Seattle Republican

State Library THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Price One Year, $3.00. Single Copies, 10 Cents. TAFT THE MAN OF THE HOUR --- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 30, 1908 country is in good hands and we had better let well enough alone. If there are any grounds to warrant a prediction that Mr. Bryan will be elected next Tuesday they are kept under cover and that is a hard thing to do. Twelve years ago throughout the entire West there was a sentiment in favor of Bryan's election, and you will remember that it was talked by day and by night, and the advocates of McKinley were unable to get enough hearers together to mould any sentiment for him. That Bryan enthusiasm neither exist in the West or East this year, and it is said to no great extent in the South is very plain to be seen. One therefore is safe at this time to predict, Taft will be elected by a greater electoral majority than was Roosevelt four year ago. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Thinking voters should take care and vote the two proposed amendments to the state constitution in the coming election. They are plainly indicated on the ticket and should not be overlooked. Remember that they are carried by a majority of those who vote on the amendments and they do not require a majority of all the votes cast for officers at the same election. This is important to the voter who has no ax to grind and who wants the amendments to stand or fall on their their merits. Those who are directly interested for or against the amendments will be sure to vote, but the great mass of the voters who do not understand that they too are involved deeply in the result should cast the deciding vote, and not the special interests. The Journal editor has made an honest study of the two and submits his ideas, not with the ida of influencing the voter but to suggest to him some points to think about and if any reader doesn't agree with us we would be very glad indeed to publish his views in next issue. One amendment would grant to individuals, firms and corporations the right of eminent domain, the right to condemn property for rights of way for drains, flumes, ditches and logging railroads. At first thought the proposition looks good. It would permit a logger to force his way through land held by the Weyerheuser and other timber syndicates, but there is another side to it. Not only is it establishing a dangerous principle of granting the right of condemnation for private purposes, but it permits the private logging railroad to hold up the owner of the land through which it passes. It will permit a logging railroad company to go through a man's bunch of timber, log all around it and force him to sell out which he will do on account of the great danger of fire and because the logging company can pull up its tracks and leave his tract of timber isolated. He cannot force the logging company to haul out his logs. He must sell his logs to them or let them stay in the woods. Under the law as it is now a logging road must be a common carrier and accept logs and other freight at regular tariff rate from every one if it condemns any property. As a result a logging road is being built up mill creek in this county, which will operate as a common carrier and haul out anybod's logs or any farmer's produce along the way. Such a road is of benefit to the country through which it goes. If logging companies want to force their way through anybody's land let them follow the example set by the Mill Creel road and the Chinook Lumber Co., on Deep River and take out charters as common carriers. It is argued that it is now possible and the practice of large corporations to bottle up isolated tracts of timber and prevent it being logged by not giving right of way through their lands, but our observation has been that corporations like the Weyerheusers, are really more reasonable than most individuals in this respect. As for the farmer whose land would be cut by these private roads, there is not much question about where his interests would lie. The other proposed amendment provides for the classification of taxable property with a view to having the state derive its revenues entirely from the railroads and other public service corporations and leave the real estate and local personal property to be assessed only for county and city purposes. Money lenders and those who invest in warrants, bonds, stocks, etc.. will oppose this amendment and they are the ones who are raising the cry that it would be class legislation, a popular cry, but one which does not bear investigation. It is true that our present law requires the taxation of all property alike, and theoretically money, bonds, stocks etc., should be treated like real estate, but in actual practice it goes free from taxation. Investors simply do not and will not report money and credits to the assessor, and all the laws making inquisitors out of assessors have been failures or have made grafters and black- Volume XV, Number 23. H. R. CAYTON, Publisher. mailers out of the assessors. The ordinary rate of taxation in this state is four per cent and investors getting eight per cent for their money will not give up half of their income for taxes when they can lie out of it. As a result money and credits have been exempted from taxation, but they should pay a reasonable per cent of the taxes of the state and under this amendment the Pennsylvania law can be adopted taxing money at the rate of four dollars per thousand for state purposes and it hae been found that investors will pay this who would not pay the rate levied on other property. Far from the proposed amendment being class legislation, we really have in actual practice class legislation under the present law. The present state tax commission have studied this subject and it was at their suggestion that the amendment was submitted. At first it looks as if they were seeking more power under it, but on second thought it will be remembered that at least two out of the three commissioners will be likely removed by Governor Cosgrove and new men take their places, so that the present ones can have no selfish motives in the matter. There is force in the argument that under the amendment each corporation would lobby against any heavy tax on itself in the legislature, but we have the lobby anyhow and we must elect legislatures that the lobby cannot influence, and legislators are becoming more independent of the lobby every year. - South Bend Journal. COSGROVE'S ELECTION UNANIMOUS THE SEATLE REPUBLICAN is still of the opinion that the voters of the state of Washington should make the nomination of Samuel G. Cosgrove unanimous, the mouthings of the Democratic mossbacks to the contrary notwithstanding. It believes so for the reaon that, in Cosgrove the voters have a candidate that stands for all thats pure and good, not only in the administration of public affairs, but likewise in the homes and at the firesides, and what nobler aim or higher purpose could human being have? On the other hand can as much be truthfully said of John Pattison-Preston, the Democratic candidate for governor? No Republican has any excuse for voting against Cosgrove for governor, but can any Democrat, who is a good loyal citizen with ambitions for the success of his son, cast his vote for John Pattison alias John Preston, notwithstanding the fact that he has been nominated for the highest office in the gift of the citizens of the state? In spreading the report that Mr. Cosgrove is sick unto death and it would be like unto electing a dead man to an office if he is elected governor, the Democratic advocates are going a long way out of their way to do a fellow man an injustice, but with Cosgrove dead before he ever qualified as governor, it would be a thousand times more honorable as well as elevating for the citizens of the state of Washington to elect him than Pattison, for even the very memory of Cosgrove would outshine any deeds that Pattison might do. In fact it would be a public calamity for the voters of the state to not give Mr. Cosgrove, not only the largest vote ever given to any gubernatorial candidate, in view of the fact there are more voters in the state than ever before. but because he is that kind of a man that the public has been clamoridg for—upright, honorable and greatest of all, an ideal citizen. New York may have Hughes as her candidate for governor to succeed himself, who is the quintesence of honesty and all that go to make a good citizen, but in his candidacy New York has none the best of the state of Washington, which has as her leading candidate for governor Samuel Goodlove Cosgrove, who will be overwhelmingly elected and who will give to the citizens of the state just as good administration as has Mr. Hughes given the state of New York for the past two years, and those of us who know Mr. Cosgrove best, think an even better one, which is saying a great deal. In this day of grafters seeking the office it seldom happens that men of the stripe of Gov. Hughes and Farmer Cosgrove are selected as candidates, and when they are, the voters should rejoice and feel glad and make their elections practically unanimous. But a few nights ago the Times, the journalistic swillbarrel of the Northwest, announced under flaming headlines the dangerous and apparent illness of Mr. Cosgrove, no part of which is true, but it is just like that putrid skunk to publish the most despicable lie its Murky Matt can conjure up. No wonder it loses one battle after another and has earned for itelf the axiom, "Saw it in the Times? Damn lie!" Mr. Cosgrove's family physician says he is not only not in a dangerous condition, but he is growing physically stronger every day. rN —~ \ ~~ 4 | al Se 5 eee Price One Year, $3.00. AIT KE A SAIN ANT RDS TORRR 80. 1c Volume XV, Number 2: Ginter Conese 10. Gents, SEATTLE. WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, OCTOBER £0, 1908 H. R. CAYTON, Publisher ooo Pina te Ren a T e THe HOUR country is in good hands aad we had better let well) mailers out of the assessors, The ordinary rate of tax- TAFT THE MAN OF THE HOUR lannuchinione. Tk there avoany croands to warrant alationin this state is four per cent and investors eettine if bryan nad not have gone through tw pike” tial campaigns and at about the close of each of them made the sam2 statemat aout his certain success at the polls as he is now doing, thos2 raading his state- monts in t12 prasant camoaiza wa favor Taft for pees- idant, migit have son> misgivings that there is some real danger of Bryan being elected, bat in the light of the past nvon2believes therear2 any grounds for either the sweep’ng claims of Mr. Bryan or the Demoerats all oves te country as to the outecom2 of the election. Of cours? Mr. Beyan may be elected next Tuesday, just a3 stran re things as that have happaned in th political affairs 0’ this country before, bat they d» not often happen, arditis not therefore balieved thit anything st-anze will hapoan next Ta2sday. Naw York state is always claimed by the Demozrats because they have always b2an able to carry the city of New York, but for the state to go Damoeratic is the excaption anl by no means the rule. It has not given its electoral vot2 for a Domoeratie president for many years, and there is no party dissention amongthe Republicans in the present campaiga t> wareant any claims on the part of the Democrats that, they will carry the state. Indiana may also go Democratic next Tuesday. It has gone Damoeratic in the past, but it has been along time ago. Indianapolis, the chief c ty of the state, is always Dem- oeratic, but the balance of the state never follows in its wake. Kern has twice tried to be governor of the state and each time has been turned down witha dull sickning thud. There is no plausible reason to believe that the people have changed their minds toward him even though he is ranning for vice president. The lte- publican machinery is in fine runaing order in Indiana and it is here predicted that Old Indiana will not forget her cunning at the presidential election. Ohio, has by some over enthusiastic Democratic prognosticator been placed in the doubtfu column, and really there are some grounds for the allegatlen, judging from the political mix-ups that has transpired in that state within the past ten months. Senator Foraker is thought to be the entering wedge for the Democratic party, but how fool- ish issuchaclaim. Foraker desires to return to the United States senate and expects the legislature, which is elected next Tuesday, to return him. That could not happen if the state went Democratic, Foraker, there- fore, is not going to help the Democrats carry the state. Then again, Foraker in the late state primaries of Ohio failed to get enough votes throughout the entire state to make it appear to the general public outside of the state that he also ran for the state delegation of Ohio. If Foraker should bolt, he would not, judging from tre results of the primary contest in the state last spring, be able to take enough votes to the Democrati: party to warrant any one in classing Ohio as a doubtful state in the presidential contest that will be pulled off next Tuesday. Other states of the North have been classed as doubtful by the Democrats, but that has been dore, in every presidential contest, and yet those states go, on and on rolling up great Republican majorities year in and year out, and never showing any Democratic | leaning, however popular the candidates on the ticket may seem to be. Bryan may carry some of the West- | ern states. Mark you, he may doit, but itis very doubtful. Whether however he does or does not carry | a single Western state, the general results will amcunt to oneand the same. The Democrats are spreading | the report that the Republicans are uneasy about the| above named states because they rushed speakers of national reputation therein during the past week. Not at all, they have simply worked on the theory that dis- cretion was the better part of valor. They worked on the cow boys’ theory, ‘‘watch a tame cow and the wild) one willnever hurt you,’”’ and likewise on the princi-| ple, ‘‘anounce of pervention is worth a ton of cure.’’ On the other hand the Republicans have gone into the heart of the Solid South and have made some headway, a thing that has never been done before. It is not gen- erally believed that the Republicans will carry any of of the Southern states, and yet it must be admitted there is as much probability of Taft carrying Kentucky, | Maryland, Tennessee and Delaware as there is of Bry-| an carrying New York, Indiana, Ohio and Wisconsin. The mostof us that have watched public sentiment know that whenever it is going to make any radical changes you can always feel itin the air. In other words men talk as they vote. They have no reason for, talking one way and voting another and they do not | doit. Men all over this country are not talking Bryan and while they may not be talking Taft as anthusiast| country is in good hands and we had beiter let well enough alone. If there are any grounds to warrant a prediction that Mr. Bryan will be elected next Tuesday they are kept un ler cover and that isa hard thing to do. Twelve years azo throurhout the entire West there wag aseutiment in favor of Bryan’s election, and you will remember that it was talked by day and by night, and the advocsates of MeKinley were unable to get enough hearers together to mould any sentiment for him. Taat Beyan enthusiasm neither exist in the West or Bast this year, and itis said to no great extent in the South is very plain to be seen. One therefore is safe at this time to predict, Taft will be elected by a greater electoral majority than was Roosevelt four yeasr ago. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Thinking voters should take care and vote the two proposed amendments to the state constitution in the coming election. Tney are plainly indivated on the ticket and should not be overlooxed. Remember that they are carried by a majority of those who vote on the amendments and they do not require a majority of all the votes cast for officers at the same election. This is important to the voter who has no ax to grind and who wants the amendments to stand or fall on their their merits. Those who are directly interested for or against the amendments will be sure to vote, but the great mass of the voters who do not understand that they too are involved deeply in the result should cast the deciding vote, and not the special interests. The Journal editor has made an honest study of the two and submits his ideas, not with the ida of influenc- ing the voter but to suggest to him some points to think about and if any reader does'nt agree with us we would be very glad indeed to publish his views in next issue. One amendment would grant to individuals, firms and corporations the right of eminent domain, the right to condemn pioperty for rights of way for drains, flumes, ditches and logging railroads. At first thought the proposition looks good. It would permit a logger to force his way through land held by the Weyerheuser and other timber syndicates, but there is another side toit. Not only is it establishing a dangerous principle of granting the right of condemnation for private pur- poses, but it permits the private legging railroad to hold up the owner of the land through which it passes. It will permit a logging railroad company to go through a man’s bunch of timber, log all around it and force him to sell out which he will do on accouat of the great dan- ger of fire and because the logging company can pull up its tracks and leave his tract of timber isolated. He cannot force the logging company to haul out his logs. He must sell his logs to them or let them stay in the woods. Under the law as it isnow a logging road must b2a common carrier and accept logs and other freight at regular tariff rate from every one if it condemns any property. Asa result a logging road is being built up ‘mill creek in this county, which will operate as a com- ‘mon carrier and haul out anybod’s logs or any farmer’s produce along the way. Such a road is of benefit to the country through which it goes. If logging companies ‘want to foree their way through anybody’s land let! them follow the example set by the Mill Creel road and ‘the Chinook Lumber Co., on Deep River and take out ‘charters as common carriers. It is argued that it is now possible and the practice of large corporations to bottle up isolated tracts of timber and prevent it being logged by not giving right of way through their lands, ‘but our observation has been that corporations like the Weyerheusers, are really more reasonable than most in- dividuals in this respect. As for the farmer whose land would be cut by these private roads, there is not much qustion about where his interests would lie. The other proposed amendment provides for the classification of taxable property with a view to having the state derive its revenues entirely from the railroads and other public service corporations and leaye the real estate and local personal property to be assessed only for county and city purposes. Money lenders and those who invest in warrants, bonds, stocks, ete.. will oppose this amendment and they are the ones who are raising the ery that it would be class legislation, a popular cry, but one which does not bear investigation. It is true that our present law requires the taxation of all prop- erty alike, and theoretically money, bonds, stocks éte., should be treated like real estate, but in actual practice it goes free from taxation. Investors simply do not and will not report money and credits to the asssessor, and all the laws making inquisitors out of asssessors have been failures or have made grafters and black- mailers out of the assessors, The ordinary rate of tax- ei in this state is four per cent and investors getting eight per cent for their money will not give up half of their income for taxes when they can lie out of it. As aresult money and credits have been exempted from taxation, but they should pay a reasonable per cent of the taxes of the state and under this amendment the Pennsylvania law can be adopted taxing money at thc rate of four dollars per thousand for state purposes and it hae been found that investors will pay this who would not pay the rate levied on other property. Far from the proposed amendment being class legislation, we really have in actual practice class legislation under the the present law. The present state tax commission have studied this subject and it was at their suggestion that the amend- ment was submitted. At first it looks as if they were seeking more power under it, but on second thought it will be remembered that at least two out of the three commissioners will be likely removed by Governor Cos- grove and new men take their places, so that the pres- ent ones can have no selfish motives in the matter. There is force in the argument that under the amend- ment each corporation would lobby against any heavy tax on itself in the legislature. but we have the lobby anyhow and we must elect legislatures that the lobby cannot influence, and legislators are becoming more in- dependent of the lobby every year. —Sonth Bend Journal. COSGROVE’S ELECTION UNANIMOUS THE SEATLE REPUBLICAN is still of the opinion that | the voters of the state of Washington should make the jnomination of Samuel G. Cosgrove unanimous, the mouthings of the Democratic mossbacks to the con- ‘trary notwithstanding. It believes so for the reaaon [that, in Cosgrove the voters have a candidate that [stands for all thats pure and good, not only in the ad- | ministration of public affairs, but likewise inthe homes end at the firesides, and what nobler aim or higher pur- pose could human being have? On the other hand can ee much be truthfully said of John Pattison-Preston, ‘the Democratic candidate for governor? No Republi- ‘can has any excuse for voting against Cosgrove for ‘governor, but can any D:mocrat, who is a good loyal citizen with ambitions for the success of his son, cast his vote for John Pattison alias John Preston, notwith- standing the fact that he has been nominated for the highest office in the gift of the citizens of the state? In spreading the report that Mr. Cosgrove is sick unto death and it would be like unto electing a dead man to an officeif he is elected governor, the Democratic ad- vocates are going along way out of their way to doa fellow man an injustice, but with Cosgrove dead before he ever qualified as governor, it would be a thousand times more honorable as well as elevating for the citi- zens of the state of Washington to clect him than Pat- tison, for even the very memory of Cosgrove would outshine any deeds that Pattison might do, In fact it would be a public calamity for the voters of the state to not give Mr. Cosgrove, not only the largest vote ever given to any gubernatorial candidate, in view of the fact there are more voters in the state than ever before. but because he is that kindof a man that the public has been clamoridg for—upright, honorable and greatest of all, an ideal citizen. New York may have Hughesas her candidate for governor to succeed himself, who is the quintesence of honesty and all that go to make a good citizen, but in his candidacy New York has none the best of the state of Washington, which has as her leac- ing candidate for governor Samuel Goodloye Cosgrove, who will be overwhelmingly elected and who will give to the citizens of the state just as good administration as has Mr. Hughes given the state of New York for the past two years, and those of us who know Mr. Cosgrove best, think an even better one, which is saying a great deal. In this day of grafters seeking the office it sel- dom happens that men of the stripe of Gov. Hughes and Farmer Cosgrove are selected as candidates, and when they are, the voters should rejoice and feel glad and make their elections practically unanimous. Buta few nights ago the Times, the journalistic swillbarrel of the Northwest, announced under flaming headlines the dangerous and apparent illness of Mr. Cosgrove, no part of which is true, but it is just like that putrid skunk to publish the most despicable lie its Murky Mett een conjureup. No wonder it loses one battle after an- other and has earned for itfelf the axiom, ‘‘Saw it ir ‘the Times? Damn lie!’’ Mr, Cosgrove’s family phy- 'sician says he is not only not in a dangerous condition, ‘but he is growing physically stronger every day. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the matter of the estate of Martin Adams, Deceased.—No. 9085. Notice to creditors. The judge of said court made herein on the 11th day of June, 1908, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against a estate or on against the community estate of said man and Billy M. Adams, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administratrix of said estate, at No. 745 New York Block, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, when one from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, October 23rd, 1908. LILLY M. ADAMS, As Administrator of said Estate. HOMER E. TURNER, Attorney for Estate. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. IN PROBATE. In the Matter of the Guardianship of William Kenneth Ross, a minor. No. 9476. Order to Show Cause on Sale of Real Estate. Sarah A. Ross, guardian of the person and estate of William Kenneth Ross, a minor over fourteen years of age, having filed her petition in this court, until the order of this court for the sale at private sale of the following real estate of said minor, to-wit: The undivided one-fourth of Tracts Eighteen (18), Nineteen (19), Twenty-six (26) and Thirty-one (31), of Shinn's Cloverdale Addition to Kent, according to the recorded plan thereof, all being situated in King County and State of Washington. And it appearing to the court that it will be for the best interest of said minor to sell said described property at private sale and that a better investment of the value thereof can be made; and it appearing to the court that said petition conforms to an agreement with the requirements of law in case made and provided; Now therefore, it is ordered by the court, that said minor and all persons interested in his estate, or in the matter of said sale, appear before the said Superior Court on the 25th day of November, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, at the court-room of the Probate Department of said Superior Court, being department of said Superior Court, the City of Seattle, in said King County, then and after to show cause if any they have, why an order of this cause should not be granted to said guardian, authorizing and empowering her to sell the said real estate of said minor at private sale, It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before said 25th day of November, 1908, in the Seattle Republican, is nowhere printed. It is also said County of King, and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 23rd day of October, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss. I, Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of king County of Washington, of hereby certify that the oregon law a full, true and correct copy of its original order to show cause, made by said court on the 23rd day of October, 1908, in the matter of the guardianship of William Kenneth Ross, a minor. Witness my hand and the seal of said court, this 23rd day, 2014, CERTO, A. CASEE, Clerk. Seen by D. K. SICKELS, Deputy Clerk. Date of first publication, October 23, 1909 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. E. T. Gregory, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. _____. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter notified scribed property, of a tax notified that the named plaintiff is notified that of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 30th day of March, 1906, and numbered B41260, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in addition to $4.10, and upon a property situated in King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 1, Block 14, Baltimore Addition. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of $3.35. For the year 1906, the sum of $2.05. For the year 1907, 69 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said dat eof payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. against any person and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wait: within 60 days after Sept. 11, the above entitled contract of action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on at his office below stated, or pay the amounts due, together with interest the costs. In case you will be judged will be heard, foreclosing the ten of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the sums charged and found against it respective and provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. GADONALD. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Louis Hatch, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. ——. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1907, and num- bered B47498, for the delinquent taxes of the years 1903, 1904 and 1905, in the amount of $72.71, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 3, less 558 acres sold, Sec. 29, Tp. 22 N. R. 3 E. W. That on Aug. 19, 1907, the following portion of the said land was redeemed: Beginning at a point 952.32 feet S. 817.66 feet E. from N. E. corner of Sections 17, 18, 19 and 20 thence S. 37° 19' W. net, thence So. 52° 19' W. 162.44 feet, thence No. 56° 3' W. 78.22 feet, thence No. 62° 3' W. 28.28 feet, thence N. 52° 19' W. 198.76 feet to beginning. That on Oct. 14, 1907, the following part of said lot was redeemed, to-wit: Beginning at a point 1170 feet So. and W. 55° 56' W. 20.8 feet from N. W. corner of lot 3, Sec. 20, Tp. 22 N. R. 3, thence north 37° 41' W. 13.90 for true point of beginning, thence S. 49° 31' W. 286.30, thence No. 56° 3' W. 59.53 feet, thence north 52° 19' W. 315.76 feet, thence S. 37° 41' E. 43.92 feet to place of Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you included said persons unless if any), are hereby furnished and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said publication, to-wit: within 60 days after October 2, 1908, in the above entitled court action; and defend the complaint of said plaintiff and the complaint of your answer on the un-designed attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the costs of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as proved by law, and as prayed in caithlt's complaint, now on file in this cause and L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. October 2, November 13, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Inherently Hale, Plaintiff, vs. William W. Hale, Defendant. No. —. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said William C. Hale, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 11th day, of September 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of desertion. EDGAR FOSTER. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. and office address: Room 303 Metropole Building, southwest corner of Second Avenue and Yesler Way. Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. H. T. Rudow and L. G. Rudow, his wife, Plaintiffs, vs. Mary E. Boman, Albert T. Rudow and Genarry C. Boman, his wife, Arissa L. A. Bilbrey and W. J. Bilbrey, her husband, Andrew F. Burleigh and Bertha V. Burleigh, his wife, F. S. DeWolf and Jane Doe DeWolf, his wife, Defendants. Summons for Publication. Tribunal of Washington to the said Mary E. Boman, Albert T. Boman and Genarry C. Boman, his wife, Arissa L. Bilbrey and W. J. Bilbrey, her husband, Andrew F. Burleigh and Bertha V. Burleigh, his wife, F. S. DeWolf and Jane Doe DeWolf, his wife, De You, and each of you, are hereby summoned to appear, within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, and defend the above entitled action in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County aforesaid; and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their offices below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment may be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint, which will be filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this said action is to clear title to that certain property described as Lots three (3), four (4), five (5) and six (6) in Bloomsbury nine (29), of Burke, Sloan. Addition to the City of Seattle, in and to which the said defendants, and each of them, claim some lien or interest, which lien or interest is sought to be foreclosed and declared void and of no effect, and that the plaintiffs' title in and to said property be quieted. IRA BRONSON and D. B. TREFETHEN. Attorneyvs for Plaintiffs. P. O. address: 614-619 Colman Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. September 11, October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE IN THE State of Washington, for King County, Jacob Hietanen, Plaintiff, vs. Anna Lisa Hietanen, Defendant—No. ..... Source: by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Anna isa Hietanen, defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear; within sixty (60) days after the date of the summons, tow: within sixty (60) days after the 12th day of September, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and answer the complaint of the defendant, and answer the signed, attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of The above entitled action is an action for divorce by plaintiff against defendant, on the ground of desertion of plaintiff by defendant, and on the ground that defendant is entitled to incurable, more than ten years last past. SMITH & COLE, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and Postal Address: 408 Boston Block, Seattle, Wash. September 11—Oct. 16, 1908. Have a Legal Notice? PHONE MAIN 305. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COURT of Washington for King County. M. Jr. Nist, Plaintiff, v. John Doe Michener, M. Jr. Nist, Plaintiff, v. John Doe Michener, unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the heretofore described real property, Defendants. No. ____. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them. You and each of you as a person, and each of you as a person, and to t he etherefore described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington dated October 1, 1905, and allows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B4129. Lot 9, Block 5, Room Division 1, Building 1, the 1905 tax for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described lot of real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of $8.71; for the year 1905, the sum of $8.69; for the year 1905, the sum of $8.05; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described lot of real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $10.65, and for the year 1907 (local Improvement district No. 1007), the sum of $2.94, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all taxed on the same basis, and taxed taxes upon and against real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exchanging with the old of last witness, August 14, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his hearing together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged by the plaintiff together with interest and costs ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. KENNETH MACKINTOSH & E. B. HERALD, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office Address: 227-30 Colman Bldg., Seattle, Wash. 14, Sept. 25, 1908 Aug. 14—Sept. 25. 1908. IN JUSTICE COURT—BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Sealey, Prince, King County, State of Washington. Century Furniture Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs.ella Teed, Defendant, No. _____, Summons for Publication. You are hereby notified that the Century Furniture Company has filed a complaint against you in said court which will come on to be heard at my office in room 210 New York Block, Suite KE, 1000 Fifth Avenue, 27th floor, day of October, A. D. 1008, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock a.m., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of the plaintiff on behalf of the receiver from said defendant, Ella Teed, the sum of $27.25, together with costs of suit on account of furniture sold and delivered by said plaintiff to said defendant during the year 1908, and that a writ of attestation of the personal property of said defendant sold to satisfy the claim of the plaintiff, together with the costs or said action, as more particularly set out in the complaint of the plaintiff and the affidavit for attachment filed therewith. I have entitled Court on September 16, 1908. R. R. GEORGE. Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. September 25. October 23, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Lola G. Wilson, Plaintiff, vs. Delbert E. Wilson, Defendant. No. ---, Summons by Publication. The Summons being to the said Delbert E. Wilson, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 25th day of September. A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered upon recording to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To procure a divorce from the defendant and for twenty-five ($25.00) dollars per month for the support of minor child, for the costs and disbursements in this action, and for attorney's fee of seventy-five ($75.00) dollars. THI CANN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address: 412 Oriental Bldg., County of King, Seattle, Washington, September 25, November 6, 1908. SUMMONS ON APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF LAND. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. George Winston and Emma Winston, his wife, Plaintiffs, vs. North Pacific Fishing Company, vs. Norton. A. P. Hotaling, company, a corporation, of Puget Sound; John Green, the unknown heirs of Jane Doe Green, Sidney Wilkenson, and Rothchild Brothers, a corporation of Portland, Oregon, and all other persons or parties, unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, or interest in the real estate described on the application herein, Defendants. Application No. 20. The State of Washington to the above named defendants, greeting: You are hereby summoned and required to answer the application of the military offender above entitled application for registration of the following land, situate in King County, Washington, to-wit: The Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Section One, Township Tenth, North, Range Four East, W. M. Said land is subject to the following rights of way, to-wit: Right of way of the Seattle-Tacoma Interurban Railway Company, and the right of way of the Chicago Railwaukee and St. Paul Railway. Said rights of way being from North to South across said land, being fifty feet in width on each side of the center line, the tracks of said roads as now marked. And to file your answer to the said application in the office of the Clerk of said Court, in said County, within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of such service; and if you fail to answer the service, and within the time aforesaid, the applicant plaintiff in this action will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the application herein. Witness, Otto A. Case, Clerk of said Court, and the seal thereof at Seattle, in said County and State, this 17th day of September, A. August, 1988. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By H. W. ODONE. Deputy. E. W. HOWELL. Attorney for Plaintiffs 601 American Bank Buildl Seattle, Wash. September 25, October 9, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington - in, and for the city of Washington. John McM. Porter, Plaintiff, vs. L. Munger and Jane Doe Munger, his wife, Defendants. No. ——— Summons. The State of Washington to L. Munger and Jane Doe Munger, his wife, above named defendants: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 25th day of September, 1908, the above judicial court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorneys for the plaintiff, at their office below stated. And in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand made against you, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. In the foregoing action the plaintiff seeks to quiet title in the following described property: Lots eight (8), nine (9), ten (10), twenty-one (21), twenty-two (22), and twenty-three (23), (24), (25), (26), Waggersford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington. REVELLE, REVELLE & REVELLE, Attorneys for the Plaintiff. Postoffice and office address: 646 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. September 25, November 6, 1908. State of Washington. County of King—ss. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the In the Matter of the Estate of Gus Strand, Deceased. No. 9101. Notice of the Estate. Notice is hereby given that in pursuance of an order of sale made and entered by the Superior Court of King County, Washington, on the 24th day of September, A. D. 1908, in the matter of the estate of Gus Strand, deceased, the undersigned administrator of said estate, will sell at public question, subject to confirmation by said court, the following described real property, to-wit: Tract twenty (20), Barto's Acre Tracts, in Georgetown, King County, Washington. Said sale will be made on the 12th day of October, 1908, at ten o'clock in the forement of said day, subject to doctoral court House in the said County of King, in the City of Seattle, State of Washington. Terms of sale, for cash, gold coin of the United States; ten per cent, of the bid payable at the time of sale and the balance upon confirmation by said court. Dated September 24th, 1908. H. S. NOICE, Administrator of the Estate of Gus Strand, Deceased, September 25, October 23, 1908. IN THE INSPIRER COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the Matter of the Insolvency of H. P. Gilbert, doing business as Richmond Beach Lumber Company. No. 60387. Notice of Assignment and Notice to Creditors Notice is hereby given that H. P. Gilbert, doing business as Richmond Beach Lumber Company, has made an assignment of all of his property for the benefit of creditors to W. H. Schumacher as assignee, and the creditors of sald insolvent debtor are hereby notified to present their claims, as insolvent debtor, to W. H. Schumacher at Rooms 615-616 New York Block, in Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of transacting the business of sald insolvent debtor's estate, within three months from the first publication of this notice, to-wit, within three months from the 25th day of September, 1908. Assignee of H. P. Gilbert, doing business as Richmond Beach Lumber Company, an insolvent debtor. Date of first publication: September 25th, 1908. September 25, November 6, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, In the Matter of the Estate of Israel O. Negus, Deceased. No. 9259. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 10th day of September, 1908, notice is hereby given to the on behalf of all persons of King County against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 1048 Kilbourne Avenue, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 25th, 1908. A. J. GODDARD, As Administrator of said Estate. KARR GORDON'S GROCERY. Attorney for Estate. 715 American Bank Building, Seattle, Wash. September 25, October 23, 1908. NOTICE AND SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. Wife of the above defendants, and each of them; You and each of you, as owners, or claimants of an interest in the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one delinquent tax certificate, issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, in 1903, and numbered B21531, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1900, in the amount of $5.75, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: South 16 feet of lot 4, block 2, of H. Yesler's First Addition to the City of Seattle. That he taxes the ongoing possession have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1901, the sum of $5.68; For the year 1902, the sum of $6.88; For the year 1903, the sum of $6.30; For the year 1904, the sum of $6.80; For the year 1905, the sum of $6.90; For the year 1906, the sum of $9.00; For the year 1907, the sum of $10.50. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from sale date of payment, and are all the sums of unpaid taxes takes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day after 60 days after September 25th, 1908, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, on account of amount due, oopen the plaintiff and due, oopen fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property ```markdown ``` for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wash. (Sept. 25, Nov. 6, 1908.) SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. Lettle V. Hibst, Plaintiff, vs. Phillip Hibst. The State of Washington, to Phillip Hibst, defendant: You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action, within sixty days after the first publication of this summons, to wit: the date of the first publication to-wit; after the 25th day of September, 1908, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for the, plaintiff, below named at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment to the plaintiff against you according to the demand of the plaintiff, which has been filed with the clerks of the above entitled court. The object of this action is to secure a divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant on the ground of cruelty and to have the former name of plaintiff restored to her. A. G. NALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wash. (Sept. 25, Nov. 6, 1908.) NOTICE AND SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown owners, and all person unknown, if aware and aware an interest in and to the herelarner described real property, Defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants, and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above property is the holder of one certain delinquent tax by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of December, 1903, and numbered B21532, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1900, in the amount of $5.75, and upon the real property situated in said King County, in the amount of $6.00, for South 16 feet of lot 5, block 2, of H. L. Yesler's First Addition to the City of Seattle. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said real property, to the: For the year 1901, the sum of $5.68; For the year 1902, the sum of $6.69; For the year 1903, the sum of $6.30; For the year 1904, the sum of $6.60; For the year 1905, the sum of $6.90; For the year 1906, the sum of $9.00; year 19,70 of the sum of $11,343. Which state will the sum be, interest at the rate of 15 per cent, the amount from a said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date first mentioned, not a note exclusive of the day of said first publication to-wit: in 60 days after September 25, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his date stated, and pay the amount due together with interest. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said taxes and costs against each parcel of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wash. (Sept. 25, Nov. 6, 1908.) NOTICE AND SUMMONS In the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in the property, having or describing real property. Defendants State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, or claimants of an interest in the inereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff, the holder of the real property situated in the city of Washington, is issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of December, 1903, and numbered B22124, for the delinquent taxes of the years 1901 and 1902, in the amount of $10.58, and upon the real property situated in the city of Washington, to-wit: West 40.09 feet of lot 4, block "A" H. L. Yesler's First Addition to the City of Seattle. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said real property, to-wit: For the year 1903, the sum of $8.86; For the year 1904, the sum of $8.71; For the year 1905, the sum of $8.96; For the year 1906, the sum of $8.97; For the year 1907, the sum of $10.14. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from the date of issue, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication on January 18, 1908. In the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien on said taxes and costs and amounting for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. A. C. MACDONALD. CRAVER, Plaintiff. Attorney for Plaintiff. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Balley Bldg., Seattle, Wash. (Sept. 25. Nov. 6. 1908.) Friday. October 30. 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. William Dorris and Maria Dorris, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. James M. McLellan and the unknown heirs of the said James M. McLellan. If the said James M. McLellan be deceased, the property described in the complaint herein, said Joseph M. Barto, if the said Joseph M. Barto be deceased, and all persons unknown, having, or claiming to have, any interest in the property described in the complaint herein. No. 62446. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to each and all of You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 7th day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs herewith for the unpaid attorney for the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint herein which has been fled with the Clerk of said court. The object of said action is to quiet title to the following described property situated in King County, Washington, to-wit: Lots one (1), and two (2), block two (2), Boston Heights Supplemental Addition to the City of Seattle, and to forever enjoin and debar the said defendants, and each and all of them, from assembling in the said house in and to obtain the said lands and premises and to obtain a decree decreeing that the said defendants, and each and all of them, have no interest whatsoever in the said property and that plantiffs' title is good and valid. EDWARD VON TOBEL Attorney for Plantiff. Office and Post Office Address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 7—Sept. 18. 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Elizabeth M. Lemon, Plantiff, vs. C. L. Lemon, No. 1000. The State of Washington to the said C. L. Lemon. Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toot-wot: within sixty (60) days after the 58 days of January 1956 and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. HERBERT E. SNOOK, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Room 537 Burke Building, King County, Washington. Sept. 18—Oct. 30. IN THE SUPERIOR Court OF THE State of Washington for the County of King—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Marcus O'Brantigam, Deceased. No. 5403. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should not be Made, and for Hearing on Final Account. Leota A. Courad administratrix of the estate of Marcus O'Brantigam, deceased, having filed in this court her final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts of Washington, at the presentation of distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered, by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the Marcus O'Brantigam, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the Prosecution of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 8th day of October, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. of said day then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said account should not be approved and an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the persons of said petition mentioned according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County and published once a week for three successive weekdays, on the 8th day of October, 1908, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 17th day of September, 1908, GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King—ss. I. Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King County, on the 8th day of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 17th day of September, 1908, in the matter of Marcus O'Brantigam, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 17th day of September 2008. By E. S. SEYMOUR, Deputy Clerk. September 18—October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. J. H. Crawford, attn. vs. Laura E. Price, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. _____. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners or claimants of an interest in the herein-after described real property, are hereby notified that the above claimant holds the certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of December, 1904, and numbered B288348, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $2.32 million. The claimant is also the King County, described as follows, towit: $E\frac{1}{4}$ of NW\frac{1}{4} of Sec. 5, Tp. 23, N. R. 3, E. W. M., less 1 acre occupied by school that the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said real property, for the year 1905, the sum of $21.60; for the year 1905, the sum of $23.40; for the year 1906, the sum of $31.50, and for the year 1907, the sum of $20.70; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unpaid sums upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- tention, to-wit, within sixty days after Sept. 18, 1008, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount of the complaint. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACADALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. September 18—October 30, 1998. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Laura E. Price, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners or claimants of an interest in the herein-after described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of December, 1904, and numbered B28895, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $1,000. The holder of said King County, described as follows, to-wit $W_{1/4} of NE_{1/4} of SW_{1/4} and N_{1/4} of NE_{1/4} of Sec. 5, Tp. 22, N. R. 3. E., W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said real property, to-wit: For the year 1904, the sum of $7.20; for the year 1905, the sum of $10.80; for the year 1906, the sum of $12.60, and for the year 1907, the sum of $8.28; which seals 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after Sept. 14, 2014, to submit a written action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the sums and amounts due to the plaintiff against it, for valid taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. MACDONALD Attorney for Plaintiff Office address, 524 Builey Building, Seattle, Wash. September 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Lottie Daughtry, Plaintiff, vs. James Daughtry, Defendant. No. 63059. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said James Daughtry, defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days from and after September, 2016, and defend the above complaint in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorneys for plaintiff at their office and post office address below desig- nated. You will be required to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of the plaintiff and defendant, on the ground of non-support, failure to provide, cruel treatment and habitual drunkenness. Attorneys for Plaintiff Office and Post Office address, 55 Haller Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. September 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora, Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. C. Askheim and Jane Doe Askheim, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herein-after described real property, Defendants. No. 62536. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, or to the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated June 5, 1906, and numbered B42178 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904 in the amount of ninety (90) cents, and upon the real property situated in King County, Washington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot (1) book for (4) Ballard Park Second Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1905, thirty-four (34) cents; for the year 1906, twenty-six (26) cents, and for the year 1907, twenty-four (24) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of $1.00 per cent. The date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you (including said unknown persons, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this complaint, to the first date of publication, to-wit; within sixty days after Sept. 18, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office on the first day of the lawsuit, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, for closing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for the satisfaction of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively, as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. OWN LAND COMPANY, of Germany AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash September 18—October 30, 1908. September 18-October 30,1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King Court Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. C. Askhelm and Jane doe Askheim, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an affidavit of being a Christian, after described real property, Defendants. No. 62535. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claimants, or to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, on June 5, 1908, numbered B42158 for the delinquent taxes for the year 1904, in the amount of ninety (90) cents, and upon the real property situated in King County, Washington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot fifty-two (52) stock four (4), Ballard Second Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1905, fifty-three (63) cents, fifty-four (63) cents, and for the year 1907, forty-eight (48) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent. per annum from the said date of payment and are all the unpaid and redeemed taxes upon and against did low. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if, any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the first date of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after Sept. 18, 1908, in the above entitled court and action are dealt with with respect to the plaintiff's deplaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charges against each for the sums and amounts due upon and charges against each for a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively, as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. AURORA, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 314 Northern Bank & 3—REPUBLICAL LEGALS hub Trust Rudg, Seattle Wash. September 18----October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. C. Askhelm and Jane Doe Askhelm, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unaware of his identity or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 62533. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, hereby hold that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated June 5, 1906, and numbered B42180, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904 in the amount of ninety (90) cents, and upon the real property situated in King County, Washington, hereby hold that thirty-two (32), Block four (4), Ballard Park Second Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff, upon said above described taxes, and the amount of thirty-four (34) cents; for the year 1906, twenty-six (26) cents, and for the year 1907, twenty-four (24) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent, per annum from the said date of payment and are all the unpaid indeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you (including said unknown persons, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first date of publication. to-wit: within sixty days after Sept. 18, 1988. In the above action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charges against each, for said taxes, interest and costs against each, for each piece of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively, as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and complaint. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Sherwin Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. September 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. C. Askheim and Jane Doe Askheim, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendant is the State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of the property in and upon which the notice issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated June 5, 1906, and numbered B42177 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of ninety (90) cents and upon the real property situated in King County. Washington, described as follows, to will Lot Number 2177, Block four (4) Ballard Park Second Addition; to Seattle, King County. Washington. of said amounts and subsequent years have been paid by each, for during a period for and for fifty-two (52) cents, and for the year provided 1907, forty-eight (48) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent, per annum from the said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon against sale of intiff. You and each of you (including said unknown persons, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN first date of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after Sept. 18, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and the defendant attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and property against the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively, as provided in the case and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg. Seattle, Wash. September 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. AurorA Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants, 82304 Notice and Summons. The State War Court to the above defended defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the certain delinquent taxe certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated April 15th, 1908, and numbered B49261 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of Ninety-three (83) cents and upon the real property, is due to Washington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot Eleven (11), Block Two (2), White Bros. Addition to Kirkland, Washington. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the real property, to-wit: for the year 1905, forty-one (41) cents; for the year 1906, fifty-two (52) cents, and for the year 1907, fifty (50) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent, per annum from said date of payment, deemed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exonerate the day of publication, and to-wit. Within sixty days after Sept. 18, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount of the complaint, and for the case. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering the payment of parcel and property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation. I. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg. Seattle, Wash. September 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King Gerald Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, defendants. No. 62227. Notice and Summary. The State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot Flifteen (15), Block Seventeen (17) Richmond Beach Supplemental Addition to King County, Washington, having prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, Forty-one (41) cents; for the year 1906, Forty-two (52) cents; for the year 1907, Fifty (50) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of Fifteen per cent, per annum from said date of payment, deemed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to within sixty days after Sept. 18, 1908, to within sixty days after Sept. 18, 1908, action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien on said property and costs against each parcel of said real estate for the amount and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in his cause and court. FORPORA OMNIPORA O. a Corpor AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. September 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation. Plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown and all persons, unk known. if any, having or claiming an identification in the mail to and after described real property, Defendants. No. 62306. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claimants, in or to the heartmatter described real property are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated April 19, 1908, ammended B49255 for the delinquen taxes of the year 1904 in the amount of Ninety-three (93) cents and upon the property situated in King County Washington district as laid out to wit: Lot five (5), Block Two (2), Whit Bros. Addition to Kirkland, King County, Washington. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by plaintiff upon said above described forty-one (41) cents; for the year 1905, fifty-two (52) cents and for the year 1907, fifty (50) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent. per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and undeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex-clusive of the day of said first publication, within sixty days after Sept. 18, 1905, in the court court and action; and defend this action answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien or payment of costs against each parcel of said real estate for the sums and amounts due upon payment against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on his cause and court. AUROPA A. K. COOPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff, F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff, Office address, 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. September 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King.—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Theophilus Elliott, Deceased—No. 8165. —Order to Show Cause why Final Account of Administratrix Should Not be Allowed and Estate Distributed. This cause coming on regularly before the court on this 16th day of September, A. D. Upon the filing of the final account and petition for the motion of Emily Elliott, administratrix of the estate of Theophilus Elliott, deceased, to be set for hearing: It Is Ordered, that the 22nd day of October, 1908, at 9:30 o'clock a. m., at the county court, house in Seattle, King County, Washington in Department No. 4, in the above court, be and the same is hereby fixed and appointed as the time and place for the hearing of said final account and petition for distribution. It Is Further Ordered, that all persons interested in said estate file their exceptions in writing, if any they have, to said final account and petition for distribution, and account and place appear and show cause why said final account should not be approved and settled and said estate distributed. And It Is Further Ordered, that all persons interested in said estate be given a copy of said hearing by the publication of a copy of its order in writing for four successive weeks in The Seattle Republican, and by posting copies thereof in three of the most public places in this King County, for at least twenty days prior to the order. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. FRANK S. CARROLL, Attorney for Administratrix. September 18-October 16, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Adelaide Cecella Eames, Plaintiff, vs. Frank Wood Eames, Defendant, Number 16144. The State of Washington to the said Frank Wood Eames, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of - this summons, towelf - within sixty (60) days after the 21st day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of the answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com-plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled actio is to obtain from you a divorce on the grounds of extreme jealousy, cruel treat ment and failure to support. PARKER & BROWN. Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 22 Union Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 21—October 2, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for the County of King No. p. 135. S. Clara Lewis, defendant. No. p. 135. S. Clara Lewis, defendant. No. p. 135. S. Clara Lewis, defendant. The State of Washington to the said Public. E. Lewis, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the filing of the complaint, summons to-wit, within sixty days after the 17th July, A. D., 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of the complaint to the defendant's attorney for plaintiff at his office below. And in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed in the court of the State. The object of the said action, set forth in the case, as follows: to obtain a divorce and dissolution of the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and the defendant herein on the ground of abandonment for more than one year. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 9-10 Starr-Boyd Block, Seattle, County of King, Washington. July 17-August 28, 1988. NOTICE SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King, —ss.—Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an order of sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 27th day of October, 1908, by the clerk thereof, in the case of the Employees Realty Association, a Depositary, at al. 1088 before Oil phant, at al. defendants, No. 63866, and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given httt I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 5th day of October, at 10:38 before the court house door of said King County. State of Washington, the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lots eleven (11) and twelve (12) of Block fifteen (15) of Byrons Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure two hundred twenty-six (27/1/00 ($1226.41) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 27th day of October, 1908. L, C. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW, DREW, Deputy. Oct. 20—Nov. 27, 1908. 4 SEATTLE REPUBLICAN SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Published Every Friday, 307 Epler Blk. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton.....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton.....Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. One Year .....$3.00 Six Months .....1.50 Three Months .....75 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matter Nome, it is declared, went dog ace mad, which to say the least was a dirty dog gone shame. Debs stood at the tomb of Lincoln and delivered an eulogy to his memory last Sunday evening and neither the tomb bursted nor fell to pieces, all of which was very remarkable. Next Tuesday and the deed will have been done and the peerless one can again take up his campaign for nomination in order to control the Democratic convention four years hence. Sir Wilfred Laurier has been victorious in another election for the Premiership of Canada and judging from his numerous successes in the past, Laurier will be Premier as long as heives. The last legislatnre voted the most of the towns in the state of Iliinois dry and now nature is taking a hand in the dry act and is not furnishing even the necessary water for the people and stock to drink. "Once more the people of the Northwest were obliged to depend on the Sunday Times for their political news," said the Times last Monday evening. Depend on it for their political "dam lies" as the Times always tells. Lets hope that that Booze law firm of Sunnyside, Washington, will refrain from going on a booze while in Sunnyside, as boozing is not popular in that rather Christian inclined community. In fact, even a "morning smile" is not considered the desideratum in Sunnyside. That the state of New York has been the battling grounds for both of the great political parties of this country during the past week was shown from the number of monster meetings that were held all over the state every night and day during the past week. Dollars to doughnuts that Mrs. Minnie L. Myers needs the thousand dollars that was given to the Washington Children's Home by Andrew Carnegie a good deal more than the Home itself did. The money would have comforted Mrs. Meyers while the medal will simply annoy her. Perhaps the most laughable forecast of the national campaign is the claim on the part of the Democratic National Committee that, the state of Washington will be for Bryan. If all those other predictions to the effect that certain states heretofore Republican will be for Bryan this year, are no nearer the truth than the one that, the state of Washington will be for Bryan, we are certain that Bryan has no more show of winning than a snowball has in passing through Hades. [Name not visible in the image] "Wayside Hospital Needs Funds," is a head line of a communication from Mrs. Marion B. Baxter. It always seems to be in the very same condidition notwithstanding the fact thousands of dollars are given it every year. It may be a despot that's ruling Venezuela, but there is no denying the fact that, he is ruling her and that, too, in a manner that is by no means pleasing to others, who would like to see it ruled by some one that would give them the privileges of robbing the country in the way of getting concessions. Being mistaken for a deer and shot to death by your friend is getting so common when two or more hunters go out together that if one desires to hunt deer its a great deal safer to go alone than with even a friend or a relative. If some of these mistakers were sent to the penitentiary for life there would be less of that kind of business done. If Capt. Haines can escape the gallows on the plea of "momentary insanity," then any one that desires to kill another may do so and plead momentary insanity and that will end the matter. When the courts hang or send to prison for natural life more persons guilty of murdering their fellow men there will be less murder committed in the United States. Erickson, the milk king, has been sentenced to serve a jail term and pay a heavy fine for forming a milk combine in King Guardian Life INSURANCE CO. OF SEATTLE THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN [Name] E. W. ROSS county, but being a king with barrels of money at his command, he has taken an appeal to a higher court and goes right on day in and day out perfecting a new milk combine, which has raised the price of milk to a higher price than it was when he was first arrested. When Erickson and his criminal associates shall have been prevented from selling milk within the city limits of Seattle they may then realize that, others have rights which they are bound to respect. Mr. Archbold may have in times past been a social lion in the most of the down east cities, but many of those he knew best are now publicly denying that they ever so much as knew the man. Lets see, we believe it was Peter, who denied that he even knew the Christ Jesus, although it was known that he had associatdd with Him for days and months. In politics these are times when its not wise to let your right hand know what your left hand receives. This perennial four year business stagnation caused on account of the probable change of presidents of the United States, might to an extent be obviated by electing our presidents to serve a term of six years and be forever thereafter ineligible. Guard INSURANCE OF SEATT Have a legal? Pnone Main 305 for prompt attention. J. W. BULLOCK DEALER IN COAL AND WOOD NOW Is the time to buy Coal if you want to get the best prices. Buy your Now and store it away for next winter's use. A postal or a telephone call is sufficient, we will be pleased to fill your order. Sunset—East 87, East 102 Queen Anne 1885 Main 3773 Indpendent—87, 8170, 7538. 289. 609 Tenth Avenue SEATTLE, WASH. Friday, October 30, 1908 JUST KNOW US OUR TAILORING OUR TAILORING AND YOU WILL DO THE REST YOU CAN'T BUY BETTER TAILORING IRVING CANNON TAILOR 211 COLUMBIA ST. Established 1890 Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. The Comfort. Newly furnished rooms. Walking distance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. L. ISRAEL WALKER, 1101-1103 Jackson Street. McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance 529 Colman Blk., Phone Main 695 Stetson & Post Mill Co. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE CONNECTION Business Office, Third and Spring Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. WILLIAM WALKER. Complete stock New Fall Goods, Ladies', Misses' and Children's Wear- ing Apparel, Furs and Fine Coats. 820 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Electric Fixtures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. Scandinavian American Bank. Write Today for a copy of "THE BANK ACCOUNT" a new, neat little 8-page paper as full of good things as an egg is of meat. MAILED FREE. The Scandinavian-American Bank, Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Puget Sound National Bank. OF SEATTLE Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. Commemorated Institution General Bank and Exchange Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash. United States Depositary. With CAPITAL and SURPLUS.$1,500,000 And aggregate RESOURCES over.....$12,500,000 Invite business on the most liberal terms consistent with conservative banking. Foreign exchange department espe- cially equipped for the conduct of Ori- ental business. M. F. Backus, Pres.; R. . Spencer, 1st V. P.; R. S. Stacey, 2nd V. P.; J. W. Maxwell, Cash. Friday, October 30, 1908 Political Pointers REPUBLICAN TICKET For President—Wm. H. Taft. For Vice President—James S. Sherman. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS Rogers, Douglas county. J. M.Fish, Stevens county. J. R. O'Donnell, Chehalis county. W. P. Trimble, King county. C. E. Kerlee, Pacific county. STATE For Congress, First District, W. E. Humphrey; Second District, F. W. Cushman; Third District, Miles Poindexter. Governor—S. G. Cosgrove. Lieutenant Governor—M. E. Hay. Secretary of State—Sam H. Nichols. Treasurer—J. G. Lewis. Auditor—C. W. Clausen. Attorney General—W. P. Bell. Commissioner of Public Lands —E. W. Ross. Superintendent of Public Instruction—Henry B. Dewey. Insurance Commissioner - J. H. Schively. Preference for United States Senator—Wesley L. Jones. A. Ann Clark, F. H. Tonkin, Howard D. Taylor. 41st Dtstrict. William G. Norris, Geo. B. Webster. 42nd District. William G. McMaster, W. T. Christensen. 43rd District. Ole Hanson, P. McInnis. 44th District. J. A. Ghent, H. C. Weir. 46th District. John A. Whalley, George R. Tennant. 47th District. Edward B. Palmer, Frank C. Jackson. Sheriff—Robert T. Hodge. County Clerk—D. K. Sickels. County Auditor—Otto A. Case. County Treasurer—George F, Russell. Prosecuting Attorney—George F. Vanderveer. County Assessor — Thomas A. Harrish. Supt. of Common Schools—A. S. Burroughs. County Engineer - James R. Marrison. First Commissioner's Dist.—M. J. Carrigan. Third Commissioner's Dist.—A. L. Ruthefrord. Wreck Master—John F. Hawkins. Justice of Peace, Seattle Precinct—John B. Gordon, R. R. George, Jonn E. Carroll. Constable, Seattle Precinct—James E. Shannon, Oscar A. Wise, J. D. Jones. Justice of Peace, County Precincts—W. W. Davies, J. Railsback, John C. Storey, J. C. Penberthy, H. F. Cory. Constables, County Precincts —C. A. Holtz, Delbert W. Nause Oscar E. Wallin, S. W. Jacobs,, Chas. Morehouse, John Shepich, A. M. Anderson. Judges of Superior Court Wilson R. Gay, Boyd J. Tallman [Name not visible in the image] Robert B. Albertson, A. W. Frater, Mitchell Gilliam, George Morris. Reports from the second congressional district of this state come to us that Hon. Francis W. Cushman is practically without opposition in the present campaign. It is said on very good authority that his opponent will not get but a few more votes than the Socialist candidate, yea verily if as many. Frank Cushman has been in the national house of representatives for the past eight years and he has been a brilliant success from the very day almost that he took the oath of office. It can be said without fear of successful contradiction that Cushman is one of the most popular politicians in the Northwest and in the state of Washington he seems to be closer to the farmer, the laborer, the mechanic and all classes of business men than any other man in the public's eye. His Republican friends all over the state are truly glad that he will be elected practically as he was nominated, by acclimation. In another column hereof will be seen the picture of E. W. Ross, who has served four years as commissioner of the land office, and who has given general satisfaction. Neither Mr. Ross nor any of the other Republican candidates need any boosting in this or any other paper in the state for election, as all of them will be elected by overwhelming majorities, but THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN hopes to see them all elected by such large majorities as to discourage the Democrats THE SEATTLE REPURI CAN A. A. from putting up tickets in this state. It is said that a few men who were not favored by Mr. Ross at the expense of the public are trying to knock him in the present campaign, but every knock like that is the same as a boost for him. Of course the Democrats have nominated a man against Mr. Ross, but no one seems to know who the man is, and after the election he will never be thought of again in this connection. No man in the state whether in private or public business is more widely known than J. H. Schively, and that he was favorably known was shown by the vote he received in the late direct prsmary contest, he leading his three competitors by a most decisive plurality. That he will be elected next Tuesday as the first state insurance commissioner goes without saying. He, like the other candidates, is practically without opposition. It seems absurd for THE SEATLE REPUBLICAN to make mention of the various Republican candidates, for they will all be elected and the only thing that it is pleading for is an overwhelming majority for them all. All Republicans will on next Tuesday vote the Republican ticket straight. Just call up Main 305, Mr. Lawyer, when you have a legal notice for publication, and it will be taken care of in first-class shape and you need give yourself no further worry. The above number is that of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN located at Room 307 in the Epler block. PERSONAL MENTION S. P Weston, for years business manager of the Post-Intelligence, but who resigned his position some six months ago and went to California in order to recuperate in health, is visiting in the city, and will remain over long enough to vote the Republican ticket before returning. James A. Moore, the well known promoter and Seattle builder, has returned from an extended business trip through many of the states of the East. He is well pleased with the businesses outlook in the East and thinks business will be brisk almost the next day after the election. A. P. Sawyer, financier of the Post-Intelligencer, has returned from a six weeks' visit in the East. While absent he has been doing whatever he could to assist in the presidential campaign. He is one of the best political advisers in the Northwest, and he was able to render the Republican national committee valuable service. Mr. Sawyer does not doubt for a single minute that W1 an Howard Taft, who by the way was not only a college mate of his, but likewise a boy mate, both of them having been born in the same town, will receive a larger vote in the electoral college than did President Roosevelt four years ago. L. H. Gray, who for the past two years has been the president of the Associated Charities, retired from that office at the late annual election and was suc- 1 ceeded by W. R. Smith, one of the most active and widely known attorneys in the city. No man stands higher in the community than Mr. Smith and it is safe to predict that he will give the society just as vigorous administration as did Mr. Gray. Judge Wilson R. Gay, accompanied by his wife, will leave Seattle, Nov. 5th, for a short stay in the East, and while absent he proposes to see America. His first stop after leaving Seattle will be in Denver, next in Kansas City and other Missouri points. After a brief stay at his old home in Pennsylvania, he will run over to Washington City, take in New York and Boston and other places of note in that section of the country. He will go south stopping for a day or so in many of the larger cities, visiting for three days in New Orleans. Turning his face homeward by the Southern Pacific he will visit the Gulf and coast cities of Texas and California, arriving home about Dec. 20th. When Bryan's Commoner says, "Roosevelt is trying to deceive the working people," it seems to forget that the people have had Roosevelt for president for seven years or more and the people do not remember of having been deceived by Roosevelt within that time, on the contrary, however, instead of believing he had deceived them or was trying to do so, they seemed to think that he is the first president in many years that has given them a square deal and for that they voted him the largest electoral college of any president in the history of the United States. Its Bryan that is trying to deceive the people, and if he is not trying to do so, he would do so if he should ever be elected president. Attorneys, attention! THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN does the best and most reasonable legal work. Phone Main 305. BUSINESS DIRECTORY E. N. BROOKS & CO. For Frills For Men. HIGH CLASS HABERDASHERY 1331 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. TREEN SHOE COMPANY Always Carry the Best. Customers Carefully Cared For. 707 First Ave., Seattle, Wash. W. H. FINCK Pioneer Jeweler and Watch Maker. Our Holiday Specials Unequaled. 816 Second Avenue, Seattle, Wash. PURCELL'S SAFE COMPANY Halls Safe and Lock Co.'s Safes and Vaults. Phones Main 667; Ind. 3197 312 Occidental Ave., Seattle, Wash. E. R. BUTTERWORTH & SONS Leading Embalmers and Undertakers We are not the only undertakers. 1921 First Ave., Seattle, Washington GUS BROWN & CO. Sells Suits That Suit Everybody. Selling at Half Price. 511 Second Avenue, Seattle, Wash. THE SEATTL DAILY REPUBLICAN Seattle's Leading Weekly. Legal Publications Solicited. 307 Epler Block, Seattle, Wash. Phone Main 305 THE RAILROAD'S EMPIRE OF THE WEST There never was a like period in the history of the railroad development of this country than demanded the enormous expenditures that are found necessary to provide the most urgent transportation facilities, as exist today in case of the systems of the West. Money - millions of money and hundreds of millions measured by the standard of a dollar, is the crying need of the artery like transportation systems that traverse the "Empire of the West." There is a current of agricultural and industrial activity existing in the West at the present day that surpasses anything appearing on the records of any other land. Following this development of its natural resources will come the area of manufacturing and in this it is impossible to prophesy the future. A glance at the brief history of Omaha as a manufacturing city, and Seattle as a shipping center, forms the key note of what may be accomplished within the next score of years. There are opportunities in the line of opportunity that attract and justify the expenditure of hundreds of millions to meet the growing needs of the country. The transportation facilities of a country are, and always have been the true test of the nation's commercial development. Rome was the greatest road-builder in the world in her day, and the supreme commercial power. Her highways, which are still the wonder of modern engineers, represented the most advanced stage of the art of transportation as it was then known, and made possible the development of her territory. So strongly was this essential feature recognized by her governing powers that with every territory subdued her first act was to commence the construction of roads to develop its transportation. From 1850 to 1900, the last year for which figures are available, the number of acres in improved farm lands in the United States increased from 113,000,000 to nearly 415,000,000, and the value of all farm property increased from less than $4,000,000,000 to more than $20,000,000,000. But for the railroads there could have been nothing approaching this marvelous increase in the agricultural wealth of the country, and these figures of course, take no account of the great fortunes that were built up in supplying the demands of the people who populated the lands which the railroads made available.—American Industries for October. Booker T. Washington In Mississippi As the guest of that genial and powerful young Negro, Banker Charles Banks, of Mound Bayou, Booker T. Washington has been going about in Mississippi doing good in no small and unheraled way. The Birmingham Age-Herald, Montgomery Advertiser and the Vicksburg. Daily News among Southern and the New York Evening Post among Northern dailies have made his tour the occasion of complimentary editorials. Great crowds of whites and Negroes throughout the state have thronged to hear him. With the lynching of two Negro excursion- ists to chill, the eternal optimist has found much more to cheer him, in the way of generous receptions, in dozen Negro banks and great Negro thrift. The Vicksburg Daily News in a leading editorial of nearly a column reports him exhorting his people to courage, industry, sobriety and frugality. Booker T. Washington in Mississippi during this widespread mob oppression of his people is not unlike Moses at the Red Sea saying to his people: "Fear ye not, stand still and see the salvation of the Lord."—N. Y. Age. THE SEATTLE THEATRE The Seattle Theatre will get away from melodrama next week and will soar toward the realms of the classical. "The Holy City" was here two years ago at the Seattle Theatre and drew capacity audiences for a week, and could have remained two weeks. If the people's taste has not changed, it will do capacity business again at the Seattle Theatre next week. It is far the most reverential play that has ever been staged in Seattle, and the excellent company portraying the various chnracters appear to enter into the religious spirit of the play when on the stage. The story is taken from the Bible, and as an object lesson, both in dialogue, action and scenery, it excels any of the most brilliant sermons ever preached by mortal man since the days of Apostles. The plot circles around John the Baptist, his beheading at the instigation of Herodias and as the edict of Herod. Luella Morey as Salome, builds up that biblical character in a manner that reflects great credit on the lady's talent; it is the pivot or central figure of the play. If you see "The Holy City" at the Seattle Theatre next week, and have any good in your the play will develop it and make you better, and incidentally it will entertain you with a great historical fact that many are lamentably ignorant of. AT THE GRAND "Just Out of College," an upto-date comedy from the pen of George Ade, should be sufficient to test the capacity of the Grand next week beginning with the matinee Sunday. It is the consensus of opinion of the press throughout the country that Ade's latest concoction, "Just Out of College," is as good as a feast and is marked by the well known characteristics of Ade humor. When we recall "The College Widow," "Peggy From Paris," and "The County Chairman," from the same author, we are justified in looking forward to an enjoyable performance. THIRD AVENUE THEATRE "The Great Express Robbery" at the Third Avenue Theatre is a thriller of the first magnitude. The heorine escapes from the villain by an acrobatic feat that would do justice to a trapese ar, tist, she is pursued by the villain from first to laat, and is rescued by the hero or some of her friends often enough to produce a thrilling climax in the many scenes in every act. Picturesque characters of the West, likewise heroes and heroines, and an abundance of new scenery, is what the pa- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN trons of the Third Avenue Theatre get this week. A few more such plays and the theatre will will certainly have to be enlarged to hold the crowd that will want to see plays like "The Great Express Robbery." "Queenof the Highbinders," will be the play next week. When a play runs from five to ten years in the Eastern cities before it is produced on the Coast, it must have merit. "The Queen of the Highbinders" has toured the large cities of the East under Al Wood's management for nearly a dozen years; it will receive its initial production at the Third Avenue Theatre next week, at the hands of the company now playing there. The play will be directed and staged by Manager R. E. French, and it will be given a mammoth production with careful attention to detail. The play, as the title implies, deals with the Chinese opium dens of San Francisco before the earthquake. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Wife of Dorris and Maria Dorris, his wife, Plaintiffs, vs. James M. McLellan and the unknown heirs of the said James M. McLellan if the said James M. McLellan be deceased. Joseph M. McLellan be deceased. Joseph M. McLellan Barto of the said Joseph M. Barto be deceased, and all persons unknown, having or claiming to have, any interest in the property described in the complaint herein. Defendants. No. 62446. Summons The State of Washington to each and all of said defendants; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 30th day of October, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above titled court in an answer to a complaint of the plaintiffs herein and serve a copy of the answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint herein which has been filed with the clerk of such court. The object of the complaint is to quiet title to the following described property, situated in King County, Washington, to-wit: Lots One (1) and Two (2). Block Two (2), Boston Heights Supplemental Addition to the City of Seattle, and to forever enjoin and debar the said defendants, and each and all of them, from asserting any claim whatsoever in and to the said land and premises and to obtain decree decreeing that the said defendants, and each and all of them have no interest whatsoever in the said property and that plaintiff's title is good and valid. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiffs. Office and Post Office Address: Rooms 604-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 30—Dec. 13, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. In Probate. In the Master of the Guardianship of Medred Works and Carl Joe Wells, Miners No. 9441, Order to Show Cause in Sue of Real Estate. Bessie I. Wells, guardian of the persons and estates of Mildred J. Wells and Carl Joe Wells, minors, having filed her petition in this court, duly verified, praying for an order of this court sale of all the real estate and interest in mining claims belonging to said wards, for the purposes therein set And it appearing to the court from said petition that it is to the best interests of said wards and their estate to sell all of said real estate belonging to said wards, as well as said mining company and it appearing to the court that said petition complied with the requirements of law, in such case made and provided: It is, therefore, by the court ordered, that all persons interested in said estate appear before said Superior Court on 3rd day of December, the hour of the day, the foreoon of said day at the court room of the probate department of said Superior Court in the City of Seattle, in said King County, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this court show not be granted to said guardian, horizizing and empowering her to sell the property and said wards as prayed for in said petition. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before the said 3rd day of December. The Seal Board newspaper printed and published in said County of King, and of general circulation therein. Done in open court on this 28th day of October, 1908. October, 1902 GEO. E. MORRIS. Judge. R. MOSER, 10. Heller, Blk. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King, Hannah McMullen, Plaintiff, vs. John McMullen, Defendant. Summons for Publication. State of Washington to the said John McMullen defendant in the above enitled cause. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: 30th of October, 1908, and defend the above entitled account of your answer to the answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint with which filed with the work of the said court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony, now existing between the plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of habitual drunkenness, cruelty and non-support. Attorney for Plaintiff. 60 Downs Block, Seattle, Washington. Oct. 30—Dec. 13, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Loraine Lavis. Plaintiff, vs. Robert Lavis, Defendant. Summons for Publi- cation. Case of Washington to the said Robert Lewis, defendant in the above entitled cause: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons' to-wit: Within sixty (60) days after the day of bob 1308, and above the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer or other pleading upon the undersigned attorney at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judge, and send the complaint to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of said action being to secure an absolute decree of divorce, severing the bonds of matrimony between plaintiff and deafnend, on the grounds of his drunkenness, support and cruelty, and the plaintiff's maiden name of Loraine Robertson. E. L. SANDERS Attorney for Plaintiff. Oct. 30—Dec. 13, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Erasmus Fowler, Deceased. No. 8410. Notice of Sale of Real Estate. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned, Mary Fowler, administratrix of the estate of Erasmus Fowler, deceased, that sale of real estate will sell at private sale on or after 10:00 o'clock A. M. of Friday, November 20, 1908, at Room 10 Haller Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, to the highest and best bidders for cash, in separate parcels of one, two or three pieces, or as one of the following described real estate, situated in King County, State of Washington, Lots 1, 2 and 3, of Block 5, of Hick's Addition to the City of Seattle. All bids or offers on said described real estate must be written addressed to sall Fowler i t Room 10 Haller Block, Seattle, Washington, and must be accompanied by a certified check for at least 10 per cent. of the amount of the bid. In witness whereof the said administrix has hereunto set her hand on this 26th day of October, 1908 MARY FOWLER. Administrix of the Estate of Erasus muster. Decease. Administrator, Essex Fowler, Deceased. E. E. SIMPSON, B. E. MOSER. Attorneys for Administratrix. Oct. 30—Nov. 27, 1908. Room 60 Downs Blk, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Vashon Col- laboration, all persons un- L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Vashon College Association, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants—No. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners or claimants of real property, the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of December, 1904, and numbered B289829, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $45 and upon real property described in said King County described as follows, to-wit: $E1/2 of SW1/4 of NW1/4 of Sec. 5. Tp. 22 N 1/4 R 3 E, W M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1904, the sum of $3.60; For the year 1905, the sum of $5.40; For the year 1906, the sum of $5.25; For the year 1907, the sum of $3.45. Which several sums bear interest at rate of 15 per cent. per annum unsaid date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days of October 9, 1908, in the above written court and action, and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing each parcel of said real property for sums and amounts due upon and agreed against each, for sale of interest and costs ordered, for sale of each parcel of opportunity for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. line in this case: L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Oct. 9, Nov. 13, 1908. No. 8215 PROBATE NOTICE. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King—ss. Notice of Seattlement of Final Account. In the Matter of the Estate of Jacob M. Nist. Deceased. No. 8215. Notice is hereby given that P. C. Ellsworth, Executor of the Estate of Jacob M. Nist, deceased, has rendered $1, and filed in said Court, in his final account as that Thursday, the 5th day of November. 1908, at 9:30 o'clock a.m., at the court room of the Probate department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said Court which is the place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. Geo. E. Morris, Judge of the Superior Court, and the Judge of said Court hereto affixed this 12th day of October. 1908. 18th day of Occupation OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By J. A. SIGURDSSON. Deputy Clerk. J. E. McGREW. Attorney for Executor. 419 Pioneer Block, Seattle, Wash. Oct. 2, Oct. 30, 1908. Nellie Temple, Plaintiff. vs. Lewis Temple, Defendant. No. 62612. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to Lewis P. Temple, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of NOTICE AND SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. E. S. Flager, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. .... Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest on them, are hereby notified real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer, of King County, State of Washington, on 17th February, 1903, and numbered B17894, for the delinquent taxes of the 1899, in the amount of $8.75, and real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: lot 4, block 20, Second Addition, City of Seattle. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said real property, to-wit: For the year 1900, the sum of $7.69; For the year 1901, the sum of $8.38; For the year 1902, the sum of $9.33; For the year 1903, the sum of $9.46; For the year 1904, the sum of $9.90; For the year 1905, the sum of $10.35; For the year 1906, the sum of $10.80; For the year 1907, the sum of $12.60; Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and redeem taxes upon and against real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of the date of first publication to-wait: within 60 days after October 9, 1908. In the above entitled court and answer and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against the parcel of your property by the sums amounts due upon, and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against, respectively, the plaintiff and the plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. in this case: L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Balley Bldg., Seattle. Wash. Oct. 9, Nov. 13, 1908. No. 8215 IN PROBATE. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. In the Matter of the Estate of Jacob M. Nist, Deceased. P. C. Ellsworth, executor of the estate of Jacob M. Nist, deceased, having filed in this court petition, deceased forth that would be now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said King, Nist, deceased, be and must before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 5th day of November, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day then and there to cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made. The residue of said estate among the heirs and successors said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the sale 5th day of November. The sales are made in a newspaper printed and published in a called King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 1st day of October, 1908. GEO E. MORRIS, Judge October, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. J. E. McGREW, Attorney for Executor. 419 Pioneer Block, Seattle, Wash. Oct. 2, Oct. 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Bessie B. deVarona, plaintiff, vs. EDUH L. deVarona, defendant, will be heard in the State of Washington, to the said Edwin L. deVarona, defendant: You are hereby summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action within the court of the State of Washington, to this summons, exclusive of the day of said publication, to-wit: within 60 days after the 17th day of July, 1908, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein, and serve a copy of the complaint for the plaintiff at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff, and served with the clerk of the above entitled court. The above entitled cause of action is brought for the purpose of obtaining a divorce from the defendant on the grounds of abandonment and Attorneys for Panhandle Office and Post Office address: 413 414 and 415 Mellhorn Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. July 17-August 28, 1908. SUMMONS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Florence Bray, Plaintiff, vs. Charles Bray, Defendant. No. _____ The State of Washington to said de- fender the plaintiff. You are hereby summoned to appear with sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 4th day of September, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff. You may oppose the answer or other pleading upon the undersigned attorney at this office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the attorney. You may oppose the said action being to secure an absolute decree of divorce, severing the bonds of matrimony between plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of abandonment and non-support. FRED C. BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and O. Address: 431 New York Building, Seattle, Washington. September 4—October 16, 1908. the first publication of this summers, wit, within sixty (60) days from and ter the 21st day of August, A. D. 198, 198, to the 21st day of August, A. D. 198, the Superior Court, of the State of Wash- ree © . Fribay October 23, 1908 IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for. the County ot King.—In Probate, In the Matter of the Estate of David 3. Bawards, Becensed.” No. 8380, Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not be Made, Caroline J. Edwards, the administra- trix of the estate of David J. Edwards, deceased, having filed in this court her petition setting forth that sald estate is how in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by lagcthereto, and it appearing to the court fsaid petition sets forth facts suffic- iMMME to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons Jnterested in the estate of the said David J. Edwards, deceased, be and appear pelore the sald Superior Court of King County, State of Washing- ton, at the court room of the Probate department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 26th day of November, 3908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. of said day then and there to show cause, Sf any they have, why an order of distri- bution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and per- sons in said petition mentioned, accord- ing to law. fc Is iurther ordered, that a copy of this order be published’ once a week for four successive Weeks betore the said 25th day .of November, 1908, in the Se- Pitle Republican, a newspaper printed nd pblished in sald King County and of general circulation therein, Done in open court this 22nd day of October, 1908. GEO. E, MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King. —s8. I, Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King Coiinty and ex-officio Clerk of the Su- perior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing isa full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by sald court on the 22nd day of October, 1908, in the matter of the estate of David J. Edwards, deceased. ‘Witness my hand and the seai o. said court this 22nd day of Octoher, 190%, (seal) OTTO A. CASE, ‘Clerk. By J. A. SIGURDSSON, Deputy Clerk. ‘Get! 23—Nov, 20 1908, J. M. WIESTLING, ‘Attorney for Estate. IN. THE-SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. —in Probate. s Jn the Matter of the Estate of John Herman Ranta, Deceased. No. 7756. Order to Show Cause. ‘Will A. Steel, the administrator of the estate of John'Herman Ranta, deecased, having filed in this court his petition duly. verified, praying for an order of his court authorizing the administrator sell or mortgage the real estate be- ing to said estate and of which said feceased died seized, for the purposes set forth in said petition; and it appear- jng to. the court thatysaid petition set forth facts sufficient to give the court jurisdiction, and it appearing from said petition that the personal property of Said deecased that has come into the hands of said administrator is not suffic- jent to pay the allowances of the family, the debts outstanding against the de- ceased and the expenses of administra- tion, and that it is necessary to sell or mortgage the whole or some portion of the real estate of said deceased and of sald estate to provide funds to pay the allowances to the family, the debts out- Standing against, the deceased and the expenses of administration; and it fur- ther appearing to the court that said petition conforms to and is in all respects tn accordance with the requirements, of the law in such case made and provided. It further Appearing to the court that one of the heirs of said deecased, to-wit: Lena Ranta, is a minor of the age of about thirteen years, and has no general guardian in the State of Washington, and that it 18 necessary to appoint some dis- interested person her guardian for the sole purpose of appearing for her and taking care of her interests in these pro- ceedings, and it appearing that Robt: A. Devers, ‘a citizen and resident of Said county and state is not in any way in- terested in said estate, and is a fit and competent. person to be appointed as such guardian. Wherefore, it Is hereby ordered by the court that all persons interested in. the estate of said deecased be and appear before the above entitled Superior Court on the 25th day of November, A. D. 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. in the court room of the Probate Department of said court, to-wit: Department No. 4, thereof. in the King County Courthous¢ in. the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, then and ‘there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this court should not be ‘granted to said administrator authorizing, directing and empowering him to sell or mortgage the whole or So much and such parts of the real estate described in said petition the court shall adjudge necessary ot eneficial, according as the court shall “at that time determine one or the other Of sald methods most beneficial, to the estate and those interested therein. ‘And it Is further ordered that sald Robt A. Devers be and he is hereby appointed as the guardian of said minor for, the Sole purpose of appearing and taking care Of her interests in these proceed- ings, And it is further ordered by the court that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four success- ive and Consecutive weeks immediately Hotere the maid, 26th day of November, 908, in the Seattle Republican, a weekly newspaper, printed and published and of general circntation in said King County. Done in open court this 22nd day of October, A. D, 1908. GEO, E, MORRIS, Judge. Oct. 28—Nov. 20, 1908. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, In and for the County of King. Norah B, Payne, Plaintiff, vg. Alfred Payne, Defendant.’ No, ——. Summons for Publication, ‘The State of Washington to the sald Alfred Payne, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 23rd day of October, 1908, and deefnd the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintift and serve a copy of your answer upon the understened attorney for plaintiff at her office below stated; and ‘in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered aaginst you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said court. ‘The object of the above entitled action is for decree of divorce upon the grounds of desertion and non-support. LEONIA W. BROWN, ‘Attorney for Plaintif, Office and Post Office Address: $30 New York Block, Seattle, King County, ‘Washington. Oct, 28—Dee. 4, 1908, IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. ¢. Van Horne, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owner, and all per: known, if any. having or clal it in and to the hereinafter 1 property, Defendants. Na, and Sum- mons. web State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each, You and each of rs, claim ants or holders of am int or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby. notified that the above named plaintift is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate is- sued by the Treasurer of King County, State of “Washington dated the Ist day of June, 1900, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, In the following amount, and upon the feal property situated in sald King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 46, Block 27, The Southern Aadi- tion; Certificate No, B54501; for the year 1899, in the sum of § .95; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plalntif upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1900, the sum of 54 cents; for the year 1901, the sum of 48 cents! for the year 1902, the sum ol 49 cents: for the Year 1903, the sum of 43 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 41 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 38 cents! for the year 1906, the sum of 98 conta: for the year 1907, the sum. of 27 cents; which several sums bear inter- est at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sald date of payment. and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you uncluding said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- clusive of the day of said first publica- tion; October 23, 1908, in the above en- titled court and’ action; and deefnd this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintift at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In cas? you fall so to do, judg- ment will be rendered herein. foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of, each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sume charged and found against it, re- spectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. C, VAN HORNE, Plaintiff, KENNETH MACKINTOSH, E, B. HERALD, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office Address: 227-30 Colman Bldg., Seattle, Wash. First publication dated Oct. 23, 1908. Oct. 33-—Dec. 4, 1908. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Emma Pullum, Plaintiff, vs, H. M. Pul- lum, Defendant.” No. ——. Summons by Publication. ‘The State of Washington to the said H.M, Pullum, Defendant: ‘You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 28rd day of October, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plainiift, and serve a copy of your ans- Wer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintift, at thelr office below stated: and In case ‘of your failure so to do, juds- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the sald court. ‘A brief statement of the object of the said action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony. existing between the plaintift and the defendant, on the ground of non- support for more’ than one year of the plaintiff by the defendant. GAY & RUMMENS, Attorneys for Plaintitt, Post Office Address: Suite 1220 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct, 23—Dee. 4, 1908. aici hte Seana IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, State of Washington, County of King. —ss, In the Matter of the Estate of David J, Edwards. Deceased, No, 8280. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Caroline J. Edwards, the administrator of the estate of David’ J. Edwards, deceased, has rend- ered to, and filed in sald court her final account as such administrator, and that Wednesday. the 25th day of November, 1908, at 9:40 o'clock, a, m., at the court room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Se- attle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by Said court for the settle- ment of said account, at which time and place any person Interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. . Witness the Hon, Geo, E. Morris, Judge of said Superior Gourt. and the Seal of sald court hereto affixed this 22nd day f October, 1908. (Seal) OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. Rv J, A, SIGURDSEON, Deputy Clerk. Oct, 23-—Nov. 20, 1908. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Joseph R. Dick, Plaintiff, vs. Alice Clark Dick, Defendant. No. '63586, ‘The State of Washington to the said Alice Clark Dick, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this summons, | to- wit: within sixty davs after the 23rd day of October, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office. below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, Judgment will be rendered against you aecording to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been fled with the clerk. ‘The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from vou on the grounds of cruelty and drunkenness. ELIAS A, WRIGHT, Attorney’ for Plaintitt, P. 0. Address, Rooms 629-621 Burke Bldg., Seattle. King County, Washington, Oct. 28—Dec, 4, 1908. IN, THE SUPFRIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Andrew Gustaf Peterson, Deceased. No. ——. Notice to Creditors, Notice is heerby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against sald deecased or against said estate, to present them with the neces- sary vouchers to the undersigned Chris- tina Louise Peterson of said estate, at No. 126 Nineteenth Avenue North, ' Se- attie, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or.same will be barred. ropnte of first publication, October 23, CHRISTINA LOUISA PETERSON, As Executrix of said Estate, GAY, & RUMMENS. Attorneys for Fstate. 1220 Alaska Bldg.. Seattle, Wash, Oct. 28—Nov. 26, 1908. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Adelaide “Cecelia Eames. Plaintiff, vs. Frank Wood Eames, Defendant. Num- ber 62563. The State ‘of Washington to the said Frank Wood Eames, defendant: THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN You are hereby summoned to appear IN within wixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- Mit: within sixty (60) days after the ney Bera day of October, 1908, and defend fy: the above éntitied action in ine above en-’ the tiled Ceurt. and*answer the complaint pe of the plaintiff, and serve @ copy of Your ino answer! upon The undersigned attorneys" for plaintift at their office below stated; fen and’in case of your failure so to do, “°% judgment will be rendered against you ant according to the demand of the com- and Dlaint, which ‘hag been fled with the ert Elerk of sald Court, “ ‘The object of the above entitled action. tei is to obtain from you a divorce on the the grounds of cruel treatment and failure We to support, re PARKER & BROWN, 4} ‘Attorneys for Plaintift. gm P..0. Address: $2" Union Block, Seat in tle, King County, Washington. ie Oct. te—Dee. "4, 1908. Mo ert orate to No. 7823. E IN PROBATE. In the Superior Court of the State of ‘Washington, for the County of King. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not be Made. In the Matter of the Estate of Kather- Ine Sederboom, Deceased. Mrs. Jo Moberly, administratrix of the estate of Katherine Sederboom, deceased, having filed in this court her petition set- ting forth that said estate Is now In a condition to be closed and ‘is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said pe- tition ‘sets’ forth facté™ sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Katherine Sederboom, de- ceased, be and appear before. the’ said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Brobate Department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the Sth day of Novem- ber, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m, of Said day then and there to show cause, lf any they have, why an order of dis- tribution should not be made of the resi- due of said estate among the heirs and persons In said petition mentioned, ac- cording to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published’ once a week for four successive weks before the said 5th day of Nov., 1908, in The Seattle Repub- lican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general cir- culation therein. ropone in open court this bth day of Oct, A. W. PRATER, Judge. State of Washington, County’ of King. ss. I, Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Su- perior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and cor- rect copy of an original order to show cause, made by, sald Court on the Sth day of Oct, 1908, in the matter of the estate of Katherine Sederboom, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 5th day of Oct., 1908. OTTO A. CASE. Clerk. By C. C, BURTIS, Deputy Clerk. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King, In the Matter of the Estate of Sarah Duggan, Deceased. No, ——. Notice of Hearing. ‘To the administrator and to all per- sons interested in the.above named es- ate: Notice is hereby given that the under- signed on the 7th day of October, 1908, served upon the administrator of the above named estate and filed in the above entitled court and cause a petition br which he prays for an order of the above entitled court in the above entitled estate authorizing and directing the administra- tor of the above named estate te perform a certain contract in writing, executed by the above named deceased in her life time, by the terms of which the above named deceased joined by her husband, Daniel Duggan, bound themselves to the undersigned to'sell and convey by a good and sufficient deed certain real estate lo- cated, lying and being in King County, Washington, and particularly deseribed as follows, to-wit: Lot one (1) in Block thirty (30) Squire's Lakeside Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washing- on, ‘That thereafter on the same day such proceedings were had that the above entitled court made an order fixing Thursday, the 12th day of November, 1908, at the hour of 9:80 o'clock In the forenoon of said day in the Probate de- partment of the Stiperior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of King, as the time and place of hearing said petition and directed notice thereof to be published and served for the time and in the manner provided by statute, and this will be notice to the administrator of said estate and to all persons interested therein “that at. the said time and place, to-wit, in the Pro- bate Department of the Superior Court for King County, Washington, on ‘Thurs- day, November'12th, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 in the forenoon of Said day, or ‘is soon thereafter as counsel can be heard, a hearing will be had on said petition, and the undersigned will ask the above entitled court to enter an, order and de- eree authorizing and directing the admin istrator of. the above named estate to perform the contract of said deceased and execute to your petitioner, upon his compliance. with the terms of said con- tract, a deed, conveying to the under- signed all of the right, title and interest of the above named deceased and of the above named estate in and to property covered by his petition and hereinabove referred to, free from all’claims of said estate and of the creditors, if any, there- of, and all persons interested In said es- tate are notified to be present at the said time and place to protect their interests as the same may appear. Dated October 7th. 1908. JOHN H, GEIGER, ’ Petitioner. NOTICE SHERIFY’S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King —s8, Sheriff's Ofice. By Virtue of an Order of Sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 12th day of October. 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of Alfred Geissler, plaintiff, versus Annie Speck and Rudolph Speck, her husband, Henry E, Egbers-and 0. A. DeWees. defendants, No, 62412, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will pro- ceed to sell at public auction to the high- est bidder for cash, within the hours pre- seribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock a. m, on the 14th day of November, A. D. 1908, before the court house door ‘of sald King County, in the State of Washington, the following de- seribed property, situated in King Coun- ty, State of Washington, to-wit: All of lot six (6). block four (4), Interlake Addition to the City of Seattle, to sutisty @ judgment amounting to five hundred twenty-eight and. 30-100 ($528.30). dol- are, and costs of sult, In favor of plain- Dated this 13th day of October, 1908, L, C. SMITH. Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Harry Devet, Plaintiff, vs. Nelile Phin- ney, and all persons unknown, if any, having er claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.» No. .,.., .Notice and Sum- mons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, a8 owners, claim- ants or holders or.an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, are hereby notified that the above hamed plaintiff fs the holder of one cer. tain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 10th.day- of Janu- ary, 1906, and numbered B40274, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $2.86, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 3,’ Block | 84, Woodland ‘Park Supplemental Addition to the City of Seattle, ‘That the taxes -for the following sub- sequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said-abave described real property, to-wit: For the year 1904, the sum of $2.38; for the year 1905, the sum of $2.16; for the year 1906, the sum of $6.65. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum, from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclu- sive of the day of said first publication. to-wit: within 60 days after the 9th day of October, 1908, In the above en- titled court and action; and detend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plain- Uff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with Interest and costs, In case yon fail so to do, judg- ment will be rendered herein, foreclos- ing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said reai property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes, in- terest and costs, ordéring a sale of éach Parcel of said property for the satisfac; jon of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's com- plaint, now on file in this cause and court, Banay ; : ‘ DEVET, Plaintift. A, C) MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintift. Office Address: 524 Bailey Builatng, Seattle, Wash. October $—November 20, 1908, 18 THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Harry Devet, Plaintiff, vs. Nellie Phin- ney, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants—No. ....... Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an’ interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintift is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate is- sued by the Treasurer af King County, State of Washington, duted the 10th day of January, 1908, and numbered B40273, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $2.86, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as flolows, to-wit: Lot 2, Block 84, Woodland Park Addition Sup- plemental to Seattle, ‘That the taxes for the following sub- sequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon. said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1904, the sum of $2.38; for the year 1905,sthe sum of. $2.16; for the year 1906, the sum of $6.65. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per. annum from sald date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon: and ugantist said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, “if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date 0: first publication of this notice, exelu- sive of the day of sald first. publication, to-wit, within 60 days after ‘the 9th day of October, 1908, In’ the above en- titled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plain- tft at his office below stated, or pay the umount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judg- ment Will be rendered ‘hefein, foreclos- ing the Men of sald taxes and costs ‘against each parcel of ‘siid ¥eal: property tor the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sid taxes, In- terest and costs, ordering a sale of each Parcel of sail property for the satisfac- tion of the sums. charged and found against it respectively as provided by Jew, and as prayed in. plaintif’s com- piaint, now on file in this -cause and court. HARRY DEVE, Plaintift. A.C, MacDONALD, Attorney for Piaintitt. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. October $—November 20, 1908, IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State! of Washington, for King County. Harry Devet, Plaintiff, vs, Nellie Phin- ney, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, Defendants, No. .... Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, are hereby notified that the above hamned plaintiff ts the holder of one cer- tain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 10th day of Janu- ary, 1906, and numbered B40272, for the delinquent taxes of the year '1903, in the amount of $2.86, and upon real prop- erty situated in said King County, de- scribed as follows, to-wit: Lot 1, Block 84, Woodland Park Addition Supple- mental to the City of Seattle. That the taxes for the folowing subse- quent years have been paid by the plain- tiff upon said above described real prop- erty, torwit: ‘or the year 1904, the sum of $2.38; for the year 1905, the sum of $2.16; for the year 1906, thé sum of $6.65. ‘Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sald date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including sala persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified ard summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclu- sive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after October Sth, i908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this setion and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on’ the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, In ‘case you fail so to do, judgment will be fae eg rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each par- cel.of said real property for the sums and amounts due-upon” and charged against each, for said taxes, interest ama costs, ordering a sale of eich parcel © said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against we spectively. as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint,” now file in this eause and Court. } HARRY DEVET, Plaintite: A. C, MaeDONALD, tee. Smee Radress: G4 ‘Batley. Balding, : ice Address: 624 ey Seattle, Wash. October $—November 20, 1908. : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State +f Washington, for King Comat. Harty Devet, Plaintiit, vs, Nellie Pim- ney, and all persons unknown, if) amy, having or claiming an. interest im ad to the hereinafter described “real pRop— erty, Defendants. No, .... Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim— ants or holders of an’ interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described reall property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate is- sued by the Treasurer of King Counts, State of Washington, dated the 10th dap of January, 1906, and numbered BA027%, for the delinquen'ttaxes of the year 190%. in the amount of $2.86, and upon real property situated in said King County. described as follows, to-wit: Let 4. Block 84, Woodland Park Addition Sup- plemental to the City of Seattle. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid iby the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1904, the sum of 3238: for the year 1905, the sum of $2.16; for the year 1906, the sum of $6.65. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from Said date of payment, and are alt the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upam andl aginst sald real property. ou Ang gach of you, (including said persons’ nktown, if any), are Reretay fyrther notified and summoned to be ana appear'within sixty days after the date Of first publication of this noties, exeta- give of the day of sald first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after the 9tt day of October, 1908, in the abore en- titled court and action; and defend this action and. answer the complaint of suid plaintiff and ‘serve a copy of yaur m= Plaintite a¢ hig office below gated, or plaintiff at his office below ‘or, the amount due, together. with interest and costs. In case you fail so to de judgment will be rendered herein, Tore- closing the len of sald taxes amd costs against each parcel of said real prop- erty for the sums and amguxts due upon and charged against eack, for said taxes, Interest and costs, ordering a wate of-each parcel of said property for satisfaction of sums charged and found Against it respectively ae provided ny law, and as prayed in plaintift's cam< plaint, now on file in this cause and court. ot HARRY DEVET, Plaintire A, C, MacDONALD, Attorney for Piainti¢r. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building. Seattle, Wash. ‘October 9——November 20. 1908. IN| THE SUPERIOR COURT GF “aaaee State of Washington, in and for King County. Washington Abstract amd Guscamty Company. a. Washington " corporation. Plaintiff vs. Henry Lusthott, Mitomden No, 63276. Summons. "Phe State of Washingtom @ the sai@ Henry Lusthoft, defendant: ; You are hereby summoned: to. sappeler within sixty, (60) days ater. the iret Publication of this. summons. sswit= Within. sixty’ (60) days after the 2nd day. of “October, 1908, and defend the Shove entitled action. in the above eu- titled court, and answer: the comptes of the plainiifl, and serve a copy a Xeur answer upon. the. undersigned: attarmes Tor plaintit at his office. below stay: and incase of your failure se 6» ib Judgment. will be rendered. weatust according to the demand. of ake, comm plaint, which has been’ Sled. witty the Clerk of sald. court. “The ‘object of tis action is to. neeever of you the stim of Thirty Dollaes (&3a-00> With Interest. from September Ist, 290m, for an on account of one certain Abstract of ‘Title made, prepared, compiled. and certified for sou by plaintit at your Fequest, and subjéct stor the Dastment sot sald debt and cost by attachment pro- ceedings. the following descrited presa- ses, to-wit: Lots Four (1) and Rive (a3, In Iilock ‘Twenty (20) of Wows: outs Division of Green Lake Addition to. the Cty" of Seattle, King Coty, Washing= on. JAMES MeNERS; 4s . _. Plaintiff's Attorney. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF THE State of Washington, In and for the County’ of King. a Lina Haggblom, Plaintim, ;ws. Haggblom, Defendant: "NO. |< Same mons for Publication. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, August. Hageblom: You are hereby summoned to appear within sitty (60) days after the, date of the frst publication of tht mummsaemm. towit: within sixty (60) days 16th day of October, 1908, ard deemed. the above entitled action ‘im te entitled court, and answer the of the plaintiff, and serve a copy at your answer upon the undersigned atternesss for plaintiff, at thir office below stated, and In case of your failure so to. do, judg- ment will be rendered against you a cording to the demand. of the. commplaimt, which has been filed with the elerk of sald court ,the object of said complaint. being to secure a divorce from yau.. AUERBACH, HOAR & SMIWRL. Attomeys for JPisimiis Office and Postoffice Address: doz Johnston Building, Seattle, King County, ‘Washington. —$_$ on _ No. 7827. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of Kime State of Washington, County af Ki Jet Notice OF Settlement’ of Hina count, Tn. the Matter of the Ewtate of Kather- ine Sederboom, Deceased. Notice Is hereby given that Mrs. Jo Moberly, the administratcix O€, the oar tate of "Katherine Sederboom, has rendered to, and filed in ‘sald court her final account as such administewtri. and that ‘Thursday, the 5th dey of Now. 1908, at 9:30 o'clock, a. m., at the court room of the Probate Department ef our said Superior Court, in the City of Be- attle, in sald King County, has beem duly appointed by sald court for the settle: ment of sald account, at which time amd place any person interested in maid ea fate ‘may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same, Witness the Hon. A. W. Frater, Judge of Said Superior Court, and the of said court hereto affixed this Sth day of October, 1908, OTTO A. CASE. Clerk. (Seal) By ¢.'C. BURTIS, Deputy Clerk. o Editorial Grave Digger Seattle's Journalistic Swillbarrel is resorting to its usual low and despicable means to defeat Republican candidates, and it has marked for defeat S. G. Cosgrove, M. E. Hay, Miles Poindexter and Will E. Humphrey. Let every Republican take his cue and give those particular candidates every vote that can be mustered up. In the past those candidates that the Times picked out for abuse have always been elected with rousing majorities and let the insolence of that miserable and contemptible blackguard publication be administered next Tuesday an even more stinging rebuke than it has ever been before, and that will be going some. A whelp that will malign a sick man is too despicable to live. So for as Mr. Hay is concerned, a more honorable man can no where be found in the state, and if he should ever become governor of the state he would give us just as honorable and progressive an administration as any other man in the state. Never lose sight of the fact, dear reader, that the Times is always a dam lie on general principles. Fools Fall Out and Fight The editor of the Portland Advocate and the editor of the Seattle Searchlight, both Afro-Americans of more or less prominence in their respective cities, Portland and Seattle, are not only in a newspaper battle of the blackiest type, but each has like wise offered to defray the expenses of the other to his town in order that their differonces may be settled, not perhaps with cold type, but with cold steel. Each accuses the other of being guilty of keeping a skeleton concealed in the closet and that if pushed he will let the cat out of the wallet. Just what either of these publishers has in the way of patronage to scrap over is more than can be seen from the bnsiness side of their paper. If one had all of the subscribers that both have, and each subscriber paid up regularly, then the fortunate one would not have enough money coming in to him to set the world on fire. Both of you had better forget your differences and work for the good of those to whom you are sending your paper and that you are not doing in publishing column articles derogatory to each other's character and reputation. Tax All Property "Do You Want Your Church Taxed?" is a headline to a circular sent out by a number of Protestant preachers of this city. Yes, just the same as I want my home taxed. To the congregation that has but a simple little church round the corner that sounds rather hard, but there are very few such churches these days, and even if such a church had to pay taxes the amount would be very small. All this cry against taxing church property eminates from those churhes that have properties valued in the multiplied thousands of dollars. They not only have a valuable church edifice in which they worship, but many of them own aside from that other properties in some instances even more valuable than the church edifice and its grounds. Every dollar's of property that does [Name not visible in the image] not belong to the state in which it is located should be taxed and all of it should be taxed equally. All this cry about not taxing church property is nothing more or less than sickly sentiment and the common sense voter should pay no more attention to it than f he had never heard of it. It is the duty of every Republican in the first congressional district to give the Hon. Will E. Humphrey his vote. He not only merits its because he is is the party's nominee for representative in the house of representatives of Congress, but because as a member of that august assembly he has made good, and what more could be asked of any public servant. In all of President Roosevelt's fights with the trusts and the railroads Humphrey has stood by him like a stone wall, and that should be a sufficient recommendation for all patriotic citizens to give him their vote. To enumerate what he has done for the improvement of this section since he has been in congress would require the most of the pages of this paper, and should space be given to them it would be but recounting those things that have been so repeatedly said and published about him. Suffice it however, to say he is the same Will Humphrey that he has always been, and earnestly solicits your suffrage at the polls next Tuesday. He will begin the serving of his fourth term as representative in congress, and all Seattle is much pleased with the work he has accomplished. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN JOHN J. KENNEDY 1917 FRANCIS W. CUSHMAN J. H. SC [Name] [Name not visible in the image] J. H. SCHIVELY The Cost of a Panama Hat. Panama hats are made in Colombia, Peru and Ecuador, but never in Panama. The value os a Panama hat is chiefly the cost --- of the labor expended in making it, for the value of raw material never exceeds 35 cents, and averages less than 13 cents. The labor is exceedingly cheap, but a great deal of it goes to the mak- Friday, October 30, 1908 ing of a hat. It takes a man, working six hours a day, six or seven days to make a common hat, worth a dollar. Two weeks are required to make a hat of better grade, worth from $1.25 to $3.00, and six weeks to make a fine hat worth $20. In making a fine Panamahat the straw is never dampened, and consequently the work can only be done when the air is very moist, that is to say, early in the morning and in the evening. The straw used for cheap hats is kept wet, so that the work can be carried on during the greater number of hours per day.—Scientific American. Does Retaliation Pay ? No one ever heard of two wrongs making a right, and having that in mind, it occurs to us those leading as well as influential Afro-Americans in Chicago that have opened up a skating rink and have widely advertised the fact that, "No white folks are wanted," are doing just what they have complained of the whites doing for the past fifty years. Suppose the whites do refuse to permit you to skate in their rinks, you are not making the case any better by such hide bound retaliation. If respectable white folks desire to take part on the floor of your skater there should be no objection to their doing so. And this reminds the writer that one or two small towns in this country controlled by Afro-Americans will not permit white men to live in the corporate limits and under no circumstances hold any of the municipal offices, and at the same time millions of black folk all over the land are living in towns controlled by the white folk and kicking like the devil because they are some times refused work, the same being given to working white folks. Consistency thou art a jewel. Negro Amply Rewarded "The Republican party has done all for the Negro that the Negro would permit it to," said a prominent Negro one day this week. Whereupon another rose and took issue with the former and said, "The Republican party has done all for the Negro that has been done for him." Bot them to an extent were right in their assumption. The Republican party looking at the emancipated American Negro as a whole has certainly done all for him that the Negro would permit it to do, and most assuredly all for him that he was capable of, literally speaking, digesting on so short a notice. It perhaps did too much for him all of a sudden, for if it had not enfranchised him so soon, or in other words, had it not permitted the seceded Southern states from going into the Union until the Negro would have been able to stand alone as it was he might have fared better. There is no denying the fact that the Republican party has done all for the Negro in the way of elveation that has been done for him, and until some party comes forward to do more the Negro should stick to it. The Democratic party is and has always been his common enemy. Have a Legal? Phone Main 305 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN