Seattle Republican

PUBLICAN THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN A member of the legislature took exceptions to one of the many brutal things Joe Smith has said about the members in general and him in particular since it has been in session, and made an effort to take out of Joe's dirty hide what Joe would not take out of his correspondence to the Spokesman-Review, and for a second or so the legislative lobby sounded very much like the anti-saloon forces were in a fatal clash with the wets. The combatants were separated, but not before Representative McArthur had blacked Joe's eyes good and plenty. A great majority of those who saw the encounter, as well as those who heard about it, seriously regretted that the members did not pound the reportorial purp's head into a jelly. "It seems to me that the legislature is permitting its time to slip away without dispatching any very great amount of work. I am afraid Senator Myers Thinks the local option and the anti-race track bills are overshadowing and sidetracking all other Legislature Not Busy. Among the distinguished visitors to the state capital this week to watch the proceedings of the legislature was former Senator John Lockwood Wilson, who a few days ago returned from a month and half visit to Southern California. When ques- "It seems to me time to slip away w Senator Myers Think Legislature Not Busy Visits Legislature. legislation, which is legislation, which is just as important as either one of them. While I was elected on a straight county unit local option platform I would not hesitate to vote for a bill excluding cities of the first and second class, if such a compromise could be effected, and some prominent law firm would give an opinion that it would not be class legislation," came from Senator Charles E. Myers, of Lincoln county, one day this week. Senator Myers came to the legislature to legislate and not to split hairs over one piece of legislation, and that is being done so extensively that no wonder he is chafing. There are a number of relief bills before the present legislature for officers who have gone to other states for prisoners. These officers took a long Relief Bills chance and put up their own money for For Officers. their own as well as the prisoner's expense, expecting to get the whole returned to him from the county in which he resides. Money for the extradition of prisoners was exhausted a year ago, hence the hundred and one relief bills. If there is no money for such expenses there should be no extradieting. Some of these officers have laid out of their money for more than a year and are having a goodly part of what is due them used up in lobbying a relief bill through the legislature, all of which should be avoided in the future. "Seeing is believing" and this theory or axiom was doubtless responsible for the authorities of the Chehalis reformatory bringing the female string band of the school to Olympia to entertain the legislature with sweet music. It may have been on Female Band From Reformatory. It appears that the eleventh legislature is developing quite an amount of congressional timber in the three districts of the state, to say nothing of the districts that may be made after 1910. In the first district Ole Hanson, who the other hand that the "tis music that soot the bad way in which that aggregation of f to soften legislation were moved to bring strikes the writer as the other hand that the authorities are great believers in " 'tis music that soothes the savage's breast," and from the bad way in which the local option bill was drifting that aggregation of female musicians was brought over to soften legislation up. But by whatever theory they were moved to bring those unfortunates to Olympia, it strikes the writer as being an awful mistake. The legislature may increase the appropriation for the school because they came, but neither the public nor the little girls feel any better for the exhibition they were put through. It was no state or national holiday, hence the whole transaction can only be seen in the light of to get more money for the school. We unhesitatingly pronounce it a burning shame. No wonder there is always a strife between the rich and the poor, and there always will be as long as legisla- Moses Lake Is Rich Man's Preserve. Speaking about lobbyists and we are reminded that there are lobbyists and then lobbyists, but the most generally repulsive lobbyist that has ever visited Olympia with the view of corrupting a legislature from our viewpoint is one Boyd P. Doty, of Seattle, anyone from shooting within a quarter of a which on its face would in the bill is four Spe acres at the head of the wild rice and here the friends get all the she anyone from shooting ducks or geese on Moses Lake or within a quarter of a mile of its meander line. All of which on its face would seem eminently fair, but the joker in the bill is four Spokane millionaires own hundreds of acres at the head of the lake, which they have seeded to wild rice and here the birds feed, and those men and their friends get all the shooting about a lake that is sixteen miles long and two and three miles wide. The decision of the State Supreme Court in the Coon-Hay quo warranto proceedings, which resulted in a majority of the members denying the writ of Coon, is published in this issue of The Court Decision. Seattle Republican and is found on the fifth page. This is the first time the full text of the opinions have been published and it would well for you and each of you to read it with care. --- --- Price One Year, $3.00. S Single Copies, 10 Cents. Acting Gov. M. E. Hay has been quoted as having said: "While I am governor there will be no removals from office to make places for other officials, but every one will be permitted to serve out his full time, unless he himself wishes to be relieved Gov. Hay.Against Clean.Sweeps. or becomes derelict to duty." If Gov. Hay lives up to this, and if he said it he will, it will take a whole lot of appointive officials off the gridiron, as the word had gone out, "a clean sweep would be made." Where one Republican administration succeeds another it hardly seems the fair thing for all of the officials of that administration to be dismissed the same as though the incoming administration was Democratic. Perhaps the legislature will pass a local option bill and perhaps it will not, but the odds of it passing such a measure are by no mean favorable. Local Option After days of strenuous fighting the May Flatfy Fail. bill drafted by the Anti-Saloon League passed the house of repre- sentatives and was immediately transmitted to the senate, where in due time it will be considered by that body and in all human probability will be turned down with a dull, sickening thud. The senate will then proceed to pass a bill of its liking, which will be promptly transmitted to the house, where the senate bill will be as promptly killed. Then a conference of both houses will follow, which will result in an utter disagreement, and no bill will be the final outcome of weeks' work and talk. Whether or not the eleventh legislature will doctor the direct primary law so as to straighten out some of its kinks and snarls remains to be seen, but whether it does or does not, there is no denying the fact that it badly needs it. While Lieut.-Gov. Hay won Supreme Court Badly Divided. Supreme Court Badly Divided. out in the quo warranto proceedings instituted against him by Charles E. Coon, on the ground that he advertised in newspapers, yet the supreme court was so badly divided on the subject that it really leaves a candidate's legal right to advertise in newspapers almost as much in doubt as before. The legislature should remove all doubts from the law and so amend it that a candidate could do a reasonable amount of advertising in newspapers, or so amend it that he would have no right to advertise at all. Representative William Bishop of Jefferson County, from a point of service, is the senior member of the house of representatives. Two years ago he was a candidate for the senate, but the Port Townsend gang, and this is said advisedly, succeeded in defeating Billy Bishop Always Heard. him. He, however, was elected a member of the house of representatives last fall and is one of the most active members in the present body. Mr. Bishop is favorable to the passage of a reasonable local option bill, but bitterly opposed to the league bill, and no representative on the floor of the house did more active work against its passage than he. He is quite a parliamentarian, which enabled him to do some very clever work. The presence of J. E. Chilberg, president of the A.-Y.-P. Exposition, in the lobby of the state house busily pinning "A.-Y.-P." gold pin sou- Chilberg Distributes A.-Y.-P. Souvenirs. Mr. Chilberg is a diplomat in a public function, and despite the fact that he did not have more than a tenth enough of the beautiful souvenirs to go round, yet he smiled so pleasantly and talked so sweetly after his supply had been exhausted that those who failed to get a pin for the time being at least felt almost as pleasantly as did the lucky one. Mr. Chilberg was attending the session of the committee on banking, representing the Scandinavian American Bank, one of the largest financial institutions in the state. When the legislature passes the bill giving King county an additional judge, Madam Rumor has it that John F. Main will be appointed. The Judge Main "young push" of Seattle is behind Seems Eminent. Main, and that push is backed by Howard Cosgrove, son of the gov- Judge Main Seems Eminent. ernor and secretary to Acting Governor Hay. Main is dean of the law school of the University of Washington, from which Howard Cosgrove graduated. For six years the Hon. S. G. Cosgrove was one of the regents of the institution and was an admirer of Mr. Main. The young men, led by Terhune, Higgins, Halverstadt et al., all favor Main for the appointment. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 1909 It is currently reported about the state capital that J. Will Lysons, who is well known in the Republican circles of this state, will soon supplant Claude C. Aspinwall as secretary of the board of control. While Mr. Aspinwall is said to be a very efficient man for the place, yet he doubtless knew the rules of the game before he began to play it, and that the ups and downs of the game were the most exciting as well as interesting points to it. Since the mind of man runneth not to the contrary, Mr. Lysons has been secretary of the Republican state central committee. He was twice elected secretary of the senate and served for a year or more as assistant secretary of the railroad commission. He was beaten for secretary of the house of representatives this year and then it was he decided to retire from personal politics, but it seems that it is next to impossible for him to break away. Senator Wilson Visits Legislature. tioned as to what particular piece of legislation had attracted him to Olympia, he replied: "None at all. I am a 'has been' and only came down to observe the difference of doing it now in comparison to how it was done when I was in the game." I, however, would like to see the legislature pass a bill making it obligatory that all supreme as well as superior court judges wear black robes when on the bench. If they did it would add both solemnity as well as dignity to the occasion. Clad in such an awe-inspiring garb would perhaps prevent so many persons when testifying before them of committing the crime of perjury. While it may be next to impossible for even the most learned to give a satisfactory definition for "grafter," as it is connomly used all over the country at present, yet if the readers of The Seattle Republican desire to learn the full significance of Grafter by Practice If Not by Precept. the term let them visit the legislative halls and chat promiscuously with the hundred and one anxious-looking faces waiting in the lobby for a member to answer his card to urge him to push a senate or a house bill No. "seven-leben." By using a bit of diplomacy the visitor will learn from the anxious faced lobbyist that if the bill passes it means a job for him, and if not a job a chunk of easy money. How much such a measure will cost the general public is of no concern to him; he simply looks at it from the "Lord bless me and my wife, my son John and his wife, us four, no more," standpoint. That's a grafter by practice if not by precept. Congressional Timber in Eleventh Legislature. in the legislature is on his feet calling to the speaker more than the whole King county delegation put together, is said to have a severe case of congressional fever. Senator J. A. Falconer is also said to be grooming himself for the same honor. In the second district Senator A. S. Ruth, of Thurston county, president of the senate, is said to be an avowed candidate for congress. Senator Paulhamus, of Pierce, is also being coaxed along that line, and the same is said to be true of Ralph B. Metcalf. In the third district Speaker Meigs entertains the hope that Miles Poindexter is a one termer, and Senator Cameron has an eye single to the job. Only four weeks of the legislature have passed, and in the other four more startling developments may rise above the horizon. Doughty Doty Does Duty. who, at an enormous salary and a personal expense account in addition to his salary, is maintained by the Prohibitionists of the nation and state at Olympia in order that he may try to browbeat the legislature into legislating this state into the Prohibition column. Mr. Doty's general appearance is neither attractive nor electrifying, and, judging from his appearance, he is a brilliant example of his prototype, Royal Raymond, who, it will be remembered, skiddood when his Eastern record to an extent became public property. historical society LIBRARY CITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 Volume XV, Number 24 H. R. CAYTON. Publisher 8 The Question of Reasonableness in Determining What Of The Police Power. Some weeks ago we commented upon the lack of concern with which some courts were regarding the most evident encroachments upon private rights having no conceivable justification under what is known as the police power. But the legislative discreation is not finally determined by this fact. It does not settle the question of the constitutionality of any proposed legislation to say that it oversteps the bounds set by some constitutional limitation. Thus, it is a universal constitutional restriction that no person shall be deprived of his liberty without the judgment of his peers. But everywhere it is possible on the report of a physician to seize a man with small-pox and confine him in quarantine with absolutely no process of law whatever, and to whose involuntary confinement, the writ of hebeas corpus is an unavailable remedy. The next question to be determined, therefore, is whether this proposed regulation of the private enjoyment of life, liberty or property, contrary to the strict terms of the constitution is justified by that universal principle of collective self preservation, known as the police power. For, we apprehend there is no occasion to justify any law under the police power until it begins to overstep express constitutional restrictions. In order to justify strictly unconstitutional legislation under the police power, it must meet either one of three great public emergencies, to-wit, the public health, the public morals and the public safety. "What is more than these, cometh of the evil one," although some courts had added other considerations, not emergencies in any sense of the term, with the evident intention of releasing the legislature from all constitutional restrictions, so far at least, as the regulation of private conduct is concerned. But having justified an act under the police power, the inquiry as to the power of the legislature to enact it is not concluded until it is determined whether the method provided by the act to meet the emergency thus justified by the police power is reasonable. Thus, for instance, it is unconstitutional to destroy a man's house without condemnation and just compensation. Nevertheless, a police ordinance may provide for the destruction of such adjoining property as to prevent the spread of fire, as such an act is in interest of the general safety of the public. But suppose the act should justify the wholesale destruction of property within several blocks of such fire, such an act would be clearly unreasonable. Here the question is not one of expediency, but of reasonableness, to wit: Does the act go further than necessary to meet the emergency, or does it sacrifice private rights in value out of all proportion to the public betifit to be derived. A recent discussion of great value on the question of reasonableness of police legislation is contained in the opinion of that splendid jurist, Judge Marshall, of the the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, in the case of Bonnett v. Vallier, 116 N. W. 885, where it was held that a tenement law, in the nature of a police regulation in the interest of the public health, which made every habitation regardless of locality, a boarding house, in case the proprietor allows a person not a member of his fsmily to have a sleeping room in the house, and regulates the maintenance of the house as regards light, location of beds, equipment with water closets, etc., is an unreasonable interference. The court said: "There must be reasonable ground for police interference and also the means adopted must be reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose in view. So in all cases where the interference affects property and goes beyond what is reasonable by way of interfering with private rights, it offends against the general equality clause of the constitution, it offends against the spirit of the whole instrument; it offends against the prohibitions against taking property without due process of law, and against taking private property for public use without first rendering just compensation therefor. In the ultimate, the scope of the term as regards any situation must be measured having regard to the fundamental principles of human liberty, as they were understood at the time of the formation of the constitution and were intended to be impregnably entrenched thereby, adapting the same, of course, to our modern conditions. Those principles have not changed in the years that have elapsed since the constitution was formed. They are unchangeable and are of no less but rather of greater importance than they were when the framers of the constitution attempted so carefully to guard them." Country Press on Legislature It costs $500 a day to pay the running expenses of the Washington Legislature. When an orator takes the floor in either house he is "blowing in" the people's money at the rate of $3 a minute. Some of these "public benefactors" wouldn't spend that much in a month if it was their own money.—The Chinook Observer. There seems to be a good deal of picket firing and maneuvering behind the scenes at Olympia, but the legislature has not yet gotten down to any real work; that will come, if it comes at all, in the last couple of weeks. There is a vast amount of preliminary skrimishing that must preceed any actual work at any session, and what the present body is likely to accomplish before it quits, would be the merest guess at this stage of the game. Lincoln County Times. If that local option law requires that prescriptions for liquor must be obtained from a yhysician, there will be more money in the prescription business than in selling the liquor. That other 'certificate' business, known locally, will not be in it.—Gray's Harbor Washingtonian, THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Stevenson's senate bill, providing for the submission of a constitutional amendment for the taxation of moneys and credits, should pass and become a part of the state constitution. As remarked in these columns several times before, there is no justice in taxing the poor rancher for his cows and chickens and not the wealthy man's money and mortgages.——Island County Times. Terrific demands are being made on the present legislature for appropriations and if all were to be granted the aggregate would be over $10,000,000, which is about twice as much as the estimated revenues of the state for the preceding two years. The worst thing about the situation is that the persons representing these different interests and institutions invariably club together and then hold a mighty club over the lawmakers. But the legislature should resist their demands and go slow, for the people of this state are already overburdened with taxes. —Yakima Democrat. Few questions present a wider diversity of opinion than that of women's suffrage, but there ought to be no radical variance as to the duty of the legislature to submit the proposition to the people for a test of public opinion as to whether the right of franchise shall be extended to the women of Washington. The cost of the election will not be a material factor, and when there comes a demand having such an apparently strong backing as the suffragists are showing at Olympia, the people and not the legislature should assume the responsibility for disposition of the matter.—Tacoma News Herald. LEE'S CHAPEL PROSPEROUS The A. M. E. Church held its second quarterly conference of this year, on Monday evening, January 18th, 1909, which was remarkable from three standpoints: First, the spiritual revival of the Church in all departments. Second, the Christian spirit of peace and harmony which prevails between the Pastor and officiary of the Church. Third, the completeness of the reports of every department of the Church, their increase in attendance and improvement financially, which indicates a healthy growth in the past, with brilliant prospects for the future. The Pastor, Rev. W. T. Osborne, merits the confidence of his congregation for he is preaching the gospel in its purity and has done nothing without the advice and approval of the church officiary. The following E. W. W Y & CO. General Insurance Fire, Marine, Burglary, Accident Plate Glass, Employer's Liability. 619-620 Bailey Building Main 2115 Ind.L 3356 I HAVE A BEER OF QUALITY IT'S Rainier BEER SEATTLE BREWING & MALTING CO. SEATTLE, WASH., U.S.A. is a brief outline of the reports with the precentages of the increase over the corresponding quarter of last year (excepting the parsonage building fund): Trustees. { Collected $261.56 Disbursed 259.76 Increase per c't.172 Stewardess { Collected $14.82 Disbursed .50 Increase per c't.11 Stewards { Collected $322.38 Disbursed 322.38 Increase per c't.49 Sunday { Collected $47.62 Disbursed 33.05 Increase per c't.220 School Woman's { Collected $117.44 Disbursed 59.50 Increase per c't.224 Mite Mission So'ty Choir { Collected $28.00 Disbursed 14.00 No report last year. The Christian Endeavor League reported thirty-seven active members and five associate members. Several attempts having been made to organize last year without success, the interest shown this year was indeed surprising as well as encouraging. The conference heartily commended the reports, it being the first time in ten years that all departments had responded with such good reports. The general increase along all lines averaged aboute 136 per cent, notwithstanding the financial stringency of the times. Isiah Allen R. S. Blassingame A. H. Hall S. H. Hall J. H. Heath Abner Jones Ed. Lawson G. N. Turner J. N. Sweeney W. N. J. Wylie Stewards and Trustees. CURRENT COMMENT. Rather an unusual incident occurred in Lansing, Kansas, recently, in the departure of nine coaches, composing a special train, which was passengured by convicts. The state of Kansas had theretofore cared for Oklahoma convicts, but recently Miss Kate Barnard, superintendent of prisons and charities in Oklahoma, made an official investigation and charged that the Oklahoma convicts were cruelly treated, so when the contract expired, Kansas refused to keep the convicts longer. Oklahoma has no penitentiary in which to house them, but 344, sixteen of whom were women, shackled together in twos, were hand d over to her just the same. FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 1909. The latest yet has been brought forward by Dr. Deaver in the shape of a dinner party for 125 surgeons from whom he had removed the appendix. Never before has history recorded the meeting together of so many appendixless. With them were twenty-five more physicians whom Dr. Dever had carved in other ways. He rightfully and proudly wears the "belt" for performing the greatest number of operations in this particular line. The appendix has been the doctor's "hobby" which he rode untirelingly, and so physicians from all parts of the country minus their appendix, met to do him honor. There has been quite a discussion among military officials as to what reforms should be instituted to increase the enlisted strength of the army and navy. It is the consensuous of opinion that the best soldiers are those who seek army life as their occupation on account of the inducements offered. Then in order to make army life as desirable as possible, various writers have pointed out reasons which tend to render it unattractive. The following, (the best group of suggested reasons), gives a good idea where reform work might begin: Insufficient pay. Unsatisfactory ration. The abolishment of the canteen. Too much work of a non military nature. Too long service before retirement. Unnecessary practice marches (infantry and cavalry) and excessive ordnance fatigue in the coast artillery. Lack of quarters for families of enlisted men other than noncommissioned staff officers. Excessive guard duty. Lack of respect for the uniform, Frequent changes in company officers, especially captains. Lack of bands at many posts. Absence of the guarantee of civil service appointment after long and faithful service. Non-existence of the grade and warrant officer. Tax for the maintenance of the Soldiers Home. Puget Sound National Bank. JACOB FURTH ..... President J. S. GOLDSMITH ..... Vice-President R. V. ANKENY ..... Cashier IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. A. Hedger, Plaintiff, vs. Jessie E. Hedger, Defendant.—No. 64731. Summ- nature. The State of Washington to the said Jessie E. Hedger, Defendant: You are hereby submitted to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 1st day of January, 1909, and defend compli- ntation in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judge- ment will be rendered against you according to the demand of complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce on the ground of abandonment and desertion for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action and for cruelty. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address: 503 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 1—February 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Catherine Percy, Plaintiff, vs. George Percy, Defendant. No. —, Summons for Publication, The State of Washington to the said defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your complaint to the court. You may for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is that plaintiff may obtain a copy from defendant on the grounds of defendant's desertion and failure to provide. H. E. SNOOK, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 540 Burke Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Viola Starr, Plaintiff, vs. Alfred Starr, Defendant. No. 64892. Summons by The State of Washington, to the said Alfred Starr, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of such summons to o-wth within sixty days after the 3d day of January, A. D. 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a signed attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action forthwith is to plaintiff, is as follows: To obtain an absolute decree of divorce from the defendant on the grounds of abandonment and non-support and failure to make suitable provision for his family. E. PIPER, Plaintiff's Attorney. Post Office Address: Rooms 36-7 Union Blk. Seattle, King County, Wash. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE R. R. George, Justice R. R. the Peace in and for the secession, King County, State of Washington. Rhoda J. Stanley and George E. Stanley, her husband, Plaintiffs, vs. Minnie W. Boaz, Defendant.—No. ..... Summons for Publication. State of Kashington, County of King, ss. To Minnie W. Boaz, defendant herein: You are hereby notified that the above named plaintiffs have filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come before the Court, which will be New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 25th day of January, A. D. 1909, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock a. m., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be granted. You are also bound by the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said complaint is to obtain Complaint filed December 21, A. D. judgment against you for $54.40 for the rent, coal bill, billsills, 1908, R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. December 24, 1908—February 4, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Rose Zacharias, deceased. No. 9447. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 7th day of November, 1908, notice herewith being to the creditors of and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate at his place for the transaction of business for said estate to.-wit: at room 8 UUnion Block, 713 First Avenue, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit within one year from the 29th day of January, 1909, or the same will be barred. FRED KOHN, Administrator of said Estate. JOHN R. PARKER, Attorney for said Estate. Room 8 Union Block, Seattle, Washington. January 29-February 26, 1909. to-wit: Lot 7, block 2, White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland; $0.35 for the year 1905; $0.47 for the year 1906; $0.58 for the year 1907, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of publication and are all the total and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of publication of this notice, and receive one of the day of first publication, to-wit 60 days after January 29, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned, by mail or affix it to a below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said taxes upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayer in plaintiff's comment, now on file in this cause and court. Attorney for Plaintiff Office Address, Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. January 29-March 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. H. F. Wahlenmayer, Plaintiff, vs. Emma K. Wahlenmayer, Defendant. Sum- The State of Washington, to the said Emma K. Wahlenmayer, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the complaint, to witness within sixty days after the 29th of January, 1903, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint plainly and oppose your answer the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimoney existing between the parties hereto on the grounds of cruelty and incompatibility of tempet. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address: 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Wash- January 29-March 12. 1909. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of Theresa Boschert, Plaintiff, vs. Charles E. Boschert, Defendant. The State of Washington, to the said Charles E. Boschert, defendant you are hereby summoned within publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 29th day of January, 1909, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff upon upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the undersigned court. That this action is brought to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant, and therefore to dispose of the property described in the complaint filed herein to be the separate and individual property of this plaintiff and awarding the same to her as her separate and individual property for her sole use and benefit. MILO A. ROOT, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 630-631 New York Blk., Seattle, King County, Washington. SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of King, H. H. Hinton, Plaintiff, vs. Nellie P. Crowl, Carrie F. Ordway, Daniel O. Preston and Lettie J. Preston, Defendants. The State of Washington to the said Nellie P. Crowl, Carrie F. Ordway, Daniel O. Preston and Lettie J. Preston, defendants: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the date of the first action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so as to be bound by the plaintiff you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to recover judgment for the sum of Two Thousand Dollars due from defendants to this plaintiff, with costs and interest, to sell the interest of Defendants Nelle P Cowl and F Ordway in lots 14, 15, 16 and 17, block 7 of Front St. Cable Addition to the City of Seattle, levied upon under writ of attachment issued out of above entitled court in this action to satisfy said judgment. SULLIVAN & STEVENS, Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 514 Balley Bld., Seattle, King County 20, March 12, 1909 NOTICE AND ADVERTISING In the foregoing book of the State of Washington, for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. John Ballin and Jane Doe Ballin, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known and am not aware of their in- terest in and to the hereinafter descri- bed real property. Defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, the plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate, BS2922, issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 11th day of August, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, 1904, in the following amount, the plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate, as follows, to-wit: Steel Works Addition to Kirkland, lot 5, block 7. Certificate No. B25922, year 1994, amount. $0.90. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above de- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN scribed real property, to-wit: Lot 5, block 7, Steel Works Addition to Kirkland, 36 cents for 1905, 50 cents for 1906, 60 cents for 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from sold date, payment, and are all the unpaid and undue taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of publication of the exclusive of the day of said publication to-wit: within sixty (60) days after Jan. 29, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the amount against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as praised by the plaintiff, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: Newbury Bank & Trust COLLEGE OF SEattle, Wash. January 29—March 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. J. A. Stratton, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. —. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest in the delinquent real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, described in February, 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described in February, 1904, Certified B25,969 for the year 1902, in the amount of $2.56, on lot 22, block 11, Valentine Addition to Seattle; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff and paid above described real property 0-wit. For the year 1903, in the sum of $1.89; for the year 1904, in the sum of $1.98; for the year 1905, in the sum of $2.07; for the year 1906, in the sum of $3.60; for the year 1906 (Del. Local Assessment), $2.32; for the year 1907, in the sum of $4.20; for the year 1907 (Del. Local Assessment), $4.89; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 cent, per annum, and the date of pay- ment, are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and sumoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of the said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer or the undersigned to pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts of sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and W. T. GAFFNER. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg. Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in the hereafter described real property, Defendants, No. _____. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, that above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of January, 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon such taxes as may be paid in King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B47,259, for the year 1904, in the amount of $1.47, on lot 41, block 10, Ballard Park Addition to Seattle; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid in the amount of $2.03, above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of 85 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.78; for the year 1907, the sum of $2.03; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sale date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, excluding the day of said publication to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case the complaint will be ordered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Blvd., Seattle, Washington 98103. attle, Wash. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1999. Date of last publication, March 19, 1999. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. L. Boggs, Beggs, Plaintiff, vs. Cornellus F. Boggs, Defendant. No. 65,467. Summons hy. Publication. The State of Washington to the said Cornellus F. Beggs, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, with sixty days after the 1936 day of February, A. D. 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at my office below stated. In case of your failure to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: For the purpose of securing a decree divorcing the parties hereto. CHAS. H. ENNIS, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 537 Burke Bldg., Seattle, County of King, Washington. Feb. 12—March 26, 1909. IN THE SULERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the Court of King. Allie E. Ruby, Plaintiff, vs. Carl Ruby, Defendant. No. 65,455. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Carl Ruby, Defendant: the summons to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 12th day of February, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above enclosed order of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complainant will be filed with the clerk of court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony now and heretofore existing between the parties hereto on the grounds of cruelty and non-support. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb. 12—March 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Anna Ryan, Plaintiff, vs. John H. Ryan, Defender, N. ... Summons and Service of Publication. State of Washington to the said John H. Ryan, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the date of the above entitled jury in the defence the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do, judgement, according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court; the object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the following grounds: First. Because the defendant abandoned the plaintiff on the —— day of ——, 1901, said abandonment having been continuous for one year and more. Second. Because the defendant for ten years last past has neglected and refused and still neglects and refuses the provisions for plaintiff and his family. Third. Because of personal indignities heaped upon the plaintiff by the defendant to such an extent as to render plaintiff's life burdensome. All of the matters herein complained of occurred without plaintiff's fault. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 429-432 Epler Block, 812 Second Avenue, Seattle, Wash. Feb. 12—March 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. John H. Burns, Plaintiff vs. Barbara A. Burns, Defendant. No. 65,440. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Barbara A. Burns, Defendant—Greeting: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of filing the complaint on his office summons to wit: within sixty days after the 12th day of February, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney in his office, and in case of your failure to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of desertion. W. H. A. RENNER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 402 Buckley Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb. 12—March 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. S. Johnsonen, Plaintiff, vs. Ben. G. Goodman, Defendant. Summons for Publication. State of Washington to the defendant Ben. G. Goodman: You are hereby summoned to appear when the summation days after the date of the first publication of this summation to-wit, within sixty days after the 12th day of February, 1909, and defend the above action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer addressed after your plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, plaintiff made here, and said court: the object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of the above entitled court compelling the defendant herein to account to the plaintiff for the sales of goods belonging to plaintiff made here, and after such an accounting aforesaid, for judgment against the defendant for the money due and owing to the plaintiff amounting to the sum of Seven Hundred Seventy-four and 48/100 (4774.48) Dollars. IRA 1800 AND D. B. TREFETHEN, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Address: 614-619 Colman Building, Seattle, Washington Bell 1111 1909 Feb. 12—March 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of Duttee Duttee J. Pearce, Junior, Plaintiff, vs. Anna F. Himes, and John Doe Himes, whose true Christian name is to plaint- tion unknown, her husband; J. W. Red- field and Jane Doe Redfield, whose true Christian name is to plainttion unknown, his wife, Defendants. No. 65252. Summer. The State of Washington to the said de- FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 1909. fendants, Anna F. Himes, and John Doe Himes, whose true Christian name is to plaintiff unknown, her husband; J. W. Redfield and Jane Doe Redfield, whose true Christian name is to plaintiff unknown, his wife, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear where the court has ordered of the first publication of this summons, towith, within sixty days after the 12th day of February, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your complaint to his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of his action is to quiet title to the west 80 feet of Lots One, Two and Three, Block Thirty-two, Law's Second Addition to Seattle. ELLIAS A. WRIGHT, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O Address: 620 Burke Building Seattle Wash. District of Washington February 12, March 26, 1909 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. In the Matter of the Guardianship of George Klinefelter, Annie Klinefelter, Helen Klinefelter, and Leonard Klinefelter, minors. No. 9166. Order to Show Cause. George W. Klinefelter, the guardian herein, having presented to the Court and filed herein his vertified petition in respects in compliance with the one-half interest of said minors in and to the following described real property, situated in Clallam County, State of Washington, and more particularly described as follows. The North half of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section thirty-two, Township twenty-north of Range fourteen West, and it appearing to the Court from such petition that there is not sufficient personal estate in the education and support of said minors, and to pay the just debts of said minors, and discharge certain lions on the real estate belonging to the said minors, and it is necessary that said real property is sold to provide funds for the education and support of the court being fully advised in the premises. It is ordered that all persons interested in said estate be and they are hereby directed to appear before this Court in Washington, N.J. of the Superior Court of King County, in the Court House in Seattle, Washington, on the 18th day of March, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 a. m., m. then and there to show cause if any they thorizing said guardian to sell the real estate of said wards for the purposes aforesaid; And it is further ordered that this order shall be published at least four successive weeks in the Seattle Republic. Done in open Court this the 11th day of February, A.D. 1909. Filed for record February 11th, 1909. Feb. 12—Mar. 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. S. E. Co. and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter real property. Defendants. Nearby New York. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in the delinquent tax certificate, property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State Washington, dated the following day, the delinquent tax certificate is follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: the delinquent tax certificate is for year 1904, in the amount of $2.24, on lot 12, block 2. Renton. Town of, (S. E. and line of Renton Coal Co.); that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property. For the year 1905, the sum of $1.56; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.44; for the year 1907, the sum of $1.44; for several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unprecedented taxes upon and against said sums. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of your warranty of exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 12, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forecasing the lien of said taxes and real property in itempled, of real property for the sums and amounts due union and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged against itempled, of widely by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFENER Plaintiff Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Feb. 12—Mar. 26, 1909. REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL CONDITION of the People's Savings Bank, located at Seattle, State of Washington, at the close of business on the 5th day of February, 1909. RESOURCES. Loans and discounts..... $ 410,708.94 Bonds, warrants and other securities..... $ 347,029.13 Real estate..... $ 76,268.32 Bank building..... $ 274,847.81 Cash and exchange..... $ 855,531.21 Total..... $1,963,895.41 LIABILITIES. Capital stock (fully paid)..... $ 100,000.00 Individual profits (net)..... $ 181,005.54 Deposits..... $ 1,082,799.87 Total..... $1,963,895.41 State of Washington, County of King—ss. L. Joseph T. Greenleaf, cashier of the above named bank, do solemnly swear to the best of my knowledge and belief. JOSEPH T. GREENLEAF, Cashier. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th day of February, 1909. (Seal.) CHAS. D. THOMAS. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Seattle. Correct-Attest: G. R. NICOLL J. S. GOLDSMITH Directors. FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 1909 REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL CONDITION of the Scandinavian American Bank, located at Seattle, state of Washington, at close of business, on the 5th day of February, 1909. RESOURCES. Loans and discounts..... $4,938,844.37 Overdrafts..... 8,595.59 Bonds, warrants and other securities..... 719,612.18 Banking house, furniture and fixtures..... 944,569.50 Other real estate owned..... 57,118.43 Due from banks..... $1,138,667.05 Checks on other banks and other cash items..... 16,574.33 Exchange for clearing house..... 99,598.21 Cash on hand 833,245.07— 2,088,084.66 Other resources..... 7,000.00 $8,763,824.73 LIABILITIES. Capital stock paid in..... $ 500,000.00 Surplus fund..... 350,000.00 Undivided profits..... 176,078.27 Due to banks, deposits..... $ 287,166.77 Deposits. De- mand..... 2,955,213.33 Deposits: Time and savings..... 4,419,769.74 Certified checks..... 31,448.03 Cashier's checks..... 44,148.59— 7,737,746.46 $8,763,824.73 State County of King—ss. I. J. F. Lane, cashier of the above named bank, do solemnly swear that the foregoing statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. J. F. LANE, Cashier. Subscribed and even to before me this 9th day of February, 1909. HENRY C. EWING, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Seattle. Correct—Attest: J. E. CHILBERG, PERRY POLSON, Directors. REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF The First National Bank, at Seattle, in the State of Washington, at the close of business February 5, 1909. Total State of Washington, County of Hickory—ss. I. J. Hall, cashier of the above named bank, do solemnly swear that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I. J. HALL, Cashier. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th day of February, 1909. REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL CONDITION of The State Bank of Seattle, located at Seattle, Wash., at the close of business, on the 5th day of February. RESOURCES. Loans and discounts ..... $528,945.82 Cl Overdrafts ..... 1,400.89 an Banking house, furniture and fixtures ..... 10,000.00 pr Expenses and taxes paid ..... 3,787.31 pr Interest accrued resources ..... 4,891.58 U. S. and other high g r a d e bonds ..... $ 55,032.59 an Warrants ..... 17,146.95 pr Due from banks ..... 146,895.37 ab Exchanges for Oliverous house ..... 40,840.92 bv Checks on other banks and other cash items ..... 834.43 Ju Cash on hand ..... 63,961.63 324,711.89 ye $879,199.66 Co LIABILITIES. Capital stock paid ..... $100,000.00 19 Surplus and undivided profits ..... 7,687.44 47 Dividends unpaid ..... 90.00 Du Due to banks, de- posits ..... $ 43,645.44 pr Individual depos- its ..... 416,680.71 de Savings and time deposits ..... 299,922.77 for Certified checks ..... 6,202.68 th Cashier's checks ..... 4,970.62 se $879,199.66 un State of Washington. I, A. H. Soelberg, cashier of the above pe named bank, do solemnly swear that the foregoing statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. A. H. SOELBERG. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th day of February, 1909. A. C. KAHLKE, Being an active attorney and from time to time having legal notices for publication, it is perfectly natural for you to want to get acquainted with those newspapers that do your kind of business. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Is just your size in this respect. It already has some notices for publication, as may be seen herein, but it needs more of them, and to that end your business is earnestly solicited. GHARLEY ON THE SPOT. Your notices are promptly called for; handled with care and accuracy. Affidavits delivered without delay. Charges reasonable from a hard times standpoint; everything done in a jam-up manner. TELEPHONE MAIN 305 When you have a publication, and if it happens to be a Divorce Summons or a Notice to Creditors, give us the facts and we will do the rest. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. 307 Epler Block. Main 305. Notices Received Up to Friday Noon. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE THE STATE of Washington for King County W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. S. E. Co., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: claimants or holders of an owner, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1999, and marked as follows, for the year in which the notice was given, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B51,256, for the year 1904, in the amount of $2.68, on lot 11, block 2, Town of Renton: (S. and E. of line of Renton Coal Co.); that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent users have been paid by the plaintiff upon have above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of $1.95; for the year 1906, the sum of $2.01; for the year 1907, the sum of $2.38, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sald date of 1904 and are all the unpaid and undeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this warranty, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 12, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged against and against a paid vided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on now file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Feb. 12–Mar. 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. J. H. Clambeau, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. —— Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, hereby declare that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B50,810, for the year 1904, in the amount of $1.81, on tract 47. Clambeau's A. H. 1st Addition to Dunlap; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid to the Treasurer and above described real property to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of $1.25; for the year 1906, the sum of $2.39; for the year 1907, the sum of $2.66, which several sums bear interest in the date of payment, from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against real property. You and each of you (including said person, known, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, and known, if any, by arary 12th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ATTORNEYS being an active attorney and from time to time being legal notices for publication, it is natural for you to want to get a copy with those newspapers that do your kind business. TITTLE REPUBLIC your size in this respect. It already notices for publication, as may be seen, but it needs more of them, and to the business is earnestly solicited. ARLEY ON THE SPOT. The notices are promptly called for; hard care and accuracy. Affidavits deliver out delay. Charges reasonable from its standpoint; everything done in a jar. TELEPHONE MAIN 305 In you have a publication, and if it has a Divorce Summons or a Notice to give us the facts and we will do the SEATTLE REPUBLIC Block. Main 305 Services Received Up to Friday Noon. --- answer the complaint of said, plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you have an indigent will be requested herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Feb. 12—Mar. 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. J. H. Clamby, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. ____. Notice and Summons. of Washington to the above defendants and of them each; You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the certain delinquent tax certificate described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B50,809, for the year 1904, in the amount of $1.81, on tract 45, A. H. Clambeh's 1st Addition to Dunlap; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid on platinum and gold above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of $1.25; for the year 1906, the sum of $2.39; for the year 1907, the sum of $2.66, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and taxed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, excluding the date of the first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 12, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below the address of the street and building with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, the foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for the purpose of the interest in a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER. Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Feb. 12—Mar. 26, 1909. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE—Sheriff's Office. State of Washington, County of King, ss. of Washington, execution, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 5th day of December, 1908, by the clerk thereof, in the case of J. A. Campbell Co., a corporation, plaintiff, versus Joseph Masoero, defendant, No. 64439, and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will process the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheriff's sales, towit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 16th day of January, A. D. 1909, before the court house door of said King County, State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendant, Joseph Masoero, in and to the following described property, in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot five (5), Block ten (10), Ralner Boulevard Fourth Addition to Seattle. levied on as the property of said defendant, Joseph Masoero, to satisfy a judgment, amounting to two thousand three hundred seventy-four and 95-100 ($2374.95) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 8th day of December, 1908. L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. By Edw. Drew, Deputy. December 11, 1908—January 8, 1909. NOTICE—SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL Estate. State of Washington, County of King, ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an alias execution, issued of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 31st day of December, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of J. E. Keefe, plaintiff, versus Charles S. Wangelin and Flora B. Wangelin, defendants, N. 668 and to me as Sheriff, received and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit, at 10 o'clock a.m. on the 6th day of December, 1908, before the Court House door of said Kettering, State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of said defendants, Charles S. Wangelin and Flora B. Wangelin, in and to the following described property, situated in King County State of Washington, to-wit: Lots two west eight (28) blocks, Block eleven (11), Hillman City Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. six (6), levied on as the property of said defendants Charles S. Wangelin and Flora B. Wangelin, to satisfy a judgment, amounting to one hundred and seventy seven hundred, and costs of, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 31st day of December, 1908, L. C. SMITH, Sheriff. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. J. C. MacCallum, Plaintiff, vs. Maud McCallum Defendant. No. Summary of Publication State of Washington to said Maud MacCallum. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from the date of the first publication of this summons, to obtain a stay of December, 108, and defend the above entitlement the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for plaintiff, at his offi- cial hearing in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be de- fered against you according to the de- mands of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. This cause is brought by the plaintiff to sue the defendant of the breach from said dendant on the grounds of extreme cru- alty, adultery and bigamy C. E. PIPER. Rooms 36 and 37 Union Block, 713 1st Ave, Seattle, Wash 98103 Dec. 11, 1908-Jan. 22, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Martin Adams, Deceased. In Probate. No. 9085. Notice of Sale of Real Estate. Notice is hereby given that in pursuance with an order of sale made and in possession of the Superior court of King County, State of Washington, 28th day of December, 1908, in the matter of the estate of Martin Adams, deceased, the undersigned administratrix of said estate will sell at public auction subject to confirmation by said Court following described real property, to-wit: Lots eleven (11), twelve (12) and the North half of thirteen (13) in block four (4). Palatine Hill Addition to the City of Seattle; said sale will be made the Sight of February, 1909, at 10:00 o'clock in the foreroom of said day at the front door of the county court house in said City of Seattle, King County. Washington. The terms of the sale will be cash, gold coin of the Unit- eer, gold coin of the bid to be payable at the time of issue and the balance son the confirmation of the said sale by this Court. LILLY M. ADAMS, Administratrix of the Estate of said 3 Deceased. Date of first publication Jan. 16, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Mary Williams, Plaintiff, vs. Emanuel Williams, Defendant. No. —. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Emanuel Williams, Defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summo, to wit: Within sixty days after the last of leniency in the above entitled action in the above titled court, and answer the compi- t of the plaintiff and serve a copy your answer upon the undersigned torneys for the plaintiff at once below your notice so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action, to obtain a decree of notice from the defendant. MILLION & HOUSPRI and GEORGE FRIEND. Plaintiff's A torneys. Post Office Address: Room 916 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of B. O. Winslow, Deceased. No. 8444. Order Appointing Day for Settlement of B. O. Winslow's Deceased. and Directing Notice to Be Given. Lillian M. Winslow, administratrix of the estate of B. O. Winslow, deceased, having rendered and presented for settlement and filed in this court her final account of her administration of the estate of B. O. Winslow, and a petition for the distribution of the residue of said estate to the persons entitled thereto; It is ordered that Thursday, the 4th day of February, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock am, be opened for a pointed for the hearing and settlement of said account and the hearing of said petition for distribution at Department No. 4 of said court; that the clerk of this court give notice thereof by cause of the most public places in King County, Washington, and by publishing a similar notice for at least four consecutive weeks immediately before said day of settlement and distribution, in the newspaper printed and of general circulation in said King County, Washington. It is further ordered that all persons interested in the estate of said deceased appear before the said Superior Court hearing in the state of Washington a. 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock of said day, at the court room of Department No. 4 of said court house in the City of Seattle, Washington, to show cause why an order should not be made distributing said estate, as prayed for in said day. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be served upon all persons interested in said estate at least ten days before the day appointed for the hearing of said petition, or that a copy of this order be published for at least four consecutive weeks prior to said hearing in the Seattle Republican a weekly newspaper published in King County, Washington, and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 31st day of December, 1908. GLO. E. MORRIS, Judge. January 1—February 4, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Albert A. Klefer, Plaintiff, vs. Edna M. Berger, Department No. ——. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said above named defendant, Edna Kleifer: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: Within sixty days after the 1st day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint upon the demand of the opposing answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which he had adjudicated of clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure a divorce from defendant on the grounds of desertion. KING DYKEMAN. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 502 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. January 1—February 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of B. O. Winslow, Deceased. No. 8444. Notice of Settlement of Final Account and of Hearing of Petition for Distribri Notice is hereby given that Lillian M. Winslow, administratrix of the estate of B. O. Winslow, deceased, has rendered and presented for settlement and filed in said court her final account of her administration of said estate and, in addition to the estate of B. O. Winslow, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock a.m. of said day at the court room of Department No. 4 of said court at the court house in Seattle, King County, Washington, has been appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in the settlement of said account, the exceptions in writing to said account and to contest the same. Notice is hereby further given that said Lillian M. Winslow, the said administratrix, has presented a petition for the distribution of the residue of the said estate of B. O. Winslow, the said day of February, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock said day, at Department No. 4 of said court at the court house in Seattle, King County, Washington, has been duly appointed by said court for the hearing of said petition, at which time all persons interested in said estate may appear and cause an arrest. He may not be granted distributing said estate as praved for in said petition In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of said Superior Court this 31st day of December, 1908. LILLIAN M. WINSLOW. Administratrix. OTTO A. CASE. Clerk of said Court. By J. A. SIGURDSSON. (Seal of Superior Court) Reputy. "What are they moving the Have a Legal? hone Main 305 Seattle Republican Published Every Friday, 307 Epler Blk. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton.....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton.....Associate One Year ..... $3.00 Six Months ..... 1.50 Three Months ..... 75 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matter. LINCOLN-DOUGLAS MEMORIAL The Sunday Forum of Seattle, an organization of Afro-Americans, will hold a Lincoln-Douglas day next Sunday afternoon and Rev. Wm. Osborne will deliver an address on Lincoln; Mr. J. W. Gray one on Douglas, while Rev. J. N. Wallace will review the results of the lives of the two great benefactors. It is more than remarkable that two such master minds should have seen the light of day in the same year, the same month, and so close to the same day of the month and that they should work after maturity along the same channels, yea, work for the same great cause—the emancipation of the slaves of the United States. No other man in all the history of the United States, if even the world, rose from such humble quarters with so few opportunities to the topmost rung of the ladder of fame as did Abraham Lincoln. No other man in all the world, who rose to such power and influence abused that power so little as did Abraham Lincoln. That an all wise God created him for the express purpose of emancipating four million human beings is verily believed, and that Abraham Lincoln was more a god than a man is likewise verily believed. Angels go in pairs, and so the birth of Frederick Douglas, or the man who bore that name, was the completion of the Creator's work. Douglas came out of the enslaved and served well the divine plan of Him who doeth all things well, to stir the souls of the men who opposed slavery to rally to the call of Lincoln to make war and finally overthrow the accursed institution. What man in all the wide world could emerge from centuries of bondage, lead the war for his own freedom, live to enjoy not only freedom for himself, but to see four million brethren enjoy the same privilege, and further still, become truly great among those who had enslaved himself and his ancestors, except a Frederic Douglas? That Douglas was no less a god than Lincoln is so apparent that he who runs may read. As the years go by the lives of Lincoln and Douglas seem more and more inseparable. This strange affinity at its beginnings seemed to have been the direct opposites, which, according to nature's law, owing to their powerful magnetic propensities, soon began to attract rather than repel, and the coming together of these forces resulted in human slavery the world over being so badly demoralized that it is no longer recognized even among savages. FACTS ABOUT LINCNLN. Abraham Lincoln had a story for every occasion and illustrated every thing by anecdote. He weilded the ax from the age of ten till he was twenty-eno. [Portrait of a man in a suit with a tie, facing forward, set against a dark background. The portrait is framed with a decorative border.]] While not by any means, a handsome man, Lincoln was of extraordinary appearance measuring six feet four inches, in height. He was a man of very strong affections and loved his mother and his first love so tenderly that their deaths often saddened him preceptiably. sistance streneous. A. B. ABRAHAM LINCOLN Lincoln's object in conducting the great civil war, was to save the Union at any cost. His patience was superabundent and he treated even those who differed from him with respect and kindness. When a lad he was often employed by his neighbors as a "hand" at 25 cents a day, which sum was paid to his father. He was a temperance man and never departed from his belief in that direction even when the custom of the times made his resistance streneous. TH ATTLE REPUBLICAN W. H. PAULHAMUS Although never a member of any church, he placed his reliance for support on the Almighty Being and often asked that prayers for his success be made. Lincoln was subject to melonoholia and at such times generally isolated himself from his friends. His physicians attributed this to his poor digestion and torpid liver. He was a remarkably strong man as well as a tall one and was in the habit of measuring his height and strength with those with whom he talked. He was a skillful and powerful wrestler, but though fond of the sport, scorned dishonest means to gain an advantage over n opdonent. It is known that Lincoln once split 400 rails for every yard of brown jeans, dyed with white walnut bark, that would be necessary to make him a pair of trousers. --- ```markdown ``` "Keep Your Eye on Pasco" and "Watch Tacoma Grow" may have been without significance—mere catch expressions to catch the town lot boomer to sell a few corner lots—but if the Republican politician does not keep his eye on State Senator W. H. Paulhamus he need not be surprised to wake up some bright morning and learn from his morning paper that Paulhamus is the foremost man of the state. You doubtless will say at this time that this is mere newspaper clap trap, so much per, but if you do you are either ignorant of the facts or you are talking your prejudices. That Senator Paulhamus is slowly but surely working himself to the front in more ways than one in this state may be seen by the systematic methods he has from time to time gone after things. On coming to this state he for a time followed the calling of a bank clerk, then he did a short political stunt and was for a while chief deputy sheriff of Pierce county. But in this he saw no "future" for himself, and he quickly gave it up and took whatever money he had and went to Sumner and bought him a tract of land, using the vulgar expression of the street, "went to it." In eight years time he has put it in the highest state of cultivation of any ranch on the Sound. From its proceeds he has become independent. He is the foremost man of all the valley in all of those things that are building up that farming community. As president of the Shippers' Association of that community he is in touch with every man in the valley and is likewise in touch with every commission merchant from coast to coast. As president of the Puyallup Fair Association he has proven a gigantic success. Some two years ago he decided to make an effort to go to the State Senate that he might do more for the community in which he lived. He went to that and succeed in his undertaking. He was re-elected last fall. In the Senate Mr. Paulhamus must be reckoned with, whether the faction with which he works be in the majority or the minority. He is a pleasing, affable gentleman and is therefore one of the most popular lawmakers now at Olympia. He was very fond of speech making and attended all the trials of the neighborhood and frequently walked fifteen miles to attend a neighboring court. In law he was singularly conscientious, his first effort being to try to arrange matters out of court; nor would he assume a case that he felt was not founded upon right and justice, He could repeat with effect all the poems and speeches in his various school readers. He could imitate to perfection the sermons of the wandering preachers who ctme to his town, It is said that there was not a housewife in New Salem but who was glad to put on an extra plate for Abe Lincoln, for while they were preparing the meal, he was either rocking the baby to sleep, telling the youngsters stories, helping to pull a wagon wheel out of a mudhole or rendering such assistance a the occasion suggested. FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 1909. in Pasco" and "Watch Tacoma Grow" but significance—mere catch expressions boomer to sell a few corner lots—but physician does not keep his eye on State man he need not be surprised to wake up and learn from his morning paper the foremost man of the state. You this time that this is mere newspaper man, but if you do you are either ignorant or are talking your prejudices. That slowly but surely working himself to less than one in this state may be seen hods he has from time to time gone to this state he for a time followed clerk, then he did a short political while chief deputy sheriff of Pierce he saw no "future" for himself, and and took whatever money he had and bought him a tract of land, using the the street, "went to it." In eight it in the highest state of cultivation Sound. From its proceeds he has bee is the foremost man of all the valley that are building up that farming indent of the Shippers' Association of man touch with every man in the valley such with every commission merchant As president of the Puyallup Fairoven a gigantic success. Some two to make an effort to go to the State do more for the community in which that and succeed in his undertaking. In fall. In the Senate Mr. Paulhamus, whether the faction with which he unity or the minority. He is a pleasing, is therefore one of the most popular Olympia. When living in New Salem, Lincoln clerked in a grocery store and was so careful about giving each customer his money's worth that he won for himself the name of "Honest Abe." The Lincoln family once moved from Gentryville, Indiana, to Decatur, Illinois. Their household goods were packed in an oxwagon which Abe was to "drive through." Young Abe, who the winter before worked in a grocery store, invested all his money in needles, pins, and other domestic necessities, and peddled as he passed along. He made a profit of about one hundred per cent. The author of the "Elsi Books," Miss Martha Finley, has ended a busy beneficial life at the ripe age of eighty-two years, She wrote under the nom de plume of "Martha Farquarson" and was the daughter of Dr. James R. and Maria Theresa Brown. After being educated in the select schools of Philadelphia and South Bend; Miss Finley taught school for a time. She then took up newspaper work in Philadelphia and lived there for several years, writing Sunday school books in her spare time. Almost every schoolgirl in the country for two generations back has known and loved "Elsie Densmore," the heroine, from babyhood to the time when she became "Grandmother Elsie." Miss Finley was born at Chillcothe, Ohio, on April 26th, 1828. Her girlhood was spent in South Bend, Ind. She had lived in Elkton for the lsat thirty years FRIDAY. FEBRUARY 12. 1909 SUPREME COURT DECIDES FOR HAY. SUPREME COURT DECIDES FOR HAY. STATE OF WASHINGTON ON THE Relation of Charles E. Coon, Relator, Plaintiff, vs. M. E. Hay, Respondent, No. 7848. Filed Feb. 6, 1909. This is an application to this court for a writ of quo warrants to oust the respondent from the office of lieutenant governor. The relator alleges, that the respondent was elected to the office of lieutenant governor at the general election held in November, 1908; that the votes were canvassed by the legislature as required by law, and respondent was declared duly elected, and on the second Monday of January, 1909, he duly qualified and is now holding the said office; that the respondent is incompetent to qualify or hold that office by reason of the fact that, prior to the primary election held on September 8, 1908, at which he was a candidate for the nomination of lieutenant governor on the republican name, he solicited and caused certain named newspapers to publish a statement consisting of the words "Fald Advertisement," followed by a photograph of said M. E. Hay, said photograph being followed by the words 'M. E. Hay' candidate for the republican nomination for the office of lieutenant governor," and promised and agreed to pay, and did pay, such newspapers for such publications. Respondent in opposing the writ presents several constitutional questions, which need not be considered in view of the construction which we place upon the statute relating to primary elections. Section 28 of the primary election law, Laws of 1907, page 472, upon which the relator relies, provides: "* * * No person shall be competent to qualify for any public office, who shall have, prior to the holding of any primary election, paid, or promised or agreed to pay, either directly or through another, or in any manner whatsoever, to the owner, publisher, manager or representative of any newspaper, any sum of money or other thing of value, for any article or published statement in a newspaper, wherein the electors are advised or counselled to vote for such candidate, or his fitness and qualifications for office are set forth, or his photograph or biography is published." The language here is somewhat involved, and is no doubt susceptible of the construction urged by the relator, to the effect that the mere publication of a photograph with a statement telling whose photograph it is disqualifies a candidate from holding office. It may also be construed as contended for by respondent, viz., as prohibiting payment for the publication of "Any article or published statement in a newspaper wherein the electors are advised or counseled to vote for such candidate or his fitness or qualifications for office are set forth, or his photograph or biography is published." In other words, the photograph must be published in connection with the published article or statement where the voters are advised to vote for such candidate or his fitness or qualification for office is set forth. We think this construction must be adopted. The mere statement whom the photograph represents is not such an article or statement as is prohibited by the provisions above named. The penalty for violating this statute is severe. It should not attach unless the meaning of the language is plain and the violation is clear. The attorney general, whose duty it is to advise public officers, gave an opinion on April 18, 1908, construing the section of the primary law under consideration, in which opinion that officer said: "That payment of money to a newspaper in the manner and for the purpose specified above, to-wit: Publication of announcement of candidacy (with or without accompanying photograph) over the signature of the candidate, but without newspaper comment, does not render that candidate incompetent for public office." Report Atty. Gen., 1908, p. 446, Opinion No. 343. We do not cite this opinion as controlling upon this court, but merely to show that Section 28 does not clearly make the publication of a photograph a disqualification for office. It also shows that the respondent acted in good faith. Under these conditions, where the statute is construed by an officer whose duty it is to advise public officers and where persons advised or with knowledge of such advice follow the same, the statute should not be construed otherwise unless the language is clear and unambiguous. The following section of the statute, viz. Section 29, makes it a misdemeanor for any newspaper or other publication to accept money for advocating the election or defeat of any candidate, and then provides: "Nothing herein shall prevent any person or persons, firm or corporation engaged in the publication of any newspaper, magazine or periodical for receiving for publication and publishing any matter, article or articles advocating the election or defeat of any candidate or candidates and receiving a consideration therefor, if such articles so published or printed have placed at the beginning thereof in plain type of black-faced Roman capitals in a conspicuous place, the statement 'Paid Advertisement.' But this section shall not be construed as permitting the payment for any publication prohibited by Section 28 of this act." The word "publication" here used refers clearly to the words "article or pub- lished statement" used in Section 28. The object of Section 29 is to prevent the newspapers named from advocating for secret hire the election or defeat of any candidate, but newspapers are authorized to openly sell their space where the readers are advised of the fact that the matter used is an advertisement merely. The last clause of Section 29 makes it clear that candidates themselves may not advocate their own election in newspapers by articles or statements which advise voters to vote for them, or where such articles set out their qualifications for office. But we think these sections are not intended to disqualify a candidate who merely publishes his picture with the statement whom the picture represents. With this construction of the statute it is unnecessary to consider the other questions presented. The writ must therefore be denied. MOUNT, J. We concur: CROW. J. I concur for the reason that the statute is so cloudy and its meaning so uncertain that I do not think it would be just to impose so severe a penalty as the loss of office upon one who might chance to misinterpret its provisions. DUNBAR, J. I concur for the reasons stated by Mr. Justice Dunbar. I regret my inability to agree with the conclusion announced by the majority of the court in this case, and the importance of the questions involved calls for, or at least justifies, a brief statement of the reasons for my non-concurrence. The opinions of the majority are based upon the ground that the direct primary law, so-called, does not prohibit the acts committed by the respondent, and does not render him incompetent to qualify for the office to which he has been elected; or, more properly speaking perhaps, upon the ground that the language of the act is so obscure and cloudy and the penalty so severe that a court should not enforce the penalty which follows as a matter of course upon its violation. The only provisions of the act which have any special bearing upon the question under consideration are Sections 28 and 29, which read as follows: "Sec. 28. No person shall, in order to aid or promote his own nomination to a public office under the provisions of this act, or any amendment thereto, directly or indirectly, himself or through another person, give, pay, expend or contribute, or promise to give, pay, expend or contribute any money or other valuable thing, except for personal expenses. The words 'personal expenses', as used in this act, shall include only expenses directly incurred and paid by a candidate for travelling and for purposes properly incidental to traveling, and for writing, printing and preparing for transmission any letter, circular or other publication not issued at regular intervals, whereby he states his position or views upon public or other questions; for stationery and postage, for telegraph, telephone and public messenger service, and for other similar expenses, and for the necessary expense of hiring halls or other rooms for the purpose of holding meetings to address the voters and others upon public questions and matters relating to his candidacy. No person shall be competent to qualify for any public office, who shall have, prior to the holding of any primary election, paid, or promised or agreed to pay, either directly or through another or in any manner whatsoever, to the owner, publisher, manager or representative of any newspaper, any sum of money or other thing of value, for any article or published statement in a newspaper wherein the electors are advised or counseled to vote for such candidate, or his fitness or qualifications for office are set forth, or his photograph or biography is published. Sec. 29. It shall be unlawful for any owner, proprietor, editor, manager, officer, clerk, agent, reporter, or employee of any newspaper, magazine or periodical printed or published in this state, to take, accept, or receive, or agree to take, accept or receive, for himself or any other person or persons, firm or corporation, any money, gratuity or other valuable consideration or article of value for or on account of or as a consideration for such newspaper, magazine or other periodical supporting or advocating the election or defeat of any candidate or candidates at any primary election. Any such owner, proprietor, editor, manager, officer, clerk, agent, reporter or employee of any newspaper, magazine or other periodical violating the provisions of this act shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be fined in any sum not less than $25.00 and not more than $500.00 or confined in the county jail not less than 10 days or more than six months or be punished by both such fine and imprisonment: PROVIDED, however, Nothing herein shall prevent any person or persons, firm or corporation engaged in the publication of any newspaper, magazine or periodical from receiving for publication and publishing any matter, article or articles advocating the election or defeat of any candidate or candidates and receiving a consideration therefor, if such articles so published or printed have placed at the beginning thereof in plain type of black-faced Roman capitals in a conspicuous place, the statement 'PAID ADVERTISEMENT.' But this section shall not be construed as permitting the payment for any publication prohibited by section twenty-eight of this act." The language of these sections may be THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN somewhat involved, as suggested in the majority opinions, but when the act is read in its entirety and construed as a whole, its meaning is plain and obvious. Section 28 declares in express terms that no person shall be competent to qualify for a public office who shall have paid to the owner or publisher of a newspaper any sum of money for any article or published statement wherein his photograph or biography is published, and if is very apparent to my mind that a statement that the respondent was a candidate for the office of lieutenant governor on the republican ticket, accompanied by his photograph, is a published statement wherein his photograph is published within the intent and meaning of the act. The majority say that the published article or statement must advise or counsel the electors to vote for the candidate, or set forth his fitness or qualifications for office, as well as publish his photograph or biography, before it comes within the prohibition of the statute; but this view is in my opinion manifestly erroneous, for at least two reasons. In the first place, the publication of an article or statement advising or counseling the electors to vote for a candidate, or setting forth his fitness or qualifications for office, without more, is a plain and palpable violation of the act and works a forfeiture of the office, and it would be an idle formality for the legislature to provide that such acts, when accompanied by the publication of the candidate's biography or photograph, would have the like but no greater effect. In the second place, to permit a candidate for office to pay for the publication of his photograph accompanied by a statement of the office to which he hears, in a newspaper published at regular intervals, is in direct violation of the provision of the first part of Section 28, which prohibits a candidate from paying or contributing money to promote his candidacy except for personal expenses, and defines "personal expenses" in a manner that of necessity excludes the expenditures made by the respondent in this case. The claim is advanced that the provisions of Section 28 are in a measure nullified, or at least rendered obscure, by the provisions of Section 29. I am unable to discover the slightest conflict between the two sections. The former is directed solely against the offending candidate and provides a penalty for its violation. The latter is directed solely against the offending newspaper and provides a penalty of a different kind for its violation. Furthermore, the last clause of Section 29 contains this express provision: "But this section shall not be construed as permitting the payment for any publication prohibited by section twenty-eight of this act;" and, as we have seen, the publication in question is twice prohibited by Section 28. Reference is made in the majority opinion to an opinion of the attorney general of this state, but I deem this of no consequence. The opinion of that officer cannot obscure a statute which is otherwise plain, though it may elucidate a statute which is otherwise obscure. Furthermore, the attorney general is only required by law to give written opinions to the governor and other state officers on legal and constitutional questions relating to the duties of their respective offices, or to either branch of the state legislature or committees thereof on constitutional or legal questions, when requested so to do. Bal., Sec. 169. An opinion of the attorney general, not authorized or required by law, stands upon no different footing from the advice of any other counsel, and cannot be looked to or considered by a court in construing a public statute of the state. The will of the people as expressed at the polls should ordinarily prevail, but the mode of exercising that will is regulated and controlled by the constitution and laws of the state, and when there is a conflict between the two, the latter must prevail. Inasmuch as the majority opinion falls to consider other objections urged by the respondent, I will not allude to them, further than to say that I find them without substantial merit. The writ should issue as prayed. RUDKIN, J. I concur in what is said by Judge Rudkin. FULLERTON, J. Assuming Section 28 of the primary law to be constitutional, I agree with all that has been said by Judge Rudkin. I believe it to be susceptible of construction, and that it does not conflict with Section 29. I do not agree with the reasoning of Judges Mount and Crow, nor with the special reasons assigned by Judges Dunbar and Gose, for their concurrence. Inasmuch as a majority of the court have decided that the writ shall not issue, it is perhaps idle to pursue the discussion, but because of the importance of this case, I feel that I am not unwarranted in expressing my reason for believing that the writ should be denied. Section 28 of the act attempts to put restrictions upon the eligibility of the candidate that are not warranted by the constitution. It provides that a candidate offending against its provisions shall not be competent to qualify for the office to which he may have been elected. Eligibility of executive officers has been defined by the constitution of the state: "No person except a citizen and a qualified elector of this state shall be eligible to hold any state office," etc. Art. 3. Sec. 25. In other words, the people have said that any one of their number who is a citizen of the United States and a qualified elector shall be eligible to hold the office of lieutenant governor. There is no qualification prescribed by statute for the elector that would bar the respondent in this case from assuming the duties of the office to which he has been elected. Bal. Code, Sections 1320-1-2-3-4. Section 28 of the direct primary law clearly puts upon the citizen a test of eligibility not contemplated by the people when adopting the constitution. Although the respondent published an article or statement prohibited by Section 28, this cannot be made, by mere statutory enactment, a disqualification, for the constitution leaves no room for such action on the part of the legislature. Many states have passed corrupt practice acts and made the expenditure of money by a candidate, beyond certain prescribed limits, a misdemeanor or a ground of contest, or have deprived the candidate of the emoluments of the office. These laws have generally been sustained. But any attempt to add additional qualifications or to impose any limitations on the terms of eligibility fixed by the constitution has found no favor except in two instances, to which I shall refer: "Hence, whenever any public office of any kind is made elective, * * * * the constitution becomes ex propie vigore applicable and operative, and fixes the qualifications for eligibility. This is a denial of power to the legislature to impose any greater restrictions or to add other qualifications for eligibility to those prescribed in the constitution." State ex rel. v. Holman, 58 Minn. 219. The constitution of the State of Minnesota provides that any person having the qualifications of a voter shall be eligible to office. In the old case of Barker vs. The People, 3 Cowen, 686, it is said, in discussing the principle which I conceive to be involved here: "Eligibility to public trusts is claimed as a constitutional right, which cannot be abridged or impaired, * * * The constitution giving the right of election and the right of appointment; these rights consisting essentially in the freedom of choice; and the constitution also declaring, that certain persons are not eligible to office; it follows from these powers and provisions, that all other persons are eligible. Eligibility to office is not declared as a right or principle, by any express terms of the constitution; but it results, as a just deduction, from the express powers and provisions of the system. The basis of the principle is the absolute liberty of the electors and the apointing authorities, to choose and to appoint, any person, who is not made ineligible by the constitution. Eligibility to office, therefore, belongs, not exclusively or specially to electors, enjoying the right of suffrage. It belongs equally, to all persons whomsoever, not excluded by the constitution. I therefore conceive it to be entirely clear, that the legislature cannot establish arbitrary exclusions from office, or any general regulation requiring qualifications, which the constitution has not required." See also: McCrary on Elections, Sec. 312; Mchem on Public Officers, Sec. 96; Thomas v. Owens, 4 M. 189. In the case of Page vs. Hardin, 8 B. Mon. 649, it was held that a statute requiring the secretary of state to reside at the seat of government could not work a forfeiture of the office in the face of a constitutional provision saying that he might hold the office for a prescribed term, "if he shall so long behave himself well." The supreme court of Ohio, 29 Ohio St. 102, and the supreme court of Colorado, 8 Colo. 417, under constitutional provisions like our own, in that they say "No person shall be elected," etc., have held that this statement, being in the negative form, could not be taken as an inhibition upon the power of the legislature to add such reasonable qualifications as it deemed necessary in order to ensure an efficient and proper discharge of the office, I may add, to ensure an incumbent who has the interest of a taxpayer in the execution of his trust. The rule adopted by these courts is as follows: "We do not believe that the framers of the constitution, by this provision, intended to say that the right to vote should be the sole and exclusive test of eligibility to all civil offices, except as otherwise provided in the instrument itself; that no additional qualifications should ever be demanded, and no other disqualifications should be imposed. If, as has been well said, they had intended to take away from the legislature the power to disqualifications for office, other than the one named in the constitution, it would not have been left to the very doubtful implication which is claimed from the provision under consideration." State vs. Covington, 29 Ohio St. 102. I am not willing to admit this to be the better rule, but if it be the rule, it in no wise militates against my attitude toward the case at bar. It cannot be denied that, if the legislature has power to add other qualifications to those fixed in the constitution, they must be reasonable. It must be within the spirit if not the letter of the constitution. Now, is the provision that one who publishes an article or statement, as provided in Section 28, a reasonable one? It cannot be so held. It does not go either to the character, capacity, sex or age of the candidate or his pecuniary interest in the affairs of state. It puts a test of qualification ("he shall not be competent to qualify") upon the successful candidate unknown to the law, and in no way tending to safeguard the privilege of the public to select officials possessing some recognized standard of fitness. The condition is arbitrary and unreasonable. It does not pertain to the citizenship, mental or moral worth of the candidate. Therefore, in construing the constitutional provision, whether it be held this 5 the legislature can add to qualification, or may add such reasonable qualifications as are not excluded by necessary implication, it makes no difference. Under the first construction, the respondent is entitled to his office; under the second, he cannot be denied, for the reason that the added qualification is neither reasonable or necessary to the faithful and competent administration of his office. Upon either theory Section 28 violates Section 25, Art. 3 of the constitution. The writ should have been denied for the reasons herein suggested. CHADWICK, J. State of Washington, County of Thurston—ss. I, C. S. Reinhart, Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Washington, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the opinion of the court as the same was filed on the 6th day of February, 1909. In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of said Court, this 10th day of February, 1909. (Seal.) C. S. REINHART. BUSINESSDIRECT Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE CONNECTION Business Office, Third and Spring People's Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R. J. Reekle, Vice Presst. Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. Commercial Savings and Trust General Bank and Exchange. Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash Stetson & Post Mill Co. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance 529 Colman Blk., Phone Main 695 W. H. FINCK Pioneer Jeweler and Watch Maker. Our Holiday Specials Unequaled. 816 Second Avenue, Seattle, Wash. The Comfort. Newly furnished rooms. Walking distance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. L. ISRAEL WALKER, 1101-1102 Jackson Street. Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Electric Fixtures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. Scandinavian American Bank. Write Today for a copy of "THE BANK ACCOUNT" a new, neat little 8-page paper as full of good things as an egg is of meat. MAILED FREE. The Scandinavian-American Bank, Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. E. N. BROOKS & CO. For Frills For Men. HIGH CLASS HABERDASHERY 1331 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. WILLIAM WALKER. Complete stock New Fall Goods, Ladies', Misses' and Children's Wear- ing Apparel, Furs and Fine Coats. 820 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. --- 9 — ee _ ee eee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE oe of Washington, in and for King ye Michel A. Provo, Plaintiff, vs. Clara An- derson Provo, Defendant. No. 63790. Summons for’ Publication, State of Washington to said Clara An- derson Provo: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from the date of the Srst’ publication of ‘this summons, |to- wit: on the 20th day of November, 1908, And defend the above entitled action in {he above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve & copy of your answer upon the under- ase aorneys, for plaintiff, at their ‘offices stated below. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be ren- Gered against you according to the, de- mands in plalntie's complaint, whieh has been filed with the Clerk’ of the Court above stated. This case is brought by the plaintiff to obtain a decree ot divorce from sald defendant on the grounds of willful desertion. FREUDENBERG & HEATON, ‘Attorneys for Plaintitt. No. 610-611 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. November 20—January 1, 190. IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington, in and for King County. Ina bi. Foster, Plaintiff, vs. Norman B. Foster, Defendant. No. s..ss+ seve Summons for Pubiteation, State of Washington to sala Norman B. Foster: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from the date of the first publication of this summons, |to- Wit: on the 20th day of November, 1908, fnd defend the aboye entitled action, in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintifé and serve a Gopy of your answer upon the under- Signed atiorneys, for, plaintit at thelr Office below stated. In case of your fall- Gre so to do, judgment will be rendered Against you according to, the demands of plaintif's complaint, which has been filed with the Cler kof ‘sald Court. ‘This cause Is brought by the plaintift to gb- fain a decree of divorce from said de- fendant on the grounds of willful de- Sertion and nonsupport, FREUDENBERG & HEATON, ‘Attorneys for Plaintitt. No, 610-611 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. November 20—January 1; 190. eee isan wOTICE AND SUMMONS. : (m_the Superior Court of the State ol Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. C. A, Cook, ‘and ail persons unknown, if any, hav- fag or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, Defendants. State of Washington, to. the above defendants and each ‘of them: | You nd each of. you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of ‘an interest or estate fn and. to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the Rbove named plaintift 1s the holder of one certain delinquent tax. certificate fssued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 20th day Of October, 1908, and numbered B54361, for the delinquent taxes of the years 1902. to. 1906, Inclusive, in the amount of $2.89, and, upon thie real property Situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Second ‘class tide fands in front of SEM of SE% of, Sec 6, Twp, 22.N., R. 3B, W. M, ‘That the faxes for the year 1907 havé been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described Feal ‘property, in the sum of 49, cents Which several sums bear interest al the the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are al the unpald and unredeemed taxes upor and against sald real property. You and each of you (including sat persons unknown, if any), are herebs further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- clusive of the day of said first publica. fon to-wit: within sixty days after November 13, 1908, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plain. tift and serve a copy of your answer on the ‘undersigned attorney for plaintif at his office below stated, or pay the Amount due, together with’ Interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judg: ment will be rendered herein, foreclos- ing. the lien of sald taxes ‘and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, tor sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the Satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's com- plaint, now on file In this cause anc Court. L, H. ORAVER, Plaintiff. A. C, MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wash, November 13—December 25, 1908. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. dna 1. Brenner. Plaintitt, vs. George ‘W. Brenner, Defendant.—No, 64990. Summons by’ Publication. The State of Washington to the sald George W. Brenner, defendant: You are hereby Summoned to appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this sum- mons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 15th day of January, 1909, and de- fend the above entitled ‘action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorneys for. plaintiff at thelr fitice and post-office address below des- ignated, and In case of your faflure so to do, judgment, will be rendered against you according to the demand of plain- Um's complaint, which hag been fled In the office of the clerk of said court. ‘The object of said action is to secure ‘a divorce from Aefendant, the custody of minor children and that the commu, nity property be awarded to plaintif gnd for permanent, allmony, attorney's fees herein and costs of this action. MORRIS, SOUTHARD, & SHIPLEY, Attorneys for Plaintift. Office and Postoffice Address: 55 Hal- ler Building, Seattle, King County, ‘Washington. spate OF Hist publication, January 15th, January _15—February 26, 1909. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, F, J. Carver, Plaintift, vs. G. W. Rob: ert? and Jané Doe Roberts, his’ wife, whose true Christian name is unknown. and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an Interest in and’ to the horainafter described real property,, De- fendants.—No, 62577. Notice and Sum- mons. ‘The State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of ‘an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, are hereby notl- fled that the above named plaintif Is the holder of one certain delinquent tax gertificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 18th day of April, 1908, and num- ered as follows, for the’ delinquent taxes of the following year in the fol- owing amount and upon the real prop- otty, situated ia amt ue County, oF Scrlbed ‘as follows, to-wit: White Brothers’ Addition to iciridand —Lot 6, block 2, “B49266, year 1904, amount ‘eighty-nine cents, “That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years Rave beon, pald by the plaintift upon said above describe real ‘property, to-witi Lot 6, block 2, White Brothers’ Addi. tion to Kirkland, thirty-five cents (360) for the year 1908; forty-seven cents (ite) for the year ‘1906, and fifty-eight cents (S80) for the year’ 1907. Which several sums bear ‘Interest ai the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the un: pald and unredeemed taxes upon an¢ Rgainst said real property. ‘You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exelu: Sive of the day of said first publication, tonwit: within aixty days after the i6tt day of January, 1409, In the above en: titled court and action; and defend this Action and answer the complaint of said plaintif and serve a copy of your an- Ewer on the undersigned attorney, for plaintit at his office below stated, o1 pay the amount due, together with Inter. esi and costs, In ease you fall 30 to do judgment wilt be Fendered herein, fore Closing the len of said taxes and costs fgainst each parcel of said real prop: erty for the sums and amounts due upor and charged against each, for sald taxes interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the Satisfaction of, the sums charged an¢ found against it respectively as, provid ed by Jaw and as prayed. in plaintitts Complaint, now on fe in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora tion, Piaintirt. F, 5. CARVER, ‘Attorney’ for Plaintift. OMmce Address, Northern Bank § Trust Co,” Bide. ‘January 18—Pebruary 26, 1909. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Aurora Land Co., a Gorporation, Plain- tim, vs. G, W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true Christian hame ix unknown ‘and all persons un: known, if any, having or claiming an in- terest’ in and to the hereinafter de- gcribed real property; Defendants —No. 62557, » Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that thte Above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate is- Sued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows: For the’ delinquent taxes of the follow- ing year, in the following amount and upon the real property, situated in, sald King County, described as follows, to- wits ‘White Brothers’ Addition to Kirkland —Lot 3, block 2, B49268, year 1904, amount,’ eighty-nine cents. ‘That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff ‘upon said above described real ‘property, to-wit: Lot 8, block 2, White Brothers’ Addi- tion to Kirkland—85 cents for the year 1905; forty-seven cents (47) for ” the year’ 1906, and fifty cents (60) for the year 1907, ‘Which several sums bear interest, at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from sald date of payment, and are all the un. pald and unredeemed taxes upon an Against sald real property, You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exelu- Sive of the day of said first, publication, to-wit, within sixty days after the 15th day of January, 1009, in the above en- titled court and’ action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your an- Swer.on the undersigned attorney for plainti’ at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with In- terest and costs. ‘Incase you fall so to Qo, judgment will be. rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due hpon and charged against each, for sald Yaxes, Interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of, sald property tor the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's com- Blaine’ now ‘on! fle “in "this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Plaintitt. F. J. CARVER, Attorney’ for Plaintitt. omce address: Northern Bank & ‘Trust Co. Bldg. January 16—February 26, 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington for the County of King.—In Probate. In the matter of the Estate of Mary N, ‘Mitchell, Deceased. No. 7527. Order to Show Cauee Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. James 8. Mitchell, administrator of the eatate of Mury’ N. Mitchell, de: ceased, haying filed in’ this court, his petitio’ nsetting forth that said estate 1s how Ina condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing. to, the court that said petition sets forth facts Sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of sald estate: Tt is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, be and appear before the sala, Superior Court of King County, State of Wash- ington, at the court room of the Pro- bate department of said court in_ the City of Beatle, on the 25th day of Feb- ruary, 1909, at the hour of 9:30, o'clock a, m, of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons. in sald petition men- toned, according to law. Tt is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before, the sald 26th day of February, 1909, in Seattle Republican, @ newspaper, printed and published in said King County and of general circulation. therein. ‘Done in open court this 22nd day of January, 1909. GEO, B. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County, of King —s8, I, D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King Cotinty and ex-officio Clerk of the Su- perlor Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby cer- tify that the foregoing 1s a full, true and correct copy of an original ‘order to show cause, made by sald Court on the 22nd day of January, 1909, in the matter of the estate of Mary N, Mitch- ell, deceased. ‘Witness my band and the seal of sald Court this 22nd day of January, 1908. D. K. SICKELS, ‘Clerk: By PERCY F. THOMAS, (Seal) Deputy Clerk. January 22—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN je- State of Washington, for Kin; oe. D. J. Hanna, Plaintift, vs. Teoes nd Bikishaw and Dewaon’ Bradshaw, co: 4, partners doing business under the firm name of Bradshaw Bros., Defendants.— or No, ..... Summons by publication, by The State of JWeabington the the sald ed James B. Bradshaw and Dawson Brad- JABNS Tbetendants: “You are. hereby 4i- summoned to appear within sixty c) days after the date of the first its publication of this summons, to-wit, ht within sixty days after the 16th day of January, A. D. 1909, and Sefeee at the above entitled action in the above way gatitied court, and answer the complaint in- of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your nd answer wen the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; (id and in case of your failure so to do, by judgment will be rendered against you hd Reegraing to the demand. of the com ite plaint, which has been filed with the lu- Clerk of said Court. The object of the Mm, sald action, set forth inthe complaint, th fs to recover the sum of two. hundred n- and twentv-five ($225.00) dollars due ig plaintiff from the defendants, as the uid salary of Peon for the month of De- n= cember, 1008, under. a certain contract ‘or vf employment between the parties to or this action, whereby plaintiff was to re- sr- ceive $225.00 per month for his services jo, as salesman, for defendants, and which re- said sum defendants have failed and re- sts fused to pay. ie p- GRAVES & MURPHY, on ‘Attorneys for Plaintiet es, _P. 0, Address! Seattle, County. ‘of of King, "Washington, at 011 Lowman he Building. nd January 16—February 26 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE Btate of Washington, for King County. Mary C, Brydges, Plaintiff, vs. Wil- Yam H. Biydges, Detendant.—No. 64926, Summons by Publication. ‘The State of Washington, to William R, Brydges, the said defendant: ‘In the name of the State of Washing- ton, you are hereby summoned to ap- pear within sixty days after the date Of the first publication of this summons to-wit, within sixty days from and after the 18th day of January, 1909, and de- fend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed, the attorney for the plaintiff, at his offices below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be fendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of tHe above entitled court. ‘The object of the said action set forth in the complaint is as follows: To secure a divorce for the plaintift from the defendant upon the grounds of non-support and habitual drunkenness, and for other proper rellef in the prem- ses, F, B, WIESTLING, Attorney for Plaintimt. P, O, Address: 421 and 422 Boston Block, Seattle, King County, Wash. Date of first publication, January 16, —Feb. 26, 1909. vm AD £ SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of Knig. —Ss.—Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an execution issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 15th day of January, 1909, by the clerk thereof, in the case of Adolph Candau, Plaintift, versus Eliza: eth Franklin, Defendant, No, 64908, and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given, that I will pro- ceed to sell at public auction to the high- est bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheriff's sales, to- Wit, at 10 o'clock A. M, on the 27th’ day of ‘February, A. D,, 1909, before the Court House’ door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the sald de- fendant Elizabeth Franklin in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to- wit: ‘On that certain lease and leasehold interest executed and delivered on May 27, 1907, by Adam Orth to Adolph Can- dau on ihe upstairs part of that certaln building situated on Lot one (1) in Block thirty-three (33) of D. §. Maynard's Plat of the Town (now city) of Seattle, situ- ated at the Southeast Corner of Fifth ‘Avenue South and Main Street, for the term. of two years from June’ 1, 1907, sald lease being filed for record on May 29, 1907, and of record In the Auditor's Ofiice of King County, Washington, In Vol. 21, Leases at page 198 et sea., levied on as ‘the property of sald, defendant Blizabeth Franklin, to satisfy a judg- ment, amounting to Ninety-five 67/100 $96.67) Dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintitt, Dated this 16th day of January, 1909. ROBT, ‘Tr. HODGE, Sheriff. By JOHN STRINGER, Deputy. January 22-February 19, 1909, SUMMONS ON APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF LAND. State of Washington, County of King 8s. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County, of King. ‘W. J. Tower, Plaintiff, vs, George Wis haya, “George Fisher, Miranda Draper Ellot Draper, Thomas Draper, Lucinds Draper, Elizabeth Draper, Lucretia, Dra. Bor, Mary Draper, Sarah Draper, William (shard, Samuel Wishard, ' Marthe Bridgefarmer, Emmaling Van Vagner Josephine Wishard, Olly Wishard, Bartné Wishard, King County, State of Wash, ington, Gity of Seattle, B. J, Rosencrance and Jane Doe Rosecrance, his wife, and the unknown heirs of Martha Ball, and all other persons oF, parties, unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, Men or Interest in the Teal estate described in the application herein, Defendants, ‘The State of Washington to the above named defendants, greeting: ‘You are hereby summoned and re- quired to answer the application of the applicant plaintift In the above entitled application for registration of the fol- lowing Jand, situate in, King County Washington,” to-wit: ‘The Bast _half (4%) of Block Twenty-eight (28), Bige- low's Addition to the City of Seattie, less the North flye (N. 5) feet of, the Hast Elghty (Bm. 80) feet of Lot Ten (10), and the South Thirty-five (S, 35), feet of the East Kighty (B. 80) feet of Lot ‘Nine (9), and to file your answer to the sald application in the offie of the Gist of said Court, in said County, within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of such service; and {f you fail to ans- wer thé said application within the time aforesaid, the applicant plaintiff in. this action will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the application herein. ‘Witness D. K. SICKLES, Clerk of said Court and the seal theréof at Seattle in said County and State this 20th day of January, A.D. 1808, TeERt® OF frst publication, January 22, D._K. SICKLES, Clerk. By_0. § BRUNS, Deputy Clerk. _ San, 22- Feb. 6, 1909. iN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THA State of Washington for, King County. Lloyd B. Dunning, Plaintiff, vs. Maude J, Dunning, Defehdant. No. 66,071. Summons by Publication, ‘The State of Washington to the said Maude L. Dunning, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the Brat publication of this summons: to-wit: ‘within sixty days after the 22nd day of January; 1909, and defend the above en- titled action in the above entteed court, and answer the complaint of the plain: Um, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plain- tift at hig office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment, will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action 18 to obtain a decree of divorce between the plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds bf abandonment of the plaintife by sald defendant for more than one year ana cruel treatment of plaintif’ by defend- ant and personal indignities rendering his life burdensame. 3. HENRY DENNING, Plaintift's Attorney. Office and Post Office Address: | 45-6 Starr-Boyd Bldg., Seattle, Wash. ‘January 22-March 6, 1909. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for thé County of King. Eawin J, Milling, Plaintiff, vs, Lucy Milling, Défendant, No. 66,099. | Sum- mons. The State of Washington to the sald Lucy Milling, Defendant: ‘You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (80) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 22nd day of January, 1908, and defend the above entitled action ‘in the above en- titled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve @ copy of your answer upoh the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his. office below Stated; and in case of your failure 80 to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. "The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of mat- yimony. between the parties hereto on the ground of abandonment and desertion for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action. B, T, SCHOFF, Attorney. for Plaintitt. Post Office Address: 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Wash- ington. fanuary 22-March 5, 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff, va; Unknown Owners, and all persons’ unknown, if any, having | oF Claiming an Interest in and’ to the here- inatter deseribed real, property, Detend- ants, No, 64,543, Notice and Summons, State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you, a8 owners, claim- ants or holders of an’ interest or estate {nana to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that, the Above named plaintift 1s the holder of one delinquent tax certificate issued by the ‘Treasurer of King County, State of Wasiington, dated the 16th day of Sep- tember, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the follow ing year In the following amount and upon’ the real property, situated in. sald ing County describes as follows, to- wit: ‘Lot Forty-four (44), Block Two (2), Kirkland Park, King County, Washing- ton, being certificate No, Bb4314, for the year 1902, One and 4/100 (31.04) Dollars. That the’ taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintif® upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot Forty-four (44), Block ‘Two (2). tor the year 1908, ‘Thirty-one cents; for the year 1004, ‘Twenty cents; for’ the year 1905, Thirty-two cents; for the year 106, Forty-four cents; for the year {g07, Forty-six. cents; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 16 per cent. per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and un- Fedeemed taxes upon and against sald real property. ‘You and each of you are hereby fur- ther notified and summoned to be and appear. within sixty days after the 1st Gay of publication of this notice, ex- clusive of the day of first publication, fo-rit: within 60 days after January 22, {8oy, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and ans- wer the complaint of said plaintift and serve a copy of your answer on the un- Gersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount fue, together with Interest and costs, Tn ease you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real property for the sums Rnd. amounts due upon and charged against each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, {nterest and costs, ordering a sale of tach. parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this eause and court SURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Plaintift. FP. J, CARVER, Attorney for Plaintift. ‘Office Address: $14 Northern Bank & Trust Bidg,, Seattle, Wash. Nee eee. rotruaty 19, 1909. HOTIOE OF STOCEHOLDERS’ MEET- Seattle, Wash., Jan. 21, 1909. Notice is hereby given that the regu- jar meeting of the stockholders of the ‘Alaska. Central Railway, Company will dovhela at the principal office of, said Company at Room 502 of the Burke Futlding, In Second Avenue, | Seattle, King. County, Washington, on’ Tuesday, the and day of March, A. D., 1908, at two o'clock in the afternoon of said day. JAMES A, HAIGHT, Secretary of the Alaska Central Rafiway Company. Jan. 22-Feb, 19, 1909. PROBATE NOTICE. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THD State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King. —s8. Tn the Matter of the Estate of James H, Cameron, Deceased. No. 7000. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Homer BE. ‘Turner, the administrator of the estate of James H. Cameron, deceased, has fendered to, and filed in sald court his final account as auch administrator, and that Thursday, the 25th day of Febru- ary, 1909, at 9:80 o'clock, a. m., at the Gorirt Room of the Probate ‘Department of our sald Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said court for, the set, flement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in sald estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same, ‘Witness, the HON. GEO. B, MORRIS, Judge of ‘sald Superior Court, and the Seal of Said Court hereto affixed this Bist day of January, 1909. 1D, K, SICKLES, Clerk. (Seal) “By J. A. SIGURDSSON, Deputy Clerk. ‘yan. 92-Feb. 19, 1909. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THD State of Washington In and for Hing County.—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of James H. Cameron, Deceased. No. 700. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 1909. en- Not be Made. : Soe Not een turner abinintattatae 2 ke ih: estate of dames H. Cameron, deceased, wer having fled ‘in this Court, his, petition in- setting forth that Said estate is now in ase a condition to be closed, and 1s ready Will for distribution of the tesidue thereof the among the persons entitled by law there- een to, and it appearing to the court, that phe said petition sets forth facts sufficient to fo authorize @ distribution of the resi- the due of the sald estate, nds Now, therefore, It 18 otdered by the ald court that all persons interested In the ind estate of said James H. Cameron, de- nd> ceased be and appear before the said ing Buberlor Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room in the Probate Depariment of said court in the ; 4 Clty of Seattle, on the 25th day of Feb. 5-6 ruary, 1909, at the hodr of 9:80 o'clock a ms of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an — order of distribution should not be made HE of the residue of the sald estate among the the heirs and persons In sald petition mentioned, according to law. cy | It is further ordered that a copy of mM- this order be, published once a week for four successive weeks before the sald ald 24th day of February, 1909, In the Se- attle Republican, a newspaper printed ear and published in’sald King County, and of of general circtilation therein. ns, Done in open court this 2ist day of and January, 1909. the GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. ene | Yun Secten 46. Tee. STIPERTIOR COTIRT | IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF, THE State of Washington, for the County of King, State of Washington, County of King—ss, In the, Matter of the Estate of Maty N. Mitchell, Deceased. No. 7527. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that James, 8. Mitohell, the administrator of the e#tate of Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, has ren- dered to, and filed’ in said Court his Final Account .as such, administrator, and that Thursday, the 2bth day of Feb- ruary, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock a. m., at the Court’ Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King ‘County, has heen duly’ appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person Interested in said estate may appear and file his ex- ceptions in writing to sald account, and contest the same. ‘Witness, the Hon, Geo. E. Morris, Judge of ‘said Superior Court, and the Beal of said Court hereto affixed this 28nd day of January, 1909, R. K. SICKELS, Clerk, By PERCY F. THOMAS, (Seal) Deputy Clerk. January 22—February 19, 1909. SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. ‘NOTICE. State of Washington, County of King, ‘—s8. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an order of sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 12th day of Novem- ber, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of James Dignan, plaintift, versus Joseph B, Johnson and Annie M. John~ fon, his wife, defendants, No. 60182, and to ine, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to, sell at public auction to the ighest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to- Wit: at 10 o'clock a. m. on the 19th day of December, A. D. 1908, before the Court House ‘door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the follow- Ing deseribed property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lots two (2) and three (3) ‘In block sixty-four (64) of Terry’s Second Addi- tion to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, to satisfy a judgment of foreclosure ‘of mortgage amounting to twenty-four thousand five hundred sixty- five and $8/100 ($24,565.88) dollars, and costs of sult, in favor of plaintiff. ippited this 12th day of November, L, C, SMITH, Sheritt, By EDW. DREW, Deputy. November 18—December 11,’ 1908. SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. in) the Bapericr’ Court. Of tis Beem Ps. ‘Washington, for King County. Osner & Mehihorn, Ine., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Mary Augusta Thompson, R, G, Thompson, Jane Doe Thompson, his wife; Ovid A. Byers, Ella M. Cow- ling’ and Richard Cowiing, her hus- band; Island Lime Company, a corpo- ration, Horace Allison and Jane Doe Allison, his wife; J. .W. Bullock and Jane Doe Dullock, Defendants. pany, a corporation, Horace Allison and Jane Doe Allison, his wife; J. W. Bullock and Jane Doe Bullock, De- fendants. ‘The State of Washington, to the said Defendant, Mary Augusta’ Thompson: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the 4th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintif herein and serve a copy of your Gnewer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the com- plaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of this court. ‘The object of Said’ getion | 18), to, recover, judgment against you in the sum of $1300.00, to- gether with interest thereon at the rate 5f 8% per apnum fram, the ard day. of October, 1907, and $128.65, for, taxes paid, and attorney's fees and costs and fo foreciose a mortgage given, to secure the same, dated October rd, 1906, upon lot 8, block 17, Woodland ‘Addition to Salmon Bay City, King County, Wash- ington, and foreclose all right, claims or equity of redemption of each and all of said defendants in and to sald prop- erty, Said mortgage was, recorded on the 8rd day of October, 1906, in Volume 825 of Mortgages, page 126, of the rec- ords in the auditor's office of King County, Washington, EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintift, Office anid Post Office Address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington, December 4, 1908—January 15, 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Nelson Miller, Plaintiff, vs, Grace Mil- ler, DefendantNo. ....... Summons. ‘the State of Washington to the said Grace Miller, Defendant: Fo are hereby summoned, to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summens, to- wit: within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of plainti, and serve a copy of your an- bwer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintif at his address below given, In base you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered against you and decree of di- vorce made against you according to the Gemands of the complaint, which has been filed ‘with the clerk of sald court. ‘This action is for the purpose of secur- ing @ divorce. J. W, BROWN, Attorhey tor Plaintirr. 314 Northern Bank Bldg., Seattle, First publication January 8th, 1908, Jan. &—Feb. 19, 1909, FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 1909. NOTICE—The stockholders of the Alpawa Mining Company are hereby notified that a special meeting of the stockholders of said company will be held at 305 25th Ave. South, in Seattle, Wash. on the 28th day of January, 1909. Respectfully, Alpawa Mining Company, G.C. Darrow and H. F. Detwiler, Trustees. January 8—22, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Alonzo Smith, Plaintiff, vs. James Thompson, No. 64862. Summar- sation Publication. The State of Washington to the said James Thompson, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons with a writ. Within sixteen days the 8th day of January 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated and case of your failure to comply with the stipulation against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure a judgment against you for nine hundred dollars, balance due for hay sold by you, and useuring bequeived by you and for which attachment has been issued and levied upon your property. J. H. ALLEN, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address, 45 Maynard Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—Feb. 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King Aurora Land Co. a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. E. H. Armstrong, Defendant.—No 64870. Summons by Publication. The State of Kentucky to E. H. Armstrong; Defendant: You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of service of this notice upon you by publication, exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the $50 fee paid in cash and an indemnified court and cause and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case you fail so to do, judgment will be in your favor. You are to receive with the plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. The object of this action is to recover from you the sum of $513.86, together with interest from October 26th, 1908, at the rate of 10 per cent, and foreclose against, at your right title and interest in certain diamonds now possession of the Northern Bank & Trust Co., of Seattle, Washington, together with the plaintiff's costs and disbursements expended. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Jan. 8—Feb. 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Charles H. Hancock, Plaintiff, vs. Alice Hancock, Defendant—Summons. The State of Washington to Alice Hancock, Defendant—Summons. We are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 1st day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint that you have served of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. We have entitled action is an action for divorce on the ground of desertion for a period of more than one year immediately prior to the commencement of this action. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address: 503 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 1—February 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Maggie Utterback, Plaintiff, vs. Charles W. Utterback, Defendant. No. No comments for location. The State of Washington, the said Charles W. Utterback, Defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 5th day of January, 1909, and after the above entitled action, the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you preceding action. The plaintiff, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the ab ve entitled action is a decree of absolute divorce from the above named defendant upon the ground of his failure to suitably provide for the plaintiff herein. PETERS & CARR. Plaintiff's Attorneys. P. O. Address: 1263 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Fred Shields, Plaintiff, vs. Elizabeth Shields, Defendant.-No. 64911. Sum- The State of Washington, King County, to Elizabeth Shields, Defendant: You are hereby notified to appear within sixty days after the date of the first hearing within sixty days after the eighth day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney to hold the plaintiff address, below stated; and in case of your failure so do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of the above Court. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and P. P. Address: 403 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. The above summons to be published for six consecutive weeks, once each week, in the Seattle Republican, beginning January 1, 1909. A W. P. FRATTER, Judge. Dated this 7th day of January, 1909. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE Miguelis Flughafen, Flughafen vs. Septimius Pinnell, Defendant. No. —. Summons by Publication. thousands of Washington to the above The State of Washington, Birmingham, Defendant: named September Primed, Defendant. Within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled plaintiff has been filed against plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, of said court. The object of said action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between plaintiff and defendant on the grounds of desertion and failure to provide. H. E. SNOOK, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address: 540 Burke Bldg, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Maude Moore, Plaintiff, vs. Frank A. Moore, Defendant. No. 64776. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Frank A. Moore, the defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first within sixty days after the summons, first within sixty days after the day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff therein, and serve a copy of the complaint to the court, and attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the court, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. That plaintiff's cause of action against you, as set forth in the complaint, is for a decree of the Court dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between you and the plaintiff on the grounds of non-support and of abandonment of the plaintiff by you for a period of more than one year previous to the 1st day of April, 1983, and for plaintiff's cause of non-support plaintiff the custody of Nada Vie Moore, the little daughter of yourself and the plaintiff. RONEY & LOVELESS. Office and Postoffice Address: 606-607 Oriental Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 1—February 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Rasmus Madsen, Plaintiff, vs. The Dodd Adjustable School Desk & Chair Company, a corporation, Defendant— No. .... Order Directing Notice to creditors. In the above entitled matter, it is ordered that all creditors of said defendant and all parties interested in the estate, prosecute and litigate that claims against the defendant in this court and in this cause, and to that they are hereby notified and required to prove their claims before this court by filing the same with the estate, prosecution and litigation under oath with itemized statements and other memoranda regarding the same, and that said creditors set forth what, if any, security they have for payment of the same, said claims to be filed before the Judge of the Court early 1909, and the Receiver is further ordered to cause notice to be given to the creditors herein by publication in The Seattle Republican once a week for three successive weeks during said period and to have the Judge of the Court at the last known place of address of said creditors, copy of said notice. Done in open court this the 28th day of December, A. D., 1908. GEO. JOE TURRIS, Judge. W. A. HANNAN, Receiver. HOMER E. TURNER, His Attorney, 745 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. January 1-29, 1909. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address 30 Wollmil Blk., Seattle, County of KING WASH. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Amelia Arnold, Plaintiff, vs. Hans Arnold, Defendant. No. 64893. Sum- mary for the judgment. The State of Washington to the said Hans Arnold, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toow. Within sixty days after the 8th judgment of your failure to do so, above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a de- gree of divorce from the defendant on the grounds of abandonment and non- judgment to make suitable provision for his family. Post Office Address: Room 36-7 Union Blk. Seattle, King County, Wash. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. C. B. Niblock, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants: You and each of you, as owners or claimants of an interest in the herein-after described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is entitled to the payment of taxes issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated Oct. 19, 1908, and numbered B54378, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of $1.26, and upon real estate situated in said King County, described as follows: north of the West Coast, the South 7½ acres of the West Coast, the South 4½ acres of the N. W. ¼ of Sec. 29, Tp. 24, N. R. 6 E. That the taxes for subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said real property, as follows: For 1905, 69 cents; for 1906, 76 cents, and for 1907, 89 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes upon said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Nov. 20, 1908, in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of said court and answer the complaint of said court and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN due, together with interest and costs. In case you fa' so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. November 20, 1908—January 1, 1909 NOVEMBER 20, 1908—ANNUAL MEETING OF THE PLANAGAN MINING CO. The annual meeting of Stockholders of the Flanagan Mining Company will be held at the office of the Company, 305 Lowman Building, City of Seattle, King County, Washington, on February 27th, at the hour of 9 o'clock A. M., for the purpose of electing a board of trust to serve for the issuing year and the transaction of such other business as may come before the meeting. J. M. POULSON, Sec. and Treas. Dated at Seattle, Feb. 1, 1909. Feb. 5—Feb. 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Mary Eliza Miller, Plaintiff, vs. Joseph James Miller, Defendant. No. 65,328. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Joseph James Miller, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 5th day of February, 1909, and de- fended by a judgment in the court of above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office and post office address below designated, and in case of your failure so to judge, in all the cases in which you according to the demand of the plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds between plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of desertion and abandonment. MORRIS, SOUTHARD & SHIPLEY, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: 55 Haller Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. M. S. Norton and all persons unknown, if any, having been the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. —— Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: the owner of the property, owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Designee of following State of Washington, dated the 17th day of January, 1907, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described in following State Certificate No. B47,654, for the year 1904, in the amount of 87 cents, on lot 21, block 10, White & Manings' Addition to West Seattle; that the taxes for the following property and subsequent years are paid by the above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of 33 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 82 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of 112 cents; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sale date of payment, and are all the unpaid and the taxes upon and against real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, excluding the day of sale, publication to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1999. In the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you wish to amend the amount, will be herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property the satisfaction of the sums charged and the fees received, vided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Blvd., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1999. Date of last publication, March 19, 1999. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. Washington plaintiff, as 84. Notion, and all persons unknown, if not, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No.—— Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: owners, lawyers, claimants and holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State or Washington, dated the 17th day of April, 1904, as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B47,655, for the year 1904. in the amount of 87 cents, on lot 22, block 10, White & Manhings' Addition of the property, the taxes for the following prior and subsequent have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of 33 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 82 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of $1.07; which several sums bear interest at the date of 15 per cent. per annum from sale date of 15 per cent. per annum are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, excluding publication, to-wit, within 60 days after 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with the costs. In case you fall so to do, do not furnish any proof herein, foreclosing the lien of said trust and costs against each parcel of sale. real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the sale and delivery of the sums imposed and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, F. 5, 1909. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffer, Plaintiff, vs. Elias Morrison, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to neverafter described real property. Defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, and the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the same date, in the King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B52,103, for the year 1902, in the amount of $1.03, on the west 16 feet of lot 9, block 63, Riley's Addition to Riley's Addition to South Seattle; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the Treasurer, and said above described real property; to-wit: For the year 1903, the sum of 53 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 33 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 49 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of 75 cents; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and redeem taxes upon and against real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the complaint, and to be the exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1999, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against, each of the amounts and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- bity law, and as prayed in this complaint, now on file in this cause court. attite. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exhale of each pay offer, and excuse, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due on account of each pay offer, and case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER. Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. attle, Washington. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, have any claim against the defendant in the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. — — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants, and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of January, 1907, and numbered as follows for the delinquent taxes of the following the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B47.258, for the year 1904, in the amount of $1.47, on lot 40, for the year 1905, in the amount of $1.47, on lot 40, attie; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of 85 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.78; for the year 1907, the sum of $2.03; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and indeemed axes upon and against You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, excluding the notice of publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the notice of publication, to-wit, within 60 days stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of sald property for the sums and amounts due to charge on such sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's notice, now on file in this cause and court. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaines, D.C. River Land Co., and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herinafter described real property, Defendants. No. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them! You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or state in a certain delinquent tax certificate real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, the delinquent taxes of a following year, in the following plaintiff, and the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B54,811, for the year 1903, in the amount of $1.11, on the west $1/2 of lot 8, block "E," Kent-Meeker's Supplemental Plat; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent taxes have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1904, the sum of 54 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 44 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.01; for the year 1907, the sum of 73 cents; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said rate of payment, and are all the number and unredeemed taxes upon and against Date of first publication, January 29th, and that Thursday, the 11th day of March, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock a. m., at the February 5—March 5, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Frances Zavolovsek, Plaintiff, vs. John Zavolovsek, Defendant—No. ... Summons Public Defender. The State of Washington to the said John Zavolovsek, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-day, Within sixty days after the 18th of February, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your annotated complaint to the attorney or plaintiff at his office below state, and case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the complaint action is to obtain a divorce from the defendant herein on the ground of incurable chronic mania existing for a period of more than ten years. P. O. Address: 745 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. February 5—March 19, 1909. VS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate. In the matter of the Estate of Mary N. Mitchell, Deceased.-No. 7527. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. James S. Mitchell, administrator of the estate of Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereof, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior court of King County, State of Washington, to the room of the Corporate department of said corporation, Seattle, on the 11th day of March, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a.m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue to estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said In day of March, 1909, in Seattle Republican in a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 5th day of February, 1909. E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King, I, D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true cause of an original order to show cause, made by the 5th day of February, 1909, in the matter of the estate of Mary N. Mitchell, deceased. Witness my hany and the seal of said Court this 5th day of February, 1909. D. K. SICKENS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. February 5—March 5, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In matter of the estate of Anna Golde, Deceased—No. 9577. Notice to Creditors. Pursuant to an order of the above entitled court entered in the above entitled cause notice is hereby given by the unannounced of the estate of Anna Golde, annexed to the estate of Anna Golde, deceased, to the creditors and all persons having claims against the said deceased or her estate to present them with the necessary purchasers within one year from the date of the sale of the notice, to-wit, within one year from February 5, 1909, to the said administrator with the will annexed, at his place of business, Room 811, Lowman Building, in the city of Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of the business of said estate. Dated at Seattle, Washington, this 5th day of February, 1909. HANS H. GOLDE, Administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Anna Golde, deceased. GRAVES & MURPHY, Attorneys for Administrator. Date of first publication, February 5, 1909. Date of last publication. March 5, 1909. NOTICE TO CREDITORS ELECTIONS Notice is hereby given that I have been appointed administratrix of the Estate of Harry E. Hopkins, deceased, and all persons having claims against said estate are hereby required to present the notice to N. Harvard Ave., Seattle, Wn., within one year from the date of this notice or the same will be forever barred. Dated, Feb. 1909 CAROLYN F. HOPKINS. Administratrix of the Estate of Harry E. Hopkins, deceased, 114 N. Harvard Ave., Seattle, Wn. PURCELL'S SAFE COMPANY Halls Safe and Lock Co.'s Safes and Vaults. Phones Main 667; Ind. 2197 312 Occidental Ave., Seattle, Wash 5 * ; a » 1N_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King unty, Michel A: Provo, Plaintiff, vs. Clara, An- derson Provo, Defendant. No. 63790, Summons for’ Publication, State of Washington to said Clara An- derson Provo: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: on the 20th day of November, 1908, &nd defend the above entitled actlon tn the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintift and serve copy of your answer upon the under- Signed attorneys for plaintifl, at thel offices stated below. In casé of your failure 0 to, do, judgment will be. ren- dered ‘against you according to the, de mands in plaintit’'s complaint, ‘which has been filed with the Clerk’ of the Court above stated. ‘This case is brought by the plaintif® to obtain a decree of @ivoree from said defendant on the Grounds of willful desertion, BREUDENBERG & HEATON, ‘Attorneys for Plaintift No, 610-611 New York Block, Seattle, Washington, November 20—January 1, 190’. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THB ‘state of Washington, in and for King County. Ina K, Foster, Plaintiff, vs, Norman B. Foster, Defendant, No. \....s4+ +++ Summons for Pubiteation, State of Washington to sald Norman B. ‘Foster: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from the date of the first publication of this summons, to: wit: gn. the 20th day of November, 1908, nd defend the above entitled action, in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serves copy, of your answer upon, the under: figned attorneys for, plalntit ot, that Office below stated. In case of your fail Gre so to do, judgment will be rendered Against ‘vou’ according to, the demands Of plaintiff's complaint, which has beer filed with the Cler kof ‘said Court. This cause is brought by the plaintiff to ob- fain a decree of divorce from, said de. fendant on the grounds of willful de- sertion and nonsupport. FREUDENBERG & HEATON, ‘Attorneys for Plaintitt No, 610-611 New York Block, Seattle Washington. , November 20—January 1; 190. Patan WOTTCE AND SUMMONS. {m_the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver,’ Plaintiff, vs. C. A, Cook, ‘and ail persons unknown, if any, hav- {ng or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, Defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each ‘of them: You ‘and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of ‘an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the Rbove named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate Issued by the Treasurer of King, County, State of Washington, dated the 20th day of October, 1908, and numbered Bb5486i, for the delinquent taxes of the years 1902 to 1906, inclusive, in the amount of $3.89, and upon the real property Situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Second ‘class tide jands in front of SEM of SE% of Sec, 6, Twp. 22.N., BR. 3 E,W. M, ‘That the taxes for the year 1907 havé been pald by the plaintiff upon said above described Feel property, in the sum of 49 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the the rate of 15 per cent, per annutn from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, ‘You and each of you (inchiding, satc persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date Of first publication of this notice, ex- Clusive of the day of said first publica- tion to-wit: within sixty days after November 13, 1908, In the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plain- tiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the Amount due, together with’ Interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judg- ment will be rendered herein, foreclos- ing. the Hen of said taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's com- Plaint, "now on file in this cause and urt, L, H. CRAVER, Plaintift. A. C, MacDONALD, ‘Attorney for Plaintift. Office Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wash. November 13—December 25, 1908. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Edna I, Brenner, Plaintiff, vs. George ‘W. Brenner, Defendant.—No, 64990. Summons by’ Publication. ‘The State of Washington to the sald George W. Brenner, defendant: You are hereby Summoned to appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this sum- mons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 15th day of January, 1909, and de- fend the aboye entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorneys for plaintiff at thelr pitice and post-office address below des: ignated, and in case of your faflure so to do, judgment, will be rendered against you according to the demand of plain- {i's complaint, which has been fled in the office of the clerk of Said court. ‘The object of said action is to secure fa divorce from “efendant, the custody of minor children and that the commu, nity property be awarded to plaintiff gnd for perinanent allmony, attorney's fees herein and. costs of this action. MORRIS, SOUTHARD, & SHIPLEY, Attorneys for Plaintift. Office and Postoffice Address: 55 Hal- ler Building, Seattle, King County, ‘Washington. dope Of Mest publication, January 16th, January 15—February 26, 1909. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ‘THE State of Washington, for King County, F, J. Carver, Plaintiff, vs, G, W. Rob- erts and Jane Doe Roberts, ‘his wife, whose true Christian name 1s unknown. and all persons unknown, ff any, having or claiming an Interest in and’ to the hereinafter deseribed real property, De- fendants.—No, 62677. Notice and Sum- mons, ‘Phe State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of ‘an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, are hereby noti- fled that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax gertificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th day of April, 1908, and num- bered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year in the fol- lowing amount and upon the real prop- erty situated in said King County, de- Sctlbed as follows, fowl White Brothers’ Addit ao to Kirkland Tots, “block 2 140260, year | 1904, amount eighty-nine cents. That the taxes for the eyeing. prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit; Lot 6, block 2, White eda ‘Addi- tion to Kirkland, thirty-flye cents (60) for the year 1905; forty-seven cents (47c) for the year 1906, and fifty-eight cents (68c) for the year 1907. ‘Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from Sula'date of payment, and are all the un- pald and unredeemed taxes upon” and against said real property. ‘You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first peter of this notice, exclu- sive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within arty days after the 15th Aty''o: January, 1809, In the above. en- titled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your an- swer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with Inter- est and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, fore- closing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real prop- erty for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sume charged and found against st teapeetively a provid: ed by law and as paged in plaintiff's Comey now on file in this cause and court. XURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Plaintiff. F, J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, Northern Bank & rust Co, Bldg. January 15—February 26, 1909. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Aurora Land Co., a Corporation, Plain- tim, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an in- terest’ in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, Defendants—No. S2557. » Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that thte Ahove named plaintit 1s the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate is- Sued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows: For the’ delinquent taxes of the follow- ing year, in the following amount and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to- wit: White Brothers’ Addition to Kirkland —Lot 8, block 2, B49268, year 1904, amount,’ eighty-nine cents. ‘That ‘he taxes for the following. prio and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff ‘upon said above described Teal (property, to-wit Lot 8, block 2, White Brothers’ Adai- tion to Kirkland—85 cents for the year 1905; forty-seven cents, (47) for the year 1908, and fifty cents (60) for the year 1907, ‘Which Several sums bear interest, at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the un- paid and unredeemed taxes upon an Against sald real property. You and edch of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclu- Sive of the day of said first, publication, to-wit, within sixty days after the 15th day of Yanuary, 1909, in the above en- titled court and’ action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintift and serve a copy of your an- Ewer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, ot pay the amount due, together with in- terest and costs. Incase you fail so to Qo, judgment will be. rendered. herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of Said real property for the sums and amounts due hpon and charged against each, for sald taxes, Interest and costs, ordering a sale of each paréel of said property for the satisfaction of ‘the sums charged and found against it respectively a8 provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's com- plamt'now ‘on’ Ale tn this “cause and eourt. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Plaintitt. F, J, CARVER, ‘Attorney’ for Plaintitt. Omce address:| Northern Bank & ‘Trust Co, Bldg. January 16—February 26, 1909, IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘tate of Washington for the County of King—In Probate. In’ the matter of the Hatate of Mary N, Mitenell, Deceased, No. 7827. Order io “Show Cauee Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. James 8. Mitchell, administrator of the estate of Mary’ N. Mitchell, de- ceased, haying filed in’ this court, his petitio’ nsetting forth that said estate Is Row. in'a condition to be closed and Is ready “for distribution of. the residue {hereof among the persons entitled by law. thereto, ‘and. it appearing to, the court that said petition sets forth tacts Suiflelent to authorize a distribution of the residue of sald estate: Tt is therefore ordered by the court that all Dersons interested in the estate of the suid Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, He aad “appear before the gala. Superior Court of King County, State of Wash- Ington, at the court Hom of the. Pro- bate department of anid court in_ the City of Beatle, on the 26th day of Feb- ruary, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a.m. of sala day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order Sf distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons. in sald peljtion men- tioned, according to Iw. Tr i further ordered, that a copy of this order be published’ once a week for four ‘successive weeks before the sald Seth day of February, 1908, in Seattle Republican, a newspaper. printed “and published in said King. County and of Reneral circulation. thereln. Done in open court this 22nd day of January, 1909, ‘GEO. B. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King—ss, I, D, K. Sickels, County Clerk of King Cotinty and ex-officio Clerk of the Sus perior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby cer- tify that the foregoing’ Is a. full, true And correct copy of an original ‘order to show cause, made by sald Court on thet aina day’‘of January, 1908, in, the matter of the entate of Mary N. afttch~ ell, deceased. ‘Witness my band and the seal of sald Court this 22nd day of January, 1909, ‘D.R BICKBLS, ‘Clerk. By PURCY F, THOMAS, (Seal) Deputy Clerk January 22—ebruary 19, 1909. eet ne ea ae aes THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN je- State of Washington, for King County. D, J. Hanna, Piaintift, ys. James nd Bradshaw, and Dawson ' Bradshaw, co: 4, partners doing business under the’ firm hame of Bradshaw Bros., Defendants.— or No. «+... Summons by. Publication. by ‘the State of Washington the the aia ed James B. Bradshaw and Dawson Brad- shaw, Defendants: You are. hereby {1 summoned “to appear within sixty e) days. after the date of the firs f% publication. of this summons, | to-wit, nt Within sixty days after the 16th day of January, A. D, 1800, and defend at the above entitled action Jn the above ym entitled court, and answer the complaint n- of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your nd answer upon the undersigned qttorneys for plaintift at their office below stated; Ja and in case of your failure so to do, by judgment will be rendered against you nd Recording to the demand of the com- te plaint, which has been filed with the u- Clerk ‘of said Court, ‘The object of the yn, said action, set forth in the complaint, th is to recover the sum of two hundred n> and twenty-five ($225.00) dollars due ig plaintiff from the defendants, as the id Salary of plaintift for the month of De- n- comber, 1908, under a certain contract or of employment between the parties to or this action, whereby plaintiff was to re- sr ceive $225.00 per month for his services io, as salesman for defendants, and which e- said sum defendants haye failed and re- its fused to pay. = GRAVES & MURPHY, on ‘Attorneys for Plaintiff, 28, _P. 0, Address: Seattle, County ‘of of King, Washington, at 911 Lowman he Building. nd January 15—February 26 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Mary ©, Brydges, Blaintit, vs, Wil Ham H. Biydyes, Defendant—No. 64926. Summons by Publication, ‘The State of Washington to William R. Brydges, the said defendant: ‘In the name of the State of Washing- ton, you are hereby summoned to ap- pear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days from and after the 15th day of January, 1909, and de- fend the aboye entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed, the attorney for the plaintiff, at his offices below stated; and in casé of YOUF fallure go. to do, Judgment will be endered against you according to, the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with, the clerk of the ahove entitled court. ‘The object of the said action set forth in the complaint is as follows: ‘To secure a divorce for the plaintift from the defendant upon the grounds of non-support and habitual drunkenness, and for other proper relief in the prem ses, F, B, WIESTLING, Attorney for Plaintirt. P, O, Address: 421 and 422 Boston Block, Seattle, King County, Wash. Date of first publication, January 15, —Feb. 26, 1909. lm Aw F SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. ‘State of Washington, County of Knig. —ss.—Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an execution issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 15th day of January, 1909, by the clerk thereof, in’ the case of Adolph Candau, Plaintiff, yersus Eliza- beth Franklin, Defendant, No, 64908, and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will pro- ceed to sell at public auction to the high- est. bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheriff's sales, to- Wit, at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 27th day of ‘February, A. D,, 1909, before the Court House’ door of’ said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the tight, title and interest of the said de- fendant Elizabeth Franklin in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to- wit: ‘On that certain lease and leasehold interest executed and delivered on May 27, 1907, by Adam Orth to Adolph Can- dau on the upstairs part of that certain building situated on Lot one (1) in Block thirty-three (33) of D. S. Maynard's Plat of the Town (now city) of Seattle, situ- ated at the Southeast Corner of Firth Avenue South and Main Street, for the term of two years from June’ 1, 1907, said lease being filed for record on May 29, 1907, and of record in the Auditor's Ofiice of ‘King County, Washington, In Vol. 21, Leases at page 198 et seq. levied on, as ‘the property of sald. defendant Elizabeth Franklin, to satisty a judg: ment, amounting to Ninety-five 67/100 $95.67) Dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintift. ‘Dated this 16th day of January, 1909. ROBT. 'T. HODGE, Sherif. By JOHN STRINGER, Deputy. January 22-February 19, 1969, SUMMONS ON APFEICATION FOR ' REGISTRATION OF LAND. State of Washington, County of ing, ss. IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, tn and for the County of King. ‘W. J. Tower, Plaintiff, vs. George Wis- hard, George ‘Fisher, Miranda Draper, Ellot, Draper, ‘Thomas Draper, Tuelnda Draper, Miizabeth Draper, Lucretia, Dra- per, Mary Draper, Sarah Draper, William Wishard, Samuel Wishard, Martha Bridgetarmer, Emmaling Van Vagner, Josephine Wishard, Olly Wishard, Bartne Wishard, Jing County, State of Wash. ington, City of Seattle, ©. J, Rosencrance and Jane Doe Rosecrance, his wife, and the inknown heirs of Martha Ball, and all other ‘persons of parties, ‘unknown, claiming any, right, title, estate, len or Interest’ in the real estate described In the application herein, Defendants, ‘The Btate of Washington to the above named defendants, greeting: You are hereby summoned and re- quired fo answer the application of the Applicant plaintife in the above entitled application for registration of the fol- lowing land, situate in, King County, Washington, to-wit: ‘The Hast halt (E%) of Block Twenty-eight (28), Bige- low's Addition to the City of Seattle, less the North five (N. 5) feet of, the Rast Eighty (i. 80) feet of Lot Ten. (10), ‘and the South Thirty-five (8, 85) feet of the East Eighty (B. 80) feet of Lot Nine (9), and to, file your answer to, the sald application in the office of the Clerk of sald Court, in said County, within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of such service: and if you fall to ans- wer the said application within the time aforesaid, the applicant plaintiff in. this action will apply to the court for the rellef demanded in the application herein. ‘Witness D. K. SICKLES, Clerk of sald Court and the seal thereof at Seattle in sala County and State this 20th day of January, A, D. 1909, repate OF first publication, January 22, D. e SIGKLBS, Clerk. By_0. & BRUNS, Deputy Clerk, _ Jan, 22- Feb. 6, 1908. vie IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington for King County. Lloyd #. Dunning, Plaintiff, vs, Maude Jy Dunning, Defendant. ‘No. 65,071, Summons by Publication, ‘The State of Washington to the sald Maude L. Dunning, Defendant: You are hereby ‘summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the firat publication of this eummens, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 22nd day of DOBERER AIOE Oe SReee aattian reat iitled action th the above entitied court, and answer the complaint of the plain- tit, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plain- tiff at hig office below stated; and in case Of your failure so to do, Judgment, will be rendered against you According to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of satd court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce between the plaintift and defendant upon the grounds of abandonment of the plaintit by sald defendant for more than one year and cruel treatment of, plaintift by defend- ant and personal indignities rendering his life burdensame, 3, HENRY DENNING, Plaintiff's Attorney. Office and Post Office Address: | 45-6 Starr-Boyd Bldg., Seattle, Wash. ‘January 22-March 6, 1909. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Edwin J, Milling, Plaintiff, vs, Lucy Milling, Défendant,’ No, 65,099." Sum- mons, The State of Washington to the sald Lucy Milling, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 22nd day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action, In, the, above en. titled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve @ copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his, office below Stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you avcording to the demand of the Complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. "The above entitled action is an action for divoree dissolving the bonds of mat- rimony between the parties hereto on the ground of abandonment and desertion for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action. E, T, SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintift. Post OMice Address: 603, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Wash- ington. fanuary 22-March 6, 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King Surore Land C c it uurora’ Land Company, a Corporation, plaintiff, vs, Unknown Owners, and all persons" unknown, if any, having | oF Claiming an Interest in and’ to the here- inafter described real, property, Defend- ants, No. 64,548, Notice and Summons, State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the Rbove named plaintift is the holder of one delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 16th day of Sep- tember, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the follow- ing year in the following amount and upon the real property, situated. in sald Hing County described as follows, to- wit: ‘Lot Forty-four (44), Block Two (2), Kirkland Park, King County, Washing- ton, being certificate No. B54314, for the year 1902, One and 4/100 ($1.04) ‘Dollars. ihat the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintif! upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot Forty-four (44), Block Two (2), for the year 1903, ‘Thirty-one cents; for the year 1904, ‘Twenty cents; for the year 1905, Thirty-two cents; for the year 1906, Forty-four cents; for the year 1907, Forty-six cents; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 16 per cent, per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and un- Fedeemed taxes upon and against said real property. ‘You and each of you are hereby fur- ther notified and simmoned to be and appear within sixty days after the 1st day of publication of this notice, ex- elusive of the day of frst publication, to-yit: within 60 days after January 22, {80., in the above. entitled court and action; and defend this action and ans- Wer the complaint of said plaintift and serve a copy of your answer on the un- Gersigned attorney for plaintiff at his Office below stated or pay the amount fue, together with interest and costs. fn ease you fail so to do, judgment will pe rendered herein, foreclosing the len of said taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real property for the sums nd amounts due upon and charged against each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, {nterest and costs, ordering a sale of each. parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law and as prayed In plaintift's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Plaintiff. FJ. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 814 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg, Seattle, Wash. Pee egy kchonaby 19, 1009, HOTIOn OF STOCKHOLDERS’ MEET- Seattle, Wash,, Jan. 21, 1909. Notice is hereby given that the regu- jar meeting of the stockholders of the ‘Alaska. Central Ratlway Company will hovhela at, the principal office of, sald Company at Room 502 of the Burke Building, in Second Avenue, , Seattle, King County, Washington, on Tuesday, the 2nd day of March, A. D,, 1908, at two o'clock in the afternoon of sald day. JAMES A, HAIGHT, Secretary of the Alaska Gentral Railway Company, Jan, 22-Feb, 19, 1908. —— Aen SCRE. IN, THD SUPERIOR COURT OF ounty State of Washington, for the County of King, State of Washington, County of King. —s8. Tn the Matter of the Estate of James H, Cameron, Deceased. No. 7000. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice Is hereby given that Homer 3. ‘Turner, the administrator of the estate of James. H. Cameron, deceased, has fendered to, and filed in sald court his final account a8 such administrator, and that Thursday, the 25th day of Febru- ary, 1909, at $:30 o'clock, a, m., at the Court Room of the Probate ‘Department of our sald Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said court for the set- tlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested In sald estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to Said account, and contest the same, ‘Witness, the HON, GEO. E, MORRIS, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of Said Court hereto affixed this Bist day of January, 1909. PD. K. SICKLES, Clerk. (Seal) ‘By J. A, SIGURDSSON, Deputy Clerk. Jan, 22-Feb, 19, 1909, ee et teem IN_THD SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington in and for King County.—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of James H. Cameron, Deceased. No. 700. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 1909. en- Not be Mad pid db srt, Homer # Turner, abinihlsttathe $f tne in: estate of James H. Cameron, deceased, wer having fied ‘ln this Court his petition Nin getting forth that Bald estate is now in ase a condition to be closed, and is ready vill for distribution of the fesidue thereof the among the persons entitled by law there een to, and it appearing to the court, that The said petition sets forth facts sufficient }to to authorize a distribution of the resi- the due of tho sald eatate, i nds Now, therefore, it 18 ordered by the aid court that all persons interested in the and estate of sald James H. Cameron, de- nd- ceased be and appear before the said ing Superior ‘Court of king County, Bate of Washington, at the court room in the Probate Department of said court in the r 4 City of Seattle, on the 26th day on Feb 8-6 ruary, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock am. of said day, then and there to Show’ cause, if any they have, why an — order of distribution should not be made HE of the residue of the sald estate among the the heirs and persons In sald petition mentioned, according to law. cy | It is further ordered that a copy of um- this order be, published once a week for four ‘successive. weeks before the sald aid 24th day of February, 1909, In the Be- attle Republican, a newspaper printed ear and published in'said King County, and of of general circulation theretn. ns, Done in open court this 21st day of 2nd January, 1909. the GEO. E, MORRIS, Judge. en; Tan, 22-eb, 19, 1809, io. risen wrt IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, State of Washington, County of, King—ss. In the Matter of the Estate of Mary N. ‘Mitchell, Deceased. No. 7527. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that James 8, Mitchell, the administrator of the estate ot Mary N, Mitchell, deceased, haa Fen- dered to, and filed’ in said Court his Final Account as such. administrator, and that Thursday, the 26h day of Feb: ruary, 1909, at 9:80 o'clock a, m., at the Court’ Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King ‘County, has been duly’ appointed by sald Court for the settlement of sald account, at which time and place any person Interested in sald estate may appear and file his ex- ceptions in writing to sald account, and contest the same. ‘Witness, the Hon. Geo. E. Morris, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto affixed this 22nd day of January, 1909, 'R. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, (Seal) Deputy Clerk. January 22—February 19, 1909. SHERIFF'S BALE OF REAL ESTATE. wOTTCH, State of Washington, County of King, —ss. Sheriff's Office, By virtue of an order of sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 12th day of Novem- ber, 1908, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of James Dignan, plaintiff, versus Joseph B, Johnson and Annie M. John- ‘son, his wife, defendants, No. 60183, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that 1 will proceed to, sell at public auction. to, the ighest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to- Wit: at 10 o'clock a.m. on the 19th day of December, A. D. 1908, before the Court House ‘door of said king County, in the State of Washington, the follow- Ing described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lots two (2) and three (3) ‘in block sixty-four (64) of Terry's Second Addi- tion to the City of Seatile, King County, Washington, to satisty a judgment of foreclosure ‘of mortgage amounting to twenty-four thousand five hundred sixty- five and 88/100 (324,565.88) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. repiited this I2tn day of November, L, C, SMITH, Sheritt. By EDW. DREW, Deputy: November 13—Deceinber 11,’ 1908. SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. In_the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. Osner & Mehihorn, Inc., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Mary Augusta Thompson, R. G. Thompson, Jane Doe Thompson, his wife; Ovid A. Byers, lla M. Cow: ling and Richard Cowling, her hus- band; Island Lime Company, a corpo- ration, Horace Allison and Jane Doe Allison, his wife; J. .W. Bullock and Jane Doe Dullock, Defendants. pany, a corporation, Horace Allison and Jane Doe Allison, his wife; J._W. Bullock and Jane Doe Bullock, De- fendants. The State of Washington, to the sald Defendant, Mary Augusta. Thompson: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the 4th day of December, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your Answer upon the undetsigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and’ in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the com- Plaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of this court, The object. of Said action | is), to. recover. Judgment against you in the sum of $1800.00, to- gether with interest thereon at the rate 6f 8% per apnum from the 8rd day of October, 1907, and $128.65, for taxes paid, and attorney's fees and costs and fo foreclose a mortgage given, to, secure the same, dated October 3rd, 1906, upon lot § block 17, Woodland ‘Addition to Salmon Bay City, King County, Wash. ington, and foreclose all right, claims or equity of redemption of each and all of sald defendants in and. to sald prop erty, Said mortgage was recorded on the 8rd day of October, 1906, in Volume 838 of Mortgages, page 126, of the rec- ords in the auditor's office of King County, Washington. EDWARD VON TOBE, Attorney for Plaintitt, Office arid Post Office Address: ‘Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, Hing County, Washington. December 4, 1908—January 15, 1909. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Nelson Miller, Plaintiff, ys. Grace Mil- ler, DefendantNo. ....... Summons, ‘the State of Washington to the said Grace Miller, Defendant: ‘You are, hereby summoned, to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summens, to- wit: within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the ahove entitled action in the ‘above | entitled court, and answer the complaint of plaintift, and serve a copy of your an- Swer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his address below given, In Case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered against you and decree of di- vorce made against you according to the demands of the complaint, whieh has been filed with the clerk of sald court. ‘This action 1s for the purpose of secur- ing a divorce. J. W., BROWN, Attorhey tor Plaintit. 314 Northern Bank Bldg., Seattle. First publication January Sth, 1908, Jan. 8—Feb. 19, 1909. NOTICE—The stockholders of the Alpewa Mining Company are hereby notified that a special meeting of the stockholders of said company will be held at 906 West Ave. Seattle in Seattle, Washington on the 28th day of January, 1909. Respectfully, Alpewa Mining Company. G. G. Darrow and H. F. Detwiler, Trustees. January 8—22, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Alonzo Smith, Plaintiff, vs. James Thurston Defendant. No. 64802. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the sald James Thompson. Defendant: The State of Washington to E. H. Armstrong, Defendant: You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of service of this notice upon you by publication, exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the Ship's Dept. in the United States notified court and cause and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case you fail so to do, judgment will be in your favor with the plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. The object of this action is to recover from you the sum of $513.86, together with interest from October 26th, 1908, at the rate of 10 per cent, and to foreclose against all legal title and interest in certain diamonds now possession of the Northern Bank & Trust Co., of Seattle, Washington, together with the plaintiff's costs and disbursements expended. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Jan. 8—Feb. 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Charles H. Hancock, Plaintiff, vs. Al- do Hancock, Defendant—Summons. The State of Washington to Alice Hancock, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your wit, within sixty days after the 1st day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your wit, under the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; in case of your failure so to do, judge- ment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of The above entitled action is an action for divorce on the ground of desertion for a period of more than one year immediately prior to the commencement of this action. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address: 503 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 1—February 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Maggie Utterback, Plaintiff, vs. Charles W. Utterback, Defendant. No. Summons for Washington to the State of Washington to the said Charles W. Utterback, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 5th day of January, 1909, and the above entitled诉讼, and the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you upon plaintiff, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the ab ve entitled action is a decree of absolute divorce from the above named defendant upon the ground of his failure to suitably provide for the plaintiff herein. PETERS & CARR. Plaintiff's Attorneys. P. O. Address: 1263 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE INHUMER COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King. Fred Shields, Plaintiff, vs. Elizabeth Shields, Defendant—No. 64911. Sum- The State of Washington, King County, to Elizabeth Shields, Defendant: You are hereby notified to appear with sixty days after the date of the first publication of sixty days after the eighth day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of the above Court. The attorney is to procure a dissolution of the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and the defendant. EDWARDS, MEAKIN & CUSHING, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 403 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. The above summons to be published for six consecutive weeks, once each week, in the Seattle Republican, beginning January 4th at 15:00. W. F. FRATTER, Judge. Dated this 7th day of January, 1909. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE Magnolia Plinneel, Plinneel vs. Septimus Magnolia Plinneel Pinnell, Defendant. No. —. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the above named Septimus Pinnell, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the attorney for the complaint, your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore extinguished between plaintiff and defendant in the grounds of desertion and failure to provide. H E SNOOK. Attorney for Plantiff. Postoffice Address: 1150 Fifth Blvd. Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Maude Moore, Plantiff, vs. Frank A. Moore, Defendant. No. 64776. Summons: The State of Washington to the said Frank A. Moore, the defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear with the plaintiff in the court of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 1st day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the court of the plaintiff before and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered again, accords to the demand of complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. That plaintiff's cause of action against you, as set forth in the complaint, is that you have solved the bonds of matrimony now existing between you and the plaintiff on the grounds of non-support and of abandonment of the plaintiff by you for the failure to pay the debt to the 1st day of April, 1908; and for a decree of the Court awarding to the plaintiff the custody of Nada Vie Moore, the little daughter of yourself and the RONEY & LOVELESS. Office and Postoffice Address: 606-607 Oriental Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 1—February 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Rasmus Madsen, Plaintiff, vs. The Dodd Adjustable School Desk & Chair Company, a corporation, Defendant— No. . . . . . Order Directing Notice to Creditors. In the above entitled matter, it is ordered that all creditors of said defendant and all parties interested in the esse, and demands against this said defendant in this court and in this cause, and to that end they are hereby notified and required to prove their claims before the Receiver, or his attorney, properly verified under oath with itemized statements and other memoranda regarding the same, and that said creditors set forth what, if any, security they have for payment on or before the 1st day of February, 1909, and the Receiver is further ordered to cause notice to be given to the creditors herein by publication in The New York Times, successive weeks during the period and by mailing to each of the known creditors at the last known place of address of said creditors, copy of said notice. Done in open court this the 28th day of December. GEO. E. MORRIS. Judge. of December. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. W. A. HANNAN, Receiver. HOMER E. TURNER, His Attorney, 745 N. WORK Block, Seattle, Washington. January 1-29, 1909. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Wash. Blk., Seattle, County of King Wash. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Amelia Arnold, Plaintiff, vs. Hans Arnold, Defendant. No. 64893. Sum- mary of the publication of this summons, tow- t: Within sixty days after the 8th adgment will be remanded against you above entitled action in the above attempted court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so do you adgment will be remanded against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a de- gree of divorce from the defendant on nonsupport and failure to make suitable provision for his family. Post Office Address: Room 36-7 Union Blk. Seattle, King County, Wash. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. C. B. Niblock, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants: You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Nov. 20, 1908, in the above entitled court and in the definite its action and answer the complaint of your answer to serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN due, together with interest and costs. If case you fa" so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAYER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Construction Wash: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. November 20, 1908-January 1, 1909 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF THE PLANAGAN MINING CO. The annual meeting of Stockholders of the Flanagan Mining Company will be held at the office of the Company 905 Lowman Building, City of King County, Washington, on February 27th, at the hour of ten o'clock A.M., for the purpose of electing a board of nine tru- tees to serve for the ensuing year and the transaction of such other business as may come before the meeting. J. M. MILLER, Sec. and Treas. Dated at Seattle, Feb. 1, 1909. Feb. 5—Feb. 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Mary Eliza Miller, Plaintiff, vs. Joseph James Miller, Defendant. No. 65,328. Summary of Publication. The State of Washington to the said Joseph James Miller Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-write within sixty days after the summons, and to send the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office and post the address below designate, in the case of the case, the judge do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to obtain the satisfaction of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of desertion and abandonment. MORRIS, SOUTHARD & SHIPLEY, MORRIS, SCO Attorneys for Plaintiff Office and postoffice address: 55 Haller Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. M. S. Norton and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, contests. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimant and all persons interested or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, and filed in the January, 1907, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, Washington, filed in the Certificate No. B47,654, for the year 1904, in the amount of 87 cents, on lot 21, block 10, White & Manings' Addition to West Seattle; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years are paid in the amount of $1,000, above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of 33 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 82 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of 82 cents; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and undeemed taxes upon and against the debt. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of publication, and are thus exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and oppose its answer to the undersigned plaintiff at the notice below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said taxes due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff, now on file in this cause and court. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. M. S. Norton, and all persons unknown, if any, having been charged with the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants, in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of the delinquent and numbered as follows, for the delinquent and numbered as follows, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B47.655, for the year 1904, in the amount of 87 cents, on lot 22, block 10, White & Manlings' Addition to West Seattle; that the taxes for the following property and subsequent years shall be paid by the above described real property, to-wait. For the year 1905, the sum of 23 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 82 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of $1.07; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sale due of payment, and are all the unpaid and taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, excluding the sum due, said first publication, to-wait, within 60 days of the 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with the costs. In case you fall so to do, the summons will be herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxed and costs against each parcel of salt. real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged against and against a lawyer videed by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA State of Washington. State of Gaffney. Plaintiff, vs. Elias Morrison, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, and the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of October, 1902, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: No. — Plaintiff, No. — Plaintiff, 1902, in the lot amount of $1.03, on the west 16 feet of lot, 9 block, 63 Riley's Addition to Riley's Addition to South Seattle; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real For the year 1903, the sum of 53 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 33 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 49 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 49 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of 75 cents; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and payable taxes upon and against real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of sale first published to sell within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1909. In the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest, to sell the judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for salts taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg. Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the date of said first publication of the war in the Pacific, 5th, 1809, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, in lieu of an amount of costs and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's plaintiff, now on file in this cause and court. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Onwers, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Demandants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, of the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of January, 1907, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the tenure of the same year, in King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B47,258, for the year 1904, in the amount of $1.47, on lot 40, block 10, Ballard Park Addition to Seattle; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid to the Treasurer of King County and described real property to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of 85 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.78; for the year 1907, the sum of $2.03; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid amount, and taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, excluding the publication to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1899, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the notice of the complaint, stated, or may the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of sald property for the sums and amounts due to the parcel charged in sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's notice, now on file in this cause and court. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR CURT OF THE State of Washington, Coing County W. T. Gaffney, Plaintiff, White River Land Co., and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described area property. Defendants. No. _____ Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants, and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff the holder of a taxable certificate tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Certificate No. B54,811, for the year 1903, in the amount of $1.11, on the west $1/2 of lot 8, block "E", Kent-Meeker's Supplemental Plat; that the plaintiff have been paid by the subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1904, the sum of 54 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 44 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 44 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of 73 cents; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against Date of first publication, January 29th, at 9:30 a.m. on 31st day March, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock a.m., at the February 5—March 5, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Frances Zavolovsek, Plaintiff, vs. John Zavolovsek, Defendant—No. .... Summons the State of Washington to the said John Zavolovsek, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to within sixty days after the 65th day of February 1999, and defend the entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for claim H at his office below stated and the case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said county in opposition to the entitled action is to obtain a divorce from the defendant herein on the ground of incurable chronic mania existing for a period of more than ten years. P. O. Address: 745 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. February 5—March 19, 1999. VS IN THE INSPIRER COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate. In the matter of the Estate of Mary N. Mitchell, Deceased—No. 7527. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should No. 7527. James S. Mitchell, administrator of the estate of Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a possession of other persons to obtain the distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that such sets forth facts sufficient to authorize distribution of the residue of said estate; It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, may appear before the said Superior Court of the State of Kentucky at the court room of the Probate department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 11th day of March, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a.m. of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to the law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 11th day of March, 1909, in Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and sold by said county and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 5th day of February, 1909. State of Washington, County of King, us, I, D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct order to show cause, made by said Court, on the 5th day of February, 1909, in the matter of the estate of Mary N. Mitchell, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 5th day of February, 1909. D. K. SICKEL, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk February 5—March 5, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In matter of the estate of Anna Golde, deceased—No. 9577. Notice to creditors. Pursuant to an order of the above entitled court entered in the above entitled cause notice is hereby given by the undersigned administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Anna Golde, deceived by the willful and willful persons having claims against the said deceased or her estate to present them with the necessary vouchers within one year from the date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit, within one year from February 5, 1900, to the said administrator with the annexed, at his place of business, Room 101, Building, in the city of Seattle, county King, Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of the business of said estate. Dated at Seattle, Washington, this 5th day of February, 1909. Administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Anna Golde, deceased. GRAVES & MURPHY Attorneys for Administrator. Date of first publication, February 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 5, 1909. NOTICE TO CREDITORS. Notice is hereby given that I have been appointed administrator of the Estate of Harry E. Hopkins, deceased, and all persons having claims against said estate are hereby required to present them to me at 114 N. Harvard Ave., Seattle, Wn., within one year from the date of this notice or the same will be forever barred. Dated, Feb.—1909. CAROLYN E. HOPKINS. Administrator of the Estate of Harry E. Hopkins, deceased, 114 N. Harvard Ave., Seattle, Wn. PURCELL'S SAFE COMPANY Halls Safe and Lock Co.'s Safes and Vaults. Phones Main 667; Ind. 3197 312 Occidental Ave., Seattle, Wash.