Seattle Republican

State Library LE REPUB SEATTLE REPUBLICAN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, Friday, May 8, 1908 --- VOL. XIV. NO. 50 WHO WILL BE GOVERNOR? The Seattle Post-Intelligence announces that it will support Governor Mead in his candidacy for the Republican nomination in the direct primary to be held next September. This announcement has been expected for some time and it forecasts the line-up that will be made between Mead and McBride, and in the judgment of the Bulletin will result in the selection of S. G. Cosgrove of Pomeroy on the second choice provision of the direct primary law. The Bulletin not only believes Cosgrove is a winner, but that he ought to secure the nomination. This newspaper believes the Republican party will be in better shape to make a winning fight with Cosgrove as its nominee than with any other candidate now before the people. There is bound to be a bitter contest between Mead and McBride, and in the event of the selection of either the bitterness of the primary campaign is certain to have an effect on the election afterwards. Following his defeat four years ago Governor McBride retired to public life and has not since been active in any of the party's affairs. He unquestionably contributed his influence towards the effort to defeat the party nominee. He could very appropriately have left this to his supporters, who felt aggrieved over his defeat, and himself have given the entire ticket the support it was entitled to, but he sulked in his quarters and now comes forth bearing the banner of the railroad lobby he so opposed. While nominated by the railroads and corporations of the state, Mead has stood steadfastly with the people, and McBride himself could not have done more to secure the legislation he pretended to favor than has Governor Mead. This newspaper is not in favor of the renomination of Governor Meade for other reasons, but it is going to be perfectly fair towards him, as it is towards all aspirants for public position. Its reasons for opposing Governor Mead are largely personal and it is not trying to hide behind any other pretext or deception. These are reasons sufficient, to our mind, to justify us in opposing him. If he is renominated this paper will support him, because it believes he is honest and means to do the square thing by the public, even if he is lacking in judgment and steadfastness of purpose. Before Henry McBride is entitled to the support of Republicans, even those who supported him four years ago, it will be necessary for him to explain the activity in his behalf of the men whom he so bitterly opposed at that time. It requires no high and lofty tumbling for the lobbyist to explain their support of McBride. They called him all kinds of a scoundrel then and say now it was because he was opposed to them and not because he really was what they claimed. That is equivalent to saying he is with them now. McBride found it advantageous to denounce them four years ago, but inexpedient to do so now. There is but one inference, and that he is now the candidate of the lobby and the bosses of the machine. From the house tops he denounced the lobby, yet it infested the capital as never before, during his administration. Mead said nothing, but quietly eliminated the lobby, and it has been less in evidence during his administration than ever before in the history of the state It is exceedinly improbable that either Mead or McBride will secure 40 per cent of the Republican vote in the primary. Cosgrove can come as near getting that proportion of the vote as either of them and will be the second choice of every Republican in the state who is not for him for first choice, except a handful of the machine who will be instructed to throw their votes to Ridpath or Atkinson, who are mere stalking horses for the real candidate of the machine, Henry McBride. The voters of this state should take this fact home and consider it well. If they sincerely wish to destroy bossism and machine politics, McBride is the last man to place in the governor's chair. — Walla Walla Bulletin. [Picture of a man in a suit with a bow tie]. C. G. AUSTIN After years of absence from the political arena former Police Judge C. G. Austin, of Seattle, has again shied his castor in the ring and has announced that he will be a candidate for the Republican nomination for lieutenant governor at the primaries next Sextember. Mr. Austin is both well and favorably known in this and other communities in the state and there is no denying the fact that he will have some votes when the counting time comes round. PERSONAL PARAGRAPHS Dr. Sparling, of Newcastle, was on hand and met some fellows he has been wanting to see very much. Its all right now. Pete Smith is not much of an enthusiast, but nevertheless he is a mixer from way back, and in his mixing rounds Pete "sho" can do things. Dr. C. E. Hoye was on hand with a smile that the delegates from the country could see all over the hall, and it is said he made a couple of votes in the mix up. Dr. J. J. Smith was a delegate to the county convention last Wednesday and looked as though he had lost none of his political sagacity on account of his long political rest. John Wooding, the war horse of the south district, looked just as cute and cunning as he marshaled his hosts in the county convention last Wednesday, as he did when the state nominations depended on it. PRICE TEN CENTS The Snohomish county convention endorsed Wyatt J. Rucker for one of the delegates to the national Republican convention. Mr. Rucker is well and favorably known throughout the state in political circles. J. H. Ryan, editor of the Tacoma Forum, was in Seattle on business one day this week and did a bit of politics while here in the interest of the Ankeny bunch. Mr. Ryan is one of the delegates to the state convention from Pierce county. W. H. Clark, who can do more politics in a minute than the average man can in a day, was at the convention and did things. Whether or not there was any need of doing things is a question, nevertheless Clarkie did them just the same. The Pierce county convention endorsed R. F. McCormick as one of the delegates to the Chicago convention. Mr. McCormick is at the head of the Weyhauser Lumber Syndicate in this state and once entertained the hope of representing the state of Washington in the United States senate. Collector of Customs F. C. Harper, was in Seattle one day this week, and mingled with the politicians for the most part while in the city. "It occurs to me that it would be wise for King County to ask for but one delegate to the national convention and let Snohomish, Whatcom and Skagit each have one." ANKENY MACHINE OPPOSES COSGROVE As the Bulletin predicted, the Ankeny machine is getting ready to support McBride for governor. The re-publication in the Union on an article from the Seattle Times claiming that S. G. Cosgrove is in the Wilson combine, is in itself proof of the attitude the machine will take. Cosgrove is one of the best and most loyal Republicans in the state and the intimation that he is a party to any scheme to oppose the successful candidate in the primaries, if he should be defeated, is a falsehood made out of whole cloth. Coming from the supporters of McBride, this talk about bolting the ticket has a hollow sound that deceives no one. Simply because McBride and Crocker have been engaged in this line of campaign is no indication that the whole party is made up of the same kind of men. Cosgrove's friends throughout Eastern Washington should bear in mind that he is being opposed by the Ankeny machine, which is in league with Henry McBride. Cosgrove has not made any combine with the opponents of Senator Ankeny and has personally been most friendly and kind to him and his candidacy. There is no other reason why the Senator's friends should not support Cosgrove except they are in cahoots with McBride or some candidate opposed to Cosgrove. Take Cosgrove's action in Walla Walla as an example of his attitude toward Ankeny. He turned his campaign here over to men who were known to be friends of the Senator and has not attempted at any time to interfere in the senatorial contest. What more could Senator Ankeny ask? Why should he, in the face of this fact, go out of his way to oppose Cosgrove? During all the years Senator Ankeny has been manipulating politics Cosgrove has always stood loyal to the ticket when nominated, no matter what disappointment it meant to him. There is no reason whatever for Senator Ankeny to oppose this stalwart old Republican except it is part of a bargain with some other candidate whom he thinks can and will give him more strength—Walla Walla Bulletin. idence; and how much birth up to the present absorbed any of the aff the taxpayers in said that they have notice issued that will incumpondents which was of Logan Judge Longworth the father of Nicholas L fond of talking with While driving through in his dog cart, Judge ped a plodding labored wanted a lift. The In once in the cart, the "Well, Pat, you'd land before you wou judge." An anecdote is told John C. Spink, Judge tice Waite of the Un Court, and a number that day, were atthe Maumee Valley, and hotel kept by Mr. Ki Col. Henry Kingsbury in a circle about a la yarns and enjoying th IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE JOHN E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Max Malakoff, plaintiff, vs. Joe Phillips and Jane Doe Phillips, whose true Christian name is to plaintiff unknown, his wife, defendants. No. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King—ss. The State of Washington to Joe Phillips and Jane Doe Phillips, whose true Christian name is to plaintiff unknown, his wife. You and each of you, are hereby notified that Max Malakoff has filed a complaint against you in said Court, which will come to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Building, Seattle, king County, Washington, on the 1st day of June, A. D. 1908, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock a. m., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said Max Malakoff is for the sum of sixty-one and 95-100 ($61.15) dollars for groceries furnished you at your request on and prior to April 30, 1908. Complaint filed May 6, A. D. 1908. JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. May 8—May 29, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for the County of King. George A. Russell, plaintiff, vs. Ada M. Russell, defendant. No.—— Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Ada M. Russell, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 2nd day of May, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To obtain a decree of divorce from said defendant on the grounds of desertion and abandonment for more than one year, and a decree awarding to the plaintiff the S. $\frac{1}{2}$ of the S. W. $\frac{1}{4}$ of the S. W. $\frac{1}{4}$ (less 11.97 acres right of way) and the S. $\frac{1}{2}$ of the S. E. $\frac{1}{4}$ of the S. W. $\frac{1}{4}$ (less 12.29 acres right of way). In Section 27, Township 20 North of Range 15 East, W. M., situated in Kittitas County, Washington, as his sole and separate property free from any community or other claims of said defendant, and for such other and further relief as the court may deem equitable. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 304 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. May 8—June 19, 1908. Have a Legal Notice? PHONE MAIN 305. ```markdown ``` One of our esteemed correspondents sends us the following demurrer which was actually in the district court of Logan county: District Court of Logan Co., State of Oklahoma. Now comes William Taylor and demurs to the petition of the City of Guthrie for the following reasons, to-wit: 1st. That the city of Guthrie is not a legal person. 2nd. The parents of the city of Guthrie were not married and the city of Guthrie was never born. 3rd. The city of Guthrie is not entitled to enter the courts of the state of Oklahoma by reason of its illegitimacy. 4th. The city of Guthrie has no known residence or possessions shown by the records of the state of Oklahoma. 5th. The quarterly report due between the 15th and 20th days of September, 1907, did not show any judgments outstanding against the city of Guthrie. 6th. Plaintiff's petition is too indefinite and it does not set forth sufficient facts and data to show on whom it has felonious intentions of robbing; and there is no record evidence to show the taxpayers of the aforenamed townsites whether they are interested parties or not. Therefore we ask that plaintiff be required to show that it is a legal person by record evidence. When it was born and what was its size at its birth, by record ev- 图 When is a Town "Born?" One of our esteemed correspon sends us the following demurrer which actually in the district court of county: City of Guthrie v. Townsites. District Court of Logan Co., State or homa. Now comes William Taylor and due to the petition of the City of Guthrie the following reasons, to-wit: 1st. That the city of Guthrie is a legal person. 2nd. The parents of the city of G were not married and the city of G was never born. 3rd. The city of Guthrie is not able to enter the courts of the state of homa by reason of its illegitimacy. 4th. The city of Guthrie has no residence or possessions shown by the orders of the state of Oklahoma. 5th. The quarterly report due by the 15th and 20th days of September did not show any judgments outstriking against the city of Guthrie. 6th. Plaintiff's petition is too incumbent and it does not set forth sufficient and data to show on whom it has felt intentions of robbing; and there is no ord evidence to show the taxpayers aforenamed townsites whether they are interested parties or not. Therefore we ask that plaintiff quired to show that it is a legal per record evidence. When it was born what was its size at its birth, by reco State of Washington, in and for the State of King. County of John Crane, plaintiff, vs. A. E. Downing and E. May Downing, his wife, defendants. No. 60999. Summons for Publication The State of Washington, to said A. E. Downing and E. May Downing, his wife, defendants in the above entitled action: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within 60 days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within 60 days after the 8th day of May, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated. And in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this action is to obtain judgment on a certain promissory note, made, executed and delivered by you, the said A. E. Downing and E. May Downing to William A. L. Koch, for $100.00 with interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the 8th day of July, 1904, and for the sum of $20.00 attorney's fees; and to foreclose that certain mortgage, made, executed and delivered by you to the said William A. L. Koch, securing the payment of said promissory note on Lot 4. Block 8, Madison Street Addition to Seattle, as shown by the record of said plat now on file in the office of the County Auditor of said King County and State, situated in King County, Washington; that said note and mortgage were on the 17th day of March, 1908, assigned to plaintiff herein, John Crane, and he is now the owner and holder thereof; and to obtain the usual decree in foreclosure for the sale of said premises, and that the proceeds of said sale may be applied in payment of the amount due on said promissory note, and the judgment to be obtained thereon; and that all persons, including the said defendants, A. E. Downing and E. May Downing, claiming any interest in said mortgaged premises subsequent to the execution and delivery of said mortgage on the 8th day of July, 1902, either as purchasers, incumbrances, lessees, or otherwise, may be barred and foreclosed of all right, claim, or equity of redemption in said premises and every part thereof, and that the right, title, interest and claim of the above named defenders, and each of them, if any they have, be decreed to be subject, subordinate and inferior to that of the plaintiff in and to the real estate and premises herein described, and for such other relief as shall by the Court be deemed equitable. GUIE & GUIE. Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. and office address: Rooms 615- 616 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. May 8-June 19, 1908. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN idence; and how much it has grown since birth up to the present date; and if it has absorbed any of the aforenamed townsites; the taxpayers in said townsites request that they have notice before any bonds are issued that will incumber their property. Filed March 24, 1908. C. H. Griswold, Clerk District Court. Central Law Journal. HUMOR OF THE LAW (JFrom Central Law Journal) Judge Longworth, of Cincinnati, the father of Nicholas Longworth, was very fond of talking with the "sons of toil." While driving through Eden Park one day in his dog cart, Judge Longthworth stopped a plodding laborer and asked him if he wanted a lift. The Irishman accepted and once in the cart, the judge said: "Well, Pat, youd be a long time in Ireland before you would be driving with a judge." "Yes, sir," replied the judge's guest. "And you'd be many a day in Ireland before they'd make ye a judge." An anecdote is told that one cold night John C. Spink, Judge Way and Chief Justice Waite of the United States Supreme Court, and a number of other lawyers of that day, were attending Court in the Maumee Valley, and were stopping at a hotel kept by Mr. Kingsbury, an uncle of Col. Henry Kingsbury. They were sitting in a circle about a large fireplace, telling varns and enjoying themselves hugely. A man rode up to the hotel on horseback, dismounted, stripped off his overoat, leather overshoes, and was escorted before fairly warm into the dining-room for supper. After eating his supper the stranger, who had the appearance of being a well-to-do farmer, was invited into the sitting-room adjoining the bar room, where the lawyers were seated before the fire. The man was cold, fairly chilled through from riding, but there was no move on the part of the lawyers to make room for him near the glowing logs in the fire-place, but they were otherwise quite cordial in their greeting, and evidently thought to have a little sport at the expense of the stranger. One asked the man where he hailed from. "Chicago," was his reply. Then another inquired as to the condition of the roads there. "They are horrible," he said, and continued, remarked that "the roads through the swamps between here and Chicago are the worse I ever saw—worse than h-ll." This last remark struck Judge Way as an opening for the fun to begin, so he turned to the stranger and said: "My dear sir, you speak like one familiar with h-ll. How are things down there?" WM. TAYLOR. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King. C. W. Rodeen, plaintiff, vs. Georgena Rodeen, defendant. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Georgena Rodeen; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait: within sixty days after the 8th day of May, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds of cruelty and personal indignities, rendering life burdensome. E. L. SANDERS, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. May 8—June 19, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington. In and for the County of King. Katherin V. Willson, plaintiff, vs.. Alphanso M. Willson, defendant. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Alphanso Willson: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 8th day of May, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony, now existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of desertion and nonsupport. E. L. SANDERS, Plaintiff's Attorneys. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. May 8—June 19, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for King County. Theeresia Watson, plaintiff, vs. James Watson, defendant. No. — Summons. defendant. No. Summons. The State. Washington to James Watson, thus she was defended. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the 8th day of May, 1908, and defend the above entitled action, in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of failure on your part so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court; that plaintiff's cause of action against you as set forth in the complaint for divorce, founded on cruelty. EDGAR FOSTER. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. and Office Address: Suite 304 Metropole Building, corner Second Avenue and Yesler Way, Seattle, King County, Washington. Friday, May 8, 1908 rode up to the hotel on horse- ounted, stripped off his overoat, warshoes, and was escorted before in into the dining-room for sup- tating his supper the stranger, the appearance of being a well-to- was invited into the sitting-room the bar room, where the lawyers had before the fire. The man was chilled through from riding, was no move on the part of the to make room for him near the dogs in the fire-place, but they wise quite cordial in their greet- idently thought to have a little the expense of the stranger. kicked the man where he hailed Chicago," was his reply. Then quired as to the condition of the le. "They are horrible," he said, qued, remarked that "the roads the swamps between here and the worse I ever saw—worse" Just remark struck Judge Way as giving for the fun to begin, so he to the stranger and said: "My you speak like one familiar with how are things down there?" The stranger replied: "Oh, it just as it is everywhere else, the we always nearest the fire." Circle opened at once, and made the shivering stranger.—Virginia ater. ain 305 when you have a legal publication and watch us get it. To this the stranger replied: "Oh, it is there just as it is everywhere else, the lawyers are always nearest the fire." The circle opened at once, and made room for the shivering stranger.—Virginia Law Register. Call Main 305 when you have a legal notice for publication and watch us get there for it. OF THE STATE County of King, Georgena Ro-Publication. the said Geor-appear within the first publication within sixty days and defend the entitled Court, the plaintiff, and upon the under-this office below failure so to do, at you according which has been NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF THE UNITED CITIES TRUSTEE COMPANY. To the Stockholders: The adjourned meeting of the stockholders of the United Cities Trustee Company will be held at the office of the Company, No. 1011 American Bank Building, Seattle, Washington, on Thursday, June 4th, 1908, at 1 o'clock p. m., for the purpose of electing trustees for the ensuing year, and for such other business as may properly come before said meeting. RICHARD STEVENS ESKRIDGE, President. Attest: H. H. MATTESON, Secretary. Seattle, Wash., May 8—May 29, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Reg. E. Morgan, Plaintiff, vs. A. B. Braddick and Emmie C. Braddick, his wife, Defendants. No. 60350. Summons. The State of Washington to the said A. B. Braddick and Emmie C. Braddick, his wife, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 8th day of May, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County as said and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought to obtain judgment against you in the sum of $46.50 and costs for goods sold and delivered to you by the Eastern Outfitting Co., a corporation-plaintiff's assignor. MONCRIFE CAMERON, Attorney for Plaintiff. 1054 Empire Bldg., Seattle, Wash. May 8—June 19, 1908. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of Elliza J. Grayson, Deceased. To All Whom It May Concern: Notice is hereby given and extended to the creditors of Elliza J. Grayson, deceased, and to all persons having claims against said deceased, or against her estate, that they are required to present said claims, with the necessary vouchers, within one year after the date of this notice, to the undersigned Administrator of the estate of said Elliza J. Grayson, deceased, at the office of said Administrator in the City of West Seattle, King County, Washington, the same benign the place LAWYER'S LEGALS Always Get Good and Prompt Attention by Calling MAIN 305 The Seattle Republican 307 EPLER BLOCK The image provided is too blurry to accurately recognize any text. It appears to be a blank or heavily blurred background with no discernible features. Friday, May 8, 1908 NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King—ss.—Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an alias order of sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 11th day owl April, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of W. J. Janlsch, plaintiff, versus Bert Acteson and Mary M. Acteson, his wife, H. A. Raser, Trustee and the Title Guaranty and Trust Company, of Scranton, Pennsylvania, defendants. No. 56014, and to me, Sheriff, directed and delivered. Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, towt: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 23rd day of May, A. D. 10,08, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, tow: Lots numbered eleven (11) and twelve (12) in block numbered ninety (90) of Woodlawn Addition to Green Lake, according to the recorded plato thereof in the Auditor's office of King County, Washington, together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, to satisfy judgment of foreclosure of mortgages amounting to the sums of seven hundred forty-one and 77-100 ($741.74) dollars and eight hundred seventy-three ($873.00) dollars, respectively. Whereas, the said Order of Sale directs that the proceeds of said sale be applied as follows: 1st. To the payment of the judgments herein rendered in favor of plaintiff: principal, interest, attorney's fees and costs. 2nd. To the payment of the judgment in favor of defendant Title Guaranty and Trust Company; principal, interest and costs. Provided, however, that nothing shall be paid on said last mentioned judgment until the costs of sale and of this action, the judgment of plaintiff, principal, interest and attorney's fee shall have been fully discharged and paid. Dated this 11th day of April, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. April 17—May 15, 1908. SUMMON. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King. J. W. Hulse, Plaintiff, vs. Sarah J. Hulse, Defendant—Summons. The State of Washington to the said Sarah J. Hulse, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 10th day of April, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The object is said action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant herein on the ground of desertion and abandonment for more than one year. C. E. PIPER, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: Rooms 36 and 37 Union Block, No. 713 First Ave., Seattle, King County, Washington. April 10—May 22, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for King County. King County Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Albert Isaacson, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defend- ants.—No. 60768. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate, issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 27th day of April, 1905, and numbered B33779, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, 1903, in the amount of $4.24, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as its towit: The east one-half of the E. ¼ of the N. W. ¼ of Sec. 16, Tp. 25 N., R. 6 E. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1904, the sum of $5.05; for the year 1905, the sum of $4.51; for the year 1906, the sum of $3.36; for the year 1907, the sum of $3.45 Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including sald persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, towit, towit, within sixty days, April 10, 1908, in the above enclosed action and action; and defend the action and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, to serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. KING COUNTY LAND CO., a Corporation, Plaintiff A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. First publication dated April 10—May 22, 1908. SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King. Anna Jones, Plaintiff, vs. Milroy Jones, Defendant.-No. 60714. The State of Washington to the said Milroy Jones, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 3rd day of April, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony between the parties hereto on the ground of desertion for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address: 503-504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. April 3, May 15, 1908. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. I. I. Walker, Plaintiff, vs. Julia A. Curtiss and John Doe Curtiss, her husband, J. A. Cox, Trustee, and all other persons, parties, corporation or corporations, whomsoever unknown, claiming any right, title, interest, lien or estate in the real estate described herein, Defendants. The State of Washington, to the said Julia A. Curtiss and John Doe Curtiss, her husband, J. A. Cox, Trustee, and all other persons, parties, corporation or corporations, whomsoever unknown, claiming any right, title, interest, lien or estate in the real estate described herein, defendants, erecting: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service, towit, within sixty (60) days after the 27th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court; answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which will be filed with the Clerk of said Court or a copy of which is herewith served upon you. The object of the above entitled action is to quiet title in the said plaintiff in and to all of the south half (S½) of the northeast quarter (NE½) of the southeast quarter (SE½) of section seventeen (17), township twenty-three (23), range four (4) east, containing five (5) acres, located in King County, Washington; and that Julia A. Curtiss and John Doe Curtiss, her husband, J. A. Cox, Trustee, and all other persons, parties, corporation or corporations whomsoever unknown, claiming any right, title, interest, lien or estate in the real estate described herein, be forever enjoined and restrained from asserting or claiming any interest in the above entitled realty; and that it be further adjudged, that they and each of them, have no right, title, estate, lien or interest in said real estate or any portion thereof; and that plaintiff recover costs and disbursements. ANDREW R. BLACK, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: Room 315 Pacific Block, Seattle, Wash. March 27—May 8. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Zygmond Rozycki, Plaintiff, vs. Irene Rozycki, Defendant.—No. 60666. The State of Washington to Irene Rozycki, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty days after the 3rd day of April, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint herein which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action, as set forth in the complaint, is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant upon the ground of desertion and abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant and to declare lots four, five, six, nine, twelve, fifteen, sixteen and seventeen, block three, Second Addition to Adam's Home Tracts, in King County, Washington, the separate property of the plaintiff. EDWARD VON TOBEL. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, the 3rd day of April, 1908-May 15. NOTICE TO CREDITORS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for King County.—In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Olivia Slettengren. Decased.—No. 8852. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against the said deceased, or her estate, to present the same, with the necessary vouchers, to the undersigned administrator at his office, No. 202 Boston Block, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, the same being the place of transaction of the business of said estate, within one year from the date of the first publication of this notice, towit: within one year from the third day of April, 1908. HUGO SLETTTENGREN, Administrator of the Estate of Olivia Slettengren, Deceased Seattle, Washington, April 3, May 15, 1908. SUMMONS. Supreme Court. The State of Washington to said defendant, Mary E. D. Sheard: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 3rd day of April, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer or other pleading upon the undersigned attorney at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of said action being to secure an absolute decree of divorce, severing the bonds of matrimony between plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of incompatibility of temper and cruelty. C. H. STEFFEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 614 Bailey Bld., Seattle, Washington. April 3., May 15., 1908. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County, Laurence D. Black, Plaintiff, vs. Magdalena Black, Defendant.—No. ..... The State of Washington to Magdalena Black, Defendant: You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the day of said first publication, towit, within sixty (60) days after the 10th day of April, 1908, and defend the said plaint of plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for the plaintiff below named at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against the plaintiff, and demand of the complaint of plaintiff which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of this action is to secure a divorce for the plaintiff against the defendant on the ground of cruelty and desertion. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 10th-May 22, 1908. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for King County. Virginia Marie Van Dooren, Plaintiff, vs. Fredderick, Van Dooren, Defendant—No. .... The State of Washington to Frederick Van Dooren, Defendant: You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action, within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the date of the said first publication, towit, within sixty days after the 10th day of April, 1908, and answer the complaint of plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for plaintiff below named at his office below indicated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of plaintiff, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of this action is to obtain a divorce for the plaintiff against the defendant on the grounds of failure to support and cruelty. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 10th—May 22, 1908. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King, Agnes Taylor, Plaintiff, vs. Adam Taylor, Defendant. The State of Washington to the said Adam Taylor: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 3rd day of April, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the unresigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment; and be ordered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds of desertion and non-support, and for plaintiff's maiden name, Agnes Clayton. E. L. SANDERS, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Eldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. April 3, May 15, 1908. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF HERALDINE, FOR KING COUNTY The State of Washington to Wm. Drummond, Defendant: You are hereby summoned and notified to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action, within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 10th day of April, 1908, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court, and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for the plaintiff below named at his office below indicated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the said complaint. The object of this action is to secure a divorce for the plaintiff from the defendant and to have the former name of the plaintiff restored to her. MARY DRUMMOND, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 10th—May 22, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Richard Worth, Defendant.—No. 60596. Merwin Edward, Worth, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 27th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of cruelty and drunkenness. ELLIAS A. WRIGHT. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Rooms 629-631 Burke Bldg. in Seattle, King County. Washington. March 27—May 8, 1908. SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. William Knape and Christiana Knape, his wife. Plaintiffs, vs. Church of God in Christ, if such there be, and John D. Barton, its founder and general trustee, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herelman described real property, De- 00553 The State of Washington to the said Church of God in Christ, if such there be, and John D. B. Barton, its founder and general trustee, isendant. You are hereby summoned with your jury to hear the case, with the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 27th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to quiet title to lots five (5) and six (6), block ninety (90), of Salmon Bay Park Addition to the City of Seattle, Washington. ELLIAS A. WRIGHT, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Rooms 629-631 Burke Bldg., in Seattle, King County, Washington. March 27-May 8, 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. M. Grady, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. ..... Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 15th day of November, 1906, and numbered B431231, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $1.81, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 11, Block 17, Town of Renton. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1904 the sum of $2.93, for 1905 $2.57, for 1906 $2.50. Which several sevens bear interest, the sum of $1.25 cent per minimum said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days of May 1, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes, and costs against said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 524 Balley Building, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. M. Grady, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. .... Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 15th day of Novem- linquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount 1006, and numbered B 43124 for the de- of $1.81, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, tow- t: Lt 12. Block 17. Town of Renton. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: $2.93 for year 1904, $2.57 for year 1905, $2.50 for year 1906. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of payment from the date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after May 8, 1908, in the above entitled court and action: and defend this action and answer the complaint of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due together with interest and costs. If you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forecasing the cost of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King. Probate Notice. State of Washington, County of King—ss. In the matter of the estate of Mary Mulliken, deceased. No. 7589. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Mabel G. Fowler, the administratrix of the estate of Mary Mulliken, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said Court her final account as such administratrix, and that Thursday, the 4th day of June, 1908, at 9:30 o'clock a. m. at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle. In said King County, has been duly appointed by said Court for the settlement of a person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. Geo. E. Morris, judge of sald Superior Court, and the seal of said court hereto affixed this A. CASE, Clerk. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By J. A. SIGURDSSON, Deputy Clerk. SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Published Every Friday at 307 Epler Block. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton .....Editor and Publisher Susie Revele Cayton .....Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. One Year .....$2.00 Six Months .....1.00 Three Months .....60 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matter, Osculating Hobson spoke at the State University last week to quite an audience, but just how many of the handsome young ladies he osculated, the deponent sayeth not. Things in national political circles are beginning to look serious for Taft, and unless he is awfully careful he will be nominated for president when the Republican convention convenes at Chicago. The dope fiend on the Evening Swillbarrell is still whooping it up for Ballinger for delegate to the national convention trying to steal somebody's thunder. Mr. Ballinger has been the candidate of the PostIntelligence ever since before the convening of the state central committee. An eastern tenderfoot left $1,800 in a room in a Tacoma hotel, which was found and returned to him, which so digusted him that he had his trunks packed and left for Seattle at once, where the Seattle Spirit will see to it that he will never have that much money again to leave in his sleeping room. The Riplinger evidence check has vanished from the city controller's office, which is another seven days' wonder. How that check, like John Riplinger, could vanish when every one in the office knew that it, like Riplinger, was wanted by the strong arm of the law, is what a great many taxpayers of the city woul like for those boys to explain, but they won't. Georgetown poolrooms have closed their doors, not so much because the proprietors thereof saw the error of their ways as because it looked to them as if they themselves did not close their doors the sheriff would. The closing of that industry will, however, make a marked difference in the receipts of the city and while they are closed "easy money" will not be picked up so readily as when they were open. J. Edward Shewsberry, the well known barber, has been named by Mayor Miller to succeed himself on the park board. He was first appointed by Mayor Humes and has been a member of the board ever since. There were other names suggested in connection with the position, but the mayor evidently took the view that, since Mr. Shrewsberry had done his duty and no complaint had been registered against him, he would be of more benefit to the city than a new man. --- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN One W. L. MacKinzie King says the idea is gaining ground throughout England that, Canada is a white man's country, and to the exclusion of the Hindus. Just why the white man does not occupy Canada his recognized country, and get out of India, which is naturally the Hindu's country, which should be so recognized by England, is what we cannot understand. Practice what you preach, Johnnie. Opportunities for Negro Boys The highest places are open to Negro boys who begin life even in the lowliest walks. Then, every Negro boy now has opportunities of education to prepare him for posts of honor and positions of usefulness. There are offerings, too, for all manner of ability and talent. There are a hundred, a thousand kinds of work to-day, to one kind in bygone days. The changed and improved conditions of our times, with their marvellous inventions and wonderful perfection of machinery, multiply the meaning many fold. A Negro can travel further now in a month than he could have travelled in years a few centuries since. One Negro standing by a machine can accomplish more at present in a week than his grandfather could have accomplished in a year working tirelessly with his hands. The bright, earnest, colored boy in school today can hope to achieve more in his one little lifetime than he could have achieved in ten life-times if he had been born a few years earlier. When we read of the antediluvians that they lived nearly a thousand years, we think that they had a splendid chance to make their lives sublime. But the colored boy who is now beginning his sixty or seventy years will have one hundred times better chance, for one year of his occasion with all the avails of modern Christian civilization to enrich his life will mean more than dreary years of time in the days before the flood. At no period in the past did colored boys have anything like the chance they have in the twentieth century. It will be a terrible pity for any boy of the race who misses his chance. How to make the best and most of his chance is the problem every Negro boy should resolve to master. When a Negro boy has a glimpse of the real meaning of life and its possibilities, he should awake at once to his responsibilities. The first thing in his opportunity is to build a beautiful and noble character. Not what we do, but what we are, is always the most important thing in our lives. No measure of success in the world is anything more than a mere shell if one be not good at heart, true, righteous and worthy in life. Nothing can take the place of character, founded on the truth of God, and built up in every part of things, that perish not.—San Francisco Outlook. A prominent physician was recently called to his telephone by a colored woman formerly in the service of his wife. In great agitation the woman advised the physician that her youngest child was in a bad way. "What seems to be the trouble?" asked the doctor. "Doc, she done swallowed a bottle of ink!" "I'll be over there in a short time to see her." said the doctor. "Have you done anything for her?" "I doe give her three pieces of blottin' paper, Doc," said the colored woman doubtfully. -Ladies Home Journal. Call up Main 305 for Legal Work. Our prices are right. SEATTLE REPUBLICAN, 307 Epler Block. Friday, May 8, 1908 NEGROES VS. RESTAURANTS Recently a restaurant keeper in the lower part of the city refused a respectable, peaceable, law-abiding Afro-American, who by the way, is the pastor of a local church organization, services in his place. At the time the unwelcome guest was without witnesses, so he went out and got a witness and then returned again. He asked for service which was given him, but he was informed that he would have to pay $5 for what white guests paid only fifteen cents, this he offered to do if the restaurant man would give him a receipt for this amount, which was refused and the man left the meal on the table. The Negro laid his case before the prosecuting attorney and a John Doe warrant was issued for the proprietor of the restaurant. To refuse one service on account of his color or nationality is a strict violation of the law, and on being convicted of the offense both a fine and imprisonment may be imposed upon the violator; and in addition to this the complainant in the criminal action may sue for personal damages and indignities for a reasonable sum and stands a very good show of getting judgement. This law has been in full force in this state since 1895, and yet in King county but one case has ever been actually put on trial, and that one was badly handicapped, notwithstanding the fact that hundreds of just such refusals have occurred. A number of arrests have been made, but right there is where the insulted Negro has always fallen down for some emissary of the public inn-keeper has always been able to induce the Negro to accept a hundred or more dollars and settle the matter out of court, which accomplished, the restaurant keeper draws the line more closely than ever. In other words the insulted Negro has simply used the prosecuting attorney's office as to assist him in a blackmailing scheme to make a bunch of ready money. We hope that the Rev Asberry will push his case to a complete finish, and if he shows any intimation of wanting to settle the case out of court, we hope the prosecuting attorney will issue a warrant for his arrest on the grounds of compounding a felony. Either the Negro is entitled to the accommodations of restaurants, hotels, inns, barber shops and places of public entertainment and amusement or they or not, and in view of the fact that the A. Y. P. exposition opens next year, and there will be many Negro visitors here, the matter should be settled before that time. "Test the law" should be the watch word. If this is not a clear case of infringement of the civil rights law, then get another case, which we are told can be easily gotten, and then push it to the limit. Lets prepare to find out exactly where we are before next year opens. The Negro who has been refused accommodations and accepts money to not prosecute the case is a whimpering whelp and as totally devoid of manhood as an Indian statute. Such scoundrels ought to be kicked out of every gathering they dare to put their heads in. There is no reason for attorneys in Seattle sending their legal notices out of the city to be published when they can get better service in the city. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN will be pleased to have your patronage and will not only give you good service, but will treat you right in the way of prices. Our publishing day is Friday and we take notices until noon of that day. Phone your divorce notices in and leave the work and worry to us. Main 305. Office 307 Epler, THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. Friday. May 8, 1908 CURRENT COMMENT. The rumor that Seattle is to have a new morning daily paper which will be backed by Senator Levi Ankeny, and in fact to be his organ on the Sound, must give Col. Blethen the cold shivers, for judging from all indications he was just shaping himself to make a cool million out of the man that desires to succeed himself as senior United States senator from Washington. Its a serious question, however, for the senator to decide whether to spend a million dollars trying to build up a paper of his own or to hand that sum over to Col. Blethen for the support of the Times. A new paper would have little or no effect upon the political world and the support of the Times is an absolute detriment to any one, and there you are. Horace McClure has the right idea of the situation in buying up the country weekly papers and converting them into uncompromising Ankeny papers, which will go a long way toward building up local sentiment for the man who is so anxious to spend another six years in Washington City that, he can pass another bill in the United States senate in the interest of his constituents. Two million dollars for the Moran Company's ground site is to say the least a handsome sum of money for twenty-seven acres of land, despite the fact that, the owners thereof are holding out for $500,-000 more. In view of the fact that the company is desirous of moving its plant, a location having been found between Seattle and Everett, it is more than probable that the company will take the tempting offer. Over a year ago it was hinted that the Moran Company would move its entire plant from Seattle and even out of the county on account of the high rate of taxation, but it was denied by the officers of the company, and of course the talk died a birning. Whether or not the moving of the plant from the heart of the city of Seattle would prove a financial detriment to the city is a question, but our guess is that it would not, as Seattle would get the greater amount of the trade of the company and its workmen just the same, and the small amount of taxes in comparison to the whole would not cripple the county's exchequer to any great extent, and then again the new improvements that would take the place of the plant would more than make up for its loss. It is also claimed that within the next year or such a matter the Stetson Post Mill Company will also move its plant outside of the city limits, and perhaps out of the county. The world seems to have gone mad on getting something for nothing, which after all, is about as delusive as the proposition of inventing or manufacturing perpetual motion. Its no uncommon thing to see men and women far above the ordinary human being, shrewd business men and women, who will take a chance on some kind of a fake; which is nothing more than giving up something for nothing, or in other words, another feature of the weakness of human beings to take a hand in any kind of gambling device that comes along. Thinking that you can beat the other man's game at which he is making a living, is about as foolish as to put yourself up as being able to fathom and solve every difficult and intricate proposition of state or otherwise, that comes along without having given any study or consideration thereto. The person who gets something for something is a million times more happy than the person who is even successful in getting something for nothing, as he or she must know that some one else just as needy and deserving as themselves has been cruelly robbed. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN In St. Louis you can step out of the train at the depot, and within thirty or forty feet you can step into the open saloon, (right in the depot) and let me whisper in your ear, ye hypocrites of Seattle, who in your hypocryci would exclude any saloon from opening within a block of the depot in Seattle, lest we might have the appearance of immorality, that it will be many a long year before Seattle will reach the high moral standing of St. Louis; hypocryci and the saloons are not allies; but beer and morality are.—Seattle Patrarch. Begone, to you! Such talk is either that of a fool or a knave. There is no city in the whole United States with a worse criminal record than that of St. Louis. It is not only so at the present time, but it has been so for the past half century. Its the headquarters for highwaymen, murderers, and thieves, and its dive saloons simply breed such moral perverts. The man who takes a drink is perhaps just as good as the man who does not, but the man who gets drunk on intoxicant liquors and renders himself a consumate fool on the streets and public places, is not fit to associate with decent people; and the man who takes a drink at all is liable at any time to find himself under the influence of drink. If this be true then it seems that it would be a hundred thousand times better for man to give up drinking rather than to make a fool of himself before his fellow men. The new controller of the currency, Lawrence C. Murray, of New York, is a Catholic and also a prominent member of the Knights of Columbus. -Catholic Northwest Progress. What's the use of parading the fact that this or that government appointee is a Catholic or a member of any other kind of a religious denomination? If he is an honorable citizen of the United States that is recommendation sufficient and the mere fact that he is a member of some particular kind of religious faith should have no weight or influence. The papers run by and in the interest of the Catholic church seem to take pleasure in pointing out the fact to the general public of a man selected for high political honors, that he is a member of the Catholic church. In the United States there is no connection or contention between church and state; and while a majority of the folk in the United States are inclined to some one or the other of the various Protestant churches, yet they do not care a tinkersdam whether an official is a Catholic or a Protestant just so he is a MAN. While the founder of the Bon Marche, Seattle's greatest department store, and the largest one west of Chicago, perhaps never entertained the remotest dream or hope of the store ever reaching the mammoth proportions that it has, yet he knew he was laying a splendid foundation and he believed he was laying it so well that after he was no more it would be a valuable asset to his children, and even his children's children. Last Tuesday the Bon Marche celebrated its eighteenth birthday and incidentally compared its present self to what it was say seventeen years ago. Not even in Chicago has department stores grown as rapidly as has this store. It can be truly said of the Bon Marche that it has grown just as has Seattle. In 1892 Seattle was a town of some 35,000 inhabitants, while today, sixteen years later, it has a population of at least 275,000. Just as has Seattle herself grown, just has this remarkable store, and it is due to the good judgment of those at the helm who kept pace with the times. 红斑 Yakima Republic: The rapid spread of the prohibition and local option movement, which has put thousands of saloons out of business and at the present time menaces the brewing and distilling industries with great loss if not actual destruction, is doubtless the cause of the great activity of the liquor dealers in many states in the suppression of dives. The dispatches today say that New York saloon men have formed an association for this purpose, and indicate that that they are about to take up a work that they have sadly neglected in the past. Good citizens, whether they want the saloons put out of businesses or not, will be pleased with this result of the prohibition movement, and will hope that it will manifest elsewhere. There may be honest differences of opinion about prohibition, but all must agree that the dive which is the breeding place of vice and crime ought to go. Seattle is talking of withdrawing from King county and having a little county of its own.—Ellensburg Localizer. And it would not be such a little county after all. A recent census taken for the city of Seattle shows its has a population of fully 275,000, more by far than all of Pierce and Spokane counties combined, hence it is very apparent that, if such a thing was done Seattle would still be the largest by odds in the state. Speaking about dividing the county reminds the writer that former State Senator John Wooding was quoted a few days ago as threatening to take the south end of the county into Pierce county if Seattle withdrew from King county. A few years ago it was said of John Wooding that he owned the south district of King county, but he denied the allegation, now he comes out and practically admits the fact, by saying "the division idea does not meet his personal approval and he would therefore take his part of the county into Pierce county if Seattle pushed the proposition;" in which case, however, he would be cutting off his nose to spite his face. With Seattle out of King county there would be a mad scramble for the county seat and Wooding must fear of his home town losing the county seat, which prompts him to threaten to withdraw from the county before a battle has been waged. George Edward Adams stole long and well that he might make a queen of his wife and a lady of quality of his mother-in-law, but like most animals when once a taste of stolen sweets has been gotten, he went to the trough once too often and was caught. To save his wife any great amount of disgrace and humiliation he plead guilty and was lead away to a prison cell. In other words he took his medicine, but the wife, who had enjoyed his ill-gotten gains, however innocent she might have been of their coming, as soon as the prison door had closed behind him grew cold and indifferent to him, and as a capping climax one day this week secured a divorce from him. Not content with giving him the marble heart, she, according to reports, would not so much as send him a picture of an only son to cheer his broken spirits while he languished in his cell, expiating a crime he had committed that she might be his queen. Nero may have fiddled while Rome burned, but even in that he exhibited no harder heart than when a mother refuses to send a former husband, who had never done her a wrong, the picture of an only child. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN, 307 Epler Block. Phone Main 305. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. J. A. Sigurdsson, plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. 61038. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 22nd day of March, 1906, and numbered B41218 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1900. In the amount 88 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 2, Block 37, Commercial Street Addition. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1901 the sum of 40 cents, for 1002 36 cents, for 1003 32 cents, for 1904 13 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the 1st day of May, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. J. A. SIGURDSSON, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. May 1 1908 10:00 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for King County. In the matter of the estate of Joseph Hamilton, deceased. No. 8981. Notice to Creditors. In the matter of the estate of Joseph Hamilton, deceased. No. 8981. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 24th day of April, 1908, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executrix of said estate, at 911 Lowman Building, Seattle, Wash., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will, under the laws of the State of Washington, be barred. Attorney for Executrix, 911 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, Wash. May 1-29-1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King. In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Mary Mulliken, deceased. No. 7589. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Mabel A. Fowler, administratrix of the estate of Mary Mulliken, deceased, having filed in this court her petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Mary Mulliken, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said Court in the City of Seattle, on the 4th day of June, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 4th day of June, 1908, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 23d day of April, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS. Judge. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DISTRIBU- TION SHOULD NOT BE MADE, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Mary C. Stiffler, Deceased—No. 7682. Jacob R. Stiffler, administrator of the estate of Mary C. Stiffler, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Mary C. Stiffler, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 4th of June, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 4th day of June, 1908, In The Seattle Republic, a weekly newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 29th day of April 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. Mar. 29, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for King County 81 Washington, for King County. J. A. Segurdson, plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. 61037. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them. You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 22nd day of March, 1908, and numbered B41217 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1900, in the amount of 88 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, towkt: Lot 1, Block 37, Commercial Street Addition. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon sald above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1901 the sum of 40 cents, for 1002 36 cents, for 1003 32 cents, for 1004 13 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sald date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against sald real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after the 1st day of May, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it for taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. J. A. SIGURDSSON, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. PROBATE NOTICE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King—ss. In the matter of the estate of Mary C. Stifler, Deceased.—No. 7682. Notice of Settlemen of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Jacob R. Stifler, as the administrator of the estate of Mary C. Stifler, deceased, has rendered to and filed in said Court his final account as such administrator, and that Thursday, the 4th day of June, 1908, at 9:30 o'clock a.m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and may any person interested in said estate may acquaint and fill his responsibilities in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. Geo. E. Morris, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto affixed, this 4th day of June, 1908. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By J. A. SIGURDSON, Deputy Clerk. May 1—May 29, 1908. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King, ss.—Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an execution, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 28th day of April, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of F. K. Shipley and Fannie Shipley, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. W. T. Gaffner and Tillie M. Gaffner, his wife, defendants, No. 54836, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, towit: at 10 o'clock A. M., on the 6th day of June, A. D. 1908, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said plaintiffs, F. K. Shipley and Fannie Shipley, in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit. Lot seventeen (17), block 150 (10). The Baker Ackleman to Seattle levied on as the property of said plaintiffs, F. K. Shipley and Fannie Shipley, to satisfy a judgment, amounting to fifteen ($15.00) dollars, costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 28th day of April, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. May 1—May 29, 1908. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Mrs. E. J. Rice, Plaintiff, vs. Joseph L. Byrne, Defendant.—No. 60162. The State of Washington to the said Joseph L. Byrne, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 1st day of May, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to secure judgment against the defendant upon a certain promissory note for $1300.00, given by defendant to plaintiff February 16th, 1907, and interest at 7 per cent and attorneys' fees and costs of action, and to foreclose a certain mortgage given by defendant to plaintiff. February 16th, 1907, to secure said note and interest, said mortgage being upon lt. 12 block 4. Yesler's Second Addition to the city, Seattle, Washington, and which said mortgage is recorded in volume 356 of mortgage records of King County, Washington, at page 111, and to subject said mortgaged property to the payment of the several sums of money secured thereby, according to the provisions of said mortgage. CROSS & RICE, Attorneys for Plaintiff. 229 Burke Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, May 1—June 12, 1908. NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL ESTATE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the matter of the estate of Jerry Perry, deceased, administratrix of the estate of Jerry Perry, de-Notice is hereby given that the undersigned, ceased, in obedience to an order of the Superior Court of the County of King, State of Washington, made on the 16th day of April, 1908, and signed and entered on the 29th day of April, 1908, will sell at public auction to the highest and best bidder for cash, on Saturday, the 6th day of June, 1908, between the hours of ten o'clock in the morning and the setting of the sun, beginning at the hour of eleven o'clock a.m. at the front door of the King County Court House, in the City of Seattle, in the County of King aforesaid, those certain lots and parcels of land particularly described as follows, towit: Lot 1, in block 1, Jackson Street Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, and lot 4, block 2, in Public Benefit Tract No. 17, in the plat of Georgeown, King County, Washington. The terms of sale will be fifty per cent cash the company bid, and the remaining fifty per cent upon confirmation of sale and delivery of administratrix's deed. Dated at Seattle, Washington, this 29th day of April, 1908. BRIDGET PERRY, Administratrix. GRAVES, PALMER & MURPHY, Attorneys for Administratrix. May 1—May 29, 1908. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, in and for the County of King. Alva E. De Wolf, plaintiff, vs. Emma De Wolf, defendant: The State of Washington to the said Emma De Wolf, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 1st day of May, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below state; and in case of your failure so do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of fraud. ELIAS A. WRIGHT, P. Q. Address: Rooms 629-631 Burke Bldg., in Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 1, 1908, 1008 NOTICE TO CREDITORS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King, County. of Washington, for King County. In the late estate of Joseph Grealash. Deceased 8822 Notice is hereby given by the undersigned, duly appointed administrator of the estate of Joseph Grealish, deceased, to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against, said deceased, to exhibit them, with the necessary vouchers, within one year after the first pub- lication of this notice, to the undersigned at 404 Bank of California Building, Tacoma, County of Pierce, and State of Washington, being the place for the transaction of the business of said estate. Date of issuing and first publication of this notice, April 24, 1908. JOHN GREALISH, Administrator of said Estate. LOVEDAY, KELLEY & McMILLAN, Attorneys for Administrator. April 24—May 22, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for the County of King. In the matter of the estate of William Sparks Thomson, deceased. Notice of Appraisement: Taxation of Inheritance. To the State Board of Tax Commissioners, and to Jane Lewis Thomson, widow; Annie L. Thomson, daughter; William Thomson, son; and Charles E. Thomson, son; of the deceased William Sparks Thomson, heirs of the estate of said deceased, notice: You, and each of you, are hereby notified that the undersigned, the duly appointed and qualified appraisers of the property charged, or sought to be charged, with the payment of the Inheritance Tax, will at two oclock P.M. on the 16th day of May 1908, at the office of D. B. Trefethen, 614 Colman Building, Seattle, King County, State of Washington, proceed to appraise the property of the estate of William Sparks Thomson, deceased, subject to the Inheritance Tax as provided by law. You are further notified that at said time and place you shall be present if any objections thereto you may have to offer. Dated at Seattle, Washington, this 20th day of April, 1908. LOREN GRINSTEAD, THOMAS SOUTAR, E. E. MORRIS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Frances M. Gles, Plaintiff, vs. Frank A. Gles, Defendant. No. 60061. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Frank A. Gles, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 24th day of April, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below the building, and in case of your failure so to, do judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer of the complaint which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. This said action is intended for the purpose of dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of the neglect and refusal of defendant to make suitable or any provisions for plaintiff and the family of defendant, for the restoration to plaintiff of her maiden name, and for such other and further relief as to the court may seem meet in the premises. C. A. RIDDLE, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: Suite 310 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 24—June 5. Have a Legal Notice? PHONE MAIN 305 Friday, May 8, 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for the County of King. Robert C. Dwyer, Plaintiff, vs. M. F. Harrington, Defendant. No. — Summons. The State of Washington to the said defendant, M. F. Harrington: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 17th day of April, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be endered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought to recover from the defendant the amount of $232.00 with interest from Sept. 15th, 1906, being the balance due for services performed under a verbal agreement, made at Butte, Montana, March 25th, 1906, according to the provisions of which plaintiff was to prospect and locate mining claims for the defendant. EDWARDS, MEAKIM & CUSHING, Attorneys for Plaintiff. 403 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. April 17--May 29, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Ralph Cook, Deceased. No. 8948. Notice to Creditors. To all the creditors of the above named Estate: All persons having claims against Ralph Cook, deceased, or the community composed of the said Ralph Cook, and his wife, Ellen Cook, also deceased, are hereby required to present the same with the necessary vouchers, to the undersigned, the duly appointed, qualified and acting executrix of the said estate of Ralph Cook, deceased, at 422 Boston Block, Seattle, Wash., where she transacts the business of the said estate, within one year from and after the first date of the publication of this notice, to wit, within one year forward and after the 17th day of April, 1908, and in case of your failure to do so, the same and all thereof will be barred. First date of publication of this notice, April 17th, 1908. MARY HAYES, Executrix of the Estate of Ralph Cook, Deceased. 422 Boston Block, Seattle, King County, Wash. FRANK B. WIESTLING, Attorney for the Executrix, 422 Boston Block, Seattle. April 17—May 15, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King. Frederick C. Richmond, Plaintiff, vs. Mary E. Richmond, Defendant. No. 60092. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, To the said Mary E. Richmond, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 17th day of April, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filled with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: divorce on the ground of abandonment. Z. B. RAWSON. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 617 Pacific Block, Seattle, County of King, Washington. April 17—May 29, 1908. SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for King County.—Case No. ..... Louise Marlin, Plaintiff, vs. Norman Marlon, Defendant. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, Norman Marlon: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 10th day of April, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office and postoffice address below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This is an action for divorce on the grounds of non-support. BAXTER & WILSON, Plaintiff's Attorneys. P. O. and Office Address: 539 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUNTY, Washington. In the matter of the petition of the City of Seattle for widening Third Avenue and for the ascertainment of damages to private property under Ordinance No. 14345.-No. 54135. The State of Washington to the said M. Gottstein: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 10th day of April, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the petition of the petitioner, Puget Sound Realty Associates, a corporation, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorneys for the said petitioner, at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the petition, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said petition of the Puget Sound Realty Association is to obtain an order of court directing the payment to said petitioner of the judgment entered in said matter on, towit, July 27, 1907, in the sum of $17,250.00, for the taking and damaging of the following described real estate in King County, Washington, towit: Lot two (2), block fourteen (14), Boren's Addition to the City of Seattle, which said judgment was in favor of the said M. Gottstein and others. SHANK & SMITH, Attorneys for Petitioner. Office and Postoffice Address: No. 1002 Alasks Building, Seattle, Washington. April 10, Mar. 9, 2018 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. George F. Moore, plaintiff, vs. Francis A. Utter, Morris W. Utter, Jacob S. Utter, George B. Utter, John H. Utter, Dolly Mariah Utter, and George L. Utter, heirs at law and divisees of Ira W. Utter, deceased; John L. Utter, George H. Utter, Olive Crooks, Mary Crooks and James Crooks, defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the said above named defendants and each of you: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 8th day of May, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment and decree will be entered against you and rendered against you and each of you quieting the plaintiff's title in Lot 14. Block 81, map of Gilman Park, King County, Washington, as shewn by the plat thereof recorded in Vol. 3 of plats, page 41, in the office of the Auditor of King County aforesaid for which this action is brought and forever barring and estopping you and each of you from having any interest whatever therein adverse to the title of plaintiff and granting all the other relief demanded and prayed in the plaintiff's complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. That the object of this action is to quiet the title of plaintiff in the lot above described. J. W. BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Company Bldg. May 8—June 19, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. W. F. Comstock, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. 61193. Nationwide and Simpson's. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the abov named plaintiff is the holder of one certain dilinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 28th day of June, 1906, and numbered B42271, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $1.27, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: S. E. ¼ of N. W. ¼ of N. W. ¼ of Sec. 15, Tp. 21 N. R. 5 E. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1904, the sum of $0.87; for the year 1905, $0.82; for the year 1906 the sum of $1.68. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes mone and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after May 8, 1908. In the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of your taxes and costs against said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King, County. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. 61140. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You an deach of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above namd plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County State of Washington dated the 17th day of October, 1904 and with the number 271786, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1902, in the amount of $10.75, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 10, Block 173, of Gilman Park. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1903 the sum of $8.86; for 1904, $8.58. That afterwards, on April 3, 1906, the north 70 feet of said lot was redeemed from its proportionate share of said taxes, penalties, interest and costs. That afterwards this plaintiff paid taxes on the south 30 feet of said lot as follows: For the year 1905 the sum of $2.73, and for the year 1906 the sum of $3.16. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 8th day of May, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due either with interest and costs, or pay the amount fall so to do judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. May 8—June 19, 1908 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS. POWER PLANT FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON ON THE CAMPUS AT SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. Seattle, Washington, April 25th, 1908. Notice is hereby given that sealed bids for furnishing all material and labor and erecting complete a Power Plant for the State University of Washington, on the University campus, Seattle, Washington, in accordance with the plans and specifications for the same prepared by Howard & Galloway, Architects and Engineers, will be received by the University Regents at the offices of the Regents, rooms 21 and 22 Post-Intelligencer Building, at Seattle, at the hour of three o'clock p. m., as shown by the clock in the Regents' office, on Thursday, May 23rd, 1908. and there publicly opened. Bids offered later than this hour will not be received. Bidders are invited to submit bids in accordance with the provisions of the specifications on a complete plant. Bidders shall file with their bids a certified check on some solvent bank in an amount equal to or greater than five per cent of the amount of the main bid as a guaranty that they will, if awarded the contract, enter into contract with two good and sufficient bonds, one in an amount equal to twenty-five per cent of the contract price and one equal to one hundred per cent of the contract price, executed by some responsible surety company, authorized to do business in the State of Washington. All proposals shall be considered offers in force for thirty (30) days after date of opening, unless bidders are sooner notified of rejection of their bids. In the event of failure of the bidder to enter into a contract and furnish the required bonds within fifteen (15) days after the acceptance of the proposal, then said certified check shall be forfeited to the Regents of the State University of Washington, in which event the Regents reserve the right to accept any other bid for the same work, but upon execution of said contract and delivery of said bonds, said check will be returned. Bidders shall file one check covering all bids. Plans and specifications can be obtained from the Registrar of the University of Washington, Seattle, or from Howard & Galloway, 604 Mission Street, San Francisco, California, and Administration Building, Alaksa-Yukon-Pacific Exposition, Seattle, Washington. One set only of plans and specifications will be furnished each bidder. A deposit of Ten Dollars must be made on receipt of each set of plans, which sum will be refunded upon return of plans. Information can be had of Howard & Galloway, who may be addressed at 604 Mission Street, San Francisco, California, or at the Administration Building, Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition, Seattle, Washington. The Board of Regents of the University of Washington reserve the right to reject any or all bids, as may seem best to them. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON. A. P. SAWYER, President. WM. MARKHAM, Secretary. NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS. POWER HOUSE FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON ON THE CAMPUS AT SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. Seattle, Washington, April 25, 1908. Notice is hereby given that sealed bids for furnishing all material and labor and erecting complete a Power House for the State University of Washington, on the University campus, Seattle, Washington, in accordance with the plans and specifications for the same prepared by Howard & Galloway, Architects and Engineers, will be received by the University Regents at the offices of the Regents, rooms 21 and 22 Post-Intelligencer Building, at Seattle, at the hour of three o'clock p. m. as shown by the clock in the Regents' office, on Thursday, May 23d, 1908, and there publicly opened. Bids offered, later than this hour will not be received. Bidders are invited to submit bids in accordance with the provisions of the specifications on a complete building. Bldders shall file with their bids a certified check on some solvent bank in an amount equal to or greater than five per cent of the amount of the main bid, as a guaranty that they will, if awarded the contract, enter into contract with two good and sufficient bonds, one in an amount equal to twenty-five per cent of the contract price, and one equal to one hundred per cent of the contract price, executed by some responsible surety company, authorized to do business in the State of Washington. All proposals shall be considered offers in force for thirty (30) days after date of opening, unless bldders are sooner notified of rejection of their bids. In the event of failure of the bidder to enter into a contract and furnish the required bonds within fifteen (15) days after the acceptance of the proposal, then said certified check shall be forfeited to the Regents of the State University of Washington, in which event the Regents reserve the right to accept any other bid for the same work, but upon execution of said contract and delivery of said bonds, said check will be returned. Bidders shall file one check covering all bids. Plans and specifications can be obtained from the Registrar of the University of Washington, Seattle, or from Howard & Galloway, 604 Mission Street, San Francisco, California, and Administration Building, Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition, Seattle, Washington; one set only of plans and specifications will be furnished each bidder. A deposit of Ten (10.00) Dollars must be made on receipt of each set of plans, which sum will be refunded upon return of plans. Information can be had of Howard & Galloway, who may be addressed at 604 Mission Street, San Francisco, California, or at the Administration Building, Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition, Seattle, Washington. The Board of Regents of the University of Washington reserve the right to reject any or all bids, as may seem best to them. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON. A. P. SAWYER, President. WM. MARKHAM, Secretary. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King County. In the matter of the estate of John L. Cole, deceased No. 8941. Notice to Creditors. deceased. By order of said Court made on the 10th day of April, 1908, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executors of said estate, at 1308 Alaska Building, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of the transaction of business of said estate, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice, or same will be barred. Date of first publication April 24, 1908. FERRY H. COLE, ARTHUR J. COLE, Executors of the Last Will and Testament of John L. Cole, Deceased. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Martha J. Whittier, Deceased. No. 8719. Notice of Sale. Pursuant to an order made and entered herein by the judge of the above entitled court on this, 16th day of April, 1908, after hearing and adjudication upon an order to show cause herein why a sale should not be made herein, of an undivided one-fourth interest in lots 3 and 4, Fostoria Garden Tracts, in said county, owned by said estate, notice is hereby given that sealed bids will be received and may be filed with the clerk of the above entitled court at his office in the court house of said county, in Seattle, until 12 o'clock, noon, of the 12th day of May, 1908, for an undivided one-fourth of all or any part of said lots numbered three (3) or (4) Fostoria Garden on the plot of same county as appears on the plat of same county in the office of the auditor of said county. Such bid or bids should be sealed and labeled on the outside of the envelope containing same, the label showing title of the cause herein, description of the land above mentioned and the fact that the enclosure is a bid on some portion of said land. MERCER WHITTLE Administrator of Estate of Martha J. Whittler, Deceased. Date of first publication, April 17—May 1, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Worcester for the County of King or Washington, for the County of King, Annie G. Wadleigh and Arthur P. Wadleigh, Plaintiffs, vs. Leophus T. Scherer and Jane Doe Scherer, Defendants—No. 59908. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington. To the said Leophus T. Scherer and Jane Doe Scherer, Defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 17th day of April, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for plaintiffs at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: to procure the setting aside and cancellation of two certain mortgages upon lots 7 and 8, block 24, Second Plat West Seattle, ex- ecuted to Leophus T. Scherer without consideration. P. H. WILSON, Attorney for Plaintiffs. P. O. Address: 308 Boston Block, Seattle, County of King, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. C. Shulte, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property. Defendants.—No. _____ Notice and amends. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 11th day of Jan., 1904, and numbered B24071, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1902, in the amount of $14.12, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: S.E. $1/4 of the N.E. $1/4 of Sec. 19, Tp. 20 N., R. 7 E., W. M. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described tax, to-wit: the year 1903, the sum of $13.50; for the year 1904, the sum of $15.36; for the year 1905, the sum of $17.28; for the year 1906, the sum of $13.00. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within (60) days after April 24 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and, as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. April 24—June 5 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Lilly Ely, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.—No. —. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinfater described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 27th day of July, 1904, and numbered B27510, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1902, in the amount of $1.20, and upon the real property situated in said King County, the real property follows, to-wit; at 38 clock 3 Pittsburgh's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1903, the sum of 65 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 64 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of $4.98; for the year 1906, the sum of 88 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you. (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to wit: within (60) days after the 17th day of April, 1908, in the above entitled court action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said property for the sums and amount due upon and charged against it and paid taxes, interests and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. April 17—May 29, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for Kling County. 61 Washington, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Lilly Ely, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.-No. —— Notice and Summons. Of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 27th day of July, 1904, and numbered B27509 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1902, in the amount of $1.20, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 37, Block 3, Pittner's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1903, the sum of 65 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 64 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of $4.98; for the year 1906, the sum of 88 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within (60) days after the 17th day of April, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest costs, and amounts due on said parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. April 17—May 29, 1908. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King—ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an execution issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 15th day of April, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of The Star Paint & Wall Paper Co., a corporation, plaintiff, versus G. N. Carl and Ida Carl, his wife, defendants, No. 59400, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit, at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 5th day of June, at 10, 1908, before the Court house door of, said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendants G. N. Carl and Ida Carl, his wife, in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot ten (10), Block nineteen (19) Replat of Fred E. Sander's five-acre tracts, in Seattle, King County, Washington, levied on as the property of said defendants G. N. Carl and Ida Carl, his wife, to satisfy a judgment, amounting to one hundred fifty and 74-100 ($150.74) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 16th day of April. 1908. L. C. SMITH. Sheriff. B. EDW. DREW. Deputy. April 24—June 5. NOTICE OF PUBLICATION. Notice is hereby given that the annual meeting of the stockholders of The Consolidated Gold Mines Company of Washington will be held June 8th at 7:30 p. m. at the office of the Company in Seattle, Washington, for the purpose of the election of directors for the ensuing year and for the transaction of any other business that may come regularly before the stockholders. N. A. THOMPSON, Secretary. April 25, 1908. PERSONAL. Mr. and Mrs. J. H. Ryan of Tacoma saw the sights of Greater Seattle last Wednesday. Mr. Denny Graves is at home again after quite an extended absence. He contemplates remaining with his parents until after the summer season. Mr. Sheppard has closed his place of business on Madison Street. He will not reopen in the photograph business at least in the near future. Madeline, the little girl at the Seattle General Hospital whom the Dorcas Charity Club is caring for, was able to take a car ride out to Madison Park. She is far from strong yet, but is quite as well as could be expected. Mrs. H. V. Wray has rented and furnished the house on Madison street just opposite the Afro-American Hall in the rear. She still owns and operates her rooming house on Seneca street. Mr. J. Samuel Peoples, who has been employed on the city police force for the past two years, has been dismissed from the service. He was charged with conduct unbecoming to an officer. Mr. and Mrs. G. Campbell, who were recently married at the home of Mrs. A. G. Harrison, have decided to make Seattle their home at least for some time to come. Mr. Campbell is originally from Chicago, but more recently from California. Mrs. Campbell, who was Miss Endicutt, comes from Kansas. Mrs. C. H. Dodge of St. Louis, who visited with her sister, Mrs. J. M. Webb, and others of this city three years ago, is in the hospital at her home undergoing a very serious operation. The Forum's committee, which is making preparations to aid in the entertainment of the sailors May 24th met last Wednesday evening and will meet again next Wednesday evening at the office of Mr. A. G. Harrison in the Schuerman block, corner First and Cherry. The four young people, who despite the protests of their parents, went automobiling last Tuesday evening at an unusually late hour of the night, which resulted in a bad smash up and all of them probably maimed for life, got their just deserts. Whether or not the Negro of this country should endorse the present national administration and likewise the candidate it desires as Roosevelt's successor, will be discussed at the Forum next Sunday. If you have a baby under three and a half years old kindly telephone Mrs. W. L. Presto, East 2955, or Mrs. Wray, Main 6189, so that they may list the names for the baby show, which takes place on the evening of the 15th. Mrs. M. Harris, 1705 24th Avenue, has met with quite a painful accident. A window sash fell upon her hand; severely mashing it and breaking one finger. NOTICE: The collector for THE SEATTE REPUBLICAN will be in Spokane in May and will collect subscription for the year instead of later on. He will also stop at Sunnyside, North Yakima, Ellensburg, Roslyn and Ravensdale on his retur. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN WM. PITT Who desires the nomination [Name] WM. PITT TRIMBLE Who desires the nomination for presidential elector. SEATTLE THEATER Next week, starting Sunday afternoon, the Burgess-Bunting Company will be seen in "The Burglar's Daughter." Miss Bunting will of course play the part of "Meg," the diminutive heroine of Mulberry Bend. Here is a play with an example on the subject of hereditary. Meg is a . If you wish to marry, or correspond with refined ladies or gentlemen, address "Seattle Select Club," P. O. Box 922, Seattle, Wash. *** IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Ira D. Watson, Plaintiff, vs. Mary M. Watson, Defendant.—No. — The State of Washington to the said Mary M. Watson, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 17th day of April, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of personal indignities and abandonment. CARRICO & DURK, Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Room 603 Peoples' Bank Building, in Seattle, King County, Washington. April 17—May 29, 1908. McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance The Comfort. Newly furnished rooms. Walking distance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. I. ISRAEL WALKER, 1101-1102 Jackson Street. ```markdown ``` [Name] daughter of a burglar, but instead of following in the foot steps of her parent, she is honest and honorable to the core in all things. The contrast of her various moods in the play are remarkable features of Miss Bunting's acting Any one witnessing her quaiut little character in the play next week, after seeiug her this week, could scarcely help but marvel at her versatility GET A FOOTHOLD IN ALASKA MINES We propose locating, bonding, developing and selling MINES COAL and OIL BIG CHANCE FOR LARGE PROFITS Stock Now Selling TWO CENTS PER SHARE Investigate without delay. Send Stock Orders with Money Order to 422 Boston Blk. Seattle PHONE MAIN 2318 Friday. May 8. 1908 Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE CONNECTION Business Office, Third and Spring Acme Publishing Co. 312 Marion Block BRIEFS OUR SPECIALTY Telephones: Sunset, Main 1997—Ind., 1306. Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. WILLIAM WALKER Complete stock New Fall Goods, Ladies', Misses' and Children's Wear- ing Apparel, Furs and Fine Coats. 820 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Electric Fixtu- tures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. Scandinavian American Bank. OFFICERS: A. Chilberg, Prest. J. E. Chilberg, Vice Prest. John B. Agen, 2nd Vice Prest. J. F. Lane, Cashier L. H. Woolfolk, Asst. Cashier. Wm. Thaanum, Asst. Cashier F. P. Searle, Manager Ballard Office. Geo. H. Tarbell, Mgr. A. D. Hayden, Cashier Tacoma Office. Puget Sound National Bank. OF SEATTLE JACOB FURTH .....President J. S. GOLDSMITH .....Vice-President R. V. ANKENY .....Cashier CORRESPONDENTS IN ALL THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE. DRAFTS ISSUED ON ALASKA AND THE YUKON TERRITORY. THE NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE. United States Depositary. With CAPITAL and SURPLUS..$1,500,000 And aggregate RESOURCES People's Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R. J. Reekie, Vice Presst. Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. Commercial Savings and Trust General Bank and Exchange. Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash. Stetson & Post Mill Co. Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711