Seattle Republican

Friday, January 19, 1906

Seattle, Washington

10 pages

Page 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 2
Page 3
Page 3
Page 4
Page 4
Page 5
Page 5
Page 6
Page 6
Page 7
Page 7
Page 8
Page 8
Page 9
Page 9
Page 10
Page 10
Page text (machine-generated)
SEATTLE REPUBLICAN [Picture of a man in a suit with a bow tie and a mustache. He is facing slightly to the right.] VOL. XII, NO. 34 The Seattle Republican Established May, 1892 H. R. Cayton.....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton.....Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. One Year .....$2.00 Six Months .....1.00 Three Months .....60 Published every Friday at 214 Columbia St. Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second-class Mail Matter. When Dr. W. R. Harper died medical science lost a great battle. Had he recovered the ravages of the fatal cancer would have been completely checkmated. When Judge Thomas H. Paynter was elected United States senator from Kentucky the South again placed a premium on border outlawry, as he was the judge that heard the mock trial of the accused slayers of one alleged Governor Goebel. Of course Senators Ankeny and Piles got good committee places because their wishes were championed by Senator Spooner, an N. P. representative in the Senate. Spooner knows that they will vote right on all railroad measures. A few Negroes in the East are greatly exercised because it is reported that Hon. Harry W. Furniss, minister to Hayti, some time ago married a Spanish lady and the ground for their mind disturbance is because Mr. Furniss did not marry a "colored woman." Well, if a Spaniard is not colored then he or she is born that way. But what gave them the right to say to Furniss or any one else whom they should marry? Senator Reed Smoot, the Utah polygamist, defies the W. C. T. U. and invites them to do their worst in unseating him. Evidently some one at Washington City has given Brother Smoot a tip that his vote will be needed either for or against the rate regulation bill and if he votes right he won't have to go. The devil himself would be acceptable or tolerated by the railroad senators if he would only vote so as to serve their political masters. The Seattle city estimates for 1906 include $30,000 for the construction of a municipal garbage crematory. No definite plans have yet been suggested or adopted, but City Engineer Thomson suggestively remarks that it will be patterned after a disposal plant operated in Europe. A plot of ground, near the shores of Lake Union, has already been selected for the location of this public utility. ```markdown ``` SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, JANUARY 19, 1906 IRVING Candidat POLITICAL POT-PIE If the Democrats, the labor unions and the Municipal advocates are not playing a foxy grandpa game on the Republicans then the Pie-maker misses his guess. They have caused the news to be spread throughout the political circles of the city that they would not fuse, but would all go it alone in order to throw the Republicans off their guard, when every indication points to them endorsing and supporting one man at the election for the principal offices. The combination hopes the Republicans will nominate a candidate for mayor that will be weak with the people and then it will nominate or endorse some man whom they believe will by the united efforts of the anti-Republican votes defeat the entire ticket. Scott Calhoun was correct in saying to the central committee that plenty of time should be allowed for a thorough campaign as he scented danger ahead for the party unless they have time sufficient to answer the arguments advanced by the Democrats and their sympathizers. Mayor R. A. Ballinger cleared the political atmosphere completely last Tuesday morning when he addressed a letter to the Post-Intelligencer, in which he declared, under no circumstances would he be a candidate for renomination. The appearance of the letter in public print was the signal for the other aspirants for the nomination of mayor to get busy and the very same day Irving --- BLICAN 1906 PRICE FIVE CENTS COLE or Mayor T. Cole opened up political headquarters in the Butler hotel. The friends of John F. Miller as did the friends and advocates of Billy Murphy, the political wonder of the Ninth ward, also began political fence building. As matters now stand a pretty three cornered fight is in progress between the men mentioned above while a dark horse candidate is looking on ready to spring into the arena at an opportune moment when the three have so completely blocked each other's efforts of being nominated that neither will be able to move and a compromise candidate will be the only solution of the embroglio. Cole will doubtless go into the convention with more delegates than any other candidate, Murphy will be a close second, while Miller will go into the convention with a number of determined followers, who will dead lock the convention rather than see him defeated. It is claimed that he is receiving the tacit support of Mayor Ballinger and is the Piles candidate. This, however, is not very generally believed and Mr. Miller vigorously deny both of the stories. That it will be fatal for Senator Piles to take any part in the candidacy of either of the aspirants past experience of other senators demonstrate and it if he is not he had better hands off. The Municipal League and the Labor Union party meet tomorrow (Saturday) to make the first nominations for mayor and other officials of Seattle to be voted for at the next regular election. It looks now as though Mathew Dow, a well known contractor and builder, will be nominated without opposition. If subsequently the Demo- --- IRVING T. COLE Candidate for Mayor UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON PRICE FIVE CENTS se PERSONAL. J. S. Peoples is now a full-fledged policeman, He is the first of his race for fourteen years that has served on the police force in this city. The many friends of Spencer Smith, who for many years lived in Seattle, will regret to learn that he died of typhoid fever after only a few days illness in North Yakima a couple of weeks ago. Rey. S, J. Collins, who held his first quarterly conference of the year at Lee’s Chapel of the A. M. E. Church of this city, spent a few days the first of the week in the city shaking hands with old friends and acquaint- ances. Mr. Collins some years ago was a resident of this city and stood very high among the most substantial citizens. In order to vote it is necessary for you to register. The charter makes it obligatory to register every year if you want to vote. The election is coming and if you wish to exercise the right of suffrage you should run up to the city hall and register. You can do the job in less than ten minutes and then it will be over and you will not stand a show of having losing your vote for not having registered. Do it now. Through a communication to an Eastern paper inviting Negro emi- grants to Arizona, it was learned that Con A. Rideout, who for many years was a practicing attorney in this city is now living in Tucson. Rideout, it will be remembered, went to Africa with his wife and step daughter, but he deserted the wife and eloped with the daughter. Mrs. Rideout returned to Seattle and later sued and obtained a divorce from her heartless spouse. She subsequently married a Mr. Pur- ness and they have moved to California. Rideout and the daughter later also returned to America, and for a while lived in New York, then they moved to Chicago and then to Arizona. It is not known whether he has as yet deserted the daughter or not. Mr. J. W. McConnaughey, ex-county treasurer of King county, who served in that capacity for four years, but who is now farming in Yakima coun- ty, spent the most of the week in the city visiting with old friends and po- litical assocites. “Our climate is al- most as pleasant in the part of Yakima cn Oy ae A aa deg a ee Musical Medley IMMENSE VARIETY AT D. S. JOHNSTON’S ‘The variety of musical instruments at the D, S. Johnston Co.'s store is simply bewildering. Starting with a magnifi- cent pipe organ (two manuals), there is everything down to a flageolet, and scores of new inventions in between. The list of pianos alone is remarkable. There are the magnificent Chickering, the Kimball, the Hobart M. Cable, the Haddorf, the Pease, the D. S. Johnston Co.'s Special and many others. There is the world famous Pianola, with the Metrostyle—the Orchestrelle and the wonderful Pianola Pianos—the player being-put INSIDE the case of the piano. There's the Regina Concerto, which, for a nickel, produces a world of beauti- ful music.’ The Reliable Self-Playing Piano. Both of these are well suited for cates and public buildings of every sort. And there’s a wealth of Violins, Gui- tars, Mandolins, ete. Besides the won- derful Edison Phonograph, which enables you to record your own voice or that of your friends—and countless records. Visitors are cordially welcome to this Temple of Modern Music, D. S. JOHNSTON CO. 903 Second Ave. Burke Buldg. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN county in which I live as your Seattle climate, and I think I enjoy it even better. I am raising potatoes and su- gar beets and occasionally I raise a “dead beet” with the toe of my boot. I think I have splendid prospects ahead and even the frenzied specula- tion in Seattle tide lands does not move me to return to Seattle to get into the push. “There was altogether too much tide land talk in Seattle for me to stay in Ravensdale, and so I came down to get in the push,” came from Dr. C. E. Hoye, who for four years served as county coroner, I slid down this morning and at once got rid of a piece of tide land that I had been holding for a good while, and I think I can now return to my home and be happy for a while at least. Dr. Hoye has charge of the hospital at Ravens- dale and is doing exceedingly well. However, it is reported that he has an eye on the job of sheriff and may make an effort to get the nomination at the expiration of Lou Smith’s four years. Louis James, the eminent tragedian, will open at the Grand Sunday night in “Richelieu”, presenting on Monday and Wednesday nights “Virginius”, Tuesday night “Merchant of Venice” and Wednesday matinee “Ingomar.” “Virginius” has many commendable attributes—it appeals to the lover, the soldier, the patriot, and the child with equal force, for its many component virtues are evidenced with such pro- found sincerity that the auditor be- comes in harmonious, sympathetic touch with the events that are reacted before him. A new Shylock will be offered us by Mr, James. Not the typical Jew of tradition, but an exalted personage who by circumstances has been ad- judged guilty ofan offense, that to- day would be considered clever finan- ceering. His Jew is said to be not the black-hearted Rialto usurer of tradi- tion, but a humane man, loyal to his race, devoted to his daughter, and fatherlike, revengeful at the wrong done her—his Shylock will be watched with interest. MINER’S “AMERICANS.” The engagement of Miner’s “Amer- icans” will commence at the Seattle Sunday. One of the catchiest vaude- ville bills will be presented that has ever been seen in a long time. A very clever musical farce in two acts en- titled “A Yankee Doodle Gjirl” by Barney Gerard is presented, which gives plenty of scope to the comedians and principal ladies. Everything that is new and up-to-date has been incor- porated in the performance this sea- son. The olio contains only acts of rec- ognized ability; those who appear in this portion of the bill are Fisher and Clarke, eccentric comedy sketch art- ists; Joe Goodwin, the Boy Monolo- guist; May Butler, the Female Bari- tone; and as an added feature, the phenomenal and sensational melodra- matic moving picture, “The River Pi- rate.” The American Trio, Betts-Rey- nolds-Fox, and the Breakaway Bar- lows. The Roscian Opera Company will open a short season of comic opera at standard prices at the Grand Fri- day, January 26. The opening bills will be “El Capitan” and “The Mi- kado.” Lucia Nola, the prima donna soprano with the Roscian’s, has the endorsement of Schumann Heink as LOUIS JAMES. an artist of the front rank. Her work with that famous singer under the management of Fred Whitney was, it is said, particularly effective, and in “El Capitan” the part of Isabel will give her exceptional opportunity for the display of that marvelous voice with which she is credited, THIRD AVENUE THEATRE. E. J. Carpenter’s offering of Hal Reid’s masterpiece, “At Cripple Creek” is booked for an engagement at the Third Avenue Theatre nevt week, opening Sunday afternoon. This play deals with life in the Rocky Moun- tains and the characters include min- ers, Indians, half breeds and hardy Westerners, with novelty in the way of a girl from the New England States. Several types, new to the stage, are introduced and clever character draw- ing is said to contribute one of the most commendable features of the play. The first act takes place in the saloon of Martin Mason, called the “Temple of David.” Act second shows Joe Mayfield’s cabin at Rift Canyon. In act third the scene discloses the interior of a mine known as the “Last Dollar” claim. Here occurs one of the most novel and effective scenes that has been put into a recent play. The fourth and last act is laid in Joe’s new home at Cripple Creek upon the occasion of his marriage. “At Crip- ple Creek” is climatically built and full of tender heart interest balanced by flashes of brilliant humor and quaint comedy. The company employ- ed to exploit this piece has been se- lected with the utmost care, and each member of the cast is peculiarly fit- ted for his or her part. Hal Reid’s thrilling new drama is full of spirit and fire, Go to a respectable place to borrow money on diamonds, jewelry and watches. Low rates. Private offices and all business strictly confidential. American Watch and Jewelry Co., 908 First Ave., opp. Rainier-Grand Hotel. Full line of Builders’ Hardware at Spinningis Cash Store, 1310 2nd Ave. DRINK Yellowstone Whiskey Clarke’s Pure Rye [M. &@ K. GOTTSTEIN] WHOLESALE Li DEALERS ze§ Bank Peoples’ Savings Ban Second and Pike. Capital $100,000 Deposits received from $1 to $10,000; 4 per cent interest allowed on savings deposits. E. C. Neufelder, President. R. H. Denny, Vice President. J. T. Greenleaf, Cashier. SAFE DEPOSIT VAULT OF COMMERCE m. C. Menry, Pres. ®. B. Spencer, Cashier. FRIDAY, JANUARY 19, 1906. The Largest Music House on Coast + — +68 Better Pianos Robie an ee Lower Prices — AND oN-—— Easier Terms Than any other House in Seattle Investigate and you will be convinced. Our line of Pianos headed by famous Weber Piano is complete. Call at any time: no trouble to show goods. Kohler & Chase 1305 2nd Ave., Seattle. Both Phones 949 © Established 1888 E. R. BUTTERWORTH & SONS E.R. BUTTERWORTH Mor Professional Funeral Directors and Embalmers 1921 FIRST AV, SEATTLE Moran Bros. Zo. Manufacture and Sell Lumber For All Purposes SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. BONNEY-WATSON Co. UNDERTAKERS ‘Third and Columbia. Preparing bodies for shipping a spe- cialty. All orders by telephone or tele- graph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. John H. McGraw Geo. B. Kittinger REAL ESTATE Fire and Marine Insurance. Room B, Bailey Building. Telephone Main 695 Building Material Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. -STETSON POST MILL CO. Eestablished 1875. Tel. Main 3 THE PUGET SOUND NATIONAL BANK OF SEATTLE. Capital stock paid in..........$528,000 RUPPIUS Fs lave uokdss@acasea ccd + O8000. Jacob Furth, Pres:; J. S. Goldsmith, Vice- Pres.; R. V. Ankeny, Cash. Correspondence in all the principal cities of the United States and Europe. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SEAT- TLE, WASH. Paid up capital..........++++++$150,000 LESTER TURNER, President. C. P. MASTERSON, Cashier. MAURICE McMICKEN, Vice- Pres. F. F, PARKHURST, Asst. Cash, A general banking business transact- ed. Letters of credit sold on all princi- pal cities of the world. Special facilities for collecting on British Columbia, Alaska and all Pacific Northwest points. We have a bank at Cape Nome. CONTRACTOR and BUILDER. All work guaranteed and all 4010 12th Ave. N. E. Phone North 530. contracts lived up to. crats endorse him it matters not whom the Republicans nominate, Dow will give him a hard tussel for the election. Should Murphy be nominated the odds of Dow being elected would be some three to one. If again the Republicans take a radical stand against municipal ownership in their platform Dow will come pretty nearly beating any one the Republicans may nominate. The Pie-maker, therefore, advises making haste slowly in the matter of platform and further advises the Republican platform makers to come boldly out for municipal ownership as the people want that particular reform and will not be content without an effort put forth to get it. The political talk that Clark M. Nettleton is seeking the nomination of mayor on the Republican ticket is without foundation so far as Mr. Nettleton is concerned. He does not want it and will not turn his hands over to get it, but like all good American citizens, if the nomination is brought to him on a silver platter, it is not recorded that he would throw it to the winds. It must be remembered that Mr. Nettleton is a member of the civil service board of this city and if the charter means what it says he is ineligible to hold the office of mayor. This has been threshed over in the past and it seems child play to go all over it again. Colonel Buster Blethen has begun the publication of a lot of fabrications about municipal ownership in case it succeeds, equally as absurd as the fabrications he published in his paper in 1896 when McKinley was a candidate for the presidency in case he succeed. Those of us who were in Seattle at that time and read the Times remember that Col. Buster Blethen declared in black face type that, if McKinley won in that contest the American people would be reduced to political slavery and McKinley would be declared absolute dictator of the country in three months after he was elected. That the old man was shooting off his mouth without any facts to warrant his wild statements all of us verily believed at the time and of course know it now. The Seattle Republican after reading the rot published in the Times from time to time in the last state campaign felt called upon to editorially declare, "Saw it in the Times? Damn lie." The language, it must be admitted, is rather rough, but it was the naked fact. It has already begun to publish rawhide and bloody bones stories about municipal ownership in case it succeeds in Seattle in electing a ticket at the next election, all of which is as monstrous political lies as those it published about McKinley in 1896, about Frink in 1900 and those it published about Mead in 1904. If the opposers of the municipal ownership idea hope to defeat it in the coming election they had better call Blethen off or it will go through by an overwhelming majority. Blethen and the Times have lost every political fight they have made in Seattle and they will lose the municipal ownership fight. Frank P. Mullen will not be a candidate for the seventh ward nomination for councilman, but will accept the nomination for councilman at large if tendered him. He THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN will make no fight for that, however, but if the voters want him and hand him the nomination he will willingly accept the same and thank them for it. Two other names have been mentioned in connection with the nomination for councilman at large. H. P. Rude it is said will endeavor to succeed himself for the nomination and election of councilman at large. He believes that Mullen will be unanimously nominated and he wishes to be his running mate. Henry Beck of the Sixth ward is a receptive candidate at this time for Rude's place and before another week may become an active candidate. Beck is a splendid politician and stands A1 all over the city. It is believed by a great many politicians that he will give Rude a good run for his money. "I am a candidate for the Republican nomination of corporation counsel and if nominated and elected I will endeavor to give the taxpayers a straightforward businesslike administration,' was the brief statement of Scott Calhoum, the present corporation counsel, whose portrait accompanies this notice. He was elected to the office he now holds by the city council less than a year ago, when Corporation Counsel Mitchell Gilliam was appointed a superior court judge by Governor Mead to fill the vacancy created by the legislature, and during the time he has been in office he has made a most admirable official and the affairs of his office have been conducted with such brevity and object as to give entire satisfaction to each and every one. Scott Calhoum was practically born and raised in and about Seattle. He has seen it grow from a mere village to a great city and he has not done a great deal seeing at that. He is the son of a distinguished Puget Sound pioneer and he is following from a good citizen standpoint in the footsteps of his father. He is a member of the Young Men's Republican Club of this city and is one of the acknowledged leaders thereof. The members of the club have frequently mentioned his name in connection with a congressional nomination and it is verily believed that, if for any reason Congressman Humphrey would not be a candidate to succeed himself, Scott Calhoum would be the almost unanimous choice of King county as his successor, but great bodies move slowly and therefore Mr. Calhoum will abide his time to aspire for greater political honors and will be ever grateful to the Republicans in convention assembled for the unanimous nomination which he is now seeking and which he feels practically certain of getting, and in view of the fact that a nomination is equal to election in Seattle, his friends have already begun to congratulate him over his very flattering political future both in municipal as well as National affairs. The Republican wishes to add just one word to the high certificate of character that has been given Mr. Calhoum, he is the same Scott Calhoum in office as he was out of office and any man of that caliber will always get there when he appeals his case to the people. It can be said without fear of successful contradiction that Seattle never had a more popular public official than John Riplinger, FRIDAY. JANUARY 19, 1906. Acme Publishing Co. 214 COLUMBIA ST. BRIEFS our Specialty Telephones: {Sunset, Red 197 Independent, 1306 UNTIL JANUARY 15 25°. Discount On all Cut Glass, European Art Goods and Imported Electric Lamps ALBERT HANSEN JEWELER AND SILVERSMITH Established 1883 706 FIRST AVE. THE UNION SAVINGS TRUST COMPANY OF SEATTLE IN THE UNION THERE IS STRENGTH Cor. Second Ave. and Cherry St. Hoge Building Seattle, Wash. We Pay 4 Per Interest JAMES. D. HOGE, Pres. . B. SOLNER, Cashier Agents for Alaska Banking and Safe Deposit Co. Nome, Alaska Strictly High-Class Clay Building Materials Of all kinds Best Sewer Pipe, Pressed Brick, Electric Conduit Tile, Paving Brick, Etc. Denny-Renton Clay & Coal Co. Room 71 Dexter Horton & Co. Bank Building, Seattle RESULTS That's what the ACME BUSINESS COLLEGE is working for That is what we get—Results. Mr. Eugene Harris, now engaged in court reporting and lang office work in Walla Walla, came to the Acme a few years ago to study shorthand. Now he is in an esponsible position, with good pay. Recently he said to afriend: "All my success I owe to the Acme Business College." Not all. The Acme furnished the instruction; he furnished brains—and work. If you will work we can set you on the road to success. Acme Business College P.-I. Building, Seattle FRIDAY, JANUARY 19, 1906. FRIDAY, JANUARY 19, 1906. [Picture of a man in a suit with a bow tie]. JOHN RIPLINGER Candidate for City Comptroller the present city comptroller. Mr. Riplinger has been repeatedly solicited by admiring friends to allow them to push his name for the nomination of mayor before the next municipal convention, but he has steadily refused and adding, "I am a candidate to succeed myself and ask nothing more of my friends and constituents." When seen one day this week by The Seattle Republican he again said: "Say for me that I am a candidate for city comptroller to succeed myself, only this and nothing more, and will be very thankful to my friends and constituents if they will favor me with the honor." Enough said. While many of the voters would be glad to have been permitted to have thrown off their coats and worked for his nomination for mayor, if comptroller is what he wants, The Seattle Republican will guarantee him at this time that he will not only be nominated, but will guarantee him that no other name but his will be presented to the next city convention for that nomination. In other words, he will get the same without a dissenting vote and no greater tribute could be paid an official, who has already served one term than for his constituents to place such confidence in him as to renominate him without a dissenting vote. Political friends and foes one and alike speak well of Riplinger and all because he conducts his office on business principles and every one having business therein is made to feel perfectly at home regardless of his political affiliations, his nationality or his religious beliefs. Would that there were more such men who aspire to political offices and if there were, there would be fewer public scandals for the yellow journals to write scare head lines over their peculations. Candidate for City Treasurer.—"Owing to my long experience in official duties such as are incumbent on a man elected to the office of city treasurer, I feel peculiarly fitted to fill such a place and I therefore THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN take this opportunity to announce my intention of standing for the Republican nomination for city treasurer," said George H. Appleton one day this week. For three years Mr. Appleton was cashier in the county treasurer's office under J. W. McConnaughey. For the past two years he has acted as one of the assistant city treasurers under Sam F. Rathbun and in both cases his work has given perfect satisfaction, and if nominated and elected to the position of city treasurer no one who supported him will have reasons to regret it. Dr. Crichton is a Candidate.—"Yes, I am a candidate for renomination for councilman from the Eighth ward subject to the Republican city convention, and if nominated and elected again I will continue to put forward my best efforts for my ward in particular and for the city in general. I have nothing new to promise and my past efforts in the council perfectly reflects my future efforts in that body," said Dr. J. E. Crichton one day this week. It was reported a few days ago that Dr. Crichton would have some opposition for the nomination in the next convention, but search as diligently as we could no such opposition could be run down. Why should a man who has served his constituents as faithfully as has Dr. Crichton have any opposition? If it is honesty of purpose that the electors want in their representatives they certainly have it in the fullest extent in Dr. Crichton, and if it is a man that does things among his fellow representatives then in Dr. Crichton the electors have their ideal man. Opposing a candidate on the part of another simply because such candidate has been repeatedly nominated and elected for the same place is puerile. It is the man who has had the actual experience that accomplishes the most for his constituents in representative bodies, and no better illustration could be cited than the success that Dr. Crichton has G. H. APPLETON Candidate for City Treasurer [Image of a man with a mustache and a suit with a tie. The background is a solid black oval.] SCOTT CALHOUN Candidate for Corporation Counsel had in the council in getting things for his ward. Cole Wants to be Mayor.—"Had Mayor Ballinger decided himself to have been a candidate for a renomination I would not have allowed the use of my name in connection with the mayoralty nomination, but when he publicly announced that under no circumstances would he be a candidate I consented to the importunities of my friends and informed them that if they saw fit to push my candidacy I would not object to it, and if nominated and elected I would endeavor to give the city a clean administration. I am in hearty accord with the Ballinger administration and should I be so fortunate to be elected mayor of this city I would endeavor to so conduct the affairs of the office that at the close of my term I would have made friends instead of enemies. My policy, if elected, will be the policy of my party, for I consider no candidate or official greater than the party that created him," said Hon. Irving T. Cole one day this week. Irving T. Cole has been a prominent as well as conspicuous political figure in the councils of the Republican party of this city for the past ten years or more. Four years ago he was elected to the house of representatives of the Seventh legislature of this state and made a very brilliant record as a legislator. Two years ago he was elected a member of the city council and the record he has made as a member of the council has been a most flattering one. His success, therefore, in the positions of public trust he has already filled is a splendid reflection of his success in a more exalted public position. He is one of the heavy taxpayers of the city and therefore has the financial welfare of the city at heart. It is the concensus of opinion among those with whom the writer has conversed as to his candidacy that no better man for the place could be found. He has property interests enough in the city to be ever on the alert for the city's best good. He has sufficient property and means to not be dependent on the salary for a sustenance, both of which are important essentials in the selecting of a candidate for mayor of a city like unto Greater Seattle. crats endorse him it matters not whom the Republicans nominate, Dow will give him a hard tussel for the election. Should Murphy be nominated the odds of Dow being elected would be some three to one. If again the Republicans take a radical stand against municipal ownership in their platform Dow will come pretty nearly beating any one the Republicans may nominate. The Pie-maker, therefore, advises making haste slowly in the matter of platform and further advises the Republican platform makers to come boldly out for municipal ownership as the people want that particular reform and will not be content without an effort put forth to get it. The political talk that Clark M. Nettleton is seeking the nomination of mayor on the Republican ticket is without foundation so far as Mr. Nettleton is concerned. He does not want it and will not turn his hands over to get it, but like all good American citizens, if the nomination is brought to him on a silver platter, it is not recorded that he would throw it to the winds. It must be remembered that Mr. Nettleton is a member of the civil service board of this city and if the charter means what it says he is ineligible to hold the office of mayor. This has been threshed over in the past and it seems child play to go all over it again. Colonel Buster Blethen has begun the publication of a lot of fabrications about municipal ownership in case it succeeds, equally as absurd as the fabrications he published in his paper in 1896 when McKinley was a candidate for the presidency in case he succeed. Those of us who were in Seattle at that time and read the Times remember that Col. Buster Blethen declared in black face type that, if McKinley won in that contest the American people would be reduced to political slavery and McKinley would be declared absolute dictator of the country in three months after he was elected. That the old man was shooting off his mouth without any facts to warrant his wild statements all of us verily believed at the time and of course know it now. The Seattle Republican after reading the rot published in the Times from time to time in the last state campaign felt called upon to editorially declare, "Saw it in the Times? Damn lie." The language, it must be admitted, is rather rough, but it was the naked fact. It has already begun to publish rawhide and bloody bones stories about municipal ownership in case it succeeds in Seattle in electing a ticket at the next election, all of which is as monstrous political lies as those it published about McKinley in 1896, about Frink in 1900 and those it published about Mead in 1904. If the opposers of the municipal ownership idea hope to defeat it in the coming election they had better call Blethen off or it will go through by an overwhelming majority. Blethen and the Times have lost every political fight they have made in Seattle and they will lose the municipal ownership fight. Frank P. Mullen will not be a candidate for the seventh ward nomination for councilman, but will accept the nomination for councilman at large if tendered him. He THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN will make no fight for that, however, but if the voters want him and hand him the nomination he will willingly accept the same and thank them for it. Two other names have been mentioned in connection with the nomination for councilman at large. H. P. Rude it is said will endeavor to succeed himself for the nomination and election of councilman at large. He believes that Mullen will be unanimously nominated and he wishes to be his running mate. Henry Beck of the Sixth ward is a receptive candidate at this time for Rude's place and before another week may become an active candidate. Beck is a splendid politician and stands A1 all over the city. It is believed by a great many politicians that he will give Rude a good run for his money. "I am a candidate for the Republican nomination of corporation counsel and if nominated and elected I will endeavor to give the taxpayers a straightforward businesslike administration,' was the brief statement of Scott Calhoum, the present corporation counsel, whose portrait accompanies this notice. He was elected to the office he now holds by the city council less than a year ago, when Corporation Counsel Mitchell Gilliam was appointed a superior court judge by Governor Mead to fill the vacancy created by the legislature, and during the time he has been in office he has made a most admirable official and the affairs of his office have been conducted with such brevity and object as to give entire satisfaction to each and every one. Scott Calhoum was practically born and raised in and about Seattle. He has seen it grow from a mere village to a great city and he has not done a great deal seeing at that. He is the son of a distinguished Puget Sound pioneer and he is following from a good citizen standpoint in the footsteps of his father. He is a member of the Young Men's Republican Club of this city and is one of the acknowledged leaders thereof. The members of the club have frequently mentioned his name in connection with a congressional nomination and it is verily believed that, if for any reason Congressman Humphrey would not be a candidate to succeed himself, Scott Calhoum would be the almost unanimous choice of King county as his successor, but great bodies move slowly and therefore Mr. Calhoum will abide his time to aspire for greater political honors and will be ever grateful to the Republicans in convention assembled for the unanimous nomination which he is now seeking and which he feels practically certain of getting, and in view of the fact that a nomination is equal to election in Seattle, his friends have already begun to congratulate him over his very flattering political future both in municipal as well as National affairs. The Republican wishes to add just one word to the high certificate of character that has been given Mr. Calhoum, he is the same Scott Calhoum in office as he was out of office and any man of that caliber will always get there when he appeals his case to the people. It can be said without fear of successful contradiction that Seattle never had a more popular public official than John Riplinger, FRIDAY, JANUARY 19, 1906 Acme Publishing Co. 214 COLUMBIA ST. BRIEFS our Specialty Telephones: {Sunset, Red 197 Independent, 1306 UNTIL JANUARY 15 25°. Discount On all Cut Glass, European Art Goods and Imported Electric Lamps ALBERT HANSEN JEWELER AND SILVERSMITH Established 1883 706 FIRST AVE. THE UNION SAVINGS TRUST COMPANY OF SEATTLE IN THE UNION THERE IS STRENGTH Cor. Second Ave. and Cherry St. Hoge Building Seattle, Wash. We Pay 4 Per Interest JAMES. D. HOGE, Pres. . B. SOLNER, Cashier Agents for Alaska Banking and Safe Deposit Co. Nome, Alaska Strictly High-Class Clay Building Materials Of all kinds Best Sewer Pipe, Pressed Brick, Electric Conduit Tile, Paving Brick, Etc. Denny-Renton Clay & Coal Co. Room 71 Dexter Horton & Co. Bank Building, Seattle RESULTS That's what the ACME BUSINESS COLLEGE is working for That is what we get—Results. Mr. Eugene Harris, now engaged in court reporting and lang office work in Walla Walla, came to the Acme a few years ago to study shorthand. Now he is in an esponsible position, with good pay. Recently he said to afriend: "All my success I owe to the Acme Business College." Not all. The Acme furnished the instruction; he furnished brains—and work. If you will work we can set you on the road to success. McLaren & Thomson's Acme Business College P.-I. Building, Seattle --- FRIDAY, JANUARY 19, 1906. [Image of a man in a suit with a bow tie]. JOHN RIPLINGER Candidate for City Comptroller the present city comptroller. Mr. Riplinger has been repeatedly solicited by admiring friends to allow them to push his name for the nomination of mayor before the next municipal convention, but he has steadily refused and adding, "I am a candidate to succeed myself and ask nothing more of my friends and constituents." When seen one day this week by The Seattle Republican he again said: "Say for me that I am a candidate for city comptroller to succeed myself, only this and nothing more, and will be very thankful to my friends and constituents if they will favor me with the honor." Enough said. While many of the voters would be glad to have been permitted to have thrown off their coats and worked for his nomination for mayor, if comptroller is what he wants, The Seattle Republican will guarantee him at this time that he will not only be nominated, but will guarantee him that no other name but his will be presented to the next city convention for that nomination. In other words, he will get the same without a dissenting vote and no greater tribute could be paid an official, who has already served one term than for his constituents to place such confidence in him as to renominate him without a dissenting vote. Political friends and foes one and alike speak well of Riplinger and all because he conducts his office on business principles and every one having business therein is made to feel perfectly at home regardless of his political affiliations, his nationality or his religious beliefs. Would that there were more such men who aspire to political offices and if there were, there would be fewer public scandals for the yellow journals to write scare head lines over their peculations. Candidate for City Treasurer.—"Owing to my long experience in official duties such as are incumbent on a man elected to the office of city treasurer, I feel peculiarly fitted to fill such a place and I therefore THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN take this opportunity to announce my intention of standing for the Republican nomination for city treasurer," said George H. Appleton one day this week. For three years Mr. Appleton was cashier in the county treasurer's office under J. W. McConnaughey. For the past two years he has acted as one of the assistant city treasurers under Sam F. Rathbun and in both cases his work has given perfect satisfaction, and if nominated and elected to the position of city treasurer no one who supported him will have reasons to regret it. Dr. Crichton is a Candidate.—"Yes, I am a candidate for renomination for councilman from the Eighth ward subject to the Republican city convention, and if nominated and elected again I will continue to put forward my best efforts for my ward in particular and for the city in general. I have nothing new to promise and my past efforts in the council perfectly reflects my future efforts in that body," said Dr. J. E. Crichton one day this week. It was reported a few days ago that Dr. Crichton would have some opposition for the nomination in the next convention, but search as diligently as we could no such opposition could be run down. Why should a man who has served his constituents as faithfully as has Dr. Crichton have any opposition? If it is honesty of purpose that the electors want in their representatives they certainly have it in the fullest extent in Dr. Crichton, and if it is a man that does things among his fellow representatives then in Dr. Crichton the electors have their ideal man. Opposing a candidate on the part of another simply because such candidate has been repeatedly nominated and elected for the same place is puerile. It is the man who has had the actual experience that accomplishes the most for his constituents in representative bodies, and no better illustration could be cited than the success that Dr. Crichton has [Picture of a man with a mustache and a suit. The background is a plain, light color. The man is facing slightly to the right.] G. H. APPLETON Candidate for City Treasurer [Name not visible] SCOTT CALHOUN Candidate for Corporation Counsel had in the council in getting things for his ward. Cole Wants to be Mayor.—"Had Mayor Ballinger decided himself to have been a candidate for a renomination I would not have allowed the use of my name in connection with the mayoralty nomination, but when he publicly announced that under no circumstances would he be a candidate I consented to the importunities of my friends and informed them that if they saw fit to push my candidacy I would not object to it, and if nominated and elected I would endeavor to give the city a clean administration. I am in hearty accord with the Ballinger administration and should I be so fortunate to be elected mayor of this city I would endeavor to so conduct the affairs of the office that at the close of my term I would have made friends instead of enemies. My policy, if elected, will be the policy of my party, for I consider no candidate or official greater than the party that created him," said Hon. Irving T. Cole one day this week. Irving T. Cole has been a prominent as well as conspicuous political figure in the councils of the Republican party of this city for the past ten years or more. Four years ago he was elected to the house of representatives of the Seventh legislature of this state and made a very brilliant record as a legislator. Two years ago he was elected a member of the city council and the record he has made as a member of the council has been a most flattering one. His success, therefore, in the positions of public trust he has already filled is a splendid reflection of his success in a more exalted public position. He is one of the heavy taxpayers of the city and therefore has the financial welfare of the city at heart. It is the concensus of opinion among those with whom the writer has conversed as to his candidacy that no better man for the place could be found. He has property interests enough in the city to be ever on the alert for the city's best good. He has sufficient property and means to not be dependent on the salary for a sustenance, both of which are important essentials in the selecting of a candidate for mayor of a city like unto Greater Seattle. Chief of Police Thomas R. Delaney may be a Democrat in politics, but it remained for him to be the first public man in Seattle to completely overlook the nationality of a man in naming new men for police duties and from the civil service list take therefrom the names of the men making the highest mark in the examination and assign them to duty without regard to race, color or conditions. Some months ago J. S. Peoples, a worthy young Negro of this city, took the civil service examination for police duties, and be it said to his credit, he stood at the head of the list of certified eligibles from the civil service board. The racial friends of the man thought he was wasting his time, believing the chief would always overlook his name even though it was at the head of the eligible list, but they did not know Tom Delaney, for he is neither a moral nor a public coward. "He is a man," using the words of Collector of Customs Ide, "that will die in endeavoring to do his duty." Peoples' name stood at the head of the eligible list and he therefore was the first man to be named by the chief for duty, though nine others were named at the same time. Peoples will be the first man of his nationality that has been regularly appointed to police duties in this city and it is here predicted that he will take his official cue from his chief and do his duty or die in trying to do it. Years ago Ike Evans, a Negro, was made turnkey at the city hall, but he did not hold the job very long, as the other policemen entered into a conspiracy to cause him to lose his position and they were eminently successful. They succeeded, however, because the chief of the police himself was not averse to it, but no such didoes as that will be attempted on Officer Peoples and simply because Chief Delaney will relieve the first man that starts it of his police authority. Now let the heathen from Missouri rage and the fellow, who at the time Sam Thorn passed examination, predicted that if put on duty Thorn would not last on the force a week, attempt to play his hand at this time and it will be he instead of the other fellow that will walk the gang plank. The tide land excitement in Seattle for the past two weeks has perhaps exceeded anything in the way of real estate transfers in the history of the Pacific Coast and most assuredly anything in the history of the Puget Sound country. Men who a few days prior did not think themselves worth scarcely anything, though they well knew they owned some tide lands, realized in a few days that they were worth thousands and thousands of dollars, more money than they had ever hoped to have, let alone expected to have. The man who had a small chunk of tide lands and disposed of it within the past two weeks is as well fixed as was Tom Lippy, who spent four or five years in the bowels of the earth in frozen Alaska getting down to bed rock in his mine that he could pan out the gold, and he realized it all while he was sleeping and at a time when he was least expecting it. Nothing is more indicative of the fact that Seattle will be a great city than the fabulous prices that are constantly being paid for Seattle real estate. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN [Picture of a man in a suit with a tie and a mustache.] DR. J. E. CRICHTON Candidate for Councilman from Seventh Ward Fourteen years ago persons coming to the city declared that real estate was too high and that it was bound to come down, but it has gone up some every year since that time and it is still going up and the fellow who wants a piece of Seattle dirt had better get it now or he will have to be a millionaire in order to get in gun shot of the purchase price of a business lot. The general public was greatly pleased when it was announced a few weeks ago that Andrew Hemrich and his brothers had bought Ed Sweeney's interest in the Seattle Brewing & Malting Company and Sweeney would retire from the business. While Sweeney has made a fortune out of the business since he has been in Seattle nevertheless it was more bull head luck than business ability. He is a man who seems to want to impress you as he passes by that, you must fall on your face until the Mighty of Mighty is gone. The various brewing companies would never have had one tenth of the trouble they did had it not been for Sweeney. He boasted that the breweries would never recede from the stand they took against the unions, but he it was that crawfished and accepted every unreasonable term the strikers demanded. It was the trouble that Sweeney got the brewers in that prompted Andrew Hemrich to make preparations to take over his interest at any cost in order to get rid of the man. All of the Hemrichs are splendid business men and make friends among all classes, while Sweeney made friends with no one. It is now reported that Sweeney will start an independent brewery in the near future, and if he does it is the prediction of The Seattle Republican that he will be down and out before two years have gone by. The public of this day and age no longer does business with men who always want to make everybody feel as though he was the whole show. For the past few years the Seattle Lighting Company has been furnishing gas to the county to light the court house, which has - FRIDAY. JANUARY 19. 1906. cost the taxpayers the round sum of $250.00 per month. The county commissioners came to the conclusion that the county was being robed by the gas company and they began at once to cast about for other bids and an electric company agreed to light the court house for $100.00 per month, making a net saving of $150.00 per month to the county. The City Lighting plant has not as yet bid on it and when it does the commissionrs are of the opinion that that $100.00 per month bid will yet be reduced, but if it is not, in one fell swoop the commissioners will save the taxpayers $1,500.00 per year on the court house lighting bill. There will still be another saving for every year since gas has been used in the court house, the whole building had to be gone over with a coat of tint which added another $500.00 to the lighting bill because the gas smoked up the building so badly. This is a sample of gas using in Seattle, Mr. New Home Builder, and you should govern yourself accordingly. A number of men started out a few weeks ago to canvass for a patent gas burner and it is said by those who tried the article that it is a splendid thing, but they found so few persons using gas that they threw up the job in utter disgust. "I was canvassing in the very best part of the city," said one of the men, "and to my surprise I did not find one home in twenty using gas and those I did find the owners declared they intended to have the gas taken out just as soon as the city strung its lighting wires by their homes. I never saw a city that used as little gas in homes as this and so I began to make inquiries of why so many of them were cutting out gas for illumination since it made such bright lights and I was informed that it was due to the fact that a few months' use of gas in the home was sufficient to do $300.00 worth of damage to the paper on the walls and to the other furniture. Then again the men who read the meters are not particular whether they see the meters or not in making up their monthly consumption of gas the home burned. The gas company seemed to figure out the amount of gas each home was expected to use and they charged you accordingly and when the meters were properly read, if that ever happened, the sterilized air had done more running the meter than the gas consumed. It seemed to be the worst game of graft that a householder ever ran up against and I did not care to try to sell an economical gas consumer when the consumer was burning sterilized air instead of gas. When the pipes were full of that air the pressure would break a tin mantle, to say nothing of the delicate article used for mantles." THE RICHMOND GAS WORKS The Arena (Boston, December), referring to the profitable operation of the Richmond, Va., gasworks under municipal auspices, as noted on page 177 of The Municipal Journal and Engineer for September last, observes in it "another illustration of the wisdom and practicability of the people owning and operating their own utilities. The municipal plant was established in 1867. During the generation that elapsed from 1867 to 1897 the operation shows an actual surplus of $1,532,930 to the credit of the people. If it had been in the hands of a FRIDAY, JANUARY 19, 1906. private corporation such as have exploited the people of New York, Boston and other American municipalities, the people would have paid extortionate prices for their gas, with the result that besides having been robbed for an inferior commodity, the city would have received no returns, while a few men would have acquired millions of dollars, a small portion of which would in all probability have been used to subsidize a corrupt political machine and to influence the press to discourse on the blessings of private ownership and the perils of a city enriching itself by the legitimate fruits of its enormously valuable public franchises." HUMPHRIES HITS HARD. John E. Humphries read the communication in this paper last week wherein it was claimed that municipal ownership was a fad, and that he would be cured of his views in the matter after the next election. He says he is somewhat astonished at the claim of the correspondent. The corerspondent evidently has never heard of Seattle's water system and electric light plant, and much less has he heard of the large tract of land owned by the city of Seattle for a city cemetery. He has never read the article in Everybody's Magazine for January, 1906, by Charles Edward Russell, under the head of "The Soldiers of the Common Good" wherein it is shown that 100 American cities are buzing with inconclusive discussions of municipal ownership. Municipally owned street railways alone in Great Britain pay an annual profit of $3,823,865. He has failed to see that in Leeds, a city of 446,000 inhabitants, the street car lines have been for 10 years owned and operated by the municipality, and so well that on a capital investment of $5,000,000, the annual gross profit is $355,000, of which $250,000 goes to the reduction of taxation; Sheffield, with 425,000 population, pays $125,000 a year; Salford, with 300,000 population, $25,000; Glasgow, Scotland, pays more than $1,000,000 a year, and among its achievements last year was the carrying of 57,000,000 passengers at a one cent fare. For 30 cities, there has been a net profit of $3,823,865, and $1,090,200 has been contributed to taxation. From the municipal gas plant, Belfast turned over to the reduction of taxation $100,000; Leeds, $150,000; Salford, $100,000; Rochdale, $65,000; Nottingham, $100,000; Southport, $56,000; St. Helens, $25,000; Manchester, $300,000. Of the cities owning their own electric light plants, 30 of them, as set out on page 50 of said magazine, made a clear profit of $1,351,000. Glasgow, from her telephone system, turned over a net profit of $102,000. I do not believe any disinterested person can, at this age of the world, sit down and favor private ownership of public utilities. Whatever profit is to be made, should belong to the public. Under the theory of Thomas A. Edison, electricity will soon be furnished at nominal cost sufficient for lighting purposes, heating purposes and power purposes. By the direct process, the cheap electricity can be applied to the propulsion of street cars, cooking purposes, and will cheapen housekeeping, heating purposes and in fact have every use that electricity can be applied. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN FIFTEEN REASONS WHY. Professor Frank Parsons, of Boston, well known as an authority on social-economic questions, has recently formulated fifteen reasons why public utilities should be owned and operated by the people, laying particular stress upon the gain in economy of production which he believes to be inherent to public ownership. These reasons are: "1. A public plant does not have to pay dividends on watered stock. "2. It does not have to pay dividends even on the actual investment. "3. It does not have to retain lobbyists, or provide for the entertainment of councilmen or legislators or subscribe to campaign funds, or bear the expenses of pushing the nomination and election of men to protect its interests or give it new privileges, or pay blackmail to ward off the raids of cunning legislators and officials and others. "4. It does not have to advertise or solicit business. "4. It is able to save a great deal by combination with other departments of public service. Speaking of the low cost of electric light in Dunkirk, the mayor of the city says: 'Our city owns its water plant, and the great saving comes from the city's owning and operating both plants together.' "6. Full public ownership (that is, public ownership free of debt) has no interest to pay. "7. Even where public ownership is incomplete, the people not owning the plant free of debt, they still have an advantage in respect to interest, because they can borrow at lower rates than the private companies have to pay. "8. As cities usually act as their own insurers, public ownership is free of tribute to the profits and agency-commissions of private insurance companies. "9. There is often a large saving in salaries. A public plant pays its chief well, but does not pay the extravagant salaries awarded by millionaire monopolists to themselves or their substitutes in office. "10. Public plants frequently gain through the higher efficiency of better treated and more contented labor. "1. The losses occasioned by costly strikes and lockouts do not burden the ledgers of public works. "12. Damages and costs of litigation are likely to be less with publics than with private works. Accidents are fewer in a system that aims at good service and safety, and treats its employees well. "13. The civic interest of the people leads to other economies through the increase of patronage and the lessening of waste. The larger the output, the lower the cost of production per unit of service, other things equal, and the tendency to waste electricity, water, etc., is much less when the people know that the service is a public one, the profits of which belong to them, than when they know that the service is rendered by a private corporation charging monopoly rates and making big profits for a few stockholders. These economies are intensified as education and experience with public owner- ship develop the understanding and the civic patriotism of the people. "14. The cost of numerous regulative commissions and interminable legislative investigations into the secrets of private monopolies would be saved by the extension of public ownership. "15. Legislation would cost us less were it not for the private monopolies. For a large part of the time and attention of our legislatures is given to them." He anticipates possible objections to the position thus assumed, in the following further statement: "Private ownership may claim an advan-tage through the payment of lower wages, but on broad grounds of public policy this is a very dubious advantage. It is like saving money by wearing paper clothes, or eating only one meal a day. "Even on economic grounds the evidence is that in many lines of business the efficiency of well-paid labor is so great that the cost per unit is less than with poorly-paid labor. "Moreover, it would be fair in many cases to compare municipal ownership with private ownership on the basis of the private wage, subtracting from the operating expenses of the municipal plant the excess of the public wage above the company wage for the same work, on the ground that the increase of pay under public ownership is not really a payment for gas or electric light or transportation, but an investment in manhood and civilization. "But whether this is done or not, the experience of Glasgow, Liverpool and other English and German cities with municipal and private tramways in the same localities, and the experience of hundreds of cities and towns in this country and in Europe with municipal waterworks, gas and electric plants, etc., abundantly confirms the conclusion pointed to by the above considerations as to the superior economy of public ownership wherever it is tried under reasonable conditions that permit it to work out its natural and legitimate results."—Municipal Journal. Spokane, Wash., Jan. 11, 1906. Mr. H. R. Cayton. Dear Sir:I have read and reread your splendid article on "The Oriental Boycott" in the Republican of January 5th, and find the more I read it and think over certain paragraphs the better I like it, for it voices my sentiments exactly. Let us thank Mr. Andrew Hemrich for expressing his fear of the results of the boycott, for in doing so it caused you to use your pen with telling effect. The comparison between the two dark races, and the treatment they receive from the Anglo-Saxon in Christian America are well brought out. The spirit of honor to whom honor is due prompts me to personally compliment you on your Oriental Boycott article. In discussing your recent remarks on Governor Vardiman of Mississippi it was said that you would "sass" back a little, anyhow, but be that as it will or may, I know Mr. Cayton will talk. Respectfully, MRS. P. M. VAUGHNER, 1827 Smith St., Spokane. Proposed Charter Amendments tor the City of Seattle RESOLUTION NO. 822. of the city to be graded, regraded, ninety (90) feet respectively from corporation for its water supply or proper amount of such rental or cor Proposed Amendment No. 1. sidewalked. residewalked, planked or said street margin. The fourth sub- distribution, or for the joint or en- pensation, to arbitration in conforr A_ resolution and proposition to amend section 9 of article IV of the city charter and providing for the submission of such proposed amendment to the qualified voters of the city of Seattle at the next general election. Be it resolved by the city council of the city of Seattle as follows: ‘That section 9 of article IV. of the city charter of the city of Seattle be amended so as to read as follows: “Section 9. ‘The council shall meet upon the first and third Mondays of each month, or if iether of those days be a legal holiday, then upon the next day, not a legal holiday, there- after, and all its sessions shall be public, and it shall not adjourn to any other place than its regular place of meeting. The mayor, or in his ab- sence or disability, the president of the council, or any three councilmen, may call a special meeting of the city council.” And be it further resolved, that the foregoing amendment be and the same is hereby submitted to _ the qualified voters of the city of Seat- tle for their ratification or rejection at the next general election to be held the 6th day of March, 1906. Passed the city council the 2nd day of January, 1906, and signed by mé in authentication of its passage this 2nd day of January, 1906, H. Cc. GILL, President of the City Council. Filed by me this 2nd day of Jan- uary, 1906. JNO. RIPLINGER, City Comptroller and ex-Officio City Clerk, First publication January 19th. RESOLUTION NO. 821. ‘eennnash Amendments 10. @ Ee Ae mention C1. amend subdivision 2 of section 11 of article VIII. of the city charter, and providing for the submission of such proposed amendment to the qualified voters of the city of Seat- tle at the next general election, Be it resolved by the city council of the city of Seattle as follows: ‘That subdivision 2 of section 11 of article VIII. of the city charter of the city of Seattle be amended so as to read as follows: “Subdivision 2. The city council shall, by generai ordinance, provide the manner in which the aforesaid improvements may be made, and pre- scribe all needful regulations for the exercise by the city of the power granted and contained in the forego- fhe subdivision of this section; pro- vided, that in all cases in which the whole or any portion of the cost and expense of any such improvement, is to be defrayed by the collection of a special assessment upon the property specially benefitéd thereby, the fol- fowing proceedings shall be taken, viz: ‘There must be presented to the board of public works a written pe- tition setting forth the street or streets, lane or lanes, alley or alleys, Squares or places, or parts thereof to be improved, the nature of the im- provement, the mode of payment and the fact that the signers are the own- ers of the property to be benefited by such improvement to the aggregate amount of a majority of the special assessment to be levied therefor ac- cording to the transfer books in the office of the county auditor. If any such property stands in the name of a deceased person or any person for whom a guardian has been appointed, the signature of the executor, admin- istrator or guardian, as the case may be, shall be equal to the signature of the owner of the property on such pe- tition. If the board of public works finds the facts set forth in said pe~ tition to be true, they shall cause an estimate of the cost and expense of such. improvement to be made and transmit the same, together with all papers and information in their pos- ession touching such improvement, with the estimated cost thereof, and their recommendations thereon, a de- scription of the property which will be specially benefited thereby and a statement of the proportionate amount of the cost and expense of such improvement which shall be borne by such property, to the city council. The city council shall have full authority to consider all matters in relation to such proposed improve- ment, and may authorize the same by ordinance or refuse it in its discre- tion; provided, that unless the peti- tion’ for said improvement shall be signed by three-fourths (%) of the property to be assessed therefor and Specifies a greater percentage than fit- ty per cent., the city council, or board of public works shall not have au- thority to further proceed in the mat- ter of such improvement whenever the cost of any work or improvement ordered, to be done by the city coun- cil and’ chargeable as a lien, under the provisions of this article, against the property specially benefited with- in such assessment district shall ex- ceed fifty per cent. of the total as- sessed valuation of the lots or par- cels of land contained in such assess- ment district as the same appears upon the last annual assessment roll. made for the levying of taxes for municipal purposes, in which case such improvement shall not be grant- ed unless the same be so modified that the cost thereof shall not exceed such fifty per cent, of the aforesaid valuation. Said limit of fifty per cent., however, may be extended when any improvement shall be petitioned for bv the owners of three-fourths (%) of the property to be assessed for said proposed improvement, and when Cee ee av ecined’ Hot tagaexe ceed a certain higher percentage. The action and decision of the city council as to all matters passed upon by it in relation to the rejection or the granting of such petition shall be final and conclusive. ‘The city council may order the whole or any part of the streets, lanes, alleys, Squares or public places of the city to be graded, regraded, sidewalked, residewalked, planked or replanked, payed, repaved, macad- amized, remacadamized, graveled, re- graveled, piled, repiled, capped, re- capped, or may order any bulkhead, retaining wall, viaduct, tunnel, water main or sewer with manholes, catch basins and other proper connections, to be constructed or repaired therein and may provide for defraying the whole or any portion of the cost and expense of any such improvement by the collection of a special assessment upon the property specially benefited thereby in the manner provided in this section without the presentation of any petition either to the board of public works or to the city coun- cil; provided, that unless a petition as hereinbefore prescribed be pre- sented, such improvement shall not be ordered except by ordinance passed by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of all the members of the city coun- cil, at a regular meeting, or at a meeting which is an adjournment of a regular meeting; provided, no street shall be ordered graded without pe- tition, except by a unanimous vote of all members present; and provided that there may be established sewer or drainage districts in conformity to the requirements of the topography of the ground; and constructed in each of said districts a main or trunk sewer. Such district shall include real estate which can be convenient- ly sewered or drained into such main or trunk sewer, either directly or by means of sub-sewers, and which will be benefited thereby, There shall first be levied against the property immediately abutting and contigu- ous to such main or trunk sewer, and which can be conveniently sewered or drained into said main or trunk sewer, such amounts, in accordance with Special benefits as would have been levied against such property in case there had been constructed, in the same place, a branch or sub-sew- er for the service of that immediate neighborhood only, the remaining portion of the cost of said main or trunk sewer shall then be distrtbuted and assessed equitably against all the land included in Said sewer or drainage district in accordance with special benefits and in proportion to the area of the various lots, tracts or parcels of land therein. And be it further resolved, that the foregoing amendment be and the same is hereby submitted to the qual- ified voters of the city of Seattle for their ratification or rejection at the next general election to be held the 6th day of March, 1906. Passed the city council the 2nd day of January, A. D. 1906, and signed by me in open session in’ authentication of its passage this 2nd day of Jan- uary, A. D. 1906, H.C. GILL, President of the City Council. Filed by me this 2nd day of Jan- uary, 1906. JNO. RIPLINGER, City Comptroller and ex-Officio ‘City Clerk. First publication January 19th. RESOLUTION WO. 819. Dermehied Bamana tn. 2. A resolution and proposition to amend subdivision 3 of section 11 of article VIII of the city charter, and providing for the submission of such proposed amendment to the qualified voters of the city of Seat- tle at the next general election. Be is resolved by the city council of the city of Seattle as follows: That subdivision 8 of section 11 of Article VIII, of the city charter of the city of Seattle be amended so as to read as follows: “Subdivision 3. Every ordinance ordering any improvement mentioned in this section shall establish a local improvement district to be called ‘Local Improvement District No. —,’ which district shall embrace, as near as may be, all the property specially benefited by such improvement. Un- less otherwise provided in such ordi- nance, such district shall be deemed to include all the property between the termini of said improvement, abutting upon, adjacent or proximate to the street, lane, alley, avenue, place or square proposed to be im- proved to a distance back from the marginal line thereof to the center line of the blocks facing thereon; provided, that in any case the dis- tance back from the street shall be at least ninety (90) feet; and provid- ed further, that in the case of unplat- ted property, the distance back from the margin of the same, for purposes of assessment, shall be the same dis- tance as that included in the assess- ment of the platted lands immedi- ately adjacent thereto, and all prop- erty included within ‘said limits of such local improvement district shall be considered and held to be the property specially benefited by such local improvement, and shall be the property to be assessed to pay the cost and expense thereof or such pro- portion thereof as may be chargeable against the property specially bene- fited by such improvement, which cost and expense shall be assessed upon all of said property so henefit- ed in proportion to the sevarate and special benefit conferred on. such property by reason of its area and particular location within the dis- trict. Said local improvement dis- trict shall, for the purpose of assess- ing the cost of such improvement, in proportion to the separate and spe- cial benefits conferred, be divided into four subdivisions to be num- bered respectively, Ist, 2nd, 3rd and 4th subdivisions. |The first subdivi- sion shall include all lands lying be- tween the street margin and a line drawn parallel therewith and thirty (30) feet therefrom. The second sub- division shall include all lands lying within lines drawn parallel with and thirty (30) and sixty (60) feet re- spectively from said street margin. The third subdivision shall include all lands lying within lines drawn parallel with and sixty (60) and ninety (90) feet respectively, from said street margin. The fourth sub- division shall include all lands lying between a line drawn parallel wit and ninety (90) feet from said street margin and the outer limit of sald local improvement district, as_here- inabove described. If the areas of each of the four subdivisions are equal, there shall be assessed against the first subdivision 40 per centum of the whole cost, against the second subdivision 25 ‘per centum of the whole cost, against the third subdi- vision 20 per centum of thé whole cost, and against the fourth subdi- Vision 15 per centum of thé whole cost. If the areas are unequal, the rates fixed for each subdivision shall be fixed on the basis that the benefits conferred on a square foot of land in. subdivisions first, second, third and fourth respectively, are related to each other as are the numbers 40, 25, 20 and 15 respectively. ‘rhe city council, at all heatings on. assessment rolls, shall sit as a board of equalization in open council for the purpose of changing, altering or amending said rolls, that all asses- ments shall be made, as near as may be, strictly in accordance with spe- cial benefits, and the subdivision rate of assessment herein prescribed shall in nowise limit or abridge such pow- ers of the city council. All notices of hearing on assessment rolls shall clearly specify that at such hearing the council will proceed to confirm all assessments shown thereon, or lower, raise or otherwise modify or alter ‘the same, as in its discretion may be deemed just. ‘All assessments levied upon lands of the city of Seattle shall be paid by the city of Seattle out of its gen- eral fund. ‘And be it further resolyed, that the foregoing amendment be ‘and the same is hereby submitted to the qual- ified voters of the city of Seattle for their ratification at the next general election to be held the sixth day of March, 1906. ‘Passed the city council the 2nd day of January, A. D. 1906, and signed by me in open’ session in authentica- tion of its passage this 2nd day of January, A. D. 1906. H.C. GILL, President of the City Council. Filed by me this 2nd day of Jan- uary, 1906. JNO. RIPLINGER, City Comptroller and ex-Officio City Clerk. First publication January 19th. RESOLUTION NO. 816. mennnsed Amendment Wo. 4 A resolution and proposition to amend section 1 of Article XVII. of the city charter and providing for the submission of such pro- posed amendment to the qualified voters of the city of Seattle at the next general election. Be it resolved by the city council of the city of Seattle as follows: That section 1 of article XVII. of the city charter of the city of Seat- tle be amended so as to read as fol- lows: “Section 1. The mayor shall re- ceive an annual salary of five thou- sand dollars, payable monthly. The annual salaries of the following offi- cers of the city shall be payable monthly, and shall be as follows: Treasurer, three thousand six hun- dred dollars; city comptroller and ex-officio city clerk, three thousand six hundred dollars; corporation counsel, five thousand dollars; coun- cilmen,’ one thousand five hundred dollars each. A deduction of ten dol- lars for each absence shall be made from the salary of each councilman who shall be absent from any regu- lar meeting of the city council. This section shall apply to all councilmen holding office subsequent to the adop- tion of this amendment, including those holding office by virtue of an election held prior to the adoption of this amendment. All parts of the city charter in conflict with this section or any part thereof, be, and the same are, hereby repealed. And be it further resolved that the foregoing amendment be, and the same is, hereby, Submitted to the qualified’ voters of the city of Seat- tle for the ratification or rejection at the next general municipal elec- Hon to be held Tuesday, March 6, 06. Passed the city council the 2nd day of January, 1906, and signed by me in open session in authentication of its passage this 2nd day of January, PRES. PRO. TEM. J. BE. CRICHTON, Of the City Council. Filed by me this 2nd day of Jan- uary, 1906, JNO. RIPLINGER, City Comptroller and ex-Officio City Clerk. First publication January 19th. RESOLUTION NO. 813. Froposed Amendment Wo. 5. A resolution and proposition to amend subdivision 14 of section 18 of Article IV, of the city charter, and providing for the submission of such proposed amendment to the qualified voters of the city of Seattle at the next general munici- pal election. Be it resolved by the city council of the city of Seattle as follows: That subdivision 14 of section 18 of article IV, of the city charter of the city of Seattle be amended so as to read as follows: “Fourteenth—To provide for erect- ing, purchasing or otherwise acquir- ing, as the sole and exclusive proper- ty of the city, water works, within or without the corporate limits of the city. to supply sald city and its in- habitants with water for any and all purposes, and to fix, alter, regulate and control the use and price of the water so supplied; provided, however, that the city council shall not enter into anv contract or agreement what- ever with any person, company or corporation for its water supply or distribution, or for the joint or en- tire use of ‘the whole or any part of the city water supply or distributing plant, including conduits, mains and reservoirs, without first’ submitting such proposed contract or agreement to a vote of the qualified electors of the city at a general election, or spe- cial election called for that purpose, and unless a majority of said elec- tors voting at said election shall vote therefor; provided further, that noth- ing herein contained shall be so con- strued as to prevent the city from selling to any consumer water for power or other uses, or the power manufactured from water, upon terms open to all consumers; and, provided further, that the city coun- cil may, in its ‘discretion grant, by ordinance, to any institution which is supported in whole or in part by public charities, the free use of city water; and be it further resolved that ‘the foregoing amendment be, and the same is, hereby submitted to the qualified voters of the city of Seattle for their ratification or rejec- tion at the next general municipal election, to be held Tuesday, March 6, 1906. Passed the city council the 3rd day of January, 1906, and signed by me in open session ‘in authetication of its passage this 3rd day of January, 1906. H.C. GILL, President of the City Council. Filed by me this 3rd day of Jan- uary, 1906. JNO. RIPLINGER, City Comptroller and ex-Officio City Clerk. First publication January 19th. RESOLUTION NO. 832. Geanosed Amendment Mo. 6. A resolution and proposition to amend subdivision 37 of section 18 of article IV. of the city charter and providing for the submission of such proposed amendment to the qualified voters of the city of Seattle at the next general election, Be it resolved by the city council of the city of Seattle as follows: That subdivision 37 of section 18 of article IV. of the city charter of the city of Seattle be amended so as to read as follows: “37th. To project or extend or establish streets over and across any tide lands within the corporate limits of the city and along or across the harbor areas of the city. in such manner as will best promote the in- terests of commerce, and to excavate and improve, for use as public slins or wharves, ‘any of said streets, and to use all or any portion of every street extending to or projecting into the water as a public slip or wharf. No street extending to or projecting into tide water shall .be vacated, ex- cept and unless such vacation be made for the purpose of altering the location of any such street, and then only after there shall have first been deeded or dedicated to the city, in exchange therefor, land equally or etter adapted to the uses of the city for street or municipal purposes. ‘And be it further resolved, that the foregoing amendment be ‘and the same is hereby submitted to the qualified voters of the city of Seattle for their ratification or rejection at the next general election to be held March 6th. 1906, Passed the city council the 3rd day of January, 1906, and signed by me in open session in authentication of Its passage this Srd day of January, 1906. H.C. GILL, President of the City Council. Filed by me this 3rd day of Jan- uary, 1906, JNO. RIPLINGER, City Comptroller and ex-Officio City Clerk. First publication January 19th. RESOLUTION NO. 831. Seanosed Amendment Wo. 7. A resolution and _ ovroposition te amend section 20 of article IV. of the city charter, and providing for the submission of such proposed amendment to the qualified voters of the citv of Seattle at the next general election, Be it resolved by the city council of the city of Seattle as follows: That section 20 of article IV. of the city charter of the city of Séat- tle be amended so as to read as fol- lows: “Section 20. No street car, tele- phone, gas, electric or heating fran- chise ‘shall be granted, extended or renewed to any date beyond Decem- ber 31st. 1934, which does not con- tain adecuate’ nrovision authorizing the city to acanire the plant and an- purtenances built thereunder at their reasonable cash value at any time after said date; no value being as- signed to anv franchise right. Every franchise extending beyond said date shall contain definite provisions for ascertaining and determining such value and for submitting anv differ- ences to arbitration, No street car franchise shall be granted, reenwed or extended to or for any ‘period of time alone the routes herein de- scribed, which does not contain a pro- vision that the city of Seattle or any person or persons or street railway company hereafter obtaining a fran- chise from the city of Seattle author- izing the operation of street cars for the purpose of carrying vassencers or freight within the district or alon= the routes hereinafter described shall haye the right to the common use with the erantes, its successors or assigns, for the running of the cars of the city of Seattle or of such other person or persons, company or com- mission »s the case may be. upon paving to the grantee therein, its successors or assigns, such monthly or annual rental or comnensation as may be iust and reasonable, no value being assigned to anv franchise rieht, Fach such franchise shall con- tain definite provisions for submit- ting any difference respecting the proper amount of such rental or com- pensation, to arbitration in conform- ity with the laws of the state of Washington in that regard, or in such manner as shall be prescribed by the city council in the ordinance grant- ing such franchise, The routes hereinabove referred to to_be as follows: Denny way from the west line of Warren avenue to the east line of Second avenue north, and Second ave- nue from Denny way to Pike street; Fourth avenue, Fourth avenue pro- duced and: Fourth avenue south from Denny way to the southerly city lim- its’ Westlake avenue from Pike street to Denny way; _ Pine street from First avenue to Fifth avenue; Prefontaine place from Yesler way to Fourth avenue south, and such other routes as the city council may from time to time designate as canon or strategic routes. Every grant of a franchise, right or privilege shall be subject to the right of the city council at any time thereafter to repeal, change or mod- ify the said grant if the franchise granted thereby is not operated in accordance with the provisions there- of, or at all, and every ordinance making such ‘grant shall contain a reservation of the right of the city council to so repeal, amend or mod- ify said ordinance. When the right, privilege or franchise has been grant- ed, and has been accepted, the city council shall not extend the time for which such right, privilege or fran- chise is granted until within three years of the expiration of the time for which such right, privilege or franchise is granted. ‘And be it further resolved, that the foregoing amendment be and the game is hereby submitted to the qual. ified voters of the city of Seattle for their ratification or rejection at the next general election to be held the sixth day of March, 1906. Passed the city council the 3rd day of January, A. D. 1906, and signed by me in open session in authentication of its passage this 3rd day of Jan- uary, A. D. 1906. H.C. GILL, President of the City Council. Filed by me this 3rd day of Jan- uary, 1906. JNO. RIPLINGER, City Comptroller and ex-Officio City Clerk. First .publication January 19th. Application No, 2923. NOTICE OF SALE OF ESCHEATED LANDS. Notice is hereby given that on the 17th day of February, 1906, at the hour of 10 o'clock in’ the forenoon on said day, at the door of the Court House in King County, Washington, the following described escheated land will be sold at public auction to the highest bidder therefor, to-wit: No, 2923: Lot i, of Block 17, Sec. 17, Twp. 23, Range 5 FP, W. M., appraised at $250.00; improvements’ appraised at $10.00. Lot 2, of Block 17, Sec. 17, Twp. 23, Range 5 BE. W. M., appraised at $200.00; improvements’ appraised at $5.00. Lot 19, of Block 17, Sec. 17, Twp. 23, Range 5 BE. W. M., appraised at $200.00; improvements’ appraised at $5.00. Said escheated land will be sold for not less than the appraised value and subject to the improvements sit- uated thereon, and as appraised by the Board of State Land Commission- ers in the manner provided by law, a statement of which is now on file ‘in the office of the Auditor of said Coun- ty, ‘Terms of sale are: Under contract, one-tenth to be paid on the day of sale, and one-tenth annually there- after on the first day of March of each year. with accrued interest on deferred balance at 6 per cent. per annum: Provided. That any —pur- chaser may make full payment at any time and obtain a deed. The pur- chaser of such land will be required to pay at the time of sale the ap- praised value of any improvements or valuable materials on such land in full, in addition to the one-tenth of the'sale price. The above described escheated lands are offered for sale by virtue of an order of the Board of State Land Commissioners, made on the 11th day of August, 1905, duly certified and on file in office of said County Auditor. J. P. AGNEW, County Auditor, Dated at Seattle, Wash., this 1ith day of January, 1906. Jan. 12-Feb. 9th. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF The State of Washington in and for the County of King. In the matter of the Estate of Mary Ella McCutcheon, an Insane Person. Notice to Show Cause. To Mary Ella McCutcheon, an in- sane person, and to all whom it may concern: You and each of you, are hereby notified that on the 15th dav of March, 1906, at the hour of 9:30 a. m., or'as soon thereafter as the said matter may be heard, there will be brought on before the Honorable Ar- thur B. Griffin, one of the judges of the above entitled Court. in Depart- ment No. 4 in the King Gounty Court Hovse in the Citv of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, the pe- tition of Mary L, Macdonald for the appointment of F. 'T, Fischer as guar- dian of the estate in the State of Washington of Mary Ella McCutch- eon, an insane person, non-resident of the’ said State of ‘Washington, at which time and place all persons !n- terested in said estate are hereby cited and notified to be and appear if they have any objections to the hearing of said petition, Dated at Seattle, Washington, this 19th day of January, 1906, the date of the first publication hereof. IRA BRONSON & D. B. TREFETH, Attorneys for Mary L, Macdonald. Jan. 19, Feb. 23. Main 305 IND. 1306 OFFICE 214 COLUMBIA STREET SEATTLE REPUBLICAN PUBLISHES LEGAL NOTICES FRIDAY, JANUARY 19, 1906. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington in and for King County. William H. Stitt, Plaintiff, vs. May Stitt, Defendant.—No. ..... Summons. The State of Washington to the said May Stitt, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 8th day of December, 1905, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. This is an action to secure a divorce from the defendant on the ground of desertion and abandonment. WILLIAM C. KEITH, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address: Seattle, King County, Washington. 46 Starr-Boyd Bldg. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington, for King County. Ada M. Bailey, Plaintiff, vs. Harry J. Bailey, Defendant.—No. 49465. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Harry J. Bailey, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 8th day of December, 1905, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office and postoffice address below designated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed in the office of the Clerk of said Court. The object of said action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant on the grounds of cruel treatment and habitual drunkenness. MORRIS, SOUTHARD & SHIPLEY, Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys For Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: 55 Haller Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, December 8, 1905. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington, for King County. Gunild Fretland, Plaintiff, vs. Knute Fretland, Defendant.—No. ... Summons. State of Washington to Knute Fretland, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: sixty days after the 22d day of December, 1905, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this action is to secure a decree dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between plaintiff and defendant, and for an absolute divorce, the grounds for securing the same being cruelty and non-support. JAMES T. LAWLER, Attorney for Plaintiff, 611 Lumber Exchange Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington for the County of King. Mari Groshl, plaintiff, vs. Frank Groshl, defendant. No. — Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Frank Groshl, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 22nd day of December, A. D. 1905, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant herein on the grounds of neglect and refusal of defendant to make suitable provisions for his family, and cruel treatment. J. P. BALL, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. and Office Address: 9-10 Starr-Boyd Block, Seattle, County of King, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington for the County of King. In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Annette M. Haslehurst, deceased. No. 5951. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Frederick M. Haslehurst, executor of the last will and testament of Annette M. Haslehurst, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate. It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Annette M. Haslehurst, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said Court in the City of Seattle, on the 1st day of February, 1906, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock, A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be settled and allowed and why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County for a period of four weeks and published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 1st day of February, 1906, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 28th day of December, 1905. A. W. FRATER, Judge. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of Laura Ellis, Deceased. No. ____. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given that John W. Ellis is the executor of the estate of Laura Ellis, deceased, and all persons having claims against said estate are hereby notified to present the same to the undersigned executor, or to his Attorney, Gill, Hoyt & Frye, No. 427 Colman Building, Seattle, Washington, within one year from the date of the first publication of this notice. JOHN W. ELLIS, Executor of the Estate of Laura Ellis, deceased. Date of first publication January 19—Last, Feb. 23. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF King County, Washington. In the matter of the guardianship of Patrick Nolan, an insane person. No 6530. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given that the undersigned has been duly appointed and qualified, by the Superior Court of King County, Washington, as guardian of the estate of John Nolan, an insane person. All persons having claims against said John Nolan will please file the same in the office of H. E. Foster, Attorney for the Guardian, 606 Marion Building, Seattle. NOTICE TO CREDITORS. In the case of the estate of Otto Sommer. Deceased. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned administratrix of the estate of Otto Sommer, deceased, to the creditors of and all persons having claims against the said deceased, to exhibit them within one year after the first publication of this notice, to the said administratrix at 412 Pacific Block, this being the office of Nicholas Schmitt, attorney for said administratrix, the same being the place for transaction of business of said estate, in the City of Seattle, King County. Signed this 10th day of December, 1905. JOHANNA SOMMER. NICHOLAS SCHMITT, Attorney for Administrator. Room 412 Pacific Block. Jan. 13-Feb. 10. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington, for King County. Pearl Lockie, Plaintiff, vs. James Lockie, Defendant.—No. 49832. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said James Lockie, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 13th day of January, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plain- tiff, and serve a copy of your answer ro- upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered be against you according to the demand se of the complaint, which has been filed as with the clerk of said Court. That plaintiff's cause of action against you, as set forth in the com- plain, is for divorce founded on non- support, desertion and cruelty. RONEY & LOVELESS, Attorneys for the Plaintiff. Office and Post-Office Address, Room 606 Oriental Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Jan. 13-Feb. 24. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington in and for the County of King. Isaac Michelovitch, plaintiff, vs. Fannie Michelovitch, defendant. No. — Summons. The State of Washington to the said Fannie Michelovitch, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: sixty (60) days after the 15th day of December A. D. 1905, and defend the above-entitled action in the above-entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the court aforesaid. That the plaintiff's cause of action against you, as set forth in said complaint, is for divorce, founded on desertion, cruelty, and incompatibility of temper. PHILIP TWORGER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 602 Oriental Block, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington for the County of King. Elizabeth M. Belle-Isle, plaintiff. vs. Joseph N. Belle-Isle, defendant. No. — Summits by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Joseph N. Belle-Isle, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 15th day of December, A. D. 1905, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of said action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant herein on the grounds of neglect or refusal of defendant to make suitable provision for his family, and cruel treatment. Attorney for Plaintiff P. O. and office address: 9-10 Starr- Boyd Block, Seattle, County of King, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington, for King County. In the matter of the Estate of Stephen Carkeek, Deceased.—No. 6129. Order to Show Cause Why Real Estate Should Not Be Sold. The petition of William Carkeek, as administrator of the estate of Stephen Carkeek, deceased, for releave to sell certain real property belonging to said estate, described as follows, towit: One-half interest in Lot twenty-eight, Block twenty-nine, Northern Addition, and all of lot twelve, block twenty-nine, Northern Addition, coming on regularly to be heard, this 28th day of December, 1905, and it appearing to the Court that there is no personal estate in the hands of the administrator to pay debts against the estate, taxes, and the expenses of administration, and that it is necessary to sell the whole of the real estate to provide funds for the payment of such debts, and the court being fully advised in the premises. It is ordered that Emily Ashman, Charles W. Carkeek, Mrs. Bessie Carkeek French, Cora Carkeek, Stephen Carkeek, Mrs. Emily Carkeek Maynard, Mrs. Emma Carkeek Hunt, Archie Carkeek, a minor, and W. M. French, as guardian ad litem for Archie Carkeek a minor, and any and all persons interested appear before this court on the eighth day of February, 1906, and show cause why an order should not be made to the administrator to sell the above described real estate in accordance with the petition of said administrator. It is further ordered that this order shall be published for four consecutive weeks in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper of general circulation in King County. Done in open court this 28th day of December, 1905. A. W. FRATER. Judge. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington, King County. In the matter of the estate of Nora Younggren, Deceased.—No. 6188. An order to show cause why order of sale of real estate should not be made. It appearing to this court by the petition this day presented and signed by David G. Younggren, the administrator of the estate of Nora Younggren, deceased, that it is necessary to sell a portion of the real estate of the said decedent to pay the debts of the decedent, it is therefore Ordered, by this court, that all persons interested in the estate of the said decedent, appear before the said Superior Court on the first (1) day of March, 1906, at the hour of 10 o'clock A. M. of said day, at the courtroom of the said court, in the courthouse in the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, to show cause why an order should not be granted to said administrator to sell so much of the said real estate as shall be necessary, and that a copy of this order be published four (4) successive weeks in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said County. Dated January 11th, 1906 Dated January 14 ARTHUR E. GRIFFIN. Judge of said Superior Court. REVELLE, REVELLE & REVELLE, 646 New York Block. Attorneys for the Petitioner. January 12; February 9. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington for King County. May Kinne Byron, Plaintiff, vs. Albert E. Byron, Defendant.—Summons. The State of Washington to said Albert E. Byron, defendant: You are hereby summoned to apear within sixty (60) days from the date of the first publication of this summons, that is to say, within sixty (60) days from the 5th day of January, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated ;and in case of your failure so to judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said complaint, which has been heretofore filed with the Clerk of said court. The object of said action is to obtain an absolute divorce from the bond of matrimony heretofore existing between yourself and the said plaintiff, said divorce being asked upon the grounds of non-support, cruel treatment and personal indignities rendering life burdensome. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 220 Colman Building, Seattle, Wash. The date of the first publication of this summons is January 5, 1906. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Myrtle Masser, plaintiff, vs. Amas W. Masser, defendant. No. ____. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Amas W. Masser, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty (60) days after the 13th day of January, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to procure from you an absolute divorce on account of non-support. JOHN L. NEAGLE, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: Room 306 Bailey Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. NOTICE TO CREDITORS. In the matter of the estate of Robert Young, deceased. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned administrator of the estate of Robert Young, deceased, to the creditors of and all persons having claims against the said deceased to present them, with the necessary vouchers, within one year after the date of this notice to F. M. Jeffery, at room 747, New York Block, in Seattle, King County, State of Washington. Dated this 8th day of December. F. M. JEFFREY. Administrator of the Estate of Robert Young, Deceased. TO ALL WHOM IT MAY CONCERN and particularly to the stockholders of the Coast Carton Company: Notice is hereby given and extended to any and all persons in any and all ways concerned with the Coast Carton Company, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Washington, with its principal place of business in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, that a meeting of the stockholders would be held at the office and principal place of business of said corporation, No. 614 Colman Building, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 26th day of January, 1906, at the hour of 10 a. m., the object and purpose of which meeting is to increase the capital stock of said corporation from $20,000.00, which is the present capital stock, to the sum of $30,000.00 of the par value of $100.00 per share, to be fully paid and non-assessable preferred stock bearing 8 per cent cumulative dividends, which stock shall be retirable at the election of said corporation at which time and place a vote of the stockholders of said corporation will be held for the purpose of determining whether or not the capital stock of said company in the amount and manner and form aforesaid shall be so increased to the amount of $30,-000.00. And furthermore, that any and all persons interested in such proceedings are now and hereby notified and requested to be present at said meeting to present any objection which they may have thereto or to present cause, if any they have, why said capital stock shall not be increased to such an amount in the manner and at the time as aforesaid. Dated at Seattle, King County, Washington, this 1st day of December, 1905. NOTICE TO CRERITORS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington for King County. In the matter of the estate of Hans Askar Hoglund, deceased.—No. 6699. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned, Andrew Chilberg, adminis- trator of the estate of Hans Askar Hoglund, deceased, to the creditors of and all persons having claims against the said deceased, or against said estate to present them, with the necessary vouchers, within one year after the first publication of this notice to the said administrator at 16-17 Dexter Horton & Co. Bank Bldg., Seattle, Washington, this being the office of Israel Nelson, attorney for said administrator, and the same being the place for transaction of the business of said estate. Dated this 18th day of January, 1906. ANDREW CHILBERG, ISRAEL NELSON, Attorney for Administrator. Jan. 19—Feb. 16. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Ella La Pointe, deceased.—No. 6675. Order to Show Cause. On this 19th day of January, 1906, Peter La Pointe, administrator of the above entitled estate, having filed herein his petition, duly verified, alleging that said Peter La Pointe and Ella La Pointe, his wide, did on the 16th day of March, 1905, contract in writing to sell lot ten (10), block four (4), Madison Heights Addition to the City of Seattle, to P. P. Juul and Anna M. Juul, his wife, and that said P. P. Juul and Anna M. Juul, his wife, are now willing to pay the balance of the purchase price on said contract; and praying that a decree be made by this Court authorizing and directing said Peter La Pointe, as administrator of the above entitled estate, to execute and deliver to said P. P. Juul and Anna M. Juul, his wife, a good and sufficient deed of the right, title and interest of said Ella La Pointe, deceased, in said premises in pursuance to said contract. It is therefore ordered by this Court that all persons interested in the estate of Ella La Pointe, deceased, be and appear before the above entitled Court at the Court Room of the Probate Department of said Court in the County Court House of King County, in the City of Seattle, Wednesday, the 21st day of February, 1906, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any there be, why the said petition should not be granted. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published for four successive weeks in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper published in King County, State of Washington, and in general circulation in said county and state. Done in open court this 19th day of January, 1906. ARTHUR E. GRIFFIN, Judge. Jan. 19Feb. 16. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington in and for the County of King. In the matter of the estate of William Joseph Bryant, Deceased.—Notice to Creditors. To All Whom It May Concern: Notice is hereby given and extended to the creditors of William Joseph Bryant, deceased, and to all persons having claims against said deceased, or against his estate, that they are required to present said claims, with the necessary vouchers, within one year after the date of this notice to the undersigned executrix of the estate of said William Joseph Bryant, deceased, at the office of said executrix, 408 Queen Anne Avenue, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of business for said estate. Dated at Seattle, King County, Washington, this 15th day of September, 1905, the day of the first publication hereof. FANNIE ELLA BRYANT. Executrix of the Estate of William Joseph Bryant. BREWERY