Seattle Republican
Friday, June 19, 1908
Seattle, Washington
Page text (machine-generated)
State Library
SEATTLE REPUBLICAN
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, Friday, June 19, 1908
VOL. XV. NO. 4
POLITICAL POT PIE
Thomas P. Fay, the well known real estate man, has decided to shy his castor into the race for county commissioner from the third commissioner's district. He says: "I mean to run as a business man's candidate and if I am nominated and elected I propose to see to it that the county affairs are conducted along business lines. Among the many things I propose to stand for is a sinking fund for the county that all outstanding bonds and interest may be taken care of when they fall due. Then again I will fight for the building of good roads throughout the county, a thing we have not got at this time. Good roads will help the city just as much as it will the county and I therefore think the city should become as deeply interested in the building of good roads as the country, and in this contention I think that I will be heartily sustained by the business men of Seattle. In standing for a business like administration of the affairs of the county, I mean that the county must get value received for every dollar it expends and that the road funds will not be used for political purposes as it is alleged they have been in the past. A square deal for both the laborer and the county will be my contention in every transaction in which the county will be interested."
* * *
The first to announce his candidacy for the Republican nomination for superintendent of schools is Edward H. Stafford, one of the principals of the Seattle schools. Mr. Stafford had a long school record before coming to this county and he has stood high in school work since he has been here, having acted as superintendent of schools at Ballard and subsequently teaching in the Seattle schools where he stands very high as an educator.
* * * .
Representative Will E. Humphries is home from Washington City and has already begun to look after his political fences. Mr. Humphrey is most fortunately situated in a political way as he will hardly have any opposition for the nomination for the position he now holds until after the state has been redistricted, which will be some four or six years in the future. King county cannot afford to support two candidates for that nomination as in doing so she might lose the place and she therefore, for the same reason, will oppose any outside candidate for the nomination, which leaves the field practically clear for Humphrey until after the state is redistricted, as King county controls the district. The same thing applies to Cushman if he desires to hold on to the place he now has, but rumor has it that Frank will surely get into the senatorial race to succeed Piles, and the rumor seems well founded, in which case it is barely possible that he will be Jones' associate in the senate.
**
Who the devil is Edward Von Huwaldt, who has announced himself as a candidate for the Republican nomination for sheriff of King county subject to the coming primaries? The Pie-maker has been dubbing around in the political circles of this county for a good many years, but he has heard of Von Huwaldt for the first time. This the Pie-maker suspects is a huge political joke and means Jim Agnew instead of Von Huwaldt.
Will the various aspirants for judicial honors at the hands of the bar, which contest will be pulled off tomorrow (Saturday), abide by the decision of the election returns is the all-absorbing question among the attorneys today. If they do not, then it will be a long, long time before a similar contest is ever undertaken. On the other hand if the nineteen candidates take their medicine and let the results of Saturday settle the matter as to who will be the six judges for King county for the ensuing year, a precedent will be set that it will take years and years to overthrow. There are something like 1,200 or more lawyers in King county and only some 700 have registered, not to exceed half of the regular practicing attorneys in King county, and a majority of those not registered are opposed to the proceedings of tomorrow, which means that, they will hardly submit to the results of the bar contest, but some of them will announce themselves for the nomination for the regular primary election and make a fight wholly independent of the lawyers and especially those who agreed to abide by the decision of the bar election.
---
The feeling to clean out the court house ring is growing stronger every day and finding many substantial backers among the heavy tax payers of the county. The men at the court house in many instances have been there entirely too long and for the good of the county some new blood should be infused into the machinery of the law. It looks bad for the same set of men to just change about from one office to the other at the court house and grow old nursing a public teat. It looks as if such men feel their inability to go out in the world and make a living, and if the county is to support such charges, why not send them to either the asylum or the county poor farm where they will not be such expensive charges? The affairs of the county are said to be in a most wretched condition, it requiring twice as much to run the county as is necessary and consuming all and even more than is taken in by excessive taxation, thereby slowly but surely running the county head over heels in debt. The county needs business men at the head of affairs so that things could run kind of even along.
* * *
Speaking about this joke the Pie-maker is reminded that one Jim Agnew has announced himself for the Republican nomination for sheriff. Of course Jim has been county auditor as long as he can be under the law and he feels that he would actually starve to death if he were not sucking some kind of a public teat, and he therefore strikes out for the biggest place in the county in order to make sure that he will not starve to death for the next four years. In case he fails to land this nomination you will see him strike out at once for some kind of a federal or state appointment in order to keep the wolf from the door. To work the dear people seems to be a weakness of Jim Agnew and he does that to a queen's taste.
Gov. Mead's campaign which was opened at Bellingham a few days ago, is receiving attention of the press all over the state and the Pie-maker after watching the comment pro and con on the part of the various publications is inclined to think the Governor has all the best of the comment. That he made a telling speech no
1
PRICE TEN CENTS
one who read it has reasons to doubt and that it is having good effect may be seen from the comments of the press and even from what may be heard from different persons who are discussing the speech. Governor Meade it will be remembered was nominated four years ago by the railroads as opposed to the McBride policies, but when he went into the campaign he was not long in discovering that, the people wanted, the things that McBride had advocated, and so he promised the people on the stump that, if the legislature passed such measures, and if he were elected, he would not vetoe them. He not only did not vetoe them, but finding that they were necessary for the good of the state he used his power and influence as governor of the state to push them along and succeeded beyond expectation. The friends of Governor Mead are now jubliant for they believe that he will not only beat all his opponents, but will get even more than the 40 per cent necessary for the nomination and be nominated to succeed himself by an overwhelming majority. They say further that, the very voters that supported McBride four years ago are supporting Meade now because he has carried out the policies of McBride, while McBride is now with the railroad folk and is opposed to the policies he represented four years ago.
TEDDY THE TERRIBLE
William Howard Taft—The present secretary of war, was at the supreme moment nominated by the Republicans in convention assembled at Chicago for president of the United States of America, thus ending one of the fiercest political struggles that has ever prevailed in presidential circles in the history of this "land of the free and home of the brave." While Taft, when he will have been elected president of the United States as he will surely be, may be president in fee simple, not even taking orders or suggestions from him in whose shoes he is so soon to stand, nevertheless there is no denying the fact that, he is a creature of President Theodore Roosevelt and his nomination is but another demonstration of the stronghold the president has upon the rank and file of the American people. The president has not only had his way in all matters of national legislation and government affairs in general for the past four years, but he has been able to dictate his successor, which, to all intent and purpose, means four more years of Teddy the Terrible. No president in the history of the country has had things as much his own way as has Mr. Roosevelt; no other president has had to handle such grave and momentous questions of state as he; and finally no other president's four year administration has been as free of mistakes as his, which explains his general popularity. We believe Mr. Taft will give to this country a conservative, sane and sound administration, and while he will to a more or less extent carry out the Roosevelt policies, yet he will likewise have a Taft policy of his own, and his sobriquet—Taft the Toiler, will be doubly more apparent for the ensuing four years than for the past four. While the whole country would be delighted beyond measure to return Roosevelt to the White House for four years more, yet Taft, will in our opinion, close the first four years of his presidency equally beloved as is Theodore Roosevelt himself.
So here is for Taft and Teddy!
PRESENT SITUATION IN INDIA
DEAR EDITOR:— Reading an article written by one Indian, Mr. S. M. Mitter, commenting on Lord Cromer's views in the May issue of the 19th Century on oriental mind, and one by Mr. G. Mukerji in April's issue of the Overland Mail, discussing the immigration and educational question of Indians on the Pacific coast, I request you to publish these few lines in your valuable paper and oblige.
I am very glad to see that our Indian young men are struggling hard to convince the liberty loving people of the United States the real position of the Indians in the mother land and on the Pacific Coast. I cannot help but admire the sacrifice of one of our Indian young men who has been forced to resign the post of sixty dollars, i. e., Rs 180 or so a month, for only undertaking in his own hands the hard task of managing a monthly leaflet, "Free Hindustan," and expressing his free opinion on the subject of "British rule in India and their policy, etc."
This shows clearly that the national spirit among the Indians is awakening quickly and the time is coming very near to attract the sympathy of the freedom-loving nation-I mean the United States of America. The past Russo-Japanese war clearly explains the facts that if this nation had not have shown the heartfelt sympathy towards the right action of the Japanese, there would not have been victory in favor of the Japanese.
In the constitution of the United States government, based on the universal principles of freedom and liberty, every one has the right to become its citizen, and so the natives of all other nations are being naturalized in the land of freedom. These are good signs no doubt for the harmonious development of the human races. Every one here has the equal right of speech and free expression of his thoughts and opinions in public, pulpit and press. But on the other hand what do we see in India? Manlike, Lord Cromer, student and keen observer of oriental mind of thirty-five years standing, feels that freedom of press in India, especially to Indian editors, is the cause of the present unrest in India. There in different parts of the country many young and old editors are being sent to prison, some for months and some for years, for rigorous imprisonment. And though in their whole lives they have never worked as manual laborers, now they are grinding flour with heavy, stone-hand-machines, and sending their heartfelt blessings to the British bureaucracy.
Though Lord Cromer is right in saying that the doors of higher education should not be closed to the Indian mind, yet man-like Lord Curzon, the Auranzeb of the Mohamedan rule in India, has adopted the policy to stop higher education altogether, and
THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN
so the University Act has been passed in India to debar the Indian from the privilege of getting high education at home.
After the unpleasant events of 1857, which was termed by our British friends as a Mutiny, as the Indians could not succeed in gaining their object to drive the British yoke away from their heavy laden necks, while the events of the same nature in France were considered a French revolution; and in the United States, war of independence, because they gained the desired object of their mind Arms Act was passed to cut the hands of the Indians, at the time of the risk of their lives even and thus not allow them to protect themselves from danger. Now we see the consequences of all this.
On the surface of the earth there is no nation so poverty stricken, whose average daily income is less than two cents a day, whose daily meal is one-consisting of some leaves of shrubs and grass and a cup of God-sent rain, preserved in natural pools of water. Twenty-five million people died on account of starvation and plague during the last twenty-five years. Was death a welcome? Education is five per cent among one hundred and fifty millions of male population and one per cent among female. Throughout India, such a vast empire, there is not a single college for female education supported by the British goverment.
Sixty-five per cent is taxation on land production, and no representation is allowed, on the part of the people. Under such a terrible condition, if people speak something publicly at home, they are considered seditious and hence sent to jail or deported from the country without any trial.
And if they dare to come up in foreign lands, labor unions and Asiatic leagues stand against them. The doors of Australia and South Africa, Natal, are shut for them, and now they are being deported from British Columbia though these poor fellows are British subjects on paper. No work can be given to these poor fellows who have been so mercilessly taxed at home by the British autocracy and commercially robbed by B S. N. Co., of India, and C. P. R. Co., of B. C. in transportation.
Foreign missions from the West are sending millions of dollars to convert heathens into Christians, but a few heathens on the Pacific Coast are out of work and no Christian heart is moved to help them. Some illiterate heathens coming in contact with the Christian laborers are going to adopt the evil habit of drinking, and one educated heathen wants to check it. Many obstacles and hinderances are put in his way by the educated Christian friends.
Lord Cromer says India is a down trodden country enslaved with caste prejudices, as low caste Pharya is not allowed to see the high caste Brahmans. Of course it is true and it is a pity!
But is not the British white face Heavenly born, more cruel and merciless not to even allow the high caste Brahman to see the Malechh British executive officer in the District?
He says moreover in India congress committee there are high caste Brahmans. Of course it is not a fact. He is not aware of the fact that the congress does not claim to be a social organization but it is a political body representing political rights for the country for all sects, having no caste or creed, consisting of men of high abilities, qualifications and education. There are Parsees, men like Dada Bhai, Naoraji-Watchas, Brahmans of course. Messrs. Gokhale, Tilak, S. Boonerji, Mohamedens; Kashtrizyas - Rajpoots, Vaish, Aryas. Brahmans, Sikhs and all other communities of Hindu race or even Christians.
There is no question of high or low castes, but it is just as it is in English Parliament, House of Commons, a mere matter of ability and qualification. The same law holds good in the United States House of Representatives and other western countries as well.
We refer our readers to the article on "Asiatic Immigration on the Pacific Coast," by G. D. Kumar, published in the Daily Times, Victoria, B. C., and News Advertiser, Vancouver, B. C. They can then get a better idea of the situation, and we appeal to the nations to get moral support and sympathy for our national aspirations.
BENCH AND BAR.
(From the Central Law Journal)
LIABILITIES FOR INJURIES The case of Cunningham v. The C. R. Pease House Furnishing Co., 69 Atl. Rep. 120, is interesting and based upon sound principles. In the principal case there was a common law count for negligence and a trial and verdict. The plaintiff's evidence tended to prove that the manufacturers of a stove blacking advertised in Nashua, stating that it was for sale by the defendants. The plaintiff's mother saw the advertisement, called at the defendants' store and asked the clerk if the blacking that they were advertising was intended for stoves or stove-pipes. He replied that, "it was for stoves" and that, "the warmer the stove the better it works." She replied, "won't that be fine, I can black my stove without letting my fire go out." Relying on the representation that the blacking could be safely used on a hot stove, the mother bought a can. Two days later the plaintiff, a member of the mother's family, used some of the blacking on a hot stove, and an explosion resulted, cuasing the injuries complained of. The plaintiff and her mother
Yours truly,
G. D. KUMAR.
Friday, June 19, 1908 were blamelessly ignorant of the fact that the blacking contained naptha.
The court likened the defendant's position to that of "one who puts destructive *** materials in situations where they are likely to produce mischief." 50 N. H. 420, 432, 9 Am. Rep. 267. Such a person must respond in damages to those who are injured because of his acts, if either he knew or ought to have known that the materials were dangerous and the person injured might come in contact with them." Hobbs v. Company, 74 N. H. 116; Scott v. Shepard, 3 Wills, 403; Cooley. Torts. 78.
"Although the defendants probably did not have the plaintiff in mind when they sold the blacking to the mother, they knew the mother had bought it to use on her stove and that other members of the family were likely to use it. Consequently the plaintiff can recover if the mother could have recovered had she been injured instead of the plaintiff. The defendants will not be prejudiced by the assumption that the plaintiff cannot recover if the mother could not and by the omission to consider whether the situation might not be such that a recovery might be had against both the mother and the defendants. Ricker v. Freeman, 50 N. H. 439, 9 Am. Rep. 267. The case, is therefore considered as though it were an action by the mother,"
"The court says the common law imposes upon the seller the duty to refrain from falsely representing material facts for the purpose of misleading the buyer. The seller may praise the good qualities of his wares as much as he pleases and he is not bound to disclose their defects to the purchaser, even if he knows of them and is aware that the buyer believes that he is purchasing sound goods. But if for the purpose of inducing the prospective buyer to change his position, the seller sees fit to make any representation, either expressed or implied, in respect to facts which are material to the subject matter of the sale. he must tell the truth." 74 N, H. 57, and cases cited in the opinion.
"The defendants admit their liability for an intentionally false statement of fact, but contend that they are not liable for a false statement honestly believed to be true, though negligently made," citing Derrry v. Peek' App. Cases, 337; Angus v. Clifford 1891. Ch. 449, 470. But the court shows that such is not the law in New Hampshire and cites Shackett v. Bickford, supra, a number of other cases to the effect that "a person who acts upon a false representation, made for the purpose of inducing him to change his position, may recover the damages he sustains in an action of negligence when he ought to have known it to be so," and concludes that, "If the defendant's false representation that it was safe to use the blacking on the hot stove
4
SEATTLE REPUBLICAN
Published Every Friday at 307 Epler Block.
Phone Main 305.
H. R. Cayton .....Editor and Publisher
Susie Revels Cayton .....Associate
One Year ..... $2.00
Six Months ..... 1.00
Three Months ..... .60
Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second
Class Mail Matter
In the conflagration at Madison park it is to be hoped that the blind pigs all lost their lives.
With former Governor Henry McBride's Fourth of July speech at North Yakima shorn of its political vitrol whats the use making the speech?
If our creditors will call to see us next week all our obligations will be liquidated as the races open tomorrow and we have a handful of straight tips.
That reckless automobilist has been convinced by Judge Frater that, the state law regulating the speed of automobiles was not intended to simply Guy the public.
"Cheer Up, Signs are Brighter," says a catch line. Of course electric signs are very much brighter, but that line lies like a dog when it intimates financial signs are brighter.
"Fine Ladies' Dresses Cleaned," says a sign. Ladies with fine dresses are warned to steer clear of that cleaning establishment as he makes no pretense of handling fine dresses.
Between the cyclones and the floods the state of Louisiana seems to be getting all that is coming to her: The mills of the gods may grind slow, but they grind exceedingly fine.
When an outsider looks up to the court house with the thought that, "I would like to taste public office for a season," he sees Sickles a foot long hanging therefrom due to the icy stare he gets by the gang.
Evidently the state of Washington does not expect to elect anything next fall but a United Staies senator and a governor as no other offices are seldom if ever mentioned in connection with the next election.
Col. Frederick D. Grant may not have Southern devils as did his father to fight to a farewell finish, but he is nevertheless reducing militaryism to as fine a system as did his illustrious father.
A life time sucking the public teat is a loong, long time, but that is just what a great many of the present employes of the King county court have done, and we believe a change would be good for the taxpayers.
```markdown
```
THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN To admonish you to read THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is a waste of words for you are doing that right now, but we would like to solicit you to pay for THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN after you have finished reading it.
Winter may have hnng in the lap of spring for an unusually long period, much to the discomfort of the natives, but the perfectness of the weather just now makes us forget all of its shortcomings in the past.
Ward took a tumble after last Faiday's SEATTLE REPUBLICAN was out and evidently begged the mayor to name him as chief of the police immediately if not sooner, which the mayor did, and now it is Chief Ward. So promote it be.
"Real estate is quiet," came from a Seattle enthusiast one day this week as he mopped the prespiration from his brow, just as though he had ever heard of real estate making a noise, but the fool had to say something to be seen.
High rent for the hundred and one small stores on Third avenue is responsible to a great extent for so many "For Rent" signs being seen. Its the rent man more than any other kind of man in Seattle that is killing the town and he knows it.
George E. Adams, who was sent to McNeils Island for stealing gold at the assay office in Seattle, proposes that although he is in a federal prison he is not to be forgotten so easily as the other fellow had thought for, and he therefore periodically breaks into print.
Of course a great many of the citizens of this community wrote letters of commendation to the Times for advocating murder, but all of them wished their names withheld from publication thereby showing that they were as dastardly criminals as the Colonel himself.
We fear the Yakima Democrat is fooling itself in declaring that the Negroes of this country, owing to their opposition to Roosevelt will not vote for Taft, and if they are not successful in getting Foraker to run on a Lincoln Republican ticket, will openly vote for Bryan. There is no difference as far as the Negro is concerned between Bryan and Vardeman.
The Republican National convention, which has been in session since last Tuesday, has been excitement from the very beginning. The southern contests were all settled in favor of Taft with the exceptoin of Louisiana, which was a compromise between the two factions. The proposition to cut down the number of delegates from the South was lost by an overwhelming vote. No retiring president in the history of the country received the ovation as did the mention of Theodore Roosevelt's name by the chairman of the convention, thus showing that he is near and dear to the majority of the folk of this country. The demonstration lasted forty-five miutes. Telephones had been arranged so that the president could listen to the proceedings of the convention without leaving the White House.
```markdown
```
Friday, June 19, 1908 Jack Stringer, who for the past eight years heen a deputy United States marshal in this district, has handed in his resignation to take effect July 1st. He takes this step that he may make the fight for the nomination for sheriff without a handicap. Now let the other fellows who thought that Jack was not a factor in the fight, set up and take notice.
Jim Agnew who has twice been elected auditor of King county by the Republicans, and who is now seeking the nomination for sheriff, preferred to announce his candidacy in the Times (Democratic), prior to announcing it in the Post-Intelligencer (Republican), which simply means that Jim is a partisan only for what there is in it for Jim—a political hog.
Mary Dougherty, a seventeen-year old girl of South Park, has been committed to the asylum and her ailment is said to be due to the brutal treatment of her own father and two other men, the former now being confined in the county jail, charged with the most heinous of crimes. We regret to say that none of the parties concerned are Negroes, because in so saying the idols of some folks are badly shattered.
Not content with making a fool of himself over the jury releasing Chester Thompson, the editor of the Evening Swillbarrel (Times) has jumped from Tacoma to Kentucky, and is raging at the governor of that state like a mad maniac over the pardon of Caleb Powers and Jim Howard, two alleged accessories to the killing of Gover-Goebel. But why discuss the words and acts of a person, who is by far less responsible for what he says and does than Chester Thompson ever was.
No Race of Men Incapable of Intellectual Development.
By Jean Frost
All condemnations of people and races in virtue of an innate superiority have in reality failed. Life has taught us to be more circumspect in our judgments. A savant who presumes to pronounce a verdict of eternal barbarism against any people deserves to be laughed at.
Let us remember that in the time of the encyclopedists savants refused to the Russians the possibility of becoming civilized in the European manner. The following century was destined to give them the lie, for it gave to this people consigned to barbarbity thinkers and writers who are accounted among the guiding spirits of humanity. If the Russian nation shall arrive some day at enjoying that liberty whereby it may develop unimpeded its moral and intellectual faculties the cause of progress shall have counted a hundred million workers more.
For ages the Negro races have been offered as proof positive that some nations are hopelessly separated from others in point of culture and capacity. But any one that has studied their development in the Southern States realizes that they are susceptible of rapidly absorbing the civilization now surrounding them.
A few brief years ago Negroes were not considered capable of carrying on business transactions or holding property. Today thousands of Negro proprietors are conducting plantations of various sorts and own thousands of acres of land worth millions of dollars. In brief, it is only as the equality of men is recognized and their essential unity believed that progress can be accodnted for.
Friday, June 19, 1908
~ TALES OF THE TOWN
THE SEATTLE REPUBICAN is in receipt
of a letter from President Theodore Roose-
velt bearing his thanksand congratulations
for the splendid booklet recenily issued by
the editor hereof, entitled Cayton’s Cay-
ton’s Campaign Compendium. Even the
president knows a good thing when he sees
it. A similar letter from Secretary Taft
has been received. Both are very busy
men just now, but they are not too busy to
overlook a courtesy.
Will H. Thompson has given it out that
he is of the opinion that he, accompanied
by his son Chester, willleave for the South
within a very few days and may cast his
lot in that section. That Mr. Thompson is
a most brilliant lawyer and will be a suc-
cess wherever he pitches his tent, goes
without saying. He would have been one
of the leading men of this section had he
used more diplomacy and tact, by cutting
out, ‘‘I am from the South,’’ and everlast-
ingly parading that before the public,
which did not help hima bit, but on the
other hand did him harm.
The proposition on the part of the dairy-
men in and about Seattle to have a bill
passed by the next legislature appropriat-
ing money out of the state funds to pay
them for their diseased cows, whose milk
they peddle to the public after the same
has been badly watered, must be a joke
that some good natured soul palmed off on
the dairymen. The idea is preposterous
and if the legislature should do such a fool-
ish thing every mother’s son of them
should be ridiclued from one end of the
state to the other and the treasurer enjoin-
ed from paying the money. A more ridic-
ulous proposition was never before dis-
cussed.
“J. Edward got the chickens,’’ was
quoted in a local weekly paper not long
since and from which a very pretty story
was told at the expense of J. E. Hawkins,
the well known Afro-American attorney of
Seattle. ‘I must admit,’’ said Haw-
kins, that there is abit of truth in the
story and the very thoughts of it makes me
almost smile; for I am reminded by it that,
its as much impossible for an Afro-Ameri-
can to carry a sack with chickens on his
shoulders through the streets of Seattle as
it would be for a snowball to fly through
Hades. I started a colored man witha
sack of fine chickens to the owner, and it
was after night fall when he started and
he had not gotten more than three blocks
from my house before a cop sent him to
the station for stealingchickens. The man
in charge telephoned me and I smoothed
matters over and he was given the chickens
and started out,again, but before he was
three blocks from the police station he was
again sent in and again released, having
become acquainted. All told, he was ar-
rested four times that night and finally an
officer was sent with him, but by that time
the chickens had all been smothered to
death and the colored man, becoming dis-
gusted, brought the sack of dead chickens
back to my house and threw them on the
porch where I found them the next morn-
ing. I had some hesitancy about even try-
ing the proposition myself, andso I bought
other chickens at the market and had them
.delivered.”’
Last Saturday there was held in this
‘city rather a remarkable meeting composed
of the stockholders of the Alaska Central
Railway Company, which road by the way
THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN
CS
ARTE rR Li \ \ oN NY
De iNineaee ar: a ‘ om
ce Te eh ' Dig
Cae a) Mi?
ee oe i 7 iN
Fs Hi Cees = : i 4
a Tae? bg a
AONE A, aa
pee as vont
AAA A HN : ue "
nae SE se
iy ai Uo ea a :
a oe a a a
a i ae | a
ee he cee | a oe re ae 8) |
Hee ae
etd i
ihe ae canta ae 4 :
car Tee x ee \\\l
ie e i i es .
Li ees a : An mene ve. ll
Leas BC ea ueeaNogy : ee aa
as a ea hee Re
GOV. A. E. MEAD
is now in the hands of a receiver on applica- Call
tion of J. E. Ballaine, the promoter of the ue
company. In the above meeting Mr. Bal- oor E
laine charged President A. C. Frost I
and Attorney George Turner, form-
er United States senator from Washington, a
with fraud and collusion in the affairs of 4
the company to the extent of bankrupting R
the property of the company, to which both
of them replied by denouncing Ballaine as ‘
a liar and a snakein the grass, but Ballaine
stuck to his text and strange to say neith-
er of them has asked for his arrest for
slander and defamation of character. The
meeting was adjourned to June 25th, and
to Chicago, at which time and place Bal-
laine promises to make startling disclosures
before the bondholders. $
Speaking about Ballaine, he is well
known in this state among the old time
politicians. At the time George Turner
was elected to the United States senate,
February 1897, he was reporting on the
Tacoma Ledger at Olympia. He favored
the Fusion ticket and did such effective
work that he was made Turner’s private
secretary after he, Turner, had been elect-
ed. After spending a short time in Wash-
ington City, he tired of the job and return-
eq to the state, where he accepted a posi-
tion on Gov. Reger’s military staff. He
went to the Philipines with the Washing-
ton boys, but returned before the fighting
was all over. He became interested in
Alaska and after many days hard work
figured out the possibilities of building the
Alaska Central Railway, and then, with
Senator Turner as an adviser, set about to
promote the scheme, in which he was em-
inently successful. He is interested ina
townsite in Alaska and it is reported that
he has fair prospects of cleaning up a
round million dollars, even if he never re-
alizes anything out of his stock in the Alas-
ka Central. Ballaine, like hundreds of
other young men in the Puget Sound coun-
try, stepped from poverty to financial
prominence almost in a day.
Call up Main 305, for Legal Work. Our
prices are right. SEATTLE REPUBLICAN,
307 Epler Block.
IRACES|!
o | RACES!
| She ES!
JUNE 20th to
| SEPTEMBER 12th
- SIX RACES DAILY
: RAIN OR SHINE
Take Car at FIRST AVENUE
and JACKSON ST.
Every LO Minutes After 11 A. M.
Races Start at 2 P, M.
Admission Including
Grand Stand
Gentlemen $1 Ladies 5() Cents
SE Sys 2 eee
Foto Healy Th
pene ee i cae Le
De Le
Bhs Be ican NN a
By, Sich ae fs
Dati c oats ee aie let ea meee
Hien Nl <P Ahee 2 A eh On a
peer ic SE a
Pei coe se Metres ga aon
.Y Pes eae a
Be fr A aa or ae
Bay) eh cerna ee SARS oe
a Gs oot ee ae
Bi PoP IR A Bsa ae
Sai is oii | GA aR aa
Bee iaty he SIA ae an
es Oe
Fe cus ere ea
paen sie fa NE ats a
a
Br eee
Be A a
i G nl i eee x
es Re, ie st toca en eaael
Fa ae OS OS
Bey, ooh tuk Le aa yi
ica 1 Phiy OF ea aes
eee se hs aa sa
Br 8G OES ae Se aan
fee) oe aie at ae pa
Dy soe aa
BS SS)
isos) A aie
PROP ccns ea ae ee eee
Nena! 77a 3 amen Ce
an ee ae
Ws x sy 3 2: Aes Bebe tes facnoes
el
Beet isline Cle ee a
Bee to Ne Ce ae
PA uk ee ae
Rag aril ose ne
eG 5 eee
Rage ae
Bea So hcg iti re
Beige (oi ae eee
6 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Friday, June 19, 1908
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
of Washington for King County,
Sara R. Bauer, Plaintiff, vs, A.B. Llewellyn
and A.D. Eshelinan, and ‘all persons unknown,
ig any, having or elaiming an interest in and
to the hereinafter deseribed real property, De-
fendints, No. —— Notice and Summons.
State of Washington to the above defendants
aind each of them:
You and each of you, 28 owners, claimants or
holders of an interest or estate in and to the
hereinafter described real property, are hereby
notitied that the above named plaintit® is. the
holder of one certain delinquent tax. certificate
issited by the ‘Tretsurer of King County, State
of Washington, dated the Ist day of Decem-
ber, 1905, and’ numbered B30312, for the de-
Hinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount
of $2.17, aud upon the real property situated
in said. King County, described as follows, to-
wit? Undivided two-lifths of tract 10, being a
part of the Base % of the N.b.4 of the Nuts Mi
of Sec, 32, Tp. 26 N. R58. W. M.
That the taxes for the following prior and
subsequent yeurs have been paid by the plain-
tif’ upon suid above described real property,
Hee eat ue penn 1905 the sum ot #160)
for the year 1906 the sum of $1.28, whieh
several sims bear interest at the rate of 15
per cen. per anmun from said date of payment,
and are wil the unpaid and unredeemed taxes
Upon and against said real property,
You and each of you (ineluding said persons
unknown, if any), are hereby fuéther notified
und stinmoned to be and appear within sixty
days after the date of first publication of this
hotive, exclusive of the day of said first pub-
lication, to-wit, within 60 days after June 19,
108, in the above entitled court and action:
and defend this action and answer the com-
plaint of said plaintif and serve a copy of
Your answer on the undersigned attorney for
pluinti® at his office below stated, or pay the
hinount dite, together with interest and costs.
Ti case you fail so to do, Judgment will be
rendered “herein, foreclosing ‘the Tien of said
taxes and costs against each parcel of said
real property. for the sums and amounts due
tpon ‘and charged against each, for said taxes,
interest and costs. ordering a sale of each par-
cel of sald property. for the satisfaction of the
sums charged and found against it respectively
as_provided by law, and as prayed in plain:
tins complaint, now on file in this cause and
Court.
SARA R. BAUER, Plaintift.
A.C, MACDONALD,
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Ofice ‘address: 52% Bailey Building. Seattle,
Wash.
June W—Tuly 3, 1908.
‘ane 19—July 17. 1908.
IN ‘THE SUPERIOR COURT OF Shh Shain
of Washington, for King County,
Francis B. Crumb, Plaintift, vs. Grace Amelia
Crumb, Defendant.—No. 61794.
‘Tie State of Washington to the sald Grace
Amelia. Cramb, Defendant: .
‘You are hereby summoned to appear within
sixty, (G0) days after the date of the first pub-
Hieation of this summons, to-wit: within, sixty
(G0) days after the 19th day of June, 1908, and
defend the above entitled action in the above
entitled court, and answer the complaint of the
plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon
the undersigned attorney for plaintift at his
office below stated; and in case of your failure
so to do, Judginent’ will be rendered against you
according to the demand of the complaint, which
has been filed with the clerk of said court.
"The object of the above entitled action is to
obtain a’ divorce from you on the grounds of
personaz indignities and abandonment,
CARRICO & DURK,
Attorneys for Plaintiff.
P. 0. Address: Room 603 People’s | Bank
Building, in Seattle, King County, Washington.
June 19—July 31, 1908.
JIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
of Washington for King County.
Gertrude F. Lawrence, Plaintiff, vs. William
J. Lawrence, Defendant. No. —— Summons
by Publication.
‘The State of Washington to William J. Law-
rence, defendant herein:
You are hereby summoned to appear within
sixty. (G0) days after the date of the first
publication of this summons, to-wit: | within
Sixty (60) days after the 19th day of June,
1908, and defend the above entitled action in
the nbove entitled court, and answer the com-
plaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your
huswer upon the undersigned attorneys for the
plainti® at their address below given; in ease
Ve your failure so to do, judgment will be
rendered against you according to the prayer
of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed
with the elerk of sald court,
The object of the above entitled action is to
obtain a decree of absolute divoree from you on
the ground of failure and neglect on your part
to provide suitable snppert for plaintiff
CARRICO & DURK,
‘Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Pp. 0, Address: 603 Peoples Bank Building,
Seattle, King County, Washington,
Tune’ 19—July 31, 1098.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
‘of, Washington for King County.
John A, Freeman, Plaintim. vs. Walter Miteh-
oli, as Administrator of the Estate of Fred Boy-
Jan, Deceased, James Boylan and Mary Boylan,
sole heirs of Fred Boylan, Deceased, Defendants.
No, —. Summons for Publication.
"Phe “State of Washington to James Boylan
and Mary Boylan, his wife:
You, and each of you, are hereby summoned
and required to appear within sixty, days after
the date of the first pulbieation of this sum-
jnong, to-wit: within sixty days after the 19th
fay of June, 1908, and defend the above en-
titled. action and answer the complaint of the
plaintif’ herein and serve a copy. of your ans:
Wer herein. upon the undersigned attorney | for
plaintitt, at his address below stated. and in
Rase of ‘your failure so to do judgment will be
fendered against you according to the demand
Of the complaint herein, whieh is on file with
the clerk of this court. ‘The object of said
action as set forth in the complaint is to ob.
tain a decree canceling and holding for naught
fcertain contract given by plaintif® to the said
Tred Boxlan, now. deceased, February Ist, 1907.
hud revorded In Vol. 503 of Deeds, page 151, of
the records in the auditor's office of King
County, Washington, for the purchase of Tots
Hand 12, Block 15, Maynard's Lake Washing-
fon, Addition to. the City of Seattle, in King
Connis., Washington, and. to obtain’ a decree
quieting title to said property,
EDWARD VON TOBEL,
Attorney for Plaintitr.
Office and Post Office Address, Rooms | 603-5
Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King Commty,
Washington. June 19—July 31, 1908.
Have a Legal Notice?
PHONE MAIN 305
THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
Oa een ate
You an deach of you, ag owners, claimants or
holders of an Interest or estate in and to the
hereinafter described real property, are hereby
notifid that the above namd plaintit is the
holder of one certain delingnent tax certifiente
issued by the Treasurer of King County, State
of Washington, dated the 17th day of October,
1904, and numbered B27186, for the delinquent
taxes of the year 1902, in the amonnt of $10.75,
and upon the real property situated in sald
King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot
W, Block 178, of Gilman Park.
That the taxes for the following subsequent
years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said
above described real property, to-wit: For the
year 190% the sum of $8.86: for 1904, $8.58.
‘That afterwards, on April 3, 1906, the north
70 feet of suid ‘lot was redeemed from its
proportionate share of said taxes, penalties, in-
terest and costs.
‘That afterwards this plaintiff paid taxes on
the south 30 feet of sald lot as follows: For
the yeur 1905 the sum of $2.72, and for the
year 1906 the sum of $3.16.
Which several sums bear interest at the rate
of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of
pay ient and are all the unpaid and unredeemed
tar-s upon and agalust said real property.
tia end vac’ of you (Including said persons
ankwwn, tf 2), are hereby further notified
and summon to be and appear within sixty
days after the date of first publication of this
notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub-
lication, to-wit: within sixty (60) dass after the
Sth day of May, 1908, in the above entitled
court and aetion; and defend this action and
answer the complaint of sald plaintif nnd
serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned
attornes for plaintiff at lls office below stated,
or pay the amount due, together with interest
and costs. In ease you fail so to do, judgment
Will be rendered herein. foreclosing the Hen of
sald taxes and costs against each parcel of sald
real property for the sums and amounts due upon
and charged against each, for said taxes, inter.
est and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of
suid property’ for the satisfaction of the sums
charged aud fousd against it respectively as pro-
vided by Jaw. and as prayed in plaintiff's com-
plulut, now on file in this eause and Court,
1. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff.
A. C. MACDONALD,
Attorney for Plainttm.
OMfce Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle,
Wash.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
of Washington for King County.
George V. Moore, plaintiff. vs. Francis A.
Utter, Morris W. Utter. Jacob 8, Utter, George
B. Utter, John I. Utter, Dolly Mariah Utter,
and George L. Utter, heirs at law and divisees
of Ira W. Utter, deceased: John L. Utter, George
H. Utter, Olive Crooks, Mary Crooks and James
Crooks, defendants. No. —— Notice and Sum-
mons.
The State of Washington to the said above
named defendants and each of you:
You are hereby stmmoned to appear within
sixty days after the date of the first publica-
tion of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days
after the Sth day of May, 1908, and defend the
above entitled action in tle above entitled court,
and answer the complaint of the plaintif and
serve a copy of your answer upon the under-
signed attorney for the plaintiff at his office
below stated; and in case of your failure so to
do, judgment and decree will be entered against
yon and rendered against you and each of you
quieting the plaintift’s title in Lot 14. Block 81,
map of Gilman Park, King County, Washington,
as shewn by the plat thereof recorded in Vol. 3
of plats, page 41, in the office of the Auditor
of King’ County aforesaid for which this action
is brought and forever barring and estopping you
and each of you from having any interest what-
ever therein adverse to the title of plaintifl
and granting all the other relief demanded and
prayed in the plaintift’s complaint which has
been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘That
the object of this action is to qujet the title
of plaintiff in the lot above described.
J. W. BROWN,
Atorney for Plaintiff.
314 Northern Bank & ‘Trost Company Bldg.
May S—June 19, 1908.
iN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATH
of Washingtoa in and for the County of King.
W. J. Janisch, Plaintiff, ys. Bert, Acteson
and ‘Mary M. Acteson, his. wife, HL. A. Raser,
trustee, and the ‘Title Guaranty & ‘Trust Com:
pany of Scranton, Penna., a corporation, De-
fendants.
‘The State of Washington to the said Mary
M._Acteson
You are hereby summoned to appear within
sixty days after the date of the first. publica-
tion of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days
after the 19th day of June, 1908, and ‘defend
the above entitled action in’ the above entitled
court and answer the amended cross-complaint
of the defendants H. A. Raser, ‘Trustee, and
the Title Guaranty & Trust Company of Seran-
ton, Penna., and serve a copy of your answer
upon the ‘undersigned attorneys for said de-
fendants and cross complainants at their office
below stated; and in ease of your failure so
to do, Judgment will he rendered against you
according to the demand of their amended
cross-complaint, whieh has been filed with the
clerk of said court,
Defendants seek by their answer and amended
cross-complaint. to have a certain trust deed
executed by the defendants Bert Acteson. also
known as A. EB. Acteson, and Mary M. Acteson,
his wife, running to the defendants and cross
complainants H. A. Raser, ‘Trustee, and the
Title Guaranty & ‘Trust Company of Scranton,
Penna., a corporation, and covering certain real
property located in King County, Washington,
and particularly dexeribed as follows: Lots 11
and 12, Block 90, Woodlawn Addition to Green
Take, ‘King County, Washington. reformed in
certain particulars and declared to he a mort-
gage and to have a decree of foreclosure en-
fered and the property sold thereunder, to satis-
fy the claim of said defendants and cross
complainants,
GRAVES, PALMER & MURPHY,
Attorneys for defendants and cross complain:
ants 1H. A. Raser and the Title Guaranty &
Mrnst Company of Scranton, Penna.
P.O. Address: 911 Lowman Butlding, Se-
attle, King County. Washington.
Tune 19—Tuly 31, 1908,
APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN,
Noting Su horabe given that<the undermined:
Notice is hereby given that the undersigned
was on the 28th day of May, 1908. duly ap:
pointed guardian of the person and estate of
Julia Butler of Seattle, Wash. Notice Is further
given to all persons having any claims or ac-
counts against said Julia Butler to present the
same to me at No. $1 Sullivan Building, Se-
attle, Wash., within one year from date.
Dated Tune 15, 1908, ‘
W. A. BUTLER, Guardian.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
of Washington, in and for the County of King.
Katherin V. Willson, plaintiff, vs.. Alphanso
M. Willson, defendant. Summons for Publica-
tion.
‘The State of Washington to the said Alphanso
Willson:
You ate hereby summoned to appear within
sixty days after the date of the first publica-
tion of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60)
days after the Sth day of May, 1908, and de-
fend the above entitled ‘action in the above
entitled court, and answer the comp. int of the
plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon
the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his
office below stated; and in case of your failure
0 to do, judgment will be rendered against yon
according ‘to the demand of the complaint, which
has been filed with the elerk of the said court.
The object of the above entitled action is to
dissolve the bonds of matrimony, now existing
between plaintiff and defendant, upon the
gronds of desertion and nonsupport.
B. EL, SANDERS,
Plaintif’s Attorneys.
P. 0, Address: 58 Downs Bldg., Seattle, King
County, Washington.
May ‘S—June 19, 1908.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
of -AWashington, In and for King County.—tn
Probate,
In the Matter of the Estate of Sarah A. Wil-
liamson, Deceased.—No. 6811, Order to Show
Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made.
Laura M. Blumb, the administratrix of the
estate of Sarah A, Willlamson, deceased, having
filed in this court her petition setting forth
‘that safd estate is now in condition to be
closed and is ready for distribution of the resi-
due thereof among the Teme entitled thereto,
and it appearing to the court that said petition
‘sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distri-
bution of said estate, it is therefore ordered by
the court that all persons interested in safd es-
fate be and appear before said Superior Court
of King County, State of Washington, at De-
partment No. 4 thereof, rt the Court House, in
the City of Seattle, Washington, on the 25th
day of June, 1908, at 9:30 a. m. of said day,
there and then to show cause, if any they have,
why an order of distribution should not be made
of the residue of said estate according to law.
It is further ordered that a copy of this order
be posted in three of the most public places in
said county and published once a week for four
successive weeks before sald 25th day of June,
1908, In the Seattle Republican, a” newspaser
printed and published and of general circulation
in King County, Washington.
Done in open’ court in Seattle, King County,
Washington, this 16th day of May. 1908.
GHO. EB, MORRIS. Judge.
JAMBS McNENY, Attorney’ for Administratrix.
May 29—June 19, 1908.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
of Washington, in and for (he County of King.
©. W. Rodeen, plaintift, vs. Georgena Ro-
deen, defendant. | Summons for Publication.
‘The State of Washington to the said Geor-
gena Rodeen:
You are hereby summoned to appear within
sixty days after the date of the first publica-
tion of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days
after the 8th day of May, 1908, and defend the
above entitled action in the above entitled Court,
and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, .and
serve a copy of your answer upon the under-
signed attorney for plaintif, at his office below
stated: and in case of your failure so to do,
judgment will be rendered against you according
to the demand of the complaint, which has been
filed with the clerk of the said Court. +
‘The object of the above entitled action is to
dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing
between the plaintif’ and defendant mpon the
grounds of cruelty and personal indignities, ren-
dering life burdensome.
B. L, SANDERS,
Plaintiq’s Attorney.
P. 0, Address: 58 Downs Bldg., Seattle, King
County, Washington,
May S—June 19, 1908.
iS LS SREB Ve ss eee
of Washington in and for the County of King,
Maud Berggren, Plaintiff, vs. Charles A.
Berggren, Defendant. No. 61468. Summons.
‘The State of Washington to the said Charles
A. Berggren, Defendant: You are hereby sum-
moned to appear within sixty days after the
date of the first publication of this summons,
to-wit, within sixty days after the 29th day of
May, 1908, and defend ‘the above entitled action
in the above entitled court and answer the com-
plaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your
answer upon the undersigned attorney for the
plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case
of your failure so to do, judgment will be rend-
ered against you according to the demand of the
complaint, which has been filed with the clerk
of sald court.
‘The above entitled action is an action for di-
vorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony be-
tween the plaintiff and defendant on the grounds
of non-support.
B. T. SCHOFF.
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Post office address, 503 Pioneer Building, Se-
attle, King County, Washington.
May 29—July 10, 1908.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
of Washington for King County.
Reg. BE. Morgan, Plaintiff. vs. A. B. Braddick
and Emmie ©. Braddick, his wife, Defendants.
No. 60350. Summons.
The State of Washington to the said A. B.
Traddick and Emmie C. Braddick, his wife, de-
tendants:
You are hereby summoned to appear within
sixty days after the date of the first publication
of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after
the Sth day of May, 1908, and defend the above
entitled action in the Superior Court of the State
of Washington for King County aforesaid; and
answer the complaint of the plaintiff and ‘serve
a c¢epy of your answer upon the undersigned at-
torney for plaintiff. at his office below stated:
and in case of your failure so to do, judgment
will be rendered against you according to the
demand of the complaint, which has been filed
with the clerk of said court.
| This action is brought to obtain judgment
‘against you in the sum of $46.50 and ‘costs for
‘xoods sold and delivered to you by the Eastern
Outfitting Co., a corporation-plaintiff’s assignor.
MONCRIFFE CAMBRON,
Attorney for Plaintift.
1054 Empire Bldg., Seattle, Wash.
/May S—June 19, 1908,
Friday, June 19, 1908
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
of Washington, in and for King County.—In
T'robate.
In the matter of the estate of Sarah A. Wil-
HMamson, Deceased.—No. 6811. Notice.
Notice is hereby given that the undersigned
administrator of the estate of Sarah A. Wil-
liamson, deceased, has rendered and presented
for settlemen, and filed in said court her final
account of her administration of said estate,
and that Thursday, the 25th day of June, 1908,
at 9:30 a. m., at the court house, in the City of
Seattle, Washington, In Department No. 4 of
said court, has been fixed for the settlement of
said account, at which time and place any per-
son Interested in said estate may appear and file
exceptions in writing to said account and con-
fest the same.
Witness the Honorable Geo. B. Morris, Judge
of said Superior Court, and the seal of said
court hereto affixed on this 16th day of May,
1908, OTTO A. CASE, Clerk.
J. A. SIGURDSSON, Deputy.
JAMES MeNENY, Attorney.
(Seal.)
May 29—June 19.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
of Washington, for the County of King.
Bertha Younger, Plaintiff, vs. Nicholas Young-
er. Defendant.—No. 61482." Summons by Pub-
lication.
The State of Washington to the said Nicholas
Younger, Defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear within
sixty days after the date of the first publication
of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after
the 20th day of May, ’A. D. 1908, and defend
the above entitled action in the above entitled
court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff,
and serve a copy of your answer upon the un-
dersigned attorney for plaintif’ at his office be-
low stated; and in case of your failure so to do,
judgment will be rendered against you accord-
ing to the demand of the complaint, which has
been filed with the Clerk of said court. The
object of the said action and the relief sought
to-be obtained therein is fully set forth in saidé
eccomplaint, and is briefly stated as follows:
Divorce on ground of abandonment.
%. B. RAWSON, Attorney for Plaintiff.
P. (6. Address: 617 Pacific Block, Seattle,
County of King, Washington.
NOTICE—SHERIFFS SALE OF
RRAT, RATATR.
State of Washington, County of King, ss.
Sheriff's office.
By virtue of an order of sale, issued
out of the honorable Superior Court of
King County, on the 1st day of June,
1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of
Ira Bronson, plaintiff, versus Elmer W.
Bader and Francis A. Bader, his wife, de-
fendants, No. 61435, and to me, as Sher-
iff, directed and delivered:
Notice is hereby given that I will
proceed to sell at public auction to the
highest bidder for cash, within the hours
prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-
wit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 11th day
of July, A. D. 1908, before the front door
of the King County Court House of said
King County, in the State of Washing-
ton, the following described property,
situated in King County, State of Wash-
ington, to-wit:
The south twenty (20) feet of lot
three (3), in block’ twenty (20), of C.
D, Boren's Plat of the town (now, city)
of Seattle, except the east nine (9) feet
thereof taken by the City of Seattle for
widening Fourth Avenue, to satisfy a
judgment of foreclosure of a mortgage,
amounting. to twenty-five thousand and
twenty-five dollars, and costs of suit, in
favor of plaintife.
Dated this 8rd day of June, 1908.
L. C. SMITH, Sheriff.
By EDW. DREW, Deputy.
SUMMONS.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
of Washington, in and for King County.
‘Theresia Watson, Plaintiff, vs. James Watson,
Defendant.—No. ./.....
‘The State of Washington to James Watson,
the above named defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear within
sixty days after the date of the first publica-
tion of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days
after the 22nd day of May, 1908, and defend
the above entitled action in’ the above entitled
court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff
and serve a copy of your answer upon the un-
dersigned attorney for plaintif€ at his office be-
low stated; and in case of your failure so to do,
judgment will be rendered against you according
to the demand of the complaint, which has
been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘The ob-
Jeet of said action is to procure an absolute di-
yorce from the defendant on the grounds of cruel
treatment and habitual drankenness.
JACKSON SILBAUGH,
Plaintiff's Attorney.
Office and P. 0. Address, 952-4 Empire Build-
ing. Seattle, Washington,
Date of first publication, May 22—July 3,
SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, in and for the
County of King.
Harvey Shoults, Plaintiff, vs, Edith
Shoults, Defendant.
The State ‘of Washington to the said
Edith Shoults:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication of this summons, to-
wit: within sixty days after the 16th
day of May, 1908, and defend the above
entitled action in the above entitled
court, and answer the complaint of the
plaintiff, and serve a copy of your an-
swer upon the undersigned attorney for
plaintiff, at his office below stated; and
in case of your failure so to do, judg-
ment will be rendered against you ac-
cording to the demand of the complalit,
which has been filed with the clerk of
said court.
The object of the above entitled ac-
tion is to dissolve the bonds of matri-
mony now existing between plaintiff and
defendant, upon the ground of desertion,
E. L, SANDERS,
“Attorney for Plaintiff,
P. O, Address: 58 Downs Block, Se-
attle, King County, Washington.
May 15—July i, 1908.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County.
W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. P. A. Hyman and Jane Doe Hyman, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 61397. Notice and Summons.
State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tar certificate No. B27413 issued by the King County. State of Washington dated the 25th day of June 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit:
Riley's Addition to Riley's Addition to South Seattle—Lot 4, block 58, certificate number B27413, year 1902, $3.02. That on Dec. 22, 1904, the east 48 feet of said lot was redeemed from said certificate, leaving said certificate still outstanding against the remainder of said lot as follows:
Riley's Addition to Riley's Addition to South Seattle—Lot 4 (less the east 48 feet), block 58, certificate number B27413, year 1902, $2.93.
That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, towit: Lot 4 (less the east 48 feet), block 58, Riley's Addition to Riley's Addition to South Seattle, $2.30 for year 1903; $1.39 for year 1904; $1.51 for year 1905; $3.45 for year 1906.
Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property.
You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after May 29th, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court.
W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff.
Office address, 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash.
May 29th-July 10, 1908.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King County
W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. J. E. Kruchon and Jane Doe Kruchon, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 61396. Notice and Summons.
State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate No. B24821, issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 7th day of December, 1903, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit:
Denny & Hoyt's Addition to Seattle—Lot 3, block 24, certificate number B24821, year 1902, $10.23.
That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, towit: Lot 3, block 24, Denny & Hoyt's Addition to Seattle - $9.17 for year 1903; delinquent local assessment, $12.93 for year 1903; $10.24 for year 1904; delinquent local assessment, $18.75, for year 1904; $10.72 for year 1905; delinquent local assessment, $34.01 for year 1905; $11.11 for year 1905; delinquent local assessment, $36.80 for year 1906. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property.
You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after May 29th, 1908 in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court.
W. T. GAFNER, Plaintiff.
Office address, 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash.
May 29—July 10, 1908.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County.
W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. P. A. Hyman and Jane Doe Hyman, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 61395. Notice and Summons.
State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain deferred tax certificate No. B27404, issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 25th day of June, 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Riley's Addition to Riley's Addition to South Seattle—Lot 2, block 58, certificate number B27404 year 1902, $3.02.
That on Dec. 22, 1904, the cast 48 feet of said lot was redeemed from said certificate, leaving said certificate still outstanding against the remainder of said lot as follows:
THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN
Riley's Addition to Riley's Addition to South Seattle—Lot 2 (less the east 48 feet), block 58, certificate number B27404, year 1902, $2.93.
That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, towit; Lot 2 (less the east 48 feet), block 58, Riley's Addition to Riley's Addition to South Seattle—$2.30 for year 1903; $1.39 for year 1904; $1.51 for year 1905; $3.45 for year 1906.
Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property.
You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after May 29th, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court.
W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff.
Office address, 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash.
May 29—July 10, 1908.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Frank Eagling and Jane Doe Eagling, his wife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 61367. Notice and Summons.
State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them; You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate No. B41323, issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 26th day of April, 1906, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit:
Ballard's Addition to Gilman Park—West 13 feet of lot 38, block 2, certificate number B41323, year 1902, 71 cents.
That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, towit: West 13 feet of lot 38, block 2, Ballard's Add. to Gilman Park—14 cents for year 1903; 54 cents for year 1904; 34 cents for year 1905; 80 cents for year 1906. Which several sums bears interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property.
You and each of you. (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after May 29th, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon such charged against each, for said taxes, interest and order, sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court.
W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff.
Office address. 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. May 29—July 10, 1908.
SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for King County.
Minnie A. Horrobin, Plaintiff, vs. John T.
Horrobin, Defendant, No. 61623
The State of Washington to John T. Horrobin, Defeckant:
You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 12th day of June, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action, as set forth in the complaint, is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the ground of cruelty, and for the custody of the two minor children of plaintiff and defendant.
EDWARD VON TOBEL.
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Office and Postoffice Address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County.
Matilda Birdsall, Plaintiff, vs. Luther J. Birdsall, Defendant.—No. .....
The State of Washington to the said Luther J. Birdsall, Defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 12th day of June, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court.
*The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of wilful abandonment for more than one year and failure to provide.
HERBERT E. SNOOK,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
P. O. Address: Room 537 Burke Building, Seattle, King County, Washington.
June 12—July 24, 1908.
of Washington pfor King County.
June 12-July 24, 1908.
NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL ESTATE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the matter of the estate of Jerry Perry, Deceased.
Notice is hereby given that the undersigned, administratrix of the estate of Jerry Perry, deceased, in obedience to an order of the Superior Court of the County of King, State of Washington, made on the 16th day of April, 1908, and signed and entered on the 29th day of April, 1908, will sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, on Saturday, the 11th day of July, 1908, between the hours of 10 o'clock in the morning and the setting of the sun, beginning at the hour of eleven o'clock a. m. at the front door of the King County Court House. In the City of Seattle, in the County of King after-sid, those certain lots and parcels of land particularly described as follows, towit:
Lot 1 in block 1, Jackson Street Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, and
Lot 4, block 2 in Public Benefit Tract No. 17 in the plat of Georgetown, King County, Washington
The terms of sale will be fifty per cent. cash to accompany bid, and the remaining fifty per cent. upon confirmation of sale and delivery of administratrix' deed. Dated at Seattle, Washington, this 29th day of April, 1908.
61 April, 1983 BRIDGET PERRY, Administratrix.
GRAVES, PALMER & MURPHY,
Attorneys for Administratrix.
Date of first publication, June 12, 1908.
Date of last publication, July 10th, 1908.
NOTICE AND SUMMONS.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County.
Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Ole Fergerson and Jane Doe Fergerson, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in or to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.—No. 61275. State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated April 15, 1908, and numbered 449718, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1908, to the amount of 93 claims and to the real property situated in King County, Washington, described as follows, ttl-wt: Lot three (3), block four, Kirkland Syndicate's 1st Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington.
That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, towit: For the year 1903, 41 cents; for the year 1904, 43 cents; for the year 1905, 41 cents; for the year 1906, 52 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot.
You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after the 12th day of June, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND CO., Plaintiff.
F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff.
Office address, 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash.
NOTICE AND SUMMONS.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for King County.
Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Emma Peterson and John Doe Peterson, her husband, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.—No. 61621.
State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them:
You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 12th day of August, 1907, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to wit:
Lot twenty (20), block ten (10), Hillman's Garden Tracts, certificate No. B49209, for the year 1904, amounting to 86-100 dollars ($0.86). That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, towit:
Lot twenty (20), block ten (10), Hillman's Garden Tracts, amounting to thirty-two cents ($0.32) for the year 1905, and ninety cents ($0.90) for the year 1906; and ninety-two cents ($0.92) for the year 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property.
You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this notice upon you by publication, exclusive of the first date of publication. to-wit: sixty (60) days after the 12th day of June, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums
charged and found against it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court.
AURORA LAND CO., Plaintiff.
F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff.
Office address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. June 12—July 24, 1908.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King, William E. Hedlin, plaintiff, vs. Ida W. Hedlin, defendant. No. ..... Summons and Service of Publication.
State of Washington to the said Ida W. Hedlin, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (0) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 12th day of June, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court; the object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the following grounds:
Because the defendant abandoned the plaintiff and his home, and that said abandonment has been continuous for one year and more and has been without fault of plaintiff.
A. J. SPECKERT.
Attorney for Plaintiff.
P. O. Address: 429-53 Epler Block, 813 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington.
June 12, July 24, 1908.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
of Washington for King County
Selma Ericksen, plaintiff, vs. Charles E. Ericksen, defendant. No. ..... Summons for Publication.
The State of Washington to the said Charles E. Ericksen, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty (60) days after the 12th day of June, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony between plaintiff and defendant on the grounds of cruelty.
HOMER E. TURNER.
Plaintiff's Attorney.
P. O. Address: No. 745 New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington.
June 12, July 24, 1908.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County.
In the Matter of the Estate of Edward Julia Van Atta, deceased. No. 7200. Notice of Sale of Real Estate.
Notice is hereby given that in pursuance to an order of the Honorable Geo. E. Morris, one of the judges of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County, sitting in probate, made and entered on the 9th day of May, 1908, in the above entitled matter, the undersigned, as administrator of the estate of the above named deceased, will sell at public action to the highest bidder, for cash, subject to the confirmation of the court, on Saturday, June 27, 1908, at the hour of 10 o'clock a. m., at the west door of the County Court House, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, all and singular the right, title, interest and estate of the deceased above named, in and to the following described real property, lying and being in the County of King, State of Washington, to-wit:
Lot Eight (8) of Block Three (3) of Law's Second Addition to the City of Seattle.
Dated at Seattle this June 12th, 1908, the date of first publication hereof.
Administrator of the Estate of Edward
Julia Van Atta, Deceased.
A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Administrator.
June 12, July 10, 1908.
NOTICE AND SUMMONS.
L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Annie L. Pratt,
and all persons unknown, if any, having or
claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter
described real property, Defendants.—No. 61704.
State of Washington to the above defendants,
and each of them:
You and each of you, as owners, claimants or
holders of an interest or estate in and to the
hereinafter described real property, are hereby
notified that the above named plaintiff is the
holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate
issued by the Treasurer of King County, State
of Washington, dated the 12th day of July, 1907,
and numbered B48183, for the delinquent taxes
of the year 1900, in the amount of 96 cents, and
upon real property situated in said King County,
described as follows to-wit:
Addition to the City of Seattle.
That the taxes for the following subsequent
years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said
above described real property to-wit:
For the year 1904, the sum of $0.42; for the
year 1905, the sum of $0.40; for the year 1906,
the sum of $1.19.
Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after June 12, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court.
A. C. MacDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff.
Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle
Wash.
June. 12—July 24, 1908.
Mrs. A. G. Harrison has opened an ice cream and refreshment garden.
Mrs. Charles Sumner Long is in Everett where she will reside for some little time.
Mr. I. F. Norris is preparing to build an addition of six more rooms to his home.
Dr. David T. Cardwell, who some few days ago took unto himself a better half, is now at home to his friends.
Mr. Z. L. Woodson has begun the construction of a large and commodius flat, which he hopes to have ready for occupancy in the very near future.
Mrs. I. F. Norris leaves for her old home in Memphsis, Tenn., tomorrow (Saturday), and will be absent for three months. She will be accompanied by her yougest son, Claudius.
Mr. Hassel has the contract to feed the city's prisoners for the ensuing year. Much complaint has been heard about the way the prisoner of the city have been fed in the past and it is truly hoped that he will be more successful than his predecessors.
Rev. S. J. Collins, of Tacoma, has returned from a trip to Georgia, his old home, and reports a splendid stay. He had many enquiries in regard to the Northwest in the South and he distributed fifty copies of the Northwest Negro Progress number in Georgia.
The first quarterly conference of the St. Paul church was held at the residence of Mr. J. G. Gayles last Monday evening and was presided over by Rev. Harrington. The reports from the various leaders showed much progress in the work since the beginning, which was April 5th, 1908.
Mrs. A. B. Canny, of Valparaiso, Indiana, was a visitor in Seattle for a couple of days the past week, a guest of The Comfort. She is touring the West and left last Monday for San Francisco by boat. She is a relative of Mrs. John H.Ryan, of Tacoma, and the daughter of the late Bishop Paul Quinn of the A. M. E. church.
Rev. W. S. Harrington, district superintendent of the Methodist Episcopal church for Seattle, will preach Sunday evening at the Afro-American hall, 2613 East Madison street, which is the present meeting place of the St. Paul Methodist Episcopal church. The general public is cordially invited to be present and learn the ideas of the superintendent as to this particular work in Seattle.
The Pioneer Social Club entertained at the residence of Mrs. Carrie Dixon Black last Monday afternoon in honor of Mrs. Norris, who leaves tomorrow for a three months' visit in the Southern states. Last Thursday afternoon some twenty or more ladies, all immediate friends and associates of Mrs. Norris, called to say good bye and wish her bon voyage.
THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN
Next week the Seattle Theater will have Miss Emma Bunting and the Burgess-Bunting Company in "The Gambler." Among the plays of the west in the early days, this play, which was formerly called "The Golden Giant," still holds first place as the best and it will outlive any modern production of a western play, for the simple reason that it was written by a poet and a stage director who was unequaled at his time—Joaquin Miller and McKee Rankin. "The Gambler" breathes of a mountain atmosphere of a mining camp and deals with picturesque and interesting characters, who are living natural lives. To see Miss Bunting as "Bess Fairfax" is to see her at her best in a moodish character which gives her talent full scope.
If you wish to marry, or correspond with refined ladies or gentlemen, address "Seattle Select Club," P. O. Box 922, Seattle, Wash. ***
NOTICE AND SUMMONS.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County
of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. H. A. Kenney et al., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.—No. 61706. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them;
You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of February, 1907, and numbered B47559, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of $1.44, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: $W\frac{1}{4}$ of the NW$\frac{1}{4}$ of Sec. 14, Tp. 23 N., R. 8 E. W. M., less portion lying south of county road. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of 66 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 79 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property.
You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after June 12, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court.
L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff.
A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff.
Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash.
NOTICE AND SUMMONS.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for King County.
I. Washington,
L. H.] Craver, Plaintiff, vs. H. Shultz, and
all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming
an interest in and to the hereafter described
real property, Defendants.—No. 61705.
State of Washington to the above defendants
and of them:
You and each of you, as owners, claimants or
holders of an interest or estate in and to
the hereafter described real property, are hereby
notified that the above named plaintiff is the
holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate
issued by the Treasurer of King County, State
of Washington, dated the 18th day of June, 1908,
and numbered BA223, for the delinquent taxes
of the year 1904, in the amount of $1.81, and
upon real property situated in said King County,
described as follows, to-wit:
Beginning at N. W. corner of S. W. ¼ of Sec.
10. Tp. 26 N. R. 5 E. W. M. thence east 465
feet, thence south 347 feet, thence west 465
feet, thence north 347 feet to the place of
beginning, less tax lots 13. 14, 15. 16, 17 and 30,
being a part of the N. W. ¼ of the S. W. ¼
of said section.
That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of $1.20; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.61. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after the 12th day of June, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy
June 12-July 24,1908.
JUST KNOW US
OUR TAILORING
AND YOU WILL DO
THE REST
YOU CAN'T BUY
BETTER TAILORING
IRVING CANNON
TAILOR
211 COLUMBIA ST.
Established 1890
of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court.
L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff.
A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff.
Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash.
First publication dated June 12th, 1908.
June 12—July 24, 1908.
McGraw & Kittinger.
295 Colman Blk., Phone Main 695
Albert Hansen.
Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses
706 First Avenue.
Stetson & Post Mill Co.
BUILDING MATERIAL
Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice.
Established 1875. Tel. Main 711
Acme Publishing Co.
312 Marion Block
BRIEFS OUR SPECIALTY
Telephones:
Sunset, Main 1997—Ind., 1306.
The Comfort.
Newly furnished rooms. Walking distance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week.
```markdown
```
I. ISRAEL WALKER, 1101-1103 Jackson Street.
Friday. June 19. 1908
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON in and for King County. Robert C. Dwyer, Plaintiff, vs. Michael F. Harrington, Defendant. No. 60840. Notice of Application for Commission and Taking of Deposition. Michael F. (M. F.) Harrington, defendant: You will please take notice that Robert C. Dwyer, by his attorneys, Edwards, Meakim & Cushing, will, on June 27th, 1908, at 10 o'clock a. m., apply to the clerk of the Superior Court at his office in the court house of King County, Washington, for the appointment of a commission to take the depositions of Robert C. Dwyer and John V. Dwyer for the use of the plaintiff in the above entitled cause.
You will further take notice that the depositions of Robert C. Dwyer and John V. Dwyer, to be used on the trial of the above entitled action on the part of the plaintiff, will be taken before Nicholas A. Rotering, room 8, Silver Bow Block, Butte, Montana, July 10, at ten o'clock in the forenoon, A. D., 1908, and so continuing until completed. The cause of the taking of such depositions is that the said Robert C. Dwyer and John V. Dwyer do not reside in the State of Washington.
To Michael F. or (M. F. Harrington, EDWARDS, MEAKIM & CUSHING, Attorneys for Plaintiff.
The above t obe published in the Seattle Republican, once each week for three consecutive weeks beginning June 12th, 1908.
Dated this 11th day of June, 1908.
BOYD J. TALLMAN, Judge.
Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Business Office, Third and Spring
Bonney-Watson Co.
UNDERTAKERS
Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13.
WILLIAM WALKER.
Complete stock New Fall Goods, Ladies', Misses' and Children's Wearing Apparel, Furs and Fine Coats. 820 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash.
Seattle Electric Co.
Secure our prices on Electric Fixtures before letting your contract.
Latest Designs Exclusively.
The Seattle Electric Company,
Scandinavian American Bank.
A. Chilberg, Prest.
J. E. Chilberg, Vice Prest.
John B. Agen, 2nd Vice Prest.
J. F. Lane, Cashier
L. H. Woolfolk, Asst. Cashier.
Wm. Thaanum, Asst. Cashier
F. P. Searle, Manager Ballard Office.
Geo. H. Tarbell, Mgr.
A. D. Hayden, Cashier
Tacoma Office.
Puget Sound National Bank. OF SEATTLE
JACOB FURTH .....President
J. S. GOLDSMITH .....Vice-President
R. V. ANKENY .....Cashier
CORRESPONDENTS IN ALL THE
PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE
UNITED STATES AND EUROPE.
DRAFTS ISSUED ON ALASKA AND
THE YUKON TERRITORY.
THE NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE.
United States Depositary.
With CAPITAL and SURPLUS..$1,500,000
And aggregate RESOURCES
over .....$12,500,000
Invite business on the most liberal
terms consistent with conservative
banking.
Foreign exchange department espe-
cially equipped for the conduct of Ori-
ental business.
M. F. Backus, Pres.; R. . Spencer, 1st
V. P.; R. S. Stacey, 2nd V. P.; J. W.
Maxwell, Cash.
People's Savings Bank.
Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier
Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889.
Commercial Savings and Trust
General Bank and Exchange.
Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash.