calm and dignified campaign they have successfully conducted. They have surely earned the right of suffrage and now let them suffer, just like the men. Seattle's Lexow Committee [Picture of a man in a suit with a tie and a white shirt. The background is a plain, light color. The man's face is centered, and he has a serious expression. The portrait is oval-shaped.] J. Y. C. KELLOGG CHIBF INQUISITOR FRIDAY, December 23. 1910 ```markdown ``` --- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN SITOR THOMAS P. REVELLE, ADVISOR [Name] E. L. BLAINE, CHAIRMAN --- "WHAT HAPPENED TO JONES" To print this well known title correctly, an interrogation point should be used. George Broadhurst, the wealthy playwright has made a tidy little fortune out royalties by asking this question of the public in all lands for the past ten years. At last the question will have a definite answer right here in Seattle. "What Happened to Jones" was booked for the week commencing Dec. 18th at the Seattle Theatre, but will not make its appearance upon that date. The public will naturally ask the question "What Happened to Jones?" The answer is that the "Girl of the Golden West" has a prior claim and by virtue of her many good qualities and popular powers of entertainment will run a second week thus compelling Jones to make his annual call a week later than had been scheduled. "The Girl" is the only visitor at the Seattle theater this season who by an overwhelming majority has been invited to prolong the visit. "Brewster's Milions," "The Barriers" and one or two others had cordial invitations and would have been welcomed with large and smiling house parties, but the management was adamant and would not deviate from a fixed rule of change of play weekly. It took the "Girl" backed by the universal demands of a large and growing public to break the managerial will, but compensation for the humbled pride will be found in the fulsome box receipts. Therefore, be it known all mens by these paesents, That, "The Girl of the Golden West" will remain with us for the second and final week commencing Sunday Dec. the 18th and "What Happened to Jones" will be the Christmas week attraction with a special Christmas Day (Monday 26th) matinee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King. Henry Store Coon, Plaintiff, vs. Ida N. Coon, Defendant. No. 77713. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Ida N. Coon, Defendant; Mary are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this Summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 23rd day of December, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and assert the opinion of your answer to the undersigned attorney. Plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the Defendant, upon the following grounds. Because the Defendant, without Plaintiff's fault, has been guilty of personal indignities to such an extent as to render Plaintiff's life burdensome; said personal indignities consisting of frequent quarrels upon the part of the Defendant towards the Plaintiff and also that the defendant frequently told that called plaintiff and title names, abused him and threw dishes at him and threw dishes around the room and broke them and tried in every way possible to make life unpleasant for plaintiff. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Fourth Ave., Between Pike and Pine Streets, Second Floor Stevens Academy, Seattle, Washington. Dec. 23, 1910—Feb. 3, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Grote-Rankin Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. D. C. Brownell and F. W. Winters, doing business as Hotel Corlew, and Mrs. Gertrude Corlew and John Doe Corlew, her husband, whose true Christian name is unknown, Defendants. No. —— Summons by Public The State of Washington. To the defenders, Mrs. Gertrude Corlew and John Doe Corlew, her husband, whose true Christian name is unknown, Defendants. You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 23rd day of December, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff in case of below stated and case of your failure to judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with A the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to recover the possession of certain goods, wares and merchandise sold by the plaintiff the defendants Corlew and wife under a conditional sale contract on which there is a balance due of $595.75, together with interest of the legal rate from the third day of October, 1910, or the value of said goods, if same can not be returned, and that the plaintiff has had issued out of this cause and court a writ of attachment and has levied in certain property of the defendants in this county, to-wit: Lot Five (5), in Block Three (3) of C. P. Stone's Home Addition to the city of Seattle. F. J. CARVER & JOHN SLATTERY. Attorneys for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Building, Seattle, Washington. Dec. 23, 1910—Feb. 3, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. A. Biswanger, Plaintiff, vs. W. T. Gaffner, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants. No. — Notice Seller. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of October 1910 and numbered 15 follows for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Bothell's 1st Add. to Bothell, lot 1, block 1, certificate number B-67341, year 1904 to 1907 $4.63, year 1908 $2.50. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon the said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 1, block 1, 1st Add. to Bothell, year 1909. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication being December 23rd, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and designate the court as the court of said plaintiff and serve a copy of you ranswer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and paid by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. A. BISWANGER, Plaintiff. WM. C. KEITH, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: Leary Building, Seattle, Washington. Dec. 23, 1910—Feb. 3, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Summons by Publication. Catherine Lomas plaintiff, vs. Harry Lomas, defendant. No. ____. The State of Washington, to Harry defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 28th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled act of man above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his ofmand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this complaint is to maintain absolute divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant on the grounds of cruelty and nonsupport, and for the return of her malden name. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Blag.. Seattle, Washington. Oct. 28—Dec. 9, 1910. State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Preston Mill Co., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants - No. 75685. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as purchers, claimants or holders of interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April, 1910 and numbered B617540 for the delinquent tax certificate in the amount of 90 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King county, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at S. E. cor. of N. E. 1-4 of Sec. 32, Tp. 24, N. R. 7 E., W. M. thence west 420 feet to School Dist. No. 76, thence north to N. P. Ry., thence easterly along Ry. to easterly line of said section. thence S. 235 feet to the place of beginning.¹ (Part of S. E. 1-4 of the N. E. 1-1. Sec. 32, Tp. 24 N., R. 7 E. W. M.) Nnat the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property to wit: For the year 1906, the sum of 57 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of 72 cents; for the year 1908, the sum of 44 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 27 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and with sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Sept. 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his offire below stated, or pay the due, together with interest and costs. In case fail so to do judgment will be considered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said taxes and costs against each sums and amounts due upon and charg- ed against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Wyman, Partridge & Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, defendants.—No. 74735. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to appear at thirty days after the day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the clerk, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to recover a judgment against said defendants upon a claim by plaintiff for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered to said defendants by said plintiff in the sum of Two Thousand One Hundred Twenty-seven and 10-100 Dollars ($2,127.10), with interest thereon to the costs of suit, and in which said action an attachment has been taken out and levied. LEOPOLD M. STERN, and L. M. BUSSELL. Attorneys for plaintiff Office and postoffice address, 705 Low- man Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 2, Oct. 15, 1910. IN THE JUSTICE'S COURT BEFORE John E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Summons by Publication. Blossom-Provine Lumber Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. T. W. Williams and Jane E. Williams, his wife, whose true Christian Name is unknown, defendants.—No. 18472. To T. W. Williams and Jane Doe Williams, his wife, defendants. In the name of the State of Washington you are hereby notified that Blossom-Provine Lunber Co. has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come to on be heard at my office in Seattle, Kling County, Washington, on November 3, 1910, Block the 23rd day of November, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m., and unless you appear and then and there answer the same will be taken as confessed, and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said claim is to receive the payment balance due for roads, wares and merchandise, to-wit; lumber sold and delivered to said defendants by the plaintiff within the last past three years. Complaint filed September 29, 1910. JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace. Oct. 28—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Summons by Publication. Frieda Marshall, plaintiff, vs. Joe Marsh shall, defendant—No. — The State of Washington to Joe Marsh shall. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled point and usurve the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed on the grounds of habitual drunkenness of the defendant and the neglect and refusal of the defendant husband to make suitable provision for his family, be granted an absolute divorce from the defendant herein and the custody and control of the plaintiff of the plaintiff, defendant herein, and such other and further relief as the court may direct. F. J. CARVER Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg.. Seattle, Wash. Oct. 7—Nov. 18, 1910. INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. IN PROBATE—In the matter of the estate of Emil Engelmann, deceased, No. 10.408. Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Paul G. Engelmann, administrator of the estate of Emil Engelmann, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for his resurrection the resilient of among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to au horize a distribution of the residue of sald estate; It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Emil Enl. almann, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Department No. 7 on the 5th day of December at the hour of 10 o'clock A.M. of said day, then there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should no be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published on request for four consecutive weeks before the said fourth Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 31st day of October, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, C. C. John R. Wilson, a torney for said Estate. 533 New York Block, Seattle. Nov. 4-D. Dec. 1, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Order Appointing Day for Settlement of Account. In the Matter of the Estate of J. A. Burkholder deceased—No. 11797 Hallie Burkholder, administratrix of the estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased, having this day rendered and presented for settlement and filed in this court her account of her administration of the estate of said deceased. It is therefore ordered that Monday, the 28th day of November, A. D. 1910, at 9:30 o'clock in the forement be and the same is hereby appointed for the settlement of the said account; and that the clerk give notice thereof by causing notices to be posted in at least three public places in this county, one of which shall be at the place where this court is held, at least 14 days before said day of settlement and by publishing such notice in the City Republic, a newspaper published and of general circulation in this county, once a week for two weeks prior to said day of settlement. Done in open court this 9th day of November, 1910. A. W. FRATER, Ludge. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Administratrix. Northern Bank & Trust Bldg. Seattle, Washington. Nov. 11—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Notice of the Hearing on a Petition for Special Performance. In the Matter of the Estate of Sarah E. T. Mitchell, deceased—No. 11020. Notice is hereby given that E. B. Mitchell, the administrator in the above entitled cause, on the 3rd day of November, 1910, filed in the above entitled court his petition asking leave of the court to specifically perform a certain contract with Nellie M. Peterson upon the following described property, toowit: Boys six (6), seven (7), fourteen (14), and fifteen (15), Block two (2), of the Second Addition to Adams Tracts, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the auditor's office of King County, Washington. And the court on said 3rd day of November, 1910, set the 12th day of December, 1910, at 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon, in Department No. 7 in the court house in Seattle, King County, said petition; and all persons interested as creditors, heirs, devisees or personal representatives are ordered to appear and present any objections to the granting of the said petition. Dated this 3rd day of November, 1910. E. B. MOWELL, Administrator. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Administrator. Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication. Blossom-Provine Lumber Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. A. Watkins and Jane Doe Watkins, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown; L. D. W. Shelton and Jane Doe Shelton, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown; defendants—No. The State of Washington, to A. Watkins and Jane Doe Watkins, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown; L. D. W. Shelton and Jane Doe Shelton, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear with sixty (60) days after the date of the publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty days after the 11th day of November, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, induce you against your accounting to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to foreclose a lien for materials furnished by the plaintiff to the defendants to be used upon lots 43 and 44, block 7, Greenwood Park Second Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. King County, W. Va. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Daisy Volgt, plaintiff, vs. William E. Volgt, defendant.—No —. VOIRT, defender—No. _____ The State of Washington, to William E. Voigt, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff; in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be provided upon you, according to the prayer of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you on the grounds of desertion and failure to support plaintiff, and for a restoration of the malden name of plaintiff. HOWARD O. DURK, Attorney for Plaintiff. 535 Henry Building, Seattle. King County, Washington. November 11—Dec 23, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Missouri County Summons for Publication You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The subject of the above entitled action is to secure divorce and annul marriage of plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds of non-support. No allmony is asked. Date of first publication, November 11, 1910. FRED L. RICE, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 229 Burke Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 17—Dec. 23, 1810. FRIDAY December 23, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Summons by Publication. William J. Clarke, plaintiff, vs. Nellie Clarke, defendant—No. — The State of Washington, to Nellie Clarke, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summation, wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned publication of his address below given; in case of your failure to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer of the plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you on the ground of desertion. HOWARD O. DURK, Attorney for Plaintiff. 535 Henry Bullding, Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR Court OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. State of Washington, County of King. ass. In the Matter of the Estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased.—No. 11797. Notice is hereby given that Hallel Burkholder, administratrix of the estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said court her final account as such administratrix, the account as such day of November, 1910, at 9:30 o'clock, m. at the court room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. A. W. Frater, judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said court hereto affixed this 9th day of November, 1910. D. K. SICKELS, (Seal) Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. Nov. 11—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE JUSTICE'S COURT BEFORE John E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Prechnet King County, Washington. Summons by Publication. R. J. Eichler, plaintiff, vs. Cora Lowe. torial furnished and labor performed by this plaintiff for and on behalf of said demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of this action is to recover the sum of Twelve Dollars same will be taken as confessed, and the (1) 000, being Doe, Lowe, and John Doe, Lowe, her husband. REMOVAL NOTICE The Light and Power department of the Seattle Electric Company has moved to the Electric Bldg., Seventh avenue and Pine street. Street car tickets can be purchased and all bills paid in the Electrical Sales Room at the old location 907 FIRST AVENUE THE SEATTLE ELECTRIC CO ORDER A CASE OUT TO YOUR PLACE OF Rainier PALE BEER PHONE SIDNEY 526 Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar. You save two dollars, I will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established. Block 14 is for 18 years. I do not comete Take a trip to Seattle and me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar or two dollars and the State Dental Monopoly will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established at 713 First Ave., in the Union Block, for cheap dentists, but with the high-class dentists for half their price. Open evenings until 8 and Sundays until 4 for people who work. EDWIN J. BROWN, D.D.S. 713 First Avenue Seattle, Wash. Read my article in Sunday's P.-J. and Monday's Times and Star. GILHAM-LYSONS REALTY CO. General Offices: 411 Lowman Bldg. Loans, Investments, Insurance. H. E. Gilham. Main 3044. J. W. Lysons. Ind. 1538. BUY THE BEST If you want a safe which you know Has No Superior, buy one of the Hall Safe & Lock Co.'s, manufactured by the Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co., for which we are the sole agents. PURCELL SAFE CO. Prefontaine Bldg., Prefontain Place and Yesler Way DENNY-RENTON CLAY & COAL CO., Manufacturers of All Kinds of Clay Products. Main 2189—Phones—Ind. 5125. FRIDAY December 23, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Charles Pfeffer, plaintiff, vs. Mile Ben- nifer, plaintiff, vs. Mile Ben- nifer, husband, Charles P. Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown, William Brenner, D. A. Hatfield and "Jane Doe" Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown, and Charles W. Fisk, F. M. Hatfield, Ida M. Barton and Aurora Land Company, a corporation, defendants.—No. 75263. The State of Washington to Charles P. Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, whose true given name is to D. A. Hatfield and Jane Doe Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is unknown, You, and each of you, are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 15th day of September, and for the day of the commencement in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and have a copy of your answer served upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment to be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to foreclose a certain mortgage executed and delivered by the said defendants Millie Bennett and Walter C Bennett, her husband, to one S. Campbell and by the sald S. Campbell assigned to this plaintiff, dated the 28th day of January, 1910, to the sale of the 28th day of January, 1910. Vol. 407 of mortgages, page 39 of the record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, which mortgage was given to secure a promissory note of $500.00 with interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent per annum and was given upon Lots 18, 19, 20, 22 and 22 Book Glamour Fine Fashion Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to obtain judgment for the said $500.00 together with interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the 28th day of January, 1910, and an attorney's fee of $75.00 and costs of suit and to foreclose and determine all right, title and interest of each and all of said defender and to said premises and every part thereof. EDWARD VON TOBEL. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg.. Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- nx. Summons. A. L. Weaver and Ella May Weaver, husband and wife, plaintiffs, vs. Peter E. Nordin, defendant. The State of Washington to the said Peter E. Nordin, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons to-wit, within sixty days after the ten day period 1910 and should be above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment and decree will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said courts and all rights and interest in the lands described in the complaint claimed by you likewise in the contract, and payments described therein will be foreclosed, forfeited, and the title of the plaintiffs cleared as to all claims you may have or claim. J. W. BROWN. Attorney for Plaintiffs. 1324 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Antone Kaas, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described residents of the No. 75305. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff with holder of the delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of November, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Seize 260 feet of $1/2 of $1/2 of NE/4 of $1/4 Sec. 4, Tp. 21, N, R 4 E, W. M., certificate number B64644, year 1906, amount $12.28. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Amount $1.40 for year 1907; 76 cents for year 1908. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from sale date of payment and are all the said and deemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days Aug. 19, 1910, in her act entitled and action required to defend this action and the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plea-tiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due and charged against such said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and aprayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, Summons. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summary, for this last day, the 23rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office before the court, and so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is instituted for the purpose of dissolving the bonds of matrimony by dividing between the plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds that said defendant has failed, neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the support and maintenance of said plaintiff; and for the decree awarding to said plaintiff the following described real estate, guardian County of Clamam, State of Washington, particularly described as follows, to-wit: Lots twenty-two (22), twenty-three (23), twenty-six (26) and twenty-seven (27), in section seven (7), township thirty (30), north of range nine (8) west, Clamam County, Washington; and the following property in King County, State of Washington: The west half of lot twenty-five (25) and lot twenty-six (26), block eight (8). Bucklus Addition to the City of Seattle; and for such other and further relief as to this court may seem just and equitable. Office and P. O. address: 960 Empire Building. Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPPERIOR COUR8, KING County, Washington. Elizabeth Turnbull, Plaintiff, vs. George Turnbull, Defendant. No. ----- Summons. The State of Washington to the said George Turnbull, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear with you (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complainant in this action prays for divorce and that the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved. H. E. FOSTER. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Minneapolis Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, October 7, 1910. Date of last publication, November 18, 1910. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE Fred C. Brown, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. California Wine and Cordial Company, corporation, Plaintiff, vs. John Doe Matijasevich and Richard Roe Gilovich, copartners, doing business under firm name and style of Alaska Llquor Company, Defendants. No. —. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King, ss Title of Washington: To John Doe Matijasevich, Richard Roe Gilovich, copartners, doing business under firm name and style of Alaska Llquor Co; You, and each of you, are hereby notified that California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, has filed a complaint against you in said Court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Building, Seattle King County Washington, on the 20th day of October, A. D. 1910, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock a. m., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said action is for the sum of Eighty-two Dollars and Twenty-five Cents (82.25), being a balance due the plaintiff on account of merchandise sold and delivered to the defendants during the year 909. Filed September 15th, A. D. 1910. FRED C. BROWN, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. TWOROGER & WINKLER. Attorneys for Plaintiff. 10-11 Triangle Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication Sept. 16. 1910 Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Allen P. Mitten, Deceased.—No. 11658. By order of said court made herein on the 8th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having said estate, upon said deceased with the said estate, to creditors with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executors of said estate, at 1308 Alaska Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 23, 1910. Attorneys for Estate. 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Oct. 22, 1910. JUSTICE COURT—BEFORE JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Wm. Zehring, plaintiff, vs. Mrs. A. M. Simmons, defendant. State of Washington, County of King, ss. The State of Washington to Mrs. A. M. Simmons. You and each of you are hereby notified that Wm. Zehring has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in room 2100. I will be on the King Count, Washington, on the 28th day of November A. D. 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of plaintiff granted. The object and demand of sale complaint is to recover the debt of 82,222. Bail due for goods, wares and merchandise, sold and delivered to you by this plaintiff within the last past three years. Complaint filed October 10th A. D. 1910. JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Nov. 4-Nov. 25. 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Summons for Public Laurentine E. Cole, plaintiff, vs. Aina May Cole, defendant—No. 76580. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN The State of Washington, to the said Anna May Cole, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to appear within sixty (60) days after the 21st day of October, 1910 and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object for which the brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant, upon the following grounds: Because the defendant without the plaintiff's fault, abandoned the plaintiff on the 9th of October, 1909, at Seattle, Washington, and that said abandonment has been continuous for one year and IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Massachusetts, in and for King County, New York. Lillian Collins, plaintiff, vs. James Collins, defendant.—No.—The State of Washington, to the said James Collins, defendant:You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first hearing of the trial of James Collins, wit, within sixty days after the 21st day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office, at least, at least one of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court.The object of this action is to secure a decree of divorce, dissolving the bonds of marriency existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of desertion and failure to provide for more than one year. Oct. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Lorenz Schweizer, Deceased. No. 12054. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given to the cre- ditors of and all persons having claims against the deceased, or his estate, to present them with the necessary vouch- ers to the university administrator of sold estate at room No. 604 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of the transaction of business of said estate, within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice or the same will be barred. Dated this 18th day of November, 1910. Date of first publication Nov. 18, 1910. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Administrator of the Estate of Lorenz Schweizer, Deceased. Nov. 18—Dec. 16, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of Seattle. Frank B. Wilson, Plaintiff, vs. Emily W. Wilson, Defendant. The State of Washington, to the said Emily W. Wilson, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 19th day of November 1890, and the above entitled action in the entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, having served the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: Divorce suit on the grounds of drunkenness. VOICE FOR HERRY. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Seattle, County of King, Washington. Nov. 19—Dec. 30, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. 71. Probate, Administrator's Notice of Sale of Real Estate. In the Matter of the Estate of James J. Lynch, Deceased.—No. 19026. Notice is hereby given that under and by virtue of an order of sale of the Superior Court of King County, Wash- ington, dated October 8th, 1810. I will it private sale the following descri- ed real estate situated in King County, Washington: Lot 21, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot 32, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle the court. Dated this 20th day of October, 1910. Date of first publication, October 21, 1910. HARRY W. BRINGURST, Administrator of the Estate of James J. Lynch, Deceased. Awarded May 14, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons. Henry D. Pellissus, plaintiff, vs. Park D. Thillis, defendant. The State of Washington, to the above named defendant, Park D. Phillips: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the twenty-first day of October, 1910, exclusive of said twenty-first day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and to serve g copy of your answer or other paper upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his hereinafter designated postoffice address, and in case of your failure so far, no judgment will be rendered in said cause according to the form of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of said action is to procure a judgment and decree forever severing the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of the failure, forescual and neglect of the deed, to provide for or contribute anything to the support or maintenance of the plaintiff's marriage on the 5th day of July, 1900, and on the further award, that the defendant more than EXCLUSIVE WOOLENS A call will convince the most skeptical of the Worth and Beauty of our slash. The established reputation of our tailoring assures you of satisfaction. 21 COLUMBIA STREET Established 22 Years two years ago wilfully and without just cause abandoned the plaintiff, and at all times since has so continued to live separate and apart from plaintiff. PROBATE NOTICE—IN THE SUPERIOR Court of Washington, for he County of King. State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the Matter of the Estate of Allan B. Increase, No Notice of Settlement of Final, Account Notice is hereby given that Phebe L. Poole, executrix of the last will and testament of Allan Poole, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said Court, her Final Account as such executrix, and that that Thursday, the 5th day of Decem- 1914, 10:30 a.m. Court of Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in the estate may appear and make itsceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. A. W. Frater, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto affixed this 18th day of November, 1910. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. Nov. 25—Dec. 9, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. In Probate. In the Mayor of the Estate of John E. Corbally. Deceased. No. 1204. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given that all persons having claims against the estate of John E. Corbally, deceased, are hereby required to present the same, with vouchers in support thereof, to Mary Corbally, executrix of said estate, at the office of Robert F. Booth, 811 Lowman Building, Seattle Washington that begging the place for the transaction of such business, within one year from the date of the first publication hereof. MARY CORBALLY, Executrix of the Estate of John E. Corbally, Deceased. 811 Lowman Building, Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication November 25; last, December 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. May V. Russell, Plaintiff, vs. John T. Russell, Defendant. No. 77203. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said John T. Russell, Defendant: To request a judgment to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 25th day of November, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for plaintiff at his office below the street, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and non-support. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 539 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. Nov. 25, 1910—Jan. 6, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. Daisy Hour, plaintiff, vs. John Francis Hour, defendant—No.— The State of Washington, to the said John Francis Hour, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 30th day of September, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the file in this cause and Court. State of Washington: To the above de fendants and each of them: You must each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County State of Maine dated the 19th of November, 1908, and numbered B54857, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.45, and upon the real property situated in said IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of said first publi-plication, to-wit: within sixty days Sept. 9, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and Attorney for Executrix. answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Caroline L. Burns, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.-No. 75301. State of Washington. To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claims or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 3rd day of October 1909, and a number of complaint of the plaintiff, and served copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been King County, described as follows, to-wit. Lot 12, Block 5, Alentown Acres. That the complaint has been served for ten years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- julification, to-wit, within sixty days Sept. 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure to do this, med will be rendered herein, foreclos- cling the lien of said taxes and costs L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seat- tle, Wash. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Walter S. Boxwell, Plaintiff, vs. Izola Lourine Boxwell, Defendant. No. The State of Washington: To Izola Lourine Boxwell, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 2nd day of December, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of which will be to secure an absolute divorce from the defendant by the plaintiff on the grounds of desertion and for a decree declaring him to be the sole and separate owner of Lots 30 and 31, Block 11, Green Lake Reservoir Addition to the city of Seattle. F. J. CARVER and JOHN SLATTERY. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. DEC. 2. 1910—Jan. 3. 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Winifred Jones, Plaintiff, vs. Frances J. Jones, Defendant. No. 77320. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to Frances J. Jones. Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 2nd day of December 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and answer of the defendant and answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to secure an abusive case upon the defendant by the plaintiff on the grounds of drunkenness and desertion. F. J. CARVER and JOHN SLATTERY Attorneys for Painiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Dec. 2, 1910—Jan. 13, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- tv. Summons by Publication. Mary Murphy, plaintiff, vs. Thomas A. defendant. No. 75150. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty days after the 16th day of December, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff; in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you on the grounds of desertion and failure to support plaintiff and for habitual drunkenness. EDWARD W. FRANKLIN, Attorney for Plaintiff 29 Scheureman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Dec. 16, 1910—Jan. 27, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Order Directing Notice to Creditors. Standard Oll Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Taxi Delivery Co., a corporation, defendant—No. 75872. In the above entitled matter it is ordered that all creditors of said defendant, and all parties interested in the estate, prosecute andigate their claims and demands against this defendant and in this cause to that end they are hereby notified and required to prove their claims before this court by filing same with the receiver, or his attorney, properly verified under oath, with itemized statements and other memoranda regarding same; and that said creditors what, if any security they have for the payment of same, said claims to be filed or before the 19th day of December, 1910. And the said Ralph C. McAllaster, having asked for his discharge as receiver of the said defendant corporation, it is further ordered, and notice is hereby given to all creditors and parties interested in the estate, that the said Ralph C. McAllaster will move this court for the passing of his final account and his discharge as receiver on the said 19th day of December, 1910. And the receiver is further ordered to cause notice to be given to the creditors herein publication in the S.E. REPUBLICAN, once a week for two successive weeks during said period and by mailing to each of the known creditors at the last known postoffice address of said creditors, a copy of said notice. Done in Open Court this 3rd day of December, 1910. A. W. FRATER, Judge. RALPH C. McALLASTER, Receiver. LEOPOLD M. STERN, Attorney for the Receiver, 705 Lowman Building, Seattle, Washington. Dec 9—Dec. 16, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King—ss. King Standard Oil Company, a corporation, Printish, vs. Taxi Delivery Company, a corporation, defendant.—No. 75872. I. D. K. Sickels, county clerk of King County, and ex-officio clerk of the Superior Court of the state of Washington for the County of King, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy with the original order directing notice to creditors in the above entitled cause as the same appears on file in my office, and the same is a true and perfect transcript of said original and of the whole thereof. Witness my hand and the seal of the said Superior Court, at my office in Seattle this 5th day of Dec., 1910. (Seal) By W. K. SICKELS. Deputy. D. K. SICKELS. Clerk. NOTICE OF DISSOLUTION. Notice is hereby given that the partnership existing between Anton Aagaard and Scott I. Wallace for the manufacture of Aagaards Waterproof and Leather Preservative has this day been dissolved and agreed to pay all accounts against said partnership, said partnership having appeared under the name of the AAGAARD MANUFACTURING CO. The undersigned will not be responsible for any indebtedness incurred in the name of the above company hereafter. Dated Dec. 1908. SCOTT I. WALLACE. Dec. 9—Dec. 30, 1910. Notice is hereby given that there will be a meeting of the stock-holders of the Savings Investment Association, a corporation, on the 4th day of February, 1911, at 1:30 o'clock p. m., at No. 809 Fifth Avenue, for the purpose of considering the question of increasing the capital stock of the corporation from 40,000 to 550,000, and for the transaction of such business connected with said increase as may properly come before said meeting. Dated December 7, 1910. EVELYN H. HALL, HARRIETT M. BISHOP, ANNA M. BROWN, RUTH FLAGLES, ENI MARSH, AHONEY, ADELAIDE POLLOCK, JOSEPHINE I ATWOOD. Dec. 9, 1910—Jan. 28, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- tury Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of J. A. Burkhald deceased - No. 11797 By order of said court made herein on the 7th day of December, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said deceased and Hallie T. T. to preface with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executrix of said estate, at 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication December 9, 1910. HALLIE HURKHOLDER, As Executrix of said Estate. F. J. Carver. Corner for Estate. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Dec. 9, 1910—Jan. 7, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Summons by Publication. Ben Huber, plaintiff, vs. Sina M. Adams, the Empire State Surety Co., John A. Ames and L. G. Helzn, defendants. No. 17372. The State of Washington to the said defendant, Sina M. Adams: You are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 16th of December, 1910 defend the above entitlement in the writ entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at the address below stated and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of said action, as set forth in the complaint, is to foreclose those two certain mortgages heretofore given by you, the first one executed and delivered on the 18th day of May, 1909, to secure the sum of $400.00. to interest the one month rate of 8 per cent from said date until paid, and the second one dated July 30, 1910, to secure a note for the sum of $400.00, with interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from said date until paid, and to recover judgment for said amounts and interest against you and an attorney's fee. to interest the two certain mortgages being on the following described real property in King County. Washington, to-wit; Lot 13, block 12, Gilman Park, as per map recorded in Vol. 2 of plats, page 40, records in the auditor's office of King County, Washington, and to foreclose and determine all the right, title and interest of the said defendants, and each and all of them, in and to said property. EDWARD VON TOBEL Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, Rooms 604-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Dec. 16, 1910—Jan. 27, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of Marlon B. Baxter, deceased. To an aunt it may concern, and particularly to the creditors, if any, of the estate of Marlon B. Baxter, deceased: You, and each of you, will please take notice that the undersigned has been appointed the executrix of the estate of Marlon B. Baxter, deceased, and that all claims of every kind and name which are made to Marlon B. Baxter or against the estate of said Marlon B. Baxter, deceased, should be presented to the undersigned, as executrix, at her business address, No. 314 Colman Building, Seattle, Washington, on or before one year after the notice to-wit, on or before one year from the 16th day of December, 1910. BEATRICE BAXTER MCCLURE, Executrix of the Estate of Marion B. Baxter, deceased. Dec. 16, 1910—Jan. 13, 1911. NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF MIDWAY MILL CO. To the Stockholders: The regular annual meeting of the stockholders of the Midway Mill Co. will be held at the office of the Company, No. 1011 American Bank Building, on January 19th, 1911, at 10 o'clock A. M. for the purpose of electing trustees for the ensuing year, and for such other business as may properly come before said meeting. C. C. PIERCE, JR., President. Attest: R. A. ALEXANDER, Assst. Secretary. Dec. 16, 1910—Jan. 6, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Probate, Administrator's Notice of Sale of Real Estate. In the Matter of the Estate of Charles H. Hathaway, deceased... No. 11819 H. hathaway, deceased.—No. 11813. Notice is hereby given that under and by notice of an order of Sale of the Superior Court of King County, Washington, dated December 12th, 1910. I will sell at public auction sale at the front steps of the King County Court House at 10:30 A. M., January 7th, 1911, for cash, the following described real estate, situated in King County Washington: Lot ten (10), block six (6), Evans & Blewett's addition to Seattle. Dated this 15th day of December, 1910. Date of first publication, December 16th, 1910. ALICE HATHAWAY. Administratrix of the Estate of Charles H. Hathaway. JOSEPH R. ANDERSON, 607 Pioneer Building. Dec. 16, 1910—Jan. 6, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King George C. H. Boynton, plaintiff, vs. William B. wit: within sixty days after the 14th LEOPOLD M. STERN, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address 705 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 14—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be mad. In the Matter of the Estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased—No. 5656. Malcolm K. MacRae, administrator of the estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons duly appointed to the estate, appearing to the court that said petition is forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said T. J. Riordan, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior and at the ongoing County, State of Washington at the court of the bate Department of said court in Seattle on the 14th day of October, 1910, and the hour of 9.30 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of persons among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said enactment and shall be posted four consecutive weeks before the said 14th day of November, 1910, in the ATTORNEYS, ATTENTION! THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is looking for your legal publications, and if you are looking for your own business interests you will see to it that no publication is sent from your office without first talking with CAYTON about it. It is an indisputable fact that there are but two weekly publications in Seattle that publish lawyers' legal notices and give the lawyers no trouble on account of errors and prompt "returns" of publishers' affidavits, and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN takes the lead. In this day of busy, bustling activity, the lawyer's time is so much absorbed in the preparation of his voluminous cases that he has not the time to look the paper over every week to see if his notices are being regularly published, nor to read over his notices to see if they are absolutely correct. It often happens that even lawyers make errors in getting up their notices for publication, which errors are very annoying to the lawyers if not detected and corrected before going into the paper. If, therefore, the lawyer feels absolutely certain that the publisher gives his personal attention to notices or calls the lawyer's attention to them before going to press sent to his paper and either corrects small errors in notices it's a great relief to his mind. The publisher of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN has had so much experience with legal publications that he can detect a faulty publication almost as readily as the lawyer himself, and, if not a grievous one, corrects it then and there, but if a grievous one, the lawyer's attention is called to the same before going to press. Returns on publications are promptly made, so that lawyers do not have to worry about the publisher's notice after his case has been called in court. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN E Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County, and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 7th day of October, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Court Commissioner. State of Washington, County of King ss. D. K. Sickels, county clerk of King County and ex-officio clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by sald court on the 7th day of November, 1910, in the matter of the estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of sald court this 7th day of October, 1910. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons by Publication. Seattle Lumber Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Celestine J. Sullivan and Evelyn Sullivan, his wife, E. W. Andrews and Jane Doe Andrews, his wife, Fred G. Cutler and Mildred Cutler, his wife, Netherland American Mortgage Bank, a corporation. H. W. Fisher, Trustee, The National Bank of Commerce, of Seattle, Washington, a corporation, John Davis & Company, a corporation, Jahn Brooke & Company, Elliott Bay Mill & Lumber Company, a corporation, L. A. Borde, Crane Company, a corporation, John Scutt and Richard Roe Gelser, co-partnership doing business as Scutt & Gelser, Schwabacher Hardware Company, a corporation, V. D. Gossett, John Knapp and Richard Roe Lambert, doing business as Knapp & Lambert. J. J. Frantz and W. J. Winters, defendants. Globe Electric Company, Cox & Gleason Company, and J. K. Witherspoon, intervenors.—No. —. The State of Washington, to the said Celestine J. Sullivan, Evelyn Sullivan, his wife, and H. W. Fisher, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: sixty days after the 14th day of October, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the court of intervention. Withespoon, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for intervenor at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said intervenor. The court of intervention has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint in intervention, is as follows: To foreclose a laborer's and materialman's len upon lots 19 and 20, block 24, Ries & Kight's addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. C. H. WINDERS. Attorney for Intervenor, J. K. Witherspoon. Office and postoffice address: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of washington, for King Coun- tellor Justice In the Matter of the Estate of Lavina Christine Rudberg, deceased.—No. 11877. By order of said court made herein on the 4th day of October, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouch- sure of the undersign of administratrix of said estate, at 323 Northern Bank & Trust Building, Seattle, Wash, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication October 14, 1910. ELMA LOUISE RUDBERG, As Administratrix of said Estate. GORDON McGAUVRAN, Attorney for Estate. 327-8-9 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King Coun- ty. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Katherine Schulver, deceased.—No. 11830. By order of said court made herein on the 12th day of October, 1910. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and so all persons having claims against FRIDAY Decembe 23, 1910 said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 229 Burke Block, Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice same will be borne. Date of first publication Oct 14, 1910. FRED L. RICE, As Administrator of said Estate. FRED L. RICE, Attorney for Estate. 229 Burke Block, Seattle, Wash. Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. Send your legals to The Seattle Republican, 305 Epler Blk., Phone Main 305. Bonney-Watson Co. Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. STETSON & POST LUMBER CO. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 71) ALBERT HANSEN. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses. Phone, Main 268. Seattle Washington. First and Cherry.