Seattle Republican

Friday, December 13, 1907

Seattle, Washington

8 pages

Page 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 2
Page 3
Page 3
Page 4
Page 4
Page 5
Page 5
Page 6
Page 6
Page 7
Page 7
Page 8
Page 8
Page text (machine-generated)
SEATTLE REPUBLICAN THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN PUBLISHES LEGAL NOTICES AT REASONABLE RATES. MAIN 305. VOL. XIV. NO. 29 SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Published Every Friday at 307 Epler Block. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton .....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton .....Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. One Year .....$2.00 Six Months .....1.00 Three Months ......60 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matter, ARE YOU THE MAN? There's a scary sort of feller gain' round the country through A-talkin' of the future in a way to make you blue; A-predictin' woes and panics and all kinds of dreadful shocks. And a-blamin' folks in Wall Street and condemnin' deals in stocks; Sayin' our financial system is a structure full of faults. And a-callin' in his money and a-lockin' it in vaults. And with wish to bring him forward and convert him if we can We are seekin' information- Shucks! Don't let a little fluerry from the clouds a-passin' by Make you think the storm has covered all the broad Make you think the storm has covered all the broad financial sky; Trouble finds the man who falters sooner than the man who fights: Let a little cheerful confidence, not grumblin', be your plan, Now to save the situation— Say, are you the man? —Contributed. THE OUOTATION DENIED. Mrs. Edith Tozier Weatherred, the chaparon of the nine Hawaiian girls, who recently visited Seattle, denies that she in any sense intimated in her speech that those young ladies were here looking for husbands, the report of the daily press and the subsequent comment of The Seattle Republican to the contrary notwithstanding. That the lady was misquoted The Seattle Republican now verily believes and for any one to be thoroughly convinced of that fact need but to talk to her on the subject. Mrs. Weatherred seems to be a most estimable lady and so far as quoting her is concerned The Seattle Republican was totally in error. She takes a most commendable as well as charitable view of the racial conditions in the United States and if more of the leading ladies of the land would share her opinions there would be far less fiction in this "land of the free (?) and home of the brave," between the whites and the blacks. The allegation on its face did not look cruelly raw, but when the same, if not in so many words, nevertheless strongly intimated, was published in the leading paper of the state without contradiction, then it sounded at least plausible, hence the comment. This paper has too high a regard for womanhood in general and especially Uncle Sam womanhood to not only not misquote her, but in any sense put her in a THE SEATTLE REPUBLIC SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, DECEMBER 13, 1907. false light or at a disadvantage and therefore it becomes a real pleasure to correct the error. Like Banquo's ghost, that Brownsville outrage perpetrated by President Roosevelt on the Negro soldiers will not down, and it is more than probable that Foraker is going to have a whole bushel of fun out of it before it has been finally disposed of. That there is nothing in the veritable howl the Star set up about the city printing contract any publisher of sound judgment will readily testify. The Seattle Republican, as is known, is not much of an admirer of the Times, but when the Bulletin got the city printing at fifty cents per inch it by no means tore its shirt from a financial standpoint. Not even a weekly paper could afford to publish the matter for a less sum and make any great amount of money out of doing so. The Star itself would not do the work at that figure and why expect a newspaper to do work for the city for any less than for commercial houses. If there is a voter in Seattle that would vote against one of the councilmen because he voted to accept the bid of the Bulletin for the city printing at that price then such voter is too cheap to live in Seattle. Woman's beauty lies not in fine features, says an eastern paper. The idea is that beautiful features need not be adorned to manifest themselves. The thought is not only true, but easily apparent. However, who has either the time or the inclination to peek under a two-year-old hat for an admiration of lovely features. Let it be known that the wearer of plain clothes could purchase more elaborate ones if she wished and at once the beauty of her features, if she possesses any, asserts itself. Strange, but it's a way we have. A police woman, Miss Dorothy Stewart, keeps order in one of Chicago's largest theaters by simply looking pretty in her uniform and waving a flimsy handkerchief. A few among the sterner sex of Seattle's theater goers might stop to look at the fit of a policewoman's uniform providing the woman who wore it also had a pretty face, but when she, the police woman, ran up against one of those way back down Third avenue gallery strings waiting for the Grand to open its gallery window, if she depended only on a lace handkerchief she would meet with a great disappointment. With the rapid growth of Seattle it is daily becoming more apparent that a battle for bread is on and he who does not push to the front in some way must content himself with a scarce amount. Yet."times" can still become closer. In a part of New York, for instance, the owners of push carts often sleep in them or roll themselves up in blankets and sleep on the tops of their carts in order to hold their places near the curbstone. It will UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 BLICAN R 13. 1907. PRICE TEN CENTS be many years, however, before this city reaches that degree of intensity in the struggle for existence. The expected clash between the soldiers and the strikers at Goldfield has not occurred as yet, but the sooner it does the better it will be for the camp, as those cusses must be taught to fear the strong arm of the law even if the soldiers are forced to shoot to kill to bring that about. It is said on good authority that Ernest B. Herald, one of the deputies in the prosecuting attorney's office, will be a candidate for one of the superior court judges next year. Mr. Herald is said to possess quite a legal mind and has the turn of a very able jurist. With the preachers withdrawing their moral and religious support from the Y. M. C. A. on account of the association installing billiard and pool tables in their new building, it would appear that the association in Seattle has about outlived its usefulness. Notwithstanding the fact the National Republican Central Committee has past its half century milestone the next convention in Chicago June 16th will be something New under the son. Ankeny Has a Good Record," says a Times head-line. For what? Going back on those that helped to make him United States senator? In that we must admit his record is par excellent. Representative Humphrey is learning to do the "gallery stunt" all the same Jim Ham Lewis. Don't the people love to be humbugged. The Y. M. C. A.-preacher controversy is to resolve itself to a Lippy one, which, in other words, will be a mere war of words. Are we to understand from the verdict of the jury that the theatres in Seattle were not open for business on Sunday? Talkings of the third term touches Teddy in a tender spot, and he makes a pretense of putting a quietus on it. Why not send your legal publications to The Seattle Republican where you always get a square deal? There seems to be some doubt as to the alleged friendship of the Star for the Post-Intelligencer. The Seattle Republican publishes on Friday and bears that date. The Seattle Republican, Main 305. RECONABLE RATES. MAIN 305. Political Pot-Pie For Senator John L. Wilson denies having any gubernatorial aspirations or any political aspirations or ambitions of any class, kind or character. While Senator Wilson is more or less interested in the political checker board, yet he asks nor seeks no office for himself. * * * No Democrat has as yet filed his declaaration for the nomination of mayor of Seattle, but J. B. Metcalf has been asked to make the race by a large number of Democrats, as well as Republicans, and it begins to look as if he will be forced to do so. * * * H. H. Kulies, the well known Dutch Democrat, says he will contest the nomination for mayor with J. B. Metcalf or any one else seeking that nomination. A great many of the Democrats are opposed to nominating any one for mayor, but want to leave the head of the ticket blank so that Mayor William Hickman Moore may be voted for. * * * "In my opinion," said P. J. Smith, the well known politician from the north district, the man who will be nominated for mayor on the Republican ticket has not been named yet. Seattle's next mayor should be a man broad and liberal and able to do the city proud during the life of the A.-Y.-P. exposition." *** If Jim Agnew says he has the assured support of the Post-Intelligencer in his fight for sheriff he is as badly mistaken as was L. H. Gray in his assertion that Senator Wilson favored him for mayor. It was but a few months ago that Agnew declared he preferred the opposition of the P.-I. to its support, but now he is absolutely telling falsehoods about having the backing of the P.-I. If the Afro-Americans want to show their independence in politics why do they not name some one of their number for some of the nominations that are to be made. If such a candidate received only the votes of the Afro-Americans that would demonstrate that they were at least independent enough to vote for one of their number. * * * The Democrats met Thursday to formulate a platform on which to go before the voters after the direct primaries have been held but the gathering did not show complete harmony. If the Democrats ever hope to win a political fight they will have to get together and make a solid front. * * * It would seem that Hi Gill is to have the fight of his life for a renomination for councilman from the Third ward as F. M. Jefferey has filed his declaration for the same nomination. It is said that Jefferey has the support of D. W. Bowan in the fight, which would seem to indicate that Gill will have to hustle if he gets there. If both John E. Humphries and Lewis Levy are not nominated for mayor on the Republican ticket it will not be because they are not working like beavers. Judge Humphries has already fixed a number of dates THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN [Picture of a man in a suit and bow tie]. HON. ELLIS MORRISON when he will address the voters and explain his views. Mr. Levy is seeing his personal friends and making new acquaintances day in and day out. * * * If Gen. George W. Tibbets goes to the soldiers' home as commander, and there is hardly any doubt of it, Gov. Mead for once will have acted wisely. Gen. Tibbetts is a deserving old soldier as well as a King county politician and should have been remembered ere this. He will be heartily supported by the G. A. R. of King county as Gen. Ames desires to retire from the position. * * * Politicians as well as prominent business men all over the state will be pleased to learn that State Senator Walter J. Reed is to be married within the present month to a Miss Lydia MacMillian of a prominent Philadelphia family. From time to time Senator Reed has been spoken of in connection with the gubernatorial nomination, but he has always declined the honor. He is a candidate to succeed himself in the senate with fair prospects of winning out. There seems to be no doubt but that Theodore M. Daulton will be the Democratic nominee for city treasurer. Mr. Daulton, it will be remembered, was elected councilman some four years ago over the Republican nominee in the Seventh ward, which gave a Republican plurality of 1,600 on all other candidates and with Reber as his opponent he believes he is certain of winning. Harry Carroll, it is said, will be without an opponent in the primaries, which, if true, will be quite a compliment to him. The same state of affairs will prevail so far as Scott Calhoun is concerned. Rumor has it that Senator Piles contemplates breaking the Sweeney agreement so far as Charles Hopkins is concerned and have him removed from the marshall's office. As his successor the names of John FRIDAY, DECEMBER 6, 1907. Wooding and Jim Agnew have been mentioned. Whereupon a well known Republican remarked: "It would seem that Jim Agnew had better shed his swadding clothes of Republican birth before wanting a place like United States marshall. He was a Democrat until he found it more profitable to be a Republican. * * * Quite a number of persons have already filed their declarations for places on the direct primary ballot seeking nominations from the various parties in Seattle, which primary election will be held the 3rd of February, 1908. They are as follows: [Picture of a man with a mustache and a suit]. STATE SENATOR W. J. REED Who is to soon become a benedict. us a Se 4 ree a \ =“ ; 4 * Fx! © 4 i “ 2 5 acer nr a ee I all rn el we . FRIDAY, DECEMBER 13, 1907. ward, Republican; Z. B. Rawson, councilman from the Ninth ward, Republican; W. M. Hines, councilman from the Twelfth ward, Republican; James Kelso, councilman from the Eleventh ward, City Party; Osear P. Oliver, for mayor, Republican; A. A. Booth, councilman from Third ward, City Party; Syvert Stray, councilman from the Fifth ward, Republican; T. P. Fay, councilman from the Eleyenth ward, Republican; Joel Docking, councilman from the Second ward, Republican; Max Wardell, councilman from the Fourteenth ward, Republican; G. A. Steiner, councilman from the Thirteenth _ward, Socialist; E. S. Ingraham, councilman from the Seventh ward, Republican; Alfred E. Parker, councilman from the Tenth ward, Republican; Hiram C. Gill, councilman from the Third ward, Republican; Charles H. Drager, councilman from the Second ward, Republican. J.B. Metealf, for mayor, Demoerat; Abra- ham Kestler, councilman-at-large, Repub- lican; William Hickman Moore, for mayor, City Party. There are a lot of business men wondering why it is that the Hon. R. L. McCormick is leading the fight against the railroads in the lumber rate controversy. Can it be true that Mr. McCormick is independent of the rail- roads? It is true, but it spoils an awful pret- ty Democratic story cireulated when Wright was a candidate and believed by enough weak-kneed Republicans to assist in defeat- ing the best man that Tacoma has had an opportunity of voting for in a decade. If the Hon. Robert L. McCormick was mayor of Tacoma now—well, things would be differ- -ent. The eternal bickering at the City Hall would have ceased, and Tacoma would now be on a business basis. The lesson learned by Republicans has not been in vain, It will teach them, we hope, the advisability of nom- inating a good man and then voting for him. —Tacoma Forum. Why not elect him governor and thereby place him in line for the senatorship to suc- ceed Piles. Just think what a team Ankeny and MeCormick would make in the senate. A few days ago we received a letter from Hon.| Ellis Morrison, of Seattle, announcing that he would be a candidate for lieutenant governor on the Republican ticket at the next primary election to be held on the second ‘Tuesday in September, 1908. Mr. Morrison is not a stranger to the people of this state. Tn 1893 and 1895 he represented King county in the lower house of the state legislature and was elected speaker in 1895, He was chairman of the Republican State Central committee in 1902, and was a member of the Seattle city council for a number of years. ‘The writer has been personally acquainted with Mr. Morrison for twenty years, and if the lieutenant governorship is tu go to the west side of the state we do not know of a better man for the position.—Hartline Stan- dard. This is truly a ease of going away from home to hear the news, but nevertheless it’s good news and the Pie-maker predicts that Ellis Morrison will make a splendid showing for this nomination, THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ABs enn Mane rkee tS erate spire 8. thr. PR Mowe te ae nee | gaming aR 1a Be hg ce ain we i ey i | i i Pog HON. JOHN L. WILSON, Who Seeks No Political Preferment. BENCH AND BAR. The supreme court has handed down an opinion which practically destroys the valid- ity of the Seattle water bonds amounting to $2,500,000. This will prove a severe loss to Seattle as her water system stands greatly in need of extensive improvements. We have the exclusive ageney for the Cen- tral Law Journal of St. Louis for the state of Washington, Would you like it, Mr. Law- ver? NOTES OF IMPORTANT DECISIONS. From Central Law Journal. Carriers—Right to Recover Penalty for Refusing a Transfer Where Case is Made Up for That Purpose—In the recent case of Johnston y. New York City Railway Co., 104 N. Y. Supp. 812, the court effectively dis- courages a class of litigation from which many damage lawyers in New York expect- ed to reap a rich harvest. The court held in that case that a street railway is not liable for refusal to give a transfer to one who be- comes a passenger solely to lay a foundation to sue for such refusal. The court further held that such proof when disclosed cast dis- credit on all of plaintiff’s testimony. The court said: ‘‘This is an action to recover a penalty for a refusal by the defendant to give a transfer. The plaintiff in this case boarded a car at Wall and South streets, ‘going north, paid his fare, and asked for a transfer for a Chambers street and Broad- way car, which was given him, He then boarded a Chambers street car going west, and told the conductor he desired to use the transfer for riding on a Broadway car going north. This right was refused him, and he was also refused another transfer for the Broadway line, and on boarding a Broadway car was compelled to pay a second fare. Since the trial of this case the appellate divis- ion, first department, in the case. of Nichol- son v. N. Y. City Ry. Co., 103 N. Y. Supp. 695, has held that, to entitle the plaintiff to recover in actions of this character, it must be proven that the passenger became such in good faith, and for the purpose of going to some point on the line to which he wished to be transferred. Prior to this decision the motive that prompted the passenger in mak- could recover a penalty for being refused a transfer, and it is a reasonable presumption that in all the cases of this character, where the plaintiff recovered a judgment for a pen- alty, and where evidence was received tend- ing to show that the passenger was riding for the purpose of being refused a transfer and then bringing an action, such evidence was not considered. It is true that the court, in the Nicholson Case, states that the evi- dence in that case was uncontradicted, that the ‘sole’ purpose of the plaintiff in asking a transfer was to bring an action in case a transfer was refused, and that ‘the statute * * * by express provision precludes one from suing for a penalty who has no intent to go to a point on the connecting line but who takes the car merely for the purpose of putting himself in a position to bring an action;’ and respondent’s attorney urges that, where the passenger testifies that he has an actual point of destination and business to transact at that point, he is not precluded from recovering a penalty because he also testifies that one of his objects in taking the trip was to sue for the penalty if refused a transfer, This would be true if the court believed such testimony. In the case at bar, and in several others in which appeals are now pending in this court in actions of this character brought by the same plaintiff and others, the testimony shows many, and in some cases all, of the following facts, viz.: That the plaintiff has from five to fifty similar actions, so many, in fact, that he is unable to give the exact number; that the trips to be made and the routes over which they are to be taken were planned in advance in the office of the plain- tiff’s attorney; that such trips were to be taken on certain designated days, and the plaintiff then returned to the office of the attorney, where complaints were signed and sworn to, said complaints having been fully prepared in advance, except the filling in of the date and the route taken; that a sum- mons was then attached to the complaint, said summons in many instances having been obtained prior to the time the trip was taken, and the summons and complaint then deliv- ered to the officer for service; that in some instances the plaintiff has walked several blocks away from the point where he could have taken a car which would have taken him to his destination without a transfer, in order to board a car upon which he knew or had reason to believe a transfer would be re- fused. In many of the cases now pending upon appeal the plaintiff has testified to no business necessitating the making of the trip, and has admitted that one of his objects was to begin an action for the penalty, if refused a transfer. The testimony of a plaintiff is not always binding upon a court or jury. Where the facts and circumstances disclosed by the evidence are so much at variance with the direct testimony of a witness as to cast a doubt upon its truthfulness the mere declaration of an interested party is not to be given the greater credit. Such facts and circumstances, if weighed and believed by the court, would justifiably result in a judgment 3 te ore Soe a ATR Gh tm M4 sa ay ety eae as | i Ae Nay aaa Bee Hh 3 : eae 4 re as ae hey Sani ne "4 ye eh ae See eat Ft oe ia Cy ae peas a oe CN ies ieee ae. Sos adem Canal Be ‘ ee | 5 age ae: 1 Oe a ; Ae oa APRAGY i, Apa HEL See eo = % a a oe ; Pee : ee i Sci pacae 2G : ee a ee Dis Pad ge Y ees — PG fe NOE Onan Sie eee (ie + ae ; Pees i ae ea eae : + Sine os hee “te fo Ns tee Ce 0 a aotHts Fh Coens pee a ae Se al ae is es ae : 1a ee 4 Ss ae eae SAE ak ot ae say eel | i oa i Se ees i REE neha ; Seay CS aie i eat : j oS } 1h Sia vt 5 heen faa seg ee e an a Sea a kl WASHINGTON WEEKLY REVIEW. The Seattle Times has already nominated and elected the next mayor of that city, with- out the aid or consent of the voters. Great is the power of the press.—Centralia Chronicle. But do not forget the truism, Saw it in the Times? Damn lie. The saloons seems to have carried a major- ity of towns in Washington again this year.— Rockford Register. And they are laying their plans to capture Seattle and at once inaugurate a wide-open policy such as was in full foree and effect in Seattle some six years ago. The Todd murder has been rung through many changes, but how silent have been the Harbor papers on the dozen of floaters, un- doubtedly murdered, that have been found in the bay at Hoquiam and Aberdeen. These poor devils have been scarcely noticed, prob- ably because no one thought that a woman had been mixed up in the murders. As a matter of fact there are reasons to believe that even greater criminality would have been found had many of these eases of float- ers been investigated. Perhaps the Chron- icle may err but it believes that had the floater mysteries been thoroughly investigat- ed a gang of thugs and murderers would have been found that would have made the Todd murder seem commonplace.—Elma Chronicle. Reports from different parts of the county indicate that the opening of the new year will see a closing of the lid in this county that will surprise the natives. Evidence is being gath- ered in every town and city in the county, which will be laid before the county attorney. In Blaine, Sumas and Lynden, particularly, the advoates of Sunday closing are at work with energy and dispatch and they claim to be in shape to close the lid and sit in a very short time.—Sumas News. At the present time there is no valid excuse why J. J. Hill should not build the Wenat- chee-Orovill branch of the G. N. Railway. The only objection to building the road last sum- mer was the searcity of labor and as that ob- jection is removed we will expect Mr. Jim to go ahead with his road building, or we may be compelled to build it ourselves. However, we are willing to give Jim the first chance if he will improve it, but we can not wait much & “<“on , ru a : ee ser Be. a PIR sd aioe rea eG JOHN WOODING, Who May Succeed Charley Hopkins as U. S. Marshal for Western Washington. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN plentiful on account of so many mills and mines closing down and if Jim intends to build this road it is time he was getting busy. This is the last call—Brewster Rerald. longer on his slow motions. Labor is now ROOSEVELT’S RECENT MESSAGE. Without fear of successful contradiction it can be said of Theodore Roosevelt’s recent message to Congress that it was the most exhaustive as well as comprehensive docu- ment that was ever filed in the archives of the National Capitol. It was replete with meat for thought from beginning to end, so clear and so concise were the needs, and ne- cessities, of the government as well as the evils and remedies therefor pointed out that eyery person of average intelligence, who either read or heard the message read, knows well the nation’s case from an executive standpoint, and the most of the president’s fellow citizens heartily agree with him in all that he said therein, The Seattle Republican truly hopes that Congyess will favorably act onfeach and every recommendation therein and if it does we have no doubt but that the United States of America will be much the, better thereby. But with all of President Roosevelt’s nobleness of character and high aims as a publie benefactor, yet like Napolean the Great he does things seemingly just to the contrary of what one would expect him to do. Tt was said of Napoleon that though a Cor- sican by birth he sadly neglected the island after becoming emperor. Despite the fact he was a Roman Catholie he imprisoned the pope and did other things against the vital principles of the church. Notwithstanding the fact he was the guiding hand that over- threw the old French dynasty, fighting the people’s battles, yet he became the most heartless tyrant in all Europe on becoming emperor of France. “*All men up,”’ once said President Roose- velt, after being severely criticized by a dele- gation of Southern white men on account of Roosevelt having shown a disposition to treat the American Negro with fairness. ‘‘Would you have me close the door of hope on the Negro? Not so. He shall stand as fair be- fore the law as the most favored.’’? And he his high regard for the worthy black man and yet in his recent message as in previous ones not one reference or recommendation did he make to Congress that the wilful slaugh- tering of the black folk by the whites be checked. Soldiers are dispatched to Gold- field and to this and that place regardless of state rights, if human'‘life and property in- terests are in danger of mob violence, but the killing of Negroes by the scores in the South and for alleged crimes that in the ‘‘North’’ would amount to a mere petit offense, moves him not. It was while the president ‘was in the South that a Negro was lynched for hav- ing stolen seventy-five cents from a white boy. Another was lynched in Vicksburg, Miss., three days before the Roosevelt demon- stration there for an equally petit offense. At Brookhaven, Miss., a Negro was brained in the court room by the prosecuting attor- ney for answering his questions impudently FRIDAY, DECEMBER 13, 1907. and the court publiely approved of his acts. But why recite these cases for similar ones oceur periodically year in and year out, but President Roosevel in all his wisdom officially sees them not. He may not ‘‘close the door of hope on the Negro and he may want ‘‘all men up,’’ but if as president he exhibits no greater proof of those broad principles tham the mere uttering of them then the Negro has. a very poor advocate at court. ° So far as the Negro is concerned what @ peculiar friend he has in Theodore Roosevelt. It was the Negro soldiers that saved the day for Colonel Roosevelt at San Juan Hill and yet in a subsequent magazine article Roose- velt, the historian, branded them as cowards and traitors, which he denied when candidate for the presidency. The same Theodore Roosevelt when governor of New York en- tertained a Negro singer in the governor’s. mansion on hearing that the hotels refused to provide accommodations for him. When the country went wild over his dining Prof. Book- er T. Washington he shrugged his shoulders and declared that the half had not been told so’ far as the Negro at the White House was concerned, but he never repeated the dining act. His discharge of the Negro soldiers was without precedent and while the facts brought out in the investigation clearly proved that the soldiers were innocent of the act, he permits the outrage to remain in a statu quo, thus showing how poorly he prae- tices what he preached ‘‘all men shoutd stand equal before the law.’’ That there is untold good in the man even all Negroes verily doeth know and truly be- lieve, but his peculiar methods of giving the, black folk of this country his proverbal “square deal’? passeth all understanding,~ ““God works in mysterious ways His wonders to perform’’ and Time may yet demonstrate that Theodore Roosevelt is no less a friend to the Negro than the immortal Lincoln himself. WOMAN. What Some of the World’s Great Men ‘ Thought of Her. Divination seems heightened to its highest power in woman.—Aleott. Heart on her lips and soul within her eyes, Soft as her clime and sunny as her skies. —Byron. The world was sad; the garden was a wild, And man, a hermit, sigh’d—till woman smil’d. —Campbell. - Her air, her manners, all who saw admired ; Courteous, though coy, and gentle, though retired. —Crabbe. REAL OF RELIGION. The Year Book of the Congregational Churehes for 1907 reports 6,512 churches, a loss of 8, and 763,447 members, a gain of 12,401, The Sunday school membership— 726,584—showed a loss of 3,695. The list of ten largest churches is headed by three in Brooklyn, and tailed by a fourth. The other six are in Los Angeles, Oakland, Worcester, Elgin, Springfield (Mass.), and Holyoke. 5 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN FRIDAY, DECEMBER 13, 1907. G. W. H. PRESSIDENT THEODORE ROOSEVELT press; whose recent refusal to stand for a third term, and whose more recent annoyance at tree of the Brownsville affair has placed him very much in the limelight. Whose recent message to the Sixtieth Congress; whose recent refusal to stand for a third term, and whose more recent annoyance at the coming report of the investigating committee of the Brownsville affair has placed him very much in the limelight. Whose recent message to the Sixtieth Congress; whose recent refusal to stand for a third term, and whose more recent annoyance at the coming report of the investigating committee of the Brownsville affair has placed him very much in the limelight. a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Estella Marr, Plaintiff, vs. Fred J. Marr, Defendant. No. 58534. Publica- tion of Summons. The State of Washington to the said Pred J. Marr, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear, within sixty (60) days after the date’ of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 15th day of November, 1907, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff therein, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rend- ered against you according to the de- mand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. That plaintiff's cause of action against you, as set forth in the complaint, is for a decree of the court dissolving the ponds of matrimony now existing be- tween you and the plaintiff on the grounds of non-supoprt and of abandon- ment of the plaintiff by you for a period of more than one year previous to the ist day of November, 1907, and for the equitable distribution to plaintiff of the property, real and personal, of plaintiff and yourself, RONEY & LOVELESS, Attorneys for Plaintiff, Office and Post Office address, 606-607 Oriental Block, Seattle, King County, State of Washington. Nov. 15—Dee. 27. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. William H, Bolen, Plaintiff, vs. Eu- gena Bolen, Defendant. No. 58705. Sum- mons for Publication. In the State of Washington to the above named defendnat, Eugena Bolen: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: Within sixty days after the 22nd day of November, 1907, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at- torneys for plaintiff, at their office be- low stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. Said action is brought to obtain a di- vorce upon the ground of adultery. EELER & GRASS, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Post Office address: 501 Marion Build- ing, Seattle, Washington, Nov, 22—Jan, 4, WOTICE. To All Whom It May Concern, and Rarticularly to the stockholders of the uperior Portland Cement Company: Notice is hereby given and extended to any and all persons in any and all ways concerned with the Superior Port- land Cement Company, a corporation or- ganized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Washington, with its principal place of business in the City of Seattle, King County, Wash- ington, that a meeting of the stockhold- ers will be held at the office and prin- cipal place of business of said corpora- tion, No. 510 Mutual Life Building, in the City of Seattle, King County, Wash- ington, on the 14th day of November, 1907, at the hour of ten o'clock a. m., the object and purpose of which meeting is to increase the capital stock of said cor- poration from $400,000, which is its present capital ‘stock, to the sum of $500,000, of the par value of $100 per share, at which time and place a vote of the stockholders of said corporation Will be held for the purpose of deter- mining whether or not the capital stock of said company, in the amount and manner and form aforesaid, shall be so increased to the amount of $500,000. And furthermore, that any ‘and’ all persons interested in such proceedings are now and hereby notified and request- ed to be present at sald meeting to pre- sent cause, if any they have, why said capital stock shall not be increased to such an amount in the manner and at the time as aforesaid. Dated at Seattle, King County, Wash- ington, this 8th day of October, 1907. JOHN C. EDEN, FRANCIS B. CLARKE, WARREN W. BUTLER, E, B. CAINE, W. DB. HOFIUS, MICHAEL EARLES, JAS. F, McELROY, FRED “‘T, SHERMAN, D, A. ROBINSON, Trustees, Dated of first publication, October 11. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. George L. Hunter, Plaintiff, vs, Bessie L, Hunter, Deefndant. No, ——. Sum- mons, The State of Washington to the said Bessie L, Hunter, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the 15th day of November, 1907, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your gnawer, upon the undersigned atorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated: and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which wilt be filed with the clerk of said court, THE SEATTL REPUBLICAN The above entitled action is an action for divorce on the ground of desertion for a period of more than one year prior to the commencement of this ac- tion, E, T, SCHOFF, Attorney ‘for Plaintiff. Post Office address, 503-504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Wash- ington, Nov, i5—Dec, 27. INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the matter of the estate of Annie Scholen, Deceased.—No. ..... Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 27th day of November, 1907, notice is hereby given to the creditors ‘of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of sald deceased and Nels Scholen, her husband, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executor of said estate at Rooms 320-321 Hpler Bld., No. 812 2d Ave., Seattle, Wash., the place of business ‘of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year trom and after the date of first publica- tion of this notice or same will be barred. i Date of first publiation, November 29, 1907. NELS SCHOLEN, As Executor of, said state. JAS, M. EPLER, Attorney for state Annie Scholen, Epler Bld., Seattle, Wash. Nov. 29—December 27. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. P. P, Newell and A. B, Newell, Plain- tiffs, vs. Absalom Sim; the unknown heirs of Absalom Sim, deceased, if any there be; John Rey Thompson; City of Seattle; J. K. Bothwell; B. F. Baker; Jone Doe Muldoon, wife of Patrick Mul- doon; also all other persons and par- ties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, De- fendants. No, 58786. The State of Washington to the said Absalom Sim, the unknown heirs of Ab- salom Sim, deceased, if any there be, H. F. Baker, Jane Doe Muldoon, wife of Patrick Muldoon, also all other persons and parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein: You, and each of you, are hereby sum- moned to appear within sixty days aft- er the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 29th day of November, 1907, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for the plaintiffs, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be ren- dered against you according to the de- mand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to quiet the title of the plaintiffs to the following de- seribed land: Lot Thirteen (13) in Block Nine (9) in the Plat of Jackson Street Addition to the City of Seattle, in the County of King and State of Washington, and to exclude the defend- ants from any interest or lien therein. EDWARD JUDD, Attorney for Plaintiffs, P, O, Address: 432 New York Block, Seattle. Washington. Cor, Second & Cherry. NOTICE TO CREDITORS. IN |THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, State of Washington, In the Matter of the Estate of John ©. Morrow, Deceased, with the Will An- nexed. No, 6819. Notice is hereby given to the credit- ors and all persons having claims against John C. Morrow, deceased, or against said estate, to present and exhibit them within one year from the date of the first publication of this yotice to the undersigned administrator, with the nec- essary vouchers, at the law office of J. M, Weistling, 431-2-3 Boston Block, Se- attle, Washington, the place for’ the transaction of the business of said es tate. & J, M, WEISTLING, Administrator of the Estate with the Will Annexed of John C. Morrow Deceased, IN| THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Ella M. Finch, Plaintiff, vs. Fred D. Finch, Defendant.—No, 48999. Sum- mons, The State of Washington to the said Fred D, Finch, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 13th day of December, 1907, and defend the above ‘entitled action in the above en- titled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the Clerk ‘of said Court. The object of said action is to obtain an absolute divorce and a decree dis- solving the bonds of matrimony exist- ing between the plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds of eruel and inhuman treatment and personal indignities of the defendant, rendering life’ burden- some to the plaintiff. SAUTEN & SHELDON, ‘Attorneys for Plaintiff, Office and Post Office Address: Room 536 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Witla James Cavanagh, Pleintift, vs. Maty Hlizabeth Cavanagh, Defendant. No. 58422.— Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King, ss. ‘The State of Washington to the sald Mary Blizabeth Cavanagh: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first pub- Heation of this summons, to-wit: Within six- ty days after the 8th day of November, 1907, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the com- plaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, ‘which bas been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of the above entitled court divorcing the plaintiff’ from the defendant on the ground of abandonment for more than one year. MeCLURD & MeCLURD, “Attorneys for Plaintiff, Postoffice and Office Address: 1304 Alaska Buildiug, Seattle, King County, Wash. Nov. &—Dee. 20. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King. Daniel Costello, Plaintiff, vs. Minnie E. Cos- tello, Defendant, Summons by Publication, ‘The State of Washington, to the said Min- nie E. Costello, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publica- tion of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 8th day of November, A. D. 1907, and defend the above entitled action in the aboye entitled Court, and answer the com- plaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney — for plaintif’ at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered againet yon according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court, ‘The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint. is us follows: For a diyorce on the grounds of abandonment for more than one year. FRANK P. CHRISTENSEN, Attorney for Plaintitr. P.O. Address: 51 Haller Building, Cou ty of King, Seattle, Washington. Nov. 8—Dec. 20. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Wushington for King County. Charles Scribner's Sons, a corporation, plain- tif, ys. A. G. Dundomb and Jane Doe Dun- comb (whose true Christian name fs to plain- tiff unknown), his wife, defendants. ‘No._ 58330. ‘Summons ‘for Publication. The ‘State of Washington to the said A. G. Duncomb and Jane Doe Duncomb (whose true Christian name is to plaintif€ unkuown), his wite, Greetiv:: You are hereby simmoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the flist publica- tion of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the Ist day of November, 1907, and de- fend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘The object of this action ts to recover judg- ment against you for the sum of Four Hundred Eight Dollars ($408), with interest at tlie rate of six (6%) per cent’ per annum from October 28th, 1907, and plaintift’s costs and disburse ments herein. Arid you are notified that said plaintif has caused a writ of attachment to be issued in said cause, and has placed the same in the hands of the sheriff of King County, Washington, for service, and that said sheriff has, under and by virtue of sald attachment, levied upon and attyched all your right, title and interest in and to Lot six (6) and the north half of Lot seven (7) in Block three (3) of D. M. Crane's Addition to the City of Seat. tle, and Lot three (3) in Block fourteen (14) of ‘the Denvy-Fuhrman Addition to the City of Seattle, sitnated in King County, State of Washington, and that in case judgment is ren- dered against you the len of’ said attachment will be enforced upon and against said prop- erty, and said property, or so much thereof as may be necessary to’ satisfy plaintiff's sald Judgment, will be sold in the manner pro- vided by ‘the laws of the State of Washington for the sale of real property under execution, MeCLURD & McCLURE, ‘Attorneys for Plaintifr, Postoflice and Office Address: 1804 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, Nov. 1—Dee. 13. IN JUSTICE’S COURT—BEFORE RB. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Se- attle Precinct, King County, State of Wash- ington, Charley Camevale, plaintiff, ys. John Ollts, defendant. ‘No, ———. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King—ss.’ ‘To John Ollis, Defendant: You are hereby notified that Charley Came- yale has filed a verliled claim against you in said court which will come on to be heard at my office in room 210 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 2d day of December, AL D. 1907, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock a. m,, and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the _ plaintiff granted, The object and demand of said. vert- fied claim is to recover judgment against you for $25.10 and costs for goods sold you in Seattle by plaintif at your request and to sub- ject your money in the hands of the Seattle Bleetrle Company to the payment of such judg- ment, Claim filed Oet, 25, A. D. 1907, R. R. GRORGR, Tustice-.of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. F. B. WIESTLING, Attorney for Plaintift, 422 Boston Block, Seattle. Novy. 1—Dec. 13, PROBATE NOTICE, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King, ss, In the matter of the estate of Wel- come Murdock, Deceased.—No, 7263. No- tice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that F, M. Jef- fery, the administrator of the estate of Welcome Murdock, deceased, has ren- dered to, and filed in said Court, his final account as such administrator, and FRIDAY, DECEMBER 13, 1907. that Thursday, the 16th day of January, 1908, at 9:30 o'clock a, m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Se- attle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said Court for the settle ment of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said es- tate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. R. B. Albertson, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto affixed this 10th day of December, 1907. OTTO A, CASE, Clerk. By J. A. SIGURDSON, Deputy Clerk, FF. M, JEFFERY, Administrator. INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Wel- come Murdock, Deceased.—No. 7263. Or- der to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not be Made. F. M, Jeffery, administrator of the estate of Welcome Murdock, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law there- to, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the es- tate of the said Welcome Murdock, de- ceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said Court in the City of Seattle, on the 16th day of January, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a, m, of said day, then and there to show cause, ifyany they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition men- tioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four suecessive weeks before the said 16th day of January, 1908, in Seattle Republican, a\ newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in onen court this 10th day of December, 1907, 4 k, 6. ALBERTSON, Judge. F. M. JEFFERY, Administrator. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. ‘The ‘Tatlored Ready Company, Plain- tiff, vs, John Doe Webb, Morris Gross and George. Kinnear, | Defendants.— Summons. The State of Washington to the said Morris Gross, defendant: You are here- by summoned to appear within sixty, days after the first publication of this' summons, towit, sixty days after the 6th day of December, 1907, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer to the com~- plaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at- torneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to have the plaintiff dedlared the owner of a certain lease of real estate, fradulently obtained by the defendant while an offi- cer of the plaintiff corporation. ELMORE WINKLER, PHILIP TWOROGER, Attorneys for Plaintiff, P. 0. Address: 1217 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN |THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, Washington. Bella Wilkins, Plaintiff, vs. Eaward E. Wilkins, Defendant—No, 58934. Sum- mons for Service by Publication, The State of Washington to the said Edward EB, Wilkins, Defendant: You are hereby Summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty (60) days after’ the 6th day of December, 1907, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at, his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk ‘of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a di- yoree from you on the ground of non- support. Se RUMEN ca RGAE F. M. JEPPERY, Piaintift’s. Attorney, P.O, Address, Room 747 New_York Building, in Seattle, King County, Wash- ington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. Sadie Silverstone and P. A. Silverstone, plain- tiffs, vs. A. M. Hanley, Dora Hanley, Anthony Harn, Earl R. Harn, Anthony G. Harn, Charles E. Harn, Mary EB. Harn and Joseph P. Harn, defendants, No. 57,747. ‘The State of Washington to the said A. M, Hanley, defendant: You ‘are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 18th day of October, 1907, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for the plaintiffs, at his office below gtated; and in case of your failure so to do, Judbment will be rendered against you, ac- cotding to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to remove as clouds upon the title of the plaintiffs to Lot Three (3) in Block Three (3) in Union Depot Addition to South Seattle, in said County and State, certain deeds, in one of which you are the grantee, and in another you are the grantor, and to exclude you from any interest or len in said land. EDWARD JUDD, --- IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the matter of the estate of Margaret Lewis, deceased. No. 6235. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 18th day of November, 1907, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executor of said estate, at 1441 20th Avenue, Seattle. King County, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, November 22, 1907. ALFRED LLEWELLYN LEWIS, As Executor of said Estate. JOHN F. REED, Attorney for Estate. 960 Empire Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Nov. 22-Dec. 20. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Bessie R. deVarona, Plaintiff, vs. Edwin I. deVarona, Defendant.—No. 58310. The State of Washington to the said Edwin I. deVarona, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to wit: within 60 days after the 1st day of November, 1907, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated in case of your failure to do justice will be convicted against you according to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The above entitled cause of action is brought for the purpose of obtaining a divorce from the defendant on the grounds of abandonment and non-support. Date of first publication. Nov. 1st, 1907. SAYRE & SUTHERLAND. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 309 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, Washington. Nov. 1—Dec. 13. No. 5839. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King. William C. Black, Plaintiff, vs. Gertrude Black, Defendant—No..... Black, Defendant—No. Black, Defendant—sent to the above named defendant, Gertrude Black; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 1st day of November, 1907, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant. EDWARD JUDD, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 432 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. Nov. 1—Dec. 13. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King In the matter of the Estate of George F. Jones, deceased. In Probate. No. 7651. Notice of Public Sale of Real Estate. Notice is hereby given that in pursuance of an order of the above entitled Court, made in the above entitled matter on the 14th day of November, A. D. 1907, the undersigned, Margaret Jones, as administratrix of the estate of George F. Jones, deceased, will sell the premises hereinafter described at public auction, in parcels, to the highest bidder for cash, on Saturday, the 21st day of December, 1907, at the hour of 10 o'clock a. m. of said day, at the front door of the Court House in the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, subject to the confirmation of said sale as by the law provided. The property hereinbefore referred to is particularly described as follows, towit: 1st: An undivided one-half (½) part or right of, in and to the following described real estate, to-wit: The South one-half (½) of Lot Five (5) in Block Forty-four (44) of Terry's First Addition to the Town (now City) of Seattle, according to the plat thereof of record in the office of the Auditor of King County, State of Washington. 2nd: All of tracts three and fourteen (3 and 14) of Springbrook Five Acre Tracts situated in King County, Washington, as shown by the official plat thereof and recorded in the office of the County Auditor of King County, State of Washington. 3rd: All of Lot Forty-four (44) in Block One (1) of Kirkland Park, King County, Washington, according to the plat thereof recorded in the office of the County Auditor of King County, State of Washington. 4th: One five (5) room house, being No. 98, situated upon leased ground owned by the Pacific Coast Company at Black Diamond, King County, Washington. Dated, Seattle, Wn., November 13th, 1907. MARGARET JONES, Administrator of the Estate of George F. Jones, Deceased. HARVARD, NEW YORK HARRISON BOSTWICK. Attorney for Administrator, Offices and P. O. Address, 601-602 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, Wash. November 22-December 20. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Francis McArther, Plaintiff, vs. R. J. McArther, Defendant—No. .... Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said R. J. McArther, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 6th day of December, A. D. 1907, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: This action is brought to procure a decree of divorce on the grounds of non-support. T. H. CANN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 412 Oriental Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Dec. 13—Jan. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF WESTMINSTER, OF KING COUNTY. State of Washington, for King County, Sarah L. Newhall, Plaintiff, vs. Jacob Brooks and Jane Doe Brooks, his wife, whose first name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming any interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.—No. 58883. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to Jacob Brooks and Jane Doe Brooks, his wife, whose first name is unknown, who are the owners, or reputed owners of and all persons unknown claiming or having interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants: You, and each of you, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff, Sarah L. Newell, is the owner and holder of two certain delinquent tax certificates, No. B 48820 and No. B 48368, issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, embracing the following real property situated in King County, Washington, and more particularly described as follows, to-wit: The west 77 feet of lot fourteen (14) in block sixteen (16) in Washington Central Improvement Company's First Addition to Kent That said certificate No. B 48820 was issued on the 14th day of November, 1907, for the sum of two dollars and ninety-seven cents ($2.97) for the delinquent taxes for the year 1903, and said certificate No. B 48368 was issued for the delinquent taxes upon said premises for the year 1905, in the sum of two dollars and sixty-three cents ($2.63), and assigned to the plaintiff, and plaintiff's assignor paid to said Treasurer the sum of eleven ($11.00) dollars upon said premises for the year 1906, and assigned all rights thereunder to the plaintiff; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from the date of payment. You, and each of you, are hereby directed and summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this notice and summons, exclusive of the day of said first publication, toowit: Within sixty (60) days after the 6th day of December, 1907, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, or pay the amount due together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered foreclosing the lien for said taxes, interest and costs against the real property, lands and premises herein named. SARAH L. NEWELL, Plaintiff. RALPH SIMON, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 513 Pacific Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Jesse Baird, Plaintiff, vs. John L. Baird, Defendant.—No. 57227. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to John L. Baird, Defendant: You are hereby notified and summoned to be an dappear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the day of the said first publication, towit, within sixty days after the 6th day of December, 1907, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer or other pleading on the attorney for the plaintiff below named at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of plaintiff, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of this action is to secure a divorce for the plaintiff from the defendant on grounds provided by statutes of State of Washington. Office and Post Office Address: 524 Bailey Building. Seattle. Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Augusta Van Every, Plaintiff, vs. Wm. Van Every, Defendant.—No. .... Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to Wm. Van Every, Defendant: You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the day of the said first publication, towit, within sixty days after the 6th day of December, 1907, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer or other pleading on the attorney the plaintiff below named at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of plaintiff, which has been filed with the clerk of the above court. The object of this action is to secure a divorce for the plaintiff from the defendant on grounds provided by statutes of State of Washing- Office and Post Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, State of Washington.—Department No. 4. P. C. Ellsworth, Plaintiff, vs. Wallace B. Taylor and Hattie M. Taylor, his wife, Joseph Delnotro, also written Joseph Delnotro, and Jane Doe Delnotro or Delnotro, his wife, Defendants.—No. 58929. Summons for Publication. State of Washington to the said Wallace B. Taylor, Hattie B. Taylor, Joseph Delnotro, also written Joseph Delnotro, and Jane Doe Delnotro or Delnotro, Defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: within sixty (60) days after the 13th day of December, 1907, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office and postoffice address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of this action is to recover judgment against Wallace B. Taylor and Hattie M. Taylor, his wife, two of the defendants above named, for the sum of six hundred dollars ($600.00), together with interest on said amount at the rate of eight (8) per sent cent per annum from the 20th day of April, 1907, also to recover judgment for attorney's fee in the sum of seventy-five dollars ($75.00), and costs of suit, according to the terms and conditions of two promissory notes executed by said Taylor and wife on the 20th of October, 1905, for the sum of three hundred dollars ($300.00) each, payable in two and three years respectively from the date thereof; and the further object of this action is to foreclose a mortgage upon the south half of lot number three (3), in block number eighty-one (81) of D. T. Denny's Park Addition to the City of Seattle, in King County, Washington, according to the recorded plat thereof filled in the Auditor's office of said county; said mortgage being dated the 20th of October, 1905, and given to secure the aforesaid promissory notes, which are due and owing by reason of the interest not having been paid on same according to agreement. That the defendants above named claim to have some interest in real property herein named, and which is being foreclosed in this action; that any interest they or either of them have in said property is inferior and junior to the lien and claim of plaintiff created by his mortgage hereinbefore described. Attorney 10. Flamon: Postoffice Address: 419-20 Pioneer Bldg., Seattle, Wash. December 6—January 24, 1908. PROBATE NOTICE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the matter of the estate of Zacheus D. Kyle, Deceased.—No. 7361. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Susanna M. Kyle, the administratrix of the estate of Zacheus D. Kyle, deceased, has rendered to and filed in said Court her final account as such administratrix, and that Thursday, the 9th day of January, 1908, at 9:30 o'clock a.m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness the Hon. R. B. Albertson, Judge of said Superior Court, (Seal) and the seal of said Court hereto affixed this 5th day of December. December 6—Jan. 4. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate. In the matter of the Estate of Zacheus D. Kyle, Deceased.—No. 7361. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Susanna M. Kyle, administratrix of the estate of Zacheus D. Kyle, deceased, having filed in this court her petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Zacheus D. Kyle, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 9th day of January, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a.m. of said day then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 9th day of January, 1908, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County, and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 5th day of December, 1907. R. B. ALBERTSON, Judge. December 6—Jan. 12. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Amelia Koehler, Plaintiff. vs. Harry Koehler, Defendant. No. 58822. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Harry Koehler, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 29th day of November, 1907, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this action is to secure a divorce from you, the defendant above named, and for alimony, attorney's fee and costs. EDWARD C. KRIETE, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address: 1201 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 29. 1—LEGALS REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Mary E. O'Neal, Plaintiff. vs. Charles O'Neal. Defendant. No. 58578. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Charles O'Neal, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (69) days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 15th day of November, A. D., 1907, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office and post office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant on the grounds of cruelty and non-support. F. B. CARPENTER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 5413 Ballard Avenue, Seattle, Washington. Post Office adrdess, Box 401, Ballard, Washington. Nov. 15—Dec. 27. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Alta May Harrison, Plaintiff, vs. E. Glen Harrison, Defendant. No. 58576. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said E. Glen Harrison. Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 15th day of November, 1907, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce from defendant. GEORGE FRIEND, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. address, 916 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 15--Dec. 27. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of B. O. Winslow, Deceased. No. 8444. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned, administratrix of the estate of B. O. Winslow, deceased, to the creditors of and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate to exhibit them with the necessary vouchers within one year after the date of this notice, to-wit: within one year after the 22nd day of November, 1907, to the administratrix at the office of Leasure-Winslow Company, in Georgetown, King County, Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of the business of said estate. Dated November 22nd, 1907. LILLIAN M. WINSLOW. Administratrix of the Estate of B. O. Winslow, Deceased. Nov 22—Dec 20. FRIDAY. DECEMBER 13, 1907 BANK FOR NEGROES STARTS. The only Negro bank north of the Mason and Dixon line came into being yesterday in this city. It is the People's Savings Bank, and it opened for business in unpretentious quarters at 1428 Lombard street. A string of depositors a quarter of a square long waited for the opening of the doors, Negro men and women filed up the stairs which lead to the office of George Henry White, the Negro President of the bank, and deposits of one, two and three dollars were made. George Henry White is a lawyer, a former Congressman from North Carolina, and ex-member of the Senate and House of Representatives from that State. He is also a former prosecutor of the Eastern Judicial District of North Carolina. At present he is practicing in this city. He has set aside a corner of his law office for the People's Savings Bank of Philadelphia, Pa., to give it its incorporated title. "We have had a good opening day," said George Henry White. "Our deposits have been fairly large. Ordinary avenues of banking and business being closed to members of the Colored race because of racial dislike, I thought that it would be a good plan to start a bank where the Colored people could deposit their money, instead of spending it. I want to teach the members of my race economy." First Vice President, E. W. Moore; Second Vice President, J. T. Seth; Treasurer, Walter P. Hall; Secretary, John Q. McDougal; Cashier, William J. Trent; Assistant Caschier, William A. Sinclair.—The Public Ledger, Philadelphia, November 23. There will be two attractions at the Seattle Theatre next week, a big spectacular extravaganza, "The Land of Nod" opens at the Seattle Theatre next Sunday afternoon (authorities permitting). This is undoubtedly the largest traveling attraction that has been seen in Seattle for years; they actually carry seventy people, two special carloads of scenery and paraphernalia—the entire production costing in ```markdown ``` the neighborhood of $150,000—that is three productions, this one and "Coming Through the Rye," two companies, cost Mr. Laragie over $300,000. It is to be regretted that the company could not be booked here for a week, they were booked for the Moore Theatre. There will be a special matinee on Wednesday. Stetson's "Uncle Tom's Cabin" comes to the Seattle Theatre Friday and Saturday night. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Mrs. J. D. French, sister of Mrs. L. A. Graves, is visiting in the city, the guest of her sister. Something like $100 was realized by the Dorcas Charity Club from Mrs. G. O. Allen's doll bazaar. Mr. I. I. Waler and Mr. Harry Shepard visited Tacoma last Wednesday on Elk Lodge business. The doll social of the Dorcas Charity Club, which was held at the AfroAmerican hall last evening, was well attended and was a great financial success. Mrs. Della Fields, daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Greenfields of this city, who has been visiting with her parents for the past two months or more, left for her home in St. Louis last Sunday evening much pleased with her visit to the Northwest. Go to a respectable place to borrow money on diamonds, jewelry and watches. Low rates. Private offices and all business strictly confidential. American Watch and Jewelry Co., 908 First Ave., opp. Rainier Grand Hotel. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for King County. Nora Patterson, Plaintiff, vs. John M. Patterson, Defendant. Dummons by Publication. State of Washington to John M. Patterson, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this summons by publication, exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit: Sixty (60) days after October 25, 1998, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff, at their office below stated, and in case of failure so to do, judgment will be entered and rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff's complaint which is filed in this cause and court. The object of this action is to obtain an absolute divorce from you on the ground of cruelty and non-support and to obtain the custody of the two minor children of the plaintiff and defend herein. BROWN & CARVER. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Co.'s Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, October 25, 1907. Oct. 25—Dec. 6. NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN OF AN INSANE AND INCOMPETENT PERSON. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the matter of the Estate of May E. Dawson, an insane and incompetent person.——No. 8210. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned, that he was on the 11th day of December, 1907, duly appointed by the Honorable Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of King, guardian of the estate of May E. Dawson, a non-resident insane and incompetent person; and that he is now and has been ever since the 11th day of December, 1907, the duly qualified and acting guardian of the estate of the said May E. Dawson, the said insane and incompetent person. W. H. BARD. Guardian of the Estate of May E. Dawson, insane and incompetent. December 13 to January 10. NOTICE TO CREDITORS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the matter of the Estate of May E. Dawson, an insane and incompetent person.—No. 8210. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned, guardian of the estate of May E. Dawson, the insane and incompetent person above named, to the creditors of and all persons having claims against the said May E. Dawson, the said insane and incompetent person, that you and each of you and all persons having claims against the said May E. Dawson, the said insane and incompetent person are hereby required to present your said claims with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned, at his place of business at the Northern Bank & Trust Company, number 400 Pike Street, in Seattle, Washington, within six months after the date of the first publication of this notice. Date of first publication of this notice December 13th, 1907. W. H. BARD. Guardian of the Estate of May E. Dawson, insane and incompetent. December 13 to January 10. PERSONAL. Acme Publishing Co. 312 Marion Block BRIEFS OUR SPECIALTY Sunset, Main 1997—Ind., 1306. Newly furnished rooms. Walking distance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. Men's and Boys' Colthing. Furnishing Goods, Hats, Shoes, Trunks Valises and Miners' Outfits. 511-515 Second Ave. Seattle, Wash. WILLIAM WALKER. Complete stock New Fall Goods Ladies', Misses' and Children's Wear ing Apparel, Furs and Fine Coats. 820 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. Seattle Electric Co. Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Electric Fix tures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. IRRIGATED LANDS We have 100,000 acres in the famous SUNNYSIDE COUNTRY. Rates reasonable. Terms. WASHINGTON IRRIGATION CO. Seattle, Washington. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE CONNECTION Business Office, Third and Spring McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance Colman Bldg. Main 695. Seattle : : : : Washington For ANTHRACITE COAL Phone THE PACIFIC COAST CO. Ind. 92. Private Exchange 99 Stetson & Post Mill Co. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 I. ISRAEL WALKER, 1101-1103 Jackson Street. Gus Brown. For Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. Scandinavian American Bank. OFFICERS: A. Chilberg, Prest. J. E. Chilberg, Vice Prest. John B. Agen, 2nd Vice Prest. J. F. Lane, Cashier L. H. Woolfolk, Asst. Cashier. Wm. Thaanum, Asst. Cashier F. P. Searle, Manager Ballard Office. Geo. H. Tarbell, Mgr. A. D. Hayden, Cashier Tacoma Office. Puget Sound National Bank. OF SEATTLE JACOB FURTH ..President J. S. GOLDSMITH ..Vice-President R. V. ANKENY ..Cashier CORRESPONDENTS IN ALL THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE. DRAFTS ISSUED ON ALASKA AND THE YUKON TERRITORY. Union Savings & Trust Co. A SPECIALIST Gives you the best possible service consistent with sound banking methods. UNION SAVINGS & TRUST CO. Cor. Second & Cherry. First National Bank SEATTLE, WASH. Paid up Capital ..... $150,000 Surplus and Undivided Profits ..... 150,000 M. A. Arnold ..... President Maurice McMicken ..... Vice-President D. H. Moss ..... Vice-President J. A. Hall ..... Vice-President and Cashier R. F. Parkhurst ..... Assistant Cashier C. A. Philbrick ..... Assistant Cashier A general banking business transacted. Letters of credit sold on all principal cities of the world. Special facilities for collecting on British Columbia, Alaska and all Pacific Northwest points. THE NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE. United States Depositary. With CAPITAL and SURPLUS..$1,500,000 And aggregate RESOURCES over .....$12,500,000 Invite business on the most liberal terms consistent with conservative banking. Foreign exchange department especially equipped for the conduct of Oriental business. M. F. Backus, Pres.; R. . Spencer, 1st V. P.; R. S. Stacey, 2nd V. P.; J. W. Maxwell, Cash. People's Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R. J. Reekie, Vice Prest. Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. Commercial Savings and Trust General Bank and Exchange. Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash. Seattle, Tacoma and Ballard. Capital Paid Up, $500,000.00. Suprus. $350,000.00 Seattle Brewing & Malting Co. Rainier PALE BEER Its Purity Guaranteed Under the New Pure Food Law Sunset 27, Ind. 27. Claussen Brewing Association. Brewers and Bottlers of TANNHAUSER and WUERZBURGER BEER "Promotes Good Cheer" Bottled Beer Delivered to any Part of the City. Brewery at Interbay Queen Anne 1088 Ind. 7396 ---