Seattle Republican

SEATTLE REPUBLICAN VOL. XIV. NO. 45 POLITICAL POT PIE Governor, (1st choice) - Albert E. Mead, Whatcom. Governor, (2nd choice) - Samuel G. Cosgrove, Garfield. Lieutenant-Govenor-John D. Atkinsos, Chelan. Secretary of State-I. M. Howell, Pierce. State Treasurer-E. K. Erwin, Spokane. Attorney General-R. H. Kipp, Colfax. State Auditor-C. W. Claussen, Kitsap. State Land Commissioner-E. W. Ross, Cowlitz. Insurance Commissioner-George B. Lamping, King. The above ticket has been suggested to the Pie-maker for the consideration of his readers. While there may be some seeming inconsistencies in it, yet on the whole it has considerable merit. John D. Atkinson, who is an avowed gubernatorial candidate, would probably not think of becoming a candidate for lieutenant-governor, and yet if he would, his nomination would be almost certain. As has been previously said in these columns, whatever strength Governor Mead may have, will be for first choice, and if he is not nominated by that, he will be down and out. Mead, however, has more strength than his opponents are willing to give him credit for, and if he does not win the nomination, he will come awfully near it. That Sam Cosgrove has a great deal of first choice strength no one but a fool will deny, and that he will bag the bulk of the second choice vote becomes more and more apparent every day: He will not only get the vote that goes for Governor Mead, but will get the state vote that goes for McBride; all of which means that, Mr. Cosgrove has, after all, the best show to be the next governor of this state. I. M. Howell, who has entered the race for secretary of state, and who hails from Pierce county, where he has twice been elected county auditor, is not unmindful of the fact that his opponent, the Hon. Sam H. Nichols, is a very popular man and will be hard to beat, but he has received sufficient amount of encouragement to make him feel justified in risking the $30 register fee on it. R. H. Kipp, who is seeking the nomination for attorney general, hails from Whitman county, and is highly spoken of all over the state. Should he enter the combination mentioned above, he would be a tower of strength to it, and he at least be a sure winner. E. K. Erwin, who seeks the nomination for state treasurer, hails from Spokane, and while he does not carry the vote of the county in his pocket, yet he has never appealed to the voters of the county for their suffrage but what he got it. That he would be a strong spoke in the above wheel is plain to be seen. C. W. Claussen, who was elected state auditor four years ago, hails from Kitsap county. So far as going into any conbine, he would not do so, but he has no opposition, and is therefore only used to fill out the ticket. Mr. Claussen is as good as nominated now. State Library PUBLICAN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, Friday, April 3, 1908 [Name] Colonel George B. Lamping, Candidate for State Insurance Commissioner. No opposition to E. W. Ross, who hails from Cowlitz county, has developed as yet, and it looks as if he was certain of a second term as state land commissioner. Mr. Ross like Mr. Claussen, is taking no part in any combination that is being formed, but is simply moving on in the even tenor of his way. Col. George B. Lamping, who will be a candidate for insurance commissioner, hails from King county and is quite popular at home. His opponent, the Hon. John Henry Schively, also hails from King county and is likewise popular, and a battle royal will be the result of Greek meeting Geeek in this instance. But Lamping has a brilliant military record to fall back on, and he thinks best of all the support of the big Seattle morning paper. It will be observed that in this prospective ticket no mention is made of superintendent of public instruction. Since the death of Superintendent Bryan it will devolve on the Governor to name his successor, and whoever that is, will doubtless be the most favorable candidate for the nomination. It would seem to the Pie-maker that if the Governor would name a superintendent from some county which has no representative on the above ticket it would add another strong spoke in his political wheel. Dr. S. F. Wiltsie, who for the past eight years has been deputy coroner of King county, thus serving through two administrations, will ask the Republicans of the county for the nomination of coroner, and in doing so believes his record for the past eight years as deputy will be one of the strongest reasons for his nomination. During the time he has been deputy he has made hundreds of official calls taking him in every section of the county and wherever he has been he has always made many friends. As a physician and surgeon he is very popular in the city and his friends believe that he will, the numerous candidates to the contrary notwithstanding, be able to get twice as many votes in the city as any two of the other candidates. Dr. Wiltsie has never aspired to office holding, and is a candidate for the coronership because of his long experience with the office. --- PRICE TEN CENTS PERSONAL PARAGRAPHS. Representative Cole, from Alaska, is cutting as many capers in Congress as a genuine March hare. Paul D'Heirry, at one time quite a light in local Republican circles, has begun the publishing of the Georgetown Republican, "just for fun." Tom Taggart, the Indianapolis Democrat wheel horse, is still national committeeman from Indiana. It is hoped by Republicans that he will manage the next Democratic campaign. A. F. Statter, Senator Ankeny's private secretary and political manipulator, is again in Walla Walla with his shoulder to the wheel. Evidently Statter got thoroughly alarmed about the progress the Boxers are making. Miles C. Moore, the last territorial governor of Washington, was defeated for an honorary office in a Taft league organized in his home city last week, which means there will be Moore to follow. Senator Levi Ankeny sent a charity organization of Seattle, that asked his assistance to the extent of one dollar, his blessings instead of the dollar. Samuel G. Cosgrove, after a month's campaigning in and about Seattle, left for other parts of the state last Tuesday. If he is not the next governor of Washington it will not be his fault. Rev. Lee A. Johnson, of Sunnyside, Washington, twice elected to the legislature of this state, aspires, so says rumor, to succeed W. L. Jones in the house of representatives of Congress. Six others of that district are of a like opinion. Col. C. C. Dlaton says the SEATTLE REPUBLICAN published the best picture of Henry McBride four years ago that was ever published. Do you, Colonel, consider that in this statement you are given the devil his due? Sherwood Bonney, a Washington pioneer, died last Monday at Sumner. He about a month ago celebrated his 95th birthday. He was the father of L. W. Bonney, of Seattle, who looks younger to-day by twenty years than he did twenty years ago. Dan Lesh, the former statesman from North Yakima, was in Seattle the other day and looked as familiar as when he carried Yakima county in his vest pocket. He has been East for some time on private business matters. Officer Applequist by persistent efforts got a favorable opinion from the Civil Service Commission in regard to his suspension from the police force, but since his jail record has come to light, we suspect he wishes that he had not. Ed Dickson, the statesman from Ellensburg, attended the meeting of the A. Y. P. Exposition Commission the first of the week. "No, no politics in Ellensburg. All of the gubernatorial aspirants have some advocates there, but perhaps Mead leads all the rest. But say, that was a great fight the P.-I. put up for Miller. Wonder if Miller and his friends realize that the P.-I. elected him?" Sometimes we demand what we ought not, and when we do not get satisfaction we grumble. The case of the British Columbians in attempting to throw the so-called Natal Act at the Japanese immigrants reminds us of a wilful child who does not want to have the friends of the family about the house. The Imperial government of England and the Colonial government of Canada are bound by treaties and by their policies friendly toward the Japanese to welcome them in the Canadian provinces. We do not want to find fault with the British Columbians, nor with any other people on the Pacific coast of North America for being discourteous occasionally. Fifty years ago some of our fathers in Japan had shown discourtesies, perhaps more humiliating than those of to-day, towards the foreigners. If our countryman on the coast are humiliated, one and only one consolation we can have in bearing the ills that we know of, is to go back in our own history and think that we are paying the bills our misdirected fathers had incurred in their days. It is curious to note how things change as years go by. Fifty years ago it was the Japanese who childishly tried to expel foreigners. Today it is the people of the nations—or at least sum of them—who helped Japan to adopt the policy of open door, who are now trying to expel our countryman from the lands which they claim are their own exclusively. Our critics may say the foregoing is not a good 2 Japanese Fiöht Exclusion Sometimes we demand what we not, and when we do not get said we grumble. The case of the Brumbians in attempting to throw called Natal Act at the Japanese grants reminds us of a wilful child not want to have the friends of the about the house. The Imperial ment of England and the Colonial ment of Canada are bound by treat by their policies friendly toward anese to welcome them in the provinces. We do not want to find faulty British Columbians, nor with any people on the Pacific coast of North America for being discourteous occ. Fifty years ago some of our father pan had shown discourtesies, more humiliating than those of to wards the foreigners. If our coun on the coast are humiliated, one one consolation we can have in best ills that we know of, is to go back own history and think that we are the bills our misdirected fathers curred in their days. It is curious to note how things as years go by. Fifty years ago it Japanese who childishly tried foreigners. Today it is the people—or at least sum of the helped Japan to adopt the policy door, who are now trying to e countryman from the lands who claim are their own exclusively. ics may say the foregoing is no Personal Mention Paul Morton, former secretary of the navy, and at present president of the Equitable Life Insurance Company, is visiting in Seattle and incidentally looking after the insurance business. John C. Murphy, who for a number of years was more or less prominent in state and local politics, but who dropped out of sight something over a year ago, is in the city again and says that he has been getting hold of coal lands in Alaska, which should not be a very hard thing to do. Senator Jeff Davis, the political curio, from Arkansas, was arrested in Little Rock last Tuesday charged with carrying a revolver. The statesmen from the South seem to be anxious for gun notoriety these days. James J. Hill is of the opinion that trade will revive very slowly in the United States, but nevertheless very surely. We believe the very same thing, which should leave no doubt of it. Dr. C. E. Hoye, former coroner of King county, stands a most excellent show of being the next sheriff of the county. Samuel Hill, who is in Washington City conferring with the secretary of state concerning good roads, wires that he has been quite successful. Edgar C. Raine, who went to Colorrdo and Arizona for his health something over a month ago, has returned and announces that he will be a candidate for county clerk to succeed Major Case. --- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN [Picture of a man in a suit with a bow tie]. Hon. Lee A. Johnson, who seeks to succeed Wesley L. Jones. and only bearing the back in our share paying ers had in- ogs change it was the to expel people of the them — whoicy of open expel our which they Our crit- not a good analogy, since Japan welcoming foreigner ica will not receive a ing the Japanese in many were there of saw good results of fifty years ago? S any good results, only feared that the given to dogs when fo to enter. Will our critics sa allowed to enter the only of the gentlema ers? But what is th analogy, since Japan received benefit by welcoming foreigners, while North America will not receive any benefit by welcoming the Japanese immigrants. But how many were there of our fathers who fore-saw good results of welcoming foreigners fifty years ago? So far from expecting any good results, the majority of them only feared that the country had been given to dogs when foreigners were allowed to enter. Will our critics say that those who were allowed to enter the country of Japan were only of the gentleman class, and not laborers? But what is the difference between [Picture of a man with a mustache and a high collar, wearing a dark suit and a white shirt. The background is a plain, light color.]] Prof R. B. Bryan, late Superintendent of Public Instruction, who died at North Yakima last Monday. Hi Gill says that he can prove what he said about F. M. Jeffrey, and Jeffrey retorts: "You are ——." Let the public have the facts fellows, and quit your chewing the rag. Joe Gan's wife has sued him for a divorce and charges him with infidelity. Others have charged Joe of being guilty of the same offense, which caused them to be parted from a well proportioned roll of long green. If he loses this case, however, Joe will himself be parted from a well proportioned roll of long green, as his wife is asking for plenty of alimony. Secretary Taft's managers do not seem to be making much headway breaking into the Solid South, a thing the secretary thought he would be able to do. --- in received benefit by us, while North America benefit by welcomigrants. But how our fathers who forewelcoming foreigners so far from expecting the majority of them the country had been foreigners were allowed by that those who were country of Japan were in class, and not laborer difference between they claim expel who argument "While This is the Under that the Natal later this Only it will see keep on on hot air, the future the shall fade will be co effect of p [Name not visible] Prof. F. M. McCully, who was Prof. Bryan's assistant, who died one year ago. A man in a Seattle restaurant recently ordered a poached egg and got a black eye. It often happens that one gets a bad egg, but it seldom ever happens that you get a black eye. In speaking about Senator Ankeny's inability to make a public speech one day this week some one was mean enough to quote the following jingo: The man of millions has no need. C. orator's wiles to wait. On oratory's wiles to wait He merely lets his money talk He merely lets his money talk, And the applause is always great. Is it possible that J. Henry Smith of the local land office is guilty of wrong doing? Certainly not, for J Henry looks too innocent and inoffensive to be guilty of any right doing let alone any wrong doing. He does not look qualified to do anything, right or wrong. --- welcoming the "gentleman" class and the laboring class, so far as the results produced concerned? Both helped or are helping to develop the resources of the countries where they immigrated. There is no question that the Pacific coast regions need Oriental labor. Without it the development of the country will not be satisfactorily effected. Common sense judgment should tell any one that cutting the number of co-workers in the conquest of nature will mean so much detraction or stagnation. The truth of the matter cannot be easily pounded into the heads of those knight errants of exclusionism, who simply don't want "Japs" in Canada or America. Influence of logical arguments is necessarily limited. Beyond the limit it can never go by itself. There must be something else besides it to propel it. When the exclusionists exhaust their points of argument they fall back upon the plea that they do not like the Japanese. If they do not like, they claim that they have all the power to expel what they do not like. There is no argument that can beat that. "White Canada, Orientalls must go!" This is the slogan of British Columbians. Under this banner of barbarism they caused the Natal Act to be passed. But sooner or later this banner will be haulled down. Only it will take a little time before we shall see that done. Meanwhile we will keep on devising means to refrigerate the hot air, thereby hoping that in the near future the nightmare of Oriental invasion shall fade away, and that the exclusionist will be completely disillusioned from the effect of pipe dreams. — Japanese Current. Friday. April 3, 1908 for the "gentleman" class and long class, so far as the results pro- cerned? Both helped or are to develop the resources of the nowhere they immigrated. There mention that the Pacific coast regions mental labor. Without it the de- tat of the country will not be satis- fected. Common sense judge- d tell any one that cutting the co-workers in the conquest of all mean so much detraction or both of the matter cannot be easily into the heads of those knight er- exclusionism, who simply don't "ips" in Canada or America. In logical arguments is necessarily Beyond the limit it can never go There must be something else to propel it. When the exclu- haust their points of argument back upon the plea that they do the Japanese. If they do not like, in that they have all the power to that they do not like. There is no that can beat that. Like Canada, Orientalists must go!"" the slogan of British Columbians. is banner of barbarism they caused Act to be passed. But sooner or banner will be haulled down. will take a little time before we that done. Meanwhile we will revising means to refrigerate the thereby hoping that in the near the nightmare of Oriental invasion away, and that the exclusionist completely disillusioned from the pipe dreams. — Japanese Current. George Russell has not been heard from in a whole week and his friends are uneasy lest John Riplinger has kidnapped him, took another $5,000 of Seattle's hard earned cash and confiscated the boat. Will Seattle ever get rid of honest John Riplinger? Flying Tom has gone north, but the SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is still in the city and as ready and willing to publish your legal notices at reasonable rates as ever. Call up Main 305, and be convinced. Mrs. Laura M. Haines may have gotten a big bunch of goods while things were coming her way, but a jury of twelve men good and true handed her a bunch that she did not order. Editor Kibbe has sold the Elma Chronicle and retired from the editorial tripod, after more than twenty years spent in the harness. With his vitrolic pen, Editor Kibbe was a force for clean politics in Chehalis county, and his retirement will not be mourned by the would-be bosses and shirking officials.—Ex. In London only 60,000 are studying Esperanto. The American Esperantent, published in Chicago, gives the number of Esperantists in the United States as 250,000. About three weeks ago an Esperanto society was formed in Spokane which has about thirty members. Meetings are held every Tuesday at eight o'clock at room 16, Hawthorne school. Strangers are welcome. Judge W. E. Richardson, 701 Peyton block, is president of the club and Mr. R. Kerkhoven of the Inland printing company is secretary. The image provided is too blurry to accurately recognize any text. It appears to be a blank or heavily blurred background with no discernible features. Friday. April 3. 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffer, Plaintiff, vs. P. A. Hyman and Jane Doe Hyman, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 60144. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington dated June 1904, and unimpaired as follows for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 3, block 58. Riley's Addition to Riley's Addition to Seattle; for the year 1902, in the sum of $3.02; certificate No. B27412. That on Nov. 22, 1904, the east 48 feet of land was redeemed from said certificate leaving said certificate still outstanding against the remainder of said lot as follows: Lot 3, less the east 48 feet, block 58, Riley's Add. to Riley's Add. to Seattle; for the year 1902, and in the sum of $2.93; certificate No. B27412. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described property, to-wit: Lot 3, less the east 48 feet block 58, Riley's Add. to Seattle for ear 1903, in the sum of $2.12; for ear 1903, in the sum of $1.86; for year 1905, in the sum of $1.78; for year 1906, in the sum of $4.05. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after February 28, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. First publication dated Feb. 28—April 10, '08. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of James Mills, deceased. Notice is hereby given that in pursuance of an order of the above entitled court entered on the 4th day of March, 1908, whereby the former sale of the personal property of the above entitled estate to Charles Niemeyer, Jr., was set aside, and a re-sale of the personal property was authorized and ordered, the undersigned, as special administrator, of the above entitled estate, will sell at public auction to the highest and best bidder for cash, in front of the door of the shop formerly occupied and used by said deceased as a blacksmith shop in the town of Woodinville, at the hour of ten o'clock a. m. of Saturday, March 21st, 1908, the following described personal property, toowit: All tools, mechanical appliances, devices and equipments of any and every kind and description belonging to said deceased, and all stock, materials, supplies, etc., belonging to said deceased; also the lease of that certain building in said town of Woodinville wherein said deceased carried on his trade as blacksmith at Woodinville. Dated this 6th day of March, 1908. M. M. RUSELL, Special Administrator of the Estate of James Mills, Deceased Office: 911 Lowman Building, Seattle. March 6—March 13,1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Country of King. Dora Wilson, plaintiff, vs. Leon R. Wilson, defendant. No. -. Summons by Publication. Publication. State of Washington, to the said Leon R. Wilson, defendant: You are summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty (60) days after the 6th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this action is to obtain a judgment and decree of said Court in favor of said plaintiff and against you, dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between you and the plaintiff herein on the grounds of habitual gross drunkenness and non-support. WILL H. MERRITT. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. address: 520-1 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Mar. 6—April 17, 1908. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the matter of the Insolvency of H. P. Gilbert, doing business as Richmond Beach Lumber Company.—No. 60387. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of the above named insolvent debtor, H. P. Gilbert, doing business as Richmond Beach Lumber Company, to present their claims against said insolvent debtor, under oath, to W. H. Schumacher at No. 615 and 616 New York Block, in Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of transacting the business of said insolvent debtor's estate, within three months from the date of the first publication of this notice; to-wit, within three months from the 20th day of March, 1908. W. H. SCHUMACHER, Assignée of H. P. Gilbert, doing business as Richmond Beach Lumber Company, an insolvent debtor. Date of first publication, 20th day of March, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King, May Bartlett, plaintiff, vs. George Bartlett, defendant. The State of Washington to the said George Bartlett, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 21st day of February, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and use as evidence against you to judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to recover the person from the grounds of abandonment and non-support. P. O. address: Room 58 Downs Block, in Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb. 21—April 3, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King, Katie A. MacGregor, Plaintiff, vs. Walter B. MacGregor, Defendant. Cause No. 60088. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Walter B. MacGregor: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 28th day of February, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above certified Court, and answer to the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and the defendant, upon the grounds of desertion and non-support, and to restore the plaintiff to her maiden name. PAUL F. FOSS. Attorney for the Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 212 American Bank Building, Seattle, Washington. Date of first publication Feb. 28—April 10, 1908. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. Dos Grellish, Plaintiff, vs. Patrick J. Grellish, Defendant. State of Washington, County of King—ss. The State of Washington to the said Patrick J. Grellish: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait; within sixty days after the 13th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain the decree of the above entitled court divorcing the plaintiff and the defendant on the ground of abandonment for more than one year, and on the further ground of neglect and refusal of the defendant to make suitable or any provision for the support of his family. sion to McCLURE & McCLURE, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Post Office and Office Address: 304 Iaska Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington Date of first publication, March 13, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Julia Daisy Worth, Plaintiff, vs. Merwin Richard Worth, Defendant.—No. 60596. The State of Washington to the said Merwin Richard Worth, Defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 27th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of cruelty and drunkenness. ELIUS A. WRIGHT. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Rooms 629-631 Burke Bldg., in Seattle, King County, Washington. March 27—May 1, 1908. W. H. SCHUMACHER. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION No. 60371 SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. I. I. Walker, Plaintiff, vs. Julia A. Curtiss and John Doe Curtiss, her husband, J. A. Cox, Trustee, and all other persons, parties, corporation or corporations, whomsoever unknown, claiming any right, title, interest, lien or estate in the real estate described herein, Defendants. The State of Washington, to the said Julia A. Curtiss and John Doe Curtiss, her husband, J. A. Cox, Trustee, and all other persons, parties, corporation or corporations, whomsoever unknown, claiming any right, title, interest, lien or estate in the real estate described herein, defendants, greeting: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service, towit, within sixty (60) days after the 27th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court; answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which will be filed with the Clerk of said Court or a copy of which is herew served upon you. The object of the above entitled action is to quiet title in the said plaintiff in and to all of the south half (S$_{1/2}$) of the northeast quarter (NE$_{1/4}$) of the southeast quarter (SE$_{1/4}$) of the southeast quarter (SE$_{1/4}$) of section seventeen (17), township twenty-three (23), range four (4) east, containing five (5) acres, located in King County, Washington, and that J. A. Curtiss and John Doe (Curtiss, her husband, J. A. Cox, Trustee, and all other persons, parties, corporation or corporations whomsoever unknown, claiming any right, title, interest, lien or estate in the real estate described herein, be forever enjoined and restrained from asserting or claiming any interest in the above entitled realty; and that it be further adjudged, that they and each of them, have no right, title, estate, lien or interest in said real estate or any portion thereof; and that plaintiff recover costs and disbursements. ANDREW R. BLACK. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: Room 315 Pacific Block, Seattle, Wash. March 27—May 8. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for the County of King. Abram L. Vicory, plainfiff, vs. Neuland F. Vicory, defendant. No. 60030. The State of Washington to the said Neu- land, F., Vicory, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 21st day of February, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce on the ground of cruelty and incompatibility of temper. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address: 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb. 21—April 3, 1908. SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. William E. Terrill, Plaintiff, vs. Kate Terrill, defendant, No.... The State of Washington, to the said Kate Terrull, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 21st day of February, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of the said action, as fourth in the objection, is as follows: To obtain a divorce by the plaintiff against the defendant upon the ground of defendant's willful abandonment and desertion of the plaintiff by the defendant for more than one year last past. FRED H. LYSONS. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. address: Rooms 420-21 Bailey Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb. 21—April 3. 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Amelia Hughes, plaintiff, vs. James Brainard Hughes, defendant. No. — Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said James Brainard Hughes, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 6th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint heretofore filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure a divorce from the defendant upon the grounds of desertion and non-support, and also for the custody of the minor son. James Victor Hughes, and for general relief. GRAVES, PALMER & MURPHY. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office address: 911 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, March 6- 3 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF THE UNITED CITIES TRUSTEE COMPANY. To the Stockholders: The regular annual meeting of the stockholders of the United Cities Trustee Company will be held at the office of the Company, No. 1011, on Friday, the 10th and 11th of February, Washington, on Thursday, May 7th, 1908, at one o'clock p. m. for the purpose of electing Trustees for the ensuing year, and for such other business as may properly come before said meeting. RICHARD STEVENS ESKRIDGE. President. Attest: H. H. MATTESON, Secretary. Seattle, Wash., April 3rd, 1908. SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King. Anna Jones, Plaintiff, vs. Milroy Jones, Defendant.—No. 60714. The State of Washington to the said Milroy Jones, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: within sixty days after the 3rd day of April, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony between the parties hereto on the ground of desertion for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action. E. T. SCHOFF. Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address: 503-504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. April 3, May 15, 1908. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Laurence D. Black, Plaintiff, vs. Magdalena Black, Defendant—No. The State of Washington to Magdalena Black, Defendant: You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the day of said first publication, towit, within sixty (60) days after the 3rd day of April, 1908, and defend the said plaint of plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the plaintiff's plaint of plaintiff below at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of plaintiff which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of this action is to secure a divorce for the plaintiff against the defendant on the ground of cruelty and desertion. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 3rd—May 15, 1908. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Virginia Marie Van Dooren, Plaintiff, vs. Fred-erich Van Dooren, Defendant—No. erick Van Dooren, Defendant.—No. . . . The State of Washington to Frederick Van Dooren, Defendant: You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action, within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the date of the said first publication, toowit, within sixty days after the 3rd day of April, 1908, and answer the complaint of plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney. For plaintiff below named at his office below indicated, and in case of your failure to judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of plaintiff, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of this action is to obtain a divorce for the plaintiff against the defendant on the grounds of failure to support and cruelty. A. C. MacDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 3d, May 15, 1908. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for the County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of Ruth Anne Klinfelter, Deceased. No. 7098. Notice of Sale of Real Estate. Notice is hereby given that in pursuance of an order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of King, made on January 9th, 1908, in the above entitled cause, the undersigned administrator will sell at private sale to the highest bidder, on or after the 28th day of March, 1908, all the right, title and interest of the estate and the heirs thereof, to lot-Will four and the following described real estate, to lot-Will four and the south one-half of the northwest quarter of section five, township thirty north, range thirteen west of Willamette Meridian, being in Clallam County, Washington. Said sale will be for cash on confirmation of sale by the Court, and all bids must be in writing and addressed to the undersigned administrator at room 402 Arcade Building, Seattle, Wash., and endorsed on envelope "Bid for real estate in estate of Ruth Anne Klinfelter." Deposit will be required on acceptance of bid. For CLAM M. KLINEFELTER. Administrator of the Estate of Ruth Anne Klinfelter. Deceased. HOWARD H. STARTZMAN, Att'y for Adm'l', 402 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. PROBATE NOTICE. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King.,—State of Washington, County of King, ss.—In the Matter of the Estate of James Brownie, Deceased. No. notice of Settlement of Final Account.—No. 7469 Notice is hereby given that James Brownie, the Notice of Settlement of James Brownie deceased, has tendered to, and filed in said Court her final account as such administratrix, and that Thursday, the 19th day of March, 1908, at 9:30 o'clock a. m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contend the same. Witness the Hon. G. E. Morris, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto affixed this 13th day of February, 1908. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. A Published Every Friday at 307 Epler Block. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton .....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton .....Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. One Year .....$2.00 Six Months .....1.00 Three Months ......60 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matte, REPRESENTAIVE HEFLIN SHOOTS A representative in Congress from the state of Alabama, Thomas J. Heflin by name, saw fit to regulate a Negro, who was a fellow passenger on a street car, for some infraction of Southern ethics, and in carrying out the program drew a revolver and seriously wounded the Negro and likewise wounded a by-stander, a white man, for which the representative was arrested and is now out on a $5,000 bail. If the published reports be true, there is no denying the fact that, the Negro was both crude and uncouth and especially so since there were a number of ladies in the car, but by what right or law did Mr. Heflin have to regulate him? Why did he not with the aid and assistance of the conductor, motorman and white passengers, detain the drunken negro in the car until a policeman could be called? Had the authorities delegated unto him the arduous task of regulating misbehaved Negroes to the extent of killing them if they resisted him, throughout the District of Columbia? That Mr. Heflin had no more right, justice, cause or excuse to precipitate a row with that drunken Negro than an Indian statute, is plain to be seen. Throughout the North the trainmen are supposed to be the peace officers while their cars or trains are in transit, and passengers are only called upon to render assistance when they find that they are unable to maintain order. But being from Alabama, Mr. Heflin felt that he was justified in regulating any boisterous, unruly Negro, from his view point that came under his observation and that is where he is sadly mistaken. Because he had introduced a Jim Crow street car bill in Congress for Washington City and had received a number of threatening letters, he was given permission to carry a gun to protect himself from men boiling over with righteous indignation, he used it to regulate a Negro, who evidently did not even know that his fellow passenger (white) was the monstrosity from Alabama, a damphool by nature and a murderer by practice, and in doing so it looks as though in the getting of permission to carry a gun for self-protection, it was but a subterfuge to get a gun in his pocket that he might kill a Washington City Negro just to play even for their independence in sending him threatening letters. Now Mr. Heflin's political and public prominence to the contrary notwithstanding, he should be put on trial for the degree of the offense which he has committed, and if there be any justice in the courts, he should be found guilty and given the limit by the trial judge. It often happens that white men from the South become insulting in public places in the North. Can you imagine what would happen if some black man, however prominent he might be in the community, should attempt to regulate him, and in the scuffle shoot the man and likewise an innocent bystander? Yes, you not only imagine what would happen, but you know what would happen. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Some of the black folks of Washington City may have been willing to do Mr. Heflin an injustice if an opportunity would have presented itself, but that particular one showed no disposition to do so, he was simply an uncouth Negro, and Mr. Heflin chagrined at not getting his damnable Jim Crow car law through Congress, vented his spleen by abusing the first Negro that gave him the hundreth part of an opportunity. He believes a majority of his fellow members in Congress will sustain his murderous assault, and it may perhaps be the means in some way of helping his sleeping measure to life again. Let justice be as blind to the prominence of Mr. Heflin as it would be if the drunken Negro had have done what he did, and in its blindness send Representative Heflin to the penitentary for just as long a term as it would have the Negro for the same offense. Let his murderous constitutents return him to Congress if they like after his discharge from prison, but let the courts do its duty by seeing that the law is no respector of person and will punish the criminal without taking into consideration his color, condition, creed or public prominence. Praise Our Schools A little hearty praise of our national educational system on the part of an intelligent outside obseever will do us no harm, but rather will stimulate us to further efforts in behalf of our public schools. It is pleasant therefore to read such words as the following from the pen of Miss Kate Stevens head mistress of Montem Street, School, London. She says: "It is widely acknowledged that the American schools are amongst the best in the world. And they certainly are if we judge them either by the alertness, intelligence and adaptability of the pupils educated in them, or by their desire and efforts to continue their education after the end of the compulsory school age. The general level of intelligence amongst the working men in America is admittedly higher than with us. After visiting the States twice—for three months in 1889 and again for six months in 1906, and seeing for oneself how true the above certainly is—one asks: 'How does it come to pass?' The atmosphere and tradition amongst the American-born children have been reared, and the freedom and scope there is for each individual who depends upon his own industry and development are of prime importance. The necessity for self-help and self-improvement is impressed upon every pupil—how the future prosperity of the country depends upon them. The dignity of work the disgrace of idleness, are inculcated from the very first." This is a fine compliment to the spirit of our institutions. It sets before us a high ideal. May we all strive to live up to it.—From Education, Nov., 1907. Editor O. M. Moore, of the Hoquaiam Washingtonian, was convicted of libel in the superior court at Montesano last week. The charge grew out of a letter which Mr. Moore wrote Senator Poulson in which he made certain references derogatory to the character of another man. With the spirit of revenge Mr. Poulson gave the letter to the third party, and in the trial Juge Linn refused Mr. Moore the right to attempt to prove his charges. The judge's rulings are being severely condemned by those who are in a position to know the merits of the the case. -Elma Chronicle. Friday, April 3, 190 EDITORIAL NOTES Oh, yes, Mrs. Eddy is easily pacified, but it takes the "long green" to do it. How often since 1902 has Henry McBride and his friends voted the Republican ticket? Cotterill, politically dead, seems to give local Democracy as much worry as Cotterill "belly much alive." "Give your neighbor a Socialist book," says the Olympia Capital. What for, to make an Anarchist of him? Representative Heflin has begun his campaign advertising quite early in view of the fact that, his district is hopelessly Democratic. Bryan and Johnson have met on the pass across the Democratic mountain and it not being wide enough to pass each other a deadlock seems inevitable. Assessor Parrish may think he is popularizing himself by burdening our merchants with excessive taxation, but he will find out better when he goes to suck. Charley Gillette may have been innocent of murdering "Billy" Brown as declared his mother, but she seems to be the only human being that believes it. Seattle milk men declare there is no milk combine in Seattle which may or may not be true, but they will hardly deny that, there is a milk-water combine in Seattle. Flying Tom, the American car in the New York-Paris race, may think it had a hard trip across the continent, but it is nothing to what it is going to have across Alaska and Siberia. Editor Ryan may be correct in saying, "Taft's true friends and advocates are among the Ankenyites of the state," but he joshes so much, that Taft does not know how to believe it. "Mme Paderewiski paid $7,500 for four chickens, while her husband paid $13,000 for a piece of Seattle real estate," says the Times. We suspect that they have since drawn straws to see which was the bigger damphool. If all the Anarchists bomb throwers were as successful as that one in New York last week that killed himself while trying to kill the police, bomb throwing would become unpopular. In the death of R. B. Bryan, state superintendent of public education, the state loses a useful and exemplary citizen and the cause of education an able and successful exponent. He has directed the destinies of the office most of the time since statehood, in fact all the time except a four-year term filled by Prof. Brown, who was elected during the free silver epidemic. The officials of the state house paid homage to his memory, in that while his body lay in state, their offices were closed. Peace to his ashes. C. F. Cushman had no more right to shoot motorman Arnold than did Representative Heflin the Negro he shot, and both should be sent to the penitentiary for their natural lives. Suppose Arnold did willfully slap the face of an aged man, it was not Cushman's "put-in" to regulate him, and in butting in he committed a rash and uncalled for crime, for which he should be punished. His plea of self-defense is as flimsy as the usual insanity dodge so often plead to escape the gallows. There is altogether too much such reckless killing as this, and nothing will so effectively put a quietus on it, as to send the perpetrators of such crimes either to the gallows or prison for life. Friday, April 3, 1908 BUILDING UP THE NATION'S WEALTH [From Roesevelt and the Money Power.] It is a positive pleasure to describe the effect of the policies of President Roosevelt. Every man, woman and child in the country has enjoyed throughout his administration the luxuries which accompany an abounding prosperity. Had the President been as mischiefously inclined as his enemies would have us believe, it would not have been difficult for him, with the immense power his office affords, to have embarked upon a course which long ago would have brought disaster. As it is, the President, by his determination to make honesty and decency triumphant, has been more conservative than the men who claim to be conservative but are really reactionary. During the past six years: Commerce has increased by $1,057,000-000. Manufactures have increased $2,000-000,000. Crops have increased by $2,058,-000,000. Transportation by rail increased 500,000,000 tons. Transportations on the Great Lakes increased by 30,500,000 tons. So much for the prosperity of the country generally. Now as to the effect upon the individual: Unfortunately the industrial statistics available are only those of the Census Bureau for 1900 and 1905. Yet they give a fair idea of the Roosevelt policies. They show that: The number of indsturial establishments in those five years, four with Roosevelt as President, increased by 8,700. The capital employed increased by $3, - 700,000,000. The number of salaried officials and clerks in industrial establishments increased by 155,000. The salaries of salaried officials and clerks in industrial establishments increased by $190,000,000. The average number of wage arners increased by 609,000. The total wages paid increased by $602, - 000,000. The value of products of all the establishments increased by $3,400,000,000. Now let us turn to the conditions of our farmers. In five years the value of our farm real estate increased almost $7,600,000,000. In five years the value of domestic anima's increased more than $1,000,000,000. In five years, then, the farmer's total capital, as composed of domestic animals, other live stock and implements and machinery, increased by at least $8,600,00000. During the last 7 years, the farmers have produced an amount of wealth that have made them more prosperous than the farmers of any country of any age. The value of their products in 1901 was $5,300,000,000. In 1907 it was $7,358,000,000., an increase of $2,058,000,000. What has been the effect of this tremendous prosperity upon the farmer: His standard of living has risen. He has become a traveler. He has his telephone, his daily mail and his newspaper. He is debt free. He has money in the bank: or his promissory note is good. Thus we see the wage worker, the salaried industrialists and the farmer increasingly benefitted during the years President Roosevelt has been at the head of the nation. We know also that the shipper no longer suffers from bare-face discriminatory methods, and that the small dealer stands a better chance in competition with the powerful corporation. The general practice of giving and receiving railroad discrimination has never been so curtailed as is the case to-day. We find that our food has been made more healthful, our drink purer, our medicines freed from adulterations. We see more careful THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN scrutiny of immigration. We see action to conserve our mineral forces. Wherever the need, there the President has acted; and not only the present but all future generations will enjoy the fruits of his wise policies. OUR PRESIDENT THRODRE MOOREVELT Let us glance for a moment at the steps taken by President Roosevelt to conserve our natural resources. The National Forest Policy as it now exists has taken shape during the present administration. On October 1, 1901, the area of the Government's forests, then under the administration of the Department of the Interior, was only 46,153,119 acres. To-day, six years later, the National Forests have an aggregate area of 160,000,000. The year before the consolidation of the Governments's forest work, the income from the use of the National Forests amounted to $59,000. For the fiscal year ending June 30th, last, the proceeds amounted to more than $1,530,000. These figures show that the great areas in the National Forests have been brought to a condition where they are beginning to serve the purposes of the West. The conservation of timber and forage through wise use and the protection of stream flow is the only insurance of many industries which have contributed materially to the prosperity of the country. The forage crop of the 160,000,000 acres of National Forests support cattle, horses, sheep and goats which pay into the pockets of Western stockmen in profits something like $10,000,000 annually. The annual timber crop which these forests are capable of producing would be worth, on the the stump, at present prices, perhaps $10,000,000 more, and probably ten times this amount when prepared for market. In many regions, the National Forests are the only guarantee that the user of wood will be able, in the future, to get it at any price. By the wise use of the enormous resources of these forests, which, under the operation of the land laws would, but for their withdrawal from entry by Presidential proclamation, now be almost wholly in private hands with only nominal compensation to the public; they can be made, so to speak, to develop themselves. Without their conservation and development, there is not a form of human activity that would not, at some future time, suffer hardship. At any rate, the Southern Negroes have never been out of sympathy with the President in regard to "race suicide."—Charleston News and Courier. No, the Negro has never been a party to "race suicide." And in that our white brothers may observe a potential future for the race.—New York Age. 5 NOTES OF IMPORTANT DECISIONS Bankruptcy-New Promise to Pay Debt Discharged. That a discharge in bankruptcy is a complete bar to all debts provable in the proceedings, and that the burden rests upon the party attacking the discharge to show cause why it is not effectual is held in Meyer v. Bartels, 107 N. Y. 778. The defendant had been discharged in bankruptcy in 1902, and the debt sued on in this case was one that accrued prior to that time. Plaintiff conceded a discharge in bankruptcy, but alleged a revival of the debt under a new promise and partial payment. The evidence for plaintiff was to the effect that the new promise was oral, and that at the time the promise was made a payment of a dollar was made on account, all of which was contradicted by defendant. In reversing the judgment and dismissing the complaint, the court says: "The discharge in bankruptcy, was an absolute bar to all demands that were provable in the proceedings, and the burden rests upon the party attacking the discharge to show some cause why it is not effectual. Stevens v. King, 19 App. Div. 374, 44 N. Y. Supp. 893. On the theory of partial payment and new promise, the statute of frauds specifically provides that such a promise must be in writing. Wheeler v. Simmons, 60 Hun. 15 N. Y. Supp 542, demonstrates that partial payment on account of a debt that has been discharged in bankruptcy is not sufficient to renew the original indebtedness or create a new obligation on the part of the debtor to pay the balance due." This decision, of course, rests upon the statute of New York. There are a few other jurisdictions in which it is required that the new promise must be in writing. But in the absence of such a statute, the new promise need not be in writing. The legal obligation to pay the debt if released, but the moral obligation remains, and will support a new promise to pay. It has been said however, that the new promise "must be clear, express, distinct, and unequivocal, and without qualification or condition. It need not be in waiting unless a state statute so requires.—Law Journal. The Manufacture of Buttons At the census of 1905, establishments with a capital of $7,783,900, were reported as engaged in the manufacture of buttons. These factories furnished employment for 11,335 persons, who earned an aggregate of $4,371,669, and the value of the products was $11,138,769; this including button blanks and other products. The leading variety of product was pearl buttons. The value of the 13,143,553 gross of such buttons was $4,870,274. As between fresh water and ocean pearl, the former greatly predominated, with 11,405,723 gross, valued at $3,359,169, or 69 per cent of the value of all the pearl buttons. Twenty-one states engaged in the manufacture of buttons, although only four had products valued at more than $1,000,000. New York was the leading state, with $3,849,317; New Jersey had $1,592,261; Iowa, $1,500,945; and Connecticut, $1,446,219. Almost one-half of the pearl buttons and about two-thirds of the vegetable ivory buttons were manufactured in New York. All the bone buttons were made in Pennsylvania. Button blanks were produced mainly in Iowa, the reports showing for this state 4,575,814 gross and a value of $594,946, or about two-thirds of the total. — Exchange. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN, 307 Epler Block. Phone Main 305. 4 SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Published Every Friday at 307 Epler Block. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton .....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton .....Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. One Year .....$2.00 Six Months .....1.00 Three Months ......60 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matter. REPRESENTAIVE HEFLIN SHOOTS A representative in Congress from the state of Alabama, Thomas J. Heflin by name, saw fit to regulate a Negro, who was a fellow passenger on a street car, for some infraction of Southern ethics, and in carrying out the program drew a revolver and seriously wounded the Negro and likewise wounded a by-stander, a white man, for which the representative was arrested and is now out on a $5,000 bail. If the published reports be true, there is no denying the fact that, the Negro was both crude and uncouth and especially so since there were a number of ladies in the car, but by what right or law did Mr. Heflin have to regulate him? Why did he not with the aid and assistance of the conductor, motorman and white passengers, detain the drunken negro in the car until a policeman could be called? Had the authorities delegated unto him the arduous task of regulating misbehaved Negroes to the extent of killing them if they resisted him, throughout the District of Columbia? That Mr. Heflin had no more right, justice, cause or excuse to precipitate a row with that drunken Negro than an Indian statute, is plain to be seen. Throughout the North the trainmen are supposed to be the peace officers while their cars or trains are in transit, and passengers are only called upon to render assistance when they find that they are unable to maintain order. But being from Alabama, Mr. Heflin felt that he was justified in regulating any boisterous, unruly Negro, from his view point that came under his observation and that is where he is sadly mistaken. Because he had introduced a Jim Crow street car bill in Congress for Washington City and had received a number of threatening letters, he was given permission to carry a gun to protect himself from men boiling over with righteous indignation, he used it to regulate a Negro, who evidently did not even know that his fellow passenger (white) was the monstrosity from Alabama, a damphool by nature and a murderer by practice, and in doing so it looks as though in the getting of permission to carry a gun for self-protection, it was but a subterfuge to get a gun in his pocket that he might kill a Washington City Negro just to play even for their independence in sending him threatening letters. Now Mr. Heflin's political and public prominence to the contrary notwithstanding, he should be put on trial for the degree of the offense which he has committed, and if there be any justice in the courts, he should be found guilty and given the limit by the trial judge. It often happens that white men from the South become insulting in public places in the North. Can you imagine what would happen if some black man, however prominent he might be in the community, should attempt to regulate him, and in the scuffle shoot the man and likewise an innocent bystander? Yes, you not only imagine what would happen, but you know what would happen. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Some of the black folks of Washington City may have been willing to do Mr. Heflin an injustice if an opportunity would have presented itself, but that particular one showed no disposition to do so, he was simply an uncouth Negro, and Mr. Heflin chagrined at not getting his damnable Jim Crow car law through Congress, vented his spleen by abusing the first Negro that gave him the hundreth part of an opportunity. He believes a majority of his fellow members in Congress will sustain his murderous assault, and it may perhaps be the means in some way of helping his sleeping measure to life again. Let justice be as blind to the prominence of Mr. Heflin as it would be if the drunken Negro had have done what he did, and in its blindness send Representative Heflin to the penitentary for just as long a term as it would have the Negro for the same offense. Let his murderous constitutents return him to Congress if they like after his discharge from prison, but let the courts do its duty by seeing that the law is no respector of person and will punish the criminal without taking into consideration his color, condition, creed or public prominence. Praise Our Schools A little hearty praise of our national educational system on the part of an intelligent outside obsever will do us no harm, but rather will stimulate us to further efforts in behalf of our public schools. It is pleasant therefore to read such words as the following from the pen of Miss Kate Stevens head mistress of Montem Street, School, London. She says: "It is widely acknowledged that the American schools are amongst the best in the world. And they certainly are if we judge them either by the alertness, intelligence and adaptability of the pupils educated in them, or by their desire and efforts to continue their education after the end of the compulsory school age. The general level of intelligence amongst the working men in America is admittedly higher than with us. After visiting the States twice—for three months in 1889 and again for six months in 1906, and seeing for oneself how true the above certainly is—one asks: 'How does it come to pass?' The atmosphere and tradition amongst the American-born children have been reared, and the freedom and scope there is for each individual who depends upon his own industry and development are of prime importance. The necessity for self-help and self-improvement is impressed upon every pupil—how the future prosperity of the country depends upon them. The dignity of work the disgrace of idleness, are inculcated from the very first." This is a fine compliment to the spirit of our institutions. It sets before us a high ideal. May we all strive to live up to it.—From Education, Nov., 1907. Editor O. M. Moore, of the Hoquaiam Washingtonian, was convicted of libel in the superior court at Montesano last week. The charge grew out of a letter which Mr. Moore wrote Senator Poulson in which he made certain references derogatory to the character of another man. With the spirit of revenge Mr. Poulson gave the letter to the third party, and in the trial Juge Linn refused Mr. Moore the right to attempt to prove his charges. The judge's rulings are being severely condemned by those who are in a position to know the merits of the the case.—Elma Chronicle. Friday. April 3. 190 EDITORIAL NOTES Oh, yes, Mrs. Eddy is easily pacified, but it takes the "long green" to do it. How often since 1902 has Henry McBride and his friends voted the Republican ticket? Cotterill, politically dead, seems to give local Democracy as much worry as Cotterill "belly much alive." "Give your neighbor a Socialist book," says the Olympia Capital. What for, to make an Anarchist of him? Representative Heflin has begun his campaign advertising quite early in view of the fact that, his district is hopelessly Democratic. Bryan and Johnson have met on the pass across the Democratic mountain and it not being wide enough to pass each other a deadlock seems inevitable. Assessor Parrish may think he is popularizing himself by burdening our merchants with excessive taxation, but he will find out better when he goes to suck. Charley Gillette may have been innocent of murdering "Billy" Brown as declared his mother, but she seems to be the only human being that believes it. Seattle milk men declare there is no milk combine in Seattle which may or may not be true, but they will hardly deny that, there is a milk-water combine in Seattle. Flying Tom, the American car in the New York-Paris race, may think it had a hard trip across the continent, but it is nothing to what it is going to have across Alaska and Siberia. Editor Ryan may be correct in saying, "Taft's true friends and advocates are among the Ankenyites of the state," but he joshes so much, that Taft does not know how to believe it. "Mme Paderewiski paid $7,500 for four chickens, while her husband paid $13,000 for a piece of Seattle real estate," says the Times. We suspect that they have since drawn straws to see which was the bigger damphool. If all the Anarchists bomb throwers were as successful as that one in New York last week that killed himself while trying to kill the police, bomb throwing would become unpopular. In the death of R. B. Bryan, state superintendent of public education, the state loses a useful and exemplary citizen and the cause of education an able and successful exponent. He has directed the destinies of the office most of the time since statehood, in fact all the time except a four-year term filled by Prof. Brown, who was elected during the free silver epidemic. The officials of the state house paid homage to his memory, in that while his body lay in state, their offices were closed. Peace to his ashes. C. F. Cushman had no more right to shoot motorman Arnold than did Representative Heflin the Negro he shot, and both should be sent to the penitentiary for their natural lives. Suppose Arnold did willfully slap the face of an aged man, it was not Cushman's "put-in" to regulate him, and in butting in he committed a rash and uncalled for crime, for which he should be punished. His plea of self-defense is as flimsy as the usual insanity dodge so often plead to escape the gallows. There is altogether too much such reckless killing as this, and nothing will so effectively put a quietus on it, as to send the perpetrators of such crimes either to the gallows or prison for life. Friday, April 3. 1908 BUILDING UP THE NATION'S WEALTH [From Roesevelt and the Money Power.] It is a positive pleasure to describe the effect of the policies of President Roosevelt. Every man, woman and child in the country has enjoyed throughout his administration the luxuries which accompany an abounding prosperity. Had the President been as mischiefously inclined as his enemies would have us believe, it would not have been difficult for him, with the immense power his office affords, to have embarked upon a course which long ago would have brought disaster. As it is, the President, by his determination to make honesty and decency triumphant, has been more conservative than the men who claim to be conservative but are really reactionary. During the past six years: Commerce has increased by $1,057,000-000. Manufactures have increased $2,000-000,000. Crops have increased by $2,058,-000,000. Transportation by rail increased 500,000,000 tons. Transportations on the Great Lakes increased by 30,500,000 tons. So much for the prosperity of the country generally. Now as to the effect upon the individual: Unfortunately the industrial statistics available are only those of the Census Bureau for 1900 and 1905. Yet they give a fair idea of the Roosevelt policies. They show that: The number of indsturial establishments in those five years, four with Roosevelt as President, increased by 8,700. The capital employed increased by $3, - 700,000,000. The number of salaried officials and clerks in indnstrial establishments increased by 155,000. The salaries of salaried officials and clerks in industrial establishments increased by $190,000,000. The average number of wage arners increased by 609,000. The total wages paid increased by $602, - 000,000. The value of products of all the establishments increased by $3,400,000,000. Now let us turn to the conditions of our farmers. In five years the value of our farm real estate increased almost $7,600,000,000. In five years the value of domestic anima's increased more than $1,000,000,000. In five years, then, the farmer's total capital, as composed of domestic animals, other live stock and implements and machinery, increased by at least $8,600,00000. During the last 7 years, the farmers have produced an amount of wealth that have made them more prosperous than the farmers of any country of any age. The value of their products in 1901 was $5,300,000,000. In 1907 it was $7,358,000,000., an increase of $2,058,000,000. What has been the effect of this tremendous prosperity upon the farmer: His standard of living has risen. He has become a traveler. He has his telephone, his daily mail and his newspaper. He is debt free. He has money in the bank: or his promissory note is good. Thus we see the wage worker, the salaried industrialists and the farmer increasingly benefitted during the years President Roosevelt has been at the head of the nation. We know also that the shipper no longer suffers from bare-face discriminatory methods, and that the small dealer stands a better chance in competition with the powerful corporation. The general practice of giving and receiving railroad discrimination has never been so curtailed as is the case to-day. We find that our food has been made more healthful, our drink purer, our medicines freed from adulterations. We see more careful THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN scrutiny of immigration. We see action to conserve our mineral forces. Wherever the need, there the President has acted ; and not only the present but all future generations will enjoy the fruits of his wise policies. OUR PRESIDENT THEODORE ROOSEVELT Let us glance for a moment at the steps taken by President Roosevelt to conserve our natural resources. The National Forest Policy as it now exists has taken shape during the present administration. On October 1, 1901, the area of the Government's forests, then under the administration of the Department of the Interior, was only 46,153,119 acres. To-day, six years later, the National Forests have an aggregate area of 160,000,000. The year before the consolidation of the Governments's forest work, the income from the use of the National Forests amounted to $59,000. For the fiscal year ending June 30th, last, the proceeds amounted to more than $1,530,000. These figures show that the great areas in the National Forests have been brought to a condition where they are beginning to serve the purposes of the West. The conservation of timber and forage through wise use and the protection of stream flow is the only insurance of many industries which have contributed materially to the prosperity of the country. The forage crop of the 160,000,000 acres of National Forests support cattle, horses, sheep and goats which pay into the pockets of Western stockmen in profits something like $10,000,000 annually. The annual timber crop which these forests are capable of producing would be worth, on the the stump, at present prices, perhaps $10,000,000 more, and probably ten times this amount when prepared for market. In many regions, the National Forests are the only guarantee that the user of wood will be able, in the future, to get it at any price. By the wise use of the enormous resources of these forests, which, under the operation of the land laws would, but for their withdrawal from entry by Presidential proclamation, now be almost wholly in private hands with only nominal compensation to the public, they can be made, so to speak, to develop themselves. Without their conservation and development, there is not a form of human activity that would not, at some future time, suffer hardship. At any rate, the Southern Negroes have never been out of sympathy with the President in regard to "race suicide."—Charleston News and Courier. No, the Negro has never been a party to "race suicide." And in that our white brothers may observe a potential future for the race.—New York Age. CJPR NOTES OF IMPORTANT DECISIONS Bankruptcy - New Promise to Pay Debt Discharged. - That a discharge in bankruptcy is a complete bar to all debts provable in the proceedings, and that the burden rests upon the party attacking the discharge to show cause why it is not effectual is held in Meyer v. Bartels, 107 N. Y. 778. The defendant had been discharged in bankruptcy in 1902, and the debt sued on in this case was one that accrued prior to that time. Plaintiff conceded a discharge in bankruptcy, but alleged a revival of the debt under a new promise and partial payment. The evidence for plaintiff was to the effect that the new promise was oral, and that at the time the promise was made a payment of a dollar was made on account, all of which was contradicted by defendant. In reversing the judgment and dismissing the complaint, the court says: "The discharge in bankruptcy, was an absolute bar to all demands that were provable in the proceedings, and the burden rests upon the party attacking the discharge to show some cause why it is not effectual. Stevens v. King, 19 App. Div. 374, 44 N. Y. Supp. 893. On the theory of partial payment and new promise, the statute of frauds specifically provides that such a promise must be in writing. Wheeler v. Simmons, 60 Hun. 15 N. Y. Supp 542, demonstrates that partial payment on account of a debt that has been discharged in bankruptcy is not sufficient to renew the original indebtedness or create a new obligation on the part of the debtor to pay the balance due." This decision, of course, rests upon the statute of New York. There are a few other jurisdictions in which it is required that the new promise must be in writing. But in the absence of such a statute, the new promise need not be in writing. The legal obligation to pay the debt if released, but the moral obligation remains, and will support a new promise to pay. It has been said however, that the new promise "must be clear, express, distinct, and unequivocal, and without qualification or condition. It need not be in waiting unless a state statute so requires.—Law Journal. The Manufacture of Buttons At the census of 1905, establishments with a capital of $7,783,900, were reported as engaged in the manufacture of buttons. These factories furnished employment for 11,335 persons, who earned an aggregate of $4,371,669, and the value of the products was $11,138,769; this including button blanks and other products. The leading variety of product was pearl buttons. The value of the 13,143,553 gross of such buttons was $4,870,274. As between fresh water and ocean pearl, the former greatly predominated, with 11,405,723 gross, valued at $3,359,169, or 69 per cent of the value of all the pearl buttons. Twenty-one states engaged in the manufacture of buttons, although only four had products valued at more than $1,000,000. New York was the leading state, with $3,849,317; New Jersey had $1,592,261; Iowa, $1,500,945; and Connecticut, $1,446,219. Almost one-half of the pearl buttons and about two-thirds of the vegetable ivory buttons were manufactured in New York. All the bone buttons were made in Pennsylvania. Button blanks were produced mainly in Iowa, the reports showing for this state 4,575,814 gross and a value of $594,946, or about two-thirds of the total. — Exchange. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN, 307 Epler Block, Phone Main 305. 6 NOTICE TO CREDITORS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of King., No. S708. In the Matter of the Estate of Gertrude A. Edwards, Deceased. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against Gertrude A. Edwards, deceased, or against her estate, to present the same, with the necessary vouchers, within one year from the date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit: within one year from the 13th day of March, 1908, to John Edwards, administrator of the estate of Gertrude A. Edwards, deceased, at the office of Reed & Hardman, 960 Empire Building, Seattle, Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of the business of said estate. Dated at Seattle, Washington, this 13th day of March, 1908. JOHN EDWARDS, Administrator of the Estate of Gertrude A. Edwards, Deceased. REED & HARDMAN, Attorneys for Administrator, No. 960 Empire Bldg., Seattle, Wash. (March 13—April 10.) State of Washington, for King County. —In Probate. In the matter of the estate of James Cowley, deceased.—No. 8790. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given to all persons having claims against the estate of James Cowley, deceased, or against the community consisting of James Cowley and Matilda A. Cowley, to present the same, with proper vouchers attached, to the undersigned Administrator of the estate of said deceased, at his place of transaction of the business of said estate, namely, at the office of Douglas, Lane and Douglas, 204-209 Lumber Exchange Building, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, within one year after the first publication of this notice, to-wit: within one year after the 13th day of March, 1908, or they will be forever barred. WILLIAM M. COWLEY. Administrator of the Estate of James Cowley, Deceased. DOWGLAS JANE & DOWGLAS DOUGLAS, LANE & DOUGLAS, Attorneys for Administrator, 204-209 Lumber Exchange Building, Seattle, Washington. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ON SALE OF REAL ESTATE. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King—In Probate—No. 8719. In the matter of the Estate of Martha J. Whittier, Deceased. Merril Whitty, the administrator of the estate of Martha J. Whittier, deceased, having filed his petition in this Court, duly verified, praying for an order of this Court for the sale of the estate of which the said deceased died deceased, for the purposes therein set forth: And it appearing to the Court from said petition that the personal estate of the said deceased in the hands of said administrator is not sufficient to pay the lecalms against the said estate and the expenses of the administration thereof, and said estate owns an undived one-fourth interest in and to lots three (3) and four (4) in Fostoria Garden Tracts, in said county; that it is necessary to sell all or a portion of the real estate of the said deceased to pay the said claims and expenses of the administration thereof, and to pay the said petition conforms to and is in accordance with the requirements of law in such case made and provided. It is ordered by the Court that all persons interested in the estate of the said deceased appear before said Superior Court on Thursday, the 16th day of April, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day at the Court room of the Probate Department of said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this Court should not be granted to said administrator authorizing and empowering him to set up the said estate of said property to so much thereof as may be necessary to pay the aforesaid claims and expenses of administration. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before the said 16th day of April, 1908, in the Seattle "Republican," a newspaper printed and published in said County of King and of general circulation therein. Done in open Court this 7th day of March, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington. County of King—ss. I, Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 7th day of March, 1908, in the matter of the estate of Martha J. Whittier, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 7th day of March, 1908. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. (SEAL) By J. A. SIGURDSSON. Deputy Clerk. ALLEN WEIR, Attorney for Petitioner. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of King. E. E. Van Hook, Plaintiff, vs. Fred Mauer, Defendant. The State of Washington to the said Fred Mauer: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 13th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do, judgment be ordered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which he kept filed with the clerk of said Court. This action is in foreclosure of a chattel mortgage executed by defendant to plaintiff, and is brought for the purpose of foreclosing all of the right, title and interest of the defendant in and to one gasoline launch, known by the name of "Mink," the property of defendant. E. L. SANDERS, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Bldg. Seattle, County of King, Washington. (March 13-April 24, 1908.) THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUNTY State of Washington. Morris Berger, Plain- iff, vs. Sarah Berger, Defendant. No. 60059. Summons for, Service, by, Publication. The State of Washington to the said Sarah Berger, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 28th day of February, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney, plaintiff, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the above named defendant upon the grounds of cruelty and abandonment. R. R. GEORGE. Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address, Rooms 210 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb. 28—April 10, 1908 of Washington for the county of King. L. W. La. Mar, plaintiff vs. Mabel H. La. Mar, defendant, No. 60018. The State of Washington to the said Mabel H. La Mar, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 21st day of February, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of our answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: Divorce on the ground of desertion. Z. B. RAWSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address: 617 Pacific Block, Seattle, County of King, Washington. Feb. 21—April 3, 1908. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for King County,—Case No.……. Bertrand R. Benedict, Plaintiff, vs. Primrose F. Benedict, Defendant. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, Primrose F. Benedict: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 6th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office and Post Office address now stated: and in case of your failure so do, Judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. This is an action for divorce on the grounds of abandonment for more than one year. E. M. FARMER, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. and Office Address: 609 Burke Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. NOTICE TO CREDITORS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of King.,—No. 59031 C. L. Rohrer and M. L. Rohrer, formerly doing business as Rohrer Brothers, Plaintiffs, vs. Inter-State Live Stock Insurance Company, a corporation, Defendants. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned Receiver of the Inter-State Live Stock Insurance Company, a corporation, to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said Inter-State Live Stock Insurance Company, a corporation, to exhibit, and present them, with the necessary vouchers and duly verified, on or before the 13th day of April 1908, at room number 615 New York Block, Seattle, Washington, the same being the place for transaction of the business of said estate. WILL HANNA. Receiver of Inter-State Live Stock Insurance Company, a corporation. (March 13—April 1908.) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of Jerry Perry, Deceased. Bridget Perry, as executrix of the estate of Jerry Perry, deceased, having filed her petition in this court, duly verified, praying for an order of this court for the sale of real property for the purposes therein set forth, and it appearing to the court from said petition that the personal estate in the hands of said administratrix is not sufficient to pay the claims against said estate and expenses of administration, and the family allowance, and that it is necessary to sell all or a portion of the real property of said deceased to pay the claims against said estate, the family allowance made therein and the expenses of administration, and it appearing to the court that said petition conforms to and is in accordance with the requirements of law in such cases made and provided. It is now and here ordered, considered and adjudged by the court that all the persons interested in said estate appear before the said Superior Court on Thursday, the 16th day of April, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the foremono of said day, at the court room of the Probate Department of the Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, in the City of Seattle, then and then to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this court should not be granted to said executrix, authorizing and empowering her to sell the real property of said deceased or so much thereof as may be necessary to pay the claims against said estate, the family allowance and the expenses of the administration. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before the 16th day of April, 1908, in the Seattle "Republican," a newspaper published and printed in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 12th day of March, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. (March 13—April 10, 1908) SUMMONS. No. 3559 In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for King County. Order to Show Cause and Petition for Allowance. In the Matter of the Estate of George F. Smith. Deceased Ollie Smith, the executrix of the estate of George F. Smith, deceased, having filed her petition in this Court, duly verified, praying for an order of this Court allowing her the sum of $50.00 per month for her maintenance, as the widow of the said George F. Smith, deceased, during the administration of said estate, and it appearing to the Court from said petition that the deceased left no homestead or dwelling house for his said widow, and it appearing that the petitioner, Ollie Smith, the executrix of said estate, is the widow of said deceased and is a devisee under the will of said deceased; and that by said will no provision was made for the support and maintenance of his said widow, and that it is necessary that some provision be made for the support of said widow during the administration of said estate, and it appearing that said petition conforms to, and is in accordance with the requirements of law in such cases made and provided; and it appearing that notice of the time and place of hearing said petition should be given by publication: It is ordered by the Court that all persons interested in the estate of said deceased appear before said Superior Court on the 17th day of April, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day, at the court room of the Probate Department of said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, King County and State aforesaid; then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this Court should not be granted to said executrix, authorizing and empowering her to pay to herself as the widow of said deceased, from the estate of said deceased, the sum of $50.00 per month for her support and maintenance, and charge the same against said estate. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks, before the said 17th day of April, 1908, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said County of King and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 4th day of March, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King—ss I. Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 4th day of March, 1908, in the matter of the estate of George F. Smith, deceased. Witness my hand and seal of said Court on the 4th day of March, 1908. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. (SEAL) By J. A. SIGURDSSON. Deputy Clerk. Date of first publication, March 6; last, April 3rd. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of King.—No. 8731. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Rode Vukojevje, Deceased. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against Rode Vukojevje, deceased, or his estate, to present the same with the necessary vouchers, within one year from the date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit: within one year from the 6th day of March, 1908, to C. C. Emmons, administrator of the estate of Rode Vukojevje, deceased, at the office of John E. Carroll, No. 210 New York Building, corner of Second Ave. and Cherry St., in the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of the business of said estate. Dated at Seattle, King County, Washington, this 6th day of March, 1908. C. C. EMMONS. Administrator of the Estate of Rode Vukojevie, Deceased JOHN E. CARROLL, Attorney for Administrator, No. 210 New York Building. Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, March 6—April 3, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King, Otto C. Ehmsen and Marie Sophronia Ehmsen, Plaintiffs, vs. Robert Novarak and Julia Novarak, husband and wife, Defendants. The State of Washington to the said Robert Novarak and Julia Novarak, husband and wife, defendants: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first submission of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 13th day of March, A. P. in 1908, and defend the above entitled attorney in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiffs' complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled Court. The object for which this action is brought is to foreclose a mortgage on certain real estate described as follows, to-wit: Lot numbered thirteen (13) in block numbered fifteen (15) of Joseph R. McLaughlin's Water Front Addition to the City of Seattle, according to the official plaat thereof as appears of record in the office of the Auditor of King County, State of Washington. MITCHELL & LAWRENCE; Attorneys for Plaintiffs. Office Address and Post Office Address: Rooms 611-612 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, State of Washington. (March 13—April 24, 1908.) *To be published for six successive weeks, or seven times.* No. 8635 IN PROBATE. IN PROBATE No. 60366. MITCHELL & LAWRENCE. Attorneys for Plaintiffs. Friday. April 3. 1908 SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for King County. James Callahan, Plaintiff, vs. Susan Callahan, Defendant. State of Washington to the said Susan Callahan, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 6th day of March, 1908, in the above entitled action, in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. This action is brought to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the grounds of desertion and adultery. JOHN R. PARKER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: Rooms 30-31-32 Union Blk., Seattle, King County, Washington. (March 6 to April 17, 1908) No.3655 NOTICE FOR PUBLICATION. In the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, United States of America, Petitioner, vs. Pietro Sclaffani, Respondent. The United States of America to Pietro Sclaffani: You are hereby notified and required to appear in the above entitled Court within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication hereof to answer the petition of the United States of America, the petitioner herein. The object for which this petition is filed is to obtain an order from the above entitled Court for the purpose of vacating, setting aside and holding for naught a certain order heretofore made, to-wit: on or about the 2nd day of October, 1896, by the Court of Criminal Correction at St. Louis, in the State of Missouri, granting your petition and admitting you to become a citizen of the United States of America and for the further purpose of revoking, cancelling and holding for naught that certain certificate of naturalization issued to you under and by virtue of the aforesaid order of Court, upon the ground that the same was obtained fraudulently and by perjury. You are further notified and required to serve a copy of the answer upon the undersigned attorney for the petitioner at his Post Office address below stated, within the stated time of sixty days, and unless you so answer said petition and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned within that time, judgment will be taken against you in accordance with the prayer of said petition as confessed and by default. ANDREW J. BALLIET, Attorney for Petitioner. P. O. Address and Office Address: United States Court House, 4th and Marion St., Seattle, Washington. W. D. COVINGTON, Deputy Clerk of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Date of first publication, March 6, 1908; last publication, April 17, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. P. A. Hyman and Jane Doe Hyman, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Disturbance of the real property, State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 25th day of June, 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, o-wit: Lot 5, less the east 48 feet, block 58, Riley's Add. to Riley's Addition to Seattle: for the year 1902, in the sum of $2.93; certificate No. B27414. That on Nov. 22, 1904, the east 48 feet of sold lot was redeemed from said certificate, leaving said certificate still outstanding against the remainder of said lot as follows: Lot 5, less the east 48 feet, block 58, Riley's Add. to Riley's Addition to Seattle: for the year 1902, in the sum of $2.93; certificate No. B27414. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 5, less 48 feet block 58, Riley's Add. to Riley's Addition to Seattle: for the year 1905, in the sum of $2.12; for the year 1904, in the sum of $1.86; for the year 1905, in the sum of $1.78; for the year 1906, in the sum of $4.05. While several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after Feb. 28, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each said taxes, interest charged, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER. Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Friday, April 3, 1908 NOTICE AND SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, plaintiff, vs. H. W. Blaine and Jane Doe Blaine, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No.... State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 7th day of December, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Palatine Hill Addition to the City of Seattle, lot 14, block 3, certificate No. B24521, year 1901, $1.97. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, towfit; Lot 14, block 3, Palatine Hill Addition to Seattle, $1.62 for year 1902, $1.52 for 1903, $3.35 for 1905, $3.51 for 1906. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: sixty (60) days after the 21st day of February, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and against each parcel of said property for the sums and amounts due upon an decharged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER. Plaintiff. Office address: 457 Arcade Building, Seattle, Wash. First publication February 21, 1908; last, April 3, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Edith Ayers, Plaintiff, vs. Harry Ayers, Defendant. Summons, for, Publication. No. --- Edith Ayers, Plaintiff, Vs. Harry Ayers, Defendant. Summons for Publication. No. 10. State of Washington the said Harry Ayers, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty (60) days after the 21st day of February, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to procure an absolute divorce from you on account of extreme cruelty and neglect. EDGAR FOSTER, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: Metropole Building, Southwest corner Second Avenue and Yesler Way, Seattle, King County, Washington. NOTICE OF SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County of Washington for King County. M. J. Nist, plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herelainen described real property, defendants. No..... State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or herelainen of an est or state in and to the herelainen described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 3rd day of September, 1907, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situate in said King County, described as follows, to-write: City of Des Moines, lot 2, block 78, certificate No. B48591, year 1902, $1.11. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described lot of real property, to-wit: 51 cents for year 1903, 22 cents for year 1904, 20 cents for year 1905, 15 cents for year 1906. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby father notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication. Feb. 21, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at the time of payment the due together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office address: 225-30 Colman Bldg., Seattle, Wash. First publication Feb. 21, 1908; last, April 3, 1908. Have a Legal Notice? PHONE MAIN 305 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN NOTICE AND SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No..... State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, on the 7th day of December, 1903, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Denny & Horty's Addition 'to the City of Seattle, lot 13, block 62, certificate No. B24845, year 1902, $2.12. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 13, block 62, Denny & Hoyt's Addition to the City of Seattle, $1.52 for year 1903, $1.92 for 1904, $2.01 for 1905, $2.92 for 1906. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the date of said first publication, to-wit: sixty (60) days after the 21st day of February, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered proper for forecaching the loss of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER. Plaintiff. Office address: 457 Arcade Building, Seattle, Wash. First publication February 21, 1908; last, April 3, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Georgiana Raven, Plaintiff, vs. George Raven, Defendant. No. 60267. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to said George Raven: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit, within sixty days after the 6th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated. And in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this action against you is to obtain a decree herein dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant, on the statutory grounds of desertion for more than eight years last past, and that the following described real estate be decreed to be the separate property of plaintiff, to-wit: A tract of land in Sec. 24, Twp. 25 N. Range 3 East W. M., described as follows: Beginning 478 feet south and 37 feet east of the northwest corner of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Sec. 24, thence east 120 feet, thence south 38 feet, thence west 120 feet, thence north 38 feet to the point of beginning. The following described tract of land situated in the town of Hannibal, County of Oswego, New York, to-wit: Two parcels of land containing $ \frac{1}{4} $ of an acre each, being part of Lot 39; one hundred acres in Great Lot No. 39, part of Lot 39 of Great Lot 39, containing six and one-half rods. Also all that other parcel or parcels of land, known and described as one-half acre of land in the States. And the easterly 18 feet of Lot 21, Block 4, according to a plan of part of Lot 231, Group 1, Kamloops Division of Yale District, situated in the City of Kamloops, Province of British Columbia. And for such other relief as to the Court shall seem proper. GUIE & GUIE, Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. and office address: No. 615-16 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. March 6—April 17. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. SUMMONS. Benjamin F. Blair, Plaintiff, vs. Ada C. Blair, Defendant—No..... The State of Washington to the said Ada C. Blair. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the day of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 6th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The action is one for divorce. McBURNEY & CUMMINGS. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 414 Boston Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. March 6-April 17. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. W. H. Thayer, Plaintiff, vs. Agnes E. Thayer, Defendant. No. 60153. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Agnes E. Thayer, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 28th day of February, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the county of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said Court. A brief statement of the object of the said action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant, upon the ground of abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant for more than one year. EDWARD BRADY. Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: Suite 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb. 28—April 10, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffer, Plaintiff, vs. Geo. L. Hill and Jane Doe Hill, his wife, and all persons unknown, if accused of murder. If accused, the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. 60145. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 16th day of December, 1903, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 36, block 1, Madison St. Cable Ry. Add. to Seattle: for the year 1902, in the amount of $3.87; certificate No. B24601. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described property, to-wit: block 1, Madison St. Cable Ry. Add. to Seattle, for year 1903, in the sum of $3.63; for year 1905, in the sum of $3.80; for year 1906, in the sum of $5.40. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, towift, within 60 days after Feb. 28, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. First publication dated Feb. 28—April 10, '08. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County, W. T. Gaffer, Plaintiff, vs. P. A. Hyman and Jane Doe Hyman, his wife, and all persons unknown. if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herinafter described real property. Defendants. No: 60143. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of June, 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County described as follows to the extent I hold 58. Riley to Riley's Addition to Seattle; for the year 1902 and in the sum of $3.02; certificate No. B27403. That on Nov. 22, 1904, the east 48 feet of said lot was redeemed from said certificate leaving said certificate still outstanding against the remainder of said lot as follows: Lot 1, less the east 48 feet block 58, Riley Add. to Riley's Add. to Seattle; for the year 1902 and in the sum of $2.93; certificate No. B27403. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 1, block 58, less the east 48 feet of Riley's Addition to Riley's Add. to Seattle, for year 1903, the sum of $2.12; for year 1904, the sum of $1.86; for year 1905, the sum of $1.78; for year 1906, the sum of $1.69; for year 1907, the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication ...of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit within sixty days after Feb. 28th, 1908, in the above entitled court and action: and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated .or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each for satisfaction of each parcel of said property for satisfaction of the sums charged found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. First publication dated Feb. 28—April 10, 1988. 2 SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King. Susie S. Hamilton, plaintiff, vs. Patrick Stewart Hamilton, defendant: The State of Washington to the said Patrick Stewart Hamilton, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 13th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; in case of your failure to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of abandonment and non-support. ELIAS A. WRIGHT, P. O. Address: Rooms 629-631 Burke Bldg., in Seattle, King County, Washington. NOTICE AND SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, plaintiff, vs. Sarah McDonaugh and John Doe McDonaugh, her husband, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No..... State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasury of King County, State of Washington, dated the 7th day of December, 1903, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King county, described as follows, to-wit: Denny and Hoyt's Addition to the City of Seattle, lot 21, block 27, certificate No. B24825, year 1902, $4.39. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 21, block 27, Denny & Hoyt's Addition to the City of Seattle, $4.67 for year 1903, $5.79 local assessments for 1903, $4.80 for 1904, $15.60 local assessments for 1904, $5.03 for 1903, $29.92 local assessments for 1905, $7.90 for 1905, $29.92 local assessments for 1906. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: sixty (60) days after the 21st day of February, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, proceeding the law of said taxes, and costs, against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. First publication February 21, 1908: last, April 3, 1908. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Grace McGarva, Plaintiff, vs. Andrew McGarvey, Defendant—No. ... The State of Washington to the said Andrew McGarva, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 27th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in rendering failure to comply with the rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to procure an absolute divorce from you on account of extreme cruelty and neglect. JOHN L. NEAGLE. Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 306 Bailey Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. May 14, 2009 SUMMONS. P. O. Address: Rooms 629-631 Burke Bldg. in Seattle, King County, Washington. March 27—May 8, 1908.