Seattle Republican

State library THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1908 Col. C. C. Dalton, who, by the way, is one of Henry McBride's managers, is decidedly of the opinion that the fight for governor today is between Gov. Mead and Henry endorsement for United States senator next Tuesday than a snow ball has of flying through hades. The court house ring must be destroyed! It is safe to say that the only presidential candidate that will visit Seattle this year spoke twice in the city last Tuesday in the person of Eugene W. Chafin, presidential candidate on the Prohibition ticket. Presidential Politics, Vermont Votes. Whatever else that may be said either for or against Mr. Chafin King county in the past week and I say to you the gubernatorial nomination is between these two men and King county is the key to the situation." It will thus be seen that even the strongest opponent to Gov. Mead, concedes that the Times is giving its readers false dope and that if McBride is not nominated Mead will be. The Anti-Saloon League has given Mead an unqualified endorsement as has the church going folk of the state, all of which means that Mead is absolutely certain of being nominated next Tuesday. In speaking of the situation in King county, T. P. Revelle, the local Mead manager, said: "I predict Gov. Mead will carry the Third, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, Twelfth, Thirteenth and Fourteenth wards of Seattle and the North end of the county by overwhelming majorities. He may lose the other wards of the county, but he will get enough votes even in them to keep his opponent from overcoming the majority that he will get in the wards that he will carry, all of which means that Albert E. Mead is going to sweep King county next Tuesday, the Times to the contrary notwithstanding. Reports from other sources indicate that Gov. Mead will carry the greater part of Eastern Washington even to Spokane county, where the McBride folk declare they stand ace high. While the Review is not openly supporting Mead, yet it is not opposing him and its editor says on the side, he has given the state all the reform that he had ever advocated and it can not consistently support a man for governor who is tied up with the same men that it has all along been lined up against. Douglas county will give Mead a splendid majority as will Lincoln and all of the counties in that section of the state. However confident you, dear reader, may be of Mead's nomination do not overlook the fact that you must vote for two men for governor and you should vote for two men either of whom you would be willing to see elected governor and therefore vote for Meaed first choice and Cosgrove second choice. If you love your wife, vote to destroy the King county court house ring! of the most pleasing and affable gentlemen to talk with that you have met in many moons. Mr. Chafin, it will be remembered, was the hero of the late Springfield riot, he having saved the life of a Negro that was being persued by an angry mob at the risk of his own, he in the melle having received a severe blow on the head from a flying missle. Of course the Prohibitionists do not expect to win a single state in the coming election, yet the candidates as well as the advocates of that cause are making a vigorous campaign all over the country with the view of arousing public sentiment in its favor. It is law enforcement that the Prohibitionists are fighting most for at this time and by making a vigorous campaign everywhere they believe they will accomplish more than the making of a partial and pacific one. Vermont has spoken its peace and its the same old story, a rousing Republican majority for the entire state ticket. If the political actions of Vermont is any indication of the general elections in November for president, then William Howard Taft will succeed Theodore Roosevelt by an overwhelming majority. Vermont's plurality for the Republican nominees have varied, some years it being larger than others. Her vote last Monday was little below the Republican plurality four years ago and a bit larger than her plurality eight years ago. The average plurality of the various candidates last Tuesday was in the neighborhood of 30,000, which is a slight loss to what it was four years ago. Maine will be the next state to speak and, "as go Maine so goes the Union," has long since been the Republican national watch-word, hence Maine like Vermont will be watched all over the country with intense interest. The Anti-Saloon League got real busy one day this week and made some selections and endorsements for those who believe in their cause, which will to an extent That King county is burdened with one of the most corrupt political rings that ever smuggled itself into a course house is so apparent that he who runs may read; Moral Element Makes Endorsement The Agnew..Ring Robs King County. ator, recommends that the members and sympathizers of the league vote for Wesley L. Jones. It also recommended that the members support Albert E. Mead for governor, first choice, and Samuel G. Cosgrove for governor, second choice. For lieutenant governor it recommended M. E. Hay for first choice and C. G. Austin second choice. Coincident with the endorsement of the league for senator and governor the Methodist fraternity of the Seattle community and likewise a part of the Presbyterian fraternity passed resolutions endorsing the candidacy of Jones for senator and Mead for governor, thus giving the candidacy of both of those gentlemen the moral support of the temperance workers and two of the largest religious denominations in the vicinity of Seattle. Of course the Ankeny-McBride workers have not been wholly asleep while their enemies were working, for while they were getting those endorsements they secured the endorsement of the saloon league and likewise the brewing interest of the state, which is not to be dispised, that is, when one is out looking for votes. It is fair to presume that the anti-Saloon League and the Church Elements that have endorsed Mead in Seattle alone means in the neighborhood of 10,000 votes and their actions here will help these men in other parts of the state. It is being said on the streets by those men favorable to the other candidates who fell short of an endorsement by those organizations that they will not vote solid for any candidate, which is quite true, but when the leaders of an organization are instructed to look into the characters of persons seeking preferment at the hands of all, endorse a certain person and that endorsement is ratified by the entire body it is more than probable that a majority of the members thereof will follow in the wake of the leaders and vote as they do. Such must be a fact or all of the candidates would not have sought to get such an endorsement. Congressman Jones and Gov. Mead are therefore to be considered fortunate in securing the much coveted plum. Karthago est delindo—the court house ring must be destroyed! ditor; Charles Beckingham, county commissioner from the first commissioner's district, and Al. Rutherford, commissioner from the third district, is so patent to the voters of King county that it's a waste of words to further demonstrate the fact. The question is or should be with every taxpayer of King county, Will you further perpetuate this corrupt ring in the court house by electing Agnew sheriff, Brier auditor, and Rutherford and Beckingham commissioners and especially Agnew and Brier for sheriff and auditor. Has Agnew at any time since he has been a salary drawer of King county given value received for what he got? Has Agnew ever given up the time to the duties of the office that he was morally bound to do in order to draw his salary? Did Agnew as deputy auditor or as auditor at any time protect the interest of the tax-payers by preventing the ring, of which he is the acknowledged head, from putting through deals that filched the county treasury out of large sums of money without the county getting value received? No, he has done none of those things. Instead of being at his office each day during office hours, Jim Agnew has been found at the baseball grounds, where he was the general manager, or at the race track, where he was plunging in the pools as the ponies wound off the reel. Instead of being at the court house attending to his official duties Jim Agnew has been seen day out and day in at either the baseball games or the race track, and in winter in the back rooms of cigar stands where there was always more or less fun going on. Is that the kind of man that you, Mr. Voter, desire to elect sheriff of this county? Instead of protecting the financial interest of the county when corrupt deals were being put through Jim Agnew was giving his signature to the same. Do you want such a man to continue to be in a position to hold up the taxpayers by having the county pay exorbitant bills to men who have not honestly earned them? If you want such a man then elect Agnew sheriff of the county for the ensuing two years, which you will do if you nominate him next Tuesday. Down the court house ring! Price One Year, $3.00. Single Copies. 10 Cents. POLITICS AND POLITICIANS. Of course Wesley L. Jones is going to win the senatorial nomination next Tuesday by carrying every county in the state, thus showing that the people propose in the a tribute to the clean cut fight that Jones has made against a barrel of money and some of the shrewdest political manipulators that could be found in the United States. Despite the fact the odds seem to have been against him in King county Mr. Jones campaigned in the county last week and in a series of speeches he so thoroughly riddled the agreement theory that the advocates of Senator Ankeny has had nothing to say in reply. He convinced the doubting Thomases, who thought that Senator Piles might be injured by the defeat of Senator Ankeny, that in supporting Ankeny it was a vote against Piles instead of one for him. That agreement was made and entered into by and between men who wanted to suck the public teats, and cared no more for Piles future success than they did for Jones and would throw Piles just as readily as they would Jones if Piles in any way disturbed them or their political holdings. Eloquent speakers may not be in so great demand in the United States senate as in years gone by, but a great majority of those who have listened to the rather eloquent as well as logical talks of Jones would vote a hundred times over for him instead of Ankeny, who can neither talk nor write, but who depends on buying the few favors that he gets from his fellow senators. Mr. Jones will speak at the Commercial Club next Monday evening thus closing one of the most brilliant campaigns that has ever been held in the Northwest, and it is here predicted that he will at that time deliver to the voters of King county one of the most masterly political addresses that they have heard in many years, and that the room will not be able to accommodate those desiring admission is even now a foregone conclusion. The young voter, the honest voter and the economical voter are all for Jones and despite the alleged agreement or political mortgage given on the voters of King county when Senator Piles was elected to be foreclosed at this time, the voters of King county will give Jones an endorsement that will make his very soul feel good next Tuesday. Destroy the King county court house ring! All that has been said against the re-election of Senator Levi Ankeny may have been absolute falsehoods, as claims his ardent supporters, but it has been told in such a manner as to keep both the senator and his lieutenants, including the Skunk of the Cabbage Patch (Times) in a red hot denial state ever since the Senator Ankeny Badly Beaten. Senator Ankeny Badly Beaten. campaign opened. The stories have been told from the City of Washington to the State of Washington by men not given to downright lying in the past and in newspapers that have never been before branded as journals of doubtful veracity, hence a great majority of the new voters in the state of Washington are inclined to believe them and the indications today are that Senator Ankeny will be beaten next Tuesday at the primaries by an overwhelming majority. It is here predicted that he will lose every county in the state save perhaps Walla Walla county and one or two little counties lying adjacent. We are not too sure, however, that he will not lose even Walla Walla county, where he has resided for many years. His henchmen no longer speak of him on the streets and the only man that is saying a word on the stump for him is Senator Piles, who claims to be keeping a written agreement, wherein he was to campaign King county for him at this time. The only daily newspaper in the state that is raising its voice in behalf of the senator is the Times of Seattle, a renegate Democratic paper, that is also raising its voice in no uncertain terms in behalf of William Jennings Bryan, the Democratic candidate for president. In the outset of the campaign it was thought by even the Jones men that Ankeny had a show of carrying King county, but it is now very apparent that he will lose the county by at least 10,000 plurality. The business men who signed that much talked of agreement set out to make a fight, but soon found they were up against the real thing and not caring to have their business concerns suffer on account of their support of a dead one for the United States senate took a tumble to themselves and now they too have dropped the candidacy of Mr. Ankeny. They may vote for him at the election, but they have nothing to say in his defense. It will thus be seen that Senator Levi Ankeny has no more show of receiving the Republican popular guide them at the primaries next Tuesday. It, after carefully going over the records of the various candidates for United States sen- Volume XV, Number 15. H. R. CAYTON, Publisher. Mead Sweeps King County. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. C. H. Weed, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter unaffected description, Defendants. No. —掌名, and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter unaffected description, the plaintiff identified that the above unpaid plaintiff is the holder of one certain deficient tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 21st day of Dec., 1906, and numbered 1906, in the amount of 93 cents, and upon real property situate in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 4, Block 2, Hutchinson's Division of Green Lake Addition to City of San Antonio. That the taxes for the following claim be paid by the plaintiff said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1901, the sum of 37 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unpaid taxes upon the above described property. and again, and each of you, (including said persons and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of said publication of this notice, within sixty (60) days after July 24, 1908, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for this case, with interest and costs. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreseeing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property and amount due to the unpaid charges against each, taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailley Bldg., Seattle, Wn. July 24th - Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. C. H. Weed, plaintiff, vs. Bishop of Nisqually, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. — Notice of the arrival of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, owners, claimants or holders of an interest or property, in and to the helofermaid, that the above named claimant is the holder of one certain demand tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 21st day of Dec., 1906, and numbered 1906, for the delinquency of the above named claimant in $1.82 and upon real property in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning 555.06 feet East of N. W. corner of S. W. 4' 40" Twp. W. E. M.;末里 South 30' West 182.16 feet;末里 South 172.92 feet;末里 South 20' 30' West 173.58 feet;末里 South 33' West 172.92 feet;末里 West 180.8 feet;末里 North 30' 22 feet;末里 North 30' 99.06 feet;末里 the place of beginning, being a part of the S. W. 1/4 of the S. E. 1/4 of said section. That the years have been paid by and subscribed above property, to-wit: For the 1906 the sum of $1.23; for the year 1905, the sum of $1.17, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice exclusive of the late (40) days after this publication, late (60) days after July 24, 1980. In the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer the court answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below, or for the amount due, fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forecasing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property and sums and amounts of said property charged against each parcel of said property, interest and costs, ordering sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. C. H. WEED, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailley Bldg., Seattle, Wn. July 24th-Sept. 4, 1980. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. C. H. Weed, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No Notice and of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of or an owner of the described real property, in and to the hearsenal, are the above amended plaintiff is the holder of one certain deferred tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 21st day of Dec., 1960, and number 4648 for the delinquent taxes paid in 1903, in the amount of $15,000 and upon real property sittu to-wit. King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 3, Block 2. of Hutchinson's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City. That the taxes for the subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said described real property, to-wit: For the year 1903, the sum of 37 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of one per annum from sale to settlement, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and upon property. of Washington for up to 10 years. of Washington for up to 10 years. Thes. Ross, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property. Defendants. No. —, Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and others of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or property, are hereby notified of the above named plaintiff tax, the amount of one certain delinquent tax, the certificate issued by the Treasurer of the county, State of Washington, dated the 21st day of Dec., 1906, and numbered 346421, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, the following sum of $2.47, and upon property situated in such county, described as follows to Block D. The University Addition. That the taxes for the following submoney upon said described real property, to wittz for the year 1905, the sum of $1.83, which several sums bear interest at the rate percent, per annum from such payment, and are all the unpaid or unredeemed taxes upon real property. and again, and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication, exclusive of said first publication, within sixty (60) days after July 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at its office below stated, or pay the amount you fail to do to, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charges against, with interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause C. H. WEED, Plaintiff. C. A. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailley Bldg., Seattle, Wn. July 24th-Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. C. H. Weed, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereunderfit described real property, Defendants. No. — State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described property, are hereby notified that above delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 21st day of Dec., 1906, and numbered B44147 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, the amount of 99 cents, and the property situated in said King County, described as Syndicate First Addition. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year the sum of 55 cents; for the year the sum of 42 cents; for the year 1902, the sum of 40 for the year 1904, the sum of 36 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 35 cents, which several suns bear interest at the rate of 15 percent, per annum from said date of payment, are all the unpaid and assumed taxes upon the described real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this notice, executive said a publication within sixty (60 days after July 24th, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the your answer on the undersigned stated, or pay the plaintiff a due, together with interest and costs, in case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and as stated, or pay the plaintiff a due, together with interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as stated in Plaintiff complaint, now on this cause and court. A. C. MACONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Pellet Bldg., Seattle, Wn. July 24th-Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. C. H. Weed, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants No. — State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the herelinfer described real property, are hereby notified of the name of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 21st day of Dec., 1906, and numbered B44141 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1890, the amount of 99 cents, and situated in said County, described as follicle First Addition. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property-to-wit: For the year 1900, the sum of 55 cents; for the year 1901, the sum of 49 cents; for the year 1903, the sum of 36 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 37 cents, and for the year 1905, the sum of 35 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per number from said date of payment, and are the unpaid and deferred taxes upon and against property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the day of the day of said service, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the underwriting attorney for the case, the stated, stated, amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each of the said persons, the amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it, resulting as prescript, by law, in the plaintiff's complaint, not laid in this cause and court. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Balley Bldg., Seattle, Wn. July 24th - Sept. 4, 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. C. H. Weed, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown. If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the earlierinfer described real property, Defendants. No. ____. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the tax certificate of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 21st day of Dec., 1906, and numbered B44145 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1900. In the amount of $1.63 and upon its situated in King County, described as follo- wi-fit. Lot 13, Block 3, Kirkland Park. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1889, the sum of $49 cents; For the year 1890, the sum of $19 cents; For the year 1902, the sum of 50 cents; for the year 1903, the sum of 43 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 25 cents, and for the year 1905, the sum of 35 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from the payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the days of publication to-wit, within sixty (60) days after July 24th, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned and answer the complaint of said plaintiff or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon and against the plaintiff and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in his cause and court. A. C. MACDONAID, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wn. July 24th - Sept. 4, 1908. State of Washington I. Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of King County, and the King County Clerk of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court on the 15th of October, 1915, to the estate of Edward Julia Van Atta, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 13th day of July, 1908. (Seal) OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By J. A. SIGURDSSON, Deputy Clerk. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for King County. C. R. Weed, Plaintiff, vs. G. Nydell, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. —. Notice and Summa. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, the sum of the named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 21st day of Dec., 1906, and numbered 484144, the sum of the amount of 98 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 15. Block 1, Kirkland Steel Company, the sum of 40 cents, a sequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1901, the sum of 43 cents; for the year 1902, the sum of 40 cents; for the year 1903, the sum of 40 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 33 cents, and for the year 1905, the sum of 29 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are gill the amount of the assumed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, executive of the day said first publication of the notice, (in the case of the 24th day of July, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attesting that you have paid the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and payable to the plaintiff, and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MACONDAL. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Balley Bldg., Seattle, Wn. July 24—August 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King County You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the date of third publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after July 24th, 1908. In the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the court by the date of third publication of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said real property, for the sums and amounts due upon and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wn. July 24th—Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King County State of Washington to the said Otis Hill, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 24th day of July, 1908 and define the court, the court and define court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the court. The court action is brought is to obtain a degree of divorce from the defendant on the following grounds: 1st. Because the defendant abandoned the plaintiff on May 6th, 1907, said abandonment having been continuous for one year and more, the plaintiff was denied a right to 1907 has neglected and refused and still neglects and refuses to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family. Each of said causes of action having occurred without plaintiff's fault. JNO. S. MONROE. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 429-32 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. July 24—Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. C. H. Weed, Plaintiff, vs. S. A. Kinsey, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described Defendants. No. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 3rd day of Jan., 1906, and numbered 184,000, in the amount of $14.56, in the amount of $14.56, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: West 100 feet of lot 20, Block 21, Snougall Falls. Must that the taxes for the property be paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of $13.27, which several suns bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, except within sixty (60) days after July 24th, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or payed in the amount stated with written costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff, Office Address: 524 Ballet Bldg., Seattle, Wn. July 24th - Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE AND WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY D. N. Howard and Amanda E. Howard, husband and wife, Plaintiffs, ys. all persons known to the court, and to the heroiner described real property. Defendants. No. 62277. Notice and Sum- You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the publication, and are exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after July 24th, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiffs, and serve a copy of the complaint to the plaintiffs at their office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of land owned by the plaintiffs the open and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as pursuant in plaintiff's complaint, now on 14th of this month, in court. D. N. HOWARD. AMANDA E. HOWARD. Plaintiffs. CARRICO & DURK. Attorneys for Plaintiffs. Office Address: 603 People's Savings Bank Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. July 24th-Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE AND WASHINGTON, for King County L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. W. J. Hunt, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herelander described real property, Defendants. No. ——. Notice State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the becafterla described real property named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington. dated the 15th day of Sept., 1907, and numbered B48513, B48514, B48515, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: S. W. ¼ of the S. W. ¼. Section 25, Tp. 23 N. R. 6 E. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent payments are paid above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1906, the sum of $8.27, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the middled and undeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the date of the last publication of this notice, on or before 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, in the amount stated, or pay the amount due, in the fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts charged against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on now in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King. Emma M. Craig, Plaintiff vs. John Alexander Craig, Defendant.—No. 62290. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said John Alexander Craig, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the complaint, to wit, within sixty days after the 24th day of July, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at the office below stated; and in writing, to the said Justice, and answer against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1908. E Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To obtain a decree of the above entitled court for dissolving and an annualing the bonds of matrimonial estate, be granted the said defendant, and granting the plaintiff a divorce from said defendant on the grounds of desertion and abandonment for more than one year, and to obtain a decree in said proceedings for the real estate of the mother of the newborn children of said plaintiff and defendant, toow: James Craig and Benjamin Craig, and decreeing the household furniture and utensils and real estate property of the corner First State Avenue, Augusta Street, Province of Ontario, to be the sole and separate property of the plaintiff, and awarding the same to her as her sole and separate property, free from any other defendant, and to obtain such other and further rights, as the court may deem just in the premises. P. V. DAVIS, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 304 Pioneer Building, Seattle King County, Washington. July 24 - September 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR CURTOR OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Ann E. Erickson, Plaintiff, vs. Linnie Erickson, Defendant.-No. 62293. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Linnie Erickson, defendant. You are hereby summoned to apear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 24th day of July, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer to the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony on the ground of non-support. HOMER E. TURNER. Attorney for Plaintiff. P, O. Address: No. 745 N. Y. Blk., Seattle, County of King, Washington. July 24-September 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE In the Matter of the Estate of Sarah Duggan, Deceased. No. 9213. Notice to Creditors, order, dated January 18, 1908, made upon the 15th of July, 1908, and given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, or against the community formerly existing, said deceased and with her husband, Duke Duggan to present them with the neces- sary vouchers to the undersigned, R. G. Duggan, administrator of said estate, at room 623 New York Block, in Seattle, Wash., the place of birth, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice, to-wit, within one year after July 24, 1908, or same will be barred. Date of first publication, July 24, 1908. B. G. DUGGAN, As Administrator of Said Estate. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Attorney for Estate. 623 New York Block, Seattle, Wash. July 24th—Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Margaret Hanegschobel, Plaintiff vs. John Hanegschobel, Defendant. No. 62277. Summ- State of Washington to John Hanegschnobel, defendant herein: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 24th day of June 1008, in the office of the court, in the presence of entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer thereto upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their address below given; in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer of plaintiff's office, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of habitual drunkenness and failure to support plaintiff. Attorney for PLATKR. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 603 Peoples Bank Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for the County of King, Alfred Vandesandt, Plaintiff, vs. Kittle Vandesandt, Defendant. No. —. Summons for Publication. State of Washington to the said Kittle Vandesandt, above named defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 24th day of July A. 1908, and defend the plaintiff in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated. And in case of your failure to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand in the above cited court, which been dled with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To obtain a decree of the court annulling the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant. GEORGE A. ATTORNEY for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 545 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. July 24th - Sept. 4, 1908. Wash. July 24—August 28, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. M. J. Nist, Plaintiff, vs. John Doe Michener, John Doe Riley, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herenafter described real property. Defendants. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest in the property, have been notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, has been filed with the Court of King County, 1906, and numbered follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows: Block 5, Craven's Division to Green Lake, for the year 1904 in the sum of $8.05; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the palpitant upon said above property, in the sum of $8.05; for the year 1905, the sum of $8.71; for the year 1906, the sum of $8.09; for the year 1906 (local improvement district No. 1007), in the sum of $8.09; for the year 1906 (local improvement district No. 1007), the sum of $2.94, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid property taxes upon and the real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, and to appear in court for such publication to-wit, August 14, 1908. In the above entitled court and action: and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned and the plaintiff, and pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail to do, judgment will be remunered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon such parcel, and the plaintiff, and pay the amounts, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and address. M. J. NIST, Plaintiff. KENNETH MACKINTOSH & E. B. HERALD. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office Address: 227-30 Colman Bldg., Seattle, Waiks. Aug. 14—Sent. 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Adelalde Cecelia Eames, Plaintiff, vs. Frank Wood Eames, Defendant. Number 16144. The State of Washington to the said Frank Wood Eames, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to sixty (60) days after the 21st day of August, 1998, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain from you a divorce on the grounds of extreme jealousy, cruel treatment and failure to support. PARKER & BROWN. P. O. Address: 32 Union Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 21—October 2, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for the County of King P. O. Lewis, plaintiff, vs. Charl E. Lewis, defendant, The State of Washington to the said Clarion E. Lewis, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of the summons, for plaintiff, within sixty days after the 17th July, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, of the said court, and defend. And in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been made by the court of the said action, set forth in the complaint, as is follows: to obtain a divorce and dissolution of the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and the defendant herein on the ground of abandonment for more than one year. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 9-10 Starr-Boyd Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. July 17, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. sald above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1903, the sum of $1.55; for the year 1904, the sum of $1.37; for the year 1905, the sum of $2.00; for the year 1906, the sum of $4.28. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from sald date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against sald redemption. You and each of you (including sald persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear with nixity days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of sald first publication, and of the day of sald first publication, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of sald plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the sums due together below stated or pay the amount due, together with any other sums, in case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forecasing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon bargaining for or against sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sum of the sums property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. Office address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 17-August 28, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. John E. Greenland and Jane Doe Greenland, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and persons unknown, if any, having or not having any real property, to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of your defendants, if any, having or not having any real property or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain deficient tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of the State of Washington, April 15, 1908, and numbered B40476 for the deficient taxes of the year 1904. in the amount of ninety-three (93) cents, and upon the real property situated in King County, Washington, described by the Court of King County, in Block Three (3), Kingman Syndicate's First addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. That the taxes for the following price and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said described real property, to-will: the tax for the year 1906, fifty-two (52) cents; for the year 1907, fifty (50) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent, per annum from sald date of payment and are all the unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot. Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Mrs. J. A. McKinnon, and John Doe McKinnon, Mrs. J. A. McKinnon, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons claiming or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property. Defendants, to 6248 Notice and Summons. Defendants, to 6248 Notice and Summons. Defendants, and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the heresafter described real property. Defendants, to 6248 named plaintiff is the holder of one certain de- HERMAN D. CROW FRIDAY. SEPTEMBER 4. 1908. 1997 July 17-August 28, 1908. liquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated June 5, 1906, and numbered B21200, for the delinquent taxes (£9.90) and the unpaid taxes (£9.90), and upon the real property situated in King County, Washington, described as follows, to-wit: lot forty-two (42), Block five (5), Ballpark, the town of the county, King County, Washington; that the taxes, the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1905, thirty-four cents, for the year 1906, thirty-four cents, for the year 1907, twenty-four cents, (£24), which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from the sale date of payment and are all the unpaid and unpaid taxes. You, and each of you, (including said unknown persons, If any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this complaint, and upon the date of said death, publication, to-wit: within sixty days after August 14, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer for plaintiff or for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the complaint together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forecasing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums charged for such parcel, charged for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of such parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in the complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AUROURA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation. Plaintiff. F. J. CARVAR, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldk., Seattle, Wash. Aug. 14—Sept. 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Mrs. J. A. McKinnon, and John Doe McKinnon, her husband, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the heroiner described real property. Defendants. Named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. Washington, dated June 5, 1906, and numbered B42159, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of ninety cents of King County. Washington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot forty-one (41), Block five (5), Ballard Park 2nd addition to Seattle, King County. Washington; that the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the court, to-wit; for the year 1905, thirty-four cents, to-wit; for the year 1905, thirty-four cents ($.34); for the year 1906, twenty-six cents ($.26) and for the year 1907, twenty-four cents ($.24), which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from the said date of the year 1907, and unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You, and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this publication, to-wit; within sixty days after August 14, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the complaint, and obtain plaintiff's office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums payable therein, and ordering plaintiff's office for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of such parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation. Plaintiff. F. J. CARVAR, Attorney for Plaintiff. (Our Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Blldg., Seattle, Washington. Aug. 14—Sept. 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for King County. You and each of you (including said unknown persons, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (90) minutes of the said complaint of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after Aug. 14, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of this action and answer the complaint of your action on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered hereon against each said tax and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, for the satisfaction of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of each parcel of said property found against it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARRAR. Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle. Wash. Aug. 14—Sept. 23, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for the County of King. In Probate in the matter of the Estate of Charles Dettrich, Deceased. No. 8157. Order to Show Causes Why Distribution. Not Be Made. George Dettrich, on the 17th of August, died in the Estate of Charles Dettrich, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof. George Dettrich, on the 17th of August, it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: therefore ordered by the court that all persons in the department of the estate of the said Charles Dettrich, deceased, and be appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the department of the said Court in the city of Seattle, at the 17th of August, 1908 at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a.m. of said day, then and there to show cause. If any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made, the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this once be published once a week for four successive weeks, in the form of a copy of September, 1908, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 12th day of August, 1908. BOYD J. TALLMAN, Judge. Aug. 14—Sept. 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of John George Kellett, deceased. Notice of Sale of Real Estate. In response to being Given: That the unsigned, administratrix of the estate of John George Kellett, deceased, in obedience to an order of the Superior Court of the County of King, State of Washington, made on the 20th day of August, 1908, will sell at public auction to the highest and best bidder, for cash, on Saturday and 121st day of September 10, 1908, between the 10 and 40 clock in the morning and the setting of the sun, beginning at the hour of eleven o'clock a. m., at the front door of the King County Court House, in the City of Seattle, in the County of King aforsaid, that certain lot and parcel of land particularly described as follows, to Lot 15, in Block 13, Town of Kirkland, King County, State of Washington. The terms of sale will be fifty per cent cash to accompany bid, and the remaining fifty per cent upon confirmation of sale and delivery of administratrix deed. Dated at Seattle, Washington, this 20th MARTHA KELLETT. Administratrix of the Estate of John George Kellett, deceased. GRAVES. PALMER & MURPHY, Attorneys for Administratrix. August 21—Sept. 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the date of publication of this notice, and the date of the day of publication of this notice, to-wit: within sixty days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the complaint of said plaintiff, this office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs, ordering the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY. A Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg. Wash. July 31-September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. J. W. Brown. Plaintiff, vs. H. McCord et al, and all persons unknown, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. 617400. State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them, including said H. McCord (otherwise named H. M. McCord) et al and all persons unknown and unknown owners of the property assigned with the plaintiff and each of you are hereby notified that the plaintiff is the owner and holder of one delinquent tax certificate Numbered B48408 issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, to the plaintiff and each of you are assigned with all sub-payments to the plaintiff) for the taxes of 1904 which with all subsequent tax and interest to June 1, 1908, amounts to $3.22, which is all the taxes due and delinquent said property. The amount of the costs that the costs of this action are $7.50. Total ($10.72) Ten Dollars and seventy-two cents, and more than three years since first delinquent, assessed as the property of the defendant H. or J. McCord et al. described Book 2, Wasserman's Addition to Ravenwood Park, Seattle, Wash. You and each of you are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within 60 days after the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit: 60 days after the first day of publication, to report any action, and defend the action and answer the complaint and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for plaintiff at his address below given or pay the amount of tax, interest and costs due and charged upon said lot. In case you fail so to do judgment will be held against you for the full amount of said taxes, costs and interest, and all accruing liabilities, and a decree will be made decreeing the same to be a first lien upon said lot and foreclosing the same and ordering a sale thereof as provided by law, and forever barring and estopting any interest therein adverse to the claim of the plaintiff and for such other relief as prayed in plaintiff's complaint on file in this cause and court. J. W. BROWN. Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. Notice of Sale of Collateral. Now therefore, by virtue of the premises, we will expose for sale and sell at public auction, to the highest and best bidder, for cash, on Wednesday, the second of clock a. m., at Room 715 New York Block, corner Cherry Street and Second Avenue, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, said fourteen (14) bonds, or so many thereof as may be necessary, upon the behalf of the said Title Trust Company, with interest thereon and costs of this sale. Dated Seattle, Washington, this 19th day of August, 1908 TITLE TRUST CO. HERR, BAYLEY & WILSON. Attorneys. August 21—August 28. TOOR A OJM PROBATE NOTICE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King—ss. In the matter of the Estate of Charles Deltrich, deceased. No. 8157. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that George F. Telfer, the administrator of the estate of Charles Deitrich, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said Court his Final Account as such administrator of the estate of Charles Deitrich, September 1908, at 9:30 o'clock a. m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed, in said Court, as the Probate Account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same, the Hon. Bord J. Tallman, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto affirmed this 12th day of August, 1908. August 14 - September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Louise Clark, Plaintiff, vs. Charles H. R. Clark, Defendant. No. 61579. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Charles H. R. Clark, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first sixty (60) days after the summons to-wit; within sixty (60) days after the summons to-wit; within 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff his objection to do. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of desertion and non-support. F. M. JEFFERY, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 147 New York Block, Seattle, King County, State of Washington. June 26—August 7, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington in and for King County. On Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co. a corporation, plaintiff v. Aurora Land Co. a corporation, plaintiff wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown. If any, having or changing an interest in or to the hereafter property, defendants. No. — Notice and Statement. State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an unauthorized or or to the heretofore described real property. The above delinquent plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated October 11, 1975, number B49175 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1975, ninety-three (93) cents; and upon the real property situated in King County, Washington, described as follows: to-wit. Lot Eight (8), described as follows: to-wit. Site Settlement's First Addition to Seattle, King County Washington. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property. Lot Eight (8), described as follows: forty-one (41) cents; for the year 1906, fifty-two cents; for the year 1909, fifty (50) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent an annum from sald date of payment and are all unredeemed taxes and are alreadt said lot. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby further notified that you will appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of the notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the 17th day of July, 1908, in the above entitled court of the United States, for the satisfaction and answer the complaint of said plaintiff for your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, to the said plaintiff for your answer on the rendered herein, forecasing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and for each said taxes, interest and costs, ordering said of the said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now furnished by AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 14 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. July 17-August 20, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE You and each of you (including said unknown persons, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (90) days of the date of publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of the first publication, to-wit: within sixty (90) days after the 17th day of July, 1908, in the above entitled court of the United States, answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve the answer of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, to the plaintiff, for the rendering herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs against each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, made on file in this cause and court, AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorne for plaintiff. Plaintiff. or the Northern Bank & Trust Blldg., Seattle, Washington. July 17-August 28, 1908. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE Washington, in and for the County of Krug. Dewitt, in and for the County, vs. Jennee Johnson, defendant; Washington to the said Jennee Johnson, defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons. to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 17th day of July, 1998, and ten (10) days after the 18th day of July, 1998, entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his offive below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you for the above complaint, which has been filed with the clerk. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of fraud and duress. ELLA S. A WRIGHT, P. O. Address: Rooms 623-631 Burke Bldg., in Seattle, King County, Washington. July 17—Aug. 28, 1998. 3 SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, in and for the County of King, Charles P. Sloggy, Jennie Sloggy, J. F. Pike, and C. K. Pike, Plaintiffs, vs. Eliza B. Stevens, and C. K. Pike, persons or parties unknown, claiming any right to lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein" by reason of the mortgage hereafter described, Defendants—No. 62394 The State of Washington to the said Eliza B. Stevens, also 'all other persons or parties unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint after described); and claiming an interest therein by reason of that certain mortgage executed by Mary Sloggy on April 26, 1893, against the east twenty-eight (28) acres of the Northwest (N. W. 1/2), and the Northwest quarter (N. W. 1/4), and the East hundred (N. W. 1/4), and U. S. Government Lots six (6) and seven (7), all in Section thirty (30), Township twenty-five (25) North of Rauge six (6) East W. M., securing mortgage five (500) dollars, which said mortgage was waived of the annuity Loan & Trust Company, a corporation which said mortgage by its terms became due and payable July 1, 1898, which said mortgage was due and payable April 26, 1893, in the office of the Auditor of King County, by the auditor of King County, bearing Auditor's File No. 112373, in Volume 49 of Mortgages, on page 441, of the Records of said Office, which said mortgage was on May 5, 1893, duly assigned unto one Eliza B. Stevens, which said assignment was duly recorded on June 19, 1893, of the Auditor of King County, State of Washington, in Volume 103 of Mortgages, on page 636 of the Records of said Office, defendants: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towitt, to the office of the summons of July, 1908, and defend the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs herein, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorney of the above office below stated, and in case of your failure to answer the complaint, be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The above action is for the purpose of finding that the described complaint has been fully paid and satisfied, and cancelled, and annulled, and to quiet the title to the said lands above described in plaintiffs as now owned by you, of the defendants and each of them, and that by said defendants and each of them, and that said defendants have no estate, right, title, interest, or Ilen whatsoever in or against said lands and premises, and that the title of said defendants free from any and all claims or lions of said defendants and each of them, and that said defendants and each of them, forever enjoined, barred and precluded from asserting any claim or Ilen whatsoever by reason of your mortgage, in and to said lands above described, or any part thereof. Attorney for Plaintiffs. Office and Postoffice address: 754 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. July 31—September 11 PROBATE NOTICE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the matter of the Estate of Floy P. Ingall, Deceased—No. 8069. Notice of Settlement account. Notice is hereby requested that Albert M. Ingall, administrator of the estate of Floy P. Ingall, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in Court his final account as such administrator, and that Thursday, the 3rd day of September, 1908, at 9:30 a.m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department, in the Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said Court, he been duly appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and contest exceptions in writing to said account, and contest this 31st day of July, 1908. Witness the Hon. Arthur E. Griffin, Judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said Court hereto affixed this 31st day of July, 1908. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By E. S. SEYMOUR, Deputy Clerk. Seal of Superior Court. King County, Washington IN PROBATE INFERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for the County of King—bso Probate. all the matter of the Estate of Floy P. Ingalls, in the State of New York. So to show Cause Way Distribution should Not be. Albert M. Ingalls, administrator, estate of Floy P. Ingalls, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is the distribution of the residue thereof among the petitioners by law thereto, and it appearing to the court the petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all petitioners in the estate of the said Floy P. Ingalls, deceased, appear before the said Superior Court of King Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said Court in the City of Seattle, at the 3d day of September, 1908, at the hour of 0:30 of that day, on said day, then and there to show cause, if they have, why an order of distribution should not be made, the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the 3d day of September 1906. In The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court on the day of July, 1908. Arthur E. GRIFFIN, State of Washington, Country of King, sage. I. Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the forgiving is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 31st day to July, 1908, in the matter of the estate of Floy P. Ingalls, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 31st day of July, 1908. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk, (Seal) By E. S. SEYMOUR, Deputy Clerk. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. William Dorris and Maria Dorris, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. James M. McLellan and the unknown hels of the said James M. McLellan, and James M. McLellan, who be deceased, Joseph M. Barto, and unknown hels of the said Joseph M. Barto, if any, of the Barto be deceased, and all persons unknown, having, or claiming to have, any interest in the property described in the complaint herein. The State of Washington to each and all of said defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the date of the action, 808, and defend the above entitled action, the entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, the undersigned stated and in case of your failure so to do, judge, and against you according to the demand of the complaint herein which has been filed with the Clerk of said court. The object of said action is to quiet title to the following described property situated in King County, Washington, to-wit: Lots one (1), and two (2), block two (2), Court Helgts Supplemental Addition to the Bounty Helgts Supplementary Enjoin and debar the said defendants, forever enjoin and debar them, and all them, from asserting any claim whatsoever in and to the said lands and premises and to obtain a decree decreeing that the said defendant, the said defendants, have no interest whatsoever in the said claim and that plaintiffs' title is good and valid. EDWARD VON TOBEL. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: Room 603-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 7-Sept. 18, 1998 August 7-Sept. 18, 1908. Have a Legal Notice? PHONE MAIN 305. SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Published Every Friday, 307 Epler Blk. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton.....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton.....Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. One Year .....$3.00 Six Months .....1.50 Three Months .....75 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matter. Legal Publications a Specialty. The two hardest fights in King county for Republician nominations for county offices are for sheriff and county commissioners. Once it seemed it was the field against Agnew, but it begins to look now as if Agnew had to get in and rustle just the same as the other candidates. Aside from Agnew all the other aspirants are acceptable to the great rank and file of the voters and the nomination of any of them would not be amiss. BENCH AND BAR. Judge Milo A. Root, of the State Supreme Court has expressed himself strongly against legal technicalities defeating justice. In one decision he said: "The function of a court is to adjudicate the differences existing between litigants and mete out that which is right and lawlul, so far as such a consummation may be approximated under the forms of law. They are not institutions where the rights of suitors are to be determined by the prowess, skill or sharp practice of attorneys on the one side or by the inconsequential errors, omissions and oversights of the opposite counsel. Technicalities, forms and rules must not be permitted to defeat the highest purpose of courts the dealing out of substantial justice-unless in a given case an arbitrary statue or established rule of decision positively so requires."—Reported in Washington Reports page 265. Judge Root is a candidate for renomination at the coming primary. Legal Mono Joseph W. MILO A. ROOT CANDIDATE FOR SUPREME JULGE. When death claimed I. D. McCutcheon, one of Seattle's well known attorneys, a through ex-pounder of the laws both theoretical as well as practical a good man went. Mr. McCutcheon was generally liked by members of the bar as he was affiable and acomodating. He was a good citizen and had many friends among the men of the business world as well as among the laboring class. The remains were sent to New York where a son and daughter live for interment. At the late bar primary in this county Mr. McCutcheon was a candidate for one of the six judiciary nominations. While former Governor Eugene Semple was not in Seattle at the time of his death which took place last Sunday in California, whither he had gone some months ago for his health, nevertheless he was an honored member of the King county bar and was considered at one time one of the bright legal minds of the bar not only of Seattle, but of the country. He died as said above after a lingering illness covering many months. He was interested in many enterprises in Seattle, but the one that gave him the greatest amount of notoriety was the Lake Washington Water Way, better known in Seattle as the south canal. For the part he played in urging the claims of the south canal before the government as a more feasible scheme than the north canal he was severely sensured by the friends of the latter, yea he was for a time roundly abused by the general public. His efforts to get the government to endorse the south canal fell short of the mark and since that time but little has been heard of the project, though the company is still doing business, filing in the tide lands out of which it is making a vast sum of money. ENFORCEMENT OF OBSOLETE LAWS. Whether a court has the right to refuse to enforce a law merely because it is obsolete, is not a debatable question although many so-called statesmen and many editors of the secular press have found in it opportunity for [Name] [Name not visible in the image] THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN profound argument. But our esteemed contemporary, the National Corporation Reporter, calls our attention to the recent case of District of Columbia v. Robinson, 36 Wash. Law Rep. 101, where the court in that case claims the right to disregard an obsolete law, under proper circumstances. The defendant in that case was charged with a violation of an old statue of Maryland, adopted in 1723, and which has been adopted by Congress, along with the other statues of Maryland, as the law of District of Columbia at the time of its organization. The statue provided that "no person should work on the Lord's day," etc., and that ever person transgressing the act and being thereof convicted, by the oath of one sufficient witness or confession of the party, before the Police Court, should forfeit 200 pounds of tobacco, to be levied and applied as aforesaid." We are enclined to agree with our contemporary's criticism that 'so far as this portion of the act is concerned the statue seems to have differed very little from the statues which have been upheld in many states as proper police regulations, and the fact that the original act from which this provison was taken, had provided for barbarous punishment against blasphemers, swearers, drunkards and Sabbath breakers, and other persons guilty of theological offences (all of which provisions seem to have been eliminated before the act was adopted by the federal government for the District of Columbia), affords no reason why that portion of the act which was left and which was not itself offensive to the provisions of the federal constitution, should not have been enforced." It is quite a dangerous doctrine to be allowed to creep into the state, that courts can refuse to enforce a law merely because it is "obsolete." What right has any court to consider such a purely legislative question? There is often a great hue and cry raised when some reformer like Gov. Hughes of New York or Gov. Folk of Missouri discovers some law on the statue books which previous administra- called "obsolete" legislation relates usually to the public morally and are frequently called "blue laws," having been promulgated at a time when public sentiment supported a strict enforcement of the Sabbath, the suppression of gambling, the severe punishment of drunkenness, blasphemy and indecent speech. But no matter what the color of the law may be, if it be not violative of existing constitutional restrictions, it should and must be enforced by the courts whenever such enforcement is demanded through the proper channels. We have often heard the argument used that a certain law is "dead" and obosolete and no longer supported by public opinion. We have a distinct recolection of such an argument in regard to a very strict Sunday law in a certain state which, when it was sought to be repealed, was approved by a large majority of the legislature. It is, therefore, presumptuous on the part of any court to pronounce the nullification of any law on the ground that it is "obsolete" until the legislature has directly or indirectly indicated its intention to repeal it. It is proper and the duty of every court to enforce every law duly enacted and in force, leaving to the legislature the obligation to repeal all obsolete or obnoxious legislation.—Central Law Journal, St. Louis, Mo. When it comes to lying, Robinson has Ananias skinned a mile. If the Lord ever created a more dishonest commodity than Joe Robinson, it has escaped attention. An endorsement of E. M. Carr for Supreme Judge was published recently in the daily press, signed by attorneys for the Seattle Electric Company, the Great Northern Railway Company and numerous other big corporations. Some of the labor unions have endorsed Judge Humphries. Practically everybody else in King county is supporting Judge Root. [Name not visible in the image] ```markdown ``` HERMAN D. GROW CANDIDATE FOR SUPREME JUDGE. tions have not seen fit to enforce; and the suggestion has come from the public press that the refusal to enforce a law for thirty, fifty or even a hundred years has nullified the law, and that the governor is guilty of oppression in office in asking for its enforcement. This is all very strange doctrine and its adherents are becoming bolder every year, making necessary that a note of warning be sounded. If the doctrine be a good one then any party or executive in power who for any number of years refuses to enforce certain laws can justify the courts on some future application for their enforcement, in nullifying them on the ground that they have become obsolete. Such a conclusion is absolutely violative and destructive of our three-fold scheme of government. If the executive and judicial departments of government can thus combine to nullify the work of the legislative department the later arm of the government becomes instantly powerless and atrophied by the severe restraint thus imposed upon it. It would be better to return to the great Anglo-Saxon scheme of government and make parliament supreme over all than to allow the courts to combine with the executive to nullify legislation by non-enforcement. It is true that most of the so- Talking with a group of lawyers at the Bar Association, Judge Morris said: "I have known Judge Root intimately for over 12 years and know him to be a good man, able lawyer and conscientious judge." "I have known him for 17 years, much of the time intimately, and I can fully endorse Judge Morris' remarks," answered Judge Frater, who was in the company. Nobody who knows the record and character of Joe Robinson will pay any attention to his attacks on the judges and other officials. Friday, September 4, 1908 } Friday, September 4, 1908 POLITICAL POINTERS. VULING LN LEE, PINE INE EO, THE FOLLOWING has been pre- pared for the Ellensburg Locali- zer by L. A. Vincent, an attorney of Ellensburg: Q. How shall I vote at the Sep- tember primary? #° On going to the poles stud- iduyiy and carefully read the sample ballots and instructions there displayed for your infor- mation. Q. Is the matter of voting at the primary difficult or compli- cated? A. No. Itis quite simple and easily understood. Q. What shall I do next? A. Approach the election offi- cers, ask for your ticket, giving the name of the party the candi- age of which generally you ex- pe to support. Whereupon you will be given a ticket of that party having printed on it the names of canadates of that party only—(except judges non-par- tisan). Q. Is there a form of ticket reccommended in the primary law? A, There is. Q. Please describe the form as to general appeavances and ar- rangement of canditates thereon? A. The first office or rather the names of the first candidates claiming your attention will be the head, CONGRESSIONAL, the ticket being arranged in two columns, the Congressional can- didates and all candidates for State offices being in the left- ind column; in the right-hand jumn candidates for U. S. Sen- ator, then under a head ‘‘Legis- lative’? comes State Senator and next member ‘‘House of Repre- sentatives,” and next one after the other comes county. officers, precinct offices and precinct com- miteemen. Q. Shall I have the opportuni- ty of seeing a sample ballot be- fore the primary election? ‘A. Yes. There will be sample pallots of all political parties en- titled to be printed on the official ticket, posted up in the County Auditor’s office about August 23rd and prior to that date the County Auditor will have for distribution phamphlet copies or booklets of the primary law. Q. Is the State now divided into Congressional districts? A. Yes. Three Congressional districts. Q. Shall I paticipate in the election of three Congressmen as in former elections? A. No. You willonly partici- pate in the selection of the can- didate for the First district. Q. What about First and Second choice voting? For what offices am I entitled to vote for a First and Second choice? I A. Your right to vote for a “irst and a Second choice may apply to the first candidate for which you vote, that of your can- didate for Congress. Q. How may I know when I shall vote a First and Second choice? A. If under the head CON- GRESSIONAL and __sub-head Representative in Congress’’ there appears the names of four or more candidates, you will be required to vote for First and Second choice. Q. How else shall I know? A. There will appear under the designation of the office, thus, the words; ‘Vote for both first and second choice.’’ OQ. To what other offices does the first and second choice apply? A, Governor, Lieutenant Gov- ernor, Secretary of State, State Auditor, State Treasurer, Attor- ney General, Commissioner of Public | Lands, _and Superinten- o % & 2 "4 in oe cy bs i Ib too an | Ye. js ae CHAKLES &, GUUN. Lieutenant Governor’s Life One cf Great Business Activity. A. No. He must vote for a different person, for one person for first choice and for another for second choice. Q. Isthere a penalty attached to voting for the same ye'son for both first and second choice? A. Yes. The penalty for so voting is: The person—voter so offending, will loose his vote for that office, that is his vote will not be counted for that office. Q. If there are less than four candidates for Representative in Congress or for any State office how shall I vote? A. Vote for one. Vote for your choice. Q. Where shall I look for candidates for U. S. Senator? - A. Atthe top of the right- hand column. Q. What offices follow? A. Under the head ‘‘Legis- lative’’ first come candidates for State Senator, then ‘‘Member of House of Representatives,’’ next under the head ‘‘County’’ come the County offices one after another, Q. How many candidates shall I vote for, for any one of these offices just named on the right column? ‘A. You may vote for but one candidate for any one office— you will see printed the words ‘‘Vote for one’’ (except representatives and county commissioners, when you vote for two). Q. How shall I vote for judges of the Supreme Court and judges of the Superior Court? A. The names of all candi- dates entitied to be voted for at the September primary will be printed at the bottom of each ticket, of whatsoever _ politics, under the head: *‘NON-PARTIS- AN JUDICAL TICKET,”’ There are three judges of the Supreme Court to be nominated and elect- ed and six judges of the Superior Court to be nominated and elect- ed. Q. Where will the names of these candidates appear on the ticket? A. At the bottom of every ticket, Republican, Democratic or whatsoever ticket is entitled to be printed and voted for at the September primary, will appear the names of all candi. dates under the head: ‘‘NON- PARTISAN JUDICAL TICK. ED? Q. Where shall I look for candidates or judges of the Sup- reme Court? A. Under the heading named and in the left-hand column, Q. Where will names of the candidates for judges of the Superior Court appear? » A,..In the right-hand column-- to the right of the candidates of judges of the Supreme Court. Q. Why the designation, “NON-PARTISAN JUDICIARY TICKET?” THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN A. Because candidates for these offices are required to not desiginate in their declarations of candidacy the party of which they are or may be members, and the names of all candidates for those offices are required to be printed on each and every ticket. Q. Why should these offices be taken out of politics ? A. To enable the judges nom- inated and elected to be entirely independant, under obligations to no man or party, so that their judgement and decisions may_be r:spected for fairness and im- partiality. What party ticket will ap- pear or be printed as official to be voted at the September prim- ary? A. The Republican, the Demo- cratic and such other parties which may be represented on the official ticket at the last city or general election, its candidates or any of them received ten per cent of the vote cast at said elect- ion, Other parties, thatis, those whose vote was lees than ten per cent, may nominate their candi- dates by conventions as formerly, provided such conventions are held on the day fixed by law for the holding of the September primary. Will there be candidates for precinct offices on the ticket furnished me? A. Yes. For justice of the peace, for which office you will be entitled to vote for one candi- date if you live in a country pre- cinct and for two if you live in a city precinet. You will also be entitled to write in a name as your choice for precinct commit- teeman. In withdrawing from the race for county commissioner A. B, Ball warmly favors the nomina- tion of A. F. Haas as may be seen from the following excerpt from a letter addressed to this office. : I would recommend my friends to vote for Mr. A. F. Haas. I have known Mr, Haas for the past fifteen years and I am confi- deat no better man can be found in the city of Seattle for the po- sition. Mr. Haas knows nothing of this move on my part and will not knowit perhaps until he sees it in print. The votersof the 47 represen- y tative district in the opinion of . the Piemaker could not elect a better _man_for the legislature q than Hon. E. B. Palmer, who served two terms in the state e senate from the district and was e twice elected to the house of rep- resentatives- His. record while _ in the legislature is cleanandone ¢ that any man shonld feel proud of. Mr. Palmer is unqualifiedly _ tight on all the moral questions y at issue and always voted for joc al option. ee a Lieutenant Governor Charles E. Coon, who is practually assured of renomination at the primaries on next Tuesday, has spent more than forty years of his life in business and political activity, and is one of the best known men in the State of Washington. Starting out by enlisting in the civil war as a member of the 23rd New York Volunteers at the age of 18 years, Mr. Coon’s life has been one of daily acti- vity ever since. Charles E. Coon_came to the State of Washington in 1895 and livéd for two years in Tacoma. In 1897 he went to Port Town- send as the head of the Port Townsend Mercantile Company, and since living there served four years as mayor of the city and was for four years president of the -cham- ber of commerce. His term as mayor was marked by a construction of a gravity water system by the city at a cost of a quarter of a million dollars, which has turned out to be a splended financial in- vestment and is the pride of every citizen of that community. He is also president of the State Grocers’ Association, now serving his fourth term. After the civil war Charles E. Coon was in the treasure department untll 1883, be- ginning as aclerk and rising by promotions tothe position of assistant secretary of treasury, being for several montls acting secretary. He spent several yezrs in Another representative from the district has to be elected and the Piemaker is of the further opinion that-Fred L. Rice, the well khown attorney with offices in the Burke block, would make a most suitable colleague for Mr. Palmer. There is no question as to where Mr, Rice stands on the moral questions that are and will be at issue before the next legis- lature. He heartily asscribes to the party platform as laid down by the Spokane convent:on and when hetiled his declaration for the nomination he likewise agreed to vote for the man for United States senator getting the high- est popular vote in the direct primary contest. in voting for representatives in this district vote for two and we recomend that those two be E. B. Palmer and Fred L. Rice. It would appear, judging from what one hears on the street, that a majority of the voters in Seattle are quite favorable to the candidacy of W. P. Bell for at- torney general and that he surely will get a majority of the votes of the county seems a foregone concelussion at this writing. Mr. Bell is one of the able lawyers of the state and it might be added one of the most successful. Its an honor for an attorney after he has succeeded well in his pro- fession and desiring to partially retire from active practice to want some place of judicial honor and from the attorney general to the supreme court is but a step and the lawyer has not been born that does not want to end his carier on the supreme bench. After spending a life of some twenty odd years in the state practing law Mr. Bell comes. te the voters of the state asking his nomination and as a recom: endation for the same he§ brings the unanimous endorsement of his home county Ifitbe true that Beckinham and Rutherford have stationed hundreds of men at the various saloons and hold outs in the var- ious smaller towns of the county and more especially at North Bendand the vicinity, who are being paid to vote for them, then it is a fact that those men stand a splended show of being nomi- nated again and the lavish and willful expenditure of the public funds be continued for another two years, but if the above is not true then both of those men will have to rustle for re-election. The Beckinham-Rutherford com- bine, of which Jim Agnew is the acknowledged head, claim tc have a cinch on twenty five pet cent of the votes that will be cast in King county next Tues: day and they make no bones ir saying will nominate them. Re- member this when you vote next Tuesday. Europe in the service of the gov- ernment as financial agent for the treasure department, and re- funded millions of dollars in bonds at a great saving in inter- est to thiscountry. This service was recognized by resolution of the national congress. As presiding officer of that body, Lieutenant Governor Char- les E. Coon has twice been unani- mously commended by the Wash- ington state senate as a man “‘of marked ability and fair and im- partial manner,’’ and he dis- patches more business than any: other presiding officer the senate ever had. Lieutentant Governor Coon is one of the most distinguished looking men in the state. His announcement card has made the “hit”? of thecampaign. Itshows Lieutenant Governor Coon in- troducing Hon. W. H. Taft on the steps of the capitol building at Olympia last September, Charles E. Coon’s name is No 2on the cfficial ballot for the office of lieutenant governor. Attorneys, attention! THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN does the best and most reasonable legal work. Phone Main °305. In the first district the Pie- maker is of the opinion that the voters would do themselves proud if they would nominate A. F, Haas for commissioner althcugh any one of the other aspirants would make acceptable cfficials with the exception of Charles Beckinkam. In the third district 0. A. Tucker seems to be the strongest opponent of Rutherford though Albin is foregin to the front wiih great strides, but there are a number of good men seek- ing the nomination and any one of them save Al Rutherford would give the county a thousand times cleaner administration than she is now getting. In voting for these commissioners the voter should keep in mind that the Rutherford bunch is desperate and not leaving a stone unturned to keep in power. They would not hesitate to place a few hun- dred floaters in the country dis- triets for the purpose of voting as they directed. So beware. The Seattle Republican has no hesitancy insaying that Supreme Court Judges Milo A. Root and Herman D. Crow have given general satisfaction since they have been members of the bench and they have at all times so act- ed on ie bench in the way of rendering opinions as skould and verly will merit the hearty sup- port of every good citizen for their re-election. No class of men can truthfully say but that both of them have not only done their duty and their whole duty and in doing so handed down decisions that have been fair to all men regardless of race or con- ditions. While there are other candidates seeking the supreme bench they entertain little or no hope of defeating either of these gentlemen, but hope to be the third man, who will succeed Judge Hiram E. Hadley, who voluntarily retires from the bench at the expiration of his term. On this point the attorneys as well as the laymen differ widely as Judge 8. J. Chadwick is re- ceiving a hearty support among many of the leading Republicans on this side of the mountains in preference to the Republican as- poate: Judge Chadwick has een repeatedly elected superior court judge of Whitman county and throughout that section of the state he is considered one of the ablest judges that has ever held a court in that section. John E, Humphries is also mak- ing a vigorous campaing for the third place and the same is_true of Judge Parker and O, V. Linn. It is safe to say at this writing the strength of the respective candidates are bout as they have been named herein, which: puts the odds quite in favor of Chad- wick’s election. 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Isabella Haskin, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. — State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest, or estate in and to the heretofore described real property and as owners, claimants or holders of the above claimant tax certificate of the holder of one certain claimant tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 2nd day of May, 1907, and numbered 48497, for the delinquencies paid by the amount $8.13 and upon real property the amount $8.13 paid King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 15, Block 4, Thomas Gem and subsequent years have been paid plaintiff upon said abuse of property, and for the year 1905, the sum of $6.60, and for the year 1906, the sum of $6.44, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon WASHINGTON July 31—September 11, 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE Vice Governor of Washington Lee, Philiphit, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property. Defendants. No. ____. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or property, in and to the heretofore described case, are hereby the above amended bill to the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 15th day of Nov., 1906, and numbered B43119, for the delinquent taxes of the year the amount of the taxes paid by the real estate in said King County, described a follows, to-wit: Lot 1, Block 33, Maynard's ake Washington Addition. That the taxes are being paid prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon a writ of relief in said King County, for the year 1904, 1905, and 23 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 21 cents, and for the year 1906, the sum of 5 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the impaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said seal. property, and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first notice, execlive, executed of the said public first publication, within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of answer on the same notice for plaintiff together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered hereinafter, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and against each parcel of the sums charged and for the each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in the same complaint, now on file in the court. this cause and A. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. B. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. C. Office Address: 324 Bailey Building, Seattle. Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for the Tallintif, vs. Wm. McIntyre and all persons unknown, if any, having or claim- ing an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. — You and each of you, (including sald persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear with six days after the date of the court of this notice, exeivit in the day of said first publication, to wit: within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer, the plaintiff of said plaintiff, the copy of your answer on the assigned attorney for plaintiff due, together with interest and costs. In case you so fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of the same property costs against it, and the amount of said real property against each, for sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the same claim found against it, restoring it by law, and as prayed by plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. M.CADONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31-September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King State. County II. Matter of the Estate of Frank R. Harrison, deceased. No. 8084. Notice of Settlement of Final Account, and Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Belle Hanson, the legally appointed, duly qualified attorney and administratrix of the estate of Frank R. Harrison, deceased, filed in this Court hereto and final account, setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and distribution of the residue thereof made to the person by law entitled thereto, and it appears that Court that said petitioned and final account set forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of estate. said. It is therefore by the Court ordered that all persons interested in the estate of said Frank R. Harrison, deceased, be Court of King County, State of Washington, at the Court Room, the Probate Department of said Court in the City of Seattle, on the 1st day of October, A. D. 1908 at 8:30 a.m. of said day then and there to show cause if they have, why the final account of said administratrix should be accepted and confirmed and an order of distribution made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 1st day of publication, in 1908, in the Republican," a newspaper printed and published in said King County, and of general circulation therein. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King, Agda Almen, Plaintiff, vs. Olaf Almen, Defendant, Summons for Publication, The State of Washington to the said Olaf Almen: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the publication of this summons, wo-wit; within sixty days after the 4th day of September, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above enti- ted court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned and an for plaintiff, at the office below stated, within sixty (60) days after your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the compla- nt, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matri- mony now existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of desertion. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. September 4—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a corporation. Plaintiff, vs. Margaret Johnson, Defendant. No. 62643. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to Margaret Cooper. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this summons upon you by publication exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the the 4th day of November, 1908, the bove entitled action, in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, that the document will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff which is filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to collect the sum of thirty-five dollars ($35.00), being the amount due by you to F. Carver and Brown and Services rented you, which claim has been assigned to the Aurora Land Co., the plaintiff herein. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. September 4—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. H. H. Mecken and Jane Doe Mecken, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an allegation of the breach after described real property, Defendants. No. 62639. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate, B49543, issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 1st day of May, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amounts, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, Lake Shore Addition to Kirkland—Lot 17, Block 2; Certificate Number B49543; year, 1904; amount, $1.34. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 17, Block 2, Lake Shore Addition to Kirkland—78 cents, 1905; $9 cents, 1906; $1.02, 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date and payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon the unpaid said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit; within sixty days after the day of publication, 1908, in the above ended count and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do judgment will be rendered with fines, closing costs, interest on taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and E. J. CARVER. September 4—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Martin Henry Hiscock, Deceased.—No. 7897. Order to Show Causes. Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Fred A. Simons, executor of the estate of Martin Henry Hiscock, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of sed estate. It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Martin Henry Hiscock, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, the court of the City of Seattle, the Department of said court, in the City of Seattle, on the 24th day of September, 1988, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. This order ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 24th day of September, 1908, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 28th day of August, 1908. BOYD J. TALLMAN, Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss. I. Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the said Court and now cause the said Court on the 29th day of August, 1908, in the matter of the estate of Martin Henry Hiscock, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 29th day of August, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the matter of the estate of Martin Henry Hiscock, Deceased.—No. 7897. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby made to A. Simmons of the estate of Martin Henry Hiscock, deceased, has rendered to and filed in said Court his final account as such executor, and that Thursday, the 24th day of September, 1908, at 930 o'clock a. m., at the court room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of King County, has been duly appointed, Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness the Hon. Boyd J. Tallman, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto affixed this 28th day of August, 1908. (Seal) OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By D. K. SICKELS, Deputy Clerk. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Eva Z. Snyder, plaintiff; vs. Lowery G. Snyder, defendant. No.—Summons for Publication. The state of Washington to the said Lowery G. Snyder, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, on the third day of July, 1908, and demand the above entitled action in the above entitled court, an danswer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned for plaintiff after failure to be served; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the court of the state of Washington in the above entitled action is that the plaintiff may obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you upon the grounds of abandonment for more than one year. PETERS & CARR. Plaintiff's Attorneys. P. O. Address: 1263-64 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 7–Sept. 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. James F. Wilson, plaintiff; vs. Eva Wilson, defendant. No. 62399. Summons for Publica- The State of Washington to the said Eva Wilson, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summon, to-wit, within sixty days after the 7th day of August, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and answer the complaint of your answer upon being admitted as attorney for plaintiff at his office address below stated; and in case of your failure to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the notice of your answer filed with the clerk of the court. The object of said plaintiff in this action is to secure a divorce from you, said defendant, on the grounds of abandonment and cruel treatment. WARREN H. LEWIS. Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 308 Shafer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 7 - September 18, 1908. IN JUSTICE'S COURT-BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Joseph Masvroy, plaintiff, vs. P. Juguin trading and doing business, under the name of Anchor Rinkley, defendant. No.—— Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King-ss. To P. Juguin, trading and doing business un- der the name of Anchor Rinkley, defendant. No.—— Summons for Publication. IN JUSTICE'S COURT-BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Evan, Evans, Plaintiff, vs. P. Jugni trading and doing business under the name of Anchor Restaurant, defendant. No. — Sumner State of Washington, County of King—ss. To P. Juglin, trading and doing business under the name is hereby notified that William N. Evans has filed a complaint against you in a court which will come on to be heard at my office in room 210 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington on the date of October 4, 1989, at the hour of 8:30 of September. A. A. is the judge of the court, and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said action and complaint is to obtain an argument against you for the property and 8-700 ($89.9) hours, for goods ware and merchandise and meat sold and delivered to you by plaintiff between April 1st, 1988, and June 30th, 1988, no part of which has been paid, and thus to sell under attachment, the personal property of you, and under attachment issued heretofore in favor of plaintiff. Filed August 6, A. D. 1988. R. R. GEORGE Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington August 7—Sept. 4, 1988. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for the County of King, Charlotte Scobey, Plaintiff, vs. George Scobey, Defend the State of Washington to the said George Scoebey: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 24th day of July, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the case of the plaintiff, and answer your answer to the plaintiff, and copy of your answer upon the under-signed attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been made by the court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony, now existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of habitual drunkenness, idleness, non-support and desertion and for plaintiff's unlawful conduct. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. In the matter of the estate of Judith Cox Moore, deceased. No. 9237. Notice to creditors. In order of said court made herein on the 31st day of July, 1908. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Judith J. Moore, the estate of New York Street, Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, In said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication August 7, 1908. JUDITH J. MOORE. 960 Empire Bldg., Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Nellie Temple, Plaintiff, vs. Lewis Temple, Defendant. No. 62612. Summons for Publication of the State of Washington to Lewis P. Temple, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty, (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit, within sixty (60) days from and after the 21st day of August, 1991, to file a complaint action in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered to the court. To the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The above entitled action is brought by the plaintiff to obtain a decree of divorce of and from the defendant, Lewis P. Temple, on the ground of failure, neglect and refusal to make suitable provision for said plaintiff's support, and for such other and further relief as to the court may seem just and equitable. HERBERT L. JACKSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office address: Room 307 Bailey Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 21st—October 2, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Grada B. Craayo, Plaintiff, vs. Antonie Johan Craayo, Plaintiff, No. — Summons for Jail. The State of Washington to the said Antonie Johan Craayo, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 21st day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and serve a copy of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been made by the object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant. JAS. M. EPLER, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: Epler Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the her- lier described own property. Defendants. No. 62540. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claima- tion and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate, B49533, issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington da- tion, for April 1901, numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situa- tated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate # Edition—Lot 10. Block 7: Certificate Number B49553; year, 1904; amount 41 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 10, Block 7, Wilberton Addition—82 cents, 1905; $1.63, 1906; $1.22, 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and payable taxes upon and upon said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of the said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the date of first publication 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you will so do, judgment will be laid and said taxes against the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as assigned by law, and as prayed in the plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Ogden 161 Office address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. September 4—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Emma McKissen and Jane Doe McKissen, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the her- inged described real property, Defendants. No. 62641. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1908 ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of May, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the follow-up upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Harry White & Co.'s Commercial Addition to Kirkland—Lot 37, Block 4; Certificate Number B49542; year, 1904; amount, $1.34. Taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 37, Block 4. Harry White & Co.'s Commercial Addition to Kirkland—77 cents, 1905; 89 cents, 1906; $1.02, 1907. Which several sums bear interest, the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sale of property, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: with sixty days after the 4th day of September, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend and demand of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said real property for the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as praved in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. this cause and Court. AURORA LAND COMPANY F. J. CARVER Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. September 4—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of Kling. Ivah Marie Durant, Plaintiff, vs. Cassie B. Durant, Defendant. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Cassie B. Durant. Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 21st day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony between the parties hereto on the ground of abondance and desertion for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action. E. T. SCHOFF. Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 21—October 2, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Bessie B. deVarona, plaintiff, vs. Edwin I. deVarona, defendant. No. 62098. Summons. The State of Washington, to the said Edwin I. deVarona, defendant: You are hereby summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action within the time set forth in the summons, exclusive of the day of first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after the 17th day of July, 1908, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein, and serve a copy of your complaint to the judge of the plaintiff at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff, and served with the clerk of the above entitled court. The above entitled cause of action is brought for the purpose of obtaining a divorce from the defendant on the grounds of abandonment and non-support. Date of first publication, July 17, 1908. SAYRE & SUTHERLAND. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office address: 413 414 and 415 Mehlhorn Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. July 17—August 28. 1908. SUMMONS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 4th day of September, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above of the plaintiff, and answer the claim of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer or other pleading upon the undersigned attorney at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been the clerk of the said court. The object of said action being to secure an absolute decree of divorce, severing the bonds of matrimony between plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of abandonment and non-support. York Building, Seattle, Washington. FRED C. BROWN. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 431 New September 4—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 4th day of September, 1908, and defend the above which have been admitted and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according the demand the plaintiff which has been admitted with theork of said court. The object of said order is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the grounds of abandonment for more than one year and for non-support. PARKER & BROWN. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office Address: Room 32 Union Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1908 'IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. M. J. Nist, Plaintiff, vs. John Doe Michener, John Doe Riley, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafterinafter real property. Defend-ment Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to be held by the above named plaintiff that the above delinquent tax certificate is the holder of one certain user of King County. State of Washington to the above named plaintiff that the delinquent taxes of the following year. In the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wait: HB 1048, Division 1 and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year. In the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wait: HB 1048, Division 1 and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year. In the sum of $2.66; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff, to-wait: For year 1904, the sum of $2.61; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff, to-wait: For year 1906, the sum of $2.23; for the year 1906 (local improvement district No. 1007), for the year 1906, the sum of $2.01; for the year 1906, the sum of $2.32; for the year 1906 (local improvement district No. 1007), for the year 1906, the sum of $3.67, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unpaid taxes upon and property. against you and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear with delay days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of first publication entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff serve a copy of your answer of the court underwritten attorney for plaintiff below, office below stated, and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the said fees and costs against each of said real property and against the said saled property and against each, for saled taxes, incurred against each, for saled taxes, incurred and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the parcel charged and found against it. It is provided by law, and as such is in plaintiff's complaint, now on file this cause and court. KENNETH MACKINTOSH & E. B. HERM, MD Attorneys for Plaintiff Office Address: 227-30 Colman Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Aug. 14—Sept. 25, 1998 IN THE SUPERI-1 R COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. L. H. Crawford, M. A. Larson, and H. H. Crawford, known if, any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herinnera described real property. Defendants. No. _____. Notice and Simmons State of Washington to the above defendants and of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of real property in and to the above described real property, notified that the above plaintiff is the holder of one certain薄入侵 tax certificate issued by the Trust of King County, State of Washington, filed the 18th day of June, numbered B42040, in入侵 taxes of the years 1896 to 1904, inclusive, in the amount of $20.44, upon the real property, situated in King County, described as follows: to-wit: Lot 4, Block 17, Trust of the Salmon Bay Addition, that the taxes for the following sub-sequents have been paid by the above described to-wit for the above described to-wit; for the years 1906, the sum of $2.73, and for the years 1906, the sum of $2.97, which several sums annum from sald date of payment, and are the unpaid and unreimbursed taxes upon and the against said person, or each of you, (including said persons and summoned to be and appear notified and summoned to be and appear notified days after the date of first notification of this notice, exclusive of said person, of said first publication, within 60 days after July 31, in the above entitled court and actions and defend this action and answer the question of said plaintiff and serve a copy of the answer on the undersigned and answer the plaintiff at this office below and or pay the amount due, for interest and cost. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered hereafter closing the lien of said taxes and agreeing each parcel of said taxes and agreeing each amount and amount and charged against each, sale of each parcel of said property for the sales, it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause. and court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. M.CONADALN. Attorney for Plaintiff. A. Office Adresses: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herinnera described real property, Defendants. No. — Notice and Signatures State of Washington to the above defendants and each of you. You and each of you. as estate or claimants or holders of an interest or property. in and to the herelainfter described property. are hereby notified that the above plaintiff tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of the county. State of Washington. dated the 14th day of April, 1905, and numbered the for the delinquent taxes of the year 1902, in the amount of 31 cents, and the total property situated in said Kidney County, described as follows, to the sum of 4 Block 2. Goodspeed's Add. to West Seattle. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid to the plaintiff upon said described property. waiver; for the year 1902, the sum of 24 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 20 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 23 cents, and for the year 1906, the sum of $1.26, which several sums beat interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon an of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Vallus, Valhus, and all others. If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants. No. _____. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants as owners, claimants or holders of an interest in estate and to the bequest of the above real property, and to certify that the above defendant is the holder of one certain deed of King County, State of Washington for 14th day of April, 1904, of the deed of the year 1923156, for the delinquency of the year 1923156, of the $1.26, and upon real property flows, to-wit: 1ot 6. Block 5. Queen to the delinquency of the year the taxes paid by the plaintiff upon said above described sum of 68 cents; for the year 1902, the 63 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 64 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 67 cents, and for the year 1906, the sum of $1.17, which several years bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, are annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and deferred taxes upon an estate property. **referral sales** you and each of you, (including said persons if they, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of its notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, in the county of Washington, 1908. In the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at its hearing. In the case of any other party together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums paid for the taxes, interest and costs for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and the plaintiff will be charged and paid in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Charles Osner and Agnes Osner, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. Annie Smith and John Doe. The court gives the given name is unknown to plaintiffs, her husband and dendants. No. 62709. Sumons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Annie Smith and John Doe Smith, her husband whose true given name is known. You and each of you are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait within sixty days after the 28th day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court of the plaintiffs herein and serve a copy of your answer herein the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint herein, which is on file with the clerk of this court. The object of this complaint is to obtain a decree cancelling and holding for naught a certain contract given by plaintiff, Charles Osner, to the defendant, Annie Smith, May 20th, 1906, and recorded in Vol. 476 of deeds, page 482 of records in the Auditor's office of King County for the sale of Lot 13 and the east half of Lot 14. First Addition to the City of Seattle, and to obtain a decree quieting title to said property in plaintiffs. Office and Post Office Address, Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. August 28—October 9, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, In, and, for Kbr Counts. Owingsville, Washington, D.C. a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. H. Schultz and Jane Doe Schultz, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the healerafter described real property, Defendants. No. 024948. State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the herederafter described real property, Defendants. No. 024948. plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated June 5, 1906, and numbered B42175, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of ninety cents. King County, Washington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot twenty-five (25), Block Three (3), Ballard Park 2nd Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington, described as follows, to-wit: for the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years from the year 1904, in the amount of described real property, to-wit: for the year 1905, thirty-four cents (.34), for the year 1906, twenty-six cents (.26), and for the year 1907, twenty-four cents (.24), which several suns bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from the year 1904, to the year 1907, and underdeemed taxes union and against lot. You and each of you, (including sald unknown persons, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the publication, on behalf of the day of sald first publication, to-wit; within sixty days after August 14, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of sald plaintiff and serve a copy of the complaint to the plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs, for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it, as provided in the complaint in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation. F. J. CARVAR, ARTOR for plaintiff. Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash., Aug. 14-Sept. 25, 1908. Notice is hereby given that the undersigned has been duly appointed guardian of the estate of John Loststhm, an insane person, and all persons having claims or demands against said insane person are hereby requested to present them to the said guardian at his place of business, at 745 New York Blk., Seattle, Washington. HUGH A. BOWMAN, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Wexford, in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. D. Van Dewatte, and Jane Doe Van Dewatte, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property. Defendants. No. 60875. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereafter described real property. Defendants. No. 60875. The plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquency tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. Washington, dated May 26, 1906, and numbered B42143, for the delinquency taxes of the year 1904. in the amount of eighty-five cents. The plaintiff is the holder of a situated in King County, Washington, described as follows: to-wit: Jot nineteen (19), Block eighteen (18), Bay View Addition to Salmon Bay. Washington: that the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid properly; to-wit: for the year 1905, thirty-four cents ($.34); for the year 1906, twenty-six cents ($.26), and for the year 1907, twenty-four cents ($.24), which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from the said date, and of the same sums bear interest at the rate of tenteen taxes mnex and agustat said lot. You, and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of the complaint, to wit; within sixty days after publication, to wit; within sixty days after August 14, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your complaint to it in office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each of your claims and amounts due upon and charged against each for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law in this cause and court. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVAR, Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Aug. 14-Sept. 23-1008. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington in and for King County, Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, sa- d. D. V. Wattie, and J. Janet Van De Watte, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and al persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the bereannah described real property, Defendants. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the heretofore described real property, are hereby notified that the above named defendant has been issued an侵入quent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated May 23, 1966, and numbered B42144, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of eighty-one cents (8.1) of the taxable income. King County, Washington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot twenty (20), Block eighteen (18), Bay View Addition to Salmon Bay, Washington; that the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff in the year 1905, thirty-four cents ($.34); for the year 1905, twenty-six cents ($.26), and for the year 1907, twenty-four cents ($.24), which several suns bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from the said date of payment, and unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You, and each of you, (including sald unknown persons, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of "his satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed for" his complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVAR, Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg. Seattle, Wash. Aug. 14—Sept. 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR Court OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. William Edward Rhodes, Plaintiff, v., Mary Louisa Rhodes, Defendant. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Mary Louisa Rhodes: Mary Louisa Rhodes) summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 28th day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case you fail so to do judgement will be repaid against it, according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filled with the clerk of the said court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matriomy now existing between the plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of desertion. E. L. SANDERS. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 28—October 9, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Daniel Williams, Plaintiff. vs. Hilma Yriana, Williams, Defendant. No. 104, Supreme Court. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 28th day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the court of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been made by the court of said Court; the object of the above entitled action is-for a decree of divorce on the grounds of desertion and abandonment. T. G. GRFGSON and P. V. DAVIS Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: T. G. Gregson and P. V. Davis, attorneys at law, 304 Pioneer Bldg., Seattle, Wash. August 28—October 9, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King County L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having on claiming an interest in and to the heaterin described real property, Defendants. No. — State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the building of the building, are notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington to the above plaintiff is the holder of King1120, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of 75 cents, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as real property in the county, for the year 1903, in the amount of 75 cents, Washington Addition. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property in the county, for the year 1903, in the amount of 23 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 21 cents, and for the year 1906, the sum of 36 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and for the year 1906, the sum of 64 taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days of the unpaid amount of the unpaid amount of the notice exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of the complaint to the unpaid amount of the plaintiff's his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against the sums unpaid and amount due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against the plaintiff, now on file in plaintiff's complaint, on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff, A. C. MACDONALD, attorney for Plaintiff, Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31 - September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King County L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown. vs. any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Deindendants. No. ____. Notice and Summons. and summons to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain defendant and one certain owner of the Rug Country, State of Washington, dated the 15th day of Nov., 1906, and numbered B43121. for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of 75 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows to-wit: Lot 3, Block 33, Maynard's 1242 Washington Addition. That the taxes for the year 1903, the sum of 21 cents, the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1904, the sum of 23 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 21 cents, and for the year 1906, the sum of 36 cents, which several suns bear interest at the rate of one cent, per annum from said payment, and unreceipted taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty minutes of the date of the notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the court. In the case of office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against it respectively as provided by law, and amounts due upon and charged against each for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed for its complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACADONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Ballue Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington for King Countr L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. C. D. Hillman, and all persons unknown. If any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. —, Notice State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the heresafter described real property, and the claimant named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington dated the 15th day of Nov., 1906, and numbered B43132. The tax is $7.22, and upon real property situation in said King County, described as follows, tow-tit: Lot 24. Block 15. Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff for the year 1905, the sum of $8.30, and for the year 1906, the sum of $4.83, which several suns bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all taxed on the same taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, in the case of any person who was born in 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his gate once stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest due upon his death, so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a lien of said real property against each fraction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as pursued in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. GRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 324 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County I. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff, vs. W. H. Minor, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. — In connection to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above claimants and each of them have issued lien tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 22nd day of Dec., 1906, and numbered B46052, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904. In the case of the delinquent taxes of the year 1905, situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 2. Sec. 31. Tp. 26 N. R. 7 E. W. M. that the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon the date of the filing of the lien tax certificate for the year 1905, the sum of $8.11, and for the year 1906, the sum of $3.20, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the same deemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, the date of first publication of the action, to-wit; the first day of July, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, for together with the amount due of said case, the judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property; said sums of said taxes, the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 324 Bally Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King, Count L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the beforenatter described in the property, Defendants. No. Officer, and Sumner. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the heresafter described real property, to the same extent as named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 12th day of April, 1907, and numbered B48005, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1902. In the case of the real property upon said above-described real property, the sum of the sum of $1.76 for the year 1904, the sum of $1.69; for the year 1905, the sum of $1.71, and for the year 1906, the sum of $2.40, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per annum, in addition to the sum of payment, and are all the unpaid and unpaid taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after July 31, 1908, for this notice, exclusive of the day of said first cation, to-wife; within 60 days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the com- and defend this action and serve a copy of your answer to the underwritten notice at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forecasing the loss of said taxes and costs which the court has ordered for sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against you, as provided by law and as武ed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailley Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31 - September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE, of Washington for the County of King—In Probate. In matter of the estate of Erust Hille, deceased, no. 7820. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Charles Osser, administrator of the estate of Erust Hille, deceased, having filed in this case, a motion to be heard. It is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets up for distribution. It will organize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Erust Hille, or their companion, be admitted to the Superior court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate department of said Court in the City of Seattle, on the 10th day of September, 1908, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock in a. m. of said day then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the 10th day of September, 1908, in the Seattle Publication, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 5th day of August, 1908. MITCHELL GILLIAM, Judge, Aug. 7—Sept. 4, 1908. PROBATE NO. 181 TO THE SUPERIOR Court of the State of Washington, for the Court of King County, State of Washington, County of King—ss. 9 in the matter of the estate of Ernst Hille, deceased. No. 7820. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Charles Osner, the Kishenee attorney of the estate of Ernst Hille, deceased, has rendered to, and then in said Court, his final account as such administrator, and that Thursday, the 10th day of September, at 10:30 c. oak a.m., m., at the Court Room of the City of Seattle, said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, said King County, has been duly appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said account, may be admitted to his exceptions in writing to said account, and upon the Witness, the Hon. Mitchell Gilliam, Judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said court hereto advised this 5th day of August, 1908. BY J. A. SIGURDSSON, Deputy Clerk. Aug. 7-Sept. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Clare Montelith, Plaintiff, vs. John A. Monteith, Defendant, No. 62620. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said John A. Monteith, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 21st day of August, 1908, and defend the above enforced action in the above entitled court, and serve a copy of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you to the demand of the complaint, which have been filed with the clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to procure for the plaintiff a divorce from the defendant upon the grounds of his habitual drunkenness, and his neglect and refusal to make provision for his failure to be armed to plaintiff the sole custody and control of Julian Monteith, Grace Monteith, and Isabel Monteith, the three children of plaintiff and defendant. H. W. CRAVEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 654 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 21—October 2, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of WASHINGTON of Washington, in and for King County. Amoreland Land Company, a corporation. Plaintiffs, wife. G. W. Plaintiffs, wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property. Defendants. No. 62303, New York, in and for Washington. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereafter described real property are hereby notified that the above claimants and claimants are hereby notified that the inquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated April 15th 1908, and numbered B42960, for the delinquen taxes of the year 1904. In the amount of Ninety six dollars and six cents, upon the real property situated in King County, Washington, as follows: to-wit. Lot ten (10). Block two (2) White Bros. Addition to Kirkland, King County Washington. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by their owners, upon the real property, to-wit: for the year 1906, forty-two (41) cents; for the year 1906, fifty-two (52) cents, and for the year 1907, fifty (50) cents, which several suns bear interest at the rate of fifteen percent per annum from said date of payment and are, upon and unredeemed axs upon and against said lot. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the notice, by publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after July 31, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; or upon this action and answer the complaint and said lawsuit, by a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for bail, office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with the interest and costs. In case you to do judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosure, or judgment will be charged against each parcel of said real property for sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the charge and found 2-LEGALS-REPUBLICAN hub against it, respectively, as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, A Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Blade, Seattle, Wa. July 31 - September 11, 1908 NOVICE. Sheriff's Sale of Real Estate. State of Washington, County of King, State of Washington, County of King—ss, Sheriff's Office. By vittue of an Order of Sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County on the 20th day of August, 1908, by Clerk thereof, in the case of John Crane Malinft, versus A. E. Downing and E. M. Downing, his wife, Defendants, No. 60999, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered. Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wait: at 10 vowel m on the 3d day of October, A. D. 1908 before the Court House door of said King County in the State of Washington, the following prescribed property, situated in King Coun-scribed property, situated in Washington, to-wait: Lot four (4), Buckeyeight (8), Madison Street Addition to Seattle King County, Washington, as recorded in volume two (2) of plates at page 85, records of ditor's office, King County, Washington, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure of counting to one hundred and fifty-two $150 dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff, King County, Washington. Dated this 21st day of August, 1908. L, C, SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW, DREW, Denny. '8061 922 aquaidog-82 isnw PAID ADVERTISEMENT. Candidate for the Republican nomination for Sheriff of King county. [Image of a man with a mustache and a suit and bow tie]. ELLIS MORRISON Candidate for the Republican nomination for the office of Lieutenant Governor. Your vote and influence repectfully solicited. PAID ADVERT FOR A CLEAN AND BUSINE FOR A CLEAN AND BUSINESS-LIKE ADMINISTRATION A. F. HAAS REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE FOR County Commiss For The First Dist County Commissioner For The First District. PAIDADVERTISEMENTS ```markdown ``` DR. G. H. SPARLING Candidate for the Republican nomination for Coroner of King County. Primaries September 8, 1908. The image provided is too blurry to accurately recognize any text or graphics. It appears to be a blank or heavily blurred background with no discernible content. 80 PAID ADVERTISEMENT [Picture of a man in a suit with a mustache]. J. H. SCHIVELY Republican candidate for the nomination for Insurance Commissioner. Primaries Sept. 8. 1908. J. C. Redward Candidate for the Republican nomination for County Commissioner, First Commissioner's District of King county. ADVERTISEMENT. BUSINESS-LIKE ADMINISTRATION Commissioner First District. [Name] --- RACES! RACES! RACES! RACES! JUNE 20th to SEPTEMBER 12th SIX RACES DAILY RAIN OR SHINE Take Car at FIRST AVENUE and JACKSON ST. Every 10 Minutes After 11 A.M. Guardian Life INSURANCE CO. OF SEATTLE THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN RACES! RAC JUNE 20th to SEP SIX RACES DAILY Take Car at FIRST AVENUE Every 10 Minutes RACES START AT Admission Including Gentlemen $1.00 M. H. GEO. F. VANDEVERE Who Merits Your Vote For Prosecting Attorney. GEO. F. VANDEVERE Who Merits Your Vote For Prosecting Attorney. [Name] W. P. BELL Candidate For Attorney General. Vote For Him. W. P. BELL Candidate For Attorney General. Vote For Him. SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for the County of King. J. C. Calum, Maude Mac- Callum, Defendant...Summons. Guardian INSURANCE OF SEATTLE T TWO P. M. ling Grand Stand Ladies 50 Cents The State of Washington to the said Maude MacCallum, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this complaint, on the 31st day of July, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the underwriter of your plaintiff at this court stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action involves the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant herein on the ground of fraud and cruelty. C. E. PIPER. plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: Rooms 36 and 37 Union Block, No. 713 First Ave, Seattle, King County, Washington. July 31—September 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for Kibb County You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after July 31, have entitled court and action; and defend this notice to a complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your notice on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, to you, upon interest and costs. In case you fail so of it, find further notice ordering a sale of each parcel of said property, satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as praised in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. July 31—September 11, 1908. The Comfort. Newly furnished rooms. Walking distance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. L. ISRAEL WALKER, 1101-1102 Jackson Street. McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance 529 Colman Blk., Phone Main 695 Stetson & Post Mill Co. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 ian Life Friday, September 4, 1908 JUST KNOW US OUR TAILORING AND YOU WILL DO THE REST YOU CAN'T BUY BETTER TAILORING IRVING CANNON TAILOR 211 COLUMBIA ST. Established 1890 Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE CONNECTION Business Office, Third and Spring Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. WILLIAM WALKER Complete stock New Fall Goods, Ladies', Misses' and Children's Wear- ing Apparel, Furs and Fine Coats. 820 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Electric Fixtures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, Scandinavian American Bank. a new, neat little 8-page paper as full of good things as an egg is of meat. MAILED FREE. The Scandinavian-American Bank, Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Puget Sound National Bank. OF SEATTLE JACOB FURTH ...President J. S. GOLDSMITH ...Vice-President R. V. ANKENY ...Cashier CORRESPONDENTS IN ALL THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE. LRAFTS ISSUED ON ALASKA AND THE YUKON TERRITORY. THE NATIONAL BANK OF COM- MERCE. United States Depositary. With CAPITAL and SURPLUS.$1,500,000 And aggregate RESOURCES over ...$12,500,000 Invite business on the most liberal terms consistent with conservative banking. Foreign exchange department es- specially equipped for the conduct of Ori- nal business. M. F. Backus, Pres.; R. Spencer, 1st V. P.; R. S. Stacey, 2nd V. P.; J. W. Maxwell, Cash. People's Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R. J. Reekle, Vice Prest. Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. Commercial Savings and Tru. General Bank and Exchange. Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash.