Seattle Republican

State Library THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Price One Year, $3.00. Single Copies, 10 Cents. Each inauguration of the president of the United States grows more elaborate and ceremonial and always at an additional expenditure of Taft's Inauguration money. The inauguration of William Howard Taft promises to be the most expensive one that the To Cost $100.000. United States has ever seen. Whether or not this is a tendency to royalism is a serious question, but the average citizen is of the opinion that a hundred times more money is spent on these ceremonies than is necessary. The committee having charge of the Taft ceremonies has already collected $75,000, which is $12,000 more than has ever before been expended for the inaugural ceremonies of a president of the United States and it hopes to get at least $25,000 more in order to pull off the ceremonies as the more wealthy citizens of the United States would have it done. If four-fifths of that money were turned into the hands of the associate charities of the city for the poor and needy it would show more common sense and a great deal more political economy. The mad rush that is indulged in by persons in remote sections of the country to be present at the inauguration of the president is both foolish and fickle. While addressing the white teachers of the state of South Carolina, United States Senator Benjamin R. Tillman of pitchfork fame warned the Educating Negroes a Menace to Whites. ing the Negroes of the state and in that case white supremacy would stand a splendid show of losing control of her affairs. In other words the senator gave the white teachers to understand that the white man was not able to hold his own only by brutalizing those he came in contact with, and even though finely educated could not compete with another class of people similarly educated. If the white man is as weak as that then the sooner he steps down and out and hands over the control of the government to a stronger people the better for the government and the country in general. The statement of the senator, however, is rash, yea not only rash, but absolutely untrue. It may be true that in highly educating the Negro the white man may the sooner absorb him, but so far as controlling this country when the white man ceases to do that there will be no white men left in the country. A short time ago a Christian organization went on record as deprecating the drawing of racial lines in the worship of God. In other words Brotherhood of Man Partially Realized. earth. While perhaps the First Methodist Episcopal church of Seattle made no special efforts to start out along those lines New Year, yet at its sacramental altar last Sunday, the first Sunday of the new year, knelt almost all nationalities and certainly all colors. The Chinaman and the Japanese, despite their racial antipathy, knelt and broke bread together and the two passed it to their white brethren. The black man and the red man also broke bread at the same table and passed it on to their white brethren and for the moment it appeared that the difference in colors on the part of those at that sacramental board had been completely forgotten and the true spirit of brotherly love prevailed and that too without stopping to inquire as to the color or nationality of the brother. It's a splendid omen for good and it is hoped that the time is not far distant when Christians will meet as Christians. The actual horrors of the earthquake in Sicily will perhaps never be fully told, but it is estimated now that at least 300,000 souls lost their lives in Uncle Sam Gives the great catastrophe and the country, which was one of the prosperous plats of the earth, is now either a heap of ruins or wiped completely out of existence and at the bottom of the sea. God works in mysterious ways His wonders to perform, and while man can not always understand the wonders that He does perform, yet He has an object in performing them and invaluable lessons can be learned from each one of them. It is by far the most disastrous earthquake as to human beings that the world has any record of and equally so as to property. It is the duty of the civilized world to rush assistance to the strick- --- ATTLE REP SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, JANUARY 8, 1909 en community without stint and there is no doubt but that it will be done. The government at Washington has voted nearly a million dollars as a relief fund and the various churches and communities of the country are responding liberally and it is safe to predict that the United States will contribute more than a million dollars to the sufferers. City Engineer R. H. Thomson of Seattle has caused to be introduced in the council an ordinance, which has for its object, the city condemning and purchasing the water shed in and about Cedar Lake, the source of the city's water supply, and if she Seattle to Purchase Cedar River Shed. does, the city will own a tract of land amounting to 20,000 acres, all of which is heavily timbered, which also will in the very near future be a source of revenue to the city. The object of Mr. Thomson asking the city to make this purchase at this time is due to the fact that a mill company is taking steps to put in a plant in the shed, which Mr. Thomson thinks will sooner or or later contaminate the water coming to Seattle for domestic use. There can be but one opinion on the making of this purchase and that is she should do so at her earliest opportunity. As it now stands there is no way the city can protect its water supply from being contaminated, but if she makes the proposed purchase she can then do so and it should be done immediately if not sooner. The ordinance should meet no delay in the city council and if it has to be submitted to a vote that should be done at once. President Roosevelt's special message on the secret service of the country being opposed by certain members of Congress revealed some citizens of the United States, and that includes almost 99 per cent of the business, professional, as well as laboring men, little suspected that the meshes of the government were filled with thieves, who in some way or other were robbing the government, but if the president's message can be believed, it is an absolute fact. It is learned from the message that the secret service saved the general government fully $100,000 by uncovering an ink steal, that is to say, the scoundrels supplying the government with printer's ink and writing fluid were systematically robbing the government each year out of that amount. And as in this instance so also in hundreds of others only more gigantic. To make it worse, the president almost openly charged certain members of Congress as standing in with the steal and chief among them Uncle Joe Cannon, speaker of the house of representatives. From the number of "big men" in the business it must not be a crime to steal from the government. What promised to be the hotest political fight in the United States for many years for a senatorial toga will be no fight at all, for both Charley ton the undisputed candidate for the toga and the Republican members of the legislature have decided to unanimously elect Mr. Burton to succeed Senator Foraker, who has been a star in the senate for many years. Representative Burton is alreaedy a central figure in national politics he has been a member of the house of representatives of Congress for a number of terms and has been for the most of the time chairman of the committee on rivers and harbors, which made him the central figure in the eyes of every community that wanted to filch the general government out of a few thousand dollars for the purpose of improving some creek, the necessity of which was as much uncalled for as the tunneling of the Olympic mountains. While Mr. Burton will hardly hold as prominent chairmanships in the senate for some time to come as he did in the house, yet he will take a prominent place therein almost at once. From Mayor Miller's annual message to the city council it is learned that the city's bonded indebtedness amounts to $7,570,380. It is likewise learned that the city's limit of bonded indebtedness is $17,813.-671.80, thus showing the city to be in a most excellent financial condition, the quackers to the contrary notwithstanding. The following is the city's assets and liabilities: "On the first day of December, 1908, the books of the --- Stealing From Government Not Considered a Crime. Burton to Succeed Joseph Benson Foraker. PUBLICAN city comptroller showed the entire assets of the city to be estimated at $16,269,948.61. This includes every item of realty and personality owned by the city of Seattle. On the other side of the comptroller's ledger, the total of the city's liabilities is shown to be $9,441,945.61. The difference between these two totals, which is $6,828,003.00, is the excess of the assets over the liabilities. "The real estate owned by the city is conservatively appraised at $4,746,623.56. The city's personal property, including everything from office furniture to fire-fighting apparatus, is estimated at $11,523,425.05. The most valuable single item invoiced as personal property, is the water system, which includes the plant and stock. It is valued at $5,553,725.99. "The cash in the treasury is $3,346,341.99. This, minus trust funds held by the city, amounting to $1,189,-894.10, leaves a balance of $2,156,447.89, which is the amount of money now on hand belonging to the city." Some years ago the city of Seattle under the urgency of socialistic agitators undertook the construction and management of a municipal lighting plant. The cost of the plant was to have been $1,000,000, but to date there has been expended upon it $1,758,805. Seattle Electric Plant Scored. Seattle Electric Plant Scored. and $500,000 more is needed to finish the work. And $300,000 more is wanted to pay for cumulative losses. In the meantime the plant is supplying electric light, having sold within the year $193,000 worth of current ($67,000 sold to the city for street lighting) developed at a cost of $308,698, to which must be added an interest charge of $35,875, with other expenses amounting to $15,000. Municipal rates for electric lights at Seattle are graded from $1/2 cents to $41/2 cents per kilowatt, whereas in the neighboring city of Tacoma, where the supplying of electric current is a private business, the rates are graded from 6 cents to 3 cents. The average consumer of municipal light at Seattle pays 2 cents per kilowatt hour more than the average Tacoma consumer. The average Seattle consumer using 40 kilowatts pays $3.20, the average Tacoma consumer $2.40. With these facts in mind we can easily agree with Auditor Young of the municipal plant, who is quoted as sayiing: "The most dangerous thing a city can take hold of is an electric power plant. It is all a matter of management. Unless all politics are cut out, unless your department is admirably systematized and organized, and unless you have the proper men to head it, it can never pay."—San Francisco Argonaut. As a rule public corporations do not figure on paying their bonded debt, but only on keeping up the interest charges and refunding when the The Real Facts bonds become due; but the lighting About the Plant. plant can be out of debt in 20 years, and have a fund left to replace all worn out parts of its installation. The receipts of the department from the sale of current have been as follows: In the year 1905 ..... $ 3,562.50 In the year 1906 ..... 157,439.36 In the year 1907 ..... 201,970.99 In the year 1908 to October 31 ..... 295,316.47 Total to October 31, 1908 ..... $658,289.32 Estimating an income of $70,000.00 for November and December the receipts for 1908 would amount to ..... 365,316.00 Cost of plant to November 1, 1908 ..... $1,694,272.67 Receipts during the 10 months ending November 1, 1908 ..... 295,316.47 Earnings during the 10 months ending November 1, 1908 ..... 249,839.59 Expenditures for same period: Operating expenses including maintenance ..... $102,748.15 Reconstruction due to caring for wires and pole lines on regrade work ..... 9,313.79 Accrued interest for 10 mos. ..... 42,396.00 Depreciation for 10 mos. at 3 per cent ..... 42,500.00 Sinking Fund to retire $1,-440,000.00 in 20 years for 10 months ..... 39,735.00 236,692.94 Surplus over operating and fixed charges..... $ 13,146.65 It will be seen from the above figures that the plant is a self-sustaining institution, and is earning enough not only to pay its operating expenses, but to pay interest on its bonded debt, provide a sinking fund for the liquidation of its bonds in 20 years, and set aside a fund to cover the annual depreciation. Volume XV, Number 24. H. R. CAYTON, Publisher NORTHWEST BRIEFS. A resolution was introduced at the recent meeting of the city council asking Mayor John E. Reyburn of Philadelphia, to send the Liberty Bell to the Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition. The Pend d'Oreille River Navigation Co. has just inaugurated the best river service which the traveling public has ever enjoyed on that river. The teachers' institute held in Spokane is being well attended. Two-thirds of the Columbia river bridge is completed and about 1,000 feet of St. Paul tunnel through the Bitter Root mountains remain to be driven. Altogether there is not fifty miles of the Milwaukee road unbuilt to connect Seattle with Chicago. A building six stories high, to cost $100,000, is to be built in Vancouver by the American Life and Accident Insurance Company of the State of Washington. Vancouver is to be the home office of the company, which is capitalized at $500,000. It is reported that enough members of the legislature have already pledged themselves to pass the proposed bill to prohibit race-track gambling, and it is expected that public sentiment will impel the senatorial body to join in the reform even if it is not enthusiastically in favor of the prohibition. From the most recent reports from California it is expected that Governor-elect Cosgrove will return for the inauguration, after which he will go back to California for the winter. Five thousand dollars has now been subscribed for the fruit canneries at Vancouver, and a committee of the Vancouver Commercial Club will further canvass the city for the purpose of raising $4,000 more. The Yakima Produce Company has now prepared for shipment to London, England, two-carloads of fancy Yakima Valley apples for customers in the British Isles. An annual picnic for the entire Palouse country, taking in more particularly the counties of Spokane and Whitman, in Washington and Latah, in Idaho, and absorbing the famous Whitman county picnic held at Elberton, is a festive summer event planned for the inhabitants of the Palouse by the Spokane & Inland Electric Company. Oregon's Fish Warden McAllister believes that the Columbia river is being over-fished and advocates the regulation of aol gear an a shorter fishing season. He also calls attention to the vast number of irrigating ditches in use which destroy millions of young fry. Juneau, Alaska, is being made the headquarters for several new concerns that will operate in that vicinity next year, and there are plans well under way for the erection of a new cannery there to handle the fish taken from a number of the traps driven last fall. A new cannery is being established at Hawk's Inlet, where there are a number of fish traps, and active operations will be commenced at the opening of the season. A cold storage plant will be erected at Kake. Washington apples sent to England and Scotland by the Fruit Growers' Ass'n of Wenatchee, in November, are declared by Eng- [Name] JOHN FRANKLIN MILLER. Mayor of Seattle, Who Is Very Much in the Public Eye Just Now. lish experts to be the best ever seen in England. EMANCIPATION EXER The exercises, under CHAMBER OF COMMERCE DELEGATES HOME FROM THE ORIENT. The report soon to be submitted to the Pacific Coast Chambers of Commerce by the members of the commission who have recently returned from a ten weeks' stay in the Orient, promises to contain much of interest to the peopel. Harry W. Treat, E. F. Blaine and J. D. Lowman were among the number of members who left Seattle on the 21st of September for Japan. The trip was not only interesting but instructive, and an excellent opportunity was offered to study the conditions existing on the other side of the water and to become familiar with the attitude of the orientals toward Americans. The Japanese and Chinese vied with each other in making the stay of the members of the commission pleasant, and magnificent exhibits were promised for the A. Y. P. fair. In no instance was there a feeling of hostility shown and many valuable suggestions made by the Seattle delegates were received with approval by the officials abroad, and an invitation was extended to have another delegation sent to complete the work commenced by this one Representative Japanese and Chinese business men will probably return the visit of the commission some time in the spring, thereby further promoting the already existing feeling of friendliness. Judge Wilson R. Gay, the only new judge on the King county bench, will for the present take Judge Griffin's department. Judge Gay has been in California for a few days, but returns today to be ready to start in next Monday. REGINALD H. THOMSON, Seattle's City Engineer, Who is Advocating the City Purchasing the Cedar River Water Shed. REGINALD H. THOMSON, Seattle's City Engineer, Who is Advocating the City Purchasing the Cedar River Water Shed. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN MILLER, ch in the Public Eye Just Now. EMANCIPATION EXERCISES. The exercises, under the auspices of the Sunday Forum, which were held in the auditorium of the Y. M. C. A. Building on New Year's night, commemorative of the issuing of the Emancipation Proclamation by Abraham Lincoln, were witnessed by a large and representative audience, which taxed the capacity of the main hall and extended far into the balcony. Everything that was said and done had for its object the elimination of race feeling, the I. ISRAEL WALKER, President Sunday Forum, Who Gave the Public the Excellent Program at the Emancipation Exercises. effecting of a mutual understanding between the races and the location of a neutral ground upon which they might meet. Mr. I. I. Walker, president of the Forum, after explaining the nature and purpose of the organization under the auspices of which the program was given, which, as he expressed it, was the only nonpolitical and non-sectarian organization among the colored people, having for its object the moral and intellectual upbuilding of the race, in a few well chosen words reviewed the situation and condition of the race locally, after which he introduced the next speaker, Mayor John F. Miller. Throughout his discourse Mayor Miller showed himself to be a deep thinking and broad-minded man, well informed in regard both to the LUTHER B. YOUNGS, Superintendent of Water and Light Department, who Thinks the Light Plant a Good Investment. LUTHER B. YOUNGS, Superintendent of Water and Light Department, who Thinks the Light Plant a Good Investment. achievements and the defects of the Brother in Black. In a few straight-forward, clean-cut remarks, free from partiality or prejudice, he pointed out to his auditors the shortcomings of the Negro and deplored the fact there was such a general impulse with them to rush to the already overcrowded cities where the cost of living is the highest and competition the greatest. With Booker T. Washington, Mayor Miller agreed that the life of the agriculturist is the most independent existence in the world. He mentioned the fact that along many lines the Negro had already attained eminence, and that too in the face of almost unsurmountable obstacles. He said it was unjust to condemn the whole race for the misdeeds of a few evil-minded members; that it was an undeniable fact that the race included many who were anything but a credit to it, a statement, he added, which applied equally well to every other race. The remarks of J. E. Hawkins were scholarly and well timed. He thoroughly reviewed the situation, presenting a long list of illustrious representative men and women of the race whose lives are worthy of emulation. Mr. Hawkins expressed very optimistic views in regard to the future of the Negro, and said: "Like any other race of people, the Negro needs to apply himself in order to bring to the surface his natural intelligence." His motto was evidently "Excelsior," for he demonstrated the fact that at the top in all vocations, and along all lines there is always room for more; that the paramount issue was not so much one of color as of fitness. H. R. Cayton's address was reminiscent of slavery days, of the then existing conditions and of the dependence placed upon the faithful slave by the "quality folks." He said that it was no more than right and fitting that the race had made progress, for every inducement, every advantage had been offered, and, admonishing his auditors not to overlook the smaller things, he said that if the Negro were less polite, less a gentleman, if his credit were not as good as in ante-bellum days, then as a race he was retrograding and not advancing. The musical numbers rendered consisted of the Triumphal March from Damascus, by a chorus of twenty-five voices; a ladies' trio, selections by the Whangdoodle Quartet, and a solo by Mrs. Daisie Taylor. GERTRUDE CHRISMAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Nelson Miller, Plaintiff, vs. Grace Miller, DefendantNo. 108, Summons. the State of Washington to the said Grace Miller, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1908, and defend the above claim against the other said court, and answer the complaint of plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his address below given. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered against you and decree of divorce for the damages of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is for the purpose of securing a divorce. J. W. BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Blvd. Seattle. First publication January 8th, 1909. Jan. 8—Feb. 19, 1909. BUSINESS DIRECTORY Puget Sound National Bank. OF SEATTLE JACOB FURTH .....President J. S. GOLDSMITH .....Vice-President R. V. ANKENY .....Cashier CORRESPONDENTS IN ALL THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE. DRAFTS ISSUED ON ALASKA ANI THE YUKON TERRITORY. FRIDAY. JANUARY 8. 1909. Scandinavian American Bank. Write Today for a copy of "THE BANK ACCOUNT" a new, neat little 8-page paper as full of good things as an egg is of meat. MAILED FREE. The Scandinavian-American Bank, Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. E. N. BROOKS & CO. For Frills For Men. HIGH CLASS HABERDASHERY 1331 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance 529 Colman Blk., Phone Main 695 TREEN SHOE COMPANY Always Carry the Best. Customers Carefully Cared For. 707 First Ave., Seattle, Wash. W. H. FINCK Pioneer Jeweler and Watch Maker. Our Holiday Specials Unequaled. 816 Second Avenue, Seattle, Wash. The Comfort. Newly furnished rooms. Walking distance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. L. ISRAEL WALKER, 1101-1108 Jackson Street. PURCELL'S SAFE COMPANY Halls Safe and Lock Co.'s Safes and Vaults. Phones Main 667; Ind. 3197 312 Occidental Ave., Seattle, Wash Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Electric Fixtures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. Stetson & Post Mill Co. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE CONNECTION Business Office, Third and Spring People's Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R. J. Reekle, Vice Presst. Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1987. Consultant and Trust General Bank and Exchan. Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash WILLIAM WALKER Complete stock New Fall Goods, Ladies', Misses' and Children's Wear- ing Apparel, Furs and Fine Coats. 820 Second Ave. Seattle, Wash. E. W. WAY & CO. General Insurance Fire, Marine, Burglary, Accident Plate Glass, Employer's Liability. 619-620 Bailey Building Main 2115 Ind. L 3356 IN_JUSTICE’S COURT—BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington: Century Purniture Company, a, corpo: ration, Plaintiff, vs, Alice Baldwin, De- fendant.—No. ....,. Summons for Pub- Heation, State of Washington, County of King, ss. To Alice Baldwin: You are hereby notified that the Cen- tury Furniture Co., a corporation, has filed a complaint against, you in’ said court which will come on to be heard at my office in room 210 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 25th day of January, A. D. 1908, at the hour of 8:90 o'clock A. M., and un- less you appear and then and ‘there an- swer, the same will be taken as con- fessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted, The object and demand of said plaintiff Century Furniture Company s to recover of and from sald defendant Alice Baldwin the sum of thirty-six and 15-100 dollars, In accordance with the complaint of ‘plaintift. Fled December 9, A. D. 1908. R, R. GEORGE, Tugtice of the Peace, Seattle Procinot, King County, Washington, January 1-22, 1909. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County. of King. A. Hedger, Plaintiff, va. Jessie B. Hedger, Deféndant—No. 64781. Sum- mons. ‘The State of Washington to the sald Jessie E. Hedger, Defendant: ‘You are hereby’ summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit, within sixty days after the Ist day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitles court. and answer the complaint of th plainiifl, and serve a copy of your ane Swer upon the undersigned attorney £01 plaintit at his office below stated; and in caxe of your failure so to do, ju ment will be rendered against you ag- Cording to the demand of, complaint Which has been filed with the clerk of sald court. ‘The above entitled action is an action for divorce on the ground of abandon- ment and desertion for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action and for cruelty, HT, SCHOFR, Attorney for Plainti¢y, Postofice Address; 503 Pioneer Bulid- ing, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sanuary 1—February 12, 1909. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Joseph R. Dick, Plaintiff, ys, Allce Clark Dick, Defendant. No. 63586. ‘The State of Washington to the sata Alice Clark Dick, defendant: ‘You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this summons, to- wit: Within sixty days after the 27th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk. ‘The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of cruelty and drunkenness. ELIAS A, WRIGHT, ‘Attorney’ for Plaintimt. P. 0, Address, Rooms 629-631 Burke Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Se 57. 1908 Jan, 8. 1509, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Catherine Perey, Plaintiff, vs. John ‘Percy, Defendant. No. —~. Summons for Publication, The State of Washington to the said John Perey, Defendant : You are hereby summoned, to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- Wit: Within. sixty days after the sth day of January, 1909, and defend the Rbove entitled action ‘in the above en- Htled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your Answer, upon. the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and ‘in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- Dlamt jwhich has. been filed with, the Elerk of said court. ‘The object of the {above entitled action is that plaintift May obtain a divorce from defendant on fhe grounds of defendant's desertion and failure to provide, TL. B, SNOOK, Attorney for Plaintift. P. 0, Address: 640 Burke Bldg., Seat- tle, King County, Washington: Jangary S-February 19, 1909. IN_ JUSTICE’S COURT OF SEATTLE Precinct.—Before Hon. John ©. Car~ roll, Justice of the Peace in and for the’ Precinct of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, Edward Vande Vanter, Plaintiff, vs. T. T. Scudder, Defendant, Summons for Publication. No. 5919-20, State of Washington, County of King—ss. ‘The State of Washington to T. T, Scud- der, Defendant: You are hereby notified that Eaward Vande Vanter has filed a claim against you in said court which will come on to be heard at my office in Seattle, King Coun- ty, Washington, at room No, 210 in the New York Block in said city on the 15th day of February, 1908, at 8:80 o'clock 2. m. and unless you appear and then and there answer the same, the same will be taken as confessed, and the demand of the plaintiff granted. ‘The ‘object and demand of said claim is to recover judgment against you for the sum of $50 alleged to have been loaned fo you, at your request, and to subject to said judgment a sum of money owing from John D. Morrisey to yourself, now under garnishment in this court, Complaint fled on Dec. 17th, 1908. JOHN B, CARROLL, J.P. ‘qTanunty Sc Tanuare 22, 1008. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington for the County of King. Viola Starr, Plaintiff, vs. Alfred Starr, Defendant. No. 64892. Summons by Publication. ‘The State of Washington, to the said Alfred Starr, Defendant: You are here- by summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of tha frst publica. tion of this summons, to-wit, within sixty. days after the Sth day of January, A. D. 1909, and de- fend the above entitled " action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for plaintiff at his Office elow stated; and in case of your fail- ure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘The object of the said action, set forth in the com- plaint, is as follows: To obtain an ab- Bolute decree of divorce from the de- fendant on the grounds of abandonment and non-support and failure to make suitable provision for his family. CG BH. PIPER, IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Solomon Hess, Plaintiff, vs. Bertha Hess, Defendant—No. 64704. Summons by_Publication. ‘State of Washington to Bertha Hess, defendant herein: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date Of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action {n the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer thereto upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their ad- dress below given; in case of your fail- ure so to do, judgment will be ren- dered against you according to the pray- er of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘The object of the above action is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of abandonment. Date of first publication, 25th day of December, 1908 CARRICO & DURK, Attorneys for Plaintiff. 603 Peoples Savings Bank Building, ‘Seattle, King County, Washington. IN_JUSTICE’S COURT—BEFORE R. R- George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Rhoda J, Stanley and George B, Stan- Jay, her, husband, Piaintits, vs. Minnie Y Boaz, Defendant—No. ..... Sum- ons for Publication. Bate of Kashington, County of King, ss, ffo Minnie W. Boaz, defendant herein: You are hereby notified that the above named plaintiffs have filed a complaint Against you Jn said, court, ‘which will me. on to be heard at my office in room 40 New York Block, Seattle, King Coun- ¥, Washington, on the 25th’ day of Jan- Ery, A. D. 1909, at the hour of 8:30 felock a. m., and ‘unless you appear and Fran chess anger esa wit be een as confessed and the demand of the plaintift granted. ‘The object and de- fand of sald complaint is to obtain Complaint filed December 21, A. D. judgment, against, you ‘for $54.40" for ouse rent, coal bill, lights and gas bills, 1908, R. R, GEORGE, fistice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, ‘King County, Washington. ng her 24, 1908—February 4, 1909. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington, in and for the County of King, George Walter, Plaintiff, vs. Lydia ‘Walter’ Defendant. Summons for Pub- Heation, “The State of Washington to the said Lydia Walter: "You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of the summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 13th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action’ in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your ans- Wer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintift at his offes below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court, "Phe object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and deefndant, upon the ground of desertion and cruelty. B. L. SANDERS, Attorney for Plaintift, P. 0, Address: 58 Downs Block, Se- attle, King County, Washington. ‘November 13—December 25, 1908. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THY State of Washington in and for the County of King. Mable Waters, Plaintift, vs. Clark S. Waters, Defendant, Summons for Pub- Hieation. State of Washington to the said Clark S, Waters, defendant in the above en- titled cause: ‘You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 13th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action, in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk ‘of the said court. ‘The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of idleness, non-support and cruelty, B, L. SANDERS, Attorney for Plaintiff, P, 0. Address: 60 Downs Block, Se- attle, Washington. November 18December 25, 1908, ee nse Sere. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF TE ‘State of Washington, for the County of King. 7 State of Washington, County of King —ss. In the Matter of the Estate of John McDonald, Deceased. No. 8412. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that William B. Gaffney and Joseph A. Hyde, the execu- tors of the estate of John McDonald, deceased, have rendered to, and filed in sald court their final account as such executors, and that ‘Thursday, the 17th Gay of December, 1908, at 9:80 o'clock, ‘a.m. at the court-room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by sald court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to sald account, and contest the same. Witnéss, the Hon, Geo. BE. Morris, Judge of ‘said Superior Court; and the Seal of said court hereto affixed this 12th day of November, 1908. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. (Seal) By J. A. SIGURDSON, Deputy Clerk. November 13—December 11, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate, In the Matter of the Sstate of John McDonald, Deceased. No. 8412. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not be Made. Willlam B. Gaffney and Joseph A. Hyde as executors of the estate of John McDonald, deceased, having filed in this court their petition setting forth that said estate 1s now in a condition to be closed and Is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court htat sald petition sets fort facts sufficient: to authorize a distribu- tion of the residue of said estate: It ig therefore ordered by the’ court that all persons interested in the estate of the said John McDonald, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Wash- ington, at the court room of the Pro- bate department of sald court in the City of Seattle, on the 17th day of De- cember, 1908, at the hour of 9:80 o'clock, A. M,,' of said day then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN order of distribution should not be made t of the residue of said estate among the a heirs and persons in said petition men- tioned, according to law. Tt is further ordered, ‘that a copy of this order be published once a week for 1 four ‘successive weeks before the said 1ith day of December, 1908, in The Se- - attle Republican, | newspaper printed and published in’ said King County and of general circulation therein. Bone in open court this 12th day of November, 1908, x Signed: GEORGE E. MORRIS, | ude. State of Washington, County of King a —ss. I, Otto A, Case, County Clerk of King Coiinty.and ex-oificio clerk of the Su- f perlor Court of the State of Washington, \ fo rthe County of King, do hereby certify 2 that the foregoing is a full, true and ¢ correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court, on the 12th y day of November, 1908, in the matter of the estate of John McDonald, deecased. p ‘witness my hand and the seal of sald i court this 12th day of November, 1908. OTTO A, CASE, Clerk ¢ By J. A. SIGURDSON, 4 Deputy Clerk November 13—December 11, 1908. t IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF, THE State of Washington, for the County of King, Helen M. Dalton, Plaintiff, vs. Hugh ‘M, Dalton, Defendant. No. 64,020. Sum- mons by Publication. ‘The State of Washington to the said Hugh M, Dalton, defendant: ‘You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 13th day of November, A. D., 1908, and defend the above entitied action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upoh the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the Glerk ‘of said court. ‘The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To obtain the judgment of said court for the divorce of the par- ties hereto, and dissolving the bonds of matrimony’ now and heertofore existing between the parties hereto and awarding to plaintiff the right to resume and bear her maiden name of Helen M. Schroeder, and for costs of action. ‘8. D. KING, Attorney for Plaintift. P. 0, Address: Room No, 617 New York: Building, City of Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. ‘November 18—December 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate, In the Matter of the Estate of Emma Nancarrow, Deceased. No. 7608. Order Approving Final Account. and to Show Cause Why Distribution Bhould Not be jade, Clifford H, Anderson, administrator of the estate of Emma Nancarrow, deceased, having filed in this court his final ac- count and petition setting forth that Said estate Is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of sald estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Emma, Nancarrow, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Wash- ington, at the court room of the Pro- bate department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 17th day of De- cember, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock, A. M,, of said day then and there to Show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be approved and an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law, Tt is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places In King County and pub- Hished once a week for four successive weeks before the sald 17th day of De- cember, 1908, in The Seattle Republican, @ newspaper printed and published in Said King County and of general cireu- lation therein. Done in open court this 10th day of November, 1208, GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King —s8. I, Otto A. Case, County Clerk of King County and ex-olficio clerk of the Su- perlor Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is\a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said corut on the 10th day of November, 1908, in the matter of the estate of Emma Nancarrow, deceased. ‘Witness my hand and the seal of sald court this 10th day of November, 1908. OTTO A, CASE, ‘Clerk. By J. A. SIGURDSON, ‘Deputy Clerk. ‘November 13—December 11, 1908. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. ‘Walter H. Oliver, Plaintiff, vs. Mamie Oliver, Defendant. ' No. —. ‘The State of Washington to the sald Mamie Oliver, Defendant: ‘You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this summons, to-wit: day of November, 1908, and defend the ‘above entitled action tn the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your gnewer, upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in casé of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk ‘of said court, ‘The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of cruelty and adultery. ELIAS A. WRIGHT, ‘Attorney for Plaintift, P. 0, Address: Rooms 629-631 Burke Buldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. Nov. 27, 1908—Jan. 8, 1909. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. James A. Rook, Plaintiff, vs. Lillian Rook, Detendant.—No. 64038. ‘Sum- mons’ by Publication, ‘The State of Washington to the said Lillian Rook: You are hereby summoned to appear within ‘sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days (60) days after the 14th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the piaintifé and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for plaintift at his of- fice below stated; and in case of your failure 0, to do judgment will be ren- dered against you according to the de- mand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of the said Court. acihe, obfect of this action ts to obtain a decree of the above entitled court dis- solving the bonds of matrimony now and heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant. J. ¥. C, KELLOGG, Attorney for Plaintitt. Office and P.O, Address: 614 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Seach Gwiite, Phainuite, ver Ward W; White, Defendant. No. ——. Summons for Publication. : ‘The State of Washington to, the said above named defendant, Ward W. White: ‘You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the rst publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 6th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action’ in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your ans- Wwer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintife at his office below stated; and Tn'case of your failure so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint, Which has been filed with the clerk of Said court. ‘The object of the above en- titled action is to secure a divorce from defendant. on the grounds of cruelty, @runkenness and abandonment, EB, M. FARMER, * Attorney’ for Plaintift. P.O, Address: 609 Burke Bldg., Seat- tle, King County, Washington. ‘November 6—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In Probate. In_ the Matter of the Estate of Gus ‘Strand, Deceased, No. 9101, Notice of Salc.of Real Estate. Notice is hereby given that in pursu- ance of an order of sale made and eu- tered “by. the Superior Court of King County, Washington, on the 24th day of September, A. D. 1908, in the matter of the estate of Gus Strand, deceased, the undersigned administrator of sald estate, will sell at public auction, subject to confirmation by sald court,’ the follow- ing. described real property, to-wit: Tract twenty (20), Barto's Acre Tracts, in Georgetown, King County, Washing- ton, Said sale will be made On the 12th day of October, 1908, at ten o'clock in the forenoon of sald day at the, front door of the County Court House in the said County of King, in the City of Seat- fle, State of Washington. ‘Terms of sale, for cash, gold coin of the United States; ten per cent, of the bid payable at the time of sale and the balance upon con- _rmation by said court, Dated September 24th, 1908. ‘H. 8. NOICE, Administrator of the Bstate of Gus ‘Strand, Deceased. September 25, October 23, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, In and for the County of King. Inthe Matter of the Insolvency, of H, P. Gilbert, doing business as Richmond Beach Lumber Company. No. 60387. Notice of Assignment and Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given that H. P. Gil- bert, doing business as Richmond Beach Lumber Company, has made an assign- ment of all of his property for the bene- fit of creditors to W. H. Schumacher as assignee, and the ereditors of said in- golyent debtor are hereby notified to pre- sent their claims against said insolvent debtor, under oath, to W. H. Schumacher at Rooms 615-616 New York Block, in Seattle, King County, Washington, the Place of transacting the business of said Insolvent debtor's estate, within three months from the first publication of this notice, to-wit, within three months from the 25th day of September. 1908, ‘W. H. SCHUMACHER, Assignee of H. P. Gilbert, doing business ‘as Richmond Beach Lumber Company, an insolvent debtor, Date of first publication: September 25th, 1908. ‘September 25, November 6, 1908. Te Te Be eee ee State of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Israel O. ‘Negus, Deceased, No, 9269. Notice to Creditors, By order of said court made herein on the ‘oth day of September, 1908, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased or against sald estate, to pre- sent them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 1048 Kilbourne Avenue, the place of business of sald estate, in Se- Atle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. ‘Date of first publication September 25th, 1908. A. J, GODDARD, Ag Administrator of said Estate. KARR & GREGORY, ‘Attorneys for Estate, 715 American Bank Building, Seattle, Wash. September 25, October 23, 1908, IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington for King County. J, W. Brown, Plaintiff, ve, ‘Thos. Boyd, N. W. Chapman and all persons _un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herein atter described real proeprty, Defend- ants. No, 64513—Notice and Summons. ‘State of Washington to the above named defendants, including sald ‘Thos. Boyd, N. W. Chapman and any and ev- ery other person having or claiming any Interest in the property hereinafter de- scribed: You and each of you are hereby note fied and summoned, that the above nam- ed plaintifl, J, W. Brown, is the owner fnd holder ‘of one delinquent tax certit- Jeate issued. by the treasurer of King County, Washington, June 6, 1908, for the taxes of 1898-9, 1900-1-2-3 and 4. in- elusive, numbered 1353266 and 27050, Upon and against Lot one (2), block, six- teen. (16), Riverside Addition’ to Seattle, King County, Washington, assessed as the property of said defendants with the costs of this action $7.60), amount- ing to $11.50 and subsequent’ taxes. to date $1.60, in all to date aggregating $13.10 and bearing 15 per cent Interest per annum, which are all the taxes due hnd delinquent and unpaid against said property and more than three years de- inguent. ‘You and each of you are further noti- fied and. summoned to be and appear within sixty days after first publication of this notice and. simmons exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit: 80 days after December 18, 1908, In the above entitled court and action, and de- fend this action, and answer the com- plaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy bf. your answer upon the undersigned attorney. for the plaintiff at his_oMfice elow. given, or pay the above amount with Interest, penalty, cost and accrued and. accruing taxes. ‘In case you fall 80 to do, judgment will be taken and Gecree rendered against said lot for the ame and decree of foreclosure entered Gecreeing said judgment to be a first lien and forever barring you and each of you from having or claiming any Inter- est adverse. to. this claim of plaintiff, fand ordering a sale of sald lot to, satisty the same as provided by law in sucl cases and as prayed in plaintiff's com- FRIDAY, JANUARY 8, 1909. plaint now on file in this cause and Court, J. W, BROWN, Attorney for Plaintitt. 314 Northern’ Bank Bldg, Seattle, ‘Washington, First publication December 18, 1908. January 29, 1909. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs, Unknown Owners, and persons ‘unknown, if, any, having | or claiming an interest in and to the here- inafter described real property, Defend- ants. No.———Notice and Summons, State of Washington: ‘To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the herginafter described real prop- erty, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one cer- tain delinquent tax certificate issued: the Treasurer of King County, State Washington, dated the 9th day of tember, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the follow- ing year, in the followinig amount, and upon thé real property situated in’ sald King County, described as follows, to- wits Kirkland Park Addition, lot 8, block 1; certificate No. 54812; year 1900; amount, $1.05. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent, years have been paid by the plaintiff “upon sald above, described real property, to wit: Lot 8, block 1, Kirkland Park Ad- dition; amount, $0.68 for 1902; $0.62 for 1908; $0.81 for '1904; $0.44 for 1905; $0.56 for 1906; $0.50 for 1907, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 16 per cent per annum from sald date of payment, and are all the unpaid and un= redeemed taxes upon and against sald real property. ‘You and each of you (including sala persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publica- tion, to-wit: Within 60 days after the 18th day of December, 1908, In the above entitled. court and action: and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a’copy of your anawer on the undersigned attorney for plaintif at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with inter- est and costs. In case you fail so to do, iudement will be rendered herein, fore- slosing the Hen of sald taxes and’ costs against each Darcel of said veal property for the sums and amounts due upon and sharged against each, for sald taxes, in lerest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfac Hon of the sums charged and found gainst it respectively as provided by aw, and as prayed in plaintiff's com- aint, now on file in this cause and sourt. AURORA LAND, COMPANY, ‘A Corporation, Plaintiff. * J. CARVER, oy eee F, J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bidz., Seattle, Wash. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF, rake State of Washington for the County’ of King. Pacific Bottlers’ Supply Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Youngstown Drug Company, Defendant. No. 53723— Order Directing Notice to Creditors. In the above matter, it is ordered that all creditors of said ‘defendant and all parties interested in the estate prosecute and litigate their claims and demands against this defendant in this court and in this cause and to that end they are hereby notified and required to prove their claims hefore this court by filing same with the receiver or his attorney properly verified under oath, with {tem ized statements and other memoranda regarding same; and that said creditors set forth what, if any, security they have for ‘the payment of same, said claims to be filed on or before the fit- teenth day of January, 1909, ‘And the receiver is further ordered to cause notice to be given to the cred~ itors herein by publication in the Seattle Republican once a week for three suc- cessive weeks during sald period and by mailing to each of the known creditors at the last known postoffice address of said creditors, a copy of sald notice. Done in open court this 12th day of December, 1908. GEO. B, MORRIS, Judge. E, B, MORRIS, Receiver, LEOPOLD M. STERN, Attorney for Receiver, 705 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, Wash. December 18, 1908-January 15, 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. ‘Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs, Unknown Owners, and all persons ‘unknown, if any,’ having | or claiming an interést in ana to the here- inafter described real property, Defend- ants. No. ———Notice and Suinmons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, are hereby notified that the abov named plaintiff 1s the holder of one cer- tain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 9th day of Sep- tember, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the follow= ing year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in’ said King County, described as follows, to- wit: Kinkland Park Addition; Lot 2 block 1; certificate No. BS4311; “year, 1900; amount $1.07. ‘That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years has been paid by the plaintif! upon sald above described real property, to- wit: “Lot 2, block 1, Kirkland Park Ad- ition: ‘amount, $0.63. for 1902; $0.52 for 1008; $0.31 for 1904; $0.44 for 1905; $0.66 for 1906; $0.51 for’ 1907; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 16 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against sald real property, You and each of yor Cncluding sala persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within six days after the date af first publication of this notice, exclusive of the date or sald first public cation, to-wit: Within sixty days after December 18, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plain- {iff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintife at his office below stated, or pay the amount duo, together with Interest and. costs. Tn case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the len of sald taxes and costs against each par- cel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of efch parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by Jaw, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court, AURORA LAND COMPANY, A Corporation, Plaintift. F. J, CARVER, Attorney for Plaintift, Office Address: Northern Bank & ‘Trust Co, Bldg, Seattle, Wash, December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909, 4 REPUBLICAN 609B IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King Catherine E. Wakefield for plaintiff, vs. William H. Wakefield, Defendant. No. 64446—Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said William H. Wakefield, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons. Within sixty days after 8th day of December 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your an- swer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to do a judgement will be rendered against you, requiring attention of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of non-support. F. M. JEFFERY. Attorney for plaintiff, acc. P. O. Address: 747 New York Block in Seattle, King County, Wash. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Arthur Bastheim, Plaintiff, vs. American Produce Company, a corporation, Defendant. No. 60345—Order Directing Notice to Creditors above matter, it is ordered that all creditors of said defendant and all parties interested in the estate prosecute and litigate their claims and demands against this defendant in this court and in this cause and to that end they are hereby notified their claims and demands prior to this court by filing same with the receiver or his attorney properly verified under oath, with itemized statements and other memoranda regarding same; and that said creditors set forth what, if any, security they have for the property of the defendant to be filed on or before the fifteenth day of January, 1909. And the receiver is further ordered to cause notice to be given to the creditors herein by publication in the Seattle Republican once a week for three successive weeks during said period and by mail to the known creditors at the last known postoffice address of said creditors, a copy of said notice. Done in open court this 15th day of December, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. B. F. WOODS, Jr. Receiver. LEOPOLD M. STERREN. Attorney for the Receiver. 705 Lowman Blk. Seattle. Wash. December 18, 1908-January 1, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Thomas Mullen, Plaintiff, vs. Jenny Mullen, Defendant. No. — Summons for The State of Washington to the said Jenny Mullen, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first notification of this case to-wit: Within sixty days after the 18th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve copies of the complaint to the commissioner of attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated and in case of your failure to do so judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said county to secure a divorce from the defendant, above named, for desertion. WILLIAM C. KEITH Attorney for Plaintiff Postoffice Address: 45 Starr-Boyd Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington; and for the Della Simonelli, Plaintiff, vs. Cerubinium Simonelli, Defendant. No—Summons. The State of Washington, to the said Cerubinium Simonelli: You are hereby summoned to appear in the sixth trial of its own action, the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 18th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, whose property was wrongfully question upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been made by the plaintiff. The object of said above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of abandonment and desertion, and for a decree of said court awarding said plaintiff's property, detached in the complaint. P. O. Address: 625-626 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. State or Washer Plaintiff, vs. N. W. Chapman, Thos Boyd and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. 64514-Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the owner named plaintiff of J. W. Chapman, said N. W. Chapman, Thos Boyd and every other person having or claiming an interest in the property hereinafter described: You and each of you are hereby notified and summoned that the above named plaintiff of J. W. Chapman, the owner named plaintiff of one delinquent property issued by the treasurer of King County, Washington, for the taxes of 1898-9, 1900-1-2-3 and 4 inclusive, numbered B27050 and B53267 assessed as the property of said Chapman and Boyd respectively for (1) block upon and against (2) block upon and against Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington, aggregating $11.90, including $7.50 costs in this action: That plaintiff is the owner of all subsequent taxes on said lot aggregating $1.60 in all aggregating $13.50 to this date and which bears the highest est per annum all the taxes due, and unpaid on said lot and more than three years past delinquent. You and each of you are also further notified and summoned to be and appear within 60 days after the first publication of this notice and are excluded from publication, to-wit: 60 days after December 18, 1908, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action, and answer the complaint of plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon address below for given, or pay the above amount with interest, penalty and costs accrued and hereafter accruing. In case you fail so to do judgment will be entered and rendered against you as a sum of foreclosure decreed forever barring and estopping you and each of you from having or claiming any title therein in adverse to this claim of plaintiff and decreeing said judgment of it, and lien and order of the said lot to be given same as provided by the law in such cases and as prayed in plain- Being an active attorney and from time to time having legal notices for publication, it is perfectly natural for you to want to get acquainted with those newspapers that do your kind of business. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Is just your size in this respect. It already has some notices for publication, as may be seen herein, but it needs more of them, and to that end your business is earnestly solicited. GHABLEY ON THE SPOT. Your notices are promptly called for; handled with care and accuracy. Affidavits delivered without delay. Charges reasonable from a hard times standpoint; everything done in a jam-up manner. TELEPHONE MAIN 305 When you have a publication, and if it happens to be a Divorce Summons or a Notice to Creditors, give us the facts and we will do the rest. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. 307 Epler Block. Main 305. Notices Received Up to Friday Noon. tiff's complaint now on file in the office of the clerk of this court. First day of publication Dec. 18, 1908, December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Mary C. Bell, Plaintiff, vs. Augustis Bell, Defendant. No.——Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Augustis Bell, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear days after the date, the first publica- tion of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 18th day of December, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned with the written state; and case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To obtain an absolute decree of relief from the defendant on the grounds of desertion, non-support and cruel treatment. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 412 Oriental Bldg. Seattle, County of King, Wash. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the matter of the estate of James Mills, deceased. No. 8718—Notice to President. By order of sfaid court made herein on the 5th day of December, 1908, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against any of the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 305 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and in the state after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication December 11, 1908. E. E. MORRIS, As Administrator of said Estate. E. B. PALMER. Attorney for Estate, 305 Lowman Building, Seattle, Wash. December 11, 1908, January 8, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Dear John, Plaintiff, vs. John G. Zarek, Defendant. No, 64417—Summons. The State of Washington to the said John G. Zarek: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 11th day, within sixty days after the denote the entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do; judgment will be rendered against you to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matri-mony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant upon the ground of non-support and cruel treatment. & DURK. Marie Attorneys for Plaintiff. Room 603 People's Bank Bldg. December 11, 1908-January 22, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Marie Maud Ravey, Plaintiff, vs. Wilfred Ralston Ravey, Defendant. No.-Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Wilfred Ralston Ravey, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to appear within the date (60) days after the 11th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complain THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ATTORNEYS Being an active attorney and from time to time legal notices for publication, are natural for you to want to get with those newspapers that do your business. TITTLE REPUBLIC your size in this respect. It alrre notices for publication, as may be, but it needs more of them, and to the business is earnestly solicited. ARLEY ON THE SPOT notices are promptly called for; he care and accuracy. Affidavits do out delay. Charges reasonable from standpoint; everything done in a year. TELEPHONE MAIN 30 when you have a publication, and if it be a Divorce Summons or a Notice, give us the facts and we will do. ATTLE REPUBLIC Block. Main notices Received Up to Friday Noon of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, attendant will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of cruelty. EDGAR FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. and Office Address: 304 Metropole Building, southwest corner of Second Avenue and Yesler Way, Seattle, King County, Washington. December 11, 1908—January 22, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR CURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. James Milton Shaver, Plaintiff, vs Evans Maud Shaver, Defendant. No—Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Evelyn Maud Shaver, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, with his sign, the affidavit of the U.S. Judge December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of desertion. EDGAR FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. Office and Address: 304 Metropoor Building, southwest of Second Avenue, and Yesler Way, Seattle, King County, State of Washington. December 11, 1908—January 22, 1909. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL Estate—Sheriff's Office. State of Washington, County of King, ss. By virtue of a writ of execution issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 4th day of October, 1908, by the case of M. Seller & Co., a corporation, plaintiff, versus J. J. Brys, defendant. No. 62689, and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the high-grade house, 100 yards with the house prescribed by law for sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 16th day of January, A. D. 1909, before the court house dorp of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the defendant, upon the following scribed property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Tracts twenty-three (23) and twenty-four (24). Fry's Addition to Columbia, levied on as the property of said defendant, J. J. Brys, to satisfy the judgment, judgment to ninety-one and 29-100 ($81.29) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 8th day of December, 1908, L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By Edw. Drew, Deputy. December 11, 1908—January 8, 1909. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE—Sheriff's Office. State of Washington, County of King, ss. By virtue of a writ of execution, issued out of the Honorable Superior of King County on December 11, 1908, by the clerk thereof, in the case of J. A. Campbell Co., a corporation, plaintiff, versus Joseph Maso- ero, defendant. No. 64439, and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will pro- ceed to make notice to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 16th day of January. A. D. 1909, before the court house door of said King County, State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said deendant, owe- ing the said county to the living described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot five (5). Block ten (10), Ralnier Boulevard Fourth Addition to Seattle ```markdown ``` levied on as the property of said defendant, Joseph Masoero, to satisfy a judgment, amounting to two thousand three hundred seventy-four and 95-100 ($2374.95) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 8th day of December, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By Edw. Drew, Deputy. December 11, 1908—January 8, 1909. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL Estate. State of Washington, County of King, ss. —Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an allas execution, issued of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 31st day of December, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of J. E. Koefele, plaintiff, versa Charles S. Wangelin, and Florin B. Wangelin, defendants, No. 64660, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to wit, at 10 o'clock a.m. on the 6th day of February, A. D. 1909, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of said defendants, S. Wangelin, and Flora Wangelin, in the to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lots twenty-eight (28) and twenty-nine (29), Plock eleven (11), Hillman City Addition of the office of Seattle, Division No. 6), levied on the property, said defendants Charles S. Wangelin and Flora B. Wangelin, to satisfy a judgment, amounting to one hundred forty and 27-100 ($140.27) dollars, and costs of sale, I favor of suit. Dated this 31st day of December, 1908, L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By FDW, DREW, Deputy. January 1-29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR CITY OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. J. C. MacCallum, Plaintiff, vs. Maud MacCallum, Defendant. No. ... Susan PUBLICATION State of Washington to said Maud Mac- Calhoun You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from the date of the first publication of this summons, to wait on the 11th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the lawsuit you have filed, giving to the demands of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. This cause is brought by the plaintiff to obtain a decree of divorce from said defendant on the grounds of extreme cruelty, adultery and bigamy. E. PIPER. Attorney for Plaintiff. 26 and 37 Union Block, 713 1st Ave. Seattle Wash. Dec. 11, 1908—Jan. 22, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. In Probate. In the court the estate of Israel O. Negus, deceased No. 92509. Notice of Sale of Real Estate. Notice is hereby given that, in pursuance of an order of sale made and entered by the Superior Court of King County, WYashington, on the day of December, 1908, in the matter the estate of Israel O. Negus, deceased, the undersigned, administrator of said estate, will sell at public auction, subject to the order of the Court, the following described real property of Lots fifteen (15) and eighteen (18), block nine (9), Lakeview addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington. Sale to be made on the 28th day of December, A. D. 1908, at ten o'clock in the forenoon of said day at the front door of the County House, in said King County, in the City of Seattle, State of Washington. Terms of sale for cash, gold coin of the United States, ten per cent of the bid payable at the time of the sale and the balance upon confirmation by this Court, 1908. 3 A. J. GODDARD, Administrator of the Estate of Israel O. Negus, Deceased. December 4—25—1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Mary Williams, Plaintiff, vs. Emanuel Williams, Defendant. No. —. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Witness Defendant. Emanuel M. Banks You hereby hereby summoned to appear with sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: Within sixty days after the 1st day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a notice to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant. MILLION & HOUSER and GEORGE FRIEND, Plaintiff's Attorneys. Post Office Address: Room 916 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of B. O. Winslow, Deceased, No. 8444. Order Appointing Day for Settlement of the Estate and Distribution, and Directing Notice to Be Given. Lillian M. Winslow, administratrix of the estate of B. O. Winslow, deceased, having rendered and presented for settlement and filed in this court her final account of her administration of the estate of said deceased, together with the distribution of the residue of said estate to the persons entitled thereto: It is ordered that Thursday, the 4th day of February, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock a. m., be, and the same is hereby appointed for the hearing and settlement of said account and the hearing of Department No. 4 of said court; that the clerk of this court give notice thereof by causing notice to be posted in at least three of the most public places in King County. Washington, and by publishing a similar notice for the client of said deceased apprehended before said day of settlement and distribution, in the Seattle Republican, a weekly newspaper printed and of general circulation in said King County. Washington It is further ordered that all persons interested in the estate of said deceased apprehended before said Superior Court on Thursday, the 4th day of February, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m., said day, at the court room of Department No. 4 of said court house in the City of Seattle, Washington, to cause why an order should not be made district and estate, as prayed for said petition. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be served upon all persons interested in said estate at least ten days before the day apointed for the hearing of said petition, or that a copy of this order be published for at least four consecutive weeks to be said hearing, in the Seattle Republic, a newspaper published in King County, Washington, and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 31st day of December, 1908. December, 1909. GEO. E. MORRIS. Judge. January 1—February 4, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Albert A. Kiefer, Plaintiff, vs. Edna Kiefer, Defendant, No. — Summ- mons. Publication. The State of Washington to the said above named defendant, Edna Kiefer: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 1st day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled attorney in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint to the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been laid with the clerk of sale court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure a divorce from defendant on the grounds of desertion. KING DYKEMAN. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 502 Mutual Life Bld., Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of B. Winslow, Deceased. No. 8444. No notice of Settlement of Final Account and Hearing of Petition for Distribution. Notice is hereby given that Lillian M. Winslow, administratrix of the estate of B. O. Winslow, deceased, has rendered O. O. Winslow, deceased, has rendered in said court her final account of her administration of said estate, and that Thursday, the 4th day of February, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock a. m., of said day, at the court room of Department No. 8444, of the King County, Washington, has been appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file exception to said account and to contest the same. Notice is hereby further given that said Lillian M. Winslow, the said administratrix, has presented a petition for the sale of the estate and that Thursday, the 4th day of February, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock of said day, at Department No. 4 of said court, the county house, Keekar Court. Washington has been duly appointed by said court for the hearing of said petition, at which time all persons interested in said estate may appear and show their order shall be instructed distributing said estate as praved for in said petition. In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of said Superior Court this 31st day of December, 1908. LILLIAN M. WINSLOW, Administratrix. OTTO A. CASE. Clerk of said Court. By J. A. SIGURDSSON. (Seal of Superior Court) Reputy. "What are they moving the church for?’ “Well, stranger, I'm mayor of these diggin's, an' I'm fer law enforcement. We've got an ordinance what says no saloon shall be nearer than three hundred feet from a church. I give 'em three days to move the church.’ It perhaps has not been cold enough in Seattle for the past week to freeze brass monkeys, but it did play havoc with the brass faucets. An ordinance preventing the overcrowding of street cars may be a beautiful theory, but when it is pouring down rain and one is waiting on a street corner, it's a thousand times more preferable to take the first car, even if you have to stand, than to continue standing in the rain on the street corner waiting for a regulation car. In Seattle the very idea is not only preposterous but unreasonable. It seems to us that the saloons were all getting along very nicely without being disturbed again by some tinhorn councilman, who is doubtless in the employ of some dive saloon, and the ordinance asking that saloons be permitted to run all night should die a-bornin'. While the snow and coal bear no striking resemblance or show any signs of being related, nevertheless when Mr. Snow puts in his appearance Mr. Coal follows close after him. The two may not be related, but they are inseparable. What is the matter with the A.-Y.-P. commission? There seems to always be things doing among the members thereof. The latest is the resignation of R. W. Condon. Is there something rotten in Denmark? Legislative clans have begun to assemble and once again the city of Olympia is a real live one. What the Pacific Wave, the University of Washington student paper, lacks in being a public nuisance is so slight that it would require a Philadelphia lawyer to figure it out. We know Postmaster George F. Russell will not remove W. J. Colkett, and for no other reason than that Colkett is a cotton-mouth Democrat. Russell owes his own appointment to J. D. Farrell, an offensive Democrat, and even Senator Piles himself owes his election to the United States senate to J. D. Farrell, and Farrell is backing Colkett—well, we guess nit. Moral lepers, even though representatives of foreign countries, when discovered do not last long at the Roumanian court, as Crown Princess Marie makes it so unpleasant for them that they are glad of an opportunity to leave between two suns. Would to God there was some one of her stripe in social authority at Washington City. Harriman plans to tap Northern Mexico, says a head line, and if he does, another republic will be added to Harriman's possessions. Capitol Hill Improvement Club wants a cluster light for the east side of Volunteer park, which reminds us that some people always want something, if for no other reason than because some one else has it, whether they need it or not. Countess Cassini is the high-faluting name of a Russian royal pauper who hopes to grab a man of money in the United States. A fool and his money soon part. WE ARE MOVED TO REMARK That there is something familiar about the new year. That good resolutions will not stand alone or work their own way. That the 4,000,000 saplings destroyed to make Christmas trees should not cause serious regret they were saved from the lumber trust. That Chicago mass meetings should not decide delicate matters of state. That a Russian is not necessarily a patriot because he helped to kill a couple of women. That with the majority of its counties voting "dry" Ohio ought to be able to hold Cincinnati and Boss Cox down at Columbus. That the State of Missouri does not recognize the "twilight zone" in Standard Oil matters. That Mr. Burton of Ohio was speaking after the manner of an "Advance" editorial when he told the Toledo business men that "the interests" prefer to do business through political bosses." That it is not worth while for Mr. Bryan to call upon Tammany to explain—Tammany is its own explanation. That no postal savings bank bill is to be passed during the present session of congress, "because Senator Aldrich is opposed to it;" Senator Aldrich is a majority. That if the Missouri supreme court had rendered its decision against the Standard Oil Company a month sooner perhaps President Roosevelt would not have been so sure that the states cannot handle big corporations. That the eyes of the country will soon be upon Oregon in the matter of primary pledges. That if Mr. Taft goes to Panama every year during his administration will it keep the bottom under the dam and the ditch? That if you see anything in The Seattle Republican during the year which you do not like, write to the editor and blow him up; but when you are well-pleased don't say anything to him; it might increase his pride. MOST ELOQUENT WOMAN IN THE WORLD. 'The nation cannot afford to go on losing the intelligence, the energy, the culture, the affection, and the devotion of more than half its population. The country cannot prosper which does not properly represent in its domestic, and its legislative life the point of view of its womankind. The state cannot spare from its high councils the deep wisdom of its mothers and the comradeship of its wives.'—Ethel Annakin Snowden. Mrs. Ethel Annakin Snowden. the beautiful young English woman who recently came to America to speak on woman's suffrage, THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN has been pronounced the most eloquent woman in the world. Along with her great oratorical powers Mrs. Snowden possesses great magnetism of personality, a powerful intellect, and the courage of her convictions. She is an educated woman, the daughter of well-to-do parents and the wife of Philip Snowden, one of the best known members of the House of Commons. Mrs. Snowden has done much to shape her husband's career. He is a cripple and almost constantly an invalid, and many times when he has not been able to speak as announced she has taken her place before an audience and spoken in his stead. Although very versatile, Ethel Snowden's greatest speeches are made for woman's suffrage. She has written books and delivered lectures on the subject both here and in England. In Carnegie Hall, December 4th last, at a meeting of the Interurban Suffrage Council, which was promoted by Mrs. Clarence Mackay, Col. George Harvey, and other prominent New York people, Mrs. Snowden spoke her farewell to America. The boxes, which stretched in two tiers around the entire hall, sold for ten dollars for the first row and five dollars for the second. All these were filled by New York's representative men and women. The rest of the house up to the topmost balcony was black with people and thousands were turned away. During her talk Mrs. Snowden spoke of the beginning of the suffragette movement in England. She told of how a body of two hundred women went to Sir Henry Campbell Bannerhead, leader of the Liberal party, and said they would wait until everything else had been attended to before they put their plea; that they only wanted a statement from him that before the Liberal party went out it would grant, or seek to grant some measure of suffrage to women. Sir Henry had replied, "I can hold out no hope to you that anything will be done." Annie Kenny, the little mill girl and Napoleon of the movement, had jumped upon a chair, pale and vibrant, and called out, "Women, is this war?" and they replied, "Yes, it is war." "It has been war ever since. It will be war until we attain our end." Mrs. Snowden said. In speaking of the suffragettes' habit of breaking up political meetings by asking questions, she explained that in England it was the custom of everyone who had a cause to urge, to ask questions of the speaker. She had seen very distinguished speakers interrupted rudely at almost every sentence by men calling out such things as "Say, forget about that, we want to hear about the unemployed," or, "Rats! Cut it! Give us something on old-age pensions." "But, because these men were voters," Mrs. Snowden said, "they were answered very politely. Because the women were not voters, they were dragged out and kicked down stairs." She concluded her address by saying, "The history of the world's progress, so far as I can read it, has not been a history of the majorities. It has been a history of intelligent minority. If be true that large numbers of women do not want the ballot, I HAVE A BEER OF QUALITY IT'S Rainier BEER SEATTLE BREWING & MALTING CO. SEATTLE, WASH., U.S.A. Guardian Life INSURANCE CO. OF SEATTLE that is the very reason why it should be conferred upon them, that they may receive the education and enlightenment which can come only by its use. Telegrams, cablegrams, have come to us in England from the women of every country in the world—from Russia, from Germany, Austria, Italy, Japan, even from India, all saying, "English women, you must fight on. It is our fight you are fighting, you must win it for us." Then, if it indeed be true that the happy women of America do not want the ballot, think of the women of the whole race. Join hands with us across the sea to win this fight for the women of the world." The applause continued for more than five minutes after she sat down, and when an immense boquet of beauty roses was borne down the aisle it burst forth afresh. The most eloquent woman living! And she is devoted to the work for woman's suffrage. All over the world this cause is gaining the support of people of FRIDAY. JANUARY 8. 1909 wealth, talent and influence. It has taken on such vast proportions that the only way left for those who do not wish to think it is coming, is to move to another planet. P. WILSON R. GAY, The New Member of the King County Superior Court Bench. FRIDAY. JANUARY 8, 1909. POLITICAL POT-PIE. "In my opinion the man from Tacoma, who will get the endorsement of the business men for United States senator will be the Hon, R. L. McCormick, instead of either Cushman or Judge Snell," said a well known politician one day this week. "Not that Frank Cushman is not popular, but he will agree to McCormick's endorsement in the interest of perfect political harmony. In case Mr. McCormick is a candidate he will receive the unanimous endorsement of the lumber interests of the state. He will also receive the support of the Perkins' Press and may get the support of the old Ankeny guard. I am not prepared at this time to say that R. L. McCormick will be the only candidate from Pierce county for United States senator, but from the political didoes that are being cut in Tacoma at this writing I believe I am safe in saying that McCormick is the man and that Cushman will be for him and Snell will not be able to oppose him. "Did Piles play fair, you ask? Well, not if the court knows itself, and it thinks it does. In that much talked of senatorial agreement a man was named, and that man was none other than Senator Levi Ankeny, and Senator Piles knew it, but when he returned from Washington he declared no one was named in the agreement and only an Eastern Washington man was in the consideration. As a result of that explanation hundreds and thousands of voters in King county, and even in other counties of the state, felt that they were not bound by the agreement to support Senator Ankeny in view of the fact that Jones was also an Eastern Washington man. Had Senator Piles told the voters of King county they were morally bound to support Senator Ankeny the most of the voters of the county would have done so, and the voters of other counties would have followed in their wake and Senator Ankeny would have been re-elected. I can not see how any Ankeny man can consistently support Senator Piles for re-election in the light of his actions last summer." In naming Eugene Lorton as a member of the board of control a splendid selection has been made and the Pie-maker believes that he will give the state an ideal administration. Strange things happen in the political world, as may be seen in the rise of Eugene Lorton to political power and the going down of Senator Ankeny. Once Lorton was a great admirer of Levi Ankeny and helped to direct his forces in Walla Walla, he being the editor of the Union of that city, but for some reason Mr. Ankeny's local manager took offense at Lorton and prevailed on him to kick Lorton out. This caused Lorton to espouse the cause of the Boxers and he and his friends have hammered away at the Regulars in Walla Walla until they have not only driven them from power in the city and county, but have beaten them in the state and nation, and as a result Senator Ankeny is retiring to private life while Lorton is becoming one of the political leaders of the state. "The world do move." The inauguration of Governorelect Cosgrove will take place next 1890 ROBERT L. McCORMICK, Who Hopes to Get Pierce County's Unanimous Endorsement for United States Senator for Washington to Succeed Senator Piles. Tuesday, and according to reports he will be on hand to go through with the trying ordeal, but after he has been inaugurated he will return to California. Howard G. Cosgrove, who was one of the managers of his father's campaign, will be his private secretary. If he returns to California Lieutenant Governor Hay will act as governor, though he will be guided largely by Howard's recommendations, who will always keep in close touch with his father. Rumor has it that injunction papers will be served on Lieutenant Governor-elect M. E. Hay next Monday with the view of preventing him from being inaugurated. He will be attacked from both the Democratic side of the house as well as the Republican. The Democrats will attack him on the grounds that he was not a resident of either Lincoln or Spokane county at the time of his nomination and election. The Republicans on the grounds that he unlawfully spent money in his election. In case the supreme court disqualifies Mr. Hay, Lieutenant Governor Charles E. Coon will hold over under the constitution until his successor is elected and qualified. The legislature which meets next Monday promises to be one of the warmest legislative assemblies that has ever met in this state. The Meigs men declare they have 63 pledged votes for speaker, while the opposition declares that there are a sufficient number of scattering votes not pledged for speaker to concentrate on some one and elect him with perfect ease. In case the opposition is correct then it is barely possible that the Hon. Edward B. Palmer stands a most excellent show of winning the plum. The terms of thirty-one United States Senators will expire on March 4, but this does not mean that there will be that many new faces in the upper house when the special session of congress meets ```markdown ``` THE SEATTLE REPURLICAN [Name] in the middle of March to revise the tariff. There will be thirteen new senators on the roll call, as eighteen of the thirty-one already have been re-elected or assured of re-election, either through success in primary contests or pledges of a majority of the membership of the several state legislatures charged with the duty of electing senators before the beginning of the next congress. In addition to the vacancies occurring in the regular way there will be a vacancy in Pennsylvania on account of the forthcoming resignation of Senator Knox to accept the position of secretary of state in the Taft cabinet. That Secretary Root will be given the New York senatorship now held by Senator Platt is conceded, and a contest is not expected. The Republican senators whose [Name] [Portrait of a man in formal attire, wearing a suit and bow tie, with a serious expression. The background is plain and dark, emphasizing the subject.] Who Will Be Inaugurated Governor of Washington Next Tuesday and Realize His Life Ambition. Who Will Be Inaugurated Governor Realize His SAMUEL GOODLOVE COSGROVE, terms expire at the end of the present congress, but who are reasonably sure of being returned, are Cummins (primary), Dillingham, Gallinger, Heyburn, Hopkins (primary), Penrose, Perkins, Smoot and Stephenson. Democratic senators who will be returned are Clarke (of Arkansas), Clay, Gore, Johnston, McEnergy (of Louisiana), Newlands, Overman, Smith and Stone. By reason of defeat in primary contests Senator Ankeny, of Washington, will be succeeded by Representative Wesley L. Jones, Senator Hansbrough of North Dakota by M. N. Johnson, Kittredge of South Dakota by Governor Coe I. Crawford, and Long of Kansas by Joseph E. Bristow, former fourth assistant postmaster general. All of these men are Republicans, and in addition Fulton of Oregon probably will be succeeded by Governor Chamberlin, Democrat, who was victorious in what is popularly known as the double primary system of the state. Of the Democratic senators whose terms expire on March 4, Gary of South Carolina will be succeeded by E. D. Smith, and Milton of Florida by Duncan U. Fletcher. Offsetting the Oregon situation is that of Kentucky, former Governor W. O. Bradley, Republican, having been elected to succeed McCreary, Democrat, by reason of the failure of the Democratic majority in the Kentucky legislature to agree. Teller of Colorado will be succeeded by Charles J. Hughes of Denver, who was endorsed by the Democratic state convention after Teller had declined to be a candidate for re-election. The legislature is Democratic. BENCH AND BAR. Some one has said, "there are tricks in all trades except mine," which may or may not be true, but what we are trying to get out of this is, as insignificant as may the clerkship of a superior court judge seem to be to the average citizen, yet its is rumored that the clerk of a superior court judge in King county made out of the receiverships to which he was appointed by the judge for whom he [Name] Corner of Washington Next Tuesday and his Life Ambition. 5 works during the year 1907 the enormous sum of $38,000, which sum made his $80.00 per month salary look like fifteen cents with fifteen holes in it. Of course, someone had to be appointed to those receiverships, but it looks like crowding things when the clerk of the court is appointed to them and never lose a day from his labors at the court house and yet make so vast a sum of money as that on the side. Such a proceeding is perfectly legitimate, but it hardly seems fair. The attorneys of Seattle have decided to ask the legislature to create another judgeship for King county on the grounds that there is a sufficient amount of work for that number of judges in the county, and yet they declared a few minutes later that, all of the judges in King county were quite up with their work except Judge Tallman, who was behind on account of sickness. The judges from now on will get $4,000 each per year in salary, and the salary list for the superior court judges at present will amount to $24,000 per year, and if the additional judge be given it will amount to $28,000 per year. From a monetary standpoint that does look like going some. Two additional justices of the peace for Seattle is to also be asked for. ALABAMA CODE OF ETHICS ADOPTED BY THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. Alabama lawyers have in the history of the profession in the state much to remember with pride. A report of the committee on code of professional ethics of the American Bar Association says: "The code of the Alabama State Bar Association, as it is the foundation of all the other codes, is made the basis of this compilation." The Alabama code, adopted in 1887, was written by Judge Thomas G. Jones of this city, who was paid the great compliment of being asked to sit with the committee of the national body, though not a member. Continuing, the report says: "While Sharswood's Essay on Professional Ethics was doubtless the inspiration for the Alabama code, the profession is nevertheless indebted for that code's existence to the initiative of Col. Thomas Goode Jones, afterwards governor of Alabama, and now United States judge for the middle district of Alabama, who in 1881 suggested the adoption of a code of professional ethics for the State Bar Association, and afterwards compiled it." Incident to the recent disposition to criticise the courts, the following section of the Alabama code, quoted with special note in the report, is given: "Courts and judicial officers in the rightful exercise of their functions should always receive the support and countenance of attorneys against unjust criticism and popular clamor; and it is an attorney's duty to give them his moral support in all proper ways, and particularly by setting a good example in his own person of obedience to law." This section has been adopted verbatim in Georgia, Virginia, Michigan, Colorado, North Carolina, Maryland, West Virginia, Kentucky, Missouri and in Wisconsin, save that last portion beginning with the words "and particularly by."—Central Law Journal. Seattle Republican Published Every Friday, 307 Epler Blk. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton...Editor and Publisher Busie Revels Cayton...Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. One Year $3.00 Six Months 1.50 Three Months 75 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matter. Legal Publications a Specialty. It perhaps has not been cold enough in Seattle for the past week to freeze brass monkeys, but it did play havoc with the brass faucets. An ordinance preventing the overcrowding of street cars may be a beautiful theory, but when it is pouring down rain and one is waiting on a street corner, it's a thousand times more preferable to take the first car, even if you have to stand, than to continue standing in the rain on the street corner waiting for a regulation car. In Seattle the very idea is not only preposterous but unreasonable. It seems to us that the saloons were all getting along very nicely without being disturbed again by some tinhorn councilman, who is doubtless in the employ of some dive saloon, and the ordinance asking that saloons be permitted to run all night should die a-bornin'. While the snow and coal bear no striking resemblance or show any signs of being related, nevertheless when Mr. Snow puts in his appearance Mr. Coal follows close after him. The two may not be related, but they are inseparable. What is the matter with the A.-Y.-P. commission? There seems to always be things doing among the members thereof. The latest is the resignation of R. W. Condon. Is there something rotten in Denmark? Legislative clans have begun to assemble and once again the city of Olympia is a real live one. What the Pacific Wave, the University of Washington student paper, lacks in being a public nuisance is so slight that it would require a Philadelphia lawyer to figure it out. We know Postmaster George F. Russell will not remove W. J. Colkett, and for no other reason than that Colkett is a cotton-mouth Democrat. Russell owes his own appointment to J. D. Farrell, an offensive Democrat, and even Senator Piles himself owes his election to the United States senate to J. D. Farrell, and Farrell is backing Colkett—well, we guess nit. Moral lepers, even though representatives of foreign countries, when discovered do not last long at the Roumanian court, as Crown Princess Marie makes it so unpleasant for them that they are glad of an opportunity to leave between two suns. Would to God there was some one of her stripe in social authority at Washington City. Harriman plans to tap Northern Mexico, says a head line, and if he does, another republic will be added to Harriman's possessions. --- Capitol Hill Improvement Club wants a cluster light for the east side of Volunteer park, which reminds us that some people always want something, if for no other reason than because some one else has it, whether they need it or not. Countess Cassini is the high-faluting name of a Russian royal pauper who hopes to grab a man of money in the United States. A fool and his money soon part. WE ARE MOVED TO REMARK That there is something familiar about the new year. That good resolutions will not stand alone or work their own way. That the 4,000,000 saplings destroyed to make Christmas trees should not cause serious regret—they were saved from the lumber trust. That Chicago mass meetings should not decide delicate matters of state. That a Russian is not necessarily a patriot because he helped to kill a couple of women. That with the majority of its counties voting "dry" Ohio ought to be able to hold Cincinnati and Boss Cox down at Columbus. That the State of Missouri does not recognize the "twilight zone" in Standard Oil matters. That Mr. Burton of Ohio was speaking after the manner of an "Advance" editorial when he told the Toledo business men that "the interests" prefer to do business through political bosses." That it is not worth while for Mr. Bryan to call upon Tammany to explain—Tammany is its own explanation. That no postal savings bank bill is to be passed during the present session of congress, "because Senator Aldrich is opposed to it;" Senator Aldrich is a majority. That if the Missouri supreme court had rendered its decision against the Standard Oil Company a month sooner perhaps President Roosevelt would not have been so sure that the states cannot handle big corporations. That the eyes of the country will soon be upon Oregon in the matter of primary pledges. That the King of England comes very near being in the unemployed class, but he is not suffering want. That if Mr. Taft goes to Panama every year during his administration will it keep the bottom under the dam and the ditch? That if you see anything in The Seattle Republican during the year which you do not like, write to the editor and blow him up; but when you are well-pleased don't say anything to him; it might increase his pride. MOST ELOQUENT WOMAN IN THE WORLD. 'The nation cannot afford to go on losing the intelligence, the energy, the culture, the affection, and the devotion of more than half its population. The country cannot prosper which does not properly represent in its domestic, and its legislative life the point of view of its womankind. The state cannot spare from its high councils the deep wisdom of its mothers and the comradeship of its wives.'—Ethel Annakin Snowen. Mrs. Ethel Annakin Snowden, the beautiful young English woman who recently came to America to speak on woman's suffrage, THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN has been pronounced the most eloquent woman in the world. Along with her great oratorical powers Mrs. Snowden possesses great magnetism of personality, a powerful intellect, and the courage of her convictions. She is an educated woman, the daughter of well-to-do parents and the wife of Philip Snowden, one of the best known members of the House of Commons. Mrs. Snowden has done much to shape her husband's career. He is a cripple and almost constantly an invalid, and many times when he has not been able to speak as announced she has taken her place before an audience and spoken in his stead. Although very versatile, Ethel Snowden's greatest speeches are made for woman's suffrage. She has written books and delivered lectures on the subject both here and in England. In Carnegie Hall, December 4th last, at a meeting of the Interurban Suffrage Council, which was promoted by Mrs. Clarence Mackay, Col. George Harvey, and other prominent New York people, Mrs. Snowden spoke her farewell to America. The boxes, which stretched in two tiers around the entire hall, sold for ten dollars for the first row and five dollars for the second. All these were filled by New York's representative men and women. The rest of the house up to the topmost balcony was black with people and thousands were turned away. During her talk Mrs. Snowden spoke of the beginning of the suffragette movement in England. She told of how a body of two hundred women went to Sir Henry Campbell Bannerhead, leader of the Liberal party, and said they would wait until everything else had been attended to before they put their plea: that they only wanted a statement from him that before the Liberal party went out it would grant, or seek to grant some measure of suffrage to women. Sir Henry had replied, "I can hold out no hope to you that anything will be done." Annie Kenny, the little mill girl and Napoleon of the movement, had jumped upon a chair, pale and vibrant, and called out, "Women, is this war?" and they replied, "Yes, it is war." "It has been war ever since. It will be war until we attain our end," Mrs. Snowden said. In speaking of the suffragettes' habit of breaking up political meetings by asking questions, she explained that in England it was the custom of everyone who had a cause to urge, to ask questions of the speaker. She had seen very distinguished speakers interrupted rudely at almost every sentence by men calling out such things as "Say, forget about that, we want to hear about the unemployed," or, "Rats! Cut it! Give us something on old-age pensions." "But, because these men were voters," Mrs. Snowden said, "they were answered very politely. Because the women were not voters, they were dragged out and kicked down stairs." She concluded her address by saying, "The history of the world's progress, so far as I can read it, has not been a history of the majorities. It has been a history of intelligent minority. If be true that large numbers of women do not want the ballot, I HAVE A BEER OF QUALITY IT'S Rainier BEER SEATTLE BREWING & MALTING CO. SEATTLE, WASH., U.S.A. Guardian Life INSURANCE CO. OF SEATTLE that is the very reason why it should be conferred upon them, that they may receive the education and enlightenment which can come only by its use. Telegrams, cablegrams, have come to us in England from the women of every country in the world—from Russia, from Germany, Austria, Italy, Japan, even from India, all saying, "English women, you must fight on. It is our fight you are fighting, you must win it for us." Then, if it indeed be true that the happy women of America do not want the ballot, think of the women of the whole race. Join hands with us across the sea to win this fight for the women of the world." The applause continued for more than five minutes after she sat down, and when an immense boquet of beauty roses was borne down the aisle it burst forth afresh. The most eloquent woman living! And she is devoted to the work for woman's suffrage. All over the world this cause is gaining the support of people of FRIDAY, JANUARY wealth, talent and influence. It has taken on such vast proportions that the only way left for those who do not wish to think it is coming, is to move to another planet. ```markdown ``` WILSON R. GAY, The New Member of the King County Superior Court Bench. FRIDAY, JANUARY 8, 1909. POLITICAL POT-PIE. "In my opinion the man from Tacoma, who will get the endorsement of the business men for United States senator will be the Hon, R. L. McCormick, instead of either Cushman or Judge Snell," said a well known politician one day this week. "Not that Frank Cushman is not popular, but he will agree to McCormick's endorsement in the interest of perfect political harmony. In case Mr. McCormick is a candidate he will receive the unanimous endorsement of the lumber interests of the state. He will also receive the support of the Perkins' Press and may get the support of the old Ankeny guard. I am not prepared at this time to say that R. L. McCormick will be the only candidate from Pierce county for United States senator, but from the political didoes that are being cut in Tacoma at this writing I believe I am safe in saying that McCormick is the man and that Cushman will be for him and Snell will not be able to oppose him. "Did Piles play fair, you ask? Well, not if the court knows itself, and it thinks it does. In that much talked of senatorial agreement a man was named, and that man was none other than Senator Levi Ankeny, and Senator Piles knew it, but when he returned from Washington he declared no one was named in the agreement and only an Eastern Washington man was in the consideration. As a result of that explanation hundreds and thousands of voters in King county, and even in other counties of the state, felt that they were not bound by the agreement to support Senator Ankeny in view of the fact that Jones was also an Eastern Washington man. Had Senator Piles told the voters of King county they were morally bound to support Senator Ankeny the most of the voters of the county would have done so, and the voters of other counties would have followed in their wake and Senator Ankeny would have been re-elected. I can not see how any Ankeny man can consistently support Senator Piles for re-election in the light of his actions last summer." In naming Eugene Lorton as a member of the board of control a splendid selection has been made and the Pie-maker believes that he will give the state an ideal administration. Strange things happen in the political world, as may be seen in the rise of Eugene Lorton to political power and the going down of Senator Ankeny. Once Lorton was a great admirer of Levi Ankeny and helped to direct his forces in Walla Walla, he being the editor of the Union of that city, but for some reason Mr. Ankeny's local manager took offense at Lorton and prevailed on him to kick Lorton out. This caused Lorton to espouse the cause of the Boxers and he and his friends have hammered away at the Regulars in Walla Walla until they have not only driven them from power in the city and county, but have beaten them in the state and nation, and as a result Senator Ankeny is retiring to private life while Lorton is becoming one of the political leaders of the state "The world do move." The inauguration of Governorelect Cosgrove will take place next THE VIEW [Name] ROBERT L. McCORMICK, Who Hopes to Get Pierce County's Unanimous Endorsement for United States Senator for Washington to Succeed Senator Piles. Tuesday, and according to reports he will be on hand to go through with the trying ordeal, but after he has been inaugurated he will return to California. Howard G. Cosgrove, who was one of the managers of his father's campaign, will be his private secretary. If he returns to California Lieutenant Governor Hay will act as governor, though he will be guided largely by Howard's recommendations, who will always keep in close touch with his father. Rumor has it that injunction papers will be served on Lieutenant Governor-elect M. E. Hay next Monday with the view of preventing him from being inaugurated. He will be attacked from both the Democratic side of the house as well as the Republican. The Democrats will attack him on the grounds that he was not a resident of either Lincoln or Spokane county at the time of his nomination and election. The Republicans on the grounds that he unlawfully spent money in his election. In case the supreme court disqualifies Mr. Hay, Lieutenant Governor Charles E. Coon will hold over under the constitution until his successor is elected and qualified. The legislature which meets next Monday promises to be one of the warmest legislative assemblies that has ever met in this state. The Meigs men declare they have 63 pledged votes for speaker, while the opposition declares that there are a sufficient number of scattering votes not pledged for speaker to concentrate on some one and elect him with perfect ease. In case the opposition is correct then it is barely possible that the Hon. Edward B. Palmer stands a most excellent show of winning the plum. The terms of thirty-one United States Senators will expire on March 4, but this does not mean that there will be that many new faces in the upper house when the special session of congress meets ```markdown ``` THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN THE CITY OF NEW YORK in the middle of March to revise the tariff. There will be thirteen new senators on the roll call, as eighteen of the thirty-one already have been re-elected or assured of re-election, either through success in primary contests or pledges of a majority of the membership of the several state legislatures charged with the duty of electing senators before the beginning of the next congress. In addition to the vacancies occurring in the regular way there will be a vacancy in Pennsylvania on account of the forthcoming resignation of Senator Knox to accept the position of secretary of state in the Taft cabinet. That Secretary Root will be given the New York senatorship now held by Senator Platt is conceded, and a contest is not expected. The Republican senators whose [Name] [Name not visible in the image] Who Will Be Inaugurated Govern Realize H Who Will Be Inaugurated Governor of Washington Next Tuesday and Realize His Life Ambition. SAMUEL GOODLOVE COSGROVE, terms expire at the end of the present congress, but who are reasonably sure of being returned, are Cummins (primary), Dillingham, Gallinger, Heyburn, Hopkins (primary), Penrose, Perkins, Smoot and Stephenson. Democratic senators who will be returned are Clarke (of Arkansas), Clay, Gore, Johnston, McEnery (of Louisiana), Newlands, Overman, Smith and Stone. By reason of defeat in primary contests Senator Ankeny, of Washington, will be succeeded by Representative Wesley L. Jones, Senator Hansbrough of North Dakota by M. N. Johnson, Kittredge of South Dakota by Governor Coe I. Crawford, and Long of Kansas by Joseph E. Bristow, former fourth assistant postmaster general. All of these men are Republicans, and in addition Fulton of Oregon probably will be succeeded by Governor Chamberlin, Democrat, who was victorious in what is popularly known as the double primary system of the state. Of the Democratic senators whose terms expire on March 4, Gary of South Carolina will be succeeded by E. D. Smith, and Milton of Florida by Duncan U. Fletcher. Offsetting the Oregon situation is that of Kentucky, former Governor W. O. Bradley, Republican, having been elected to succeed McCreary, Democrat, by reason of the failure of the Democratic majority in the Kentucky legislature to agree. Teller of Colorado will be succeeded by Charles J. Hughes of Denver, who was endorsed by the Democratic state convention after Teller had declined to be a candidate for re-election. The legislature is Democratic. BENCH AND BAR. Some one has said, "there are tricks in all trades except mine," which may or may not be true, but what we are trying to get out of this is, as insignificant as may the clerkship of a superior court judge seem to be to the average citizen, yet its is rumored that the clerk of a superior court judge in King county made out of the receiverships to which he was appointed by the judge for whom he [Name] Governor of Washington Next Tuesday and his Life Ambition. 5 works during the year 1907 the enormous sum of $38,000, which sum made his $80.00 per month salary look like fifteen cents with fifteen holes in it. Of course, someone had to be appointed to those receiverships, but it looks like crowding things when the clerk of the court is appointed to them and never lose a day from his labors at the court house and yet make so vast a sum of money as that on the side. Such a proceeding is perfectly legitimate, but it hardly seems fair. The attorneys of Seattle have decided to ask the legislature to create another judgeship for King county on the grounds that there is a sufficient amount of work for that number of judges in the county, and yet they declared a few minutes later that, all of the judges in King county were quite up with their work except Judge Tallman, who was behind on account of sickness. The judges from now on will get $4,000 each per year in salary, and the salary list for the superior court judges at present will amount to $24,000 per year, and if the additional judge be given it will amount to $28,000 per year. From a monetary standpoint that does look like going some. Two additional justices of the peace for Seattle is to also be asked for. ALABAMA CODE OF ETHICS ADOPTED BY THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Alabama lawyers have in the history of the profession in the state much to remember with pride. A report of the committee on code of professional ethics of the American Bar Association says: "The code of the Alabama State Bar Association, as it is the foundation of all the other codes, is made the basis of this compilation." The Alabama code, adopted in 1887, was written by Judge Thomas G. Jones of this city, who was paid the great compliment of being asked to sit with the committee of the national body, though not a member. Continuing, the report says: "While Sharswood's Essay on Professional Ethics was doubtless the inspiration for the Alabama code, the profession is nevertheless indebted for that code's existence to the initiative of Col. Thomas Goode Jones, afterwards governor of Alabama, and now United States judge for the middle district of Alabama, who in 1881 suggested the adoption of a code of professional ethics for the State Bar Association, and afterwards compiled it." Incident to the recent disposition to criticise the courts, the following section of the Alabama code, quoted with special note in the report, is given: "Courts and judicial officers in the rightful exercise of their functions should always receive the support and countenance of attorneys against unjust criticism and popular clamor; and it is an attorney's duty to give them his moral support in all proper ways, and particularly by setting a good example in his own person of obedience to law." This section has been adopted verbatim in Georgia, Virginia, Michigan, Colorado, North Carolina, Maryland, West Virginia, Kentucky, Missouri and in Wisconsin, save that last portion beginning with the words "and particularly by."—Central Law Journal. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Michel A. Provo, Plaintiff, vs. Clara Anderson Provo, Defendant. No. 63790. Summons for Publication. State of Washington to said Clara Anderson Provo: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from the date of the first publication of the complaint with the county of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys, or plaintiff, with offices stated in the complaint, with do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands in plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of the Court above stated. This case is brought by the plaintiff. A decree of divorce from said defendant on the willful desertion. grounds FREUDENBERG & HEATON, Attorneys for Plaintiff. No. 610-611 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. November 20—January 1, 190. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King Ina E. Foster, Plaintiff, vs. Norman B. Foster, Defendant. No. ..... Summons for Publication. State of Washington to said Norman B. Foster: You are hereby summoned to appear within thirty days from the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: on the 20th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and seize copy of your answer and the undersigned attorney's plaintiff, at their stated. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands filed with the Cler kof said Court. This cause is brought by the plaintiff to obtain a decree given from said defendant on the grounds of willful defiance and nonsupport. sertion FREUDENBERG & HEATON, No 610-611 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. November 20—January 1, 190. SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. NOTICE. State of Washington, County of King, Shoriff's Office F. virtue of an order of sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 12th day of November, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in case of James Dignan, the attorney for Joseph B. Hohn, Annie M. Johnson, his wife, defendants, No. 60182, and then as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, with the highest prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to wit: at loc. court on the 19th day of December, A. D. 1908, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the following described property, situated in County, State of Washington, no-wait: Lots two (6) and the third (6), in block (64) of Terry's Second Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure of mortgage amounting to twenty-four thousand five hundred and eighty/100 ($242,583) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. This dated this 12th day of November, 1908. 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. November 13—December 11, 1908. NOTICE AND SUMMONS. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. Washington, L. K., Plaintiff, vs. C. A. Cook, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property. Defendants. State of Washington, to the above delinquency each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereinafter the holder of above delinquency the holder of certain delinquency tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 20th day of October, 1908, and numbered B544 for the delinquency taxes of 1992 and 1993 in the amount of $3.89 and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Second class tide lands in front of SE % of SE % of 5 Tww 22 N. N. That the second year 1907 have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, in the sum of 49 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment are the unpaid and indeemed taxes upon the plaintiff said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication to-wit: within sixty days after November 13, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the court to determine the copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail to answer, will you be ordered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and thereby paying a tax, against of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. C. A. Cook, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and described real property. Defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or oolders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property. named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 20th day of October, 1908, and numbered B54362, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1902, in the amount of $3.86, and upon the real property situated said plaintiff sold to W. M. Second class tide lands fronting Lot 1, Section 8, Two 23 N. R. 3 E. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1903, the sum of $2.09; for the year 1904, the sum of $2.71; for the year 1905, the sum of $2.53; for the year 1906, the sum of $2.42; for the year 1907, the sum of $2.33 Which several sums bear interest due of person upon from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the summons, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after November 13, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be relied upon by the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. May A. Taylor, Plaintiff, vs. W. M. Taylor, Defendant. No. 64,044. Summons. The State of Washington to W. M. Tay- lor, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the thirteenth year of your birth, and answer above entitled action in the above enti- ted court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff, at their office, below stated; and in case of your failure to so you answer the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The plaintiff in the above entitled action, May A. Taylor, prays the court for an absolute divorce from the defendant, W. M. Taylor, and for the custody of a minor child, the issue of said marriage. EDWARD MEAKIN & CUSHING, Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 403-4 New York Block, Seattle, Wash. The above to be published for six consecutive weeks, once each week, in the Seattle Republican beginning Nov. 13, 1908. BOYD J. TALLMAN, Judge. November 13—December 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Thomas F. Basse and Maude Basse, his wife, Plaintiffs, vs. Susan A. Moore and John Doe Moore, her husband, A. C. Edward and Mary Doe Edward, his wife, Company of Boston a corporation, Fred Angle and Mary Doe Angle, his wife, Marcellus Lara and Mary Doe Lara, his wife, The Commonwealth Title and Trust Company, County, State of Washington, a municipal corporation, Henry Nathan, Jr., and Mary Doe Nathan, his wife, Henry A. Webster and Mary Doe Webster, his wife, George W. Webster, his wife, Julia E. Blinn and Ida May Blinn, Francis Tarbell (or Torbell) and Mary Doe Tarbell (or Torbell), his wife, Thomas T. Minor and Mary Doe Minor, his wife, George W. Bailey Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Company, a corporation, and all persons claiming an interest in lands described in plaintiff's complaint but which persons are unknown to plaintiffs. Defendants. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Susan A. Moore and John Doe Moore, her husband, A. C. Edwards and Mary Doe Edwards, his wife, American Loan and Trust Company of Boston, a corporation, Fred Angle and Mary Doe Angle, his wife, Lawrence Land and Mary Doe his wife, The Commonwealth Title and Trust Company of Philadelphia, a corporation, King County, State of Washington, a municipal corporation, Henry A. Webster and Mary Doe Webster, his wife, A. B. Wyckoff and Mary Doe Wyckoff, Bilhn, Francks Tarbell (or Torbell) and Mary Doe Tarbell (or Torbell), his wife, John W. White and Mary Doe White, his wife, Thomas T. Minor and Mary Doe Minor, his wife, and Kate M. Balley, widow of George W. Bailey, Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Company, a corporation, in an article in *Judges* described in plaintiffs' complaint but which persons are unknown to plaintiffs. Defendants: You, and each of you, are hereby summoned to appear, within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication hereof and defend the claim of the defendant for the court of the State of Washington for King County aforesaid; and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiffs at their offices stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment upon the complaint to the demand of the complaint, which will be filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to clear title to that certain property described as blocks one (1) to six (6) inclusive; lots fourteen (14), and fifteen (15) of block seven (7), by nine (9); blocks two-four (2), twenty-five (25) and twenty-six (26) of block eleven (11); blocks fourteen (14) and fifteen (15); lots one (1) to five (5) inclusive; block nineteen (19); blocks twenty (20), twenty-one (21) and twenty-two (22); all of salts lots and blocks being shared as Park as Greveland Park an Addition to King County, State of Washington; in which the said defenders, and each of them, claim some lien or interest, which lien or interest is sought to be foreclosed and declared void and of no effect, and that the plaintiffs' in said action, said property be quited in said action. November 6—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Harriet V. Griffiths, Plaintiff, vs. Wm. L. Griffiths, Defendant. No. 63386. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Wm. L. Griffiths, said named defendants. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the summons. You are hereby summoned Within sixty days after the 18th day of November, 1908, and defend the above en- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN titled action in the above entitled court. taint and answer the complaint of the plaintiff. taint; and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for said plain- tiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment. rendered against, according to the object of said complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said suit is to obtain a decree of said court dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between sale plain- tiff and defendant, and to obtain the said plaintiff the court and custody of their obeyance on the ground of abandon- ment, and failure to support. Date of first publication November 13th, 1908. W. W. FELGER. Plaintiff's Attorney. Post Office Address: Room 28 Downs Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. November 13—December 25, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Harriet E. Bates, Plaintiff, vs. Ora G. Bates, Defendant. No. — Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty (60) days after the 6th day of January, 1908, and defend evidence entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below so as to do, judgment will be rendered against you, to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to seek the divorce on the ground of nonsupport, cruel treatment and the infliction of personal indignities rendering life burdensome. HORACE A. WILSON, Plaintiff's Attorney, P. O. Address: 1414 Building, Seattle, King County, Washington November 6—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for William Dorris and John Dorris, his wife and the unknown James M. McLellan M. McLellan if the said James M. McLellan be deceased, Joseph M. McLellan the unknown, and the said Joseph M. McLellan if said Joseph M. Barto be deceased, and all persons unknown, having claiming to have, any interest in the property described in the complaint hear- in. Defendants. No. 62446. Summons The State of Washington to each and all of said defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 30th of October, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the titled complaint in answer to the complaint of the plaintiffs herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his address below stated, and case of your complaint against you according to the demand of the complaint herein which has been filed with the clerk of said court to be object of said complaint is its title to the complaint described property, situated in King County, Washington, to-wit: Lots One (1) and Two (2), Block Two (2), Boston Heights Supplemental Addition to the City of Seattle, and to ever enjoin and be dear the said defenders, and each and all of them, from asserting any claim whatsoever in and to the said lands and premises and to obtain a decree decreeing that all of defendants, and that all of them interest whatsoever in the said property and that plaintiffs' title is good and valid. EDWARD WOEN TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiffs. Office and Post Office Address: Rooms 604-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 30—Dec. 13, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County.—In Probate. In the Matter of the Guardianship of Mildred J. Noells and Carl Joe Wells, Minors. No 9444 Order to Show Cause Bessie I. Wells, guardian of the persons and estates of Mildred J. Wells and Carl Joe Wells, minors, having petition in this court, is appointed, praying the sake of the court for the sale of all the real estate and interest in mining claims belonging to said wards, for the purposes therein set forth; it is appearing to the court from said petition that it is to the best interests of said wards and their estate to sell all of said real estate belonging to said wards, as well as said minors of and it appears to be that said admittance conforms to and is in accordance with the requirements of law, in such case made and provided: It is, therefore, by the court ordered, that all persons be admitted in said estate by the said Superior Court on the 3rd day of December, 1908, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day at the court room of the probate department, said Superior Court on the 3rd day in Seattle, in said King County, and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this court should not be granted to said guardian, authorizing and empowering her to sell the real estate of said wards as prayed for said petition. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least 34 days after December, 1998, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said County of King, and of geenra calendar on this 28th day of Done in open court on this 28th day of October, 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS. Judge. B. B. MOSER. 10 Haller Blk. Attorney for Guardian. Oct. 28—Nov. 27, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Hannah McMullen, Plaintiff, vs. John McMullen, Defendant. Summons for publication. State of Washington to the said John McMullen, Defendant in the above entitled cause. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: 30th of October, 1982 and entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; the case, in which judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The court has the above entitled action is to disolve the grounds of matrimony, now existing between the plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of habitual drunkenness, cruelty and non-support. E. L. SANDRIN, Attorney, Plaintiff. 60 Downs Block, Seattle, Washington. Oct. 30—Dec. 13, 1988. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of Kling. Loraine Lavis, Plaintiff, vs. Robert Lavis, Defendant. Summons for Publication. State of Washington to the said Robert Lavis, defendant in the above entitled cause; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, also-wit: Within sixty days after the above day of October 1908, and after the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer or other pleading upon the undersigned attorney at his office below stated, and in case of failure to answer, you be renders you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of said action being to secure an absolute decree of divorce, severing the bonds of matrimony between him and deefendant, on the grounds of habitual or for plaintiff's malden name of Loraine Robertson. E. L. SANDERS, Attorney for Plaintiff. Room 60 Downs Blvd. Seattle, Wash. Oct. 30—Dec. 13, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County.—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Erasus Fowler. Deceased. No. 8410. Notice of Witness. No. 8410. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned. Mary Fowler, administratrix of the estate of Erastus Fowler, deceased, that said administratrix will sell at private sale on or after 10:00 o'clock A. M. of Friday, November 20, 1908, at M. Room 10 Haller Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, to the highest and most bidders for cash, in separate bidders of one, two or three pieces, in one tract, the following described real estate, situated in King County, State of Washington. Lots 1, 2 and 3, of Block 5, of Hick's Addition to the City of Seattle. All bids or offers on sald described real estate must be in writing addressed to said Mary Fowler at Room 5 Block, Seattle. Washington and must be accompanied by a certified check for at least 10 per cent of the amount of the bids. In witness whereof the said administrix has hereunto set her hand on this 26th day of October, 1908. MARY FOWLER, Admin'siartrix of the Estate of Erastus Fowler, Deceased. SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. Osner & Mehlhorn, Inc., a corporation. Plaintiff, vs. Mary Augusta Thompson, R. G. Thompson, Jane Doe Thompson, his wife, c. A. Bryce Ella M. Cowhill, Richard Cowling, her husband; Island Lime Company, a corporation, Horace Allison and Jane Doe Allison, his wife; J. W. Bullock and Jane Doe Dullock, Defendants, a corporation, Horace Allison and Jane Doe Allison, his wife; J. W. Bullock and Jane Doe Bullock, De fendants. The state of Washington, to the said defendant, Mary Augusta Thompson: You are hereby summoned to appear first publication of this summation wit: within sixty days after the date of the day of December 1988 and defend the above action in the above entitled plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below and in case of failure to do judgegm fully rendered against you, going to the demands of the complaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of said action is to recover judgment against you in the case of 133 to 88% per annum from the 3rd day of October, 1907, and $128.65, for taxes paid, and attorney's fees and costs and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the same, dated October 3rd, lot 8, block 10, Salmon City, King County, Washington and foreclose all right, claims or equity of redemption of each and all of said defendants in and to said property. Sold mortgage was recorded the 3rd day of October, Volume 323 of Mortgage Records, 126, of the records in the auditor's office of King County, Washington. Office and Post Office Address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington. December 4, 1908-January 15, 1909. This is to certify that the real estate business carried on by H. H. Milburn, E. C. Smith and J. F. Fisk, under the Empire Building, Milburn-Smith Co., Washington, has been dissolved, E. C. Smith has dissolved, Said business will be carried on at the same place under the name of H. H. Milburn & Company, who will take over all business and pay all counts that may be due or owing by the Office. MIDDLE dated at Seattle, Wash., this 30th day of November, 1908. SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY. State of Washington for King County. Eleanore Perrin Miller, Plaintiff, vs. First National Bank of Winfield, a corporation; Northern Pacific Railway Company, Corporation, and Charles Perrin Miller, Defendants. No. 63,791. The State of Washington, to the First National Bank of Winfield, Kansas, a corporation; Northern Pacific Railway Company, Corporation, and Charles Perrin Miller, Defendants: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within 60 days after the date of the first publication of summons, to-wit; and after the 27th day of November, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the entitled court; answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff in the address below for the purpose of to do judgment will be reordered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which is on court. The object of the above entitled action is to defend the judgment and decree of the court that that certain judgment of the above entitled court in favor of said defendant. First National Bank of Winfield, Kansas, a corporation and against said defendant, of Peoria, Willis and Pacific Railway in corporation, recorded in Execution Docket 24 at page 211, in the office of the clerk of the above entitled court, is not a lien or claim upon the following described record: Book Eighteen (18). Lot Two (2) in Block Branches Capitol Hill Addition, Division Number 2, to the City of Seattle, situate in King County, State of Washington; and that FRIDAY, JANUARY 8, 1909. the court order and decree that said judgment is a separate debt of said defendant, Charles Percy Miller, and is not a community obligation of the community composed of the plaintiff and said defendant, Charles Percy Miller, and that said real property above described and the separate real property of the plaintiff be freed from the lien of said judgment. That the court order and decree that said above described property and that said real property above described property of the plaintiff and that the defendant, Charles Percy Miller, has no interest therein. That plaintiff have judgment against said defendants for the loss of his action and for such other damages, and to the court may seem meet and just. J. HENRY DENNING, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 48 Starr-Boyd Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, Nov. 27, 1908. Date of last publication, Jan. 8th, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, S. A. Bussey, You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wait a sixty day before the 27th day of November, 1998, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court, the object of said complaint being to secure a civil fine. OLVER ANDERSON. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice address, room 327 Epler Bld., Seattle, Washington. November 27, 1908, January 8, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, State of Washington—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Johanna D. Oftedal, deceased. No. 9629.—Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given to the creditors and all persons having claims against Johanna D. Oftedal, deceased, or her estate, to present the same with the necessary vouchers in support thereof within one year from the date of the first publication of the notice, to the office within two days the 27th day of November, 1908, to J. E. McGrew, executor of the last will and testament of said deceased, at 419-20 Pioneer Building, in Seattle, King County, Washington, the said place being the office for the transaction of the business of the aforesaid estate. Executor of the Will and Estate of Johanna D. Oftedal, deceased. First publication dated 27th of November, 1908. November 27th, December 25, 1908. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL Estate—Sheriff's Office. State of Washington, County of King, ss. By virtue of an execution issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of Pierce County, on the 20th day of November, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of Ed. Erickson, Plaintiff, versus Carbon, corporation, Defendant, No. 26469, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for the sale, the hours prescribed by law for the sale, on the 2nd day of January, A. D., 1909, before the Court house door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of said plaintiff, Ed. Kirkman, the following-scribed property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: The north one-half (N. $ \frac{1}{2} $ ) of the southeast quarter (S. E. $ \frac{3}{4} $ ) Section eight (8), Township two (2), Village Willamette Meridian, levied on as the property of said plaintiff, Ed. Erkson, to satisfy a judgment, amounting to one hundred sixty-seven and 20/100 dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of defendant, Carbon Hill Coal Co., a Dated this 24th day of November, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. November 27th, December 25th, 1908. State of Washington, County of King, as, Sheriff's, Office. By virtue of an execution, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 25th day of November, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of Nettie E. Burling, plaintiff, versus T. D. Page and Sarah J. Page, his wife, defendants. No, to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed for Sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 2nd day of January, A. D. before the 2nd day of January, A. D. before the 2nd day of January, all the right, title and interest of M. A. Jorgensen, one of the judgment debtor; in said execution named, in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington to-wit: Lots three (3), (4) and five (5), Jackson Street Addition, leveled in as the property of said M. A. Jorgensen, to satisfy a judgment, amounting to forty-three (43.00) dollars, costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 25th day of November, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW. DREW, Deputy. November 27, 1908—December 25, 1908. FRIDAY, JANUARY 8, 1909. NOTICE—The stockholders of the Alpewa Mining Company are hereby notified that a special meeting of the stockholders of said company will be held at 305 25th Ave. South, in Seattle, Wash., on the 28th day of January, 1909. Det. Spectfully, Alpewa Mining Company, C.C. Darrow and H. F. Detwiler, Trustees, January 8—22, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Alonzo Smith, Plaintiff, vs. James Thompson, Defendant. No. 64862. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Justice, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: Within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above action, the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so you will be remanded against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure a judgment against you for nine hundred dollars and ten hundred and used and embezzled by you and for which an attachment has been issued and levied upon your property. H. H. LLEN, Plaintiff Attorney. P. O. Address, 45 Maynard Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—Feb. 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR Court OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. E. H. Armstrong, Defendant.— You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of service of this notice upon you by publication, exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the 8th day of January, in accordance with this action and answer and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case you fail so to do, judgment will be taken against you in accordance with this action and compain new on file in this cause and court. The object of this action is to recover from you the sum of $513.86, together with interest from October 26th, 1908, at the rate of 10 per cent, and to foreclose against all your right, title and interest from your account and possession of the Northern Bank & Trust Co., of Seattle, Washington, together with the plaintiff's costs and disbursements expended. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 320 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg, Seattle, Wash. Jan. 8—Feb. 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the country. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to appear in court, on such day, of January 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer to the complaint, at the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of state court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce on the ground of desertion for a period of more than one year immediately prior to the commencement of the trial. E. T. SCHOFE. Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address: 503 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 1—February 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Maggie Utterback, Plaintiff, vs. Charles W, Utterback, Defendant. No.... Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Charles W. Utterback, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, today of January 19, 1909, and on day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure to do agreement with the undersigned against you to demand the of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is a decree of absolute divorce from the above named defendant upon the ground of his failure to suitably provide for the plaintiff P. O. Address: 1263 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Fred Shields, Plaintiff, vs. Elizabeth Shields, Defendant.—No. 64911. Summons. The State of Washington, King County, to Elizabeth Shields, Defendant; You are hereby notified to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait, of sixty days after the eighth day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the case of your complaint, stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of the above Court. The object of this action is to procure a dissolution of the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and the defendant. EDWARDS, MEAKIN & CUSHING. Attorneys for Plaintiff Office and P. O. Address: 403 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. The above summons to be published in six consecutive weeks, once each week, in Seattle, Republican, beginning January 8th, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE MATTEI Pinnell, Flainton vs. Septimus Mabelle Pinnell, Flainton vs. Septimus Pinnell, Defendant. No. —. Summons, by Publication. The State of Washington to the above Saint Louis Birmell Defendant: named Septimus Pinnell, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons on October 1, 1999, at 8th hour of January, 1999, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated and case number. If you will meet will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofoose existing between plaintiff and defendant in the bounds of desertion and failure to provide. H. E. SNOOK Postoffice Address: 540 Burke Blge., Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Maude Moore, Plaintiff, vs. Frank A. Moore, Defendant. No. 64776. Summons. The State of Washington, the said Frank Moore, in the defendant. We are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 1st day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above complaint of the plaintiff therein, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgement will be rendered against you, and the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. That plaintiff's cause of action against you, as set forth in the complaint, is for a decree that the plaintiff be held for matrimony now existing between you and the plaintiff on the grounds of non-support and of abandonment of the plaintiff by you for purposes of the Court awarding to the 1st day of April, 1908; and for a decree of the Court awarding to the plaintiff the custody of Nada Vie Moore, the little daughter of yourself and the RONEY & LOVELESS. Office and Postoffice Address: 606-607 Office Park, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 1—February 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Rasmus Madsen, Plaintiff, vs. The Dodd Adjustable School Desk & Chair Company, a corporation, Defendant— No. Order Directing Notice to creditors. In the above entitled matter, it is ordered that all creditors of said defendant and all parties interested in the estate, prosecute and litigate their claims and demands against this said defendant. In this case, the creditors and they are hereby notified and required to prove their claims before this court by filing the same with the Receiver, or his attorney, properly verified under oath with itemized statements and other memoranda, regarding the same, and that said creditors seceded what, if any, of the same, and they pay for any, if any, said claims to be filed on or before the 1st day of February, 1909, and the Receiver is further ordered to cause notice to be given to the creditors herein by publication in The Seattle Republican once a week for three successive weeks during the month of February, the known creditors at the last known place of address of said creditors, copy of said notice. Done in open court this the 28th day of December, A. D. 1908. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. W. A. HANNAN, Receiver. H. A. MURNER, His Attorney. 745 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. January 1-29, 1909. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 38 Union Blk., Seattle, County of King, Wash. January 28, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Amelia Arnold, Plaintiff, vs. Hans Arnold, Defendant. No. 64839. Summons for Publication. The State Court of Arnold to the said Hans Arnold, Defendant: You are hereby requested to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: Within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the love entitled action to the above titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, obey the terms of the agreement, according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the grounds of abandonment and non- obligation to make suitable provision for his family. Post Office Address: Room 36-7 Union Blk., Seattle, King County, Wash. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. C. B. Niblock, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants: You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Nov. 20, 1908, in the above entitled court and action to the court to defend this action and answer the complaint to the court and serve a copy of your answer on the dersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office, below stated, or pay the amount THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN due, together with interest and costs. In case you fa" so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien N of said taxes and costs against said real property for the sums and amounts due o upon and charged against it, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD. A. C. MACDONALD Attorney for Plaintiff Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. January 1, 1989 November 20, 1908—January 1, 1909. PROBATE NOTICE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of Annie Scholin, Deceased. No. 8443. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Nels Scholin, the executor of the last will and testament of Annie Scholin, deceased has rendered to, and filed in said court his final account as such executor, and that Thursday, the 10th day of December, 1908, at 9:30 o'clock, a. m., at the court room of the Probate Department in the city of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. Geo. E. Morris, Judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said court heath affixed this 16th day of November, 1908. OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By J. A. SIGURDSSON, Deputy Clerk. November 20—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Lewis G. Kindred, Plaintiff, vs. Lena Kindred, Defendant. No. 64097. Summ- mons. The State of Washington to the said Lena Kindred, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the docket of the application, to-wait: within sixty days after the 2009 day of November, 1908, and deefend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the case of your complaint, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The judgment action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony between the parties heerto on the grounds of cruelty and adultery. E. T. SCHOFF. Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. November 20—January 1, 1909. Before R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the District Court, King County, State of Washington Leon Cepparo, Plaintiff, vs. Francisco Glamietta, otherwise known as "F. Giammarusto," Defendant. No. 16117. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King. —ss. To Francisco Giampetra, otherwise known as "F. Glammarusto:" You are hereby notified that the plaintiff has filed a complaint against you in sale of the clock on one on be heard at my office in room 20 on New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 21st day of December, A. D., 1908, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock, A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as concessions, and the demand of the plaintiff given. The clock is recovered and complaint is to recover judgment against you for $27.70, being for goods, wares and merchandise sold you by Vito Vitti. Complaint filed October 29th, A. D., 1908. Dated November 17, 1908. R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. November 20—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. B. Eslon, Plaintiff, vs. Harry Hoffman, Defendant. No, 64, 021. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Defendant Harry Hoffman: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 20th day of bloom, be released 188, and defend the above entitled action in the court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff to serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below given; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be issued against you according to the demand of the plaintiff has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to procure a judgment against you for the sum of $105.00 for services rendered with costs and interest and to sell the property of the defendant in King County, levied upon the plaintiff in achment issued out of the above entitled court in this action to satisfy said judgment. THOMAS M. ASKREN and H. M. OWENS, Attorneys for Plaintiff. 911 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. November 1, 1900. November 20—January 1, 1909. SUMMONS ON APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF LAND. State of Washington, County of King—ss. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. John Winston and Clara Winston, his wife Wintiffs, vs. J. E. Whitworth, E. A. Whitworth, vs. Isaac M. Dunn, Jane Doe Dunn, his wife, if any of Zeph Dunn, deceased; John E. Davis, Lella J. Davis, his wife, Rebecca Turner, John Doe Turner, her husband, Worrell Wilson, King County, New England, Mortgage Security Company, a corporation, John Doe Turner, E. E. Whitworth, Clyde C. Carr, Mille E. Carr, his wife, John F. Benson and Lulu Benson, his wife, and all other persons or parties, unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, Hen or interest in the real estate in the application herein, Defendants, to the State of Washington to the above named defendants, greeting: S. E. $\frac{1}{4}$ of N. E. $\frac{1}{4}$; all in Section Thirty-two (32), Township twenty-three (23) N. R. Five (5) E. W. M., and to file your answer to the said application in the office of the clerk of said court, in said county, within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, exe- ceding day of death service if you fail to answer the said application within the time aforesaid, the applicant plaintiff in this action will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the application herein. Witness, Otto A. Case, clerk of said court and the seal thereof at Seattle, in said county and state this 18th day of Nov. A. D., 1908. (Seal). OTTO A. CASE, Clerk. By MAURICE THOMPSON, Deputy. November 20—December 4, 1908. NOTICE. SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE State of Washington, County of King, —ss. Sheriff's Office. By v. Sheriff's Office, an owner of sale, issued out of the Honourable Superior Court of King County, on the 9th day of November, 1908, by the clerk thereof, in the case of Jos, Martin and Flora Martin, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. G. G. Fetterly and Rose Fetterly, his wife, defendants, No. 10 to me, as sheer, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given, that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheeriffs sales, to-wit; December, A. D., 1908, before the court house door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit; Lots twenty-three (23), twenty-four (24), twenty-five (25) and twenty-six (26) all in block forty-one (41) of the Plat of the Town of Des Moines, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure of a mortgage, twenty-three and 20/100 ($176.20) Dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 17th day of November, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By EDW, DREW, Deputy. REVELLE, REVELLE & REVELLE. November 20—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Rosa Triest, Plaintiff, vs. Fred Triest, Defendant. No. 63,890. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington, to the sad Fred Triest; thereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit within sixty days after the 20th day of November, A. D. 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which have been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a divorce from the deefendant heearin on the grounds of failure to support and on the further grounds of cruel treat- JOHN E. RYAN. JOHN E. RYAN. Attorney for Plaintiff. 416 Globe Building, Seattle, King County, Washington November 20—January 1, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of Martin Adams, Deceased. No. 9080. Order to Show Cause Why Order of Sale of Real Estate Should Not be Made. It appearing on this court by the verified notice presented and filed by Lillie M. Adams, administratrix of the estate of Martin Adams, deceased, that it is necessary to sell the whole or some portion of the real estate of said decedent to pay the debts of the said decedent to pay the expenses and charges or administration. It is therefore ordered by this court that all persons interested in the estate of said deceased appear before the said Superior Court on the 24th day of December. 1908, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock the undersigned, at the time of the undersigned, or at such time as this matter can be called on thereafter, at the court house in the City of Seattle, County of King, State of Washington, to show cause, why an order should not be made at the time of the said real estate as shall be necessary and that a copy of this order be published for four consecutive weeks in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in the city. Done in open court this 18th day of November. 1908. November 20—December 18, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Maria C. Gilbert, Plaintiff, vs. Al. McCoy and Emma McCoy, husband and wife. Dependants No. 636535. Summons. The State of Washington to Al. McCoy and Emma McCoy, husband and wife: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of the summons, to-wit; within sixty days after the sixth December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the county, where a lower状告 was filed, and in case of your failure, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the action is to recover damages against you in the sum of $2500 and to sell your real estate in Tacoma to satisfy the same. F. M. JEFFERY. Attorney for Plaintiff. 747 New York Block, Seattle, King County, State of Washington. December 18, 1908-January 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. James E. Phillips, Plaintiff, vs. Emma W. Wilson and all persons unknown, if any, having or being described real and to the heerinafter described real property, Defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defenda- tive, each of them. You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of two certain delinquent tax certificates, issued by the Treasurer of King County, Washington, dated the 25th day of January 1994, and are hereby followed, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 10, Block 28, Replast of Green Lake Home Addition to Seattle, Certificate No. B45688, for the year 1904, Replast of Green Lake Home Addition to Seattle, Certificate No. B45689, for the year 1904 in the sum of $2.50; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon each of said above described property. For the year 1905, the sum of $1.85; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.77; and for the year 1907, the sum of $2.06, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unreimbursed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of this notice. This notice is exclusive of the day of said first publication, Nov. 20, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer of the plaintiffs in this notice. The plaintiffs at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against the sums and amounts due to property for the sums and amounts due to property against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it relied upon as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's notice, now on file in this cause and court. JAMES E. PHILLIPS, Plaintiff. KENNETH MACKINTOSH, KENEH T. R. KERALD. E. E. HERALD, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office Address: 227-30 Colman Bldg. Seattle, Wash. First publication dated Nov. 20, 1908. November 20—January 1st, 1909. NOTICE SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE County of King -ss: Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an order of sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 27th day of October, 1908, by the clerk thereof, in the case of The Employees Reality Association, a population plaintiff, versus J. C. Oliphant, otal, et al., the court of 1906, to me, as sheer, directed and delivered! Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheer's sales, to-wit; toick, on the 5th day of December, A. D., 1909, by the house door of said King County in the State of Washington, the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lots (11) and twelve (12) of Block fifteen (15) and twelve (12) of the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure of mortgage amounting to one thousand two hundred twenty-six and 41/100 ($1224.14) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 27th day of October 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. BY EDW. DREW, Deputy. Oct. 30—Nov. 27, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Ellen C. Rains, Plaintiff, vs. Levander Railroad Agent.—No. 64162. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Levander Rails: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 20th day of November, d. A. 1908, and defend the body attitted to you, in the above entitled court, and answer the court to the plaintiff of the plaintiff, and serve copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against the ground of the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a divorce from the defendant herein on the grounds of failure to support plaintiff and on the further grounds of abandonment of plaintiff. JOHN E. RYAN, Attorney for Plaintiff. 416 Globe Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Helene Raymond, Plaintiff, vs. John W. Raymond, Plaintiff. No. 64316 Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said John W. Raymond, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear, within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the date of the above or December, 1908, and defend the entire action in the above entitled court, and defend the complaint of the plaintiff and serve copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office and postoffice address below designated in case of your failure so to do, judgment against you according to the demand against plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of said court The object of said action is to remove a cloud from plaintiff's title and to quiet it in her to lots one, two or three of block forty (1, 2 and 5, Blk. 40), plat second. Addition to the Town (now City of Washington) as laid off by the heirs of Sarah A. Belt (described also lot 4, block 22 (Lot 4, Blk. 22) of the plat of an addition to the City of Seattle, as laid off by D. T. Denny, guardian of the estate of J. H. Nagle, according to the recorded plats on record in the auditor's office King County, State of Washington, and forever barring the defending them claiming any right, title or interest in or to said premises and to determine any or adverse claims of said defendant to said property in favor of plaintiff, and for a decree adjudging plaintiff to be the owner of said real estate, free and clear of all claims or interest therein in defendant, and for relief as prayed for in plaintiff's complaint on file in the office of the clerk of the Superior Court of King County, Washington. MORRIS, SOUTHARD & SHIPLEY. Directions for Plaintiff. Office and Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: 655 Haller Building, Seattle, King Co. Washington. Date of first publication December 4th, 1908. December 4, 1908, January 15, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR, COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, lege Association, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an injunction against the hereinafter described real property. Defendants.—No. Notice and Summons. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners or claimants of interest, you neveratter described real property, are hereby the above named plaintiff is the holder of one delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of December, 2003, 2893, for the delinquent taxes of the 1903, in the amount of $4.63 and upon real property situated in said King county, are submitted as follows, to-wit: $E% of SW% of NW% of Sec. 5, Tp. 22 N.R. 3 E.W.M.