Seattle Republican

August 24, 1906 BISHOP GRANT LECTURE In discussing the subject of "Some of the Problems that Confront the American People," to a house full and overflowing at Lee's Chapel last Monday evening Bishop A. Grant held his audience spell bound for an hour and a half, though he was frequently roundly aplauded. By request he spoke briefly of the trouble in South Africa. He freely admitted that it was due to the American Negro, who was there as a missionary of the African Methodist Episcopal Church. Those missionaries had not only taught the natives religion, but they had taught them American independence and unity among themselves and as a result, the tribes were no longer warring among themselves, but were demanding justice from the European for the native black man. A church of the same name as their county was pleasing to their ears and the converted natives were leaving the other denominations and joining the African Methodist, which does not meet the approval of the other denominations. The first great problem that is confronting the United States is the foreign emigration question. With millions of foreigners flocking to our country each year it wont be long before our citizenship will be foreign born or of parentage foreign born, the black man being the exception. Should this great army of foreigners ever get uncontrolable this government would have to draw largely on the Negro men to protect her. The trust problem was another that was giving the people much concern and it required a level headed president like our own and only Theodore Roosevelt to hold the trusts in check. Roosevelt was not only not afraid to do so, but was doing it. The educational problem was also a difficult one to be handled and notwithstanding the fact this country was carying on a great educational work, yet there was still room for improvement. He favored the passage of a National Educational Bill such as was recommended by the late lamented McKinley. Along this line he felt as if the government would not go amiss if it established industrial schools fashioned after Tuskegee for the Negro children in all of the Southern tates. The drink problem was not only a difficult one, but likewise a dangerous one. It is the prime cause of pretty nearly all the crime committed in this country, which is no small amount as statistics declare that out of twenty-seven civilized countries the United States has by far the greatest number of criminals. He declared that over six million dollars were spent annually in this country for drink while but a little over a million dollars were spent annually for educational work. Finally, some of our white friends tell us there is a Negro problem in this country for solution. I deny the allegation. There is no Negro problem. The Negro is peaceful, law abiding and hardworking and the so called Negro problem that our white friends tell us about and over which they are so much exercised, is not so much how to make the Negro a better citizen, as to how to keep him from becoming a citizen at all. If the statesmen and newspapers of this country would for fifty years never call the word Negro and forget all about him—leave him severely alone—at the end of that time even the white man himself would forget the Negro's color and treat him as he does any other class of people. He is accumulating property despite the Tillmans, Vandemans, Jeff Devises and Tom Dixons. Right in Vandeman's own state the Negroes own and operate ten substantial banks besides owning a vast amount of farms and homes. The Bishop concluding advised the Negro to endeavor to get homes in the country where they could live independent of any one. We are flocking to the cities and towns without a justifiable excuse. On this point those of the Negroes of this city who took exceptions to Senator Wilson's advice to the Negro to work, work, work, must have either been convinced that their exceptions were not well founded or that Bishop Grant too was giving them the wrong idea of how to succeed. Education is the hope of the human race; that education that is thorough, that uplifts heart and head, that strengthens character as it broadens the mind.—Reformer. Ignorance is responsible for many things. For some time it has been responsible for a very reprehensible state of affairs in social functions among the Negroes of Omaha. The unfortunate fact is that the custom against which we shall speak in emphatic terms is chiefly in vogue among those who ought to know better—certainly among those who make great pretentions at knowing what is the proper conduct in polite society. Their actions in this regard at least clearly prove that they are wofully ignorant of the fundamental principals of right behavior in polite society.—Enterprise. The National Negro Business League stands for the elevation of the Negro people in business and commercial directions, but recognizes fully the necessity for work also in other directions; such work, for instance, as is being done by the Afro-American Council and numerous religious and secular organizations. During the brief period of its existence, the League has given the race new hope and new light and added faith. It has stimulated the entire race in business directions. Largely through its influence nearly 200 local Negro business leagues have been organized, businesses of nearly every character, such as merchandising, banking, realestate dealing, manufacturing, contracting, and others have been started. Twenty-two banks are now being operated by the race, eight of these in Mississippi alone. No less than fourteen of these banks have been started since the League was organized. Two theatres have also recently been built.—Tuskegee Student. A case has been decided in the law court at Charlotte, New York State, that has created intense interest in the Masonic circles among the Colored Masons in several of the States last week, and the Colored Grand Lodge of New York which was the first started some years ago by the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts, met an overwhelming defeat and was routed at every point. The Grand Lodge of the State of New York commenced a law suit at Charlotte, N. Y., against J. B. Thornton and several other Masons representing the Hiram Grand Lodge of Ancient Free and Accepted Masons of the State of Pennsylvania to prevent them from organizing lodges in the State of New York under the authority of the Hiram Grand Lodge of the State of Pennsylvania. The case came up before Judge Laverty and was bitterly contested, and after an argument of a whole day by counsel representing both sides Judge Laverty rendered his decision that after investigating the matter thoroughly that Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts that was organized many years ago was an illegal and irregular Grand Body and that, the Grand Lodge in the State of New York having had lodges established in New York State that organized lodges from the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts that established the Grand Lodge of New York that it was an unlawful Grand Lodge, and that the Hiram Grand Lodge of Colored Masons of the State of Pennsylvania was a lawful and regular Page 3 Grand Body. The Hiram Grand Lodge of the State of Pennsylvania was organized formerly of chartered lodges from the Grand Lodges of the District of Columbia. The Grand Lodge of the District of Columbia was several years ago set right, and made regular by the White German Grand Lodge of Masons.—Broadax. “What is the meaning of 'alter ego'?” asked the teacher of the beginners' class in Latin. "The other I" said the boy with the curly hair. "Give a sentence containing the phrase." "He winked his other I."—Chicago Tribune. ——————— Page 4 POLITICAL POT-PIE. You of the Thirty-seventh senatorial district who favor the direct primary law, certainly do not expect to have an advocate in the senate of that measure, if you nominate and elect Robert F. Booth. That he will vote against the measure is a foregone conclusion, Booth, as both he him- self and Senator Piles have publicly admitted, is a political protege of Senator Piles. Well does not Senator Piles favor a direct primary law in this state? you ask. Not in a thousand years and his friends and proteges in the next legislature will work and vote against it from start to finish, and more than that, will defeat it, because he can not “deliver” to Ankeny with a direct primary law in effect. Senator Piles is tied up to the re-election of Senator Ankeny, who will not only fight the measure in the next legislature, but has already taken a firm stand against the proposed law, and the Union, his per- sonal organ, is fighting every one seeking office, who in any sense favors the direct. primary law. Robert F. Booth is pledged to not only vote for the re-election of Senator Levi Ankeny, but has pledged himself to vote in the senate on all public questions as Senators Piles and Ankeny think for their best political interest. It certainly will not be to the best political interest of Senator Levi Ankeny to have a direct primary law passed, which provides for the election of a United States senator by the direct vote of the people instead of by legislative jugglery, for, if it were, he would have no show of succeeding himself, and, if Booth is pledged to Senator Ankeny how can he support a wholesome direct primary law. To wait to defeat Booth after he has been nominated will be throwing away a golden opportunity and running a big risk of getting one more enemy in the senate to oppose the proposed direct primary law. Do it now. It hardly seems possible that the anti-whiskey voters of the district will sit idly by anl permit a man to be nominatel and elected to the senate, who is to be the mouthpiece from this county of the Liquor Dealers Association, and yet Robert F. Booth has been selected by them as the can- didate for their united support. It will be re- membered that the Liquor Dealers Association controlled the senate of the eighth legislature and prevented the passage of any measure that would prove detrimental to their business. Yea, they were even able to repeal laws that had been passed by a previous legislature. If you nomin- ate and elect Robert F. Booth he will be always found voting with that bunch. If you nominate Robert F. Booth you will be en- dorsing a man who seemingly is and has been doing everything in his official legal power to obstruct the early settlement of the John Sulli- van estate, now worth a million dollars, because it looks as if Senator Piles would lose his inter- est therein, the title to which, it is now generally believed, he acquired from persons not heirs of the late John Sullivan, If Booth had not butted in on this case the estate long ere this would have been escheated to King county, but Booth had to do something for Senator Piles to repay him for his endorsement, and he therefore blocked the settlement of the Sullivan estate, which means a half a million to Piles if he succeeds. Has Robert F, Booth an ulterior motive for seeking this senatorial nomination, you ask. You bet you. He has already got a pledge from Senators Piles and Ankeny to support him for attorney general to succeed John D. Atkinson, and in that position he would be able to do even better by Senator Piles in the Sullivan estate settlement than he can now do. He is at present deputy attorney general and drawing a salary of $1800 per year, and it is claimed on very good authority that he got that appointment by holding up the appro- priation for Mr. Atkinson’s office until he forced Mr. Atkinson to promise in writing that he, , BOBBY BOOTH FOR SENATOR. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Candidate for the nomination as representative } from the 47th Legislative District. This district ; comprises all of the Third and Seventh wards, 3 excepting the First and Fourth precincts of the ie Seventh ward. Mr. Sweeney’s platform is an honest representation of the people and the direct in Sen F er eae a ee am a am ot HOMER SWEENEY. primary. He has served two years on the Re- publican County entral Committee with honor to himself and credit to the people of this district who elected him to this position. He is a man of sterling qualities and a business man of high integrity. He has the confidence of all classes of people who have come in contact with him, either in business or politics, since coming to this city five years ago. If nominated and elected from this district, he will make a strong representative for the people and will be a credit to King county. He has kept clear from all factional fights and has done much in the last two years to bring harmony in the Republican ranks of the Seventh ward and will continue to do so if given the opportunity, Booth, would be appointed a deputy under him for four years. Can such a man as that be trust- ed? How much better is a man that will do a thing like that than a man who will sell his vote to a private corporation for so many dollars and cents? When Booth shall have been nominated, if ever, all of these things will be talked over by the opposition press and public speakers; and if he is elected in the face of them then the Roose- yelt spirit of reform has not taken a very strong hold on the voters of that district. The Seattle Republican is calling the attention of the Re- publican voters of the district to what they may expect if Booth is nominated and they should profit thereby. THAT RIVAL STREET CAR SYSTEM. ‘When one votes for a change of either men or affairs, so far as the general public is concerned and interested, he does so with the view of getting relief from what he thinks is either an anoyance or a burden. If this be granted then in what way can the tax*payers and voters get any relief in this city from the street car burden py voting bonds for a competitive street railway system? It certainly would be a relieve if the city owned and operated the only street car system in the city, but for the city to paralell the present system’s lines no relief could come to the citizens for a half century and by that time both systems might be compeltely bankrupt. If the city’s system, however, was not bankrupt 1 would be because either a bond election would be held from time to time to replinish its ex- hausted money vaults or a tax would be levied each year on the taxpayers to pay the operating deficite. With the taxpayers thus pouring funds into the city’s street car system it would soon become so burdensome to them that a complete right-about-face would eventually be the result. August 24, 1906 Lets see if even Seattle with all of her pros- perity can afford to build a rival street car system. Before the system could or would become a source of revenue to the tax’ payers seven million dollars would have to be expended on it, to say nothing of the interest on that vast sum for it would have to be borrowed. Now it is déclared by the ad- vocates of this-rival system that it is not to be built with the view of it becoming a money maker, but to give the people cheaper fares and so pretty soon the fares would be reduced and then the income would be no more than enough to pay the interest.on the bonds and the operating expenses, thus leaving the wear and tear to eat up the system and in the end throw back on to the taxpayers a seven million dollar debt as a legacy, which they would have to pay without having anything to show for it. If therefore the voters undertake and verily do build a rival street car system in Seattle they will transmit to their children’s children a bonded debt legacy that will cause them to repent of ever having inherited property interests in the city of Seattle. The bonded indebtedness of Seattle at present is in round numbers six million dollars (see comp- troller’s May report); then if you vote the seven million dollars for the rival street car system; yote the four million dollars for the water system and for the much needed improvements, that will bring the bonded indebtedness of the city up to the seventeen million dollar mark. Then add to this enormous sum another four mililon dollar in- debtedness for school district No. 1, which is the city of Seattle and which she now owes and fifty per cent of the county taxation, which Seattle pays would also be added and it will be readily seen that Seattle will have an indebtedness hang- ing over her head that will make twenty-five million dollars look like thirty cents with a hole in it. Seattle may be growing pretty fast, but we fear not fast enough to ever overtake an indebt- ednes so large as this. Paying a three cent fare to ride in the city and paying a five or six mill tax levy in order to get the three cent fare looks like a rather poor piece of financiering and it does not seem that men of intelligence would undertake it. The voter who pays no taxes at all may be inclined to vote to pile an indebtedness on the taxpayers until they are completely crushed under the load, but that would give them no concern, if a penny could be saved on a street car fare, for when times got dull here they would move on. On the other hand, every home owner would feel the burden, every business man would stagger under the load until the city’s great prosperity which she now enjoys would take the winds of the morning and finan- cial disaster would be her portion. To build and maintain this rival street car system in Seattle for the sake of some time in the future getting a four or three cent fare reminds us very much of the Massachusetts farmer that Ben Butler told about. The farmer was not wholly satisfied with the income of his farm so he added hog raising to his stock of resources, As an experiment along this line he bought him a hog, paying six dollars for it, he kept it a year and fed it six dollars worth of corn and at the end of the year sold it for ten dollars. A friend to whom he was relating the outcome of his new industry wanted to know where was his profit in the investment. Oh, he quickly replied, “I owned the hog.” Own- ing the hog may be a great deal of self satisfac- tion, but to a cold blood matter of fact business man it was a losing investment. It looks to us as if the proposed rival street car system would prove an investment similar to the farm- er’s hog. Yoy would do well to think, the matter over before you vote for a rival street car system hog. In every presidential election from 1876 to 1896, with the exception of that of 1892, a change of 20, 000 or less votes from one party ticket to the other might have elected the defeated candidate. The case of the disputed election of Hayes, when the electcral commission decided every point by a vote of 8 for Hayes to 7 for Tilden, is very simple. August, 24 1906 The electoral vote was finally fixed at 185 for Hayes to 184 for Tilden. Aside from the disputed states of south Carolina, Florida and Louisiana, whose electoral votes have given Tilden Nevada's three votes, a change of 1,403 votes would have given him California's six electoral votes, or a change of 3759 votes would have given him Ohio's 22 electors. The electoral vote in 1880 stood 214 for Garfield to 155 for Hancock. Hancock lost his election by Tammany's failure to lend him cordial support. Garfield's majority over Hancock in New York state was only 21,033, so that a change of 10,517 votes would have placed the electoral vote of New York to the Democratic candidate's credit and elected him. Disregarding New York, which was a pivotal state, the combined majorities for Garfield in Connecticut, Indiana, Maine and Oregon, of which states the electoral votes totalled 31, amounted only to 18.837. A change of 1,329 votes in Connecticut, of 3,322 in Indiana, of 4,435 in Maine and 336 votes in Oregon, or of 9,422 votes in the four states, would have elected Hancock. In 1884, when Cleveland received 219 electoral votes to Blaine's 182, New York was again the pivotal state. It went for Cleveland by the narrow majority over Blaine of 1,149. By turning 575 votes to Blaine the Republicans would have defeated Cleveland. Connecticut gave Cleveland only 1,276 votes more than Blaine, New Jersey 4,358, and West Virginia 4,221. Their electoral votes counted 19 in all, enough to defeat Cleveland if 4,923 votes had been changed in these three states. Again Indiana gave Cleveland a majority of 6,527 over Blaine and 15 electoral votes. If 3,264 votes had been changed their and 639 in Connachticut, or 3,903 votes in the two states, Blaine would have been elected. In 1888 New York remained the pivotal state. The electoral vote stood 233 for Harrison to 162 for Cleveland. If one more than half of Harrison's majority of 13,002 over Cleveland in New York, or 6,502 votes, had been changed to Cleveland, Harrison would have been beaten for the presidency. Illinois gave Harrison 22 electoral votes and Indiana 15. A change of 11,093 votes in the first and 1,175 in the second, or 12,286 votes, would have defeated him. On the same theory Cleveland would have been easily beaten in 1892 when the electoral vote showed the wide difference of 277 for the Democratic candidate and 145 for the Republican. California gave Cleveland only 44 majority over Harrison, Indiana 7,125, Illinois 26,993, New Jersey 15,094 and Wisconsin 6,544. A change of 27,899 votes in these five states would have elected Harrison. Mc Kinley had a lead of 95 electoral votes over Bryan in 1896. Yet a change of 1,394 votes from the Republican to the Democratic column in California, of 9,092 in Indiana, of 1,059 in Oregon, of 142 in Kentucky, of 1,916 in Delaware, and of 5,744 in West Virginia, or 19,274 in the six states, would have given Bryan 48 more electoral votes than he received and would have seated him in the White House. Elections in theory are often closer than in fact. Sir Henry Hawkins was once presiding over a long, tedious, and unrinteresting trial, and was listening apparently with great attention to a long winded speech from a learned counsel. After a while he made a pencil memorandum, folded it, and sent it by the usher to the queen's counsel in question, who, unfolding the paper, found these words: "Patience competition. Gold medal. Sir Henry Hawkins. Honorable mention. Job."—Argument. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN There was so much "hot air" at the banquet last Wednesday evening that the food the fellows ate soured before they got away. FOR SHERIFF. My office and my official record are an open book and on them I rest my case for a renomination and election. I am a candidate to succeed myself as sheriff of King county, subject to the pleasure of the next Republican county convention. LOU C. SMITH. FOR COUNTY CLERK. Believing that I have the approval of every man, woman and child that have done business with the county clerk's office the past eighteen months, as having done my duty and my whole duty without fear or favor, I hereby announce my candidacy for the nomination of county clerk, subject to the endorsement of the next Republican county convention. If nominated and elected my second term shall be like unto my first. SAUSE OTLO selves. FOR COUNTY TREASURER. Believing that the voters and taxpayers want even the men elected to office to give value received for the salaries they draw, and further believing that, the taxpayers and voters expect every employee in a county office to do his or her duty, and whole duty, the same as if they were working for a private person, concern or corporation, I have since assuming the duties of treasurer endeavored so to do. I hereby announce myself as a candidate for renomination, subject to the endorsement of the next Republican county convention. MATT. H. GORMLEY. FOR COUNTY CORONER. I hereby announce my candidacy for county coroner, subject to the will of the next Republican county convention. If renominated and elected I shall endeavor to act during my second term in the way of conducting the affairs of the office as I did during the time of my first term. F. M. CARROLL, M. D. FOR SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS. I am a candidate for superintendent of public schools of King county, to succeed myself, and rely on my work in that capacity for the past eighteen months as my chief recommendation for the renomination and election which I seek. My candidacy for the nomination is subject to the endorsement of the next Republican county convention. FOR COUNTY AUDITOR. In announcing my candidacy to succeed myself as county auditor, I do so, believing that my office has given general satisfaction to the public. No partisan, however, is greater than his party, and however pleased the public might be, the party workers might have reason to think otherwise, hence my candidacy for the nomination of county auditor is subject to the endorsement of the next Republican county convention. JAMES P. AGNEW. FOR PROSECUTING ATTORNEY. On the record that my administration of the office of prosecuting attorney has made for the past eighteen months, I again seek the nomination for prosecuting attorney of King county at the hands of the next Republican county convention. If nominated and elected, I hereby pledge to give to the voters and taxpayers just as economical administration in the affairs of the office for the ensuing two years as I will have in the past two years. KENNETH MACKINTOSH. FOR COUNTY ASSESSOR. I hereby announce myself as a candidate for the nomination for King county subject to the endorsement of the Republican county convention. If nominated and elected I pledge to give the county an economical administration of the affairs of the office without fear or favor. GEORGE V. GAU. JOB PRINTING AT THIS OFFICE. JOB PREVIEW Page 5 EOR COUNTY ASSESSOR STEVE G. MEEK. Subject to the ratification and endorsement of the next Republican County Convention. FOR COUNTY ASSESSOR H. A. GOODFELLOW. Subject to the action of the Republican County Convention. FOR COUNTY ASSESSOR. At the request of a large number of taxpayers and business men of the county, I hereby announce my candidacy for the office of county assessor to succeed John W. Peter, for whom I acted as chief deputy during the four years he will have been assessor, subject to the ratification of the next Republican county convention. If nominated and elected I will, as in the past, give value received. CHESTER EATON FOR COUNTY COMMISSIONER. After consulting with a very large percentage of the voters in the Third Commissioners' District I have decided to seek the nomination for county commissioner from the Third District, subject to the ratification of the next Republican county convention. If nominated and elected I will endeavor to carefully look into every contract let by the commissioners and use due diligence in protecting the taxpayers from being imposed upon in the letting of contracts. My vote shall always be cast for a judicious expenditure of all county funds. Call for Republican State Convention. A Republican state convention is hereby called, to be held at Seattle, Wash., on Wednesday, September 19, 1906, at the hour of 10 o'clock a.m., for the purpose of nominating three candidates for representative in congress and four candidates for supreme court judges, promulgating a party platform, selecting a state central committee, and for the transaction of such other business as may properly come before said convention. The basis of representation in said convention shall be four delegates at large for each county and one delegate for each 200 votes or major fraction thereof, cast for Hon. Samuel G. Cosgrove for presidential elector at the general election held in November, 1904, as follows: County. Vote. Delegates. Adams 1,138 10 Asotin 747 8 Benton (new) 7 Chehalis 2,589 17 Chelan 1,243 10 Clallam 903 9 Clarke 2,436 16 Columbia 1,089 9 Cowlitz 1,589 12 Douglas 1,722 13 Ferry 511 7 Franklin 572 7 Garfield 777 8 Island 424 6 Jefferson 962 9 King 20,434 106 Kitsap 1,736 13 Kittitas 1,787 13 Klickitat 1,370 11 Lewis 3,098 19 Lincoln 2,472 16 Mason 661 7 Okanogan 1,192 10 Pacific 1,354 11 Pierce 9,773 53 San Juan 554 7 Skagit 3,051 19 Skamania 297 5 Snohomish 6,025 34 Spokane 10,258 55 Stevens 2,369 16 Thurston 2,121 15 Wahkiakum 473 6 Walla Walla 2,924 18 Whatcom 5,410 31 Whitman 4,090 24 Yakima 3,484 21 It is recommended that alternates be elected by the respective county conventions, and that no proxies be allowed in the state convention except such as are held by regularly elected delegates or alternates. It is recommended that county conventions be held not later than Saturday, September 15, and that certified lists of delegates and alternates to the state convention and to joint or district conventions be promptly forwarded to the secretary of the state central committee by the secretaries of the respective county conventions. It is recommended that joint or district conventions be held at Seattle on the same date as the state convention. By order of the Republican state central committee. E. B. PALMER, Chairman. Attest: J. W. LYSON, Secretary. Seattle, Washington, May 23, 1906. August 24, 1906 PERSONAL. The trolley party given in honor of Bishop Grant on Monday afternoon was well attended and every one en- joyed themselves to the highegt. On Friday evening, Aug. 17, a num- ber of the young ladies gave a danc- ing party at the Afro-American hall on 27th avenue and Madison street. The evening was pleasantly spent in games and dancing. Miss Helen Stafford of Spokane ar- rived in the city Thursday, Aug.. 23, and is the guest of Miss Alma Clark. Mrs. Johm R. Davis of Portland, for- merly of Tacoma, was in the city a few days this week. Rev. and Mrs. Donohoo left for Ta- coma Wednesday morning, Aug. 22, to be present at the annual conference. Mrs. J. G. Gayles, accompanied by her neice, Miss Wylie Lee, left for Ta- coma Saturday, Aug. 25, where they will spend several days, also attend- ing conference. “Deadwood Dick,” the play at the Third Avenue Theatre this week, scored, apparently, the greatest suc- cess of any play of the season last Sunday, The theatre was crowded at both performances, and hundreds were turned away. “Deadwood Dick” is a play of the plans,—that is, a large section of the prairie country lying from the 42nd meridian south. The play deals with realistic life in the Black Hills, thirty years ago. “Dead- wood Dick” is the hero, and Laurette Taylor, as “Kit Carson, Jr.,” his sweetheart, is one of the most fetch- ing plains women ever seen in a like character. There are about a thous- and good laughs in the play, and al- most any one can enjoy it. Next week will be the last week of the Taylor Company at the Third Ave- nue Theatre for the present. The play will be “The Female Detectives,” a living mirror of New York life, with all the pitfalls in both high and low life. There is more comedy in the play than sensationalism. Two young policemen, brothers, disguised as Irish women, run to earth the cleverest pand of criminals that New York has ever been cursed with, and strange, the story is taken from actual life and many of the characters are living today. The Third Avenue Theatre will be dark for two weeks after Russell & Drew open the Seattle Theatre, on September 2nd, with a New York com- pany, “On the Bridge at Midnight.” The Taylor Company appears at the Seattle Theatre, week of September 9th, in “Stolen by Gypsies,” with Mr. Edwin Fox, one of last season’s favor- ite actors in the cast. Go to a respectable place to borrow money on diamonds, jewelry and watch- es. Low rates. Private offices and all business strictly confidential. Ameri- can Watch and Jewelry Co., 908 First Avenue, opp. Rainier Gsand Hotel. INtii SurmRion COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, W. A. Glover, Plaintiff, vs. Myrtie M. Glover, Defendant. No. ——— | Summons. The State of Washington to the said Myrtie M. Glover, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 24th day of August, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your an- swer upan the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; 1 \ THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN and in case of your failure so to do and in case of your judgment will be rendered against you judgment will be rer according to the demand of the com-j according to the den plaint which has been filed with the) plaint, which has be Clerk of the said Court, The object of | clerk of said court. such action to obtain a divorce from| above entitled action you on the ground of abandonment for|vorce from the detend more than one year before the com-|0f desertion. mencement of this action and for cruel WILL treatment and personal indignities ren- Pla. dering life burdensome and other causes ||, P. O. Address, Roon rendering it impossible for parties to | Building, Seattle, Kir longer live together. IN THE SUPERIOR ‘ W._T. SCOTT, State of Washingtor Plaintiff's Attorney. ‘Annie Duncan, pla Postoffice address: Seattle, King| Duncan, defendant, } County, Washington, 404 Marion Bldg.| ‘The State of Wasl Aug. 24—Oct. 5. Duncan, defendant: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. William F. Chase, Plaintiff, vs. Minnie Chase, Defendant, No, 62238, Sum- mons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Minnie Chase, defendant You are here- by summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publica- tion of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 3rd day of August, A. D. 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action is to dis- solve the bonds of matrimony. existing between the plaintiff and defendant herein on the ground of abandonment for more than one year. J. P, BALL, Attorney for Plaintiff. P.O. and Office Address: 9-10 Starr- Boyd Bldg., Seattle, County of King, Washington, IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. William L, Chellis, plaintiff, vs. Laura Chellis, defendant. ' No. 52228.° Sum- mons by Publication. The State of Washington to Laura Chellis, defendant: In the name of the State of Washing- ton you are hereby summoned to ap- pear within sixty (60) days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 3rd day of August, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for plaintiff at his of- fices below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be ren- dered against you according to the de- mand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. ‘The object of said action set forth in the complaint is as follows: To secure in favor of plaintiff and from defendant, an absolute and unconditional divorce for- ever dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds of cruelty and_per- sonal indignities rendering the life of plaintiff burdensome, caused by the acts of the defendant, to’ such an extent that it is impossible ‘for the parties to this action to live together any longer, as will at large appear from the complaint. FRANK B. WIESTLING, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O, Address: 421-423 Boston Block. Seattle, King County. Washington. REPUBLICAN LEGAL IN| THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE Beats of Washington, for the County of ng, H. M. Gould, Plaintiff, vs. the Unknown Heirs of John L. Lewis, deceased, De- fendants. No. 52,490. The State of Washington to the said “The Unknown Heirs of John L. Lewis, deceased”: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit, within sixty days after the 24th day of August, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to procure a partition of land described as Lot Nine, in Block Fifteen, in Madison Street Addition to the City of Seattle, in said County and State, in which it is alleged in the complaint in said action that you have an undivided half interest. JUDD & SAMPSON, Plaintiff's Attorneys. P. O. Address: 432 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. Date of first publication Aug. 24, 1906. IN_|THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, State of Washington. Herman fF. Richter, plaintiff, vs. Barbara Julia Richter, defendant.—No. «+++... Summons for Service by Pub- lication, The State of Washington to the said Barbara Julia Richter, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 6th day of July, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘the object of the above entitled action is to obtain a di- vorce from the defendant on the ground of desertion. WILLIAM C. KEITH, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address, Rooms 46-7 Starr-Boyd Building, Seattle, King County, Wash- IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Annie Duncan, plaintiff, vs, Robert Duncan, defendant. No. —— Summons. ‘The State of Washington to Robert Duncan, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 10th day of August, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned, attor- ney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment’ will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this action is to ob- tain a decree of divorce by plaintiff from defendant, to award to plaintiff the care, custody and control of the minor children of plaintiff and defend- ant, and to set over and decree to plain- tiff'as and for her separate property all the right, title and interest of defend- ant in and to the following described property: Lots twenty-one (21) and twenty-two (22) in M. D, Ballard’s Supplemental Plat of Lake’ Union Addition to the City of Seattle, and the household fur- niture of the parties hereto. JAMES McNENY, Plaintiff's Attorney. Office and _postoffice address, 514 Mar- ion Block, Seattle, Wash. NULIVCE SRE ES BAe VE SNe ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King—ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an order of sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 2nd day of August, 1906, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of Simon Kreielsheimer, Jacob Kreielsheimer and Max Kreielsheimer, co-partners doing business as Kreiel- sheimer Bros. plaintiffs, versus Chris- tian Favri and Bernhardina Favri, his wife, and Claussen Brewing Associa- tion, a corporation, defendants, No. 51142, and to me, ‘as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock A. M, on the 8th day of September, A. D. 1906, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washing- ton, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendants, or any of them, in and to the following described prop- erty, situated in King County, State of ‘Washington, to-wit: Lot seven (7), block one hundred thirty-four (134), Seattle Tide Lands, King County, Wash- ington, and all of the right, title and interest of the defendants, or any of them, in and to that certain lease of said lot executed to the defendant, Christian Favri, by one Thomas H. Me- Gough on the 2nd day of October, 1906, and also that certain story frame struc- ture known as the Great Northern Hotel. situated upon said lot, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure of mortgage, amounting to the sum of four thous- and four hundred forty-eight and 76-100 ($4,448.76) dollars, and costs of suit in favor of plaintiff; also a judg- ment in favor of the Claussen Brewing Association, a corporation, defendant, against the defendants, Christian Favri and Bernhardina Favri, his wife, as follows, to-wit: the sum’ of four thous- and five hundred twenty-one and 82-100 ($4,521.82) dollars, together with in- terest thereon from July 30th, 1906, and costs of suit. Dated this 6th day of August, 1906. L, CG, SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. W. L. Bohall, plaintiff, vs. Theodore Cc. Bohall, defendant. No. 52203. Sum- mons by Publication, The State of Washington to the said Theodore C. Bohall, defendant: You are hereby Summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit, within sixty days after the 3rd day of ‘August, A. D. 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint. which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: ‘That plaintiff may obtain a complete and absolute divorce from the defendant on the grounds of drunk- enness, neglect, and non-support. JOHN L. NEAGLE, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 306 Bailey Bldg., Seat- tle, County of King, Washington. Aug. 8—Sept. 14. Page 6 NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE, State. of Washington, County of King—ss. Sheriff's Office, By virtue of an order of sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, onthe 10th day of Au- gust, 1906, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of Will May, plaintiff, vs. F. D, Swank and William G. Potts; John Mc- Grath and George W. Dilling as Trus- tees of Seattle Commandery No. 2, Knights Templars, stationed at Seattle, Washington, Defendants, No. 51304, and to an siem Sheriff, directed and deliv- ered, Notice is hereby given that I will pro- ceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock A, M. on the 22nd day of September, A. D, 1906, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washing- ton, the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: The southerly two-thirds (2-3 of lot four (4), block twenty-seven (27) Supplemental Bell and Denny’s First Addition to the City of Seattle, to satisfy a judgment of fore- closure of mortgage amounting to one hundred six and 32-100 ($106.32) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 10th day of August, 1906. L, C. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. Aug. 17—Sept. 14. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATH, State of Washington, County of King—ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an order of sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 10th day of Au- gust, 1906, by the Clerk thereof, in the case’ of Edward Strong, plaintiff, vs. Iona A. Rose, defendant, No, 50715, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and deliv- ered. Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock A.M. on the 22nd day of September, A. D, 1906, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washing- ton, the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot 17, Block 12, of Lake Union Second Addition to the City of Seattle, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure ‘of lien, amounting to Bighty-one ($81.00) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 10th day of August, 1906. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. Aug. 17—Sept. 14, IN| THE SUPERIOR COURT OF Washington for the County of Sno- homish, In Probate. In the matter of the estate of H. P. Rasmussen, deceased. No. —— Now on this 15th day of August, 1906, it appearing to the Court that EL L .Rasmussen, as administrator of the estate of H. P. Rasmussen, deceased, has filed his petition herein praying for an order of sale of the real estate of said decedent hereinafter particularly described and the purposes in said pe- tition set forth, it is therefore Ordered that all persons interested in the estate of said decedent appear be- fore the said Superior Court of Snohom- ish County, Washington, on the 15th day of September, 1906, -at 10 o'clock inthe forenoon of said day at the Court Room of said Court in the City of Everett in said county to show cause, if any they have, why an order should not be granted to said adminis- trator to sell so much of the real estate of said decedent as shall be necessary and that a copy of this order be pub- lished for four weeks in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said County of King. The real estate hereinbefore referred to and particularly described as follows: Lots forty-seven (47) and forty-eight (48), in block twelve (12) of Saunders First Addition to West Seattle, lying and be- ing in the county of King, State of ‘Washington. Done in open Court this 15th day of August, 1906, JOHN SANDIDGE, Court Commissioner of the Superior Court of Washington, for the County of Snohomish. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Clara’ i. Jones, Plaintiff, vs. Albert B. Jones, Defendant. No,’—— Sum- mons. The State of Washington to the said Albert B. Jones, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after date of the first publication of ‘this summons, _ to-wit: Within sixty days after the 17th day of August, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your an- swer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at, his office below stated: and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plate which has been filed with the ‘lerk of the said Court. The object of such action to obtain ‘a divorce from you on the ground of abandonment for more than one year before the com- mencement of this action and for the neglect and refusal of the defendant to make suitable provision for the sup- port of the plaintiff and her child. ‘Ww. T, SCOTT, Plaintiff's Attorney. Postoffice address: Seattle, King County, Washington, 404 Marion Bldg. ‘Aug. 17-Sept. 28. Page 7 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Lena Kegel, plaintiff, vs. Charles Kegel, defendant. . No. 52262. Sum- mons and Service of Publication. State of Washington to the said Charles Kegel, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 10th day of August, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the com- plaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned Attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your fail- ure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court; the object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the de- fendant on the following grounds: Because the defendant for two years last past has neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the plain- tiff and for his family. Personal indignities rendering plain- tiffs life burdensome caused by many acts of cruelty, abuse and mis-conduct py the defendant upon_ the plaintiff. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. 429-31 Epler Block, Seattle, Wash. IN JUSTICE’S COURT, BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattie Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Mrs. B. Larcom, Plaintiff, vs. BE. Lar- com and The Inland Navigation Com- pany, a corporation, Defendants. No. 12026, Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King. —s8. To EB, Larcom. you are hereby notified-that Mrs, B. Larcom has filed a complaint against you in said court which will come on to be heard at my office in room 448 New York block, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 17th day of Septem- ber, A. D. 1906, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock, a. m., and unless you appear an dhten and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said complaint is for the re- covery of possession, and adjudication of ownership by said plaintiff of that cero tain lot of personal property, described in said complaint consisting of house- hold goods and furniture, said goods and property being that certain lot jevied upon and seized in the hands of the defendant, The Inland Navigation Company, under writ of replevin here- fofore issued herein; or in lieu of said possession, for a judgment against you for $99.00 and costs. Complaint filed July 24th, A. D. 1906. R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. PARROTT & GRISWOLD, GRAY & STERN, Attorneys for Plaintiff, 702 Lowman building, Seattle, Wash. (Hirst publication Aug. 17, 1906.) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. shelman-Llewellyn Mortgage _ and ‘Trust Co. (a corporation), Plaintiff, vs. Kate Marriott; Oregon Improvement Company (a corporation); Portland Trust Company, of Oregon (a corpora- tion), and Seattle National Bank of Se- attle’ (a_ corporation), Defendants. No. ....+. Summons by Publication, The State of Washington to the said ‘ate Marriott, Oregon Improvement upany, a corporation, and Portland st Company, of Oregon, a corpora- defendants: You are hereby sum- ‘.oned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first, publieutica of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 27th day of July, A.D. 1906, and de- fend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action, set forth in the com- plaint, is.as follows: To quiet the title in plaintiff to the following real estate situated in the County of King and State of Washington, particularly described as follows, towit: All of lots one (1) to forty-eight (48) (inclusive), in Block one (1) and being all of the lots in said Block one; all of lots one (1) to forty- eight (48), inclusive, in Block three (3), and being all of the lots in said block three; all of Lots five (5) to twenty-two (22), inclusive, in Block two (2), and all of Lots thirty-three (33) to forty-six (46), inclusive, in said Block two (2), in the Plat of Olympic Heights Addition to West Seattle, which plat comprises West Seattle Five Acre Tracts, num- pered twenty-five (25), twenty-six (26), thirty-nine (39) and forty (40), and which plat will be found recorded in the office of the County Auditor of said King County, and to obtain a decree de- clearing and adjudging plaintiff to be the sole owner in fee simple of said Jands and premises, and that you the said defendants, be decreed to have no interest therein or lien thereon. R. R. GHORGE, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 447 New York Block, Seattle, County of King, Washington. 7 AT THE SEATILE REPUBLICAN tate of the said deceased, be and appear) plaint, which has b before the said Superior Court of King| Clerk of said Cour County, Washington, in the probate de-| “m4 object of partment thereof, in’ the City of Seattle, om the 16th day of August, 1906, at the|to have —_decree hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon, | formance of a then and there to show cause, if an, they have, why an order of distribution | tract Serie should not be made of the residue of| January, 1905, by sald estate to the parties entitled there-|in which defendant to as in said petition prayed for. And it is further ordered that a copy| Plaintif! agrees to. of this order be published once a week} described lot, trac' for four successive weeks before the|in King County, Ste last mentioned time in the Seattle Re-| +o wit: blican, a newspaper printed and pub-| ‘O;W't: Fished in said King County, and of gen- Commencing at : eral circulation therein. dred and eighty-fiv Done in open court, this 12th day of} 4199) ft. South of ARTHUR BE. GRIFFIN, Judge. he NW. % of July, 1906. of the N. 3 1t'is further ordered. that a copy of| Township twenty-tl this order be published once a Week| five (5) Hast, then for fi successive weeks before the ey said 16th day. of August, 1906, in The|dred and fifty-five Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed| South three hundi and published in said 1ing County and| (346) feet, to South of general circulation therein. z Done in open Court this 11th day of|of the N. W. % of July, 1906. ship 23, Range 5 es a said line Hast five ee S| (680), feat, thence IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THB | dred and forty-six | State of Washington, for King County. Martha McQuaid, plaintiff, vs. 1}. Burns and Jane Doe Burns, his wife, whose true first name is to plaintiff un- known; and John Doe Jackson and Jane Doe Jackson, his wite, whose true first names are to plaintiff unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, defendants.—No, .... Notice and Summons, State of Washington to F. Burns and Jane Doe Burns, his wife, and John Doe Jackson and Jane Woe’ Jackson, his wite, who are the owners or reputed owners of, and all persons unknown, claiming or having an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property. You and each of you are hereby noti- fled that the aboye named plaintiff Mar- tha McQuaid is the.holder of two cer- tain delinquent tax certificates, num- bered as hereinafter stated, issued by the County ‘Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, embracing the tollowing real property situated in said King County, Washington, and more particularly described as follows, to-wit: Delinquent Tax Certificate Number B42030, lot 4 block 190, Kirkland; delin- quent tax certificate number B42031, lot 6 block 190, Kirkland. That said certificates were issued on the 29th day of May, 1906, for the fol- lowing sums and for delinquent taxes for the following years, to-wit: Tax certificate No, B42030, for years 1893 to 1902 inclusive, $12.10. Tax cer- tificate No, B42031, for years 1893 to 1902 inclusive, $12.11. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described lots. to-wit: Lot. Block, ti Amount, 1¢ar, 4 190 Kirkland ......$0.61 1904 4 190 Kirkland ...... .54 1905 5 190 Kirkland ...... .61 1904 5190 Kirkland ...... .54 1905 Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the ser- vice of this notice, exclusive of the day of the date of the first publication, to- wit: within 60 days after the 6th day of July, 1906, in the above entitled Court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and Serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount, together with penalty, ‘interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you and against each parcel of said real prop~ erty for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, includine costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and ,foand against it re- spectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and Court. MARTHA McQUAID, Plaintiff. JOHN C. MURPHY, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 212 Marion Block, Se- attle, Wash. First nublication July 6th. 1906. FOR KING COUNTY. Amanda Bird, plaintiff, vs. Thomas J. Davis, defendant. No. ..... Sum- mons by publication. The State of Washington to the said Thomas J. Davis, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixth (60) days after the first publi- cation of this summons, to-wit: with- in sixty (60) days after the 13th day of July, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the Complaint of the Plaintiff; and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will _be rendered against you according to the demand of the Com- plaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this action is to have decree specific per- formance of a real estate con- tract executed on the 19th day of January, 1905, by the parties hereto, in which defendant agrees to sell and plaintiff agrees to buy the following described lot, tract or parcel of land in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: “Commencing at a point seven hun- dred and eighty-five and 4-100 (785 4-100) ft. South of the N. H. corner of the N. W. % of Section four (4), Township twenty-three (23), Range five (5) Bast, thence West five hun- dred and fifty-five (555) feet, thence South three hundred and forty-six (346) feet, to South line of N. EB. % of the N. W. % of Section 4, Town- ship 28, Range 5 Hast, thence along said line Hast five hundred and fifty (550) feet, thence North three hun- dred and forty-six (346) feet to point of beginning, being four and one-half (4%) acres, more or less, according to government survey,” and to obtain deed to the above described realty. ANDREW R. BLACK, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. and Office Address: 315 Pacific Block, Seattle, King Co., Wash. IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the matter of the guardianship of Earl Henry Stanley and Bertha May Stanley.—No. 6,000. Notice of Sale of Real Estate at Public Auction. Notice is hereby given that, in pur- suance of an order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington in and for the County of King, made on July 26, 1906, in the above entitled matter, the undersigned guardian of aforesaid mi- nors will sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, gold coin of the U. S., and subject to confirmation by said Superior Court, on Monday, the 20th day of August, 1906, at the hour of 1 o'clock p. m., at the main entrance, to- wit; the western door of the Court House, in the City of Seattle, King coun- ty, Washington, all that certain real es- tate hereafter ‘described and_ belonging to aforesaid minors, to-wit: Earl Henry Stanley and Bertha May Stanley, and which said real estate is more particu- larly described as all that certain lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and_being in the county of King, state of Washington, and bounded and de- scribed as Lot six (6), Block nineteen (19) of the Plan of North Seattle, as platted by D. T. Denny, as shown by the recorded plat thereof. ‘Terms and conditions of sale are cash, gold coin of the U.S. EB. C. GOODWIN, Guardian of the Estate of Earl Henry Stanley and Bertha May Stanley, Mi- nors. Dated at Seattle, July 26, 1906. HUMPHRIES & COLE, Attys. for Guardian, 2 602 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle. IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Alpheus Coss, Plaintiff, ys. Katie Coss, Defendant.—No. 52108. | Summons by Publication. ‘The State of Washington to said Katie Coss, Defendant: Inthe name of the State of Washing- ton, you are hereby summoned to appear within. sixty (60) days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days from and after ‘the 27th day of July, 1906, and defend the above entitled ac- tion in the above entitled court, and an- swer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his offices below stated; and in case of your failure so. to do, judgment will be ren- dered against you according to the de- mand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of’ said court. The object of the said action set forth in the complaint is as follows: To secure in favor of plaintiff and from defendant an absolute and unconditional divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony exist- ing between plaintiff and defendant upon the ground of desertion and abandon- ment of plaintiff by defendant continu- ously for more than one year's time im- mediately preceding the verification of the complaint on file herein, and for oth- er proper relief in the premises. FRANK B. WIESTLING, ‘Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 421-423 Boston Block, Seattle, King County. ‘Washing- ‘on. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. In the matter of the Estate of Susie J. Corey, Deceased,—No. 4827. Order to Show ‘Cause on Sale of Real Estate. Burton S, Corey, the administrator of the estate of Susie J. Corey, deceased, having filed in this court his petition duly verified, praying for an order of this Court for a sale of all the real es- tate of which the said deceased died August 24, 1906 seized for the purposes set forth in said petition, to-wit: For the purpose of paying the debts and charges of the administration of said estate; and it appearing to the court from said petition that the personal es- tate of the said deceased that has come into the hands of the said administrator is not sufficient to pay the debts of said estate and the expenses of the adminis- tration thereof and that no personal property belonging to said estate re- mains undisposed of or in the hands of said administrator and that it is neces- sary to sell all of the real estate of said deceased to pay the said debts and ex- penses of the administration of said estate, to-wit: All of the following described real es- tate situated in said King County, State of Washington, and particularly de- scribed as follows, to-wit: Lots 5 and 6, in Block 7, in McAllister’s Addition to the City of Seattle. And it further appearing to the Court that said petition conforms to and is in all respects in accordance with the re- quirements of the law in such case made and provided, ‘Wherefor, it is hereby ordered by the ‘court that all persons interested in the estate of said deceased be and appear be- fore the aboye entitled Superior Court on the 80th day of August, A. D. 1906, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the fore- noon of said day in the court room of the probate department of said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, King Coun- ty, State of Washington, then and there to’ show cause, if any they may have, why an order of this Court should not be granted to said administrator authoriz- ing and empowering him to sell the said real estate of said deceased. It is further ordered by the Court that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before the said 30th day of August, 1906, in the Seattle Republican, a weekly newspaper printed and published and of general circulation in said King Coun- Ts Done in open court this 27th day of July, A. D, 1906. MITCHELL GILLAM, Judge. SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. Della Moore, plaintiff, vs. Daniel Moore, defendant. No. 51993. ‘The State of Washington to Daniel Moore, defendant: In the name of the State of Wash- ington, you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this sum- mons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 13th day of July, 1906, and de- fend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed, the Attorney for the plaintiff, at his’ offices below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action set forth in the complaint is as follows: To se- cure in favor of plaintiff and from de- fendant an absolute and unconditional decree of divorce absolutely and uncon- ditionally dissolving the bonds of mat- rimony ‘existing between plaintiff and defendant, and that the name of plain- tiff be changed to Della Druin and for other proper relief in me premises. This divorce is sought upon the grounds of failure to provide and the desertion of the plaintiff by the defendant for more than one year’s time last past, FRANK B. WIESTLING, Attorney for Plaintiff, Postoffice Ad- dress 421-423 Boston Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. NOTICE TO TAXPAYERS. Notice is hereby given that the King County Board of Equalization will be in session three (3) weeks, commencing MONDAY, AUGUST 6, 1906. At the Auditor's Office at the King County Court House, for the purpose of equalizing the tax roll or 1906. All tax- payers claiming abatement of tax are hereby notified to appear on or before MONDAY, AUGUST 27, 1906. or be forever barred. J. P. AGNEW, County Auditor and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of King County, Washington. Dated at Seattle this fifth day of July. 1906. ——_————— Manufactuie and Sell For 11 Purposes Seattle, - - - - - Washington John H. McGraw Geo. B. Kittinger REAL ESTATE Fire an! Marine Insurance. Colman Building. Telephone Main 6) Page 8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Marcellus Lara and Sada W. Lara, plaintiffs, vs. The Commonwealth Title Insurance and Trust Company of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Trustee, Northwestern Trust Company of Seattle, King County, Washington; Mary Riggs, the unknown heirs of Mary Corcoran, whose real first name is unknown, wife of W. W. Corcoran, late of Washington, in the District of Columbia; the unknown heirs of Mary Riggs, wife of Elisha Riggs, late of the City of New York, in the state of New York; H. E. Kelsey, Mike Rosa, Fred Soupe, Thomas Fank, George Barnes and J. R. Kirkpatrick: also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, to-wit: Blocks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 of the Plat of Mercer Park, in King County, in the State of Washington, Defendants. No. — Summons. The State of Washington to the said, The Commonwealth Title Insurance and Trust Company of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Trustee, Northwestern Trust Company of Seattle, King County, Washington, Mary Riggs; the unknown heirs of Mary Corcoran, whose real first name is unknown, wife of W. W. Corcoran, late of Washington, in the District of Columbia; the unknown heirs of Mary Riggs, wife of Elisha Riggs, late of the City of New York, in the State of New York; H. E. Kelsey, Mike Rosa, Fred Soupe, Thomas Fank, George Barnes and J. R. Kirkpatrick; And also all other persons or parties unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, to-wit: Block 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 of the plat of Mercer Park, in King County, in the State of Washington: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 24th day of August, 1906, and defend the above entitled action, and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorney for plaintiffs, at his office below stated; and, in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the Clerk of the Court. The object of this action, set forth in the complaint, is to quiet the title of plaintiffs in and to the following real estate, situate in King County, Washington to-wit: Blocks One (1), Two (2), Three (3), Four (4), Five (5), Six (6), Seven (7), Seventeen (17), Eighteen (18), Nineen (19), Twenty (20), and Twenty-one (21) of the Plat of Mercer Park, which Plat will be found recorded in the office of the Auditor of said King County and to obtain a decree declaring and adjudging plaintiffs to be the sole owners in fee simple of said premises; that the defendants, known and unknown, be required to set forth the nature of their several claims; and that each and all of said claims be determined and that defendants be forever barred and enjoined from asserting or maintaining any claim, lien, right, title or interest in said premises or any part thereof adverse to the right and title of plaintiffs therein; that each and every of the liens, claims, rights, titles and interests of said defendants, and each of them, in said premises, or any part thereof, be declared null and void, and for general equitable relief. equitable referral. JAMES McNENY, Attorney for Plaintiffs. Office and P. O. Address: 514 Marion Block, Seattle, Washington. PROBATE NOTICE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the matter of the estate of Henry W. Junkin, deceased.—No. 5954. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that M. J. Montague, the administrator of the estate of Henry W. Junkin, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said Court his final account as such administrator, and E. R. BUTTERWORTH, Mgr. Professional Funeral Directors And Embalmers : 1921 First Avenue, - Seattle present none but the strongest most reliable Fire Insurance Com THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN BONNEY-WATSON CO UNDERTAKERS Third and Columbia. Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. WHEN GOING EAST Ask the Ticket Agen end You —OVER— "The Northwestern Line" Eight Trains Every day in the Year —BETWEEN— Minneapolis, St. Paul and Chicago THE TRAIN OF FAME The Northwestern Limited Embodies the newest and best ideas for COMFORT, CONVENIENCE and LUXURY. It is lighted with both electricity and gas; the most brilliantly illuminated train in the world. The equipment consists of private compartment cars, standard 17-section sleepers, luxurious dining car, reclining chair cars, (seats free), modern day coaches and buffet, library and smoking cars. For Time Tables, Folders, or any further information call on or write, F. W. PARKER, Gen. Agt. 720 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. The Puget Sound National Bank OF SEATTLE Capital stock paid in ..... $528,000 Surplus..... 35,000 Jacob Furth, Pres.; J. S. Goldsmith, Vice-Pres.; R. V. Ankeny, Cash. Correspondence in all the principal cities of the United States and Europe. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SEATTLE, WASH. Paid up capital.....$150,000 LESTER TURNER, President. C. P. MASTERSON, Cashier. MAURICE M'MICKEN, Vice-Pres. F. F. PARKHURST, Asst. Cash. A general banking business transacted. Letters of credit sold on all principal cities of the world. Special facilities for collecting on British Columbia, Alaska and all Pacific Northwest points. We have a bank at Cape Nome. Peoples' Savings Bank Second and Pike. Capital $100,000 Deposits received from $1 to $10,000; 4 per cent. interest allowed on savings deposits. : : : : E. C. Neufelder, President. R. H. Denny, Vice-President. J. T. Greenl af, Cashier SAFE DEPOSIT VAULT THE NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE H. C. Henry, Pres. R. R. Spencer, Cashier. M. & K. GOTTSTEIN WHOLESALE LIQUOR DEALERS 206 First Aye. South. --- GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY TABLE THE COMFORTABLE WAY. TICKET OFFICE Second Ave. and Columbia St. PHONES—Main 117; Ind. 117. Leave Arrive Daily. Daily. # SEATTLE 9:30 a. m. "ORIENTAL LTD" To Spokane, St. Paul, Chicago and all points East. 7:45 p. m. 8:00 p. m. "FAST MAIL" To Spokane, local points, Montana, Chicago and East 7:00 a. m. 8:30 a. m. Everett ..... 7:00 a. m. 9:30 a. m. Everett ..... 10:00 a. m. 4:35 p. m. Everett ..... 11:50 a. m. 5:30 p. m. Everett ..... 4:00 a. m. 6:30 p. m. Everett ..... 7:45 p. m. 8:00 p. m. Everett ..... 10:00 p. m. 8:30 a. m. Bellingham ..... 11:50 a. m. 4:35 p. m. Bellingham ..... 4:00 p. m. 5:30 p. m. Bellingham ..... 10:00 p. m. 8:30 a. m. Vancouver, B. C. ..... 4:00 p. m. 4:35 p. m. Vancouver, B. C. ..... 10:00 p. m. 8:30 a. m. Whitney, Fidalgo ..... 11:50 a. m. 4:35 p. m. and Anacortes... 10:00 p. m. Woolley, Hamilton, Rockport ..... 11:50 a. m. 4:00 p. m. 9:30 a. m. Snohomish ..... 7:00 a. m. 6:30 p. m. and ..... 10:00 a. m. 8:00 a. m. Skykomish ..... 7:45 p. m. For rates, folders and full information call on or address C. W. MELDRUM, C. P. & T. A. S. G. YERKES, A. G. P. A. Building Material Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice STETSON POST MILL CO. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 RAC FIRST RACE 2 P. M. SHARP. SIX Open at th EVERY DAY E FIRST RACE 2 P. M. SHARP. SIX RACES DAILY, RAIN OR SHINE Rain O Take cars at Rain Or Shine Take cars at King Street and First Avenue South. Admission Fifty Cents, Including Grand Stand. SIX RACES DAILY BREWERY YES SIR! HERE'S THE BEER, SIR! RAINIER- THE ONLY BEER, SIR! SEATTLE BREWING & MALTING CO. SEATTLE / / / WASHINGTON. TELEPHONE: RAINIER JO. ACME PUBLISHING CO. 214 COLUMBIA ST. BRIEFS OUR SPECIALTY Telephones: {Sunset, Red 1997 }Independent, 1306 ALBERT HANSEN JEWELER AND SILVERSMITH 706 First Avenue. CES! RACES DAILY, RAIN OR SHINE e Meadows EXCEPT SUNDAY Shine King Street and August 24, 1906