Seattle Republican

Historical Society The Seattle Republican CURRENT CURRENT COMMENT unpleasant to be kept in such suspense, and if any person or persons were responsible for the delay they should be legally punished for it. If the delay was due to the lameness of the law, then the next legislature should remedy its defects. There is, however, no doubt of the fact that the law is a rotten one. The direct primary law may have to an extent killed off the political bosses, which was Direct Primary Flat Failure. and it is very doubtful if the killing off of the political bosses will compensate us for the loss of our representative government. A law that will give us Bob Hodge for governor of the state of Washington, and Matt Starwich for sheriff of King County, should be repealed immediately if not sooner. It may be a fact that these men have not the ability to mulct the treasury to the extent of their more learned first cousins, but the educated man with more or less high ideals, though he swipes a little more money from the treasury, is a thousand times to be preferred to the ignorant and untutored semi-barbarian. treasury, is a th to the ignorant rian There is perhaps more or less merit in the political doctrines known as Socialism, or so Socialist Sordid Doctrines False. think, and to an extent look into the future, would not be advocating it, but as Socialism is preached on the street corners and the public places and as published in papers of that faith, there is nothing to it, not only nothing to it, but the teachings are inimical to the perpetuation of this government. For every evil there is a remedy and the remedy need not be either anihilation or revolution. Men are constituted so as to think out the remedy by peaceful means and not by revolution, such as Socialism teaches. To read a real Socialist paper and your mind is filled with revolution and war; when just the opposite should be the result. "It's the irony of conditions that brings about the nomination for the highest office Hodge Holds The Fort. May, perhaps, things have been said about Mr. Hodge that are absolutely false, but their own. Single Copies, 10 Cents. "As goes Maine so goes the country," was a political saw in years past, which proved absolutely correct. In later years, Maine Indicates Republican Victory. however, from a Republicanstandpoint,the state has wavered, and it is no longer a safe Republican barometer, but to an extent it's a slight indication of the political trend. Two years ago Maine went Democratic, which was a universal surprise, but the anti-administration excitement at that time was at its height, and it was a rebuke to President Taft, but last Monday she swung back into the Republican column, and while the Republican plurality was small, in comparison to former years, yet it is a strong indication that the anti-Taft feeling is dying out and he has more than a fighting chance of succeeding himself, Col. Bullmoosevelt to the contrary notwithstanding. Two months of hard-headed, old-fashioned Republican campaigning will greatly change the complexion of the presidential finish in November, and if Mr. Taft is not elected at the polls then no one else will be, and the House of Representative will be called upon to elect Taft's successor and that will be Taft himself. Whether you like or dislike Theodore Roosevelt, you are bound to admit that he is a man with a wonderful personnel, which never Cyclone Teddy Has Passed. fails to draw a crowd. He has come and gone Cyclone Teddy Has Passed. and it was like unto the roaring cyclone. His coming was with a flash, a crash and a roar that was deafening, while his going left a stillness that was cruelly painful. May, perhaps, he will carry the state of Washington, but there are no indications at this time justifying the prediction. The prevailing presumption is that the worst he will be able to do in the November election will be to defeat Taft and elect Wilson, which would please Teddy next to himself being elected; not that he loves Wilson more, but because he hates Taft. There must be either something radically wrong about the direct primary law in this state or something Primary Count confoundedly wrong Too Very Slow. about those who operate it at the polls. Primary Count Too Very Slow Candidates who sought nominations in last Tuesday's election do not today know the exact results of that election, when the results should have been fully known by not later than Wednesday noon. Who is responsible for the delay, and why was it? It's a good thing, but it about killed off our representative government at the same time. many college professors and persons of high educational attainments who really VOLUME XIV, NUMBER 28. one thing is certain: he is almost as ignorant and illiterate as a man can be, and as coarse and uncouth as a human being was ever known to be and yet be classed as a human being. If any of Mr. Hodge's personal acts from boyhood to maturity is worthy of emulation such one has never come under our observation. If any act of Mr. Hodge can be pointed to with pride by respectable people, then we have never heard of it, and yet this man has been nominated for governor. To what depths of public indiscretion does the political game lead us into committing? In thirty days more there will be loads of money come to Seattle for investment," says an advanced prosperity agent, and, if he be correct in his prognostications, then, per- Mister Money Is Coming. Mister Money Is Coming. haps, it foreshaodws a period of business activity for not only Seattle, but the whole Northwest. Money is the desideratum for business activity, but if the borrower is to put up 100 cents in gold coin as security for every dollar borrowed, then such borrower is the loser by the proposition. Financial wild-catting should be given a wide birth, but if the city and the community are to be systematically developed, then money must be not only forthcoming, but it must be had at a reasonable rate of interest. Money for development is sadly needed in this section of the Northwest, and it is hoped that it will soon put in its appearance. Hazel Irwin, who was recently tried in Portland, Oregon, for murder, she being accused jointly with her consort of the heinous crime. After baring her scarlet life to the Women Warblers Should Be Caged. Women Warblers Should Be Caged. jury, which she says was due to having been betrayed when a mere girl, she denied participation in the crime. She, however, admitted she lured the man into her apartments where her paramour lay in wait for him, and once in, he dealt the unfortunate victim the fatal blow. Hazel may not have known what was going to happen, but she must have had her suspicions, and nothing short of imprisonment for life should be her reward.. Such characters are unfit to be at large, despite the fact they in their more tender years had been betrayed by a fiend incarnate. The country will be the better off with such women safely under lock and key. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1912. The Sunday Mail Controversy $ Sargeant Becker’s trial has been delayed again, which is evidently due to his attorneys’ sparring for time. It Becker Trial was thought for a Is Delayed. while that Becker would come through and give the whole Dam family of police grafters away, but his attorneys discovered he had large sums of money on deposit in different banks of the city, and for a large slice of the money they have promised to either get him acquitted or wear out the case in the courts. Such a thing seems to be pos- sible in the courts of this country, but the time is rapidly coming when the guilty will be punished and not wait for ‘‘ judgment day’ to do it. A jury may acquit Becker for the murder of Rosenthal, but even that would be no proof of his innocence, for po- licemen all over this country have learned the science of, professional court swearing and they will swear just as their best ‘‘in- terest’ directs them. It often happens that large cities get to run- ning in such a bad way that a general clean- up is absolutely neces- Purity Squad sary. New York city Better Go Slow. is undergomg just such a political and public renovation at present, and very de- servedly so, but it’s such conditions that produce a ‘‘purity squad,’? which often goes to the other extreme and goes until the pro- motors of the clean-up are moved to throw up their hands and exclaim: “Oh, Reform! the crimes that are committed in thy name.”’ The ‘purity squad”’ is running riot in Seat- tle just now and unless Mayor Cotterill and Chief Bannick put a quietus upon the bunch then the mayor will find himself up against a strong recall game and holding a doubtful hand. The mayor must not overlook the fact that the preachers of the city are none too well pleased with his administration and, if they should join issues with the dissatis- fied business men against him there will be things doing pretty soon. According to press dispatches Mrs. Jack Johnson committed suicide on account of having been ostracis- Mrs, Jack Johnson ed by the Caucasians Commits Suicide. because she was mar- ried to a Negro, all of which may be true, but the statement is seriously doubted, not on the grounds that she spoke falsely, but on the grounds that the Associated Press that pretended to speak for her, spoke falsely, There is no doubt but that all such unions bring much unhap- piness to both parties, and they should be avoided as long as racial prejudice is as keenly observed in this country as it now is. Of course tliat means racial miscegenation in the dark instead of in the open. Nearly half of the Negroes in the United States are half-breeds, the result of whites and blacks cohabiting, and so fair in complexion are they breeding that, thousands of them moye to another community and become simon pure Anglo-Saxons. The numbers of these half-breeds are steadily on the increase; so steadily as well as rapidly that, the next century will not find hardly a trace of the The law prohibiting the handling of the mails on Sunday is bringing to Postmaster- General Hitchcock more or less unfavorable criticism, and, it remains to be seen, though a good thing, whether it will work to the political detriment of President Taft before it is thoroughly understood, or bring to him untold strength. Though a measure may be unpopular among the rich and opulent classes, President Taft has always been found advoeating it, if, in his opinion, it favored the masses. Some of the criticisms of the law may be found below: Wrathful newspaper attacks upon Con- gress and the Postmaster-General following the passage of a law to stop the delivery of mail on Sundays in first and second class post-offices are only a degree less harsh since Mr, Hitecheock has decided to give the law “liberal interpretation.’’ His ruling that the order shall not interfere with ‘‘ certain classes of mail that can not be held until Monday morning without serious inconvenience to the addressees’’ (this to include newspapers and hotel guests) is characterized as ‘‘service by favor’? and ‘‘mail for the elect.’’ For the law itself, condemnation in the metropoli- tan press is almost savage. In New York city the editors present such a collection of descriptive terms as ‘‘backwoods legisla- tion,’’ ‘‘exasperating folly,’’ ‘‘the work of meddlesome and rash Congressmen,’’ a ‘*Pu- ritanic blue law.’’ It is indignantly declared by some of the press that the provision was included in the postal appropriation on the last day of the session by. trickery—‘‘a clause snooped in,’’ says the New York Evening present Negro in the United States. In the South, where race prejudice against the Ne- gro is the most intense, many white men spend their entire lives with Negro para- mours, and though ostracised from the whites, none of them has ever been known to commit suicide over it. Mrs. Johnson, how- ever, was to be pitied, and we hope she has found more heart ease in ‘‘yonder’s world’’ than she did in this, but we are inclined to think she was crazy. THE NATIONAL CITY BANK of Seattle, Washington Corner Second Avenue and Columbia Street eG). ey 7. ee eemons .......500,000.00 Bt BIAS caiecrseeecncse vaeerpssee, SOOO OU, Deposits shown under eall of September 4, 1912, showed an increase over call of Septem- ber 1, 1911, OF 78 PER CENT the largest gain of any bank in Seattle. An Evidence of Confidence. 4 PER CENT ON SAVINGS. OFFICERS: J. W. Maxwell, President F. W. Baker, Vice-President J. H. Bloedel, Vice-President i John K. Bush, Cashier Chas. B. West, Assistant Cashier Sun. Strictly interpreted, it prohibits, be- ginning on September 1, all delivery on Sun- days in large post-offices, except of mail that is sent special delivery. It provides: “That hereafter post-offices of the first and second classes shall not be open on Sun- days for the purpose of delivering mail to the general public, but this provision shall not prevent the prompt delivery of special- delivery mail.’’ Editors are saying that if this were liter- ally enforced it would clog the entire deliv- ery system for half the week, prove a great inconvenience to traveling men in receiving business correspondence, and in the newspa- per offices prevent the timely arrival of mail ‘‘copy’’ and exchanges and tie up the distribution of Sunday editions to readers out of town. Many of the press, not deny- ing that legislation to give postal and car- riers a day off once a week is demanded, can not see that Sunday need be observed by all of these employees at one time. The New York World calls the action not ‘‘Puritan- ism,’’ but ‘‘oppression of the people by the paid servants of the people.’’ Th Neew York Sun, since the appearance of the Postmaster-General’s statement inter- preting the order ‘‘liberally,’’ announces it- self placed among the privileges classes by “executive discrimination.’’ Further, “The administration of the post-office has sought to reduce the inconvenience and hard- ship decreed by the Congress as much as it can, To accomplish this it is obliged to make a distinction between its customers, a thing at once hateful and potentially demoraliz- mg.”’ To the declaration that the benefit to the postal employees will be slight, the answer from some of the Sunday-elosing advocates has been that the amount of mail delivered on Sundays also is slight, and that in some ‘instances not over one-half of 1 per cent. of the public is affected. Business men, how- ever, are reported to be taking the law as a serious matter, PERSONAL PRARGRAPHS. Otis M. Moore, who for many years was a well-known newspaper man of the North- west, but who some five years ago got a gol- den opportunity to sell his paper at Hoquiam and did so, and then packing up his ‘‘golden opportunity’’ and returning to Maine, his old home, to spend the remainder of his life on a farm, bought with his ‘‘golden oppor- tunity,’’ is longing again for Puget Sound and is expected here some time this fall. R. A. Hutchinson, of Spokane, who is a rapacious Bull Moose, was in Seattle last Tuesday, accompanying the Big Bull Moose through the state. Dick, dollars to dough- nuts, will be in the next state senate as a Bull Mooser. Eugene A. Childe is a Republican nominee for the house of representatives in the next Washington legislature, Twice before Mr. Childe tried for this nomination, but failed ; the third time, however, proved the charm, and now he is almost certain of election. Lawyers and The Color Line FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1912. (From Literary Digest.) The final action of the American Bar Association upon its three Negro members—voting to return them to membership after the executive committee had unseated them, but ruling that in the future candidates must state whether they are white or colored—is denounced by many editors as an unworthy compromise. Several comments state that if the Negroes won a victory it was an empty one and the consensus of editorial opinion declares that the Bar Association has diplomatically taken this occasion to draw the color line. A characteristic judgment is that of the Philadelphia Inquirer: "We consider this a most unfortunate compromise. The Bar Association is not a private club, not a social organization. It claims to represent the legal ability of the country, but as a fact it will hereafter represent only the Caucasian element." The New York Evening Mail speaks of the situation as "passing strange" and "not very 'civilized'." "A sneaking settlement" is the comment of the New York Globe, which further declares that the Bar Association "has dishonored those great principles of right and justice to which the legal profession pretends to be devoted." The Springfield Republican, one of the many to say that the lawyers seem to regard their association as a "kind of social club," sees the action as "inherently absurd"—"for it would hereafter exclude from membership a colored lawyer notwithstanding that he might be the attorney-general of the United States or a judge of the United States Supreme Court." If the association isn't a club, the New York Sun argues, there is no other intelligible way to explain the policies adopted: "The association did not even have the courage to do a mean thing manfully. It shifted responsibility, compromised on a resolution requiring local bar associations to declare henceforth whether a candidate proposed for membership in the national association is a Negro." The New York Tribune thinks there are evidences of cowardice in the language of the resolution: "Apparently it has neither the wish to admit Negroes nor the courage to shut them out. On its face the resolution appears to recognize the possibility that they will become members in the future, yet it asserts as the policy of the association that 'it never has been contemplated that members of the colored race should become members of this association; and it requires sponsors for candidates proposed in future to state their color. Altogether, it seems to be a straddle unworthy of a body of such fine purpose and personnel. If there is one place where race prejudice should not exist it is in an organization which purports to be representative of a learned profession whose members are officers of the courts and who are bound, in or out of that organization, to uphold worthy standards and high aims and to work for the general improvement of legal and social conditions." One of the three Negro attorneys, William H. Lewis, is an assistant to Attorney-General THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Wickersham, who led in the defense of the case of the Negroes. The New York Evening Post says the result at least was "a notable victory for Mr. Wickersham." The New York Journal of Commerce thinks that the Bar Association itself is a sufferer from the controversy and has on this account "lost ground." This writer's argument runs: "Independent of the merits of the issue whether Negro lawyers should or should not be accepted by the association, the country has been disappointed to find it largely controlled by persons to whom this disputed question loomed so large. Mr. S. S. Gregory, the president of the association, appears to have been largely responsible for the unfortunate development of the squabble, but he could not have gone so far had he not been greatly aided and abetted by many associates. This sort of difficulty about membership, accompanied by internal wrangling, has long been the scourge of scientific and professional societies in the United States." COUNT TOLSTOI'S THOUGHTS ON SUBJECT OF DEATH. "Think of death more often, and live as if you were to die soon." "Remember that you do not live in this world, but you pass through it. For the man who leads a spiritual life there is no death." "However you may hesitate how to act, imagine that you are to die in the evening, and your doubts will clear immediately." "Death is more inevitable than the approach of night, or winter. Why, then, while preparing for night, for winter, do we not prepare ourselves for death? The preparation for death is a righteous life." "You may envy another, you are indignant, angry at him, you want to wreak your vengeance on him. Consider that today or tomorrow that man will die, and not a trace will be left of your evil feelings against him." The following are some of his maxims that are now being circulated throughout the Russian Empire, which he styled his Code of Health: "Fresh air day and night; daily exercise; moderation in eating and drinking; one hot bath weekly, and a cold one daily; comfortable and not over-heavy, clothes; a dry, spacious, sunny dwelling; scrupulous cleanliness; regular and intensive work, which acts as a preventive against the ills of body and mind. Rest from labor must not be sought in distractions. Night was intended for sleep. The chief condition for good health is a life fruitful in labor and ennobled by good actions."—Christian Advocate. Philip N. Ashmun, editor and publisher of the Herald of Enumclaw, attended the Bull Moose convention last Tuesday, and between Teddy's talks found time to drop into The Republican office, one of his former haunts. There is no doubt but that things have changed with Phil since going to Enumclaw, and as a result he is one of the prosperous publishers of the county. PUGET SOUND TRACTION COMPANY Is selling the Most Reliable Light and at a Reduced Cost. Carbon Lamps Are Supplied Free to consumers of our current. Call at the ELECTRIC BUILDING, Seventh Avenue and Olive Street, Or phone Main 2680 - - - - Independent 208 BONNEY-WATSON CO. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Elliott 13. Candidate for Judge of the Superior Court King County, Washington Primary Election, Sept. 10, 1912. JOHN T. CASEY for Superior Court Judge Law Office, 449 New York Block, Seattle Main 8642 Election Sept. 10, 1912. A. R. UPRIGHT Candidate for State Land Commissioner Subject to Republican Primaries September 10, 1912. DAVID H. COX Republican Candidate for State Treasurer Subject to Republican Primaries, September ber 10, 1912. L. FRANK BROWNE Non-Partisan Candidate for Judge of Superior Court King County, Washington Primary, Sept. 10, 1912. JOHN E H.UMPHRIES Non-Partisan Candidate for Judge of Superior Court King County, Washington Primary Election Sept. 10, 1912. Nothing Counts Like Good Service LESS WORK BETTTER COOKING A CLEAN KITCHEN CLEAN FOOD LESS COST FOR FUEL USE A GAS RANGE A Small Payment with Your Order Will Place One In Your Home Seattle Lighting Co. 1314 Fourth Ave. Main 6767 --- PROBABLE PRIMARY WINNERS And now let us join in the grand old hymn, "Everybody Lies But Teddy!"—New York Sun. Congressmen who haven't been nominated can at least enjoy their vacation.—Albany Journal. There's a mighty familiar sound in the latest from Oyster Bay—let Loeb do it!—Washington Post. All parties in seeking campaign funds seem anxious this time to avoid an embarrassment of riches.—Boston Transcript. It must get Colonel Roosevelt pretty mad to have to buy gasoline of the Standard Oil Company.—Ohio State Journal. "Supreme Dietator" is the title borne by the head of the Loyal Order of Moose. How M. H. H. B. DEWEY Congressman at Large. C. PERRY H. NILES State Land Commissioner. PERTINENT THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN BLE PRIN PRIMARY EUGENE A. CHILDE Representative in Legislature. Ireland WILL E. HUMPHREY Congressman, First District. old hymn, New York anticipatorily approp script. The newly rich in mostly members of the delphia Press. nominated.—Albany The more Colonel atorily appropriate.—Boston Tr newly rich in New York seem to members of the police force.—Ph Press. more Colonel Roosevelt thinks ab anticipatorily appropriate. — Boston Transcript. The newly rich in New York seem to be mostly members of the police force.—Philadelphia Press. The more Colonel Roosevelt thinks about his past life, the more he can't remember a single mistake he ever made.—Columbus Ohio State Journal. A special meeting of the Ananias Club has been called to act upon the waiting list. It is probable that the quarters of the club will be enlarged.—Boston Advertiser. Considering the outlook, it would appear that the Bull Moose party ought to have quit when it discovered that it made a profit of $474.63 on the Chicago convention.—St. Louis Republic. MARY W [Name] DAVID H. COX For State Treasurer. state. — Boston Tran- new York seem to be police force.—Phila- posevelt thinks about CO The pro- of of a Coun- City Office Police an- which are one of the cided by the propositi- city and C which wo- and suffer the l The proposed $980,000 bond issue for the erection of a County Office Building, to house all County and City Officials, including the Courts, excepting the Police and Health Departments, Hospital and Jail, which are to occupy the present City Building, is one of the most important local questions to be decided by the voters at the coming election. This proposition is clearly an economical one, as the County and City are now paying for rented space, a sum which would covier the interest on the entire issue, and suffer all the inconvenience and loss from having the Departments scattered about the city. The County is deriving no income from the block of land which it owns and upon which the building is to be erected, and as the present Courte House is unfit for further use, there can be no logical argument against the issue. The building is being designed as a commercial structure, such as private enterprise would build. No attempt at determining the location of a Civic Center is being made, as the building is not designed to form a unit of any civic group, but as an office building covering the entire block bounded by Third and Fourth Avenues, James and Jefferson Streets As many stories as will be required will be erected, and the foundations will be laid for additional height, so that the finished structure will be twelve stories, covering the major portion of the block, with the central portion adequate for eight more. Thus providing a structure that can readily be disposed of to private investors at a profit to the County, when a Civic Center is voted and the County and City erect their buildings as part of the Civic group. FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1912. VINNERS 10 TPEU J. E. FROST Congressman-at-Large. [Name] MYRON E. HAY For Governor. COUNTY AND CITY COURT HOUSE he proposed $980,000 bond issue for the erection of County Office Building, to house all County and City Officials, including the Courts, except the State and Health Departments, Hospital and Jail. He is to occupy the present City Building, so that the most important local questions to be dealt with by the voters at the coming election. This position is clearly an economical one, as the County and City are now paying for rented space, a sum would covcer the interest on the entire issue, suffer all the inconvenience and loss from harm to the Departments scattered about the city. The County is deriving no income from the block and which it owns and upon which the building be erected, and as the present Courte House is for further use, there can be no logical argue against the issue. The building is being designed as a commercial structure, such as private enterprise would build, attempt at determining the location of the Center is being made, as the building is named to form a unit of any civic group, but a office building covering the entire block bound by Third and Fourth Avenues, James and Jeffery Streets. For many stories as will be required will be needed, and the foundations will be laid for additional height, so that the finished structure will have stories, covering the major portion of the building, with the central portion adequate for eight stories. Thus providing a structure that can readily disposed of to private investors at a profit in County, when a Civic Center is voted and the City and City erect their buildings as part of the group. September 6—October 25, 1912. THE SEATTLE NATIONAL BANK FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1912 JOHN L.'S BEST FIGHT. John L. Sullivan, in his own time the greatest of all heavy-weight pugilists, used to have two boasts—that he could whip any man ever born of woman, and that he could consume any combination of mixed drinks and still walk straight. After his prize-ring career was over, the newspapers began to print all sorts of stories about frequent saloon brawls in which he participated, and continued to print them for a long time. Much that was said about him was greatly exaggerated, of course, but Sullivan himself did not pretend to be a sober, peaceful citizen. But a few years ago the newspapers ceased publishing stories about his prodigalities, tho not because the ex-champion had quit fighting. It is true he had quit fighting, men bue had had begun a still harder fight, one which required tremendous courage of the rarer and finer quality. An incident narrated by Richard Barry in Pearson's Magazine explains just what kind of a fight it was: "One day, only a few months ago, a gruff-mannered, gray-haired man with sweeping gray moustaches, heavy of paunch and deliberate of gait, waddled into Healy's cafe on the upper West Side of New York. "Tom Healy, the proprietor, saw him coming and personally rushed to prepare a table for him. ' 'It's a fine day, Mr. Sullivan, and happy I am to see you coming this way again,' murmured Tom, blending the manners of an Irish diplomat with those of an obeisant fight fan. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN “‘How a-are ye?' said John L., extending a pudgy fist lamely and permitting it to be seized, as an emperor would suffer the approach of a satrap. “Healy beckoned the nearest waiter impressively. 'A magnum of our best champagne,' he said. “‘Naw!' growled John L. “‘We have some private stock Burgundy. Bottled it ourselves in '91.' Healy blushed as he realized that he had unwittingly mentioned the worst year in history, the year of the Old Roman's Waterloo. “‘Naw!’ “‘Some Johannisberger. I think we have a bottle or two of '07. It's rare,' purred Healy.’ “‘Naw!’ “‘Some good old English porter?’ “‘Naw!’ ‘Healy was plainly troubled. John L. sat puffing deeply, and fixing his would-be host with a stolid glare that might have indicated enmity had not the fact of his appearance been perfect assurance of his friendship. “‘Well, what will it be then? Name your own tipple. I guarantee to furnish it.’ “‘Nothing doing, Tom. I'm on the water wagon.’ ‘Healy beamed broadly, reassuringly. 'Sure,' he asserted. 'Tis a good thing now and then, a wonderful thing—braces a man up—keeps him trim—and then you enjoy the grape more when you get back to it.’ ‘But as he spoke Healy was thinking of the past, of the night when John L. had stood before his mahogany while two bartenders, as rapidly as they could work, mixed gin fizzes for him, which he consumed more quickly than they could be passed out, until sixty-seven had entered his capacious throat. He was thinking of the night when his present guest had offered to drink two bottles of wine for every one that any other man could consume and how he thereupon drank three of the boss alcoholics of Harlem under the table before he, himself, sank by the wayside in a stupor. "Naw! I've had my last drink,' boomed the throaty bass voice. "Healy smiled that smile mingled of incredulity, patronage, and considerate attention which the perfect host should always bestow upon the reformer. John L. got all the inflections of the smile. "I've put King Booze down for the count. It was my hardest fight and my best knockout, and I'll never give him another chance at the title. I'm retired—and this time that goes. Never again a drop of liquor enters my body. It's been three years since I had one. I'll be a million years an angel before I touch another." "There was quiet certainty in the tone which said that this was no idle boast. It was far more effective, even, than had been that threat, 'I'll lick any man in the house right here now—them's my sentiments—John L. Sullivan—that's me!' uttered so often, so vaingloriously, so effectively in years dead and gone. "He meant it. John L. Sullivan has become a Y. M. C. A. lecturer on temperances, and he practices what he preaches." IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. In the matter of the Estate of Matthew Dow, Deceased. No. 14230. In Probate. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned, administrators of the estate of Matthew Dow, deceased, to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against, the said deceased, to exhibit them with the necessary vouchers within one (1) year after the first publication of this notice, to the said administrators, at No. 913, Northern Bank & Trust Building, corner of 4th Avenue and Pike St., in the City of Seattle, County of King, State of Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of all the business of said estate. AMES R. STIRRAT, JOHN KYLF. Administrators of the Estate of Matthew Dow, Deceased. Aug. 16, 1912—Sept. 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Effie Sheldon, Plaintiff, vs. Chas. R. Sheldon, Defendant. No.——. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Chas, R. Sheldon, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 16th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of non-support for more than one year and for extreme cruelty. ALBERT J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 405-406 Ellers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Aug, 16—Sept. 27, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons. Henriette Mauvais, plaintiff, vs. Romeo Mauvais, defendant.-No. The State of Washington to the said Romeo. Mauvais, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 9th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure to so do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complaint in this action prays for divorce and that the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved. H. E. FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 708 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, Aug. 9, 1912. Date of last publication, Sept. 20, 1912. JUSTICE'S COURT, BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Summons for Publication. E. M. Brouillette, plaintiff, vs. C. P. Rollins, defendant.—No. 28064-56. State of Washington, County of King—ss: The State of Washington to C. P. Rollins: You, and each of you, are hereby notified that E. M. Brouillette has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in room, 611 Prefontaine Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 12th day of September, A. D. 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said E. M. Brouillette is to recover a judgment against you for services rendered you as attorney in the case of Bernard Murray vs. C. P. Rollins et al in the Superior Court of Washington for King County and numbered 77066 in said court, which said complaint demands judgment for $99.95, interest and costs. Complaint filed June 26, A. D. 1912. Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Wash. August 9—September 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Summons for Publication. Nettie May Heater, plaintiff, vs. Guy H. Heater, defendant.—No. ____. The State of Washington to the said Guy H. Heater, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 9th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintive, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the com- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant, because the defendant without plaintiff's fault ever since the 27th day of February, 1912, has failed and neglected to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family and that he still fails and neglects to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family. Plaintiff also seeks the restoration of her maiden name, Nettie May Gregory. A. J. SPECKERT; Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address, Stevens' Dancing Academy, Fourth Avenue, near Pine Street, Seattle, Washington. August 9—September 20, 1912 SUMMONS ON APPLICATION FOR Registration of Land. Application. State of Washington, County of King -ss. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Clarence M. Austin, a bachelor, plaintiff, vs. H. F. Custance, Theodore Jensen, Rasmus Jensen, and the unknown heirs, if any, of Leonard Olett, deceased, and the unknown heirs, if any, of William Brown deceased; Johannah Maria Paulson of Krogrieve, Kingdom of Norway, and the unknown heirs, if any, of said Johannah Maria Paulson, if she be deceased; and the unknown heirs, if any, of A. Amunds, deceased; and all persons or parties, unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the application herein, defendants. The State of Washington to the above named defendants, greeting: You are hereby summoned and required to answer the application of the applicant plaintiff in the above entitled application for registration of the following land, situate in King County, Washington, to-wit: "Austin's Garden Addition to the City of Seattle," as per plat thereof recorded in the auditor's office of King County, in Vol. 20 of Plats at page 48 of the records in said office, and file your answer to the said application in the office of the clerk of said court, in said county, within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of such service; such service being deemed complete at the end of the twenty-first day from and including the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, August 23, 1912; and if you fail to answer the said application within the time aforesaid, the applicant plaintiff in this action will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the application herein. WITNESS, D. K. Sickels, clerk of said court and the seal thereof at Seattle, in said county and state this 3rd day of August, A. D. 1912. (Seal) D. K. SICKELS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Olive Burchett, plaintiff, vs. Clinton T. Burchett, defendant.-No. 89145. The State of Washington to the said Clinton T. Burchett, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 9th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for the purpose of obtaining a divorce from this defendant and in favor of this plaintiff, on the grounds of desertion and non-support for a period of more than one year. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address 405-406 Ellers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. August 9—September 20, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Madeline Glazier, plaintiff, vs. John W. Glazier, defendant—No, 88021 Glazier, defendant.—No. 88021. The State of Washington to the said John W. Glazier, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 30th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is an absolute divorce on the grounds of non-support. JOHN R. WILSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address 539 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the co-partnership heretofore existing between Thomas G. Penkins, Sam Gibson, John Campbell and Nellie Campbell under the firm name and style of Purity Cone Company, and doing business at 141 22nd Ave. North, Seattle, Wash., has been dissolved by mutual consent, John Campbell and Nellie Campbell withdrawing therefrom, and notice is hereby given that the undersigned will not be responsible for any debt incurred by said Purity Cone Company from this date. JOHN CAMPBELL. NELLIE CAMPBELL. August 23—September 13, 1912. NOTICE OF DISSOLUTION Notice is hereby given that the co-partnership heretofore existing between W. H. Simpson and C. L. Gillette, under the firm name and style of Simpson & Gillette Sign Co., at Seattle, Washington, has been dissolved, C. L. Gillette withdrawing therefrom. W. H. Simpson will continue the business under the firm name and assume all the obligations and receive all moneys due the firm. W. H. SIMPSON, C. L. GILLETTE. Dated this 25th day of May, 1911. August 23—September 20, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Mary Palmer, Plaintiff, vs. Chas. H. Palmer, Defendant. No. ____. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Chas. H. Palmer, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 13th day of September, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of non-support, desertion, and habitual intoxication. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address 405-406 Ellers Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. First publication Sept. 13, 1912. Last publication November 1, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. German Savings, Building & Loan Association, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. F. F. Travis, Maud E. Travis, his wife; William Jensen, Hulda Jensen, his wife; P. H. Ammidown and Jane Doe Ammidown, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dyer, the General Hauling Company, a corporation, Defendants. No. 87755. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to P. H. Ammidown, Jone Doe Ammidown, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dyer; You, and each of you, are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 19th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at the address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment from said court in favor of the plaintiff, against the said defendants F. F. Travis, and Maud E. Travis, and Maud E. Travis, his wife, for the sum of Ten Hundred Sixty-one Dollars and Twelve Cents ($1061.12), together with interest thereon at the rate of 12 per cent per annum, and interest, attorney's fees, costs and disbursements, and to foreclose that certain mortgage made by the said defendants on the 28th day of February, 1906, for the sum of $1650 (Sixteen hundred and fifty dollars) upon Lot 6, Block 5, Westlake Boulevard Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, which mortgage is of record in Vol. 285 of Mortgages, page 358, record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, and for the sale of said lands to satisfy the amount that may be adjudged by the court to the plaintiff and to bar and foreclose all right, title and interest of each and all of said defendants in and to said lands and premises and every part thereof and for general relief. Date of first publication July 19, 1912. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 604-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In Probate. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Stella Ellinwood, deceased.—No. 14330. By order of said court made herein on the 8th day of July, 1912. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1912 present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Clarence Ellinwood, of said estate, at 4340 11th Ave. N. E., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication August 23rd, 1912. CLARENCE ELLINWOOD, As Administrator of said Estate. FRITZ F. HARRI, Attorney for Estate. 405 New York Block, Seattle, Wash. August 23—September 20, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for County of King. Charles Jenson, Plaintiff, vs. Erma E. Jenson, Defendant. No. 89538. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Erma E. Jenson Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 6th day of September, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from the defendant Erma E. Jenson, dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore and now existing between the plaintiff and the defendant on the grounds of desertion and drunkenness, and personal indignaties rendering life burdensome. P. O. Address 502 Pioneer Building, Seattle, County of King, Washington. September 6—October 11, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, State of Washington. In the Matter of the Application of the Immachuck Hydraulic & Dredge Co., a corp., to Dissolve and Disincorporate. No. 89633. Notice. The Immachuck Hydraulic & Dredging Co., a corporation, having filed in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County, its petition to dissolve and disincorporate, and an order having been made by the Judge of said Court, fixing the time and place herein below stated for the hearing of said petition. Notice is hereby given, that the application and petition of said Immachuck Hydraulic & Dredging Company to dissolve and disincorporate will come on duly and regularly for hearing in Dept. No. 9 of the Superior Court of said State of Washington, for King County, in Seattle, Washington, on Monday, the 28th day of October, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day. Witness the Honorable Boyd J. Tallman, Judge of the above entitled court, and the seal of said court hereto affixed this 3rd day of Sept. 1912. KELS Clerk (Seal) D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By G. A. GRAND, Deputy Clerk. Septevmebr 6—October 25, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Lena King, Deceased. No. 14508. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the fifth day of September, 1912, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate of Lena King, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Administrator of said estate, at 614 Lumber Exchange Building, the palce of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. John Thomas, plaintiff, vs. Jessie Thomas, defendant.—No. 88043. The State of Washington to the said Jessie Thomas, defendant You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action by the plaintiff is to obtain a judgment of divorce from the defendant, upon the grounds of cruelty, and defendant's desertion and refusal to live and cohabit with plaintiff. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 200 Epler Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. June 28—August 9, 1912. FRIDAY SEPTEMBER 13. 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. K. Winslow, plaintiff, vs. Lascar P. Du- Boise, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 89050. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of eleven certain delinquent tax certificates issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 8th day of April, 1912, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year 1908, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 5, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 6, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1910. Lot g, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909. Lot 6, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 6, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Lot 7, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 Lot 7, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 7, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Lot 8, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909. Lot 8, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 8, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Lot 9, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 Lot 9, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910 Lot 9, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 Lot 10, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 Lot 10, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910 1910. Lot 10, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 Lot 11, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909. 1908. Lot 11 block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910 Lot 11, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 1908. Lot 12, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910 1910. Lot 12, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 1911. Lot 13, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Lot 13, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 13, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after the 2nd day of August, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at this office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Etta C. Chapman, Deceased. No.____. Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. D. H. Chapman, administrator of the estate of Etta C. Chapman, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said estate of Etta C. Chapman, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle, King County, State of Washington, on the 12th day of October, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why, said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 12th day of October, 1912, in "Seattle Republican," a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 10th day of September, 1912. A. W. FRATER, Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss. I, D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 10th day of September, 1912, in the matter of the estate of Etta C. Chapman, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 10th day of September, 1912. (Seal) D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By J. A. SIGURDSSON, Deputy Clerk. First publication Sept. 13, 1912. Last publication October 11, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Rose Besaw, Palintiff, vs. Charles Besaw, Defendant. No. —. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Charles Besaw, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty days after the 13th day of September, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce on the grounds of non-support and desertion HOMER E. TURNER. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address 508-10 Lyon Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. September 13—November 1, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons by Publication. Maud M. Peugh, plaintiff, vs. Frank J. Peugh, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington to the said Frank J. Peugh, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 2nd McLEAN & BALLIET. of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered alainst you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant for the following reasons: First.—Because, without plaintiff's fault, the defendant abandoned the plaintiff at Bakersfield, California, in April, 1909, said abandonment being continuous for one year and more. Second.—Because, without the plaintiff's fault the defendant since April, 1909, has neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family and still neglects and refuses to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family. Plaintiff also seeks the restoration of her maiden name, Maud M. Burgua. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address, Steven's Dancing Academy, Second Floor, Fourth Avenue between Pike and Pine Streets, Seattle, Washington. August 2—September 13, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for publication. Mabel Nex, plaintiff, vs. Albert Nex, defendant.—No. 88872. defendant.—No. 88912. The State of Washington to the said Albert Nex, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 2nd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and non-support for a period of more than three years. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 405-406 Ellers Bldg, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN TH E SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. German Savings, Building & Loan Association, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. F. F. Travis, Maud E. Travis, his wife; William Jensen, Hulda Jensen, his wife; P. H. Ammidown and Jane Doe Ammidown, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dyer; the General Hauling Company, a corporation, defendants.—No. 87754. The State of Washington to P. H. Ammidown, Jane Doe Ammidon, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dyer. You and each of you are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 19th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at the address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment from said court in favor of the plaintiff, against the said defendants, F. F. Travis, and Maud E. Travis, his wife, for the sum of Ten Hundred Sixty-one Dollars and twelve cents ($1,061.12), together with interest thereon at the rate of 12 per cent per annum, and interest, attorney's fees, costs and disbursements, and to foreclose that certain mortgage made by the said defendants on the 28th day of February, 1906, for the sum of $1,650.00 (Sixteen Hundred and Fifty Dollars) upon Lot 5, Block 5, Westlake Boulevard Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, which mortgage is of record in Vol. 285 of Mortgages, page 360, record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, and for the sale of said lands to satisfy the amount that may be adjudged by the court to the plaintiff and to bar and foreclose all right, title and interest of each and all of said defendants in and to said lands and premises and every part thereof and for general relief. Office and Postoffice address, 604-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Max L. Kendall, Plaintiff, vs. Louise Kendall, Defendant. No. $9685. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Louise Kendall, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 13th day of September, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled ac- . tion is an absolute divorce on the grounds of cruelty and abandonment. JOHN R. WILSON, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address 539 New York block, Seattle, King County, Washington. September 13—November 1, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 23rd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment against this defendant on one certain promissory note for one thousand dollars ($1,000), and interest thereon at 6 per cent from April 25th, 1910, and to foreclose one certain mortgage, of date April 28th, 1910, on the following real estate, to-wit, lots five (5), six (6), seventeen (17), and eighteen (18), Steel Works Addition to West Seattle, King County, Washington, which said mortgage was given to secure said note. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 405-406 Eller Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Axel Nelson and Emma Nelson, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington to the said G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 23rd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment against this defendant on one certain promissory note dated January 18, 1910, for the sum of seven hundred dollars ($700), with interest at 6 per cent, and to foreclose mortgage, given to secure said note on lot twelve (12), block two (2), of Star Addition to West Seattle, King County, Washington, which said mortgage was given to secure said note. A. J. ALLEN. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 405-406 Eiler Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Schwabacher Hardware Company, a Corpora- tion, plaintiff, vs. B. F. Zimmerman, and Carroll Hayward Zimmerman, his wife, and R. L. Hankinson, and Jane Doe Hankinson, his wife, defendants—No. 89294. The State of Washington to the said B. F. Zimmerman, and Carroll Hay- ward Zimmerman, his wife, and R. L. Hankinson and Jane Doe Hankinson, his wife defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 23rd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to foreclose that certain mortgage given by the defendants, B. F. Zimmerman and Carroll Hayward Zimmerman, his wife, to Schwabacher Hardware Company, a corporation, dated August 10, 1911, to secure the payment of the sum of $2,500.00 one year after said date, with interest at 8 per cent, and an attorney's fee of $250.00, and for a deficiency judgment. LEOPOLD M. STERN & J. W. RUSSELL, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address, 714 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 23—October 4, 1912. mand of said complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for the purpose of dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff, Edwin A. Hunt- ley, and the defendant, Marie Baxter Huntley, upon the grounds of cruelty and desertion. WILSON R. GAY, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, suite 720 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. July 26—Sept. 6, 1912. --- This Is It! long, live, weekly paper that is not afraid of the public weal, is what every house or her address. If you think like this initiative, then you are on, if you will A good, strong, live, weekly paper that is not afraid to say things for the benefit of the public weal, is what every householder should have come to his or her address. If you think like this and are inclined to act on this initiative, then you are on, if you will send THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN n. It first saw the light of day in 1894, ever since, without having missed an issue management would feel greatly enation list would double up this year.. It republican, and is quoted by the state weekly. your subscription. It first saw the light of day in 1894, and it has been firming away ever since, without having missed an issue and but a few hours late. The management would feel greatly encouraged if the paper's subscription list would double up this year.. It is always Readable, Reliable, Republican, and is quoted by the state press more than any other state weekly. --- "IT Makes The Mountain Smile" Rainier BEER RAINIER BREWING & MALTING ON MOUNTAIN OR LAKE YOUR SUMMER OUTING WILL NOT BE COMPLETE WITHOUT RAINIER. FREE DELIVERY MADE TO ALL PARTS OF THE CITY. PHONES SIDNEY 1; SIDNEY 526. 8 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is published every Friday by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3 per year; six months, $1.50; postage prepaid. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, Inc. Main 305 427 Epler Block HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON, - - - Publisher SUSIE REVELS CAYTON, - - - Associate T. R. could easily settle that color-line dispute in the Bar Association by simply inquiring as to which side of the Teddy and Dixon line the Negro candidate hails from.—Washington Post. The double-decked street car is in operation in New York. The next will be a car of five or ten stories, with exits by drawbridge, allowing passengers to enter office buildings at upper floors.—Syracuse PostStandard. No bosses in the new party. "Bosses," you will note, is in the plural.—Burlington Hawkeye. "I never hit softly," declares the Colonel. Whereupon Mr. Archbold takes steamer for Europe.—Boston Traveler. Excursionists bound for Armageddon would do well to see that their tickets have a return coupon.—Washington Post. A good campaign button for Colonel Roosevelt would be a picture of Ananias done in oil.—St. Louis Globe-Democrat. They will do something for justice at last in New York. The statue over the City Hall will be regilded.—Buffalo Inquirer. Perhaps the investigation committee could get more out of John D. Archbold by striking up a correspondence with him.—Detroit News. "You can not check this movement," says a friend of the Colonel. We shall have to ask Mr. George W. Perkins about that.—Harper's Weekly. The fact that Lieutenant Becker has so much on deposit in New York banks must be distinctly encouraging to his lawyers.—Philadelphia Inquirer. The announcement that the Russian people are giving up vodka and taking to beer is an evidence of advancing civilization.—New York World. The strangeness of the times is evident when the senior Senator from Massachusetts is moved to declare that he is a regular Republican.—Boston Advertiser. That Washington damned the Senate is but another evidence of his ability to be always first in war, first in peace, and first in the hearts of his countrymen.—New York World. ALBERT HANSEN Jeweler and Silversmith LOWMAN BUILDING First and Cherry --- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN A good, strong, live, week for the benefit of the public have come to his or her address to act on this initiative, then FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1912 a paper that is not afraid to say things real, is what every householder should If you think like this and are inclined you are on, if you will send TLE REPUBLICAN The light of day in 1894, and it has been it having missed an issue and but a few would feel greatly encouraged if the double up this year.. It is always Read- is quoted by the state press more than THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN 423 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington.