Seattle Republican

Friday, April 5, 1912

Seattle, Washington

8 pages

Page 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 2
Page 3
Page 3
Page 4
Page 4
Page 5
Page 5
Page 6
Page 6
Page 7
Page 7
Page 8
Page 8
Page text (machine-generated)
The Seattle Republican Single Copies, 10 Cents. Boom which suddenly bursted is one of the political wonders of the age. Six months ago it looked as if Roosevelt would only say the word, the presidency would be handed to him on a silver platter. Even President Taft is quoted as having said to Roosevelt, "If you are a candidate for the presidential nomination I will not be." After toying with the situation for weeks and halting between, whether I will or will not, he finally threw his hat into the ring and then followed his hat by announcing his willingness to accept the nomination if tendered to him, then it was that his popularity ogan to wane. It was the concensus of opinion six weeks ago that Roosevelt would carry the state of Washington by a ten to one vote over Taft, but it now looks as if, he would not be able to get one vote in ten, if a presidential primary should be held. In other words, Roosevelt is an absolute dead one. Roosevelt headquarters were opened up in Seattle, but there does not seem to be any visitors thereto and in fact the officers in charge are seldom ever on hand. No one seems to be able to account for the sudden waning of the "colonel's" popularity and Taft's sudden rise in the political scale. Roosevelt's coming out killed La Follette's prospects of being nominated and there are those mean enough to say, the coming out of Roosevelt was a prearranged plan for the purpose of putting La Follette on the shelf and making sure the nomination of William Howard Taft. But looking at it from any view point, one thing is absolutely certain, the Roosevelt men in the state of Washington have been left high and dry and the Taft followers will control the next state convention, which will send eight delegates and eight alternates to the next Republican national convention. The Weekly King County Press Association will hold its regular quarterly meeting Saturday, April 13th, in Seattle at the Commercial Club. Some very important matters will come before the body for final passage and each member should be present. President Yuan Shih-Kai of China is wondering whether he can serve out a first consecutive term.—New York Evening Post. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, APRIL 5, 1912. Politics and Politicians [Picture of a man in a suit and bow tie]. MYRON E. HAY Who hopes to succeed himself as governor of Washington. In handling the Republican gubernatorial situation the P.-I. is certainly pulling off a stunt that no one save itself seems to know what it is doing. It has been generally conceded that, the P.-I. favors the candidacy of Governor Hay as his own successor, and yet it has been giving Bob Hodge a publicity that would make even Hay feel good way down in his boots could he get the same kind of publicity. As a result of the publicity the big morning paper has been giving the big burley bruiser from King he has forged to the front as a strong gubernatorial possibility so far as the Republican nomination is concerned. On first choice up to the present writing, the state is divided between Hay and Lawrence, but the recent coaching of Hodge by the P.-I. has caused him to be given some consideration as a first choice candidate, and that may be the P.-I.'s game so far as Hay's candidacy is concerned. Hodge or some other man of like caliber, as a second choice candidate will become a dangerous candidate so far as Hay's and Lawrence's chances are concerned. Some weeks ago it looked as if Otto A. Case would develop into the leading second choice candidate all the same Cosgrove, but he has been about lost sight of and Hodge has been taken up as his successor, and if he continues to forge ahead as he has for the past two weeks, he, as said above, will become a strong first choice candidate, and force Lawrence to take a second choice option on the job, but as a second choice candidate Lawrence would be even more dangerous, so far as Hay is concerned, than he as a first choice candidate. It is predicted at this writing that no one will get the nomination on first choice, which of course would mean the defeat of Hay as he will get very few, if any, second choice votes. But whatever may be the outcome of this mixup it is hard to fathom the maneuvers of the P.-I. at this time. The editor of the P.-I. is here in the interest of the re-nomination of President Taft and it may be he is sacrificing everybody and everything, locally speaking, to accomplish that end. Reginald H. Thomson will hardly do any more service for Seattle and, perhaps there are those in the city, who are proud of the fact, but such persons have not the good of Seattle at heart. As has been repeatedly said in these columns Thomson is one of the most profound engineers in the Northwest and he stayed in Seattle at a sacrifice to himself, and it is a wonder he did not jump his job years ago. It had no sooner been known that he had quit the employe of Seattle than other cities and communities began to bid for his services and the successful bidder seems to have been British Columbia, who wants him to beautify Vancouver Island, and in order to secure him he is offered $15,000 per year for the next five years, just twice what the port commission had contracted to pay him. It was unfortunate for Seattle that Mr. Thomson left, but perhaps his place can be filled. What, however, is Vancouver's gain is Seattle's loss but we regret that we have lost. Roger W. Watts, of Tacoma, for the past two sessiodns one of the clerks in the senate at Olympia, was a Seattle visitor one day this week and the most of the time he was in the city he was putting in sledge hammer blows for the candidacy of Senator H. O. LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 blican VOLUME XIV, NUMBER 4. S [Name] JOHN C. LAWRENCE Who believes he can be the next governor of Washington. Fishback who is seeking the Republican nomination for state land commissioner. David H. Cox, state senator from Walla Walla, attended the funeral of Senator Whalley last Wednesday and took advantage of the opportunity and called on a number of political friends and acquaintances while in the city. He is a candidate for state treasurer and feels absolutely certain of copping the nomination and he thinks the nomination is equal to an election. He in all probability will get a tremendous vote in King county. For Insurance Commissioner, unless some new Richmond enters the fight, it will be a two-handed scuffle between John H. Schively, one of the best known politicians in the state, and H. O. Fishback, who is likewise way up in the degrees of public acquaintanceship. Schively has been more or less in the public eye from a political standpoint since he was a member of the legislature and as a political luminary he has seen many ups and downs. Some three years ago he received his hardest blow when he was charged with malfeasance in office and was --- --- Oliver B. Burridge A. S. RUTH Who desires to be the next lieutenant governor of Washington. forced to defend himself against impeachment proceedings before the bar of the senate. He was finally acquitted and it was predicted by his enemies, though acquitted, he was politically dead, but, in spite of the prediction, he has come back and promises to be the liveliest corpse that was ever laid out. He claims to be backed by the insurance people of the state and by the most of the secret societies, which is saying quite a good deal. Though the P.-I. favored his impeachment it is not recorded that it will oppose his nomination and election this year, and if it does not Jack will demonstrate to his opponent that he is a splendid political sprinter. On the other hand Fishback was a member of the senate for two sessions of the legislature and was one of the members of the investigating committee, that shook up the public institutions, and materially aided in the indictment of Schively before the legislature. From that expose Mr. Fishback obtained a great deal of political notoriety, which if handled properly may be used as a political asset. He hails from the Southwest where he is more PETER H. Who seeks the Republican nomination for state treasurer. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN or less popular, but he seems inclined to let his candidacy take care of itself instead of getting out and hustling like his political opponent and his friends are already doing. For Lieutenant Governor. There seems to be three candidates in the field for lieutenant governor among the Republicans, W. H. Paulhamus of Pierce, Robert F. Booth of King and A. S. Ruth of Thurston, all of whom are more or less popular in political circles, second choice candidate will be necessary to decide the hot conwhich in all probability means a test. At this writing it looks as if Paulhamus and Ruth will be the two, who will get the first choice votes, and if Booth is as smooth as he thinks he is, he will W. H. PAULHAMUS Who wants to be lieutenant governor of Washington. work both sides for second choice votes and thereby cop the nomination. Paulhamus and Ruth stand for the exact opposite in politics and the persons voting for Paulhamus for first choice will under no circumstances vote for Ruth nor will those voting for Ruth for first choice give Paulhamus a second choice vote, hence, if Booth is the only other candidate for lieutenant governor, he will stand a mighty good show to get the nomination. While Paulhamus is popular Ruth is powerful and a battle royal between them will be the result. John A. Whalley, whom we all loved for his worth, has joined the great unnumbered host on the other side of life. Though born in a foreign land, yet he grew to manhood in Seattle and being made of the right kind of stuff, he developed as he grew in years until he was one of the strong men of the Northwest and one of the leaders of the public enterprises of Seattle. Mr. Whalley, commercially speaking, graduated into the business world under the tutalage of that sterling character that once held the future of Seattle in the hollow of his hand, L. S. J. Hunt, and he was always proud to get an opportunity to refer to Mr. Hunt as being his ideal. When he left the Post-Intelligencer he at once branched out into business for himself and it was a success from the very day he opened the door of his office for business. While he was pronounced in his views and was slow to change his mind when once made up yet he was always on the square and in the open and even those he opposed knew where to find him. As a member of the legislature he was neither a great floor leader nor a brilliant gallery player but he did things just the same. John A. Whalley was more responsible for the expose of the Ortis Hamilton shortage than the newspaper man, who quietly dug up the facts and was responsible for them being published before the general public had any knowledge of any crooked work having been practiced. In the legislature he insisted on Hamilton making his report, which he dodged from time to Friday, April 5, 1912. [Name not visible] JOHN H. SCHIVELY Who believes he can succeed himself as insurance commissioner of Washington. time and Whalley, who was on the Military committee, smelt a mouse and started a quiet investigation, with the result that soon after the legislature adjourned the whole story came out. It seems too bad that such useful men should be called away almost in their bloom of life, but it happens every day. He had many plans for the future in the way of state legislation and he was anxious for the body to meet in order that he could go to work at them. He was a faithful friend, a loyal citizen and above all an ideal husband and father. May his memory live on and on. John R. Kinnear has paid the great debt of life and has gone to his reward. The world is both better and wiser that he lived and the deeds and acts of his life will be living monuments to his memory for centuries yet to come. He who so lives as to inspire hope in his fellow man that the examples of his live in turn may act as a lighted lamp for other beknighted souls served well the purpose of his Creator. Mr. Kinnear early in life seems to have adopted the motto of "do all the good you can to all the people you can," and he religiously lived up to it. His footprints on the historic A. H. JOHN R. KINNEAR THE PEOPLE'S FORUM I attended court at Olympia last Friday. It was motion day. There sat the "Old Roman," with two judges on each side. The day's session was not devoid of mirth, and Judge Fullerton started what I expected would end in a rough house, but the thing ended joyfully. The judge cross-examined an attorney, while the latter was presenting an application for a mandamus. The lawyer's position didn't look good to me for a time, who, however, stood his ground heroically. Judge Ellis, who seems to have a great big heart, helped the young barrister all he could. At the opportune moment, Judge Morris made a remark that broke the tension. After that conditions prevailed similar to those described by the fellow who lost his mother-in-law, who said "everybody was well satisfied in the neighborhood." Being an early riser, I got to the capitol early. It wasn't long until Judge Parker showed up. He got to his office at three minutes before eight. Court is not regularly in session now, but the judges are working hard writing opinions heretofore argued. There is too much work for the judges. There are too many appeals, and every case, regardless of merit, takes time. Judge Chadwick was out of the city. I always like to see him around, even if he did write the opinion in the telephone case. Some of the judges will stand for re-election this fall. Judge Dunbar is one of them. There is no use saying anything for him. Everybody will vote for the judge. More than twenty years' continuous, hard, consciencious work is his record. I met Judge Ellis for the first time last week. I have spoken of his work. He is making good. Governor Hay found him in Tacoma. It was a good find. It seems to me there are three to be elected. If so, I don't know who the other man is. Anyhow, the court is all right, and all who ask it, should be re-elected. Olympia is to have a new building, and will be called the Temple of Justice. The state is putting it up for the Supreme Court and other state officers. I often think Olympia depends too much on what it can make out of the state. It seems to be slow—too slow. The Olympians could make that city one of the greatest and most important places on the coast, but its slowness prevents it. Why just think of it. There is only one man in that town that is working to have a canal dug THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN BV A. .G McBRIDE across to Gray's Harbor, and yet, there is no one improvement that could be made that would be of so much benefit to the state and to the government, too. It is only sixty miles across and a river channel could be utilized for one-half of the distance. In getting to Bremerton from the south, the government would save about one hundred and fifty miles. There would be a saving in freight to Seattle, Tacoma and as far north as Port Townsend. Why don't Olympia go to work and have the canal dug? You tell, Seattle has been working for twenty-one years to my personal knowledge for the Lake Washington and Lake Union canals, and in a year or two it will be completed. This city has stayed by it, and won. Olympia can do the same. The trick is easily turned. Work, persistent hard work, will give Olympia that canal in five years. The Commercial Club and the New Chamber of Commerce each recently fired a proposition at the other for the purpose of effecting a consolidation. The repudiation of the action of the Commercial Club concerning the Bush terminals, by its officers a few days before the late election, was probably the work of the Chamber of Commerce, and if the latter is going to control the former organization, they might as well consolidate. Heretofore, the Club has been against a merger at about ten to one, but the committee that had the matter in charge seems to have gone over, body and breeches, and the funny part of it is, that it was composed of men whose loyalty had never been questioned. When such a fighter as Richard Saxe Jones lays down, up go my hands. The merger will take place, but the members of the Club will live to see the day when they will wish they had maintained their separate organization. The Democratic house of representatives is playing altogether too much politics. Its refusal to continue the appropriation of money to increase the navy will not be met with favor by the people. This nation can afford a good navy, and ought to have the best on the seven seas. For fifty years, the people have kept the party out of power, except the two terms of Cleveland, and if it wishes the confidence of the voters, the lower house better do business and play politics on less important matters. One would think the old Jefferson-Jackson party would in half a century take in some common sense by absorption if not by a knowledge of past history. Perhaps I am uncharitable. "Can the Ethiopian change his skin or the leopard his spots?" What changeable creatures we are. Only a few years ago, Col. Blethen made all manner of fun at the P.-I. for moving out of town, but it wasn't long until the fighting Colonel moved up onto the same street and on the further side at that. Now, the Times announces that it will build at Stewart and Fourth, four blocks from its present location. When a person guesses on what Seattle will do within a few years, he is liable to lose his reputation as a prophet. Dr. Crichton, in his commendable zeal to protect the health of the city, dropped the chickens, and made an assault on the street cars. If the good doctor can induce the car companies to take down the straps that the poor distressed public hangs onto going around the curves, and give them a good cleaning, he will do the people a service. In some of the cars, the straps must have been in constant use for the past seven years. You cannot down the "Seattle Spirit," and the next in vitality, is the question of consolidation between the New Chamber of Commerce and the Commercial Club. The Chamber, like Barkis, is "willin'," but the Club is hopelessly against it. There is one way in which this merger can be brought about and that is for the members of the New Chamber of Commerce to join the Commercial Club. In Bellingham, there lives one of the truly great novelists, Ella Higginson. Her "Mary Ella Out West," if that is the correct title, is the equal of either the "Scarlet Letter" or "Adam Beede." I know I am just firing away without knowing much about the matter, but having read the three books, I will swear by our Ella. It was generally supposed that the Wappenstein case would be reversed by the Supreme Court. It may be yet, on a petition for a re-hearing. The chances, however, are against it. There are some grotesque situations connected with this case. I don't believe that Mr. Murphy knows how he escaped a reversal. Friday, April 5, 1912. JM If you can live just ten years longer, you will be lucky. Within that time, the inventive genius of the world will be able to show what can be accomplished with electricity. Did you read the magazine section of last Sunday's P.I? If not, do it. Dr. Mathews is a Democrat and Dr. Leonard a Republican, so there you are politically, but when it comes to the Bible, both are equally loyal to the good old Book. Don't hatch eggs, or let the hens hatch them during the month of May. However, if you do, look out for bugs on the heads of the little ones. Milwaukee has repudiated Socialism in its municipal government. No use of trying to get around it, the best talent for governing cities, states and the nation, will be found in the Republican party. Oregon has the recall for judges, but not one has thus far been recalled. The men in the silken robes are evidently sitting up straight and taking notice. In some of the districts of Washington and California, wearing the silken robe is about as appropriate as a bay window on an outside toilet. In Germany, one witness is not sufficient to convict in case of murder in the first degree, and follows the biblical law, which will be found in Numbers, 35-30, and Deuteronomy, 17-6. Talk of regrading Beacon Hill is again in the air. What a pity it cannot be left as it is, one of the most sightly and beautiful parts of the city. If reports be true, Judge John E. Humphries is organizing an Ananias Club, and some of the Supreme Court judges will be charter members. Just common air slacked lime will keep the bugs out of your chicken houses. Use it about once a week. Are moving pictures being taken of the Hazzard fast cure? If not, why not? I hope it wasn't Roosevelt's best hat that was in the ring. It sure got stepped on in New York. ```markdown ``` Friday, April 5, 1912. --- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Is published every Frid Company. Subscriptions, $3 per postage prepaid. Entered as second-clas at Seattle. Is published every Friday by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3 per year; six months, $1.50; postage prepaid. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. Is published every Friday by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3 per year; six months, $1.50; postage prepaid. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, Inc. Main 305 427 Epler Block Seattle, Washington HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON, - - - Publisher SUSIE REVELS CAYTON, - - - Associate Congressman Humphrey's con-4—REPUBLICAN—April 5—n ogressional hat has recently been THE SPICE OF LIFE. thrown into the ring. Cautious.—Cook—“Why didn’t you call for your dinner yester- Judge Dunbar quit smokingday?” several years ago. Beggar—“I heard that the missus was cooking.”—Fliegende Bessie and Clarence each madeBlaetter. statements this week. Up to the Minute.—Knicker— Candidates for clerk and auditor“Is their car up to date?” are very quiet. Bocker—“Well, it is paid for If you are a lawyer, you know what it means to get good service in your publication notices. You get ready for your day in court and at the last minute you find your affidavit of publication has not been made, you rightly lose your temper and say things that would neither sound well in Sunday School nor look well in print. If you had have given the notice to The Seattle Republican you would have had no such worry and would not have to go to confession in order to get right with your Creator. The Seattle Republican is prompt and painstaking, which means all of it in legal matters. It takes notices until Friday noon, which means a whole week over Saturday publications. When you have a notice for publication, call Main 305. with next year's money."—New York Sun. In High Life.—"Don't these parvenus make you sick?" asked Chapley of his vis-a-vis at the Spildorf. "I don't know," she replied innocently. "I never ate any."—Judge. Modern Competition.—"With the good position you had in view why did you break your engagement?" "My fiancee took the position." —Fliengende Blaetter. Father's Wisdom.—"Father, Alfred has something to say to you tonight." "Well, and what have you and your mother decided I must tell him?"—Detroit Free Press. The Very Thing.—"Have you any rubber articles?" asked the 00.000.001.4 WB.810.21 00.07 T1.000.101.1 ```markdown ``` IMPORTANT TO LAWYERS lawyer, you know what it means to get in notices. You get ready for your day you find your affidavit of publication close your temper and say things that day School nor look well in print. If so The Seattle Republican you would by what it means to get good service get ready for your day in court and offidavit of publication has not been or and say things that would neither book well in print. If you had have republican you would have had no to go to confession in order to get Seattle Republican is prompt and not in legal matters. It takes notices a whole week over Saturday pubie for publication, call Main 305. SEATTLE REPUBLICAN, 4. 423 Epler Block. man entering the store. "Surely," replied the salesman. "We have a fine line of operaglasses."—Yonkers Statesman. Unkind Cut.—"See, I am familiar with your music," remarked the amateur at the musicale the other evening. "It seems so," replied the popular composer. "You are taking liberties with it."—Judge. Objectionable.—"I don't like the looks of that juror with the big ears and the long pointed chin," the defendant in the case whispered to his lawyer. "He has an ugly mug," said the lawyer; "that's a fact." "It isn't altogether his looks, though," confided the client; "he's paying too blamed close at- E. L. GRONDAHL, President JOHN ERIKSON, Vice-President A. H. SOELBERG, Vice-Pres. and Cashier A. C. KAHLKE, Assistant Cashier Condensed Statement of Condition of THE STATE BANK OF SEATTLE Seattle, Washington As rendered to the State Examiner at the close of business February 20, 1912 WE INVITE YOUR ACCOUNT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Caroline Frederica Ensminger, deceased.—No. By order of said court made herein on the 21st day of February, 1912. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator with the will annexed of said estate, at his office 320-321 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, February 23, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. George W. Crane and Hannah H. Crane, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. Samuel E. Brackins and Jane Doe Brackins (whose true christian name is to plaintiffs unknown), his wife; W. N. Sandy, Wilbur F. Hill, James McNaught and Jane Doe McNaught (whose true christian name is to plaintiffs unknown), his wife; also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, defendants.—No. 86489 The State of Washington, to Samuel E. Brackins and Jane Doe Brackins, (whose true christian name is to plaintiffs unknown), his wife; W. N. Sandy, Wilbur F. Hill, James McNaught and Jane Doe McNaught, (whose true christian name is to plaintiffs unknown), his wife; also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, defendants: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days from and after the 15th day of March, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiffs at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the above court. cleark The object of this action is to clear title to lot fifteen (15), block six (6), of Noah Flickinger Town Plat of Cove Add- ition to the City of Seattle, King Coun- JAS. M. ELIZAR Attorney for Estate. Epler Block, Seattle, Wash. Feb. 23—March 22, 1912. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN The Seattle Republican loves to publish Legal Notices and if you will call up Main 305 when you have a notice for publication it will do the rest. 423 EPLER BLOCK ty, Washington, and to enjoin and restrain you, and each of you, from claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest of any kind, name or nature whatsoever therein. HIGGINS, HALL & HALVERSTADT, Attorneys for Plaintiffs. Office and Postoffice address, 817-823 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication March 15th, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Erma Cramer, deceased—No. 11674. By order of said court made herein on the 16th day of February, 1912, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 1308 Alaska Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication February 23, 1912. ALEXANDER H. CRAMER, Administrator of the Estate of Erma Cramer, deceased. BRADY & RUMMENS, Attorneys for Administrator. 1308 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, King Coun- ty Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. In Probate. Order to show cause on sale of real estate. In the Matter of the Estate of Harry T. Traynor deceased—No. 15599. T. Traynor, deceased The administratrix of the estate of Harry T. Traynor, deceased, having filed her petition in this court, duly verified, praying for an order of this court for the sale of all real estate of which the said deceased died seized, for the purposes therein set forth; And it appearing to the court from said petition that the personal estate of the said deceased in the hands of said administratrix is not sufficient to pay the claims against the said estate and the expenses of the administration thereof, and that it is necessary to sell all or a portion of the real estate of the said deceased to pay the said claims and expenses of the administration. And it appearing to the court that said petition conforms to, and is in accordance with the requirements of law in such case made and provided. It is ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said deceased appear before said Superior Court on Monday, the 25th day of March, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day at the court-room of the Probate Department of said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, then and y, then and final report is March 15—April 26, 1912. ALEXANDER, H. CRAMER. BRADY & RUMMENS. The Seattle Republican loves to publish Legal Notices and if you will call up Main 305 when you have a notice for publication it will there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this court should not be granted to said administratrix authorizing and empowering her to sell the said real estate of said deceased, or so much thereof as may be necessary to pay the aforesaid claims and expenses of administration. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before the said 25th day of March, 1912, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said County of King and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 16th day of February, 1912. A. W. FRATER, Judge. J. E. McGREW, Attorney for Administratrix. 432 Pioneer Block, Seattle, Wash. Feb. 23—March 22, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons by Publication. The MacDougall & Southwick Co. (a corporation), plaintiff, vs. Lillian M. Willis, defendant. The State of Washington to the said Lillian M. Willis, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 2nd day of February, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to recover judgment for $1549.13 for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered to defendant between Nov. 1st, 1910, and Jan. 1st, 1912. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 457 Arcade Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb. 2—Mar. 15, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Order Directing Creditors to File Claims. Western Lime & Lumber Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Pacific Coast Lime Company, a corporation, defendant.—No. 56871. Standard Oil Company, a corporation, having duly presented its petition to the court herein, from which it duly appears that said petitioner is a coporation entitled to maintain this proceeding; that one E. M. Williams, on or about the second day of August, 1907, was duly appointed permanent receiver for the defendant above named; that said E. M. Williams as such receiver on or about the 30th day of September, 1910, filed what purported to be his final report as such referee; that there- Friday, April 5, 1912. TOURIST BATHS Here you will find the most up-to-date bath establishment in the West. Equipped at a cost of $50,000. Turkish, Russian, Nanheim Effervescing, Electric Ray and Medicated Baths. Bake Oven treatment applied for rheumatism. Both ladies' and gentlemen's departments, respectively, in charge of skilled and experienced men and women. Operated in conjunction with the remodelled TOURIST HOTEL Occidental and Main Seattle THE SEATTLE ELECTRIC COMPANY Is selling the Most Reliable Light and at a Reduced Cost. Carbon Lamps Are Supplied Free to consumers of our current. Call at the ELECTRIC BUILDING, Seventh Avenue and Olive Street, Or phone Main 2680 Ind.208 Now, on motion J. W. Russell, one of i Bede eS aes SR hate Friday, April.5, 1912. LEGAL NOTICES 427 Epler Bik. Main 305 the attorneys for said petitioner, Stand- ard_Oll, Company, IT IS ORDERED, that the. creditors of &. M, Williams as receiver of the Pacific Coast Lime Company, a corpo- ration, present and file with’ the clerk of this court on or before the 26th day P Pecatee 1912,. their claims, duly veri- ied. ‘And it is ordered further that this order be published in some newspaper regularly printed and published in the city of Seattle, for two consecutive weeks (once each week), and that a copy of this order as 80 printed be mailed to cach of such creditors at their last known place of address, which said publishing and mailing shall be deemed sufficient notice to all the creditors of said FE. M. Williams as receiver of the Pacific’ Coast Lime Company, a corpo- ration. And it is hereby further ordered that any creditor of said EB, M. Williams as receiver of the Pacific Coast Lime Com- pany, a corporation, may on or before April 7th, 1912, file’in the office of the clerk of ‘this court, objections to the claims of any other creditor filed pur- suant to this order, And it is hereby further ordered that immediately after said April 7th, 1912, the petitioner herein may apply to this court to have a date set for the hear- ing of all said. claims and the objec- tions thereto. if any, and that this order and the publication’and service thereof as hereinbefore provided for shall be deemed sufficient. notice to all the cred- itors of said E. M. Williams as receiver of the Pacific Coast Lime Company, a corporation, of the time and place set for the hearing upon said claims, and objections filed thereto, if any. And it is hereby further ordered that the question of the compensation to be allowed to the attorneys of said peti- tioner, Standard Oil Company, for their services in the action against the surety on said receiver's bond, and for their services in this proceeding, shall be de- ferred until the making of the final or- der upon the hearing and determination of such claims, and objections, if any, filed thereto. Done in open court this 7th day of March, 1912. KING DYKEMAN, Judge. (March 15—March 29, 1912.) JUSTICH’S COURT, BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Summons for Publication. Albert A, Evans, plaintiff, vs. H. S. Hel- gason, defendant.—No. '27005, State of Washington, County of King ss: ‘The State of Washington to H. S. Hel- gason, defendant: You, and each of you, are hereby no- tified ‘that Albert A. Evans has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in room 611 Prefontaine Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 19th day of April,’A, D. 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock’ a. m., and’ unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said paintiff is for goods, wares and merchandise (neces- saries) sold defendant by plaintiff in the sum of eighteen and 25-100 dollars with interest. Complaint filed Feb. 24, A, D. 1912. Dated March 11, 1912. R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace in and for Seat- tle Preeinet, King County, Wash. March’ 15—April 7, 1912. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons. Dorethy Collins, plaintiff, vs. Ernest 0. Collins, defendant.—No. 86447. The State of Washington to the said Ernest O, Collins: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the 15th day of March, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled Sour and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to do so, judgment will be rendered against you, according to,the demand of the corm- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘The object of the above entitled ac- tion is to secure a decree of divorce from defendant on the grounds of de- sertion and_non-support. CORWIN A. TOWNSEND, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address, 505 and 506 Bailey Building, Seattle, King County, Wash- ington. IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Notice. In ‘the Matter of the Petition of the Ford Harder Grain Co. to dissolve and disincorporate.—No. 86344. Notice is hereby given that the Ford Harder Grain Co., a corporation, has filed a petition in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King Coun- ty, which said petition prays that said corporation be disincorporated and be dissolved, and said Court has fixed the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of the 20th day of May, 1912, in the court room of Department No. 9 of the above entitled Court in the court house in the City of Seattle, King County, State of ‘Washington, as a time and place when and where said petition will be heard, THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN at which time and place all persons interested may show cause, if any they have, why said corporation shall not be dissolved and disincorporated. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 8th day of March, 1912. D. K. SICKELS, (Seal) Clerk of Said Court. By D. A. GRANT, Deputy. BRADY & RUMMENS, Attorneys for Petitioner. 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. March 15—May 17, 1912. IN |THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, Washington. Order to Show Cause Why Real Estate Should Not Be Sold at Private Sale. In_ the Matter of the Estate of Mary Gibson Bell, Deceased.—No. 6677, James Bell, the administrator of the estate of Mary Gibson Bell, deceased, having filed in this court his petition for an order requiring him to sell at ppivate sale all or sufficient of the real estate of Mary Gibson Bell, deceased, for the purpose of paying claims against the said property and the costs of ad- ministration, and it appearing therefrom that there is not sufficient personal es- tate in the hands of said administrator to pay said claims, it is ORDERED that all persons interested in the said estate do appear before this court at the court room of the probate department thereof on the ist day of April, 1912, at 9.30 a, m. then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order for the sale of the real estate as prayed for by the said administrator should not be made, and it is further ORDERED that a ee of this order to show cause be published once each week for four consecutive weeks, be- ginning with the ist day of March, 1912, in the Seattle Republican, a weekly newspaper printed and published in the city of Seattle. one in open court this 27th day of February, 1912. By the Court, A, A. FRATER, a Shee pe March 1—March 29, 1912. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication, Herman Nelson, plaintiff, vs. Chas. F. Albin, John Winston and Ciara Wins- ton, defendants.—No. 86167. The State of Washington to the said Chas. F. Albin, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the’ ist day of March, 1912, and defend the above entitled’ action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at- torney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk ‘of said court, The object of the above entitled ac- tion is to foreclose a mortgage on the land described in the complaint in this action, and situated in King County, Washington. Said mortgage was given by the above named defendant Chas. F. Albin to the plaintiff and bears date the 30th day of March, 1909, and is rec- orded in Volume 430 'of mortgages on page 559, GEO, McKAY, Plaintiff's Attorney. P.O. Address, Arcade Building, Seat- tle, King County, Washington. March 1--April 12, 1912. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for Knig Coun- ty. Summons by Publication. Etta: Logan,’ plaintiff, vs. John W. Lo- gan, defendant.—No. $6159. The State of Washington to the said John W. Logan, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 1st day of March, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at- torneys for plaintiff, at their office be- low stated; and in case of your failure so to do,’ judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the esroblaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of ‘the said court. Briefly stated the object of this ac- tion is to dissolve the bonds of matri- mony existing between the plaintiff and defendant and to grant the plaintiff a divorce from the defendant on the ground of the failure of the defendant to make suitable provision for his fam- ily, and on the further ground of cruelty to the plaintiff by the defendant, and to award to the plaintiff the care, cus- tody and control of Patrick John Logan, a minor son of said parties, and to award and decree to plaintiff as her sole and separate property the following de- scribed lands and premises: Lots eleven (11) and twelve (12) in Block 8636 Tacoma Land Company's Sixth Addition to the City of Tacoma, together with certain personal property described in the complaint, For further particulars reference is made to plaintiff's complaint now on file herein. BRADY & RUMENS, Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O, Address: 130% Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. March 1—April 12, 1912, IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of Cordelia A. Davega, deceased.—No. 12501. I. E, Moses, administrator with the will annexed, of the estate of Cordelia A. Davega, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition set- ting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue ‘thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts suf- ficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the es- tate of the said Cordelia A, Davega, de- ceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle on the 15th day of April, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o’clock a, m..of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and per- sons in said petition mentioned, accord- ing to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 15th day of April, 1912, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper. printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein, Done in open court this 11th day of March, 1912, A. W. FRATER, Judge. March 15—April 12, 1912, IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. ‘Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of Davit Albien Lunden, deceased.—No, 12369, Emil 'T. Hendrickson, administrator of the estate of Davit Albien Lunden, de- ceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribu- tion of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said peti- tion sets forth facts sufficient to au- thorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Davit Albien Lunden, de- ceased, be and appear before the’ said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Se- attle, Washington, on the 22nd day of April, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m: of said day, then and there to show cause, if any'they have, why said final account should not be allowed, and an order of distribution be made of the residue of Said estate among the heirs and persons in sald petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hear- ing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 22nd day of April, 1912, in The Seattle Re- publican, a newspaper printed and pub- lished in said King County and of gen- eral circulation therein. Done in open court this 15th day of March, 1912. A, W. FRATER, Judge. March 15—April 12, 1912. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Geo. Winston, and all persons unknown, if any, hay- ing or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, defendants.—No, 84585. State of Washington, to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, are hereby noti- fled that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of Aug., 1909, and numbered B60369, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount $1.73, and upon the real property situ- ated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Undivided % of N. % of NE. % of SE. &% Sec. 20, Tp. 21 N., Rh. 6 E,W. M. ‘That the taxes for the following sub- sequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of $1.72 for the year 1908, the sum of $2.28; for the year 1909, the sum of $2.11; for the year 1910, the sum of $1.17, Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publieation of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- lication, to-wit, sixty days after Dec. 15, 1911, in the above entitled court and defend this action and answer the com- plaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned at- torney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the len of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as INTHE. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Stewart Holmes Drug Co. (a corpora- tion); plaintiff, vs. The Make-Man 'Ta- blet Co. (a corporation), defendant.— No. 86521, ° The State of Washington to the said The Make-Man Tablet Co, (a corpora- tion), defendant: You ‘are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit, within sixty days after the 5th day of ‘April, A.D. 1912, and defend the above entitled. action’in the above en- titled Court and answer’ the complaint gf the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your auswWer Mpon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to recover judg- ment against the defendant in the sum of $17.17, interest and costs, and to garnishee money owing by F. C. Blendel, of Seattle, Washington, to said defend~ ant, LEOPOLD M. STERN, J. W. RUSSELL, Attorneys for Plaintiff, P. 0. Address, 714 Lowman Bldg. Seattle, County of King, Washington, (April 5—May 17, 1912.) IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Summons for Service by Publication. Mary Hlizabeth Graham, plaintiff, vs. Wendell Stuart Graham, defendant.— No. 86743. State of Washington to the Defendant, ‘Wendell Stuart Graham: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 5th day of April, A. D. 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the com- plaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their address below stated, and in case of your fail- ure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of ‘said Court. ‘The object of the above entitled ac- tion is to obtain a divoree upon the ground of failure to support and aban- donment. Dated at Seattle, Washington, April 2, 1912. BOSTWICK & STEELE, Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. and Office address: 609 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, Washington, (April 5—May 17, 1912.) JUSTICE’S COURT, BEFORE JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King Coun- ty; State of Washington. Summons for Publication, Peter E. Peterson, plaintiff, vs. Pete Kiboff, alias Sedor Kebizoff, alias Pete Kabizoff, defendant.—No, 22107-22108, ‘The State‘of Washington to Pete Kiboff, alias Sedor Kebizoff, alias Pete Kabi- zoff: You, and each of you, are hereby noti- fied that Peter E. Peterson has filed a complaint against you in said Court, which will come to be heard at my of- fice in Room 602, Prefontaine Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 6th day of May, A. D. 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A, -M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said com- plaint is to recover judgment against you for the sum of $86.67, claimed to be due plaintiff, costs and disburse- ments, Complaint filed March 27th, A. D, 1912. JOHN BE. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace. H. M. DALTON, Attorney for Plaintiff. 604-5 Mutual Life Bldg. Seattle, Washington. (April 5—May 3, 1912.) IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Summons for publication. Charles B, Mayhugh, plaintiff, vs. Grace 1. Mayhugh, defendant.—No, 0911. The state of’ Washington to the said Grace BE. Mayhugh, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this sum- mons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 5th of April, 1912 and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the eom- plaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office be- low stated, and in case of your failure so to do, ‘judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant, upon the grounds of abandonment. JOSEPH R, ANDERSON, ‘Attorney for Plaintiff, Office and postoffice address, 498 Pioneer Block, Seattle, Wash. April’ 5—May'17, 1912. 8 REPUBLICAN LEGALS—Mar 8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the King County of King. Perry A. Conley, plaintiff, vs. Florence Conley, defendant. Summons for Publication.—No. 86256. To the said Florence Conley, defendant, greeting: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 8th day of March, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object and purpose of the above entitled action is to procure on the part of the plaintiff, a divorce, dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant herein, on the ground of desertion. H. O. DURK, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. address, 525 Henry Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. March 8—April 19, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the King. County of King. Susan Clark, plaintiff, vs. Earl J. Clark, defendant. Summons for Publication.—No. 86255. To the said Earl J. Clark, defendant, greeting: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 8th day of March, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complain of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be re- dented against you, according to the de- mand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. miled with the clerk. The object and purpose of the above entitled action, is to secure on the part of the plaintiff, a divorce, dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant herein, on the ground of abandonment and desertion H. O. DURK, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. address, 525 Henry Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. March 8—April 19, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Geo. Winston, Bank of B. C., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.— No. 84581. State of Washington, to the above de- dent, and each of them: Yankee. You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 11th day of July, 1906, and numbered E42434, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount $6.00, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Undivided $¼ of NE. ½ of NE. ¼ of Sec. 20, Tp. 21 N., R. E; F. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property to wit: For the year 1905, the sum of $3.65; for the year 1906, the sum of $5.52; for the year 1907, the sum of $7.92; for the year 1908, the sum of $20.92; for the year 1909, the sum of $20.39; for the year 1910, the sum of $16.57. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown if any), are hereby further notified id summoned to be and appear with sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of th. day of said first publication, to-wit. sixty days after Dec. 8. Rainier PALE BEER PHONE SIDNEY 526 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN 1911, in the above entitled court and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said stated, or pay the amount due, together real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Arminta E. Craig, Deceased. No. 13822. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of and all persons having claims against said deceased, or against her estate, to present the same, with the necessary vouchers, to the undersigned executor of said estate, at the office of Edward Von Tobel, 604 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of business of said estate, within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit: within one year from the 22nd day of March, 1912. Dated this 22nd day of March, 1912. EDWARD J. CRAIG, Executor of the Estate of Arminta E. Craig, deceased. March 22—April 19, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. In the Matter of the Estate of Samuel Hamnett, deceased.—No. 12263. Emily A. Hammett, administratrix of the estate of Samuel Hamnett, deceased, having filed in this court her final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Samuel Hamnett, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle, on the second day of May, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition emmotioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said second day of May, 1912, in "The Seattle Republican," a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 27th day of March, 1912. A. W. FRATER. Judge. State of Washington, County of King,—ss. D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 27th day of March, 1912, in the matter of the estate of Samuel Hamnett, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 27th day of March, 1912. (Scald) D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. J. HENRY DENNING, Attorney for Estate. Date of first publication, March 29, 1912. Date of last publication, April 26, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter o the Estate of J. H. Clarke, deceased. Probate No. 13845. By the order of said Court made and entered on the 25th day of March, 1912, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the vouchers required by law to the undersigned, M. J. Clarke, administratrix of said estate, at 401 Marion Building,, the place of business of said estate in Seattle, in said King County and State of Washington, within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, March 29, 1912. M. J. CLARKE, As Administratrix of said Estate. E. C. MILLS, E. C. MYHLE, Attorney for said Administratrix and Estate. Office and Postoffice address, 401 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. March 29—April 26, 1912. NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF THE UNITED CITIES TRUSTEE CO. THE Stockholders:—The regular annual meeting of the stockholders of the United Cities Trustee Co. will be held at the office of the company, No. 1010 American Bank Building, Seattle, Wash., on Thursday, May 2nd, 1912, at 10 o'clock a. m., for the purpose of electing trustees for the ensuing year and for such other business as may properly come before said meeting. Seattle, Wash., March 28th, 1912. March 29—April 26, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons of Publication. Alfred Wilkinson, plaintiff, vs. Mamie Wilkinson, defendant. Wilkinson, defendant. The State of Washington to the said Mamie Wilkinson, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: Within sixty days after the 29th day of March, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of desertion for five years and for incompatibility and cruelty. ALBERT J. ALLEN, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address, 405-406 Eiler Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. March 29—May 10, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not be Made. In the Matter of the Estate of Anna Shaughnessy, deceased-No. 11412. Shaughnessy, deceased. Charles C. Smith, executor of the estate of Anna Shaughnessy, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is thereore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Anna Shaughnessy, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court on the 29th day of April, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 29th day of April, 1912, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 22nd day of March, 1912. A. W. FRATER. Judge. State of Washington. County of King,—ss. D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 22nd day of March, 1912, in the matter of the estate of Anna Shaughnessy, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of sald Court this 22nd day D SICKELS, Clerk (Sen) By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. March 29—April 26, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. Reva Jacobson, plaintiff, vs. Eva M. Shafer, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 85430. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of 1 certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 2nd day of May, 1911, and numbered B 68716, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of 99 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 41, Block 39, East Seattle Replat Plates 39 and 40. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1908, the sum of 79 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 64 cents; for the year 1910, the sum of $1.16. Which several sums bears interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after the 19th day of Jan., 1912, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the Friday, April 5, 1912. sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. REVA JACOBSON, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 508 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, Summons. Hyman & Oppenheim, a Corporation, plaintiff, vs. Mrs. D. C. Robbins, defendant.—No. _____. The State of Washington to the said Mrs. D. C. Robbins, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 25rd day of February, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the action is to recover the sum of Eight Hundred and 63-100 ($800.63) Dollars with interest at six per cent per annum, balance due over and above all payments for merchandise sold and delivered by plaintiff to said defendant at her special instance and request between March 11th, 1910, and February 16th, 1911, inclusive, and to subject Lot 7, Block 1, H. E. Orr's Park Division Two (2) in King County, Washington, to attachment and sale towards satisfaction of the judgment which plaintiff will recover in said action. Date of first publication February 23, 1912. LEOPOLD M. STERN, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address, 714 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, State of Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. G. F. Mayer, plaintiff, vs. A. L. Irish, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 85431. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter defied that the above named plaintiff is the holder of 30 certain delinquent tax respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. G. F. MAYER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD). A. C. MACDONALD Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 508 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Elizabeth Bieber, deceased.—No. 13863. By order of said court made herein on the 4th day of March, 1912. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executor of said estate, at 1308 Alaska Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said King county and state of Washington, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication March 8th, 1912. CONRAD BIEBER. As Executor of Sald Estate. BRADY & RUMMENS. Attorneys for Estate. 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. March 8—April 5, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, Washington. Notice to Creditors. In the matter of the Estate of Sarah C. Towsley, deceased. — Probate No. 13864. By order of said court made and entered on the 4th day of March, 1912, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said estate to present them with the vouchers required by law to the undersigned, Ethel B. Slosson, at her residence in the city of Mount Vernon, Skagit County, Washington, or to her attorneys, McLean & Balllet, 663-4-5 Empire Building, Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, within one year from and after the 8th day of March, 1912, the same being the date of the first publication of this notice, or the same will be barred. ETHEL B. SLOSSON, As Executrix and Trustee under the Will of Sarah C. Towsley, Deceased. By McLEAN & BALLIET, Empire Building, Seattle, Wash. March 8—April 5, 1912. Preparing bodies for shipment specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 18.