Seattle Republican

Friday, February 26, 1909

Seattle, Washington

8 pages

Page 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 2
Page 3
Page 3
Page 4
Page 4
Page 5
Page 5
Page 6
Page 6
Page 7
Page 7
Page 8
Page 8
Page text (machine-generated)
PUBLICAN THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 1909. So far as the incorporated towns of the state are concerned they not only have local option, but actual prohibition if a majority of the voters demand and vote for it under the present laws and why not let well enough alone. If there is a disposition to have the county unit local option outside of the incorporated cities and towns of a county then let them have it." Acting Governor Hay may be absolutely correct in his statement that, George F. Cotterill is the only Republican senator in the legislature from Governor Hay's King county, but we suspect that Senator Cotterill will not take the state Only Republican. a fact that he at one time was quite a Republican, but that has been a long time ago and he has been so many different things since that time that he does not now entertain the faintest remembrance of the taste of Republicanism. If Cotterill is the only real Republican senator from King county then we very seriously doubt the Republicanism of Acting Governor Hay himself. We do not believe that Gov. Hay is doing his party any good by declaring in public that a rank Democrat, one even more erratic than William Jennings Bryan himself has the only correct idea of genuine Republicanism. Mr. Cotterill is a very brilliant man, we admit, but he nevertheless is a cotton mouth Democrat with all of the objectional features that that ism is given to. It has been argued that if the women of the state of Washington were given the right to vote they would immediately put the state in the Are the Women prohibition column. They might Natural Prohibitionists? and then they might not, but if you take those states where wo- men have the full right of suffrage as criterions they would not. In Colorado, Utah and Idaho the women have the right to vote and verily do vote and each of those states is not only free from prohibition, but practically free from prohibition agitation. Women are no more fanatical or even emotional than men and if given time to duly consider any matter in which the people or the community as a whole are interested they generally act as wisely as men under like circumstances. Of course, hundreds and thousands of women in this state are for prohibition, but on the other hand hundreds and thousands are against it. A strenuous effort was made in the house of representatives last Tuesday to practically abandon the miserable old shack better known as the Populist Capitol state capitol building. Those opposing the further expenditure of state funds on the present state capitol Not Popular. The editor of the Waterville Press takes a very sensible view of the liquor question, which is agitating the minds of the people of Washington at the present time. He believes that the mere act of taking a glass of whiskey, beer or wine Country Editor Has a Sensible View. The little city of Georgetown, a city within a city being wholly surrounded by Greater Seattle—has been all excitement for the past week lest does not constitute a crime in itself. But it is the excess that makes the injury. Continuing, he adds: "No individual is doing justice to his fellow man who does a thing injurious to himself or to his neighbor. There is a reason to all things and bounds beyond which one can not pass. It is the excess in drinking, the excess in horse racing, and even in religion that makes the thing intolerant."—Odessa Record. Georgetown Sends Carle to Olympia. that city to register protests against such a drastic measure and they selected the Hon. W. A. Carle, a former member of the legislature, to go to Olympia and there battle for the cause of Georgetown. In selecting Mr. Carle the citizens of that berg made no mistake, as he during the past week has seen and reseen every senator with the hope of not only killing it in the senate, but go a step further and smother it in the committee room. Mr. Carle is well and favorably known and the senators have shown him every consideration and he believes he has the bill beaten. When Senator Booth announced he had decided to stand for a renomination for state senator from the Thirty-seventh Senatorial district the Odessa Record. The Prohibiti sweeping victory. The Prohibitionists are pluming themselves on a sweeping victory. They declare that no wine, even, shall be drank. Of course, if they win, the taxes per capital will be heavier. Will the churches agree to taxation to help out? No! They Prohibition Mania Being Checked. Prohibition Mania Being Checked. would sacrifice prohibition and everything else before submitting. How easy to wear the crown if the other fellow bears the cross! Of course, liquor is a curse. But think of the curse of stagnation waiting upon the sudden closing of distilleries and breweries. The very idea is so absurd that I can't believe it will be realized. Every disease that is rooted in time is the same. It cannot be rooted up violently. Time is needed to cure any distemper of long standing. As to compromising with vice, who does not compromise with something? The Prohibitionists have the unlimited gall to throw bouquets at themselves because they abolished the army canteen. The army canteen's abolishing is the cause of untold horror. Since its close, low groggeries dispensing worse than poison have sprung up at the very gates of the Presidio. Drunkenness, I hear, has increased one hundred per cent.—From San Francisco News-Letter. When the senate passed the bill which has for its object the assessing of railroad terminals in the counties in which they actually exist and County Assessment Railway Terminals. Parish declares it was a move in the direction to save to King county something like $200,000 per annum. Smaller counties do not look favorably on the proposition as each and every one of them will lose not less than $15,000 annually if the bill becomes a law. Representatives from those small counties argue that the railroad terminals belong to every county in the state and not to some individual county despite the fact that terminals may be wholly within such individual county. Before the senate committee on labor large numbers of business men and labor leaders appeared last Wednesday evening to discuss the eight-hour law for women now pending in the senate, and despite the fact the various branches of organized labor had their hired agitators there to misrep close, low grogger sprung up at the ness, I hear, has in San Francisco New Labor Agitators vs. Business Men. "One measure much interested is "One measure before the legislature in which I am much interested is the bill for a general and uniform accounting system in all of the state, Auditor Clausen's county and city offices of the state," Accounting System. said State Auditor C. W. Clausen. At present it is utterly impossible for A joint committee has been named by the legislature to thoroughly investigate the $30,000 deficit in the state printer's office. A ten to one shot Printing Office Investigation Needed. any one office in the state to have a check on another. The state treasurer has to receive whatever moneys the various officials turn over to him without knowing or having the right to ask any questions as to the correctness of the account. A shortage might exist in one of the state offices and not be known during the time said official held the office and such a thing might be possible to so cover it up that it would run on and on until the books were experted and such a thing has not been done since I have been in office. The proposed system would make it possible to hold a complete check on not only all state, but on all county and city offices. dollars under the present state law regulating that office, and we would not be surprised if the committee does not recommend that the state discontinue its present printing methods and in lieu thereof recommend that the state purchase its own plant and that the printing department be under the supervision of a regularly appointed superintendent, the same as the other state institutions. When a state appointee can clear up fifty or sixty thousand dollars from an appointive position then you can bet your last dollar that the taxpayers are getting robbed. Woman suffrage ran the gauntlet of the senate last Tuesday like a half slide in a deep snow and the women who were working for its passage can compliment themselves for their clever work. Their clever work, however was not in the number of senators they actually brought to the assistance of their bill, but in having early in the session enlisted the sympathies of Senator George U. Piper to their cause. He was not one of those senators that had taken on to himself the that it would run on and such a thing in office. The propos hold a complete county and city of Piper Piped Woman Suffrage. "No, I am not ing for or against Senator Hemrich Visits Olympia. Another local option bill has bobbed up serenely, and it is said to have the approval of both the wets and the drys. It is not impossible to put a local Another Local Option Bill. option bill through the legislature, even at this late date, but the odds are against it. Unless the proposed bill meets the "No, I am not at Olympia for the purpose of lobbying for or against any local option bill or any other bill that may have been introduced in the legislature, which has for its object the regulation of the liquor traffic, but am here because the Another local opt it is said to have the dry Another Local Option Bill. Visits Olympia. Senator Hemrich Visits Olympia. approval of both sides it, like the Falconer-McMaster bill and like the Nichols bill, will go down and out. While Acting Governor Hay threatened to call the legislature in extra session if it failed to pass a local option bill it is not now believed he will do so. members of the house morals committee asked me to come before them," said former State Senator Andrew Hemrich of Seattle, who was an Olympia visitor one day this week. "Yes, I said to the committee I favored a reasonable local option bill—one not unreasonable either way. --- --- Price One Year, $3.00. Single Copies, 10 Cents. IN THE ELEVENTH LEGISLATURE. Sepech making in the senate so far as the present session is concerned has outlived its day of usefulness and Senator Cotterill should take a Hot Air Period tumble to himself. Speech making has won its spurs and the time for actual work has arrived. The legislature still has an opportunity to make good and if it will get down to brass tacks from now, on it will do so. Whenever a member of either the senate or house rises now and begins making a set speech all of his colleagues get busy with other matters and it is with difficulty that the presiding officer keeps them quiet enough for the speaker to hear himself divest himself of his over-supply of hot air. The man in the legislature that speaks to exceed one minute on any subject should be forced to subscribe for The Seattle Republican. Populist Capitol Not Popular. building made no bones of having for the ultimate aim the completion of the former state capitol building site, on which there is already a splendid foundation for a building erected at a cost of $95,000. If the building as was planned on the old capitol building site were erected the state would have something to be proudof and a building that would be of some lasting as well as serviceable benefit to the taxpayers. When the new building will have been completed the old should be used for an insane asylum. Booth's Constituents voters of that district smiled all Almost Smile. over their faces and asked themselves the question, who next. While we are unable to speak with authority, yet so reasonably sure are we that he will be beaten so badly that he himself will hardly remember that he also ran, we suggest that his fellow senators had as well begin to bade him a final farewell as a state senator. Mr. Booth won his nomination under the old convention system and at the suggestion of Samuel H. Piles, then a candidate for United States senator. Since that time the old convention system has been supplanted by the direct primary system and Sam Piles, despite the fact he was elected, has lost political caste not only in the Thirty-seventh Senatorial district, but all over the county. Booth himself has not popularized himself with his constituents, hence he is as certain of defeat as if he were already defeated. resent laboring men, the business men seem to have gotten the best of the argument. In the places of business which they represented the girls and women worked either by the hour or the piece and all of them were opposed to the enactment of a law that would cut them out of two hours work for which they were amply paid just to appease a few labor agitators of the Frank Cotterill stripe, who is always ready to shorten the number of working hours, but increase the number of dollars to be received for those fewer working hours. Piper Piped Woman Suffrage. Society LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 Volume XV, Number H. R. CAYTON, Publisher : aa ) 7 ' IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. A. Hedger, Plaintift, vs. Jessie E. Hedger, Deféndant—No, 64781. Sum- mons, ‘The State of Washington to the said Jessie E. Hedger, Defendant: You ate hereby’ summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit, within sixty days after the Ist day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plainiift, and serve a copy of your an- Swer upon the undersigned attorney for Plaintif®. at his office below stated; and In case of your failure so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘Ths above entitled action is an action for divorce on the ground of abandon- ment and desertion for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action and for cruelty. , T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintitt PostuMice Address: 603 Ploneer Buiid- ing, Saattle, King County, Washington. fanuary i—February 12, 1909, IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Catherine Perey, Plaintiff, vs... George Percy, Defendant. No, ——. Summons for Publication, ‘The State of Washington to the said George Percy, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the sth day of January, 1909, and defend the Above entitled action ‘in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintift at his office below stated; and ‘in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you According to the demand of the com- plaint ,which has been filed with the Clerk of said court. ‘The object of the above entitled action is that plainti, may obtain a divorce from defendant on the grounds of defendant's desertion and failure to provide. H. B, SNOOK, Attorney for Plaintim. P.O. Address: 540 Burke Bldg., Seat tle, King County, Washington. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King, Viola Starr, Plaintiff, vs. Alfred Starr, Defendant. No. 64892. Summons by Publication. ‘The State of Washington, to the said Alfred Starr, Defendant: You are here- by summonéd to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publica- tion of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 8th day of January, A. D. 1909, and de- fend’ the Above entitled ' action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your fall- ure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the sald action, set forth in the com- Plaint, 1s as follows: To obtain an ab- Solute decree of divorce from the de- fendant on the grounds of abandonment and non-support and failure to make Suitable provision for his family. Cc. E, PIPER, Plaintift’s Attorney. Post Office Addsess: Rooms 36-7 Union Bik, Seattle, King County, Wash. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County, In the Matter of the Estate of Rose Zacharias, deceased. No. 9447. Notice to Creditors, ‘By order of said court made herein on the 7th day of November, 1908, notice is hereby given to the creditors of and all persons having claims against sald deceased or against sald estate to pre- sent them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of sald estate at his place for the transaction of business for said estate to,-wit: at room 8 UUnion Block, 713 First Avenue, in the City of Seattle,’ King County, Washing- ton, within one year from and after the Gate of the first publication of this no- tice, to-wit, within one year from the 29th day of January, 1909, or the same will be barred. FRED KLOM, Administrator of sald Estate. JOHN R. PARKER, Attorney for said Estate. Room 8 Union Block, Seattle, Wash- ington. Sanuary 29-February 26, 1909. INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington in and for the County of ing. Allie #, Ruby, Plaintiff, vs. Carl Ruby, Defendant, No. 65,455. Summons. Ye ‘The State of Washington to the sald Carl Ruby, Defendant: ‘You aré hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 12th day of February, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for, the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to Go, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- Dlaint, which will be filed with the clerk Of, sala court, ‘The above entitled action ts an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of mat- rimony now and heretofore existing be- tween the parties hereto on the grounds of cruelty and non-support, , 'T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintitt, Post Office Address: 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Wash- ington. Feb. 12—March 26, 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Dos Roberts, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known, If any, having or claiming an in- terest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants, No. 62556. Néotice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you, a8 owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in ana to their hereinafter described real proeprty, are notified that the abova hamed plaintiff is the holder of one cer- tain delinquent tax certifieate issued by the ‘Treasurer of King County, State of ‘Washington, dated the 18th day of April, 1906, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in #aid King Coun- ty, described as follows, to-wit: White Brothers Addition to Kirkland, lot 7, block 2: certificate No. B49257; for the year 1904, $0.89. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent year, have been paid by the plaintitt Yeare Rave nove described real property, WP as Lot 7, block 2, White Brothers’ Addi- tion to Kirkland; $0.85 for the year 1905; $0.47 for the year 1906; $0.58 for the year 1907, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of a ear. said persons unknown, if any), are hereby notified and summoned to be and sppent within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the cs, ‘of first publication, to-wit 60 days after January 29, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintift and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with ine forest and costs, Incase you fail so to do, apdernent ‘will be rendered herein, foreclos! ing the lien of said taxes ahd costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due ‘upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, orderinig. a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayer in plaintiff's com- plain’ now on file in this cause and court, AURORA LAND COMPANY, Plaintiff. F, J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, Northern Bank & Trust Co, Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. ‘January 29-March 12, 1909, IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington in and for the County of King. HF. Wahlenmayer, Plaintiff, vs. Em- ma i Wahienmayer, Defendant. Sum- mons. The State of Washington, to the sald Emma K. Wahlenmayer, Defendant: "you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit, within sixty days after the ‘29th of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in. the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintife and serve a copy of your answer hpon the undersigned attorney for plain- tit, at his office below. stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment Will be fendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of sald court. The above entitled action is an action for divoree dissolving the bonds of mat- Hmoney existing between the parties hereto on the grounds of cruelty and in- compatibility of temper, i,t. SCHORR, Attorney for Plaintitt. Postoffice Address: 508, 604 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Wash- ington. january 29-March 12, 1909. eee No. 65285 eases Ge arn STOm, In_the Superior Court of the Sie aty ‘Washington, In and for the County of King. ‘Theresa Hoschert, Plaintiff, vs, Charles ‘B. Boschert, Defendant. The State of Washington, to the sald Charles E. Boschert, defendant: You fare hereby summoned to appear within alxty “dave after, the date of, the first Duplication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 29th day of January, 1909, and answer the com- plaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy Of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below Stated; and in case of your faflure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the Complaint which has been filed with the clerk of sald court, ‘That this action is brought to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing be- tween plaintiff and defendant, and to secure a decree adjudging the property described in the complaint filed herein to be the separate and individual prop- erty of this plaintiff and awarding the same to her as her separate and indi- vidual property for her sole use and benefit. MILO A, ROOT, ‘Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 680-681 New York Blk, Seattle, King County, ‘Washington. January 29—March 12, 1909, ‘No. 63997 ee a a /arranar aren. In_the Superior Court of the State o- ‘Washington, in and for the County of King, HH. Eaton, Plaintitt. vs. Nellle P. ‘Growl, Carrie F, Ordway, Daniel 0. Preston and Lettie J. Preston, De- fendants. The State of Washington, to the satd Nellie P. Crowl, Carrie 'F. Ordway, Daniel O. Preston and Lettie J. Preston, defendants: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publica~ tion. of this, summons. to-wit: within sixty days after the 29th day of Janu- ary, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintift at their office below stated: and in case 6f your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against vou according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court ‘The object of this action 1s to recover judement for the sum of Two Thousan¢ Dollars due from defendants to this plaintiff, with costs and. interest. ant fo sell the interest of defendants, Nelli P. Crow] and Carrie F, Ordway in lots 14, 15, 16 and 17, block 7 of Front, St Cable Addition to the City of Seattle fevied upon under writ of attachmen: Issued out of above entitled court fr this action to satisfy said judgment. SULLIVAN & STEVENS, Attorneys for Plaintitt P.O, Address: 514 Bailey Bldg., Seattle King County, Washington, January 29—March 12, 1909. No, 64542 worrcEe AND SUMMONS. In_the Superior Court of the State oF ‘Washington, for King County. Aurora. Land’ Company. a_ corporation, Plaintiff, vs. John Ballin and Jane Doe Rallin, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known, {f any, having or claiming an Interest In and to the hereinafter de- seribed real property, Defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, are hereby notified that the above piainti@ is the holder of a certain de- Tinquent tax certificate, B52922, Issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 11th day of August, 1908, and numbered as follows) for the delinquent taxes of the follow- Ine vear. 1904. in the followin amount, $0.90, and upon the real property situated in sald King County. desorbed as fol- lows, to-wit: Bteel Works Addition to Kirkland, lot 5. block 7, Certificate No. B25922, year 1904, amount, $0.90. ‘That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff. upon sald above de- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN scribed. real property, to-wit: ‘ Lot 6, block 7 Steel Works Addition Co to Kirkland, 36 cents for 1905, 50 cents | for 1906, 60 cents for 1907. wi ‘Which several sums bear interest at fir the rate of 15 per cent per annum from wi sald date of payment, and are all the Fe Unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and ab against said real property, tt ‘Fou and each of you Gncluding sald of persons unknown, if any), are hereby an further notified and summoned to be for and appear within sixty days after the | date of first publication of this notice, juc exclusive of the day of said publication, ac to-wit: within sixty (60) days after Jan. plz 28, 1909, in the above entitled court and cle action; ‘and defend this action and sai answer the complaint of said plaintiff is and serve a copy of your answer on the cur undersigned attorney for plaintift at hig he offce below stated, or pay the amount Que, together with interest and costs. fn ease you fail so to do, judgment will J be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien att of said taxes and costs against each | parcel of said real property for the sums —— And amounts due upon and charged IN Against each, for sald taxes, interest | and costs, ordering @ sale of each parcel | Of said property for the satisfaction of |. the sums charged and found against it Ry respectively as provided by law, and as an prayed, im plaintitrs complaint, now on ‘ fle in this cause and court. HL. AURORA LAND COMPANY, 3 a_corporation, ‘Plaintift. wii F. J, CARVER, the Attorney for Plaintift. to- Office Address: Northern Bank & Trust 121 Co, Bldg., Seattle, Wash. the fanuasy 29—-March 12. 1909. ent IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. . Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs, J. A. Stratton, and all’ persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and’ to. the hereinafter. described real property, Defendants. No. ——. Notice and. Summons, ‘State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ats or holders of an’ interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the Above named plaintiff 1s the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the Sth dey of February, 1904, ‘and numbered as follows, for the dslinguent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon ihe teal property, situated in ‘sald Hing County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B26,969, for the year 1902, in the amount of. $2.56, on lot 22, block 11, Valentine Addition ‘fo Seattle; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintift upon sald above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1903, in the sum of $1.89; for the year 1904, in the sum of fe: for the year 1906, in the sum of $2.07; for the year 1906, in the sum of $8.80; for the vear 1906 (Del. Local Assess- ment), $2.82; for the year 1907, in the Sum 6f $4.20; for the year 1907" (Del. Local Assessment), $4.89; which several sums bear interest’ at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of pay- ment, and are all the unpaid and unre deemed taxes upon and against said real property. ‘You and each of you, (including, sald persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and sumoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- Clusive of the day of sald first publi- cation, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. Sth, 1809, in the above entitiea court and action; and defend this action and ans- wer the complaint of said plaintift and serve a copy of your answer on the Undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together With interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment, will be rendered herein, foreciosing the lien of said taxes and costs: against each parcel of said Teal property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of ‘each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by Jaw, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFENER, Plaintift, Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Se- attle, Wash. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. ‘Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County: W. T. Gaftner, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants, No,——. Notice and Sum- mons, ‘State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an’ interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the Above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of January, 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon ihe real property, situated in said ising County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B47,259, for the year 1904, in the amount of $1.47, on lot 41, block 10, Ballard Park Addition to Se- attle; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been Bald by the plainti®! upon said above jeseribed real property, to-wit: ‘For the year 1905, the sum of 85 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.78 for the year 1907, the sum of $2.03; which several sums bear interest at the tate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed’ taxes upon and against said real property, You and each of you, (including sata persons unknown, if any). are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- clusive of the day of said first publi- cation, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 109, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and ans- wer the complaint of said plaintift and Serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case, you fail so to do. Sudgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the Men of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes, Interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against It respectively a8 pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's Complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFENER, i Plaintitt, Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Se- attle, Wash. ‘Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. INTHE SUPPRIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King, Tots M. Begme, Plaintift, ws, Cornelius F. Beggs, Defendant. No. 65,467. Sum- St aor eet ee alae Sie ‘The State of Washington to the sald Cornelius F. B Defendant: "You are. hereby ‘summoned. to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit within sixty days after the 12th day 0: February, A. D. 1909, and defend the above entitled action ‘in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at my office below stated. ‘And in case of your faflure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk ‘of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: For the purpose of se- curing a decree divorcing the parties hereto, CHAS. H. ENNIS, Attorney for Plaintiff, P, O, Address: 537 Burke Bldg., Se- attle, County of King, Washington. ‘Feb. 12—March 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Anna. Ryan, Plaintiff, ys. John H, Ryan, Defendant. No. -——. Summons and Service of Publication, State of Washington to the said John H. Ryan, Defendant: ‘You are hereby summoned to appear pithin sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this, summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after, the 12th day of February, 1909, and defend the above entitled action In the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintift and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated and in case ofyour failure so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court; the object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the following grounds: First. Because the defendant aband- oned the plaintift on the —— day of —————, 1901, said abandonment having been ¢ontinious for one year and more. ‘Second. Because the defendant for ten years last past has neglected and refused and still neglects and refuses to make suitable provisions for plaintiff and his family, Third. Because of personal indignities heaped upon the plaintiff by the defend- ant’ to such an extent as to render plaintif’s life burdensome. All of the matters “herein complained of having occurred without plaintiff's fault, A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintift. P.O. Address: 429-422 Epler, Block, 813 Second Avenue, Seattle, Wash. ee Meee 86.1900, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County, of, King. John H. Burns, Plaintiff, vs, Barbara A. Burns, Defendant. No. 65,440. Sum- mons. ‘The State of Washington to the said Barbara A. Burns, Defendant—Greeting: ‘You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the 12th day of February, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in.the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff. and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintift at his office below stated: and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk, "The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of desertion. ‘W, H. A. RENNER, Attorney for Plaintift, OMce and Post Office Address: 402 Hinckley Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, Feb, 12—March 26, 1909, INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. 8. Sorensen, Plaintiff, vs. Ben. G. Goodman, Defendant. ‘Summons for Publiaction, State of Washington to the defendant Ben. G. Goodman: ‘You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 12th day of February, 1909, and defend the above action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plain- tiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and In case of vour failure s0 to do, juds- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of sald court: the object of the above en- titled action is to obtain a decree of the above entitled court compelling the de- fendant herein to account to the plain- tiff for the sales of goods belonging to plaintift made by the defendant, herein, and, after such an accounting aforesald, for judgment against the defendant for the money due and owing to the nlaintift amounting to the sum of ‘Seven Hundred Seventy-four and 48/100 (3774.48), Dot ars, IRA_BRONSON and D, B. TREE THEN, : Attorneys for Plaintiff. Address: 614-619 Colman Building, IN THD SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington for the County of King. Ditee I Pearce, Junior, Plaintiff, vs. ‘Anna ®. Himes, and John Doe Himes, qhose true Christian name ts to plain: Tituntnown, her husband: #, W. Rea- hela and Jane Doe Redfield, whose trie Christian name ts to plaintif® unknown, his. wife, Defendants.” No. 65262: Summons, he State of Washington to the sald de- Yendants, Anna. I Himes, and John Doe Himes, whose true Christian name {sto plaintift unknown, her husband: TW. Reafela and Jane Doe Rednetd, Whose true Christian Name ts to plain: tit inknown, his wife, defendants: You are hereby simmioned to appear within siety days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- with, within sixty. dave after the 12th day 'of Pehruary, 1909, and defend the Above entitled petion inthe above one {tea conrt, and anawer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your Qnawer, umnon the undersimned attorney for patie, at his office below stated: ana Tinvcass of vour failure #0 to do. indement will be rendered against you Aecardine ta the demand. of the. com- Dinint. whieh has been. fled with the Phere of sald Court, The ohiect of this action 1 to quiet title tothe west 80 feet of Lots One, Two and Three, Block Thirty-two, Laws Second Addition to Sent te ELIAS A. WRIGHT. ‘Attorney’ for Plaintiff. Omee and P. 0. Address! 629 Burke Buliding, Beattie. Washineton. ‘rebruiry. 12-—March 26, 1969. TN, THA SUPFRIOR COURT OF THE Btate of Washineton for King County, Wit. Gattner, Plaintiff, va. S. B. Co, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest’ in and to the FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 1909. hereinafter real property, Defendants. No. ——. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: , You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants oF holders of an interest or estate jn and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the Rbove named plaintiff 1s the holder of @ certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State Of Washington, dated the Ist day of Fane, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in ‘sald King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certifeate No, B61,257, for the year 1904, in the amount of $2.24, on lot 12, Mock 2: Renton, Town of, (S, and B. of line of Renton Coal Co.);' that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been. paid by the plaintift tipon anid above described real property, onwit: ‘For the year 1905, the sum of, $1.56; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.44; for the year 1907, the sum of $1.70, which several sums bear interest at the rate of is per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and tnredeemed_taxes upon and against sald teal property. ‘You and each of you, (Including said persons unknown, ff any), are hereby further notifiga and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- Clusive of the day of said first publica tion, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 12, 1909, in ‘the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and ans- wer the complaint of said plaintiff and Serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintif! at his office below Stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, Tn case you fail foto do, judament will be rendered herein, foreclosing the Ten of said taxes and costs against each parcel of. said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for saia taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of safd property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in thst cause and court. ‘W. T. GAFENER. Plaintite, Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Se- attle, Wash, eh 19-_ Mar. 26. 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR Con ine County, State of Washington for King County. WW. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. 8, B. Cb. and all persons tunknown, {f any. having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, De- fendants. No. ——— Notice and Sum- mons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, ag owners, claim- ants oF holders of an interest or estate in-and to the hereinafter described real property. ate hereby notified that the Above named plaintiff 1s the holder of a certain delinquent tax certifeate Issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the Ist day of Tune, 1909, and marked as follows, for the. delinquent taxes of the following year, In the following amount, and mpon the teal property situated in sald King County, deseribed as. follows, to-wit: Certincate No, B61,256, for the year i904. in the amount of $2.68, on lot 11, block 2, Town of Renton: (8, and B. of Tine of Renton Coal Co.); that the taxes for the following prior ‘and, subsequent years have ‘been paid’ by the plaintift {upon aia above described real property, onwit: ‘For the year 1908, the sum of $1.95; for the year 1906, the sum of $2.01: for the year 1907, the sum of $2.38, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sald date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against sald real property. ‘You and each of vou, (including sald persons unknown, ff any), are hereby farther notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- Clusive of the day of said first, publica tion, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 32, i908, in ‘the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and, ans- wer the complaint of said plaintife and Serve a copy of your answer on the Undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together With Interest and costs. In case you fail 0. to do, Judgment will be rendered herein, foreciosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said Teal property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sata taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- ¥ided by Jaw, and as prayed In plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintimt, Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Se- atte, Wash, ‘Web. 12-—Mar, 26, 1909. NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF Se State of Washington, County of King. —ss.—Sherift’s Sale. By virtue of an execution issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 6th day of February, 1908, by the clerk thereof, In the case of William H. Cross. Plaintiff, | va, iing County et al, Defendants, No. 48,485, and tome, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice 1s hereby given, that T will pro- ceed to sell at public auction to the high- est bidder for cash, within the hours pre~ scribed by law for sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the $rd day of ‘April, A. D, 1909, before the Court House door ‘of said Kine County, tn, the State of Washington, all of the right, title and {Interest of the sald plaintiff, William Hi. Cross In and to the following described property, situated in King County, State Of Washington, to-wit: ‘The South half (S%) of the North- west quarter (NW%) of the Northeast quarter (NY) of the Northeast quarter (NEY) of Section one (1), of Township twenty-two (22) north, of Range two (2) east, of W. M., levied on as the Property’ of, sala plaintity, William Fi Gross to satisfy a Judgment amounting to ‘Ten ($10.00) Dollars, in favor of de- fendants, ‘Dated this 19th day of February, 1909. ROBERT T, HODGE, Sheriff. By JOHN STRINGER, ‘Deputy. First publication Feb. 19, 1909, Last publication March 19, 1909. Have a Legal? hone Main 305 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN tofore existing between plaintiff and de- action and answer the comp FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 1909. REPUBLICAN—Legals IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Ina E. Foster, Plaintiff, vs. Norman D. Foster, Defendant. No..... Summons for Publication. State of Washington to said Norman D. Foster. Norman D. hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from the date of the first publication of this summons, to wait on the 20th day of November, 1908. and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and answer a copy of your answer to the under- standing of the plaintiff, at their office below stated. In case of your fail- ure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. cause is brought by the plaintiff to ob- jective demand of divorce from said defendant on the grounds of willful des- ertion and nonsupport. FREUDENBERG & HEATON, Attorneys for Plaintiff. November 20—January 1, 1949. NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATOR'S SALE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of Washington. In the matter of the Estate of John Chadwick, Deceased. No. 532. Notice is hereby given that by virtue of an order of sale made in the above cause on the 20th day of February, the undersigned will on Saturday, the two hundred and seventy-third estate, will on Saturday, the Third day of April, 1909, at the hour of ten o'clock in the forenoon of said day, at the front door of the Court House in Seattle, County of King, Washington, offer for sale and sell to high, and best价位, and shall all the right, and interest of said estate in and to the following described real estate, to-wit: Lots twelve (12) and thirteen (13), block forty-six (46), of Woodland Addi- tion to Green Lake Lake, Washington, that said sale will be wash and subject to confirmation, by the above named Court. Dated this 26th day of February, 1909. S. L. JONES. Administrator of the Estate of John Chadwick, Deceased. JESSE A FRYE, Attorney for Administrator, 916 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, Washington. First publication, Feb. 26. Last publication, March 19. Thompson, Defendant—No. 64862. Summons for Publication. mons for Publication: The State of Washington to the said Federant: James Thompson. You are hereby summoned to appear with sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: Within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint for the plaintiff, and answer the copy of your application on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed by the court of said court, and the object of the above entitled action is to secure a judgment against you for nine hundred dollars, balance due for hay sold by you for plaintiff and used and embezzled by you and for which an attachment has been issued and levied upon your property. P. O. Address, 45 Maynard Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—Feb. 19, 1909. Upton. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. The object of said action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant in the grounds of desertion and abandonment MORRIS, SOUTHARD & SHIPLEY Attorneys for Plaintiff Office and postoffice address: 55 Haller Building, Seattle, King County, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King- ss. I. The Matter of the Estate of Martha J. Whittier, Deceased. No. 7191. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Merriel Whittier, administrator of the estate of Martha J. Whittier, deceased, has re- warded to an estate of final court, and final court such administrator, and that thursday, the 25th day of March, 1909, at 3:30 o'clock, A. M., at the court room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, said King County, and duly appointed court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to account, and contest the same. Witness, and the E. Morris, Judgment said Superior Court, and The Seal of said court hereto affixed this 18th day of February, 1909. AULLEY, January for Administrator. 19—March 19. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Mary Louise Ouse, Plaintiff, vs. F. J. Ouse, Defendant. No. — Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said F. J. Ouse, Defendant: Within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit; Within sixty days after the 27 day of February, 1909, and defend the title of titled actuarial service, give entitled court, tiff, and serve the complaint of the plain- upon the undersigned attorney for plain- tiff at his office below stated, cause, and judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk or said court. The object of the above said action is to obtain the rights of divorce before existing between plaintiff and de- Attention! ATTORNEYS Attention Being an active attorney and from time to time having legal notices for publication, it is perfectly natural for you to want to get acquainted with those newspapers that do your kind of business. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Is just your size in this respect. It already has some notices for publication, as may be seen herein, but it needs more of them, and to that end your business is earnestly solicited. GHARLEY ON THE SPOT. Your notices are promptly called for; handled with care and accuracy. Affidavits delivered without delay. Charges reasonable from a hard times standpoint; everything done in a jam-up manner. TELEPHONE MAIN 305 When you have a publication, and if it happens to be a Divorce Summons or a Notice to Creditors, give us the facts and we will do the rest. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. 307 Epler Block. Main 305. Notices Received Up to Friday Noon. fendant, on the grounds of abandonment and non-support extending over a period of one year, and asking that the community property be awarded to the plaintiff, and for the custody and control of minor children LOUIS NOCKELS, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 524 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. First publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. NOTICE OF INCREASE OF CAPITAL STOCK OF THE PACIFIC COAST RUBBER COMPANY. TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF THE PACIFIC Coast Rubber Compamy and to You, and each of you, will please take notice, and notice is hereby given and extended to any and all persons in any wise interested in or concerned with The Pacific Coast Rubber Company, a corporation of three, and, therefore, that a meeting of the stockholders of said corporation will be held at the office and principal place of business of said corporation, to-wit, 214 Jackson Street, in the City of Seattle, King King Street, in the Twentieth (27) day of April, 1909, at the hour of ten o'clock a.m., the object and purpose of which meeting is to increase the capital stock of said corporation from the amount of three thousand ($300,000), which is present capital stock, to the amount of Five Hundred Thousand ($500,000), and for the further purpose of declaring that the Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000) of additional stock shall be designated for the stockholders of the corporation as preferred stock; at which time and place a vote of the stockholders of said corporation will be had for the purpose of determining whether or not said capital stock shall be so large that it is to whether or not such increased amount of capital stock shall be set aside and sold as preferred stock; and further, any and all persons interested in such proceedings are requested to be present then and there to present such matters, and they have in response to their transactions. Dated at Seattle, King County, Wash. The date of the first publication hereof is the date of publication. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Co., Inc., Plaintiffs, G. Roberts, Roberts, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. No. 62576. No. 62576. Summer. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter possessed real property, as and defined that specified that the owner and plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following years, in the following manner: upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland —Lot 8, Block 2; Certificate Number 49259; for the year 1904; to the amount of 89 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the hitherto upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 8, Block 2, White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland—35 cents for year 1905; 47 cents for 1906; 58 cents for 1907, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent; the sale of real estate, and are all the basis and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and sued by the court for the days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: Sixty days after the 26th day of February; Seventy days after the 26th day of February; and defend this action; and answer the complaint of said THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ATTORNEYS being an active attorney and from time to time being legal notices for publication, it is natural for you to want to get a with those newspapers that do your kind business. TTTLE REPUBLI your size in this respect. It already notices for publication, as may be seen but it needs more of them, and to the business is earnestly solicited. ARLEY ON THE SPOT. notices are promptly called for; hard care and accuracy. Affidavits delay out delay. Charges reasonable from its standpoint; everything done in a jar. ELEPHONE MAIN 305 in you have a publication, and if it has a Divorce Summons or a Notice to give us the facts and we will do the ATTLE REPUBLIC Block. Main 30 notices Received Up to Friday Noon. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 314 Northern Bank & Treasury Hall. First publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. are all the upon and persona further appear w of first sitio ```markdown ``` plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you wish to do so, the attorney should be ordered help in enclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property to a satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. AURORA LAND CO., Inc. plaintiff. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Washington, WI. Must be a McPherson and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No . . . Notice State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest in the estate of Washington, described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of Washington dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the same date, in King County, described as follows, to-wit: Ogle's Garden Tracts—Lot 2, Block A: Certificate Number B51979; year 1908; amount $30.45. Taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 2, Block A: Ogle's Garden Tracts— $40.10 for 1908; $2.45 for 1905; $2.17 for 1906; $2.41 for 1907, which several bears interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and undeemed taxes upon and against said real You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within six days timely to declare of each parcel for said this notice, exclusive of the said first publication, to-wit: Within sixty days after February 26, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend his action and claim against each parcel of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so, you may appeal the action, forecasing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs. In case you fail so, you may appeal the action for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively is provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address, 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Washington. First publication, February 26. Publication, April 9. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. S. E. Co., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. —— Notice and Summons. 2—Republican. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate, the property of Kirkwood, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following property situated upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: That the taxes for the following prior Renton Coal Co.—Lot 13, Block 2; Certificate Number B51258; year 1904; amount $1.37. and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 13, Block 2, Town of Renton, S. and E. of line of Renton Coal Co.—78 cents for year 1905; 87 cents for 1906; $1.02 for 1907, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per year; $1.03 for 1908, which are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons, unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of publication, and to give a sive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: Within sixty days after February 26, 1999, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the date of publication. If the court stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against, each parcel of said taxes, due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff'saint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER, Office Address, 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Washington. First publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Terrace Land Co. and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim, and in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, for June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, and the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to Claremont Addition to Seattle—Lot 3 (less East 33 feet). Block 8; Certificate Number 1004. 1904, amount $1.50 and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: 10,800 (less East 33 feet). Block 8, Certificate addition to Seattle—$1.04 for year 1905; 79 cents for 1906; 83 cents for 1907, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and from the taxes imposed upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of your filing of the notice of the day of said first publication, to-wit: Within sixty days after February 26, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office before you, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against you, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively. 2 as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFNER. Plaintiff. Office Address, 457 Arcade Blvd., Seaville, Washington. First publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gafner. Plaintiff. vs. Unknown Owner, all claims for an interest in and to the hereafter described real property. Defendants. No. _____. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and only the first publication days after the date of first publication and shall beclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: Within sixty days after February 26, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action by filing a copy of your answer to the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of any further taxes interest and costs ordered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against the taxes interest and costs, ordering a sale of the property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFNER, Plaintiff, Office Address, 457 Arcade Blvd., Seattle, Washington. Written publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. David B. Hill, ex-Governor of and Senator from New York, has a secluded hatter somewhere in the state who makes his high hats after elaborate plans drawn by Mr. Hill many years ago, and not changed since. One night Governor Odell, of New York, was giving a reception in Albany, and Mr. Roosevelt, then elected Vice-President, met Mr. Hill on the steps of the New York executive mansion. Roosevelt wore a black roughrider hat and Hill had one of his peculiar sky-pieces. "Senator," said Roosevelt, "you should wear a hat like this one that I have one. They are much easier on the head, preserve the hair and are altogether better than silk ones." Mr. Hill looked at the coming Vice-President. "My dear sir," he said, "I haven't worn a hat like that since I went out of the show business."—Rochester Herald "I was only acting the part of peace-maker," explained the prisoner. "But you knocked the man senseless with a stich," the magistrate pointed out. "Sure I did," was the answer. "There was no other way to 'ave peace with 'im around." —Exchange. Spokane building laws will be revised at once, and the city commissioners, consisting of John Wetzel, City Engineer J. C. Ralston, and Building Inspector Geo. W. Mackie and one chosen architect will soon get together and draft a building ordinance adequate to the growing needs of the Power City. The value of the mineral products of the United States in 1907 reached the enormous total of $2,069,289,196, surpassing the value of the same products in 1906 by $165,282,162, or 8.68 per cent, that of 1905 by 27.33 per cent, and of 1904 by 58.81 per cent. Both metallic and nonmetallic products contributed to the gain. Chewelah, Wash., has organized a commercial club with Charles G. Burch as president and E. D. Jermain as secretary. Seattle Republican Published Every Friday, 307 Epler Blk. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton.....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton.....Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. One Year ..... $3.00 Six Months ..... 1.50 Three Months ..... 75 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matter. Legal Publications a Specialty. Jim Wickersham seems to have the fighting disease. Does Senator Cotterill love to hear himself talk? Bryan's acceptance precludes a struggle among the Democrats. That north tunnel cave-in proved a rather dark and foreboding proposition. Would-Be President Bryan had a better opinion of Gov. Haskell than did the Federal grand jury. Sheriff Hodge is a reformer with a vengeance and if he keeps on he will sprout into gubernatorial timber before four years roll around. In case of an extra session of the legislature the taxpayers will realize what it means to buy Hay out of season for so many members. The cold trust and the coal trust both seem to have it in for the poor people, as each have been working overtime to do them up this season. Of course, Frank Cotterill is for humanity if it happens to be wrapped up in a white skin, but to hell with all other kind always sounds good to him. Sumptuary laws have become so common to Kansas that her legislature is trying to make it a penal offense for a white man to marry out of his class. Think of the untold suffering such a law would bring about. Local Politician Dies. William Connor, a well known Seattle politician, and who two years ago was sergeant at arms of the tenth legislature of this state, passed over the great beyond one day this week, after a brief illness. He has been more or less a factor in the politics of the Third ward of this city for a number of years and that being a part of the thirty-seventh senatorial district he sometime ago announced his intention of making a fight for the nomination of state senator. His death leaves, so far as is now known, Robert F. Booth, Frank C. Jackson, W. G. Potts, E. B. Palmer and Howard Sweeney seeking the nomination for state senator to succeed Booth whose successor will be elected in 1910. LIFE'S SUNNY SIDE. A woman journalist at the Colony Club was praising Mrs. Taft. "She will form a salon at the White House," said the journalist. "Washington, under her regime, will become the center of art and letters, as well as the center of politics." "She deplored during my interview the scorn of culture that marks our ultra-smart set. She said it had not always been so. She cited Harriet Lane Johnston --- as a typical society woman of culture in the past. "When Miss Lane," she said, "lived in London with her uncle, the Ambassador, an English nobleman was most attentive to her one night at dinner. "Miss Lane's hands were very beautiful. The nobleman, gently touching one of them as it lay on the cloth, quoted Gray: '‘Hands that the rod of empire might have swayed.’ Miss Lane's smiling retort was the completion of the couplet: '‘Or wake to ecstacy the living lyre.’' —Washington Herald. A country correspondent for a Kentucky newspaper once found himself in the mountains of that state looking for items of interest to his journal. "There ain't a bit of news," said the farmer. "All down this way are too busy with their crops to think of anything else." "Fine crops this year, eh?" asked the correspondent. "Couldn't be better," asserted the farmer. "I oughter be in my field right now, an' I would be only I come to town to see the coroner." "Yes; he's wanted to hold an inquest on a couple of fellers in our place." "Accident?" "I reckon not! Ran Morgan ain't doin' nuthin' like that by accident! He got Jim Jeffords an' his brother Tom with two shots! Got to have an inquest though." "What led to the fight?" "There wa'n't no fight. Ran never give the other fellers any chance to make it a fight. Jes' hid behind a tree an' give it to 'em as they come along." "No. What's the use? Some o' the Jeffords people come along, burned down Ran's house, shot him an' his wife, an' set fire to his barn. No, Ran ain't been arrested. But I ain't got time to stand heah talkin' to you. Got to git back to my harvestin'. But there ain't any news down our way. Ef anything happens I'll let you know."—Harper's Weekly. Walter Ward Biller tells the following story about a hardware store in St. Louis which advertised for an errand boy. As it happened the boss was talking to a customer when a boy came in. Thinking he wanted to buy something, he excused himself, and, going over to the boy, asked him what he could do for him. The boy told him that he came in answer to his advertisement and asked for the job. Well, of course, the boss got made for being disturbed while he was talking to a customer. He said ot the boy, "You go outside and walk a block. If I call you back, why, I will hire you; if I don't, why, you just keep right on walking." The boy did as he was told, but, going out, he picked up a shovel that was standing near the door, put it on his back and started down the street. Before he had gone ten feet the old man was after him, yelling: "Come back! Come back!" The boy came back, took off his coat, and asked where he wanted him to work—downstairs or upstairs, or where. The man took one good look at him and said: "I guess I'll hire you. Never mind putting your coat on. Start right in."—Judge. TH REPUBLICAN BENCH AND BAR. The large amount of work of the supreme court has necessitated some plan of relief. No officers of the State have worked harder during late years than the judges of this court. There is some question however as to whether relief should come in the shape of increasing the membership of the court. Some think a court of nine members would be unwieldy and that an intermediate court, would better serve the purpose. It is said that other states have found the latter method preferable. Be that as it may, it is quite generally conceded that material relief could be had by raising the juriditional amount necessary to appeal a case to the supreme court. At present any law case involving over $200 can be appealed to the supreme court, and an equity case of any kind may be so appealed even if only a dollar is in controversy. This permits many small cases to reach that court and consume the time of the judges and other officers of the court to the great expense of the taxpayers. The constitution it is thought might be wisely changed so as to permit no civil cases to be appealed to the supreme court unless it involved $400 or $500 or some question of the validity of a statute or tax or some constitutional question or right. It is also suggested by good lawyers that the justices courts might be given jurisdiction up to $300. This, would keep many cases out of the superior court that now are required to be brought there. It would save money both for litigants and tax payers and make justice more speedy. It is often called 'the poor man's court' and its door shall be open as wide as possible to people of limited means. Scandalum Magnatum. The proceedings against the New York World by the federal government for criminal libel because of charges made against government officials with respect to the purchase of the French interests in the Panama canal, are so unusual as to demand some comment even from a law periodical, which usually withholds comment until the final disposition of the cause. Without, however, touching on the merits of any issues of fact involved, or excusing in the least any moral turpitude which may attach to the action of a newspaper in carelessly charging government officials with criminal motives and conduct, we desire to make use of the occasion to discuss certain interesting questions which arise in connection therewith. A few observations on the offense of "scandalum magnatum." We do not say that this proceeding is based on this theory. But, in much of the discussion of this unusual proceeding the question has been asked. Does the fact that the alleged libelous charges were made against the president of the United States or against the government acting through its various departments, make the offense more heinous than it otherwise would be, or make that an offense which would not be an offense if directed against an ordinary individual? Under the common law offense of "scandalum magnatum" there would be such a distinction. At common law it was an indictable offense to bring the government into disrepute, or any of its officers, and that was made an offense when spoken against a public officer which would not be an offenss if spoken against an ordinary individual. This rule was crystallized into statutory form, making it an offense to publish false news whereby discord might grow up between the king and his people. 3 Edw. I, c. 34. See also 2 Rich. II. St. I. c. 5; 12 Rich. II. c. 11. In strong contrast stands forth the rule of the civil law,—that system of law, to which, says Hon. Hannis Taylor in his Science of Jurisprudence, all the nations of the world are gradually turning, as being based on the most unalterable and most widely applicable principles governing human conduct. Thus in the Theodosian Code it was expressly declared that slanders of majesty should be unpunished, for, if this proceeded from levity, it was to be despised; if from madness, it was to be pitied; and, if from malice, it was to be forgiven. And in Patterson on Liberty of Press. p. 87, it is related that "Emperor Agustus desired to punished a historian who passed some stinging jests on him and his family, but Maccenas advised him that the best policy was to let such things pass and be forgotten. Ceasar also said that to retaliate was only to contend with impudence and put oneself on the same level." The soundness of the Roman law over the rule at common law is clearly apparent, notwithstanding the able contention to the contrary of Justice W. C. Marshall in the case of State v. Shepherd (Mo.), 76 S. W. I. c. 83, where the Missouri supreme court attempted to revive this offense as a basis upon which to punish an editor for a general libel upon the court. The contention in the Shepherd case is clearly error so far as it gives a court any ground for proceeding against a person for constructive contempt where the charge against the court, though malicious and false, is not in relation to any controversy depending before the court. This, we think, we clearly showed in 57 Cent. L. J. 101, 402, and supported by many authorities. The rule of the civil law is clearly in harmony with the policy of Ameriean institutions, while the rule of the common law like so many of the rules of law proceeding from that source has all the crudities of that savage era of monarchical autocracy in whichit had its birth, still clinging to it. The Massachusetts supreme court definitely rejected the doctrine in a case where a member of the legislature relied upon it, alleging that the dignity of the commonwealth was attacksd where members of the legislacere were assaulted in relation to their transaction of the public business. Sillars v. Collier, 151, Mass. 50, 23 N. E. 723, 6 L. R. A. 680. This same abhorrence of this principle is shown by the attitude of the American people toward all sedition legislation that has from time to time been proposed. FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 1909 Thus when John Adams was president, congress passed a sedition law, making it an offense to libel the government, congress or the president. The law met with fierce opposition and was so foreign to the policies of our laws that many able lawyers pronounced it unconstitutional and it was quickly repealed. See Cooley's Const. Lim. (6th Ed.) p. 526. It is quite apparent that the old common law offense of "scandalum magnatum" was left behind when our fathers planted the principles of civil liberty and equality on the shores of the newly-discovered continent. And in England as well as this country this old rule has now given place to the rule of the civil law that there can be no libel of the government or of government officials as such. It is thereforoe no greater offense to libel Theodore Roosvelt as president than it is to libel Theodore Roosevelt, the private citizen, unless the charges amount to treason or the subversion of all constituted authority, as the preaching of anarchy. It is no greater wrong to criticise the government than it is to speak evil of a private citizen. State v. Kaiser, 20 Oreg. 50. AngloSaxon barbarism affirmed the contrary and the old Tower of London witnessed the sufferings of men who dared to raise their voices against the king. Roman civilization, on the other hand, declared the rule that the dignity of the government demanded that such insults be unnoticed. And the rule of the civil law is recognized to-day as the rule of a higher civilization than that out of which grew the doctrine of "scandalum magnatum."Central Law Journal, Short Strange Stories. A seventy-five year old woman in Virginia has sued her husband for a divorce alleging cruelty. The couple has been married over thirty years, The legislature of the state of Texas has passed a law against official nepotism. In future it will be a criminal offense for any official to name any of his relatives to position in his jurisdiction. It might be well for other states to enact a similar law. In making report of a train wreck in a southern city the local manager of the road in reporting the matter, denied that there was a single human life lost in the wreck, but. he concluded: "Two niggers were killed." Evansville, Indiana, has a young man who was married at the age of fourteen to a girl thirteen. They have been married two years and a few days ago they were divorced on the grounds of incompatability. They have a child one year old. A colored woman in a southern city was placed under peace bonds and warned that if she licked her husband again she would be fined ten dollars. For the next few weeks the woman was seen working day and night at whatever wages she could get. "Are you working to keep out of trouble? anxiously inquired another woman. No. I am working to earn ten dollars." Its useless to add her husband got the promised licking and the court the hard earned ten dollars, but revenge is sweet, sayeth the Lord of Hosts. FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 1909. THE PASSING THRONG. Before another issue of The Seattle Republican will have reached its readers the United States government will have undergone its quadrenial change in rulers and the most strenuous president the United States has ever had will have retired to private life. Teddy the terrible will have been succeeded by Taft, the toiler. President Roosevelt is to truly retire to private life and in order to completely do so he proposes to spend the first year of his retirement in Africa hunting big game and studying conditions in that country and the second year in visiting other governments. Few men in the world as much absorbed in statecraft as has been President Theodore Roosevelt for the past eight years could so completely absolve themselves as he will do and lose himself in the jungles of Africa where the daily paper and its press dispatches can not be seen. There is not the slightest doubt but that President Roosevelt nominated and elected William Howard Taft as his successor, but he seems to think that completes his mission and Mr. Taft will have to take care of himself after he has been inaugurated. In closing his two terms as president Theodore Roosevelt has won for himself the plaudits of the civilized world. Of course the Rockefellers, Harrimans and other government looters rebuke him and their only reason for doing so is because he stopped them from actually appropriating the United States government to their private and personal use. Already President-elect Taft has made two selections for his cabinet from the South, thus showing very conclusively that, he proposes to make greater inroads on the Solid South, politically speaking, than the mere eating of all her "possum and taters up." Mr. Taft may find even another man from the South for his cabinet and thus break the record since the administration of President Buchanan. There is a disposition among the leading men of the North to break down the section lines between the North and the South, the results of the Great Civil War, but the South is obdurate and seems inclined to cling to her idols, and as an example, but a few days ago the damphools of Mississippi, Oklahoma and other states of the South refused to honor Lincoln's BELLINGHAM NORMAL EMBROGLIO Someone has said that "When thieves fall out honest men get their own." The quotation may not be wholly applicable to the ugly situation that now exists at the state normal located at Bellingham, and yet if a tenth of the charges and counter charges of misfeasance in office respectively by the principal and two of the teachers against each other be true then there is far more truth than poetry in the accusations. Principal Mathes called the attention of the board to statements made by the two teachers in question derogatory to himself as well as to the school, all of which he was able to convince the board were absolutely false and for the offense the board dropped their names from the roll of teachers. Stung by the rebuke the principal had been able to administer to them the teachers retaliated by charging Principal Mathes with official corruption of such a serious nature that a legislative investigation may be the result. As to either the facts or the alleged facts the public is without any evidence and nothing save a searching investigation will prove beyond a question of doubt which side is telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, if either. Principal Mathes is one of the leading educators of the Northwest, if not the Pacific Coast, and he is to be credited with the high state of efficiency that the school has attained since his connection therewith. That, however, does not preclude the possibility of him having done things not laid down in either the rules or the curriculum. To err is human and why not him the same as the other fellow. Let the public have all the facts. It has been charged on the floor of the State Senate that every institution in the State should be investigated, and in view of the normal school trouble it would not be a bad idea. Taft After Solid South. THEODORE ROOSEVELT memory by declaring his birthday a legal holiday. White Mobs in United States. Last Monday's press dispatches told of mobs in both Iowa and Nebraska made up of what we are pleased to term "white men" attacking in both cases a weaker people living in their midst. It is so common for the intelligent, cultured and Christian white men of the United States to take umbrage at some alleged offense committed by Negroes and mass themselves together and massacre every Negro that they see that it no longer causes even comment, but the outbreak against the Greeks in Omaha was unexpected. Property valued at $25,000 was destroyed and a score or more persons injured. [Portrait of a man in a suit with a tie, set against a large building with a high roof and multiple chimneys.] EDWARD T. MATHES. PRINCIPAL STATE NORMAL, BELLINGHAM. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN THEODORE ROOSEVELT While the mob was at white heat threats were made against the Japanese laborers of the town, but the dirty cowards remembering the Japanese government had men of war ready to sail for the United States and so they let their better judgment prevail and the Japs were not disturbed. Jim Wickersham With Us. Either James Wickersham, the deelgate to Congress from Alaska, is the most monumental scoundrel or he is one of the most maligned men that ever hybernated in the Alaskan territory. Despite the fact that Jim Wickersham, while he was judge of Alaska, was accused of either having actually committed every manner of crime known to the territory or having eir own." that now th of the the prin- far more attention compounded the crimes of others, yet he stood for delegate to Congress last year and beat his opponents so badly that they were hardly able to say, "I also ran." Mr. Wickersham arrived in Seattle one day last week, direct from Fairbanks and he was received by a local committee of Seattleites with open arms and was subsequently tendered one of the most brilliant banquets ever seen in the history of the city. Let's hope that the man is a truly good man and will prove himself so in the halls of Congress. Got a Deserving Blow. Detective Lee Barbee, of the Seattle police force, for once did not get his man, but it was no fault of his intentions for as usual he shot 5 to kill a human being. This slaughterer of human beings by laying in wait for his victims, then deliberately shooting them down without warning and then covering up his revolting crime with his official cloak, it seems, fixed himself last Friday evening and went out for human game and he was not long in finding an excuse in using his gun. He, however, did not exactly kill his man, but he did his best. In the melee Lee got badly used and as a result he is now nursing a fractured jaw and other bruises about his body. If there is an unprincipled whelp in all the world it is Lee Barbee and it is to be regretted that, it was not his neck instead of his jaw that was broken. Uncle Sam's Fleet Home. The great nations of the world have all seen Uncle Sam's navy and judging from what the American newspapers have to say about it, all of the nations were greatly impressed with them, yea not only impressed, but in many instances were even overawed at the sight of the great human destroyers. After encircling the globe the men of war are all safe and sound again in Hampton roads from whence they started something over a year ago. In the course of the trip these men of war were called upon to render some assistance to the earthquake sufferers in Italy and they did it so well that, the Italian government through its king and queen personally thanked the officers for the service rendered. Aside from that nothing has been gained or accomplished by this long cruise. Nations who had never seen the fighting contrivances of Uncle Sam are perhaps willing to join with those who had not only seen them, but likewise felt them is now of a like opinion that, Uncle Sam is a fighting little cuss, but what does that prove or gain for Uncle Sam as a civilized gentleman? Cuba for Cubans is a slogan on that island just now. If Uncle Sam had not interfered it would still be Cuba for Spanish grafters. Some folk so soon forget from whence they came. It has been very generally conceded that a cat has nine lives and from the number of times Charles E. Coon bobs up after he has been put to sleep the Coon, from a life standpoint, should be classed along with the cat. --- IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Edna I. Brenner, Plaintiff, vs. George W. Brenner, Defendant—No. 64990. Summons by Publication to the said George W. Brenner, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 15th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint that has been filed against you of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office and post-office address below designated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of said court. The object of said court will be to acquire a divorce andendant, the custody of minor children and that the community property be awarded to plaintiff and for permanent alimony, attorney's fees herein and costs of this action. MORRIS, SOUTEARD & SHIPLEY, Attorneys for Plantiff. Office and Postoffice Address: 55 Haller Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, January 15th, 1909. January 15—February 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, F. J. Carver, Plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the descendant described real property. Defendants—No. 62377. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or claim of any kind, and the heraftera described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th of April, 1904 and numbered as follows for the delinquent taxes of the following year in the following amount and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland-Jones Acre-Five cents 1904, amount eighty-nine cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 6, block 2. White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland-Jones Acre-Five cents (35c) for the year 1905; forty-seven cents (47c) for the year 1906, and fifty-eight cents (58c) for the year 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid amounts of property taxes upon and unpaid sums of property taxes upon. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of publication of this office publication of the day of said first publication, to-wit; within sixty days after the 15th day of January, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien on said taxes and costs for the sums due, as provided by the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and the corresponding perspective as provided by law and as proved in plaintiffs complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AUPORA LAND COMPANY, a corporation. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for plaintiff. Office Address, Northern Bank & Trust Co., Bldg. January 15—February 28, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffer, Plaintiff, vs. J. H. Clambey, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in the hereditary described real property, Defendants. No. - Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: women, owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereditary described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the King County Court of Washington dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County Court of Washington as follows, Certificate No. B59,810 for the year 1904, in the amount of $1.81, on tract 47. Clambey's A. H. 1st Addition to Dunlap: that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid above described real property to wit. For the year 1905, the sum of $1.25; for the year 1906, the sum of $2.39; for the year 1907, the sum of $3.59; several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unpredeemed taxes upon and against said sums. You and each of you. (including said persons unknown, if any). are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the filing of the notice, inclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after February 12th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff under the plea of the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forecasing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said taxes and due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as imprisonment law, and as praved in plaintiffs complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Feb. 12—Mar. 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, the Court W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. J. H. Clambey, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them; You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, Certificate No. B50,809, for the year 1904, in the amount of $1.81, on tract 45. A. H. Clambey's 1st addition to Dunlap; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above mentioned tax payee. For the year 1905, the sum of $1.25; for the year 1906, the sum of $2.39; for the year 1907, the sum of $2.66, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and certain taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this application, the exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 12, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against it, respectively, applied due upon the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively, applied by law, and satisfied in plaintiffs' complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg, Seattle, Wash. Feb. 12—Mar. 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Aurora Land Co., a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe who is whose name the mine is unknown and all persons known, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants.—No 62557. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and them. You and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of the real property, and the certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows: For the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount and the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland — Lot 8, block 2, B49258, year 1904, amount, eighty-nine cents. The following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 8, block 2, White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland—35 cents for the year 1915; may-sey-cen (47) for the year 1906, and fifty cents (50) for the year 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid sums of payments upon an against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after the 15th day of January, 1909, in the above enclosed notice. If you answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and any judgment you do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's comment now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. January 15—February 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King.—In Probate. In the matter of the Estate of Mary N. Mitchell, Deceased. No. 7527. —Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. James S. Mitchell administrator of the Estate of Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, having filed in this court his petitio nsesting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petitio sets forth facts of the distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court, at the court room of Washington, at the court room of the Probate department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 25th day of February, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show the residence of said person once a week of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of the said petition should once a week for four successive weeks before the said 25th day of February, 1909, in Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 22nd day of January, 1909. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington. I. D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on January 1, 1900, in the matter of the estate of Mary N. Mitchell, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN January 22—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. D. J. Hanna, Plaintiff, vs. James B. Bradshaw and Dawson Bradshaw co- partners in the lawsuit for the name of Bradshaw Bros. Defendants. No. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington the said James B. Bradshaw and Dawson Bradshaw, Defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first within sixty days after the 16th day of January, A. D. 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; the judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is to recover the sum of two hundred dollars (250.00) of plaintiff from the defendants, as the salary of plaintiff for the month of December, 1908, under a certain contract of employment between the parties to this action, whereby plaintiff was to receive $225.00 per month for his services as salesman for defendants, and which defendants have failed and refused to pay. GRAVES & MURPHY, P. O. Address: at County of King, Washington, at 911 Lowman Building January 15—February 26 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Mary C. Brydges, Plaintiff, vs. Willi- lah C. Brydges, Plaintiff. No. 64925. Summaries by Publication. The State of Washington to William R. Brydges, the said defendant: In the name of the State of Washington, you are hereby summoned to apprehend the plaintiff of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days from and after the 15th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff of the first publication of our answer upon the undersigned, the attorney for the plaintiff, at his offices below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of the said action set forth in the complaint is as follows: To secure a divorce for the plaintiff from the defendant upon the grounds of non-support and habitual drunkenness, and for other proper relief in the premises. F. B. WIESTLING, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 421 and 422 Boston Block, Seattle, King County, Wash. Date of first publication, January 15, —Feb. 26, 1909. NOTICE. SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE State of Washington, County of Knig- shire, State of Washington By virtue of an execution issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 15th day of January, 1909, the defendant, William Adolph Candau, Plaintiff, versus Elizabeth Franklin, Defendant, No. 64908, and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that I will prosecute the defendant for assault, the bolder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheriff's sales, to-wit, at 10 o'clock A. M, on the 27th day of February, A. D., 1909, before the court in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendant Elizabeth Franklin in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to- On that certain lease and leasehold interest executed and delivered on May 27, 1907, by Adam Orth to Adolph Candau on the upstairs part of that building, and on the downstairs part of it. In block thirty-three (33) of D. S. Maynard's Plat of the Town (now city) of Seattle, situated at the Southeast Corner of Fifth Avenue South and Main Street, for the term of two years from June 19, 1907, and of record in May 29, 1907, and of record in the Auditor's Office of King County, Washington, in Vol. 21, Leases at page 198 et seq., levied on as the property of said defendant Elizabeth Franklin, to satisfy a judge-damaged bank, to Nine-five/170 $96.67. Dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 16th day of January, 1909. ROBT, T. HODGE, Sherrif. By JOHN STRINGER, Deputy. January 22-February 19, 1909. IN THE JUSTICE'S COURT BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. J. Colle, Plaintiff, vs. N. Stein, Def- endant. No. — —. Summons by Publication. J. N. Stein: In the name of the State of Washington you are hereby notified that J. Colle has filed a complaint against you in said court which will come on to be heard at my office, in Room No. 210 New York Block, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 22nd day of March, 1909, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear, among the other defendants the same will be taken as confessed and the prayer of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of sald complaint is as follows: To recover a judgment against you for the sum of ninety per annum from the 25th day of August, 1908, upon a certain promissory note given by you to plaintiff on the 25th day of August, 1908, and on October 25th, 1908, overseeing the possession of the notice. In this action a writ of garnishment was issued to S. Melstein. Complaint filed Feb. 16th, 1908. Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. February 19—March 12, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Lloyd E. Dunning, Plaintiff, vs. Maude L. Dunning, Defendant. No. 65,071. Suspected by Dunning. The State of Washington to the said Maude L. Dunning, Defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 22nd day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of your action is to obtain decree of divorce between the plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds of abandonment of the plaintiff by said defendant for more than one year and cruel treatment of plaintiff by defendant and personal indignities rendering his life burdensome. J. HINRY DENNING, Plaintiff's Attorney. Office and Post Office Address: 45-6 Starr-Boyd Bldg., Seattle, Wash. January 22-March 5, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Lawin J. Milling, Plaintiff, vs. Lucy Milling, Defendant. No. 65,099. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Lucy Milling, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first office within sixty days after the 22nd day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the court at the appointment date, and in case of your failure so you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of sald court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of matriarch between the parties hereto on the ground of abandonment and desertion for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 503 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 22-March 5, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, an Summons, a State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claims or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff has filed a one thousand certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 16th day of September, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year in the following amount and upon the real property situated in said King County described as follows, tow- lot. Lot forty-four (44), Block Two (2), Kirkland Park, King County, Washington, being certificate No. B54314, for the year 1902. One and 4/100 ($1.04) Dollars. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff, and above described property to wit: Lot Forty-four (44), Block Two (2), for the year 1003, Thirty-one cents; for the year 1004, Twenty cents; for the year 1005, Thirty-two cents; for the year 1006, Forty-four cents; for the year 1007, Forty-six cents; which several sums bear interest at the rate of per cent, per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredeemed upon and against said property. You and each of you are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the 1st day of publication of this notice, the clusive of publication within within 60 days after January 22, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff in an office below the court with amount to the value with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each parcel of said property against the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this case and AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. Ft. Lauderdale, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Blidge, Seattle, Wash. 111-1000 January 22-February 19, 1909. NOTICE OF STOCKHOLDERS' MEETING Seattle, Wash., Jan. 21, 1908. Notice is hereby given that the regi- nal meeting of the officers of the Alaska Central Railway Company will be held at the principal office of said Company at Room 502 of the Burke Building, in Second Avenue, Seattle, King County, Washington, on Tuesday, the 2nd day of March. A. D. 1908, at two o'clock in the afternoon's day. JAMES A. HAIGHT, Secretary of the Alaska Central Railway Company. Jan. 22-Feb. 19, 1909. PROBATE NOTICE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of James H. Cameron, Deceased. No. 7000. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Homer E. Turner, the administrator of the estate James Cameron, deceased has rendered to, and filed in court his final account as such administrator, and that Thursday, the 25th day of February, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock, a.m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, in writing and appended to Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the HON. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge, said Superior Court, and the Seal of Said Court hereto affixed this 21st day of January, 1909. 21st day of January D. K. SICKLES. Clerk. (Seal) By J. A. SIGURDSSON. Deputy Clerk. Jan. 22-Feb. 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Permelia F. Robinson, Plaintiff, vs. David M. Robinson, Defendant. No. — Summons. The State of Washington to David M. Robinson, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 19th day of February, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above attempted court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy mason of the underlined attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do. FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 1909. judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce absolute, by plaintiff from defendant on the ground of extreme cruelty. JAMES McNENY, Plaintiff's Attorney. Office and P. O. Address: 514 Marion Bldg., Seattle, Washington February 19—April 2, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County,—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of James H. Cameron, Deceased. No. 700. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Homer E. Turner, administrator of the estate of James H. Cameron, deceased, having filed in this Court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition be made by the court of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of the said estate. We therefore is ordered by the court that persons interested in the estate of James H. Cameron, deceased be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room in the Probate Department, or at the court room in the residence of the 38th day of February, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m., of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of the said estate among the persons entitled by said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 24th day of February, 1909, in the Seattle Republican, with espousal print and a copy of said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 21st day of January. 1909. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. Jan. 22-Feb. 19, 1899. PROBATE NOTICE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, Count of King—ss. In the Matter of the Estate of Mary N. Mitchell, Deceased. No. 7527. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that James S. Mitchell, the administrator of the estate of Mary N., was deceased, has rendered to and filed in said Court his Final Account as such administrator, and that Thursday, the 25th day of Feb- ruary, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock a.m., at the Court Room of the Probate Bureau, and in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions may be told to account, and receive the same. Witness, the Hon. Geo. E. Morris, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto affixed this 22nd day of January, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. William B. Hays, Plaintiff, vs. Rhoda A. Hays, Defendant, No. 65,567. Summer of State of Washington to the said Rhoda A. Hays, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within hours after the 18th day of February, A.D. 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your ans- wer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, of the date of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is to a absolute decree of divorce from the defendant on the grounds of desert. E. H. CARRICO, Plaintiff's Attorney. Post Office Address: Room 100 Peoples Savings Bank Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. February 19—April 2, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Ira A. Fleming, Plaintiff, vs. Amella A. Fleming, Defendant. No. — Sum mons the State of Washington, to the said Amella A. Fleming, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 19th day of February 1899, and to the day of the 19th day of February 1899, and the above, entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against the complaint, according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce on and in behalf of the defendant, and to obtain the matrimony heretofore existing between plaintiff and defendant on the grounds of desertion on the part of the defendant, and to obtain custody of the child of the defendant. arend and HOLZHEIMER, HERALD & HOLZHEIMER, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office Address: 428 Lumber Exchange Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Feb. 19—April 2. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Nelson Miller, Plaintiff, vs. Grace Miller, DefendantNo. ..... Summons. The State of Washington to the sald Grace Miller, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear with you, serve the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer to the assigned attorney for plaintiff at his address below given. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered against you and decree of divorce made against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court, for the purpose of securing a divorce. J. W. BROWN. Attorney for 314 Northern Bank Blvd., Seattle. First publication January 8th, 1909. Jan. 8—Feb. 19, 1909. NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King- 县, By virtue of an execution issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 4th day of February, 1909, by the clerk thereof, in the case of J. W. Brown, Plaintiff, vs. Ole Siverson, Defendant, No. 61, 615, and to me, as shefir, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given, that I will pro- ceed to the court to auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for shefir's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 3rd day of April, A. D. 1909, before the Court House door of said King County in the State of Washington, all of the title and interest of the said defendant reserved, and to the following described property situated in King County State of Washington, to-wit: The Southeast quarter (SE$4/4) of the Southeast quarter (SE$4/4) of Section thirty-three (33), less East Fifty (50) feet and less West Fifty (50) feet, in Section Fifty (SE$4/4) of the Northeast quarter (NE$4/4) of the Southeast quarter (SE$4/4) of Section thirty-three (33), less East Fifty (50) feet, all in Township twenty-five (25) North of Range seven (7) East, of W. L., evaded on as the property of W. L., evaded on as the property of W. L., a judgment amounting to sixty-five ($65.00) Dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. E. H. Armstrong, Defendant.—No. 64870. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to E. H. Armstrong, Defendant: Attorneys. You hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of service of this notice upon you by publication, exclusive of the first day of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1898, in accordance with the law and cause and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case you fail so to do, judgment will be taken against you in accordance with the law and cause. Tow on file in this cause and court. The object of this action is to recover from you the sum of $513.86, to together with interest from October 26th, 1908, at the rate of 10 per cent, and to foreclose against all your right, title and interest in the property now in possession of the Northern Bank & Trust Co., of Seattle, Washington, together with the plaintiff's costs and disbursements expended. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Bldg. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg. Seattle, Wash. Jan. 8—Feb. 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Maggie Utterback, Plaintiff, vs. Charles W. Utterback, Defendant. No. Summons for Publication. ... The State of Washington, for the said Charles W. Utterback, Defendant. Charles W. Utterback, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication on sixty days summons, to test. Within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. In lieu of the have entitled action is a decree of absolute divorce from the above named defendant upon the ground of his failure to suitably provide for the plaintiff herein. PETERS & CARR. Plaintiff's Attorneys. P. O. Address: 1263 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Fred Shields, Plaintiff, vs. Elizabeth Shields, Defendant—No. 64911. Sum- The State of Washington, King County, to Elizabeth Shields, Defendant: You are hereby notified to appear within sixty days after the date of the first court action, within sixty days after the eighth day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer paper, under the notice for the plaintiff at the office address below stated; and in case of your failure so do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clark of the above Court. The above summons is to procure a dissolution of the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and the defendant. EDWARDS, MEAKIN & CUSHING, Attorneys for Hainff, Office and P. Address: 403 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. The above summons to be published for six consecutive weeks, once each week, in the Seattle Republican, beginning January 8th, 1909. A WWW.FRATER. Judge. Dated this 7th day of January, 1909. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Mabelle Pinnell, Plaintiff, vs. Septimus Pinnell, Defendant. No. —. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the above plaintiff, Mabelle Pinnell, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the court and hold the said court to answer a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed in the court of said action is to obtain a decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between plaintiff and defendant on the grounds of desertion and failure to provide. H. E. SNOOK. Attorney for Plaintiff. Address: 540 Burke Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Amelia Arnold, Plaintiff, vs. Hans Arnold, Defendant. No. 64893. Sum- The State of Washington to the said Hans.Arrold Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 8th day of January, 1009, and defend the above entitled action against the entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you. The plaintiff, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the grounds of abandonment and non-support and failure to make suitable provision for his family. C. E. PIPER. Plaintiff's Attorney. Post Office Address: Room 36-7 Union Blk., Seattle, King County, Wash. January 8—February 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King.—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Martha J. Shuttlecock. Deceased. No. $719. Order to Shuttlecock Why Distribution Should Not be Made. Merrilr Whittier, administrator of the estate of Martha J. Whittier, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and having set forth that his petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate. It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Martha J. Whittier, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, upon the occasion of the Petition department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 25th day of March, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock, A. M., of said day then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 25th day of March, 1909, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and bound in said county, and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 18th day of February, 1909. GEO. E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King. I, D. K. Sickles, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court on the 18th day of February, 1909, in the matter of the estate of Martha J. Whittler, deceased. Witness my hand and seal of said court this 18th day of February, 1909. D. K. SICKLES, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe, Plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and those true claimant name is unknown, and all persons 2—REPUBLICAN LEGALS hub unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 62,305. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above named claimants of the property. You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate named the Delinquent Tax of King Washington, dated April 15, 1908, and numbered B49,254 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904 in the amount of Ninety-three (93) cents and upon the real property situated in King County, Washington, described as follows, to the Addition to Kirkland, King County, Washington. Addition to Kirkland, King County, Washington. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit. For the year 1905, the taxes for the year 1906, Fifty-two (52) cents and for the year 1907, Fifty (50) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent, per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and redeemed taxes upon and against You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of first date, of the notice, with regard to sixty days after February 19th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due together with the interest judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said real property, defaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a corporation. Plaintiff. F. R. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, Feb. 19, 1909. Date of last publication, April 2, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Agricultural Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unk- nown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herinafter described real property. Defend- ance No. 6367, No. 6368. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- arts or holders of an interest or estate in or to the herinafter described real property are hereby notified that the herinafter described real property one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, Washington, dated April 15, 1908, and numbered B49,253 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904 in the amount of Ninety-three (93) cents and upon the Ninety-fourth (94) cents of the year 1904 Washington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot Three (3), Block Two (2), White Bros.' Addition to Kirkland, King County, Washington. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff, the plaintiff, Forty-one, Po-wit; for the year 1905, Forty-one (41) cents; for the year 1906, fifty-two (52) cents, and for the year 1907, Fifty (50) cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent. per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unsecured taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of publication, and are hereby the exclusive of the day of said first date of publication, to-wit; within sixty days after February 19, 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint or said notice on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment may be made against the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporat- ion of Bristol F. J. CARVAR, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Bristol Date of first publication, Feb. 19, 1909. Date of last publication, April 2, 1909. NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF THE FLANAGAN & MATHING CO. The annual meeting of Stockholders of the Flanagan Mining Company will be held at the office of the Company, 305 Lowman Building, City of Seattle, King County, Washington, 97214. At the hour of ten o'clock A. M. for the purpose of electing a board of nine trustees to serve for the ensuing year and the transaction of such other business as may come before the meeting. J. M. POUISON, J. Sec. and Treas. Dated at Seattle, Feb. 1, 1909. Feb. 5—Feb. 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Washington, M. S. 98001 and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. ____. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of January, 1907, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the certain delinquent tax certificate described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B47,654, for the year 1904, in the amount of 87 cents, on lot 21, block 10, White & Manings' Addition to West Seattle; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years are to-wit, in the amount of above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of 33 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 82 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of $1.07; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of publication of the day of the said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with costs of each parcel, fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiffs complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg. Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington by Kline County State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. M. S. Norton, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. —— Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them, you. You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a real property, and the holder of a by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of January, 1907, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the delinquent taxes of the said King County, described as follows: Certificate No. B47,655 for the year 1904, in the amount of 87 cents on lot 22, block 10, White & Manings' Addition to West Seattle; that the taxes for the season have been paid by the plaintiff in have been paid by the plaintiff in above described real property-to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of 33 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 82 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of $1.07; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sale and undeemed taxes and are all the unpaid and undeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, excluding the vacation, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with the sum of the debt fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro bity by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Elias Morrison, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, the tenants. No. ____. Notice and Summons. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the sale of such property to-wit: within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with the sums of the damages fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon taxes, interest and costs, ordering the sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE INDEPENDENCE ERIKON State of Washington for King County, W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Onwers, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the heresafter described real property, Dependants. No. — Notice and Summe- State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in the delinquent tax certificate, property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, and read the "11th of January, 1907, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, January 1907, and numbered as follows, Certificate No. B47,268, for the year 1904, in the amount of $1.47, on lor 40, block 10, Ballard Park Addition to Seat- attle; that the taxes for the following print and the subsequent years have been by the plaintiff upon said above described real property-to-wit. For the year 1905, the sum of 85 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.78; for the year 1907, the sum of $1.88; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and taxes upon and against had real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, excluding the date of each publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with the amount of each payment, fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffney, Plaintiff, vs. White River Land Co., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants. No. — NW-1018. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the property situated in said King County, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, for the Certificate No. B54,811 for the year 1908, in the amount of $1.11, on the west $1/2 of lot 8, block "E." Kent-Meeker's Supplemental Plat: that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the property said above described real property, to wit: For the year 1904, the sum of 54 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 44 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.01; for the year 1907, the sum of 73 cents; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against all real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, excluding of each parcel individually, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; in the defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount the court ordered and costs, case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER. Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King-County, Frances Zavolovsek, Plaintiff, vs. John Zavolovsek, Defendant—No. ... Summons for Publication The State of Washington to the said John Zavolovsek, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first day of the trial, and to answer the witness witt. Within sixty days after the 5th day of February, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the defendant upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed in the court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from the defendant herein on the ground of incurable chronic mania existing for a period of more than ten years. Attorney for Plaintiff, P. O. College: 745 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. February 5—March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King.—In Probate. In the matter of the Estate of Mary N. Mitchell, deceased—No. 7527. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. James S. Mitchell, administrator of the estate of Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a district where he is chosen to be the distribution of the residue there among the persons entitled by law there , and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue or to be ordered by law. It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Mary N. Mitchell, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Wash- ington, at the court room of the Probate department of the City of Seattle, on the 11th day of March, 1909 at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a.m. of said day, then and then to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distrib- ution should not be made of the residue caught among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, accord- ing to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for your successive weeks before the said 11th day of March, 1909. in Seattle publication, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 5th day of February, 1909. E. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King, I, D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true copy of the original order to show cause, copy of the order on the 5th day of February, 1909, in the matter of the estate of Mary N. Mitchell, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 5th day of February, 1909. B. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. February 5—March 5, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the matter of the estate of Anna Golde, Deceased.-No. 9577. Notice to Creditors. Pursuant to an order of the above entitled court entered in the above entitled cause notice is given by the undersigned administrator Anna Golde, annexed of the estate of Anna Golde, deceased, to the creditors and all persons having claims against the said deceased or her estate to present them with the necessary vouchers within one year from the first publication of this notice, to withhold one year from February 5, 1909, to the will administrator with the will annexed, at his place of business. Room 911 Lowman Building, in the city of Seattle, county of King, Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of the business of said estate. Dated at Seattle, Washington, this 5th day of February, 1909. HANS H. GOLDE, Administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Anna Golde, deceased. GRAVES & MURPHY, Attorneys for Administrator. Date of first publication, February 5, 1909. Date of last publication. March 5, 1909. CREDITOES. Notice is hereby given that I have been appointed administrator of the Estate of Harry E. Hopkins, deceased and all persons having claims against estate are hereby required to present them to me at 114 N. Harvard Ave., Seattle, Wn., within one year from the date of this notice or the same will be forever barred. Dated, Feb. 19, 1909. CAROLYN F. HOPKINS. Administratrix of the Estate of Harry E. Hopkins, deceased, 114 N. Harvard Ave., Seattle, Wn. Feb. 19—March 19, 1909. PURCELL'S SAFE COMPANY Halls Safe and Lock Co.'s Safes and Vaults. Phones Main 067; Ind. 3197 312 Occidental Ave., Seattle, Wash 80 J. HAMILTON LEWIS IN JAPAN. J. HAMILTON LEWIS IN JAPAN. Oh, Commodore Perry, he opened their ports, A fact that no body denies- But it's J. Ham Lewis, the Brummel of Courts, That's a-going to open their eyes. West Side Ballads He passed within the ancient temple In fashion courtly and beguiling; He left the throng at worship dazzled And all the Buddha stones smiling. —Yamalo Tahiras The cable wednesday night bore the momentous news that Colonel J. Hamilton Lewis was in Tokio. He is there and the Japanese have beheld him. Henceforth let the nations rest at ease The magic of his presence will cause discord to flee. Fondly the fancy dwells on the scene which must have been presented when Colonel Lewis, in all his pink-whiskered effulgence, entered the land. What multitudinous bows to right and left, with smiles whose radiance caused the snows on Fuji-Yama's top to thaw most visibly, with a glad welcoming light in his eye, and withal, bearinr himself in such a fashion that the assembled samurai felt like novices, must the distinguished visitor have made his advent. We can see in the mind's eye the little Japanese women looking forth from their houses and saying: "Can it be that spring has come so soon again?" We We can hear the cherry trees perplexedly inquiring of each other: "Is not the time for blossoming once more upon us?" And most significant of all, in the temples and at the wayside shrines, we fancy we witness the bronze Buddha relaxing the contemplative seriousness of centuries and smiling broadly, while remarking: "Well, he is simply great." There can be no question that before Colonel Lewis has been long in the land the samuari will be imploring him to organize classes and teach them. They will understand how crude there forms and courtesies are when compared with his marvelous art. Then upon Colonel Lewis will be laid the sad necessity of telling them that it cannot be imparted. A Japanese girl learns the "tea service" in several years. A Japanese man could not learn the J. Hamilton Lewis way in a life time. And when the imperious duty of ornamenting the landscape of his native country recalls Colonel Lewis from his Oriental triumphs the memory of him is sure to be kept green. For generations the Japanese mothers will no doubt hold him up as an example in the art of courteous ceremonial. The student of Japanese literature a thousand years from now will surely come on innumerable poems dedicated to the "Serene and Honorable Lord of the Universe and Companion of the Sun," What fragments of his art the nobility have been able to gather during his stay there will of course be preserved and zealously handed down. The dispatch does not say whether Colonel Lewis is officially authorized to settle all difficulties with Japan. But even if he is not, he will be in no wise hampered. Official authorizations in his case are superfluous. His marvelous manners are what do the work and those he has always with him. Chicago Inter Ocean. CURRENT COMMENT. JUVENILE MOONSHINERS under the age of ten, are not only making things lively for the officers of York, a settlement in the "dark corner" of South Carolina, but are demonstrating the fact that, young America will imitate the actions of old America be they either worthy or criminal. BALD HEADS in New York are accusing the women of having so much curiosity to see what the men might see that they attend sensational plays there by making a full house which promotes the continuation of the same. The club women, the sufferagists and the anti-sufferigists, are up in arms and reply with a whole sale criticism of the bald heads who nightly flock to these sensational and suggestive plays, and as soon as an act is over, pile out again. Everyone knows that these bald heads do rush to these plays and every one knows that they do pile out as soon as the act is over. But whe is to blame that such plays are staged? Why, goodness only knows.. "WEDDED IN SHOW window, now divorced in court" runs a headline from a Shelbyville, Indiana, paper. There should be no surprise attending this statement for it is a foregone conclusion that a couple who would have their nuptials solemnized in a show window for the cheap notoriety or meager moneyed consideration there might be in it, could have but a slight conception of what the marriage vows imply. A JAPANESE farmer who has a rench on the Ridge tract near Sacramento, has borne off the honors for potato raising. He shipped the largest load of potatoes ever grown on one ranch. The farmer is one George Shima and in this shipment were 6,000 sacks valued at $13,000 and all consigned to one company. That's making spuds sprout some, alright. AMERICAN schools form one of the gregtest of her industries, and for conducting this business $442,000,000 is expended yearly. The teachers consume $240,000,000 and $80,000,000 each year is used to provide for buildings. Over one-fifth of the population of the United States are enrolled as pupils in the schools. The number of teachers employed in the common schools in the school year ended June, 1907, was 475,000. Of these 370,000 were women. The average school year is now much longer than in former times, now being 150 days. when we consider the volume of books, of stationery., of school supplies for all this army of 19,000,000 school children we are impressed with the enormous economical and commercial importance of the school system. HIGH PRICES for the necessities of life in the United States is felt by every one. Skilled housewives yearly seek to hue closer to the line in the THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN way of keeping down expenses, but even that does not make the pot boil, and the outlook is gloomy among the poorer classes. Corn, oats, barley, and wheat, have steadily risen in price since 1897 consequently labor by farm animals is much higher than ever before. The cost of building material has also increased, so consequently for the laboring man who wishes to get a suburban or rural home, so as to stop extortionate city rents there arises another difficulty. Coal, lard and pork, have also risen in price until there is little to compare with their price save the necessity for the same. Butter, eggs, sugar, canned fruits, canned vegetables and condensed milk, articles most needed for daily table use have shown quite a percentage of increase. Many causes have been suggested for this great increase in the cost of living. One argument is that the price of foodstuffs has risen of late because the managnet and the productiveness of the farms have not kept pace with the tide which has swept into the big cities from the rural districts. Whatever the cause it is easy to see an impending disastrous result. As the price for living increases the influence of the home inviorment decreases. Father must go earlier and stay later, Brother is started on his business career earlier, sister shortens her school work to help contribute, and in many instances even mother has to leave her younger children to the guidance of an older child so that she may also add to the amount necessary to make ends meet and save a nest egg for the rainy day which sooner or later comes into all of our lives. Some persons who have an "ax to grind" are so anxious to get the edge on quickly that they forget to cover up the handle and their would be victim smiles up his sleeve while he is being patted on the back and assured in confidential tones that there lives in this darn old world one man who will stand by him till the end and then some. Two policemen in New York on going to arrest one Harry Emory on a charge of passing bogus checks found him in bed. They waited outside for half an hour and then entered to see why he dressed so slowly. They found him in the midst of an elaborate toilet and acceded to his request that he be permitted to finish it. After which he was locked up in the police station. The police of the West at least in Seattle are not built that way. They seen to have a decided lack of regard so far as the raiment goes and value their own time so highly that regardless of the appearance or occupation when their dignity arrives the person sought either walks or suffers the consequences. This anecdote concerning one Wilhelm Kaiser of Germany, bears inherent evidence of its truth. When the much-discussed monarch was a small boy he was discovered by one of his tutors drawing a map of Africa. When he had finished he wrote the word "Germany" across the paper. "What are you doing?" asked I HAVE A BEER OF QUALITY IT'S Rainier BEER SEATTLE BREWING & MALTING CO. SEATTLE, WASH., U.S.A. the teacher. "That is not German territory." "That is all right," retorted Wilhelm. "When I am Kaiser it will be."—Chicago Tribune. At the Seattle Theatre this week, Messers. Russell & Drew, with their new stock company, under the direction of Mr. R. E. French, are offering the biggest whirlwind melodrama that Seattle has ever seen. It has Lincoln J. Carter, Charles A. Taylor and other famous productions overshadowed so greatly that they are almost eclipsed. The play was a surprise to the most expectant of the audience last Sunday, and the company was even more a surprise, for never before has such a large number of clever actors and actresses been seen together in a melodrama in Seattle. The play is aptly described as a collosal scenic production; for it is all that, and "then some." If you have not seen "A Race Across the Conticent?" Don't miss it. It's the big "show" of the week in Seattle. As a scenic production, it reflects credit upon the Seattle scenic artist, and the lavish display that Messrs. Russell & Drew have given the setting. The company is practically sure to make friends and become one of the most popular stock companies ever seen here, Miss Thornton is an intelligent and artistic actress. Mr. Noel Travers, as the hero this week, became an instantaneous favorite; but the two leading people are only more prominent on account of the chsracters they impersonate. The other members of the company share all the honors with them—and the result is, one of the most even and best performances seen at the Seattle Theatre for two years or more. "A Race Across the Continent" runs until Saturday night. Next week, the same company will be seen in "The King and Queen of Gamblers;" entlrely new here, and wholly unlike any other melodrama of the kind. Mr. Travers will have a great part as the "Jack O' Diamonds." The part of "Doloris", a Spanish gambler queen, will afford the actress playing it, much better opportunities than the play this affords the leading lady, the "heavy", or the heroine. Patrons of the Seattle Theatre can for the next several weeks, safely look forward to a series of good plays at the hands of as clever a company as Messrs. Russell & Drew have ever gathered together for a stock season. FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 1909 BUSINESSDIRECT Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE CONNECTION Business Office, Third and Spring People's Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R. J. Reekle, Vice Preset. Jos. P. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. Commercial Savings and Trust General Bank and Exchange. Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash. Stetson & Post Mill Co. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance 529 Colman Blk., Phone Main 695 W. H. FINCK Pioneer Jeweler and Watch Maker. Our Holiday Specials Unequaled. 816 Second Avenue, Seattle, Wash. The Comfort. Newly furnished rooms. Walking distance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. L. ISBAEL WALKER, 1101-1103 Jackson Street. Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Electric Fixtures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. Scandinavian American Bank. Write Today for a copy of "THE BANK ACCOUNT" a new, neat little 8-page paper aa full of good things as an egg is of meat. MAILED FREE. The Scandinavian-American Bank, Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. E. N. BROOKS & CO. For Frills For Men. HIGH CLASS HABERDASHEEY 1331 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. WILLIAM WALKER. Complete stock New Fall Goods, Ladies', Misses' and Children's Wear- ing Apparel, Furs and Fine Coats. 820 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash. OF SEATTLE JACOB FURTH .....President J. S. GOLDSMITH .....Vice-President R. V. ANKENY .....Cashier CORRESPONDENTS IN ALL THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE. DRAFTS ISSUED ON ALASKA AND THE YUKON TERRITORY.