Seattle Republican

SEATTLE REPUBLICAN VOL. XIII NO. 15 SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Published every Friday at 816½ 3rd Av. H. R. Cayton .....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton .....Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. One Year .....$2.00 Six Months .....1.00 Three Months ......60 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matter. ATLANTA'S AWFUL DISGRACE. That there was absolutely no excuse for the recent bloody race riot in the city of Atlanta goes without saying. In that city the black man is reported as prospering as in no other city or community in the whole South and the riotous whites have been looking for an excuse for the past two or three years for just such an opportunity for an outbreak against the Negroes, and the pretext of a black woman insulting a white man was simply ridiculous. If the black woman charged with insulting c white man was not his paramour, and demanding her rights, we miss our guess; and if the opportune black men at the windows of white women were not white men with blackened faces, for the express purpose of inciting the whites to go on the war path against the Negroes, then we doubly miss our guess. It is perfectly preposterous to think Negroes in the heart of the South would attempt any such crimes on white women, when they know it means certain death either for themselves or a number of other Negroes. With two million mulatto Negroes in the South, the result of white men's wholesale illicit relations with black women. Its darn little insulting that black women have an opportunity of doing to white men. Among the Negroes Atlanta is the educational and financial center of the South Atlantic seaboard, and to check their progress, Hoke Smith, the political monster of that state, who recently captured its gubernatorial nomination, which is equal to an election, made his Anti-Negro campaign. The condition of the Negro in Georgia and all over the South is most deplorable— The image provided is too blurry to accurately recognize any text. It appears to be a blank or heavily blurred page. SEATTLLE, WASHINGTON SEPTEMBER 28, 1906. not because he is worthless, criminal and ignorant, but simply because he is a Negro and is accumulating property and wealth; refinement and education. He is no more criminal than the whites, and finally making greater strides toward educating himself than the poor whites. In commenting on the great strides he has made since his emancipation, the Constitution, of Atlanta, a few years ago, under the caption, "What will the Poor White Boy Do?" editorially pointed out that the great industrial education that the Negro boy was acquiring, owing to the fabulous sums of money Northern philanthropists were sending South for him, would soon make the black boy the white boy's master. The editorial was taken up by every city and rural publication in the South and caused wide spread comment. Lest just such a condition should actually come to pass, the recent race riot was hatched. The Negro is encouraged to save his earnings that he may become independent; taught a higher civilization, that he may not commit crime; told to educate that he may become a more useful citizen and yet, when he does all of these things, he is ruthlesslv mobbed, by the hundreds, by the jealous "po' whit, trash." The condition to say the least is a puzzle over which statesmen are at a loss for a method of solution. Vice President Cushman sounds well, but Frank should be perfectly frank in stating that such is not even within the pale of possibilities. For a human being to be black in complexion is not one-hundredth part as bad as to be a blaguard, soliloquizes Appeal to Reason, the well known socialist organ. Our own and only Frank Cushman has at last one admirer in Washington City, if the communication in another column herein is in any sense genuine, who desires to see him promoted. Burning from the scorching administered to its managing editor by the Seattle Republican, the Snohomish Tribune, for APR 29 1952 PRICE TEN CENTS. the fisst time during the past eight years, failed to put in its appearance this week. The editor proves that he is not only a cur, but likewise a coward. The Alaska - Yukon - Pacific Exposition gets in action October 2nd. Locking Bryan's mouth is more easily suggested than done. Billy always did talk too much out of his mouth, but he can't help it, he was born that way. It is to be regretted that Seattle's lighting bonds have been decided worthless. The mistake will be rectified of course, but it is a lot of unnecessary expense for the city just the same. What's left of Populism in this country has grounds for complaint at William Jennings Bryan for having appropriated the only suit of clothes it had left, in which it proposed to make its final parade before the public. Electricity as a motive utility is like unto a new born baby and the parent with a son, whether he wishes him finally to be a professional man or not, should give him a thorough course in electrical engineering and then the boy will be pfepared for an emergency. Why the Chinese dislike Christianity, is a headline which might be answered thusly: Because it is not their form of religion, and every fellow to his liking should be granted to every nationality, race or class of human beings. That Esther Mitchell is as crazy as a March hare, and that Mrs. Creffield is even more so, if such a thing be possible, is the concensus of public opinion; and that neither one of them would be convicted by a jury is likewise the concensus of public opinion; snd if there be any loop hole whereby they can both be incarcerated in an insane asylum for life, we see no impropriety in doing so, the objections of the Evening Scavinger and the prosecuting attorney to the contrary, notwithstanding. ```markdown ``` September 28, 1906 MR. WASHINGTON. The Bee: Elsewhere in the Bee will be read with interest the speech of Prof. Booker T. Washington, delivered before the Business League which met at Atlanta, Ga. The Bee has had occasion to differ with Mr. Washington, and it may have occasion to continue. Notwithstanding what its feelings may be it snall always give him credit for the good he does and condemn the bad. Mr. Washington may have made mistakes. Are all men perfect? He may have said unwise things, but did he meaningly say those things to the detriment of his people? It is true he has done, and is doing, some good things. Because he has made mistakes in the past, must the Bee decline to give him credit for the good he is doing? While he has committed errors, the Bee must admit that it admires the man for the good he is doing for the colored man in the South. The Bee was informed by a gentleman from Tuskegee, who called at this office a few days ago, that 1,200 mechanics and engineers left Tuskegee this year for different parts of the United States. Sixteen are in the city, (Washington, D. C.,) all employed and all of them living together in one house, and the informer's wife is cooking and keeping house for them. Now this is doing something for a struggling people who are oppressed. The Bee agrees with Mr. Washington in his address to the Business League, and believes if his advice is strictly followed in that regard the race will be improved. Twenty years or more ago the Bee, in an editorial, declared that some day a Black Cardinal from the South would rise, to whom all nations would bow. The Bee files in the Congressional library contain this article. The article further stated that the Black Cardinal would lead the colored man. Has its predictions been verified? The Bee will leave it to the world and existing conditions. Within the last few years Mr. Washington has been manly in his utterances, and has defended every interest of his people. In a recent speech delivered in Winona, Ind., a few weeks ago, on which occasion Dr. J. E. Sheppard spoke, the editor of the Bee was reliably informed that Mr. Washington made a most manly speech. His audience was all white. He spoke for the colored man and his condition. The Bee is with him when he is right, and against him when he is wrong. Every man should be given credit for what he does, no matter who he may be. The Bee in the past did not leave a stone unturned to throwodium on the acts of Booker T. Washington and it is refreshing to see that it has seen the error of its way and is willing to give honor where honor is due. It is hoped that ere long more of the colored citizens will come round. MELODIES OF SCOTCH ORIGIN. Most of our alleged Negro songs have been described by Mr. Henry T. Fink, musical critic of the New York Evening Post, as a "hodge-podge of Spanish, Portugese, English, German, French and American tunes"—see the Literary Digest, June 23. A writer in Musical America, Mr. Angelo M. Reed, now declares that they are derived largely from Scotch airs. He is in agreement with recent writers on the subject in denying that the Negro melodies are "purely African." For generations, Mr. Reed asserts, "the Negro, while under the ban of slavery, and in contact with the enlightened white race, did not fail to change in nature, so much so, that in life, language and song, he eventually became American. In certain parts of the Southern states, the early settlers were largely of Scotch descent. It is natural therefore, that the Negro should take kindly to Scotch music, both major and minor. It is also natural that through a process of evolution these Scotch TuE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN melodies should become Negro." How the music which now passes characteristically as Negro was derived from the Scotch airs is explained as follows: "Clever at imitation the Negro did not fail to appropriate this music to his own use, and by passing it along through generations from parent to child the original melody lost its contour entirely and became a new thing to creature needs. "This fact is the more conclusive because the Negro used his smooth voice to transmit this music from one to the other. This explains 'the change of the story in the telling.'" "The Negro came from barbarism to civilization. In his schooling he threw over the simple chant of his native Africa, for a more progressive American one. This latter he adopted to his larger life according to his capacity. "From the first the Negro was surrounded by a culture exceeding his own. Naturally ignorant, though endowed as I have said with a mimetic sense and impulsive nature, he relied upon others for a livelihood, rather than occupy any responsible position. In music, however, he has attained to a distinction which will at least add much interest to the history of the colored race in America. The fact of association with the music of the whites adds much to the theory that the Negro assimilated much of the music of his superiors in education during his earlier days of slavery. Especially may this be said of the Southern districts inhabited by the Scotch settlers. There is therefore reasonable truth in the assertion that the airs sung by these Scotch descendants were taken up by the slaves and transformed by them, through different generations, into distinct Negro meodies. "If we trace the source of these slave songs we find the pentatonic scale is used for many of the major, and the minor scale with a minor seventh for many minor songs. This substantiates pretty clearly the assumption that the Negro was impressed by the Scotch music, which latter is also constructed upon these scales. 'There are, however, many of the finest Negro 'spiritual and snouts,' constructed upon other scales, the result no doubt of local influences. There is, moreover, another reason which lends force to the argument. It is the sudden syncopation, in other words 'Scotch catch or snap,' found in both the Scotch and Negro music. This may have suggested the so-called 'rag-time,' attributed to the Negro, which recently reached so much exaggeration in the 'coon song.' It seems to me a fancy promulgated by Antonin Dvorak and others to designate Negro music, the national music of America. Because the music is not national at all, so long as it is restricted to a few less enlightened colored people and they chiefly local.'—Literary Digest. CELEBRATE EMANCIPATION DAY Saturday, September the 22d, is the anniversary of the issuance of that world's famous proclamation that liberated 4,000,000 slaves in the United States. The Declaration of Independence in all of its sacredness and patriotism and Americanism does not class with the Emancipation Proclamation in its significance to the American Negro. One declared independence of one form of government and established another, while the other meant the transforming of human beings from slaves to free men and citizens. The Declaration of Independence is celebrated as is well known in every city, town and hamlet of this country. It is a national holiday and is given over for all sorts of celebration. The Emancipation Proclamation should be celebrated to even a greater extent by the colored people of this country. There are thousands of our people living today who were liberated by this proclamation and millions of their grandchildren enjoying the advantages of its results, and here in Springfield, Illinois, is the home and burial ground of the man who issued this proclamation, is the proper place to hold annually on the 22nd of September, a celebration in commemoration of that event.—The (Springfield, Illinois) Forum. It is meet and proper that the Negro from Maine to Mexico and from the Atlantic to the Pacific and wherever the immortal Lincoln's proclamation affected him, should never lose sight of the day and should always celebrate it. Seattle was not the immediate home of Mr. Lincoln, but his home was wherever the stars and stripes floated over. BORROWED THOUGHTS Mr. Alladin, leader of the Russian "Group of Toil," has forty-five death sentences hanging over him, and it must afford him some satisfaction to think that he is bound to beat the government out on forty-four of them.—Washington Post. That "brilliant piece of word-painting describing the glories of peace" which Mr. Bryan handed to the Interparliamentary Union recently might be a good thing to put in pamphlet form and pass around among the various kinds of Democrats.—Indianapolis News. Common Sense Is a Jewel THE RE PUBLICAN • Job Printing Department DOES FIRS-CLASS PRINTING AT COMMON SENSE PRICES PHONE MAIN 305 OFFICE 8161-2 THIRD AVENUE --- Newcastle Lump and NUT COAL The Pacific Coast Co. Telephone Private Exchange 99. Ind. A 92. POLITICAL POT-PIE. The Democratic state convention met last Wednesday and named the following ticket for slaughter next November: Congressmen-at-Large WILLIAM BLACKMAN, of Seattle. DR. PATRICK S. BYRNE, of Spokane. DUDLEY ESHELMAN, of Tacoma, Supreme Court Justices, Short Term. WARREN W. TOLMAN, of Spokane. BO SWEENEY, of Seattle. Long Term. C. W. HODGDON, of Hoquiam. E. C. MILLION, of Seattle. About thirty-five years ago Judge Dunbar lived at and practiced law in Olympia, Thurston county. Subsequently he removed elsewhere, but returned frequently as a member of the legislature. Since 1889 he has lived there continuously as a member of the supreme court. So Thurston county people have known him well and long. Judge Root settled in Olympia some twenty-three years ago and practiced law there thirteen years, then moved to Seattle, where he has lived ten years frequently visiting the courts and state departments at Olympia, and being there the past two years a member of the supreme court. The people there know him thoroughly. Judge Mount was in the legislature years ago, and as a member of the supreme court has been liv, ing in Olympia for the last six years continuously, so he is well known there. Judge Crow served six years as state senator and has been the last two years on the supreme bench, living that time in Olympia, so those people have had a chance to know him intimately. When the Thurston county Republican convention met recently—being the largest convention ever held in the county,—it heartily endorsed all of these judges, and by a unanimous vote instructed its delegates to vote for them and secure their nomination in the state convention. Klickitat county, the former home of Judge Dunbar; King county, the home of Judge Root; Spokane, the home of Judges Mount and Crow, and several other counties where the four judges are well known, did practically the same. It speaks well for all of these judges when their neighbors and acquaintances of so many years standing compliment them in this emphatic and effective manner. The political tools of the gamblers and vicious element and character assasins who hung around the hotel lobies during the recent Republican state convention made a miserable failure of their schemes. Some were loud mouthed and some pere "sneaky," but they were soon "spotted" and despised by the decent element, which comprised nearly the entire membership of the convention. Decency in politics is demanded; and the day when the vicious element could defeat good men by corruption or filthy methods, has gone by, if it ever existed in this state. A Seattle newspaper tells us that John L. Wilson, the senior senator from Washington, has left politics as far as office seeking is concerned; goes on and says that John will stay in politics, to help to place his friends in office and flare defeat in the face of his enemies. Seattle, and the entire state of Washington have just cause to be proud of the former senator, for no man ever went to Congress from this state who has accomplished more for the betterment of conditions generally throughout the state, than this same John L. All of the large and important improvements of the past ten years, while not by any means completed by him, were nevertheless made possible for those who followed him, to finish. Wilson, in bucking the wire pulling, machine politicians, and who have caused his defeat by most crooked means, is doing a lasting favor to the element in the Republican party which is for elevating the moral standard of politics.—Brewster Herald. WASHINGTON, D. C., September 19, 1996. EDITOR SEATTLE REPUBLICAN:— The nation has sent no truer, more zealous, firm, more patriotic representative to Congress than Francis W. Cushman, of the state of Washington. His record in Congress is a strong attestation of his eminent fitness and qualifications for the post of honor to which the Republicans of Washing ington elected him. He never tires in his effort to render faithful service to his ssate and his constituents, and then to the whole nation. He never loses an opportunity to ably serve his people when general measures or issues come up in Congress. He is one of the ablest and most eloquent members on the floor of the House of Representatives. When he is announced to speak all members on both the Republican and Democratic side of the House are in their seats; senators come to the House lobby, and diplomats and visitors fill their respective galleries. Daniei Webster, Henry Clay, Wm. McKinley, Senators John C. Spooner or Joseph B. Foraker, never drew larger crowds. In debate he is the peer in the House of Representatives. Cushman is a man of the Lincoln, Grant and Sumner school of Republicans, and is broad and patriotic in his views. He believes in equality of right for all men before the law, with special privileges reserved for none. He stands for the rights of the poor as well as the rich; the black as well as the white, and the citizen as well as the office holder. The American people as well as the people of his state stand ready to elevate him to a higher place within the gift of the people than the one he now holds. He has many friends all over the country who will urge his name before the Republican national convention of 1908, for vice president of the United States. I hope that his constituents will give sanction to these sentiments by giving him their endorsement in no uncertain way. The Republicans of this city have organized the Brightwood Avenue Republican Club, which has declared for Senator Joseph B. Foraker of Ohio for president of the Unitted State, and Francis W. Cushman of the state of Washington for vice president. This is a splendid endorsement, coming as it does from Republicans right here at the capitol who caught their admiration of him from watching his course in Congress and finding that every pulsation of his heart beat for the proection of the best interests of all of the people of our great country, regardless of race, religious creed, or color. He is the friend of the people and all that they hold dear. Send him back to Congress by such a large majority as will aid in pushing him higher in political fame, and in a more exalted position in 1908. SAMUEL B. THOMPSON, 2318 Brightwood Avenue, Washington, D. C. There is still a little muttering as to the results of the late Republican convention but no man has as yet been bold enough to say that he is a Republican and in the same breath declare that he is opposed to September 28, 1906 any man on the ticket. This is one year when all true Republicans must stand together. The Maine election shows the danger of wandering off after strange gods.—Bellingham Reveille. Some folk are so selfish that they do not realize that there is anybody else on earth but themselves. The editor above wants all Republicans to stand pat—it is absolutely necessary and all because the men he advocated for county nominations were successful in getting the same. A horse thief may have been named somewhere else by a Republican convention, but vote for him in order that Whatcom county Republican nominees, who are personal political protogees of his, as party bolting for any cause, for any office and any place, might endanger the success of the Republican ticket in Whatcom county. Did you ever see exhibited a more selfish spirit, or was "God bless me and my wife, my son John, and his wife, us four and no more," ever more applicable. Seattle is going ahead with the firm intention of making the Alaska-Yukon exposition, to be held in that city in 1909, a three-times winner. Tacoma is ready to lend a helping hand in the matter. It is an enterprise that will redound to the benefit of the entire Pacific Northwest, and the success of the Portland exposition is evidence that Seattle can deliver the goods.—West Coast (Tacoma) Trade. An old lady was praying earnestly to the Lord for bread and was overheard by a number of mischevious boys, who thought they would play a practical joke on the aged supplicant. So they scurried away and bought a loaf of bread and stole stealthily back to the humble home and while she prayed on they threw the bread through the window at her feet. She had, however, heard the young scamps and suspected some kind of a prank. So when she saw the bread she said, "the Lord sent it, though the devil brought it." The Trade sees an opportunity for Tacoma to profit at Seattle's expense, and so it is willing to help boom Seattle's proposed exposition. The above editor seems to be equally as selfish as the Reveille editor. POLITICS AND POLITICIANS Mayor Tom L. Johnson, of Cleveland, is of the opinion that Mr. Bryan's advocacy of government ownership of railroads will force Mr. Roosevelt to run for president again. George A. Carden, of Dallas, the new chairman of the Democratic state committee of Texas, was a news paper man in Chicago before he went into law and politics. Senator Tillman's opinion of the Bryan homecoming: "This great hooray in New York is legitimate in a way, and yet there is an element of hidden management in it, a slight odor of the manufactured product." John W. Langley, disbursing and appointment clerk of the census office, recently resigned to accept the Republican nomination for Congress in the 10th Kentucky district. New Orleans is possessed with the idea that the next Democratic National convention should be held there. The Crescent city has never entertained a national political convention. Before the Bryan boom gathered strength in the Central West, Senator Bailey, of Texas, was much talked of for the Democratic presidential nomination, and some of his friends would not be surprised if he gets back into the race. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Page 5 September 28. 1906 ```markdown ``` --- BEAUTIFUL UNIVERSITY PARK THE PRIDE OF THE STATE SCIENCE HALL GYMNASIUM OBSERVATORY TERRITORIAL UNIVERSITY Founded 1861. STATE: UNIVERSITY'S NEW BUILDINGS 1895 U. OF W. HIAM! HIAM! U. OF W. SIAN! SIAN! SKORKUM! SKORKUM! WASHINGTON!! ADMINISTRATION BUILDING LEWIS HALL UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON 1904 CLARKE HALL To say I live in University Park, will be to say: I love elegance and refinement. I love the beautiful. I love to have my children grow up in the best maral and literary atmosphere in the world. Any one of these joys is worth more in a year than the price of a lot. You have only a very few days in which you may be able to enjoy the distinction of living in University Park. If you are fortunate enough to get a lot in University Park after the 15th Inst. you will have to pay from $100 to 200 more per lot for being dilatory. THE GREAT OLMSTED will soon begin to park the University grounds for the ALASKA-YUKON-PACIFIC-EXPOSITION. The University grounds will be as a part of your home in University Park. MOORE INVESTMENT CO. LUMBER EXCHANGE ...ALASKA-YUKON-PACIFIC EXPOSITION.. INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON Capital Stock $500,000.00 Divided into 50,000 Shares of Ten Dollars Each. The undersigned hereby subscribes for and agrees to take (.....)shares of the Capital Stock of Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition of the Par value of Ten Dollars Each, upon the following terms and conditions, toowit: Subscriptions shall be payable in four equal installments, as follows: Twenty-five (25) per cent. on October 2nd 1906; twenty-five (25) per cent on April 2nd, 1907; twenty-five (25) per cent. on October 2nd, 1907; twenty-five (25) per cent on April 2nd, 1908. Witness my hand and seal this .....day of ....., 1906. NOTE-Mail to Will H. Parry, Chairman Ways and Means Committee, 1102 Alaska Building, Seattle, U.S.A. September 28, 1906 ...ALA Capital S The undersigned here of the Capital Stock of A lowing terms and condition Twenty-five (25) per cent per cent. on October 2nd. Witness my hand and NOTE—Mail to Will H. PERSONAL NOTES. Mr. Joseph Burnett has been confined to his bed all week, suffering from rheumatism. Louis Tooma has been appointed door keeper at the King county central committees rooms. Mr. Oswell Hall, of Stockton, Cal., has decided to make this city his home. He is now working at Frye & Co's abattoir. Mr. and Mrs. A. L. Agg, of Dawson, Y. T., are in the city. Mr. Agg is out for the purpose of placing his children in school. Mrs. Amanda Mallory died at Providence hospital Monday night and was buried from Bonney, Watson's undertaking parlors. Rev. Donohoo, pastor of the 14th St. A. M. church, has been granted a two week's vacation by the congregation, and with Mrs. Donohoo is visiting Victoria and Vancouver. Mr. J. F. Norris returned from Portland last Monday whither he went to speak at the Emancipation celebration held in that city last Saturday. In speaking of the affair Mr. Norris said, "It was the best thing of its kind that I have lately seen. The program was well arranged and was carried out as planned without a hitch. There was an enthusiastic crowd present both white and black, and it was on the whole a brilliant success." The Seattle Republican is under obligation to the committee for courtesies extenden. THE THIRD AVENUE THEATER The crowds that have nightly greeted the Taylor Company at the Third Avenue theater this week have been more enthusiastic over the play there, "Escaped From the Harem," than any thing for a long while. They certainly get big value for their money. The play is a comedy, drama, melodrama, spectacular drama, circus and spectacle combined. If you go and see it and ```markdown ``` THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN PACIFIC EXPOSIT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON to 50,000 Shares of Ten Dollars CAPITAL STOCK... to take of the Par value of Ten D will be payable in four equal -five (25) per cent on April 2nd t on April 2nd, 1908. day of Name ...SUBSCRIPTION TO CAPITAL STOCK... Go to a respectable place to borrow money on diamonds, jewelry and watches. Low rates. Private offices and all business strictly confidential. American Watch and Jewelry Co., 908 First Avenue, opp. Rainier Grand Hotel. NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF STOCK. To Lionel A. Wolf: You are hereby notified that you are delinquent in the payment of your assessment of your mining stock in the Skagit River Copper Mining Company for the annual assessment work for the following years, to-wit: For the year ending December 31st, 1903, the sum of ..... $23.20 For the year ending December For the year ending December 31st, 1902, the sum of ..... $10.00 For the year ending December 31st, 1903, the sum of ..... 10.00 For the year ending December 31st, 1904, the sum of ..... 10.00 For the year ending December 31st, 1905, the sum of ..... 27.50 Total ..... $57.50 You are further notified that your shares of stock in said company, or such part thereof as may be necessary to satisfy said assessments, will be sold on the 30th day of November, 1906, at the hour of ten o'clock A. M. at the company's office, 46 Starr-Boyd Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. GEO. W. FICKS, Secretary. Sept. 28—Nov. 23. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, Washington. The Grote-Rankin Company, Plaintiff, v. H. C. Jackson and Mrs. H. C. Jackson, Defendants.—No. 52934. Summons. The State of Washington to H. C. Jackson and Mrs. H. C. Jackson, the defendants above named: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 28th day of September, 1906, and to defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to recover possession of certain household goods in the complaint specified, which are now on deposit in the warehouse of the Union Transfer and Storage Company on Bell Street, between don't like it, nothing will please you in the way of a theatrical performance. That you will be sure to sit through the entire drama is certain, for the interest never flags. The Taylor Company will present the first new play that they have essayed in several weeks next Sunday. The old Taylor plays have proved such favorites that the management has found it expedient to continue them; but this week they will be given a rest and the company will be seen in the latest melodramatic sensation, "New York by Night." The production will be the most elaborately scenic of the Taylor Company's season. THE CONVICT'S DAUGHTER Opens at the Seattle Theatre next Sunday afternoon for a week. The leading part is played by Mr. Elmore, the same actor that appeared in the character last year. He began his career under the direction of Manager Russel 15 years ago, and is now one of the acknowledged character actors of the country. The Convict's daughter is a play full of pathos, relieved by clever comedy. The fact that it has earned over $100,000 for its owners during the past five yesrs, is a guarantee that it has a place in dramatic literature. The Seattle theater is likely to be crowded to its utmost capacity next Sunday. John H. McGraw Geo. B. Kittinger Fire and Marine Insurance. Colman Building. Telephone Main 695 Ind. L 738 $10.00 10.00 10.00 27.50 Page 6 ```markdown ``` Seattle, Washington. Building, Seattle, U.S.A. First Avenue and Western Avenue, in the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, or if possession of said household goods cannot be had, judgment in the sum of $246.55, together with cost of action. SHANK & SMITH, Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 1002 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 28—Nov. 9. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Ilam Henry Stuart, defendant. No. 52906. State of Washington, to the said William Henry Stuart, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 21st day of September, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court; the object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the following grounds: I. Because the defendant abandoned the plaintiff in the State of California on the day of February, 1905, which abandonment has been continuous for one year or more. Because the defendant has neglected and refused ever since the day of February, 1905, to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family and because he still neglects and refuses to do the same. III. Personal indignities rendering plaintiff's life burdensome caused by many acts of cruelty upon the plaintiff by defendant, abuse and misconduce of the plaintiff by the defendant, and also drunkenness of the defendant. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. 429 to 432 Epler block, 813 Second avenue, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Alphonso James, Plaintiff, vs. Clara James, Defendant. No. 52975. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Clara James, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 28th day of September, A. D. 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant herein on the ground of abandonment for more than one year. ANDREW R. BLACK. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. and Office Address: 315 Pacific Blk., Seattle, County of King, Washington. Sept. 28—Nov. 9. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Lena Kegel, plaintiff, vs. Charles Kegel, defendant. No. 52262. Summons and Service of Publication. State of Washington to the said Charles Kegel, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 10th day of August, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court; the object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the following grounds: I. Because the defendant for two years last past has neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and for his family. Personal indignities rendering plaintiff's life burdensome caused by many acts of cruelty, abuse and mis-conduct by the defendant upon the plaintiff. A. J. SPECKERT. Attorney for Plaintiff. 429-31 Epler Block, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. William W. Sperry, plaintiff, vs. Madeline Sperry, defendant. No. 52907. Summons and service of publication. State of Washington to the said Madeline Sperry, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of the first publication of this summons, toowit, within sixty days after the 21st day of September, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court; the object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the following grounds: 1. Because the defendant abandoned the plaintiff in the State of Washington on the 1st of September, 1905, which abandonment has been continuous for one year and more. P. O. address: 429 to 432 Epler block, 813 Second avenue, King county, Seattle, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Annie Duncan, plaintiff, vs. Robert Duncan, defendant. No. — Summons. The State of Washington to Robert Duncan, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 10th day of August, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned, attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce by plaintiff from defendant, to award to plaintiff the care, custody and control of the minor children of plaintiff and defendant, and to set over and decree to plaintiff as and for her separate property all the right, title and interest of defendant in and to the following described property; Lots twenty-one (21) and twenty-two (22) in M. D. Ballard's Supplemental Plat of Lake Union Addition to the City of Seattle, and the household furniture of the parties hereto. JAMES McNENY. Plaintiff's Attorney. Office and postoffice address, 514 Marion Block, Seattle, Wash. REPUBLICAN LEGAL IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. H. M. Gould, Plaintiff, vs. the Unknown Heirs of John L. Lewis, deceased, Defendants. No. 52,490. The State of Washington to the said "The Unknown Heirs of John L. Lewis, deceased": You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 24th day of August, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to procure a partition of land described as Lot Nine, in Block Fifteen, in Madison Street Addition to the City of Seattle, in said County and State, in THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN which it is alleged in the complaint in said action that you have an undivided half interest. JUDD & SAMPSON, Plaintiff's Attorneys. P. O. Address: 432 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. Date of first publication Aug. 24, 1906. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Nellie Merriam, Plaintiff, vs. George H. Merriam, Defendant.—No. 52575. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said George H. Merriam, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 31st day of August, A. D. 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows. That plaintiff may obtain a complete and absolute divorce from the defendant herein on the grounds of drunkenness, neglect and non-support. JOHN L. NEAGLE, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 306 Bailey Building, Seattle, County of King, Washington. Date of first publication, Aug. 31st, 1906. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Queen City Manufacturing Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Olympic Drug & Chemical Company., a corporation, defendant.—Notice of Hearing on Receiver's Final Report Notice is hereby given to the creditors of and all persons interested in the Olympic Drug & Chemical Company, a corporation, that the receiver heretofore appointed in the above entitled court and cause for said company, has filed his final report in the clerk's office of the above named court, and said court has made an order designating the 5th day of October, 1906, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m., in the equity department of said court, as the time and place for a hearing upon said report, and for a distribution of the assets in the hands of the receiver and all creditors or other persons interested in the said Olympic Drug & Chemical Company, a corporation, are notified to be present at said time and place and protect their interests as the same may appear. This notice is published under and by virtue of an order made and entered in the above entitled court and cause on the 15th day of September, 1906. C. R. PENDARVIS, Receiver. Date of first publication, September 21, 1906. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Jonathan Gifford, doing business as Gifford Realty Trust, plaintiff, vs. William A. Fermann and Jane Doe Fermann, his wife (whose Christian name is unknown), defendants.—No. 52719. Summons. The State of Washington to the said William A. Fermann and Jane Doe Fermann, his wife, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 21st day of Sept., 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of the court. The object of the above action is to obtain a judgment against you for $120 commission for the sale of real estate. An attachment has been issued in F. M. JEFFERY, Plaintiff's Attorne Postoffice address: 747 New York Block, City of Seattle, in King County, State of Washington. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King, ss.—Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an order of sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 12th day of September, 1906, by the clerk thereof, in the case of Netherlands American Mortgage Bank, a corporation, vs. Sadie Canterbury and John Doe Canterbury, her husband, M. M. Riley and Jennie Riley, his wife, I. R. Williams, I. D. Kramer and Mathilde E. Kramer, his wife, H. Ochiltree, C. Ochiltree and Kentucky Liquor Company, a corporation, defendants, No. 51450, and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheriff's sale, towit, at ten o'clock a. m. on the 20th day of October, A. D. 1906, before the court house door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot twelve (12) and the south half of lot eleven (11), block twenty-six (26) of Law's Second Addition to the City of Seattle, according to the recorded plat thereof, levied on to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure of mortgage, amounting to two thousand seventy-five dollars and thirty cents ($2075.30), and costs of suit in favor of plaintiff. Dated this twelfth day of September, 1906. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Alpheus Coss, Plaintiff, vs. Katie Coss, Defendant.—No. 52108. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to said Katie Coss. Defendant: In the name of the State of Washington, you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days from and after the 27th day of July, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his offices below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said court. The object of the said action set forth in the complaint is as follows: To secure in favor of plaintiff and from defendant an absolute and unconditional divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant upon the ground of desertion and abandonment of plaintiff by defendant continuously for more than one year's time immediately preceding the verification of the complaint on file herein, and for other proper relief in the premises. Post Office Address: 421-423 Boston Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Clara Anna Green, Plaintiff, vs. Albert Eneymore Green, Defendant.—No. 52667. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to said Albert Enemore Green, defendant above named: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty (60) days after the 7th day of September, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of said action is to obtain a decree of divorce from you, the said defendant, on the ground of habitual drunkenness, personal indignities to plaintiff and a neglect to make suitable provision for the plaintiff, and a failure and neglect to give her proper and necessary support. P. O. Address: 422 Boston Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication September 7th IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Ella McBride, Plaintiff, vs. Linas McBride, Defendant. No. 52785. Summons and Service of Publication. State of Washington to the said Linas McBride, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 14th day of September, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the following grounds: I. Because defendant abandoned the plaintiff on or about the ..... day of May or June, 1903, and because said abandonment has been continuous for one year or more. Because the defendant has neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and the family for more than two years last past. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. 429-31 Epler Block, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 14—Oct. 26. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Martin L. Thompson, Plaintiff, vs. Gerda Thompson, Defendant.—Summons. No. 52679. Th State of Washington to the said Gerda Thompson, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 14th day of September, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. September 28, 1906 The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defendant on the ground of desertion and abandonment. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 506 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sent, 14—Oct. 26. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Norah J. Wixom, Plaintiff, vs. Orsom C. Wixom, Defendant—No. ..... The State of Washington to Orson C. Wixom, the above named defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the 7th day of September, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of failure on your part so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court; that plaintiff's cause of action against you as set forth in the complaint for divorce founded on cruel and inhuman treatment. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 300-301 Pacific Block, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 7-Oct. 19. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. The State of Washington to the said James S. Grady, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 28th day of September, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complain of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you accor-ing to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and the defendant on the grounds of non-support and neglect. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address: 506 Pioneer Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. Sent. 28 Nov. 9. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Clara E. Jones, Plaintiff, vs. Albert B. Jones, Defendant. No. — Summons. The State of Washington to the said Albert B. Jones, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 17th day of August, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated: and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the Clerk of the said Court. The object of such action to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of abandonment for more than one year before the commencement of this action and for the neglect and refusal of the defendant to make suitable provision for the support of the plaintiff and her child. W. T. SCOTT. Plaintiff's Attorney. Postoffice address: Seattle, King County, Washington, 404 Marion Bldg. Aug. 17-Sept. 28. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. F. M. Jeffery, Plaintiff, vs. Alice Harmon and L. C. Harmon, husband and wife, Defendants. No. 52220. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Alice Harmon and L. C. Harmon, husband and wife, Defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons to-wit: within 60 days after the 7th day of September, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County aforesaid; and answer the complaint of the Plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. This action is brought to collect a debt of $50 for professional services. P. O. Address: 747 New York Block, in Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. Sept. 7—Oct. 19. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the matter of the estate of Carl Johan Carlson, Deceased.—No..... In Probate. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned administratrix of the estate of Carl Johan Carlson, deceased, to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against the said deceased or said estate, to exhibit and present them with the necessary vouchers within one year after the first publication of this notice to the undersigned administratrix at 704 New York Block, Seattle, Washington, that being the place for the transaction of the business of said estate. This notice is given under and by virtue of the order of the above entitled court made and entered on the 13th day of September, 1906. JOSEPHINE C. CARLSON, Administratrix. Attorney for Administratrix 704 New York Block, Seattle, Wash. First notice, Sept. 14, 1906. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Hanna Magnusson, deceased.—No. 6638. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made and Final Account Should Not Be Approved. Andrew Chilberg, administrator of the estate of Hanna Magnusson, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Hanna Magnusson, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said Court in the City of Seattle, on the 18th day of October, 1906, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said account should not be approved and an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County for a period of four weeks, and published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 18th day of October, 1906, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. ARTHUR E. GRIFFIN. Judge State of Washington, County of King, ss. I, Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 13th day of September, 1906, in the matter of the estate of Hanna Magnuson, deceased. son, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 13th day of September, 1906. (Seal) OTTO A. CASE. Clerk. By D. K. SICKELS, Deputy Clerk. ISRAEL NELSON, Attorney for Administrator. 704 New York Block, Seattle, Wash. IN TH ESUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the matter of the estate of Richard M. Davis deceased.—Notice of death of executrix, and appointment of administrator, and requiring presentation of claims to such administrator—No. 6484. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned, administrator with the will annexed, of the estate of Richard M. Davis, deceased, to all creditors and persons having claims against said estate, that hertofore, to-wit, the 24th day of April, 1906, Emilia R. Davis, the duly appointed, qualified and acting executrix of the estate of Richard M. Davis, deceased, died, and that thereafter, to-wit, on the 13th day of September, 1906, the undersigned, W. W. Wilshire, was duly appointed administrator of said estate with the will annex, has duly qualified and is acting as such administrator; and that all creditors and persons having claims against said estate are hereby rotified to exhibit and present to*him their said claims within one year from the date of the first publication of notice to creditors by said Emilia R. Davis, as such executrix, to-wit, September 15th, 1905, exclusive on the time between the date of the death of said executrix and the date of the first insertion of this notice in this publication, to-wit, between April 24th, 1906, and the 14th day of September 1906, at his office, 442 New York Block, Seattle, Washington, that THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN being the place for the transaction of the business of said estate. Dated the 14th day of September, 1906. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. The Everett Timber & Investment Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Lewis W. Gore, Defendant. No. — Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, Lewis W. Gore: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty (60) days after the 7th day of September, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at- torneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to have that certain deed made by you on the 8th day of November, 1899, and recorded in Volume 244 of Deeds' at page 192 of the records of King County, corrected and reformed, so as to apply to and describe the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section Twenty-six (26) in Township Twenty-five (25) North, of Range Eight (8) East of the W. M. Date of first publication September 7th, 1906. BROWNELL & COLEMAN, Attorneys for Plaintiff, Office and P. O. Address, Everett, Snohomish County, Washington, Colby, Building. Address, Everett, Snohomish County, Washington, Colby Building. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Minnie L. Rollin, Plaintiff, vs. Charles G. Rollin, Defendant. No. 52609. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Charles G. Rollin, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 7th day of September, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County aforesaid; and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complant, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this action is to obtain a divorce from you and for alimony $15.00 per month and for setting over community property to the plain- P. O. Address: 747 New York Block, in Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King, William Bottcher, Plaintiff, vs. Sophie Markkanen and Abel Markkanen, Defendants.—No. 52476. The State of Washington to the said Sophie Karkkanen and Abel Markkanen: You, and each of you, are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit, within sixty (60) days after the 7th day of September, 1906, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been file) with the clerk of said court. Plaintiff seeks by the above entitled action to recover from the defendants, and each of them, the sum of three hundred ($300.00) dollars, due on a certain promissory note, together with interest and attorney's fees, and has filed in the above entitled court his affidavit alleging that you and each of you have departed from the State of Washington, with the intent to defraud your creditors, and to avoid the service of summons, and has caused a writ of attachment to be sued out of the above entitled court and levied upon the following described property located. Lying and being in the County of King, State of Washington, and particularly described as follows, towit: Lot six (6), block fifty-five (55), Kilbourn's Supplemental Plat of that part of Lake Union Addition to the City of Seattle situated in lot four (4), section seventeen (17), township twenty-five (25) North of range four (4) east; and seeks to have any judgment recovered in the above entitled cause declared a lien upon said premises, all of which will more fully appear from the pleadings and files in this cause on file in the clerk's office of the above entitled court. GRAVES, PALMER & MURPHY Attorneys for Plaintiff. Date of first publication, Sept. 7, 1906. Date of last publication, Oct. 19, 1906. P. O. Address: 911 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Marcellus Lara and Sada W. Lara, ard M. Davis, deceased. Sept. 7-Oct. 19. plaintiffs, vs. The Commonwealth Title Insurance and Trust Company of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Trustee, Northwestern Trust Company of Seattle King County, Washington. F the unknown heirs of M. Corcoran, whose real first name is unknown, wife W. W. Corcoran, late of Washington in the District of Columbia; the unk heirs of Mary Riggs, wife of Elisa Riggs, late of the City of New York, in the State of New York; H. E. Kelsey, Mike Rosa, Fred Soup Thomas Fank, George Barnes and J. Kirkpatrick; also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in real estate scribed in the complaint herein, to-w Blocks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 17, 18, 19, and 21 of the Plat of Mercer Park, in King County, in the State of Washington, Defendants. No. — Summons. The State of Washington to the said, The Commonwealth Title Insurance and Trust Company of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Trustee, Northwestern Trust Company of Seattle, King County, Washington, Mary Riggs; the unknown heirs of Mary Corcoran, whose real first name is unknown, wife of W. W. Corcoran, late of Washington, in the District of Columbia; the unknown heirs of Mary Riggs, wife of Elisha Riggs, late of the City of New York, in the State of New York; H. E. Kelsey, Mike Rosa, Fred Soupe, Thomas Fank, George Barnes and J. R. Kirkpatrick; And also all other persons or parties unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, to-wit: Block 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 of the plat of Mercer Park, in King County, in the State of Washington: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 24th day of August, 1906, and defend the above entitled action, and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorney for plaintiffs, at his office below stated; and, in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the Clerk of the Court. The object of this action, set forth in the complaint, is to quiet the title of plaintiffs in and to the following real estate, situate in King County, Washington, to-wit: Blocks One (1), Two (2), Three (3), Four (4), Five (5), Six (6), Seven (7), Seventeen (17), Eighteen (18), Nineteen (19), Twenty (20), and Twenty-one (21) of the Plat of Mercer Park, which Plat will be found recorded in the office of the Auditor of said King County and to obtain a decree declaring and adjudging plaintiffs to be the sole owners in fee simple of said premises; that the defendants, known and unknown, be required to set forth the nature of their several claims; and that each and all of said claims be determined and that defendants be forever barred and enjoined from asserting or maintaining any claim, lien, right, title or interest in said premises or any part thereof adverse to the right and title of plaintiffs therein; that each and every of the liens, claims, rights, titles and interests of said defendants, and each of them, in said premises, or any part thereof, be declared null and void, and for general equitable relief. Attorney for Plaintiffs. Office and P. O. Address: 514 Marion Block, Seattle, Washington. present none but the strongest and most reliable Fire Insurance Com- panies : : : : £10 NEW YORK BLOCK ONES: } SUNSET 1090 } INDEPENDENT 432 SINCE 1830 YES SIR! HERE'S THE BEER, SIR! RAINIER-THE ONLY BEER, SIR! SEATTLE BREWING & MALTING CO. SEATTLE / / / WASHINGTON. TELEPHONE RAINIER JO. September 28, 1906 BONNEY & WATSON UNDERTAKERS Third and Col m . Prepaing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. Both 'P ones 49 Established 1888 E. R. TTERWORTH & SONS E. R. BUTTERWORTH, Mgr. Professional Funeral Directors And Embalmers : 1921 First Avenue, - Seattle The Puget Sound National Bank Capital stock paid in ..... $528,000 Surplus. ..... 35,000 Jacob Furth, Pres.; J. S. Goldsmith, Vice-Pres.; R. V. Ankeny, Cash. Correspondence in all the principal cities of the United States and Europe. Building Material Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice STETSON POST MILL CO. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 ACME PUBLISHING CO. 312 MARION BLOCK BRIEFS OUR SPECIALTY Telephones: {Sunset, Red 1997 }Independent, 1306 ALBERT HANSEN Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted with Glasses. 706 First Avenue. M. & K. GOTTSTEIN WHOLESALE LIQUOR DEALERS 206 First Aye. South. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SEATTLE WASH. C. P. MASTERSON, Cashier. MAURICE M'MICKEN, Vice-Pres. F. F. PARKHURST, Asst. Cash. A general banking business transacted. Letters of credit sold on all principal cities of the world. Special facilities for collecting on British Columbia, Alaska snd all Pacific Northwest points. We nave a bank at Cape Nome. Peoples' Savings Bank Second and Pike. Capital $100,000 Deposits received from $1 to $10,000; 4 per cent. interest allowed on savings deposits. : : : : E. C. Neufelder, President. R. H. Denny, Vice-President. J. T. Greenleaf, Cashier SAFE DEPOSIT VAULT THE NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE H. C. Henry, Pres. R. R. Spencer, Cashier. ```markdown ```