Seattle Republican

SEATTLE REPUBLICAN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, JULY 22, 1904 UNCLE SAM'S RACE PRO BLEM AND IT'S SOLUTION UNCLE SAM'S RACE PROBLEM AND IT'S SOLUTION brow. And this they are doing by keeping a race problem bugbear constantly to the front. How about the North, which pretends to be in favor of bringing about a happy solution of the race differences in this country between the whites and the blacks? Do the Northern people want it settled in a way as they would want an Italian, a Swede or any other foreign nationality coming in great numbers to their shores question settled? Not much. They want a race problem for "a white man's burden" so as to make perpetual menials instead of enterprising citizens out of the Negro. They refuse to give him honest labor only when they want to club the working men of the white race into subjection over their heads and when that has been done, then the capitalist leaves the Negro to his fate, and he is kicked and cuffed from pillar to post by those whom he has robbed of their positions. It's not a question of will the Negro work, but it is, will you permit him to work? and in most instances you will not. There is nothing either grave or difficult in settling the existing troubles in this country between Negro and the Caucassian. The latter is overwhelmingly in the majority and the real masters of the land; while the former knows he is and will be for many years yet to come the hewers of wood and the drawers of water and likewise the tillers of the soil and will be quite content to work out his salvation along that line, if not murdered and beaten at the pleasure of those masters. The black man, whether North, South, East or West that commits a crime is always a hundred times more criminal than the white man who commits a similar crime. The scab Negro that takes the white striker's place commits a much more grievous offense against nature than the white scab. The solution, therefore, as has already been said, of the race problem lies in giving the Negro employment and then treating him as you would any other human being while he is performing that work. It's neither difficult nor grave and it's up to the white man to settle it at once and for all time to come and thereby eradicate another annoyance that might sooner or later lead up to real trouble. Under the caption of "The Nation and The Negro," last Monday's Post-Intelligencer discussed at length the much-mooted "race problem" in this country and said many things both favorable as well as unfavorable to the Negro. The so-called race problem in this country it pronounced "one of the most difficult ever set before a people." "The Negro question," it continued, "is not a Northern or a Southern problem to be settled by one or the other, but is the gravest of national problems." The gravest of national problems in what respect and from what standpoint? Difficult of solution, why? Because you wish to solve it from a selfish instead of a religious standpoint. The Negro is as passive and law-abiding as the most patriotic Caucassian American citizen. If allowed to pursue the even tenor of his way will hoe corn and dig potatoes and be content with the goods the gods provide. He rushes to town and becomes a city loafer because he is beaten, murdered and burned at the stake in the country on the slightest provocation and the provocation results wholly from the fact that, he is a free man instead of a slave. If he was permitted to till the soil, given a reasonable remuneration for his labor and was treated as are other weaker races found in this country, he would be the most valuable peasant the world has ever seen. The South desires to solve the race problem in this country, if such there be, by re-enslaving the Negro even in a more brutal form than in former years. The Negro is quite cognizant of that fact and is struggling to get away from his native haunts in order to prevent it, if possible, and so he is scattering to the four ends of the country as fast as he can to be out of danger when danger comes. Hundreds of years of association, where he has been overwhelmingly in the majority, ought to have convinced those whites, who have lived with him, that the only real solution of the race problem in this country is,—give the Negro the proverbial "forty acres of land and a mule" and he will do the rest. The struggle on the part of the whites is to prevent him from getting that very thing which would make him a man and a citizen at once. So long as they can hold him in abject subjection just so long can they live by the sweat of his MITTEE VISITS SEATTLE MERCHANT MARINE COM MERCHANT MARINE COMMITTEE VISITS SEATTLE MERCHANT MARINE COMMITTEE VISITS SEATTLE ally, and they are still competing with a British line subsidised $3,000,000.00 annually, and each of these lines have ships that cost 30 per cent. less to build and cost less to operate than American ships. If some plan can be devised to cause us to do our own carrying in foreign trade, it will not only make Seattle a great commercial center, but on Puget Sound will be built up one of the greatest shipbuilding industries of the world. This commission is pledged to no particular scheme or remedy, but each member of it is anxious to raise this country to the proud position that it once held among the great sea powers of the world. We urge every loyal citizen of Seattle who has any facts to give that will be of value to this Commission to attend their meetings; and those who do not have any statements to make to the Commission, should also attend in order that they may obtain information on this important subject. The members of the Commission that will be present in Seattle are Senator Gallinger of New Hampshire, chairman; Congressman Minor of Wisconsin; Congressman Spight of Mississippi; and Congressman Humphrey of this city. Mr. Humphrey, after much effort, finally induced the Commission to visit the Pacific Coast and Seattle being the noted foreign shipping point it was perfectly natural that the Commission hold its first session here. The state of Washington should not forget Congressman Humphrey for his persistent fight for the Northwest in having the Commission to visit it in person. So far as this immediate section is concerned there is no more important committee in Congress than the Merchant Marine. The Commission appointed in accordance with a law of Congress to investigate the condition of our Merchant Marine, and to ascertain what aid is necessary to place our flag once more upon the sea, will have a hearing in this city next Tuesday and Wednesday This is one of the most important meetings to this city and the Northwest that has ever been held in Seattle Few people realize the alarming condition of our merchant marine Once this country carried ninety-five per cent. of all our foreign commerce, but last year less than eight per cent. of the $2,200,000,000.00 worth of our foreign trade was carried in American ships. More than half a million dollars in gold is paid each day to foreign ships for carrying our own products, and the most of this sum is paid directly to foreign labor. We have today a great navy, but we have no transport service to accompany it, neither have we sailors sufficient to man the same. In case of war with any great power we would be utterly helpless; in case of war between any two great nations our commerce would be destroyed and industrial ruin brought to the country by the withdrawal for the necessities of war the ships now carrying our trade. Puget Sound today is the only American port where more tonnage of the deep sea trade is carried in American ships than in foreign ships. Few even of our own people realize the great struggle the ships running from this port are making to prevent being driven from the sea. They competed until lately with a Japanese line subsidised $350,000.00 annu- --- --- The VOL. XI. NO. 7 LIBRARY CITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 PRICE FIVE CENTS STREET GOSSIP FOUND A MARE'S NEST In the Harry Eaton escheat case about which the Times has made such a roar, it would seem that it has found a mare's nest and couldn't count the eggs. The facts are, Eaton knew of property in this county that could be escheated, the county commissioners did not know of it and perhaps never would have, Eaton went to them with a straight business proposition and offered to put them into possession of the property if they would give him half of it, the county commissioners looked at it just as any good business man would have done, reasoned that, if it could get half of something that they knew nothing of, that it was an excellent business proposition and then and there made a contract with him, as a result King county is $7,000 ahead by the deal. If the editor of the Times can get onto some property of this kind and will go to the county commissioners with a similar proposition he will get a similar contract. GOT A TIP FROM CHRIST. While discussing the Eaton escheat matter one day this week one of the commissioners told of another man who was up there not long since with a proposition to get permission from the commissioners to dig up $35,-000 on the Yesler estate, which he had been informed by Jesus Christ was buried there. If given permission he was perfectly willing to divide it up with the commissioners. With this fellow we were a little more liberal than with Eaton for we give him permission to dig it up and he could have it all. Eaton's proposition to the commissioners was just as mysterious as the other fellows and we had no more idea what he really had up his sleeve than the other fellow. The county commissioners are simply transacting business and are by no means in the sooth-saying business. BE SURE YOU ARE RIGHT. That Hindoo student, who was maliciously arrested, thrown into a dirty dark cell at the city hall and denied an opportunity to communicate with the outside in order to get legal advice, has sued Chief Delaney for $8,000, and he has done exactly right. So far as Chief Delaney is personally concerned he would not wrong one man any sooner than another, his color, nationality or creed to the contrary notwithstanding, but the chief has a number of self-important whelps in the service who feel called upon to regulate the racial conditions of this country and they therefore go out and promiscuously arrest persons whom they pronounce "damn niggers trying to act like white folk" and it is time some halt be put to their cussedness. When such an abortive offspring of hades and hell as Detective Hubbard is given the right to arrest men at will it is well that those giving him such privileges be made to pay for the damages he commits. It will be remembered that it was only a few weeks ago that Hubbard arrested a Negro and invited the man in whose hame he was found to kill the black _____, or words to that effect. Some one should be squelched. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN HE'S A JOURNALIST. Up in the Burke block one day this week sat Charley Chaimberlain in his office with a copy of the Tacoma Forum in his hands and he seemed greatly pleased with its general appearance, but with a sheepish look on him for having been caught in the very act he broke in before a word could be said to him with: "Permit me to inform you, sir, that the owner of this paper is what I call a journalist. Some people are newspaper men, some are correspondents and some are "editors," but the owner of the Forum is a journalist of the true sense of the word. Now there is one other journalist in this country and it is the owner of the Patriarch, the great Seattle family paper, but of the two the Forum owner takes the cake. Saying nothing and yet lead your readers, for a while at least, to make you think you are either saying something or going to say something is a true definition of "journalism," and the Forum religiously does that one week with another. POQR WHITE TRASH TRIBE. "Poor white trash" is and always has been, so far as this country is concerned, an odius epithet applied to that class of white folk that is considered the missing link between man and monkey. All is told when you pronounce Mr. Just Acquainted With, of the "poor white trash" class, that is to say, he is a degree less than nothing. Whether there is any real merit in the accusation is a question, but somehow or other such persons always seem to be from the dross of the human family, and though they gain some prominence among their fellow men, yet they never lose their spots, whitewash them as often and as heavily as you will or may. One occasionally runs onto one of those specimens of the genus homo even in the far Northwest—they are indigenous to this section of the country, however, and flourish only in the Southern section)—and though they mingle with the people they are unable to keep their tusks sufficiently filed off in order to deceive those with whom they are thrown in contact as to their real identity. QUITE BENEATH THE NEGRO. A rather gentlemanly Negro was relating one day this week of having repeatedly met one of those beats on the streets of Seattle of recent months, and though it has made some feeble effort to conceal its identity it absolutely failed. "Having become acquainted through ordinary business life, I passed the time of day with him as we met on the streets. That he acted very peculiar from the very first was quite apparent, but it did not dawn on me that 'I was up against the real thing' until he went out of his way one day to inform me, 'I'm from th' Sauth.' However, he need not have told me that in so many words, for a subsequent act on his part gave him dead away. One day I met him with his wife on the street, and, raising my hat just the same as I would have to a gentleman in deference to the lady at his side, he chucked his hands deep down in his trousers pockets, a thing exceedingly characteristic of the breed, and brisked by with Friday. July 22. 1904 'Hi yew.' It was all off—he had given himself dead away; he was poor white trash. The hot blood of the true lady must have scorched the very cheeks of his wife as she observed the thing at her side whom she was unfortunately compelled to call her liege lord and husband, permit a Negro, whom he said was greatly inferior to him, to have more gallantry in the presence of a lady than he.' The above is a true mark of that class of white citizens found in the Southern states and known by both whites and blacks as "Poor White Trash." Disguise themselves as they will or may the facts sooner or later leak out. They may become prominent in public affairs, may gain great wealth or learning, but the "poor white trash"odium clings to them. It's a loathesome disease but it is everlasting. NO CIRCUS AT ANY PRICE. The city of Seattle nor King county does not want Ringling Bros.' circus at any price. The city should absolutely refuse them a license to pitch tents in its limits and the county commissioners should do the very same thing. Times are hard and money scarce and the people are in no condition for that circus to come to the city and take thousands of dollars away with them, for which those who gave the money will get no return. They will see the same things that they have seen for years and there is no need of opening the gates of either city or county for those people to relieve the citizens of some $40,000 or more. Even if they pay the $1500 license that is proposed to charge them it will be a poor recompense for the sum they will rake in. No circus is wanted this year. ANOTHER CARNIVAL FAKE. Seattle is being imposed upon again by another carnival fake and that too of the vilest and most rotten type, so far as the exhibition is concerned. Every year the public and especially Seattle is preyed upon by these fakes and relieved of hundreds of dollars the greater part of which is taken out of town. Because some organization or click of city folk can get a small percentage of the gate receipts they take the lead and arrange for these fake carnivals in order that vending shows that are as vile as shows can get to be and yet be called shows can come to the city and filch the citizens out of their hard-earned cash and give nor leave nothing in return. It is being done under the guise of the Labor Unions this year and merchants, business men and the citizens in general are patronizing the fake because they fear of displeasing organized labor if they do not. Such fakes should be squelched by law or the city council should not grant them license regardless of the local influence that is brought to bear. No, this is not the Republicans' headquarters, but it is the Republican's headquarters where you send your legal notices for publication and the phone numbers are Main 305 and Independent 1306. Office 214 Columbia. Kensington and Rogers-Peet Clothing NOTHING BETTER W. B. HUTCHINSON CO 1401 Second Ave. and Union St. IS THERE GRAVE DANGER OF DEMOCRATIC SUCCESS Friday, July 22, 1904. DEMOCRATIC SUCCESS. Say what you will or may, but there is grave danger of the Democratic ticket being elected next November, Roosevelt's popularity to the contrary notwithstanding. The question is, Is Roosevelt popular in those places and states where the results of the presidential election hangs in a balance? There are many reasons why there is imminent danger of the Democrats electing their ticket: First, they have agitated the race question in the South to that extent that they are absolutely certain of carrying every state in the South. The Republicans have had the power to cut down the representation of those states, but rather than offend the Southern gentry, and also because they themselves were at heart in favor of the disfranchising of the Negro vote with the hope that the Democrats would divide their vote between the two great parties of this country, have refrained from doing so, and so they have not only slept on their political rights, but have lost a golden opportunity to shear the South of much of its ill-gotten strength. Discussing this question for a moment by way of digression, as soon as Congress assembles it will make a most fatal mistake if it does not cut down the representation from the South. Let the Democrats howl, let them do their worst, but with the representation cut down a body blow below the belt will have been dealt them and they will from that time on be powerless to do what they firmly believe they will do this year, elect Parker and Davis by fraudulent votes from the South, aided by corrupted votes from the North purchased outright by the trusts and money sharks. Returning to the original question as to the probable success of the Democrats, everybody knows it has been nothing else save the continuous agitation of the Negro question that has solidified the South and this was but another piece of political strategy on the part of the Democratic leaders at the expense of the Republicans. Therefore in the presidential fight they start out with but a few votes short of electing their presidential nominee without so much as to have to make a single speech or hold a single campaign rally in order to get them. If in addition to the solid South they can carry New York, New Jersey, West Virginia, Montana and Colorado the deed will have been done. Can they do this? you ask. Well, let's see. The money bugs are supporting Parker almost to a man. The trusts and corporate influences are for him all over the country, but especially in New York. That of itself practically gives the state of New York to Parker. The state of New Jersey is the home of the trusts and being a semi-Southern state where the race question will conspicuously figure in the campaign, those two influences combined will unquestionably turn it over to the Democrats. There are a great many Negroes in that state and the race question will be worked in New Jersey with telling effect. The same influences will pull hard for the Democrats in West Virginia. It is not a Northern state by any means and the race question is very much agitated there and the state is likewise very much under the trust influence and finally it is the home of Can- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN didate Davis. He is at the head of the coal syndicate of that section and he himself is worth his multiplied millions, much of which is at the disposal of the spending and purchasing committees of the Democratic campaigns. The state of Montana has always been more or less Democratic. It has gone that way a good deal more often than it has Republican and there is nothing to warrant the belief that it will not go Democratic this year. Owing to continuous labor troubles in Colorado and owing to the fact that the present governor of that state who has been struggling to put down the rioters is Republican it is perfectly natural to put the Centennial State in the Democratic column. With these states safely landed in the Democratic ranks Roosevelt will have been weighed in a balance and found wanting on election day. Even should the Democrats lose one or two of the smaller states above enumerated they still have excellent chances of carrying Connecticut, Utah or Wisconsin. If therefore the Republicans expect to win they will have to concentrate their entire energies in the aforesaid states are they are as good gone as shell corn. CAN JUDGE PARKER WIN? The question is constantly being asked, How can Judge Parker possibly win the presidency? There is certainly a difficulty in figuring out a reversal of the overwhelming verdict against the Democratic party in 1900, but it may be frankly admitted that the attitude of the Democratic party with Parker and Davis as its candidates is materially changed from what it was when Bryan and Stevenson were running on the Kansas City platform four years ago. The West was strongly with Bryan in 1896, but abandoned populism in 1900, and it is conceded that the verdict of the states west of the Missouri river will be almost if not quite unanimous for Roosevelt this year. In speculating on the chances it is almost as safe to place the sixty-five electoral votes of the thirteen states from Virginia to Texas in the Democratic column. Montana, Idaho, Nevada and Colorado were in the Democratic column in 1900, but these states, with the exception of Nevada, have since gone Republican. With the silver issue abandoned by the Democrats, it is reasonably expected that even these will deliver their electoral votes to Roosevelt and Fairbanks. The states of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts and Rhode Island are absolutely certain for Roosevelt and Fairbanks, notwithstanding the fact that the Democrats elected their candidate for governor of Rhode Island in 1902 and 1903. There is a group of states including Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland and West Virginia which are regarded as debatable ground. Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota and Iowa complete the list of states and these eight states are almost certainly Republican. The Democratic claim that Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin are debatable is based upon the wildest assumption. Conceding to the Democrats the thirteen Southern states of Virginia, North and South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, Arkansas, Missouri, Kentucky and Tennessee, Parker and Davis are assured of 151 votes. The group of Eastern states, consisting of Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland and West Virginia, where the chief Democratic fight will be made, have a total electoral vote of seventy-six, which, added to the 151 votes of the South, would make a total of 227, or twelve less than a majority in the electoral college. The Republicans could lose all of these states, together with Colorado, five; Montana, three, and Nevada, three, and Parker and Davis would still fail of a majority, having 238 votes, or exactly one-half of the total. In the event of a tie the present house of representatives would elect Roosevelt and Fairbanks. But it is to be remembered that all the Eastern states above named, regarded as debatable, have been carried by the Republicans at almost every election since 1892. There is no exception to this rule in Connecticut, New Jersey, Delaware or West Virginia. New York elected Judge Parker to the court of appeals bench in 1897 and Maryland elected a Democratic governor in 1899 and 1903. All of these states, with the exception of Maryland, are now normally Republican, and the expectation that the Democrats will sweep them all this year requires a surprising amount of blind assurance. BARNES & CO. Among Seattle's great army of attorneys, who practice in our state courts as well as the United States courts, settling financial troubles between man and man and defending criminals at the bar, is to be found another kind of attorney in Mr. Barnes, the well-known patent attorney. His firm has been established in this city for a number of years and has had such singular success in looking after patents for those having such wor kto be done and intrusting the same to his care that it is almost absolutely necessary, if you wish your ideas properly put before the public, to have him look after your business. If you have an invention in your mind he will make you a drawing—a very essential thing to be done. If you wish a patent he can get that for you at less expense than you yourself can get it. In short, it behooves you to employ some one versed in the patent business if you are interested in an invention and want your rights protected, and this the firm of Barnes & Co. is well versed in. Here are some points that this firm will be of service to you: Getting copies of patents; taking appeals; interference on the part of others; how to make assignments; employes' rights, infringements; designs, trade marks, labels, copyrights and a hundred and one other things connected with the patent office. The firm of Barnes & Co. in the Starr-Boyd building is unquestionably the leading as well as most reliable firm of its kind in the Northwest, and you stand in your own light to not consult the firm before undertaking any patent office business. : The Seattle Republican Established May, 1894 RPE Gagtone seo scien as cemctinttinnetgeeG@ieen Susie Revels Cayton..................Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. OMe “FORO. vccs es cur bieserseeerssevessnecgoU0 Bik MONtHG iene secre dan cee weiealees oo LUD) Three MONthS .c.ucccesasteeseMevecsensrs SOU Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second- class Mail Matter. If Harriman and Hill would call up Main 305 or Independent 1306 The Republican will give them a straight tip as to how to set- a eee Bremerton is crowded with U. S. vessels awaiting their turn to go on the dry dock, but the Evening Liar of Seattle goes right on knocking Bremerton. In a hurry to get to a weekly paper! Well run right over to The Seattle Republican, 214 Columbia street, or better still, call up Main 305 or Independent 1306. It can be truly said of the Democratic nominees for president and vice-president that the mute and the mummy have been found and are now on exhibition. When the railroad interests of this state will have domineered the Democratic state convention as it surely will, it will not take them long thereafter to publicly an- nounce, ‘‘to hell with the people.’’ If John L. Wilson did not own the Post- Intelligencer, Seattle’s Minneapolis highway robber would be at a complete loss for food for thought. And this reminds us that it’s an ill wind that blows no one good. A place in Parker’s cabinet is a plum that no sensible man would give up even a posi- tion as a street car conductor on the strength of Parker’s absolute promise of giving him such a place in ease he, Parker, is elected. ‘‘Big-heartedness is better than big-head- edness,’ says the Daily Times. Quite true, and how pig-headed on the part of the edit- or-in-chief of the only up-to-date twentieth- century paper that he does not practice what he preaches. Washington state’s tin soldiers have been having a monkey and a parrot time storm- ing windmills and gas bags. They would have trampled each other to death if a char- acter like Harry Tracy had have threatened to attack the lump lot of them. The failure of the prune crop in this state will necessitate Godwin, Church & Co. of seeking some other article with expanding proclivities to feed their stump speakers on if they are expected to pump hot air into their hearers during the fall campaign. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Tacoma claims to be growing faster than Spokane. That’s not saying much from a Seattle standpoint, Miss Tacoma, but Taco- ma is without either the facts or the figures to make good her allegation only from a Tacoma standpoint and that’s worse still and more of it. There may be in this state editors pin-head- ed’’ enough to follow in the wake of the Post-Intelligencer, but the old montebank of the Seattle Times can bet his last ‘‘Min- neapolis dollar’’ that there are not one so grossly -ignorant as to take his editorial cue from the Daily Times. With the penitentiary staring him m the face, Convict Harris was in no condition to keep his promise with the prosecuting attor- ney’s office. And then again, Harris believes in the old adage, ‘‘promises like pie crusts are easily broken’’ and especially when by breaking one you can profit therefrom. If the accusations on the part of the Demo- crats of this state to the effect that J. D. Farrell ran the late Republican convention then what must they think of their own party with L. C. Gillman domineering and dictating its every move, who is Mr. Far- rell’s chief legal advisor. It requires no special messenger or car- rier pigeon to send your legal notices for publication to Seattle’s leading weekly pa- per, but just ask central to give you either Main 305 or Independent 1306 and make known your wants at the office of the Seattle Republican and the deed will have been done. Harriman in a pitched legal battle over in New Jersey last Friday completely routed James J. Hill, which may result in the latter losing control of the Northern Pacific and that may induce him to sell out his Great Northern interest, in which case there will be something doing among the politicians of this state. Is not this the ‘‘most unkindest cut of all? “Bryan would do the ticket more harm than good if he speaks for it,’’ is the unanimous opinion of the National Democratic Commit- tee. How has the mighty fallen. It matters not, however, who speaks for or against it, they will but be wasting wind and energy for it is already as dead as a doornail. “‘Can Parker carry New York?’’ is a news headline. Not in a thousand years and Par- ker of himself can neither carry New York nor any other state, county or municipality in the United States. The ‘‘trusts,’’ how- ever, may be able to buy up enough votes in the slums of Greater New York City to car- ry the state. There is at least imminent dan- ger of it. Mayor Black of Bellingham, having made such a poor showing as congressional ‘‘tim- ber,’’ notwithstanding he had but recently Friday, July 22, 1904. been elected chief executive of the fourth city of the state that at his recent election in that city no one could be found so mean as to oppose him either for the nomination or election, and all because they had learned it was a stepping stone to nothing higher. It is learned from the Columbian of Van- couver that that city is seriously troubled with a lot of knockers. In most towns of the West there live such ‘‘things’’—we refrain from calling them man, beast, bird or bee- tles—and in many instances they actually thrive at other people’s expense. Systemat- ically squelch them sooner or later is the only remedy of ridding the community of their obnoxious presence. Judging from the report of the adminis- trator of the Sullivan estate that old pioneer made an awful financial blunder in erecting that splendid brick edifice, for it takes prac- tically all it produces in the shape of rentals to keep up its current expenses, and that too despite these piping days of high rent in Se- attle. The Sullivan block must take in $6,000 rents per month. Mighty God, whith- er are we drifting? When the Alabama delegation to the late Demoeratic National Convention announced that Alabama Democrats would bolt the ticket if Senator Turner was nominated for vice-president, it was very apparent that, the ‘‘New South’? was but the Seceded South whitewashed. Turner was a Republi- ean U. S. marshal in Alabama during recon- struction days and made those devils feel the strong arm of the law and they can not only not forgive him, but cannot forget him. Oom Paul Kruger, erstwhile president of the Transvaal republic, but who fled to Swit- zerland at the overthrow of that Republic, was, on general principles a most unique public character. Though a pretended de- vout christian he practiced cruelties on the African natives that were blood-curdling in the extreme. He believed might made right and lived it. For a time his government flourished like a green bey tree, but Eng- land had also been educated in the school of might makes right and she applied its teach- ing to Oom Paul himself as well as his gov- ernment and he lived to see his cruel and heartless government go to pieces a hundred times faster than it was put together. As you sow so shall you reap. He died an exile from home and we haye no tears to shed. Those persons in this city who recently listened to the lecture of Dr, J. W. E. Bowen at the First Methodist Episcopal church and was so greatly pleased with the same, will regret to learn that his wife suddenly died a few days ago while visiting in St. Louis. A letter from him dated at Gammon Theological Institute was received at this office last Tuesday which announced the sad event and saying that she had been laid to rest, Mrs. Bowen, if all reports of her were true, was one of God’s select, and she was equally as well accomplished as her husband. She was but in the prime of life when she died, which makes it all the more hard for husband and friends to bear, a a a a Friday, July 22, 1904. COLORED BAPTISTS IN ANNUAL SESSION. The Fifth Annual Convention of Colored Bap- tists of Washington and the surrounding states convened in Roslyn last Thursday at 10 o'clock with a goodly attendance present. Rev. J. B. Beckham of Spokane is president of the conven- tion and Rev. F. T. Walker of Seattle secretary. ‘The introductional sermon was preached by Rev. 8. G. Wilson of Everett. The president's annual address was delivered Friday afternoon and this was followed by a welcome address on the part of Rev. J. P. Brown, pastor of the Second Bap- tist church of Roslyn. O, Stallworth of Belling- ham lead the devotional meeting at the opening Friday forenoon. The program for Friday after- noon will be exclusively confined to the Home and Foreign Missionary Society work. At this meet- ing Mrs. R. A. Travis will read a paper entitled, “Woman as a Missionary,” and Mrs. L. Smith will talk along the line of “The Mission and Its Work.” The devotional meeting for the evening will be lead by Rev. William Hammond of Seattle and the sermon will be preached by Rev. S. A. Franklin of Newcastle. The devotional meeting for Saturday forenoon will be conducted by Rev. J. M. Mathews of Ravensdale. The election of the officers for the ensuing year will take place at this session of the convention. Saturday after- noon will be given over to discussing the Sunday school work. The devotional exercises will be led by Mrs. R. A. Travis. Mrs. F. T. Walker will read a paper entitled: “Sunday School Work.” “Our Great Women” will be the subject of a paper read by Mr. J. F. Cragwell of Seattle. The Satur- day evening session will be opened by Rev. Wil- son and the Doctrinal sermon will be preached by Rev. F. T. Walker. The theme of his discourse will be, “Communion and Those Who Should Commune.” The regular Sunday forenoon service hour will be opened with devotional exercises led by Rey. F. J. Davidson of Tacoma. The sermon will be preached by Rev. William J. Hammond. A general mass meeting will be held in the after- noon and a paper will be read by Mrs. L. B. Kelso entitled, “Fight or Surrender.” Miss Alma Clark of Seattle will read a paper on, “Young Folk in the Church.” The evening session will be opened by Rev. Davidson and the sermon preached by Rey. J. B. Beckham, which will close the work of the convention. Editor A. D. Griffin was doing the city last Tuesday, returning to Portland the same day. Mr. Griffin and family leave for the Hast in a few days and will be absent until next September or later. IN| THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington in and for the County of King. Westley G. Ulrich, Plaintiff, vs. Marie J. Ulrich, Defendant. No———. Summons. STATE OF WASHINGTON, To said Marie J. Ul-ich, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to ap- pear within sixty days after the 22nd day of July, 1904, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the com- plaint of the Plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorneys for the Plaintiff, at their office below stated, and in case of failure on your part so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the Com- plaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court, that Plaintiff's cause of action against you as set forth in the Complaint is for Divorce, founded upon desertion and abandon- ment; that you without cause or rea- son since the 22nd day of December, 1902, at Los Angeles, California, de- serted and abandoned the Plaintiff, and ever since has lived separate and apart from him, against his wish and consent. ROSSMAN & JOHNSON, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice address, 314 Pa- cific Block, Seattle, Wash |. NOTICE TO THE CREDITORS OF Joseph Nathan, Deceased. No. 5624. Notice is hereby given by the un- dersigned, administrator With the will annxeed of the estate of Joseph Nathan, deceased, to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present and exhibit them, with’ the necessary vouchers, within one year from the 22nd day of July, 1904, to said administrator, at the office of his attorney, room 416 Globe Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, that being the place for the transaction of the business of said estate, Dated July 23, 1904. J. C. NATHAN, Adimnistrator with the will annexed of the estate of Joseph Nathan, Deceased. H. R. CLISE, Attorney for Administrator, Room 416 Globe Building, Seattle, King County, Washington . First publication July 22, 1904, last publication August 19, 1904. o on se 2 oe | ee) AE a aq ee a oO om © dmaamt Cem — $8 Collis) See =e ee MN wa SS oo wien kan THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN PROBATE NOTICE. ‘Plats, on pe IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Wagsh- ington, county of King.—ss. No. 4819 Notice of settlement of final account. In the matter of the estate of Magnus Lund, deceased. Notice is hereby given that C. A. Kloepfli, the administrator of the es- tate of Magnus Lund, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said court his final account as such administra- tor, and that Thursday, the 25th day of August, 1904, at 10 o'clock a. m. at the courtroom of the probate de- partment of our said superior court, in the city of Seattle, in said King county, has been duly appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writ- ing to said account, and contest the same, Witness, the Hon. Arthur E. Grif- fin, judge of said superior court, and the seal of said court hereto affixed this 18th day of July, 1904. (Seal) Cc, A. KOEPFLI, Clerk. By D. K. SICKELS, Deptuy Clerk. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington, in_and for King County. T. L. Ross, plaintiff, vs. Hettie Ross, defendant. No. ———. Summons for Publica- tion. The state of Washington to the said Hettie Ross, defendant: You are hereby summoned to ap- pear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this sum- mons, to wit, within sixty days af- ter the 22d day of July, 1904, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you accord- ing to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought by the plaintiff to secure a decree of divorce from the defendant upon the grounds of desertion. T. D. PAGE, Plaintiff's Attorney. P, O. address 308-9 Oriental Blde., Seattle, King county, Wash. July 22, Sept. 2. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington, for the County of King, In probate. No. 4819—Order to show cause why dis- tribution should not be made. In the matter of the estate of Mag- nus Lund, deceased, C. A. Koepfli, ad- ministrator of the estate of Magnus Lund, deceased, having filed in this court’ his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribu- tion of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that’ said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate; it is therefore ordered by the court ‘that all persons inter- ested in the estate of the said Mag- nus Lund, deceased, be and appear be- fore the Said superfor court of King county, state of Washington, at the courtroom of the probate department of said court in the city of Seattle, on the 2t5h day of August, 1904, at the hour of 10 o'clock a. m, of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four.successive weeks be- fore the said 25th day of August, 1904, in ‘The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King county and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 18th day of July, 1904. ARTHUR ©. GRIFFIN, Judge. State of Washington, county of King. —ss. I, C. A, Koepfli, county clerk of King county and ‘ex-officio clerk of the ‘superior court of the state of Washington, for the county of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by ‘said court on the 18th day of July, 1904, in the matter of the es- tate ‘of Magnus Lund, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 18th day of July, 1904. (Seal) C. A. KOEPFLI, Clerk. By D. K. SICKLES, Deputy Clerk. IN| THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the state of Washington in and for King County. M. Pyatt, Plaintiff. vs. James Conlin and Jane Doe Con- lin, his wife and all persons un- known if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the here- inafter described real property, De- fendants. No. 43537. Notice’ and Summons, , State of Washington, to the above named defendants and ‘each of them, who are the owners or reputed own- ers of, and all persons. unknown, claiming or having an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property. You and each of you are hereby notified that the above named plain- tiff, M. Pyatt, is the holder of two certain delinquent tax _ certificates numbered respectively, B22583 and B22584, issued by the County ‘Treas- urer of King County, State of Wash- ington, for the taxes of 1896, includ- ing the interest at Fifteen (15) per cent. per annum, and the certificate fee, amounting to One ($1.00) Dollar each respectvely on and against lots Thirty-two (32) and Thirty-three (33) Block 2 in Ballard Park Addi- tion to Seattle, King County, Wash- ington, according to the Plat ‘thereof, of record in Volume Four (4) of Plats, on page 80, in the office of the Auditor of King County, Washington; that certificates were issued on the 21st day of June, 1904; that plaintiff has paid taxes on said lots for the followiwng subsequent years: 1897, 1898, 1899, 1900, 1901, 1902 and 1903, which with the interest thereon at 15 per cent. per annum to June 23rd, 1904, amounts to Three and 61-100 ($3.61) Dollars, upon and against each of said lots, which several sums bear interest at the rate of Fifteen (15) per cent. per annum from said date of payment June 23rd, 1904, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said lots respective- ly, and amounting to Four and 61-100 ($4.61) Dollars each, to said date not including the costs of this action. You and each of you, including said persons unknowwn, if any, are hereby further notified and summoned to be and apear wthin sixty (60) days after the service of this notice by publica- tion exclusive of the first day of pub- lication to-wit: 60 days after July 22, 1904, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action, end answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your an- swer on the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff, at their office below stated, or pay the amount together with’ penalty, ineres and coss. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered against you and against each parcel of said real property, for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each respectively, in- cluding costs, and a decree will be rendered confirming the said taxes and decreeing the plaintiff's lien to be prior and paramount, and foreclos- ing the same against each of said lots, for the amounts and sums charged and found against it, as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's com- plaint, now on file in this cause and court. M. PYATT, Plaintiff. Office and P. O. address 506-509-513 Marion Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, July 22, 1904 Tate of last ublication, Sept. 2, 1904. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington, in and for King County, M. Pyatt, Plaintiff, ys. Bugene F, Lawson and Jane Doe Lawson, his wife, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the here- inafter described real property, De- fendants. No. 43535. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, To the above named defendants and each of them, who are the owners or reputed owners of, and all persons unknown, claim- ing or having an interest or estate, in and to the hereinafter described real property. You and each of you are hereby no- tified that the above named plaintiff, M. Pyatt, is the holder of two cer- tain delinquent tax certificates, num- bered 626017 and B26018, ‘issued by the County Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, for the taxes of 1900, upon and against lots Two (2) and Three (3) In Block One (1) _in Supplemen- tary Plat of McGuire & Hol- den's Addition to Latona, Seattle, King County, Washington, with the interest at 15 per cent. per annum and the certificate fee amounting to Highty-four (84) cents; that said cer- tifieate was issued on the 28th day of June, 1904; that the plaintiff is the present owner of the subsequent faxes upon and against sald lots re- spectively, for the year 1903, amount- ing to Thirty-one (31) cents each. All the above taxes aggregating the sum of One and 15-100 ($1.15) Dollars, against each of said lots to June 29th, 1904, and are all of the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, and the whole of which, to said date amounts to Two and 30-100 ($2.30) Dollars, and bears interest at Fifteen per cent per annum from that time. You and each of you, including said persons unknown, if any, are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the service of this notice by publication exclusive of the first day of publication to-wit: 60 days after July 22, 1904, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this ac- tion and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your an- swer on the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff, at their office below stated, or pay the several amounts, together with penalty, interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be entered against you and against each parcel of said real property, for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each respectively including costs, and de- cree will be rendered confirming said taxes and decreeing plaintiff's lien to be prior and paramount and fore- closing the same, and ordering a sale of each parcel of said property to satisfy the sums found against each respectively, as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. M. PYATT, Plaintift. Ww. T. SCOTT, Pros. Atty, and STEELE & BROWN, Attorneys for Plaintiff, Office and P. 0. address 506-509-513 Marion Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, July 22, 1904 Date of last ublication, Sept. 2,'1904. IN| THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington, in and for King County. M. Pyatt, Plaintiff, vs. Eugene F. Lawson and Jane Doe Lawson, his wife, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the here- inafter described real property, De- fendants. No. 43536. Notice’ and Summons. State of Washington, To the above named defendants and each of them, who are the owners or reputed owners Ww. T. SCOTT, — Pros. Atty, and STEELE & BROWN, of, and all persons unknown, claim~ ing or having an interest or estate, in and to the hereinafter described real property. You and each of you are hereby no- tified that the above named plaintiff, M. Pyatt is the holder of three cer- tain delinquent tax certificates, num- hered B26023, B26024, B26025, Issued by the County ‘Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, for the taxes of 1900, upon and against lots Forty-six (46) Forty-seven (47) and Forty-eight (48) in Block One (1) Sup- plementary Plat of McGuire & Hol- den’s Addition to Latona, Seattle, King County, Washington, ‘with the interest at 15 per cent. per annum and the certificate fee amounting to Highty-four (84) cents; that said cer- tificate was issued on the 28th day of June, 1904; that the plaintiff is the present owner of the subsequent taxes upon and against said lots re- spectively, for the year 1908, amount- ing to Thirty-one (31) cents. All the above taxes aggregating the sum of One and 15-160 ($1.15) _ Dollars, against each of said lots to June 29th. 1904, and are all of the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, nd the whole of which to said’ date amounts to Three and 45-100 ($3.45) Dollars, and bears interest at Fifteen per cent. per annum from that time. You and each of you, including said persons unknown, if any, are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the service of this notice by publication exclusive of the first day of publication to-wit: 60 days after July 22, 1904, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this ac- tion and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your an- swer on the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff, at their office below stated, or pay the several amounts, together with penalty, interest and costs, In case you fail so to do, judgment will be entered against you and against each parcel of said real property, for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each respectively including costs, and de- cree will be rendered confirming said taxes and decreeing plaintiff's lien to be prior and paramount and fore- closing the same, and ordering a sale of each parcel of, said property to satisfy the sums found against each respectively, as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. M. PYATT, Plaintiff. WwW. T. SCOTT, Pros. Atty, and STEELE & BROWN, Attorneys for Plaintiff, Office and P. O, address 506-509-513 Marion Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, July 22, 1904 Date of last ublication, Sept. 2, 1904. interest or estate in and to the here- inafter deseribed real -property, De~ fendants. No. 43534. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, To te above named defendants and each of them, who are the owners or reputed owners of, and all persons unknown, claim- ing or having an interest or estate, in and to the hereinafter described real property. You and each of you are hereby no- tified that the above named plaintiff, M, Pyatt, is the holder of two cer- tain delinquent tax certificates, num- bered B26019 and B26020, ‘issued by the County Treasurer of | King County, State of Washington, for the taxes of 1900, upon and against lots Seven (7) ‘and Hight’ (8) in Supplementary plat of McGuire & Holden's Addition to Latona, Seattle, King County, Washington, with the interest at 15 per cent. per annum and the certificate fee amounting to Highty-four (84) cents; that said cer- tificate was issued on the 28th day of, June, 1904; that the plaintiff is the present owner of the subsequent taxes upon and against said lots re- spectively, for the year 1903, amount- ing to Thirty-one (31) cents’ each. All the above taxes aggregating the sum of One and 15-100 ($1.15) Dollars, against each of said lots to June 29th, 1904, and are all of the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, and the whole of which, to said date amounts to Two and 30-100 ($2.30) Dollars, and bears interest at Fifteen per cent. per annum from that time. You and each of you, including said persons unknown, if any, are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days. after the service of this notice by publication exclusive of the first day of publication to-wit: 60 days after July 22, 1904, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this ac- tion and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your an- swer on the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff, at their office below stated, or pay ‘the several amounts, together with penalty, interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be entered against you and against each parcel of said real property, for the sums and amounts due upoh and charged against each respectively including costs, and de- cree will be rendered confirming said taxes and decreeing plaintiff's lien to be prior and paramount and fore- closing the same, and ordering a sale of each parcel of said property to satisfy the sums found against each respectively, as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. M. PYATT, Plaintift. W. T. SCOTT, Pros. Atty, and STEELE & BROWN, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. address 506-509-513 Marion Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, July 22, 1904 Date of last ublication, Sept. 2,'1964. ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Wasington ,for the County of King.—In Probate. No .4554—Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. In the matter of the estate of Peter Munson, deceased, Jennie Paulina Munson, administratrix of the estate of Peter Munson ,deceased, having filed in this court her petition set- ting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue there- of among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts suf- ficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate; It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the es- tate of the said Peter Munson, de- ceased, be and appear before the said superior court of King conuty, state of Washington, at the court room of the probate department of said court in the city of Seattle, on the 18th day of August, 1904, at the hour of 9:30 a. m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks be- fore the said 18th day of August, 1904, in the Seattle Republican, a neswpaper printed and published in said King county and of general cir- culation therein. Done in, open court this 11th day of July, 1904. W. R. BELL, Judge. July 15, Aug. 12, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF of the State of Washington in and for King County. M. Pyatt, Plain- tiff, vs. S. J. Smith, George Camp- bell, and Jane Doe’ Campbell his wifé, and all persons unknown if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No.—. Notice and Summons. STATE OF WASHINGTON, To the above named defendants and each of them, who are the owners or reputed owners of, and all persons unknown, claiming or having an in- terest or estate in and to the here- inafter described real property. You and each of you,including said persons unknown, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff M. Pyatt, is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate No. B. 26011 issued by the County Treas- urer of King County, Washington, for the taxes of 1900 with interest at fifteen (15) per cent per annum and certificate fee, upon and against lot 44 in Block Five (5) in Lake View Addition, Seattle, King County, Washington, amounting to One and 20-100 ($1.20) Dollars; that the plaintiff is the owner and holder of the taxes for the above des- cribed lots, consisting of Seventy- nine (79) cents for 1901, and ninety- five (95) cents for 1903, All the above taxes to June 29th, 1904, ag- gregate the sum of Two and 94-100 ($2.94) Dollars’ which bears interest at fifteen (15) per cent per annum from said date, and is all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, which was assessed in 1900, as the property of the defendant S.J. Smith. You and each of you, including said persons unknown, are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this notice by publication exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit sixty (60) days after the 15th day of July, 1904, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorneys for the plain- tiff, at their office below stated, or pay the amount together with pen- alty, interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be ren- dered against you and against said real property for the sums and amounts due and charged against it, including costs, and decree will be rendered confirming said taxes and decreeing plaintiff's lien prior and paramount to any and all claims that you may have or claim upon or against said real property, and fore- close said lien, and ordering a sale of said property for the satifaction of said sums and amounts charged and found against it, as provided by law and as prayed in _plaitiff's com- plaint now on file in this cause and court, M. PYATT, Plaintiff. W. T. SCOTT, Pross. Atty., by JOHN CG. MURPHY, Deputy. STEELE & BROWN, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and post office address, 506- 409-518 Marion Bldg., Seattle, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF of the State of Washington in and for King County, M. Pyatt, Plain- tiff, vs. S. J. Smith, George Camp- bell, and Jane Doe Campbell his wife, and all persons unknown if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No,——. Notice and Summons. STATE OF WASHINGTON, To the above named defendants and each of them, who are the owners or reputed owners of, and all persons unknown, claiming or having an in- terest or estate in and to the here- inafter described real property. You and each of you,including said persons unknown, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff M. Pyatt, is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate No. B. 26012 issued by the County Treas- urer of King County, Washington, for the taxes of 1900 with interest at fifteen (15) per cent per annum and certificate fee, upon and against lot 45 in Block Five (5) in Lake View Addition, Seattle, King County, Washington, amounting to One and 20-100 ($1.20) Dollars; that the plaintiff is the owner and holder of the taxes for the above des- cribed lots, consisting of Seventy- nine (79) cents for 1901, and ninety- five (95) cents for 1903. All the above taxes to June 29th, 1904, ag- gregate the sum of Two and 94-100 ($2.94) Dollars’ which bears interest at fifteen (15) per cent per annum from said date, and is all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, which was assessed in 1900, as the property of the defendant S.J. Smith. You and each of you, including said persons unknown, ‘are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this notice by publication exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit sixty (60) days after the 15th day of July, 1904, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorneys for the plain- tiff, at their office below stated, or pay the amount together with pen- alty, interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be ren- dered against you and against said real property ‘for the sums and amounts due and charged against it, including costs, and decree will be rendered confirming said taxes and decreeing plaintiff's lien prior and paramount to any and all claims that you may have or claim upon or against said real property, and fore- close said lien, and ordering a sale of said property for the satifaction of said sums and amounts charged and found against it, as provided by law and as prayed in plaitiff's com- plaint now on file in this cause and court. M. PYATT, Plaintiff. W. T. SCOTT, Pross. Atty., by JOHN CG. MURPHY, Deputy. STEELE & BROWN, Attorneys for Plaintiff, Office and post office address, 506- 509-518 Marion Bldg., Seattle, ‘Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF of the State of Washington in and for King County. M. Pyatt, Plain- tiff, vs. S.J. Smith, George Camp- bell, and Jane Doe Campbell his wife, and all persons unknown if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No.—. Notice and Summons. STATE OF WASHINGTON, To the above named defendants and each of them, who are the owners or reputed owners of, and all persons unknown, claiming or having an in- terest or estate in and to the here- inafter described real property. You and each of you,including said persons unknown, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff M. Pyatt, is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate No. B. 26013 issued by the County Treas- urer of King County, Washington, for the taxes of 1900 with interest at fifteen (15) per cent per annum and certificate fee, upon and against lot 46 in Block Five (5) in Lake View Addition, Seattle, King County, Washington, amounting to One and 20-100 ($1.20) Dollars; that said cer- tificate was issued on the 28th day of June, 1904, that the plaintiff is the owner and holder of the taxes for the following subsequent years whici: have been paid by the plain- tiff on the above described lots, con- sisting of Seventy-nine (79) cents for 1901, and ninety-five (95) cents for 1903. All the above taxes to June 29th, 1904, aggregate the sum of Two and 94-100 ($2.94) Dollars, which bears interest at fifteen (15) per cent per annum from said date, and is all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, which was assessed in 1900, as the property of the defendant 8. J. Smith. You and each of you, including persons unknown, if any, are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this notice by publication exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit sixty (60) days after the 15th day of July, 1904, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorneys for plain- tiff, at their office below stated, or pay the amount together with pen- alty, interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be ren- dered against you and against said real property ‘for the sums and amounts due and charged against it, including costs, and decree will be rendered confirming said taxes and decreeing plaintiff's lien prior and paramount to any and all claims that you may have or claim upon or against said real property, and fore- close said lien, and ordering sale of said property for the satisfaction of such sums and amounts charged and found against it, as pro- vided by law and as prayed in plain- tiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. M. PYATT, Plaintiff. W. T. SCOTT, Pross. Atty., by JOHN _C. MURPHY, Deputy. STEELE & BROWN, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and post office address, 506- 509-513 Marion Bldg., Seattle, tila ahinetan IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF of the State of Washington in and for King County, M. Pyatt, Plain- tiff, vs. 8. J. Smith, George’ Camp- bell, and Jane Doe’ Campbell his wife, and all persons unknown if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No.——. Notice and Summons. STATE OF WASHINGTON, To the above named defendants’ and each of them, who are the owners or reputed owners of, and all persons unknown, claiming’ or having an in- terest or estate in and to the here- inafter described real property. You and each of you,including said persons unknown, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff M. Pyatt, is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate No. B. 26014 issued by the County ‘Treas- urer of King County, Washington, for the taxes of 1900 with interest at fifteen (15) per cent per annum and certificate fee, upon and against lot 47 in Block Five (5) in Lake View Addition, Seattle, King County, Washington, amounting to One and 20-100 ($1.20) Dollars; that cer- tificate was issued on the 28th day of June, 1904, that the plain- tiff is the owner and __ holder of the taxes for the following sub- sequent years which have been paid by the plaintiff on the above de- scribed lots, consisting of Seventy- nine (79) cents for 1901, and ninety- five (95) cents for 1903. All the above taxes to June 29th, 1904, ag- gregate the sum of Two and 94-100 ($2.94) Dollars' which bears interest at fifteen (15) per cent per annum from said date, and is all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, whith was assessed in 1900, as the property of the defendant S. J. Smith. You and each of you, including said persons unknown, are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this notice by publication exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit sixty (60) days after the 15th day of July, 1904, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorneys for plain- tiff, at their office below stated, or pay the amount together with pen- alty, interest and costs, In case you fail'so to do, judgment will be ren- dered against you and against said real property for the sums and amounts due and charged against it, including costs, and decree will be rendered confirming said taxes and decreeing plaintiff's lien prior and paramount to any and all claims that you may have or claim upon or against said real property, and fore- close said lien, and ordering sale of said property for the satisfaction of such sums and amounts charged and found against it, as pro- vided by law and prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. M. PYATT, Plaintiff. W. T. SCOTT, Pross. Atty., by JOHN C. MURPHY, Deputy. STEELE & BROWN, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and post office address, 506- 509-518 Marion Bldg., Seattle, ‘Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR’ COURT OF of the State of Washington in and for King County. M. Pyatt, Plain- tiff, vs. S. J. Smith, George Camp- bell, and Jane Doe Campbell his wifé, and all persons unknown if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No.—. Notice and Summons. STATE OF WASHINGTON, To the above named defendants and each of them, who are the owners or reputed owners of, and all persons unknown, claiming or having an in- terest or estate in and to the here- inafter described real property. You and each of you,including said persons unknown, are hereby notified that the above ‘named plaintiff M. Pyatt, is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate No. B. 26015 issued by the County Treas- urer of King County, Washington, for the taxes of 1900 with interest at fifteen (15) per cent per annum and certificate fee, upon and against lot 48 in Block Five (5) in Lake View Addition, Seattle, King County, Washington, amounting to One and 20-100 ($1.20) Dollars; that said certificate was issued on the 28th day of June, 1904, that the plaintiff is the owner and holder of the taxes for the following subse- quent years which have been paid by the plaintiff on the above de- scribed lots, consisting of Seventy- nine (79) cents for 1901, and ninety- five (95) cents for 1903. All the above taxes to June 29th, 1904, ag- gregate the sum of Two and 94-100 (32.94) Dollars’ which bears interest at fifteen (15) per cent per annum from said date, and is all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, which was assessed in 1900, as the property of the defendant S.'J. Smith. You and each of you, including persons unknown, if any, are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this notice by publication exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit sixty (60) days after the 15th day of July, 1904, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorneys for the plain- tiff, at their office below stated, or pay the amount together with pen- alty, interest and costs. In case you fail'so to do, judgment will be ren- dered against you and against said real property for the sums and amounts due and charged against it, including costs, and decree will be rendered confirming said taxes and decreeing plaintiff's lien prior and paramount to any and all claims that you may have or claim upon or against said real property, and fore- close said lien, and ordering a sale of said property for the satifaction of said sums and amounts charged and found against it, as provided by law and as prayed in plaitiff’s com- plaint now on file in this cause and court. M. PYATT, Plaintiff. W, T. SCOTT, Pross. Atty., by JOHN GC. MURPHY, Deputy. STEELE & BROWN, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and post office address, 506- 509-518 Marion Bldg., Seattle, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF State of Washington for King County. F. L. Dyas, Plaintiff, ys. Ellen M. Johnson and John Doe Johnson, her husband, whose true first name is unknown, and all per- sons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 48472. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to Ellen M. Johnson and John Doe Johnson, her husband who are the owners or re- puted owners of, and all persons un- known, claiming or having an inter- est or estate in and to the herein- after described real property. You and each of you are hereby notified that the above named plain- tiff, F. L. Dyas, is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate, numbered as hereinafter stated, is- sued by the County Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, embracing the following real prop- erty situated in said King County, Washington, and more particularly described as follows, to-wit: Certificate B 17498 lot 30 blogk 1 of Madison Street Cable Ry Addition to the city of Seattle. That said certificate was issued on the 17th day of March 1903, for the following sums and for delinquent taxes for the following years, to- wit: Certificate B 17498 for year 1899 $4.01, That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above des- cribed lots, to-wit: July 1, 1903, $3.15 for year 1902; June 21,’ 1904’ $3.28. and delinquent local assessment 26 cents for year 1903, Which several sums bear inter- est at the rate of 15 per cent. per an- num from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons, unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and sum- moned to be and appear within six- ty days after the service of this notice, exclusive of the day of the first publication, viz., July 15, 1904, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action an danswer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office be- low stated, or pay the amount, to- gether with penalty, mterest ‘and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered against you and against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, including costs, order- ing a sale of each parcel of said property for the satifaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff, complaint now on file in this cause and court. F. L. DYAS, Plaintiff, 1322 Franklin Ave., Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington for King County. F. L. Dyas, Plaintiff, vs. Vinci Sepsie and Jane Doe Sepsie, his wife, whose true first name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an inter- est or estate in and to the herein- after described real property, De- fendants. No. 43473. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to Vincj Sep- sie and Jane Doe Sepsie, his wife, who are the owners or reputed own- ers of, and all persons unkonwn, claiming or having an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter des- eribed real property. You and each of you are hereby notified that the above named plain- tiff, F. L. Dyas, is the holder of two certain delinquent tax certificates, numbered as hereinafter stated, is- sued by the County Treasurer of King County, state of Washington, embracing the following real prop- erty situated in said Ring County, Washington, and more particulariy described as follows, to-wit: Certificate B. 17706, lot 13; Certi- ficate B 17707, loti4, block 3 Fair- mount Addition to the city of Seat- tle. That said certificates were is- sued on the 12th day of March 1903 for the following sums and for de- linquent taxes for the following years, to-wit: Certificate B 17706 for year 1898 $2.74; certificate B 17707 for year 1898 $2.74. That the taxes for the following subsequent years haye been paid by the plaintiff upon said above des- eribed lots, to-wit: Lot 13, block 8, Mar. 12, 1903 $2.49 for years 1899; $2.26 for year 1900; $2.41 for year 1901; May 28, 1903, $2.17 for year 1902; June 21, 1904, $2.29 for year 1903. Lot 14, block 3, Mar. 12, 1903 $2.49 for year 1899; $2.26 for year 1900; $2.41 for year 1901; May 28, 1903 $2.17 for year 1902; June 21, 1904 $2.29 for year 1903. Which sveral sums bear in- terest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unre- deemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons, unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summon- ed to be and apear within sixty days after the service of this notice, ex- clusive of the day of the first publi- cation, viz. July 15, 1904, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the under- signed plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount, together with penalty, interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered against you and against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, including costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in_ plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. F, L. Dyas, Plaintiff. 1822 Franklin Ave., Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington for King County. F. L. Dyas, Plaintiff, vs. Ida M, Miller and John Doe Miller, her husband, whose true first name is unknown, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the here- inafter described real property, De- fendants. No. 43474. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to Ida M. Miller and John Doe Miller, her hus- ban, who are the owners or reputed owners of, and all persons unknown, claiming or having an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter des- cribed real property. You and each of you are hereby notified that the above named plain- tiff, F, L. Dyas, is the holder of three certain delinquent tax certificates, numbered as hereinafter stated, is- sued by the County Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, embracing the following real proper- ty situated in said King County, Washington, and more particularly described as follows, to-wit: Certificate B 17719, lot 1; B 17720, lot 2; B 17721, lot 3, block 1 of Hicks Addition to the city of Seattle, That said certificate was issued on the 12th day of March 1903, for the following sums and for delin- quent taxes for the following years, to-wit: Certificate B 17719 for years 1898, 198, 94, '95, '96, $29.88; B 17720 for years 1898, '93, °94, '95, '96, $29.88; B 17721 for years 1898, '93, '94,'95, "96, $29.88. ‘That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintif? upon said above des- crined lots, to-wit: Lot 1, block 1 Mar, 12, 1903 $2.83 for year 1899; $1.94 for’ year 1900; $2.08 for year 1901; Noy. 27, 1903 $2.01 for year 1902; June 21, 1904 31.96 for year 1903.’ Lot 2, block 1 Mar. 12, 1903 $2.83 for year 1899; $1.94 for year 1900; $2. 08 for year 1901; Nov. 27, 1903 $2.01 for year 1902} June 21, 1904 $1.96 for year 1903. ‘Lot 3, block 1, Mar. 12, 1903 $2.83 for year 1899; $1.94 for year 1900; $2.08 for year 1901; Nov. 27, 1903’ $2.01 for year 1902; June 21, 1904 $1.96 for year 1903. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unkonwn, if any), are hereby further notified and sum- moned to be and apear within sixty days after the service of this notice, exclusive of the day of the first pub- lication, viz, July 15, 1904 in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the under- signed plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount, together with penalty, interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered against you and against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, including costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. F. L. DYAS. Plaintiff. 1999 BPranklin Ave Seattle Wash._ IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF King County, Washington. In the matter of the application of Loh- ren-Sobey Co. to disincorporate. No. ——.. Notice of Hearing. To Whom It May Concern: Notice is hereby given that Loh- ren-Sobey Co., a corporation, has made application to the superior sourt of King county, Washington, for an order disincorporating said com- pany, and that said petition will be brought on for hearing in said court before Hon. W. R. Bell, one of the judges thereof, at his courtroom in the county courtouse, in the city of Seattle, King county, Washington, on the 19th day of September, 1904, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a, m., or as soon thereafter as the said petition can be heard. Dated this 16th day of July, 1904. Cc, A. KOEPFLI, (Seal) Clerk of said Court. By J. M. Brewster, Deputy. Shank & Smith, attorneys for peti- tioner. July 22, Sept. 16. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington, for the county of King. In the matter of the application of “W. H. Maud Com- pany,” a corporation, to dissolve. No. —. Notice. Notice is hereby given that W. H. Maud Company, a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the stae of Washington, has presented to the su- perior court of the state of Wash- ington, in and for the county of King, its petition praying to be allowed to disincorporate and dissolve, and that the 30th day of September, 1904, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, or as soon thereafter as coun- sel can be heard, has been appointed as the time, and the courtroom of the said superior court of the state of Washington, in and for the county of King, at the courthouse of said King county in Seattle, before the Hon. Boyd J. Tallman, as the place where said application is to be heard. Said petition prays that said cor- poration be disincorporated and dis- solved, in accordance with the law in such cases made and provided. In witness whereof, I have hereun- to set my hand and’ affixed the seal of my office this 15th day of July, 1904. (Seal) C. A. KOEPFLI, County Clerk and ex-officio clerk ‘of the superior court of the state of Washington, in and for the county of King. By J. M. BREWSTER, Deputy. Ballinger, Ronald & Battle, attor- neys for petitioner. July 22, Sept. 16. aie aia F ngs /B. or, ne n= an e- e- nd M. S- ed My or S- by: n- ee 28, is- of ny r- Lys ly 20, ks ed or n- rs, 8, or 8; 15, ns by S- 83 0; 03 o4 1 9; ar ar IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington, in and for King County. M Pyatt, Plain- tiff, vs. S. E, Amidon, L. 8. Hackett, and Jane Doe Hackett, his wife, Washington Jones, Geo. F. Fay, and all person unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 43343. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above named defendants, and each of them, who are the owners or reputed owners of, and all persons unknown, claiming or having an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter des- cribed real property. You and each of you, including said persons unknown, are hereby notified that the above named plain- tiff, M. Pyatt, is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate No. B, 24865, issued by the County Treas- urer of King County, Washington, embracing the following described real property, situate in King Coun- ty, Washintgon, to-wit: Lot one (1)' in block three (3), Lynch and Shield’s Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Wash- ington, for taxes of 1900 upon said property being $3.06; $1.40 interest And 50 cents certificate fee, total $5.70; that said certificate was issued to the plaintiff on the 17th day of June, 1904, for said sums; that the taxes for ‘the following subsequent years have been paid and are now owned by the plaintiff upon the above described lot, to-wit: $5.68 for 1901; $5.04 for 1902; and $4.58 for 1903, which include interest at 15 per cent. per annum from the time of delin- quency to June 17th, 1904 and all the above taxes and interest aggregate to that date the sum of $21.00, which said sum bears interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date, and is all the unpaid and un- redeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, including said persons un- known,’ if any, are hereby notified and summoned’ to be and appear within sixty days after the service of this notice by publication exclu- sive of the first day of publication to-wit sixty days after the Ist day of July, 1904 in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of the said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned at- torneys for the plaintiff at their of- fice as below stated, or pay the amount together with penalty, inter- est and costs of this suit. “In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered against’ you and against said real property for the sums and amounts due , upon and charged against it, including costs of this action, and a decree will be rendered decreeing the plaintiff's len to be superior and paramount to any and all claims that you or either of you may have or claim to: said property and the said taxes, judgment, and lien and such sums as may be found against it be foreclosed, as provided by law and as prayed ‘in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. M. ,PYATT Plaintiff. W. T. SCOTT, Prosecutig Attorney. by JOHN G. MURPHY, Deputy. BROWN & STEELE, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and post office address, 506, 509, 613, Marion Building, Seattle, Wash. ate of first publicat 1 ls t pi ion July 1, IN| THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington, in and for King County. M. Pyatt, Plain- tiff, vs. M. Davis, Daniel “ Jones, Jane Doe Jones, his wife, C. M. Aus- tin and Racheal Roe Austin, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, hav- ing or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 43342. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above named defendants, who are the owners of and all persons unknown, claiming or having an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter des- eribed real property. You and each of you, including said persons unknown are hereby no- tified that the above named plaintiff is the holder and owner of one cer- tain delinquent tax certificate No. B 24859 issued by the County Treasur- er of King County, Washington, em- bracing the following described real property situated in King County, Washington, to-wit: Lot ten (10) block three (3) F. D. Dibble's First Addition to Ballard; that said certificate was issued on the 16th day of June, 1904; for the delinquent taxes on the above des- cribed property for the year 1900, which, with interest at 15 per cent. to said date and 50 cents certificate fee, amounts to 97 cents; that the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon the above described property, to-wit: For 1901, with interest to date of payment, 15 per cent. 52 cents; for 1902, 43 cents; for 1903, 38 cents all of the above taxes and interest to June 17th, 1904 aggre- gate $2.30, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes against and upon said real property. You, and each of you, including said persons unknown, are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this notice by publication exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit sixty days af- ter the ist day of July, 1904 in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer ‘on the under- signed attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below mentioned; or pay the above amounts together with penalty, interest and cost. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered against you and against said property for the sums due upon and charged against it including costs and a decree will be entered decreeing the plaintiff's claim and lien to be prior and paramount to any and all claims which either of you may have or claim and decreeing the same to be a first lien on the above described property and fore- closing the same and ordering a sale of said property for the purpose of satisfying said judgment and costs and decreeing such other and further relief as provided by law and as prayed in plaitiff’s complaint, now on file in this cause and court, M. PYATT. Plaintift. W. T. SCOTT, Prosecutig Attorney. by JOHN CG. MURPHY, Deputy. STEELE & BROWN, Attorneys for Plaintiff. 506, 509 Marion Building, Seattle, Washington. Date of first publication July 1, 1904, IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington, in and for King County. M. Pyatt, Plain- tiff, vs. M. Davis, Daniel Jones, Jane Doe Jones, his wife, C. M. Aus- tin and Racheal Roe Austin, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, hay- ing or claiming an interest or estate in'and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. —_ No. 43341. Notice and Summons. Sihe State of Washington to the above named defendants, who are the owners of and all persons unknown, Claiming or having an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter des- sribed real property. criped mena reach. of you, including said persons unknown are hereby no- tified that the above named plaintiff fs the holder and owner of one cer- tain delinquent tax certificate No. B 24860 issued by the County Treasur- er of King County, Washington, em- bracing the following real property situate in King County, Washing- ton, to-wit: Lot eleven (11) block three (3) F D Dibble's First Addition to Ballard; that said certificate was issued on the 16th day of June, 1904; for the delinquent taxes on the above des- cribed property for the year 1900, which, with interest at 15 per cent. to said date and 50 cents certificate fee, amounts to 97 cents; that the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon the above described property, to-wit: For 1901, with interest to date of payment, 15 per cent. 52 cents; for 1902, 43 cents; for 1903, 38 cents all of the above taxes and interest to June 17th, 1904, aggregate $2.30, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date, and are all the un- paid and unredeemed taxes against and upon said real: property. You, and each of you, including said persons unknown, are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this notice by publication exclusive of the first day of publication to-wit sixty days after the 1st day of July, 1904 in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below mentioned; or pay the above amounts together with penalty, interest and cost, In case you fail so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you and against said property for ‘the sums due upon and charged against it including costs and a decree will be entered decreeing the plaintiff's claim and lien to be prior and para- mount to any and all claims which either of you may have or claim and Gecreeing the same to be a first lien on the above described property and foreclosing the same and ordering a sale of said property for the purpose of satisfying said judgment, and costs and decreeing such other and further relief as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. M. PYATT. Plaintiff. W. T. SCOTT, Prosecutig aiataer: by JOHN GC. MURPHY, Deputy. STEELE & BROWN, orneys for Plaintiff. 506. 509 Marion Buildir Washington. WG Beaktley rpbate of frst publication, July 1, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. J. W. Brown, Plaintiff, vs. Michael i. Byrne, and Jane Doe Byrne, his wife, and P. Pilger, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 43246. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to Michael F. Byrne, and Jane Doe Bryne, his wife, and P. Pilger, who are the owners or reputed owners of, and all persons un- known, claiming or having an intevest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property. You and each of you are hereby notl- fied that the above named plaintiff, J. W. Brown, Is the holder of two certain delinquent tax certificates,B 21999 and B 22000, issued by the County Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, embracing the following real property situated In said King County, Wash- ington, respectively, and more particu- larly described as follows, to-wit: Lots 15 and 16, block one (1), in Washington Central Improvement Com- pany’s First Addition to Kent, King County, Washington. That said certificates were issued on the 18th day of June, 1904, for the following sums and for delinquent taxes for the following years, to-wit: Certificate B 21999, for 1897, lot 15, $1.43 and certificate B 22000, for 1897, lot 16, $1.43. That the taxes for the following sub- sequent vears have been paid by the plaintif! upon said above described lots, to-wit" Lot Fifteen, block one, Washington Central Improvement Company's Add. to Kent, King County, Wash., $4.83, for years 1898-1903, both inclusive. And lot sixteen, block one, Washing- ton Central Improvement ‘Company's First Addition to Kent, King County, Wash., $4.83, for years 1898-1903, both inclusive. Total. not including costs of this -suit, $12.52; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sald date of pay- ment, and are all the unpaid and unre- deemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons, unknown, If any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be ana appear within sixty days after the serv- ice of this notice by publication exelu- sive of the day of publication, to-wit, 60 days after the 24th day of June, 1904, in the above entitled Court and action, and defend this action and an- swer the complaint of said plaintif and serve a copy of your answer on the wm dersigned attorney for plaintiff! at his office below stated, or pay the amount, together with penalty, interest and costs. In case you fail 80 to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you and against each parcel of said real prop- erty for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, including costs, ordering a sale of each enti of said property for the satisfaction ot the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintif’'s complaint ‘now on file In this cause and Court. J. W. BROWN, Plaintiff. W. T. SCOTT, Prosecuting’ Attorney. By JOHN C) MURPHY, Deputy, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 506-509-513 Marion Building, Seattle, Wash. First publication dated June 24, 1904. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. In the Matter of the Estate of J. C. Hoffman, deceased. No. 3340, State of Washington to G. A. Hill, Executor of the Last Will and testament of J.C, Hoffman, deceased and to Cal- vin L, Johnson, Olive A. Johnson and all other persons interested in the estate of J. C. Hoffman, deceased : You and each of you are hereby com- manded and cited to be and appear be- fore the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County, in _ the City of Seattle, insald State on the 15th day of July, 1904, at the hour of 9:30 a. m., there and then to show cause why the prayer of the petitioner in this cause, Louise A. Beach should not be granted and why this Court should not proceed to the administration of the es- tate of said J. C. Hoffman, and as part of such administration set over to your petitioner one half of sald estate as one of the two children and sole sur- viving heirs of said J. C, Hoffman not mentioned in his last will, in the same manner as she would have been entitled had said J. C. Hoffman died intestate. Witness the Hon. W. R. Bell, Judge of the Superior Court, of the State of Washington, for King’ County and the seal of said Court this 23rd day of June, 1904, Cc. A, KOEPFLI, Clerk. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, In the matter of the disincorporation of the Miller and Geske Construction Company. Notice of Hearing. State of Washington, County of King— 88. Notice is hereby given that the Miller & Geske Construction Comapny, a cor- poration duly organized under the laws of the State of Washington with its principal place of business at the City of Seattle, King County, State of Wash- ington, made and filed herein on the 8th day of June, 1904, its petition and application for disincorporation and dis- solution accompanying the same, with a certificate of its president and secretary under oath to the effect that at a meet- ing of the stockholders of said Company, called for that purpose, it was decided by a unanimous vote of all the stovnx ate and dissolve. and that an order has holders of the Company to disincorpor- been duly made and entered herein fix- ing the 15th day of August, 1904, at the hour of 9:30 a. m. of that day, in the No. 2 department of the Sueprior Court of the State of Washington in and for the County of King, as the time and place for a hearing upon said petition and application and that said petition and application will be heard at the time and place fixed therefor as aforesald. In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said Superior Court this 8th day of June, 1904. ¢. A, KOPPFLI, Clerk of the Superior Court. By J. M. BREWSTER, Deputy. G. F, BOGUR, Attorney for Petitioner. route of first publication June 17, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County J. J, Smith, Plaintiff, vs. Lizzie Bat- chelder and John Doe’ Batchelder, her husband, whose true first name is to plaintiff unknown, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herein- after described real property, Defend. ants. No, ———, jotice ‘and Sum- mons, State of Washington, to Lizzie Batch- elder and John Doe Batchelder, her hus- band, who are the owners or reputed owners of, and all persons unknown, claiming or having an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property. You and each of you are hereby noti- fied that the above named plaintiff J. J. Smith, is the holder of one certain de- Iinquent tax certificate, numbered as hereinafter stated, issued by the County Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, embracing the following real property situated in said King County, Washington, and more particu: larly described as follows, to-wit : Delinquent tax certificate No. 823086, lot 5, block 4, Enumclaw Stevenson's Ist Addition. That said certificate was issued on the 3d day of February, 1904, for the following sums and for delinquent taxes for the following years, to-wit: ‘Tax certificate No, B23086. That the taxes for the following sub- sequent years have been paid by the plaintif? upon said above described lots, to-wit : Lot 5, block 4, Enumclaw Stevenson's First Addition; amount, 65¢; for year 1901. Lot 5, block 4, Enumclaw Stevenson's First Addition; amount, 57; for year 1902. Lot 5, block 4, Enumclaw Stevenson's aan Addition; amount, 56c; for year 1903. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons, unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the service of this notice, exclusive of the day of the date of the first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after the 17th day of June, 1904, in the above entitled Court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plain- tiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his oflice below stated, or pay the amount, together with penalty, incerest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered against you and against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, includ- ing costs, ordering a sale of each parcel ot said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now ox file in this cause and Court. J, J. SMITH, Plaintiff. By JOHN C. MURPHY, His Attorney. w. T. SCOTT, Prosecuting Attorney. By JOHN C. MURPHY, Deputy, Attorney for’ Plaintiff. Office Address: 506 and 513 Marion Block, Seattle, Wash. First publication, June 17th, 1904. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County Robert M, Simpson, Plaintiff, vs. An- ita Simpson, Defendant. No. 48230. Summons by Publication. ‘The State ot Washington to the said Anita Simpson, defendant : In the name of the State of Wash- ington, you are hereby summoned to ap- pear within sixty (6U) days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty, days from and after the 17th day of June, 1904, and defend the above en- titled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plain- uff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorney for the plaintiff, at his offices below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court, Whe object of said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: to se- cure in favor of the plaintiff! and from the defendant an absolute and uncondi- tional divorce upon the ground of wil- ful and unjustifiable abandonment and desertion of the plaintiff by the defend- ant continuously for more than one year’s time immediately preceding the Yeritication of the complaint herein and of the commencement of this action, and for other relief. FRANK B. WIESTLING, Attorney for Viaintiff. P.O, Address: 421-423 Boston Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. aphitst date of publication June 17th, PROBATE NOTICE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the Coun- ty of King. State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the Matter of the Hstate of Julia A, Fay, deceased. No, 4911. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Helen Bunnell, administratrix of the estate of Julia A. Fay, deceased, has ren- dered to, and filed in said’ court her final account as such administratrix, and that Thursday, the 4th day of, August, 1904, at 9:30 o'clock, a) m., at the court room of the probate de~ partment of our said superior court, in the City of Seattle, in said King county, has been duly appointed by said court for the settlement of said acount, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writ- ing to said account, and contest the same, Witness, the Hon. W. R. Bell, Judge of said superior court, and the seal of said court hereto affixed this 7th day of July, 1904. (Seal.) ~'C. A. KOEPFLI, Clerk. By D. K. SICKLES, Deputy Clerk. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the Coun- ty of King.—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Julia A. Fay, deceised.—No. 4911.—Order to show cause why distribution should not be made. Helen Bunnell, administratrix of the state of Julia A, Fay, deceased, having filed in this court her petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready tor distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distri- bution of the residue of said estate; It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the es- tate of the said Julia A. Fay, de- ceased, be and appear before the said superior court of King county, state of Washington, at the court room of the probate department of said court in the city of Seattle, on the 4th day of August, 1904; at the hour of 1:30 o'clock, p. m., of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have. why an order of distribution should not be made of.the residue of said estate eone the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 4th dav of August, 1904, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King county and of general circulation therein, Done in open court this 7th day of July, 1904, W. R. BELL, Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss. I, C. A. Koepfli, county clerk of King county and ex-officio clerk of the superior court of the state of Washington. for the county of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court on the 7th day of July. 1904, in the matter of the estate of Julia A. Fay, deceased. ‘Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 7th day of July, 1904. (Seal.) C, A. KOBPFLI, Clerk. By D. K. SICKELS, Deputy Clerk. NOTICE TO CREDITORS. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County.—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of James Steel, deceased.—No. 5690. To Whom It May Concern; Greeting: All persons having claims against the above named decedent, James Steel, and all creditors of the above named estate are hereby required to present their claims against the said decedent and the said estate with the necessary vouchers within one (1) year after the date of the first publi- cation of this notice to the under- signed, A. A. Barton and John Gra- ham, the executors of the said estate, at 422 Boston Block, Seattle, King county, state of Washington, being the lace for the transaction’ of the business of this estate, and all claims. not so presented will be forever barred. A. A. BARTON, JOHN GRAHAM, Executors of the Above Estate. Frank B. Wiestling, Attorney for Executors, 422 Boston Block, Se- attle, Wash. First date of publication of this notice July 8. 1904. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington for King County. Lillian H. Nuckols, Plaintitt, vs. James R. Nuckols, defendant.’ The state of Washington to said James H. Nuckols, defendant: You are hereby summoned to ap- pear within sixty (60) days from the date of the first publication of this summons, that is to say, within sixty (60) days from the 15th day of July, 1904, and defend the above en- titled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attor- ney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do ,judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said complaint, which has_ been heretotore filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action is to obtain an absolute divorce from the bonds of matrimony heretofore ex- isting between yourself and the said plaintiff, said divorce being asked upon the grounds of desertion and non-support. JEROLD LANDON FINCH, Attorney for Plaintiff. de gE See SEE i SEULEEU RSIS attorney for FPiaintift, Office and postoffice address, 315 and 316 Globe building, Seattle, Wash. The date of the first Publication of thie summons is July 15, 1904. Aug IN THE SURERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington, for King County. No.———Summons, Lews Sears, plaintiff, vs. Sallie M. Sears, defendant. To the said Sallie M. Sears, defendant: You are hereby summoned to ap- pear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after the 15th day of July, 1904, and defend the above entitled action, in the above entitled court ,and an- swer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorney for the plaintim, at Room 502 Mutual Life uilding, Seattle, Wash., and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action as set forth in the comlaint is as follows: For divorce on the ground of desertion. REEVES AYLMORE, JR., Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 502 Mutual Life building, Seattle, King county, Wash. July 15, Aue. 26. PROBATE NOTICE. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King—ss. No. 4554—Notice of Settlement of Finall Account. In the matter of the estate of Peter Munson, deceased, notice is hereby given that Jennie Paulina Munson, as administratrix of the estate of Peter Munson, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said ‘court her final ac- count as such administratrix, and that Thursday, the 18th day of Au- gust, 1904, at 9:30 o'clock a. m. at the court. room of the probate department of our said superior court, in the city of Seattle, in said King county, has been duly ‘appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person in- terested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. W. R. Bell, judge of said superior court, and the seal of said court hereto affixed this 11th day of July, 1904, (Seal) C. A. KOEPFLI, Clerk. By D. K. SICKELS, Deputy Clerk. July 15, July 29. NOTICE OF MEETING OF STOCK- HOLDERS OF STATE BANK OF ENUMCLAW. To the Stockholders of State Bank of Enumclaw and others whom it may concern: You are hereby notified that a meeting of all of the owners and holders of the capital stock of the State Bank of Enumclaw, a corpora- tion duly organized and existing un- der and pursuant to the laws of the state of Washington, has been and is hereby called to be held at the Bank of Enumclaw building in the town of Enumclaw, King county, state of Washington, on the 10th day of September, 1904, at 1 ‘clock p. m. You are hereby further notified that it is proposed to reduce the capital stock of said corporation from twen- ty-five theusand dollars to seven thousand dollars, all paid up, and that the object of said meeting is to vote upon the question of such pro- posed reduction. Dated at Enumclaw, Wash. July 13, 1904. A. W. STONE A. F. STONE, 8. LAFROMBOIS, J. J. SMITH, A. G. HANSON, FRANK HANSON. Trustees of State Bank of Enumclaw, July 15, Sept. 9. PERSONAL Mr. Charles Bailey has been visiting in the city this week. Mr. Byron Clarke returned last Wednesday evening after an absence of ten days' vacation. Mrs. Frank Smith is making arrangement to give a concert at the Mt. Zion Baptist church next month. The Golden Gate Social Club held a very interesting meeting on Wednesday evening at the residence of Miss Hayes. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. M. Pyatt, plaintiff, vs. George H. Gunton and Jane Doe Gunton, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. 43104. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to George H. Gunton, and Jane Doe Gunton, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, who are the owners or reputed owners of, and all persons unknown, claiming or having an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property. You and each of you are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff, M. Pyatt, is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificates, numbered as hereinafter stated, issued by the County Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, embracing the following real property situated in said King County, Washington, and more particularly described as follows, to-wit: Delinquent tax certificate No. B24769, Lot fifteen (15), Block seven (7), First Plat of West Seattle Land and Improvement Company, West Seattle. That said certificate was issued on the 4th day of June, 1904, for the following sums and for delinquent taxes for the following years, to-wit: Tax certificate No. B24769, for years 1897 to 1900 inclusive, amounting, with interest at 15 per cent per annum, to $55.30, to date of June 4, 1904. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described lot, to-wit: $3.40 for 1903, in all aggregating to June 4, 1904, $59.20. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons, unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the service of this notice, by publication, exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit: 60 days after the 10th day of June, 1904, in the above entitled Court and action, and defend this action and answer the complain of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount, together with penalty, interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered against you and against Spring Is near at hand, and the time for housecleaning. We can be of benefit to you in this direction. We carry paints and varnishes, and a very large assortment of new styles in WALL PAPERS. G. F. STOELTING 816 Third Avenue. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, including costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and Court, and for closing and confirming plaintiff's lien and quieting the title in the purchaser. M. PYATT, Plaintiff. W. T. SCOTT, Prosecuting Attorney. By JOHN C. MURPHY, Deputy, and STEELE & BROWN, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office Address, 506, 9 & 13 Marion Bldg, Seattle, Wash. First publication, dated June 10, 1904. Peoples' Savings Bank Second and Pike. Capital $100,000 Deposits received from $1 to $10,000; 4 per cent interest allowed on savings deposits. E. C. Neufelder, President. R. H. Denny, Vice President. J. T. Greenleaf, Cashier. SAFE DEPOSIT VAULT THE NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE H. C. Henry, Pres. R. R. Spencer, Cashier. The Canadian Bank of Commerce London Office .....60 Lombard St New York Office.....16 Exchange Place Over 100 Branches in Canada and the United States, including DAWSON CITY, ATLIN, WHITE HORSE, VICTORIA and VANCOUVER in Canada and SAN FRANCISCO, PORTLAND, SEATTLE and SKAGWAY in U. S. Accounts of banks, corporations, firms and individuals received on favorable terms. Drafts, letters of credit and commercial credits issued available in any part of the world. Interest allowed on Time Deposits. Seattle Branch G. V. HOLT, Manager. THE PUGET SOUND NATIONAL BANK Capital stock paid in..... $528,000 Surplus ..... 35,000 Jacob Furth, Pres.; J. S. Goldsmith, Vice- Pres.; R. V. Ankeny, Cash. Correspondence in all the principal cities State Taxes, Trusts TRE SCANDINAVIAN AMERICAN BANK Capital paid up.....$ 300,000.00 Surplus ..... 150,000.00 Deposits ..... 2,250,000.00 Interest on time and Savings Deposits. Drafts and money orders issued on all parts of the world. Cor. Yesler Way and First Av. So. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SEATTLE, WASH. Paid up capital.....$150,000 LESTER TURNER, President. C. P. MASTERSON, Cashier. MAURICE McMICKEN, Vice- Pres. F. F. PARKHURST, Asst. Cash. A general banking business transacted. Letters of credit sold on all principal cities of the world. Special facilities for collecting on British Columbia, Alaska and all Pacific Northwest points. We have a bank at Cape Nome. CONTRACTOR and BUILDER. All work guaranteed and all contracts lived up to. Practical Plumber and Gasfitter. Sanitary Plumbing a Specialty. John H. McGraw Geo. B. Kittinger REAL ESTATE Fire and Marine Insurance. Room B, Bailey Building. Telephone Main 695 R. W. BUTLER D. B. SPELLMAN The Last Week Be MERCILE SLAU Read Daily Paper Rummage Sa MERCILESS PRICE SLAUGHTER ALL CARS TRANSFER TO BONNEY-WATSON CO. Preparing bodies for shipping a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. Albert Hansen JEWELER AND SILVERSMITH. Diamonds, Watches, Clocks, Jewelry, Silverware, Rich Cut Glass, Etc. Diamond Ice Leaves no slime in the refrigerator, because it is made from distilled artesian water. TELEPHONE PINK 159. Manufacture and Sell Lumber For All Purposes SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. Dollar Gas WITH Free Services as Ranges Connected Free of Charge Seattle Lighting Co. No. 216 Cherry St. PHONES—Independent, 96 Sunset, Exchange 27. Both Phones 949 Established 1888 E. R. BUTTERWORTH & SON E R. BUTTERWORTH, Manager Professional Funeral Directors and Embalmers 1921 FIRST AV, SEATTLE Building Material Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. STETSON POST MILL CO. J. M. FRINK, Phone Main 94 Prop. and Supt. Washington Iron Works Founders and Machinists. Works, Grant Street Bridge Seattle Friday, July 22, 1904. fore Stock Listing SS PRICE GHTER ers for Specials e Wednesday RCHE MAIL ORDERS FILLED We enlarge photos. We make picture frames. John Nogleberg, 1907 First avenue. Both phones. If you want to borrow money on your diamonds, jewelry or watches at low rates, don't hunt up your "friends." Go to the American Watch and Jewelry Co., 908 First Ave., private offices, and business strictly confidential. *** We Can Save You money on any kind of a Musical Instrument Among the Pianos we represent are such celebrated makes as Chickering & Sons, Kimball, Hobart M. Cable, Haddorff, Pease and the popular New D. S. Johnston Co. In Organs we have the famous Vocalion and Kimball Reed and Pipe. Also the Simplex Piano Player with circulating library. We have a number of splendid bargains in second-hand Pianos and Organs, old instruments taken in exchange. New Pianos for rent. We sell on very easy payments. Small Instruments Columbia Talking Machines from $7.50 up. Records from 25c. Also Violins, Guitars, Banjos, Mandolins, Music Boxes, etc. D. S. Johnston Co. 903 Second Ave. Burke Building YES SIR! HERE'S THE BEER, SIR! RAINIER- THE ONLY BEER, SIR! SEATTLE BREWING & MALTING CO. SEATTLE // WASHINGTON. TELEPHONE RAINIER JB. ```markdown ```