Seattle Republican

THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN SEATTLE. WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, MARCH 26, 1909. A great deal has been said condemnatory to the last legislature of the State of Washington, but after all a great many things were passed by that body which will be of invaluable service to the growth of the State. The editor of The Seattle Lay Citizens Criticise Legislature While Ralph Nichols, of the Thirty-first Senatorial District, was a very active member of the senate and always got in with the majority, yet it is very doubtful if he gave general satisfaction to either his constituents or anyone else. Ralph feels his importance, and if you do not join with him in that feeling he proceeds to cut you out. Some man like Billy Carle or some other strong and popular man will skin Ralph two to one, and for him to be left at home would be a real blessing to the taxpayers. Senator E. M. Williams voted on some measures that were before the late legislature that has made him a great many political enemies, and they are already after his scalp in the Thirty-second Senatorial District Discussing the members that were the most useful in the late legislature is again a matter of private and personal opinion and almost wholly from the standpoint in which one is interested. This paper has already said much along this line and it will from time to time continue to say things as to Doctor Ghent Made Good Thirty-Second. It is said that It is said that his political enemies are organizing against him and are satisfied they will defeat him in the primaries. This, however, is much easier said than done, because Williams, too, is a political scraper and is likewise organizing for the battle. With a dozen or more aspirants in the field he is almost certain of succeeding himself, but on the other hand, if the battle is narrowed down to a two-handed contest, the odds are greatly against Williams. In the Thirty-third Senatorial District it is hard to say whether P. L. Allen will be able to succeed himself or not, but the chances are that he can, providing he is satis- Thirty-Third. factory to Senator Piles, who lives in the district. It cannot be said of Allen that he was a useful member of the legislature or that he has any particular fitness for that kind of work, but it can be said of him that he makes himself a good fellow with the members and succeeds in getting many things through the legislature in which he is personally interested by so doing. He therefore may be able to succeed himself. It looks to the writer that George U. Piper made himself solid with his constituents in the Thirty-fourth Senatorial District and will have Thirty-Fourth. no opposition for re-election. If he has any at all it will be so slight that he will not mind it. It is said that the wholesale liquor dealers will oppose him, but it's a long time before the election and they may see it in a different light by that time, but even if they do, he will be nominated beyond the peradventure of a doubt. State Senator W. G. Potts, who was chairman of the appropriations committee of the senate in the eleventh as he has moved into the Thirty-seventh Senatorial District. He therefore is not looking for the job from that district, but it is said that his mantle is destined to fall on Representative G. W. Jeffries. While Senator George F. Cotterill, of the Thirty-sixth Senatorial District proved himself a very useful member and was truly an able one, yet he is a Democrat in politics and despite his ability he will have the task of a Hercules to succeed himself. It will be remembered that he only beat his opponent two votes when he was elected, and the Republicans of this district are beginning to organize even now to defeat Cotterill, and there is hardly any doubt but that they will down him. Prior to the senatorial contest, however, Cotterill will again try to be mayor of Seattle, and should he be successful he would not be a candidate to succeed himself. --- --- Price One Year, $3.00. Single Copies, 10 Cents. POLITICAL POT PIE. Republican was present for the most part while the legislature was in session and he can say without fear of successful contradiction that, there was less signs of legislative corruption lurking about the eleventh legislature than any other legislature in the history of the state. If any member got any money at all for his vote on any measure the sum was so small that it would not have set even the state house on fire much less the world, as goes the expression. Every time a legislature meets the lay citizens raise a howl that the members thereof are the most worthless lot that ever got together, but such is said without consideration, as those making the statement have no idea of just what previous legislatures really did accomplish in the way of good legislation. Some of the acts passed by the late legislature were vetoed and some of them that were not vetoed, in our opinion, should have been vetoed, but this again is only the opinion of one individual. If the governor had cut the appropriation bill some two million dollars or more it would have been a charitable act for the tax-payers, but he did not see fit to do so and so we must all stand for it. Doctor Ghent Made Good the personnel of the members. In this connection the name of Dr. Ghent occurs to the writer. To begin with he is a prepossessing looking gentleman and makes a good impression. He is also a good talker and never failed to respond when those things in which he was interested were before the body. From the very beginning he identified himself with those members known as the "wets," and he made a consistent fight for a local option law that to his mind would be fair. He made a number of speeches on the subject when it was up for discussion and always covered himself with much glory. His tuberculosis bill asking for an appropriation of $50,000 for the erection of a sanatarium under state auspices was a very meritorious act and should have been passed. The great "white plague" is a most dangerous foe to the human family and civilization the world over is combining to combat its ravages, and the measure proposed by Dr. Ghent was in keeping with the efforts that are being put forth all over the country. The bill, however, met its fate in the senate, and more, it is alleged, on account of personal differences than for any real opposition to the bill. He was interested in other bills equally as meritorious as those mentioned above and on the whole it can be said of Dr. Ghent that he made a most valuable member, the criticisms of Senator George F. Cotterill to the contrary notwithstanding. He will have little, if any, opposition for re-election. Those lay members who did not approve of the course pursued by John A. Whalley, make no bones in saying that he was a dead one in the legislature. He of course was a dead one from their standpoint, but they do not know the facts Whalley Was a Live Wire when they speak in that way. Mr. Whalley was one of the most active members in the legislature and for a new member, with no more gift of oratory than he, few others accomplished as much as he did. He was the direct opposite of Dr. Ghent, and so far as the writer could observe they never agreed on anything unless it was on a motion to adjourn, and not always on that. Say what you will or may about Whalley, his opponents always knew just where to find him. In other words he was either for or against your proposition. He put through some very valuable insurance legislation and was active in the passage of a local option bill. He never approved of a real prohibition measure and yet he occasionally voted in a way that lead one to think that he did. There is no doubt but that he pleased his constituents and that he will be returned to the legislature if he so desires to succeed himself. "I am inclined to think that the most of the members of the legislature from King county should be left at home next year when the time to nominate and elect members for the twelfth legislature comes round," said a very prominent newspaper man one day this week. After listening to the remarks on leaving the members of the eleventh legislature at home when the twelfth legislature is being made up it occurred to the writer that a word might be said on this subject. King county has eight state senators, and the first in order is I. B. Knickerbocker, of the Thirtieth Senatorial District. There may have been more brilliant speakers in the senate than Mr. Knickerbocker, but there was no more conscientious or successful worker in the senate than he, and there is not a shadow of doubt but that if he desires to succeed himself he will do so, and that, too, almost without a dissenting vote. He was one of the very strong men of the senate. Thirty-Second. Thirty-Third. Thirty-Fifth. Thirty-Sixth Historical Society UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1955 PUBLICAN 1909. Volume XV, Number 244 H. R. CAYTON, Publisher If there was one man in the eleventh legislature whose constituents are dead after him that man is Robert F. Booth, of the Thirty-seventh Senatorial District. There is no more show for Booth to succeed Thirty-Seventh. Thirty-Seventh. himself than there is of a snowball flying through hades. He not only did not please those of his constituents that favored legislation for the "wets," but he did not please those of his constituents that favored legislation for the "drys." If a member could act more unbecoming and ungentlemanly in a body of men than did Senator Booth, then he would have to do a whole lot of figuring in order to accomplish it. The next senator from that district will hardly pronounce his name Booth, even if it takes a Democrat to prevent it. CURRENT COMMENT ROOSEVELT SAILS FOR AFRICA America's most renowned son and the United States' most distinguished citizen is now on the high seas en route to Africa, where for the next twelve months he will hunt big game and study the natives of that now very remarkable country, which has been considered the rightful home of the blacks, but who, like the reds of the Americas, are being driven from their native heaths and not wanted in any other country are being swallowed by the sea. Teddy, as his fellow-countrymen are pleased to term him when he is not present, sailed last Tuesday at high noon, and nothing was more indicative of his real greatness than the presence of the multiplied thousands of his fellow-citizens, who lined the docks and wharves of the New York harbor to get a glimpse of him as he was sailing away. Despite the fact that he is only a privtae citizen, yet the crowds are as anxious to pay him homage as when he was president of the United States, all of which go to show that the man is truly great whether in or out of office. THE UNCROWNED KING Notwithstanding the fact that Theodore Roosevelt more than William Howard Taft is responsible for the latter now being president, and notwithstanding the fact that Theodore Roosevelt has been the United States government for the past seven years, and notwithstanding the fact that the citizens of the United States love Theodore Roosevelt more than any other living man, yet but a few days after he retired from the White House he set sail for a foreign land to be absent fully half of Taft's term, thereby completely divorcing himself from the affairs of the government and leaving President Taft to do as suits him best, all of which makes him the most remarkable man in the world. It has been said of Mr. Roosevelt that he is the uncrowned king of the world, and it is not an exaggeration. Though absent from his native land and though divorced from government affairs, yet his works live on and his reforms are growing every day, and the entire civilized world is learning to love and admire him just as much as the citizens of the United States. The counsel of no living man would have a hundredth part of the influence with all nations in the world as that of Theodore Roosevelt. LOST IN THE AIR Lost in the jungles or in the fastnesses of the mountains has been common to the United States since the white man first landed at Plymouth Rock, but to be lost in the air is a new and perhaps novel experience for the ever restless inhabitant of the United States, who seem to be constantly in search of some undiscovered land or country into which he can rush, if not for conquest, for gold, the white man's god. Doubtless to get ahead of all others in making a complete observation of the Sierra Madre mountains prompted Capt. Augusto F. Mueller, with five companions, to go up in the baloon America at Pasadena, Cal., to take a sail over the mountains in search of something new. Unfortunately for the party a heavy snow storm set in a few hours after they had been in the air, and in order to keep out of its fury they were compelled to go up some 13,000 feet. They were sufficiently high to clear the mountain peaks, but did not have fuel enough to take them some ninety miles across the mountains to the plains, and to do that might have been certain death for them, as the plains beyond is a great desert on which nothing lives any length of time. They therefore concluded to light in the mountains, and verily did do so, and after a few hours' intense suffering made their way back to the foot of the mountains to meet the entire country made up in searching parties looking for them. Despite the thrilling experience the men declared they enjoyed the outing. --- IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Julia Putnam Lilly, Deceased. No. 9636. Notice to Creditors. To When H. May Concern, Notice: Notice is hereby given to all the creditors of the above estate under and by virtue of that certain order made and entered on the 11th day of March, 1909, in the above entitled cause to present their said claims with necessary vouchers at the office of the undersigned executor of the said estate at room No. 447 at the House in the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, within one year after the date of this notice, to-wit, within one year after the 19th day of March, 1909. CHAS. H. LILLY, Executor of said Estate. JOHN H. ALLEN, Attorney for Executor. March 19—April 16. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Edith W. Taylor, Deceased. No. 9631. Notice to the Author. To Where It May Concern. Notice: Notice is hereby given to all the creditors of the above estate under and by virtue of that certain order made and entered on the 11th day of March, 1909, in the above entitled cause to present their said claims with necessary vouchers at the office of the undersigned administrator of the City of Seattle at rooms City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, within one year after the date of this notice, to-wit, within one year after the 19th day of March, 1909. J. A. TAYLOR, Administrator of said Estate. JOHN H. ALLEN, Attorney for Administrator. March 19-April 16. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Della Maus, plaintiff, vs. Robert S. Maus, Defendant. No. 66055. Summons and Service of Publication. The State of Washington to the said Robert S. Maus, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date or the date of your appearance of this summons to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 19th day of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the defendant's attorney at his office below state, and in case of your failure to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The which this complaint is brought is to obtain a decree of adjournment from the defendant with the following grounds: Ist. Because without plaintiff's fault the defendant for twelve months last past has neglected and refused and still neglects and refuses to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family. Plaintiff also prays for the custody of her daughter, Irene Maus. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 429-30 Epler Block, 813 2nd Avenue, Seattle, Washington. March 19—April 30. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of Edinburgh. Annie Edith McLean, Plaintiff, vs. Duncan McLean, Defendant. No. 60056. Summons and Service of Publication. The State of Washington to the said You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days (60) after the 19th day of March, 1909 and after the above entitled account in the above entitled plaintiff and answer the complaint plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against the demand for complaint which has been served with the Clerk of Court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant on the following grounds: 1st. Because the defendant since May, 1905, has neglected and refused and still neglects and refuses to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his wife. 2nd. Because the defendant abandoned the plaintiff in September, 1905, sald abandonment being continuous for one year, the plaintiff was unable. Because of personal indignities heaped upon the plaintiff by the defendant to such an extent as to render plaintiff's life burdensome. As to the matters herein described or of having occured plaintiff's fault. 4th. Plaintiff prays for the custody of her children, William Edward McLean and Catherine McLean. SPECKERT. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 429-30 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. March 19-April 30. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Amandina Artificial Plaintiff, vs. Julius Defendant. No. 66057. Sum- You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 19th day of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the complaint of plaintiff, and answer the complaint of your own a copy of your own upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff which has been paid with the Clerk of said Court. The object for which this action is brought is to obey a decree of divorce from the defendant on the following grounds: 1st. Because the defendant abandoned the plaintiff at Chicago, Illinois, in June, 1907, said abandonment being continuous and for one year and more. 2nd. Because the defendant since June, 1907, has neglected and refused and still neglects and refuses to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and be fairly. ard. Because of personal indignities and many acts of cruelty heaped upon the plaintiff by the defendant to such an extent as to render her life burdensome. Said acts having occurred during the past four years. All of the matters herein complained of having occurred without plaintiffs 4th. Plaintiff prays for the custody of her brother Arteel. Elise Arteel and Ellie Arteel. tee and Edge A. J. SPECKERT. Attorney for Plainfield P. O. Address 890 Elder Blk. 813 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington. March 18—April 30. Post Office Address 609-564 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Wash- ington March 19—April 30. Notice of Sheriff's Sale of Real Estate. STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY and District Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an alias writ of execution, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 15th day of March, 1909, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of Northern Bank and Trust Co., a corporation, plaintiff, of the State of Washington, his wife, Defendants, No. 61096, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given, that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock a.m. on the 24th day of March, before the Court House door of said King County in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendants, Charles Udell and Lizzie B. Udell, his wife, in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot ten (10), Block fifteen (15), and Lizzie B. Udell, eight (8), Block eleven (17), State Park Addition to Seattle, Wash., levied on as the property of said defendants, Charles Udell and Lizzie B. Udell, his wife, to satisfy a judgment amounting to two hundred forty-seven 25/100 ($247.25) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 16th day of March. 1909. Dated this 16th day of March. 1909. By BERT C. THOMPSON, Deputy. March 19—April 16. NOTICE TO CREDITORS. No. 9866. Notice is hereby given that I have been appointed administrator of the Estate of Alex Butch, deceased, and all persons having claims against said estate are hereby required to present them to me at 421 Sullivan Bldg., Seattle, Wn., within one year from the date of this notice to me. I will be forever barred. Dated March 19, 1909. EDWARD S. BAKEWELL, Administrator of the Estate of Alex Butch, Deceased, 421 Sullivan Bldg., Seattle, Wn. March 19 - April 16. Notice of Sheriff's Sale of Real Estate. State of Worcester, County of King. —ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an order of sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 2d day of March, 1909, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of the plaintiff, Plaintiff O. B. Gijarde, defender, and Felivered: to me, as Sheriff, directed, and delivered: In the Matter of the Estate of Rose Zacharias, deceased. No. 9447. Notice to Creditors. By order of sold court made herein on 14 November, 1908, notice is hereby given to the creditors of and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate at his place in the transitory estate to at room 8 UUnion Block, 713 First Avenue, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice within one year from the 29th day of January, 1909, or the same will be barred. January 29-February 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Allie E. Ruby, Plaintiff, vs. Carl Ruby, Defendant. The State of Washington to the said Ruby, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 12th day of February, 1909, and defend the above entitled action, in the defence of an end of said court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which will be filed with the clerk of said court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony now and heretofore existing between the parties hereto on the grounds of cruelty and non-support. Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb. 12—March 26, 1909. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. By virtue of an execution issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 4th day of February, 1909, by the clerk thereof, in the case of J. W. Brown, Plaintiff, vs. Ole Siverson, Dedirected and delivered and delivered, within the hours I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 3rd day of April, A. D. 1909, before the Court House door of said King County, to-wit: the washing in half the right, title and birth of the said defendant Ole Siverson in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: The Southeast quarter (SE¹⁴) of the Southeast quarter (SE¹⁴) of Section thirty-three (33), less fifty (33) of Section thirty-half (S¹⁴) of the South half (S¹⁴) of the Northeast quarter (NE¹⁴) of the Southeast quarter (SE¹⁴) of Section thirty-three (33), less East fifty (50) feet, all in Township twenty-five (25) North of Township seven (7) East, of W. M. level, or as the Order of W. M. level, or as the Order of W. M. level, judgment amounting to satisfy, judgment amounting to Sixty-five ($65.00) Dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. By JOHN STRINGER, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. J. A. Stratton, and all persons unknown if any, having or claiming interest in described real property, Defendants. No. ——. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of your owners, claimants, and the interest or estate in and to the herein described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the King County Office for Washington, dated the 5th day of February, 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, as follows: Certificate No. B25,969, for the year 1902, in the amount of $2.56, on lot 22, block 11, Valentine Addition to Seattle; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the King County Office and above described real property to-wit. For the year 1903, in the sum of $1.89; for the year 1904, in the sum of $1.98; for the year 1905, in the sum of $2.07; for the year 1906, in the sum of $3.60; for the year 1906 (Del. Local Assessment), $2.32; for the year 1907, in the sum of $4.20; for the year 1907 (Del. Local Assessment), $4.89; which several sums bear interest from said date of 15 per year, from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and sumoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, excluding of the pay of any additional publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below, of paid pay, for publication with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes incurred for the sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in real property, Defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the real property, hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of January, 1904, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B47,259, for the year 1904, in the amount of $1.47, on lot 41, block 10, Ballard Park Addition to Seattle; that the taxes for the following seprior and subsequent years have been described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of 85 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.75; for the year 1907, the sum of $1.85; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and redeemed axes upon and against the sum. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, excluding of such period as indicated in application, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1909. In the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below of each parcel of said property with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes, interest and costs against each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER. Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of Kling. Lots M. Beggs, Plaintiff, vs. Cornellus F. Beggs, Defendant. No. 65,467. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Cornellus F. Beggs, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication, the allowance court, within sixty days after the 12th day of February, A. D. 1900, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, the allowance court, in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint is as follows: For the purpose of securing a decree divorcing the parties hereto. CHAS. H. ENNIS, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 537 Parke Bldg., Seattle, County of King, Washington. Feb. 12—March 26, 1908. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Anna Ryan, Plaintiff. vs. John H. Ryan, Defendant. No.—Summons and Publication of State of Washington to the said John H. Ryan, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 12th day of February (60) and read the above entitled notice in the above opinion and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do. judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of court; the object of which this action is meant to obtain a decree divorce from the defendant on the following grounds: First. Because the defendant abandoned the plaintiff on the ____ day of _____, 1901, said abandonment having been continuous for one year and more. Second. Because the defendant for ten years last past has neglected and reenforced and with neglects and refuses to make suitable provisions for plaintiff and his family. Third. Because of personal indignities heaped upon the plaintiff by the defendant to such an extent as to render plaintiff's life burdensome. All of the matters herein complained of having occurred without plaintiff's fault. A. J. SPECKERT. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 429-432 Epier Block, 813 Second Avenue, Seattle, Wash. Feb. 12—March 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. John H. Burns, Plaintiff, vs. Barbara A. Burns, Defendant. No. 65,440. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Barbara A. Burns, Defendant—Greeting: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 12th day of February, 1909, and defend the statute contained in the above cited court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the grounds of desolation. W. H. A. RENNER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 925 Hewlett, Rock, Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb. 12—March 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. S. Sorensen, Plaintiff, vs. Ben. G. Goodman, Defendant. Summons for Publication State of Washington to the defendant Ben. Goodman. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the indictment within sixty days after the 12th day of February, 1909, and defend the above action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer paper to the court of attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the court of attorneys for plaintiff as the entitled action is to obtain a decree of the above entitled court compelling the defendant herein to account to the plaintiff for the sales of goods belonging to plaintiff made and after such an accounting aforesaid, for judgment against the defendant for the money due and owing to the plaintiff amounting to the sum of Seven Hundred Seventy-four and 48/100 (8774.48) Dollars. IRA TREFFON AND D. B. TREFFTHEN. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Address: 614-619 Colman Building Seattle, Washington 1909. Feb. 12—March 26, 1909 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Dutee J. Pearce, Junior, Plaintiff, vs. Anna F. Himes, and John Doe Himes, whose true Christian name is to plaintiff Redfield and Jane Doe Redfield, J. W. Redfield and Jane Doe Redfield, whose true Christian name is to plaintiff unknown, his wife, Defendants. No. 65252. Summons. The case of Washington to the sald defendants, Anna F. Himes, and John Doe Himes, whose true Christian name is to plaintiff unknown, her husband; J. W. Redfield and Jane Doe Redfield, whose true Christian name is to plaintiff unknown. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, on the day of the publication of this summon, the 12 day of February, 1999, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of the complaint to the court. The attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the company which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this action is to quiet title to the west 80 feet of Lots One, Two and Three, Bloomingdale-two, Law's Second Addition, Seattle, Washington. ELIAS A. WRIGHT. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 629 Burke Building, Seattle, Washington. February 12—March 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Governor of Washington. Co. and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the FRIDAY, MARCH 26, 1909. hereafter real property. Defendants. No. — — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defenders and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby appointed and upon the plain plan of the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following arrangement and upon the plain plan of the holder in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B51,257, for the year 1904, in the amount of $2.24, on lot 12, block 2, Renton, Town of, (S, and E. of line of Renton Coal Co.); that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by no planant upon said above described real property, For the year 1805, the sum of $1.55; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.44; for the year 1907, the sum of $1.50; several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said sums. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 12, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of our answer to the office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forecaching the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property accounts and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiffs' complaint, now on file in this cause and W. T. GAFFNER. Feb. 12—Mar. 26, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Ward of the town of E. Co. and all person unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property. Defendants. No. —. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: Ward of each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax on the property, of the King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1909, and marked as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described in the above document No B51,256, for the year 1904, in the amount of $2.68, on lot 11, block 2. Town of Renton: (S. and E. of line of Renton Coal Co.); that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property. For the year 1905, the sum of $1.95; for the year 1906, the sum of $2.38; for the year 1907, the sum of $2.38; several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said You and each of you. (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after this date of your publically released notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 12, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and costs against it for the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against it for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged against it, respectively provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiffs' complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Feb. 12—Mar. 26, 1909. State of Washington. County of King. es. Sheriff. Sale Dated this 19th day of February, 1909. ROBERT T. HODGE, Sheriff. By JOHN STRINGER, Deputy. First publication Feb. 19, 1909. Last publication March 19, 1909. Have a Legal? hone Main 305 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Nettie Behrie, Plaintiff, vs. August F. Behrie, Defendant. No. 66131. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said August F. Behrie, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixteen days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case it will be forced by an argument will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the court of the said court. A brief statement of the object of the said action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant, on the ground of non-support, cruel treatment and personal indignities. CARRICO & DURK Attorneys for Plaintiff Post Office Address: 603 People's Savings Bank Bldg, Seattle, King County, Washington. March 26—May 7, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Olivia Slettengren, Deceased No. 8852. The Hearing of Petition for Order Directing Administrator to Execute Deed. Notice is hereby given that C. A. Lehmann has filed a petition herein asking for the specific performance of a real estate contract made by the deceased in her life time for lot 12 and 13 in Mampton,ook County,Kitsap County, Washington, and asking that Hugo Slettengren, administrator of said estate, be authorized and directed to execute a deed to him for said property and upon the presentation of said petition the court fix the time for hearing the same 29th day of April, 1909, and notice is hereby given that said petition will be heard in Department No. 7 of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County, on the said 29th day of April, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon and any person so asking then and there appear and be heard. Dated this 23rd day of March, 1909. D. K. SICKELS. Clerek of the Superior Court, King County, Washington. By PERCY F. THOMAS. Deputy. IN JUSTICE COURT—BEFORE JOHN E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. C. C. Gibson and George M. Wintermute, Plaintiffs, vs. Standard Chair Company, Defendant, No. 6779-80. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King—ss. The State of Washington to the Standard Chair Company: You, and each of you are hereby notified that C. C. Gibson and George M. Wintermute have filed a complaint against you in said Court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 15th day of April, A. D. 1989. In 500 words, and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiffs granted. The object and demand of said complaint is for work and labor done and performance for work and labor done and your request being for commission on sale of goods. Filed March 15th, A. D. 1909. JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washing- W. H. RENNER, Attorney. March 19 - April 2. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Mary Eliza Miller, Plaintiff, vs. Joseph James Miller, Defendant. No. 65,328. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Joseph James Miller, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days from and after the date of the publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 5th day of February, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the under signed attorneys for the case, with their address below designated, and in case of your failure so to, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to obtain a decree of worse law now existing between plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of desertion and abandonment. MORRIS, SOUTHARD & SHIPLEY, Attorneys for Office and postoffice addresses 55 Haller Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. PROBATE NOTICE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King ss. In the Matter of the Estate of Martha J. Whittier, Deceased. No. 8719. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Merriel Whittier, administrator of the estate of Martha J. Whittier, deceased, has re- duced the account as such administrator, and that Thursday, the 25th day of March, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock, A. M., at the court room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the County of King, has been duly appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the Witnesses, Hon. G. E. Morris, Judge, said Superior Court, and the Seal of said court hereto affixed this 18th day of February, 1909. D. K. SICKLES. Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS. Deputy Clerk. ALLEN WEIR, Attorney for Administrator. Feb. 19—March 19. Notice of Sheriff's Sale of Real Estate. STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY of King—ss, Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an execution, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 12th day of March, 1809, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of D. Lashley, Plaintiff versus F. W. Post, D. Dendan, D. Dendan, to me, as Sheriff died and delivered. Notice is hereby given, that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the Being an active attorney and from time to time having legal notices for publication, it is perfectly natural for you to want to get acquainted with those newspapers that do your kind of business. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Is just your size in this respect. It already has some notices for publication, as may be seen herein, but it needs more of them, and to that end your business is earnestly solicited. Your notices are promptly called for; handled with care and accuracy. Affidavits delivered without delay. Charges reasonable from a hard times standpoint; everything done in a jam-up manner. TELEPHONE MAIN 305 When you have a publication, and if it happens to be a Divorce Summons or a Notice to Creditors, give us the facts and we will do the rest. THE SEATTLE REPUBLIC 307 Epler Block. Main 305. Notices Received Up to Friday Noon. highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock a. m. on the 1st day of May, A. D. 1909, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, to the right, on inwardly of the said defendant F. W. Dost, in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lots eighteen (18), nineteen (19), and twenty (20), in Block twelve (12), Madison Park Addition to Seattle, King County, on inwardly of the said defendant the property yof said defendant, F. W. Dost, to satisfy a judgment amounting to three hundred and eighty-one ($381.00) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated the day of March, 1909. ROBERT T. HODGE, Sheriff. By BERT C. THOMPSON, Deputy. March 18—April 16. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Mary Louise Owen, Plaintiff, vs. F. J. Owen, Defendant. No. — —. Summons for F. J. Owen. The State of Washington to the said F. J. Owen, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-will: Answer the complaint No. 1909, February, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, to do so. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony, hereofore existing between plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of abandonment and non-support extending over a period of one year, and asking that the community property be awarded to the plaintiff, the custody and control of minor children. LOUIS NOCKELS, Attorney for Plaintiff P. O. Address, 524 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. First publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. NOTICE OF INCREASE OF CAPITAL STOCK OF THE PACIFIC COAST Dated at Seattle, King County, Wash- ington. The date of the first publication hereof, is the date of publication. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ATTORNEYS being an active attorney and from time to time legal notices for publication, as natural for you to want to get with those newspapers that do your business. ATTLE REPUBLIC your size in this respect. It alr notices for publication, as may be about it needs more of them, and to your business is earnestly solicited. Notices are promptly called for; care and accuracy. Affidavits delay. Charges reasonable from standpoint; everything done in a year. TELEPHONE MAIN 30 Can you have a publication, and if it be a Divorce Summons or a Notice, give us the facts and we will do. SEATTLE REPUBLIC Block. Main notices Received Up to Friday Noon IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. A graduate of the University of G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and the land after described real property, Defendants. No. 62578. Notive and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants and as owners of interest, estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate in the State of Washington, State of Washington, dated the 18th of April, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following years, in the following amounts, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to wit: White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland—Lot 8, Block 2; Certificate Number 48259; for the year 1904; to the amount of $1,000. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland—35 cents for year 1905; 47 cents for 1906; 58 cents for 1907, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the taxes for the taxes upon and against, said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of publication, if any, and exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: Sixty days after the 26th day of February, 1909, in the above entitled course and action; a defamation of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and if any, to the undersigned attorney for plaintiff will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against or sued in the case of plaintiff under a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and First publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, King Washington, King of the Mary E. McPherson and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real body dandants. No — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described property, that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the year in question, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Ogle's Garden Tracts—Lot 2, Block A; Certificate Number B51979; year 1903; amount $0.45. and accounts for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 2, Block A, Ogle's Garden Tracts—$2.74 for year 1904; $2.46 for 1905; $2.17 for 1906; $2.46 for 1907; and annual and current at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unre ```markdown ``` deemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby charged with the payment of taxes upon and appear within sixty days after date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: Within sixty days after February 15, 2014, the court ordered court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with the amount due on each case, in cash so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the len of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due to the sums and amounts due to each case, in cash taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively is provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address, 457 Acade Bldg., Seattle, Washington. First publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. S. E. Co., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest, and to the demonstration described real property fendants. No. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each to the above fendants. For each you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above delinquent taxes of the following are obtained in a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following are obtained in a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, described as follows, to-wit: That the taxes for the following prior Town of Renton, S. and E. of line of Renton County No.—Lot 13. Block 2; Certificate Number B51258; year 1904; amount $1.37. and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 13, Block 2, Town of Renton, S. and E. of line of Renton Coal Co.—78 cents for year 1905; 87 cents for 1905; $1.02 for 1907, which several sums bear in the amount from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons, unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and work with us in our first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: Within sixty days after February 26, 1909, in the above entitled court action, we wish to serve the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with the costs against the case so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, on behalf of the plaintiff. In action a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address, 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Washington, First publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Land Co. and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Nouns. No. . . Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the property mediated plaintiff is the holder of above property tax certificate issued by the designer of King County, State by the Treasurer, dated the 1st day of Washington, dated as follow for June, 1908, and num 1909, follows the delinquent taxes (with the following year, and the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County described as follows, tow- Claremont Addition to Seattle—Lot 3 (less East 33 feet), Block 8; Certificate Number B50166; year 1904; amount $1.57. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described W. T. GAFFNER Plaintiff Office Address, 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Washington. First publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners and all persons, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. Notice and Summary. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above and property may be inward of certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon payment of the tax, the King County described as follows to wit: W. 285 feet of W ½ of N. W ¼ of N. W ¼ of Section 12, Tp. 21 N. W of R. 7 E, M.; Certificate Number B52101; year 1913; W. 14 of N. W ¼ of real property, to-wit; the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit; W. 285 feet of N. W ¼ of N. W ¼ of Section 12, Tp. 21 N. W of R. 7 E, M.; M—98 cents for year 1905; $1.29 for 1906; $1.89 for 1907, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and taxes upon taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the days before publication, to-wit: Within sixty days after February 26, 1999, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complain of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office be together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address, 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Washington. First publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towithin the thirty days after the 5th day of March, 1904, before the above entitled action in the above titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed by the Clerk of said Court. The object of this action is to quiet title to lots nine (9) and ten (10) in block five (5), the Byron Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington. ELIAS A. WRIGHT. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 629 Burke Building, Seattle, Washington. March 5, April 16. Seattle Republican Seattle Republican Published Every Friday, 307 Phone Main, 307 Epler Blk. H. R. Cayton . . .Edn. 305. Oceans Revoy Cavailor and Publisher Cuselier of Oceans Blk. . . .Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. SUBSCRIPTION RATES: One Year ..... $3.00 Six Months ..... 1.50 Three Months ..... 75 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mail Matter. Second Class Mail Matter. Legal Publications a Specialty. CURRENT COMMENT. MONEYLESS MEN, are simply not wanted if their lack of means will necessitate a shabby appearance. No one wants to do business with a shabily attired person as an employer or employee. One writer says: "Rich or poor let the universe of men and women garb themselves in the very best possible." There is much worthy of consideration in the advice. A shabhy man or a shabby woman is despised the whole world over. No one respects them and old adages such as "Worth makes the man" and "Poverty is no crime" have been over shadowed years ago. "Fine feathers make fine birds." There is something of a philosopher after all in the man who makes the sometimes herculean effort to cover up the fact that his fnmily is needy by a neat appearance. That it is generally understood the shabhy man is not respected is daily demonstrated by the men and their families as they walk on the streets. The man is well clothed while the economies are practiced by the wife and children. At a glance this might appear as selfishness, but the man must daily meet the public and a prosperous appearance is what the public demands. This may be a human weakness but such are the conditions. DEATH OF INFANTS in most cases is due to ignorance. Thousands of babies die annually on account of their mothers unintentional carelessness and ignorance. There is a movement on foot in London, which might be profitably adopted in America, to enlighten young mothers on the care, dress, and food of infants. The average mother among the poorer classes rears her child without thought, plan, or method. It is rather a wonder that so many live beyond their early childhood. These schools for mothers have an honorary medical officer, a woman doctor, who attends two afternoons a week to examine babies and their mothers and to give advice on their feeding, clothing, and general management. The babies are weighed every fortnight and a record kept of their condition. Mothers who come regularly join the club and pay two cents a fortnight, and they try hard to follow instructions in the feeding and clothing of the babies. The doctor in charge found irregularity of feeding to be the most common fault and bronchitis the most common ailment. THE AWAKENING of Formosa is as wonderful as the awakening of Asia. Japan got Formosa at the close of its war with China, just about five years before the Philippines came to America. The island was then the throes of rebellion and it was looked upon as about the poorest piece of property in the far east. Its inhabitants were thought to be pirates and savage head hunters, mixed with the lowest grade opium smoking Chinese, and it was turbulent to an extreme. After the island was ceded to the Japanese they had to fight their way from one end of it to the other to conquer it, and they kept a military establishment there for five or six years. The island pays its own expenses and will in time pay for all its improvements. They are putting roads everywhere and have introduced postoffices into all the towns. In 1896 there were only forty-five places where postage stamps could be bought. There are now 600 or 700. About I3,000,000 letters and post card and about 5,000,000 other postal packages go through the mails every year. They have money order offices and postal savings banks with tens of thousands of depositors. About 2,000 miles of telegraph wire and about a half million messages are sent over them every year. The savages were glad to see the Japanese come in and some of the tribes are quite docile. Schools have been established among them and men from certain tribes have visited Japan. Taken altogether the outlook fer Formosa is a bright one. THE OYSTER LAND GRAFT. "A great many graft bills ran the gauntlet of both houses of the late legislature, but the worst of them all, if such a thing be possible, was the Beach oyster land grab bill. Representative Gunderson, now deceased, who hailed from Mason county, successfully opposed the passage of a similar bill, but he was succeeded by Dr. W. M. Beach, who seems to have the interests of the oyster men more at heart than the state's, and that being a fact, he has hammered away ever since he stepped into Gunderson's shoes to filch the state out of her oyster lands. It's true he only got 400 acres this time, but that's an entering wedge and at each succeeding legislature he will endeavor to get more until all will have been taken." The above article taken from the Seattle Republican, indicates that the writer labors under the wrong impression common over the state, if we may judge by the press generally coupling this measure with the "Seattle Ditch," "Wenatchee Bridge," "Spokane $30,000 entertaining graft," and a dozen other grabs into the state sack, in which no section of the state which had a single want was overlooked in the combination." The so-called Callow Act was designed to convey title to some 400 acres of oyster lands in Mason and Thurston counties, which were taken up under territorial laws for the cultivation of oysters. In common with the later Bush Act this law contained the "revisionary clause," providing that the lands might revert to the state when used for any other purpose than the culti- LE SATTLE REPUBLICAN vation of oysters; carrying out the intent of the legislature when the provision for title to these oystermen was made. However, the Callow Act, as interpreted by the best legal authority, seems to go further than this, and make it possible for the state to escheat these lands, whether or not they continue to be used in good faith for oyster cultivation, and simply pay back to the owner the price originally paid to the state and the "value of the improvements," which at any time would be represented merely by the oysters thereon, and no consideration made of the amount of work, if any, in the preparation and improvement of these grounds. At the time those who had earned the right to do so, were permitted to perfect these rights, the lands were appraised by a board of commissers, and the price ranged as high as $23 an acre. While perhaps not half of the 400 acres are of material value, a good part of the remainder is after the lapse of twenty years, of considerable value. This is doubtless true of many thousands of acres of tide lands of other classes heretofore sold by the state at merely nominal prices, usually about $1.26 an acre. There is no demand that the state withhold a full and absolute title to these other lands, and as the oystermen who hold the Callow Act lands are using them in good faith, and as none of this class of lands has, or ever will have any value for other uses, the passage of the long-deferred law confirming title seems an act of simple justice. Referring to the position of the late Mr. Gunderson the Republican seems to have confused this act with the county's contest against the attempted "oyster reserve" grabs of its fellows townsman, ex-Senator and Representative Palmer. Mr. Gunderson and all other representatives from Mason County have asked for the passage of the bill confirming titles to the lands originally conveyed by the state, but have consistently opposed any effort to have the state part with the title of any oyster reserve lands, either to its own citizens or to outsiders.—Mason County Journal. Acting Gov. Hay vetoed the Beach bill and this ends the case for at least two years. We hear much about the "Seattle grab," chiefly from persons who couldn't, if it would save their souls, tell you the real facts in the case. The truth is that there is a great deal of merit in Seattle's claim for an appropriation for the Lake Washington canal enterprise, and we would not have the slightest bit of difficulty in recognizing it—if it were Tacoma's enterprise instead of Seattle's. By a thousand times, it is a more meritorious proposition than the purchasing by the state of the Wenatchee bridge, or the appropriation to Spokane of $30,000 for the entertainment of an irrigation congress. O, for a little candor and consistency in these days of false pretense and envy!—Puyallup Tribune. County Assessor Parish is out in a communication claiming that Senator Palmer of this FRIDAY. MARCH 26. 1909 PETTRICH SHOULD BE PARDONED There is no doubt but that Pettrich, now awaiting the black cap of the law, life was convicted more on prejudice and on the facts, and even with those facts plow well in the case, he was only convicted after legal battle. Unable to speak a word of could explain himself, which might have conviction, he now lies in his cell like a cing his hour of slaughter. God forbid that people would hang a helpless creature like The state's case from beginning to end, pothesis and at best it only proved that he when he was being shot at and, as he death threatened him. If it's part of the fabrication to hang a man under such cir let us hope that humanity will escape of such a Christianity. This man should prieved, but should be pardoned after a short term in the state penitentiary for with a gang of rowdies. at Pettrich, the Montenegrin, of the law to snuff out his prejudice and pressure than those facts playing their parts convicted after a hard-fought talk a word of English that he might have saved him from the cell like a chained lion waited forbid that an enlightened creature like this poor man. Turning to end was one of hy-roved that Pettrich only shot and, as he supposed, instant part of the great Christian under such circumstances, then will escape becoming a part man should not only be redoned after having served a sententiary for being mixed up ag above all others for which the death punishment for comping of another's child and so much, if at all, because the to and verily does extort for the untold agony that the all the time that the child may mind that they are in danger again like poor Willie Ross, turn up, and be it understood the only one of its kind in the saddler or more pathetic case sorted than that of little Willie, who was stolen from his days ago and held until the from his father for his ran-Mr. Whitla had to pay that said to be very rich, but be the family was driven to lest from them for all time to come. The meeting of father and son such a thing was possible, is already been introduced in which is in session, making it a for anyone to kidnap a child, become a law and that other w. The kidnapers have been a woman having most of the of their arrest. There is no doubt but that Pettrich, the Montenegrin, now awaiting the black cap of the law to snuff out his life was convicted more on prejudice and pressure than on the facts, and even with those facts playing their parts well in the case, he was only convicted after a hard-fought legal battle. Unable to speak a word of English that he could explain himself, which might have saved him from conviction, he now lies in his cell like a chained lion waiting his hour of slaughter. God forbid that an enlightened people would hang a helpless creature like this poor man. The state's case from beginning to end was one of hypothesis and at best it only proved that Pettrich only shot when he was being shot at and, as he supposed, instant death threatened him. If it's part of the great Christian fabrication to hang a man under such circumstances, then let us hope that humanity will escape becoming a part of such a Christianity. This man should not only be reprieved, but should be pardoned after having served a short term in the state penitentiary for being mixed up with a gang of rowdies. If there is any one thing above all a human being deserves the death punish it is for the kidnapping of an old holding it for ransom. Not so much, if a criminal one is endeavoring to and vex money from the parent, but for the untold parent is caused, believing all the time that be killed if the kidnapers find that the of being apprehended. And again like p the child may never again turn up, and that the Ross case is not the only one of United States. Perhaps no sadder or more of its kind has ever been reported than the Whitla, only eight years old, who was home in Pennsylvania a few days ago and kidnapers extorted $10,000 from his fat som. Not pathetic because Mr. Whitla amount of money, for he is said to be v cause of the distraction the family was their boy be killed or lost from them for The return of the boy and the meeting of was even more pathetic, if such a thin than the search. A bill has already been the legislature of Ohio, which is in sess crime punishable by death for anyone to and it is hoped that it will become a law states will pass a similar law. The kidnared, the man and the woman have money on them at the time of their ar If there is any one thing above all others for which a human being deserves the death punishment for committing it is for the kidnaping of another's child and holding it for ransom. Not so much, if at all, because the criminal one is endeavoring to and verily does extort money from the parent, but for the untold agony that the parent is caused, believing all the time that the child may be killed if the kidnapers find that they are in danger of being apprehended. And again like poor Willie Ross, the child may never again turn up, and be it understood that the Ross case is not the only one of its kind in the United States. Perhaps no sadder or more pathetic case of its kind has ever been reported than that of little Willie Whitla, only eight years old, who was stolen from his home in Pennsylvania a few days ago and held until the kidnapers extorted $10,000 from his father for his ransom. Not pathetic because Mr. Whitla had to pay that amount of money, for he is said to be very rich, but because of the distraction the family was driven to lest their boy be killed or lost from them for all time to come. The return of the boy and the meeting of father and son was even more pathetic, if such a thing was possible, than the search. A bill has already been introduced in the legislature of Ohio, which is in session, making it a crime punishable by death for anyone to kidnap a child, and it is hoped that it will become a law and that other states will pass a similar law. The kidnapers have been arrested, the man and the woman having most of the money on them at the time of their arrest. STETSON & POST LUMBER CO. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. The Comfort. Newly furnished rooms. Walking distance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. L. ISRAEL, WALKER, 1101-1108 Jackson Street. Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Electric Fixtures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. Scandinavian American Bank. Write Today for a copy of "THE BANK ACCOUNT" a new, neat little 8-page paper as full of good things as an egg is of meat. MAILED FREE. The Scandinavian-American Bank, Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Puget Sound National Bank. OF SEATTLE JACOB FURTH .....President J. S. GOLDSMITH .....Vice-President R. V. ANKENY .....Cashier CORRESPONDENTS IN ALL THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE DRAFTS ISSUED ON ALASKA AND THE YUKON TERRITORY. --- HANGING IS TOO GOOD county is responsible for the defeat of Senate bill 189, which was known as the railway terminal bill. This was drawn to compel the railroads owning rich terminals in Seattle to pay their just proportion of taxes. The assessor says the railroads under the proposed bill would have paid King county $250,000 more in taxes than they now pay and which in all justice they should pay. If the assessor is right Mr. Palmer should be remembered should he again attempt to hold office in this county. - White River Journal. When you want to insure with a reliable firm, call on E. W. Way & Co. Try their Fire, Marine, Burglary, Accident, Plate-Glass and Employer's Liability insurance. They are in the Bailey Building, rooms 619-620. Phone Main 2115. Ind. L. 3356. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE CONNECTION Business Office, Third and Spring People's Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R. J. Reekie, Vice Prest. Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. Commercial Savings and Trust General Bank and Exchange. Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance 259 Colman Blk., Phone Main 695 ) (eo ~~ ag PSA gC DRE in OE eee al al MeN el AD MEA NK AS a Pen ier Oe ee FRIDAY, MARCH 26, 1909. BENCH AND BAR. Right to Restrain ‘Ihe Righ Of Free Speech ore Free. Press. When Necessary To Make Effective The Terms of an Injune- tion Restraining a Boycott. Serre ghee ers ne ee es Leg a yo on the decision in the contempt proceedings before Mr. Justice Wright of the supreme court of the District of Columbia in the case of Buck Stove & Range Co. vs. American Federation of Labor, 36 Wash. L. Rep. 822, we have awaited the decision in the court of appeals on the question of the validity of the injunction, which was rendered on March 11, 1909, affirming the decree of the lower court This in our opinion concludes also the con- tempt proceedings, for, if the injunction was valid, the de- fendants are clearly subject to the penalty of the Jaw for violat- ing it. The exact issues in this case extracted from a mass of evi- dence are not difficult to state. The plaintiff stove company re- fused to grant its metal polish- ersanine hour day. The said metal polishers thereupon called a “strike,’’ but being few in numbers, the strike was: futile to compel the plaintiff to submit to their terms. They then essayed to make use of that more effective weapon, the boycott. Right here, however, the plaint- iff interfered and , requested and was granted an injunction re- straining the local union and the American Federation of Labor from carrying into effect such boycott, alleging that the boy- eott was an illegal conspiracy to injure their business. One of the prohibitions of the injunc- tion which was intended to pre- vent the carrying into effect of the conspiracy or boycott was to the effect that defendants Gom- pers and others should not in any manner publish or declare the plaintiff’s firm to be “‘un- fair.’’ Here is where the de- fendants attacked the validity of the injunction, alleging that such a mandate was void as de- priving them of their constitu- tional right to publish or speak freely on any subject they might choose. The court of appeals has sus- tained the terms of this injunc- tion. This action of the court is quite correct on principle pro- vided that the premise be cor- rect, to-wit, that a boycott is an illegal, conspiracy. Granting that the boycott was illegal it was certainly not improper for the.court to enjoin the attempt to put it into effect if it be shown that the injury to property rights, about to be inflicted, was irreparable and that there was no adequate remedy at law. Following logically, therefore, to our final conclusion, if the boyeott was illegal, and the court had power to restrain it, it necessarily follows that whatever’ prohibition is neces- sary _to make the writ of injunction effective is. within the power of the court tomake, even if the prohibition affects the constitutional right to print or speak freely. . This is not the case of an in- junction prohibiting an individ- ual from writing or speaking on any subject he pleases. There would be no authority for such injunction. This is simply the case of injunction prohibiting an alleged band of conspirators from carrying out the object of their conspiracy, to-wit, the establishment of a boycott. If the only means of making effec- tive the boycott is by writing or speaking, even the exercise of such sacred rights may be re- strained, so far only, however, as is necessary to prevent the boycott itself from becoming effective. The court .of appeals recog- nizes clearly this distinction, — indeed, even more clearly than did Justice Wright himself, who, unfortunately, allowed himself to be swayed by too much per- sonal feeling against the defend- ants. The court of appeals in accordance with the rule, as we have stated it, modified the terms of the injunction by elimi- nating therefrom the restriction upon the defendants from ‘‘men- tioning, writing or referring to the business of the plaint- iffs.”” The modification of the decree of the lower court as indicated was quite proper. ‘No injunc- tion can thus unnecessarily a- bridge the right of a free press or free speech. The extent of the restrictions which were proper to be imposed was limit- ed to those ‘‘‘references’’ by writing or speaking which were efficacious in establishing the boycott, the thing sought to be prevented, LEGAL INFORMATION. The United States district court for the eastsrn district of Pennsylvania, in Re Martorana, 159 Federal Reporter, 1010, de- cided that the wife of one who was petitioning for naturaliza- tion was not competent as a wit- ness in that proceeding, although she had been a resident of the United States all her life, as any American woman that marries 4 foreigner takes the, nationality of her husbsnd, and by marry- ing an alien she ,became an alien, Defendant, master of the “General Slocum,’’ that took fire in East river in 1904, killing a thousand persons; was convicted of manslaughter by violation of the statutes of the United States providing punishment for failure to exercise proper care in pro- viding life preservers, means for prevention of fire, etc., and ap- pealed to the circuit court of ap- peals. In Van Schaik vs. United States, 159 Federal Reporter, 847, that tribunal affirmed the decision. ‘ Equitable relief was denied in Mathews vs. Carman, 107 New York suplement, 694, where it was sought to set aside an order in summary proceedings as being obtained by fraud and to re- strain its use as evidence. The New York supreme court held such relief available in a proper case, but as the facts in this instance showed that the justice’s court in which the judgment was renderd had no jurisdiction, it was subject to THE SEATTLE REPURBLICAZ collateral attact, as being the determination of a court not of record, which could be objected to when offered in evidence. The father of defendants gave plaintiff three promissoy notes. when they were barred by limit- ation he sent a payment without direction as to its application. Plaintiff credited one-half the amount ‘on each of two notes. After the father’s death his sons gave plaintiff a note for the three held by him. Suit was brought on the son’s note. The Minnesota supreme court in Anderson vs. Nystrom, 114 Northwestern Reporter, 74, held that where payment is made on claims not barred, with- out direction as toits applica- tion, the creditor may split it up and by indorsement on the dif- ferent obligations prevent the running of the statute, but that this rule will not apply to claims already barred, The question whether or not the Hepburn law operated to re- peal the Elkins law so as to bar prosecutions commenced after the enactment of the Hepburn law, for acts committed prior thereto and in violation of the Elkins law, has been up for con- sideration in several Federal courts, and it has been held that such prosecutions were not barred, in the United States vs. Standard Oil Company, 148 Fed. eral Reporter, 719; United States vs. Chicago, ete, R. C., 151 Federal Reporter, 84; United States vs, Delaware, Lackawanz and Western R. Co., 152 Federa Reporter, 269; and United State: vs. New York Central and Hud son River R. C., 153 Federal Re poater, 630.+ - Judge Hazel ‘of the United States district court for the Western district of New York, in United States vs. New York Central and Hudson River Rail- road Company, 153 Federal Re- porter, 620, holds that a railroad company wich has entered into an arrangement with other rail- road companies for the continu- ous interstate carriage of oil is bound to comply with the inter- state commerce act as to the publication of rates, even though the line operated by the railroad company itself is wholly within one state, In determining the reason- ableness of railroad rates, ex- penditures for permanent impro- yvements and equipment should not be charged to the current or operating expenses of a single year, according to the recent de- decision, of the United States supreme court in Illinois Central Railroad Company vs. Interstate Commerce Comission, 27 Su- preme Court Reporter, 700, 206 United States 441, 51 L. Ld.—. The court is of the opinion that such expenditures should be re- imbursed by all of the traffic they accommodate during the period of their duration, and not by the revenues of a single year, Ww. H. FINCK Pioneer Jeweler and Watch Maker. Our Holiday Specials Unequsled. 816 Second Avenue, Seattle, Wash. A buxom young woman of some twenty summers came into my office the other day, relates one of our correspondents, to see me in regard to securing for her adivorce. We talked over the ease, and I advised her that we would probably have no difficul- ty in securing the decree on the grounds of non-support, and that it was likely to be a default case. She then ssked me our fee and I told her it would cost her $40. “Well”? she said, ‘‘mother has gotten three divorces and I have gotten two for.$25 each, and that is all I’m going to pay for this one.’’ “You are charged with steal- ing nine of Colonel Henry’s hens last night. Have you any wit- nesses?””? asked the Justice sternly. “‘Nussah!’’ said Brother Jones humbly. ‘‘I’spects I’se sawtuh peculiar dat-uh-way, but it ain’t never been mah custom to take witnesses along when I goes out chicken-stealin’, suh.”’ They were asking the eminent lawyer why he took so large a fee from the trust. “I think it was its largeness that made it easy to take,’’ he smilingly answered. Then the state’s attorneys conferred. “And didn’t you stop to con- sider that the money was taint- ed?’’ they asked him. “‘No,’’ he. ingenuously replied, “J only stopped to count it.’” | A lawyer came into court drunk, when the judge said tc him: ‘Sir, Iam sorry to see you in a situation which is a dis- grace to yourself and family and the profession to which you belong.”’ This, reproof elicted the fol- lowing colloquy: : ‘Did your Honor speak to me?” “I did sir, I said, sir, that in my opinion you disgraced your- self and family, the court and the profession, by your course of conduct.” ‘May i-i-it please your Honor, T have been an attorney in-in-in this court for fifteen years, and permit me to say, your Honor, that this is the first eorreet opin- ion I ever knew you to give.” —Philadelphia Ledger. - Special Inducement. 80 Beautiful views 7x10 of Atlantic City, New Jersey, and the Weekly Topic, A four page up-to-date newspaper for 3 months 25cts. in silver. : (No stamps.) Agents wanted. 1908 Arctic ave,. Atlantic City, N. J. Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. Phone For a Case of o.-8 Rainier Beer Delivered to any Part of the City. Phone Ind. 5668. Main 5668. 5 i Class Distinction Is Un-Am- merican; Neighborliness Should Prevail. By JACOH A, RITS, puthor and Journalist, Twenty years ago there wasn’t’ a single settlement in New York city. Now there are | more than sixty of them, and the settlement idea is spreading | everywhere. The settlement is not a cure- all. Its justa means of giving us something that in our modern cities we otherwise havn’t got at all—neighborliness in the true sense of the word. In the small villages from which our cities grew there was democracy in coe relations. The city has illed that. But it is essential toa full and complete life, and we must revive it. All the grasping and the greed of the world comes from not re- garding our fellows as our neigh- bors. One dosen’t trample his neighbors. He works withthem to a common end. We must come to look on all the world as our neighbors. We must do away with the idea of classes, There isn’t any justification, for class lines in America. They are unjust, un- wholesome, unrighteous and un- American. Why should we have class lines here in this country and one man despise another just because he has been lucky enough to make a little more money? Aman has some right to be proud of what he makes with his own hands and his own brains, but he hasn’t any business putting on airs over what he is merely try- ing to spend, | Weare all workin pe America. I have never seen aman that was worth anything who didn’t work in one way or another. I think that often the man who sits at a desk does harder work than the man who handles ashovel. But, anyway, | they both are workingmen. There are just two classes, those who work and those who don’t, and there isn’t any reason. why all those who work ehouldnt be neighbors to each ‘other in the true sense. The Color Line in Cuba. No sooner is Cuba fairly start- ed out on her career of independ- ent self-government than her pathway is beset with difficult- ies. An insurrection is said to be brewing in the province of Santiago, and predictions are freely made that the government will not survive two years. The race issue is to the fore there as it is in our Southern states, with the added complication that the white inhabitants of the island are in a minority and it is not easy to see how they can devise a plan by which authority can be kept out of the hands of the col- ored race, which is ina large majority have thus far done any- thing to give an excuse for trouble, it is probable that the agitation is due to the clique of annexationists in Cuba and the United States, whose only hope of carrying out their program is to stir upa rebellion that will compel the American govern- ment to interpose for a third, and probably the final, time in Cuban affairs.—Catholie Pro- gress. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, dna 1. Brenner, Plaintiff, vs. George W. Brenner, Defendant.—No, 64990. Summons by’ Publication. ‘The State of Washington to the said George W. Brenner, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from and after the Gate of the frst publication of this sum- mons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 16th day of January, 1909, and de- fend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintift and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorneys for, plaintiff at, thelr Office and post-office address below des- Yenated, and in case of your failure so to do, judament will be rendered against you according to the demand of, plain- ms complaint, which has been fled in the office of the clerk of said court, ‘Phe object of said action Is to séoure fa divorce from “tefendant, the custody of minor children and that the commu- hity property. be awarded to plaintif and for permanent. alimony, attorney's fees hereln and costs of this action. MORRIS, SOUTHARD & SHIPLEY, Attorneys for Plaintife. Office and Postofiice Address: 55 Hal- ler Bullding, Seattle, King County, Washington. roegtt® of Mest publication, January 16th, January 15—February 26, 1909. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. F. J, Carver, Plaintiff, vs. G, W. Rob- erts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true Christian name {8 unknown. and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest'In and’ to tl hereinafter deseribed real property, De- fendants.—No, 62577. Notice and Sum- mons. ‘The State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of ‘an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- seribed real property, are hereby, notl- fled that the above named plaintiff 1s the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate !ssued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 18th day of April, 1908, and num- ered as follows, for the’ delinquent taxes of the following year in the fol- lowing amount and upon the real prop- erty situated in sald King County, de- scribed as follows, to-wit: White Brothers’ Addition to Kirkland —Lot 6, block 2, B49256, year 1904 amount ‘eighty-nine cents, ‘That the taxes for the following prio and subsequent years havo been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 6, block 2, White Brothers’ Addi- tion to Kirkland, thirty-five cents (85¢) for the year 1905; forty-seven cents (qe) for the year '1906, and fifty-eight cents (58c) for the year 1907. ‘Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the un- paid and unredeemed taxes upon and against safd real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date Of first publication of this potles, exclu: sive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the 15th day of January, 1809, In the above en- titled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of sald plaintiff and serve a copy of your an- swer on the undersigned attorney for plaintift at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with Inter- @st and costs. In case you fail so to do Judgment will be rendered herein, fore closing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real prop erty for the sums and amounts due upor and charged against each. for said taxes interest and costs, ordering a sale ot each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against It respectively as provid- ed by law and as prayed in plaintift’s complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Cornora- tion, Plaintiff. F, J. CARVER, ‘Attorney’ for Plaintiff. OMice Address, Northern Bank trast Co.. Bld. ‘January 15—February 26, 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. 'T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. J. H. Clambey, and all persons unknown, if any, having or clalming an interest in and’ to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. ——. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above de- fenfants and each of them: ‘You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an’ interest or estate in and to the hereinafter deserihed real property, are hereby notified that the Above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washinaton, dated the Ist day of June, 1908, and) numbered as. follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property sitnated in sald King County, deseribed as follows, to-wit: Certifeate No. BA0,810, for the vear 1904, in the amount ‘of $1.81, on tract 4;, Clambey's A. HL. Ist Addition to Diintap: that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been pald by, the laintit! upon said above lescrihed real property, to-wit: For the vear 1905, the sum of $1.25: for the year 1908, the sum of $2.29: for the vear 1907, the sum of $2.66. which several sums hear Interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from satd date of payment. and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of vou, (including said persons wmknown, If any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- elusive of the dav of sald first publica- Hon. te-wit, within 60 dave after Febru- ary 12ih, 1969, in the above entitled court and action: and efend this action and anawet) the complaint of sald plaintiff And serve 9 copy of your answer on the tndersiened plaintiff nt his office below stated, or pay the amount due, tozether with interest and costs. Tn case you fail so to do. indgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the Men of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each. for sald taxes, Interest and costs. ordering a sale of ‘each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against It respectively as pro- vided by Jaw, and as prayed in plaintift's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFENER, Plaintiff, Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Se- attle, Wash. Web, 12—Mar. 26, 1909. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. ‘W. 'T, Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. J. H. Clambey, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and’ to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No, ——. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an’ interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the Above tamed plaintiff 1s the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by (he Treasurer of King County, State Of Washington, dated the ist day of Tune, 1908, and numbered hg follows, for the delinquent ‘taxes of the following year, In the following amount, and upon ihe real property situated in'sald King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. 860,809, for the year 1904, in the amount ‘of '$1,81, on tract 45, A. H. Clambey's Ist Addition to Dun- lap; ‘that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintif! upon said above Geseribed real property, to-wit: Por the year 1905, the sum of, $1.25; for the year 1908, the sum of $2.39; for the year 1907, the sum of $2.66, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date Sf payment and are.all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- clusive of the day of said first, publica- tion, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 12, 1909, inthe above entitled court and action; and defend this action and_ans- wer the complaint of said plaintift and Serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below Stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail #0, to do, Judgment ‘will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of ‘each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against It respectively as pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. w. T. GAFENER, Plaintiff, Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Se- attle, Wash, Feb. 12—Mar. 26, 1909. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington, for King County. Aurora Land Co., a Corporation, Plain- tiff, "vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doo Roberts, his wife, whose true Christian pame is unknown and all persons un- Known, it any, having or claiming an in- terest in and to the hereinafter de- geribed real property; Defendants.—No. 62657, Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that thte above named plaintift 1s the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate is- Sued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th day Of April, 1908, and numbered as follows: Wor the’ delinquent taxes of the follow- ing year, in the following amount and upon the real property situated in sald King County, deseribea as follows, to- wit! ‘White Brothers’ Addition to Kirkland —Lot 3, block 2, B49268, year 1904, amount,’ eighty-nine cents. ‘That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the, plaintit upon sald above described real property, to-wit {Lot 8, block 2, White Brothers’ Adai- tion to ‘Kirkland—85 cents for the year 1905; forty-seven cents (47) for "the year 1906, and fifty cents (60) for the year 1907, ‘Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the un- pald and unredeemed taxes upon an Against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and Summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclu- Sive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after the 15th day of January, 1909, in the above en- titled court and’ action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintif and serve a copy of your an- Swer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with in- terest and costs. In'case you fail 80 to do, Judgment will be. rendered herein, foreclosing the Men of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due hpon and charged against each, for sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the Satistactlon of ‘the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed In plaintift’s com- plaint now, on’ file In this cause and court, AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Plaintitt F, J, CARVER, ‘Attorney’ for Plaintitt. Office “address: Northern Bank & ‘Trust Co. Blag. January 16—February 26, 1909, IN_ THE. JUSTICE’S COURT BEFORE 1. i, George, Justice of Pence, Seattle Piecinct, King County, Washington. J, Colle, Plaintim, vs. N. Stein, Defend- ant. "No. ——.' Summons by’ Publiea- ton. To N, Stein: In the name of the State of Washington you are hereby notified that J. Colle has Sled a complaint against you in sald court which will come on, to be heard at my office, in Room No. 210 New York Block, in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 22nd day" of Mareh, 1909, at the hour of 8:30 O'clock “A, M., and unless you appear, and then’ and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the Prayer of the plaintift granted. ‘The object. and demand of said com- plaint is as follows: ‘To recover a judg- ment agalnst vou for the sum of ninety dollars with interest at 6 per cent. per annum from the 25th day of August, 1908, upon’ a certain. promissory. note given ‘by you to plaintiff on the 26th day of August, 1908, and due October 25th, 7908, and to recover costs of this action, In this setion_a writ of garnishment was issued to. 8. Melstein, ‘Complaint filed Feb, 16th, 1909. H. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington, February 19--March 19, 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Lloyd E. Dunning, Plaintiff, vs. Maude L. Dunning, Defendant, No. 65,071. Summons by Publication: ‘The State of Washington to the said Maude L, Dunning, Defendant: ‘You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 22nd day of January, 1909, and defend the above en- titled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plain- Uf, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plain- tiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure 50 to do, sudgment wilt be rendered against vou according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN object of the above entitled action Is to n- obtaln a decree of divorce between the te plaintif and defendant upon the grounds al Sf abandonment of the ‘plaintif® by sald ne defendant for more than one year ana ‘A cruel treatment of plaintift by defend- ed ant and personal indignities rendering te hia life burdensome. of J. HENRY DENNING, or Plaintiff's Attorney. 1g _ Office and Post Office Address: 45-6 yn Starr-Boyd Bldg., Seattle, Wash. oa | Suna Seubdecel 6, 1808) IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Edwin S. Milling, Plainti@, vs, Lucy Milling, Defendant.’ No. 65,099. Sum- mons. ‘The State of Washington to the sald Lucy Milling, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 22nd day of January, 1909, and defend the above entitled action ‘in the above en- titled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure s0 to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the Complaint, which has been fled with the clerk of said court. ‘The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of mat- yimony between the parties hereto on the ground of abandonment and desertion for more than one year prior to the commencement of this action. B, T, SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintimt. Post Office Address: 603, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Wash- ington. Sanuary 22-March 5, 1909. State of Washington in and for King County, Permelia F. Robinson, Plaintiff, vs. David M. Robinson, Defendant, No, —. Summons. ‘The State of Washington to David M. Robinson, Defendant: "You are hereby summoned to appear within ‘sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty (60) days after the 19th day of February, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintift and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the ‘plaintitt at his office below stated; and in ease of your failure 80 to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the Clerk ‘of said court. ‘The object of this action ts to obtain a decree of divorce, absolute, by plain: tiff from defendant on the ground of extreme cruelty. JAMES McNENY, Plaintif’s Attorney. Office and P.O. Address: 614 Marion Bldg., Seattle, Wash. February 1$—April 2, 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. William B, Hays, Plaintiff, vs, Rhoda A, Hays, Defendant, No. ‘65,067. Sum: mons. by Publication. The State of Washington to the sald Rhoda A. Hays, Defendant: | You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publica- tion. of this. summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 19th day of Feb- tuary, A. D, 1909, and defend the above entitled ‘action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plainiifl, and serve a copy of your ans- Wer upon the ‘undersigned attorney for plaintiit at his omee below stated; and In case of your failure so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint, Which has been filed with the clerk of Said court.” Phe object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is to obiain’an absolute decree of divorce from the defendant on the grounds of de- sertion, B, H, CARRICO, Plaintin’s Attorney, Post Office Address: Room 603 Peopies Savings Bank Bldg. Seattle, King County, Wash. February 19—April 2, 1909, IN |THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Tra A, Fleming,’ Plaintiff, vs. Amelia A. Wleming, Defendant, No.——, Sum- ions. y ‘The State of Washington to the said Amelia A, Fleming, Defendant: You are hereby ‘summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 19th day of February, 1909, and defend the above entitled ‘action’ in, the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your ans- Wer upon the undersigned attorneys for Pleintlit at thelr office below, stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of sald court, The obiect, of this action js to, obtain A decree of divorce on and mh behalf of the plaintiff; to dissolve the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between plaintiff and defendant on the grounds Of desertion on the part of the defend- ant, and to obtain custody of the chil- aren and award of property. HOLZHEIMER, HERALD & HOLZHEIMER, Attorneys for Plaintift, Office Address: 428 Lumber Exchange Bldg, Seattle, Wash. Feb. 19—April 2. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County—In Probate. In the matter of the Guardianship of ‘William Kenneth. Ross, a minor—No. 9476, Notice of Sale. Notice is hereby given that in pursu- ance of an order in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County, made on the 11th day of March, 1909, in the matter of the above entitled guardianship, the undersigned, as guard- jan of the minor above named, will sell at private sale, to the highest bidder for cash, and subject to confirmation by said Superior Court, the following de- scribed real property of said minor, sit- uated in the County of King, State of ‘Washington, and particularly’ described as follows, ‘to-wit: ‘The undivided one- half of ‘Tracts Bighteen (18), Nineteen (19), ‘Twenty-six (26) and ‘Thirty-one (31), of Shin's Cloverdale Addition to Kent, according to the reorded plat thereof, on file In the office of the county auditor’ of sald King County. Said sale to be made of all the interest and estate of said minor, in and to all said real property, in one parcel. ‘The payment for said real property to be made on the confirmation of said sale by the court, and the making and delivery. to the purchaser, of a deed to sald real property, by the sald guardian, Said sale will be made on or after the agth day of March, 1909, and offers and bids for the purchase of sald real prop- erty, will be received at the office of R. George, in Suite No. 210 in the New York Block, on, the Northeast corner, of Cherry, Street and Second Avenue, in, the City of Seattle, King County, Washing- on. Date of this notice and date of first publication hereof, March 12th, 1909. SARAH A. ROSS, as Guardian of the above named Minor. ‘March 12, Mareh 26th. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. William E, ‘Terrill, Plaintiff, vs, Kate ‘rerrill, Defendant —No. ..... ‘Summons. ‘The ‘state of Washington to Kate 'Ter- hill, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this Summons, | to-wit: Within sixty (60) days after ‘the 12th day of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled action, in. the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of plain- tn, and serve a copy ot your answer upon the undersigned, attorney for plain- Uff, at his office below stated; and In case of your failure so to do, judgment Will be taken against you according to the demand of the complaint, which is filed with the Clerk of sald Court. ‘The object of this action is to obtain a decree. of divorce from you upon, the ground of desertion and abandonment for more than one year last past, by you of the sald plaintift. JAMES McNENY, Attorney for Plaintiff. 514 Marion Bldg. Seattle, Washington. Stueah 14 ADH aa. Ona IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County —In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Wilus Burry, Deceased.—No. 8934. Notice to Creditors. ‘By order of said court made herein on the 9th day of March, 1909, notice is he-vby_given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to pre- sent them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 734-739 Central Building, the place of business of said estate, in Se- Attle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same ‘will @_barred, soe? Of fret publication, 12th March, LUCIUS ANDERSON, As Administrator of said Estate. FARRELL, KANE & STRATTON, ‘Attorneys for Bstate. 739 Central Bullding, Seattle, Wash. First publication March 12. Last publication April 2nd. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THB State of Washington in and for King County, Aurora Lang Company, a corporation, Plaintift, vs. J. E, West and Jane Doe West, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, Defendants —No, 64545. Notice and Summons. ‘The State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate jn and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby. notified that the above named plaintif! is the holder of One delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of ‘Washington, dated the 17th day of Aug- ust, 1908, and number as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year jn the following amount and upon the Feaol property | situated in. seid, icing County described as follows, to-wit: ‘Lot six (6), block seven (7), White Bros. Add. to Kirkland. King ‘County, ‘Washington, being certificate No. B52921 for the year 1904, ninety cents (90c). That the taxgs tor the following prior and subsequeht years have been paid by the plaintif! upon safd above deserib- ed real. property, to-wit: Lot six. (6), block seven (7), White Bros. Add. to Kirkland, for the year 1906, fifty cents (0c); for the year 1906, thirty-six cents (36c), Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of pay- ment and are all the unpaid and unre- deemed taxes upon and against said real property. ‘You and each of you are hereby fur- ther notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty dave after the frst date of publication of this notice, exclu- sive of the day of date of publication, to-wit: March 12, 1909, In the above en- titied court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintif! and serve a copy of your an- Swer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with in- ferest and costs, In'case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the len of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due tpon and charged against each parcel of said real property for the sums and ‘Amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respective- ly-as provided by law and as prayed, in plaintif’'s complaint, now on file in this cause and court ‘AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Cor- poration, Plaintiff. F, J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintitt, Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & ‘Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, March, 12. Date of last publication, April 23, IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURS or the State of Washington, In and for the County of King. fn the Matter of the Estate of P. C. warwick, Deceased—No. 9949. Notice to. Creditors. Notice is hereby given that I have been appointed administrator with the will annexed of the estate of P. C, War- wick, deceased, and all persons having claims against said estate are hereby fequired to present them to me with the necessary vouchers at the office of Hiram J. Jacobs, at No. 625 New York Block, in ‘the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, the place of thé fransastion of the business of sald es- tate, within one year from the date of the first. publication of this notice,‘ or the same will be forever barred. ‘Dated at Seattle, Washington, March 6th, 1909. HIRAM A, EMERYS, Aaministrator with the will annexed ‘of the Estate of P. C. Warwick, De- ceased. Date of first publication, March, 12. Date of last publication, April 9. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Ed. Bleith’ and Jane Dos Bleith, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herein- after described real property. Defend- ants.—No, 65167. Notice and Summons. ‘State of Washington: ‘To the above defendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real Droperty, are hereby, notified that the Above named plaintift 1s the holder of three delinquent tax certificates issued fore e Treasurer of King County, State FRIDAY, MARCH 26, 1909. of Washington, dated the 29th day of ‘April, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year In the following amount and uj the real property situated in sald County described as follows, to-wit: ‘Lot fifteen (15), block four (4), Kirk- land Syndicate 2nd Addition to Seattle, being certifleate No. B49631 for the year 1904, ninety-eight cents (98c), lot nine- teen’ (18), block four (i), Kirkland Syn- Gicate's dnd" Addition td Seattle, being certificate No, 349686 for the year 1904, ninety-eight cents (9c). Lot twenty= two (22), block four (4), Kirkland Syn- Wicate’s 2nd Addition {6 Seattle, King County, Washington, being certificate No. B49538, ninety-elght cents (98c). ‘That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have- been paid by the plaintiff upon said above describ- ed_reael property, to-wit: Lot fifteen (15), block four (4), Kirk land Syndieate’s thd Adaition to, Seattle, King County, Washington, for the year 1903, forty-six cents; for the year 1906, Afty-nine cents; for ‘the year 1907, fifty cents; lot nineteen (19), block four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's 2nd Addition to Se- attle, for the year 1905, forty-six cents; for the year 1906, fifty-nine cents; for the year 1907, fifty cents; lot twenty- two (22), block four (4), forty-six cents; for the year 1906, fitty-nine cents; for the year 1907, fifty cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of pay- ment ‘and are all the unpaid and unre- deemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you are hereby fur- ther notified and summoned to be and apepar within sixty days after the first date of publication of this notice, exclu- sive of the day of publication, ‘to-wit: within sixty days after March 12, 1909, in the above’ entitled court and ‘action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintift and serve @ copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintift at his office below Stated or pay the amount due, together With interest and costs. In ‘case you fail so to do judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against’ each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon and. charged against each par- cel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against. each, for said taxes, Interest, and’ costs, ordering sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as Provided by law and as prayed tn plain; ‘iff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURURO LAND COMPANY, a Cor- poration, Plaintift. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 814 Northern Bank & ‘Trust Bldg. Seattle, Wash. March 12-April 23, IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Aurora’ Land Company, a copporation, Plaintiff, vs. Hd, Bleith’ and Jane Dos Bleith, his wife, whose true christian name ‘is unknown, and all persons un- Known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herein after described, real property, Defend ants.—No. 65104. Notice and Summons. ‘The State of Washington: ‘To the qhove named ‘defendants and each of em: ‘You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real Property, are hereby notified that, the above named plaintift is the holder of two delinquent tax certificates issued by the ‘Treasurer of King County, State of ‘Washington, dated the 29th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year in the following amounts and upon’ the real property situated in said King Coun- ty_deseribed as follows, to-wit: Lot sixteen (16), block four (4), Kirk- land Syndicate's 3nd Addition, to Seat- tle, being certificate No. 49532, for the year 1904, ninety-elght cents (98). Lot twenty-four (24). block: four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's 2nd Addition to Se- attle, being certificate No. 840540, for the year 1904, ninety-elght cents (98c). ‘That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real estate property: Lot sixteen (16), block four (4), Kirk- land Syndicate's 2nd Addition to Seattle: year 1905, forty-six cents; year 1906, fty-nine cents; 1907, fifty cents. Lot twenty-four (34), block four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's 2nd Addition to Se attle: year 1905, forty-six cents; 1908, Aifty-nine cents: 1907, fitty cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the un- paid and. unredeeméd taxes upon and Against said real property, ‘You and each of you (including said persons unknown, If any), ate hereby further notified aud summoned to be and appeaer within sixty days after the serv- ice of this notice upon you by publica- tion, exclusive of the day of publication, to-wit: within 60 days after March 12, 1909, in’ the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of sald plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the under- Signed attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, to- gether with interest and costs. In case You fail so to do, judgment will be ren- dered herein, foreclosing the len of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, Interest. and costs, ordering a, sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the Sums charged and found against it re- spectively as provided by law and as prayed in, plaintiff's complaint now on filed in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Cor- poration, Plaintitt. FP. J, CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. sl4 Northern Bank & ‘Trust Bldg, Seattle, Wash. ~ Date of first publication, March, 12. Date of last publication, April 23, IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. B. L. Siegrist, Plaintiff, ys. Laura Sie- ‘grist, Defendant. No.'——. Summons by Publication, The State of Washington to the said Laura Siegrist, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date Of the first publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty days after the 19th day of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your an- Swer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. ‘The object of this action {s to’secure a divorce from the defendant, above named, for cruelty. WILLIAM C, KEITH, Attorney for Plaintift. Post Office Address: 45 Starr-Boya Bldg, Seattle, King County, Washing- on. March 19—April 30. ee EO ———— ee a FRIDAY, MARCH 26, 1909. IN_THE SUPERIOR GOURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County Aurora Land, Company, a corporation, -plaintift, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Boe Roberts, his wite, whose true Chris- tian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest ‘in and 'to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, defendants. No 62678, Notice and Simmons. ‘State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: "You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the Above named plaintiff 1s the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate is- sued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th day of April, 1908, and numbered a8 follows, for the delinquent taxes of the follow- ing year, in the following amount, and wpon the real property, situated in said ing County, described as follows, to- wit: ‘White Bros, Addition to Kirkland, lot 9, block 2, certificate No, B 49259, year 1904, amount 89 cents, ‘That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot §, block 2, White Bros, Addition to Kirkland, 35 cents 1905, 47 cents 1906, 58 cents 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid-and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, You and each of you, (including sata persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publi- cation, to-wit: within 60 days after March 5th, 1909, in the aboye entitled court and action! and defend this action and answer phe complaint of said plain- tiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney, for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, In case you fail so to do, judg- ment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs gainst each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, Interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums, charged and found against it re~ spectively as provided by law, and as Biaved th plaintifs, complaint, now on He in this cause and Court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, 2 Corpora- tion, Plaintiff. ¥,, J. CARVER, Northern Bank & ‘Trust Co. Blde,, ‘Attorney for Plaintift. First publication, March 5, Last publication, April 16. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Hyman Greenblatt and Molly Green- platt, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. Lena Du- iin, Ida, Dulin, Louis Daulin, Harry Mernstein, Max Neft, guardian ‘of Leng Dulin, Ida Dulin and Louis Dulin, and Joe Mernstein, guardian of Harry Mern- stein, defendants, No. 65814. Summons by_ Publication. ‘State of Washington to the said de- fendant, Lena Dulin: ‘You are hereby «summoned. to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: ‘Within sixty days after the ‘fifth Gay of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled action inthe above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs herein and serve a copy of Your answer upon the undersigned at- torney for plaintiffs, at his address be- low stated, and In case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands Of the complaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of this court. ‘The object of said action 1s to. quiet title to lot 7, of the Plat of Beacon Place in the City of Seattle, King Coun- ty, Washington, and obtain a decree ad- judging that said defendants, and each of them, have no interest | or estate whatsoever in and to said lands and premises and decreeing that plaintiff's fitie is good and valid and that each and all of sald defendants be forever en- foined and debarred from asserting any tlaim whatsoever in and to said lands gna premises adverse to the said pitin- 8. : EDWARD VON TOBEL, ‘Attorney for Plaintiffs. Office and Post Office Address, Rooms Ot ee ns Tiga Ruliding, Seattle, IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L._ .,Crayer, plaintiff, vs. Plymouth G. Saving Bank, and all persons un- mown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter de- geribed real property, defendants. No. 65826. Notice and Summons, State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an’ interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the Above named plaintift is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate is- sued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the Sth day of November, 1908, and numbered Bo4G41, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of $1.50, and upon real ‘property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: North 20 feet of lot ‘Thirteen (13), Block Twenty-two (22), Burke's Second Addition to the City of Seattle. ‘That the taxes for the following sub- sequent years have been paid by the plaintift tipon sald above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of 94 cents. For the year 1906, the sum of $1.92. For the year 1907, the sum of $2.24. ‘Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sald date of payment, and are all the unpaid and_unredeemed taxes upon and against sald real property. You and each of you, (including safd <porgons unimewn, tf any). ate hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty gare after ‘the date of first publication of this notice, exclu- sive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within, sixty (60) days after March 12, 1909, In the above en- titled conrt and action; and de- fend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the un- dersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount Gue, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be fendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and Amounts due upon and charged agains each, for sald taxes, Interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums Charged and found against It respective- Ty ga provided by Iaw, and aa prayed tn plaintiff's complint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H, CRAVER, Plaintift, A. C, MacDonald, Attorney for Plaintif. ‘Office Address, 524 Bailey Building, Se- attle, Wash, March 12, April 23. CALL OF STOCKHOLDERS’ MEETING for fncrease (or Deorense) of ‘Capital ok. ‘To the Stockholders of Olympic Roofing Company, a Corporation: Notice is’ hereby given that a meeting of the stockholders of Olympic Roofing Company, a corporation ofganized under the laws of the State of Washington, has been called by order of the board of trustees of said corporation, to be held at 629 Burke Bldg., in the City of Seattle, in the County of King and State of Washington, On, the ist day of | May, 1909, at two o'clock p. m., for the pur- pose’ of considering a resolution to in- crease (or decrease) the amount of the capital stock of said corporation, and that at such meeting it is proposed to inerease (or decrease) the amount of such capital stock to 6,000 shares of the par value of $10.00 each, inclusive of its present capitalization. In witness whereof, we, a’ majority of all the trustees of, sald corporation have hereunto set our hands on this, the 3rd day of March, 1909, BF. ZIMMERMAN. ©. G! HACKETT. March 5—April 30. State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintift, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true chris- Uan name $8 unknown, and all persons 2—REPUBLICAN LEGALS: hub unknown, if any, having or claiming .an interest or estate in and to the herein- after described real property, Defend- ants, No. 62,305. Notice and Summons. ‘The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the Above named plaintif! is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by thé treasurer of King County, Washington, dated April 15, 1908, and numbered 849,254 for the’ delinquent taxes of the year 1904 in the amount of Ninety-three (98) cents and upon the real property situated in King County, Washington, described ag follows, to- wit: Lot four (4), Block two (2), White Bros.’ Addition to Kirkland, King County, Washington, ‘That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been pald by the plaintiff upon sald above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, Forty-one (41) cents; for the year 1906, Fitty-two (52) cents and for the year 1907, Fifty (50) cents, which sev- eral sums bear Interest at the rate of fifteen per cent. per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said lot. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby urther notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- clusive of the day of sald first date of publication, to-wit; within sixty days after February 19th, 1909, in the above entitled court and ‘action and defend this action and answer the complaint of sald plaintif and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintift at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, fore- closing the lien of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes, In- terest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satis- faction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's com- plaint now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a corpora: tion, Plaintift. F. J. CARVAR, ‘Attorney for’ Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & ‘Trust Bldg. Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, Feb, 19, 1909. Date of last publication, April 2, 1909. Tet Scape ee eee eee County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. G, W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known, Jf any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herein- after described, real, property, Detend- ants, No. 62,307. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of ne certain. delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, Washington, dated April 15, 1908, and numbered 849,263 for, the’ delinquent taxes of the year 1904 in the amount of Ninety-three (98) cents and upon the real property situated in xing County, ‘Washington, deseribed as follows, to-wit: Lot Three (3), Block Two (2), White IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King.—In Probate. In the Matter of the Rstate of Martha Jy Whittier, Deceased. No, 8719. Order ta Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not be Made, Merriel Whittier, administrator of the estate of Martha J. Whittier, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that sald estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said pe- tition sets forth facts sufficient, to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate. It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the sald Martha J, Whittier, deceased, be ‘and appear before the sald Superior Gourt of King County, State of Wash- ington, at the court room of the Probate department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 25th day of March, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock, A. M., of sald day then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published’ once a week for four successive weeks before the sald 26th day of March, 1909, in The Seattle Republican, ‘a newspapér printed and published in said King County, and of general circulation therein. ‘Done in open court this 18th day of February, 1909, GEO, B. MORRIS, Judge. State of Washington, County of King. —88. I, D. K. Sickles, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Su- perior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certity that the foregoing is a full, true and cor- Fect copy of jan original Order to show cause, made by said court on the 18th day of Februgry, 1909, In the matter of the ‘estate of Martha J. Whittier, de- ceased. ‘Witness my hand and seal of said court this 18th day of February, 1909. %, K SICRLES, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. Feb. 19—March 19, THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Bros,’ Addition to Kirkland, King County, Washington, ‘That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years, have been pild by the plaintiff upon said above ‘escribed feal property, to-wit; for the year 1906, Forty-one (41) cents; for the year 1906, Fitty-two (62) cents, and for the year 1907, Fifty (50) cents, which several sumé bear interest at the rate of fifteen per cent. per annum from said date of Payment and are all the unpaid and un- redeemed. taxes upon and against sald lot. You and each of you (including, said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty,days after the date of first publication’ of this notice, ex- clusive of the day of said first date of publication, to-wit; within sixty days after February 19 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintift at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with’ interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judg- ment will be rendered Herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for Said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it re- spectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint’ now on file in this eause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Plaintif. F. J. CARVAR, Attorney, for Plaintift. Office Adiress: 314 Northern Bank & ‘Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, Feb, 19, 1909. Tate-ot lant Hublinaticn’ Apel ©) 196°.. OFM a fase Hiei Rata ore ice nce ine prayed in plaintif’s complaint’ now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- tion, Plaintift, B. J, CARVAR, Attorney, for Plaintiff. Office Adiress: 314 Northern Bank & ‘Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, Feb, 19, 1909. Date of last publication, April 2, 1909. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. M. 8. Nor- ton and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants, No.-——. Notice and Sum- mons. ‘ State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, ‘claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff 18 the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of January, 1907, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in sald King County, deseribed as follows, to-wit: Certifieate No. BA7,654, for the year 1904, in the amount of 87 cents, on lot 21, block 10, White & Manings’ Addition to West Seattle; that the taxes for the folowing prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon sald above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of 33 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 82 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of $1.07; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from a date of payment, and are all the unpat and unredeemed taxes upon and against Said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified ana summoned to be and appear within sixty caveator the date of first publication of this notice, ex- clusive of the day of said first publi- cation, to-wit. within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and ans- wer the complaint of said plaintiff and Serve ‘a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, Tn ‘case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of sald real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, Interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court, W. T. GAFFNER, . Plaintist, Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Se- attle, Wash, Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T .Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. M. 8. Nor- ton, and all persons unknown, {ff any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No, —-. Notice and Sum- mons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of You, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of January, 1907, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B47,655, for the year 1904, in the amount, of 87 cents, on lot 22, block 10, White & Manings’ Addition to’ West Seattle; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon sald above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of 33 cents: for the year 1906, the sum of 82 cents: for the year 1907, the sum of $1.07; which several sums bear interest at the Tate of 15 per cent. per annum from sald date of payment, and are all the unpald and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- | clusive of the day of said first pubil- cation, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1809, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and ans- wer tk complaint of sald plaintiff and Serve 5 copy. of your answer on the undersigns plaintife at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with Interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will: be rendered herein, SOERULORR, the Hen of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and W. T. GAFFNER, Ome Address: 457 Arcade Bldg, 8 ! 2 reade Bldg., Se- attle, ‘Wash, Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. 'W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs, Ellas Mor- rison, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants, No. ——. Notice and Sum- mons, State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an’ interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the ist day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the Gelinguent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the eal property, situated in ‘said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B52,108, for the year 1902, in the amount of $1.03, on the west 16 feet of lot 9, block 63, Riley's Addition to Riley's Addition to South Seattle; that the taxes for the following prior and sub- sequent years have been paid by the plaintifé upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1903, the sum of 53 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 38 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 45 cents: for the year 1906, the sum of 69 cents} for the year 1907, the sum of 75 cents} which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, You and each of you, (including sata persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified atid summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ox- clusive of the day of said first publi- cation, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb, 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court ang action; and defend this action and ans- wer the complaint of said plaintiff and Serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, In ‘case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreciosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering @ sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plaintift’s complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFENER, Plaintift, Office Address: 457 Argade Bldg., Se- attle, Wash. Date’ of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintif, vs. Unknown Onwers, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter descriped real property, Defendants. No, ——. Notice and Sum: mons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim. ants or holders of an’ interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff 1s the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of January, 1907, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon ine real property situated in sald King County, described as follows, to-wit: ‘Certificate No. B47,268, for the year 1904, in the amount of $1.47, on lot 40, block 10, Ballard Park Addition to Se: attle; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been Pald by the plaintiff upon sald above Gegeribed real property, to-wit: For the year 1906, the sum of 85 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.78; for the year 1907, the sum of $2.03; which several sums bear interest at the Tate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed’ taxes upon and against said real property, You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, {f any), are hereby further notified atid summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- Clusive of the day of said first publi- cation, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb, 5th, 1809, in the above entitiea court and action; and defend this action and ans- wer the complaint of sald plaintift and Serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintift at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In ‘case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreciosing the Iten of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, Interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plaintitt’s complaint, now on file in this cause and court. W. T. GAFENER, Plaintitt Offfe Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Se- attle, Wash. Date’ of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909, Pate of last nublication’ March 10 7000: IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Oscar Daye, Plaintiff, vs. Angeline Daye, Defendant. No. ——. Summons. State of Washington to Angeline Daye: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, sixty days after the 6th day of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled ac- tion ‘in the above entitled court, and ans- wer the complaint of the plaintiff, serve 4 copy of your answer upon the under- signed, attorney for the plaintiff herein, at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of this court. ‘The nature of this action is an action wherein the plaintiff above named seeks to secure an annulment of the nuptial contract between him and the defendant in said action, and for the recovery of his costs of this action, to be taxed by the clerk of this court: JOHN H, ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintitt. Office and Post Office Address: 45 Maynard Butlding, Seattle, Washington. rst publication, March’ 5, Last publication, April 16. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. In Probate. In the matter of the estate of J. B. Covert, deceased. No, 8592. Order to show cause why distribution should not be made, Eliza “J. Covert, administratrix with tne will annexed of the estate of J. E. Covert, deceased, having filed in’ this court her petition setting forth that said estate 18 now in a condition to be closed and 4s ready for distribution of the rest. due thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that, sald petition sets forth, tacts sufficient to authorize a distribution o: thg residue of sald estate: It 1s therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate or ,the sald J. 3 Covert, deceased, by and appear before the said Superio Court of King County, State of Washing, ton, at the court room of the Probat department of said Court in the City of Seattle, on the sth day of April, 1909, at the ‘hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of sald day, then and there to show cause, if any’ they have, why ‘an order of dig- tribution should not be made of the resi~ due of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, ac~ cording to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four Successive weeks before the sald 8th day of April, 1909, in the Seattle Re- publican, a newspaper printed and pub- lished in said King County and of gen- eral circulation therein, Done in open court this 4th day of March; 1909. A. W. PRATER, . Judge. State of Washington, County of King, 3s, 1, 'D. K. Sickies, County Clerk of King Cointy and ex-officio Clerk of the Su- perlor Court of the State of Washing- ton, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a. full, true and correct copy of an origine\ or- der to show cause, made by said | ourt on the 4th day of March, 1909, ” the matter of the estate of J. i, Cover , de= ceased, ‘Witness my hand and the seal ot said Court this 4th day of March, 1909. (Seal) D. K,'Sicklet Clk, By C, C, Burtis, Deputy Cle. March 5, April 2. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Mattie F. Grover, Plaintiff, vs, Hzra J. Grover, Defendant.—No, 66205, Sum- mons by ‘Publication, ‘The State of Washington, to the sald Ezra J. Grover, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to ap- pear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 26th day of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled ‘action'sin the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at- torneys for plaintiff, at their office be- low Stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of. the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. Briefly stated the object of this ace tion is to dissolve the bonds of matric mony existing between the plaintiff and defendant and to grant the plaintiff a divorce from the defendant on the ground of abandonment of the plaintift by the defendant for more than one year last past. and for the failure of the de- fendant to support the plaintiff and his family, and to award to the plaintif? the following described lands and prem- ses: Lots one (1) and two (2) in block one (1) of Taylor's Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, State of Wash- ington; ‘Together with all of the other property belonging to either the plaintiff or the defendant which is within the jurisdic= tion of this court. BRADY & RUMMENS, Attorneys for Plaintift, Post Office Address: Suite 1308 Alas ka Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash- ington. Sai stiches} NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF THE UNITED CITIES TRUSTER COMPANY, ‘To the Stockholders: ‘The regular annual’ meeting of the stockholders of the United Cities ‘Tras- tee Company will be held at the office of the Company, No. 1011 American Rank Building, Seattle, Washington, on ‘Thursday, May 6th, 1909, at one o'clock p. m.. for the purpose of electing trus- tees for the ensuing year, and for such other business as may properly come before said meetiniz. RICHARD STEVENS ESKRIDGR, President. Attest: J. R. WHBAT, Secretary. March 26—April 20. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Louisa Clark, Plaintiff. vs. Charles H. R, Clark, Deféndant.—No. 66173. Sum- mons. The State of Washington to safd Charles H. R. Clark, Defendant: You are hereby simmoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a cony of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated: and in ease of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- Plaint, a copy of whieh has been filed with the clerk of said court. Said action was begun for the pur- pose of securing a divorce upon | the ground of failure to make suitable pro- vision for the support of the nlaintiff. E. B. PALMER, Attorney for Plaintitt, Address: 709 Lowman Building, Se- attle, Washington. March 26—May 7. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County, of King, Joseph C. Reiman, Plaintim, vs. Bthel Eelman, Defendant——Summons for Publication, ‘he State of Washington to the said Ethel Reiman: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date Of the, first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 19th day of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled action In the above en- tilled court, an danswer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk ‘of the said court, ‘The object of the above entitled ac- tio nis to dissolve the bonds of matri- mony now existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of adulter- ous deseriton and non-support. HERBERT P, SNOOK, Attorney for Plaintifr. P, 0. Address: 637 Burke Block, Seat- tle, King County, Washington. March 19, April 30, 1909. — NOTICE TO CREDITORS. ee cmolnted wie inti ot a nave been appointed administratrix of the fa. tate of Harry B, Hopkins, deceased, and all persons having claims against’ sald eptate, are hereby required to present them to me at 114 N. Harvard Ave, Ses attle, ‘Wn., within one year from’ the Gate ‘of this notice or the same will be forever barred. Dated, Feb, 19, 1909. CAROLYN F. HOPKINS, Admintotratrix of the Wetate. of Harry Hopkins, Decensed, 114 N. Harvar Ave. Seattle, Wn. Feb, 19—March 19, 1909. 17 16 19 18 20 of the people of that new State. There are sixty cuts of the leading professional men and women of the once-oppressed Americans, persons among whom are Andrew R. Black, a Virginian by birth! Dr. David T. Cardwell, born in North Carolina, both graduates of Howard University, and Prof. J. Byron Reed, a Washingtonian now recognized as a music master, who was a pupil of Professors Bishoff, Tenny and Sousa. Washington Bee. The Seattle Republican, a paper published by Negroes for Negroes, has just issued a beautiful special edition which is a credit to the publishers and the city of Seattle alike. The issue contains a large number of half-tones of views in and around the cities of Seattle and Tacoma, and many cuts of Negro citizens of more or less prominence in business and the professions. Such a product merits a wide circulation and will result in benefit to those connected with its production.—Cle Elum Echo. A publication of uncommon attractiveness and special interest is the Northwest Negro Progress Number of The Seattle Republican, which also marks the celebration of the fourteenth anniversary of this enterprising and progressive newspaper. The number is replete with portraits of the progressive men and women of the race in the far-removed State of Washington, together with illustrations of their comfortable homes and upto-date business establishments. Nor is the coming generation forgotten, because over the caption, "Made in Seattle," appear some cute pictures of the little boys and girls who have made their debut in that thriving town. The edition comprises some eighty pages, printed on coated paper, and the half-tone engravings are of unusual excellence. H. R. Cayton is the editor and publisher of The Republican, and Susie Revels Cayton his associate. An article of timely interest in this edition is the editorial entitled "Come West, Black Man," which we republish in another part of The Age.—New York Age. The Seattle Republican has just published a special "Northwest Negro Progress Number." It is a creditable publication from every point of view and begins with an editorial entitled, "Come West, Black Man." The issue shows by a concrete representation some of the evidences of progress which have followed upon the efforts of the Negro people of that section to advance in all important directions. The whole edition is well printed and gives live information as to the activities of our people. It is a record of achievements which any group of people could be proud, and we would suggest that our people everywhere secure copies of this special edition of The Seattle Republican.—Tuskegee Student. The Seattle Republican has given its readers a genuine work of art, literally and typographical, in its seventy-eight page special edition which it has just issued, under the title of The Seattle Republican Northwest Negro Progress Number. The edition is embellished with fine half-tones of progressive Negroes, men and women, of the Puget Sound country, of beautiful homes and other institutions, all of which are highly creditable to our race in this country. The faces of the men and women appearing in this issue are marked with intelligence and Western progressiveness. The editor of The Republican must certainly have selected the finest looking people in Seattle, or else all the people in that city and section are strikingly handsome PROGRESS OF NORTHWEST NEGRO TO BE EXPLOITED. The accompanying cuts represent homes owned by Colored folk of Seattle, which cuts first appeared in a special edition of The Seattle Republican in 1907 along with many others. These cuts are reproduced at this time that the readers hereof may get some idea of what the Colored folk of Seattle are doing toward home-building. The Seattle Republican is preparing to issue a similar publication in the very near future, which will be more comprehensive than the Northwest Negro Progress Number it issued in 1907, which number will be ready for distribution at the A.-Y.-P. Exposition and even before the gates of the exposition are thrown open to the general public. A competent force is now gatrehing facts for the next issue of the Negro Progress Number of the Northwest, and with the view of making it the best thing ever published in the interest of the Negro your aid is solicited. That the public may get a complete yet correct idea of what the Negro is actually accomplishing in the Northwest it is hoped that every Negro will render the compiler of the Northwest Negro Progress Number, which will be issued about the middle of May, all the assistance within his or her power. It is generally believed that a great many Negroes from the East, South and North will visit Seattle during the lifetime of the exposition, and they will be pleased to get hold of some reliable statistics accurately stating the progress the Negroes of this section are making. If, therefore, you live in a neighboring city and know of any one there owning a home, write The Seattle Republican and make the fact known. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. Touching the Negro Progress Number issued by The Seattle Republican a few of the many hundred complimentary press and personal notices are requoted: "The Northwest Negro Progress Number is par excellent. I am delighted."—Sergt. A. A. Houston, Spokane. "Permit me to congratulate you on your splendid edition, the Northwest Negro Progress Number."—E. F. Myer, Bremerton. "Your Northwest Negro Progress Number never had an equal so far as the Negro is concerned."—J. R. Hawkins, Winlock. "If the colored folk do not appreciate a publication like your Northwest Negro Progress Number, it is quite evident that they are sadly lacking in appreciation."—Jas. A. Moore, of Moore Investment Company. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. The following article concerns The Seattle Republican, published in the State of Washington. It has just issued its first number of its fourteenth volume. This number will make a worthy addition to any library. It contains 78 pages, and is filled with matter concerning the growth and progress CUT OUT CLANNISHNESS There is no excuse for clannishness among races or classes in the United States, for he or she who desires to do business and goes about the desire in a business-like manner will find it comparatively easy to do business with every other race or class of citizens in his or her immediate business community. That being a fact, any move toward clannishness on the part of any class, clique, clan, color or condition should be deprecated by the better element of any one or all of them. The colored man of the United States just now is riding the race hobby at a gait that would make J. I. C. hang his head in shame. The members of the African Methodist Episcopal Church have for their long suit this race hobby and work it overtime on members of another church who do not have "colored bishops." They, however, do not seem to practice what they preach, as the weekly organ of the connection has recently gone to the wall on account of non-support, and that, too, despite the fact there are over 800,000 actual members of the church; 8,000 preachers and with equally as many non-communicant sympathizers as lay members and preachers combined. If only the preachers of the connection subscribed and regularly paid one dollar per year for the paper that amount of money would have paid all the running expenses of the paper and allowed fully $3,000 per annum for the editor, and at the same time a better paper could have been turned out than has been in the past. Unless colored men learn themselves to see merit in the labors and efforts of each other, how do they expect other folk to do so. These folk advocate separate churches in order to get a square deal and yet they permit the organ of those churches they have built up on race prejudice to languish and fail because they are lacking in race pride to support them. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN OUR SPECIAL EDITION. published a special "Northwest M of view and begins with an editor mentation some of the evidences in section to advance in all import as to the activities of our peeroud, and we would suggest that republican.—Tuskegee Student. A JOURNALISTIC ARTIST. FRIDAY. MARCH 26. 1909.