Seattle Republican

THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Once again those elected to represent the various states of the United States in the halls of Congress have assembled at the National Capitol Congress Convenes to begin the closing session for Closing Session Fifty-ninth Congress. While nothing remarkable or unusual is expected to happen between now and the 4th of March, 1909, when it will pass into history, yet the members of the present body hope to so completely clear the legislative boards by that time that they will be able to plunge into the tariff reduction tussle, which the country was promised by the campaigners before the election, as soon as the present Congress dies and the new one born and will have been called together by President Taft. While to the average lay citizen it might appear that the country is being legislated to death, yet there is always imminent need of the presence of Congress to patch this or that piece of legislation which, owing to the size and progress of the country, has sprung aleak; to pass new legislation in order to meet unforeseen emergencies that have arisen on account of the rapid development of the country, and finally to kill off certain legislation that is no longer applicable. Theodore Roosevelt has witnessed his last opening of Congress with himself president of the United States, and his message thereto Roosevelt Reports savored a to Congress great deal of a farewell ad- dress. While the message was not of a pathetic nature, yet it did re that the president knew could not the present Congress, as well as next March. It was not as long as bristled with pertinent points be good of the country as he seemed many of which were brought out by begun by him some time ago and the late campaign. President-elect the duties of the presidency of the not do better than to at least re-re the salient points which were reco Roosevelt in his recent message, as they are favorably acted upon, ever Roosevelt big stick in order to s recommends federal control of in railways put under complete commerce commission; telegraph panies likewise controlled; better laws; a weekly half holiday for all mer months; doubling the salaries checking of the abuse of issuing the national forest policy indorsed; the land waterways; the establishment banks; more money for the bure census appointees placed under the government printing office placement of commerce and labor; soldier control of the war department; sion of Arizona and New Mexico; federal fisheries; American citizenship people of Porto Rico; the withdr army from Cuba within two months important measures. The city of Los Angeles, accord that city, is in the throes of a garb versy, and the authorities, who had to make a barrel of money by handling message was not there, yet it did make recommendations it knew could not be acted upon before pass, as well as himself, officially died as not as long as previous ones, but it ment points bearing on the general way as he seemed to see them, a great brought out by the work that was time ago and made more visible by President-elect Taft, upon assuming presidency of the United States, could to at least re-recommend the most of which were recommended by President cent message, and then see to it that acted upon, even if he has to use the in order to succeed. The message and control of interstate corporations; or complete control of the interstate union; telegraph and telephone com- trolled; better employers' liability of holiday for all laborers during sum- ing the salaries of federal judges; the use of issuing temporary injunctions; policy indorsed; the improvement of in- the establishment of postal savings by for the bureau of education; the placed under civil service rules; enting office placed under the depart- and labor; soldiers' homes placed un- der department; the immediate admis- New Mexico; federal control of inter- rican citizenship conferred upon the co; the withdrawal of Uncle Sam's thin two months, and many other less Los Angeles, according to the Times of chroes of a garbage collecting contr- ities, who had thought the city would money by handling the proposition itself, of a pathetic nature, yet it did make recommendations that the president knew could not be acted upon before the present Congress, as well as himself, officially died next March. It was not as long as previous ones, but it bristled with pertinent points bearing on the general good of the country as he seemed to see them, a great many of which were brought out by the work that was begun by him some time ago and made more visible by the late campaign. President-elect Taft, upon assuming the duties of the presidency of the United States, could not do better than to at least re-recommend the most of the salient points which were recommended by President Roosevelt in his recent message, and then see to it that they are favorably acted upon, even if he has to use the Roosevelt big stick in order to succeed. The message recommends federal control of interstate corporations; railways put under complete control of the interstate commerce commission; telegraph and telephone companies likewise controlled; better employers' liability laws; a weekly half holiday for all laborers during summer months; doubling the salaries of federal judges; the checking of the abuse of issuing temporary injunctions; national forest policy indorsed; the improvement of inland waterways; the establishment of postal savings banks; more money for the bureau of education; the census appointees placed under civil service rules; the government printing office placed under the department of commerce and labor; soldiers' homes placed under control of the war department; the immediate admission of Arizona and New Mexico; federal control of interstate fisheries; American citizenship conferred upon the people of Porto Rico; the withdrawal of Uncle Sam's army from Cuba within two months, and many other less important measures. The city of Los Angeles, according to the Times of that city, is in the throes of a garbage collecting controversy, and the authorities, who had thought the city would make a barrel of money by handling the proposition itself, are in the position of the Irishman who grabbed hold of the horns of a mad bull to show his friends how strong he was, but realized after he Garbage Plant Losing Proposition --- Price One Year, $3.00. Single Copies, 10 Cents. Garbage Plant Losing Proposition SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, DECEMBER 11, 1908. THEODORE ROOSEVELT. one bull the predicament he will be to turn it loose, and soon be to help him let go of the animus of the city collecting and of the authorities have come to the city as much for the city to do private concern to do it. Purchased at a cost of $80,000, century, and the city is now seeken to take the garbage con-inerator at one-half of its origi-ble might profit by the expre-begin to hedge now on its gag before it will have lost ten ty spent. By those who have bought, it is believed that a child collect the refuse of the taxpayers than if done of Los Angeles should be loot battle goes further toward put- public meeting held in the city many days ago, in which men a erjminology of the Negro-ing discussed when the audien had caught the bull the predicament he would be in when he attempted to turn it loose, and soon began to pray for his friends to help him let go of the animal. After three years' trial of the city collecting and burning of the garbage, the authorities have come to the conclusion that, it costs twice as much for the city to do the work as it would for a private concern to do it. The city's incinerator, purchased at a cost of $80,000, has proven an expensive-luxury, and the city is now seeking to get some private concern to take the garbage contract and purchase the incinerator at one-half of its original cost. The city of Seattle might profit by the experience of Los Angeles and begin to hedge now on its garbage collecting proposition before it will have lost ten times more than it has already spent. By those who have given the subject much thought, it is believed that a private concern in Seattle could collect the refuse of the city at one-half the cost to the taxpayers than if done by the city. The condition of Los Angeles should be looked into before the city of Seattle goes further toward putting in a system of its own. At a public meeting held in the city of Greater New York not many days ago, in which men and women, participated, the crjminology of the Negro in the political world was being discussed when the audience was startled ve, because I am a Southern plenty of them on my father is now so mixed with black being wiped out. In 100 y Negro. I have, because I am a Southern woman and as a child saw plenty of them on my father's estate. But white blood is now so mixed with black blood that the real Negro is being wiped out. In 100 years from now I don't suppose there will be one left, and everybody, broadly speaking, will have a strain of Negro blood in their veins. I cannot say that I will regret it." We are satisfied that the lady did not exaggerate in her statement, and every other person born south of the Mason and Dixie line is likewise satisfied that she did not. That the Negroes in the United States within the next hundred Anglo-Saxons Are Absorbing Negroes the predicament he would be in when it loose, and soon began to pray for him let go of the animal. After three city collecting and burning of the cities have come to the conclusion that, such for the city to do the work as it concern to do it. The city's interest at a cost of $80,000, has proven and the city is now seeking to get some take the garbage contract and purse at one-half of its original cost. The net profit by the experience of Los Angeles now on its garbage collecting will have lost ten times more than. By those who have given the sub-ut is believed that a private concern erect the refuse of the city at one-half expayers than if done by the city. Angeles should be looked into before it further toward putting in a system being held in the city of Greater New York, in which men and women, parology of the Negro in the political ussed when the audience was startled to hear one Mrs. Blake, herself a Southern woman, make use of the following: "I don't suppose a woman in this room has seen a real use I am a Southern woman and as if them on my father's estate. But so mixed with black blood that the wiped out. In 100 years from now Volume XV, Number 24. H. R. CAYTON, Publisher. years will have been completely absorbed by the whites is just as apparent as the shining sun. It is impossible and contrary to human nature for a black people to be able to thrive and grow strong numerically, financially and otherwise surrounded by a white people, as is the condition of the black folk in the United States, and those persons who take indignant exceptions to the theory are either ignorant of the facts or are whistling to keep their courage up, hoping that it will not happen. In the United States the number of mixed bloods of white and black parentage has increased from a few hundred thousand at the time of the emancipation to nearly four million at the present time, and yet no one can be charged directly with having brought this about. The white man pretends to be fighting the miscegenation of the whites and the blacks in this country, even taking human life if his women do not live up to his dogma, but forgets all about his beautiful theory when the rule comes up to him, and as a result the mulatto population of the country has increased a thousandfold since the emancipation. Since the shutting down of the tenderloin district in Seattle the wise ones are asking of themselves, "Is a tenderloin district a necessary evil Are Tenderloin Districts Necessary Evils? for a city?" There have always been and always will be fallen women, who will be the consorts of fallen and disreputable men, as well as men who wear the "holier than thou" mask. If there be no district where large numbers of the more brazen and vicious are herded together, these fallen women will flourish just the same. On the other hand, if a district is set aside for them and if every available space allotted to them be occupied, there will still be thousands of them roaming around among the chaste and upright persons. In view of the fact that the "bad" seems to be omnipresent, the question naturally arises, "Is there any specific need of a district being set apart for lewd women, where they can be sought by vicious men?" It is certainly a debatable question, and The Seattle Republican would be glad to get your opinion on the subject. To herd vicious women into one district and permit the same class of men to go and live where fancy leads them is an unfair proposition, and is, in short, class legislation and should not be tolerated. But a few days ago two young married men sat talking to each other. "My wife leaves Saturday for a three months' visit with friends and relatives," said one. "In that case I suppose you will either take rooms at a down-town hotel or a house of ill-fame," was the startling reply of his companion. In reply to the latter question, the first young man declared he had not fully decided which he would do. Had the same remark been made concerning his wife the other fellow's life blood would have paid for the insult, and yet he is a companion of his wife, and his wife has as much moral right to spend her vacation at some house of ill-fame as he, and on returning be considered by her husband just as angelic as the man who had either taken rooms at a house of ill-fame during his wife's absence or spent a great many of his leisure hours therein. The editor of The Seattle Republican raises a mournful wail because of the lynching of three Negroes the day before Thanksgiving, and the apparent apathy of the governor of Tennessee. Need we tell any man why those "niggers" were lynched? No! He Seattle Republican says that no one interfered. Certainly not! The lynching was not done in a moment of high passion. It was an act of calm justice. He calls the Tennesseeans 2 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. IN PROBATE. In the Matter of the Guardianship of William Kenneth A. a minor. No. 9476. Order to Show Cause on Sale of Real Estate. Sarah A. Ross, guardian of the person and aurate of William Kenneth A. a minor over fourteen years of age, having filed her petition in the Court, having fled, praying for that order of this court at private sale of the following real estate of said minor, to-wit: The undivided one-fourth of Tracts Eighteen (18), Nineteen (19), Twenty- six (26) and Thirty-one (31), of Shinns Cloverdale Addition to Kent, according to the recorded plat thereof, all being situated in King County and State of Washington. And it appearing to the court that it will be for the best interest of said mior to sell said described property at private sale and that a better investment of the sale is required, providing to the court that said petition conforms to and is in accordance with the requirements of law in such case made and provided; Now therefore, it is ordered by the court, that said minor and all persons in his estate, by the latter of said sale, be ordered to the Superior Court on the 25th day of November, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a.m. of said day, at the court-room of the Probate Department No. 1, City of Seattle, in said King County, then and why an order of this cause should not be granted to said guardian, authorizing and empowering her to sell the said real estate of said more than 10 acres is further demonstrated that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before said 25th day of November, 1908, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in the said County, King, and of general circulation theplain. Done in open court this 23rd day of Oc- GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge, State of Washington, County of King, I, Otto A. Case, County of King, County, and ex-officio County of the Superior Court of king County State of Washington, of which certify that the foreign, a full, true and correct copy on original order to show cause, made by said court on the 23rd day of October, 1908, in the matter of the guardianship of William Kenneth Ross, a minor. Witness my hand and the seal of said court, this 23rd day on October 11, 2014. [ATTORY A CASE. Clerk. By D. K. SICKELS, Deputy Clerk. Date of first publication, October 23, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, L. H. Plaintiff, vs. Louis Hatch, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. —. Notice and Summons. Said Plaintiff to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, damnants or holders of an interest or state in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1907. The 1907. number B4149 for the delinquent taxes of the years 1903, 1904 and 1905, in the amount of $72.71, and upon real property situated in said King County, less as described as follows, to-wit: L. H. Plaintiff, less 5.58 acres sold, Sec. 29, Tp. 22 N. R. 3 E. That on Aug. 19, 1907, the following portion of the said land was rededited. Beginning at a point 19.26 feet, S. 817.66 feet at a fringe 19.28 feet, N. E. corner of S. 17, 18, 19, 18 and 20, thence S. 37* 41' E. 100 feet, thence S. 52* 19' W. 162.44 feet, thence No. 56* S. 19' W. feet, thence No. 62* S. 28.28 feet, thence N. 52* 19' E. 198.76 feet to be- That on Oct. 14, 1007, the following part of said lot was redeemed, to-will: Beginning at a point 1170 feet So. and W. $5^{\circ}$ 56' W. 20.8 feet from N. W. corner of lot 3, Sec. 20, Tp. 3.20, N. R.3. North north $37^{\circ}$ 41' Tp. 1.30 for true point of beginning, S. $42^{\circ}$ 20' W. 286.30, thence No. $56^{\circ}$ 3' W. 99.53 feet, thence north $52^{\circ}$ 19' east 315.76 feet, thence S. $37^{\circ}$ 41' E. 43.92 feet to place of which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unrepaid taxes upon and on the property. against you, and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be date of first publication after notice, exclusive of the day of said publication, to-wit; within 60 days after October 2, 1908, I have entitled court and actuarial and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and designed attorney for plaintiff at office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with the costs. In case you want to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. Jourt. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. October 2, November 13, 1908. NOTICE AND SUMMONS. NOTICE In the Superior Court of the State of King County. Washington. L. Plaintiff, vs. C. W. Smith, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, Dec. 11 State of Washington, to the above defensives and each of them: You and defensives of you, as owners, claimants or to the hereafter described real estate, are hereby notified the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the King of King County, State of Washington, dated the 20th day of October, 1908, and numbered B54333, for the delinquent taxes of the year in the amount of 90 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as to-wit; That and block 13, Plat of Richmond Beach, Section 2, Twp. 26, N. R. E. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsettiff upon said above described real estate, to-wit: For the year 1904 the sum of 38 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 34 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 32 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 5.92. Which several sums bear interest to the rate of 15 per cent. per annum file in this cause L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. G. MAGGONALD. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 624 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wash. November 13—December 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. George Walter, Plaintiff, vs. Lydia Walter, Defendant. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Lydia Walter; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of the summons, owit, within sixty days after the day of November, 1908, and defend the above court action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the lawyer, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, in case of your failure so, the judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the court. the saxon the object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plains and deconfendant, upon the ground of desertion and cruelty. E. L. SANDERS, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 58 Downs Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. November 13—December 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Mable Waters, Plaintiff, vs. Clark S. Waters, Defendant. Summons for Public. State of Washington to the said Clark S. Waters, defendant in the above entitled case. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of the letter to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 13th month of 1908, and defend the above entitled action, in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy answer upon, and answer the attorney at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the court. clerk. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of idleness, non-support and cruelty. E. L. SANDERS, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 60 Downs Block, Seattle, Washington. November 13 December 25, 1908. PROBATE NOTICE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King ss., the Matter of the Estate of John McDonald, Deceased. No. 8412. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that William B. Gafney and Joseph A. Hyde, the executors of the estate of John McDonald, deceased, are ordered to, and filed in court their final account as such executors, and that Thursday, the 17th day of December, 1908, at 9:30 o'clock, a.m., at the court room, Department of the Superior Court, Department of the Superior Court, Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exception, in writing to said accredit, and Witness, the Hon. Geo. E. Morris, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said court hereto affixed this 12th November, 1908 day of November (Seal) OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By J. A. SIGURDSON, Deputy Clerk. November 13—December 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Ira A. Putnam, Deceased. No. 9489. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 6th day of November, 1908, notice is hereby given to the creditors of and individuals persons having held in said estate, said defendants against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 623 New York Building, the place of business of said estate, in said estate, and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication November 3, 1908. FRANK A. AUSMAN, As Administrator of said Estate, ROBERT H. LINDSAY. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Attorney for Administrator. New York Building, Seattle, Wash. November 13—December 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate. In the Matter of the State of John McDonald, Deceased. No. 8412. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not be Made. HE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN order of distribution should not be made of the residue or said estate among the a heirs and persons in said petition mentioned according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 17th day of December, 1908, and that a copy of the newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 12th day of November, 1908. Signed: GEORGE E. MORRIS, State of Washington, County of King—ss. I, Otto A. A, Case, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio clerk of the Superior Court by the State of Washington, County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court on the 12th day of November, 1908. In the matter of the case of John McDonald, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 12th day of November, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Helen M. Dalton, Plaintiff, vs. Hugh M. Dalton, Defendant. No. 64,020. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Hugh M. Dalton, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 13th day of November, A. D., 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the title titled court of the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been and is completed by the court. The object of the sid action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To obtain the judgment of said court for the divorce of the parties hereto, and dissolving the bonds of matrimony now and hearttofore existing between the parties hereto and seeking to plaintiff to settle the lawsuit, and bear the name of Helen M. Schroeder, and for costs of action. P. O. Address: Room No. 517 New York Building, City of Seattle, County of Kling, State of Washington. November 13—December 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Emma Nancarrow, Deceased. No. 7608. Order Approving Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should not be Taken. Clifford H. Anderson, administrator of the estate of Emma Nancarrow, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and payment for the estate now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said position sets forth the requirements for the distribution of the residue of said estate! It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Emma Nancarrow, deceased, Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate department of said court in City of Seattle, on the 17th day in the A.M. of said day then and there to show, if any they have, why said final account should not be approved and an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the persons entitled by law, It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County and published once a week for four successive weeks before the sale. If a December, 1908 newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 10th day of November, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King—ss. Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King and ex-officio clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court on behalf of the estate of Emma Nancarrow, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 10th day of November, 1908. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By J. A. SIGURDSON. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of Kling. Walter H. Oliver, Plaintiff, vs. Mamie Oliver, Defendant. Ko. The State of Washington to the said Mamie Oliver, Defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this summons, to-wit: day of November, 1908, and defend the titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be given. You according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of cruelty and adultery. ELIAS A. WRIGHT. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Rooms 629-631 Burke Bulldg, Seattle, King County, Wash. Nov. 27, 1908-Jan. 8, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County James A. Rook, Plaintiff, vs. Lillian Rook, Defendant—No. 64033. Summons by Publication. Notice of Washington to the said Lillian Rook. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days (60) days after the 13th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action, the above complaint of the plaintiff, the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been fulfilled and would be obtained. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of the above entitled court dissolving the bonds of marmimony now and heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant. J. Y. C. KELLOGG, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 514 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Jessie White, Plaintiff, vs. Ward W. White, Detendant. No. ____. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said above named defendant, Ward W. White: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons to wit: within sixty days after the 6th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned by way for a court office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object is to prove a divorce from defendant on the grounds of cruelty, drunkenness and abandonment. E. M. FARMER, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address to Bldg. Seattle King County, Washington. November 6—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR CITY OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Gus Strand, Deceased on 9101. Notice for the Estate. Notice is hereby given that in pursuance of an order of sale made and entered by the Superior Court of King County, Washington, on the 24th day of September, A. D. 1908, in the mid of the estate and had deceased, the willer and administrator of said estate, will sell at public auction, subject to confirmation by said court, the following described real property, to-wit Tract twenty (20), Barto's Acre Tracts, in Georgetown, King County, in Wellington. Sale said will be made on the 12th day, 1908, at ten o'clock in the forement of said day at the front door of the County Court House in the said County of King, in the City of Seattle, State of Washington. Terms of sale, for cash, gold coin of the United States; ten per cent of the bid payable at the time of sale and the balance upon confirmation by said court. Dated September 24th, 1908. H. S. NOICE, Administrator of the Estate of Gus Strand, Deceased. September 25, October 23, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the State of King In the Matter of the Insolvency of H. P. Gilbert, doing business as Richmond Beach Lumber Company. No. 60387. Notice of Assignment and Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given that H. P. Gilbert, doing business as Richmond Beach Lumber Company, has made an assignment of all of his property for the benefit of creditors to W. H. Schumacher, assignee, and are hereby told that their claims against said insolvent debtor, under oath, to W. H. Schumacher at Rooms 615-616 New York Block, in Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of transacting the business of said debtor, is the estate, within three months from the first publication of this notice, to-wit, within three months from the 25th day of September, 1908. W. H. SCHUMacher, Assignee of H. P. Gilbert, doing business as Richmond Beach Lumber Company, an insolvent debtor. Date of first publication: September 25th, 1908. September 25, November 6, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Israel O. Negus, Deceased. No. 9259. Notice to Creditors. Estate of said court made herein on the 10th day of September, 1908, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary, to the unpaid administrator of said estate at 1048 Kilbourne Avenue, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 25th, 1908. A. J. GODDARD, As Administrator of said Estate. KARR & GREGORY. Attorneys for Estate. 715 American Bank Building, Seattle, Wash. September 25, October 23, 1908. NOTICE AND SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants, and enclosed You and seekers, and the owners, or claimants of an interest in the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one delinquent tax certificate, issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of WaWashington, to the holder of seekers, and numbered B21531, for delinquent taxes of the year 1900, in the amount of $5.75, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: South 16 feet of lot 4, block 2, of H. L. Yesler's First Addition to the King Seattle. That the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1901, the sum of $5.68; For the year 1902, the sum of $6.89; For the year 1903, the sum of $6.30; For the year 1904, the sum of $6.90; For the year 1906, the sum of $9.00; For the year 1907, the sum of $10.50 Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said persons, each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to write to the said person, 1908. In the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with the amount of costs. If the fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property FRIDAY, DECEMBER 11, 1908. for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged against and found against positively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wash. (Sept. 25, Nov. 6, 1908.) SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. Lettler V. Bussel, Plaintiff, vs. Phillip Hibst, Defendant. The State of Washington, to Phillip Hibst, detendant: You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the day after the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the date of the first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the 25th day of September, answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for the plaintiff, below named at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment, to the demand of the complaint of plaintiff, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of this action is to secure a divorce by the ground of cruelty and to have the former name of plaintiff restored to her. A. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff Office and Postoffice Address: 524 S. 10th St. New York, Wash. (Sept. 25, Nov. 1908) NOTICE AND SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for Kling County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all person unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the cerealnerafter described Property Debt. State of Washington, to the above defendants, and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or e-tate in and to the hereinafter described real property, named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate, issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of December, 1903, and numbered B21532 for the subsequent axes, and B21534 for the subsequent axes, 45.75, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: South 16 feet of lot 5, block 1, of H. L. Yesler's First Addition to the City of Seattle. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid, plaintiff upon said real property, to-wit: 1 For the year 1901, the sum of $5.682; For the year 1902, the sum of $6.69; For the year 1903, the sum of $6.30; For the year 1904, the sum of $6.90; For the year 1906, the sum of $9.00; For the year 1907, the sum of $11.34; Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid balances upon and against, said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of publication, and with the exclusion of the day of said first publication to-wit: within 60 days after September 25, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff to have served the said taxes, undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes, real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against the plaintiff in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 624 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wash. (Sept. 25, Nov. 6, 1908.) NOTICE AND SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Kling County. Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described property to the State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, or claimants of an interest in the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above amount is the subsequent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of December, 1903, and numbered B22124, for the delinquent taxes of the years 1901 and 1902, in the amount of six hundred and sixty-five dollars situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: West 40.09 feet of lot 4, block "A" H. L. Yesler's First Addition to the City of Seattle. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said real estate. For the year 1903, the sum of $6.86; For the year 1904, the sum of $8.71; For the year 1905, the sum of $8.71; For the year 1906, the sum of $8.97; For the year 1907, the sum of $10.14. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and all the taxes upon and said real property. A. C. MACDONALD, L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Balley Bldg., Seattle, Wash. (Sept. 25. Nov. 6. 1908.) 4 SEATTLE REPUBLICAN SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Published Every Friday, 307 Epler Blk. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton.....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton.....Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. One Year .....$3.00 Six Months .....1.50 Three Months .....75 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matter. If the Gray matter of the King County Republican Club does not give the politicians Piles of trouble, then we miss our guess. Chancellor Loyd-George declared a few days ago in a public gathering of eight thousand that a majority of the members of parliament favored woman's suffrage. Royal Raymond has abdicated in favor of Boyd P. Doty, and thereby hangs a tale in which two women and an abused wife play conspicuous parts. But of the dead speak no evil. When England finds it utterly impossible to transport 1,000 Hindus from British Columbia to British Honduras how absurdly ridiculous is the talk of importing the ten million black folk in the United States to a foreign land. Mr. Real Estate had his day in court last Saturday, and as a result he is half a million dollars to the good. While it was the inside man who reaped such a harvest, yet it will have a marked effect on the outside man. Whether or not President Roosevelt ends his administration in a flame of glory will be a matter of individual opinion, but there is no doubt of him ending it in a series of letter writing in which will be found much inflammable matter. If Champ Clark, of Missouri, as minority leader in the house of representatives of Congress, will only make as big an ass of himself as did John Sharp Williams, of Mississippi, the Republicans will be able to pass some much-needed legislation. Perhaps there was no rake-off in the purchase of the Panama canal, but if not, then it was the first thing of its kind that has been pulled off in America for many years in which Mr. Rake-Off's fine Italian hand did not play a conspicuous part. "Whether or not tenderloin districts are necessary evils to insure the rapid growth of municipalities I am not going to discuss, but I am going on record as saying the present tenderloin district in Seattle is out of business for keeps, even if no other one is opened," was Councilman Way's ultimatum. That seems to be the only Way, especially in the city council, to do things. "Piles Will Fight for a Big Navy" is a Times headline. Let us suggest that he not overlook the fact that a like increase in the army is even more essential than in the navy, as he might effectively use the army in Eastern Washington two years hence when he will have to battle for his re-election. NORTHWEST BRIEFS. Senator W. H. Paulhamus made his usual weekly round-up in Seattle this week. Work has been started on the Vancouver Carnegie library building. State Senator-elect J. A. Falenor was a visitor in Seattle, but declared he knew nothing politically. The nine-day campaign at Olympia for a fund of $15,000 to erect a new Y. M. C. A. building netted $15,600. The Twin Falls County Poultry Association will hold its first annual show at Twin Falls, Idaho, January 28-30, 1909. Competition will be open to all. It is reported that there are something like 2,000 unemployed men in the city of Seattle at present, with the number rapidly on the increase. Plans are being discussed by those interested in the various charities of the city to devise relief measures. The great Columbia river salmon industry furnishes employment for 10,000 men during four months of the year, during which time they can earn sufficient to keep their families in comfort the rest of the year without further work. Rev. A. A. Metcalf, of Pasco, with the hope of saving the life of one of his flock, permitted a pint of blood to be transferred from his body to that of Freeman Keith. The sacrifice, however, proved unavailing, as the boy died soon after from a case of advanced gangrene. The fact that the board of supervisors of Whitman college have under advisement the matter of offering a free scholarship to cover a period of four years in that institution to one boy in each of the eighty-nine counties of the three Northwest states of Oregon, Idaho and Washington, is creating much favorable comment through the three states in question. The Rt. Rev. J. O'Dea, D. D., bishop of Seattle, assisted by a number of other eminent clergymen from every part of the Northwest, presided at the dedication in Spokane of the Catholic Church of Our Lady of Lourdes. The new church is one of the most beautiful temples in the entire Northwest. Charles Dana Gibson, the great artist, and Norman Hapgood, editor of Collier's Weekly, recent visitors in Seattle, spent several days at the exposition grounds, studying the points of prospective interest and enjoying the scenery around the university. They expressed the opinion that the exposition would be one of the greatest ever held in the world and unquestionably the most beautiful one. George Weatherwax, a pioneer of Aberdeen and also a well-known man of that section of the state, died at his home last Saturday and was buried Monday. Mr. Weatherwax was prominent in the affairs of state, especially in the Southwest, for a number of years. Henry Brown, an Everett pioneer, died at his home last Sunday. Guardian Life INSURANCE CO. OF SEATTLE THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Mr. Brown was born a slave and was sold twenty-six times, at one time bringing to his owners something over $13,000. He stood well among the Everett citizens and his death was generally regretted. Judge O. V. Linn, who was twice elected judge of the superior court for Thurs.on and Mason counties, died at his home in Olympia last Sunday evening after an illness lasting a few weeks. Judge Linn was a well-known attorney and counsellor and was considered an able jurist. The Seattle Credit Men's Association has decided to ask the legislature to pass a law making it a prison offense for a business man to misrepresent, in any way, his assets in order to gain credit. The macadamized roadway between Tacoma and Seattle which will, according to plans, be completed in the spring, will be the finest in the state. Hon. H. L. Strowbridge, executive commissioner of the State of Washington for the A.-Y.-P. Exposition, died at a local hospital last Monday evening after a brief illness. Mr. Strowbridge was well and favorably known all over the state and his death will be regretted by hundreds of friends and admirers. His work in getting the exhibit of the state for the exposition was meeting with singular success and he was full of hope and pride for the exhibit which he planned to show off the state to the best advantage. His home was in Everett, where he has resided for a number of years. He was twice elected to the legislature from that city, and for the past two years has been working on the exposition exhibit of the state. "THE LAW'S DELAY." In an address delivered during the week before the convention of the National Municipal League at Pittsburg, Attorney General Bonaparte discussed what he was pleased to term the defects in American criminal law. He believes, as most laymen have long ago concluded, that the gravest fault lies in the seemingly endless delays which frequently intervene between the commission of crime and the punishment of its author. "Why need there be a foretaste of eternity," he asked, "between arrest and indictment, another between indictment and trial, and yet another between trial and actual punishment?" The legitimate functions of the criminal law, as he defines them, are, "First, to find out when and by whom the people's will has been disobeyed; and, second, to so deal with the one guilty of such disobedience that others, and ordinarily himself as well, may be taught to obey in future." As instruments to these ends he confessed himself of the opinion that "in large measure it fails of its purpose." But in seeking the causes of this failure the attorney general ran plump upon an abuse which transfers a large share of the fault from the law itself to the shoul- ders of its ministers. The delays occur, he declared, "partly because the bench and professional opinion among the bar-tolerate all kinds of dilatory, frivolous and often ridiculous proceedings on the part of counsel to cheat justice of her plain due; partly because our lawmakers afford almost infinite facilities for review of judicial action to the criminal, although being very stingy in allowing them to the government; but mainly because our laws show little sense of the value to society of a speedy administration of justice." It will be seen that while Mr. Bonaparte is disposed to deal gently with the members of his profession, he cannot, in fairness and strict truth, acquit them of at least a partial responsibility for the tedious delays of which he, in common with so many others, complain. As a matter of fact, there are many who believe, not without reason, that the modes of practice fashioned by the unwritten laws of bench and bar are more at fault than the laws themselves. It is one of the fundamentals of our system of criminal jurisprudence that the accused shall be given every reasonable opportunity. The burden of proof is upon the accusers and the defendant's guilt must be established beyond a reasonable doubt. Few persons, we daresay, would seriously advocate the abrogation of that principle, or deny to the convicted defendant the right of appeal to the courts of review. But the appeal thus provided was planned to assist, rather than to thwart, justice; whereas in the practice that presently obtains, it is as often used to balk as to aid. As for the delays, they are far oftener chargeable to the complaisance of attorneys and courts than to the law. Continuances are too frequently granted by consent, in deference to the traditions of "professional courtesy." In the absence of a' better defense, attorneys for accused persons too frequently resort to dilatory tactics, technicalities and the like. It sometimes happens that the wrangle over technical points obscures the real purposes of the trial, both in the inferior and the superior courts. A trifling error in the pleading, which has no bearing on the guilt or innocence of the defendant, becomes the basis of appeal and the foundation for a reversal of verdicts. The mistake of a clerk, the oversight of nonessentials by a prosecuting lawyer, serves to offset the sworn and positive testimony of eye-witnesses to the crime. American criminal laws are no doubt defective—they have been so often amended to defeat the technical pleas urged by shrewd lawyers and upheld by the courts that they could hardly be otherwise. But in spirit most of them are sound, contemplating the protection of the innocent and the punishment of the guilty. Some of the last-named owe their immunity to sentimental or cowardly juries, but far more escape through the dilatory practices FRIDAY, DECEMBER 11, 1908 countenanced by bench and bar. Once these are placed under the ban—and their elimination would not increase the peril of the innocent—complaint of "the law's delay" would grow beautifully less, the congestion of court dockets would be relieved and the end of justice would be far better served. New Orleans Times-Democrat. BUSINESS DIRECTORY E. N. BROOKS & CO. For Frills For Men. HIGH CLASS HABERDASHERY 1331 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance 529 Colman Blk., Phone Main 695 TREEN SHOE COMPANY Always Carry the Best. Customers Carefully Cared For. 707 First Ave., Seattle, Wash. W. H. FINCK Pioneer Jeweler and Watch Maker. Our Holiday Specials Unequaled. 816 Second Avenue, Seattle, Wash. The Comfort. Newly furnished rooms. Walking distance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. L. ISRAEL WALKER, 1101-1108 Jackson Street. PURCELL'S SAFE COMPANY Halls Safe and Lock Co.'s Safes and Vaults. Phones Main 667; Ind. 3197 312 Occidental Ave., Seattle, Wash Stetson & Post Mill Co. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. WILLIAM WALKER. Complete stock New Fall Goods, Ladies', Misses' and Children's Wear- ing Apparel, Furs and Fine Coats. 820 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Electric Flx tures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. Scandinavian American Bank Write Today for a copy of "THE BANK ACCOUNT" a new, neat little 8-page paper as full of good things as an egg is of meat. MAILED FREE. The Scandinavian-American Bank, Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Puget Sound National Bank. OF SEATTLE JACOB FURTH .....President J. S. GOLDSMITH .....Vice-President R. V. ANKENY .....Cashier CORRESPONDENTS IN ALL THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE. LRAFTS ISSUED ON ALASKA AND THE YUKON TERRITORY. People's Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R. J. Reekle, Vice Presst. Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. Commercial Savings and Trust General Bank and Exchan. re. Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash. --- FRIDAY, DECEMBER 11, 1908. POLITICS, | so hard that it still feels itself hit- ting on the bottom, yet it is said that the most active members of the ring are laying plans to again eome to the front by geiting good Positions in the court house, the people to the contrary notwith- standing. The program by which they hope to bring this about will be to induce the governor to ap- point Assessor Parish on the state tax commission, thereby making a vacancy in the assessor’s office. Parish, son of the present assessor, is to be named by the county com- missjoners to succeed his father, and E. ©. Brier, chief deputy in the auditor’s office“at present, is to be chief deputy assessor and the nthe help in the assessor’s of- fice is to be reorganized, and as many of the leeches now in the auditor’s office as possible will be taken care of. George Russell was to take care of a goodly number of them, but his unwillingness to qualify threw an unexpected bomb in their eamp and the most of the leeches will be down and out after January 11th. eee Much U. S. senatorial talk is be- ing indulged in by the Times and other papers of the state as to a successor of Senator Piles, and two years before Senator Piles will come up for re-election, all of which is due to the fact, that Sen- ator Piles seems to be in line to fol- low in the wake of Senator An- keny, who last summer, in making his campaign for re-election, ‘‘only touched in high places.’’ That Senator Piles will have trouble when he comes before the voters for endorsement is verily believed at this time by even his best po- litical advisors and all because he is not in sympathy with the great mass of the voters of the state. In the senate Senator Piles represents one class of voters to the detri- ment of the great majority of the voters, who, if he is ever elected, will have to elect him. eee Prosecuting Attorney Mackin- tosh has given the county commis- sioners an opinion to the effect that, Matt H. Gormley will hold the office of county treasurer for another term, owing to the fact that George F. Russell will not qualify for the office. Mr. Russell has been named and confirmed as postmaster of Seattle and will take over that office December 15th. eee It is claimed that the game of politics is having a great deal to do with the police embroglio in Seattle. Mayor Miller may be dead next to himself in running the office of mayor, but if he is wise he will have the politics of the police department cut out and name a chief of police that will clear the city of the thugs that are daily flocking to her. The gen- eral public would say amen to you, Mr. Mayor, if you would say to Charley Wappenstein to take charge of the police department and run it just as you did under Mayor Moore. Wappenstein is the best chief of police that Seattle has even had and no one knows that better than John F. Miller. ‘‘An elastic conscience, a reel of graft, a hook of gold, a bait qsnur ol JO Joy B puB e130\s Jo be possessed by him who wishes to fish in Republican waters,’’ edi- torially declares the Seatile ‘Times. We cheefully commend this vul- gar vernacular to those Republic- ans who take their political dope from this political hydra-headed monster which tries to be a Repub- lican dictator and denouncer at one and the same time. SHOULD STAND TOGETHER. The Daily Chronicle is informed that a movement is on foot to have the members of the legislature from Southwestern Washington stand together in the interest of legislation needed by this section of the state. We hope that those who are working to accomplish this result will be successful. In union there is strength, and only by united action can the members from the several counties in this part of the state hope to accom- plish those things which are de- sired by their constituents. It is only by a united effort on the part of the Southwestern representa- tives that they ean hope to accom- plish anything in the face of unit- ed delegations from other sections of the state. There are two things which the people of Southwestern Washing- ton desire from the legislature which meets in January. First of all they want such legislation as will insure the early completion of state roads already projected. It is not altogether on account of the direct benefit that will be derived from such roads that the demand arises; but the people realize that road construction by the state in a practical and thorough manner will set an example for local gov- ernments in the matter of road building. ‘ The second demand of South- western Washington from the coming legislature is for a state appropriation for a Southwestern Washington Fair. Here, again, the demand is not based upon the expectation of direct benefits from the expenditure of the money of the state, but upon the fact that such appropriation will be the foundation upon which shall be built an association having for its object the exhibition of the indus- tries and resources of this section. Both of these demands upon the legislature are legitimate, Every member of that body from every part of the state can conscientious- ly support measures intended to produce such results. Particular- ly should the members from South- western Washington support such measures; and it is only by united action that they can make their work effective. Other sections of the state are united for such meas- ures as they are particularly inter- ested in. If the members from the Southwest are not united, they will be permitted to vote for what the other members want—and then return home with an empty hand. The members of the legislature from Southwestern Washington can get what their constituents want if they stand together until their demands are granted. If they divide their strength they will get nothing. They should therefore stand to- gether.—Centralia Chronicle. SOME SHADY RECORDS. Roval Ravmond. he of political Royal Raymond, he of political anti-saloon fame in the State of Washington, who for the past year or more has put in so many strenu- ous hours to preserve the homes of others, seems to have over- looked his own, and as a result THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN SO OSE HEM ee GTR Pie Gye tee charging him with infidelity and naming two women as co-respond. ents. Mr. Raymond, on hearing the news, quickly resigned from the superintendency of the Anti- Saloon League in this state and was succeeded by B. P. Doty. -The divorce scandal of the Ray- monds brings to mind an article that appeared in print last sum- mer, which was a brief review of the social side of the leaders of the Anti-Saloon League. The story was never denied, hence there must have been more truth than poetry in it. Here is the story as published : Truth, a paper published at De- troit, started an _ investigation some months ago of the affairs of the Michigan Anti-Saloon League, and has given the following as the result of that investigation: O. A. Wright, first superintend- ent of Detroit; fled from the city as a result of a scrape with a woman. John Brant, state superintend- ent, forced to resign after the board of directors found he had ‘feleaned up’’ $10,000 in two years. Rev. R. G. Malone, superintend- ent of the Grand Traverse district, arrested for licentious conduct; fled the state; now in the employ of Minnesota league. Rev. Geo. Kulp, league orator, Grand Rapids, arrested for adul- tery. George Eberhardt, president Grand Rapids league, ostracized for trying to shield Kulp after Kulp had been found with Eber- hardt’s wife. D. H. Burwell, field secretary for the league, arrested for in- decent conduet with small boys. Rev. Ralph Baldwin, league ora- for at Saginaw, fled after being exposed in a liaison with a De- troit woman. ° Rev. John M. Wright, an or- ganizer for the league from Mus- kegon, proven guilty of perjury in a divorce case. Rey. J. Printer, a branch coun- ty league organizer, fled the state to escape arrest for bigamy, Rey. Charles Kjrehner, St. Clair county league, organizer and ora- tor, betrayed his foster daughter. Rey. Jos. St. John, Pontias, a member of the league’s force of workers, serving a term for as- saulting a Colored girl. Rey. J. R. Andrews, a Lansing league orator, expelled from church and arrested for blackniail. Rev. S. A. Northrop, one of the league’s most gifted orators at Owossa, expelled from his church for undue intimacy with a woman of the congregation. Rey. John Smith, a Grand Rap- ids league orator and ardent sup- porter, eloped with one of the women of his chureh. Rey. Dr. J. G. Holliday, Manis- tee county organizer, expelled from his church for swindling. Rev. Wm. P. Squires, Bay City organizer and orator for the league, expelled from his churel for falsehood and swindling. Rey. C. A. Marshall, league worker and orator at Corunna, ex nelled fram ehnrch for. lieentians be impossible to find any worse. But, after all, the right or justice of a movement cannot be decided by looking at the men who are working for or against it, although many do consider that point. Ever since Bible times liquor has been made and drunk, and no man living will ever see the time when it will not be. But just as long as the Anti-Saloon League and other kindred organizations con- tinue to employ this class of men until they are found out, and just as long as we have saloon men who are honest and upright and who live such lives that not a single word can be said against them except that they run saloons, just so long will the thinking peo- ple continue of the opinion that there are two sides to the saloon question, and that there is at least a strong argument whether it is better to allow saloons to be run by honest men, in an honest man- ner, under police restrictions, or whether it is better to make the conduct of a saloon a crime, the operator a criminal, and the man who takes a drink the aider and abettor of a misdemeanor and a breaker of the law. POLITICS. The opponents of Charles F. Murphy’s leadership within Tam- many Hall are preparing for a fight against him at the September primaries. % John B. Sheatz, treasurer of the State of Pennsylvania, has an- nounced his candidacy for the ‘United States Senate in opposition to Senator Penrose. A suit has been filed in Ohio to test the constitutionality of the Rose local option law, by which more than half the counties of that State-have voted out saloons, Adlai F, Stevenson, the defeated Demoeratie candidate for Govern- or of Illinois, is said to be prepar- ing to seek a legislative recount of the votes cast for himself and Charles S. Deneen at the Novem. ber election, | Senator John W. Daniel of Vir- ginia, who is to be voted for in the primary of next year, is again to have a clear field, as he has al- ways had since his first election ‘to the United States Senate. In New York the impression ex- ists that Timothy Woodruff, who buried his senatorial aspirations in favor of Elihu Root, will be re- warded by President Taft with an appointment to a foreign embassy, probably to the court of St. James. Never before in the history of Virginia have so many local and State contests for office been erowded into one year as will be fought out in 1909. The new State constitution made violent changes concerning the terms of officers and the time for the election of many of them, and also made a large number of appointive offices elective by the people. EQUAL SUFFRAGE FOR WOMEN. ‘When the women of Washing- ton present their petition to the legislature at its next session in January, asking for the right of suffrage, it will number among its signatures such names as Madame Lillian Nordica, Miss Cecile Buek, Miss Maude Powell, Miss Anne Ford and Miss May Mukle. An 5 Py a oe ee 9 CE RE an oat eee! NO eee and has been placed in our collee- tion at headquarters in the Ar- eade building. During Madame Nordica’s stay in the city she was visited by a group of local suf- fragists. When asked the ques- tion, ‘‘Dou you indorse the pres- ent movement for the political emancipation of women?’’ she re- [plied with great feeling, ‘‘Yes, indeed, I do, I am a suffragist om the crown of my head to the toe of my boot. I am interested in all things that mean advance- ment, and especially am I inter- ested in all things that will ren- der conditions better for women,’”’ Such seems to be the attitude taken by all the great artists who have appeared here this season. Miss Powell, the world’s famous violinist, of whom all America is proud, expressed great sympathy with the work and introduced us to the other members of the trio, Miss Anne Ford, pianist, and Miss May Mukle, violincellist, who have won fame both here and abroad. She smiled whimsically as she made the introduction, for well she knew that she had a pleas- ant surprise for us. Miss Ford and Miss Mukle were both suf- fragettes! They had taken an active part in the movement in England and had marched in that glorious London parade, Miss Mukle, the beautiful young ’eell- ist, leading the musicians and ear- rying aloft the Jenny Lind ban- ner. In speaking of the suf- fragette methods Miss Ford said: “Some people may censure us for the militant means we English women are using, but I am sure those who study the question will see that, because of the vast dif- ferences in the conditions of the two countries, what is effectual here is useless there. Instead of harm, we have done the suffrage movement all over the world a lereat amount of good. Until the English women began their cam- phign the question was practically dead, and now it seems as though the papers cannot get too much suffrage news. That is what we need, We must start people thinking.’’ Miss Ford’s vivid ae- | count of the struggle for political freedom that is going on across [the water recalled to our minds the great revolution which the working men of England went throngh more than a century ago to gain legislation for themselves as a class. The English women are in the same position today. Because of economie conditions their awakening has been delayed. The necessity of a militant move- | ment is obvious. Miss Cecile Buek, | the soprano soloist, who sang at the Moore last Wednesday and |‘Phursday nights, has been a suf- fragist for two years. Only a few months ago she returned from England and tells of many inter- esting experiences she had in the work there. While in London she heard Miss Christabel Pankhurst plead a case in court for her | mothe and Mrs. Drummond who |had been arrested for issuing a ‘manifesto inviting the people to assist the suffragettes in storming |the houses of parliament. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE SENATE, Washington, in and for King County. Michel A. Provo, Plaintiff, vs. Clara Anderson Provo, Defendant. No. 637500. Summons for Publication. State of Washington to said Clara Anderson. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from the date of the first publication of this summons, to wait; on the 20th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court of complaint to the plaintiff and serve a motion for your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their offices stated below. In case of your failure to do so, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands in plaintiff's complaint has been filed in the court of the Court moved stated. This case is brought the plaintiff to obtain a decree of divorce from said defendant on the grounds of willful desertion. FREUDENBERG & HEATON Attorneys for Plaintiff No. 610-611 New York Block, Seattle, Washington 1900 January 1 1900 November 20—January 1, 190. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Ina E. Foster, Plaintiff, vs. Norman B. Foster, Defendant. No. Summons for Publication. State of Washington to said Norman B. Poster. You are hereby summoned to appear with sixty days from the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: on the 20th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the Court to serve a copy of the attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of plaintiff's complaint, which was filed with the Clerk to said Court. This cause is by the plaintiff to obey the decree of divorce from said defendant on the grounds of willful desertion and nonsupport. sertion BND FREUDENBERG & HEATON Attorneys for Plaintiff No. 610-611 New York Block, Seattle, Washington Washington. November 20—January 1, 190. SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. NOTICE. State of Washington, County of King, —ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an order of sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 19th day of November, 1898, the Clerk thereof, in the name of James Dignan, plaintiff, versus Joseph B. Johnson and Annie M. Johnson, his wife, defendants, No. 60182, and me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered Notice is hereby given that I will proceed in the case of a auction to the pigskin bidder for cash, within the hours described by law for Sheriff's sales, to wit: at 10 o'clock a. m. on the 19th day of December, A. D. 1908, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the following descriptive property, situated in King State of Washington, to-wit: Lots two (2) and three (3) in block sixty-four (64) of Terry's Second Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, to satisfy a land grant, forecloser of the mortgage amounting to the value of the thousand five hundred sixty-five and 88/100 ($24,565.88) dollars, and cost of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 12th day of November, 1908 85. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff, W. C. WILSON, W. WILSON, November 13—December 11, 1908. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. Washington. L H. Plaintiff, vs. C. A. Cook, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property. Defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendant, and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are herehither described real owner and the plaintiff is the holder of the certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 20th day of October, 1908, and numbered 1804 for the delinquent tax of the years 1902 to 1906, inclusive, in the amount of $3.89, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Second class side lands in front of SE 42 W. of 5, 8W. of SE 42 W. That the case for the year 1907 have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, in the sum of 49 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of the year 1907 to all the unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice exclusive of the day of said first publication of within sixty days after number 13, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. in case you fail to answer with notice or ordered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, nor said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the charge and charged at it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff A. C. MacDONALD. November 13—December 25, 1908. NOTICE AND SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. C. A. Cook, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property in the State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, for the period ofber. 1908, and numbered BH44362, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1902. In the amount of $3.86, and upon the real property situated in said King County, de- tide lands fronting Lot. 2 Section 8. Tw. 22. N. R. $ 3. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the printiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1903, the sum of $2.09; for the year 1904, the sum of $2.71; for the year 1905, the sum of $2.73; for the year 1906, the sum of $2.42; for the year 1907, the sum of $2.73. Which several sums be nearest at the rate of 5 per annum from the said date of payment and are all the unpaid unredeemed taxes upon and against sold real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of the day of said first publication, to-will: within sixty (60) days after November 13, 1908. In the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff of the day of said first publication, the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be given for the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said taxes for the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as proved in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD. November 13—December 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the Gov't of King. May A. Taylor, Plaintiff, vs. W. M. Taylor, Defendant. No. 64.044. Summons. The State of Washington to W. M. Taylor, defendant. The supreme summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the thirteenth day of November, 1908, and defend the entitled action and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff, at their office, below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judge, in the course of your judgment to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The plaintiff in the above entitled action, May A. Taylor, prays the court for an absolute divorce from the defendant, W. M. Taylor, and for the custody of a minor child, the issue of said marriage. EDWARD MEAKIN & CUSHING, Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 403-4 New York Block, Seattle, Wash. The above to be published for six consecutive weeks, once each week, in the Seattle Republican beginning Nov. 13, 1908. BOYD J. TALLMAN, Judge. November 13—December 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. The State of Washington to the said Susan A. Moore and John Doe Moore, her husband, A. C. Edwards and Mary Doe Edwards, his wife, American Loan and Trust Company of Boston, a corporation, his wife, Marcellus Lara and Mary Doe Lara, his wife, The Commonwealth Title and Trust Company of Philadelphia, a corporation, King County, State of Washington, a municipal corporation, Henry A. Webster and Mary Doe Webster, his wife, A. B. Wyckoff and Mary Doe Wykoff, his wife, Julia E. Blinn and John May Wykoff, his wife, George W. Blair and Mary Doe Tarbell (or Torbell), his wife, John W. White and Mary Doe White, his wife, Thomas T. Minor and Mary Doe Minor, his wife, and Kate M. Balley, widow of George W. Balley, Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Company, a corporation, and all persons claiming to be members of the deeded trusts' complaint but which persons are unknown to plaintiffs. Defendants: You, and each of you, are hereby summoned to appear, within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication hereof and defend the above entitled action by the Supreme Court of the State of Washington for King County aforesaid; and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiffs at their offices below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the court of said court. The object of this action is to clear title to that certain property described as blocks one (1) to six (6) inclusive; lots fourteen (14) and fifteen (15) of block seven (7); block nine (9); lots one (1); twenty-six (26) of block eleven (11); blocks fourteen (14) and fifteen (15); lots one (1) to five (5) inclusive; block nineteen (19); blocks twenty (20), twenty-one (21) and twenty-two (22); all of lots and blocks being so certain that little is held as Groveland Park an Addition to King County, State of Washington; in which the said defendants, and each of them, claim some lien or interest, which lien or interest is sought to be foreclosed and declared void and no effect, and that the plaintiffs in no effect, on said property be quieted in said action. November 6—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Harriet V. Griffiths, Plaintiff, vs. Wm. L. Griffiths, Defendant. No. 63386. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Wm. L. Griffiths, said named defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the summons. Within sixty days after the date of the summons, defend the said days. November, 1908, and defend the above en- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN 185 titted actua in the above entitled court, said and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, sit; and serve a copy of your answer upon 189 the undersigned attorney for said plaintiff, tiff at his office below stated; and in case 173 of your failure so to do, judgment will be 186 issued, according to the 183 denand of the complaint, which has been the filed with the clerk of said court. The said object of said suit is to obtain a decree of said court dissolving the bonds of 187 matrimony existing between them, 184 the said court is to grant the said plaintiff the control and custody of their 18y minor child, on the ground of abandon- ment and failure to support. Date of first publication November 13th, 1908. W. W. FELGER. Plaintiff's Attorney. Post Office Address: Room 28 Downs Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. November 13—December 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Harriet E. Bates, Plaintiff, vs. Ora G. Bates defendant. No. — Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Ora. C. Rates. Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: Within sixty (60) days after the 6th day of November 1908, and thus the above entitled action, above entitled claim, below be the complaint of plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, below be filled with the of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure a divorce on the grounds of non-support, cruel treatment and the infliction of personal indignities reading life burdens. HORACE A, WILSON, Plaintiff's Attorney, P, O. Address: 314 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. November 6—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, William Dorris and Maria Dorris, wife, Plaintiffs, vs. James Lellan and the plaintiffs, in the case of the said James Lellan if the said James M. McLellan be deceased, Joseph M. Barto, and the unknown heirs of the said Joseph M. Barto if the said Joseph M. Barto be deceased, and all persons unknown or claiming to have been in the prosecution in the complaint here- Defendants. No. 62446. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to each and all of said defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the summons, towitt: within sixty days after the 30th of October, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the above of the plaintiffs and serve a copy attorney for plaintiffs at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be against you according the demand of the plaintiffs herein which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to quiet title to the following described property in King County to-to-wit: (2) Boston Heights Supplemental Addition to the City of Seattle, and to forever enjoin and debar the said defendants, and each of them, from assisting in claim whatsoever in and to obtain the lands and premises and to obtain a decree decreeing that the said defendants, and each and all of them have no interest whatsoever in the said property and that plaintiffs' title is given. Office and Post Office Address: Rooms 604-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 30—Dec. 13, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County—In Probate. In the Matter of the Guardianship of Mildred J. Wells and Carl Joe Wells, Minors No. 9441. Order to Show Cause on Sale of Real Estate. Bessie I. Wells, guardian of the persons and estates of Mildred J. Wells and Carl Joe Wells, minors, having filed her petition in this court, duly verified, praying for an order of this court for the sale of all the real estate and interest in mining claims belonging to said wards, for the purposes therein set forth. And it appearing to the court from said petition that it is to the best interests of said wards and their estate to sell all of said real estate belonging to said wards, as well as said mansion and it appearing to the court that said petition must be to and is in accordance with the requirements of law, in such case made and provided: It is, therefore, by the court ordered, that all persons interested in said estate appear before said Superior Court on 3rd day of December, the hour of 9:30 a.m. in the foreon of said court, the court room of the probate department of said Superior Court in the City of Seattle, in said King County, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this court should not be granted to said guardian, horizzing and empowering her to sell the real estate and said wards as prayed for in said petition. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before the 3rd day of December. Seal the newspaper printed at published in said County of King, and of geographical circulation therein. Done in open court on this 23th day of October, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS. Judge. B. B. MOSER, 10 Haller Blk. Attorney for Guardian. Oct. 28-Nov. 27, 1908. State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Hannah McMullen, Plaintiff, vs. John McMullen, Defendant. Summons for Publication. Washington to the said John McMullen, defendant in the above entitled cause. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty five 60 days after the date of the hearing, to the uninsured at will: 30th of October, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your judgment to the uninsured at will for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complainant with the uninsured filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony, now existing between the plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of habitual drunkenness, cruelty and non-support. Attorney for Plaintiff. 60 Downs Block, Seattle, Washington. Oct. 30—Dec. 13, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Loraine Lavis, Plaintiff, vs. Robert Lavis, Defendant. Summons for Publication. State of Washington to the said Robert Lavis, defendant in the above entitled Notice is hereby given by the undersigned. Mary Fowler, administratrix of the estate of Epaphael of Epaphael, will sell at private sale on or after 10:00 o'clock A. M. of Friday, November 20, 1908, at Room 10 Hailer Block, Chicago, for the highest and best bidders for cash, in separate parcels of one, two or three pieces, or as one tract, the following described real estate, situated in King County, State of Washington, Lots 1, 2 and 3, of Block 5, of Hick's Addition to the City of Seattle. All bids or offers on said described real estate must be in writing addressed to said Mary Fowler at Room 8 of Hern Block, Seattle. Washing and must accompanied by a certified check for at least 10 per cent. of the amount of the bid. In witness whereof the said admini- stritrix has hereunto set her hand on this 26th day of October, 1908. MARY FOWLER, Admini'siartrix of the Estate of Erastus Fowler, Deceased. E. E. SIMPSON, B. B. MOSER, Attorneys for Administratrix, Oct. 30—Nov. 27, 1908. SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION, In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. Osner & Mehlhorn, Inc., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Mary Augusta Thompson, R. G. Thompson, Jane Doe Thompson, his wife; Ovid A. Byers, Ella M. Cowling and Richard Cowling, her husband; Island Lime Company, a corporation, Horace Allison and Jane Doe Allison, his wife; J. W. Bullock and Jane Doe Dullock, Defendants, pany, a corporation, Horace Allison, Jane Doe Allison, his wife; J. W. Bullock and Jane Doe Bullock, Defendants. The State of Washington, to the said Defendant, Mary Augusta Thompson: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of the complaint, at the day after the 4th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address, and failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of said action is to receive against you in the sues of $13000, to pay with interest thereon at the rate of 8% per annum from the 3rd day of October, 1907, and $128.65, for taxes paid, and attorney's fees and costs and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the same, dated October, 1907, by the black City, Addition to Salmon Bay City, King County, Washington, and foreclose all right, claims or equity of redemption of each and all of said defendants in and to said property. Said mortgage was recorded the 3rd day of October, 1907. Volume 323 of Mortgage page 126, of the recs. to the auditor's office of King County, Washington. EDWARD VON TOBEL Attorney for Plaintiff Office and Post Office Address Rooms 603, 604, 605 Blds. Settle King County, Washington. December 4, 1908—January 15, 1909. This is to certify that the real estate business carried on by H. H. Milburn, E. C. Smith and J. F. Fisk, under the name of Milburn-Smith Co. Empire Dayling, D.C., Washington, his dayling dissolved, E. C. Smith, retiring. Said business will be carried on at the same place under the name of H. H. Milburn & Company, who take over all business and will account the money due or owing by the Milburn-Smith Co. Dated at Seattle. Wash., this 30th day of November, 1908. MIDWYR H. H. MILBURN, J. F. FISK. SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Eleanore Perrin Miller, Plaintiff, vs. First National Bank of Winnebago, Kansas a corporation; Northern Pacific Railway Company, a corporation, and Charles Percy Miller, Defendants. No. 63,791. The State of Washington, to the First National Bank of Winnebago, Kansas, a corporation; Northern Pacific Railway Company, a corporation, and Charles Percy Miller, Defendants; the court order and decree that said judgment is a separate debt of said defendant, Charles Percy Miller, and is not a community obligation of the community composed of the plaintiff and the defendant. Charles Percy Miller, and that said real property above described and the separate real property of the plaintiff be freed from the lien of said judgment. That the court order and decree that the whole body of the sole and separate property of the plaintiff and that the defendant, Charles Percy Miller, has no interest therein. That plaintiff have judgment against said defendants for the cost of his action and for such other matters as he to the court may seem meet and just. J. HENRY DENNING Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 46 Starr-Boyd Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, Nov. 20, 1908. Date of last publication, Jan. 1, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Bessle B. de Varna, plaintiff, vs. Edwin L. de Varna, defendant. No. 62098. Summons. The State of Washington, to the said Edwin L. de Varna, defendant. In the above entitled count and defend the above entitled action within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the day of said first action, and in the above entitled court will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The above entitled cause of action is brought for the cause of obliteration of a divorce from the defendant on the grounds of abstention and non-support. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. J. G. Bussey, Plaintiff, vs. S. A. Bussey, Derendant. No. ——. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, S. A. Bussey. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-write, with the undersigned, with the date of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated, and easily delivered. The judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court, the object of said complaint being to secure a divorce from you OLIVIA A. ADAMSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice address, room 327 Epler Bld., Seattle, Washington. November 27, 1908, January 8, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, State of Washington—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Johanna D. Oftedal, deceased. No. 9629.—Notice to Creditors. To Whom It May Concern; Notice is hereby given to the creditors and all persons having claims against Johanna D. Oftedal, deceased, or her estate, to present the same with the necessary承购 in such form as the date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit; within a year from the 27th day of November, 1908, to J. E. McGrew, executor of the last will and testament of said deceased, to the said place being the office for the transaction of the business of the aforesaid estate. J. E. McGREW, Executor of the Will and Estate of Johanna D. Oftedal, deceased. First publication dated 27th of November, 1908 November 27th, December 25, 1908. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL Estate—Sheriff's office. State of Washington, County of King, ss. By virtue of an execution issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of Pierce County, on the day of Nov- ember 1908 by the Clerk thereof, of Ed. Erickson, Plaintiff, versus Carbon Hill Coal Co, a corporation, Defendant, No. 26469, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered; Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for the sale, the cloak, m. on the 2nd day of January, A. D., 1909, before the Court house door of said King County. In the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of all the property described in the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: the north one-half (N. 1/2) of the southeast quarter (S. E. 1/2) Section eight (D. 1/2) Downship street, N. Range range east. Willamette Meridian, levied on as the property of said plaintiff. Ed. Erikson, to satisfy a judgment, amounting to one hundred sixty-seven and 20/100 dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of defendant, Carbon Hill Coal Co., a Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed for Sherri's sales, at the hour of 10 o'clock on the day of Januadro D. 1909, before the Court House of said King County, in the State of Washington, all the right, title and interest of M. A. Jorgensen, one of the judgment debtors in said execution, named, in and to the following described property, added in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lots three (3), four (4) and five (5), Block eight (8), Jackson Street Addition, levied on as the property of said M. Jorgensen, to satisfy M. Jorgensen, amounting to forty-three (43.00) dollars, in favor of plaintiff. costs of suit, in law Dated this 25th day of November, 1908. SMITH, Sheriff. Have a Legal? Phone Main 305 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN FRIDAY, DECEMBER 11, 1908 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington tor King County, C. Van Horne, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owner, and all persons unknown, if any, having an interest in and to the heirnafter described real property, Defendants. No. ——. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, your owners, claimants, and the interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate as such, and the holder of the State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1900, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount and upon such taxation as in salting County described as follows, to-wait: You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of his birth of this person, inclusive of the day of said first publication. October 23, 1908. In the above entitled court and action; and deedent this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned, below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said taxes, and the amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's plaintiff, now on file in this cause and court. C. VAN HORNE, Plaintiff. KENNETH MACKINTOSH, E. B. HERALD, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office Address: 227-30 Colman Bldg, Seattle, Wash. First publication dated Oct. 23, 1908. Oct. 23—Dec. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Norah E. Payne, Plaintiff, vs. Alfred Payne, Defendant. No. — —. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Alfred Payne, defendant: to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 23rd day of October, 1908, and deefend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the court a上诉 of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at her office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the court of court. The object of the above entitled action is for decree of divorce upon the grounds of desertion and non-support. LEONIA W. BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 330 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 23—Dec. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Emma Pullum, Plaintiff, vs. H. M. Pullum, Defendant. No. — —. Summons by The State of Washington to the said H. M. Pullum, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 3rd day of October, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the defendant upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do. judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which will be filed with the clerk of the court. A brief statement of the object of the said action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant, on the ground of non-support for more than one year of the plaintiff by the defendant. GAY & RUMMENS, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: Suite 1220 Alaska Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 23—Dec. 4, 1903. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King, Judge R. Dickl, Plaintiff, vs. Alice Clark Dick, Defendant. No. 63586. The State of Washington to the said Alice Clark Dick, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this summons, to wit; within sixty days after the 27th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint answer upon the copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce, from you on the grounds of cruelty and drunkenness. P. O. Address, House 629-631 Burke Bldg., Seattle King County, Washington. Nov. 27, 1908—Jan. 8, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE tState of Washington for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. August Bartleson, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in the heerinafter described real property, Defendants. No. —— Notice and Summons. State of Washington to above named defendants: Each of you, as owners or claimants of an interest in the herein described real property, are hereby notified that above named plaintiff is the holder of one delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated Oct. 9, 1908, numbered 1546, to the extent of the value of 1904, in the amount of $1.33 upon hand situated in said King County, described as follows: Beginning at a point 546 feet South of the N. W. corner of the S. W. ¼ of the S. W. ¼ of Sec. 5, Tp 26, N. 2, E. 5, W., mence: E. 71 feet; thence S. 259 feet; thence West to section line; thence North to the point of beginning, being a part of the S. W. ¼ of the S. W. ¼ of said section. That taxes for subsequent years have been paid by plaintiff upon said land as follows: For 1905, 75 cents; for 1906, 48 cents; for 1907, 10 cents; for 1908, bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes upon said land. You (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of the publication, within sixty days after Nov. 20, 1908, in the entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said land for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it, ordering a sale and land to the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. November 20, 1908—January 1, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. W. R. Foley, Plaintiff, vs. W. R. having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the heerliner described real property, are hereby notified that the above claimed tax is the holder of certain delinquent taxes issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of Oct., 1908, and numbered BS4599, for the delinquent taxes of the following year 1904, in the following amount of 91 cents and in the following amount of 12 cents and in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: That portion of the S. W. 1/4 of the S. W. 1/4 of Section 34, Tp. 20, N. 8 R. E., W. M., lying north of White River. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years are paid and subsequent taxes affixed said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of $3 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.33; for the year 1907, the sum of $1.23, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 5 per cent per annum from said above described real property. If the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the filing, and with the exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Nov. 20, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and the defendant herein, for the closing the designed attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, for closing the lien on the parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the lien on the parcel of said property as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. November 20, 1908—January 1, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King College. Adelaide Cecelia Eames, Plaintiff, vs. Frank Wood Eames, Defendant. Number 42563. The State of Washington to the said Frank Wood Eames, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to within sixty (60) days after the 23rd day before the date of the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; the plaintiff will not failure so to do judgment will be rendered against according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain from you a divorce on the ground of cruel treatment and failure to support. PARKER & BROWN. P. O. Address: 32 Union Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 16—Dec. 4, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. LH. Cravey, Plaintiff vs. OB Block, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. ____. Notice and Summons: State of Washington to the above defendants; You and each of you, as owners or claimants of an interest in the herein-after described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is entitled to the land owned and issued by the Treasury of King County State of Washington, dated Oct. 19, 1908, and numbered B54378, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of $1.26, and upon real estate situated in said King County, described as follows: north of the West acres of the South 7½ acres of the West acres of the South ¼% of the N. W. ¼% of Sec. 29, Tp. 24, N. R. 6 E. That the taxes for subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said real property, as follows: For 1905, 69 cents; for 1906, 76 cents, and for 1907, 89 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. Upon such sums paid date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes upon said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Nov. 20, 1908. In the above entitled court and answer the complaint and its details and answer the complaint of the plaintiff serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN p. due, together with interest and costs, i. in case you fail to do, judgment will c. be rendered herein, correcting the use of of said taxes and costs against said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and round against it, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. t. L. H. CRAVER. d. A. C. MACDONALD. Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building Seattle, Wash. November 20, 1908—January 1, 1909. PROBATE NOTICE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King. **2014** In the Matter of the Estate of Annie Scholnin, Deceased. No. 8443. Notice of Settlement or Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Nels Scholnin, the executor of the last will and testament of Annie Scholnin, has rendered to, and filed in said court his final account as such executor, and that Thursday, the 10th day of Decem- ber, 1908, at 3:30 o'clock, a m., at the court room of the Probate Department in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. Geo. E. Morris, Judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said court neerio affixed this 16th day of November, 1908. **OTTO A. CASE, Clerk.** By J. A. SIGURDSSON, Deputy Clerk. November 20—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Lewis G. Kindred, Plaintiff, vs. Lenna Kindred, Defendant. No. 64097. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Lenna Kindred, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 20th day of November, 1908, and deafen the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve your answer were upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk, and answer the above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony between the parties heerto on the grounds of cruelty and adultery. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington November 20—January 1, 1909. **IN JUSTICE'S COURT** Before R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Seven States, Circuit, King Court, State of Washington. Leon Cepparo, Plaintiff, vs. Francisco Giampietra, otherwise known as "F. Giammarusto," Defendant. No. 16117. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King. —ss. To Francisco Giampietra, otherwise known as "F. Giampietro:" You are hereby notified that the plaintiff has filed a complaint against you in said court which will come on to be heard at my office in room 210 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock, A.M., at the hour of 8:30 o'clock, M.A., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said complaint is to recover judgment against you for the goods, wares and merchandise sold you to Vital Complaint filed October 29th, A.D. 1908. Dated November 17, 1908. R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. November 20—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. E. Esion, Plaintiff, vs. Harry Hoffman, Defendant. No, 64,021. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Defendant, Harry Hoffman: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 20th day of November, 1908, and defend the above enclosed on in the above court and answer the complaint of your answer to serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below given; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the complaint, which has been filed with the court of King County. The object of this action is to procure a judgment against you for the sum of $105.00 for services rendered with costs and interest and to sell the property of the defendant in King County, leveled upon under writ of attachment issued out of the court of King County in this action to satisfy said judgment. THOMAS M. ASKREN and H. M. OWENS, Attorneys for Plaintiff. 911 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. November 1, 1909. November 20—January 1, 1909. SUMMONS ON APPLICATION IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County, King. Jose Winston and Clara Winston, his wife, Plaintiffs, vs. J. E. Witworth, E. A. Witworth, his wife, Isaac M. Dunn, Jane Doe Dunn, his wife, unknown heirs, if any of Zeph Dunn, deceased; John E. Davis, his Davis, his wife, Rebecca Turner, John Doe Dunn, his wife, Worrel Wilson, King County, New England Mortgage Security Company, a corporation, Fred McCoy, H. E. Whitton, Clyde C. Carr, Millie E. Carr, his wife, Jose Winston, his wife, Benson wife, and all other persons buried unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, ilen or interest in the real estate described in the application herein, Defended by the Court, no. 21. The State of Washington, to the above named defendants, greeting: S. E. 1/4 of N. E. 1/4; all in Section Thirty-two (32), Township twenty-three (23), N. R. Five (5) E. W. M., and to the your answer to the said application in the office of the clerk of said court, in said county, within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, excluding of the said application if you fail to answer the said application within the time atoresaid, the applicant plaintiff in this action will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the application herein. Witness, Otto A. Case, clerk of said court and the seal thereof at Seattle, in said county and state this 15th day of N.A. A. D., 1908. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By MAURICE THOMISON, Deputy, November 20—December 4, 1908. NOTICE. SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE State: Massachusetts, County: Kings Sheriff: Short By virtue of an order of sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 9th day of November, 1998, by the clerk thereof, in the case of Jos. Martin and Flora Martin, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. G. G. Fetterly and Fetterly, his wife, defendants, No. 6935, and to me, as sheer, directed and delivered. Notice is hereby given, that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheriff's sales, to-wit, for December, A. D., 1908, before the court house door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lots twenty-three (23), twenty-four (24), twenty-five (25) and twenty-six (26) all in block forty-one (41) of the Plat of the Town of Des Molines, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure of mortgage, and twenty-six and 20/100 ($176.20) Dollars and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 17th day of November. 1908. Dated this TRISTEIN, L. C. SMITH, Sheriff, by EDW. DREW, Deputy, REVELLE, REVELLE & REVELLE, November 20—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Rosa Triest, Plaintiff, vs. Fred Triest, Defendant, No. 63,890. Summons for Pennsylvania. The State of Washington, to the said Fred Triest: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of the summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 20th day of the year, to answer the complaint above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintif, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment to be rendered agree to, according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a divorce from the de defendant heerin on the grounds of failure to support and on the further grounds of cruel treat- JOHN E. RYAN. 416 Globe Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. November 20—January 1, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of Martin Adams, Deceased. No. 9080. Order to Show Cause the Order of Sale of Real Estate Shall Not be Made. It appearing to this court by the verified petition this day duly presented and filed by Lillie M. Adams, administratrix of the estate of Martin Adams, deceased, that it is necessary to sell the whole or some portion of the real estate of said decedent to pay the debts of the said estate and the expenses and charges of administration. It is therefore ordered by this court that all persons interested in the estate of said deceased appear before the said Superior Court on the 24th day of December 1908, at the hour of 8 o'clock A. M., of said day at the court room of the undersigned, or at such time as this matter can be called on thereafter, at the court house in the City of Seattle, County of King, State of Washington, to be granted the said real estate to the said administratrix to sell all or as much of the said real estate as shall be necessary and that a copy of this order be published for four consecutive weeks in The Seattle Republic a newspaper printed and published in said county. Done in open court this 18th day' of November, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS. Judge. November 20—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Maria C. Gilbert, Plaintiff, vs. Al McCoy and Emma McCoy, husband and wife, Defendants, No. 63653. Summons. The State of Washington to Al. McCoy and Emma McCoy, husband and wife. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the publication of this summons, to-wait: within sixty days after the 20th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff and your defense and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the action is to recover damage and pay you in the sum of $2500 and to sell your real estate in Tacoma to satisfy the same. F. M. JEFFERY. Attorney for Plaintiff. 747 New York Block, Seattle, King County, State of Washington. November 20, 1908—January 1, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, James E. Phillips, Plaintiff, vs. Emma W. Wood, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the heerinafter described real property, Defendants. No. _____. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defen- tion, each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the heerinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of two certain delinquent tax certificates, issued by the Treasurer of King County, and Jackson dated the 25th day of January 10, 1980, and follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 10, Block 28, Replat of Green Lake Home Addition to Seattle, Certificate No. B45688, for the year 1904, Replat of Green Lake Home Addition 28, Replat of Green Lake Home Addition Seattle, Certificate No. B45688, for the year 1904, in the sum of $2.50; that the 7 taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon each or said above described sums of real property to-wait: For the year 1905, the sum of $1.35; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.77; and for the year 1907, the sum of $2.06, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unrepaid taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of publication of this notice, exclusive of the publication of said, first publication, Nov. 20, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount ordered by the court of said, first costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs ordered by the court of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. JAMES E. PHILLIPS, Plaintiff. KENNETH MACKINTON E. E. B. HERALD, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office Address: 227-30 Colman Bldg., Seattle, Wash. First publication dated Nov. 20. 1908. November 20—January 1st, 1909. NOTICE. SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE --ss.-Sheriff's Office County of King. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Ellen C. Rains, Plaintiff, vs. Levander Rains, Defendant.—No. 64162. Summons for the Apt. of the Court. The State of Washington to the said Levander Rains: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, and answer the question of November, A. D. 1908, and defend the abov entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer upon the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned att- torney, and answer below stated; and in case of your failure to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The objection to this action is to obtain a divorce from the defendant herein on the grounds of failure to support plaintiff and on the further grounds of aban- donment of plaintiff. JOHN E. RYAN Attorney for King County. 416 Globe Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Helma A. Raymond, Plaintiff, vs. John W. Raymond, Defendant. No. 64316. Shipment by publication. The State of Washington, to the said John W. Raymond, defendant: You are herby summoned to appear, within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 4th day of December, 1908, and the first petition action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office and postoffice address below designated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against plaintiff, the plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to remove a cloud from plaintiff's title and to quiet title in her to lots one, two and five of block forty (1, 2 and 5, Blk. 40), plat of the Second Addition to the county (now City) of Seattle, by the heirs of Sarah A. Bell (deceased) also lot 4, block 22 (Lot 4, Blk. 22), of the plat of an addition to the City of Seattle, as laid off by D. T. Denny, guardian of the estate of J. H. Nagle, according to the recorded plats on record in the auditor's office King County, State of Washington, and forever barred from any claim and right, title or interest in said premises and to determine any and all adverse claims of said defendant to said property in favor of plaintiff, and for a decree adjudging plaintiff to be the owner of said real estate, free and clear of all claims or interest therein by said defendant, and for relief as set forth in the decree of relief on file in the office of the clerk of the Superior Court of King County, Washington. MORRIS, SOUTHARD & SHIPLEY. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: 55 Haller Building, Seattle, King Co. Washington. Date of first publication December 4th, 1908. December 4, 1908, January 15, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Vashon College Association, and all persons unkown if any, having or being in interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.—No. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners or claimants of an interest in the hereinafter described real property, for the above named plaintiff is the holder of one delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of December, 1904, and numbered B28993, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1903, in the amount of $4.63 and upon such amount as is indicated in King County described as follows, towng SE% of SW% of NW% of Sec. 5, Tp. 22 N. R. 3 E. W. M. That the taxes for the following sub- 8 PERSONALITIES FOREIGN. Concerning the published report that the liquor interesis are re- sponsible for his resignation and divorce proceedings instituted in Stratford, Conn., by the wife of Royal W. Raymond, James W. Morrison, a prominent liquor dealer of Seattle, this afternoon said: “The liquor interests have been charged with many offenses, but never before have they been ac- eused of interfering in the domes- tie relations between husband and wife,-especially for campaign pur- poses. : “The local liquor interests are not concerned in the domestic af- fairs of Royal W. Raymond nor any other official, or employe of the Anti-Saloon League. We at- tend strictly to our own affairs, and believe this poliey might well be adhered to by them. We do not care whether a man is in- volved outside his own family or not. At the same time I must em- phasize the fact—albeit a well known fact—that. there is less seandal and gossip concerning women and domestie affairs in general in saloons than there is in so-called religious circles. “Quite recently one of the league superintendents at Belling- ham was removed and criticized by the local office for not turning over sufficient funds. A few years ago a certain Dr. Thoms, a prede- cessor of Rev. Mr. Raymond, left here under a cloud, charged with a shortage of more than $1,700 of the league’s funds. “Tn Michigan and Missouri many ‘of the Anti-Saloon League officials are discredited. During the past few years several of the league officials and employes have been exposed. “Tn eonclusidn I will repeat that the liquor dealers of Washington or elsewhere are not at all inter- ested or concerned in Royal. W, Raymond’s personal or family. af- fairs, and that we absolutely deny any complicity in causing legal proceedings of any character whatsoever against him.’” “FALLACY” OF POSTAL SAVINGS BANKS. In our issue of November 21 we published an article setting forth the country’s need of postal sav- ings banks, and pointing to the probability that the early months of next year would see them estab- lished. The other side of the case is presented in The Financier (New York), by the pen of George M. Coffin, formerly deputy con- troller of the currency. It will be remembered that these Govern- ment savings banks are promised by the Republican platform, and that Mr. Taft has personally in- dorsed this pledge. On the other hand, the American Bankers’ As- sociation has voted its disapproval of the proposed reform. Mr. Cof- fin undertakes to show that not only would the innovation serious- ly affect the business of State and national banks, but that it would saddle the country with a fresh annual expense of $4,000,000 againts a new income of $100,000. Yet he admits that he sees litle likelihood of the measure not be- ing enacted, Mr. Coffin takes as his text the following words of Mr. Taft: “Tf there were savings banks in all the country as numerous and easy of access as they are in Mas- sachusetts, in the New England States, and in New York, it might ritory properly occupied by pri- vate enterprise. But when it is considered that in only eleven of ae States are there savings bank facilities, it is seen that private enterprise does not supply the need, We should not deny to the people of thirty-five States oppor- ‘tunity io make small deposits, with ‘the security of the Government roniias to pay prineipal and in- terest”? The President-elect, Mr. Coffin asserts, has been misled by incor- rect information. Thus: “He states that in ‘only eleven of the States are there savings |bank facilities.’ A reference ,to page 378, Controller’s Report for 1907, shows that there are mutual and stock savings banks in twenty States besides the Disirict of Co- jumbia, instead of only in eleven States. “Besides this every well-in- formed banker knows that not ‘only in these twenty States with ‘savings banks, but in the other erenty- sts Siates as well, ‘savings bank facilities’ are freely and fully furnished not only by State banks and trust companies, but by Nat- ional banks as well. “In these twenty-six States without ‘savings bank facilities’ we find 10,000 banks doing busi- ness with a guarantee fund of| $841,000,000 in capital and surplus and holding deposits to the great amount of $3,380,000,000. in| some of them so keen is the com~ petition and so great the demand for banking funds we find one dol- lar in capital and surplus for ev- ery two or three dollars of depos- its, which clearly affords the sav- ings depositors greater security than the mutual savings bank without any eapital stock what- soever. “Tt is a well-known fact that in all these non-savings bank States, the National and State banks and trust companies furnish very ex- tensive ‘savings bank facilities’ not only by issuing time certifi- eates of deposit bearing interest, but by receiving deposits from 25 cents up just as savings banks do and paying interest thereon at 3% and 4 per cent. “These are well-known, indis- putable facts which show beyond question that there is no need for postal savings banks, and that if the Government with its ‘promise to pay principal and interest’ and its great prestige and guaranty of security opens these 38,000 or more savings banks it will prove to be a tremendous ‘invasion of 13—REPUBLICAN hub territory properly oceupied by pri- vate enterprise.’ ’” Of the Government competition thus introduced into the banking field he asks: “Does any banker honestly be- lieve that this wide-spread govern- ment competition inviting depos- its of the ignorant or timid, and paying 2 per cent. interest, will not make a serious inroad on the business of State and National bankers? In the localities where this appeal will be most popular the average savings deposits will not exceed $100. The difference tn intavaet hatwaean 2 nar rant. and THE SEATTLE REPUBLIVAN “Assuming that during the first year an average total deposit of $1,000 is made at each of 40,000 post offies, the aggregate deposits will be $40,000,000. On this the Government pays 2 per cent. in- terest and receives 214 per cent. from the National (not State) banks with which it redeposits the funds, ~ “This leaves one-quarter of one per cent. on $40,000,000, or about $100,000 a year net to the Govern- ment toward the cost’ of admini- stration of these 40,000 branch banks. Pass books, deposit tiek- ee, withdrawal receipts, account books and ledgers, stationery and envelopes for report of operations must. be provided; also clerical help, furniture and fixtures, safes, ‘and, last but not least, examiners ‘or inspectors to verify correctness of millions of accounts at thous- ‘ands of banks once a year at least or oftener, o | “Assuming thé very small an- nual average of only $100 for each of the 40,000 branch offices, the total annual cost will be #4,- 000,000 against $100,000 income. And the greater the volume of business the larger thé cost to the whole country. “Yet Mr. Taft says that ‘objec- tion has been made that this is paternalism and Socialism, and is introducing the Government into the banking business.’ In the light of’ the facts and figures here given does the reader honestly think this objection is well-ground- ed or not?”’ The Financier suggests editorial- ly that the subject of postal sav- ings banks be referred to the Mon- etary Commission for full investi- gation.—Literary Digest. WHERE WOMAN SUFFRAGE HELPED. The friends of woman suffrage are pointing triumphantly to the victory of Judge Lindsay, of the Denver Children’s Court, as a proof of what women’s votes can do in a political crisis. Judge Lindsay ran independently in op- position to both the old party can- didates and received about 20,000 votes, to 17,000 apiece ‘polled by the Republican and Democratic aspirants. ‘‘This demonstrates,”’ says The Woman’s Journal (Bos- ton), ‘that the ballots of good women, added to the votes of good ‘men, will carry good measures and elect good candidates.”” The Denves News (Dem.) said on the day after election: “The voting strength of the women of Denver when united on one thing has been effectively de- monstrated, because it is undoubt- edly to the women—to the mothers largely—that the tremendous ‘strength of Ben B. Lindsay, run- ning for judge of the juvenile court, is due. They commenced turning out before breakfast yes- terday, and they did not stop to rest until the polls were closed at night. “*All over Capitol Hill, through the lower wards of the city, and wherever women live, no matter of what station in life, it was the same. Some of their tactics were original if unethical. They would carry their fight for the judge right into the voting booths. They would shout from upper windows at voters entering the polling places, ‘Don’t forget Ben Lind- say,’ and they would buttonhole the voter wherever he or she could be found.’’ Xmas Jewelery Or Any Kind of Jewelery Call at BURNETT LROS, 720 FIRST AVENUE For suitable masculine gifts we would suggest a walk thru his big main floor store for men, where all that is newest and yest will be found at savings worth taking advantage of. Shirts for Men Folk NECKTIES i = : ‘ 25¢ to $2.5) SUSPENDERS is . < 2e to 2.00 HOUSE COATS ue eee $4.50 to 16.50 BATH ROBES : : f 5.00 to 15.00 FANCY VESTS : e 2.50 to 6.50 UMBRELLAS . e 1.50 to 12.50 Goves ; ; : . 0c to 2.50 Underwear ; : ; 2c to 3.00 Ceps : i : . —-2de to 1.50 Pajamas i i 89c to 2.00 orp TSEMARCHE SEATTLE WASHINGTON WIT AND HUMOR. Charges. “Your lawyer made some pretty severe charges against the other fellow, didn’t he?”’ “Y-e-e-s, but you ought to see how he charged me!’” Nonreversible, Lang—Didn’t you tell me that you made yourself solid with Mrs. ‘Vane by asking her if she was her- self or her daughter—couldn’t tell them apart, and so on? Strang—I did What about it? Lang—Why, I tried the same gag with the daughter, and it did not go for a cent—Boston Tran- ae ; Called the Turn. “What's the old lady doing now?”’ asked the old stocking in the work basket. “She’s getting out her needle and yarn,”’ replied the scissors. “Well, well,’”? exclaimed the stocking, “‘I’ll be darned."”—Phil- adelphia Press. Right on the Job. Indignant Citizen (to office boy) —Your confounded paper had an outrageous attack on me this morning, and— Office Boy (briskly)—Yes, sir. How many copies will you have? To Borrow. Grimsey—What is the psycho- logical moment? Cholly—It is when you get a tip on a dead sure thing and do not happen to have the money to back it up.—New Orleans World. Modest. A young Canadian humorist who went over to England hoping to find London editors in receptive FRIDAY, DECEMBER 11, 1908. mood forwarded a contribution to Punch with this note: ‘‘Dear Sir —I arrived in London this morn~ ing and paid a visit to Westmin- ster abbey this afternoon. I found this call depressing, for a man naturally shrinks from inspecting the spot where he is to be buried.”” Absent Treatment. ‘What is the matter with Mrs. Spicy? I saw her sitting on her porch as I came by gritting her teeth and looking daggers into vacancy? 2 “Her husband is a half hour late, and she is giving him absent treatment.’’—Chicago Journal. James G. Butler, who is men- tioned as a probable opponent of Senator Joseph B. Foraker of Ohio, is a resident cf Youngstown. He is known as one of the big men in the United States Steel Corpo- ration. CHRISTMAS IS COMING. And you doubtless intend to make a few presents to those you love best, and having your interest at heart you are reminded that Houghton & Hunter, the Old Reliable Jewelers, always give the best goods for the money. SENSIBLE PRESENTS. Watches, from $1 to $200. Diamond Rings, from $25 up. Diamond Brooches, from $25 up. Umbrellas, from $1 up. 2,000 Rings, from $2.50 up. HOUGHTON & HUNTER, 704 First Avenue. EW, WAY & 00, General Insurance Fire, Marine, Burglary, Accident Plate Glass, Employer’s Liability. 619-620 Bailey Building 1 Main 2115 Ind. L 3356 Pe RE ar tee ceet ee if