Seattle Republican

Historical Society The Seattle Republican CURRENT COMMENT CURRENT COMMENT Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Is published every Friday by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3 per year; six months, $1.50; postage prepaid. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, Inc. Main 305 427 Epler Block Seattle, Washington HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON, - - - Publisher SUSIE REVELS CAYTON, - - - Associate "Thompson retires under fire," snarls the Times, but its only under the fire of the Times, and that fanned by the Blethens, which has never been considered an "all-consuming." Unlike the line, "You may forget the singer, but you won't forget the song," it will be a good many years before Seattle will forget R. H. Thompson and as for his work that will never be forgotten. In the past Puget Sound has been able to grin at the other sections of the United States in the clutches of King Boreas, but in the recent country-wide blizzard balmy Puget Sound was "frez up" just as badly as Chicago. If Beattie, the Virginia uxocide, could be sent to prison for life and beyond the hope of gubernatorial clemency, then his death sentence should be commuted as should all other death sentences, until the law is changed. There is hardly any doubt but that the Seattle Daily Times will get more court publicity in December than it had bargained for, as all thre of the Blethens and the city editor will be on trial for felonies, and Paul Hedrick will be sitting for the month as a juror. An Austrian "bowing ape," who had planned to sell his weather worn title to an American heiress for a "big wad," got jilted and so financially disappointed was he that he sued her for $25,000 as heart balm. The lady might compromise with a hundred bucks and a ticket across the waters. the Force-Astor marriage, Rev. Joseph Lambert of Providence, Rhode Island, will not only resign his pastorate, but will quit the ministry and go into business. Evidently he made a ten-strike and out when he tied that nuptial knot. It's an American disease-get the money-and the preachers are not above it. Because he was criticised for performing "Britains gloomy over high cost of living," says an exchange. Well, the Americans are way past that stage of the game, and are actually hungry over the high cost of living, and unless relief comes soon many will be starving to death over the high cost of living. --- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, NOV. 17, 1911. CURREN A MUNICIPAL TELEPHONE. In advocating a municipal telephone system for Seattle there is no disposition on the part of the Seattle Republican to punish the Sunset Telephone Company for either fancied or real grievances, but because it is a business proposition for the people. The Sunset is a business proposition for the stockholders of that company and each month they are reaping their rewards at the expense of the people. On the other hand a municipal telephone system will do no one an injustice, but will be an ever lasting benefit a well as a great financial asset to the whole community. So far as this paper is concerned it has always opposed the dual telephone system in Seattle and never consented to use the Independent, but years of experience has convinced us that the telephone system of a community, like the light and water system, should be owned and operated by the municipality. Had the lighting system of Seattle been in honest hands—in hands that would have pushed it as would a private enterprise been pushed—the city would today be getting greater returns from its lighting system than from its water system, and that is saying a good deal. Less the corns of some private enterprise be tread upon even at this time those having charge of the city lighting plant refuse to put a solicitor out or give the plant a line of publicity in the newspapers which,if done, would result in twice as many contracts being made than are now on file. So also would a municipal telephone system put in honest hands in six months time have more patrons than both the systems now operated in Seattle. The people are being bled by private corporate greed for every necessity and they themselves can remedy the evils and if they themselves do not do it then they are fit only for slaves. KING COUNTY PUBLISHERS. It is meet and proper that the publishers of weekly papers in King County band themselves together for both protection as well as for a general uplift, and to that end ten .. The .. Seattle Republican Is a LIVE ONE And you are missing A GOOD THING by not having it sent to yon every week Call Main 305, and order The Seattle Republican 424 Epler Block and Controller Key Controversies talked LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 1911. VOLUME XVIII, NUMBER 37. COMMENT COMMENT of the publishers of weekly papers of the county met in Kent last Saturday and after talking the matter over went into a temporary organization, with J. D. Dean chairman and H. R. Cayton secretary and treasurer. After an hour's consultation they adjourned for two weeks and will meet in the Georgetown Hall Saturday, November 25, at 1 o'clock. If but twenty out of the twenty-seven weekly papers of the county affiliate with the organization and do so with earnestness and zeal, there will soon be a marked improvement in the general condition of the weekly press of King County. With an organization working in perfect harmony the weekly press will be more influential in the county than any one of the metropolitan papers and will even make both of them look to their laurels. Why would it not be more profitable for advertisers to deal with a number of papers in the various parts of the county than with a daily, the most of whose readers are persons who do little else than scan the head lines. It is safe to say that twenty weekly papers of King County can be selected which have a reading patronage of between 100,000 and 200,000 each week and advertisements wisely gotten up and placed in their columns would get more publicity than any of the dailies could possibly give it and at the same time cost the advertiser less than half what it would cost in the daily. This, of course, does not apply to bargain day advertisers, but to legitimate advertisement, such as a great many business concerns seek to get. WHY YOUNG MEN GO WRONG. Why Young Men Go Wrong is a subject that is being widely discussed in the east just now and Judge O'Sullivan attributes the cause of so many young men going wrong to: A lack of religious or moral instructions in the schools. Reduced wages which have deprived parents and their children of former comforts and luxuries. A disinclination on the part of young men to work, partly because of their having been spoiled at home and partly because of their own realization of the inadequacy of the wages they will get in the trades. Bad associations on the streets at night. All of the above statements are undeniable causes that lead young men to commit crime, but to our mind there is still another that the judge did not enumerate and it is the get rich spirit on the part of the Americans, which leads the young man with lucrative employment to try to live like a man with a million at his command. Americans are money mad and that drives not only young men, but old men to commit crime to get the money. • --- The People's Forum By A. G. McBride I enjoyed a trip to Olympia the first of the week and am pleased to say that the capital city has paved a number of its principal streets and in other respects is putting on metropolitan airs. It no longer makes one tired to visit that city. Of course, everybody goes to the capitol, including myself. The Supreme Court is now in session and grinds out about a half a dozen cases each day for five days of the week. The Chief Justiceship has again swung around to Judge Dunbar. The judge has been a member of the supreme court constantly for the past twenty-two years, and has heretofore been its chief justice a number of times. The court is now composed of nine judges, who do a great amount of hard and tiresome work, and without going into the history of the past, the court as now composed, is giving high grade service and turning out decisions the equal of any state in the Union, and from what I hear the lawyers say, and they always want to be fair with the courts, the profession appreciates the excellent work that the reports show is being done. But I am getting away from my subject. I want to say a few things about Judge Dunbar. I first met him a little more than twenty-one years ago. We used to call him the "man of sense," but now he is the "Grand Old Man of Washington." Think of it: twenty-two years' continuous work in the highest court of the state and during all that time, I have never heard a breath of suspicion against his honor or integrity, and during a part of this time, I cannot say that the Judge has been in the best of company. It became a habit for lawyers to criticize our supreme court a few years ago, and a few attorneys indulge themselves in a like manner at the present time, but now is the time to quit it. The court deserves praise—not censure. Every Democrat has the unbounded right to make a fool of himself if he wants to, and because I hesitate to interfere with this inalienable right, I hesitate to criticize William Jennings Bryan. He has gone "dafffy" because a Republican court, led by a Democratic chief justice, declared that only an unreasonable restraint of trade was a crime. He says the court read the word "reasonable" into the law, which is all wrong; it was common sense that read it in, and if Bryan were anything more than a jack-leg lawyer he ought to see that what the court did was right. We have the same kind of a law in this state and I doubt not when the time comes and the question is squarely raised, the words "reasonable" and "unreasonable" will go in. Now let me illustrate: Suppose the milk dealers of Seattle should all agree that they would reduce the price of milk from eight and a third or ten cents a quart to five cents. Now according to William Jennings Bryan, those milk men would all be liable to punishment. Now in such a case, the supreme court said: "No, those men are not guilty of any restraint of trade, because the restraint, if any, is reasonable; it is not unreasonable, and therefore cannot be made a crime." Washington Supreme Court. Democratic Damphools. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN le's Forum McBride Who will say they honestly believe those milk dealers should be punished? But that is what Bryan says should be done. Col. Blethen and ex-Senator Wilson shook hands in public last Monday evening. Tally twice for "Gipsy" Smith. The Socialists elected nine or ten mayors in Ohio at the recent elections. Wall street is breeding them by the thousands. Now is the time for the city of Seattle to indulge itself in the ownership of a telephone system. The Independent should belong to the people. God pity us if the Sunset gets full control of the telephone business of Seattle. From this time on, every franchise granted by the city should contain a forfeiture clause, if the corporation commences or removes any litigation to the United States courts. The only hindrance to the enforcement of the state laws against corporations are the Federal courts. Col. Blethen's Times made an awful muss last week when it used its columns to bring about a merger of the telephone companies, instead of standing with the people for public ownership, and in defending the captain who put a boy off of his boat onto an island instead of bringing the kid to Seattle. What a power the Colonel and his Times could wield in this great, growing city if the columns of that gigantic paper would always stand for the right, and for the interests of the masses. The monetary commission has recommended the amended Aldrich plan. It seems to be universally conceded that our present money system is antiquated and unsuited to our conditions. I believe Senator Aldrich has honestly and conscientiously attempted to devise a money system that will do away with panics and give the people a quick increase of money when necessary without the consent of Wall street. There will be opposition to even giving the scheme a trial by men who don't know any more about it than I do, but it ought to be given a trial and amend it hereafter if necessary. MR. FISHER'S PLAN FOR ALASKA. The clashing views upon conservation and the Alaskan coal-lands problem which have been expressed by the President, exSecretary Ballinger, and other members and ex-members of the present administration lend an especial interest to the official announcement of the new Alaskan policy of the Department of the Interior as the one likely to be followed during the remainder of this administration. Not only the principle which has been adopted but also many of the details of the new program, were confided to the public in Secretary Fisher's Chicago speech of October 27. The Secretary, it will be remembered, went to Alaska, visited the coal country and the various places made famous by the conservation and Controller Bay controversies, talked --- NOTES. FRIDAY NOVEMBER 17, 1911. with the Alaskans, returned home, and formulated a plan, which, he says, has been discussed with the President, "meets his approval, and will have his support." With this definite program proclaimed, declares the Pittsburg Dispatch, "it will be up to congress at the coming session to enact legislation that will end the deadlock in the development of Alaska." Secretary Fisher's plan is to retain government ownership of the coal-fields, lease them to private operators, or, if private capital hangs back, to go into the business of mining and transportation to the extent necessary properly to develop the country. If a government railroad should prove necessary in the future, Mr. Fisher thinks that there is ample opportunity and ample precedent for its construction. But he would prefer to see the extension of the present privately owned lines. The essential thing, he declares, "is to adopt proper laws under which monopoly will be impossible, preserving ample opportunities for any future action," while "the immediately important thing is that the field be open to wise development to supply local needs and any market that may exist on the coast. Reverting to the methods of opening the coallands, he went on, as the Chicago Tribune quotes him: "The time has passed when the government should convey unrestricted title, deliberately encourage unrestricted private exploitation of the sources of power. Ownership carries right of sale. It is unwise and unnecessary to sell our coal-lands to insure development. "On the other hand, government operation, including mining and selling, involves such far-reaching changes of administration and policy that there is no likelihood of its adoption. Unlike railroad operation, it has never been considered a function of government. Leasing avoids difficulties of both extremes. "The choice is not whether we shall mine our coal on the leasehold scheme, but whether under private or government lease. "Only sufficient lands should be leased to meet the existing market and encourage its development. Quantity leased to any one lessee limited to what can be profitably mined, yet large enough to attract investors. Lessee shall pay royalty as he mines the coal. Annual amount shall be at a fixed minimum, which will prevent holding land without production. Mining to be accomplished without unnecessary waste and with due regard to health and safety of employees. Lessee shall not engage in combinations, agreements, or understandings to control price of coal. "Revenues derived by government not to be used as source of Federal revenue or substitute for taxation, but for development of State or Territory in which the coal is mined." Prof. W. H. Lewis of the John Hopkins University thinks he has discovered the art of taking a piece of meat and putting it in a solution and grow meat from the piece, and when it has grown large enough, get a meal from it and put another piece back in the solution and it will grow again. Often we have gotten meat from our butcher, which must have undergone a growing process, as it barely wiggled as we took it home. Country Press and Comment FRIDAY NOVEMBER 17, 1911. In speaking about the alleged lieutenant gorenor candidacy of Dick Hutchinson the Record of Olympia says, "he has been in every political party and he ought to know something about the game by this time." Well he does, and that is why he is going into it. Beriah Brown in the Record advocates, "Higher Honesty for Man." It occurs to us it is already so high that the average man that gets "an opportunity," thinks it is so high that there is no particular need of him trying to reach it, hence he gets along without using the article at all. A great many of us, no doubt, will quite agree with The Republican of Auburn when it says, "the back to the farm" slogan will have to have more back of it than the alluring representations of real estate syndicates before it will take a real grip upon the public mind." The land that the average real estate firms offers for sale to the man in the city to go back to the farm is generally not worth the money it would cost the man to move on to it. "There are no house rent songs in our town," says the Orting Oracle. Is that due to the fact that there are but a baker's dozen houses in your town? The constant efforts in some quarters to array class against class and appealing to prejudice is unworthy of the support of good citizen. It is this wrong idea which brings about strikes and often bloodshed and destruction of property. It is this arraying of class against class that makes the dynamite trial at Los Angeles shame and a disgrace to civilization. No man of intelligence is wanted on the jury and there is every imaginable appeal to prejudice being made daily. Such a line of defense is unworthy of any so called, great lawyers and in such cases the law should permit the trial judge to select the jury subject to the peremptory challenges. If this method were in force justice would be meted out quickly and much waste of time of the court and a very great expense would be done away with. The same scenes are being enacted in every court where juries are called except in the justice courts. Not alone in the courts is prejudice doing wrong but in our elections, national, state and even our own city primary. There is being made a cry that a certain church was active. And why not? If the members of the churches were half as active for good government as are the saloons a magic wand would wave over our fair city. As was said at the beginning of this article it is un-American to make such an appeal to justice. There has been no charge against any man except that he was a member of a church. A respectable proportion of the people of this land of ours are likewise members of a church and such a charge is to appeal to prejudice rather than to reason.—Lincoln County Times. A county paper remarks that the Honorable Frank L. Allen, of North Yakima, wants to wear Congressman LaFollette's shoes THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN down to Congress next term. We don't know just what makes Allen think that he is Congressional timber but we can think of a dozen things that ought to convince the average voter that he is not. It is probably true that there are in the district stronger men than Mr. LaFollette, but Mr. Allen certainly doesn't belong.—Sunnyside Observer. Never before in the history of Everett has an administration gone into power in this city made up of as many elements as compose the one that takes office the first of the year. A Republican mayor and treasurer, Democratic city attorney and one councilman, three Republican councilmen and three Socialist make a balanced political complication that is hard to beat. Only by combinations will anything be accomplished. And certainly, in view of the fact that the work before next year's administration will be difficult enough at the best, it is to be hoped that these combinations, doing away with discord as much as possible, can be effected. Everett Herald. WHEN JUDGES ARE LAW MAKERS. United States Senator Moses E. Clapp of Minnesota, in a recent speech, said: "Originally the judges dealt with matters largely of private concern, but under our system of government they deal with the making of law as well as its interpretation. The court can one day declare that the American people can not issue green backs and the next day, without changing a line in the written law of the country, declare that they can issue them. The court can declare one day that the people of the United States have an income tax law; the next day, without changing a line of our statutory law, they can declare that we do not have an income tax. A more absolute trueism was never uttered than that uttered by Judge Harlan when he declared, in the dissenting opinion in the Standard Oil cases, that the court had read into the statute that which was not there. In other words, under our system, the court does make law; and, being a law making instrumentality, it should be as much subject to the supreme sovereignity of the people as any other function of government.—Ex. President Tafs is on record as believing that after the opening of the Panama Canal, which will enable our ships to pass rapidly from one ocean to the other, instead of tracing the long course around the Horn which the Oregon was forced to take on her historic voyage in 1898, the authorization of one battleship a year will be sufficient. This would mean an annual saving of approximately $12,000,000, and the devotion of that sum to safeguarding the public health, to education, or even the leaving of it in the pockets of the taxpayers would be a larger benefit to the nation. . . . The time for reducing the naval program is now. The needs of the country will be amply served if the coming Congress authorizes but one big vessel. President Taft will strengthen his stand for peace and his position in the eyes of those who are supporting his arbitration policy if he limits to 3 one new battleship the recommendation for the increase in the Navy which, according to custom, he will make in his annuall message to Congress next month. One new ship a year will not only add sufficiently to our naval strength, but will enable our designers to keep fully abreast of the times. "If China should eventually become a republic, and a successful one, its example would exercise a profound influence upon Asia, especially upon tax-ridden Japan, where unquestioning loyalty to a Mikado ruling by divine right is giving place to a spirit of inquiry into the question of the right of monarchies to impoverish the people in furtherance of schemes for military and naval renown. It would also have a tremendous effect upon India's 300,000,000." —Louisville Courier-Journal. The Seattle Republican wants your legal publications. Main 305. EDITORIAL. A Turkish editor declares, "the Italians are a disgraced and degenerate race." Is that after all the real cause of the war? Lynching in Pennsylvania is becoming of rather frequent occurrence and especially in those districts where the illiterate foreigner prevails. "Policemen catch two highwaymen at work," says the Times. Is it against the law for highwaymen to work? and is that why those highwaymen were arrested by the intelligent (?) policemen? It is a fact that once on a time Germany was Turkey's best friend, but that was when Turkey had something that Germany coveted and was trying to play foxy grandpa with the Sick Man of the East. Comets galore, according to the astronomers, are to be seen next year, but since the astronomers made such a mess of Hally's comet it is hard for them to work up any more interest in coming fire flames. From the talk of wars and rumors of war, in which Europe is to be plunged sooner or later on account of the Tripolian dispute, we suggest to the Dove of Peace that, it take The Hague to a place of safety until the storm blows over. An English woman, it is said, was frightened to death on account of some one playing a ghost joke on her and an Oklahoma man went crazy because the fellows about town Joshed him, all of which would seem to indicate that, the human family is growing a bit ticklish these days of "trust." Working on the theory that "charity begins at home," President Taft is giving the unpleasantness in Tripoli little or no attention, but he is putting in all of his spare moments trying to head of the war that is to be waged upon him next year, which reminds us of the old addage, "Self preservation is the first law of nature." The Seattle Republican wants your legal publications. Main 305. PERSONS IN THE PUBLIC EYE Will E. Humphrey, so goes the story, will not seek a re-nomination to Congress, but the story is strenuously denied by the Seattle Daily Times, which must mean that, the Times is to be Hunphrey's cheif supporter and political organ next year, in his efforts to succeed himself. If the prophecy proves true then the finish of Will E. Humphrey is plain to be seen, for, be it remembered, the Times has never won a political victory, even when there was not well defined opposition to the candidate it was working for. If Mr. Humphrey has any hope in the world of being re-elected next year we suggest to him to have the Seattle Daily Times denounce him as a horse thief, a black leg, a murderer or any old thing cussed and mean and then the people will believe he has been doing the square thing while in Congress. The voters of this state are firmly fixed in the belief that, if you see it in the Times, its a dam lie. Timothy D. Sullivan of much political and theatrical fame in Greater New York and well known in theatrical circles in Seattle, where he is interested with John W. Considine in a number of play houses, arrived in Seattle one day this week on a tour of inspection, and had not been in the city but a few hours before he fell in with a takative reporter. Now Tim can talk a little his ownself, and when he began to talk he proceeded to defeat Taft and elect any old candidate the Democratic convention might name for president. Timmy has talked along similar lines before and got left just as he and his party will next year. Mr. Sullivan is a New York Democrat and if a Democrat is to win so easily as he predicts, he will have to do so by carrying New York, and the vote in that state a few days ago does not indicate a Democratic victory next year. To our mind Big Tim is talking through his hat and really means his theatrical ventures are going to win next year instead of his political affiliations. J. L. Ballaine, a well known Seattleletite, who has been operating for years in Alaska, and who is largely interested in the townsite of Seward where he spent the past summer, has just returned to the city and says the people are hopeful of better times in the part of Alaska where he is located. Secretary Fisher's proposition to build a government railroad through Alaska and to use the present road bed as far as it has been built and laid out of the Alas- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN No two men who have operated done more to bring about her conquest west and laid the foundation for along the Pacific Slope than the White Mr. Sullivan is a new Yale with Mr. Considine, a Seattle mation has given Seattle the most county. These men do things for Seattle at times and places that York and Seattle. John W. Considine. men who have operated in Seattle in re- ring about her commercial suprema- the foundation for her gaining a si- nic Slope than the men whose picture Livan is a new Yorker, he willing- dine, a Seattle man, to the heart, a Seattle the most complete play the men do things for Seattle, and th s and places that count, and as a tle. Considine. Timothy No two men who have operated in Seattle in recent years have done more to bring about her commercial supremacy in the Northwest and laid the foundation for her gaining a similar supremacy along the Pacific Slope than the men whose pictures appear above. While Mr. Sullivan is a new Yorker, he willingly joined hands with Mr. Considine, a Seattle man, to the heart, and the combination has given Seattle the most complete play houses in the county. These men do things for Seattle, and they do things for Seattle at times and places that count, and as a result it's New York and Seattle. WHEN JUDGES ka Central is especially pleasing to people of the section in which I operate, and, if it is done, it will mean the immediate development of that country and that too without selfish interest controlling everything in sight and making the whole population pay tribute to them for living in the immediate community." Mr. Ballaine and his brother own the major portion of the townsite of Seward and if the Alaska Central ever moves out of it and taps the heart of the Alaskan territory it will mean an immediate fortune for both of them. J. E. Bradford after a fierce struggle in the city council succeeded Scott Calhoum as corpora- seller may countervene talks. ted in Seattle in recent years have commercial supremacy in the North-her gaining a similar supremacy men whose pictures appear above. Worker, he willingly joined hands in, to the heart, and the combination complete play houses in the or Seattle, and they do things for count, and as a result it's New Timothy D. Sullivan. tion counsel, and of course will continue the policy adopted by Calhoum in the office. This means that Bradford is going to put up a hard fight to succeed himself next spring, which will be met by an equally hard fight put up by Phillip Tindall, who seems to be very popular among the people, but all of this fighting on the part of Bradford and Tindall may mean that some other fellow will slide in and take the cake while they are fighting. Mr. Tindall is from the north end and represents the reform element of the city and will give his opponents whether one or in numbers a battle royal. H. E. Kenedy, a member of the last legislature of Washington and a well known hotel man, FRIDAY NOVEMBER 17. 1911. has retired from the hotel business and is temporarily located in the Arlington hotel, where he has desk room. "I have been grinding away at the hotel business for the past ten years or more and I thought I would sell my interest in Hotel Kenedy and retire from the business with a view of going into a different kind of business. William G. Potts, who has been frequently mentioned in connection with the next Republican gubernatorial nomination, but who would not let it touch him, may yet decide to get into the lieutenant fight, and if he does he will be backed by the hotel men and the liberal voters of the state. Potts is a hard worker and if he goes out for the nomination he will make all of them set up and take notice. George W. Dilling, who on the quiet has given it out that he would not seek the nomination for mayor to succeed himself, did so, so goes the story, for the purpose of having the party leaders to wait upon him and urge that he be the candidate and in that case he would not refuse. George H. Walker, it is claimed is being groomed for the gubernatorial nomination by the Progressives and while he does not admit knowing anything about it, yet he must, because for the past week he has been making his way to the Bailey lunch counter, where the members of the Disgruntled Club take their midday luncheon and make plans for the political control of the state. No one denies but that Mr. Walker is one of the most upright men in the whole Northwest, but he has the appearance of being cold and indifferent toward his fellow men and for that reason he will have a hard time getting the nomination and a still harder time being elected. Here is a case where George had better let alone. J. D. Dean, the publisher of the White River Journal and the Ranche of Kent, King county, has been selected for the president of the county press club that was orgained last Saturday and it can be said without fear of successful contradiction that, the club has put a man at its head that will not leave a stone unturned to make it a success. Richie Kinnear,who was once the political boss of the Sixth and Eight wards of Seattle, has completely retired from the political arena and his friends declare he has so little interest in the politi- [Name not provided] cal game at present that he has to be coached to go out to vote. Dick devotes the most of his idle moments to making it pleasant for his invalid father, who too was one time prominent in the political circles of King county and was state senator from the same district which Dick subsequently represented. Micheal J. Carrigan seems to be the only political pebble on the beach so far as King county is concerned and he is boosted and boomed for every political position that becomes vacant either by death or expiration of some term of office. What great things, in heaven's name, has Carrigan ever done that he is to be made the pet and idle of King county? On the tax commission, a position for which he is said to be slated, providing the rabbit foot of the politicians work well, and for which he seems to have no fitness in the world and would rattle round in the commission like a mustard seed in a tin barrel, he would be an absolute failure. Certainly there can be found others beside Carrigan to fill the vacancies that occur in the state and county administrations. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN 1910 A Seattle the ec in tha the ve nation and in of, and after have t tory. issued him: A Ramsa the ci lature strum beging which to the highw from thereb public part i lature has le gone o a goo for a OPPORTUNITY. There is a pretty Indian legend of a good spirit who, wishing to benefit a young princess, led her into a golden corn field and said: "See these ears of corn, my daughter; if thou wilt pluck them diligently they will turn to precious jewels; the richer the ear of corn the brighter the gem. But thou mayest only once pass through this corn field and canst not return the same way." The maiden gladly accepted the offer. As she went on, many ripe and full ears of corn she found in her path, but she did not pluck them, always hoping to find better ones further on. But presently the stems grew thinner, the ears poorer, with scarcely any grains of wheat on them; further on they were blighted, and she did not think worth picking. Sorrowfully she stood at the end of the field, for she could not go back the same way, regretting the loss of the golden ears she had overlooked and lost. To each of us are golden opportunities offered; let us redeem the time by giving our hearts to Jesus now, for we can not return again to the days of childhood after. we have passed through The above shows the results of a study on the effect of temperature on the growth rate of wheat. The results show that the growth rate of wheat is highest at 25°C and lowest at 15°C. The growth rate of wheat is highest at 25°C and lowest at 15°C. The image provided does not contain any text. It appears to be a blank or empty space. CLAUDE C. RAMSAY. A Seattle M and Perh Claude C. Ramsay Seattle, and The Seattle the echo and add, If he in that connection he the very day it become nation for mayor of S and in business has sh of, and should he ever after things in a bus have the very best ma tory. The special ed issued January 1st, 1 him: A heavy property Ramsay, who is consi the city. He has seri lature of his state, wh strumental in passing beginning of the good which has resulted in to the state authorities highway from Vancou from Portland to Spok thereby engirdling the public highway. Mr. part in this latter mov lature that set the ba has lent a hand to all gone out of his way fu a good word for Seat for a live town in whi the journey of life.—Apples of Gold. AMUSEMENTS. At The Empress. For the next week the Empress offers the first "Road Show" of the season of 1911-12 with an unusually clever bill. Heading the list will be a condensed version of Lew Field's "The Girl Behind the Counter." Nat Fields, who is the bright particular star of this production, was recently of his brother's musical comedy, "The Henpecks," and his appearance in "The Girl Behind the Counter" gives him ample opportunity to display his ability. His other successes gives him much prestige and in the principal role he appears with an ease and grace characteristic of the most noted Broadway star. AT THE ORPHEUM. The celebrated writer and actress, Mrs. Gardner Crane will headline the Orpheum bill the coming week in "The Little Sunbeam." Versatility is the forte of Dave Genero and Ray Bailey, who will bring a collection of snappy new songs, including several of their A certificate issued by the Department of Agriculture for the sale of wheat. A Seattle Mayoralty Possibility and Perhaps Probability A Seattle Mayoralty Possibility and Perhaps Probability Claude C. Ramsay is being talked of for mayor of Seattle, and The Seattle Republican desires to take up the echo and add, If he will permit the use of his name in that connection he will be a popular candidate from the very day it becomes known that he desires the nomination for mayor of Seattle. Claude Ramsay in politics and in business has shown the kind of stuff he is made of, and should he ever be mayor of Seattle he would go after things in a businesslike way and Seattle would have the very best mayor she has ever had in her history. The special edition of The Seattle Republican, issued January 1st, 1911, had the following to say of him: A heavy property holder of Seattle is Claude C. Ramsay, who is considered one of the foremost men of the city. He has served the community in the legislature of his state, while acting in that capacity was instrumental in passing a good roads law, which was the beginning of the good roads adjutation of this section, which has resulted in Samuel Hill making a proposition to the state authorities to permit him to build a public highway from Vancouver, B. C., to Portland, Ore., and from Portland to Spokane and from Spokane to Seattle, thereby engirdling the state with a most magnificent public highway. Mr. Ramsay may not be playing any part in this latter move, but it was his bill in the legislature that set the ball rolling. From time to time he has lent a hand to all public enterprises and no man has gone out of his way further and oftener than he to speak a good word for Seattle among men of means looking for a live town in which to make investments. 5 own composition and featuring original Flirtation Dance Song. "The Clown and the Human Doll", is an apt description of the entertaining and unusual performance offered by Jack Horton and Mlle. La Triska. "An Acrobatic Talkfest," as presented by the "creative comedy couple," George W. Cunningham and Herman Marion, is said to involve both rare acrobatic skill and amusing repartee. One of the facinating "girl acts" which seem to appeal irresistibly to Seattle vaudeville patrons will be furnished by Mollie and Nellie King, two attractive girls, who, although quite young, have already won gratifying successes while yet in their teens with such players as Andrew Mack, Been Greet's players and Maxine Elliott. In "The Artist's Dream, or a Story of Sand and Song," Keith and Kernan have an act that has been pronounced a novelty of merit by eastern journalists. Ada Reeve, the English comedienne, who has only just arrived in America, is making a tour of the world. AT THE SEATTLE. "Checkers" will be the offering "OLD GERMAN LAGER" 6 at the Seattle Theatre next week, opening with the matinee Sunday. It is difficult to account for the success of "Checkers" by reading the novel from which it is dramatized. It is a play to be seen to be appreciated, and everybody likes "Checkers" the young, the old, and the play-weary and the theatre going novice. The SEATTLE REPUBLICAN wants your LEGAL NOTICES 427 Epler Blk. Main 305 NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL ESTATE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH. In the Matter of the Estate of Joergen S. Aandahl deceased Notice is hereby given that C. A. Christofferson, the duly appointed administrator of the above entitled estate will sell at private sale to the highest bidder, on credit not exceeding three years, payable in gross or installments, the following described real estate, tow-rit: Lots Four (4) and Five (5), Block 18, of Kilbourne's Division of Green Lake, Seattle, Washington, on the 16th day of December, 1911, or within six months thereafter, and offers or bids will be received by Mill Willis Aandahl, 205 Lowman Bldg., or 149 West 74th Street, Seattle, Wash. Said bids or offers must be in writing and left, at the place above designated. NOTICE OF DISSOLUTION. Notice is hereby given that the partnership heretofore existing between the undersigned, O. Drivstuen and K. Groethe, under the name of Washington Come Manufacturing Co., has been dissolved by the withdrawal of said K. Groethe. All bills due the firm are payable to said O. Drivstuen, who will continue the business under the same name as heretofore. O. DRIVSTUEN, K. GROETHE. Date of first publication Nov. 10, 1911. Nov. 10, Dec. 8, 1911. --- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN AN LAGER" "time"— -fashioned that's why ein Ropfweh" ent Brewing Co. nd. 58 Sidney 75 ttle IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. James Lee Hatfield, Plaintiff, vs. Alice Hatfield, Defendant. No. 83945. The State of Washington to the said Alice Hatfield: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit; within sixty days after the Tenth Day of November, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the Plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for Plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above action is to secure an annullment of the marriage existing between you, the said Defendant and the said Plaintiff. Plaintiff's Attorneys P. O. address, 25 Union Block, Seattle, King Co., Washington. Nov. 10, Dec. 22, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in the County of King In the matter of the Estate of Bertha Brown, Deceased. No. 12027. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. Sam Brown and Isaac Brown, administrators of the estate of Bertha Brown, deceased, having filed in this court their 8-REPUBLICAN-N-9 O nels final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Bertha Brown, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court on the 14th day of December, 1911, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 14th day of December, 1911, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 6th day of November, 1911. A. W. FRATER. Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss. D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 6th day of November, 1911, in the matter of the estate of Bertha Brown, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 6th day of November, 1911. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. Nov. 10, Dec. 8, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Ethel Marie Connell, Plaintiff, vs. Samuel W. Connell, Defendant. No. 83976. Summons by publication. The State of Washington to Samuel W. Connell, defendant: IN PROBATE. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 10th day of November, A. D. 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his address below stated; in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a divorce on the ground of non-support of plaintiff and for a restoration of her maiden name. HOWARD O. DURK, Attorney for Plaintiff. 535 Henry Building, Seattle, King Co., Wash. Nov. 10, Dec. 22, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Josie Churchill, Plaintiff, vs. Jarvis L. Churchill, Defendant. No. 83328. Summons by publication. The State of Washington to the said Jarvis L. Churchill, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: Within sixty days after the 10th day of November, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is brought to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from the defendant upon the ground of non-support. HOMER E. TURNER. Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. address, 745 New York Building, Seattle, King Co., Wash. Nov. 10. Dec. 22. 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. George W. Farlin, plaintiff, vs. Jackson Realty Co., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 6th day of May, 1911, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: East Seattle Addition, Lot 42, Block 23, Certificate No. B68142, 1907, 99c. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 42, Block 23, East Seattle Addition 58c, 1908. Lot 42, Block 23, East Seattle Addition, 47c, 1909. Lot 42. Block 23, East Seattle Addition, $1.01, 1910. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication November 3, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address 802 Lowman Block, Seattle, Washington. Nov. 3, Dec. 15, 1911 NOTICE OR SALE OF REAL ESTATE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of John J. Blaine. Deceased. Notice of Sale of Real Estate. No. 12213. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that in pursuance of an order of the above entitled court made on the 26th day of October, 1911, in the above entitled estate, the undersigned, administrator of said estate will sell at private sale to the highest bidder Lot Six (6) in Block Twelve (12), Cove Addition to the City of Seattle, on the 11th day of November, 1911. Offers or bids in writing will be received at Room 1112. Hoge HOMER E. TURNER. GEORGE W. FARLIN, Plaintiff FRIDAY NOVEMBER 17, 1911. Building, Seattle, Washington. Terms of said sale are one-third cash and the balance on terms. E. L. BLAINE, Administrator of the Estate of John J. Blaine, Deceased. Nov. 3, Nov. 10, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Geo. W. Farlin, plaintiff, vs. J. W. Roberts, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Central Seattle, addition to the City of Seattle, Lot 5, Block 29, Certificate No. B50260, 1906, $6.71. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff and Mrs. R. C. Fenner upon said above described real property, to-wit. All of which have been duly assigned to this plaintiff. Lot 5, Block 29, Central Seattle Addition. $6.30, 1907. Lot 5, Block 29, Central Seattle Addition, $4.53, 1910. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication November 3, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. GEORGE W. FARLIN. Plaintiff. CHAS. P. HARRIS. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address 802 Lowman Block, Seattle, Washington. Nov. 3. Dec. 15, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Minnie E. Foster, plaintiff, vs. Irwin Foster, defendant. The State of Washington, to the said Irwin Foster, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 22nd day of September, A. D. 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows. To obtain a judgment of said Court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the ground of non-support. Postoffice and office address: 201-203 Burke Building, Seattle County of King, State of Washington. Sept. 22: Nov. 3, 1911. Preparing bodies for shipment specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. FRIDAY NOVEMBER 17, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. In Probate. Order to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of James McCarthy, deceased.—No. 11951. Lottie McCarthy, administratrix of the estate of James McCarthy, deceased, having filed in this court her petition set- ting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said James McCarthy, deceased, be and appear before the said Supreior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in the City of Seattle ,on the 9th day of November, 1911, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m., of said day then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 9th day of November, 1911, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 2nd day of October, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. Estella M. Smith, plaintiff, vs. William A. Smith, defendant.—No. The State of Washington, to the said William A. Smith, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 29th day of September, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the grounds of desertion and non-support. J. P. BALL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice and office address, 201-203 Burke Building, Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. Sept. 29—Nov. 10, 1911. NOTICE AND SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. J. W. Brown and Daisy Fern Brown, his wife, and Northwest Property Company, a corporation, plaintiffs, vs. Ben Hazeltine, Annie D. Hazeltine, his wife, Frances L. Hazeltine, as executrix of the will and estate of C. B. Hazeltine, deceased, J. Settle, Louise S. Washburn, R. C. Washburn, her husband, and all persons unknown having or claiming an interest or estate in the real property hereinafter described, defendants. The State of Washington, to the said Ben Hazeltine, Annie D. Hazeltine his wife, Frances L. Hazeltine as executrix of the will and estate of C. B. Hazeltine, deceased, J. Settle, Louise S. Washburn and R. C. Washburn her husband, and to all persons unknown having or claiming an interest or estate in the property hereinafter described, and to all persons claiming in any manner under, by, through or from any of the above defendants: You and each of you are hereby notified and summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 22nd day of Sept. 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you and each of you including said persons unknown and all claimants, according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court, and decree of partition entered and rendered, setting forth the specific portions of the South West Quarter (1/4) of the South East Quarter (1/4) of Section Twenty Four (24) Township Twenty Five (25) North of Range Four (4) East of the W. M. in King County, Washington, found and decreed to be the sole property of the plaintiff as prayed and granting the relief prayed which is the object of this action, and for costs. Attorney for Plaintiffs. 1324 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 22; Nov. 3, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Geo. W. Farlin, plaintiff, vs. A. B. Jennings, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN real property, defendants. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Jennings' Ballard Addition, Lot 4, Block 51, Certificate No. B54029, 1906, $2.36. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the Mrs. R. C. Fenner upon said above described real property, to-wit. All of which have been duly assigned to this plaintiff. Lot 4, Block 51, Jennings' Ballard Addition, $2.03, 1907. Lot 4, Block 51, Jennings' Ballard Addition, $1.20, 1908. Lot 4, Block 51, Jennings' Ballard Addition, $1.29, 1909. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication November 3, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. GEORGE W. FARLIN, Attorney for Panther Office address 802 Lowman Block, Seattle, Washington. Nov. 3. Dec. 15. 1911. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Carrie King, plaintiff, vs. Wm. Herbert King, defendant. No. 83601. The State of Washington to the said Wm. Herbert King, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 20th day of October, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant on the grounds of habitual drunkenness and failure to support. GEO. McKAY, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address, 450 Arcade Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 20, Nov. Dec. 1, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. No. 83606. Walter Winfield Ayer, plaintiff, vs. Elizabeth Ayer, defendant. The State of Washington to the said Elizabeth Ayer, the defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the 20th day of October, A. D. 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of the answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. Said action being for a decree of absolute divorce on the ground of desertion. P. O. address, 535 Henry Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Oct. 20, Dec. 1, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. George W. Farlin, plaintiff, vs. Jackson Realty Company, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is CHAS. P. HARRIS, Attorney for Plaintiff SUMMONS. No. 83606. the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 6th day of May, 1911, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: East Seattle Addition, Lot 44, Block 23, Certificate No. B681444, 1907, 99c. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 44, Block 23, East Seattle Addition, 58c, 1908. Lot 44, Block 23, East Seattle Addition, 47c, 1909. Lot 44, Block 23, East Seattle Addition, $1.01, 1910. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication November 3, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. Office address 802 Lowman Block, Seattle Washington IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. George W. Farlin, plaintiff, vs. Jackson Realty Co., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 6th day of May, 1911, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: East Seattle Addition, Lot 43, Block 23, Certificate No. B68143, 1907, 99c. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 43, Block 23, East Seattle Addition, 58c, 1908. Lot 43, Block 23, East Seattle Addition, 47c, 1509. Lot 43, Block 23, East Seattle Addition, $1.01, 1910. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication November 3, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. CHAS. P. HARRIS, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address 802 Lowman Block, Seattle, Washington. Nov. 3, Dec. 15, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Geo. W. Farlin, plaintiff, vs. A. B. Jennings, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington. dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot (3) Three in Block Fifty-One of Jennings' Ballard Addition, King County, Washington, Certificate No. B54028, 1906, $2.36. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by Mrs. R. C. Fenner upon said above described real property, to-wit. All of which have been duly assigned to this plaintiff. Lot 3, Block 51, Jennings' Ballard Addition, $2.03, 1907. Lot 3, Block 51, Jennings' Ballard Addition, $1.20, 1908. Lot 3, Block 51, Jennings' Ballard Addition, $1.29, 1909. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication November 3, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. CHAS. P. HARRIS Attorney for, Plaintiff Attorney for Baltimore. Office address 802 Lowman Block, Seattle, Washington. Nov. 3, Dec. 15, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Stewart & Holmes Drug Co., a cor- poration, Plaintiff, vs. J. G. Ross, De- fendant. Summons for Publication. No. 83,288. The State of Washington to the said J. G. Ross, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 13th day of October, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment against you for the sum of Two Hundred and Twenty-eight Dollars ($228.00) with interest besides costs of suit and to reach by garnishment certain personal property and funds belonging to you in the hands of J. W. Reed. LEOPOLD A. STERN. Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address, 705 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication Nov. 26, 1911. SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. David Forrest Welch, plaintiff, vs. Sarah Ellen Welch, defendant. The State of Washington, to the said Sarah Ellen Welch, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 22nd day of September, A. D. 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitlet Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said Court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the grounds of incompatibility of temperament, and personal indignities rendering life burdensome. J. P. BALL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice and office address: 201-203 Burke Building, Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. Sept. 22; Nov. 3, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Jennie Smith, plaintiff, vs. George Smith, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington to the said George Smith, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 6th day of October, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to procure a divorce from defendant upon the grounds of desertion and non-support. J. E. HAWKINS, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address, 424-5 Boston Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 6—Nov. 17, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Geo. W. Farlin, plaintiff, vs. John T. Merrill and John F. Merrill, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, defendants. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of December, 1906, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Plat of the Town of Berlin, Lot 9, Block 4, Certificate No. B44885, 1905, $10.50. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff and Mrs. R. C. Fenner upon said above described real property, to-wit. All of which have been duly assigned to this plaintiff. Lot 9, Block 4, Plat of Town of Berlin, 9c, 1906. Lot 9, Block 4, Plat of Town of Berlin, 15c. 1907. Lot 9, Block 4, Plat of Town of Berlin, 21c, 1908. Lot 9, Block 4, Plat of Town of Berlin, 23c, 1909. Lot 9, Block 4, Plat of Town of Berlin, 19c, 1910. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication November 3, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. GEORGE W. FARLIN. Attorney for Plainin. Office address 802 Lowman Block, Seattle, Washington. Nov. 3, Dec. 15, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Geo. W. Farlin, plaintiff, vs. H. J. Miller and J. A. Stratton, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, defendants. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Valentine Addition, Lot 21, Block 11, Certificate No. B53322, 1906, $7.32. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by Mrs. R. C. Fenner and by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit. All of which have been duly assigned to this plaintiff. Lot 21, Block 11, Valentine Addition, $4.20, 1907. ORDER A CASE OUT TO YOUR PLACE OF Rainier PALE BEER PHONE SIDNEY 526 Lot 21, Block 11, Valentine Addition, $2.96, 1908. Lot 21, Block 11, Valentine Addition, $3.23, 1909. Lot 21, Block 11, Valentine Addition, $4.53, 1910. Delinquent Local Improvement assessments on the above property: $4.98, Districts 988 and 1104; $10.60, 1384-1104-988; $10.07, 1384-1104-988; $14.83, 1796-988, 1384-1104, ordance; $1.89, 13102; 70c, 13102; $1.08, 13102; $10.49, 13320. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. North 13 feet L. pect Terrace Addit. trict 1517. North 13 feet L. pect Terrace Addit. Ordance 5624. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of persons unknown, further notified and appear within date of first public exclusive of the de You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication November 3, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. Attorney for Palmith. Office address 802 Lowman Block, Seattle, Washington. Nov. 2, Dec. 15, 1911 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Geo. W. Farlin, plaintiff, vs. G. Place, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of three certain delinquent tax certificates issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following years, in the following amounts, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Prospect Terrace Addition, south 14 feet Lot 5, Block 1, Certificate No. B49880, 1906, $5.33. Prospect Terrace Addition, Lot 6, Block 1, Certificate No. B49881, 1906, $19.48. Prospect Terrace, north 13 feet Lot 7, Block 1, Certificate No. B49882, 1906, $4.99. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by Mrs. R. C. Fenner and the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit. All of which have been duly assigned to this plaintiff. South 14 feet Lot 5, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $4.90, 1907. South 14 feet Lot 5, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $5.69, D. L. A. District 806. South 14 feet Lot 5, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $2.71, 1908. South 14 feet Lot 5, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $4.69, D. L. A. District 806. South 14 feet Lot 5, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $2.95, 1909. South 14 feet Lot 5, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $6.20, D. L, A. Districts 1517 and 806. Lot 6, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $8.35, D. L. A. District 806. Lot 6, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $13.42, 1909. Lot 6, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $11.00, D. L. A. Districts 1517 and 806. Lot 6, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $17.02, 1910. Lot 6, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $70.80, D. L. A. Ordance 5624, Bros. North 13 feet Lot 7, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $5.25, 1907. spect Terrace Addition, $5.25, 1907. North 13 feet Lot 7, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $4.62, D. L. A. District 806. North 13 feet Lot 7, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $2.96, 1908. North 13 feet Lot 7, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $4.34, D. L. A. District 806. North 13 feet Lot 7, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $3.23, 1909. North 13 feet Lot 7, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $5.72, D. L. A. Districts 1517 and 806. North 13 feet Lot 7, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $4.86, 1910. North 13 feet Lot 7, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $1.60, D. L. A. District 1517. CHAS. P. HARRIS. CHAS. F. HATTIS, Attorney for Plaintiff. North 13 feet Lot 7, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Add. $1.60, D. L. A. District 1517. North 13 feet Lot 7, Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition, $36.82, D. L. A. Ordance 5624. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 cent cent. pen annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication November 3, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at this office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. CHAS. P. HARRIS, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address 802 Lowman Block, Seattle, Washington. Nov. 3, Dec. 15, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Carrie Himelhoch and Isaac Himelhoch, her husband, plaintiffs, vs. Henry F. Baker and Marie L. Baker, his wife, defendants.—No. The State of Washington, to the above named defendants: EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Sept. 1—Oct. 13, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Everett Smith deceased—No. 13245. By order of said court made herein on the 26th day of September, 1911. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said deceased to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 229 Burke Bldg., Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 29th, 1911. CHAS, S. FOLLETT, As Administrator of said Estate. FRED L. RICE, Attorney for Estate. 229 Burke Block, Seattle, Washington Sept. 29-Oct. 27, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Mary Udell, Harry S. Heath, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. State of Washington to the above de scribed real property, descendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th day of June, 1910, and numbered B65681, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of $1.31, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning 16 feet west of SW. corner of lot 4, Sec. 18, Tp. 22 N., R. 3 E., W. M.; thence west 150 feet; thence north 100 feet; thence east 150 feet; thence south 100 feet to beginning, being part of SE. ½ of SW. ½ of Sec. 18. Tp. 22 N., R. 3 E., W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1908, the sum of 94 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 94 cents. for the year 1909, the sum of 94 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after September 1, 1911, in the above entitled count and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the FRIDAY NOVEMBER 17, 1911. satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 1—Oct. 13, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of Alfred Abrahamson deceased—No. 8345. Annie Abrahamson, executrix of the estate of Alfred Abrahamson, deceased, having filed in this court her final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate; It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Alfred Abrahamson, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle, Washington, on the 30th day of October, 1911, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a.m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 30th day of October, 1911, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 29th day of September, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. James Price, plaintiff, vs. Vinci Sepsi, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 82617. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 30th day of June, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Fairmount Addition to City of Seattle, west one foot of lot 14, block 3, certificate No. B60535; year, 1907; amount, 7 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: West one foot of lot 14, block 3, Fairmount Addition to the City of Seattle; amount, 26 cents; for year 1908; west one foot of lot 14, block 3, Fairmount Addition to the City of Seattle; amount, 28 cents; for year 1909. West one foot of lot 14, block 3, Fairmount Addition to the City of Seattle; amount, 35 cents; for year 1910. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, September 8th, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complain of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 314 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. Sept. 8-Oct. 20, 1911.