Seattle Republican

Friday, July 12, 1912

Seattle, Washington

8 pages

Page 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 2
Page 3
Page 3
Page 4
Page 4
Page 5
Page 5
Page 6
Page 6
Page 7
Page 7
Page 8
Page 8
Page text (machine-generated)
The Seattle Republican [Picture of a man in a suit with a tie, set against a decorative border with traditional facial features. The background is a textured surface with a pattern of indistinct shapes and lines.]] Single Copies, 10 Cents. GEORGE W. ALLEN High Tyee of Seattle Golden Potlatch VOLUME XIV, NUMBER 22. Seattle's Golden Potlatch Festival 15667 XQS SEATTLE: LOOKING SOUTH-EAST FROM WASHINGTON HOTEL 2 A cordial invitation has been extended to the outside public by the Seattle Carnival Association to be the guests of Seattle and her hospitable citizens for the ensuing week, beginning next Sunday and ending the following Saturday. The program of entertainment is both elaborate and amusing and the Seattle Spirit is quite alive to its duty at this opportune time to make friends for the Queen City of the Northwest. Man by nature is a sociable creature and nothing adds so much to his happiness and even longevity of life as to periodically jollify with his fellow man, whether he ever before met him or not. The Golden Potlatch, which has become an annual affair in Seattle has for its object a respite from business cares on the part of host and guests for a week and enjoy a week of re-union. While of course the guests must necessarily leave considerable money in the city for board and lodging, yet the city has contributed multiplied hundreds of dollars for the free entertainment of the guests for the week, and it is further agreed by the places of accommodation that the prices of food, drink and bed will not be one cent higher during that week than they have been from time to time. The city's commercial men desire to extend the glad hand to the outside men from whom they have been taking orders for the past year, and not only extend the glad hand of welcome, but further show their appreciation for their orders by introducing them to the directors of the various firms and by having all concerned break the bread of brotherly love in a grand good time. Your friends in Seattle, Mr. Outsider, will be pleased to have you spend the ensuing week as their guests and make it an old fashion re-union. Your presence may revive THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN their sinking spirits, if such they have, and the visit to the great bustling hub will doubly fortify you to work out your salvation in your more quiet and perhaps lonesome rural home. Not only the Northwest but all America is more or less interetsed in the development of Alaska just now because it is a land of boundless resources, which at present is suffering from an overdose of false conservation, and it is the hope of all those who are struggling to make this Golden Potlatch a success, that the needs of Alaska will be more fully exploited and favorable sentiment be created for the early development of the land of the midnight sun. A Seattle sour dough, George W. Allen, has been seletced as Tyee of the Golden Potlatch and being a broad-gauged business man he will not leave a stone unturned to prove to you beyond a question of doubt that, it is to the financial interest of not only Seattle citizens, but to every enterprising person of the Northwest that the goods the gods have tucked away in the bowels of Alaska be uncovered and put into commercial activity. "Here is to the visitor and here is to the heart of men," come and be a jolly fellow with the jolliest good fellows you have ever met and mingled with. POTLATCH PROGRAM. Monday. The local Elks will entertain visiting Elks, including herds from the national convention. A magnificent street parade will be the feature of the day. Tuesday Will be Merchants and Manufacturers' Day. In the parade will be seen some of the most imposing floats and pageants ever seen in the Northwest. Friday, July 12, 1912. Festival Wednesday. Wednesday. Will be opening day of the Golden Potlatch, when Tyee Allen, with his magnificent pageant, will enter the city and take part in the parade. Thursday. The fraternal orders of the city will exhibit their numerical strength, which, perhaps, will be the longest parade of the week's festivities. Fridav. The industrial parade will hold the boards and from the preparations that are being made it will be a magnificent review of what Seattle is really doing. Saturdav. The autos of the city will be on exhibition and the owners will vie with each other in the decorating of their respective machines. The usual confetti fight will close the day, and likewise the carnival. A hundred and one side entertainments have been planned for the week for the comfort and amusement of the visitors to the city. POTLATCH WEEK GROCERIES Leave your order while in Seattle. Save the price of your trip to Seattle. These prices are for delivery next week. 100 lb. sack sugar.....$5.00 1 box Easy Monday soap.....2.50 1 box Best White soap.....3.50 35c Coffee for.....25 1 sack Idaho Flour.....1.00 You can save $1 and more on any $4 order at this Corner Market upstairs, & 45, Basement of the Sanitory Market. SUED BY FISHER FLOURING MILLS FOR SELLING TOO CHEAP. Philosophy in a Nutshell A Triumpth for the Old-Time Methods : Old German Lager, which increases in popularity season after season, is surely a triumph for the old-time methods of beer making—a case of stepping a foot backward to gain miles forward in the production of the perfect beverage. Some claim magnitude of plant—we claim simplicity. Others claim pure water, some extra sanitation—we make all these claim, and challenge any and all as to quality—and the proof and the secret of our superiority will be found in the bottle that bears the label—Old German Lager. Old German Lager is a rare combination of Bohemian hops and selected malt, and is stored and properly aged by time—not forced artificially or me- chanically—but aged only by natural methods, giving us a product that is pure and entirely lacking the bitterness so often found in bottled beers made largely of domestic hops, under modern methods. Our increasing patronage is due, we believe, to our superior product, and we have been compelled to double our storage capacity used for ageing Old German Lager. ye Those who wish to enjoy a table beer made under these ideal’ conditions. properly aged—or lagered—will find Old German Lager in pints or quarts at ‘ all liquor stores—or telephone the plant, Sidney 75. ’ Old German Lager delivered to all parts of the City j Case of Two Dozen Pints, $2.00, refund of 50c for bottles a © Cofe of Two Dozen Quarts, $3.20, refund of 70c for bottles Ind dent Brewing,,|C ndependent Brewing;\Co. , TELEPHONE,' SIDNEY§75 ° Seattle, - - - Washington ge RT ee Friday, July 12, 1912. Affection as well as wireless can anninil- ate space. Delicacy of mind is hidden under many a tousled head. ; May days are merely preparatory ones to the June bride. | Heavy perfumes are the favorites of the light-headed. Many suns seem to be brought up wrong. The debutante shows her wisdom in her artlessness. A perfect gentleman never gives the qual- ities of one a thought. All the world loves the lover who has time for the world of illusion. Love laughs at airships. A truly devout heart cannot unveil itself. A beautiful woman encircles the world’s best. ‘ Deep thought lingers in many a surface speech. Religion is not meant as a cloak, but as a golden chain. Frowns forecast a local disturbance. The man of promise is the man of few promises. Roguish ways are all right in their proper place. foe Knowledge should. never be plucked until it is ripe. Better to live in vain than to be vain while living. The man who is a credit to the community’ never starins his credit. A slip of a woman makes many a man dance to her music. When the light of love goes out, comes in the lamp of sense. Satisfaction comes of pleasing the most exacting in oneself. The meanest work becomes honorable in an honorable cause. Trust a man with your reputation, but not with your confidence. Women do a lot of things which require real courage, but they haven’t the courage to hear them narrated. The shrewd business man encourages a laugh and a jest with his emnloyers, for these elements make for friendship and help. An even temper crowns wifehood above all traits. . Many a wifely sweetness is wasted on the range’s hot air. When the fire goes out, one’s better half is best at lighting it. Too much affection never goes to waste after the wedding ceremony. Some women make of matrimony a creat suecess, with their hushand’s material and spiritual assistance. The recall and initiative and referendum always interefere with the course of true love. Parc The spring is the time a girl wants a hat: the summer the time she wants hats. When things don’t taste right. don’t go to the dentist’s, go to. the simnle life, Tn traveling for your health, he sure and be well enough to be able to stand for a good pars, Pep opestrr ope eee erereae ‘ THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN na Nutshell The man who gives you a cough remedy wouldn’t cough up a nickel to help you get it, Idleness isn’t a sign of illness—sometimes it’s mild form of sane laziness. Vows go to the bow-wow when they are made too lightly. Man wants a little woman oft, but wants that little not long. The trusted woman can go far and know the right turning alone. A woman’s rosary can be made longer by the hours he’s apart from her. Generous thought is the beginning of ma- trimonial happiness. Justice may be found outside the home, and maybe that’s why some women go out so much. Those who are cynical about marriage are often those afraid to try. A watched pot often sealds. Musie hath charms to move undesirable neighbors. Old maids know, and act as if they didn’t; young maids don’t, and act as if they did. Is Robt. W. Archibald to be punished for getting caught or for prostituting the high office he filled? 3 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Is published every Friday by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3 per year; six months, $1.50; postage prepaid. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, Inc. Main 305 427 Epler Block Seattle, Washington HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON, - - - Publisher SUSIE REVELS CAYTON, - - - Assoclate EDITORIAL. Roman Catholies in Ireland have demand- ed of the Crown absolute protection of Cath- olie worshippers and their properties against the hostilities of the Orangemen, who cele- brate this day July 12th. If there is cause for this. complaint then the Orangemen are no less intolerant than they accuse the Cath- olies of being. If there is no cause for it then the Catholics should be forced to hide their faces in everlasting shame for trying to cause trouble and conflicts between the Crown and part of its subjects. Religious intolerance on the part of any class, sect, or race should be a thing of the past. Every one should serve God as he pleases or not serve Him at all if he pleases. Let every one be the architect of his own eternal home. We suspect that hot wave in the east is due to the fiery rage of the Colonel. POLITICS AND POLITICIANS POLITICS AND POLITICIANS While the odds are most decidedly against the forming of a new political party, yet if it should be done it would purge the Republican party of a bunch of political bucaneers who are Republicans for no higher motive than because they had a better chance to get an office in the Republican party than in the Democratic party. There is hardly any doubt but the organizing a third party would result in the defeat of President Taft, but better for the party that it go to defeat than to win with the aid of such men as Miles Poindexter, W. L. La Follette, Nelson W. Durham, and their respective claquers, who seldom stay in the party, after one of their back sliding escapades, long enough to serve out their required probation. * * * Begin to frame up an answer, Mr. Candidate for Republican nominations, are you supporting the Republican National ticket, the Democratic ticket, or the proposed Roosevelt ticket? In the very near future you will have to either come out and answer this question or systematically dodge it and to do that will cost you many Republican votes as to say you are for one of the other parties. The real Republicans are not going to vote for candidates, who are Republican so far as will get them an office and some other kind of partisan reward in national affairs. Success is not the paramount question with the Republicans, but whether they are supporting Republicans for office or political mongrels is the real question. * * * This is the first filing day for all persons desiring state or county nominations in the state of Washington and the results of the filing will be studied with much care. The filing opportunity will continue for thirty days, which will be thirty days before the primary election. If a Roosevelt party is organized the advocates will either have to hold a convention to nominate its candidates or name them by petition as will the Socialists and Prohibitionists. * * * Charles D. Hilles, one of the rising young men of the country, will direct the destinies of the Taft campaign, he having been so selected by the sub-committee of the National Republican Committee. Among all classes Mr. Hilles is very popular and he will not leave a stone unturned to reelect the president. The Taft supporters have crossed the Rubicon and burnt their bridges behind them and it is now fight to the last dutch and die in the trenches rather than surrender. It's victory or death with them, politically speaking. *** The third party enthusiasm is sadly on the wane and by the time Col. Roosevelt holds his show in Chicago it will be so nearly petered out that even Roosevelt will order it etherized that it's death may be painless. *** In announcing his candidacy for the Democratic gubernatorial nomination, M. M. Godman intimates that nomination on the Democratic ticket this year is equal to elec THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN S AND POLI tion. In the past Judge Godman exhibited considerable foresight on public questions, but he seems to have lost much of his former good judgment and in his dotage talks at random. *** Would Theodore Roosevelt bolt the new party that meets in Chicago August fifth, if it should refuse to nominate him as its standard bearer? ** ** It is a significant fact that every active leader and worker in the proposed Roosevelt party in the state of Washington is a candidate in the Republican party for some kind of a public office. In other words their chief ambition is to reform the other fellow out and themselves in. *** "Perhaps I have only been initiated into the mysteries of the political game, but I have all I want of it and in the future will let the other fellow go to the convention if he likes. It's entirely too strenuous for me."—Tom Dovell. ** ** Just how one can run for a high state office on the Republican ticket and at the same time fight the Republican organization is a question for Him above all to answer, but there are those seeking the governorship of the state of Washington, who advocate such a policy. He who attempts it is a political coward and a dough face double crossed. * * * "I am going to run for Congress, if I run at all, on the Republican ticket. I would not accept a nomination from a Roosevelt or any other kind of convention. I am an advocate of a direct primary nomination and I will be nominated that way or I will not be nominated at all."—Henry B. Dewey. * * * My Dear Cayton: I am obliged for your kindly and pertinent comments, but you haven't got me "doped" just right yet. I wouldn't give a tinker's malediction to go to the House of Representatives. I am nearly fifty-one years old, have a comfortable home, the confidence of my friends and neighbors, and never was so happy and contended in my life. Two years ago I wanted to go, as I had nothing else on hands to make me busy. Now I am busy and making good. Tell with it! I am still in hopes that some candidate over here will make a pronouncement which will enable all of us who believed and still believe that Taft's nomination was and is right, and that he should be heartily supported, to get behind him for this office. I understand that Warburton is for Roosevelt, and that McNeely is non-committal. It don't look good to me. Your very truly. CLAYPOOL P. S.—What's the matter with E. E. Beard, of Vancouver? Friday, July 12, 1912 ECHOES FROM CHICAGO. Two elephants is a crowd—Baltimore Sun. "T. R." stands for "Taft Renomination." Albany Journal. That steam-rooler knows how to do things to a T.—Columbia State. Justice Hughes refused to be either a dark horse or a goat.—Cleveland Plain Dealer. It may be difficult to distinguish the bandanna from the red flag.—Philadelphia Record. Maybe the Colonel will be just paradoxical enough to win a losing fight.—Chicago Daily News. After reading a party platform one feels that the fog-horns should be blowing.—Chicago Daily News. The Chicago convention having adjourned, we presume Cuba will not intervene at this time.—Columbia State. Being in office as well as in the Republican party, Governor Hadley announced that he will stay where he is.—Cleveland Leader. Another defeat sustained by Colonel Roosevelt is that some inconspicious Taft man was the first to think of referring publicity to a fellow Republican as a gutter-worker.—Columbus Ohio State Journal. What joy a lot of British suffragettes would take in being delegates to national conventions in this country.—St. Paul Pioneer Press. Well, it was one of his own boys who said, "When father goes to a funeral he wants to be the corpse."—New York Herald. It is unfortunate that a good many readers don't seem to know whether Armageddon is an Alaska post-office or a Pullman car. —Cleveland Plain Dealer. The President and the ex-President each wished the nomination; each has got one. Everybody ought to be happy, and the Democrats are.—Philadelphia Record. Doubtless the Republic of Colombia, from which Teddy took the canal strip, would be interested in that platform plank "Thou shalt not steal."—Philadelphia Record. Senor Orozco will tell you that nothing is more discouraging than to have a personally-conducted revolution completely overshadowed by a mere Presidential convention. —Los Angeless Express. G. O. P.'s new meaning: Bood-bye, Old Party.—New York World. It is a wise Republican that knows his own party.—Columbia State. No wonder Harry Thaw thinks he is sane enough to be at liberty!—Columbia State. Wouldn't the Colonel make a dandy umpire for the home team?—Memphis Commercial-Appeal. The recall of bolts is one of the principles that can be judiciously considered at this juncture.—Pittsburg Dispatch. When Tom Platt made Roosevelt VicePresident he certainly had no conception of what he was starting.—Chicago News. Of course there will be some objection to a third party on the ground that two is all the country can stand.—Detroit News. IMPEACHING JUDGE ARCHBALD Aid for Convicts' Families Friday, July 12, 1912. The unanimous report of the House Judiciary Committee that Judge Archibald, of the Court of Commerce, ought to be impeached for his business transactions with the Erie Railroad, has revived some newspaper discussion of the question of personal guilt, but what seems to be considered the most important phase of the matter is that a trial before the Senate—if the case reaches that body—will test the efficacy of the old-fashioned recall procedure. "At a time when the recall of judges is a metter of political discussion," remarks the Charleston News and Courier (Dem.), "the country will have an opportunity of determining just how effective is the mode of recall adopted by the founders of the Government." In the opinion of the Charleston paper, there will be no need of adopting the more modern method if impeachment proceedings prove to be a device of merit. Voicing a more vigorous opinion, the Indianapolis News (Ind. Dem.), says: "This case, being really the recall of a judge and his punishment if he be found guilty, should be peculiarly valuable to this country now after so many months of crazy experiment with the new method of arraigning a judge and deciding his fate by ballot. We may hope that with the passing of the chief cause of irritation the accustomed cool, common sense of the American people will resume its sway, and that we shall still retain as one of our chief glories the full protection of the individual against all the world when duly accused by the laws of the land." The Brooklyn Eagle (Ind. Dem.) and the New York World (Dem.) agree with The News that the courts are not yet beyond the reach of the people, and that the present method of removing corrupt judges is good enough. The Philadelphia Record (Ind. Dem.) sees in the Archbald case an answer to Colonel Roosevelt's advocacy of the recall: "The fact of Judge Archbald's accusation, and the readiness with which he has been brought to the bar of judgment, under the forms of procedure provided in answer to constitutional requirement, furnish an adequate negative answer to the demand for a new method of judicial recall as proposed in the Progressive plans of Colonel Roosevelt. We can rid ourselves of unfit, incapable, or venal judges in due form, whenever the proofs of unfitness, incapacity, or venality are brought to the attention of the proper tribunal. There is no occasion for appeal to the mob for the correction of any abuse or the punishment of any criminal, high or low, if the ordered processes of the law are put in motion. Of this the Archbald proceeding is an impressive reminder." Calling attention to the fact that President Taft has expressed dissatisfaction with the way the impeachment system has worked hitherto, the New York Tribune (Rep.) says that "here is a chance to show that it is capable of better work than it has yet done." The Boston Globe (Ind.) reminds us that the process of impeachment is seldom invoked, and since the beginning of the Government only eight cases have been heard in the Senate, in only two of which impeachment was sustained. The Globe thinks the difficulty in getting impeachment usually has rested upon partisan considerations. Harking back THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ING JUDGE A to the case of Judge Ewayne, the Philadelphia North American (Prog. Rep.) makes this answer to the argument of the conservative papers: "The proof was plain. Yet so far from the necessary two-thirds vote of guilty was obtained that only thirty-five of his judges considered him deserving of punishment, while forty-seven voted for his acquittal. And the reason? et it be told by Allan L. Benson, in his reference to impeachment of judges in his thorough study of 'The Usurped Power of the Courts': "In brief, the machinery for impeachment has failed to work. It has failed to work because it is unworkable. It is unworkable because great offenders can not be tried except before a jury that is and always has been interested in their acquittal. The jury is the United States Senate. Conviction can be had only upon a twi-thirds vote. The Senate represents capitalists. The framers of the constitution frankly declared that they created the Senate to represent capitalists." "The judge who comes before the Senate for trial has been selected, in all probability, by some Senator who is a fellow servant of the special-privilege interests. And the courtesy of the Senate is far-famed." The New York Evening Mail (Prog. Rep.) a list of the impeachment cases tried in the Senate: "The first impeachment was of William Blount, a Senator from Tennessee, who was acquitted of treason (1797); the second, of Judge John Pickering, who was convicted of drunkenness (1803); the third, of Judge Samuel Chase, for misdemeanor and overbearing conduct; who was acquitted (1805); the fourth of Judge James H. Peck, impeach- Some states allow their convicts, if good, a penny a day. Some states allow their convicts, if good, a plug of tobacco. Some states allow their convicts, if good, pay for overwork. All states allow the convict's innocent families to suffer. Imprisonment of the bread winner generally leaves those dependent upon him destitute, and compels them either to endure bitter want, or to become a public charge. Recently a prisoner detained in a county jail in Indiana on a charge of petty larceny was detected passing a bundel to his wife, who was a daily visitor. The jailer examined the package and found that it contained the prisoner's food allowance, which he was turning over to his wife to keep her from starving. When the incident became known the prisoner's release was secured, and work was obtained for him. Starting on the theory that it is the dependents of those confined in prisons who do the real suffering, penologists and humanitarians in general have for some time been endeavoring to work out a correction of this situation. Many gubernatorial messages have called legislative attention to the question. During 1911, the legislation enacted discloses a spirit of greater liberality on the --- ed for 'arbitrary conduct,' who was also acquitted (1830); the fifth, of Judge West H. Humphreys, of Tennessee, who was convneted of rebellion (1862); the sixth, of Andrew Johnson, President of the United States, who was acquitted of violating the laws of Congress (1868); the seventh, of W. W. Belknap, Secretary of War, accused of receiving money of post-traders among Indians, who was acquitted for want of jurisdiction (1876) and the eighth that of Judge Charles Swayne, accused of various misconduct, who was acquitted."—Literary Digest. It seems that Representative Graham and his Democratic associate are making the Hanford investigation a matter of national politics instead of one of moral turpitude. But what more could you expect of a Democrat? His father having failed to run the Republican party Kermit quits the United States for five years at least and perhaps forever. What a pity. Following Edison.—Gabbleton: "Edison declares that four hours' sleep per night is enough for any man." Kidder: "By Jove! That is exactly what my baby thinks!"—Judge. Common.—Mr. Grump (with newspaper) : "Here's an odd case—a woman marries one man thinking he is another." Mrs. Grump: "What's odd about that? Women are doing that all the time."—Boston Transcript. part of the states towards convicts and their families. The prisoners received compensation for labor in six states—Florida, Kansas, Michigan, Nevada, Rhode Island and Wyoming. His dependent family was given assistance in five—Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, and New Jersey. In the latter state, prisoners' families dependent on charity are relieved by the commissioner of charities at the rate of 50 cents for every day the prisoner works, but this relief fund is limited to 5 per cent of the value of all goods produced. Kansas City is making an interesting experiment in the problem of supporting the families of convicts. The judge of the juvenile court of Kansas City has power to give pensions, for the aid of such families, to wives or widows of convicts residing in his county. For one child under fourteen years $10 a month is granted, for each additional child $5 a month. The pensions are given only when, by their aid, the mother is enabled to remain at home with her children, instead of going out to work thus leaving the children uncared for, with the probability that they will rapidly become delinquent. It will be of public interest to watch the practical outworking of this law.—Case and Comment. 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, plaintiff, vs. unknown owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 84338. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: West Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle, lot 1, block 2, certificate No. B55378, year 1906, amount 73 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 1, block 2, West Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington; amounts, $1.78 for year 1907, 91 cents for year 1908, $1.19 for year 1909, $1.78 for year 1910. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, sixty (60) days after June 21st, 1912, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, A CORPORATION. Office address, Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. June 21—August 2, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. Josiah F. Redfield and Catherine C. Redfield, plaintiffs, vs. James R. Boldt and John Doe Kondo, defendants. No. 87223. The state of Washington to the said James R. Boldt and John Doe Kondo, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to follow: for damages in the sum of $2,000 for personal injuries caused to the said Catherine C. Redfield on the 9th day of December, A.D. 1911, while in the employ of defendants as waitress in their cafe, in the City of Seattle, County and State aforesaid. Which is more fully and particularly described in the complaint in said cause on file in the aforesaid Superior Court. P. P. CARROLL & JOHN E. CARROLL Attorney for Plaintiffs. P. O. Address: 77 Starr-Boyd Bldg, County of King, State of Washington, Seattle May 17—July 5, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, plaintiff, vs. unknown owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 84334. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: West Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle, lot 3, block 2, certificate No. B55380, year 1906, amount 73 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 3, block 2, West Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. King County, Washington; amounts, $1.78 for year 1907, 91 cents for year 1908, $1.19 for year 1909, $1.78 for year 1910. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said REPUBLICAN LEGALS—June 28—noah IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. J. S. King, plaintiff, vs. Thomas Mickel, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 87073. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of thirteen certain delinquent tax certificates issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 24th day of September, 1902, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following years, in the following amounts, and upon the real property situated in said King County described as follows, to-wit: Lots one to nine, inclusive, and lots 38 to 41 inclusive, all in block 39, River Park of King County, Wash.; the numbers of the certificates being B14824 to B14836 inclusive; of the year 1900, for and upon each of the above described lots in the sum of ninety-one cents, the amount of taxes, interest and cost, on each of the above described and numbered certificates. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Upon each of said lots there was paid, including principal and interest to April, 1, 1912, the sum of $18.49, excepting upon lot 1 there was paid principal and interest as above the sum of $18.82, and upon each of lots 40 and 41 there was paid the sum of $18.53. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said 1st day of April, 1912, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, 60 days after the 28th day of June, 1912, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest the costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. H. H. EATON. Office address, 323 and 324 Alaska Building, Seattle, Washington. First publication dated June 28th, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Minnie A. Reay, plaintiff, vs. John Reay, defendant.No. ____. The State of Washington to the said John Reay, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against your according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of desertion and non-support for a period of two years. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 405-406 Eilers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. June 28—August 9, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Lottie Wickstrom, plaintiff, vs. A. P. Wickstrom, defendant.—No. ____. The State of Washington to the said A. P. Wickstrom, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, sixty (60) days after June 21st, 1912, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, A CORPORATION. Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. June 21—August 2, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Elmira L. Stone, Deceased. No. 14311. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 8th day of July, 1912, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the under- signed Administrator with the will annexed of said estate at 405 New York Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, July 12th. 1912. WASHINGTON TRUST & SAVINGS WASHINGTON TRUST & SAVINGS BANK. By J. H. EDWARDS, Vice-Prest. As Administrator with the Will Annexed of said Estate. H. R. CLISE, Attorney for Estate. 405 New York Bldg., Seattle, Wn. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Julia E. Siebe, Plaintiff, vs. Harry R. Siebe, Defendant. No. ----. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington: To the above named defendant, Harry R. Siebe: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 12th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is: That the plaintiff be divorced from the defendant on the grounds of (1) desertion and abandonment for one year and more, and (2) nonsupport, and (3) that the minor child be awarded plaintiff, almony and costs. Date of first publication July 12, 1912. FRANK H. KNAPP. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Room 219 Epler Block, 813 2nd Ave., Seattle, King County, State of Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Seth H. Morford, Plaintiff, vs. Albert J. D'Aoust, and the West Coast Securities Company, a corporation; H. L. Green, Defendants. No. ____. Public Publication Summons. State of Washington, to the said Albert J. D'Aoust and West Coast Securities Company, and H. L. Green, NOTICE: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this summons upon you, to-wit: sixty (60) days after the 5th day of July, 1912, exclusive of the day of service, and answer ahe complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned. attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which is filed with the clerk in the above entitled court, a copy of which is hereby served upon you by publication. The object of this suit is to foreclose a mortgage given by Albert D. J'Aoust to H. L. Green on the 26th day of May, 1911, on Lot three (3), in Block forty-three (43) of H. E. Orr Park Division number four (4). REEVES AYLMORE, Jr., Attorney for the Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 575 Colman Building, Seattle, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. John Thomas, plaintiff, vs. Jessie Thomas, defendant.-No. 88043. The State of Washington to the said Jessie Thomas, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above Friday, July 12, 1912. within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of non-support for more than three years last past. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 405-406 Eilers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. June 28—August 9, 1912. JUSTICE'S COURT, BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Summons for Publication. Nettie L. Slocum, plaintiff, vs. Roy D. Curtis, defendant.—No. 27907. State of Washington, County of King —ss: The State of Washington to Roy D. Curtis: You, and each of you, are hereby notified that said plaintiff has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 611 Prefontaine Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 29th day of July, A. D. 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said complaint is to establish a claim against you for Ninety and 35-100 Dollars ($90.35) upon account; and in said action garnishment has been directed to Burke & Farrar, Inc., a corporation of Seattle, Washington, to hold and apply upon your said indebtedness, any personal property in their possession or control, belonging to you, and any indebtedness owing from them to you. Complaint filed June 14th, A. D. 1912. Dated June 28th, 1912. R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Wash. June 28-July 19, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Prochete. In the Matter of the Estate of Bert E. Bailey, Deceased. No. 14109. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 29th day of June, 1912. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned, Minnie Bailey, Administratrix of said estate, at 703 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, July 5, 1912. MINNIE BAILEY. As Administratrix of said Estate HENRY S. NOON, Attorney for Estate. 703 New York Blk., Seattle, Wn. July 5—August 16, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Richard J. Thompson, Deceased. No. 6998. Ad- ministratrix's Notice of Sale of Real Estate. Notice is hereby given that I will sell at private sale to the highest and best bidder for cash, the following described real estate situated in King county, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot 13, Block 13, Madison Park Add- ition to the City of Seattle. Also Lot 22, Block 18, Latona Addi- tion to the City of Seattle. Said real estate will be sold in parcels or tracts as indicated in the foregoing paragraphs, and all bids for the same must be made in writing, accompanied by certified checks or cash for at least 10 per cent of the amount bid, and addressed to the undersigned administratrix. Minnie Thompson McCarty, at Room 10 Haller Building. Seattle, Washington, said administratrix reserving the right to reject any and all bids, said sale to be made on and after Monday, the 22nd day of July, 1912. MINNIE THOMPSON McCARTY. Administratrix of the Estate of Richard J. Thompson, Deceased. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. Friday, July 12, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Joseph Cass, Plaintiff, vs. Marian Pauline Cass, Defendant. No. ——. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Marian Pauline Cass, Defendant: Marian Pauline Cass, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 10th day of May, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce in favor of plaintiff and against defendant on the grounds of abandonment and desertion for more than two years. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 405-406 Eller Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. May 10—June 28, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Edith Buckwell, Plaintiff, vs. Cyril D. Buckwell, Defendant. No. 88605. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Cyril D. Buckwell, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 5th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated! and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce of this plaintiff from this defendant on the grounds of desertion and non-support. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 405-406 Eiller Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. July 5—August 16, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Ida L. B. Hewlett, Plaintiff, vs. Ralph F. Hewlett, Defendant. No. 88539 Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the Defend- ment. F. Hewlett: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 5th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action, answer the complaint of the complainant, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. court. The object of the above entitled act is a dissolution of the bonds of matrimony, and the restoration of the plaintiff's maiden name of Ida L. Burnard. Dated at Seattle, Washington, June 29, 1912. TUCKER & HYLAND, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Postoffice and Office Address: 307 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. July 5—August 16, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. by Publication Summons by Publication. Elizabeth Sorge, plaintiff, vs. Frederick Sorge, defendant. The State of Washington to the said Frederick Sorge, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 3rd day of May, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of abandonment, non-support and drunkenness. NICHOLAS SCHMITT, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address and office, 412 Pacific Block, Seattle, King Co., Wash. May 3—June 21, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Mary J. Weber, Plaintiff, vs. Otto O. Weber, defendant. No. 88138. Sum- mons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said above named Otto O. Weber, defend- ant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 14th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney—for plaintiff — at his office below THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of the court dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and for the custody of their minor child, Erma. E. W. HOWELL, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 657 New York Blk., Seattle, King County, Washington. June 14—July 26, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of G. W. Carr, Deceased. No. 13948. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 6th day of June, 1912, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to William J. Carr, executor of said estate, at Gig Harbor, Mason county, Washington, the place of business of said estate, executor, or to the clerk of the above entitled court, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be marred. Date of first publication, June 14th, 1912. June 14—July 12, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. F. A. Calfee, Plaintiff, vs. Milo H. Sanders, his wife, C. P. Hosch and Neilie J. Hosch, his wife, Eugene T. Mort, and Lucetta Mort, his wife, and Frank Myers, and W. E. White, Defendants. No. ____. Publication Symmons. The State of Washington, to Milo H. Sanders, and Alta M. Sanders, his wife; C. P. Hosch and Nellie M. Hosch, his wife; Frank Myers and E. W. White, Defendants: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this summons upon you, to-wit: sixty (60) days after the 14th day of June, 1912, exclusive of the day of service, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, a copy of which is herewith served upon you. The objects of this proceeding are to foreclose the mortgage upon Lots eight (8) and nine (9), in Block twelve (12) of Petitt's University Addition to the City of Seattle, said mortgage given to secure a note executed by Alta M. Sanders and Milo H. Sanders, under date October 15th, 1912. REEVES AYLMORE, JR., Attorney for the Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 575 Colman Bldg., Seattle, Washington. June 14—July 26, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. William J. Parry, plaintiff, vs. Ellen Berry, defendant. No. 88502. Parry, defendant. No. 88502. The State of Washinton to the said Ellen Parry, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action by the plaintiff is to obtain a judgment of divorce from the defendant upon the grounds of desertion and refusal to live and cohabit with plaintiff. E. F. KIENSTRA Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 200 Epler Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. June 28—August 9, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of Martha McClintock, deceased.—No. 8326. James McClintock, administrator of the estate of Martha McClintock, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Martha McClintock, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court, on the 22nd day of July, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 22nd day of July, 1912, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. A. W. FRATLRK, Judge. State of Washington, County of King —ss. D. K. Sickels, county clerk of King County and ex-officio clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court on the 14th day of June, 1912, in the matter of the estate of Martha McCintock, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 14th day of June, 1912. D. K. SICKELS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons. Jessie Holt, plaintiff, vs. James E. Holt, defendant.—No. ____. The State of Washington to the said James E. Holt, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days-after the 21st day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce upon the grounds of desertion, excessive drinking and non-support. MONCRIEFFE CAMERON, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, No. 323 Central Building, Seattle, Washington June 21----August 2, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons. J. W. Brown and Kate Easson, plaintiffs, vs. Venetia Harlan, and John Doe, her husband, whose true Christian name is unknown; Albin R. Seiler, and Jane Doe Seiler, his wife, whose name is unknown, and Herbert S. Upper, and all persons unknown having or claiming an interest in the hereinafter described real estate, defendants.—No. . . . The State of Washington, to the said Venetia Harlan otherwise named Mrs. Venetia Harlan), John Doe, her husband, if any whose true Christian name is unknown; Albin R. Seiler (otherwise named Albin Robert Seiler, and Jane Doe Seiler, his wife, if any whose true Christian name is unknown; Herbert S. Upper, and all persons unknown having or claiming an interest in the hereinafter described real estate, defendants; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, sixty days after the 21st day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, and decree be entered and rendered, according to the demands of the complaint, now on file in this court in the office of the clerk thereof, and a copy of which is herewith served upon you. The object of this action is to quiet plaintiffs' title in and to the southwest $ \frac{1}{4} $ of southwest $ \frac{1}{4} $ of northeast $ \frac{1}{4} $ of section 3, township 24, north of range 5, east of the W. M. in King County, Washington. J. W. BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiffs. 620 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. June 21—August 2, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. C. A. Holtz, plaintiff, vs. Mabel C. Payne and unknown owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.— No. 88359. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of certain delinquent tax certificates issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 12th day of January, 1912, and numbered as follows for the delinquent taxes of the following years, in the following amounts, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Hiawatha Park addition, lot 42, block 2, certificate No. B76913, years 1907-8-9, amount, $7.95; Hiawatha Park addition, lot 43, block 2, certificate No. B76914, years 1907-8-9, amount, $7.95. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 42, block 2, Hiawatha Park addition, amount, $1.82, for year 1910: lot 7 43, block 2, Hiawatha Park addition, amount, $1.82, for year 1910. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, being June 21st, 1912, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forecolsising the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. C. A. HOLTZ, Plaintiff. A. D. McCLEVERY, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 501 Lumber Exchange Building, Seattle, Wash. June 21—August 2, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, plaintiff, vs. unknown owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 84341. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: West Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle, lot 4, block 9, certificate No. B55387, year 1906, amount, 75 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 4, block 9, West Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington; amounts, $1.78 for year 1907, 76 cents for year 1908, $1.00 for year 1909, $1.57 for year 1910 Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from sad date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, sixty (60) days after June 21st, 1912, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, A CORPORATION Office address, Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. June 21—August 2, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Emma Chicoine, Plaintiff, vs. Louis Chicoine, Defendant. No. ——. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Louis Chicoine, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 24th day of May, A. D. 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: An action for divorce on account of non-support and abandonment for more than one year. OLIVER ANDERSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 520-1 Lumber Exchange Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. May 24—July 12, 1912. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN --- --- IMPORTANT TO LAWYERS. lawyer, you know what it means to get good service on notices. You get ready for your day in court and you find your affidavit of publication has not been close your temper and say things that would neither day School nor look well in print. If you had have to The Seattle Republican you would have had no would not have to go to confession in order to get Creator. The Seattle Republican is prompt and then means all of it in legal matters. It takes notices, which means a whole week over Saturday pub you have a notice for publication, call Main 305. If you are a lawyer, you know what it means to get good service in your publication notices. You get ready for your day in court and at the last minute you find your affidavit of publication has not been made, you rightly lose your temper and say things that would neither sound well in Sunday School nor look well in print. If you had have given the notice to The Seattle Republican you would have had no such worry and would not have to go to confession in order to get right with your Creator. The Seattle Republican is prompt and painstaking, which means all of it in legal matters. It takes notices until Friday noon, which means a whole week over Saturday publications. When you have a notice for publication, call Main 305. 423 Epler Block. "IT Makes The Mountain Smile" Rainier BEER Rainier BEI SEATTLE BREWING & MALTING ON MOUNTAIN OR LAKE YOUR SUMMER OUTING WILL NOT BE COMPLETE WITHOUT RAINIER. FREE DELIVERY MADE TO ALL PARTS OF THE CITY. PHONES SIDNEY 1; SIDNEY 526. Robert M. Hopkins, clerk of the federal court in Seattle for almost a quarter of a century, is now a convict on McNeil Island, to which place he has signed the commitments of thousands of other convicts. Hopkins tried to beat Uncle Sam and got himself caught in a bad jam. The Hopkins are pioneers in this section and they are all more or less prominent as well as wealthy, and Robert's downfall must be a stinging blow to their pride. It's remarkable the number of prominent Seattle men that have taken quarters on the "sland" this year. Mayhap it is not such a bad place after all. While political conventions are seething the real saviors of the country keep busy in the factories and on the farms.—Toledo Blade. When he returned from Africa Colonel Roosevelt should have brought home his own supply of Southern delegates.—Chicago News. The present desperate illness of the G. O. P. elephant is easily attributable to being overfed with peanut politics.—Kansas City Star. The Man on Horseback was an important personage once, but he has left his job since the Man on the Steam-Roller put in an appearance.—Milwaukee Sentinel. In the interest of public morals it is to be hoped that our authorities will not permit an exhibition of the Chicago fight pictures in the movies.—Washington Post. What a hit a clergyman could make, in opening the convention some day, by addressing the Deity as "the author of peace and lover of concord."—Boston Herald. Colonel Roosevelt is quoted as saying: "If the people want a progressive party I'll be in it." Wasn't the word "in" inserted by a careless stenographer?"—San Francisco Call. J. Pierpont Morgan paid $10,000 last week for John Bunyan's copy of "Foxe's Book of Martyrs." He is likely to find this more cheerful reading than the political news during the next few weeks.—Kansas City Star. WHAT DO YOU CALL THESE? The Reason.—"Why do so many of the the big dances stag?" "On account of the sarcity of doe, perhaps."—Cornell Widow. One of Them.—Guide (in Venice)—“This is St. Mark's.” American Tourist (sminingly).—“Ah! The patron saint of the tourists, I presume?”—Puck. Balked.—She: "Didn't you say you'd go through fire and water for me?" He—"Yes, but I'm blowed if I'm going through bankruptcy for you!"—Yonkers Statesman. The Winner.—Griggs: "I should say that the two keys to success are luck and pluck." Briggs: "Sure! Luck in finding some one to pluck."—Boston Transcript. Getting On.—"How's your son getting on in college?" "Great! They put him in as a pinch hitter the other day and he cleared the bases with a three-bagger."—Detroit Free Press. Friday, July 12, 1912 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN, 423 Epler Block.