Seattle Republican

THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN POLITICS AND POLITICIANS It's running mate, was notified last Wednesday, he had been nominated at the Chicago conference. The notification speech wae made by Sergey Browns, of Michigan, to which Mr. Sherman repented among the notable things he said was that he loved and acquiesced in every word that J. had said in accepting the nomination for president. It was a general holiday in Utica and most thousands of visitors were present, to list ceremonies. That Mr. Sherman will be able to the state of New York in the Republican colloquial doubted for a single minute. Taft's running mate, was notified last Wednesday that he had been nominated at the Chicago convention. The notification speech wae made by Senator Burrows, of Michigan, to which Mr. Sherman replied, and among the notable things he said was that he believed and acquiesced in every word that Judge Taft had said in accepting the nomination for president. It was a general holiday in Utica and multiplied thousands of visitors were present, to listen to the ceremonies. That Mr. Sherman will be able to keep the state of New York in the Republican column is not doubted for a single minute. the senate. will themselves be defeated when he take up for re-election, and if elected at all, it only after one of the hardest political fight which they have ever engaged. It is also an unpleasant fact that of the whole job lot of them, the one but three of them who are men of any political right in the senate, viz: Senator Foraker, Senators and Senator Carter. The real leaders in state it will be observed, have given Senator Ankeny word of encouragement because they know it not deserve it. When Senator Piles left Washington City, President Roosevelt sent for him, personally thanked him for the help he had given administration in the passage of much new legislation, but not one word did he say to Seney complimentary or otherwise. One wordcommendation from President Roosevelt would be that Senator Ankeny a standing in his home in all of the papers now opposing him would be powerless to have overcome, but he did not one word, because President Roosevelt knew not the man for the state of Washington to the United States senate. President Reagan is the one man at Washington City that all the confidence in and implicitly trust, and for reason than because he has made it so intended for the trusts. He knew that Levi Ankeny Washington's senior senator, did not aid him in by the trusts, and for that reason he had nothing in his favor, and when the long session can end, he permitted him to leave for his home so much as bidding him good-by, let lone servant by him to his constitutents that he was able to keep in the United States senate. Learners bear these points in mind and cast their eyes Wesley L. Jones who is looked upon in Washington as a man and a worker. State senate. will themselves be defeated when they come up for re-election, and if elected at all, it will be only after one of the hardest political fights in which they have ever engaged. It is also an undeniable fact that of the whole job lot of them, there were but three of them who are men of any political weight in the senate, viz: Senator Foraker, Senator Elkins and Senator Carter. The real leaders in the senate it will be observed, have given Senator Ankeny no word of encouragement because they know he does not deserve it. When Senator Piles left Washington City, President Roosevltl sent for him and personally thanked him for the help he had given the administration in the passage of much needed legislation, but not one word did he say to Senator Ankeny complimentary or otherwise. One word of commendation from President Roosevelt would have given Senator Ankeny a standing in his home state that all of the papers now opposing him would have been powerless to have overcome, but he did not get that one word, because President Roosevelt knew he was not the man for the state of Washington to return to the United States senate. President Roosevelt is the one man at Washington City that all men have confidence in and implicitly trust, and for no other reason than because he has made it so interesting for the trusts. He knew that Levi Ankeny, Washington's senior senator, did not aid him in bursting the trusts, and for that reason he had nothing to say in his favor, and when the long session came to an end, he permitted him to leave for his home without so much as bidding him good-by, let lone sending word by him to his constitutents that he was a good man to keep in the United States senate. Let the voters bear these points in mind and cast their votes for Wesley L. Jones who is looked upon in Washington as a man and a worker. this week. "If its on account of real friendship that the voters are being appealed to to cast their votes for Ankeny, do those making the piteous appeals for Ankeny forget the fact that for years the only friend that King county had in congress from the state of Washington was Yakima Jones? When the Seattle Chamber of Commerce was keeping a man in Washington City at an enormous salary inorder to ward off hostile legislation, who but Jones did that representative of the camber of commerce appeal to when he found there was trouble in the wind for Seattle? Was Senator Turner Seattle's friend? Was Senator Foster Seattle's friend? To the detriment of his own town was Representative Cushman Seattle's friend? Against all of those men, pray tell us what is Ankeny on record as having done in Seattle's favor when she needed real good, hard support at the national capitol? But Yakima Jones had no favors to ask of any one of the delegation and at all times he stood ready to put his shoulder to the wheel and help the representative of the Seattle chamber of commerce, not only in preventing hostile legislation to King county, but to get things for Seattle. Under these circumstances then why should not Jones be remembered for the kindness he has shown King county? You must support Senator Ankeny because he permitted Senator Piles to vote him on such matters as the Senator favored is advocated. In other words the voters of King county are called upon to support Levi Ankeny not so much for what he has done for King county, but for what he has done for Senator Piles and C. J. Smith and the legislative bunch, who was so roundly denounced as grafters and bribe takers by the Seattle Times, who is now saying they were really honorable men and that it, the Times, was mistaken in what it said about the corrupt methods that Senator Ankeny used with week. "If its on account of real friendship, voters are being appealed to to cast their vote Ankeny, do those making the piteous appeal deny forget the fact that for years the only file King county had in congress from the state Washington was Yakima Jones? When the September of Commerce was keeping a man in Wagon City at an enormous salary inorder to warrile legislation, who but Jones did that repress of the camber of commerce appeal to wound there was trouble in the wind for Seal PRICE ONE YEAR $3.00 SINGLE COPIES TEN CENTS Sherman Accepts Vice Presidency Taft's running mate, who that he had been nomination. The notification s Burrows, of Michigan, to and among the notable believed and acquiesced Taft had said in accepti dent. It was a genera plied thousands of visitor the ceremonies. That M keep the state of New Yo is not doubted for a single Ankeny Endorsed By Dead Ones State senate, will them come up for re-election, be only after one of the which they have ever enviable fact that of the w were but three of them w weight in the senate, viz. Elkins and Senator Cart senate it will be observed eny no word of encourag does not deserve it. Whington City, President it personally thanked him in the administration in the legislation, but not one Ankeny complimentary or commendation from Pres given Senator Ankeny a that all of the papers not been powerless to have o that one word, because I was not the man for the turn to the United States velt is the one man at W have confidence in and other reason than because ing for the trusts. H Washington's senior senating the trusts, and for the say in his favor, and wh an end, he permitted him out so much as bidding h word by him to his cons man to keep in the Unit voters bear these points for Wesley L. Jones who ton as a man and a work Jones or Ankeny Seattle's Real Friend this week. "If its on ac the voters are being app for Ankeny, do those ma Ankeny forget the fact th that King county had Washington was Yakima Chamber of Commerce wington City at an enormo hostile legislation, who h SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, Friday, August 21, 1908 James Schoolcraft Sherman, of Utica, New York, the Republican candidate for vice president of the United States, William Howard was notified last Wednesday dated at the Chicago conven-speech wae made by Senator so which Mr. Sherman replied, le things he said was that he d in every word that Judge ing the nomination for presi-ral holiday in Utica and multi-ors were present to listen to Mr. Sherman will be able to York in the Republican column angle minute. It is said to be a fact that every one of those United States senators, who endorsed Senator Ankeny for re-election to the United inselves be defeated when they in, and if elected at all, it will be the hardest political fights in engaged. It is also an unde- whole job lot of them, there who are men of any political biz: Senator Foraker, Senator orter. The real leaders in the bed, have given Senator Ank- agement because they know he When Senator Piles left Wash- Roosevtlt sent for him and in for the help he had given the passage of much needed one word did he say to Senator or otherwise. One word of president Roosevelt would have a standing in his home state now opposing him would have overcome, but he did not get President Roosevelt knew he the state of Washington to re- tes senate. President Roose- Washington City that all men mied implicitly trust, and for no use he has made it so interest. He knew that Levi Ankeny, nator, did not aid him in burst- that reason he had nothing to then the long session came to him to leave for his home with- him good-by, let lone sending institutents that he was a good united States senate. Let the is in mind and cast their votes no is looked upon in Washing- rker. "Why should King county not support Jones in preference to Levi Ankeny?" came from a well known politician one day account of real friendship that appealed to to cast their votes making the piteous appeals for that for years the only friend in congress from the state of na Jones? When the Seattle was keeping a man in Wash- nous salary inorder to ward off but Jones did that representf commerce appeal to when he is in the wind for Seattle? State Library the King County Bunch in obtaining his election to the United States senate. If eattle ever had a true friend in congress it was and is Yakima Jones. If eattle ever had a real obstructionist it was and is the editor of the Seattle Times, who is advocating King county to support Ankeny for re-election. representatives have any is it not due to the fact that Albert E. Mead would not wear their collar after he was elected and inaugurated governor of the state of Washington? Has he not given the voters of the state all of the reform legislation that they demanded and naturally expected to get if Henry McBride had been nominated and elected instead of Mead? If to this you answer yes, and you cannot answer otherwise, then why do you desire to attempt the dangerous feat of swapping horses in the middle of the stream? When Henry G. McBride was governor of the state of Washington it is a fact that he tried to get the legislature to pass some of the measures that Gov. Mead succeeded in having passed, but is it recorded that he would continue along those lines if he should again be elected to the governorship of the state? Is it not strange that the railroad representatives, who are bitterly opposed to Mead on account of him permitting, what they are pleased to term, hostile legislation to the railroad interest, to become laws, should be a unit in their support of McBride? Of course McBride cannot prevent any one from supporting him for governor, but it does look as though there was a nigger in the woodpile when each and every one of the railroad push in this state are out enthusiastically supporting McBride. The voters should have their misgivings of supporting any man that the railroad representatives are unaminously lined up for as it means no good for the voters. In takidg control of the Mead campaign in King county Councilman Revelle was told by a friend that, "it would cost him much of his personal as well as political popularity, as Mead is very unpopular in King county" (no part of which is true), but to this Mr. Revelle replied: "Point to me one act of Mead as governor of this state that you yourself do not approve of; point out to me one thing he has done that in any way compromises the best interests of the state; point out to me one instance where he has gone against the best interest of the people, and I will retire from the duties that I have undertaken." There was no answer, and that self same man is now assisting Mr. Revelle to carry King county for Albert E. Mead. And be it said to the credit of Mr. Revelle and those assisting in his undertaking, their efforts are already bearing fruit. he has considerable influence, for an example Al. Rutherford, Charley Beckingham for county commissioners and E. C. Brier for county auditor. Of course Agnew has a strong organization in the county and it is endeavoring to not leave a stone unturned in its effort to nominate him for sheriff, and it stands a show of doing so, owing to the fact that there are a number of strong candidates out for the same nomination and who are drawing from each other rather than from Jim Agnew. A strong sentiment however, is crystalizing against Agnewism in King county and if he does not watch himself he will yet be defeated. From time to time Agnew has been declaring on the streets and at the race tract that the Post-Intellincer was for him, not a word of which is true. The P.-I. may have at one time felt favorable inclined to the candidacy of Agnew, but when it began to look into the official record of himself and the gang of political highbinders with whom he trains, it soon discovered that it would be a rank injustice on its part to advocate the man for the Republican nomination for sheriff or anything else. "I am for any man for sheriff that I think can beat Jim Agnew," may be heard all over the city and every day on the streets of Seattle. It matters not to those who have become thoroughly aroused to the real situation, that is the perpetuation of the corrupt politicians in the affairs of King county, whether the man that defeats Jim Agnew be Hoye, Stringer or even Hodge, a recent Democratic convert, just so some one defeats him. The extravagance in the county's moneys all traced to the doors of Jim Agnew and his corrupt political cohorts has become so flagrant and apparent that the voters will go so far as to even make an effort to defeat Jim Agnew and his co-workers at the general election in case they by their unscrupulous methods win the election at the primaries. The voters have an opportunity to end the Agnew regime and they should do so in such a decided manner that, it will never poke its head up again for political preferment. Albert E. Mead For Governor representatives have ar Albert E. Mead would it was elected and inaugur Washington? Has he state all of the reform ed and naturally expe had been nominated in If to this you answer otherwise, then why dangerous feat of swa the stream? When I nor of the state of W tried to get the legislat ures that Gov. Mead su is it recorded that he lines if he should again ship of the state? Is it representatives, who a term, hostile legislative become laws, should McBride? Of course one from supporting he look as though there w when each and every w state are out enthusi The voters should have ing any man that the unaminously lined up f voters. In takidg con King county Councilma that, "it would cost him as political popularity, King county" (no part Mr. Revelle replied: as governor of this sta prove of; point out to o in any way compromis state; point out to m gone against the best will retire from the du There was no answer, assisting Mr. Revelle bert E. Mead. And b Revelle and those assi efforts are already bea Let Agnew Cohorts Be Stamped Out he has considerable Rutherford, Charley missioners and E. C. B course Agnew has a sty and it is endeavorined in its effort to nom Has any one any well founded opposition to the re-election of Governor Mead save and except the railroad representatives? And if the railroad any is it not due to the fact that he does not wear their collar after he curated governor of the state of the legal legislation that they demand-ected to get if Henry McBride and elected instead of Mead? Or yes, and you cannot answer do you desire to attempt theapping horses in the middle of Henry G. McBride was gover-washington it is a fact that he nature to pass some of the meas-succeeded in having passed, but he would continue along those can be elected to the governor-it not strange that the railroad are bitterly opposed to Mead on setting, what they are pleased to join to the railroad interest, to be a unit in their support of McBride cannot prevent any nim for governor, but it does a nigger in the woodpile one of the railroad push in this aestically supporting McBride. be their misgivings of support-the railroad representatives are for as it means no good for the control of the Mead campaign in man Revelle was told by a friend him much of his personal as well as Mead is very unpopular in of which is true), but to this "Point to me one act of Mead state that you yourself do not ap-ume one thing he has done that uses the best interests of the one instance where he has interest of the people, and I duties that I have undertaken." and that self same man is now to carry King county for Al-lee it said to the credit of Mr. Justing in his undertaking, their during fruit. Do the voters desire to perpetuate a corrupt ring in the affairs of King county, if so then vote for Jim Agnew and those over whom influence, for an example Al. Beckingham for county combrier for county auditor. Of strong organization in the courng to not leave a stone unturninate him for sheriff, and iting so, owing to the fact that strong candidates out for the who are drawing from each S CURRENT COMMENT WEEK'S CURRENT COMMENT mortal. It can be truthfully said of Mr. Sankey that he revolutionized the civilized world with his song writing. The influence of his soul stirring songs even spread to the heathen nations and they have been taught to sing and admire them. His Gospel Hymns are known to every man, woman and child in the Christian world. It was the sweet voice of the young man known as Ira D. Sankey that attracted Evangelist Moody, and he agreed to accompany the Rev. M. Moody on his tours, and became so famous for his great musical force that he was moved song writing, and was crowned with phenomenal success from the very start. He built for himself through his sweet musical strains a name that will last as long as the present civilization will be read of by coming generations and other civilizations. He died last Friday at his home in Brooklyn, in his 69th year. For the past five years he has been totally blind and for that reason not so much has been heard of him, and his death recalls the wonderful career of the man of but a few years ago, comparatively speaking. can be truthfully said of Mr. Sankey that nized the civilized world with his song influence of his soul stirring songs evie heathen nations and they have been and admire them. His Gospel Hymns are every man, woman and child in the d. It was the sweet voice of the young Ira D. Sankey that attracted Evan- and he agreed to accompany the Rev. his tours, and became so famous for his force that he was moved song writing, need with phenomenal success from the he built for himself through his sweet is a name that will last as long as the ation will be read of by coming gener- civilizations. He died last Friday at booklyn, in his 69th year. For the past has been totally blind and for that rea- th has been heard of him, and his death underful career of the man of but a few parasitively speaking. Illinois was treated to another cutbreak of race riot last Friday evening and the most deplorable part of it was that it occurred at the state capitol, and the state guards seemed rather than to quell the rioters. There is long discouraged over these race riot are likely to occur at any time and at large numbers of Negroes live. Such might have been expected at any time in Illinois, because it is in close proximity where the Negroes were imported to of the white strikers, and since that been more or less friction between the men and the working blacks, and it is real that on the slightest provocation the fanned into a dangerous clash between it had the militia used drastic measly outset the trouble would never have roadway that it did. The Springfield use an example for other places and other when similar outbreaks are reported, measures to put them down in their very did be taken. The state of Washington experienced a similar clash of races some on Negroes were first taken to the coal mill and Newcastle, had not the authoristic measures to stamp it out in its way. In the recent Springfield riots for a number of days some five persons were killed and a number injured. Finally ordered the soldiers to shoot and which brought all parties to their senses. to encourage rather than to quell the rioters. There is no need feelling discouraged over these race riot outbreaks, they are likely to occur at any time and at any place where large numbers of Negroes live. Such an outbreak might have been expected at any time at Springfield, Illinois, because it is in close proximity to the mines where the Negroes were imported to take the place of the white strikers, and since that time there has been more or less friction between the working whites and the working blacks, and it is perfectly natural that on the slightest provocation the feud would be fanned into a dangerous clash between the races. But had the militia used drastic measures in the very outset the trouble would never have gained the headway that it did. The Springfield affair should be an example for other places and other officials and when similar outbreaks are reported, take drastic measures to put them down in their very inception should be taken. The state of Washington might have experienced a similar clash of races some years ago when Negroes were first taken to the coal mines of Franklin and Newcastle, had not the authorities taken drastic measures to stamp it out in its very incipiency. In the recent Springfield riots which lasted for a number of days some five persons white and black were killed and a number injured, Gov. Deeneen finally ordered the soldiers to shoot and shoot to kill, which brought all parties to their senses. Since Confederation in 1867 there have been forty sessions of the Dominion Parliament. Not o e of these exceeded in length that of 1907-8, which came to an end just in time to admit of members hurrying away to the Tercentenary celebrations at Quebec. The session had extended over 284 days. The prolongation was due to the fact that Dominion general election is expected in the autumn, and it was, consequently, the aim of the Opposition to make the most of the shortcomings of the Government. As regards policies, there is to-day no difference in political principles which separates the Liberals in power and the Conservatives in opposition. Until 1896 the tariff was the great dividing issue. But in the last twelve years the Liberals have accepted the National Policy of the Conservatives, and carried it much further. The only bill in the recent session over which there was any serious controversy as to principle was a measure which brought the registration of voters in Manitoba under some degree of Dominion control and oversight. For the rest, most of the discussion in this usually long drawn out session centered about the increasing cost of the government and the administrative record of the Laurier Cabinet. Twelve years ago the per capita expenditure was $8.14. In 1908 it is $18, and the total expenditure has increased from $41,700,000 in 1896 to $112,000,000 in 1908. In 1906 $27,700,000 was raised by customs and excise taxations; for 1907 the sum so raised was $73,000,000, an increase of 163 per cent. The Government's answer to the complaints of excessive expenditure was that since 1896 there had arisen a new Canada—a Canada that has its place among the great nations—and that the increased expenditure is warranted by the growing population and wealth and by the increased importance of the Dominion. The administrative record of the Government was challenged chiefly in connection with the development and growth of what is known at Ottawa as the middleman system.—The Outlook. which came to an end just in time toers hurrying away to the Tercentenary Quebec. The session had extended The prolongation was due to the fact general election is expected in the auas, consequently, the aim of the Oppo the most of the shortcomings of the As regards policies, there is to-day n political principles which separates power and the Conservatives in oppo 896 the tariff was the great dividing the last twelve years the Liberals Evangelist Sankey Passes Away mortal. It can be true he revolutionized the writing. The influence en spread to the heart taught to sing and ad are known to every Christian world. It man known as Ira Dgelist Moody, and he M. Moody on his tour great musical force th and was crowned with very start. He built musical strains a nars present civilization wations and other civil his home in Brooklyn, five years he has been son not so much has b recalls the wonderful years ago, comparative Race Riots Run Riot to encourage rather than no need feelling diso outbreaks, they are jj any place where large an outbreak might l at Springfield, Illinois ity to the mines where take the place of the time there has been m working whites and perfectly natural that feud would be fanned the races. But had tures in the very outsege gained the headway affair should be an exa officials and when s take drastic measures inception should be ta might have experience years ago when Negr mines of Franklin and ities taken drastic m very incipiency. In which lasted for a nu white and black were Gov. Deeneen finally o shoot to kill, which br Dominion Politics admit of members hun celebrations at Quek over 284 days. The p that Dominion genera tumn, and it was, con sition to make the mo Government. As re no difference in politi the Liberals in power sition. Until 1896 the VOL. XV NO. 1g H. R. CAYTON, PUBLISHER In the death of Ira D. Sankey, one of the most remarkable evangelist the world has ever known, passes from the mortal to the im- Friday. August 21. 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE SENATE Washington, in and for King County Adelalde Cecelia Eames, Plaintiff, vs. Frank Wood Eames, Defendant, Number 16144. The State of Washington to the said Frank Wood Eames, defended. We hereby hereby to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty (60) days after the 21st day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and save the assigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to remove from you a divorce on the grounds of extreme jealousy, cruel treatment and failure to support. PARKER & BPOWN. Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 32 Union Block, Seattle, King Court. Washington. August 21—October 2, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for the County of King John P. Lewis, plaintiff, vs. Claire E. Lewis, defendant. No.—. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Claire E. Lewis, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear in the court on the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 17th day of July, A. D., 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of the summons to the court. The attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated. And in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been made by the Court of the said action, set forth in the complaint, as is follows: to obtain a divorce and dissolution of the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and the defendant herein on ground of abandonment for more than one year. J. P. BALL. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 9-10 Stur-Boyd Block., Seattle. County of King, Washington. July 17—August 28, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Albert Stevenson, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, defendants. No. 62158. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby entitled to a tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 11th day of September, 1905, and numbered B35249, for the estate of one certain delinquent tax certificate holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 11th day of September, 1905, and numbered B35249, for the estate of one certain delinquent tax certificate holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. described as follows, to-wit: So. $1/2 of 6, block 5. Young's Addition. That an undivided $1/2 interest of So. $1/2 of the less west 60 feet thereof was redeemed Seat. 21. ear innur he That afterwards an undivided ½ interest of $300 was said lot less west 90 feet thereof was redeemed. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon sale of the property, for the year 1963, the sum of $1.55, for the year 1904, the sum of $1.37; for the year 1905, the sum of $1.37; for the year 1906, the sum of $4.28. Which served the best interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from sold date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said tax. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within nixity days after the date of first publication of this complaint, of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after July 17, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the sums and amounts due upon publication of this complaint, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon publication of this complaint, together with interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MACDONALD, CAVER, Plaintiff. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 524 Bally Building, Seattle, Wash. July 17—August 28, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co. a corporation, Plaintiff vs. Mrs. J. A. McKinnon, and John Doe McKinnon, and whose true Christian name is unknown, and that he has claimed or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herenafter described real property, Defendants. No. 62491. Notice and Summons. No. 62492. Notice and Summons. We have named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the herenafter described real property. The named plaintiff is the holder of one certain de- Implemt tax certificate 1 used by the Treasurer of King County. Wasington, Cated June 5, 1956, and numbered B21909 for the Celtnell tax taxes (894) and upon the real property stimulated by King County. Wasington, cersified as follows, to-wit: lot fort, two (42) Block five (5), Ballard, two Addition to Seattle, King County, two Addition to Seattle, King County, prior and subseme years have been paid by the plantiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1955, thirty-four (34), for the year 1956, thirty-four (34), for the year 1957, twenty-four (28), and for the year 1997, twenty-four cents (52), which several senns bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from the said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unpaid You, and each of you, (including said unknown persons, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this complaint, to wit; within sixty days after August 14, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his court, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due in payment for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of such parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation. Plaintiff. Aug. 14—Sept. 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, D.C. for King County. You, and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this notice, and to answer of said first utilization, to-wit: within sixty days after August 14, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his court. In the above court and charge together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums of said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of such parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation. Plaintiff. F. J. CARVAR. Attorney for Plaintiff. Bldg. Address 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg. Seattle, Wash. Aug. 14—Sept. 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington In and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a corporation, plaintiff vs. H. Schultz and Jane Doe Schultz, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in the property, described real property, defendants. No. 62493. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of the treasured property, Washington, for the interest or estate in or to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain dellinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasury of Washington, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904 in the amount of ninety cents ($.90) and upon the real property situated in King County, Washington, described as follows: over 50, twenty-axi (20) bank (20) or (3) land twenty-axi addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property to the treasured property, for the year 1900, fifty-two cents ($.52), and for the year 1907, forty-eight cents ($.48), which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent per annum from the said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredeemed You and each of you (including said unknown persons, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) minutes of the date of publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit; within sixty days after Aug. 14, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of the plaintiff against each parcel of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, for the satisfaction of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARRAR. Attorney for Plaintiff, 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Aug. 14—Sept. 23, 1908. IN THE superior ICE OF THE STATE of Washington for the county of King. In Probate. In the matter of the Estate of Charles Detrich, Deceased. No. 8157. Order to Show Causes Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. George Detrich, administrator of the estate of Charles Detrich, was killed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth the obligation to organize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered byq the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Charles Detrich, deceased, and be appear before the said Superior Court of King County, the Probate department in the county of the Probate department of said Court in the City of Seattle, on the 17th day of September, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show cause. If any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made to the estate of the said heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that, upon this order be published once a week for four successive weeks, from the 17th day of September, 1908, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 12th day of August, 1908 BOYD J. TALLMAN, Judge. Aug. 14—Sept. 11, 1908. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of John George Kellett, deceased. Notice of Sale of Real Estate. Notice is hereby given: That the undersigned, administratrix of the estate of John George Kellett, deceased, is ob- jected to an order of the Superior Court of the County of King, State of Wash- ington, made on the 20th day of August, 1908, will sell at public auction to the highest and best bidder, for cash, on Saturday, the 12th day of September, A. D. 1908, between the hours of 10 o'clock in the morning and the setting of the sun, beginning at the hour of eleven o'clock a. m., at the front door on the King County Court in the City of Washington, the County of King aforesaid that certain lot and parcel of land particularly described as follows, to-wit: Lot 15, in Block 13, Town of Kirkland, King County, State of Washington. The terms of sale will be fifty per cent cash to accompany bid, and the remaining fifty per cent upon confirmation of sale and delivery of administratrix deed. Dated at Seattle, Washington, this 20th day of August, 1960. MARTHA KELLETT. Administratrix of the Estate of John George Kellett deceased. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporate entity of all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereafter describe 1 real property. Defendants. No. 62228. Not-ce and Summons. The state of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain demand for the real property of King County, Washington, dated April 15, 1908, and numbered B49272, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904. In the amount of Ninety-three (93) cents, and upon the real property situated in King County, Washington, described as a teen (17), Richmond Bench Supplemental Addition to King County, Washington. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon sale above described real property. (11) taxes for the year 1906, fifty-two (52) cents; for the year 1907, fifty (50) cents, which several suns bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exactly within sixty days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and *a*colon; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at its office below stated, or pay the amount due, to the plaintiff, in the amount due, so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this court. AUDRIA LAND COMPANY, A Corporation. Plaintiff. July 31–September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. J. Brown, maithew, McCord et al. and all persons unknown having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. 61740. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above named defender and to all of them, including said H. McCord (otherwise named H. M. McCord) et al and all persons unknown and unknown owners of the hereafter described real property: You the plaintiff is the owner and holder of one delinquent tax certificate Numbered B4$408 issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, to the Anura Land Co. June 19, 1907, (and by the same date) the plaintiff is the owner and holder of one subsequent tax and interest to June 1, 1908, amounts to $3.22, which is all the taxes due and delinquent on property, and bears 15 per cent, interest on the taxes due, that the costs of this action are $7.50; Total ($10.72) Ten Dollars and seventy-two cents, and more than three years since first delinquent, assessed as the property of the defendant H or H or M. McCord et al. described the costs to 2. W. McCord's Addition to Raven Park, Seattle, Wash. You and each of you are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within 60 days after the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit: 60 days after the first day of publication, to-visit: 60 days after the first day of publication, to-answer the action, and defend the action and answer the complaint and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for plaintiff at his address below given or pay the amount of tax, interest and costs due and charged upon said k'. In case you fail so to do judgment and estoppel for the full amount of said taxes, costs and interest, and all accruing liabilities, and a decree will be made decreeing the same to be a first lien upon said lot and foreclosing the same and ordering a sale thereof as provided by law, and forever barring and estoppel for the same and ordering any interest therein adverse to the claim of the plaintiff and for such other relief as prayed in plaintiff's complaint on file in this cause and court. J. W. BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. Notice of Sale of Collateral. Now therefore, by virtue of the premises, we will expose for sale and sell at public auction, to the highest and best bidder, for cash, on Wednesday, the second of October, 1908 at 10 a.m. at Room 715 New York Block, corner Cherry Street and Second Avenue, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, said fourteen (14) bonds, or so many thereof as may be required, by the said Title Trust Company, with interest thereon and costs of this sale. Dated Seattle, Washington, this 19th day of August, 1908 HEPP, BAYLEN & WILSON PROBATE NOTICE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Wasl'gon for the County of King. State of Washington County of King—as In the most or of t e Estate of Charles Duttrich No. 815t. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that George F. Telfer, the administrator of the estate of Charles Duttrich No. 815t. filed a said Court tis Final Account as such administrator, and that Thursday, the 17th day of September, 1908, at 9:30 o'clock a.m., at the said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said Superior County, has been Culy announced by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which three and place any person interested in settling the said account, and contests in writing to said account, and contest the same. The Hon. Browd L. Tallman Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of Sold Court hereto affixed this 12th day of August, 1908. August 14—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King County. Louise Clark, Plaintiff vs. Charles H. R. Clark, Defendant, No. 6157, Summons. The State of Washington to the said Charles H. R. Clark, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first section of this summons, to-write within sixty (60) days after the date of June, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff in the office below stated, and in case of your failure to answer the complaint, be rendered against you according to the deemed of the complaint which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of desertion and non-support. F. M. JEFFERY. Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 747 New York Block, Seattle, King County, State of Washington. June 26—August 7, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., and for King County, plaintiffs as John E. Greenland and Jane Doe Greenland, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown. If any, having or an interest in or to the heroinafter described property, defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of as owners, claimants or holders of an inter- est in the property described heroinafter described real property are hereby the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate 'smeed by the pressure of King County, Washington, dated April 15, 1964. For the delinquent tax for the delinquent taxes of the year 1949, in the ninety-three (63) cents; and upon the real property situated in King County, Washington, described as follows: to-wit. Lot Eight (8), township, for the delinquent tax for the addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the pla- nisher upon said described real property. Jo- witz: for the year 1906, fifty-two (52) cents; for the year 1910, fifty (50) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent annum from sald date of payment and are all unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the 17th day of July, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy for the sum and amount assigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below assigned attorney for amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forecaching the lien of said plaintiff and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sum and amount charged upon and charged against each for said taxes and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by the plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation. Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 144 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. July 17-August 28, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE Washington in and for King County. Aurora in and for corporation, plaintiff vs. Dan Keller and Jake Dowell in a true Christian name is unknown and all persons unknown. If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the heretofore described real property, defendants, and notice and Summons, state of Washington to the above named defendants and each of the three you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the heretofore described real property are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain deed in the issue by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated 1908, and numbered B40189 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904. in the amount of ninety-three (93) cents and upon the real property situated in King County, Washington, described as follows (1904), Block Five (5), Kirkland Syndicate's First Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. F. J. CARVER, Attorne yfor Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Blkg., Seattle, Washington. July 17—August 28, 1908. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King. Dewey Johnson, plaintiff, vs. Jennie Johnson, defendant. The State of Washington to the said Jennie Johnson, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within six days after the date of the first publication of this case; swift; withholding (60) days after the 17th day of July, 1998, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the defendant for plaintiff in five below stated; and in case of your failure to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clew. You are hereby entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of fraud and duress. ELLIAS A. WRIGHT, P. O. Address: Rooms 629-631 Burke Bldg., in Seattle, King County Washington. July 17—Aug. 28, 1998 3 SUMMONS FOR IUBULATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King, Charles County Jongle Song, Luke Tate, and K. Lika. This county is E. Stevens also "all of or persons or parties unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint leased by reason of the mortgage heiherfer described You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date the first publication of this summons, towit, to the first publication of the date of July, 1908, and defend the above complaint to the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs herein, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorney of finding that the above described mortgage has been fully paid and satisfied, and canceled and annulled, and to quiet the title to the said lands above described in plaintiffs as now owned in finding that the above defendants and each of them, and that by said defendants and each of them, adjudge' and decreed that defendants have acquired, right, title, interest, or Hen whatsoever in finding that lands and premises, and that the title to these lands from any and all claims or lions of said defendants and each of them, and that said defendants and each of them, forever enjoined, barred and precluded from assisting any claim or Hen whatsoever by reason of mortgage, in and to said lands above described, or any part thereof. J. F. PIKE, Attorney for Plaintiffs. Office and Postoffice address: 754 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. July 31—September 11 1988 PROBATE NOTICE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON or the County of King. State of Washington or the State of Washington in the matter of the Estate of Floy P. Inglehousen. Notice of Settlement in the Fee Account. Notice is hereby given that Albert M. Ingalls, administrator of the estate of Floy P. Ingalls, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said Court his his estate as such administrator, and that Thursday, the 19th of September 1908 at 9:30 o'clock a. m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the city of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed, said Court for the settlement of said account, at the place and place any person interested in said estate to appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. OTTO I. A. CASE, Clerk. By E. S. SEYMOUR, Deputy Clerk. Seal of Superior Court, King County, Washington IN PROBATE 15. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for the County of King—In Prolate. the matter of the Estate of Floy P. Ingalls, in order to Show Causes Why Distribution Should be to show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Albert M. Ingalls, administrator of the estate Albert M. Ingalls, deceased, having filed in this court his claim, setting forth that said estate is now in a condition deemed and is ready for distribution of the residence among the persons entitled by law thereto, and upon the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Floy P. is deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County. State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said Court in the City of Salem on the 3d day of September, 1908, at the hour of 1 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to deliver the case they have, why an order of distribution should be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 3d day of September, 1906. In the Seattle Republic, a copy printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court day of July, 1908. ARTHUR E. GRIFFIN, ss. State of Washington. County of King County, ss. I. Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King County and o. Otto Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true correct copy of an original order to show cause, made said Court on the 31st day of July, 1908, in the matter of the estate of Floy P. Ingalls, deceased. "Titness my hand and the seal of said Court this 31st day of July," OTTO A. CASE, Clerk (Seal) BY E. S. SEYMOUR. Deputy Clerk. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King County William Dorris and Maria Dorris, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. James M. McLellan and the unknown heirs of the said James M. McLellan, James M. McLellan, McLellan be deceased, Joseph M. Barto, and unknown heirs of the said Joseph M. Barto, if Joseph M. Barto be deceased, and all persons unknown, having, or claiming to have, any interest in the property described in the complaint herein. No defamations for Publication. The State of Washington to each and all of said defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons. to-wit: Within sixty days after the 6th day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff this address below stated and in case of your failure to adjudgment will be rendered against you according to the complaint herein which has been filed with the Clerk of said court. The object of said action is to quiet title to the following described property situated in King County, Washington, to-wit: Lots one (1), and two (2), block two (2), Boston Heights Supplemental Addition to the City of Seattle, and to forever enjoin and defend the defendants, and each and all of them, from assasinery and to the said lands and premises and to obtain a decree decreeing that the said defendants, and each and all of them, have no interest whatsoever in the said property and that plaintiffs' title in the property EDWARD VON TORBEL. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post-Office Address: Roomes 603-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, August 7—Sept. 18, 1908. Friday, August 21, 1908 In enumerating the candidates for attorney general last week the name of W. V. Tanner, theattle candidate for the office, was not exactly omitted, but a fictious name was used for immediate convenience, which was not afterwards corrected, and for which we apologize. Mr. Tanner, according to the version of a number of friends who are working for him, declare that he will be the nominee beyond a question of doubt. They declare he will carry pokane county as well as a number of the other Eastern Washington counties, that he will carry King county and finally the entire Gray's Harbor country, thus giving him a very decided advantage over all the other candidates for that office. It can be said of Mr. Tanner that he is one of the ablest young attorneys in the city and if nominated and elected he will give the state a splendid administration. The business men of King county have decided to push the cause of M. J. Carrigan for county commissioner from the first commissioner's district and to that end he filed his declaration and is making a valiant fight for the nomination. He stands well in the business world of Seattle and the other places in which he has lived, and with the united strength of the business men of Seattle behind him he stands a splendid show of being nominated and elected. There other good men that are candidates for this nomination and then it will be remembered that Charley Beckingham is likewise a candidate, and if the business men and taxpayers do not centralize on some one man they can blame one but themselves when they one but themselves when they wake up on the morning of the 9th of September and find that Beckingham of Seattle and Al Rutherford of the country have been renominated, and that the county will have two years more of their extravagance with the public funds. In referring to his candidacy the Port Angeles Tribune had the following to say of him: "In Clallam county where several years of his active business career were spent, Mr. Carrigan is known preeminently for those qualities which count most in the safe handling of large affairs. His integrity is of the sterling sort that is utterly impervious to graft in any form, and the public bnsiness while in his charge is to him a sacred private trust. His ability as a financier and promoter of enterprises of magnitude is of a high order, and his devotion to detail in whatever task is in hand falls short only, if at all, of genius. His capacity for hard and faithful work in whatever line his energies are directed is unbounded, and efficiency and enthusiasm mark even the smallest job he goes about." The primaries occur on Tuesday, Sept. 8th. Voters in the city precincts must register before the books close at the city clerk's office if they expect to participate in the primary. At the primary there will be a separate ballot for each the Republican and Democratic parties. The voter on entering the polling place must ask for the ticket of his party. He cannot vote both. When he retires to the booth to mark his ballot, he should remember the second choice provision. The ballot will tell him to which offices this provision applies, but to be posted in advance, he should remember that it applies only when there are four or more candidates for the same office. Where it applies he must vote both for a first and a second choice, and cannot vote both for the same man. If he fails to vote both a first and second choice, or votes both for the same man, his vote will nor be counted for that office. This year in the congressional district, the second choice provision will apply to but four places on the Republican ticket, viz. governor lieutenant governor, attorney general and insurance commissioner. On the Democratic ticket it will apply to the one office of governor only. Following is a complete list of the names on both tickets as they appear on the ballots to be voted: STATE Republican Ticket Congressman, First District, Will E. Humphrey Francis W. Cushman, Tacoma. Governor: STATE W. M. Ridpath, Spokane. John D. Atkinson, Wenatchee. Joseph W. Robinson, Olympia. Henry McBride, Seattle. Oscar H. Neal, Bellingham. Albert E. Mead, Bellingham. Robert E. Brown, Seattle. Samuel G. Cosgrove, Pomeroy. Lieutenant Governor: Ellis Morrison, Seattle. Charles E. Coon, Port Townsend. A. V. Fawcett, Tacoma. C. G. Austin, Seattle M. E. Hay, Wilbur Secretary of State: E. L. Erwin, Spokane. John G. Lewis, Aberdeen. John L. Murrray, Friday Harbor. State Auditor: C. W. Clausen Port Orcnard. John Tobin, Bellingham. W. E. Cromwell, Tacoma. Attorney General: W. V. Tanner, Seattle. J. H. Easterday, Tacoma. R. H. Kipp, Colfax. W. P. Bell, Everett. Commissioner of Public Lands: E. W. Ross, Castle Rock. S. A. Calvert, Zenith. I. A. Navarre, Lakeside. Superintendent of Public Instruction: H. B. Dewey, Tacoma. Insurance Commissioner: J. H. Schively, Olympia Albert Helander, Seattle D. R. Bullock, Spokane Cal. Welbon, Orcas Preference for United States Senator: Levi Ankeny, Walla Walla Wesley L. Jones, North Yakima William H. Snell, Tacoma Non-Partisan Judiciary Ticket Judges of Supreme Court: (Three to be elected) Herman D. Crow, Spokane Milo A. Root, Seattle Lucius B. Nash, Spokane J. S. Chadwick, Colfax Oliver B. Lynn, Olympia John E. Humphries, Seattle E. M. Carr, Seattle Emmett N. Parker, Tacoma Democratic Ticket Congressman, First District: Charles H. Miller, Seattle Governor: John Pattison, Colfax A. J. Splawn, North Yakima Patrick S. Byrne, Spokane Jimmie Durkin, Spokane William Blackman, Seattle Lieutenant Governor: A. C. Edwards, Spokane Harry H. Kulies, Seattle Secretary of State: State Auditor: None Attorney General: None Commissioner of Public Lands: Albert Schooley, Chehalis Superintendent of Public Instruction: Eldrige Wheeler, Montesano Insurance Commissioner: Edwin F. Masterson, Tacoma Preference for United States Senator: George F. Cotterill, Seattle M. M. Godman, Seattle WESTERN PRIMARIES The state of Kansas has just made its first experiment of the new popular primary. A day is fixed on which all the people of the state who have registered, or who have voted in the previous election, have the opportunity to determine by their votes who shall be the candidates of the various parties between whom the people of the state must choose in the fall elections. As we understand the law, there --- M. B. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is nothing to prevent one who uniformly votes the Democratic ticket from voting in a Republican primary, and similarly a Republican from voting in a Democratic primary. Of course no man can vote in both primaries at the same election. An advantage of this system is that the nominations cannot be dictated by an oligarchic machine. Disadvantages are that the nomination of one party may, in a close contest, be determined by voters from another party, and that by his attendance on the primary the voter practically declares his political position and thus the secrecy of the ballot is modified, if not destroyed. We are by no means sure that the popular primary, as now attempted in a variety of states, is the ultimate solution of the problem of how to prevent political dictation by a political oligarchy. Whether the objections to or the advantages of the system as practiced in Kansas this year counterbalance is yet to be determined. In this contest two issues were prominent: law enactment and state regulation of the railways—both of which Mr Stubbs represented. In the contest for the United States senatorship, Mr. Chester I. Long, was defeated by Mr. Joseph L. Bristow, who, when he was Fourth Assistant Postmaster General, made the searching investigation that led to the wiping out of frauds in the Post Office Department and the punishment of the offenders. Both candidates claimed to represent the Roosevelt policies. But Mr. Bristow's advocacy of them was more outspoken, perhaps more radical. Mr. La Follette, of Wisconsin took an active part in the election on behalf of Mr. Bristow. Well-informed prophets anticipate that Governor Cummins is a strong advocate of railway rate regulation and of tariff revision. If Mr. Taft should be elected president, he will have in Mr. Bristow and Mr. Cummins added strength to his administration in his endeavor to clinch the Republican policies of Mr. Roosevelt, to secure tariff revision, and to obtain from the senate its approval of the action of the House in giving to the Phillipines Islands, if not absolute free trade, a very much freer trade than they now enjoy. On the same day with those in Kansas, popular primaries were held in Missouri, for the first time in the state, and in Oklahoma. For the governorship in Missouri the Republicans named Mr. Herbert K. Hadley, the attorney general of the state, who has made a brilliant record in compelling corporations to obey the law; the Democrots named a man who has usually been allied with the machine, Mr. W. S. Cowherd.—The Outlook. SUM $0F 300,000 A YEAR A dispatch from Chicago, Aug. 10th says: The colored Republicans of Illinois have had but lit- PAID ADVER DR. G. H. SPARLING Candidate for the Republican nomination for Coroner of King County. Primaries September 8, 1908. The image provided is too blurry to accurately recognize any text. It appears to be a blank or heavily pixelated area with no discernible content. Therefore, no text can be extracted from this image. M. B. E. G. FALK Who is seeking the Republican nomination for Commissioner of King county from the Third Commissioner's District. He is well and favorably known throughout the county. He resides at Green Lake and is a member of a number of Scandinavian clubs. Mr. Falk promises if elected to see to it that the county gets value received for every dollar it pays out. He will also urge the building of good roads. tle time during the past three weeks to stop and think about the advisability of voting the Democratic ticket in the coming presidential election. The primary election law, held last Saturday, is so new and puzzling that party lines seem to be more tightly drawn than ever. In the single matter of officeholding by colored men and women in this city and county, a Democratic triumph would at this time be a very serious matter. The Hon. Csar DePriest, our present county commissioner, furnished your correspondent with a detailed statement of the political patronage now enjoyed by the colored, people as follows: Major J. C. Buckner, $1600; R. A. Williams, $1000; Blackburn, $1000; Os ar DePriest, $3600; Lockman, $1200; Riley, $1500; Ferribee, $1000; Taylor, $1200; Mrjor F. L. Dennison, $3600; Col. J. R. Marshall, $1800; L. B. Anderson, $2500; W. D. Samuel, $1200; J. Q. Grant, $1200; Bainett, clerk, $660; F. L. Barnett, (3.00) Richardson, 660; four wagons, $3600; oones, $800; Dr. J. Chavis, $1200; four girls, $480 each; Snowden, $1000; A. L. W. Morris, $1100; A. H. Roberts, $1500; six women, county building, $2160; Dr. Lane, state legislature, $2500; Ed Green, $1100; miscellaneous positions, $10,200. This does not include the large number of men on the police force, in the fire department, clerks who are holding civil service positions, and the large number of men in the Federal building, as carriers, clerks, laborers and messengers. I think it not an unreasonable estimate that the colored people of this city, county and state receive 5 $300,000 a year in salaries. is an interesting item as sn ing to what extent the colo people have been successfu pushing their claims for politic preferment. It is needless to say that dring all this time that the colored people have been getting hold of these offices the Republican party has been in power. It is also needless to say that in states that are and always have been under Democratic sway no such record of recognition of the colored electorate can be found, and, it might be added that no promise of recognition is in evidence in the event of Democratic success—Fannie Barrier Williams in New York Age. Dr. Chas. E. Hoye Candidate for the Republican nomination for Sheriff of King county. J. C. Redward Candidate for the Republican nomination for County Commissioner, First Commissioner's District of King county. ELLIS MORRISON Candidate for the Republican nomination for the office of Lieutenant Governor. Your vote and influence respectfully solicited. [Name not visible] J. H. SCHIVELY 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for the County of King. In Probate. In Letter of the Estate of Edward Julla Van Atta, deceased. No. 7200. Order to Slow Cause Why Distribution Should not be Made. C. W. Greist, administrator of the estate of Edward Julla Van Atta, deceased, having filed in this court his petition settlement that said settlement would be closed. It is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the property. It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Edward Jill Van Atta, deceased, be and appear in court on the 20th day of August, 1988, at the home of Washington, at the court room of the Probate department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 20th day of August, 1988, at the home of Washington, at the court room to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to it is further ordered, that the copy of this order be published once, and that the successive copies be issued the said 20th day of August in The Seattle Republic, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of gen- court Done in open court this 13th day of July, 1908 GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss. Lake Case County Clerk of King County and exofficio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original copy to show cause, made on the DUI involved in the murder of the estate of Edward, Julia Van Atta, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 13th day of July, 1908. (Seal) By J. A. SIGURDSSON, Deputy Clerk, July 17—August 14, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. In the court for Platufft, if Isabella Haskin, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. — **State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them:** You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or property, in and to the heretofore established property, and in and to the above claimantiff is the holder of one certain deedment tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 2nd day of May, 1907, and numbered B44, for the delinquents B44, for the above claimantiff is upon real property in the amount $8.13 and upon real property in the said King County, described as follows, to-wit. Lot 15, Block 4, Thomas Gen. Tracts. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid plaintiff upon said above property, in and to the year 1905, the sum of $6.60, for the year 1906, the sum of $6.44, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon Yard, and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be a firm application of this notice, the day of said first public notice, to wait; within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a notice of the court's decision for plaintiff at its office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you all to do, judgment will be rendered costs closed, and the sums of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as praised in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CARVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COUNT OF THE STATE L. H. Graver. Philutoff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the heroinaffer described real property. Defendants. No. _____. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in, and to the hereafter describe the proper and proper claim of the above delinquent planiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 15th day of Nov., 1906, and numbered B43119, for the delinquent taxes of the year the amount of the tax is the real amount estimated in said King County, described as follows: to-wit: Iot 1. Block 33. Maynard's Lake Washington Addition. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the planiff upon request, to-wit: for the year 1904, the sum of 23 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 21 cents, and for the year 1906, the sum of 36 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the impaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said re You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the application of this notice, of the day of said first publication, to-wait; within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, of the copy of your application, of the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herefore, foreclosing the rights of each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums and amounts due respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 254 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31 - September 14, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Wm. McIntyre, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter fitted described real property, Defendants. No. — State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the beaconefters property, to the above plaintiff is the holder of one certain deedment tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington dated the 18th day of July, 1907, and numbered the property in the amount of $1.10, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 17 Bik. 1. Cherition Fruit Gardens, Plat No. 1. That the taxes for the following subsequent years shall be paid above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1905, the sum of 68 cents, and for the year 1906, the sum of $2.65, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said unredeemed payment, and are all paid unredeemed upon deedment taxes upon and costless said real property. on and each of you, (including said persons if, any), are hereby further notified umoned to be and appear with you the dates of the action of your sive of the day of said first publ- within 60 days after July 31. we entitled court and action; action at answer; attend and serve copy of your ad attorney for plaintiff d. or pay the amount cest and costs. In case dimenioned in lieu of sales taxes and parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and paid by the plaintiff as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle Wash. July 31 - September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE Sara R. B. rauer, Plautifu, vs. A. B. Llewellier and A. D. Eslahman, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and inheriting the property of their dependants, No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them; You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby authorized to obtain a certificate of holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of December, 1905, and numbered 1904, in the decree of the Election of 1904, in the Decree of $2.17, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, towr. Undivided two-offits of tract 10, being a portion of the Election of 1904, the N.E.½ of Sec. 16, P. 26, N. R. 5 E. W. M. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, and are the sum of the taxes for the year 1906 the sum of $1.28, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the notice of the exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after June 19, 1908, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer the court and action of the said court. Your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you all will be judgment by the court, be relied upon by each of said taxes and costs against each parcel of real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, the sums charged against each, for said taxes, and of real property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Office address: 62* Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. June 19—July 31, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for King County, Aurora Land Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Dan Keller and Jane Doe Keller, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. ..... Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of any interest or estate in or to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate in the county of Washington, dated April 15th, 1908, and numbered B 49187, for the delinquent taxes for the year 1904, in the amount of ninety-three (93) cents and upon the real property situated in King County, Washington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot eight (8), Block five (5), Kirkland Snyder, Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year forty-one (41) cents for the year fifty-two (52) cents for the year 1907, fifty (50) cents, which several suns bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent, per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and from the tax. You and each of you (including said unknown persons, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this complaint, and to first appear within sixty (60) days after the 29th day of June, 1908, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of the complaint against the plaintiff at its office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forecasing the lien of said real property against the plaintiff of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the lien of said real property, respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AUROPA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff, 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg. Seattle, Washington. June 26, August 7, 1908. SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Clara Melrose, Plaintiff, ys. Roy Melrose, Defendant—No. 62052 The State of Washington to the said Roy Melrose, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 10th day of July, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the case of your answer to the complaint to the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been observed by the Court of County object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To secure a divorce for plaintiff from the defendant upon the ground of non-support. F. B. WIESTLING. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 422 North Book, Seattle, County of King, Washington. July 10. August 21. 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, in, and for King County. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, and to appear within sixty days after the 17th day of July, 1908, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of the notice to rite sinus and to call the office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lieu of said taxes and the amount paid for it. It will be charged to rite sinus and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sinus charged by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court, AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: lot nine (9), Block sewer (7), Yorkshire, to-wit: two (2), County sewer, to-wit: forty-one cents (41), for the year 1905, and fifty-two cents (52) for the year 1906, and fifty cents (50) for the year 1907, which several sums bear interest at the rate of $1.00 per cent. of the payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said possessor of you) know if and when further notified and summoned if and when appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this notice upon you by publication, exclusive of the first date of publication to-wit: sixty (60) days after the third day action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and costs; and you will fail to do so, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiffs complaint, now on file in this cause AURORO LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, F. J. CARVER, for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldk., Seattle, Washington. June 26, August 1, 1908. NOTICE OF INCREASE OF CAPITAL STOCK. TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF THE SUPERIOR Portland Cement Company and to any and all other persons interested therein: Notice is hereby extended that there will be a meeting of the members of said corporation and which meeting is hereby now called to be held, at the hour of 10 o'clock on the 5th day of August, 1908, at the office of the company, to-wit, at rooms 508-9-10 American Bank, Madison Avenue and Madison Street, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, which meeting is for the purpose of voting upon the proposition of increasing the capital stock of the Superior Portland Cement Company from its initial capitalized stock of $140,000.000, to a capitalization of $1,000,000.000, divided into 10,000 shares of $100.00 each, and yon, and each of yon, are hereby notified to be present at said meeting to vote upon said proposal. And you are further notified that this notice is signed by and published under the authority of the following named trustees, being a major of the trustees of said Superior Portland Dated at the office of the company at Seattle, Washington, this 12th day of June, 1988. June 12, August 7, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Eva Z. Snyder, plaintiff, vs. Lowery G. Snyder, defendant. No. — Summons for G. Snyder The State of Washington to the said Lowery G. Snyder, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 7th day of July, you will appear in the court, on the warrant in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and case you failure to do so, you will render against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above endorsed warranty may obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you upon the grounds of abandonment for more than one year. PETERS & CARR. Plaintiff's Attorneys. P. O. Address: 1263-64 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 7-Sept. 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE Oversight for King County. James F. Wilson, plaintiff, vs. Eva Wilson, defendant, No. 62399. Summons for Publication. The States of Washington to the said Eva Wilson, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 7th day of August, D. 11, 1984. You are hereby summoned to the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office address below stated; and in case of your answer, you are hereby summoned to the complaint against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said plaintiff in this action is to secure a divorce from you, said defendant, on the grounds of abandonment and cruel treatment. WARREN H. LEWIS. Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 308 Shafer Building, Seattle, Kirkland, WA 98037. King County... Washington August 7 - September 18, 1908. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Joseph Masvero, plaintiff, vs. P. Juguin trading and doing business, under the name of Anchor Restaurant, defendant. No. — Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King—ss. To P. Juguin, trading and doing business under the name of Anchor Restaurant: You are hereby not permitted by Masvero to be compliant against you in said court which will come on to be heard at my office You are hereby notified that William N. Evans has filed a complaint against you in said court which will come on to be heard at my office in room 210 New York Block, Seattle, King County, on the 100th day of September, A. D. 1985, at 10:00 a. m., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The defendant is the plaintiff and complaint is to recover judgment against you for ninety-nine and ST-100 ($89.87, dollars, for goods, wares and merchandise and meat sold and delivered to you by plaintiff being the defendant. The defendant is no part of which has been paid; and further, to sell under attachment the personal property levled on in this case under attachment issued heretofore in favor of plaintiff. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King County. In the matter of the estate of Judith Cox Moore, deceased. No. 9237. Notice to Creditor. By order of said court made herein on the 31st day of July, 1908. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate to present them with the necessary vouchers to the underigned Judith J. Moore, of said estate, at No. 3439 Superior Street, Seattle. Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be bared. Date of first publication August 7, 1908. JUDITH J. MOORE. As Executrix of said Estate, REED & HARDY Attorneys for Estate. 900 Empire Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Aug. 7—Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for the County of King. Charlotte Scobey, Plaintiff, vs. George Scobey, Defendant. The State of Washington to the said George Scooby: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of first publication, upon summons to the wizard of Washington, after the 24th day, June 1908, and after days above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the underwriter of the complaint. The object of the action is stated; and in case of your failure to do so, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of the action is dissolve the bonds of murmition, now existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of habitual drunkenness, idleness, nonsupport and desertion, and for plaintiff's malden name of Charlotte Whitehead. P. L. SANDERS, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. July 24—Sept. 4. 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, or King County. Nellie Temple, Plaintiff, vs. Lewis Temple, Defendant. No. 62612. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to Lewis P. Temple, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty (60) days from and after the 21st day of August, A. D. 1908, the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure to answer the complaint, you are deemed against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The above entitled action is brought by the plaintiff to obtain a decree of divorce of and from the defendant, Lewis P. Fletcher, and to refusal to make suitable provision for said plaintiff's support, and for such other and further relief as to the court may seem just and equitable. HERBERT L, JACKSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office address: Room 307 Bailey Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 21st—October 2, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Grada B. Craayo, Plaintiff, vs. Antonie Johan Craayo, Defendant. No. ——— Summons for libelation The Court ordered the said Antonie Johan Craayo, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 21st day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; in case of your failure to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant. JAS. M. EPLER, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: Epler Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, August 21—October 2, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Gertrude F. Lawrence, Plaintiff, vs. William J. Lawrence, Defendant. No. — Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to William J. Law. bursa: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 19th day of June, to appear before the judge of the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their address below given: in case you are unable to attend, you will be rendered against you according to the prayer of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of sale court, and will be served with the entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you on the ground of failure and neglect on your part to provide suitable support for plaintiff. Friday, August 21, 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for King County, Aurora Land Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Nels A. Walberg and Jane Doe Walberg, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown. If any, having or claiming in such to the herelfter described real property, defendants. No. ———, Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above named defraudors, and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of any interest or estate in or to the holder/sheriff described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one real property delinquent tax accrued in King County, Washington, dated April 15th, 1908, and numbered R 49183, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904 in the amount of ninety-three (93) cents and upon the real property situated in King County, Washington, dated April 15th, 1908, and numbered w: Iot twelve (12), Block four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's First Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff, are hereby notified for the year 1905, fort-one (41) cents; for the year 1906, fifty-two (52) cents, and for the year 1907, fifty (56) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent, per annum from said date of payment and are all unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of the said first publication, to-wit; within sixty days after the 29th day of June, 1908. In the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned and answer the complaint of said plaintiff or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts of said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against respectively as provided by law, and as prayed for in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AUTHORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation. Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. June 26. 1908. 7. 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for the County of King. George L. Snyder, plintiff. vs. Lida N. Snyder, defendant. No. ——. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Lida N. Snyder, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first day of this summons when the sixty days after of July, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the case. And in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been made by the plaintiff, and in case of the said action, set forth in the complaint; is as follows: to obtain a divorce and dissolution of the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and the defendant herein on the ground of abandonment for matrimony one year. year. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 9-10 Starr-Royd Block, Seattle, County of King, Washington. July 17—August 28, 1908. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King. Lucene Callouton, plaintiff, vs. Proper J. Callouton, defendant. The plaintiff in the said Proper J. Callouton, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first pub- lication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the date of July 1998 and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office. The object of the complaint is to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain objection from the on the grounds of non-support. P. O. Address: 629-631 Burke Bldg., in Seattle, King County, Washington. July 17-August 28, 1998. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. The State of Washington, to the said Edwin I. deVarona, defendant: You are hereby summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action within this summons, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after the 17th day of July, 1908, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein, and serve a copy of your complaint to the unmerited attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff, and will be filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The above entitled cause of action is brought for the purpose of obtaining a divorce from the defendant on the grounds of abandonment and newness. Date of first publication, July 17, 1908. SAYRE & SUTHERLAND, of the City of Washington. Office and Post Office address: 433 414 and 415 Mellhour Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. July 17-August 28, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Ivah Marie Durant, Plaintiff, vs. Cassie B. Durant, Defendant. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Cassie B. Durant, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear with sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: with sixty days after the 21st day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your document to the office of the attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The above entitled action is an action for defending the bonds of matrimony between the parties hereto on the ground of abondment and desertion for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action. E. T. SCHOFF. Post Office Address: 503, 504 Pioneer Bldg, Seattle, King County, Washington. PROBATE NOTICE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, he is hereby given that C. W. Greist, administrator, has estate of Edward Jula Van Atta, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said court his final account as such administrator, and that Thursday, the 20th day of August, 1908, at 8:30 o'clock, a. m., at the Court of King, in the City of Seattle, and said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his excepter, by writing to said account, and contest the same. (Seal) OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. ugust 21, 1908 'N THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. M. J. Nist, Plaintiff, vs. John Doe Mielener, John Doe Kiley, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the heiressatter described real property. Decedent and State of Washington to the above deendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or property, and to the heiressatter described real property. Decedent and State of Washington is the holder of one certain user of King County. State of Washington, dated the 3rd day of April, 1906, and numbered as lows, for the collpension property, and the following property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B41290, Lot 8, Block 5 Craven's Division to Green Lake the year 1904, in the sum of $1,000 for the property and subsequent property situated by the plaintiff upon said the described lot of real property, to-wit; for the year 1905, the sum of $2,01; for the year 1906, the sum of $2,02; for the year 1907, No 1007), the sum of $1,532; for the district No 1007), the sum of $1,532; for the year 1907, the sum of $3,78; for the year 1907 (local improvement), the sum of $3,78; for the year 1907 (local improvement), several suns beur interest at the rate of $1.5 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and and you and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within six days after the date of first publication of its notice, except as otherwise specified of said first plaintiff court, August 14, 1908, in the above and answer the complaint of said plaintiff serve a copy of your answer and undersigned attorney for plaintiff's office below stated, and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, fore-losing the said taxes and costs against each perplexed said property, charged against each perplexed said property, charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each perplexed property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against the perplexed said property, provided by law, in a prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. KENNETH MACKINTOSH & E. B. NIST Plaintiff. Office Address: 227-30 Colman Bld., Seattle, Wash. Aug. 14, 2017, Sep. 19, 2018. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE KEWIT County. of Washington. In H. Plaintiff, vs. C. A. Iarson, and all persons unknown if any, if having or claiming an interest in and to the heresher described real property. Defendants. No. _____. Notice State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of the property in estate and in another matter described real named plaintiff is hereby notified that the above delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington for the delinquent taxes of the years 1896 to 1904, inclusive, in the amount of $20.04, to upon the real property situated in County, described as follows—to-wit: Lot 4, Court 7, Court 8's Salmon Bay Addition toquent years have been paid by the plaintiff in said above described taxes of the $2.73, and for year 1906, the sum of $2.97, which several suns annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unreimbursed taxes upon and for the property. against each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the date of first publication of said firm within 60 days after July 19, 1988, in the above entitled court and actions, and defend this action and answer the complaints of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney by the amount due below office below address by the amount due to interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreseeing the lien of said taxes and costs agreed upon each parcel of said real property and amounts due under it against each parcel of said property and costs, ordering a sum of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. B. September 11, 1988 July 31—September 11, 1908. *IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown. If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. — —. New York State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest, or estate in and to the herder described in the property, are hereby the above named the offender holder of one certain deed of tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 14th day of April, 1905, and numbered BK3300, for the delinquent taxes of the year the amount of the total property situated in said King County, described as follo- ding to West Seattle. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said described property to the year 1904, the sum of 24 for the year 1904, the sum of 20 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 23 cents, and for the year 1906, the sum of $1.26, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sald date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unrefreshed taxes upon and and acknowledge You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the date of said first July 31, 1908, in within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your statement on the undersigned attorney for the suit at his office below stated, the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing all then sald taxes and costs against each person real property against sald taxes and amounts due charged against each, for sald taxes, interest and costs ordering a sale of each parcel charged and found against the salds provided by law, incurred in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MACONDAID, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Balloy Building, Seattle. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in the Palm Beach, Va. A. Vallus, and all persons unknown. If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property. Defendants. No. ____. Notice and Summonses and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the herbarium described property, are hereby held in trust of you, named the holder of the one certain deed warranted tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 14th day of April, 1904, and numbered 1822535 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1901, the amount of $1.26, and for the situation in which the tax certificate described as foliage to the City of Seattle. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1902, the sum of $605, for the year 1903, the sum of $605, for the year 1904, the sum of 64 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 67 cents, and for the year 1906, the sum of $1.17, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, an annum from said date of payment, and all the unpaid sums named taxes upon and in real property. You and each of you, including said persons IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE King County Land Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Cella Shorey and H. M. Mason, and all persons unknown. If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herelainen described real property, defendants. No. G1888. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the herelainen described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain property in and to the herelainen described real County, State of Washington, dated the 30th day of September, 1907, and numbered B48677, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of 93 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, in lot 6, block 20, City Second Addition. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of taxes on such property is $105,000. Which several suns bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown if any), be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after June 26, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; foreclosure on the undersigned plaintiff of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosure on the undersigned plaintiff of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectfully as provided by law and in this case the plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. C. A. MACDONALD A. Attorney for Plaintiff, June 26-August 7, 1980. Seattle, Wash. June 26-August 7, 1980. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff v. wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the heeferinher described real property, Defendants. No. 62149. Notice and Summons. and been to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the heeferinher described real property, are hereby notified that the above and subsequent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. Washington, dated June 5, 1906, and numbered B42175, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of ninety cents and one hundredth of a dollar. King County. Washington, described as follows: -to-wit: Lot twenty-five (25), Block Three (3), Ballard Park 2nd Addition to Seattle, King County. Washington: that the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been described as delinquent real property, to-wit; for the year 1905, thirty-four cents ($.34), for the year 1906, twenty-six cents ($.26), and for the year 1907, twenty-four cents ($.24), which several suns bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum for the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you. (including said unknown persons, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first arrival of this office, exclusive of the day of said first publication. to-wit: within sixty days after August 14, 1908. in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a notice of appeal for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due together with interest and costs. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against the plaintiff and serve a notice of appeal for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due together with interest and costs. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against the plaintiff and serve a notice of appeal for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due together with interest and costs. Ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectfully as provided by law, and as praised in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and action. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation. Plaintiff. F. I. CARVAR, Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash., Aug. 14. Sept. 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE Non, and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the notice of expiration of the notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to settle within sixty days after August 14, 1908, in the above entitled court notice and defend this action and answer the complaint of said person, and the undersigned attorney for obliteration at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered and costs for foreclosing on the property will be paid. The complaint said real property for the tins and amounts due upon and charged against each for said taxes interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sum charged and farnished, and as required in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY. a Corporation. Plaintiff F. J. CARVAR, Attorney for Plaintiff. Northern Bank, Aug. 14-Sept. 23—1908. Wash. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN You, and each of you, (including said unknown persons, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days ater the date of first publication of this complaint, and to-wit: within sixty days after August 14, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the court. In the office below stated, or pay the amount due, to together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to, judgment will be rederered herein, fore-closing the lien of said taxes and costs against it, and amount due upon and charged against each of said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in respects to complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVAR, Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg. Seattle, Wash. Aug. 14—Sept. 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for King County. Aurora Land Co. a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Dan Keller and Jane Doe Keller, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown. If any, having or clausing an interest in and to the laterher described real property, defendants. No. .... Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them; You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the owner of the following property, issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 15th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following year, and for the following year, said King County, described as follows, to-wit: lot eight (8), Block seven (7), Kirkland Syndicate's First Addition to Seattle, Certificate No. B. 48194, for the year 1904, amounting to ninety-cents. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent year have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: lot eight (8), Block seven (7), Kirkland Syndicate's First addition to Seattle, amounting to ninety-cents for the year 1904, two cents (20) for the year 1904, and fifty cents (50) for the year 1907, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all taxed on described taxes upon and against the real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this notice upon your publication in the law, and the publication to-wait, sixty (60) days after the 26th day of June, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at its office below stated, the date of the hearing, and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered against you herein, forecasing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a judgment against the sums of the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this case and in court. AURORA LAND COMPANY. a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg. Seattle, Washington. June 26. August 7. 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATES of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the heartmatter described real property, Defendants. No. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within 51 days after the date of service of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wait, within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and actions, and to attend the action and answer the complaint on said plaintiff's behalf on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at its office below stated, or pay the amount due, to together with interest and costs. In case you fail to close the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a lien on said plaintiff's behalf on the fraction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as praised in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bally Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown if any, having on claiming an interest in and to the herderaffair and any persons unknown if any, Defendants. No. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of vans as described in the above property in and to the herderaffair described real property, are berebly notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain depliment tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of Washington in and to the above property, is 15th day of Nov., 1906, and numbered B43121, for the depliment taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of 75 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follo the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit; for the year 1904, the sum of 23 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 21 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 21 cents; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. If any of the unredeemed persons unknown, if any are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, the unredeemed attorney for plaintiff at its together with interest and costs. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, fore-closing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums of said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed to plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bally Building, Seattle. Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear wif in sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, and to appear in court, to-wit: within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend its action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the application and the letter below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to, judgment will be rendered herein, fore-closing all of said taxes and costs against each of said plaintiffs, and amounting due upon and charged against each for said taxes. Interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against each of said plaintiffs, provided by law, and pursued in plaintiffs' complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONAID, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Balley Building, Seattle Wa. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE or Washington for King County. I, or Washington for King County, W. H. Moor, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herunterfall described real property, Defendants. No. —. Notice and summons. Welcome to the above defendants and each of them. You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the herunterfall described real property, be hereby notified that the above defendant has been notified that the above defendant's investment tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington dated the 22nd day of Dec., 1906, and numbered B40632 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904. In the year 1905, the delinquent taxes of the year 1905, the delinquent taxes of the year 1905, the sum of $3,11, and for the year 1906, the sum of $3,20, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from sald date of payment, and are all the same, are deemed taxes upon and against sald real property. You and each of you, (including said person, unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days of the date of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first cation, to testif, the 31st day of July, 1908 in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the underwriter of the said plaintiff, stating, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each of your suns and amounts due upon and charged against said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the suns charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MACDONAID, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31–September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. I. H. Craver, plaintiff, is Unknown Owner, and all claims unkempt, may, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No.—Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and all owners. You and each of your owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain defendant and all owners. The Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 12th day of April, 1907, and numbered R48005, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1902, in the amount of $23.35 and upon real property, described as to-wait, to-wait, to-wait, West 75 feet 14 inches, R1812’s Addition to South Seattle. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wait, for the year 1903, the amount of $17.80, for the year 1903, the amount of $16.30; for the year 1905 the sum of $1.71, and for the year 1906 the sum of $2.40, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 percent, per annum from said date of payment, and arguably bear undereeded taxes upon and arguably bear You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this notice. After the date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit: within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer: the com- pany of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your insurer's statement of the facts at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered hereby, fore- closing the lien of said taxes and costs, and paying the amount due for the sums and amounts due mon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found payable pursuant as provided by law, and as sraved in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STAT of Washington for the County of King—In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Ernest Hille, deceased, no. 7820. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Charles Osser, administrator of the estate of Ernest Hille, deceased, having filed in this case a motion for the estate of Ernest Hille, is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets for 1939 to check a ma. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 10th day of September, 1908, in the Seattle Republic, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 5th day of August, 1908. MITCHELL GILLIAM, Judge. Aug. 7—Sept. 4, 1908. PROBATE NOTICE—IN THE SUPERIOR Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King—ss. In the matter of the estate of Ernest Hille, deceased. No. 7820. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Charles Osner, the administrator of the estate of Ernest Hille, deceased, is the Agent of the County of Seattle, his final account as such administrator, and that Thursday, the 10th day of September, 1908, at 9:30 o'clock a.m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, has been duly appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and constitute the same, in writing to said Court, by said Court for said Superior Court, and the seal of said court hereto affixed this 5th day of August, 1908. (Seal!) OTTO A. CAS., Clerk. J. B. A. DURDSSON, Deputy Clerk. Aug. 7—Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King County Elizabeth Lindbergh, Plaintiff, vs. Erick Theo dore Lindbergh, Defendant. No. 61227. Summ mons by Publication. Theo Lindbergh, Washington to the said Erick Theo Lindbergh, the good defendant. NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS. Chairs in the Auditorium and Chemistry Buildings for the State University of Washington on the Campus at Seattle, Washington. Seattle, Wash., July 17, 1908. Notice is hereby given that sated bids for furnishing all material and labor and erecting complete about 3.15) chairs in the University campus of Washington for the State University of Washington, on the University campus, Seattle, Washington, in accordance with the specifications for the same prepared by Howard & Galloway, Architects and Engineers, will be received by the University Regents at the office of the Regents, 101 N. 10th Street, Intermountain Building, at Seattle, at the hour of 3 o'clock P. M., as shown by the clock the Regents' office on Tuesday, Augu 25th, 1908, and there publicly opened. Bids offered later than this hour will be received. Bids are required to submit bids accordance with the provisions of th specification which call for a price p. chair of various designs. Bidders shall file with their bids a certified check on some solvent bank amounting to $1,000.00 as a guaranty that they will, if awarded the contract, enter into contract with two good and two bad bonds, one in an amount equal to twenty-five cents of the contract price and one equal to hundred per cent of the contract price, by some responsible surety company, an thorized to do business in the State of Washington. All proposals shall be considered offers in force for thirty (30) days after date of opening, unless bidders are sooner notified of rejection of the proposal. In the event of failure of the bidder to certify into a contract and furnish the required sum in fifteen (15) days after the acceptance proposal, then said certified check shall be forfeited to the Regents of the State University of Washington, in which event the Regents reserve the right to accept any other bid for the same work, upon execution of said contract and delivery of said bonds, said check will be returned. Bidders shall file one check covering all bids. Specifications can be obtained from the Registrar of the University of Washington Seattle, Seattle or from Howard & Galloway, 604 Mission Street, San Francisco, California, and the Administration Building, Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition, Seattle, Washington. One set only of specifications will be furnished each bid. Information can be had of Howard & Galloway, who may be addressed at 604 Mission Street, San Francisco,onia, or at the Administration Building Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition, Seattle, Washington. The Board Regents of the University of Washington reserve the right to reject any or all bids as may seem be to them. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSIT OF WASHINGTON. Frank D. Nash, President. Wm. Markham, Secretary. July 17—August 21, 1968. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Tuesday, Francis E. Crumb, Plaintiff, vs. Grace Amella Crumb, Defendant.—No. 61794. The State of Washington to the said Grace Amelia Crumb, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: will in sixty (60) days after the day of June, 1908, and defend the above entitled counsel in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to answer, you may render against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk. The object of the above entitled action is to move from you on the grounds of persona' indignities [Name not visible in the image] William M. Russell, Seattle's veteran theater, proprietor and the friend of all the mothers and children who attend matinees, was quietly married last Tuesday and is now somewhere in the jungles spending his honeymoon. "Dad" Russell and Dick French are the founders of the old Third Avenue Theatre, which was torn down last year. Russell has stuck to the business ever since, but French took a company on the road, but is now at The Seattle taking Russell's watch, while he, Russell, is cooing under the cooocoo trees. # 80 PERSONAL Revs. Thomas and Wallace were visitors at the A. M. E. conference st Everett, Wash. Bishop W. H. Heard, of Atlanta, Ga., delivered a lecture to an appreciate audience last Monday evening at Lee's Chapel A. M. E. church. Rev. J. M. Webb will preach at the A. M. E. church Sunday forenoon and evening in the absence of the pastor who is attending the Puget Sound A. M. E. conference. The members of the St, Paul M. E. church are trying to raise every claim before the conference meets next month. They aim to pay their pastor in full and raise the apportionment on the benevolencies. The elegant flat, which Mr. Z. L. Woodson began the erection of some time ago has been completed and is now being occupied by tenants. Mr. Woodson's family is occupying one of the apartments and he says it will be kept strictly first-class. Rev. Thomas will continue his series of sermons on the Lord's prayer and next Sunday at 11 o'clock, taking as his subject, "Kingdom of Christ." In the evening a general missionary meeting will be held and a missionary sermon preached. Mrs. Anna Percy died at her residence in Hillman City last Saturday and was buried Monday, the Rev. Thomas of the Mt. Zion Baptist church officiating. She was a native of Virginia and was seventy-two years of age. She had been a resident of Seale for the past four years. The annual conference of the Puget Sound African Methodist Episcopal church is in session at Everett with Bishop Heard presiding. Quite a delegation of the lay members of Lee's Chapel of this city is attending the conference with the purpose of prevailing on the bishop to send some one other than Rev. Donohoo to this charge. The appointments will be read Sunday evening, and considerable anxiety is being felt by those interested in the case as to the outcome. Ernest Hogan Improving Ernest Hogan, who is on a farm in New Jersey, is much improved in health. Sunday he spent the best day since he became suddenly ill at the Fourteenth Street theatre while playing last January. With him are his mother, Mrs. Louise Crowdus; his brother, Mr. Bud Crowdus, of Racine, Wis.; and his niece, Miss Maggie Warefield. New York Age. Carmen Next Week For the final week of the summer stock season, Miss Bunting will essay the part of the famous historical Spanish senorita. The play is so familiar to most theater goers, from having seen it in either opera or drama, that it requires no recommendation. Miss Bunting will make an ideal Carmen; and to meet the other requirements of the play the company will be augmented by a number of auxiliaries, and the production will be one of the most notable ever seen in a Seattle theater at popular prices or otherwise. Following the Burgess-Bunting Company at the Seattle Theater, the next aattraction will be "A Wife's Secret," presented by a strong company. The play is one of the best emotional dramas seen in several seasons in the East. The secret consists of a wife hiding a drunken father from her husband, whom he does not know to be alive. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Clare Montelith, Plaintiff, vs. John A. Montelith, Defendant. No. 62620. Summons by Publication. This Court directed the诉讼 to the said John A. Montelith, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 21st day of August, 1908, and defend the new evidence presented in the complaint titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complain- ing which been filed with the clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to procure for the plaintiff a divorce from the defendant upon the grounds of his habitual drunkenness, and his neglect and refusal to make provision for his ill treatment to plaintiff the sole custody and control of Julian Monteith, Grace Monteith, and Isabel Monteith, the three children of plaintiff and defendant. H. W. CRAVEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 654 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 21—October 2, 1908. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN: RACES! RACES! RACES! RACES! JUNE 20th to SEPTEMBER 12th SIX RACES DAILY RAIN OR SHINE Take Car at FIRST AVENUE Every 10 Minutes After 11 A. M. TWO P. M. Admission Including Grand Stand Ladies 50 Cents Gentlemen $1.00 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King County. SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE L. H. Craver, Philthuft, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. of Washington, for the County of King. J. C. MacCallum, Printlist, vs. Maude MacCallum. Callum. Dementail.—Summons. The State of Kentucky to the said Maude Maude Woolford, New York. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above plaintiff has been notified of the county delinquent tax certificate issued by the Trust of King County. State of Washington, dated the 14th day of April, 1905, and numbered B33331, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1902, in the county of Washington and upon real property situated in said King County, to-wit: Lot 24, Block 7, Goodspeed's Addition to West Seattle. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, in the year 1903, the sum of 24 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 24 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 23 cents, and for the year 1906, the sum of $1.26, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all deemed to have been deemed taxes upon and against said real property. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the date of this summons, you are above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below you. If you are above entitled action will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to resolve the matter of your complaint between the plaintiff and defendant herein on the ground of fraud and cruelty. C. E. PIER. Plaintiff's Attorney. P. Q. Address: Rooms 36 and 37 Union Block, No. 713 First Ave, Seattle, King County, Washington. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, In, and for King County. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend the action and answer the complaint on the undersigned to serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned to serve a copy of your answer at its office below stated, or pay the amount together with interest and costs. In case you fail so of do, indgment will be rendered herein, foreseeing that said taxes and costs against each parcel of said property for the sums and amounts due upon and for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the sums charged and found against it respectfully as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiffs complaint, now on file in this cause and court. of Washington, in and for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Katherine Mafrige, Deceased. — In Probate. — No. — Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against Katherine Mafrige, or her estate, to present their said claims, together with the necessary vouchers, and the necessary proofs from the date of the first publication hereof, to the undersigned executor of said estate, at the office of Leopold M. Stern, 705 Lowman Building, Seattle, Washington, designated as the place for the transaction of the business of said estate. Dated this 31st day of July, 1998. Z. A. MAFRIGE, Executor of said Estate. LEOPOLD M. STERN, Attorney for Executor. July 31—August 28, 1905. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle Wash. July 31-September 11, 1993 Autumn Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the heroiner described real property. Defendants. No. 62303. NOTICE TO CREDITORS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King George of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of John McGee, Dreese Notice is hereby given tt the creditors and all persons having claims against John McGee, deceased, on against his estate, to present and exhibit the notice to the date of the first publication of this notice to the signed administratrix of said estate with the members at their offices at office of F. M. Jeffery, 747 N. Block Block, Jackson, the place for the transaction of the business of said estate. CHRISTINA McGEE. F. M. JEFFERY, Attorney, July 31—August 28, 1908 The Comfort. Newly furnished rooms. Walking distance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days of the notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; in the above entitled court and answer to the complaint of said plaintiff and in the notice on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due together with the interest and costs. In case you fail to pay the amount due, the foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering the lien of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and for the 2-LEGALS-REPUBLICAN fund against it, respectively, as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in I. ISRAEL WALKER, 1101-1102 Jackson Street. 529 Colman Blk., Phone Main 695 Stetson & Post Mill Co. BUILDING MATERIAL AURORA LAND COMPANY, A Corporation. Plaintiff E. J. CARVER Attorney for Plaintiff Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. Guardian Life INSURANCE CO. OF SEATTLE Friday, August 21, 1908 JUST KNOW US OUR TAILORING AND YOU WILL DO THE REST YOU CAN'T BUY BETTER TAILORING IRVING CANNON TAILOR 211 COLUMBIA ST. Established 1890 Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE CONNECTION Business Office. Third and Spring Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. WILLIAM WALKER. Complete stock New Fall Goods, Ladies', Misses' and Children's Wear- ing Apparel, Furs and Fine Coats. 820 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Electric Fixtures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. Scandinavian American Bank. Write Today for a copy of "THE BANK ACCOUNT" a new, neat little 8-page paper as full of good things as an egg is of meat. MAILED FREE. The Scandinavian-American Bank, Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Puget Sound National Bank People's Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R. J. Reekie, Vice Prest. Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. Commercial Savings and Trust General Bank and Exchange Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash.