Seattle Republican

The Seattle Republican Single Copies, 10 Cents. The Publisher's Notice. The Seattle Republican is published on Friday of every week by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3 per year; six months, $1.50; postage prepaid. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. CAYTON PUB. CO. INC. Publication office, 427 Epler Block. Telephone Main 305. Horace Roscoe Cayton - - Publisher. Susie Revels Cayton - - Associate. An old adage runs, "misery loves company," which must account for the rosiate view of Erastus Brainard, the retired editor of the Post-Intelligencer, taken by Frank P. Goss, now editor of the Saturday Review. It will remembered that Mr. Goss was city editor of the P.-I. under Mr. Brainerd, but for some reason lost his job, and it is said by the hands of the same man that made it necessary for Mr. Brainard to turn in his resignation. Goss was city editor of the P.-I. equally as important at least in his own mind as Erastus Brainard gave himself credit of being, which is saying a good deal. Both are now practically doing nothing and the bond of sympathy is no more than could be expected. The Orting Oracle is responsible for the information that, Erastus Brainard will probably head an afternoon paper which is to be established in Seattle in the very near future. As hard as times are the man who puts his money into an afternoon sheet in Seattle will be doing nothing short of pounding it into a rat hole. Tenino, Bucoda and Tumwater, according to the News of Tenino, are completely out of debt, and not only out of debt, but have handsome bank accounts to their credits. We regret to have to publish this bit of news because it will not be long before some of the many grafters common to the larger cities will take a hike to those cities and very soon after they will become permanent residents therof, those cities will be head over heels in debt. In commenting upon an excerpt taken from The Seattle Republican the South Bend Journal used the following rather vulgar remarks: "Fewer words than those quoted above in some climates would mean a dead "coon." The editor of the Journal would have liked to have been able to have said something equally as stinging about Col. Blethen, but he did not have the ability. Why, Mr. Editor would there be a dead "coon" in the "some other locality," if the article was true, and it must have been or you would not havs copied it. Is it a fact that men in other localities kill the man that dares to tell the truth? It is amusing to the Kent Journal to hear the daily papers of both Seattle and Tacoma claim the prospective yeast plant, which is to be established at Sumner, as SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, Sept. 1, 1911. a new enterprise coming to their respective cities, when in fact neither will get it, as Sumner, fifteen miles from Tacoma and twenty-two miles from Seattle, already has it. Do not let a little thing like that worry you neighbor for has not City Engineer Thomson already said, "In twenty-five years there would be cement sidewalks all the way from Seattle to Tacoma," and that of course would mean that Sumner would be a part of both the big cities. Judging from the rather satirical criticism in the Progress, Rev. Dr. Major of the Presbyterian church, wants to be postmaster of Seattle, and either for the time being give up his church work or run it as an annex to the post-office. If some Protestant publication had have spoken in the same manner of some Catholic divine the Progress would have had ten thousand fits all at once. We some times get disgusted with all this church hullabaloo, of which, one hears so much, and come to the conclusion, it is all rot. It seems to be more a rivalry between denominations than a fight for souls for Christ. To work yourself into an optimistic state means a great relief to an over-taxed mind and that too whether the conditions you predict come round or not, and therefore, when the Empire of Waterville, says, "The times will improve in this county from now on," which thought is based on the crop report, we fear Editor Tuttle has taken an over dose of optimism, as good crops do not seem to always bring about good times from a financial view point. In commenting upon the retirement of Erastus Brainard, Editor Eugene Lorton of the Vancouver Spokesman, paid Mr. Brainard a glowing tribute then he severely criticised his methods of editing a paper and wound up with, "this may be a rose with a thorn in it, but we trust its fragrance is not wholy impaired thereby". It is almost laughable to read the different versions placed upon the editorial career of Erastus Brainard by the country press. No man is what he ought to be and what he can be," says the Dayton Dispatch. Applied to mental and moral development, there is no denying the correctness of the thought, but men apply the same principle to getting advantage of their fellow men, which has given us the Rockefellers, the Harrimans and thousands of men in the United States, who have hoarded up wealth at the expense of their less fortunate bretheren. The man with a thousand dollars uses it to get a hundred thousand and then corrupt every other man he can to get multiplied millions and it is an undeniable fact no man can accumulate a million dollars by dealing honestly with his fellow men. Should you own a home? is a caption in the Gray's Harbor News, and then it proceeds to favorably answer its caption by saying, "every one should own a home," to which we quite agree, but from sad experience we have learned that you should LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 VOLUME XVIII. NUMBER 17. own that home in the country and not in a thriving city, if you expect to enjoy the home. The home in the city you have to rent from the tax collectors every year and in a city like Seattle at a very high rental rate at that. Yes indeed own a home, but be sure you own it in the country where you can be independent. A fifteen year old child is to be hanged in Arkansas September 15 unless the governor listens to the appeal to reason the women folk all over the country are making, and especially through their national organ, The Woman's Journal, against the barbarous act. It is useless to add that the child in question is a Negro, for had he been white he would have never been tried at all, but would have been hustled off to some reformatory until he was of age. The code of ethics for the punishment of children in the southern states is humane, if the offender is white, tolerant if Jew or Italian and damnable if a Negro. "Every boy and girl raised on a farm loves and admires a bob white, the common quail or partridge," says the Colfax Commoner. There is no doubt of it and from the way the boys and girls reared in the city go out and indiscriminately slay those feathered fellows they must love them equally well if not better than their country brothers. The country kid loves to admire the beautiful creatures while the city kid loves to eat the juicy creatures. James A. Kerr, on the quiet is roundly abused in connection with the injunction issued by Judge Hanford against the citizens of the Rainier Valley as is Judge Hanford himself. Kerr, the attorneys say—imposed upon Judge Hanford by shoving a document before him to sign, which the judge did without thoroughly investigating it, and, it is further argued, under no circumstances would the order have been signed if the judge had have taken the time to read it over. The public will remember that it was this self same Jim Kerr, who pulled off one of the worst pieces of frencied financiering that was ever heard of in the Northwest, when he as receiver for a fish concern was charged with wrecking the whole thing and organizing it into small concerns in all of which he and his brother were heavy stock holders. A fifteen year old child is to be hanged in Arkansas September 15th unless the governor listens to the appeal to reason the women folk all over the country are making, and especially through their national organ, The Woman's Journal, against the barbarous act. It is useless to add that the child in question is a Negro, for had he been Caucasian he would never have been tried at all, but would have been hustled off to some reformatory until he was of age. The code of ethics for the punishment of children in the Southern States is humane, if the offender is white, tolerant if Jew or Italian, and damnable if a Negro. McBRIDE ON THE HANFORD EPISODE McBRIDE ON THE HANFORD EPISODE Let Us Figure on Your JOB PRINTING We do nifty work that never fails to please. The appearance of your office stationery has much to do with your Business Success and our work is always classy. Phone Main 305 427 Epler Block Attorney's Briefs a Specialty 2 "What do you think of the Hanford-Crawford Seattle Renton and Southern mix up?" was the question asked of A. G. McBride, one of Seattle's attorneys and for five years connected with the prosecuting attorney's office in this county. "Well, its the same old thing that has never been and propably never will be downed. It is the ancient question of state rights. It caused no end of trouble in the adoption of our constitution and its construction by the courts, and finally cost the nation four years of internecine war with its attendant loss of millions of treasure and thousands of lives, and still the question keeps bobbing up. Judge Hanford is probably within his rights and possesses the power of granting an injunction in the case, but the remedy being equitable and temporary restraint largely within the discussion of the court. I think he should refuse to have anything to do with these little petty local affairs and let them be fought out in the state courts. That ought to be the law, but it apparently is not. The jurisdiction of the federal courts extends to the the litigation between aliens and residents of the state as well as between citizens of different states and also in all matters where a federal question is involved. In 1901, ex-sheriff Cudihee wanted to hang Nordstrom for the murder of Willie Mason. Col. Lewis had then delayed the execution for about eight years through the aid of the federal courts. The state supreme court affirmed the judgment of conviction and it was thereafter affirmed in the supreme conrt of the United States. This stage of the case was reached in a couple of years and thereafter, federal judges kept issuing writs of habeas corpus for some eight years. At this time Judge Hanford was asked for a writ, but he would not even permit the petition to be filed, and that ended the delay. Judge Hanford could have issued the writ and violated no rule of law or practice. If the federal and state courts would cut out the temporary injunctions and hear the cases on their merits, long delays would not follow. An appeal where a temporary injunction has been issued, keeps the temporary injunction in force during the pendency of the appeal. The law should be amended with respect to the issuance of injunctions, but corporation influences have prevented it thus far. Congress has been working on the matter, and it is bound to come in time. Public demonstrations like the Cordova coal party and the Dreamland rink meeting will hurry the redress of wrongs along. The federal judges should be more reserved in "butting in" on our local affairs, and especially in cases, like the one I speak of, where the applicant for the injunction is a violator of the law and the criminal laws at that. Let it be understood however, that our state judges are equally at fault with the federal judges. A short time ago Judge Donworth refused a temporary restraining order in a case in which the Seattle Kenton & Southern sought to prevent the grading and improving of a street in Rainier Beach, and one of our King county judges there- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN after granted a temporary injunction, tried the case and I suppose an appeal was taken which keeps the injunction in force for the next two or three years. If we ask the federal judges to keep hands off, our state judges should not grant injunctions which they refuse. I cannot understand why the City of Seattle has not been protected in these matters and prevented the federal courts from "butting in" on our local affairs. If these matters could be kept in the state courts, improvements and violations of the rights of the people would be settled in a very short time. Collecting more than a five cent fare and the issuing of transfers have gone through our courts and if our offices had guarded the rights of the people, those litigations would be at end. Why not have the corporation counsel and the city council had inserted in the charter of street car corporations the commencing an action in the federal courts, or appealing thereto, would cause a revocation and cancellation of the charter? Why has this been neglected during the past twenty years? The people in the Rainier valley have been shamefully treated and the only consolation they have in the matter is the present mayor, council and all of the officials, municipal and county, are in sympathy with them in their bereavement. The aid of the criminal laws have been invoked, and it is to be hoped that Crawford and his men will be arrested every time they ask for more than the five cent fare, and it should not be forgotten that the lawyers who counsel and advise the violation of the law are equally guilty with the principals. Of course, criticism of the judges, within reasonable bounds is permissible, whether the right of free speech is violated by going beyond these reasonable bounds is a question that will be fought out at the trial. Whether interfering with the court with your mouth becomes an offense in the absence of some overt physical act is a question upon which the attorneys will differ. Seattle has no more loyal citizen than Judge Hanford, but we think he has been too severely criticised. I think he should FRIDAY. Sept. 1, 19 not have issued the temporary restraining order, but really, he did no more than did Judge Dykeman when he overruled Judge Donworth and tied up the Rainier Beach improvements. Both were mistakes, honest ones. I believe in the right of criticising the courts, and I believe in the recall of judges, but corruption should not be charged every time a judge rules contrary to what we think is right. Judges are human and blunder around making mistakes the same as the balance of us and sometimes they lack horse sense and good judgment, but we should judge them as God does the heathen—according to their knowledge. IF. A correspondent sends us the following, which he entitles "An Afro-American Interlude." He says it is an accurate report of a conversation he recently heard: Jones, reclining in a hammock at the seashore, languidly brushing off the flies and other insects. "Say, Brown, do you know there is one fellow who couldn't hurt my feelings if he did draw the color line." Brown, puffing out his cheeks and then slowly blowing the smoke out through his nose: "Who's that, Jones?" Jones, slapping his cheek, "The mosquito. But then, I suppose as soon as the brethren found out they were being discriminated against they would object." Brown—"Sure thing. Not only that but some fellow would get out a patent and sell it to attract the pests. The brother would not stand being discriminated against, not by a little thing like that." Jones—"And those fellows up in Boston would protest in Fanueil Hall and form a society to put down the discrimination." Brown—"Still, I would try and stand it, the discrimination, I mean." Jones—"You would not hold out?" Brown—"Why?" Jones—"Well, as soon as the white man found out that mosquitoes would not light on a colored man he would claim it as a mark of inferiority in the race. He would say the reason the mosquitoes would not bite us was because we did not taste good." Brown—"By jove, you're right, Jones. That is just what the white man would say. Wouldn't that be tough?" (Cracking a big one on the back of his neck): "Cheer up, old man, they are still biting." New York Age. Persons in the Public Eye ey FRIDAY, Sept. 1, 1911: Neal Boyle, a Pike street clothes dealer, has to an extent got himself in the lime- light by criticizing the editor of a weekly paper for ‘an article appearing therin, to which he took religious exceptions. It looks to us very much like Neal was not half as deeply interested in the religion he pretonds to be defending as he was in getting a bit of cheap advertisement, notoriety which would sell him a few extra suits of clothes. The Catholic religion is pretty well established and any slight op- position an unfriendly editor may make about it will not impede its progress very much and Boyle knows that as well as any one else. Some men are so narrow and contracted that they would write an adver- tisement on the casket of a relative at the grave if they thought they could make a dollar by so doing. Watson C. Squire, a former territorial governor and subsequently United States senator of Washington, is still doing Seat- tle good deeds though he is seldom ever in the city at least any length of time. He practically speaking, is hardly a citizen of Seattle of late years so much of his time is spent in New York, but he never loses an opportunity to do the city a good turn. Senator Squire still has vast realty holdings in Seattle and her immediate community and he periodically makes pilgrimages here to look after his affairs, but he is almost a stranger in a strange land as the city and its inhabitants have changes so rapidly since he represented the state in the United States senate. When he retired from the senate Seattle did not have to ex- ceed 40,000 inhabitants and she now has 240,009 and is the most metropolitan city on the Pacific Coast. William Howard Taft, president of the United States, is to make a swing round the circles in October and the Northwest is included in his itinerancy and he will be in Seattle, October 16. Lets hope that Presi- dent Taft will not permit himself to be taken in charge of by a bunch of codfish aristocracy and be carted off to the golf club or some other equally generally objecticnal hole where the people as a whole will not be able to see him, and there spend his allotted time spend in Seattle away from the people. Of course this swing around the circles is for political effect and if the President desires to get good political re- sults out of it he had better pass up Caddy Collins and the other bowing apes of the community and meet the people. Will E. Humphrey, representative in Congress from the first district of Wash- ington, is home again and with the same blare of trumpets only with — different words he megaphones tu the people, ‘‘I am home again.’’ This year he is singing the praises of President Taft like unto the praises he sung of Uncle Joe Cannon last year, but who within a month after he had returned and had said all of those nice things about Cannon, stood up and de- nounced him because he found public sen- timent against him. Humphrey is a grand stand player and though he has made all THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN that talk about President Taft, if senti- ment should seem to run against Taft he would be the first to jump in the band- wagon and denounce him. His double crossing would have cost him his election last year had the people of Whatcom and Skagit counties have known him as well as do the people of King county, and if Seattle is placed in a district to itself be- fore the next election he will never repre- sent the state of Washington in Congress again. Admiral Togo, the noted Japanese war general that whipped the Russians to a stand still, who has been visiting in the United States, sailed for his home from Seattle last Tuesday morning after having been royally entertained every minute he was in the United States. In view of the oft repeated allegation that Japan and the United States are certain to plunge into a life and death struggle in the very near future. Admiral Togo must have felt as did Jesus Christ when Peter kissed Him in the presence of the Pharisees, while the citizen’s of this country. were lavishing praises upon him. Togo, however, is a great man and from a war stand point and greatness should be admired as well as honord whether it is your friend or your enemy. John H. Perry, one of the advising at- torneys in the anti-Hanfotd demonstration at the Dreamland, was for some time dep- uty prosecuting attorney of King county and was very favorably mentioned as a successor to George F. Vandevere, his su- perior. He, however, felt that he could do better as a private practitioner and in that he was quite correct for he has made dollars to his dimes in the prosecuting at- torney’s office. It is the con census of opinion that there is no case against Mr. Perry. Thomas R. Horner was never connected with the prosecuting attorney’s office of King county, but he was a Democratic candidate for the office and in his cam- paign tirades he made statements, which, if he had have made under different cir- cumstances, he would have been informed against on a charge of criminal libel. His speech in the anti-Hanford tirade, if cor- rectly quoted, was a remarkable one not for the intelligence it displayed, but for the vituperation and venom it contained. Mr. Horner seems to delight in branding those. he opposes as thleves whether he has any facts in his possession to bear out his contention or not. It is said by well informed students of Blackstone that Hor- ner will have to go some to escape the place he had hoped to send the leaders of the Republican party of this county to the ———~—— penitentiary. Oliver T. Erickson, one of the men ar- rested in connection with the anti-Han- ford meeting held in Seattle last Friday evening, is a Seattle councilman and one of the heavy industrial operators of the Northwest. In politics he is inelined to the Democratic side of the house, but he is an advocate of the single tax cult and is more or less severe in his criticism of those who do not believe as he does on the sub- ject. He has frequently ran for office in the past on the Democratic ticket, but never made much headway, owing to his radical views, but it looks now as if the city is drifting toward single tax and social- ism, which means that Erickson may yet reach the goal of his political ambition. Angelo V. Fawcett, who was likewise arrested in connection with the anti-Han- ford demonstration in Seattle, is perhaps one of the most radical men that has ever entered the political arena. He has affili- ated with every known political party and was elected mayor of Tacoma first asa Populist and subsequently as a Republican, but before his Republican time was up, he was recalled, Fawcett, to say the least, is a dangerous public character as all of his reforms are advocated by him for the pur- pose of getting himself another office. Milo A. Root, a fomer member of the su- preme court of the state of Washington, was heard to say a few days ago, “‘I do not take much stock in the single tax cult, but it occurs to me that the Austin E. Griffith ordinance in the city council, taxing vacant property held for speculation as much or more as improved property, is the proper step. The person who improves his prop- erty does so at his own expense and yet that improvement enhances the vacant property as much as it does his. The ordi- nance to my mind has the right ring.”” W. R. Crawford, chief factotum of the Renton-Southern railroad, has been arrest- ed by the prosecuting attorney of King county fora minor offense in connection with the operation of his road. Crawford has defied all law and decency in connec- tion with ‘the operation of that road for years and he has been backed in his deyil- try by one, Morris B. Sachs, a former su- perior court judge of Jefferson county, and who came within one inch of being im- peached, and, if reports be true, it cost him and his friends a small fortune in the way of corrupting the legislature to pre: vent it. If the brace of them got their just deserts they would be sent to state prison for life. Eugene W. Way, candidate for commis« sioner of the port of Seattle has a clean official record, he has always opposed graft, he has resided in Seattle for thirty years, he is a promotor and builder, work- ed at his own expense for the Cedar river water system, was a member of the city council. You make no mistake to vote for Way for this position. If you have ever spent very much time in Eastern Washington in the summer time you can thoroughly understand why the cit- izens of Wenatchee prefer shade trees to cement sidewalks; the former is refreshing while the latter is as hot as hades. political moves W. Considine ally of the of John W. ou it meant set by. But political life to him, and act he laid it had planned political life he believed the same time up politics was about ten could not have fured up his his future first venture him that he taste of suc- and on and burred him on , and so he pounds until ws of the old passed a for- surroundings short period few accom- lation or by done so by advantage in this par- 's foremost by the fame He has re- ew business the fame and JOHI [Name not provided] "Should you own a home?"—is a caption in the Grays Harbor News, and then it proceeds to favorably answer its caption by saying, "every one should own a home," to which we quite agree, but from sad experience we have learned that you should own that home in the country and not in a thriving city, if you expect to enjoy the home. The home in the city you have to rent from the tax collectors every year and in a city like Seattle at a very high rental ```markdown ``` Once upon a time there were few if any political moves made in Seattle without consulting John W. Considine of the First Ward. He was never a close ally of the Clancies, but he was an extremely close ally of John W. Considine, and if he happened to oppose you it meant you were going to have hard sledding to get by. But there comes an end to all things and the political life that he had been leading no longer appealed to him, and without any formal announcement of the fact he laid it down as quietly as he picked it up. But he had planned well for the future, for in laying down the political life he decided to take up the theatrical life as he believed he could make greater success at it and at the same time have less worry and expense. When he gave up politics and entered the theatrical business, which was about ten years ago, Mr. Considine himself says, it would not have taken an accountant many seconds to have figured up his entire worldly possessions including even his future prospects as they then appeared. His first venture brought him good results and it occurred to him that he had finally found his life callings. His first taste of success was an incentive for him to push on and on and every time he scored a new victory it only spurred him on to try to accomplish something still greater, and so he has gone on in the business by leaps and bounds until now he not only controls the vaudeville shows of the old and the new wordls, but he has likewise amassed a fortune. To jump from a man of only living surroundings to a man rolling in millions of dollars in the short period of ten years is a most remarkable feat and few accomplish it unless they do so by Wall Street speculation or by finding a gold mine, but Mr. Considine has done so by simply sticking close to business and taking advantage of opportunities that presented themselves in this particular business. He is truly one of Seattle's foremost business men and one of the few that carry the fame of Seattle to the utmost parts of the world. He has recently returned from the East and reports a new business combination which will bring him still more fame and fortune. 4 U. S. COURT IN SEATTLE, Although much has already been said in The Seattle Republican concerning the Federal Court in Seattle, owing to the anti-Hanford meeting at the Dreamland Rink, yet we cannot refrain from mentioning another coincident that came under our observations within the past week, and it is this: Rumor has it that Judge George Donworth is a very sick man, and it is further whispered that Judge Hanford himself was heard to say one day this week, Judge Donworth might never be able to go on the bench again. Judge Donworth has only been on the federal bench a little over a year and in that short time his health has completely given way and he may have to either retire or perhaps succumb to the malady which is eating on his constitution before he can retire. Some months ago the editor of the Post-Intelligencer declared Judge Hanford seriously troubled with anile and caduke, and the same opinion seems to have prevailed among those who attended the Dreamland Rink, and it is further stated that Judge Hanford has been seriously thinking of retiring from the bench, and he would do so at this time if he were not under fire. While Judge Hanford still has an active mind, yet it is the concensus of opinion that age and worry have told on him and he has outlived his days of usefulness as a federal judge. Now comes the report that Ralph M. Hopkins, who has been clerk of the federal court in Seattle ever since Judge Hanford has been on the bench, has also lost his health and is a physical wreck at his country home near Kirkland. Even if that story is not true he has had a mix-up with the government over money matters, and he is now under suspension and may never again fill the place and may not escape criminal prosecution. If all these rumors as to the mental and physical condition of the federal court in Seattle be true it begins to look as if it will not be very long before the whole lump lot of them will be down and out, and new hands at the mill. Although much has already been said in this issue of The Republican concerning the Later Mr. Hopkins has handed in his resignation and as fast as a shortage is found he pays pu, and in doing so he seems to assume the attitude, "I know I have been stealing, but I a mready and willing to blow back if you can find it out." THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN [Name] JOHN W. CONSIDINE. l is a rate at that. Yes, indeed, own a home, but e near be sure you own it in the country where t true you can be independent. Admiral Togo, the noted Japanese war general that whipped the Russians to a standstill, who has been visiting in the United States, sailed for his home from Seattle last Tuesday morning after having been royally entertained every minute he was in the United States. In view of the oft repeated allegation that Japan and the United States are certain to plunge into a life and death struggle in the very near future, Admiral Togo must have felt as did Jesus Christ when Peter kissed Him in the presence of the Pharisees, while the citizens of this country were lavishing praises on him. Togo, however, is a great man and from a war standpoint greatness should be admired as well as honored whether it is your friend or your enemy. Not enough names as yet have been secured to demand the recall of Mayor Dilling, but the crazies are working day and night on the foolish piece of tommy rot. There is no law under which such peace New York female hotel habitues, according to a recent rotel order, will have to either sleep alone or go to the basement, as no dogs will be allowed above the ground floor. Always after the women. He abstent and ad dugend but gravely hearts FR1DAY, Sept. 1, 1911 d ns * e | > i REV. MARK A. MATTHEWS, D.D. L.L. D. except the one for the water shed. If you voted for mayor last Spring you can vote at the coming election without further re- gistration. . Champ Clark is absolutely correct in say- ing, “The Democrats have redeemed all of their pledges,’ and he is correct because they made no pledges only to try to disrupt the Republican party through the agency of their pliant tools, Bob La Follette, Miles Poindexter and the other Republican rene~ gates, more commonly known as Insurgents. The country is sadly in need of real legis- lation in the interest of the uplift of the whole people and such legislation should Je had though to do so all of the old parties are wiped out of existence. The whole term of the special session was spent in the Republican party and the Democratic party, aided by the Insurgents, trying to manufacture political fuse for the cam- paign next year, and the people be damned. Not knowing of the unfortunate anti-Han- ford embroglio, Representative Humphrey blew into Seattle and at once found himself in an unfortunate predicament, because he wanted to take sides with both and so he proceeded to blow hot and col. First he denounced the meeting to the Hanfordites and then he carted himself off to the county jail to pump hot air into Erickson and his comrades. Trust Billy Humphrey to do the political stunts at all times. And speak- UR AU ST Bh RO tl ee Th aa a ew Dr. Matthews is the pastor of the First Presbyterian Church of Seattle and has been for the past ten years. When he took the pastorate of the church it was in a chaotic state, there being almost as many factions in the congregation as there were members, but he has been able to bring peace and harmony out of confusion, and after serving in the building in which the congregation was worshiping when he became its pastor for a number of years, that was sold and a new edifice erected, which is the most imposing as well as commodious church struc- ture in the Northwest. He had not been a resident of the city but a short while before he began to take an active interest in the public affairs so far as the moral attitude of the city was in- volved, and he soon made himself felt among the political bosses. He from time to time took a fall out of the city officials and especially the mayor when he failed to do his sworn duty and on a number of occasions has fought the election of nominees for mayor on the ground of their wide open policy platforms. After Hiram Charles Gill had been elected mayor of Seattle and he had watched things drift from bad to worse, he, so goes the story, with his own money employed the noted Detective John W. Burns to come to Seattle and probe into the city’s affairs, and as a result of that investigation the then chief of the police now stands convicted of accepting bribes and a score of other persons more or less prominent in political circles have grand jury indictments hanging over their heads. He was active in the recall of Mayor Gill and equally active in the election of George W. Dill- ing as mayor of Seattle. He now takes the stand that there is no excuse for the recall of Dilling because this recall movement is being fathered by the tenderloiners and their friends, with the view, if not again making Seattle a wide open town, to do as much along that line as possible. He is of the opinion that the recallers will not be successful in their nefarious undertaking. The regular nominees for Seattle port commissioners -got their nomination from the Chamber of Commerce and not from the peeple, and for that reason every one of the three ought to be defeated at the polls. The old back room star chamber methods of nominating persons for public office was murdered by the direct primary law FRIDAY, Sept. 1, 1911 and it should never again be tolerated. in speaking about this place the question has been repeatedly asked this week, “Why is it that Bob Bridges desires to quit a job paying him three hundred dollars per month to take the position he is seeking, and for which he is to get no remuneration?” If there is not a nigger in the wood pile then it smells very much like it. Without know- ing the opponent in the second commis- sioner’s district to Bridges he should be elected on general principles because it looks altogether too much like a frame-up. In the city Eugene W. Way ought to win over his opponent by a two to one vote as he comes direct from the people while the other man is not known beyond the Cham- ber of Commerce circles. Next Tuesday the omnibus bond election will be held, at which bonds for a number of public enterprises will be voted upon. This paper in its last issue almost advocated the not voting for any of the bond issues, but it now thinks the bonds for the water shed about Cedar Lake should be voted as it will be a protection to the health of the city for all time to come. Thus far and no further, and we therefore advocate that you vote NO on every other proposed bond issue. The taxpayers are already bond-rid- den to death and there is no excuse for vot- ing any more bonds at this time. You will make no mistake to vote NO on every bond proposition at the election next Tuesday THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ing about Humphrey going to the county jail to condole with the prisoners, John E. Humphries wants it distinctly understood that he has no desire at this time to be Representative Will E. Humphrey. If Will is getting any pleasure out of blowing hot and cold he has my consent to enjoy it ali alone. puss a si ole ee Scott C. Bone, new editor of the Post-In- telligencer, assumes the duties of his posi- tion today. Editor Bone brings with him the highest recommendations, and chief among his many good qualities is that of being pleasant and affiable to those with whom he is thrown in contact. While the editor-in-chief of a great daily, such as is the P.-I., does not have to be an all-round mixer, yet he must meet those persons he does meet with a smiling face and an open countenance. ready and willing to answer their questions or converse with them without causing his guests to feel that by some means an iceberg had found its way from the north and was acting editor of the paper. This seeing America first advice, which is going the rounds of the press just now, makes one tired. Let the man with the money see America or any other country he darn please first; it is none of the other fellow’s business. Of course the fellow with an ax to grind wants everybody to see America first because he can make a piece 0 ESEEESOSS'S:=SS:--— NOTICE TO. TAXPAYERS. Notice is hereby given that the King County Board of Equalization will be in session three (3) weeks commencing MONDAY, AUGUST 7, 1911, at the County Assessor’s Office at the King County Court House, for the purpose of equalizing the tax roll of 1911. All taxpayers claiming abatement of tax are hereby notified to appear on or before SATURDAY, AUGUST 26, 1911, or be forever barred. : : OTTO A. CASE, County Auditor and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners, of King County, Washington. Dated at Seattle, this 12th day of July, 1911. “OLD GERMAN LAGER” aged with “time”— in the old-fashioned way, and that’s why “Es Giebt Kein Ropfweb” The Independent Brewing Co. Phones | idney 75 Seattle ORDER A CASE OUT TO YOUR PLACE OF o Raith ( PHONE SIDNEY 526 iB Ra alee renee eee eae Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment + specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King.—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Cresentia Giebel, Deceased. Notice to Creditors. To the Creditors of Cresentia Giebel, De- ceased: You, and each of you, will please pre- sent°any claims which you may have against Cresentia Gibel, or against the estate of said Cresentia Giebel, to Har- old Wiedemann, Administrator of said Estate, at the office and business ad- dress of said Administrator, No. 314-16 Colman Building, in the city of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, with- in one year after the date of the first publication hereof, August 25, 1911. Dated at Seattle this 24th day of Au- gust, 1911, HAROLD WIEDEMANN, Administrator of the Estate of Cresentia Giebel. TREFETHEN & GRINSTEAD, Attorneys for Administrator. No. 314-16 Colman Building, Se- attle, Wash. August 25—Sept. 22, 1911. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Katherine Schulver, Deceased. No. 11830. Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Fred L. Riece, administrator of the estate of Katherine Schulver, deceased, having filled in this court his final ac-: ES count and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for disribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appear- ing to the court that said petition seis forth facts sufficient to authorize a dis- tribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Katherine Schulver, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Wash- ington; at the court room of the Pro- bate Department of said court in Seat- tle, Washington, on the 25th day of Sep- tember, 1911, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a.m, of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hear- ing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 25th day of September, 1911, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in. said King County ana of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 22nd day of August, 1911, H, A. P. MYERS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss. D, K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officia Clerk of the Su- perior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original or- der to show cause, made by said Court on the 22nd day of August, 1911, in the matter of the estate of Katherine Schul- ver, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 22nd day of August, 1911, (Seal) D, K. SICKELS, Clerk. By C. C, BURTIS, Deputy Clerk. August 25—Sept. 22, 1911. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. John Conomou and Alexander Christo- pholous, plaintiffs, vs. James Collias, defendant.—No, 81895. The State of Washington, to said de- fendant, James Collias: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 4th day of August, 1911, and defend the above en- titled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plain- tiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plain- tiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment THE SEATTLE REPURLICAN will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. . The object of said action is to compel an accounting from said defendant to said plaintiffs, and to obtain judgment against said defendant, James Collias, in favor of said plaintiffs, John Cono- mou and Alexander Christopholous, for the sum of $390, and the costs of this action, and that the interest of said de- fendant, James -Collias, in and to the partnership business ‘heretofore _con- ducted in the City of Seattle by and be- tween said plaintiffs and said defendant be sold to satisfy said judgment. The property of said partnership is all located in the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, and is de- scribed as follows: That certain coffee house and pool room known as the Pantheon Cafe or Greek Club, No. 511% Opera Place, situ- ated on the alley in the Arctic Club Building, in the City of Seattle, includ- ing all personal property of every kind, name and nature in the rooms in which said business is conducted, and consist- ing, among other things, of a cash regis- ter, dining tables, chairs, cooking uten- sils, diches, graphophone, ete., including, also, the good will and trade of said business, and including, also, two pool tables which are now in storage at Se- attle aforesaid. R, E. THOMPSON, JR., Attorney for Plaintiffs. Office and postoffice address. 618 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. rope of first publication August 4th, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Notice of Sale. In the Matter of the Estate of Anna L. Eckhart, deceased.—No. 10614. Notice is hereby given that pursuant to an order of the Superior Court of the state of Washington, in and for the County of King, made on the 17th day of August, 1911, in the above entitled matter, George J. Danz, the administra- tor of the estate of Anna L, Eckhart, deceased, was authorized to sell at pri- vate sale, for cash, or on time or terms, as may in the judgment of the admin- istrator seem best for the estate, and as the court may hereafter approve, the following described real estate, situate and being in King County, Washington, to-wit: The south half (%) of lot seventeen (17), block twelve (12), Ren- ton Hill addition to the city of Seattle, with the appurtenances. That said sale will be made on or after the 2nd day of September, 1911, said date being more than 15 days from the date of the first publication of this no- tice, and said sale will not be made be- fore said date, but must be made within six months thereafter. Bids or offers for the purchase of said described premises must be in writing, and may be mailed to, or left at No. 812 Lowman Building, in Seattle, Wash- ington, the place where the business of said estate is transacted, or delivered to said administrator, George J. Danz, per- sonally, or may be filed in the office of the cierk of the above entitled court The return of sale must be made at any time after the 18th day of August, 1911, the same being the date of the first pub- lication of said notice, and before the making of said sale. GEORGE J. DANZ, Administrator of the Estate of Anna J. Eckhart, Deceased. Cc. A. RIDDLE, Attorney for Administrator. Suite 655 Colman Building, Seattle, Wash. ere of first publication August 18, a August 25—September 8, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of Estate of S. H. Stewart, deceased, Fred H. Pearsons, administrator of the estate of 8, H. Stewart, deceased, having filed in this court final account and pe- tition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said S. H. Stewart, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Wash-~ ington; at the court room of the Pro- bate Department of said court in Seat- tle, King County, Washington, on the 21st day of September, 1911, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account .should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hear- ing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 2ist day of September, 1911, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein, Done in open court this 17th day of August, 1911. August 25—September 8, 1911, KING DYKEMAN, Judge. State of Washington, County of King —ss. D. K. Sickels, county clerk of King FRDIAY,- Sept. 1, 1y11 County _and ex-officio clerk of the Su- perior Court of the State of Washington, for the county of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true ana correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by ‘said court on the 17th day of August, 1911, in the matter of the estate of S. H. Stewart, deceased, Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 17th day of August, 1911. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. August 26—September 8, 1911. IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the state of Henry Rasche, deceased.—No. 10562. By order of said court made herein on the 24th day of July, 1911. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouch- ers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 807 Leary Building, the place of business of said estate, in Se- attle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication July 28, 1911. HARRISON B, MARTIN, As Administrator of said Hstate. HARRISON B. MARTIN, Attorney for Hstate. 807 Leary Building, Seattle, Wash. NOTICE TO STOCKHOLDERS. To the Stockholders of the Columbia Lumber Company: You and each of you will please take notice that a special meeting of the stockholders of said company will be held at the office of the company at Columbia, Seattle, King County, Wash- ington, on Saturday, the 23rd day of September, 1911, at two o'clock in the pose of increasing the capital stock of This meeting is called for the pur- afternoon of said day. said company from $10,000.00 to $15,- 000.00, and for such other matters as may be properly brought before said meeting. HARRY R. KNEISLEY, President, EMILY L. KNEISLEY, Attest: H. R. KNEISLEY, . Acting Secretary, MONCRIEFFE CAMBRON, Attorney for Columbia Lumber Co. IN |THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THR State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. In Probate, Notice to Creditors. Inthe Matter of the Estate of Maria Knight Coarum, deceased: | Joseph Knight Coarum, administrator.—No. 12472, To the creditors of Maria Knight Coar- um, deceased, and of her above en- titled estate and to all persons hav- ing claims against said deceased: You are hereby notified to present any and all claims that you or any of you may have or hold against her or her said estate, to me or my under- signed attorney at 1324 Alaska Build- ing, Seattle, Washington, with the neces- sary vouchers, within ‘one year after the date of this notice, First publication August 11, 1911. JOSEPH KNIGHT COARUM, Administrator. J. W. BROWN, Attorney’ for Administrator. 1824 Alaska Building, Seattle. INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. A.D. McPhee, plaintiff, vs. Jennet Mc- Phee, defendant. —No. The State of Washington, to the said Jennet McPhee, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this sum- mons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 14th day of July, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the ubove entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at- torney for the plaintiff at his office be- low stated; and in case of your fallure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to secure a divorce in favor of the plaintiff from the defendant on the ground of incom- patibility of temper, and on the further ground of cruelty. WILLIAM C, KEITH, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 326 Leary _ Building. Seattle, King County, Wash. IN| THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Elizabeth Pond, plaintiff, vs. Charles B, Pond, defendant.—No, The State of Washington, to the sald Charles B, Pond, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the 14th day of July, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your ans- Wer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintife at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of sald court, The object of the above en- titled action is to secure a decree of livorce on the grounds of non-support und desertion. HOMER E, TURNER, Attorney for Plaintitr. Seattle, King County, Washington. July 14—August 26, 1911, % | FRIDAY, Sept. 1, 1911 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Notice and Summons. LH. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Grace M. Roberts, Fannie McLean and Fannie McLean, Fannie E, McLean, and all persons’ unknown, if any, Raving or claiming an. interest in ‘and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. State of Washington, to the above de- You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, are hereby noti- fled that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of Oct. 1910, and numbered B67315, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1908, in the amount of $25.16, and upon real property situ- ated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 9, block 20, Law's Addition, less cast 79% feet. That the taxes for the following sup- sequent years haye been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real ‘property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $33.90; for the year 190%, the sum of $65.18. Which several ‘sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. ‘You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear Within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- lication, to-wit: within sixty days after September 1, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint, of said plain- tiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plain- tiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, fore- closing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property ‘for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, ‘interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plain- tiff’s complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintift. A. ©, MAC DONALD, ‘Attorney for Plaintiff. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Notice and Summons. L. H, Craver, plaintiff, vs. J. J. Lyson, J. M. EB. Atkinson, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, defendants. State of Washington, to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, are hereby noti- fied that the above named _ plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the Ist day of June, 1911, and numbered 872911, for the delinquent taxés of the year 1907, in the amount of $1.95, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: West 10 ft of lot 2, block §, Wallingford’s Division of Green Lake Addition. That the taxes for the following sub- sequent years have been paid by the plaintif! upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1908, the sum of $2.52; for the year 1909, the sum of $8.41; for the year 1910, the sum of $18.19. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- lication, to-wit: within sixty days after September 1, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plain- tiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plain- tiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, fore- closing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plain- tiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court, L, H. CRAVER, 2 Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. ° Sent. 1—Oct. 13. 1911. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Theodore Thorson, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real’ property, defendants, THE SEATTLE. REPUBLICAN by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of February, 1910, and numbered B-61781, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of $2,99, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to- wit: Lot i, block 4, Hillman City, Division No. 4. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above de- scribed real property, to-wit: For the year 1908, the sum of $5.67; for the year 1909, the sum of $7.25. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- lication, to-wit, within 60 days after July 7, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property 1 found against it respectively as pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plain- tiff’s complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff, A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 7, August 18, 1911, IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L._H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Ernest A, Boatman, and all persons, unknown, if any, having or claiming an_ interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of 1 certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the ist day of June, 1908, and numbered B53647, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1905, in the amount of $6.48, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: 8. BE. % of N. W. % of Sec. 18, Tp. 20.N,, R. 11 EB, W, M. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintif€ upon said above de- scribed real property, to-wit: For the year 1906 the sum of $4.14; for the year 1907 the sum of $4.40; for the year 1908 the sum of $0.58; for the year 1909 the sum of $0.53. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (incluaing said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- lication, to-wit, within 60 days after July 7, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together, with interest and costs. Tn case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon. and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plain~ tiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court, L, H. CRAVER, Plaintiff, A. C, MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 7, August 18, 1911, IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, pa vs. C. D. Hill- man and J. Luckey, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of 1 certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of February, 1910, and numbered B-61726, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of $2.16, and upon the real property situate din said King County, described as follows, to- wit: Lot 16, block 3, Hillman City Ad- dition, Division No. 2. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by. the plaintiff upon said above de- scribed real property, to-wit: For the year 1908, the sum of $3.10; for the year 1909, the sum of $3.08. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- lication, to-wit, within 60 days after July 7, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment wil be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real proverty for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plain- tiff’s complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff, aA, C, MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 7, August 18, 1911, IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. C. D, Hill- man and Hillman Investment Co., J. Luckey, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an_ interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, are hereby notitled that the above named plaintiff is the holder of 1 certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of Februdry, 1910, and numbered B-61725, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of $2.16, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to- wit: Lot 15, block 3, Hillman City Ad- dition, Division No. 2. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have Leen paid by the plaintiff upon said above de- scribed real property, to-wit: For the year 1908, the sum of $3.10; for the year 1909, the sum of $3.08. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- lication, to-wit, within 60 days after July 7, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said veal property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plain- tiff’'s complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff, A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July’ 7, August 18, 1911. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. C. G. Mor- rison and Mary L. McDonald, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. State of Washington: To fhe above defendants.and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of 1 certain aeymanent tax certificate issued by the reasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 7th day of January, 1910, and numbered B-61642, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $1.04, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to- wit. Lot 10, block 3, of the Northern Addition to the City of Seattle, east of Olympic Place. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above de- scribed real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of 43 cents; for the year 1908, the sum of seat for the year 1909, the sum of Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and ane all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real Paes. Yon and each o: zou including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first gepiettey of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- lication, to-wit, within 60 days after July 7, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plain- tiff’s complaint, now on file in this cause and Court, L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff, A. C, MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 7, August 18, 1911. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THB State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Crayer, plaintiff, vs. Jas. Mus- grove, and ‘all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in’ and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of 1 certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 22nd day of September, 1909, and numbered B-61611, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $6.16, and upon the real property situated in’ said King County, described as follows, to- wit: N. B. 4 of S. W. % Sec. 4 Tp. 21, NR. 7 EB, W. M. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above de- scribed real property, to-wit: For the year 1907 the sum of $5.59; for the year 1908 the sum of $6.37; for the year 1909 the sum of $5.55. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including sald persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned, to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- lication, to-wit, within 60 days after July 7,'1911, in’ the above entitled court and action; ‘and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due ‘upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plain- tiff’s complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L., H. CRAVER, Plaintiff, A. C, MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 7, August 18, 1911. State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons for Publication. Alice E. Rowley, plaintiff, vs. Thomas Rowley, defendant.—No. The State of Washington to the said Thomas Rowley, defendant: You are hereby’ summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit, within sixty days after the 11th day of August, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorne:’ for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘he object of the above entitled action is to obtain a de- eree of divorce on grounds of non-sup- port and desertion, HOMER BE. TURNER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address, No, 745 New York pisces Seattle, King County, Washing- ‘on, IN| THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons. D. S Crain, plaintiff, vs. J. E. Ellwelt defendant.—No, The State of Washington to the above named defendant, J. EB. Ellwell. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the publication of this summons, exclusive of the date of publication, to-wit: sixty days after the 25th day of August, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and serve a copy of youn answer upon the under- signed attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be ren- dered against you according to the de- man of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The purpose of this action is to fore- close a mortgage upon the following de- scribed premises: Commencing at a point one hundred and two and one-half (102%) feet east from the northwest corner of lot one (1), block thirty-seven (37), Maynard's Lake Washington addition, thence south one hundred (100) feet, thence east thirty-five (35) feet, thence north one hundred (100) feet, thence west thirty-five (35) feet to the point of beginning, being a part of lots one (1) and two (2), eleven (11) and twelve (12), block thirty-seven (37) Maynard's Lake Washington addition to the city of Seattle, in the county of King and state of Washington, of record in the auditor's office of said county. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 323 Central Building, Seattle, Wash. August 25—September 8, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Albert, Prince Daull, defendant: Abert Prince Baum, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 18th day of August, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to procure a divorce from defendant upon the grounds of desertion and non-support, and for alimony of fifty dollars per month. FRED L. RICE, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address, 229 Burke Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 25—September 8, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Summons by Publication. Jessie. Luckerath, plaintiff, vs. Fred Luckerath, defendant.—No. 81946. The State of Washington, to the said Fred. Luckerath, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 4th day of August, A. D. 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: An action for divorce on the grounds of habitual drunkenness. J. M. WIESTLING, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address, 314 Bailey Building, Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Lulu Morrison, plaintiff, vs. William A. Morrison, defendant.—No. 81879. The State of Washington, to William A. Morrison, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 4th day of August, A. D. 1911, and defend the above action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his address below stated; in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce from you on the grounds of non-support, cruel treatment and personal indignities, and the custody of Ethel Morrison, the minor child of plaintiff and defendant. HOWARD O. DURK Attorney for Plaintiff. 535 Henry Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Mabel H. Slve, deceased.—No. By order of said court made herein on the 28th day of August, 1911. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said deceased and to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at rooms 501-502 New York Block, in Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. As Administrator of said Estate GEO. L. PALMER, Attorney for Estate. MABEL H. SLYE, Deceased, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 1—Sept. 29, 1911. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after September 1, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 1—Oct. 13, 1911? IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. N. H. Latimer and Alfred E. Heffner, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of Nov., 1908, and numbered B54878, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.65, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit. Lot 42, N. H. Latimer's Lake Washington Plat, less S. $1/2 redeemed. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $1.88; for the year 1908, the sum of $8.65; for the year 1909, the sum of $13.12. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after September 1, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 1—Oct. 13, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Mary Udell, Harry S. Heath, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th day of June, 1910, and numbered B65681, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of $1.31, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning 16 feet west of SW, corner of lot 4, Sec. 18, Tp. 22 N., R. 3 E., W. M.; thence west 150 feet; thence north 100 feet; thence east 150 feet; thence south 100 feet to beginning, being part of SE. $1/4 of SW. $1/4 of Sec. 18, Tp. 22 N., R. 3 E., W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1908, the sum of 94 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 94 cents; Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Carrie Himelloch and Isaac Himelloch, her husband, plaintiffs, vs. Henry F. Baker and Marie L. Baken, his wife, defendants.--No. The State of Washington, to the above named defendants: You, and each of you, are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit. within sixty days after the first day of September, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs, at the address below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of this action is to quiet title to the following described land in King County, Washington, to-wit: Lot 16, block 8, Jackson Street Addition to the City of Seattle, and to obtain a decree decreeing that the said defendants have no interest whatsoever in and to said lands or any part thereof. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, rooms 604-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 1—Oct. 13, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Albert E. Smith, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.— No. 82474. State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of May, 1911, and numbered B6787, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906 in the amount of $4.21, and upon the real property situated in the County of King, State of Washington, described as follows, to-wit: The east 421 feet of the portion of Clarke's First Addition to Kent, lying south of Temperance Street, between Jason and Hazel Streets. That the plaintiff has paid the following subsequent taxes on the said property: for the year 1907, the sum of $4.00; for the year 1908, the sum of $2.41; for the year 1909, the sum of $2.53; for the year 1910, the sum of $2.07. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against the said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within 60 days after the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after September 1, 1911, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for plaintiff below named at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of the said taxes and costs against the said above described real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it for said taxes, interest and costs, and ordering a sale of the said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law and as prayed for in said plaintiff's complaint on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff vs. Jens Torineson, Jens Tonnson and Vashon College Association, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April, 1910 and numbered B61745, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of $2.29, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: West 261 feet of East 5 acres of N. ½ of SW. ¼ of SE. ¼ of Sec. 13, Tp. 22 N., R. 2 E., W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1908, the sum of $3.78; for the year 1909, the sum of $3.79. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby FRIDAY. Sept. 1. 1911 and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after September 1, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 1—Oct. 13, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Mary S. Phease, May S. Phease, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herein-after described real property, defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of May, 1911, and numbered B69792, for the delinquent taxes of the years 1903 to 1908. inclusive, in the following amount of $9.01, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 12, block 17, Hillman City Division No. 2. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1910, the sum of $2.25; for the year 1909, the sum of $2.07. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after September 1, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 1—Oct. 13, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Ruth Davis, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of 1 certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April, 1910, and numbered B61761, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of $1.22, and upon the read property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 4, less 8.49 acres right-of-way of C. M. " St. P. Ry., in sec. 24, tp. 22 N., r. 6 E. W. M. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1908, the sum of $1.27; for the year 1909, the sum of $1.54. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, Mary Carpenter Daull, plaintiff, vs. Albert Prince Daull, defendant.—No. exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after July 7, 1911, in the above entitled court