Seattle Republican

STATE LIBRARY PUBLICAN SEATTLE REPUBLICAN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, Friday, May 15, 1908 --- VOL. XIV. NO. 51 POLITICAL POT PIE The fight prectpitated in the late King county Republican convention by the alleged friends of Senator Piles, which resulted in having the delegates in convention assemble going out of its way to snub former Senator John L. Wilson, was an uncalled for breach of political etiquette as well as consistency, and will be the means of again causing King county to be rent in political factions. Mr. Wilson served twelve years in one or the other branch of the United States Congress and not having been found guilty or even accused of having committed any act that would besmirch congressional toga, if for no other reason was deserving of better treatment, but he is the chief owner of the largest morning paper in the state, which is unquestionably the organ of the Republican party, and that too, entitled him to even better treatment. It is a long lane that has no turn, and the Pie-maker is inclined to think some of those fellows that have been traveling that tract on which a sign has been stuck up at every mile board that Wilson must be destroyed, will soon reach the turning point of that lane. --- Jealous almost to insanity because it has not been able to get a seat in the John L. Wilson band wagon, the editor and the alleged owner of the Georgetown Gazette-News devoted almost its entire editorial space last week to abusing Mr. Wilson, the P.-I. and THE SETATLE REPUBLICAN, which latter paper intimated a couple of weeks ago that the Gazette-News had been gobbled up by that Ankeny mysterious personage that is going about the state purchasing weekly newspapers and sending political rot to those daily papers that will take it, about the state dying to get another opportunity to send Senator Ankeny to the senate again. The following from the Georgetown Gazette-News will show the state of mind the editor and the silent stock-holder are in: "When Ex-senator John L. Wilson wants to sling a little mud which he deems beneath the dignity of the Post-Intelligencer, he repairs to the editorial sanctum of "Darkest Africa," and through a medium published by his political slaves, pollutes the public with a political lobolly composed of exageration and untruthfulness. John L. Wilson has been a "dead one" for lo, these many years." "The leather colored editor of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN has just discovered, through John L. Wilson, that Levi P. Ankeny has purchased the Georgetown Gazette-News. Wilson tells that REPUBLICAN man something new every time he goes down to change his political luck." "THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN knows about as much who owns the Georgetown Gazette-News as a hazel splitter hog knows about the coveted land of spirits just over the beautiful hills." "We are just plain folks' and don't feel like being called boodle mongers by any journalistic hambone polisher who clings like a crawfish to the 'swaller' tails of John L. Wilson's political coat. Not so, my ebony hued friend and neighbor, not so; the 'mysterious stranger' has, as yet, failed to appear with the Ankeny 'gunny,' bulging with yellow backed bills." Throw a stone among a lot of hungry whelps and the cur that's hit always yelps. If in all Seattle no greater number of business men could be induced to sign an Ankeny iron-clad agreement in order to secure the election of Samuel H. Piles to the United States senate than the list published by the Times last Sunday, then the Piemaker is of the opinion that the Times has told just as big a dam lie as it usually does, and that the whole thing was manufactured in the Times office by Murky Matt, Dr. J. J. Smith and a few others with that bewitching face of George Stevenson overlooking the whole. Not on an average of one in one hundred of the business men seem to have signed it, and yet the one hundred who did not sign it according to the Times, must be bound by the acts of the ONE, which will hardly be done, and Ankeny will lose King county. If the circulars sent out by the Ankeny howlers is a fac similie of the much talked of iron clad agreement, which made King county morally obliged to support Levi Ankeny on account of the assistance he, Ankeny, rendered King county in electing Piles, then one can readily understand why it has not been given publicity long ere this—it was too silly to be put in print. All of that tommy rot was dug up at this time by the owners of the Times for no other reason than to forestall Senator Ankeny's threat to start a paper of his own in Seattle, which meant the loss of a good many dollars to the Times. Not suspecting any such a move on the part of Ankeny the Times had ceased to be active in his re-election interest, but when the Ankeny daily newspaper talk became current, Colonel Blethen was off for Washington in a jiffy, and then followed the political slush the public has been served for the past week or more. The Blethens are great money getters, but the Georgetown Gazette-News seems to be troubled with the same disease, and so far as Blethen and Carle are concerned its now "hoss'n hoss." --- From the amount of squirming the Georgetown Gazette-News did in its last issue, the truth must hurt. Of course W. A. Carle does not own a dollar's worth of stock in the Gazette-News because that paper has the contract for doing the city printing at a fabulous figure and Mr. Carle is a member of the city council, and it is against the law for a member of a city council to let a contract to himself, hence Carle ceases to be an active stockholder and is now only a silent one. If Ankeny money has not been used to grease the wheels of the Gazette-News as well as its silent stockholder, the Hon. W. H. Carle, and if the alleged owner of the paper is not a myth then THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is badly mistaken and it does not believe it is. ** There is no doubt but what the PilesAnkeny sympathizers could have controlled the late county convention even to the exclusion of Hi Gill as chairman thereof, but if they had have done so it would have precipitated a fight that would have given the public some idea just how strong the opposition is and they did not care to have that shown up. The convention demonstrated beyond a shadow of doubt that W. L. Jones will beat Senator Ankeny in King county by an overwhelming vote, even with Senator Piles taking the stump for him. In the United States senate the voters and taxpayers of this state do not want as their representative a boose beater and a penny pounder, and adventurers in dead men's shoes are likewise persona non grati. PRICE TEN CENTS Prohibition on Trial in Michigan Saginaw (Michigan) News Prohibition on an extensive scale is on trial in Michigan for the first time in its history. Ten counties have through the local option act barrred out saloons entirely. In other cities and counties, the number has been considerably reduced under a variety of circumstances. In every portion of the state more stringent enforcement of the liquor laws is being imposed. In several instances this regulation has driven out of business many saloons, usually of the least desirable class. The solution of the liquor problem is therefore proceeding along two lines in Michigan at present. There is the totally "dry" territory, which covers ten counties, and in which the saloon is completely banished, and there is a much larger territory where the saloon has been placed under regulation of more or less thoroughness, according to the prevailing sentiment and customs of the people. In the balance of the state, which is larger than either the "dry" or regulated territory, little or nothing has been done toward the suppression of the liquor business; conditions remain as they have existed for many years. The major portion of the state, consequently, occupies the position of an unprejudiced spectator, watching con-current experiments dealing with the drink problem along two widely divergent lines. The prohibitionists are wholly dissatisfied with strict regulation. They look upon it as compromising with the enemy. Nothing short of total abolition of the saloon will satisfey them. The "regulationists" do not believe it is practical to annihilate the saloon in one fell swoop. They contend that statutes of this character are evaded and that secret traffic in liquor which is carried on only tends to bring the law into disrepute and to aggravate the drink evil in its worse forms. In addition to the alleged impracticability of absolute prohibition, it is also claimed that business is injured and that the loss of revenue from liquor licenses is a burden which few cities under present methods of raising revenue are able to shoulder. Probably neither side will ever convince the other that it is right. Prohibition has been in force in some states for many years and the people appear to be satisfied with the results. Probably the character and customs of the substantial, governing classes have much to do with the success or failure of prohibition. In Michigan the trial is experimental, and it remains to be seen what the people in those counties where the saloon has just been banished will have to say about the matter a year or two years hence. As a general proposition however, there appears to be little doubt that control of the liquor traffic through education and conservative legislation will work out the problem to better advantage than through attempts at arbitrary abolishment. "Why is she getting a divorce?" "On the grounds of misrepsentation. She says that before they were married he claimed to be well off!" "And what does he say?" "He says he was, but didn't know it." Call Main 305 when you have a legal notice for publication and watch us get there for it. 2 ODDS AND ENDS Germany's twenty-one universities have an enrollment of 27,000 students under the care of 2,000 professors. No bird can fly backward without turning; the dragon fly however, can do this, and can outstrip the swallow. An average man living for the average period of life, may be calculated to get through about 2,000 miles of reading. The deepest hole in the world has been bored in Silesa. It has reached a depth of about 7,000 feet, and passes through eightythree beds of coal. A German technical journal has gone to the trouble of estimating that the water of the whole ocean contains in solution over 2,000,000 tons of pure silver The ivory market at Antwerp, organized only a decade ago, has become the largest one in the world-larger than the two other great markets, those of Liverpool and London. Attorney General Jackson of New York state, commenting on his experience when investigating embarrassed banks, says: "I never before met so many men who ought to be in jail." The tiny stormy petrel is a bird of immense wing power; it belongs to every sea and, although so seemingly frail it easily breasts furious storms. Petrels have been observed 2,000 miles from nearest land. Recent measurements of the vibrations of the wings of a dragon fly in the Stuttgart University show that they ranged from 10,000 to 12,000 a second. The common house fly makes 600 strokes of its wings a second while flying at its highest speed. Sawdust is turned into a transportable fuel by the simple device of being heated under high pressure steam until the resinous ingredients become sticky, when it is pressed into bricks. One man with a two horsepower machine can turn out 10,000 bricks a day. The world contains at least four mountains composed of almost solid iron ore. One is in Mexico, one in the United States, another in India, and a fourth in Africa just below the Soudan. Productions in gold in the United States fell off $4,753,401 in 1907, as against 1906, whereas the amount of silver produced was increased by over 1,000,000 fine ounces. Alaska's gold production fell off a little more than $3,000,000, according to the report of the director of the mint. Beware of fakirs. A fool knows of his errors too late wise men see in the future. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN It's Different Now One of the possible explanations is that the American voters those of them to the manner born—have really outgrown the old style American political campaign Perhaps we do not sufficiently take into account the distance evolution has carried us since 1884—to go no further back than that. Probably the log cabin and hard cider campaign of the great-grandfathers would now be an utter impossibility. Certainly, if those old patriots who swore by Andrew Jackson or Henry Clay, as the case might be, and 'Marched in percussion an' got up hoo-raws, An' tramped thru the mud fer the good 'o the cause.' the good o the cause, could come back and look around them in the United States of 1908, it isn't the "political apathy" alone that would astonish them.—Hartford Courant. Dine and Boost this Coast Joining about the banquet board the Society of Oregon and the California state associations recently celebrated the beauties of the Pacific coast and sounded the alarm of possible wars. They demanded the retention of battleships in Pacific waters and descanted on the future greatness of the far west. John Barrett was toast master. There were speeches by Congressmen Ellis, Hawley and Cushman and California Congressmen Kahn and Englebright, Colonel Straight, Eugene and J. L. Garner. From the very beginning war was the dominant note. Preparedness for hostilities was insisted upon, the rights of the Pacific coast being set up as paramount in view of the certainty that the Pacific ocean this time would be the scene of greater development of commercial activity. The arrival of the fleet in Pacific waters was the subject of many eloquent expressions. - Dispatch from Washton. Congress Gives Relief The senate has passed the house resolutions appropriating $250,-000 for the relief of the sufferers from the tornadoes in Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana. The resolution needs only the signature of the president to become effective. "Plenty of war in Warsaw," remarked the near-humorist. "Yes, and that other town is having Lodz of trouble," responded the almost wit as he proceeded to light up an El Flor de Skunk Cabbage. — Houston Chronicle. Many a man would be unable to paddle his own canoe if he couldn't borrow some other man's paddle. It takes a man with a lot of brass to dispose of a gold brick. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE JOHN E. Carroll. Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Max Malakoff, plaintiff, vs. Joe Phillips and Jane Doe Phillips, whose true Christian name is to plaintiff unknown, his wife, defendants. No—— Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King—ss. The State of Washington to Joe Phillips and Jane Doe Phillips, whose true Christian name is to plaintiff unknown, his wife. You, and each of you, are hereby notified that Max Malakoff has filed a complaint against you in said Court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 1st day of June, A. D. 1908, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock a. m., and unless you appear and then and then answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said Max Malakoff is for the sum of sixty-one and 95-100 ($61.95) dollars for groceries furnished you at your request on and prior to April 30, 1908. Complaint filed May 6, A. D. 1908. Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. May 8-May 29, 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for the County of King. George A. Russell, plaintiff, vs. Ada M. Russell, defendant. No.—— Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Ada M. Russell, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 2nd day of May, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To obtain a decree of divorce from said defendant on the grounds of desertion and abandonment for more than one year, and a decree awarding to the plaintiff the S. $ \frac{1}{2} $ of the S. W. $ \frac{1}{4} $ of the S. W. $ \frac{1}{4} $ (less 11.97 acres right of way) and the S. $ \frac{1}{2} $ of the S. E. $ \frac{1}{4} $ of the S. W. $ \frac{1}{4} $ (less 12.29 acres right of way), in Section 27. Township 20 North of Range 15 East, W. M., situated in Kittitas County, Washington, as his sole and separate property free from any community or other claims of said defendant, and for such other and further relief as the court may deem equitable. P. O. Address: 304 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. May 8- June 19, 1908 State of Washington, in and for the County of King. County of King. John Crane, plaintiff, vs. A. E. Downing and E. May Downing, his wife, defendants. No. 60999. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington, to said A. E. Downing and E. May Downing, his wife, defendants in the above entitled action: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within 60 days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within 60 days after the 8th day of May, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated. And in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this action is to obtain judgment on a certain promissory note, made, executed and delivered by you, the said A. E. Downing and E. May Downing to William A. L. Koch, for $100.00 with interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the 8th day of July, 1904, and for the sum of $20.00 attorney's fees; and to foreclose that certain mortgage, made, executed and delivered by you to the said William A. L. Koch, securing the payment of said promissory note on Lot 4. Block 8, Madison Street Addition to Seattle, as shown by the record of said plat now on file in the office of the County Auditor of said King County and State, situated in King County, Washington; that said note and mortgage were on the 17th day of March, 1908, assigned to plaintiff herein, John Crane, and he is now the owner and holder thereof; and to obtain the usual decree in foreclosure for the sale of said premises, and that the proceeds of said sale may be applied in payment of the amount due on said promissory note, and the judgment to be obtained thereon; and that all persons, including the said defendants, A. E. Downing and E. May Downing, claiming any interest in said mortgaged premises subsequent to the execution and delivery of said mortgage on the 8th day of July, 1902, either as purchasers, incumbrancers, lessees, or otherwise, may be barred and foreclosed of all right, claim, or equity of redemption in said premises and every part thereof, and that the right, title, interest and claim of the above named defendants, and each of them, if any they have, be decreed to be subject, subordinate and inferior to that of the plaintiff in and to the real estate and premises herein described, and for such other relief as shall by the Court be deemed equitable. Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. and office address: Rooms 615- 616 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. May 8—June 19. 1908. JOHN E. CARROLL. Friday, May 15, 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King. C. W. Rodeen, plaintiff, vs. Georgena Rodeen, defendant. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Georgena Rodeen: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 8th day of May, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds of cruelty and personal indignities, rendering life hurdlesome. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. May 8—June 19, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King, Katherine V. Willson, plaintiff, vs., Alphanso M. Willson, defendant. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Alphanso Willson: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 5th day of May, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony, now existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of desertion and nonsupport. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. May 8—June 19, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for King County. Theresa Watson, plaintiff, vs. James Watson, defendant. No. — Summons. The State of Washington to James Watson, the above named defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the 5th day of May, 1908, and defend the above entitled action, in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of failure on your part so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court; that plaintiff's cause of action against you as set forth in the complaint for divorce, founded on cruelty. EDGAR FOSTER. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. and Office Address: Suite 304 Metropole Building, corner Second Avenue and Yesler Way, Seattle, King County. Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Reg. E. Morgan, Plaintiff, vs. A. B. Braddick and Emmie C. Braddick, his wife, Defendants. No. 60350. Summons. The State of Washington to the said A. B. Braddick and Emmie C. Braddick, his wife, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 8th day of May, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County aforesaid; and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought to obtain judgment against you in the sum of $46.50 and costs for goods sold and delivered to you by the Eastern Outfitting Co., a corporation-plaintiff's assignor. MONCRIFE CAMERON, Attorney for Plaintiff. 1054 Empire Bldg., Seattle, Wash. May 8—June 19, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Harvey Shoults, Plaintiff, vs. Edith Shoults, Defendant. The State of Washington to the said Edith Shoults: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 15th day of May, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the ground of desertion. E. L. SANDERS. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. May 15—July 1, 1908. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King—ss.—Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an alias order of sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 11th day ow April, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of W. J. Janisch, plaintiff, versus Bert Acteson and Mary M. Acteson, his wife, H. A. Raser, Trustee and the Title Guaranty and Trust Company, of Scranton, Pennsylvania, defendants. No. 56014, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered. Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, towit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 23rd day of May, A. D. 1908, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lots numbered eleven (11) and twelve (12) in block numbered ninety (90) of Woodlawn Addition to Green Lake, according to the recorded plat thereof in the Auditor's office of King County, Washington, together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, to satisfy judgment of foreclosure of mortgages amounting to the sums of seven hundred forty-one and 77-100 ($741.77) dollars and eight hundred seventy-three ($873.00) dollars, respectively. Whereas, the said Order of Sale directs that the proceeds of said sale be applied as follows: 1st. To the payment of the judgments herein rendered in favor of plaintiff: principal, interest, attorney's fees and costs. 2nd. To the payment of the judgment in favor of defendant Title Guaranty and Trust Company; principal, interest and costs. Provided, however, that nothing shall be paid on said last mentioned judgment until the costs of sale and of this action, the judgment of plaintiff, principal, interest and attorney's fee shall have been fully discharged and paid. Dated this 11th day of April, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. April 17—May 15, 1908. SUMMON. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for the County of King. J. W. Hulse, Plaintiff, vs. Sarah J. Hulse, Defendant — Summons. State of Washington to the said Sarah J. Hulse, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 10th day of April, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The object of said action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant herein on the ground of desertion and abandonment for more than one year. C. E. PIPER, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: Rooms 36 and 37 Union Block, No. 713 First Ave., Seattle, King County, Washington. April 10—May 22, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. King County Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Albert Isaacson, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defend- ants.—No, 60768. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate, issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 27th day of April, 1905, and numbered B33779, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, 1903; in the amount of $4.24, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, towit: The east one-half of the S. E. 1/4 of the N. W. 1/4 of Sec. 16, Tp. 25 N., R. 6 E. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1904, the sum of $5.05; for the year 1905, the sum of $4.51; for the year 1906, the sum of $3.36; for the year 1907, the sum of $3.45. Which several-sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, towit, within sixty days after April 10, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. KING COUNTY LAND CO., a Corporation. Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. First publication dated April 10—May 22, 1908. SUMMONS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King. Anna Jones, Plaintiff, vs. Milroy Jones, Defendant.—No. 60714. The State of Washington to the said Milroy Jones. Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: within sixty days after the 3rd day of April, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony between the parties hereto on the ground of desertion for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action. E. T. SCHOFF. Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address: 503-504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. April 3, May 15, 1908. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. I. I. Walker, Plaintiff, vs. Julia A. Curtiss and John Doe Curtiss, her husband, J. A. Cox, Trustee, and all other persons, parties, corporation or corporations, whomsoever unknown, claiming any right, title, interest, lien or estate in the real estate described herein, Defendants. The State of Washington, to the said Julia A. Curtiss and John Doe Curtiss, her husband, J. A. Cox, Trustee, and all other persons, parties, corporation or corporations, whomsoever unknown, claiming any right, title, interest, lien or estate in the real estate described herein, defendants, greeting: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service, towit, within sixty (60) days after the 27th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court; answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which will be filed with the Clerk of said Court or a copy of which is herewith served upon you. The object of the above entitled action is to quiet title in the said plaintiff in and to all of the south half (S½) of the northeast quarter (NE½) of the southeast quarter (SE½) of the southeast quarter (SE½) of section seventeen (17), township twenty-three (23), range four (4) east, containing five (5) acres, located in King County, Washington; and that Julia A. Curtiss and John Doe Curtiss, her husband, J. A. Cox, Trustee, and all other persons, parties, corporation or corporations whomsoever unknown, claiming any right, title, interest, lien or estate in the real estate described herein, be forever enjoined and restrained from asserting or claiming any interest in the above entitled reality; and that it be further adjudged, that they and each of them, have no right, title, estate, lien or interest in said real estate or any portion thereof; and that plaintiff recover costs and disbursements. ANDREW R. BLACK, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: Room 315 Pacific Block, Seattle, Wash. March 27—May 8. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Zygmond Rozycki, Plaintiff, vs. Irene Rozycki, Defendant.—No. 60666. The State of Washington to Irene Rozycki, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 3rd day of April, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint herein which has been filed with the clerk of sald court. The object of sald action, as set forth in the complaint, is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant upon the ground of desertion and abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant and to declare lots four, five, six, nine, twelve, fifteen, sixteen and seventeen, block three, Second Addition to Adam's Home Tracts, in King County, Washington, the separate property of the plaintiff. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington Date of first publication, the 3rd day of April, 1908—May 15. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for King County.—In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Olivia Slettengren. Decreased.—No. 8852. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against the said deceased, or her estate, to present the same, with the necessary vouchers, to the undersigned administrator at his office, No. 202 Boston Block, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, the same being the place of transaction of the business of said estate, within one year from the date of the first publication of this notice, toowit: within one year from the third day of April, 1908. HUGO SLETTENGREN, Administrator of the Estate of Olivia Slettengren, Deceased. Seattle, Washington, April 3, May 15, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King. Charles H. Shepard, Plaintiff, vs. Mary E. D. Shepard, Defendant.—No. ..... The State of Washington to said defendant, Mary E. D. Shepard: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 3rd day of April, 1008, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer or other pleading upon the undersigned attorney at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of said action being to secure an absolute decree of divorce, severing the bonds of matrimony between plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of incompatibility of temper and cruelty. C. H. STEFFEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 614 Bailey Bld., Seattle, Washington. April 3. May 15. 1908. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. NOTICE TO CREDITORS. SUMMONS. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Laurence D. Black, Plaintiff, vs. Magdalena Black, Defendant.—No. ..... The State of Washington to Magdalena Black, Defendant: You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the day of said first publication, towit, within sixty (60) days after the 10th day of April, 1908, and defend the said plaint of plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for the plaintiff below named at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of plaintiff which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of this action is to secure a divorce for the plaintiff against the defendant on the ground of cruelty and desertion. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April, 10th-May, 22. 1908. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Virginia Marie Van Dooren, Plaintiff, vs. Fredderick Van Dooren, Defendant—No. .... The State of Washington to Frederick Van Dooren, Defendant: You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action, within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the date of the said first publication, towit, within sixty days after the 10th day of April, 1908, and answer the complaint of plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for plaintiff below named at his office below indicated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of plaintiff, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of this action is to obtain a divorce for the plaintiff against the defendant on the grounds of failure to support and cruelty. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 10th—May 22, 1908. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King. Agnes Taylor, Plaintiff, vs. Adam Taylor, Defendant. The State of Washington to the said Adam Taylor: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: within sixty days after the 3rd day of April, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the un-designed attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds of desertion and non-support, and for plaintiff's maiden name, Agnes Clayton. E. L. SANDERS, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. March 15, 1908 SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for King County. Mary Drummond, Plaintiff, vs. Wm. Drummond, Defendant.-No. ..... The State of Washington to Wm. Drummond, Defendant: You are hereby summoned and notified to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action, within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: within sixty days after the 10th day of April, 1908, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court, and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for the plaintiff below named at his office below indicated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the said complaint. The object of this action is to secure a divorce for the plaintiff from the defendant and to have the former name of the plaintiff restored to her. MARY DRUMMOND, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 10th—May 22, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Julia Daisy Worth, Plaintiff, vs. Merwin Richard Worth, Defendant.—No. 60596. The State of Washington to the said Merwin Richard, Worth, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 27th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of cruelty and drunkenness. Crudey and Grunden ELIAS A. WRIGHT. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Rooms 629-631 Burke Bldg. in Seattle. King County. Washington. March 27—May 8. 1908. SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. William Knape and Christiana Knape, his wife. Plaintiffs, vs. Church of God in Christ, if such there be, and John D. Barton, its founder and general trustee, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.—No. 60552. The State of Washington to the said Church of God in Christ, if such there be, and John D. Barton, its founder and general trustee, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this E. L. SANDERS, B. L. BARKER, Plaintiff's Attorney. summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 27th day of March, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to quiet title to lots five (5) and six (6), block ninety (90), of Salmon Bay Park Addition to the City of Seattle, Washington. ELIAS A. WRIGHT. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Rooms 629-631 Burke Bldg., in Seattle, King County, Washington. March 27, May 8, 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. M. Grady, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. .... Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 15th day of November, 1906, and numbered B431231, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $1.81, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 11, Block 17, Town of Renton. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit; For the year 1904 the sum of $2.93, for 1905 $2.57, for 1906 $2.50.. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days of May 1, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes, and costs against said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. M. Grady, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. .... Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 15th day of Novem-linquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount 1906, and numbered B 43124 for the def $1.81, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, tow- it: Lot 12, Block 17, Town of Renton. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, tow-tie: $2.93 for year 1904. $2.57 for year 1905. $2.50 for year 1906. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after May 8, 1908, in the above entitled court and action: and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 524 Bailey Bullding, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King, Probate Notice. State of Washington, County of King—ss. In the matter of the estate of Mary Mulliken, deceased. No. 7589. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Mabel G. Fowler, the administratrix of the estate of Mary Mulliken, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said Court her final account as such administratrix, and that Thursday, the 4th day of June, 1908, at 9:30 o'clock a. m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. Geo. E. Morris, judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said court hereto affixed this 23rd day of April, 1908. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By J. A. SIGURDSSON, Deputy Clerk. SEATTLE REPUBLICAN SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Published Every Friday at 307 Epler Block. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton .....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton .....Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. One Year .....$2.00 Six Months .....1.00 Three Months ......60 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matter Has the McGraw-Piper feud been buried in the Ankeny barrel? Many of the leading Republicans of the state are at Spokane this week making preparations to do the Democrats, who will meet there just four days later. The old time viciousness of the famous south district of King county showed up in all its glory at the late county convention and domineered things just as of yore. Extravagance seems to have been running riot in the handling of the public funds on Calamity Hill, and they say Agnew has had a big hand in all the coming and going. That circular sent out by the advocates of Senator Ankeny is all right so far as it goes, but where is the original document? The real business men of Seattle want to see that. When the other fellow has a barrel to distribute there is no doubt but that it will make the bitterest enemies very touching friends if that distribution is left to the two of them. Black print paper with white ink will be a rather sudden change of conditions so far as the reading public is concerned, but if the news can be gotten, one way is just as good as the other. Unless the Times gets busy and keeps busy, Senator Ankeny will start a daily paper of his own in Seattle. The Times therefore, is in the position of the drowning man, catching at straws. Alaska has not succeeded in raising a great amount of either cerals or vegetables, but she has raised more political hell to the square inch than any other community in the United States. Evidently Tom Payne is of the opinion that, Senator Piles is of the opinion that, he, Senator Piles, has some damphool friends in Seattle who are more zealous than they are sensible. If Foraker continues to stir up the Brownsville affair he will find himself out of the pales of the Republican party where he will be neither able to help himself or his Afro-American admirers. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Robbing the Great Northern train in broad daylight shows a remarkable degree of boldness on the part of the light fingered gentry. They evidently went on the old theory that. God hates a coward. Electing United States senators by popular vote is all right for those states where people vote, but in those states where only a part of the people vote it is just as well that one close corporation elect them as another. Hi Gill has set the retrenchment ball to rolling in the city and now the county commissioners propose to follow suit, but the taxpayers must foot the bills that have already been squandered by the Ankeny bunch. Whether murderer Haywood or Eugene Debs is to control the Socialist party of this country has been the all absorbing question among the representatives of the Socialist party for the past week, with the odds in favor of Haywood. Heinze got the drop on at least one of his Montana admirers, as the young attorney who went to New York to blackmail him into giving up $40,000, was caught in the very act and was arrested by the detectives. Former Governor John H. McGraw must have felt his former self when he threatened to throw a delegate out of the convention that did not agree with him. Old timers say that he made his way to fame and fortune by just such tricks. When the arresters of an alleged criminal has to spirit their prisoner away and thereby deny him the right of appealing to the courts, then the officers of the law become even worse criminals than their prisoner is accused of being. Francis J. Heney, the alleged San Francisco reformer, having most signally failed to reform those he has taken personal aversions to by the strong arm of the law, threatens to reform them with a gun. Poor Heney, he seems to be hopelessly insane. Cayton's Campaign Compendium, which has just been issued by the editor of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN, is just the thing you need for your campaign this year, be you a Republican, Democrat or an Anything else. The price is One Dollar per copy and cheap at that. The governorship has been stolen from the acting governor by the speaker of the house of representatives down in Arkansas, thus further demonstrating that, those Jeff Davis scoundrels will steal from each other just as quickly as they will from an outsider. That Puget Sound Wood Company published in the very beginning that, it possessed the most wonderful discovery of the age, and from the way it spent the stockholders' money there is no doubt of it. Its wonderfulness, however, seems to have been confined exclusively to its money spending qualities. After sixteen years of publishing a weekly paper in Seattle, the reading public of the city know full well that THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is for the most part correct in its political prognostications, and when it said Ankeny money had captured the Georgetown Gazette-News, they knew there was truth in the report, and that's why Carle squirmed so. CURRENT COMMENT. There is nothing like meeting and getting acquainted by exchange of ideas on the part of the human family, and therefore the meeting at the White House with President Roosevelt and the various governors and men of influence in the respective states in which they reside, is a long step in the right direction. Never before in the history of the country has there been such a conference held, which accounts for the continued growth of that damnable and pernicious doctrine, State Rights. The United States is ruled and governed by a central government and every state, territory and island that go to make up the United States are completely under the laws made by Congress at the District of Columbia, and any theory advanced to the contrary is treason. But an era of good feeling and greater brotherly love among the citizens of this country should grow out of this conference on the part of the various governors and the other persons participating. Similar ones should be repeated from time to time, and in the course of human events, perhaps even the states in that part of the union known as the South, may come round to the idea that, they are bound to obey the laws of the United States, a thing they have never yet done. The civilized world has been startled beyond expectation owing to the discovery of a female fiend near Laporte, Indiana, in the person of Mrs. Gunness, who it seemed enticed men to her country home under the guise that she wanted to propose marriage to them and give them over the control of her farm, if they would put up so much cash, and while they were there she managed in some way to kill and rob them and bury or burn their bodies. Some twenty odd buried bodies have been found, and yet this is not supposed to be more than half of her victims. When discovered she murdered her three children and left the impression that she committed suicide and then set her home on fire. It is now claimed that the female body found in the burned house was not that of Mrs. Gunness, but another woman whom she murdered in order to carry out her plans to escape, and that she is now at large. The most of the woman's victims were Swedes, who answered her cunning advertisements in Scandinavian papers and were entrapped into her meshes. So many persons are money mad these days that there is no crime so brutal but that the average person will resort to it in order to get money. Money is the curse of the world at present and it seems to be growing more so. After all there is something pathetic in seeing one by force of years compelled to give up their life work. Such a person is like unto one without a country, not that the general public in any way overlooks or snubs them, but because the person so retiring goes out in the world and knows nothing to do to even occupy his or her, what had been, active mind. History has recorded no more pathetic scene along this line than that of Robley D. Evans, the late admiral of Friday, May 15, 1908 the Atlantic squadron, which on its arrival in the San Francisco harbor, his flag was hauled down from the main truck of the Connecticut, his former flag ship. Admiral Evans is to retire in August on account of the age limit, but sickness has befallen him, and he is now a perhaps hopeless invalid. If, however, he is restored to perfect health, then he will be without an occupation, and he is too old to begin any new business enterprises, hence the similarity of the man without a country. Admiral Dewey, the hero of Manila bay, has already gone up against the proposition, he not being happy and content out of the service and too old to be in the service. What we want to get publicity on is the fact that this grand stand will be located at the corner of Stewart street and Second avenue on the day of the big land parade, May 26th, with emphasis given to the fact that the reserved seat coupon tickets can be secured at the Chamber of Commerce for $1.00 per seat. The Chamber of Commerce Reception Committee has approved the plans for the grand stand prepared by Weatherwax & Devereaux, architects. Mr. A. Forrester Devereaux, of that firm, in charge of the grand stand arrangements for the Chamber of Commerce, will have charge of the construction, details, sale of tickets and the management of police, ticket takers, ushers, etc., on the day of the parade. The most elaborate preparation will provide seats for only a limited number of the many who will desire seating accommodations. It is estimated that 100,000 strangers added to the 250,000 population of Seattle will make a total of 350,000 who will see the parade in which sixteen thousand troops, sailors, soldiers, and uniformed civilians will march to the music of a hundred bands. Large space in the grand stand will necessarily be reserved for the high officers of the Navy, Army and National Guard; for the governors and their staffs, and the many visiting and local dignitaries guests of the Chamber of Commerce. This will reduce the number of seats to be placed on sale and make it imperative that reservations be secured long in advance of the day of the great parade. Society folk will be out in full force, and the brilliant array of spring costumes, added to the glitter of uniforms of the reviewing officers, and the whole set in the handsomely decorated grand stand, will form a picture less inspiring than the pageant that will pass before it. The spirit of patriotism and enthusiasm that the occasion will inspire will be displayed at its best at the point in the parade where the official reviewing stand is located. The streets will be so congested from the earliest morning hours that intending seat purchasers will find it difficult to reach the grand stand if only a block away. By special arrangement with the police department, safe escort will be insured to all grand stand ticket holders. Mr. Devereaux managed the seating arrangements for the Dedication parade of the World's Fair, St. Louis; the Knights Templars Conclave, San Francisco, 1904; the Vanderbilt Cup Race, Long Island, New York, 1906; and the Knight Templar Conclave, Saratoga Springs, New York, 1907. Every effort will be put forth to insure comfort and convenience for the guests and seat holders of the Chamber of Commerce Official Reviewing Grand Stand. Call up Main 305, for Legal Work. Our prices are right. SEATTLE REPUBLICAN, 307 Epler Block. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN BENCH AND BAR. BENCH AND BAR. (From the Central Law Journal) We heard the remark that the members of the legal profession, in some of our large cities, have learned to respect ambulance chasers. They have also been led astray by writings and teachings that have over-emphasized the importance of the "late case." In Chicago they have had "statutes," "revised statutes," and "amendments and jeofails" as wild and vicious as those in Missouri; they have had too much legislation from little, narrow-minded legislators. Lawyers of wide vision and sound training have not drafted the enactments of Illinois. Only where there is the lack of thought, and sound education, would the procedure for the Municipal Court of Chicago be acceptable. That act brought some benefits in a way of abolishing the too long endured nuisance of the old justice of the peace organization. It was a long needed act that brought relief from such a reeking nuisance. After conceding it a benefit, it seems well to say that the Chicago lawyers and judges who have held it sacred, will have to learn how their little rudimentary code will be made to accord with fundamental law by the appellate courts. This code of Chicago, for Chicago, by Chicago, fully recognized the value of a summons, also a written appearance, praecipe, instructions to bailiffs, and the manner of developing the statement of a case in a bill of particulars. From forms before us a summons has six hundred words, the written appearance is peremptory, the praecipe for a summons and instruction to the bailiff are found between the caption and the statement of the case, which is called a bill of particulars. Formerly, the bill of particulars was an accessory or an incident of detail; but in the Illinois act is given a new function, for it is made the original pleading. Under this act one looking up the title to property founded on a judgment, will also have to consider within essential documents, the praecipe, also instructions to bailiffs. But this act was not drawn from a view point, that constructive notice, estoppel of record, and collateral attack, are important parts of the law which have to be considered throughout procedure. This act is drawn from a secondary viewpoint which is, that the statement of the claim (bill of particulars) is sufficient "if only it apprise the defendant of what he must meet at the trial." Of course, this calls for the usual comparison of this clause, which is, that "the proceedings must be liberally construed in fartherance of justice between the parties." These are the usual clauses of the acts drawn by intellects who have not studied the principles of the Roman, the English and the federal, that a thing not judicially presented cannot be judicially decided. It is vain to prove what is not alleged. Every presumption is against a pleader. Of course the lawyers of Chicago know that the Municipal Court act must be construed to accord with the above principles, which are from antiquity, and will stand for eternity. In 1874 a statue, entitled: "Amendments and Jeofails" was enacted in Illinois, that adds a little to the law as a like act that was long before enacted in Missouri. If the average Chicago lawyer would rest from the search for the "late case" long enough to learn what the three maxims above set out mean, he would be greatly advanced. Understanding these maxims, he will see that codes, practice acts, statutes, and late cases cannot change them and leave anything stable and certain. The act in question would give the Chicago lawyer more trouble than his gen- 25R eral issue, which has befogged him in the past. He has not learned that pleadings are to limit issues, and to narrow proofs. Those maxims of procedure are bulwarks of protection. They will not reveal the fact that the study of procedure is a study of government. It is coming to be said that much of the legal business in some of our larger cities is done with more "facility than ability." While the decisions of Illinois show that its courts are very unsettled as to the application of fundamental law, nevertheless we are inclined to think that they will give such construction to the Chicago code as to require the same rules of procedure there as are established for other courts, for it is already being discovered by the judges of the court of appeal, that when cases are brought before them for review from the numerous courts, the records in many cases are very unsatisfactory. In a conversation which the writer had with one of Chicago's municipal judges, he seemed to be of the opinion that nothing more was required in the code states than a bill of particulars upon which to base an action. It is certain that he did not understand the ordinances of Bascom, and that the code practice is nothing more or less than the procedure of equity. That is to say, the facts must be stated in a petition which are sufficient to give a right to a remedy either in law or equity. HJM03 OF THE LAW (From Central Law Journal) An Irishman had to go law, and in consultation with his counsel, he was told that he had a good fighting chance. Paddy, who was anxious to win his case, was meditative for a moment, and then he said: "Do you think it would be any good to send the judge a pair of ducks?" "No, no; you mustn't do that," said his lawyer. "If you send him a pair of ducks he will be sure to decide the case against you." A day or so later the case was heard, and Paddy won with flying colors. In the course of the congratulations, Paddy remarked: "It was just as well I sent the judge them ducks." "What!" exclaimed the counsel. "Did you send the ducks?" "Yes," said Paddy, quite pleased with himself; "but after what you said, I sent them from the man on the other side."—Judge. Ant—I hear they tore the centipede up so that he was completely out of the running. Spider—Yes, they didn't leave him a leg to stand on. "It's the unexpected that always happens." "How now?" "Our automobile made the run without a breakdown." There is no reason for attorneys in Seattle sending their legal notices out of the city to be published when they can get better service in the city. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN will be pleased to have your patronage and will not only give you good service, but will treat you right in the way of prices. Our publishing day is Friday and we take notices until noon of that day. Phone your divorce notices in and leave the work and worry to us. Main 305. Office 307 Epler, THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. ee oe eee ia el of Washington, for King County, J. A. Sigurdsson, plaintift, vs. Unknown Own- ers, and all persons unknown, if any, having or ‘claiming an interest in and to the herein- after described real property, defendants. No. 61038, Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate In and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintift fg the holder of one certain delinquent tax cer- tificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 22nd day of March, 1906, and numbered B41218 for the de- Unquent taxes of the year 1900, in the amount of 88 cents, and upon the real property sit- uated in said King County, described as fol- lows, to-wit: Lot 2, Block 37, Commercial Street Addition. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plain- {if upon. sald above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1901 the sum of 40 cents, for 1902 86 cents, for 1903 82 cents, for 1904 13 cents. Which several sums bear. interest ‘at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and un- redeemed taxes upon and against said real prop- erty. You and each of you (including sald per- sons unknown, if any), are hereby further no- tified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the Ist day of May, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintif and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, In ease you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the len of said taxes and costs against said real prop- erty for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it, for sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now ‘on file in this cause and Court. 2 J. A. SIGURDSSON, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, + Attorney for Plaintiff. qyomce address: 524 Halley Building, Seattle, ‘ash, May 1-29-1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. In the matter of the estate of Joseph Hamil- ton, deceased. No. 8981. Notice to Creditors. By order of sald court made herein on the 24th day of April, 1908, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary youchers to the undersigned executrix of said estate, at 911 Lowman Building, Seattle, Wash., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will, under the laws of the State of Washington, be barred. NELLIE CAMPBELL, As Executrix of said Estate. Dated May 1, 1908. ©. H. WINDERS, Attorney for Executrix, 911 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, Wash. May 1-29-1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King. In Probate. é In the matter of the estate of Mary Mulliken, deceased. No. 7589. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Mabel A. Fowler, administratrix of the es- tate of Mary Mulliken, deceased, having filed in this court her petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to au- thorize a distribution of the residue of said estate - It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the sald Mary Mulliken, deceased, be and appear before the ‘said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Pro- bate Department of said Court in the City of Seattle, on the 4th day of June, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four suc- cessive weeks before the said 4th day of June, 1908, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. oe in open court this 28d day of April, GEO. BE. MORRIS, Judge. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DISTRIBU- ‘TION SHOULD NOT BE MADE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Mary C. Stiffler, Deceased.—No. 7682. Jacob R. Stiffler, administrator of the estate of Mary ©. Stiffler, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that sald estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled’ by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Mary ©. Stiffler, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of ‘Washington, at the court room of the Probate De- partment of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 4th day of June, 1908, at ‘the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. of sald day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this or- der be published once a week for four succes- sive weeks before the said 4th day of June, 1908, in The Seattle Republican, a weekly newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. ‘Done in open court. this 20th day of April, 1908. GEO. B. MORRIS. Indge. May 1—May 20, 1908. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. | J. A. Segardsson, plaintiff, vs. Unknown Own- ‘ers, and all persons unknown, 4f any, having ee claiming an interest in and to the herein- after described real property, defendants. No. 61037. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: \ You and each of you, as owners, claimants ‘or holders of an interest or estate in and to ‘the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax cer- ‘tificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, ‘State of Washington, dated the 22nd day of March, 1908, and numbered B41217 for the de- ‘nqnent taxes of the year 1900, in the amount of 88 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to- wit: Lot 1, Block 87, Commercial Street’ Ad- dition. - That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plain- tiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1901 the sum of 40 cents. for 1902 86 cents, for 1903 32 cents, for 1904 13 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sald date of payment, and are ali the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You ‘and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- cation, to-wit: within 60 days after the Ist day of May, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the len of said taxes and costs against said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satis- faction of the sums charged and found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plain. {a's complaint, now on file in this canse and jourt. J. A. SIGURDSSON, Plaintiff. A. ©. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. qyitice address: 824 Balley Ballding, Seattle, ‘ash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King—ss. In the matter of the estate of Mary ©. Stiffler, Deceased.—No. 7682. Notice of Settlemen of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Jacob R. Stiffler, as the administrator of the estate of Mary C. Stiffler, deceased, has rendered to and filed in said Court his final account as such adminis- trator, and that Thursday, the 4th day of June. 1908, ‘at 9:30 o'clock a, m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King Coun- ty, has been duly appointed by said Court for the settlement of sald account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear. and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the’ Hon. Geo. 1. Morris, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto affixed, this 4th day of June, 1908. OTTO A, CASH, Clerk. By J. A. SIGURDSON, Deputy Clerk. May 1—May 29, 1908. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE, State of Washington, County of King, ss.— Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an execution, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 28th day of April, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of F, K. Shipley and Fannie Shipley, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. W. T. Gaffner and Tillle M. Gaffner, his wife, defendants, No. 54836, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sherift’s sales, towit: at 10 o'clock A. M., on the, 6th day of June, A, D. 1908, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said plaintiffs, F. K. Shipley and Fannie Shipley, in and to the following de- seribed property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot seventeen (17), block ten (10), The Baker Addition to Seattle, levied on as the property of said plaintiffs, F. K. Shipley and Fannie Shipley, to satisfy a judgment, amounting to fifteen ($15.00) dollars, costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 28th day of April, 1908. L. ©, SMITH, Sheriff. May 1—May 29, 1908. s SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for Rig County. Mrs. B, J, Rice, Plaintiff, vs. Joseph L. Byrne, Defendant.—No. 60162, ‘The State of Washington to the said Joseph L, Byrne, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 1st day of May, A. D. 1908, and defend the ‘above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorneys for plaintiff, at their office be- low stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of sald court. "The object of said action is to secure judgment against the defendant upon a certain promissory note for $1300.00, given by defendant to plain- tiff February 16th, 1907, and interest at 7 per cent and attorneys’ fees and costs of action, and to foreclose a certain mortgage given by de- fendant to plaintiff, February 16th, 1907, to se- cure said note and interest, sald mortgage being upon lot 12, block 4, Yesler's Second ‘ition te the Clty of Seattle, Washington, and which said mortgage 1s recorded in volume 356 of mortgage records of King County, Washington, at page 111, and to subject sald mortgaged property to the’ payment of the several sums of money se- cured thereby, according to the provisions of said mortgage. CROSS & RICE, Attorneys for. Plaintift, 229 Burke Building, Seattle, King County, ‘Washington. Date of first pyblication, May 1—June PROBATE NOTICE. NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL ESTATE, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE ‘of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the.matter of the estate of Jerry Perry, deceased. administratrix of the estate of Jerry Perry, de- ininistratMeneby given, that. ihe undersigued, ceased, in obedience to an order of the Superior Court of the County of King, State of Washing- ton, made on the 16th day of April, 1908, and sighed and entered on the 29th day of April, 1908, will sell at public auction to the highest and best bidder for cash, on Saturday, the 6th day of June, 1908, between the hours of ten o'clock in the morning and the setting of the sun, beginning at the hour of eleven o'clock a. m. at ‘the ffont door of the King County Court House, in the City of Seattle, in the County of King ‘aforesaid, those certain lots and parcels of land particularly described as follows, towit: Lot 1, in block 1, Jackson Street Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, and lot 4, block 2,’in Public Benefit Tract No. 17, in the plat of, Georgetown, King County. Washington, ‘The terms of sale will be fifty per cent eash to accompany’ bid, and the re- maining fifty per cent upon confirmation of sale and delivery of administratrix’s deed. = Dated at Seattle, Washington, this 20th day of April, 1908. BRIDGET PERRY, Administratrix. GRAVES, PALMER & MURPHY, Attorneys for Administratrix. May 1—May 29, 1008. ec a ee SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King. Alva B. De Wolf, plaintiff, vs. Emma De Wolf, defendant: "The State of Washington to the said Hmma De ‘Wolf, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first Bab Heation of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the ist day of May, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his of- fice below state; and in ease of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with tha -clerk. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divoree from you on the grounds of fraud. ELIAS A. WRIGHT, P.O. Address: Rooms 629-631 Burke Bldg., in Seattle, King County, Washington. May 1—June 12, 1908-——— a See NOTICE TO CREDITORS. EN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. In the matter of the estate of Joseph Grealish, Deceased.—No. 8822. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned, duly appointed administrator of the estate of Joseph Grealish, deceased, to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against, said de- ceased, to exhibit them, with the necessary vouchers, within one year after the first publi- cation of this notice, to the undersigned at 404 Bank of California Building, ‘Tacoma, County of Pierce, and State of Washington, being the piace for the transaction of the business of said estate. Date of issuing and first publication of this notice, April 24, 1908, JOHN GREALISH, Administrator of said Estate. LOVEDAY, KELLEY & McMILLAN, Attorneys for Administrator. April 24—May 22, 1908. IN THR SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for the County of King. In the matter of the estate of William Sparks ‘Thomson, deceased, Notice of Appraisement: Taxation of Inheritance. ~ To the State Board of Tax Commissioners, and to Jane Lewis Thomson, widow; Annie L, Thomson, daughter; William ‘Thomson, son; and Charles 'B, Thomson, son; of the deeceased William Sparks Thomson, ‘heirs of the estate of said deceased, notice: You, and each of you, are hereby notified that the undersigned, the duly appointed and qualified appraisers of the property charged, or sought to be charged, with the payment of the Inheritance Tax, will, at two o’clock P. M., on the 16th day of May, 1908, at the office of Tra Bronson and D, B, ‘Trefethen, 614 Colman Building, Seattle, King County, State of Wash- Ington, proceed to. appraise. ‘the property of the estate of William Sparks Thomson, de- ceased, subject to the Inheritance Tax as pro- vided ‘by law. You are further notified that at said time and place you shall be present if-any objec- tions thereto you may have te offer. Dated at Seattle, Washington, this 20th day of April, 1908, LOREN GRINSTBAD, THOMAS SOUTAR, B. EB. MORRIS. IN THE SUPPRIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Frances M. Giles, Plaintiff, ys. Frank A, Giles, Defendant, No. 60061.’ Summons, The State of Washington to the said Frank A. Giles, defendant: ‘You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 24th day of April, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the aboye entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintitt, and serve a copy of’ your an- swer upon the undersigned attorney for plain- tiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be ren- dered against you according to the prayer of the complaint which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. This said action 1s intended for the purpose of dissolving the bonds of matrimony now ex- isting between plaintif’ and defendant, on the grounds of the neglect and refusal of defend- ant to make sultable or any provisions for plain- tiff and the family of defendant, for the res- toration to plaintiff of her maiden name, and for such other and further relief as to the court may seem meet in the premises. 0. 4. RIDDLE, Attorney for Plaintitt, Office and postoffice address: Suite $10 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. ‘April 24-—June 5. Have a Legal Notice? PHONE MAIN 305 Friday, May 15, 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for the County of King. Robert C. Dwyer, Plaintitt, vs. M. F. Harring- ton, Defendant. No. —. Summons. The State of Washington to the said defend- ant, Mf. F. Harrington: You are hereby suin- moned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 17th day of April, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintift, and serve a copy of your ans- wer upon the tndersigned attorneys for the plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rend- ered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is pre to recover from the defendant the amount of $252.00 with interest from Sept. 15th, 1906, being the balance due for services performed under a ver- bal agreement, made at Butte, Montana, March 25th, 1906, according to the provisions of which plaintiff was to prospect and locate mining claims for the defendant. EDWARDS, MBAKIM & CUSHING Attorneys for Plaintift, 403 New York Block, ‘Seattle, Washington. April 17—May 29, 1908, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Ralph Cook, Deceased. No. 8948. Notice to Creditors. 'To all the ereditors of the above named Bs- tate: All persons having claims against Ralph Cook, deceased, or the community composed of the seid Ralph Cook, and his wife, Ellen Cook, also deceased, are hereby required to present the same with the necessary vouchers, to the undersigned, the duly appointed, qualified and acting executrix of the said estate of Ralph Cook, deceased, at 422 Boston Block, Seattle, Wash., where she transacts the business of the sald estate, within one year from and after the first date of the publication of this notice, to- wit, within one year from and after the 17th day of April, 1908, and in case of your failure to do so, the same and all thereof will be barred. First date of publication of this notice, April 17th, 1908, MARY HAYES, Executrix of the Estate of Peps Cook, Deceased. 422 Boston Block, Seattle; King County, Wash. FRANK B. WIESTLING, Attorney for the Executrix, 422 Boston Block, Seattle. April 17—May 15, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King. Frederick ©. Richmond, Plaintiff, vs. Mary B. Richmond, Defendant. No. 60902. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, To the said Mary BE. Richmond, Defendant: You are hereby sum- tmoned to posse within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit, within sixty days after the 17th day of April, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein ts fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: divorce on the ground of abandonment. Z. B. RAWSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. 0. Address: 617 Pacific Block, Seattle, County of King, Wasbington. April 17—May 29, 1908. SUMMONS, IN THB SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATB of Washington, in and for King County.— Case No. ..... Louise Maricn, Plaintiff, vs. Norman Marion, Defendant. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, Norman Marion: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this sum- mons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 10th day of April, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the aboye entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer ae the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office and post- office address below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This is an action for divorce on the grounds of non-support. BAXTER & WILSON, Plaintiff's Attorneys. P. 0, and Office Address; 539 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. S— SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUNTY, Washington. In the. matter of the petition of the City of Seattle for widening Third Avenue and for the ascertainment of damages to private property un- der Ordinance No. 14845.-—No. 54135. suue State of ‘Washington to the said M, Gott- stein: You are hereby summoned to appear within stxty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 10th day of Aprii, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the petition of the petitioner, Puget Sound Realty Associates, % corporation, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, at- torneys for the said petitioner, at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the petition, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The ob- ject of the aaid petition of Puget Sound Realty ‘Associates in the above entitled matter {s to obtain an order of court directing the payment to sald petitioner of the judgment entered in said matter on, towit, July 27, 1907, in the sum of $17,250.00, for the taking and damagiog of the following ‘described. real estate in ing County, Weshington, towit: Lot two (2), block fourteen (14), Boren’s Ad- aition to the City of Seattle, which anid jeg ment was in favor of the sald M, Gottstein a others. SHANK & SMITH, Attorneys for Petitioner. Office and Postoffice Address: No. 1002 Alaske Building, Seattle, Washington. April 10—May 22, 1908. Friday, May 15, 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. George F. Moore, plaintiff, vs. Francis A. Utter, Morris W. Utter, Jacob S. Utter, George B. Utter, John H. Utter, Dolly Mariah Utter, and George L. Utter, hefts at law and divisees of Ira W. Utter, deceased; John L. Utter, George H. Utter, Olive Crooks, Mary Crooks and James Crooks, defendants. No. —— Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the said above named defendants and each of you: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 8th day of May, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment and decree will be entered against you and rendered against you and each of you quieting the plaintiff's title in Lot 14, Block 81, map of Gilman Park, King County, Washington, as shewn by the plat thereof recorded in Vol. 3 of plats, page 41, in the office of the Auditor of King County aforesaid for which this action is brought and forever barring and estopping you and each of you from having any interest whatever therein adverse to the title of plaintiff and granting all the other relief demanded and prayed in the plaintiff's complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. That the object of this action is to quiet the title of plaintiff in the lot above described. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Company Bldg. May 8-June 19, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. W. F. Comstock, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. 61193. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the abov named plaintiff is the holder of one certain dilinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 28th day of June, 1906, and numbered B42271, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $1.27, and upon real property situated in sald King County, described as follows, to-wit: S. E. $ 1/4 of N. W. 1/4 of N. W. 1/4 of Sec. 15, Tp. 21 N. R. 5 E. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1904, the sum of $0.87; for the year 1905, $0.82; for the year 1906 the sum of $1.68. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after May 8, 1908, in the above entitled court and action: and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. May 8—June 19, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washburgton, for King County. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having on claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. 61140. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You an deach of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notifd that the above nama plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of October, 1904, and numbered B27186, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1902, in the amount of $10.75, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 10, Block 173, of Gilman Park. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1903 the sum of $8.86: for 1904, $8.58. That afterwards, on April 3, 1906, the north 70 feet of said lot was redeemed from its proportionate share of said taxes, penalties, interest and costs. That afterwards this plaintiff paid taxes on the south 30 feet of said lot as follows: For the year 1905 the sum of $2.73, and for the year 1906 the sum of $3.16. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 8th day of May, 1908, in the above entitled court and action: and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now or file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. May 8-June 19 1908. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS. POWER PLANT FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON ON THE CAMPUS AT SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. Seattle, Washington, April 25th, 1908. Notice is hereby given that sealed bids for furnishing all material and labor and erecting complete a Power Plant for the State University of Washington, on the University campus, Seattle, Washington, in accordance with the plans and specifications for the same prepared by Howard & Galloway, Architects and Engineers, will be received by the University Regents at the offices of the Regents, rooms 21 and 22 Post-Intelligencer Building, at Seattle, at the hour of three o'clock p. m., as shown by the clock in the Regents' office, on Thursday, May 23rd, 1908. and there publicly opened. Bids offered later than this hour will not be received. Bidders are invited to submit bids in accordance with the provisions of the specifications on a complete plant. Bidders shall file with their bids a certified check on some solvent bank in an amount equal to or greater than five per cent of the amount of the main bid, as a guaranty that they will, if awarded the contract, enter into contract with two good and sufficient bonds, one in an amount equal to twenty-five per cent of the contract price and one equal to one hundred per cent of the contract price, executed by some responsible surety company, authorized to do business in the State of Washington. All proposals shall be considered offers in force for thirty (30) days after date of opening, unless bidders are sooner notified of rejection of their bids. In the event of failure of the bidder to enter into a contract and furnish the required bonds within fifteen (15) days after the acceptance of the proposal, then said certified check shall be forfeited to the Regents of the State University of Washington, in which event the Regents reserve the right to accept any other bid for the same work, but upon execution of said contract and delivery of said bonds, said check will be returned. Bidders shall file one check covering all bids. Plans and specifications can be obtained from the Registrar of the University of Washington, Seattle, or from Howard & Galloway, 604 Mission Street, San Francisco, California, and Administration Building, Alaksa-Yukon-Pacific Exposition, Seattle, Washington. One set only of plans and specifications will be furnished each bidder. A deposit of Ten Dollars must be made on receipt of each set of plans, which sum will be-refunded upon return of plans. Information can be had of Howard & Galloway, who may be addressed at 604 Mission Street, San Francisco, California, or at the Administration Building, Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition, Seattle, Washington. The Board of Regents of the University of Washington reserve the right to reject any or all bids, as may seem best to them. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON. A. P. SAWYER, President. WM. MARKHAM, Secretary. NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS. POWER HOUSE FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON ON THE CAMPUS AT SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. Seattle, Washington, April 25, 1908. Notice is hereby given that sealed bids for furnishing all material and labor and erecting complete a Power House for the State University of Washington, on the University campus, Seattle, Washington, in accordance with the plans and specifications for the same prepared by Howard & Galloway, Architects and Engineers, will be received by the University Regents at the offices of the Regents, rooms 21 and 22 Post-Intelligeneer Building, at Seattle, at the hour of three o'clock p. m., as shown by the clock in the Regents' office, on Thursday, May 23d, 1908, and there publicly opened. Bids offered later than this hour will not be received. Bidders are invited to submit bids in accordance with the provisions of the specifications on a complete building. Bidders shall file with their bids a certified check on some solvent bank in an amount equal to or greater than five per cent of the amount of the main bid, as a guaranty that they will, if awarded the contract, enter into contract with two good and sufficient bonds, one in an amount equal to twenty-five per cent of the contract price, and one equal to one hundred per cent of the contract price, executed by some responsible surety company, authorized to do business in the State of Washington. All proposals shall be considered offers in force for thirty (30) days after date of opening, unless bidders are sooner notified of rejection of their bids. In the event of failure of the bidder to enter into a contract and furnish the required bonds within fifteen (15) days after the acceptance of the proposal, then said certified check shall be forfeited to the Regents of the State University of Washington, in which event the Regents reserve the right to accept any other bid for the same work, but upon execution of said contract and delivery of said bonds, said check will be returned. Bidders shall file one check covering all bids. Plans and specifications can be obtained from the Registrar of the University of Washington, Seattle, or from Howard & Galloway, 604 Mission Street, San Francisco, California, and Administration Building, Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition, Seattle, Washington; one set only of plans and specifications will be furnished each bidder. A deposit of Ten (10.00) Dollars must be made on receipt of each set of plans, which sum will be refunded upon return of plans. Information can be had of Howard & Galloway, who may be addressed at 604 Mission Street, San Francisco, California, or at the Administration Building, Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition, Seattle, Washington. The Board of Regents of the University of Washington reserve the right to reject any or all bids, as may seem best to them. THE REGENTS OF THE UNI- VERSITY OF WASHINGTON. A. P. SAWYER, President. WM. MARKHAM, Secretary. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. In the matter of the estate of John L. Cole, deceased. No. 8941. Notice to Creditors. By order of said Court made on the 10th day of April, 1908, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executors of said estate, at 1308 Alaska Building, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of the transac- tion of business of said estate, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice, or same will be barred. Date of first publication April 24, 1908. FERRY H. COLE, ARTHUR J. COLE. Executors of the Last Will and Testament of John L. Cole, Deceased. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Martha J. Whittier, Deceased. No. 8719. Notice of Sale. Whittier, Deceased. No. 8719. Notice of Sale. Pursuant to an order made and entered herein by the judge of the above entitled court on this, 16th day of April, 1908, after hearing and adjudication upon an order to show cause herein why a sale should not be made herein, of an undivided one-fourth interest in lots 3 and 4, Fostoria Garden Tracts, in said county, owned by said estate, notice is hereby given that sealed bids will be received and may be filed with the clerk of the above entitled court at his office in the court house of said county, in Seattle, until 12 o'clock, noon, of the 12th day of May, 1908, for an undivided one-fourth of all or any part of said lots numbered three (3) and four (4) in Fostoria Garden Tracts, in said King County, as same appears on the plat of same on record in the office of the auditor of said county. Such bid or bids should be sealed and labeled on the outside of the envelope containing same, the label showing title of the cause herein, description of the land above mentioned and the fact that the enclosure is a bid on some portion of said land. Date of first publication, April 17—May 1, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for the County of King. of Washington, for the County of King. Annie G. Wadleigh and Arthur P. Wadleigh, Plaintiffs, vs. Leophus T. Scherer and Jane Doe Scherer, Defendants.—No. 59998. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington. To the said Leophus T. Scherer and Jane Doe Scherer, Defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 17th day of April. A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for plaintiffs at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: to procure the setting aside and cancellation of two certain mortgages upon lots 7 and 8, block 24, Second Plat West Seattle, executed to Leophus T. Scherer without consideration. P. O. Address: 308 Boston Block, Seattle, County of King, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. C. Shulte, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.-No. —— Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 11th day of Jan., 1904, and numbered B24071, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1902, in the amount of $14.12, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: S.E. ¼ of the N.E. ¼ of Sec. 19. Tp. 20 N., R. 7 E., W. M. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1903, the sum of $13.50; for the year 1904, the sum of $15.36; for the year 1905, the sum of $17.28; for the year 1906, the sum of $13.00. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit; within (60) days after April 24, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and, as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. April 24- June 5 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Lilly Ely, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.—No. —. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinfater described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 27th day of July, 1907, and numbered B27510, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1902, in the amount of $1.20, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 88, Block 3, Pittner's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1903, the sum of 65 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 64 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of $4.98; for the year 1906, the sum of 88 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, towit: within (60) days after the 17th day of April, 1908, in the above entitled court action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Balley Building, Seattle, Wash. April 17—May 29, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. O. Washington, King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Lilly Ely, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.—No. ——. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 27th day of July, 1904, and numbered B27509 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1902, in the amount of $1.20, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 37, Block 3, Pittner's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1908, the sum of 65 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 64 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of $4.98; for the year 1906, the sum of 88 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within (60) days after the 17th day of April, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. April 17—May 29, 1908. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King—ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an execution issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 15th day of April, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of The Star Paint & Wall Paper Co., a corporation, plaintiff, versus G. N. Carl and Ida Carl, his wife, defendants, No. 59400, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 6th day of June, A. D., 1908, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendants G. N. Carl and Ida Carl, his wife, in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot ten (10), Block nineteen (19) Reptain of Fred E. Sander's five-acre tracts, in Seattle, King County, Washington, levied on as the property of said defendants G. N. Carl and Ida Carl, his wife, to satisfy a judgment, amounting to one hundred fifty and 74-100 ($150.74) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 16th day of April, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. April 24—June 5. NOTICE OF PUBLICATION. Notice is hereby given that the annual meeting of the stockholders of The Consolidated Gold Mines Company of Washington will be held June 8th at 7:30 p. m. at the office of the Company in Seattle, Washington, for the purpose of the election of directors for the ensuing year and for the transaction of any other business that may come regularly before the stockholders. N. A. THOMPSON, Secretary. April 25, 1908.