Seattle Republican

State Library THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1908 the installment plan and has that rented out in order that he may the more easily make his payments. Owing to continued sickness in his family he has been forced to deprive himself of every comfort; not only himself personally, but even his family. How strange that he would live thus with that amount of money in his possession. The man who would seek to ruin one who has had to battle like Root, commits a worse crime than the stealing of a million dollars. Judge Root has, however, courted a thorough investigation and has even offered to withdraw from the bench while such investigation is proceeding. ticket, but he certainly can not show good sense and vote the Democratic ticket. If, therefore, the Negroes of Nebraska voted the Democratic ticket on the score of that old Brownsville chestnut, they seem to have been the only real fool Negroes in the United States of America. George F. Russell, county treasurer elect, has been named by Senator Piles as postmaster of Seattle, to succeed George M. Stewart, recently removed from office by President Roosevelt, and he will assume the duties of the office as soon as his commission is forwarded from Washington City. So far as Russell is concerned it seems that Senator Piles decided that, to him hath more shall be given, and if not that it is the strengthening of a would-be political machine that has been in operation in King County, but which came very near meeting its Waterloo at the primary election. Russell, however, is an energetic young man, a native son, and it is believed will conduct the affairs of the office in a businesslike way. By Much effort is being put forth on the part of the men of commerce in the United States to capture the trade of the Orient. The effort to reach out Oriental Trade Vs. and get new business is always to be commended, but the efforts being put forth to get the trade of the South American. Orient reminds one of the proverb, "Straining at a gnat and swallowing a camel." If the same effort and expenditure of money were put forth to get the trade of the South American Republics that the business men of the United States are putting forth to get the trade of the Orient they would get anywhere from ten to one hundred per cent. greater returns for their investments. Recently J. C. Stubbs, traffic manager of the Harriman system, said: "The six million inhabitants of Argentine Republic did a bigger foreign trade last year than did China with 300,000,00 inhabitants and Japan with 50,000,000 combined." If the above statement be true, and it is not doubted, then it would seem that the business men of the United States, in crossing the deep blue sea in quest of trade, are leaving an hundred times more valuable trade to be gobbled up by some European country. If Argentine does the foreign trade that is reported of her, then the other republics of South America must do a like amount of foreign business and none of the world's great powers is as much entitled to it as the United States, and she would get it if her business men would only put forth the proper efforts. When Charles W. Morse, the well known New York banker, was convicted for crooked work in connection with his banking institution a few days ago, it added another to the already long list of "big men," who have sinned and had to suffer for the same. Under Theo- The Negro, who would advocate separate schools for the white and black children of the Northwest, is a shortsighted, selfish person and has a Separate Schools For Negro Children. many, however, it is argued that Russell is lacking in those qualities that the postmaster of Seattle will be called upon to display next year during the life time of the exposition, and those persons naturally favored some man of the calibre of Will H. Parry, who was in no sense a candidate for the place. ted States, to which Negro children are not as readily admitted as white children, and these schools have a thousand and one advantage over any school that any church or organization under the auspices of Negroes could establish in this section within the next fifty years. Then why separate schools? Men working on any such scheme may not be grafting, but they are imposing on both white and black folk and should be exposed and so far as the contributors are concerned the results will amount to one and the same thing. From a Negro standpoint it is doing the very thing that he has been pretending to fight, since his emancipation. Why advocate a separate school for Negroes when all the schools are begging the Negro to enter their halls and participate with all manner of men in acquiring an education? Negroes should hiss to scorn any Negro who would advocate such a foolish policy, and despise any Anglo-Saxon who would contribute a single penny for such a purpose. A few days ago two prominent lawyers (white) were taken from a hotel in a Tennessee town and one of them lynched and the other saved his life by breaking away from the mob and escaping in the darkness though he was followed by a hun and those persons nat bre of Will H. Parry, the place. "Uneasy lies the much a truism today more fully aware of t unexpectedly called Tennessee's Outlawry Goes Steadily On. "Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown" is as much a truism today as when first spoken, and no one is more fully aware of that than Senator Sam Piles, who was unexpectedly called upon to name a postmaster for Seattle. An hundred and one applied for the job, which could only be given to the one, and now the hundred are all out with knives up their sleeves for the senator's political scalp and make no bones of their intention. It was the giving of federal patronage that was responsible for all the political troubles of former Senator John L. Wilson, and it begins to look as if Senator Piles is to go through the same experience. It seems to be a weakness of human nature to try, as soon as one has been discovered as having committed some William Jennings Bryan's recent adieu from presidential aspirations reminds one of some European prima donna making her farewell American tour, which is but a ruse on her part to double the Judge Milo A. Root Invites Investigation. Gordon been confronted with the crime of having embezzled $50,000 from the Great Northern Railway Company, and the transaction had become public property, than he at once, so it is said, tried to square himself with the company by declaring that Judge Milo A. Root, of the Supreme Court of this state, had received some $20,000 of the swag. That such a charge is a fabrication of the most damnable type, every one who knows Judge Root will readily agree, but where such a charge hurts most is with those persons who do not know him and who take the accuser's word to be as good as that of the accused, not stopping to think that, if he is a criminal in one thing such a person is liable to be criminal in many things, even to the extent of ruining the character and reputation of an innocent man, if by so doing such a criminal can hide his or her own crime. If Milo A. Root has ever received $20,000 or even twenty dollars over his regular salary then his friends are very anxious to find it out. He certainly has never used a single dollar of that sum either on his family or in business. Judge Root is buying an unpretentious home and that on bition ticket or any other ticket other than the Republican Candidate Bryan's Third Adieu happens to give her an excuse to make another tour and the next time she does so emphasizing even more strongly than before, if such a thing he possible, that this is her farewell tour. Every time Mr. Bryan has been beaten for the presidency he has gone through the same stereotyped farewell address, but he begins before his words are cold to lay plans to capture the next Democratic nomination. He failed in 1904 to get the Democratic nomination, and while he did not actually fight the Democratic nominee for the presidency he did sulk in his tent and permit Parker to get walloped clear out of his boots. Mr. Bryan is in many respects a very brilliant man and in some ways has done good in the way of shaping legislation in this country, but it does seem that the Democrats would realize that they have other men in their party who could make just as poor run for the presidency of the United States as Mr. Bryan and then nominate one of them. --- --- Price One Year, $3.00. Single Copies, 10 Cents. The religious beliefs and inclinations of President-elect Taft are still being discussed notwithstanding the fact that the election is over. President Eschew Religion Roosevelt, in discussing the matter, if From Politics. not in so many words, in substance, A Rich Man Got It Hard. dore Roosevelt's administration many of the frenzied financiers of the United States have been put up against the real thing, some of whom are now doing terms in prison while others are refugees in a foreign land with no expectation of returning to their native country in the very near future. In the past it has been next to impossible to convict a wealthy man of any crime and especially of the crime of having systematically robbed the people through crooked bank dealings, but the conviction of Standard Oil officials and many prominent men connected with other concerns of like financial influence was the signal to begin a genuine house cleaning among the frenzied financiers, and if the good work be kept up it will not be long before men of wealth and influence will stand no better or higher in the sight of the law than the poorest man in the country. Every man should stand equal before the law and this government will fall unless this fundamental principle is lived up to. Tennessee's Outlawry Goes Steadily On. dred and one whistling bullets. But a few days ago an ex-Senator of the United States, Edward W. Cormack, of that state, was shot down and instantly killed by the leaders of an opposing political faction and other trouble is threatened. There is no doubt but that the Lord works in mysterious ways His wonders to perform, and it looks as if He is working out the redemption of the oppressed and abused people of Tennessee by having those hell devils kill each other off. If the good work will go steadily and bravely on then there is hope that the better element of the state will eventually rise in its might and put down all form of public and quasi public violence and in the future see to it that every man, regardless of his color, nationality or religion, be given a square deal, a thing they have not been able to get in the State of Tennessee for many years, if ever. It is a long lane that has no turn and in the wholesale slaughter of Tennessee's prominent men by others equally prominent may be the beginning of the end. Much was said as to what course the Negro vote of the North would take in the recent national election and for a time it was thought that it would Judge Taft Got be arrayed almost to a man against The Negro Vote. William Howard Taft, that, however, was not a fact, as the Negro vote in every state of the North with the exception of Nebraska went for Taft and the Republican party as usual. Just what moved the Negroes of Nebraska to vote for Bryan and the Democratic party in general, is a question, but as a result Bryan carried Nebraska and the entire State Democratic ticket was elected. Discussing the Negro vote as an after election thought, for that vote to have gone to the Democratic party looks like one paying the other fellow to knock him in the head and that too, with a club that he himself has brought. The Negro may consistently vote the Socialist ticket, the Independent ticket, the Prohi- M. B. Volume XV, Number 24. H. R. CAYTON, Publisher. COAL J. W. BULLOCK DEALER IN COAL AND WOOD NOW Is the time to buy Coal if you want to get the best prices. Buy your COAL TELEPHONES: Sunset—East 87, East 102 Queen Anne 1885 Main 3773 Indpendent—87, 8170, 7538, 289. 609 Tenth Avenue SEATTLE, WASH. SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. NOTICE. State of Washington, County of King, Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an order of sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 12th day of November, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of James Dignan, plaintiff, versus Joseph B. Johnson and Annie M. Johnson, his wife, defendants, No. 60182, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered. Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder in cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to wit: 10 o'clock a. m. on the 19th day of December, A. D. 1908, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lots two (2) and three (3) in sixty-four (64) of Terry's Second Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure of mortgage amounting to twenty-four thousand five hundred sixty-four and 88/100 ($24,565.88) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 12th day of November, 1908. L, C SMITH, Sheriff. By EDWN Lauty. November 13—December 11, 1908. NOTICE AND SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of King County Washington, for King County L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. A. Cook, and all persons unknown, if any, having and an interest in and to bereinafter described real property. Defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described property, are defined that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a delinquent delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 20th day of October, 1908, and numbered B54351, for the delinquent taxes of the years 1902 to 1906, inclusive, in the amount of $3.89, and upon the actual situated in the King County, described as in front of SE1/4 of SE1/4 of Sec. 5. Twp. N. R. 3 E. W. M. That the taxes for the year 1907 have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, in the sum of 49 cents. Which several of the rates of 5 per cent from said of payment, and are all thepaid and unredeemed taxes upon but against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, extention to withhold sixty days after, November 13, 1908, in the above entitled and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned: attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest the costs. In case you so do so, judgment will be ordered heirloom-collons against the len of said taxes and costs for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged the found against it respectively as provided by law, and as pursued in plaintiff's com- Court, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD. November 13—December 25, 1908 NOTICE AND SUMMONS. NORTH CAROLINA In the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. C. A. Cook, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 20th day of October, 1908, and numbered B54362, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1902, in the amount of $3.86, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Second class tide lands fronting Lot 1, Section 8, Twp. 22, N. R. 3 E. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1903, the sum of $2.09; for the year 1904, the sum of $2.71; for the year 1905, the sum of $2.55; for the year 1906, the sum of $2.42; for the year 1907, the sum of $2.33. Which sums bears bear interest at the rate of 5 rere cent per annum from said and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said plaintiff, lication to-wait, within sixty (60) days after November 13, 1908, in the above court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with est and costs, to fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, deciding the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property, satisfaction of the claims charged and found against it respectively as provided plaintiff, and as proved in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Office Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle. Washington. November 13—December 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. May A. Taylor, Plaintiff. vs. W. M. Taylor, Defendant. No. 64.044. Summons. The State of Washington to W. M. Taylor, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the thirteenth day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the answer action the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff, at their office, below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The plaintiff in above entitled action, the Taylor, prays the court in absolute divorce the court defendant, W. M. Taylor, and for the custody of a minor child, the issue of said marriage. EDWARD MEAKIN & CUSHING. Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 403-4 New York Block, Seattle Wash. The book to be published for six consecutive weeks, once each week, in the Seattle Republican beginning Nov. 13, 1908. BOYD J. TALLMAN, Judge. November 13—December 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the Thomas F. Basse and Maude Basse, his wife, Plaintiffs, vs. Susan A. Moore and John Doe Moore, her husband, A. C. Edwards and Mary Doe Edwards, his wife, American Loan and Trust Company of Boston, a corporation, for Angle and Mary Doe Edwards, his wife, Marcellus and Mary Doe Lara, his wife, The Commonwealth Title and Trust Company of Philadelphia, a corporation, King County, State of Washington, a municipal corporation, Henry Nathan, Jr., and Mary Doe Nathan, his wife, Henry A. Webster and Mary Doe Webster, his wife, A. B. Wyckoff and Wyckoff, his wife, Blinn and Ida May Blinn, Francis Tarbell (or Torbell) and Mary Doe Tarbell (or Torbell), his wife, Thomas T. Minor and Mary Doe Minor, his wife, Kate M. Bailey, widow of George W. Bailey, Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Company, a corporation, and all persons claiming an interest in lands described in plaintiffs' but which persons are unknown to plaintiffs, Defendants. Summons by Publica- The State of Washington to the said Susan A. Moore and John Doe Moore, her husband, A. C. Edwards and Mary Doe Edwards, his wife, American Loan and Trust Company of Boston, corporate Fred Angle and Mary Doe his wife, Marcelo Angle and Mary Doe Lara, The Commonwealth Title and Trust Company of Philadelphia, a corporation, King County, State of Washington, a municipal corporation, Henry A. Webster and Mary Doe Webster, his wife, A. B. Wyckoff and Mary Doe Webster, off his wife, Julia Ebell and Ida May Blimn (Ebell (or Torbell) and Mary Doe Torbell (or Torbell), his wife, W. White and Mary Doe White, his wife, Thomas T. Minor and Mary Doe Minor, his wife, and Kate M. Balley, widow of George W. Balley, commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust corporation, and all claims claiming an interest described in plaintiff but which persons are unknown to plaintiffs. Defendants: You, and each of you, are hereby summoned to appear, within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication hereof and defend the defendant entitled to the Superior Court of the State said; and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their offices in the case so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which will be filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action title to that certain property described as blocks one (1) to twelve (12) inclusive; lots fourteen (14) and fifteen (15) of block (7); block nine (9); lots one (1), twenty-four (24), twenty-five (25) and twenty-six (26) of block eleven (11); blocks fourteen (14) and fifteen (15) lots one to five (5) inclusive, block nineteen (19); blocks two (20), twenty-one (19), blocks two (20), twenty-two (22); all lots and blocks being situated in that certain addition known as Groveland Park an Addition to King County, State of Washington; in which the said defenders, and each of them, claim some lion interest, which lien or interest sought to be foreclosed void and, in effect, that the plaintiffs lie in, and to said property be quieted in said action. Date of first publication November 6th 1908. November 6—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Harriet V. Griffiths, Plaintiff, vs. Wm. L. Griffiths, Defendant. No. 63886. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Wm. L. Griffiths, said named defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-will; Within sixty days after the 13th day of November, 1908, and defend the above en- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN rs titled action in the above entitled court, id: and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, id: and serve a copy of your answer upon 199: the insigred attorney for said plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said suit is to obtain a decree of said court dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between said plaintiff and defendant, and to grant the said plaintiff the control and custody of their minor child, on the ground of abandon- ment and injury of publication. November Date of first publication November 13th, 1908. W. W. FELGER, Plaintiff's Attorney. Post Office Address: Room 28 Downs Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. November 13—December 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County Harriet E. Bates, Plaintiff, vs. Ora G. Bates, Lefendant. No. — — Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Ora G. Bates, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty (60) days after the 6th day of November, you defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure the judgment will be delivered against you to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure a divorce on the grounds of non-supply cruel treatment and the infliction of personal indignities rendering life burdens. HORACE A. WILSON, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 3414 Harrison Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. November 6—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE KING COUNTY. State of Washington Washington, D.C., Maria Dorris, his wife, Plaintiffs, vs. James M. McLellan and the unknown heirs of the said James M. McLellan if the said James M. McLellan be deceased, Joseph M. McLellan the unknown heirs of the said Joseph M. McLellan if Joseph M. Barto be deceased, and all persons unknown, having or claiming to have, any interest in the property described in the complaint herein for Publication. No. 62446. Summons The State of Washington to each and all defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the day of October, 1908, and declared the above entitled action to the above entitled court, and the complaint to the plaintiffs herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand the complaint herein has been filed with the choice of said court. The above did action is to quiet title to the following described property, situated in King County, Washington, to-wit: Lots One (1) and Two (2). Block Two. (2). Boston Heights Supplemental Addition to the City of Seattle, and to forever enjoin and debar the said defendants, and each and all of them, from asserting and whatsoever in and to the said lands and premises and to obtain a decree decreeing that the said defendants, and each and all of them have no interest whatsoever in the said property and that plaintiff's title is good and valid. EDWARD VON TOBEL. Attorney for Plaintiffs. Office and Post Office Address: Rooms 604-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 30—Dec. 13, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County.—In Probate. In the Matter of the Guardianship of Mildred J. Wells and Carl Joe Wells, Minors.—In Order to Show Cause of Real Estate. Bessie L. Wells, guardian of the persons and estates of Mildred J. Wells and Carl Joe Wells, minors, having filed her petition in this court, duly verified, praising for an order of this court the sale of all the real estate and interest in mining claims belonging to said towns, for the purposes therein set forth. And it appearing to the court from said petition that it is to the best interests of said wards and their estate to sell all of said real estate belonging to said wards, as well as said mining company and it appearing to the court that said petition continued to the court and Isin accord-ance with the requirements of law, in such case made and provided: It is, therefore, by the court ordered, that all persons interested in said estate appear before said Superior Court on the 3rd day of December, 1908, at the time of 9:30 o'clock in the day at noon of the probate department of said Superior Court in the City of Seattle. In said King County, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this court should not be granted to said guardian, to furnish and empowering her to sell the real and empowering her to sell the wards as prayed for in said petition. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before the said 3rd day of December. The Seal of the newspaper printed at published in said County of King, and of geographical circulation therein. Done in open court on this 28th day of October, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. B. B. MOSER, 10 Haller Blk. Attorney for Guardian. Oct. 28—Nov. 27, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Hannah McMullen, Plaintiff, vs. John McMullen. Defendant. Summons for Publication. State of Washington to the said John McMullen, defendant in the above entitled cause. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty 60 days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to 20th of October, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the complaint of the said court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony, now existing between the plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of habitual drunkenness, cruelty and non-support. LANDER Attorney, for Plaintiff. 60 Downs Block, Seattle, Washington. Oct. 30—Dec. 13, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Loraine Lavis, Plaintiff, vs. Robert Lavis, Defendant. Summons for Publ cation. State of Washington to the said Robert Lavis, defendant in the above entitled case. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 30th day of October, 1908, and defend the above entitled action, above entitled court, power the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of the complaint or other pleading the undersigned attorney at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of said action being to secure an absolute decree of divorce, seven bonds of matrimony between plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of habitual drunkenness and support and cruelty, and for plaintiff's malden name of Lorne Robertson. E. L. SANDERS. Attorney for Plaintiff. Oct. 30—Dec. 13, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County.—In Probate. In the Notice of the Estate of Erasus Fowler "Deceased." No. 8410. Notice of Sale of Real Estate. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned, Mary Fowler, administratrix of the estate of Erastus Fowler, deceased, that said administratrix will sell at private sale on or after 10:00 o'clock A, M of Friday, November 20, 1908, a BRAKEN 10 Haller Block, Seattle, Kidney County, Washington, to the highest of best blders for cash, in separe parcels of one, two or three pieces, as one tract, the following described real estate, situated in King County, State of Washington, Lots 1, 2 and 3, of Block 5. of Hick's Addition to the City of Seattle. All bids or offers on said described real estate must be in writing addressed to said Mary Fowler at Room 10 Haller Block, Seattle. Washington, and must be accompanied by a certified check for at least 10 per cent. of the amount of the bid. In witness whereof the said administratrix has hereto set her hand on this 26th day of October, 1908. MARY FOWLER, Admin'siartrix of the Estate of Erastus Fowler, Deceased. E. E. SIMPSON, B. B. MOSFR. Attorneys for Administratrix. Oct. 30—Nov. 27, 1908. Room 60 Downs Blk., Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Vashon College Association, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.—No. NOTE: State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners or claimants of an interest in the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff the holder of one delinquent certificate issued of the King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of December, 1904, and numbered B28938, for the delinquent taxes of the year, 1903, in the amount of $4.63 and upon real property situated in King County, described as follows, to-wit: $E% of NW^4 of Sec. 5, Tp. 22 E, W, M. N. R. The taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property to-wit: For the year 1904, the sum of $3.60; For the year 1905, the sum of $4.40; For the year 1906, the sum of $5.25; For the year 1907, the sum of $6.40. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against property. says, "You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days October 9, 1908, in the above notified court and action, and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a sentence of your answer on the attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, and court costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it, respectively, as provided by law, and as involved in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and complaint. in this case L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff A. C. MacDONALD Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Oct. 9., Nov. 13, 1908. No. 8215 PROBATE NOTICE. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, State of Washington, County of King—ss. Notice of Seattlement of Final Account. In the Matter of the Estate of Jacob M. Nist. Deceased. No. 8215. Notice is hereby given that P. C. Ellsworth Executor, the Estate of Jacob M. Nist, is said Court his final account as such executor, and that Thursday, the 5th day of November, 1908, at 9:30 o'clock a.m., at the court room of the Probate department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said Court for the settlement of said Court which is placed on place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. Geo. E. Morris, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto affixed this 1st day of October, 1908. OTTO T. CASE, Clerk. By J. A. SIGURDSSON. Deputy Clerk. J. E. McGREW, Attorney for Executor. 419 Pioneer Block, Seattle, Wash. Oct. 2, Oct. 30, 1908. Nellie Temple, Plaintiff, vs. Lewis Temple, Defendant. No. 62612. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to Lewis P. Temple, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1908. NOTICE AND SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washburnton for King County. Washington, forking L. H. Craver, Plaintiff v. F. S. Flager, and all persons unknown, if any, having or owing an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants. No. .... Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby not the holder of the above named claimant of the holder of the delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of February, 1903, and numbered B17804, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1899, in the amount of $8.76, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, in the amount of $2,000, Second Addi- Lot 4, block 22, Burke's Second Addition to the City of Seattle. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said real property, towards For the year 1900, the sum of $7.69; For the year 1901, the sum of $3.24; For the year 1902, the sum of $9.33; For the year 1903, the sum of $9.46; For the year 1904, the sum of $9.90; For the year 1905, the sum of $10.35; For the year 1906, the sum of $10.80; For the year 1907, the sum of $12.60. Which several sums bear interest at rate of 15 per cent. per annum and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication to-wit: within 60 days after October 9, 1908, in the above entitled contract action, and designate and answer the plaintiff of said plaintiff and sense a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for each and aumounts due upon each charged against each of said taxes, interest and said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. in this car L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Balley Bldg., Seattle. Wash. Oct. 9, Nov. 13, 1908. No. 8215 In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. In the Matter of the Estate of Jacob M. Nist, Deceased. P. C. Ellsworth, executor of the estate of Jacob M. Nist, deceased, having filed an order that his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of Jacob M. Nist, set deceased, be and appear before the Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 5th day of November, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should be made, the residue of the estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 5th day of November, 1908. In the Seattle Republic in a said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 1st day of October. 1908. GEO. E. F. MORRIS, Judge. J. E. McGREW, Attorney for Executor. 419 Pioneer Block, Seattle, Wash. Oct. 2, Oct. 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Bessle B. deVaron, plaintiff, vs. Edwin L. deVaron, defendant, No. 62088, suing The Supreme Court of the State of Washington, the said Edwin L. deVaron, defendant: You are hereby summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action within sixty (60) days after the date of said publication, to-wit: within 60 days after the 17th day of July, 1938, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein, and serve a copy of your answer on the said complaint, for the plaintiff at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff, which has been satisfied by the court. The above entitled cause of action is brought for the purpose of obtaining a divorce from the defendant on the grounds of abandonment and non-support. Date of first publication, July 17, 1908. SAYRE & SUTHERLAND. Attorneys for Poultrie, Office and Post Office address: 413 414 and 415 Mehlhorn Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. August 28, 1908 SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Florence Bray, Plaintiff, vs. Charles Bray, Defendant. No. _____ The State of Washington to sald defendant, Charles Bray: You are entitled to respond to appear with sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summ sons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 4th day of September, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer or other plea, at the office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of sald action being to secure an absolute decree of divorce, severing the bonds of matrim marriage between plaintiff and defendant, and the grounds of abandonment and non-support. FREE Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 431 New York Building, Seattle, Washington. September 4—October 16, 1908. the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty (60) days from and after the 21st day of August, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the Superior Court of the State of Wash- FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of David J. Edwards, Deceased. No. 8280. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not be Made. Caroline J. Edwards, the administrator of the estate of David J. Edwards, deceased, having filed in this court her petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to determine the distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said David J. Edwards, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the probate department of the Court in the County on the 25th day of November, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. of said day then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this book be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 25th day of November, 1908, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 22nd day of October, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King.—ss. I, Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Washington, that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court on the 22nd day of October, 1908, in the matter of the estate of David J. Edwards, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 22nd day of October, 1908. (Seal) OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By J. A. SIGURDSIN, Deputy Clerk. J. A. SIGURDSIN, Deputy Clerk. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. —In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of John Herman Ranta, Deceased. No. 7756. Order to Show Cause. Will A. Steel, the administrator of the estate of John Herman Ranta, deceased, having filed in this court his petition duly verified, praying for an order of this court authorizing the administrator to sell or mortgage the real estate belonging to said estate and of which said deceased died selenor for the set forth in said petition; and it appearment forth facts sufficient to give the court jurisdiction, and it appearing from said petition that the personal property of said deceased that has come into the hands of said administrator is not sufficient to pay the allowances of the family, the debts outstanding against the deceased and the expenses of administration, and that it is necessary to sell or mortgage the whole portion of the estate of said deceased and of said estate to provide funds to pay the allowances to the family, the debts outstanding against the deceased and the expenses of administration; and it further appearing to the court that said petition conforms to and is in all respects in accordance with the requirements of the law in such case made and provided it further be made to the court. A. Lena Ranta, is a minor of the age of about thirteen years, and has no general guardian in the State of Washington, and that it is necessary to appoint some interested person her guardian for the sole purpose of appearing for her and taking care of her interests in these proceedings, and it appearing for the P. Devers, an assistant resident of said interest and state is not in any way interested in said estate, is a fit and competent person to be appointed as such guardian. Wherefore, it is hereby ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of said deceased be and appear before the above entitled Superior Court on the 25th day of November, A. D. 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. in the court room of the Probate Department of said court, to-wit: the KING County Courthouse, the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this court should not be granted to said administrator authorizing, directing and empowering him to sell or mortgage the whole or so much and such parts of the real estate described in said petition as the court shall adjudge necessary or beneficial, according as the court determines at that time, that the other of such persons most beneficial to the estate and those interested therein. And it is further ordered that said Robt. A. Devers be and he is hereby appointed as the guardian of said minor for the sole purpose of appearing and taking care of her interests in these proceedings. And it is further ordered by the court that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive and consecutive weeks immediately before the 25th day of November, 1908 in the Seattle Republican, a weekly newspaper, printed and published and of general circulation in said King County. Done in open court this 22nd day of October, A. D. 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. Oct. 23—Nov. 20, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Norah E. Payne, Plaintiff, vs. Alfred Payne, Defendant. No. —. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Alfred, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 23rd day of October, 1908, and deafen the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney, within at her office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered aagainst you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for decree of divorce upon the grounds of desertion and non-support. LIONN, W. BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 330 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 23—Dec. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. C. Van Horne, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owner, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herenafter described real property, Defendants. No. —. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, October 23, 1908. In the above entitled court and court order, the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the len of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs predating, or not, the period of gold property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. C. VAN HORNE, Plaintiff. KENNETH MACKINTOSH, E. B. HERALD, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office Address: 227-30 Colman Bldg. Seattle, Wash. First publication dated Oct. 23, 1908. Oct. 23—Dec. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Emma Pullum, Plaintiff, vs. H. M. Pullum, Defendant. No. —. —. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said H. M. Pullum, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 23rd day of October, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for inquiry at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do. judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. A brief statement of the object of the said action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant, on the ground of nonsupport for more than one year of the plaintiff by the defendant. GAY & RUMMENS. Attorneys for Planning Post Office Address: Suite 1220 Alaska Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 23—Dec. 4, 1908. PROBATE NOTICE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, State of Washington, County of King, —ss. In the Matter of the Estate of David J. Edwards, Deceased. No. 8280. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that the J. Edwards is the administrator of the estate of David J. Edwards, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said court her final account as such administrator, and that Wednesday, the 25th day of November, 1908, at 9:30 o'clock, a. m., at the court room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County has been signed a said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness the Hon. Geo. E. Morris, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said court hereto affixed this 22nd day of October, 1908. (Seal) OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. Bv J A. SIGURDSSON, Deputy Clerk. Oct. 23—Nov. 20, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Joseph R. Dick, Plaintiff, vs. Alice Clark Dick, Defendant. No. 63588. The State of Washington to the said Alice Dick, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this summons, toowit: within sixty days after the 23rd day of October, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of cruelty and drunkenness. ELLIAS A. WRIGHT. Attorney for plaintiff. P. O. Address. 129-631 Burke Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 23—Dec. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Andrew Gustaf Peterson, Deceased. No. _____ Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the neces- sary vouchers to the undersigned Chris- laine Peterson of said estate at No. 126 Nineteenth Avenue North, Seat- town, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, October 23, 1908. CHRISTINA LOUISA PETERSON, As Executrix of said Estate. GAY & RUMMENS. Attorneys for Estate. 1220 Alaska Bldg. Seattle, Wash. Oct. 23—Nov. 20, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Alaida Cecelia Eames, Plaintiff, vs. Frank Wood Eames, Defendant. Number 62563. The State of Washington to the said Frank Wood Eames, defendant; THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit; within sixty (60) days after the 23rd day of October, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the cleft of the complaint. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain from you a divorce on the grounds of cruel treatment and failure to support. PARKER & BROWN Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 32 Union Block, Seattle King County, Washington. Ock 4, 4, 1908. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not be Made. In the Matter of the Estate of Katherine Hirschman, Mrs. Jo Moberly, administratrix of the estate of Katherine Sederboom, deceased, having filed in this court her petition setting torth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and appearing to the court that the petition should furnish facts sufficient authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Katherine Sederboom, deceased, be and appear before the said petition, and in the course of the said Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 5th day of November, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. said day then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 5th day of Nov., 1908, in The Seattle Republic, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 5th day of Oct., 1908. A. W. FRATER, Judge. State of Washington, County of King. —ss. I, Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 5th day of Oct., 1908, in the matter of the estate of Katherine Sederboom, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of Sarah Duggan, Deceased. No. —. Notice of Hearing. To the administrator and to all person interested in the above named estate: Notice is hereby given that the undersigned on the 7th day of October, 1908, served upon the administrator of the above named estate and filed in the above entitled court and cause a petition by which he prays for an order of the above entitled court in the above named estate and directing the administrator of the above named estate to perform a certain contract in writing, executed by the above named deceased in her life time, by the terms of which the above named deceased joined by her husband, Daniel Duggan, bound themselves to the undersigned to sell and convey by a good and sufficient deed certain real estate loca- ted, lying and being in King County, and particularly described as follow- ing: Lot one (1) in Block thirty (30) Squire's Lakeside Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington. That thereafter on the same day such proceedings were had that the above entitled court made an order fixing Thursday, the 12th day of November, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day in the Probate department of Washington in and for the County of King, as the time and place of hearing said petition and directed notice thereof to be published and served for the time and in the manner provided by statute, and this will be notice to the administrator of said estate and to all persons interested therein that at the said time and place to-wait in the Probate department of Washington in and for King County, Washington on Thursday, November 12th, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 in the forenoon of said day, or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard, a hearing will be had on said petition, and the undersigned will ask the above entitled court to enter an order and decree authorizing and directing the administrator of the above named estate and to the above named deceased and execute to your petitioner, upon his compliance with the terms of said contract, a deed conveying to the undersigned all of the right, title and interest of the above named deceased and of the above named estate in and to property covered by his petition and hereinabove referred to, free from any claims of said estate in and for the county of King, if such of, and all persons interested in said estate are notified to be present at the said time and place to protect their interests as the same may appear. Dated October 7th, 1808. JOHN H. GEIGER. Pettitioner NOTICE SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King —ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an Order of Sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 12th day of October, 1908, by the Clerk thereof. In the case of the Honorable Superior Court Speak and Rudolph Speak, her husband, Henry E. Egbers and O. A. DeWes, defendants, No. 62412, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit; at 10 o'clock a. m. on the 14th day of November, A. D. 1908, be housed in house door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit; all of lot six (6), block four (4), Interlake Addition to the City of Seattle, to satisfy a judgment amounting to five hundred twenty-eight and 30-100 ($$28.30) dollar, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 13th day of October, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Harry Devel, Plaintiff, vs. Nellie Phinney, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Lefendants. No. .... Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders or an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, for January 1906, and numbered B40274, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $2.86, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 3, Block 84, Woodland Park Supplemental Addition to the City of Seattle. In the receipt to the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1904, the sum of $2.38; for the year 1905, the sum of $2.16; for the year 1906, the sum of $2.06. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and from the year 1904. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after the 9th of October, 1988 in connection with the cited court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosure against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. HARRY DEVET, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. October 9—November 20, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Harry Devel, Plaintiff, vs. Nellie Phinney, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants—No. ..... Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defen- tials and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, and on date of the filing of January, 1908, and numbered B40273, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $2.86, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as flowls, to-wit: Lot 2, Block 84, Woodland Park Addition Supplemental to Seattle. That the axes for the following sub- jects have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1904, the sum of $2.38; for the year 1905, the sum of $2.16; for the year 1906, the sum of $6.65. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per, annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, and will be held thereafter on the day of October, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment, be held in our foreclosing the lien of said taxes, and against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. HARRY DEVET, Plaintiff. A. C. Mac DONALD. Office Address: 524 Bailey Buildings, Seattle, Wash. October 9—November 20, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Harry Devet, Plaintiff, vs. Nellie Phinney, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. .... Notice and Suspect. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 10th day of January 1903, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $2.86, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 1, Block 84, Woodland Park Addition Supplement to the City of Seattle. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Year 1904, the sum of $2.38; for the year 1905, the sum of $2.16; for the year 1906, the sum of $6.65. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and your family (including said person unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after October 9th, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on this notice. If the complaint of said plaintiff office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sales taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sales taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sales property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's plaint, now on file in this cause and Court. HARRY DEVET, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD. October 9—November 20, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Harry Devet, Plaintiff, vs. Nellie Phinney, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Detendants. No. .... Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and clap of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington for the County of January 1908 and numbered B40275, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $2.86, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 4, Block 84, Woodland Park Supplemental to the City of Seattle. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1904, the sum of $2.28; for the year 1905, the sum of $2.16; for the year 1906, the sum of $6.65. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, 60-day period in which the day of October, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, agreement will be placed with the closing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. HARRY DEVET, Plaintiff. A. C. Mac DONALD, HARRY DEVET, Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. October 9—November 20, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Washington Abstract and Guaranty Company, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff, is Henry Lushtoff, Defendant. No. 63276. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Henry Lushtoff, defendant; Official P, O. Address: 514 Marion Bldg., Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Lina Haggglom, Plaintiff, vs. August Haggglom Defendant. No. .... Summons for Prosecution. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, August Haggglom: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty (60) days after the date of October, 1908, and defend the above entitlement, the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at this office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment rendered against you according to the complaint which has been filed with the court of said court, the object of said complaint being to secure a divorce from you. AUERBACH, HOAR & SMITH, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: 402 Johnston Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. PROBATE NOTICE In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, State of Washington, County of King —ss. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. In the Matter of the Estate of Katherine Sederboom, Deceased. Notice is hereby given that Mrs. Joberly, the administratrix of the estate of Katherine Sederboom, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said court her final account as such administrative and that Thursday, the 5th day of Nov. 1908, at 9:30 o'clock, a. m., at the court room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness the Hon. A. W. Frater, Judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said court hereto affixed the 5th day of October. 1908. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. (Seal) By C. C. BURTIS, Deputy Clerk. 4 SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Published Every Friday, 307 Epler Blk. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton... Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton...Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. One Year ..... $3.00 Six Months ..... 1.50 Three Months ..... 75 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matter. It seems rather gruesome on the part of the Seattle Times to preach S. G. Cosgrove's funeral every other day, but what does the editor of the Times know about civility. Pat Crowe continues to be the rarest bird of the age, judging from the number of places he is reported as being at one and the same time. Missouri's Cowherd seems to have been corralled by the Republican rounders. Killing "big men" (white) in Tennessee has become as common as shooting black men to see them fall. Amen. Uncle Joe Cannon is to succeed himself so comes the report. If the good die young we guess Uncle Joe will live always. When two men will fight and endanger each other's lives over so small a thing as the use of a curry comb they give no more evidence of being civilized than two brindle bull purps. Perhaps Heney is not a false alarm, but in handling the San Francisco graft cases he gives no evidence of not being. Those citizens who have united to fight the order of the board of health directing the vaccination of all school children are displaying an unusual amount of unnecessary cussedness. While the A.-Y.-P. landscape gardeners are asking the citizens to give up all of their geranium plants to beautify the grounds shows great industry on their part yet, it likewise shows a vast amount of short sightedness, for if the homes are deprived of the flowers how can it be possible to make Seattle a "city beautiful"? S. A. Made, who has been a deputy in the internal revenue department of this state for a number of years, is to be the chief deputy in the state insurance office under John H. Schively. The death of Henry Watterson's son in New York last Wednesday was a most lamentable affair and certainly a sad one for the father, who had such high hopes for his son. Man may appoint, but nature disappoints. Theodore Roosevelt in the United States senate would mean that things would be doing every day. LOUISIANA'S CHILD LABOR LAW. Much was made of it by the Republican speakers in the late campaign that none of the Democratic states had passed any child labor laws and yet the Democrats were emphatically declaring on the stump that as a party it was the laboring man's real friend, which of course, was a delusion and a snare and did not work because the laboring man is no fool. The state of Louisiana is to the front with the recent passage of a child labor law, which is said to be the best passed by any southern state. The chief reason, however, for the passage of such a law on the part of the legislature of the State of Louisiana is because there are so many white children employed in the factories of New Orleans. While it is expected the law will be rigidly enforced as to the white children, yet no effort will be made by the factory inspector to see that the colored children are likewise protected. The new Louisiana law forbids children under fourteen years of age from being employed in factories, stores and other places where child labor is in demand. A hard fight was made to have children only employed nine hours a day, but the Shylocks would not stand for it and so the children must work ten hours a day. There is no denying the fact that a half loaf is better than no loaf, but the laboring man can see for himself, who is his friend for from a partisan standpoint as all of the states under the Republican party have eight hour labor laws in full force and effect. Such questions as this the peerless one would never disdain to discuss, which fully explains why at the last election the laboring men voted for Taft instead of Bryan and that, too, with Gompers trying to force them to vote for Bryan. WOMAN'S POWER. I believe that a good husband is the best "RIGHT" of any woman. Of course I make the proviso that she can get a good one, and she can if she isn't foolish and exercises judgment. Woman's power in the world is tremendous, especially if she exercises that power for good. What more could she do if "rights" were given her? Through her husband and her children she has always a great and a constantly increasing power for good. Take the wife of any man, even a poor one. If she is untidy and slovenly the man in the case will never get up in the world. On the other hand, if the woman is what she should be and has ideas and ambitions there are all sorts of possibilities. She influences her husband. The two minds work together, and through the man she sends out her power to influence for good or evil. Isn't hers a greater power than the vote? I don't believe that women as voters would be as easily bribed as the men. They might be influenced by jewelry or through clothes or even the heart, but by money—never! I do not think that women would be any better if they had the power to vote. A woman has her husband and her home, but I do not wish to imply that women are stupid. They are as educated and as cultured as men. After all, this is a very large world, and there is plenty of room in it for both men and women.—Mrs. Stuyvesant Fish. PROGRESS. In this age of unparallelel advancement and development along scientific, artistic, musical and all lines of educational work, instead of marvelling at the many wonders about us, we are greatly surprised, in looking over the current happenings in our recent publications if Guardian Life INSURANCE CO. OF SEATTLE THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN we do not see an account of some marvelous achievement. To those among us who are content to watch this progress from afar, and who have not been seized by a desire to accomplish great things, the cost seems too great, not only in the expenditure of time and money, of mental and physical exertion and exhaustion, but even in life itself, and that too, with only one chance in a thousand, in many instances, that the effort put forth will be rewarded with success. For example; in the three great baloon races which took place abroad, on the 4th, 11th and 12th of October, two lives were lost despite the great confidence of the participants in their success, while but a single record was broken. Our experience in life must be purchased dearly; every modern convenience which we now enjoy has cost some noble soul more than most of us will or can ever realize. Some selfsacrificing genius has burned the midnight oil, year in and year out, that posterity might arise and call him blessed. The mind of man is never content, and rightly so, for whenever we become so conceited, so self-satisfied that we feel that there is no further room for improvement, then it is time we should get out of the way and make room for him who can realize his imperfections and will work to obliterate them. We must either advance or degenerate. We can never tell at what moment a genius is born into the world, but when we meet him we recognize him for, if he be an artist, he sees a picture in every passing scene, he can read a story in every babbling brook and he can receive an inspiration from every light suggestion. The inventor, however, ah! there we find true genius, for not content with the world as he finds it, he sees room for improvement everywhere. Some inventive mind has recently put electricity to a new usage. It is demonstrated at the Pittsburg Homeopathic Hospital where a hundred thousand gallons of water sterilized by electricity are used daily. Dry air is passed through the ozonizers and the ozone produced is mixed with the water by means of aspirators. Three ozonizers are used for sterilizing the water, while two provide ozone used for sterilizing instruments and bandages. Along the line of invention and progress, the United States ranks high, but along one line in particular, there remains much room for improvement, viz; our public roads which are not up to the standard. This fact was demonstrated at the International Road Congress held in Paris. To the surprise of many, it was found that only a very small per cent. of our roads have been improved and rebuilt along modern lines. Out of a total of 2,151,570 miles of public road, only 7.14 per cent. or 153,662 miles have so far been improved. The most modern road and the road found to give the most satisfaction and service, has a hard, unyielding foundation, with a surface of suitable broken-stone ballast, treated with some preparation to prevent the stripping of the top dressing. For shedding water and keeping down dust, nothing better has yet been found that the old treatment with tar. It has been said that at the rate at which we are now proceeding, there will soon be nothing for the coming generation to do along the lines of invention. But in regard to that we know there is no cause for alarm, for new times bring new conditions and let us hope that in the future as at the present, there will be a man found for every emergency. THE SPEED OF A GREAT CITY. Statistics of the great City of New York show the following startling facts: Every 40 seconds an immigrant arrives. Every 3 minutes some one is arrested. Every 6 minutes a child is born. Every 7 minutes there is a funeral. Every 13 minutes a couple get married. Every 42 minutes a new business firm starts up. Every 48 minutes a building catches fire. Every 48 minutes a ship leaves the harbor. Every 51 minutes a new building is erected. Every $1 \frac{1}{4}$ hours some one is killed by accident. Every 7 hours some one fails in business. Every 8 hours an attempt to kill some one is made. Every $8 \frac{1}{2}$ hours some couple is divorced. Every 10 hours some one commits suicide. Every 2 days some one is murdered. WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT. 1857—Born in Cincinnati, September 15. 1874—Graduated from the Cincinnati school. 1878—Graduated from Yale college; second in the class and class orator. 1885—Assistant county solicitor of Hamilton county. 1886—Married Miss Helen Herron of Cincinnati. 1887—Judge of the superior court of Ohio. 1890—Solicitor-general of the United States. 1892—United States circuit judge of the Sixth circuit. 1896—Became dean of the law department of the University of Cincinnati. 1900—President of the United States Philippine commission. 1901—First civil governor of the Philippine islands. 1904—Became secretary of war of the United States. 1905—Visited Philippines with congressional party. Friday, November 13, 1908 1906—Restored order in Cuba as provincial governor. 1907—Candidate for the Republican presidential nomination. 1908—Elected president of the United States. CHRISTMAS IS COMING. And you doubtless intend to make a few presents to those you love best, and having your interest at heart you are reminded that Houghton & Hunter, the Old Reliable Jewelers, always give the best goods for the money. SENSIBLE PRESENTS. Watches, from $1 to $200. Diamond Rings, from $25 up. Diamond Brooches, from $25 up. Umbrellas, from $1 up. 2,000 Rings, from $2.50 up. HOUGHTON & HUNTER, 704 First Avenue. BUSINESS DIRECTORY E. N. BROOKS & CO. For Frills For Men. HIGH CLASS HABERDASHERY 1331 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. TREEN SHOE COMPANY Always Carry the Best. Customers Carefully Cared For. 707 First Ave., Seattle, Wash. W. H. FINCK Pioneer Jeweler and Watch Maker. Our Holiday Specials Unequaled. 816 Second Avenue, Seattle, Wash. PURCELL'S SAFE COMPANY Halls Safe and Lock Co.'s Safes and Vaults. Phones Main 667; Ind. 3197 312 Occidental Ave., Seattle, Wash Stetson & Post Mill Co. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. WILLIAM WALKER. Complete stock New Fall Goods, Ladies', Misses' and Children's Wear- ing Apparel, Furs and Fine Coats. 820 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Electric Fixtures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. Scandinavian American Bank Scandinavian American Bank. Write Today for a copy of "THE BANK ACCOUNT" a new, neat little 8-page paper as full of good things as an egg is of meat. MAILED FREE. The Scandinavian-American Bank, Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Puget Sound National Bank. Foreign exchange department especially equipped for the conduct of Oriental business. M. F. Backus, Pres.; R. . Spencer, 1st V. P.; R. S. Stacey, 2nd V. P.; J. W Maxwell, Cash. Friday, November 13, 1908 FS DRA EA SF 7! leone | anal Pe ed | od D. K. SICKELS The King county legislative delegation met last Monday after- noon, but failed to select a candi- date for the speakership and owing to wide political differences on the part of the various members it is barely possible that there will not be another call for the delegation before the legislature convenes. There are four candidates from King county and in view of the fact that the delegation will not be able to get together and go as a unit to Olympia for one man it looks to a man up a tree that the speakership will go to some other county. At the last assembling it was very apparent that Frank C. Jackson had at least seven of the members favoring him while the balance of them were supporting either Palmer, Renick or Oleson. fe’ latter says he will never vote ior Palmer and some four of the members of the delegation declare they will never vote for Jackson. Renick is perhaps the compromise candidate, but it is said he can not get the outside strength that Pal- mer can, hence his endorsement might not count for anything. eee It seems that one, Royal Ray- mond, is to be the royal figure in the shaping of the coming legisla- ture of this state and that his fine Italian hand was quite visible at the gathering of the members of the legislature elect that met last Monday afternoon. Is it possible that the good citizens have waited all these years for Mr. Raymond to drop into the political arena of the state for the express purpose of assuming the dictatorship? This wonderful leader, it is said, is not only lacking in ability to lead, but he is not even a citizen of the state and does not know the wants of the state in a single particular. The Pie-maker is of the opinion bina Brother Raymond should at least take out citizenship papers before aspiring to become the po- litical czar of the state and es- pecially the Republican party. He is nit only not a voter, but he lays . no claims to Republicanism, and if not by what right does he propose to become the ruler of a party with which he does not affiliate? oes County Clerk-elect D. K. Sickles has named as his chief deputy for the ensuing two years A. J. Sigurd- son, who, since*the resignation of E. C. Raine as chief deputy under 0. A. Case, has been probate dep- uty in the office. Mr. Sigurdson is well versed in the affairs of the office and will make a splendid official. The Pie-maker has always been of the opinion that civil serv- ice should be established in the various county offices and thereby graduate men up to the various po- sitions that are to be filled in the offices and if it were the county would get better results than the Rplosing of green men in office every / time a new man is eleteed. Mr. Sigurdson will be worth more to the county than the most expert accountant that could be found in BERT oe pn ke Pee oes ae ee ay see La : i aad : ee Se te | a oe ae ears - fe ake fame erat as a : CES Sa Taos _—— oe oan : rs . ; ; Dosis oe WILLIAM PITT TRIMBLE, * Seeking Presidency of Commercial Club of Seattle. the whole Northwest placed at the head of affairs because he knows just what is to be done and will not have to learn it. #86 When Chief Deputy Auditor E. C. Brier refused to permit Auditor- elect Case to place the man he has selected as his chief deputy in the office for the remaining six weeks that Agnew and Brier are to hold the office, it is the taxpayers and not Mr. Case who will be the suf- ferers thereby. In six weeks time the man would learn the workings of the office and he could be the more able to organize his men for the ensuing two years and thereby save the county many hundreds of dollars, but that’s the history of the auditor’s office, under its pres- ent regime, do nothing for the real interest of the taxpayers. Clerks, if reports be true, were put to work in the office according to their apparent ability to deliver votes to the machine that Agnew and his henchmen were endeavor- ing to build up, which, thanks to the voters of the county aided by the direct primary law, was smashed into smithereens. It is to be regretted that some kind of truce could not have been arranged between the jarring factions whereby Mr. Case’s chief deputy could have learned the ropes of the auditor’s office. | eae _ Report comes from Olympia that lan effort will be made to repeal the law creating the state tax commis- sion, and that the work now per- formed by that body will be put into the hands of the railroad com- mission. This move originates, no doubt, from the fact that the tax commission has been doing things as they should be done and in do- ing so has naturally trod upon the toes of some of the wealthier class. Of all of the commissions created in late years, and which have been filled by Gov. Mead, the tax commission, alone has had the nerve to attempt reforms that the state was badly in need of. Com- missioners Frost and Easterday have had the temerity to stand up to the big tax payer and tell him the assessments should be made in THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN eel Peep Sa order that all should bear the just | share of the expense of govern- ment. Mr. Frost has become an | authority on the subject of taxa- tions, but in expounding his the- ories he has bumped into many people who are not in the habit of being dictated to, hence the at- tempt to abolish the office and Mr. Frost with it. The average man will fight taxes harder than he will death, and al- though he may be imposed upon in business or social matters, yet a fancied injustice in the way of too much taxes is the signal for a bit- ter fight. If the next legislature and the next governor are wise, we believe they will permit Mr. Frost to continue his good work. |’ —wWillapa Harbor Pilot. POLITICAL. Perhaps the average citizen of Seattle is sadly mistaken in think- ing he knows a good thing when he sees it and therefore when the report comes from Washington City to the effect that George M. Stewart, who for the past eight years has been postmaster of Se- attle, has been derelict as to his duty in that office, they at once set up and take notice and feel inclined to say it is a dirty false- ‘hood, but refrain from so saying, owing to the source of the infor- mation. The citizens of Seattle almost to a man would not hesi- tate in saying that Stewart is the only real postmaster the city has ever had, and with the limited amount of material he has had to work with has accomplished more than any other postmaster in the United States. Senator Piles, it is said, has been looking for Stew- art’s political sealp ever since he, Piles, has been in office, and was delighted over the opportunity. It’s he who laughs last that laughs best, and perhaps Senator Piles will find this out some sweet day by and by. | eee Edward C. Ellis has been named by George F, Vandervere, prose- euting attorney-elect of King County, as his chief deputy. Mr. Ellis has heen a familiar figure in i bt NSE ed See SS Seeking Re-election of Commercial Club of Seattle and who is also Candidate for the Appointment ofDeputy Attorney General of this State. | Pouce. eircies In this City JOr a good many years. He lived for a Hong time in the “bloody fifth’ and while there he was a satelite of John B. Wright, who managed to get whipped in every contest in which he engaged. But be that as it is, Mr. Ellis has the reputa- tion of at least being a very vig- orous attorney, and with his chief of a like legal mind for the next two years the prosecuting attor- ney’s office ought to be a warm nubmer. eee As his chief deputy, Bob Hodge, sheriff-elect of King County, has named Maj. John Stringer, who for the past ten years has been a deputy in the United States mar- shal’s office of this district. No wiser or more popular selection could have been made and if Jack Stringer does not bring Mr. Hodge a successful administration it will be no fault of his. The county commissioners have decided to hold Mr. Hodge to his pre-election agreement to the effect he would only draw the $200 per month sal- ary for being sheriff and to that end the food used for the prisoners will be bought by the county’s pur- chasing agent. eee The charge that Senator Wilson is interfering in the speakership contest with the view of forcing the selection of Mr. Palmer is just as untrue as the hundred and one other things that have been pub- lished about him from time to time. While Senator Wilson may favor Mr. Palmer on account of former friendship he has no direct interest in him getting the place and so far as building up a political machine is concerned it would mean noth- ing. Senator Wilson is not ask- ing the legislators for anything either for himself or his friends and nothing Mr. Palmer might do while speaker would be of any po- litical benefit to him. The man who succeeds in politics in the State of Washington in the future will have to reckon with the people and by no means with the poli- ticians and the bosses. eee | “You have one man in King County that, in my opinion, would make a great run for United States senator,” said State Senator W. i. Paulhamus one day this week, “and that man is William Pitt Trimble, who at the last election was elected one of the srodental electors. I do not think Senator Piles will be re-elected and if King county wants a seantor she had better make the best of a bad situ- ation and put a man in the race that stands some show of winning. I have heard much about a sueces- sor to Senator Piles and I am thor- oughly convinced that the man from King county that ean succeed him is Mr. Trimble and that seems to be the concensus of opinion in other parts of the state. Just now former United States Senator John L. Wilson is very popular with the voters and might make a great run, but I am very reliably informed that he will not be a candidate. Not only reliably informed, but he himself, has repeatedly said as much, hence there is nothing for King county to do but to trot Trimble into the race if she hopes to win.’”’ COMMERCIAL CLUB’S ELECTION. A battle royal in the circles of the Commercial Club of this city for the presidency of the same for the ensuing year is on and those seeking the honor are George H. Revelle, who for the past year has been its president, William Pitt Trimble, prominent in the commer- cial lines of this city and one of the presidential electors-elect, who will vote for William Howard Taft for president of the United States to succeed Theodore Rosevelt, and I. E. Moses, who like Mr Trimble is heavily interested in Se attle real estate. The fight, how- ever, is between Mr. Revelle and Mr. Trimble and at this stage of the game it is next to impossible to pick the winner. For the past year few if any commercial bodies of the Northwest has been as in- strumental in getting government assistance for this section as the Commercial Club of Seattle. Its membership is made up of many of the leading and most energetic young business men of this city and county and when they decide to go after a proposition they do so with a vim and vigor that is productive of results. see Twice has Kern tried to be gov- ernor of the state of Indiana, and each time failed. Once he has tried to be vice president of the United States and failed. He now seeks to be United States senator, and it is said another failure awaits him. With so many failures at his door ue would it not be proper to brand him Failure Kren. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. IN PROBATE. In the Matter of the Guardianship of William Kenneth Ross, a minor. No. 944. Order to Show Cause on Sale of Real Estate. Sarah A. Ross, guardian of the person and estate of William Kenneth Ross, a minor over fourteen years of age, having filed her petition in this court, duly verified the sale at private sale of the following real estate of said minor, to-wit: The undivided one-fourth of Tracts Eighteen (18), Nineteen (19), Twenty-six (26) and Thirty-one (31), of Shinn's Cloverdale Addition to Kent, according to the recorded plat thereof, all being in the King County and State of Washington. And it appearing to the court that it will be for the best interest of said minor to sell described property at private sale and that a better investment of the value thereof can be made; and it appearing to the court that said petition conforms to and is in accordance with the requirements of law in such case made and ordered by the court, that said minor and all persons interested in his estate, or in the matter of said sale, appear before the said Superior Court on the 25th day of November, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a.m. of said day, at the court-room of the Probate Department of said Superior Court, being department No. 4, thereof, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, then and there to show cause if any they have, and to prove that they be granted to said guardian, authorizing and empowering her to sell the said real estate of said minor at private sale. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before said 25th day of November, 1908, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in the said County of King, and of general circulation therein. Dune In open court this 23rd day of October, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS. Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss. I, Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King County, and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of king County, State of Washington, do hereby certify that the foregoing and correct copy of original order to show cause, made by said court on the 23rd day of October, 1908, in the matter of the guardianship of William Kenneth Ross, a minor. Witness my hand and the seal of said court, this 23rd day of October, 1908. By D. K. SICKELS, Deputy Clerk Date of first publication, October 23, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Louis Hatch, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property of the Defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or state in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified the defendants aboard named plaintiff. Is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1907, and numbered B47493, for the delinquent taxes of the years 1903, 1904 and 1905, in the amount of $72.71, and upon real property situated in said King County, scored as follows: Lot 3, Less 58 acres sold, Sec. 20, Tp. 22 N. R. 3 E. W. That on Aug. 19, 1907, the following portion of the said land was redeemed: Beginning at a point 952.32 feet S, 817.66 feet E. from N. E. corner of Sections 17, 18, 19 and 20, thence S. 37 41' E. 100 feet, thence So. 52' 19' W. 162.44 feet, thence No. 56' 3' W. 78.22 feet, thence No. 62' 3' W. 28.28 feet, thence N. 52' 19' E. 198.76 feet to begin. Timing on Oct. 14, 1907, the following part of lot was redeemed, to-wit: Beginning at a point 1170 feet So. and W. 55' 56' W. 20.8 feet from N. W. corner of lot 3, Sec. 20, Tp. 22, N. R. 3, thence north 37' 41' W. 13.90 for true point of beginning, thence S. 42' 20' W. 286.30, thence No. 56' 3' W. 99.53 feet, thence north 52' 19' east 315.76 feet, thence S. 37' 41' E. 43.92 feet to place of beginning. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this publication, exclusive of the day of said publication, to-wit: in the above case after October 2, 2013, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and judgment will be rendered hereafter closeling the lien of said taxes and costs against each of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD. A. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. October 2, November 13, 1908. NOTICE AND SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. C. W. Smith, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real prop- State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that their named plaintiff is of one certain holdover tax certificate issued of the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 20th day of October, 1908, and numbered B54333, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of 90 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows. This tax is placed on front of lots 1 and 2 block 13, Plat of Richmond Beach, in Section 2, Twp. 26. N R. 3. E. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wait: For the year 1904, the sum of 28 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 38 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 86.04; for the year 1907, the sum of $5.33. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including persons unknown, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days of the date of the publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of the said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Nov. 13, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his hearing. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lion of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale each parcel of said real property, and satisfying the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. Office Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wash. November 13—December 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. George Walter, Plaintiff, vs. Lydia Walter, Defendant. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Lydia Walter: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of the summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 13th day of November, to act in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and de defendant, upon the ground of desertion and cruelty. E. L. SANDERS, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Block, Seattle, King City, Washington. November 13—December 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Mable Waters, Plaintiff, vs. Clark S. Waters, Defendant. Summons for Publication. State of Washington to the said Clark S. Waters, defendant in the above entitled cause; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait: within sixty days after the 13th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action, in the above entitled count and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, a copy of the answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of idleness, non-support and cruelty. E. L. SANDERS Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 60 Downs Block, Seattle, Washington. November 13December 25, 1908. PROBATE NOTICE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King In the Matter of the Estate of John McDonald, Deceased. No. 8412. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that William B. Gaffney and Joseph A. Hyde, the executors of the estate of John McDonald, deceased in their final account, said court their final account as such executors, and that Thursday, the 17th day of December, 1908, at 9:30 o'clock, a.m., at the court room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County has been duly appointed by said Court for his exemption, at which time and place any interest in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. Geo. E. Morris, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said court hereto affixed this 12th day of November 08. A. OTTO C. CASE, Clerk. (Seal) By J. A. SIGURDSON. Deputy Clerk. November 13—December 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Ira A. Pinnam, Deceased. No. 9489. Notice to creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 6th day of November, 1908, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the unadmitted administrator of said estate, of 623 New York Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication November 3, 1908. FRANK A. AUSMAN, As Administrator of said Estate. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Attorney for Administrator. New York Building, Seattle, Wash. November 13—December 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King—In Probate. In the Matter of the State of John McDonald, Deceased. No. 8412. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not be Made. William B. Gaffney and Joseph A. Hyde as executors of the estate of John McDonald, deceased, having filed in this court their petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be ordered for the distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court hat said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said John McDonald, deceased, be and appear before the Superior Court of King County. State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Court of the City of Seattle, on the 17th day of December, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock, A. M., of said day then and there to show cause, if any they have why an THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for the succession before the said 17th December, 1908, in The Seattle Republic, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 12th day of November, 1908. Signed: GEORGE E. MORRIS, State of Washington, County of King—ss. I, Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause made by said court on the day of the succession in the matter of the estate of John McDonald, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Witness my hand and the seal of sale court this 12th day of November, 1908. November 13—December 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Elena M. Dalton, Plaintiff, vs. Hugh M. Dalton, Defendant. No. 64,020. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Hugh M. Dalton, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait, within sixty days after the 13th day of November. A. D., 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the above notice below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To obtain the judgment of said court for the divorce of the parties hereto, and dissolving the bonds of matrimony now and heeretofore existing between the two parties, to plaintiff the right to resume and bear her maiden name of Helen M. Schroeder, and for costs of action. S. D. KING. Attorney for Plaintiff. Attorney B. Blanchard P. O. Address: Room No. 517 New York Building, City of Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. November 13—December 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King,—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Emma Nancarrow, Deceased. No. 7608. Order Approving Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not be Made. Clifford H. Anderson, administrator of the estate of Emma Nancarrow, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Emma Nancarrow, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, and appear before the said Public Department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 17th day of December, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock, A. M., of said day then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be approved and an order of distribution should not be made to the State putting the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County and published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 17th day of December, 1908, at the Seattle Court of King County and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 10th day of November, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King I, Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said corrut on the 10th day of November, 1908, in the matter of the statute of Emma Nancarrow, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 10th day of November, 1908. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By J. A. SIGURDSON. Deputy Clerk. November 13—December 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Walter H. Oliver, Plaintiff, vs. Mamie Oliver, Defendant. No. The State of Washington to the said Mamie Oliver, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 13th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of cruelty and adultery. ELLIAS A. WRIGHT. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Rooms 629-631 Burke Buldge, Seattle, Kirk County, Washington November 13—December 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. James A. Rook, Plaintiff, vs. Lillian Rook, Defendant—No. 64033. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Lillian Rook: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, within sixty days (60) days after the 13th day of January, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff, which has been fulfilled with the Clerk of the self Carried. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of the above entitled court dissolving the bonds of matrimony now and heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant. J. Y. C. KELLOGG, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 514 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Jessie White, Plaintiff, vs. Ward W. White, Deendant, No. —. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said above named defendant, Ward W. White; (Oakland) Cochran admitted to appear within sixty days after the date or the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 6th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case the complaint will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure a divorce from defendant on the grounds of cruelty, drunkenness and abandonment. E. M. FARMER, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 609 Burke Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. November 6—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Gus Strand, Deceased, No. 9101. Notice of Sale of Real Estate. Notice is hereby given that in pursuance of an order of sale made and entered by the Superior Court of King County, Washington, on the 24th day of September, A. D. 1908, in the matter of the estate of Gus Strand, deceased, the will sell at public auction, subject to confirmation by said court, the following described real property, to-wit: Tract twenty (20), Barto's Acre Tracts, in Georgetown, King County, Washington. Said sale will be made on the 12th day of October, 1908, at ten o'clock in the forenoon of said day at the front door of the County of King in the sid Court of King, in the City of Seattle, State of Washington. Terms of sale, for cash, gold coin of the United States; ten per cent, of the bid payable at the time of sale and the balance upon confirmation by said court. Dated September 19, 1908. H. S., NOICE, Administrator of the Estate of Gus Strand, Deceased. September 25, October 23, 1908. State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the Matter of the Insolvency of H. P. Gilbert, doing business as Richmond Beach Lumber Company. No. 60387. Notice of Assignment and Notice to Care. Notice is hereby given that H. P. Gilbert, doing business as Richmond Beach Lumber Company, has made an assignment of all of his property for the benefit of creditors to W. H. Schumacher as assignee, and the creditors of said insolvent debtor are hereby notified to present their claims against W. H. Schumacher at Rooms 615-616 New York Block, in Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of transacting the business of said insolvent debtor's estate, within three months from the first publication of this notice. to-wit, within three months from the 25th day of September, W. H. SCHUMACHER. Assignee of H. P. Gilbert, doing business as Richmond Beach Lumber Company, an insolvent debtor. Date of first publication: September 25th, 1908. September 25, November 6, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Israel O. Negus, Deceased. No. 9259. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 10th day of September, 1908, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against, said deceased or against said estate, to sent them with the necessary voucher to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 1048 Kilbourne Avenue, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 25th, 1908. A. J. GODDARD, As Administrator of said Estate. KARR & GREGORY. Attorneys for Estate. 715 American Bank Building, Seattle, Wash. September 25, October 23, 1908. NOTICE AND SUMMONS: In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants, and each of them. You and acquaintance, and each person identified interest in the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one delinquent tax certificate, issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of WaWashington, dated the 1st day of December, 1903, and numbered 1921 the year 1900. In the amount of $5.75, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit South 16 feet of lot 4. block 2, of H. L. Yesler's First Addition to the City of Seattle. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the above named plaintiff above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1901, the sum of $5.63; For the year 1902, the sum of $6.38; For the year 1903, the sum of $6.30; For the year 1904, the sum of $6.60; For the year 1905, the sum of $6.60; For the year 1906, the sum of $6.60; For the year 1907, the sum of $10.50; Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. (On such a case, including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after September 25th, for a motion action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, if case. If case, the court will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1908. for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel or said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wash. (Sept. 25, Nov. 6, 1908.) SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. Lettle V. Hibst, Plaintiff, vs. Phillip Hibst, Defendant. The State of Washington, to Phillip Hibst, defendant. You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the entitled action, within sixty days after the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the date of the first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the 25th day of September, 1908, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for the plaintiff, below named the deceased, for the failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of plaintiff, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of this action is to secure a divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant on the ground of cruelty and to have the former name of plaintiff restored to her. A. MACDONALD Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: 524 Eailley Blg., Seattle, Wash. (Sept. 25, Nov. 6, 1908.) NOTICE AND SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all person unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in real property or her described real, property Defendants State of Washington, to the above defendants, and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above plaintiff will be required to obtain delinquent tax certificate, issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of December, 1903, and numbered B21532, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, the amount of 15 and the real estate situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: South 16 feet of lot 5, block 1, of H. L. Yesler's First Addition to the City of Seattle. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said real property, Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sale date of payment, and are all the unpaid interest upon and against, said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day 60 of September 60 days after September 25, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due together with the costest amount case, if fall so to do, judgement will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said real property of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Blde., Seattle, Wash. (Sept. 25, Nov. 6, 1908.) NOTICE AND SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants. The above defendants and each of them; You and each of you, as owners, or claimants of an interest in the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, for December, 1903, and numbered B22124, for the delinquent taxes of the years 1901 and 1902, in the amount of $10.58, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit. West 40.09 feet of lot 4, block "A" H. L. Yesler's First Addition to the City of Seattle. That the taxes for following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said real property, to-wit: For the year 1903, the sum of $6.86; For the year 1904, the sum of $6.71; For the year 1905, the sum of $6.97; For the year 1906, the sum of $8.97; For the year 1907, the sum of $10.14. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the sums of such payments upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after September 18, 2016, to withhold action and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and changed against each of the less interest paid during a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wash. (Sept. 25, Nov. 6, 1908.) FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE sraTE Of Washiugton for King County, ‘William Dorris and Marta Dorris, tls wite, pintotite, eas games: Mf; MeLellan, snd the, un own Letts of the said James M. Mel.ellan, if the said James M. McLellun Le deceased, oweph A, Barto, and ihe unknown heirs of the Said Joseph M. "Barto, if the sald Josepli M. Barto be deceased, and all persous unknown, having, "or laliing (to. have, aus, tuterent i je property described In the complaiut Level. No. 6246. Summons for Publication. ‘Phe State of Washington to euch and all of sald defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within wixty days after the date of the frst publica: tion of this summons, to-wit: Within alxty pdays after the 7th day of August, 1908, and defend. the above entitled wctlon In the above titled court and auswer the complaiut of the plaluiiffe lieveln and serve @ copy of your au Mwer upon the undersigued attorney for plalu Hite at bis address below stated aud In case of your fallure so 10 do, judgment will be reudered Against you uccording to the demand of the cgmplaint erein which, an Been led, Ith the Glerk of sald court, The object of sald uctlov fe to quiet title to the following described prop: erty, situated In King County, Wasbiugton 10 wit: Lote one (1), and two (2), block two (2), Boston Helglte Supplemental’ Addition to. the City of Seutile, aud to forever eujolu aud de bar the sald defendants, and each and all ot tilem, “frou asserting ‘any, claluy whatsoever tu and to the sald lands and premises aud to ob- tain a decree decreelng that the sald defend fants, and each and all of them, have no tuter- at ‘vliatsoever in. the suid, property aud that Plaintiffs" title ts good and, walla. EDWARD VON TOBEL, ‘Attorney for Pluintit, Office and Post Office Address: | Roows GUd-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, ‘Wastington. ‘August 7—~Sept. 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington, for King County. Elizabeth M, Lemon, Plaintiff, vs. C. L. Lemon, Defendant.—No. ...... ‘The ‘State of Washington to the said C._L. Lemon, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear piithin sixty, (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wot :within sixty (60) days after the 18th day of September, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your gnawer upon the, undersigned attorney for plaintif! at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you faecording to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the srounds of fallure to provide and general relief. HERBERT E. SNOOK, ‘Attorney for Plaintiff, P.O. Address: Room 637 Burke Bulld- ing, Seattle, King County, Washington. Wy ere oot 46. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King.—In Probate, In the Matter of the Estate of Marcus O'Brantigam, Deceased. No. 6403. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not be Made, and for Hearing on Final ‘Account. ‘Leota A. Conrad, administratrix of the estate of Marcus O'Brantigam, deceased, having filed in this court her final ac- count and petition setting forth that sald estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the resi- due thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said’ petition sets forth facts Sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered, by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Marcus O'Brantigam, de- ceased, be and appear before the sald Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 8th day of Octo- ber, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. of sald day then and there to show cause, if any they have, why, said ac- Count’ should not be approved und an Order of distribution should not be made of the tesidue of sald estate among the heirs and persons in said petition men- tloned, according to law. Tt is tutrher ordered. that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places'in, icing County and, py, fished once a week for three successive ‘weeks before the sald 8th day of October, Toos, in The Seattle Republican, a news- paper printed and published in dala King Bounty and of general clreulation tnere- ne ‘Done in open court this 17th day of September, 1908. GEO. B, MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King.—ss. 1, Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Su- perlor Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and cor- Feet copy of an original order to show “Cause, made by said Court on the 17th poay of September, 1908, in the matter of fhe estate of Marcus O'Brantigam, de- ceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 17th day of September, 1908. (Seal. Orro A. CASE, Clerk. By EB. 8, SEYMOUR, Deputy Clerk. September 18—October 16, 1908, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. L. H, Crayer, Plaintift, vs, Laura 1. Price, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. ————. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners or claimants of an interest in the herein- after described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff 1s the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the ist day of December, 1904, and num- ered B28894, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $25.27, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, t0- wit: SE% of NW% of Sec. 5, Tp. 22, N. R, 8 FE, W. M, leas 1 acre dccupted by School that thé taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintif upon said real property, to-wit: Tror the year 1904, the sum of $21.60; for the year 1905, the sum of $32.40; for the year 1906, the sum of $31.50, and for the Year 1907, the sum of $20.70; which sev- Gral sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and un- Tedeemed taxes upon and against sald yeal property. You and each of you (including, sald persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- Clusive of the day of said first publica. fion, to-wit: within. sixty davs after Sept. 18, 1908, in the above entitled court and action: and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff pand serve a copy of your answer on tre Uindersizned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated. or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, In ease you fail so to do, judgment will be fendered herein, foreclosing the lien of aid taxes and costs against each parcel ‘of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged aguinst each, tor sald taxes, Interest and cos.s, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald Property for the satisiaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintift's complaint, now on fie in. this L, H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A, C, MACDONALD, ‘Attor..ey tor Plaintiff, Office address, 624 Bailey Building, Se- attle, Wash. September 18—October 30, 1908, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington tor King County L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Laura i) Price, and all perso..s unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and io the hereinaiter described real property, Defendants. No, ————. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners or claimants of an interest in the herein- aiter described real property, are hereby notified that the above 1amed plaintiff Is the holder of one delinquent tax certin- cate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the Ist day of Lecember, 1904, and numbered Buss96, for the delinquent taxes of te year 1903, in the amount of $8.76, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: SW% of NEM of SW% and N¥% of NE% of SW% of Sec. 5, Tp, 22, N. R. 3 K W. M. ‘That the taxes for the following Subsequent years have been pald by the plaintiff upon said real property, to-wit: For the year 1904, the sum of $7.20; for the year 1906, the sum of $10.80; for the year 1906, the sum of $12.60, and for the year 1907, the sum of $8.28; which sev- eral sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and un- redeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex: clusiye of the day of said first publica- tion, to-wit: within sixty days after Sept. 18, 1908, in the above entitied court and action; and defend this action and ans- wer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the un- @ersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the sums and amounts due upon aud charged against it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for thé satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. 'H, CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C, MACDONALD: Attorney for Plaintitt Office address, 624 Builey Building, Seattle, Wash. ‘September 18—October 30, 1908, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT.OF THE State of Washington for King ‘County. Lottie Daughtry, Plaintiff, vs. James Daughtry, Defendant. No. 63059, Sum- mons for’ Publication. ‘The State of Washington to the said James Daughtry, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within ‘sixty (60) days trom and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 18th day of September, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorneys for plaintiff at their office and post office address below desig- nated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintift's complaint, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of said court: ‘The object of said action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant, on the ground of non-support, failure to provide, cruel treatment and habitual drunkennéss. MORRIS, SOUTHARD & SHIPLEY, Attorneys for Plaintift Office and Post Office address, 55 Hal- ler Building, Seattle, King ' County, Washington. September 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co. a corporation, Plain- tif, vs. C. Askhelm and Jane Doe Ask- heim, his wife, whose ‘true christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate In and to the herein- after described real property, Defend- ants. No. 62536. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above named defendants and éach of them: You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or helders of an interest or ostate in or to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintift is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate is- sued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated June 5, 1906, and numbered B42178 for the’ delinquent taxes of the year 1904 in the amount of ninety (90) cents, and upon the, real property situated in King County, Wash- ington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot twenty-eight (28), Block four (4), Bal- lard Park Second Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington. ‘That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintif’ upon sald above desorbed real property, to-wit: for the year 1905, thirty-four (34) cents; for the year 1906, twenty-six (26) cents, and for the year 1907, twenty-four (24) cents, which sev- eral’ sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent. per annum for the said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You snd each of you (including, sal¢ unknown persons, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of the said first date of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after Sept. 18, 1908, in the above entitled court and action ‘and de- fend this action and answer the com- plaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy 6f your answer on the undersigned at- torney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with Interest and costs. In case you fail So to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forciosing the lien of said tax : and costs against each parcel of sai¢ real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs ordering 4 sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged anc found against it respectively, as providec by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's com: plaint,’ now on file in this cause anc court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora tion, Plaintift. F, J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Offive address, 314 Northern Bank é ‘Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. ‘September 18—October 30, 1908. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co. a corporation, Plain- tif, vs. C. Askhelm and Jane doe Ask- helm, (his wite, whose true christian namé {s unknown, and ail persons un- Known, if any. having or claiming an interest or estate In and to the herein- after described, real property,, Detend- ants. No. 625%5. Notice and Summons. State of Washington. to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property. are hereby notified that the above hamed plaintift is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate is- Sued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated June 5, 1908, and numbered B42158, for the’ delinquent taxes fer the year 1904, in the amount of ninety (90) cents, and upon the real property, situated in iting County, Wash- ington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot filty-two (52), Block four ‘(4). Ballard Park Second ‘Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington, That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the, plainti! upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1905, thirty-four (34) cents, for the year 1906, flty-three (68) cents, and for, the year 1907, forty-eight (48) cents, which sev- eral’ sums bear interest at’ the rate of fifteen per cent. per annum from the sald date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredéemed taxes upon and against sald lot. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notifled and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the first date of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after Sept. i8, 1908, in the above entitled court and action atl de- fend this action and answer the com- plaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned at- torney for plaintift at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with Interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charges against each for sald taxes, Interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively, as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's com- plaint,” now on file in this cause and ur, AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Piaintif, F. J, CARVER, Attorney for Plaintitt. Office address, 314 Northern Bank’ & 3—REPUBLICAN LEGALS hub Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. September 18—October 30, 1908. State of Washington in and for King County, Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plain- tiff, vs. C, Askhelm and Jane Doe Ask- heim, his ‘wife, whose ‘true christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herein- after described, real |property, Defend- ants. No, 62533, Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above named defendants and éach of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an’ interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of ‘one certain delinquent tax certificate is- sued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated June 5, 1906, and numbered 42180, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904 In the amount of ninety (90) cents, and upon the real property, situated in King County, Wash: ington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot thirty-two (32), Block four! (4), Ballard Park Second Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington, That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1905, thirty-four (#4) cents; for the year 1906, twenty-six (26) cents, and for the year 1907, twenty-four (24) cents, which sev- eral ‘sums bear interest at the rate of fit- teen per cent. per aunum from the said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against sald lot. You and each of you (including sald unknown persons, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first date of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after Sept. 18, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, In case you fail so to do, judg- ment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charges against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it re- spectively, as provided by law and as prayed in’ plaintiff's complaint, now on fle in this cause and court: AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Plaintitr. FP. J, CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 314 Northern Bank & ‘Trust Bldg,, Seattle, Wash. ‘September 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plain- tiff, vs. C. Askheim and Jane Doe Ask- heim, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herein- after described real property Defend- ants. No, 62532. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named ae is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King, County, ‘Washington, dated June 5, 1906, and numbered 842177 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of ninety (90) cents and open the real prop- erty situated in King County, Washing- ton, described as follows, to-wit: Lot twenty-seven (27, Block four (4), Ballard Park Second Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. ‘That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1905, thirty-four (34) cents; for the year 1906, fifty-two (52) cents, ana for the year 1907, forty-eight (48) cents, which sev- eral sums bear interest at the rate of fif- teen per cent, per annum from the said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you (including said unknown persons, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appeur within sixty (60) days after the first date of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after Sept. i8, 1908, in che above entitled court and action and de- fend this action and answer the com- plaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned at- torney for plaintif at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail 80 to do, judgment will be rendered here- in, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and custs against each parcel of said rev! property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively, as provided by law, and as prayed in plaints com- plaint,’now on file In this cause and co rt, AURORA LAND COMPANY. a Corpora- tion, Plaintim, F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 314 Northern Bank’ & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. September 18—October 30, 1908, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, hig wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known, if any, having, or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herein- after described real property, Defend- ants. No. 62304. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff Is the holder of one certain delinquent taxe certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Wash- ington, dated April 15th, 1908, and num- bered 849261, for the deiinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of Ninety- three (98) cerits and upon the real prop- erty situated in King County, Washing- ton, described as follows, to-wit: Lot Eleven (11), Block Two (2), White Bros. Addition to’ Kirkland, Washington. ‘That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been pald by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1905, forty-one (41) cents; for the year 1906, fifty-two (52) cents, and for the year 1907, fifty (50) cents, which several sums bear’ interest at the rate of fifteen per cent, per annum, from sald date of pay- ment and are all the unpaid and unre- deemed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you (including sald persons unknown, 1f any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- clusive of the day of said first publica- tion, to-wit: within sixty days after Sept. 18, 1908, in the above entitied court and ‘action and defend this action and answer the complaint of sald plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the len of said taxes and costs against each par- cel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintift's complaint,’ now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Plaintitt. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintift. Office address, 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. September 18—October 30, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs, Unknown Owners and ali persons’ unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 62227. Notice and Summons, ‘The State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property are hereby notified that the above named plaintift is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the ‘Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated April 15th, 1908, and numbered 849271 ‘for the ‘delinquent taxes of the year 1904 in the amount of Ninety-three "(93) cents and upon_ the real property situated in King County, Washington, described as follows, to-wit Lot Fifteen’ (15), Block Seventeen (17) Richmond Beach’ Supplemental Adaition to King County. Washington. ‘That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid bj the plaintiff upon said above describec real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, Forty-one (41) cents; for the year 1908, Fifty-two (52) cents! for the year 1907 Fifty (50) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of Fifteen per cent. per annum from said date of pay- ment and are all the unpaid and unre: deemed taxes upon and against sald lot You and each of you (including saic persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be anc appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclus ive of the day of said first publication to-wit: within sixty days after Sept. 18 1908, in the above entitled court anc action; and defend this action and ans wer the complaint of said plaintift anc serve a copy of your answer on. the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at Wii office below stated or pay the amoun' due, together with interest and costs In €ase you fall so to do, judgment wil be rendered herein, foreclosing the lier of said taxes and costs against each par cel of said real property for the sum: and amounts, due upon and charge against each, for said taxes, interest anc costs, ordering a sale of each parcel 0} said property for the satisfaction of th sums charged and found against it re spectively as provided by law, and a: prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now ot file in thie cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora tion, Plaintitr, F, J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 314 Northern Bank 4 ‘Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. ‘September 18—October 30, 1908, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, @ corporation, Plaintiff, vs. G. W, Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown and all persons, un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herein- after described. real property, Defend- ants. No. 62806. Notice and Summons. ‘The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the heerinafter described real property are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate is- sued by the Treasurer of King County, ton, dated April 16th, 1908, anv Muanbered bane, Aer ke ablingues taxes of the year 1904 in the amount a Ninety-three (93) cents and upon th real property situated in King Counts Washington, described as follows, to wit: Lot five (5), Block Two (2), White Bros, Addition to Kirkland, King County, Washington, ‘That the taxes for the following. prior and subsequent years have been paid. by. the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1906, forty-one (41) cents; for the year 1906, futy-two (62) cents’ and tor the year 1907, fifty (50) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent. per annum trom said date of Payment and are all the unpaid and un- Fedeemed taxes upon and against sald lot. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days alter the date of first publication of this notice, ex Clusive of the day of said first publica Hon, to-wit: within sixty aays. after Sept. 18, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer thé complaint of said piaintift and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney’ for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the len of said taxes and costs against each pare cel Of said real property for tho sina and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisiaction of the sums charged and found against It ree spectively as provided by iaw, and ‘as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Plaintim, FJ CARVER, Attroney for Plaintitt. Office address, 314 Northern Bank’ é& Trust Bidg., Seattle, Wash, September 18—October 0. 1909 ate op RIOR COURT OF THE tate of Washington in and tor the County of King.—In Probate. in the Matter of the Estate of ‘Theo- philus Elliott, Deceased.—No. 8105 Order to Show’ Cause why Final Account of Administratrix Should Not be Allowed and Estate Distributed. Phis cause coming on regularly before the court on this 16th day of September, A.D. 1908, upon the filing of the final account and petition for distribution of Emily Eliott, administratrix of the es: {ate of ‘Theophilus Elliott, deceased, te be set for hearing: it Is Ordered, that the 22nd day of Oc- tober, 1908, at ‘9:30 o'clock a.m. at the County ‘court house in Seattle, King Gounty, Washington, in Department No 4, In the above entitled court, be and the same is hereby fixed and abpointed ax the time and place for the hearing of said final account and petition for diss tribution. It Is Further Ordered, that all persons interested in said estaté file their excep- flons in writing, if any they have, to sald final account and petition for distribur tion, and at the said time and place ap- bear and show cause why sald final aes count should not be approved and settled and said estate distributed. And It Is Further Ordéred, that all Persons Interested in said estate be given @ notice of said hearing by the publicat fon of a copy of this order once’a woek for four successive weeks in ‘The Seattle Republican, and by posting copies there. of in three of the most public places In this King County, for at least twenty days prior to said’ hearing, GEO. 1B. MORRIS, Judge. FRANK 8. CARROLL, Attorney for Ad: ministratrix. September 18—October 16, 1908, a ieee ite ne pan ee ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King ‘ounty, Adelaide Cecelia Eames, Plaintiff, vs, gan Wood Eames, Defendant, Num- er 16144, The State of Washington to the sala Frank Wood Eames, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toe Pit: within sixty (60) days after the gist day of August, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in ‘the above ent titled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated? and in case of your failure so to do, Judgment will bé rendered against. yer according to the demand of the com plaint, which has been filea with th clerk ‘of said Court, ‘The object of the above entitled actio {s to obtain from you a divorce on th grounds of extreme jealousy, cruel treat ment and failure to'support, PARKER & BROWN, Attorneys for Plaintite. P.O. Address: 32 Union wlock, Seat- tle, King County, Washington, August 21—October 2, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATB ‘of Washington for the County of King. John P. Lewis, plaintit, v3, Clara 8. Lewls, defendant. “No. Summotis by Publication, ‘The State of Washington to the said Clara B. Lewis, defendant: “You are hepehy ‘sun. moned to appear within sixty. daye after the date of the frst pubiteation of tits. summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 17th day of July, “A. D.. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled eourt, and auswer the complatne of the plaintit, and’ serve © copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plainti@ at nis office below stated, And in case of your failure 80 to’ do. judg: ment will be rendered against. you according fo the demand of the complaint, which has been Mled with the clerk of sald court, ‘The object of the safd action, set forth In. the complaints {s as follows: to obtain a divorce and. dissolu: Uon of the bonds of ma’ “mony now. existing between platntit and the defendant herein on the ground of abandonment for more than one year. J.P. BALL, Attorney “for Pinintit, P. 0. Address: 9-10 Starr-bord Block., Se atte Connty of ‘King, Washington, July 17—August 28," 1908, a worrcn, SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King. —ss.—Sheriff’s Office. By virtue of an order of sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 27th day of October, 1908, by the clerk thereof, in the case of The Employees Realty ‘Association, a corporation, plaintiff, versus J. C. Ol- phant, et al, defendants. No. 63666, and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given htat I will EO ceed to sell at public.auction to the high- est bidder for cash, within the hours pre- scribed by law for sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock A. M., on the 5th’ day of December, A. D., 1908, before the court house door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the folowing: de- seribed property, situated in King Coun- ty, State of Washington, to-wit: Lots eleven (11) and twelve (12) of Block fifteen (15) of Byrons Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washing- ton, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure of mortgage amounting to one thousand two hundred twenty-six and 41/100 ($1226.41) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff, Dated this 27th day of October, 1908. L. C, SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. Oct, 30—Nov. 27, 1908. . plage ist us, BENCH AND BAR. that the rule of the mob is not) sectional, but extends through- out the entire country. | Why isit that whole commun- ities undertake to administer the Jaw after their own way? Why is it that there seems to be no abatement in the number of these outbreaks? The answer is not hard to give. It is be- cause mobs .are practically as- sured freedom of all punishment. The word ‘‘all’”’ is used advised- ly. The history of prosecutions for the crime of mob shows that but few cases of prosecutions have been attempted as com- pared with the great number of offenses actually committed, and but a comparatively few of these prosecutions have resulted in convictions. And in practically all of these cases, the prisoner was pardoned at an early period of his term. This country prides itself up- on its intelligence, upon its law abiding qualities, upon its pro- gressive ideas, and yet the fact remains to its everlasting shame and disgrace that the rule of the mob prevails here in larger mea- sure than it does in any other civilized portion of the globe. Lynch iaw has become so fre- quent in this country that Jus- tice Brewer, of the Supreme Court of the United States, says that it may be regarded “as a habit’? of the American people. Scarcely a day passes, he says, that the people of some commun- ity have not, as is said, taken the law into their own hands. Think of calling a crime a habit, and that too by one of the jus- tices of the highest court in the land. And yet the facts amply justify the statement. Now, what is imperatively needed to meet this situation at the present time, as Dr. Cutler: well says, those persons who compose the mob, and others, too may be included, have small res- pect for the law and less fear of it. For them it is absolutely necessary to invoke a policy which will bring about a change of feeling upon the situation. They must be taught to regard the law and have a righteous dread of its violation. This can- not be accomplished by the exist- ing laws as at present adminis- tered. The history of judicial proceedure fully confirms this statement. Arrests are rarely made; convictions are next toim- possible. Certainty ;of convict- ion of the guilty is the end to be aimed at. How is this to be at- tained? Only by radical changes in the criminal proceedure of the country. In the first place: The place of trial of those accused of the offense must be changed to some other portion of the state than the county where it is charged the offense was committed. This is necessary in order to get a fair and impartial jury, fair and impartial alike to the state and the accused. To hope fora con- viction by a jury of the county where the offense was charged apis Cie MEN a f ee Ee AS ak deaths Ip, ot ES RR Pree : GEE ot ORE OP ea Ba i Teles ts Pa ie BAR, asi. aes Pee a. i 6h + et ai a sae uae Hae es oe Ge ee citer ee 3 R Be ae ; rR a Fs " 1 comet d pea eae “ y f : Pat Po jae ) A SUPREME JUDGE MILO A, ROOT Who is now under fire, owing to a charge by inuendo made either by Judge Gordon or some one else, who proclaims to know whereof he speaks. Judge Root himself asked that the State Bar Association probe the matter to the very limit to find out the facts, if such there be, in the allegation. President Bridges of the State Bar Association has named Hon. John H. Powell, Seattle, chairman, with R. G. Hudson, Theodore L. Stiles and George E. Wright as associates. While the committee seems to be starting out to look for some- thing that has not been very accurately described and something no one seems desirous of declaring as being in actual ewistence, yet they will delve into the rumors just as deep as possible to see if there is anything even in the rumors. Tt is claimed that a state senator has facts concerning the alleged transaction and that he will testify before the committee if permitted to and tf not he will bring the matter up in the senate when the legislature meets. In the mean time neither Judge Root nor his friends feel any uneasiness about the matter, knowing that nothing will be found to in any way besmirch either his charac- ter or reputation. place of trial would make neces sary an amendment to the res- pective constitutions of the var- ious states, for the contstitutions now provide that the acccused is entitled to a speedy trial by a jury of his county. This consti- tutional provision has worked a misscarraige of justice so often that the amendment is necessary in the interest of good order and the fair administration of the ‘criminal laws. | Third: A preponderence of credible evidence should be suf- ficient to convict members of a mob. Evidence which satisfies beyond a reasonable doubt should not be required. The rule of ‘evidence should be changed in this regard. The temptation to commit perjury is so great that the change in the rule of evi- dence is absolutely esential in order to accomplish the ends of justice in this class of cases. Fourth: The prosecuting at- torneys are usually made by the electors of the respective coun- ties. This fact serves, in many instances, and I personally be- lieve, in most instances, to deter the state’s attorney from vigor- ously prosecuting the mob. It seems wise, therefore, that the governor and the attorney gen- eral should have the discretion- ary power to substitute another attorney to prosecute the mob, sopplaneing the local prosecutor with an attorney who would not EE Te ee Te ee THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN - be controlled by local sentiment -|and feeling. A vigorous and de- -| termined prosecution is necess- sary that conviction may follow. s| And it isa conviction of whole ajcommunities of guilty persons -| that is aimed at all the time. a| Fifth: In case the jury acquit n| the State should have the right y | to have the case reviewed by the d{ higher court before an absolute e discharge of the prisoner or pri- |soners be entered. This is not a f | new suggestion, but is advocated ‘-|by many able members on the a bench and bar. It seems esen- s|tial to prevent tie misearraige d | of justice in criminal cases, Un- # | doubtedly the near future will n' find such legislation on the law )) BOOKS OL Many Of tne states, ‘| These are confessedly radical | changes in the existing criminal ; procedure of the land, but they are not too radical. The triumph .|of lawless force throughout the »|length and breadth of the land, -|a force that is unwhipped of jus- '|tice, demands that this change ‘|should be made. It is true that ‘| Americans are a patient people. -|And they seem willing to bear :| the ills they have for an indefi- -jnite period, rather than fly to -|others that they know nothing -|of. But to maximize one lawless ‘lactin an attempt to minimize another infinitely greater to the | entire social order of the conntry: ‘lis both cruel and preposterous to’ mas the ultimate degree. It has no foundation in reason or jus- tice. We want no self - appointed conservator of peace and order. Such persons belong to the dark ages and to the savages of the woods and plains. They are not good citizens and the citizenship they have should be taken from them. Quite apart from the foregoing yet closely related to it, is the suggestion that compensation be accorded the legal heirs of the victim of the mob by the state which failed to give protection against the mob.—St. Louis Law Journal. Next week the play that opens at the Seattle Theatre will be an entire change from anything of- fered hitherto in that theatre dur- ing the present season. Mr. Ed. mund Carroll will be the first star actor of the season at Messrs. Rus- sell & Drew’s playhouse. ‘‘We Are King”’ is a high-class comedy drama; it was written by the fam- ous actor Walter Whiteside, who appeared here in ‘‘The Magic Melody.’”? ‘“We Are King’? has run for five years in the East and appeared only in the best theatres; it was secured for the Seattle Theatre only a few weeks ago, at what would appear to be an enor- mous expense, The company is a BR RS att cite Cy ate boa a a Se Yr Friday, Novembor 13, 1908 high class one, in keeping with the play, and only five stops have been made, and those at the largest cities between St. Paul and Se- attle. There will be no change in prices at the Seattle Theatre, how- ever, during this engagement. 4 Next week the stock company offer ‘‘The Texas Ranger,”’ a play in which they appeared to ezcel- lent advantage, and one that is al- ways a favorite with theatregoers, and the very class that patronizes the Third Avenue Theatre. The play is quite as good as‘‘The Girl From the Golden West,’’ and much better than ‘‘The Rose of the Rancho.’’ Stanley Johns will in- terpret the male role, and Eliza- beth Hale will make her last ap- pearance with the stock company at the Third Avenue Theatre next week, At the conclusion of ‘The Texas Ranger’? engagement, she will retire permanently and her place will be filled by another prominent leading lady. Therg will be several new faces in the bill at the Third Avenue Theatre this week. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE CONNECTION Business Office, Third and Spring \ JUST KNOW US OUR TAILORING AND YOU WILL DO THE REST You ate BUY r BETTER TAILORING IRVING CANNON TAILOR 211 COLUMBIA ST. Established 1890 The Comfort. \ Newly furnished rooms. Walking dis- tance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. © ISRAEL WALKER, 1101-1108 Jackson Street. Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. E,W, WAY & CO, General Insuran Eire, Marine, Burglary, Accident Plate Glass, Employer’s Liability. 619-620 Bailey Building Main 2115 Ind. L. 3356 4 McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance 529 Colman Blk., Phone Main 695