Seattle Republican

Historical Society ATTLE RE E REPUBLICAN THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, APRIL 16, 1909 THE CITY COURT THE CITY COURT Last Tuesday the unwashed and unterrified Democrats of this country paid honor to what they are pleased to term "our patron saint Thomas Jefferson," but who in fact was not as much a Dem- Thomas Jefferson's Birthday Anniversary THE STATE CAPITOL OF WASHINGTON The final report of the committee will be watched with keen interest and for no other reason than because it is the consensus of opinion that, it is inclined to do a bit of whitewashing in its final report. The personel of the members of the committee for the most part is not such as to recommend it to the general public with any degree of approval that it will accomplish anything that those who worked the hardest to bring about the investigation desired. Speaking about the personel of the members of the committee leads the writer to speak for a second on that subject. State Senator Plinny L. Allen, who has been selected as chairman of the committee, is well known in Seattle, where he grew to manhood. Whether or not he is guilty of the accusation is perhaps a question, but he bears the reputation of being a man in whom not an ounce of political or publicconfidence can be placed. It has been the talk among the boys about town for many years that if you want a political trick turned, get Plinny Allen to do it. A number of politicians a few days ago stood discussing the investigating committee, and it was the consensus of opinion of those talking that, it was impossible for it to accomplish anything with a man like Plinny Allen at its head. Despite this unfavorable comment Allen may not be guilty of any wrong doing and may investigate the affairs of the various state offices with as much honesty of purpose as any man in the state. State Senator H. O. Fishback on the other hand bears the reputation of being one of the squarest men in the state, and it was common talk about the state house at the time the committee was named that all sides, so far as he was concerned, would get a square deal and that there would be no whitewashing done if he could prevent it. There is every reason to believe that he will prove the safety valve to the committee. Representative Wm. McMaster may be as honest as the days are long in summer, but he seems to be of a flighty, impetuous disposition and inclined to go off half cocked or that was the general impression formed of him as a member of the legislature. In whatever he believes he is correct, he becomes very much biased in it and is not willing to accord the other side fair treatment. Therefore, not much can be expected of him in the way of fair play unless the fair play is favorable to the side he represents. In other words McMaster was named because it was believed he stood for conviction, guilty or innocent. Representative Howard Taylor, judging from his actions in the legislature, is something on the order of McMaster, but more of the "me too" stripe. Everything he did in the legislature was purely of a selfish nature and done with the view of helping Howard Taylor in some way or other. In all the legislature there was not another man that showed as much narrowness in his legislative moves as did Howard Taylor. He is Howard Taylor --- Price One Year, $3.00. Single Copies, 10 Cents. A very rich woman while out riding perchanced to see a very poor woman gathering sticks for firewood and was moved with womanly symyathy to exclaim to her coachman: "As soon as we get home John and you put your horses away, come to me and get an order for a ton of coal for that poor woman." In the course of a few minutes after they had arrived to home John appeared for the order for the coal, but the rich woman had by that time basked herself by a warm fire, and replied to John's inquiry for the order: "I guess I will not send it, the weather has moderated." When the legislature was in session and things were all jumbled up together and there seemed to be no room for anything, Governor Hay was moved to help the legislature pass a bill ordering the sale of the capitol lands for the purpose of building a more adequate capitol, but when the legislature had adjourned and there was nothing but empty space all about the capitol building he seemed to have suddenly concluded, "we do not need any more space for state house purposes, there is nothing else but space in the present capitol building." Like the rich lady, the weather had moderated. Governor Hay knew then and knows now just exactly what the legislature meant when it passed the state capitol bill, and when he wrote to each member thereof for his opinion as to what he individually meant when he voted for the bill, Governor Hay himself is off his trolley or he thinks the members were off their trolleys. It was simply a grand stand gallery play and made for the purpose of attracting attention from him for his failure to vetoe certain appropriation bills passed by the late legislature and for which he is being mildly censured by the people and the press of the state just now. The accompanying picture is that of the present state house, which the opponents to the sale of the state lands for the purpose of completing the regular state capitol building, declare is fully adequate to accommodate the state as a capitol building for the next fifteen years, which may or may not be true, but for the sake of argument the point is granted. How long do those opponents of the bill think it will take to complete the building, the foundation of which is already up? To sell the lands and complete the preliminaries, to begin the work and finally to complete the actual erection of the building the greater part of the time will have been consumed. It can be said without fear of successful contradiction that, the capitol commission, rush things as rapidly as it will or may, cannot complete the new building one day before it will be sadly needed for state house purposes. Governor Hay is too good a financier to not be able to see that it will be a great saving to the state to stop the present interest drain, which the tax payers are called upon to put up every year for the debt on the capital. The legislative investigation committee to look into the workings of the state offices and the various state institutions has begun to grind away, and as was predicted, the workings of insurance commissioner were the first to be looked into. In this office a peculiar if not strange condition presents itself to the committee, and it is that the commissioner himself admits everything that the committee is trying to fasten on him in the way of official mistake, and when the committee will have gone through this particular office it will have to report the very things the commissioner, in the very outset said, did actually exist. If the commissioner has violated any law, then thing for some one to do is to file a complaint with the prosecuting attorney of Thurston county and have him either call a grand jury or inform against him in the courts, and thereby save the state the expense of finding out by investigation what the commissioner has already confessed. There may be reasons for investigating other offices, but there certainly is none for investigating the office and official that pleads guilty before the charge before the court convenes. LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 Volume XV, Number 97 H. R. CAYTON, Publisher not certain with which side he is really with in the fight, but in all probability he will manage to line up with the winner in due time to exclaim, "me too." While Representative Hubbel may be a man with as honest intentions as any man in the whole state, yet he was charged with having trained with the "wets" in order to get elected to the legislature and then voting with the "drys" after he got to the legislature, thereby completely reversing himself. If this accusation be true, then he is a man that is not to be relied upon. But even if he had not betrayed a trust as he has been accused of having done, he is a man that showed no ability at all to act in the capacity of a member of the legislature. It is very doubtful, if as a member of the committee he will be of any service toward either turning on or off the light. hed and unterrified Demohonor to what they are pleased to term "our patron saint Thomas Jefferson," but who in fact was not as much a Dem- Thomas Jefferson's Birthday Anniversary ocrat as Democracy is understood today as he was a Republican, and it is barely possible that he was not very much of either. Thomas Jefferson was one of the noble character of the infant days of the United States and he rendered his country valiant service, and that too, without much regard for party or section. His highest ambition seems to have been to serve well his country and to do those things that would redound to the greatest good to the greatest number, in which he was eminently successful, and his memory is deserving of everlasting praise by the citizens of the United States without regard to party, politics, creed or conditions. --- New Orleans regardless of its environments and its salubrious climate is making no numerical progress and very little, if any, commercial pro gress, as comes the report from there after a local census of the city had been completed. No city New Orleans is A Dead One in the United States is more favorably located and so easily approached by land and water as the Cresent City, and yet it is in a languid, listless state, gaining neither population or wealth. For the past ten years New Orleans has been the hot bed of anti-Negro progress, fearing, as she expressed it, the financial and political success of the Negro in any shape or manner meant social equality with the whites. This crusade against the black folks has been carried on to such a great extent that capitalists evidently feared serious trouble would sooner or later be the outcome, and so they have steered clear of New Orleans as a place of investment for their idle capital, which accounts for the torpid condition of one of the best located cities in all the United States. Here is truly a case of sowing to the winds and reaping a whirlwind. The sacrifice of many lives seems to be necessary to quicken public sentiment up to the point of demanding better protective laws against impending dangers. Such is the condition of afflairs relative to the au- Too Much Freedom To Automobiles tomobiles as they are now driven in our towns and cities. All other vehicles are driven under prescribed laws which the authorities see enforced, but the rich man's and likewise the stranger's auto has only to toot its horn and pedestrians flee for their lives or else get run over. A call for stricter rules well enforced should be the cry from all who believe in the rights of liberty and the pursuit of happiness. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE- ‘State of Washington for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Julia ‘Putnam Lilly, Deceased. No, 9636. Notice to Creditors. ‘To Whom It May Concern, Notice: ‘Notice is hereby given to all the cred- {tors of the above estate under and by -yirtue of that certain order made anc entered on the 1ith day of March, 1909, in the above entitled cause to present their said claims with necessary youch- ers at the office of the undersigned ex- ectitor of the said estate at rooms Nos. 43-45 Maynard Building, in the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washing- ton, within one year after the date of this notice, to-wit, within one year af- ter the 19th day of March, 1909. CHAS. 'H. LILLY, Executor of said Estate. JOHN H, ALLEN, Attorney for Executor. March 19—April 16. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington for King County. In Probate, In the Matter of the Hstate of Edith W. ‘Taylor, Deceased. No. 9631. Notice to Creditors. To Whom It May Concern, Notice: ‘Notice is hereby given to all the cred- itors of the above estate under and by virtue of that certain order made and entered on the 11th day of March, 1909, in the above entitled cause to present their said claims with necessary vouch- ers at the office of the undersigned ad- ministrator of the said estate at rooms Nos, 43-45 Maynard Building, in the City of Seattle, King County, ‘State of ‘Washington, within one year after the date of this notice, to-wit, within, one year after the 19th day of March, 1909. J. A. TAYLOR, Administrator of said Estate. JOHN H. ALLEN, ‘Attorney for Administrator, March 19—April 16. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington in and for the County of King. Della Maus, Plaintiff, vs. Robert §. Maus, Defendant. No. 66055. Sum- mons and Service of Publication. The State of Washington to the sald Robert S. Maus, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within ‘sixty (60), days after the date Of the first publication of this sum- mons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days af- ter the 19th day of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the ‘above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of plaintiff and serve a copy. of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below Stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against You'according to the demand of the com- Blaint which has been Aled with the erk of sald Court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain 2 decree of divorce from the defendant on the following grounds: ‘ist. Because without plaintift's fault the defeendant for twelve months last past has neglected and refused and still heglects and Tefuses to make suitable provisions for the plaintitt and his fam- Y ‘Plaintift also prays for the custody of her daughter, Irene Maus. ‘A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plainti, P, 0, Address: 429-20 Epler Block, 818 2nd Avenue, Seattle, Washington, ‘March 19—April 30. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington In and for the Sounty of Hing. Annie Baith MeLean, Plaintift, vs, Dun~ can McLean, Deféndant, No. 66056. Summons and Service of Publication. ‘The ‘State of Washington to the said Dunean McLean, Defendant: You are hereby’ summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, fo-wit, within sixty days (60), after the 18th day of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled Court, and answer the complaint of plaintif and serve a copy of your an- awer upon the undersigned attomey for Plaintli at his ofice Below stated, and In case of your failure so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint Which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. ‘The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree Of. divorce from the defendant on the following grounds: Ist. Because the defendant since May, 1905, has neglected and refused and Still neglects and refuses to make suit- able, provisions for the plaintift and his family. Bnd. Because the defendant aban- doned the plaintiff in September, 1905, said abandonment being continuous for one year and more, Sra. Because of personal indignities heaped upon the plaintiff by the defend- ant to such an extent as to render plain- fift's life burdensome. All of the mat- ters herein complained of having oc- curred Without plaintiff's fault. ith. Plaintif’ prays for the custody of her children, William Edward Me- Lean and Catherine McLean, ‘S.J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintitt, Office Address: 429-20 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington In and .for the County of King. Amandina Artecl, Plaintiff, vs. Julius “~Atteel, Defendant. No. 66067. Sum- mons and Service of Publication, The State of Washington to the sald Jullus Arteel, Defendant: You are heréby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (00) days after the 19th day of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled Court, and answer the complaint of plaintift and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintife at his office below stated and in. case of your failure so to do, judgement will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- Plaint which has been filed with the Gierk of said Court, ‘The object for which this action is brought ts to ob- tain a decree of divorce from the de- fendant on the following grounds: ist. Because the defendant abandoned the plaintift at Chicago, Timois, in June, 3907, said abandonment being continu- ous and for one year and more. nd. Because the defendant since June, 1907, has neglected and refused And still neglects and refuses to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family, Grd. Because of personal indignities and many acts of cruelty heaped upon the plaintiff by the defendant to such an extent as to render her life burden- Some. Sald acts having occurred during the past four years. ‘All_of the matters herein complained gf paving occurred: without plaintift's aut, ° 4th, Plaintitt prays for the custody vf her children, Julius Arteel, Wisie Ar- teol and Elice Artecl. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. P.O. Address: 420-80 Epler Bik, 813 ‘Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington. ‘March 19—April 30, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington in and for the Reabern’ 22 Ogauy Plaintif, John C. eabern gan, Plaintiff, vs. John Ogan, Defendant. Summons, The State of Washington to the said ‘John C- Ogan, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first Publication of this summons, to-wit, Within sixty (60) days after the 19th Gay of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled actién in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your an- Ewer upon tho undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and ‘in case of your failure 80 to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which will be filed with the Clerk Of said Court. ‘The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of mat- rimony between the parties hereto on the grounds of abandonment and desertion ‘or more than one year prior to the commencement of this action and for non-support, B, T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintift. Post Office Address: 603-504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Wasb- ington. March 19—April 30, ‘Notice of Sheriff's Sale of Real Estate. STATE. OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY of King—ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an alias writ of execu- tion, issued out of the Honorable Su- perlor Court of King County, on the isth day. of March, 1909, by, the Clerk thereof, in the case of Northern Bank and ‘Trust Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, Versus Charles’ Udell and Lizaie B. Udell, his wife, Defendants, No. 61096, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is Nereby given, that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the Highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to- Wit: at 10 o'clock a, m. on the 24th day of April, A.D. 1969, before the Court House door of said King County, in tho State of Washington, ail of the right, title and interest of the sald defendants, Charles Udell and Lizaie B. Udell, his wife, in and to the following described Property, situated in Xcing County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot ten (10), Block fifteen (15), and Lots six (8), seven (7), and elght, (8), Block eighteen (18), State Park Addl: tion to Seattle, Wash., levied on as the proherty (Of, Said defendants, "Charles ‘dell_and Lizale B. Udell, his wite, to satisfy. a judgment amounting ‘to, two Rundrea” forty-seven 26/100 (3247.20) dollars, and costs of sult, in favor of plaintift. ‘Dated this 16th day of March; 1909. ROBERT T. HODGE, Sheritt, By BERT C, THOMPSON, Deputy. March 19—April 16, NOTICE TO CREDITORS. ‘wo, 9066. Notice is hereby given that I have been appointed administrator of the Hs- tate of Alex Butch, deceased, and all persons having claims against sald estate are hereby required £9 present them, to me at 421 Sullivan Bldg., Seattle, Wn. within one year from the date of this notice or the same will be forever barred. Dated March 19, 1909. EDWARD S. BAKEWELL, Administrator of the Estate of Alex Butch, Deceased, 421 Sullivan Bldg., Seattle, Wn. March 19—April 16, Notice of Sheriff’s Sale of Real Estate. State of Washington, County of King, —ss. Sheriff's Office. ‘By virtue of an order of sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 2d day of March, 1909, by the Clerk thereof, In the case of 1, McGuire, plaintift, versus 0. B. Gjerde, defendant, No. 62864, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given, that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by, law ‘for, Sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 1ith day of April, A. D. 1909, before the Court, House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, the follow- ing described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot “E” and 80, 81 and $2, in Block Five (5), in C.D. Hillman's Meadow Garden Addition’ to the City of Seattle, Division No, Qne (1), as the plat of the same is now ‘of record in the office of the Auditor of King County, Washing- ton, together with all and singular the tenements, hereditaments and appurte- nances thereto belonging, to satisty a Judgment of a foreclosure of a mortgage amounting to Six Hundred and Seventy- nine 30/100 ($679.20) Dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff, Dated this 5th day of March, 1909. HORBET 't, HODGE, Sheriff. By BERT C. THOMPSON,’ Deputy. Marh 5—April 2, IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County, Ip the Matter of the Estate of Rose Zacharias, deceased. No. 9447, Notice to Creditors, By order of said court made herein on the 7th day of November, 1908, notice Is hereby given to the creditors of and all persons having claims against sald deceased or against said estate to pre- sent them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate at his place for the transaction of business for sald estate to,-wit: at room 8 UUnion Block, 718 First Avenue, In the City of Seattle, King County, Washing- ton, within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this no- tee, to-wit within one year from the 2oth day of January, 1909; or the same will be barred. FRED KOLM, Administrator of sald Estate. JOHN R. PARKER, Attorney for’said Estate. Room § Union Block, Seattle, Wash- ington. ‘January 29-February 26, 1909. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Allie i, Ruby, Plaintiff, vs. Carl Ruby, Defendant. No, 65,455. Summons. ‘The State of Washington to the said Carl Ruby, Defendant: ‘You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 12th day of February, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer “upon to undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which will be filed with the clerk of said court, ~ ‘The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of mat- rimony now and heretofore existing be- tween the parties hereto on the grounds of cruelty and non-support, . T. SCHOFT, Attorney for Plaintitt, Post Office Address: 503, 504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Wash- ington, Feb. 12—March 26, 1909. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THD SUPERIOR COURT OF THE tl State of Washington In and for the a County of King. ® Rozelia Crawford, plaintift, ys, J. B.D. es Crawford, defendant. No, 66613. " Sum- mons, ‘The Stato of Washington: To the sald x J._B. D, Crawford, defendant: D You are hereby summoned to appear w within sixty days after the date of the pi first publication of thig summons, to- ir wit: within sixty days after the 16th day n df April, 1909, and defend the above en- ei titied action in the above entitled court fc and answer the complaint of the plain- t tif, and’ serve a copy of your answer ai upon the undersigned. attorney for theo} plaintiff, at his office below stated; and tl Tn’ case ‘of your failure so to do, judg- m ment will be rendered against you ac- fi cording to the demand of the complaint, a Sitch has been filed with the clerk of o Said court. t The above entitled action is an action 1s for divorce on, the grounds of cruelty and non-support, A B. 'T, SCHOFR, Attorney. for Plaintift. Post Office address: 603, 504 Ploneer Building, Seattle, King County, Wash- — ington, i eoril 16-May 28. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. In the, matter of the estate of Kate Lawrencé, deceased. No, 10052. Notice to Creditors. ‘By order of said court made herein on the 1th day of April, 1909, notice Is hereby given to the creditors of, and. to all persons having claims against sal deceased or against sald estate, to pro- sent them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 515 W. Cremona St., Seattle, Washington, the place of business of sald estate, in Seattle, in said county and State, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this no- tice or same will be barred. tote Of first publication April 16th, 09. REUBEN R. LAWRENCE, Administrator of said Estate, MILO A. ROOT, Attorney for Estate. 631-632 New York Block, Seattle, ‘Washington. ‘April 16-May 14. < NOTICE OF ‘SHNRIFF’S SALE OF Real Estate, State of Washington, County of King, ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an execution, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 10th day of April, 1909, by the clerk thereof, in the case of Blossom Provine Lumber Co. a corpora- tion, plaintiff, vs. C. J, Davis and Jane Doe’ Davis, "his wife, defendant, No. 66227, and'to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: ‘Notice 1s hereby given, that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheriff's sales, to- Wit: at 10 o'clock a. m. on the 29th day of May, A .D. 1909, before the court house door of said King County, in. the State of Washington, all of the right, fitle and interest of the said defendants G. J. Davis and Jane Doe Davis, his wife, in and to the following described prop- erty, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lots seven, (7)_ to nine (9) inclusive, Block three (3), Clo- verdale Addition to city of Seattle, King Co., Washington, levied on as the prop- erty of said defendants C. J. Davis and Jane Doe Davis ,his wife, to satisty a judgement amounting to Forty-two and 22-100 ($49.22) dollars, and costs of sult, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 12th day of April, 1909. ROBERT T. HODGE, Sheriff. By JOHN STRINGER, Deputy. April 16-May 14. IN PROBATE. IN_ THD SUPERIOR COURT OF mn State of Washington for King County. In the matter ‘of the estate of Mat- thew H. Gailey, deceased. No, 8986, Or- der to show. cause why distribution Should not he made and fixing time for hearing final account and giving notice thereof. 'D. A. Gailey, administrator of the es- tate of Matthew “IH. Gailey, deceased, having this day rendered, presented and filed in this court his final account as Administrator of sald estate and his) pe- tition for distribution, thereof setting forth that said estate Is now in a_con- Gition to be closed and ts ready for dis- tribution among the persons entitled by law. thereto, ‘And it apnearing that the frets set forth are sumeient to authorize the dis- tripution. of said estate, Tt is now ordered by the court that Thursday, the 20th day of May. 1909, at 9:20 o'clock in the forenoon of sald day, be and the same is hereby appaint- ed vas the time for hearing and settle- ment of said final account and petition of distribution. at, the court, room in Department No. Seven at the court house of King County, In the City of Se- attle, Washington, and It is ordered that all persons interested in said estate an- pear before said court at sad time and place, then and there to show, cause, if Tny they have, why said final account Should not he approved and why an or- der of distribution should not he made of the residue of said estate in the man- ner provided by law. Tt Is further ordered that notice of the time and place of hearing said final Account and petition for distribution be given by posting a copy of this order in three af the most public places in Kine County, Washington, at least four Weeks hefore the suid 20th day of May 1909, and further that a conv of this order he published once a week for four Strecesalye weeks. before anid 20th day of May, 1908, in ‘The Seattle Remablican, h newspaper ‘published in sald King Connty and of general etroulation there: in and the court now finds and adindges that the posting ‘and publishing of this onder, as above set forth, is a proper And ndeanate notice In the premises. ‘Dane In-open court this 9th day of April, 1908 A. W, PRATER. ‘Tudse: April 16-May 14. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ‘THE State of Washington fn and for the County of King. In tho matter of the estate of Sis- mund D, Rosenbaum, deceased. Tn Pro- bate, No, $297. Order fixing time for settlement of final account. ‘This cause having come on to be heard this Sth day of April, 1909. upon the petition of Juitus CG. Lang, the ad- ministrator with the will annexed of the estate of Sigmund D. Rosenbaum, de- ceased, who has this day rendered and presented and filed in this conrt his final account of his administration of the estate of said deceased, and. the gourt being duly aavised In’ the prem- ses: Now, therefore, it ts ordered and de- creed that ‘Thursday, the 20th day of May, 1909, at the hour of 1:80 o'clock p. ms, on Said day, or as Soon thereafter as said matter may he heard, be, and tho same Is hereby appointed as the time for the hearing and settlement of the said final account In the court room of the Probate Department of said Super- for Court, to-wit, in Court Room No. 7 of the Superior ‘Court of the State of Washington in and for King County. In the court house in the city of Beatle in sald King County: that notice of the time and place of the hearing and set- tlement of the said account of the sald administrator with the will annexed be given by posting up a written notice in tach of the three most public places in said King County, at Teast four, weeks before the said time appointed for the settlement of the said account, and by publishing a similar notice once in each week for four (4) consecutive weeks prior to the said 20th day of May, 1909, in the Seattle Republican, a weekly newspaper, published in sald county, each of which said notices shall set forth the name of estate, the name of the administrator with the will anexed ana the day appointed for the settlement of said account, and shall give notice that any person ‘interested in said estate may appear at said time and place and file his objections in writing to the said account and contest the same, and the court now finds and adjudges such no- flea ts proper and adequate in the prem- 88, 3 ‘Done in open court this 9th day of April, 1909, A. W. PRATER, Te att Arie Judge. IN, THD SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington in and for the County of King. In the matter of the estate of Sig- muna D, Rosenbaum, deceased. In Pro- bate, No. $297. Order to show cause why distribution should not be made. ‘This cause having come | on to. be heard on this 9th day of April, 1909, upon the petition of Jullus C. Lang, ad- ministratot with the will annexed of the estate of Sigmund D. Rosenbaum, de- ceased, that an order to show cause be entered herein, and it appearing that said petitioner has Sled tn this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution to the persons en- titled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets fort! facts sufficient to authorize a distribu. tion of the residue of said estate and the court being duly advised in the premises: Now, therefore, it is ordered and de- creed and ordered that all persons inter- ested In the estate of said Sigmund D. Rosenbaum, deceased, be, and appear be; fore the Superior Court of the State of Washington in and for, King County, in Department No. 7 in the King County Gourt House in the city of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, on the 20th day of May, 1909, at the hour of 1:30 o'clock, p. m., on said day or as soon thereafter as ‘sald matter may be heard, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate to the successor in interest of the devisees, legatees, trustees and foreign executors in said petition men- fond according to the provisions of the aw. Tt is further ordered and decreed that a copy of this order be published once a week for four (4) consecutive weeks before the said 20th day of May, 1909, in the Seattle Republican, a weekly newspaper printed and published in sald King County, State of: Washington, and of general circulation therein, ‘Done in open court this 9th day of April, 1909, : A. W. FRATER, Judge. dee eae oa aaah woTTCE TO CREDITORS IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. In the ‘matter of the estate of Benja- min’ I. Lashmett, deceased. ‘To the creditors of sald deceased: An persons. having claims against Benjamin F, Lashmett, deceased, are hereby notified and required to present them, with the necessary vouchers, with- in one year after the date of this no- tice, to Miles Bigelow, administrator of said ‘estate, at the office of Herchmer Johnston, rooms 672-3 Colman Building, in the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, being the place for trans- action of business of said estate. ‘Dated April 15th, 1909, ‘MILES BIGELOW, NOTICE OF SHERIFI’S SALE OF REAL BSTATH State of Washington, County of King, S8-—Sheriff’s. Office| By virtue of an order of sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 18th day of April, 1909, by: the Clerk thereof, in the case of Aurora Land Co. a corporation, plain- tir versus %. A. Mafrige and Jane Doe Matrige, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and The Boston Store of Seattle, a corporation, and Michael Fonn and Jane Doe John ,his wife, whose true Christian name is’ unknown, de- fendants, No. 66115, and to me, as Sherif, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given that Twill, pro- ceed to sell at public auction to the high- est bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by Inw for Sheriff's sales, to- Wit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 29t day of May, A. D. 1909, before the Court rouse door of said King County, in the State of Washington, ail of the zisht, title and interest of the sald defendant in and to the following described prop. erty, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Tots leven (11) and Twelve (12), in Block Twelve (12), Hast Park Addition to the City of Seattle, levied on as. the property of sald defendant, of a forectos- Ure of a mortgage, to sitisty a judg. ment amounting t¢ four thousand two hundred and 40-190 ($4200.40) dollars, and costs of suit, In favor of plaintitt, Dated this 12th day of April, 1909. RORERT T HODGE, Sheriff. By RERT. C,. 2 HOMERON, DePuy: April 16—-May it, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King, Dutee J. Pearce, Juntor, Plaintift, ys. ‘Anna #, Himes, and John Doe Himes, whose true Christian name is to plain= tif unknown, her husband; J. W, Red- field and Jane Doe Redfield, whose true Christian name fs to plaintite unknown, his wife, Defendants, No, 65252. Summons. ‘The State of Washington to the sald de- fendants, Anna F. Himes, and John Doe Himes, whose true Christlan name is to plaintift unknown, her husband; J, W. Redflela and Jane Doe Redfield, Whose trie Christian name 1s to plain= Uff unknown, his wife, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within elxty days after the date of the first publication of this. summons, to- with, within sixty days after the 12th day of February, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his offce below stated; and in ease of your failure so to do, Judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the Clerk ‘of sald Court, title to the west $0 feet of Lots One, Two and Three, Block Thirty-two, Law's Second Addition to Seattle, ELIAS A. WRIGHT, 1N_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaftner, Plaintiff, vs. 8. E. Co., and all persona unknown, {f any, having or claiming an interest'in and to the FRIDAY, APRIL 16, 1909 hereinafter real property, Defendante. No. ——. Notice and Summons. : State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: ‘You and each of You, as owners, clatm- ants or holders of an‘interest or esta in and to the hereinafter described real Property, are hereby notified that the Above named plaintiff s the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the teat property situated in anid Hing. County, deseribed as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B51,257, for the year 1904, in the amount of $2.24, on lot 1%, block 2, Renton, Town of, (8, and B. o: line of Renton Coal Co.); that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been, paid. by, the plaintiff upon sald above described real property, o-wit: For the vear 1905, the sum of, $1.56; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.44; for the year 1907, the sum of $1.70, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. ‘You and each of you, (including satd persons unknown, {f any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- clusive of the day of said first, publica tion, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb, 12, 1909, inthe above entitled court and action; and defend this action and ans~ wer the complaint of sald plaintiff and Serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with Interest and costs. Tn case you fall so. to do, Judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the len of said taxes. and costs against each parcel of said teal property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes, Interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by Jaw, and as prayed In plaintiff's complaint, now on file in ths! cause and court. W. T, GAFENER, Plaintift, Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Se- attle, Wash, = 9 INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. 'T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. 8. 1. Co., and all persons unknown, if any, having or. claiming an interest In and to the hereinafter described real property, De- fendants. No. ——. Notice and Sum- mons. State of Washington to the above de- fendante and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, ate hereby notified that the Above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1909, and marked as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in'sald King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No, B51,256, for the year 1904, in the amount of $2.68, on lot 11, block 2, Town of Renton: (8, and ©. of line of Renton Coal Co.); that the taxes for the following prior and, subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff iipon, said above deseriped real property, ‘onwit: For the year 1905, the sum of $1.95; for the year 1908, the sum of $2.01; for the year 1907, th® sum of $2.38, which several sums bear Interest at the rate of 45 per cent. per annum from sald date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against sal real property. ‘You and each of you, (including sald persons unknown, if any). are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of frst publication of this notice, ex- clusive of the day of sald first, publica tion, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb, 12, 4909, inthe above entitled court and action; and defend this action and ans- wer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve ‘a copy of vour answer on the hndersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with Interest and costs. In case you fall 80 to do, judzment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the ten of sald taxes and costs against each parcel of sald Teal property for the sums and amounts due tpen and charged against each, for sald taxes, Interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against {t respectively as pro- vided by law, and ag prayed In plaintiff's rompiaint, now on Ate in this cause and court. W. T, GAFENER, Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Se- attle, Wash, Feb. 12—Mar, 26, 1909. NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF SEAL EStTATZ. State of Washington, County of King. <“gs.—-Sheriff's Sale, By virtue of an execution tssued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 6th day of, Febrnary, 1908, by the clerk thereof, in the case of Wiliam Fl. Cross, Plaintiff, vs, Ting County et al, Defendants, No. 48.485, and tome, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice ts hereby given, that T will pro- coed to sell at public auction to the high est bidder for cash, within the hours pre- serihed by law for sheriff's sales, to-wit: At 10 o'clock A. M, on the Srd’ day of April, A. D. 1909, before the Court House doar ‘of said King County, In. the State of Washington, all of the right, title and Interest of the entd plainti®, Wiliam TH. Cross in and to the following described pronerty, situated In King County, State Of Washington, to-wit: ‘The South halt (8%) of the North wost quarter (NW%) of the Northeast quarter (NEM) of the Northeast anarter (NEY) of Section one (1), of Township twenty-two (22) north, of Range two (2) east, of W. M, levied on as the property’ of sala piainti¢, William, FH Groms to satiety a fudgment amounting. to Ten ($10.00) Dollars, in favor of de fendants. Dated this 19th day of February, 1909, ROBERT T. HODGE, Sheritt, By JOHN STRINGER, ‘Deputy, First publication Feb. 19, 1909, Last aublication March 19, 1909. Have a Legal? hone Main 305 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King County. Nettle Behle, Plaintiff, vs. August Behle, Defendant No. 66131. SUMMARY. The State of Washington to the said August F. Behrle, Defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the summons, and to this summons, the twixt; within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and a demand of the plaintiff, the undersigned atorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff, which has been nixed with the olerk of the said court. A brief statement of the object of the said action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant, on the ground of non-support, cruel treatment and personal indignities. CARRICO & DURK Attorneys for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 603 People's Savings Bank Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. March 26—May 7, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Olivia Slettengren, Deceased—No. 8852. office of Hearing of Petition for Order Directing Administrator to Execute Notice is hereby given that C. A. Lehmann has filed a petition herein asking for the specific performance of a real estate contract made by the deceased in her life for lots 12 and 13, block 1, Manitou Park Addition, Kitsap County, Washington, and asking that their Slettengren, administrator of said estate, be authorized and directed to execute a deed to him said property and upon presentation of said petition the court fix the time for hearing the same for 9:30 o'clock in the foremenon on the 29th day of April, 1909, and notice is hereby given that said petition will be heard in Department No. 5, perior Court of the State of Washington, for King County, on the said 29th day of April, 1909, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the foremenon and any person so desiring can then and there appear and be eard. Dated this 23rd day of March, 1909. D. K. SICKELS. IN JUSTICE COURT—BEFORE JOHN E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Prednet, King County, State of Washington. C. Gibson and George M. Wintermute, Plaintiffs, vs. Standard Chair Company, Defendant. No. 6779-80. Summons for Publication. for 10 State of Washington, County of King—ss. The State of Washington to the Stand- ard Chair Company: You, and each of you, are hereby not notified that C. C. Gibson and George M. Wintermute have had a complaint against you, in said Court, which will come to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 15th day of April, A. D. 1909, at the hour 8:30 o'clock a.m., and unless pear and then and after the answer, the same will be confessed and the demand of the plaintiffs granted. The best and demand of said complaint is for work and labor done and performed for you by the plaintiffs at your request, being for commission, sale of goods. Filed March 15th, O.D. E. JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seat- tle Precinct, King County, Washington. W. H. RENNER, Attorney. March 19—April 2. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Mary Eliza Miller, Plaintiff, vs. Joseph James Miller, Defendant. No. 65,328. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Joseph Miller, Defendant: are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days the 5th day of February, 2014, and defend and defend action in the entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff in office and post office address, how designated, and in case of failure so do, in accordance will be rendered against the plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to a decree of divorce in the bonds of the plaintiff, how existing between plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of desertion and abandonment. of desertion into MORRIS, SOUTHARD & SHIPLEY, Attorneys for Plaintiff MORRIS, SCO Attorneys for Plaintiff Office and postoffice address: 55 Haller Building, Seattle, King County, Wash- ington ington. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. PROBATE NOTICE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King. ss. I. The Matter of the Estate of Martha J. Whittier, Deceased. No. 8719. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Merriel Whittier, administrator on the estate of Martha J. Whittier, deceased has rendered to an accused said court his final Tuesday, the 25th day of March, 1909, at 8:30 o'clock, A. M., at the court room of the Probate Department in the City of Seattle, in Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed said court for the settlement any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the Witness, the Hon. Geo. E. Morris Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said court hereto affixed this 18th day of February, 1909. ALLEN W. for Administrator. Feb 18—March 19. Notice of Sherif's Sale of Real Estate. STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY of King—ss. Sherif's Office. By virtue of an executive issued out of the Honorate Court of King the 12th day of March, 1909, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of B. Lashley, Plaintiff, versus F. W., Defendant, No. 1, to me, as Sher- fard delivered. invoice. It is hereby given, that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the Being an active attorney and from time to time having legal notices for publication, it is perfectly natural for you to want to get acquainted with those newspapers that do your kind of business. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Is just your size in this respect. It already has some notices for publication, as may be seen herein, but it needs more of them, and to that end your business is earnestly solicited. Your notices are promptly called for; handled with care and accuracy. Affidavits delivered without delay. Charges reasonable from a hard times standpoint; everything done in a jam-up manner. TELEPHONE MAIN 305 When you have a publication, and if it happens to be a Divorce Summons or a Notice to Creditors, give us the facts and we will do the rest. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN 307 Epler Block. Main 305. Notices Received Up to Friday Noon. highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock a. m. on the 1st day of May, A. D. 1909, before the Court House door of said King County, in the title and interest of the said defendant, F. W. Dost, in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lots eighteen (18), nineteen (19), and twenty (20), in Block twelve (12), Madison County, State of Washington, State of Washington, levied on as the property yof said defendant, F. W. Dost, to satisfy a judgment amounting to three hundred and eighty-one ($381.00) dollars, and costs of sult, in favor of plaintiff. Dated the day of March, 1909. ROBERT T. HODGE, Sheriff. BY BERT C. THOMPSON, Deputy. March 19-April 16. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Mary Louise Owen, Plaintiff, vs. F. J. Owen, Defendant. No. — —, Summons for the Publication. The State of Washington to the said F. J. Owen, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: February, 1409, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office be set forth for the sum of money to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain the decree of divisofoe existing between plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of abandonment and non-support extending over a period of one year, and asking that the community property be awarded to the plaintiff, and the custody and control of children. LOUIS Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 524 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. First publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. NOTICE OF INCREASE OF CAPITAL STOCK OF THE PACIFIC COAST RUBBER COMPANY. TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF THE CORPORATION COMPANY and 10 Pacific Coast Rubber Company and to all other interested persons: Greeting; You, and each of you, will please take notice, and notice is hereby given and extended to any and all persons in any wise interested in the concurrence of the Pacific Coast Rubber Company, a corporation, either as stockholders, creditor, or otherwise, that a meeting of the stockholders of said corporation will be held at the office and principal place of business of said corporation, backstage City, or Seattle, in County, on Tuesday, the Twenty-seventh (27) day of April, 1909, at the hour of ten o'clock a.m., the object and purpose of which meeting is to increase the capital stock of said corporation and amount of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000), which is its present capital stock, to the amount of Five Hundred Thousand ($500,000), and for the further purpose of declaring that the Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000) of national stock be designated and named by the trustees of the corporation as preferred stock; at which time and place a vote of the stockholders of said corporation will be had for the purpose of determining whether or not the increased amount of such an amount aforesaid and as to whether or not such increased amount of capital stock shall be set aside and sold as preferred stock; and further, any and all persons interested in such proceedings are required to be present at the meeting and present at the time they may have in record to such transactions. Dated at Seattle, King County, Washington, this 19th day of February, 1909, the date of the first publication hereof. OTTO RICHTER. FRANZ RICHTER. THOS F. BASSE. Trustees. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ATTORNEYS being an active attorney and from time to time being legal notices for publication, it is natural for you to want to get with those newspapers that do your k usiness. TTLE REPUBLI your size in this respect. It already notices for publication, as may be seen but it needs more of them, and to the business is earnestly solicited. notices are promptly called for; have care and accuracy. Affidavits delive out delay. Charges reasonable from its standpoint; everything done in a jar er. TELEPHONE MAIN 305 in you have a publication, and if it ha be a Divorce Summons or a Notice , give us the facts and we will do t SEATTLE REPUBLIC Block. Main 30 Fees Received Up to Friday Noon. mort, and are the IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Co., Inc., Plaintiffs, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any being the owner of property added to the hereinafter, described real property, Defendants. No. 62578. Native and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants and the interest, or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issue of Washington, measured in State of Washington dated the 13th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following years, in the following amounts, and upon the real property situated in King County, described as follows, tow- White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland—Lot 8, Block 2; Certificate Number 48259; for the year 1904; to the amount of That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 8, Block 2; White Brothers' Addition to Kirkland—35 cents for year 1905; 47 cents for year 1906; 58 cents for 1907, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and to the hereinafter described real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: Sixty days after the 26th day of February, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend the rights of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of a lawsuit, the court will be rendered herein, foreclosing against the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each or sale upon such lien, together with a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and AURORA LAND CO. Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg. First publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE PUBLIC COURT. State of Washington for King County, Gaffer, M. May, M. McPherson, all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No . Notice and Summons. Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- in and or holders of an interest or estate and to the hereafter described real property, are deemed plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and was issued as tolls of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Ogle's Garden Tracts—Lot 2, Block A; Certificate Number B51579, year 1903; That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, for Block A. Ogle's Garden Tracts—$2.74 for year 1904; $2.46 for 1905; $2.17 for 1906; $2.41 for 1907, which several sums bear interest in the property from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unre- deemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby required to appear within sixty days after date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: Within sixty days after February 26, 1909, in the above article, counsel and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and fees, upon judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the len of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said interest and fees, upon judgment will be rendered of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively is provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address, 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Last publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. S. E. Co., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the muffner described real property. Defendants. No. — Notice and Simmons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in the delinquent tax certificate described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1983, of the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: That the taxes for the following prior Town of Renton, S. and E. of line of Renton County Co.—Lot 13, Block 2; Crittenden Number B512582; year 1904; amount $1.37 and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 13, Block 2, Town of Renton, S. and E. of line of Renton Coal Co.—78 cents for year 1905; 87 cents for 1906; $1.02 for 1907, which several sums bear interest at the rate of $1.02 per cent. from state rate of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons, unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days of this notice, exclusive of the publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: Within sixty days after February 26, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail to pay the amount due herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sale of taxes entered in such sale of each parcel of said property for the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address, 457 satisfaction Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Federal publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Land Co. and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property dandants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you as purchaser, claimant, and owner of interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the following amount, and upon the real property situated in King County, described as follows,owit: Clarence Addition to Seattle—Lot 3 Number R60166; year 1904; Amount $1.57 That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: 1. 33 feet (33 feet), Block $, Claremont Addition to Seattle—$1.04 for year 1905; 79 cents for 1906; 83 cents for 1907, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment and taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after he is released from custody, and exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: Within sixty days after February 26, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, the foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against, each parcel of such taxes and costs, amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interests and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in affidavit, now on file in this cause and Court. First publication, February 25. Last publication, April 9. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners and all persons, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property. Defendants. No. —. Notice and Summons. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, excluding of the days after publication, to-wit: Within sixty days after February 26, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complain of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office be together with interest and costs. In case you fail so, judgment will be rendered herein, for closing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER, Plaintiff. Office Address, 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Washington. First publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first calendar of the date of wit: within sixty days after the 5th day of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the court and answer the complaint of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment to the rendered against you according to the Court's five (5), the Byron Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington. ELIAS A. WRIGHT. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. Address: 629 Burke Building, Seattle, Washington. March 5, April 16. pie coal tmenenlel 4 —_—_————__—_—_— Seattle Republican Published Every Friday, 307 Epler BIk. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton........Assoclate "SUBSCRIPTION RATES. SONG NAO ascends exsecniga sy GRO Bix Monthe oo... cece 1650 Three Months ..............000. 76 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mall Matter. Legal Publications a Specialty. With ‘‘thirteen ’’ jurors in a a box to try Calhoun, the alleged San Francisco grafter, why is not that city in line for another mishap more disastrous perhaps than the late earthquake that shook her from center to circum- ference? After only three days of mar- ried lifea Seattle woman became a raving maniac. Old grouch bachelors, who are opposed to taking the responsibility of a wife and family, now have an- other argument in their favor against getting married. It does not really matter how many blocks a policeman has to look over on the beat to which he is assigned, he does not look over any. A beat with only five blocks in it would for the most part be as sadly neglected as one with nine hundred blocks in it. Easter was simply ‘‘grand’’ and the ladies were quite equal totheoccasion. It may not have been the original intention of those responsible for Easter cere- monies to make it a day of gorg- eous display of fine clothes, but it is being done just the same. Governor Marshall, of Indiana, may be a Democrat and a Demo- erat of the old school, but Demo- crat though he is, heis not stand- ing for Tom Taggart, the India- napolis politieal Democrat boss to run gambling wide open at French Lick, a resort and a sec- ond Monte Carlo, his Democracy to the contrary notwithstanding, all of which must sound awfully strange to Tommy Taggart. An American has been made to believe that he really broke the pank at Monte Carlo, which was reported for no greater reason than to induce the hundreds of American suckers to try the game of breaking the bank and thereby lose every cent they have. A fool and his money soon part, and this is especially true of the average American traveling in Europe. Governor Hay seems to be in a hot box about what the legisla- ture meant when it ordered the state capital built. Hither the governor does not understand Mother English or he has worked himself up to the point to think the membersof the legislature did not. Had Governor Hay used the same amount of precaution in considering the Wenatchee bridge graft that he is using in the building of the capital, he would have vetoed instead of ap- proved of that $190,000 graft for a priyate concern, | Why should the coming of any! one else to the United States be, detrimental to the common good of the country? Regardless of what nationality an emigrant) may be, if the emigrant becomes an industrious, law abiding citi- zen, his presence in the country, whether in large or small num- bers, should be no handicap either to the country or the indi- viduals. The world was made for man and man has or should have the right to live in any part of it that hemay see fit and where he prospers the best, and that too, without the interfer- ence from his fellow man, “Necessary Evils” ‘There are no ‘necessary evils’ in government,” declares former Covernor Joseph W. Folk, of Missouri, adding ‘“‘that those who profited by abuses would shout the loudest in the denunci- ation of those who pointed out abuses.’” “Criminal wealth when as- sailed always tries to hide behind the skirts of legitimate business. The highest civic virtue is the overthrow of depravity. One of the obstacles to the progress of righteousness is the mistaken view that it injures a city or state to prosecute wrong doing. . If patriotism could be made as aggressive as rottenness, the problem of good government would be solved. If eorruption exists anywhere the people are to blame. If corruption is to be eradicat- ed the people alone can do it. What is needed is more of the sort of patriotism that fights for city, state and country every day—that will go into battles of peace as well as battles of war. The most conspicuous munici- pal governments in the United States today are governments by the. few and not by the people. Bosses usually are men of strong mentality but feeble morality, who have behind them the pub- lie service corporation and the saloon. They are the connecting links between the criminal rich and the criminal poor. They rule because the people do not rule.’”’ Facts and Fancies Mr. Sully, once known as a cotton king, proposes to saye Southern planters $250,000,000 annually. Of course he will ex- pect a commission, he end of the world has been set for 1914. Naturally people setting it retain the right to change the date. Mr. Patrick, of New York, dis- plays such anxiety to go to the electric chair.that the public is beginning to see excellence in the idea. Going the millionaire pace on $1000 income may be easy, but the road is short. "Ice is to cost more, on the the- ory that people will pay more than go without. J. J. Hill is reported as opti- mistic. Must have gotten his share of the earth when he and Harriman divided it. The liquor act is accused of “having asnake in it.”’ For the matter of that, so is the liquor. Boss Cox, of Cincinnati, was canght playing dice. The police were so astonished at finding him engaged in a game so inno- cent that they failed to arrest him. Doubtless the arrest of blind beggars is an occasional necess- ity, but the policemen who have it to do, do not feel entitled to medals, THE SATTLE REPUBLICAN |Warning to a Republican i Congress ‘OF BEAL JOSE, One Cees S| Taft before his term is half over? In preparing the new tariff, Chairman Payne and his associ- ates are compelled to meet two demands. To those industries whieh need protection they must give a rate which is adequate. They must provide for a revenue far in excess of that of the pres- entyear. Each of these require- ments was met fairly well by the present tariff when it was en- acted in 1897, but the changes in business conditions in the past twelve years have rendered a re- shaping of the schedules impera- tive. The Republicans recog- nized this necessity in their plat- form of 1908. Incalling the new Congress in extra session on March 15th, President Taft car- ried out the platform promise. Except in 1897, this was the first*time in which the Republi- cans, in reviewing a tariff, were compelled to keep revenue needs in mind. But this necessity at present is immeasurably greater than it was twelve years ago. While the -treasury deficit was $18,000,000 in, 1897, when Mr. McKinley entered office, it will be at least $120,000,000 for the year which ends on June 30th, 1909, four months after Mr. Taft’s accession, When aman or a firm in private business finds income falling short of outgo, the outgo is cut down. But to this elemental demand of finaa- cial common sense Congress gives no heed. In the recent regular session it expanded the apppropriations to unprecedent- ed dimensions, these appropria- tions being for the fiscal year which begins on July 1st, 1909. Even allowing for an improve- ment in business in the interval which would largely increase the government's income, the deficit for'the year which begins on that date will be in the neighborhood of $140,000,000 or $150,000,000 unless new sources of taxation are invented. Here is a double peril for the |Republican party. If the treas- ury shortage for the year which begins on July 1st, 1909, should be anything like $140,000,000, the Republicans will be on the de- fensive in the congressional cam- paign which begins just as that year closes on June 30th, 1910. The Democrats will be furnished with an argument which they can use with destructive force in the canvass. If, on the other hand, the Republicans are com- | pelled to provide new sources of taxation, they can also be hit by the Democrats. New taxes are endurable in time of war, but levied in peace days, as now, it will be difficult for the Republi- cans to defendthem. If the Re- |publicans re-impose the stamp and other taxes of the Spanish war days, they will lose many seats in the congressional elec- ‘tion, and, conceivably, could lose enough to put the Democrats in power in the House of Repre- sentatives for the second half of Taft’s term. We hope the Pres- ident will bear this fact in mind. The party which holds the presidency always loses some of the president’s term, Suffici- ent were lost in 1874, 1882, 1890, and in »1894 to put the other party in control. Thus Grant, (in his second term), Arthur, Harrison and Cleveland (in his second term), had the House of Representatives against him. Let the Republicans re- member that while Mr. Roose- velt, in 1905. started out with a Republican majority of 114 in the House, Mr. Taft’s lead in that chamber is only forty-six. A comparatively slight set back might give the House next year to the Democrats. The Republi- cans should be very cautious about imposing war taxes in time of peace. While they have carried the House of Representa- tives in every election since 1894, and beginning with that year, and while they have had a long succession of victories for Presi- dent, theyare not invincible. If adequate provocation be furnish- ed, the people might be tempted to turn them out and give the Democrats a new ttial. A very difficult and delicate task is be- fore the Republican tariff fram- ers at this moment, and we com- mend these facts to the careful consideration of President Taft, Vice-President Sherman, Speaker Cannon, and the other Republi- can leaders at Washington. — Leslie’s Weekly. Bishop Hamilton on Mis- cegenation But a few days ago and the newspapers of the land, and es- pecially the daily newspapers on the Pacific Coast were filling space with yellow journal ac- counts of a white girl having married a Japanese, and even until yet distant rumblings of Mr. and Mrs. Aoki are heard. Now comes Bishop John W. Hamilton of the Methodist Epis- copal church with the following startling announcement: “Tam going to say something that will astonish you all. There istno [necessity for having home and foreign missions. They are allthe same. You women are destined to be the great-great grandmothers of the conglomer- ation of the Chinese, the Japan- ese and of every other race of the earth as they now mingle in America. This is inevitable. 1 do not advocate it, but I do say that Jesus did not suffer more for one man than another. “The people of the lower classes will mix and mingle. It cannot be prevented nor can the habits of the vicious aristocratic classes. This will result in the intermingling of all the human races, which will reduce the number of races on the globe to one, The only hope for this con- conglomerate race is the church of God. We must fit the mem- bers of all these alien races for further membership in the big family.” When further questioned 4s to whether he favored the mingling of the races, he replied: “Tt is none of my business. There is so much crime and wrong doing going on, which we may deplore but cannot-help,’”’ In discussing the relations in this country between the white man and the black man, he said: “I do notadvoeate social equal- ity. That is a matter which will take care of itself. But if a white man chooses to eat with FRIDAY, APRIL 16, 1909 Negroes in his own house or in company, it is his own business, and it would be a piece of the grossest impertinence for any ‘one to object. | ‘I myself once dined witha Negro, a doetor of divinity, who was my guest in a hotel. An impudent young man swaggered up behind the table and inquired of the waiter what ‘that nigger’ was doing there. I sprang to my feet, told him who I was and inquired if he wished to speak to me, but he ran away like a shot to the other side of the room. “T know a Chinese preacher in San Francisco who had a white wife. She is everything that a preacher’s wife should be. Their married life leaves nothing to be desired. Things like this contribute to the solidarity of the race. ‘However, we have nothing to do with these matters — with equality of the races and inter- marriage. It is toomuch trouble to interfere with another man’s martial affairs. But we have to do with the idea of one man get- ting the idea that he is so much better than his fellow man. I will probably be misrepresented on this subject, but I cannet help it, for it is discrimination before God to which I refer. There are other inequalities than those of race,”” When all of us learn to takeas liberal view of this ques- tion as Bishop Hamliton then there will be a millenium not far ahead. Uncle Samis destined to become the father of a people in in whose veins courses the blood of all nationalities, and that peo- ple will be the most powerful people physically, intellectually and otherwise, that has ever in- lhabited the globe. To even want to establish a consumptive camp in the midst of a resident portion of the city is criminal in its very idea to say nothing of actually establishing the camp. The residents of Queen Anne Hill should not only register their protests, but. should defend their rights by force if need be to prevent such an outrage. When residents of another section of the city are going to court to prevent a man of a different race from them- selves building an elegant resi- dence among them, then the res- idents of Queen Anne Hill have a hundred times more legal rights to not only try to prevent by law but by big, armed force the bringing of diseased patients among them. Sickly sentiment is making herculean efforts to prevent Pio- neer Place from being converted into.a rest station for the con- venience of the general public, As a beauty spot there is no de- nying the fact that Pioneer Place, being as it isin the heart of the city, the none such, but beauty spots are not to be con- sidered when convenience spots are wanted. As it now stands the only place a stranger can find a lavartory is in some saloon and strangers do not always feel inclined to take advantage of the open invitation of saloons to use even their conveniences. By all means lets have the rest station at Pioneer place, and we further suggest that Fortson Place like- wise be converted into a rest station, and still others would not be out of place, FRIDAY, APRIL 16, 1909 BENCH AND BAR. NOTES OF IMPORTANT DECISIONS Elections — Illegal solicitation of campaign funds.—It is sur- prising how much money the people are urged to contribute to each of the two great politi- cal parties ‘in order to prevent the other from securing most of their votes with which to ride in- to power and to crush under the jron heel of oppression the rights of the common people. Our last clause is the usual per- oration: of the Democratic and Republican orators which we haye now come to accept with patient resignation. But pati- ence ceases to be a virtue with us when year after year we are assessed for contribut' ons to con- vince the other fellow while at the same time the other fellow is likewise importuned for funds to convince us. When we and the other fellow, especially if we pe office holders, get together, this little one-sided game of chance is declared off and a law is passed prohibiting the solicita- tion of campaign funds among certain employes of the govern- ment. All such laws are in the inter- est of a sound public policy and should be liberally construed in favor of the fellow who has spent all of his money in obtain- ing an office and then is asked to mortgage his debts in order to keepit. We commend therefore, the decision of the United States District Court in the recent case of United States v. Smith, 163 Fed. 926. In this case defendant was in- dicted under the federal statute for soliciting in the postoffice at Clanton, Ala., a contribution of money for a political purpose from the postmaster. It appear- edthat defendant was the Re- publican committee chairman of the county, and that he was con- ducting a political campaign there. He wrote letters in his office to a number of persons, in- cluding the postmaster, soliciting campaign contributions, and af- ter putting them in envelopes, andsealing and addressing them, took them to the postoffice to stamp and mail. While stamp- ing the letters in the postoffice, the postmaster came into the. room and spoke to him. De- fendant thereupon handed him the letter addressed to him, say- ing? “This willsave a stamp.’” He took the letter, and defend- ant, without advising him as to its contents, immediately left the postoffice, not having in any way solicited any contribution except by the sealed letter. The court held that a verbal solicita- tion was not necessary to consti- tute the offense on the ground that the statute forbids the so- licitation in any manner what- ever, and, therefore, the solicita- tion was complete and the stat ute was violated when the letter was handed to the postmaster. : Constitutional law—Indefinite in fixing the offense in a crimin- al statute. —Against many of our criminal laws the charge of in- definiteness is often made. And in many cases the charge is well founded, until today in many states a citizen is not only pre- sumed to know the law but also what the legislation intended to prohibit or what the courts may say the legislation intended. This is very unsatisfactory, but is only exceeded when the legis- lature adds to this uncertainity the interference of some court’s idea determining agency in fix- ing the crime, so that the citizen must not only know the law or what the legislature intended by the law or what the courts shall say that the legislature intended but must also know at their peril what the courts shall say that the legislature intended for certain outside organizations to do before the definition of the crime shall be definitely fixed. This was the situation con- fronting the Supreme Court of Montana in the recent case of State v. Holland, 96 Pac. Rep. 719, which involved the construc- tion of a statute which provided that any person who shall wear or use the insignia or ceremonials of any society, order or organi- zation of ten years’ standing in the state, unless entitled to use or wear the same under the con- stitution or regulations of such organization, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Appellant con- tended that this law was uncon- stitutional as it enabled the or- ganization to fix the offense, thus delegating to it the exercise of powers rightfully belonging to the legislature. Thus a citi- zen was unable to ascertain from the statute what he was prohib- ed to do, but had to gain such information from the regulations of asecret society which were closed to him. Toavoid the pen- alty of the statute he had to keep himself posted as to the changes in such societies. The Supreme Court of Montana held thatas the legislature declared the prohibition and provided the penalty for its violation, but left it to the societies to supply the description of the violated ritual, the statute was unconstitutional. —Central law Journal. U.S. District Attorney Joseph B. Keating, of Indiana, recently resirned his office rather than assist in an attempt by the gov- erment to remove the case of criminal libel against the Indian- oplis News, from Indiana to Washington City for trial. Keat- ing contended that defendants had a right to & trial at home. It will be remembered that this was one of the contentions made by our forefathers when Great Britain was in the habit of carrying them across the ocean to be tried upon criminal com- plaints. Mr. Keating is evident- ly one of those prosecutors who thinks it more important to have justice dealt out fairly than to lose a case—a prosecutor who re- members that a defendant has some rights and is entitled to some-consideration even though the prosecutor might get more yellow journalism advertising by ‘conducting himself as a persecu- tor instead of a legitimate prose- cutor as contemplated by law. Regardless of the merits of the case, the average American citi- zen will respect the prosecuting attorney who had the courage to resign his office rather than be a party to depriving a fellow hu- man being of rights which he be- lieved him to possess ~~ even though temporarily under the cloud of a criminal charge. The right of a state by statute or a municipalality by ordinance to regulate the speed of auto- mobiles seems to be clearly rec- fi PE le OE [oo ae SS aa [fe Sere eee Be a [Bea 2 ee oo) RAISE cea | cS oC .. a ct we = ne | Pro cee ‘ . \ y/ JOHN H. SCHIVELY Insurance Commissioner, whose office is being investigated by the legislative committee and whose connection with he Live Stock Insurance Association of Spokane is being investigated by the Grand Jury now in session there. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ognized by most of the courts that have passed on the ques- tion. Efforts have been ‘made: to show that such statutes were in- valid because they did not apply to other vehicles. But an auto- mobile is different from the us- ual vehicles found ordinarily upon highways, and its opera- tian occasions dangers peculiar to itself and makes it a proper subject for consideration by the legislature under the police power of the state. The cases of Bellingham v. Cisna, 44 Wash., 397; State v. Smith, a Rhode Island case and State v. Swaggerty, a Missouri case, all dealin an interesting manner with this question. The necessity for such regula- tions is deeply impressed by the number of accidents occasioned by the machines. Recent Deaths of Noted Persons. Governor Samuel G, Cosgrove, of Washington, at Paso Robles, Cal., March 28th, Mrs. Pierrie Lorillard, Jr., prominent figure in national so- ciety, at Washington, March 25th Suicide. Aquilla Chase,* “‘the youngest soldier in the Union army”’ dur- ing the Civil War at New York, March 25th, aged 60. Suicide. Mrs. Eliza M. Zarega, form- erly Baroness von Bretton, at New York, March 26th, .aged one hundred. Professor Alfred Messel, fam- ous German architect, at Berlin, Germany, March 24th, aged 56. Rev. Dr. Sereno E. Bishop, prominent missionary in Hawaii, and writer, at Honolulu, March 2th, aged 83. Avon Saxon, once a famous op- era singer, at Halifax, Nove Scotia, March 24th, aged 52. Charles Gonthier, Prince of Schwarzburg - Sonderhansen, at Dies, Germany, March 28th, aged 78, _ Dr. James Hume Canfield, li- brarian of Columbia University, well known lecturer and author, formerly president of the Uni- versity of Ohio, and chancellor of University of Nebraska, at New York, March 29th. aged 62. Charles B. Waite, ex-territorial judge of Utah, friend of Lincoln, noted author and historian, at Chicago, Ill.,* March 26th, aged eighty-five. Borrewed Thoughts Foreign noblemen are, as be- fore, on the free list. — New York Post. Naturally the tariff on stock- ings will help to keep them up. —Augusta Chronicle. The tariff on white rhinocer- oses, dead or alive, remains the same. —New York World. If the inheritance tax will bring the inheritance, it will be all right.—Florida Times-Union. As far as some of the infant industries are concerned, the tariff is cruelty to children. — At- lanta Journal. The senate is waiting to con- vert Mr. Payne’s measure into one of those popular cut-off puz- zles. —Baltimore Sun. At least Judge Kenesaw Moutain Landis did everything he could to reduce the deficit. — Memphsis Commercial Appeal. Works of art over twenty years old ought to let in those dapper and perfumed foreign noblemen, —Indianapolis Star. Congress should now permit some tariff speeches to have birth that have slumbered for twenty years in the systems of certain statesmen, —Chieago News. _ One reason that the consumer fares badly is that he is not able to keep up an expensive lobby ir Washington.—Chicago News. The new tariff will reduce the cost of your new house very ma- terially—until the bids are open- ed and you wake up.—Indianap- olis Star. Behold the sons of the rich racing through the pages of the Constitution te see if there is anything in it about the inherit- ance;taxes.—Teleda Blade. Thef proposed tax on tea does not create much excitement. Times have changed since that little tea party at Boston in 1773. —San Francisco Call. & Reports that Mr. Carnegie was consulted about the terms of the new tariff bill are confirmed by thelfactt that curling stones are on its free list.—Chicago News. © Women of art more than twen- ty years ‘old can come into the country free. Strictly applied, that would still keep out most ef our Raphaels and Botticellis.— New York Post. Mere Man’s opinion—Kicker— Do you think the tax on women’s gloves should be increased? Bocker—No, they should tax the mitten.—New York Sun. Wit and Humor A Boston lawyer tells this story on another lawyer named Ames, who wasretained as coun- sel fora man who stepped ina hole in the street and broke his leg. Suit was brought against the city in the sum of $100,000. and Ames won the case. The city appealed to the supreme court, but here also the verdict was in favor of Ames’ client. After settling up the claim, Ames handed his client a silver dollar. “What is this for?’ asked the man, “That is whatis left after tak- ing out my fee, the cost of ap- peal and other expenses.”’ The man regarded the dollar a moment, then looked at Ames. “‘What’s the matter with this?”’ he asked. ‘‘Is it bad?” Three colored men were dis- cussing the intelligence of diff- erent animals. One favored the deg, another the horse; but old Peter Jackson said: “In my opinion de goat am de *tellingentest critter livin.’ De goat kin read. I saw him do it. Once I was walkin’ down street dressed in my best suit, an’ wearin’ mah new plug nat. When : got down on the main street I seed a billboa’d on which it said: ‘Chew Jackson’s plug.’ A goat wuz standin’ thar when I passed and when I wuz ten feet away he must hab recogniz- ed me, fur de next thing I knew I went sailin’ in de mud. When I looked ’round dat goat wuz chewin’ mah plug hat for all he wuz worth. Gen’men, da is no question in mah mind about de *telligence of de goat. Heama wondah.,”’ “Your dead husband wor a good mon,”’ declared the sympa- thetic Mrs. Casey to the bereay- ed widow. “He wor!’’ exclaimed Mrs. Murphy, dashing the tears from her eyes. ‘‘No two polacemin cud handle him.’’ > f : — X IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ‘THE uate of Washington for the County Of icing. Pobate notice. fh the mnatter of the guardianship of James isimer Gatley, Liltlan Gatey and Haith Gailey, minors. No. 10089, No- tice. of application for appointment of guardian, Notice. is hereby given that D, a. Galley: has led im_the Superior Court Of the State of Washington, tor the ounty of King, a petition praying that a guardian of te persous and estates of Tames Elmer Gailey, Lillian Gailey and Rare hGalley, be appointed, and tat lee ters of guardiansitip be issued 10D. “A, Galley. and that ‘Thursday, the 21th day Of May. 1008, at 9:90 o'clock a. my. of Said day, at the court room of the Pro- pate Department of said Superior Court has been set for Hearing sald petition, When ‘ana where any. person. Interested May appear and. show cause Why” the braver’ Or said petition “should noe be ranted. erWitness, the Hon. A, W. Frater, Judge of waid Superior Court, and the seal of Said Court nereunto aifixed this 1st day of April, 1909, D, K, SICKELS, Clete. hy PERGY MO DHOMAS, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Probate notice. State of Washington, County of King, ss. ‘In the matter of the estate of John C. Morrow, deceased. No. 6819, Notice of settlement of final account. Notice is hereby given that J. M, Wiestling, the administrator of the es- tate of John C, Morrow, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in’said Court his final account as such administrator, and that Thursday, the 6th day of May, 1909, at 2 o'clock a m., at the court room of the Probate Department of our said Su- perior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly ‘ap- pointed by said Court for the settlement of sald account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing tO said account, and contest the same, Witness, the Hon. A. W. Frater, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of Said Court hereto affixed this Ist day of April, 1903, D, K. SICKHLS, Clerk, By JOHN M. WILMOT, Deputy Clerk. April 2-April 29, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington for King County, In the matter of the estate of William A. Murray, deceased. No. 9933. Notice to creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 23d day of March, 1909, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said deceased and Wlizabeth A. Murray, to present them with the necessary vouch- ers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 709 Lowman Building, Se- attle, Washington, the place of business of sild estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and at- ter the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, April 2, 1909, WILLIAM J. MURRAY, As Administrator of sald Estate, THOS, M. ASKREN, Attorney for Hstate, 709 Lowman Building, Seattle, Wash. ‘April 2-April 29, 1909. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. In Probate. In, the matter of the estate of Charles H., Page, deceased, No. 10001. Notice to’ creditors. Pursuant ‘to an order of the Superior Court made herein March 26, 1909, no- tice is hereby given to the creditors of and all persons having claim against Charles H. Page, deceased, or his es- tate, to present ‘such claims with the necessary Vouchers attached to the un- dersigned administrator of said estate at Room 10, Haller Building, Seattle, Washington, ‘within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice, or such claims will be bar- red, Date of first publication April 2, 1909, GEORGE H. ALDEN, As Administrator of the estate ‘of Charles H. Page, deceased. B, B, MOSER, Attorneys for said estate, ‘April 2-April 29, 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. In probate. In the matter of the estate of David H. T. Gage, deceased. No. 9406. Notice to. creditors. Pursuant to an order of the Superior Court made herein March 26, 1909, no- tice is hereby given to the creditors of and all persons having claim against David H, T. Gage, deceased, or his es- tate, to present such claims with the necessary vouchers attached to the un- dersigned administrator of said estate at Room 10, Haller Building, Seattle, ‘Washington, within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice, or such claims will be barred. Date of first publication April 2, 1909. B. B. SIMPSON, As Administrator of the estate of Davia ‘H, T. Gage, deceased, R. R. MOSER, Attorney for said Bstate. April 2-April 29, 1909. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County, In_progate. In the matter of the estate of Nancy W. MeLean, deceased. No. 10063. No- tice to creditors. Pursuant to an order of the Court made herein on the 26th day, of March, A. D, 1909, notice 1s hereby given to the creditors, and all persons having claints against Nancy W. McLean, deceased, or against her estate, ‘to ‘present such claims with the necessary vouchers at- tached to the undersigned executor of said estate, at Room 10, Haller Block, Seattle, Washington; said place belng the place designated by sald executor for the transaction of the business of said estate, within one year from the date of the fitst, publication of this notice, to; wit: within one year from the second day of April, A. D, 1909, or such claims will he forever barred. SUSAN S. McLEAN, As Executrix of the estate of Naney W. McLean, deceased. B. EB. SIMPSON, B. B. MOSER, Attorneys for said Estate, April 2-April 29, 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE Btate of Washington for King County. BB. Lyon, plaintif®, vs. Dr. Francis G. Bryant, Henry H, Baker, and Marle L. Baker, "his wife, the unknown heirs of any of the above named defendants who are deceased, and all other persons or parties unknown haying or claiming any right, title, interest or lien in or to the real property described in the com- Blaine herein, defendants, No. 66269, jummons. ‘The State of Washington to the sald Dr, Francis G. Bryant, Henry H. Baker, and Marie I. Buker, his wife, the un~ known heirs of any Of the above named defendants who are deceased, and all other persons or parties unknown having or claiming any right, title, interest or lien in or to the real property. described in_the complaint herein, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the fixst publication of this summons, to; wit: within sixty days after the 2nd day of April, 1908, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve 2 copy of your an- Swer upon the undersigned attorneys for plainthif, at thelr address or office below Stated; ‘and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint which has been filed with the Clerk of said court. Said action is brought to quiet plain- tif’s ttle In and to the following de- scribed real property in the County, of King, State of Washington, to-wit: lots 1 to’ 10 inclusive, being the whole of block 11 Bay View Addition to the City of Seattle, HOWELL & BENJAMIN, Plaintiff's Attorneys. P, 0. Address: 340 to 343 N. ¥. Bik, Seattle, Wash. “April 2-May 14, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, In probate. In the matter of the estate of Cor- liss P. Stone, deceased. No. 7500. No- tice, Notice is hereby given that the Wash- ington Trust Company of Seattle, ag ad- ministrator with the Will annexed of the estate of Corliss P. Stone, deceased, has this day presented and filed with the Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County, its 2-—REPUBlican legals—Tomy. first anual report and petition asking that the widow's portion of the said es- tate be segregated and distributed to her, and. that, The 29th day of April, 1909, at 2:00 o'clock p. m. af the Court'of the Probate Department’ of our said Superior, Court in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, has been appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account and the hearing of said petition, at Which time and place any person inter~ ested in said estate may appear and contest the same. Witness, the Honorable A. W. Frater, Judge of ‘sald Superior Court, ‘and the seal of sald Court hereto affixed this 1st day of April, A. D. 1909. D. K, SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F, THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. ‘April 2-April 29, 1909. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. In probate, In the matter of the estate of John ©. Morrow, deceased. No. 6819. Order to show cause why distribution should not be made. J. M. Wiestling, administrator of the estate of John C, Morrow, deceased, hav- ing’ filed in this court his petition set- ting forth that sald estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said peti- tion sets forth facts sufficient to au- thorize a distribution of the residue of sald estate: It ig therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said John C. Morrow, deceased, he and appear before the sald Superior Court of King County, State of Wash- ingotn, at the court room of the Pro- bate Department of sald Court in. the City of Seattle, on the 6th day of May, 1909, at the hour of 2 o'clock, p. m. of safd'day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of dis- tribution should not be made of the res- idue of sald estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, ac- cording to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four ‘successive Weeks before the said 6th day of May, -1909, in The Seattle Republican, @ newspaper, printed and published in “said King County and of general circulation therein. ‘Done in open court this ist day of April, 1909, A. W. FRATER, Judge. State of Washington, County of King, 85, I. D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-oiticlo Clerk of the Su- perior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certi- fy that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an. original’ order. to show cause, made by sald Court on the Ist day of April, 1909, in the matter of the estate of John C. ‘Morrow, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 1st day of April, 1909, D. K. SICKELS, ‘Clerk. By JOHN C. WILMOT, Deputy Clerk. ‘April 2-April 39. 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. In probate, In the matter of the estate of James ‘Wilbur Jones, deceased. No. 6771. Or- der to show cause on sale of real estate. Amanda L, Jones, the administratrix of the estate of James Wilbur Jones, de- ceased, having filed her petition in this Court,’ duly verified, praying for an or- der of this Court for the sale of a part of the real estate of which the sald de- ceased died seized, for the purposes therein set forth; = And it appearing to the Court from said petition that the personal estate of the said deceased in the hands of sald administratrix 1s not suffictent, to pay the claims against the said estate and the expenses of the administration there- of, and taxes and special assessments, that It is necessary to sell all or a por- tion of the real estate of the said de- ceased to pay the sald claims and ex- penses of the administration. And it ap- pearing to the Court, that said petition conforms to, and is in accordance with the requirements of law in such case made and provided, It 1s ordered by the Court that all persons interested in the estate of the said deceased appear hefore said Superlor Court on ‘Thursday, the 7th day of May, 1909, at the hour of 9:80 o'clock in the forenoon of said day at the court room of, the Probate Department of said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King Coun- ty, then and there to show cause, If any they have, why an order of this Court should not be granted to sald adminis- tratrix authorizing and empowering her to sell the said real estate of sald de- ceased, or so much thereof as may, be necessary to pay the aforesaid claims and expenses of administration. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before the sald 7th day of May, 1909, in ‘The Seattle Republican, a newspaper print- ed and published in said County of King and of general circulation therein. Done in open Court this Ist day of April, 1909, A, W. FRATER, Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss. I, D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Su- perlor Court of the State of Washing on, for the County of King, do hereby THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN n- certify that the foregoing is a full, true 1d and correct copy of an original order to Tl show cause, made by said Court on the g ist day of April, 1909, in the matter of mr the estate of James Wilbur Jones, de- d Ceased. Witness my hand and the seal of sald yr Court this Ist day of April, 1909, 16 D. K. SICKELS, 0 Clerk. id By G._B. MYERS, re Deputy Clerk. + ee ee FS ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for -King County, Permelia F. Robinson, Plaintitt, va. David M. Robinson, Defendant, No, —. Summons. ‘The State of Washington to David M. Robinson, Defendant; You ate hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the frst Publication of this’ Summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after ‘the 19th day of February, 190%, and defend the above entitied action In the above en- Utled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the ‘plaintift at his office below stated; and in case of your failure £0 to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the Clerk ‘of said court. ‘The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce, absolute, by plain- (im from ‘defendant on the ‘ground of extreme cruelty, JAMES MeNENY, Plalntif’s Attorney, Office and P.O. Address: 614 Marion Bldg, Seattle, Wash, February 1$—April 2, 1909, IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. William B, Hays, Plaintiff, vg, Rhoda A. Hays, Defendant, No. 65,567. Sum- mons’ by Publication. ‘The State of Washington to the sald Rhoda A. Hays, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publica~ tion of this summons, ‘to-wit, within sixty days after the 18th day’ of Feb- ruary, A. D. 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your ans- wer upén the undersigned attorney for Plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint, which has been fited with the clerk of said court. The object of the sald action, set forth in the complaint, {8 to obtain an absolute decree of divorce from the defendant on the grounds of de- sertion, BE. H. CARRICO, Plaintif’'s Attorney. Post Office Address;, Room 608 Peoples Savings Bank Bldg, Seattle, King County, Wash. February 19—April 2, 1909, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Ira A. Bleming, Piaintitt, vs, Amelia A. Fleming, Defendant. No.——, Sum- Tons. ‘The State of Washington ‘to the said Amelia A, Fleming, Defendant: You are hereby ‘summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 19th day of February, 1909, and defend the above entitled ‘action’ in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your, ans- Wer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court, ‘The object of this action Is to obtain a decree of divorce on and in behalf of the plaintiff; to dissolve the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between plaintiff and defendant on the grounds of desertion on the part of the defend- ant, and to obtain custody of the chil- drei and award of property, HOLZHEIMER, HERALD & HOLZHEIMER, Attorneys for Plaintift. Office Address: 428 Lumber Exchange Bldg., Seattle, Wash, > Feb. 19—April 2. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County Or King. | Probate Notice, State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the matter of the estate of William Sparks ‘Thompson, deceased. No. $801. Notice of settlement of final account, Notice is hereby given that G. Alston Hole, the administrator with the will an- nexed of the estate of William Sparks ‘Thompson, ‘deceased, ‘has rendered to, and filed in said Court his final account 4s such administrator, and that ‘Thurs- day, the 13th’ day of May, 1909, at 2 o'clock p. m., at the Court Ttoom of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in sald King ‘County, has been duly ‘appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested In sald estate may ap- pear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. A. W. Frater, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of Said Court hereto affixed this Ist day of April, 1909. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By JOHN M, WILMOT, ‘Deputy Clerk. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County—In Probate. In the matter of the Guardianship of William Kenneth Ross, a minor.—No, 9476. Notice of Sale. Notice is hereby given that In pursu- ance of an order in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County, made on the 11th day of March, 1909, in the matter of the above entitled guardianship, the undersigned, as guard- fan of the minor above named, will sell at private sale, to the highest bidder for cash, and subject to confirmation by said’ Superior Court, the following de- seribed real property of said minor, sit- uated in the County of King, State of Washington, and particularly’ described gs follows, to-wit: The undivided one: half of Tracts Wighteen (18), Nineteen (19), ‘Twenty-six (26) and ‘Thirty-one (31); of Shinn's Cloverdale Addition to Kent, according to the recorded | plat thereof, on file In the office of the county auditor’ of said King County. Said sale to be made of ali the interest and estate of said minor, in and to all said real property, in one parcel. ‘The payment for said real property to be made on the confirmation of said sale by the court, and the making and delivery to the purchaser, of a deed to sald real property, by the sald guardian. Said sale will be made on or after the 27th day of March, 1909, and offers and bids for the purchase of said real prop- erty will be received at the office of R. R. George, in Suite No. 210 in the New York Block, on the Northeast. corner, of cherry Strect and Second Avenue, in, the city of Seattle, King County, Washing- ion. ‘ ‘Date of this notice and date of frst publication hereof, March 12th, 1909. ‘SARAH A. ROSS, as Guardian of the above named Minor. March 12, March 26th. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and fpr King ounty. William 3, ‘Terrill, Plaintiff, vs. Kate ‘Terrill, Defendant.—No, ..... Summons. ‘The state of Washington to Kate Ter- nil, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within ‘sixty. (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty’ (60) days after ‘the 12th day of March, 1909, and defend the above eniitted action, In the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of plain- tit, and serve a copy of your answer tipon the undersigned, attorney for plain itt, at his office below, stated; and in case of your failure so to do, Judgment Will be taken against you according to the demand of. the complaint, which is fileg ‘with the Cleric of said Court, ‘The object of this action Is to obtain a decree-of divorce from you upon the ground. of desertion and abandonment for more. than one year last past, by you of the said plaintift, JAMES MeNENY, Attorney for Plaintitt. 514 Marion Bldg, Seattle, Washington. ‘March 12, Aprit 23. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County —In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Wilus Burry, Deceased.—No. 8984. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the Sth day of March, 1909, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against sald deceased or against sald estate, to pre- sent them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 734-739 Central Bullding, the place ‘of business of said estate, in Se- Attle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of thie notice or same will barred.” TRE? OF first publication, 12th March, 09. LUCIUS ANDERSON, As Administrator of said Estate. FARRELL, KANE & STRATTON, ‘Attorneys for state. 739 Central Building, Seattle, Wash. First publication March 12. Last publication April 2nd. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, 8 corporation, Plaintif, vs. J, B, West and Jane Doe ‘West, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons un- Known, if any, having or claiming an interest In and to the hereinafter de- seribed real property, Defendants —No. 64545. Notice and Simmons. "The State of Washington: ‘To the above defendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate fn and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the Rbove named plaintiff is the holder of ‘one delinquent tax certificate issued by the ‘Treasurer of King County, State of ‘Washington, dated the 17th day of Aug- ust, 1908, and number as follows, for the Gelinquent taxes of the following year in the following amount and upon. the reael_ property situated in said King County described as follows, to-wit: Lot six (6), block seven’ (7), White Bros, Add. to. Kirkland, King ‘County, Washington, being certificate No. 352921 for the year 1904, ninety cents (900). ‘That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff! upon said above deserib- ed. real. property, to-wit: Lot six (6), block seven (7), White Bros. Add. to Kirkland, for the year 1906, fifty cents (0c); for the year 1905, thirty-six cents (36c). Which several Sums bear Interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of pay- ment ‘and are all the unpaid and, unre- deemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you are hereby fur- ther notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the first date of publication of this notice, exclu- sive of the day of date of publication, to-wit: March 12, 1909, in the above en- titled court and ‘action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your an- Bwer on the undersigned attorney for plaintif! at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with in- ferest and costs. Incase you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foredlosing the Wen of anid taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due Upon and charged against each parcel of said real property for the sums and ‘mounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, Interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respective- ly as provided by law and as prayed, in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. ‘AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Cor- poration, Plaintift, F, J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintitt, Office Address: 814 Northern Bank’ & ‘Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication, March 12. Date of last publication, April 28. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the Matter of the Bstate of P. C. Warwick, Deceased.—No. 9949. Notice to. Creditors, Notice is hereby given that I have been appointed administrator with the will annexed of the estate of P. C. War- Wick, deceased, and all persons having claims against sald, estate are hereby required to present them to me with the necessary vouchers at the office of Hiram J, Jacobs, at No, 625 New York Block, in the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, the place of the transaction of the business of said es- tate, within one year from the date of the first publication of this notice, or the same will be forever barred. ‘Dated at Seattle, Washington, March Gth, 1909. HIRAM A. EMERY Aaministrator with the will annexed of the Estate of P. C. Warwick, De- ceased. Date of first publication, March, 12, Pate of last publication, April 9% IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington, in and for King County. Aurora’ Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Ed. Bleith’ and Jane Doe Bleith, his wife, whose true christian name ‘is unknown, and all persons un- Known, if any, having or claiming an Interest or estate in and to the herein- after described real property. Defend- ants,—No, 65167. Notice and Summons. ‘State of Washington: ‘To the above defendants and each of them: ‘You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that, the above named plaintift is the holder of three delinquent tax certificates issued by the Treasurer of King County, State FRIDAY APRIL 16, 1909 of Washington, dated the 29th day of ‘April, 1908, and numbered as follows, for. the delinquent taxes of the folloy year in the soe w Ee amount and uj the real property situated in sald. County described as follows, to-wit: ‘Lot fifteen (15), block four (4), Kirke land Syndicate 2nd Addition to Seattle, being certificate No. B49631 for the year 1904, ninety-eight cents (98c), lot nine- teen’ (19), block four (4), Kirkland Bie dicate’s 3nd Addition to Seattle, bel ie certificate No, B49535 for the year 1904, ninety-eight cents (98c). Lot twenty~ two (22), block four (4), Kirkland Syn- dicate’s 2nd Addition to Seattle, ing County, Washington, being certificate No. 149538, ninety-elght cents (98¢). ‘That the taxes for the following prior and. subsequent years have been paid by the Ane upon,said aboye deserib- ed_reael property, to-wit: Lot fifteen (15), block four (4), Kirk- land Syndicate's 2nd Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington, for the year 1508, forty-aix cents; for the year 1906, fifty-nine cents; for the yen 1907, an cents; lot_nineteen (19), block four (4). Kirkland Syndicate’s 2nd Addition to 8é- attle, for the year 1905, forty-six cents; for the year 1906, fifty-nine cents; for the year 1907, fifty cents; lot twenty- two (22), block four (4), forty-six cents; for the year 1906, fifty-nine cents; for the year 1907, fifty cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 16 per cent. per annum from said date of pay- ment and are ajl the unpaid and unre= deemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you are hereby fur~ ther notified and summoned to be and apepar within sixty days after the first date of publication of this notice, exclu- sive of the day of publication, to-wit: within sixty days after March 12, 1909, in the above entitled court and ‘action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff! and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below Stated or pay the amount due, together With interest_and costs, Tn ‘case, you fail so to do judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each par- cel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against. each, for sald taxes, interest and” costs, ordering a sale. of each parcel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law and as Preyee in plain- tiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and’ court. AURURO LAND COMPANY, a Cor- poration, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintift, Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & ‘Trust Bldg, Seattle, Wash. March 12-April 23, IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington, in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Hd, Blelth’ and Jane Doe Bleith, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the herein after deseribed real property, Defend- ants.—No, 66104. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington: ‘To. the apove named “defendants and each of enn: You and each of you, as owners, claim ants or holders of an’ interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the Rbove named ‘plaintift is the holder of two delinquent tax certificates issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 29th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the Geliiquent taxes of the following year in the following amounts and upon’ the real property situated in said King Coun- ty deseribed as follows, to-wit: Lot sixteen (16), block four (4), Kirk- land Syndicates nd Addition, to Seat tle, being certificate No. 849932, for the year 1904, ninety-elght cents (980). Lot twenty-four (24), block four (4), Kirkland Byndieate's 3n@ Addition to Se- attle, being certificate No. B4040, for the year 1004, ninety-eight cents. (98c). ‘Phat the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintift upon sald above described real estate property: Lot sixteen (16), block four (4), Kirk- land Syndicate's 2nd Addition to Seattle: year 1905, forty-six cents; year 1906, fifty-nine cents; 1907, fifty cents. Loot twenty-four (34), block tour (4), Kirkland Syndicate's 2nd Addition to Be- attie: year 1905, forty-six cents; 1906, fifty-nine cents: 1907, fifty cents, ‘Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum trom said date of payment, and are all the un- paid and unredeemed taxes upon and Rgainst said real property. "You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appeaer within sixty days after the serv- ice of this notice upon you, by publica- tion, exclusive of the day of publication, to-wit: within 60 days after March 12, 1909, in’ the above. entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintif! and serve a copy of your answer on the under signed attorney for plaintift at bis omes below stated or pay the amount duo, to- gether with interest and costs, In caso You fail so to do, judgement will he ren- dered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against eich, for sald. taxes, interest. and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property ‘for. the satisfaction of the Sums charged and found against it re- spectively as provided by law and as prayed Jn piaintiats complaint now on fled in this cause and court. ‘AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Cor- poration, Plaintift. Fg, GARVBR, Attorney for Plaintift, al4°Northern Bank & Trust Bldg, Seattle, Wash, Date of first publication, March 12. Date of last publication, April 28, IN_THP SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. BL, Siegrist, Plaintif, vs. Laura Sie- grist, Defendant. No. ——. Summons by Publication, ‘The State of Washington to the said Laura Siegrist, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to. appear within ‘sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 19th day of March, 1909, and defend the above entited action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your an- Bwer upon the undersigned attorney for plaincit a¢ hs omce below stated, and incase of your failure so to do judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of Sald Court. ‘The object of this action is to secure a divorce from the defendant, above hamed, for cruelty. WILLIAM ©. KEITH, ‘Attorney for Plaintift, Post Office Address: 45. Starr-Boyd Bldg, Seattle, King’ County. Washing on. Niarch 19—April 30, IN THE SUPERIOR GOURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, plaintiff, vs. G. W. Roberts and Jane Doe Roberts, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in the case after deprived real property defendants. No. 82578. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in the property, are hereby furnished real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th day of January, 1994, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, towit: Wake Bros. Addition to Kirkland, lot 9, block 2, certificate No. B 49259, year 1904, amount 89 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, towit: Wake Bros. Addition to Kirkland, 35 cents 1905, 47 cents 1906, 58 cents 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid sums of taxes upon and paid real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication, of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after March 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of taxes and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against respectively the parcel of taxes and amounts due upon and charged plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARRY Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. Attorney for Plaintiff. First publication, March 5. Last publication, April 16. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Hyman Greenblatt and Molly Greenblatt, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. Lena Dulin, Ida Dulin, Louis Dulin, Harry Mernstein, Max Nef, guardian of Lena Dulin, Ida Dulin and Louis Dulin, Joe Mernstein, guardian of Harry Mernstein, sues. No. 65814. Summons b. Publication. State of Washington to the said defendant, Lena Dulin. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, wit. Within sixty days after the fifth day of May 1909, and defend the above attempted action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs, at his address bellow stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment, agree against the plaintiffs according to the demands the complaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of said action is to quiet title to lot 7, of the Plat of Beacon Place in the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, and all other defendants, and each of them, have no interest or estate whatsoever in and to said lands and premises and decreeing that plaintiff's title is good and valid and that each and all of said defendants have a deceased claim whatsoever in and to said lands and premises adverse to the said plaintiffs. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiffs. Office and Post Office Address, Rooms 604-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. March 5, April 16. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Plymouth G. Saving Bank, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in any of the latter property defendants. No. 65262. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an intracourt real property, described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County State of Washington, dated the 12th day of November, 1908, and numbered B54461, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of $1.50, and upon real property situated in said King County State of Washington, dated the 20th day of Thirteenth (13), Block Twenty-two (22), Burke's Second Addition to the City of Seattle. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff and said above described real property, to-wit. For the year 1905, the sum of 94 cents. For the year 1906, the sum of $1.92. For the year 1907, the sum of $2.04. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from sale date of payment, and are all the upmost taxes upon and abstain said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the notice, pay this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after March 12, 1909, in the above entitled court and action, and entitle the action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undesigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or the that the due notice of interest an costs. In you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts incurred in the said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed for, sent, now on file in this cause and Court. Cause and Office L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MacDonald, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. March 12, April 23. CALL OF STOCKHOLDERS' MEETING for Increase (or Decrease) of Capital Stock. To the Stockholders of Olympic Roofing Company: a Corporation: Notice is hereby given that a meeting of the stockholders of Olympic Roofing Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Washington, has been called by order of the board of trustees of said corporation, to be held at 629 Boulevard Bldg., the City of Seattle, at 10:30 a.m. on the 1st day of May, 1909, at two o'clock p. m., for the purpose of considering a resolution to increase (or decrease) the amount of the capital stock of said corporation, and that at such meeting it is proposed to increase or decrease the capital stock of 5,000 shares of the par value of $10.00 each, inclusive of its present capitalization. In witness whereof, we, a majority of all the trustees of said corporation have hereunto set our hands on this, the 3rd day of March, 1909. B. F. ZIMMERMAN. C. G. HACKETT. March 5—April 30. PROBATE NOTICE. State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King —ss. And the Matter of the Estate of Daniel H. O'Brien, Deceased. No. 7009. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Mary A. French, administratrix of the estate of Daniel H. O'Brien, deceased, has renders account as such administratrix, and that thursday the 29th day of April, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock, A. M., at the court room the probate department, and said Supplier of Seattle, has appointed said King County, has been duly appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person may file his exceptions estate marrying to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. A. W. Frater, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said court hereto affixed this 9th day of April, 1909 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Hyram E. Myers, Plaintiff, vs. Annie Annie Etta Myers, Defendant. No. 66,437. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Annie Etta Myers. Defendant: for sixteen days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 9th day of April, A. D. 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is to obtain an absolute decree of divorce from defendant on the grounds of deser HERBERT L. JACKSON, Post Office Address: Room 605 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. April 9—May 21, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. William Wilson, Plaintiff, vs. Eiffle H. Wilson, Defendant. No. — Summons by publication. The Plaintiff, in Washington, to the said Eiffle H. Wilson, Defendant, above named: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days of the day of the first publication of this summons, to-wait: within sixty days after the 9th day of publication, to take the entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated and case will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this suit is to obtain a decree of divorce on the ground that the decree has deserted, and for desertion, this plaintiff. P. O. Address: 1015 Alaska Bldg., Se P. O. Address: 1015 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, April 9, 1909. Date of last publication, May 21, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of Elliot L. Gaetz, Deceased. No. 10,019. Notice to Creditors. No. 10,019 is hereby given that I have been appointed administratrix of the estate of Elliot L. Gaetz, deceased, and all persons having claims against said estate are hereby required to present them to me with the necessary vouchers, at No. 40 to Baker King County, Way of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, the place of the transaction of the business of said estate, within one year from the date of the first publication of this notice, or the same will be forever barred. Dated at Seattle, Washington, April 4th, 1909. MATTIE A. GAETZ. Administratrix with the will annexed of the Estate of Elliot L. Gaetz, Deceased. Date of first publication, April 9, 1909. Date of last publication, May 7, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of C. C. Maring, Deceased. No. 6311. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Francette P. Maring, executrix of the last will and testament of the said C. C. Maring, deceased, of the estate above estate, has rendered to, and filed in said court her final account as such executrix and administratrix, and that Thursday, the 29th day of April, 1909, at 2, o'clock, P. M., at the court room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in Court City, in the City of Seattle, appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in written to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. A. W. Frater, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of sation of hereto affixed this 8th day of April, 1909. April, 1906. D. K. SICKLES, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. —In Probate, In the Matter of the Estate of Charles E. Peterson, Deceased. No. 10,036. No THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN tion to Creditor By order of said court made onhere on the 1st day of April, 1909, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administratrix of said estate, at 1513 First Avenue West, Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said court, county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, April 2nd, 1909. GEORGIA PETERSON, As Administratrix of said Estate. ELIAS A. WRIGHT, Attorney for Estate. 800-222-2222, Seattle, Wash. April 3—May 7, 1909. NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King —ss, Sheriff's Office Born virtue of an execution, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 1st day of April, 1909, by the clerk thereof, in the case of Frye Erhu, Inc. (a Corp.), Plaintiff, vs. W. T. Wood and R. A. Wood, his wife, W. T. Wood and R. A. Wood, his wife, O. T. Wood, and O. T. Wood, no. 65,541, and to me, as sheiff, the defendant. Notice is hereby given, that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheiff's sales, towelt: at 10 o'clock, A. M., on the 15th hour, for the house door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendants, W. T. Wood and R. A. Wood, his wife, O. S. Wood, in and to the following described property situated in King County of Washington. The Southeast quarter (SE$^4$) of the Northeast quarter (NE$^4$) of the Southeast quarter (SE$^4$) in Section fifteen (15), Township twenty-five (25), Range five (5); the South half (S$^2$) of the South half (S$^2$) in Section fifteen (15), Township twenty-five (25), Range five (5); Lots thirteen (13) and fourteen (14), Block six (6), Hillman City, Div. No. Addition to the City of Seattle on as the property of salt defendants, W. H. Wohlhis wife, and O. S. Wood, to satisfy a judgment amounting to One Hundred Forty-one and 43/100 ($141.43$). Dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 2nd day of April, 1969. ROBERT T. HOUSE Sheriff. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Permella F. Robinson, Plaintiff, vs. David M. Robinson, Defendant. No. 1048th notice to take Depositions. To the abbreviated defendant. You are hereby notified that on the 24th day of April, 1909, at 9:30 A. M. I will apply on behalf of plaintiff, to the said Superi- or Court, in Department No. One thereof, at the court house in Seattle, 1048th judgment a courtroom in Albert H. Barclay. Esq. to take the deposition, on written interrogatories, of Mrs. Lester Leonard, at No. 48 Church Street, in the City of New Haven, Connecticut, on the 80th day of April, beginning at the 8 o'clock of that day. to be used in said cause that said de- position will be taken at the time and place, and before the said commissioner, above mentioned. Dated Seattle, Washington, April 8th, 1909. JAMES McNENY. Attorney for Plaintiff. 514 Marian Bldg., Seattle, Washington. April 9—April 23, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King In the Matter of the Estate of George C. Collins, Deceased. No. ____. Notice to Creditors. The executors designated having been appointed executrix of the non-intention will of George C. Collins, deceased, notice is hereby given to the creditors of and all persons having claims against said deceased, or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to theigne executrix of said estate, at her place for the payment of any expenses for said estate, to-wit. Room 402 Arcade Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit, within one year from the 9th day of April, or such claims will be forever barred. ALICE O. CGLLINS. executrix of the Estate of George C. Collins, Deceased. HOWARD H. STARTZMAN, State of Washington, County of King ss. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King George Winston, and Emma Winston, his wife, Plaintiffs, vs. Harry O. Tiedemann, Jane Doe Tiedemann, his wife, unknown heirs of Jane Doe Tiedemann, deceased; James L. Wilson, and Marie Johnson, his wife, A. Howland, and Jane Holland, his wife, Rasmussen, and Nora Rasmussen, his wife, Emma Smith, John Roe Smith, her husband, O. F. Field, and Jane Doe Field, his wife, John Clark, and Jane Doe Clark, his wife, and King County, one of the counties of Washington, and all persons of parties, unknown, claiming the right that the state may interest in the real estate described in the application herein, Defendants. No. 28. Application. The State of Washington to the above named defendants, greeting: You are hereby summoned and required to answer the application of the applicant plaintiff in the above entitled application for registration of the following land and situate in King County, Maryland, in King County, 9, inclusive, and 23 and 24, in block 3 to 8, and 10 to 28, inclusive, in block 11; 1 to 10 and 20 to 30, inclusive, in block 13; all in the Gem Addition to Des Moines, according to the official plat, and to file your answer to the said application in the office of the clerk of said county, twenty days after the service of this summons you, exclusive of the day of such service; and if you fail to answer the said application within the time aforesaid, the applicant plaintiff in this action will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the application herein. Sidney, D. K. Sickles, Clerk of said county, and the thereof at Seattle, in said county and state this 6th day of April, A. D. 1909 HOWELL & BENJAMIN 342 New York Block, Seattle, Wash. April 9—April 23, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Washington is the only known Onwers, and all persons unknown in having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. . . Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued (the Ticket Killer) by the State of Washington, dated the 17th day of January, 1907, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King Court, dated the 17th day of January, 1907, Certificate No B47,258, for the year 1904, in the amount of $1.47, on lot 40, block 10, Ballard Park Addition to Seattle; that the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above defendants, dated the 17th day of January, 1907. For the year 1905, the sum of 85 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.78; for the year 1907, the sum of $2.03; which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of publication, and are thus inclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 5th, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and oppose its answer on the undersigned plaintiff at the date below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forecailing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said property upon the date upon which due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's plaintiff, now on file in this cause and court. Date of first publication, Feb. 5, 1909. Date of last publication, March 19, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Oscar Daye, Plaintiff, vs. Angeline Daye, Defendant. No. — Summons. State of Washington to Angeline Daye: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the deadline, first publication of this summons, to-wit, sixty days after the 5th day of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and ans- sure the complete disclosure of your a copy of your answer upon the under- signed, attorney for the plaintiff herein, at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the contract between him and the defendant, filed with the clerk of this court. The nature of this action is an action wherein the plaintiff above named seeks to secure an annulment of the nuptial contract between him and the defendant, has the recovery of his costs of this action, to be taxed by the clerk of this court. JOHN H. ALLEN. Office and Post Office Address: 45 Maynard Building, Seattle, Washington. First publication. March 5. Last publication. April 16. SUMMONS ON APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF LAND. State of Washington, County of King IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. George Winston, and Emma Winston, his wife, Plaintiffa vs. Joseph Baumeister, his wife, the unknown heirs of Jane Doe Baumeister, deceased, wife of Joseph Baumeister, W. A. Rosenberger, and Jane Doe Rosenberger, his wife, the unknown heirs of Jane Doe Rosenberger, deceased, wife of W. A. Rosenberger, Alfred Johnson, D. A. Johnson, L. W. Wilson, Jane Doe Johnson, his wife, Mrs. Mary Ross, John Roe Ross, her husband, State Savings Bank of Tacoma, J. V. Johnson, Jane Doe Johnson, his wife, O. J. Volland, Jane Doe Volland, his wife, Niels Nilson, Jane Doe Nilson, his wife, James L. Wilson, and John Osborn, J. O. Osborn, Jane Cleary, Jane Doe McCleary, Carry Osborn, Jennie Osborn, his wife, and all other persons or parties, unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the application herein, Defendants, No. 29. Application to the above named defendants greeting: You are hereby summoned and required to answer the application of the applicant plaintiffs in the above entitled application for registration of the following cases: Washington, to-wit; Lots 4, 5 and 7, block 8; lots 2, 3, 9, 10 and 11, block 7; 2, 3 and 8 to 13, inclusive, block 35; lots 1, 2 and 3, block 24; lots 7 to 16, block 27; lots 4 to 9, inclusive, block 36; lots 1, 2 and 3, block 24; lots 6 to 7, 8 and 9, block 54; lots 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12 and 3, block 59; all in Southern Pacific Land Company's Second Addition to Des Moines, according to the official plat, and to file your answer to the said application within the court for the said court, in said county, within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of such service; and if you fail to answer the said application within the time aforesaid, the applicant plaintiffs this action will apply to the court for the said demanded in the application herein. Witness, D. K. Sickles, Clerk of said court and the seal thereof at Seattle, in said county and state this 6th day of April, A. D., 1909. D. K. SICKLES. Clerk. By MAURICE THOMPSON. Deputy. HOWELL, & BENJAMIN, 342 New York Block, Seattle, Wash. April 9—April 23, 1909. SUMMONS ON APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF LAND. State of Washington, County of King state. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King, George Winston, and Emma Winston, his wife, Plaintiffs, vs. Charles Beaton, Jane Doe Beaton, his wife, Ee, the unknown heirs of Jane Doe Beaton, deceased, wife of Charles Beaton, Lyman U. Loomas, Elizabeth B. Loomas, his wife, E. E. Bair, Jane Doe Bair, his wife, unknown heirs of Jane Doe Bair, deceased, wife of Charles Beaton, Lyman U. Loomas, known heirs of John Roe Bair, deceased, husband of Mary E. Bair, M. F. Kane, and Ida Kane, his wife, James L. Wilson, and Marie E. Wilson, his wife, and King County, Washington, and all other person s of parties, the claimant, any rightful person, the title, her interest in the real estate described in the application 4—REPUBLICAN hub therein, Defendants. No. 27. Application. The State of Washington to the above 7 named defendants, greeting: You are hereby summoned and required to answer the application of the applicant plaintiffs in the above entitled complaint, to the lowering land, situate in King County, Washington, to-wit: Lots 5 to 10, inclusive, and 15 and 16, block 36; lots 1 to 12, inclusive, block 37; lots 1, 2, 11, and 14, block 40; lots 1 to 4 and 9 to 8, block 41; lots 1 to 12, inclusive, block 51; lots 1 to 12, inclusive, block 56; lots 1 to 10 and 12 to 16, inclusive, block 63; all in Southern Pacific Land Company's Huntington Park Addition to Des Moines, King County, Washington, to-wit: The said application in the office of the clerk of said court, in said county, within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of such service; and if you fail to answer the summons, the applicant plaintiffs in this action will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the application herein. Witness, D. K, Sickles, Clerk of said court and the seal thereof at Seattle, in said county and state this 6th day of April, A. D., 1909. HOWELL & BENAMIN, Seattle, Wash. April 3 -- April 23, 1992 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. M. Grover, Plaintiff, vs. Ezra J. Grover, Defendant, No. 66205. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Ezra J. Grover, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear at court, and answer the complaint of the first publication of the case -to-wit, within sixty days after the 28th day of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- DED court, and answer the complaint of your answer upon the undersigned torness for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so do, judgment will be rendered and according to the demand of the complaint, with the seven filed with the clerk of the said court. Briefly stated the object of this action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant and to grant the plaintiff a demand from the defendant on the ground of breach of contract to the plaintiff by the defendant for more than one year last past, and for the failure of the defendant to support the plaintiff and his family, and to award to the plaintiff the following described lands and premises: Lots one (1) and two (2) in block one (1) of Taylor's Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington; Together with all of the other property belonging to either the plaintiff or the defendant which is within the jurisdiction of this court: BRYAN & RUMMENS Attorneys for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: Suite 1308 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. March 26—May 7. NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF THE UNITED TRUSTEE COMPANY. To the Stockholders: The regular annual meeting of the stockholders of the United Cities Trustee Company, be held at the office of the Company, New York Bank Building, Seattle, Washington on Thursday, May 6th, 1909, at one o'clock p. m., for the purpose of electing trustees ensuing year, and for such other business that may properly come before said meeting. RICHARD STEVENES ESKRIDGE, President. Attest: J. R. WHEAT, Secretary. March 26 - April 30. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Louis Clark, Plaintiff, vs. Charles H. R. Clark, Defendant.-No. 6113. Summons The State of Washington to said Charles H. R. Clark, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date to the first publication of this summons, 60th day in sixty (60), 26th day of March, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney and of the attorney office below and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, a copy of which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The case was been heard by the purpose of securing to divorce upon the ground of failure to make suitable provision for the support of the plaintiff. E. B. PALMER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Address: 709 Lowman Building, Seattle, Washington March 26-May 7. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Joseph C. Reiman, Plaintiff, vs. Ethel Bell, Defendant.-Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Ethel Reiman: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, bill of sale, on March 19, 1999, after the 19th day of March, 1999, and after the above entitled action in the above entitled court, an answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; do, judgment will be rendered against according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of the above entitled acti- tive is to obtain the bonds of matri- mony now existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of adulter- derous and non-support. HERBERT E. SNOOK. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 537 Burke Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. March 19, April 1 NOTICE TO CREDITORS Notice is hereby given that I have been appointed administratrix of the Estate of Harry E. Hopkins, deceased, and personal property against said estate are hereby required upon them to me at 114 N. Harvard Ave., Seattle, Wn. within one year from the date of this notice or the same will be forever borne. Dated, Feb. 19, 1908. CAROLYN F. HOPKINS, Administratrix of the Estate of Harry E. Hopkins, Deceased, 114 N. Harvard Ave., Feb. 19—March 19, 1909. 8 He Owed a Negro That associate press dispatch last week that told of a constable, an attorney and a lot of workmen, who went to the home of a Federal judge and dismantled it under a judgment execution regularly issued out of the courts of that state, did not seem to think that the law had in any way been violated, but the outrage of the matter was, a Negro held the judgment, and it was to satisfy his judgment that the house was disrobed of all of its belongings. Why should there be any more indignation among the members of the bar for the judgment held by a Negro being satisfied than if the judgement had have been held by the governor of the state or some banker? The whole affair seemed to us the most ludicrous piece of information that the associated press has ever sent over its wires. So ludicrous was it that, the Seattle Daily Times, as big a fool as it is, editorially had the following to say on the subject: "A federal judge in Atlanta is very much exercised over the fact that a Negro who held an unsatisfied judgment against him dismantled his home of its furniture. It would seem that the judge should have looked after the matter in the proper way and the fact that the man to whom the judgment was given was a Negro has no bearing upon the subject. Of course we must allow something for the fact that the occurrence had its scene in Georgia, but from the facts at hand, we cannot see how the fault does not rest with the judge rather than with the Negro." Its just such contemptible articles as this dispatch that keeps a continued strife going on between the white and black folk of this country. Federal judge though he was he should have no more legal rights than any one else, and the law should have compelled him to satisfy a Negro's just claim against him the same as it would have that of the most influential banker in the country. Freedom It is of consequence that the notion of freedom be within us. It does make a difference. How many pass through life oppressed by the idea that we are slaves dominated by environment and influences that are fixed, and are no different from the inanimate things about us. It makes a difference if we believe ourselves not slaves to circumstances, not with characters inevitably fixed, and can look into the possibilities of the future and draw strength from them. We may then be master's of life's field - Prof. Palmer in Boston Transcript. When you want to insure with a reliable firm, call on E. W. Way & Co. Try their Fire, Marine, Burglary, Accident, Plate-Glass and Employer's Liability insurance. They are in the Bailey Building, rooms 619-620. Phone Main 2115. Ind. L. 3356. Cora—I never discuss serious topics with Harold. He doesn't like clever women. Dora — Then in that case you should. THE FASHION WEEKLY The Seattle Republican is preparing to issue a similar publication in the very near future, which will be more comprehensive than the Northwest Negro Progress Number it issued in 1907, which number will be ready for distribution at the A.-Y.-P. Exposition and even before the gates of the exposition are thrown open to the general public. A competent force is now gatrehing facts for the next issue of the Negro Progress Number of the Northwest, and with the view of making it the best thing ever published in the interest of the Negro your aid is solicited. That the public may get a complete yet correct idea of what the Negro is actually accomplishing in the Northwest it is hoped that every Negro will render the compiler of the Northwest Negro Progress Number, which will be issued about the middle of May, all the assistance within his or her power. It is generally believed that a great many Negroes from the East, South and North will visit Seattle during the lifetime of the exposition, and they will be pleased to get hold of some reliable statistics accurately stating the progress the Negroes of this section are making. If, therefore, you live in a neighboring city and know of any one there owning a home, write The Seattle Republican and make the fact known. Touching the Negro Progress Number issued by The Seattle Republican a few of the many hundred complimentary press and personal notices are requoted: "The Northwest Negro Progress Number is par excellent. I am delighted."—Sergt. A. A. Houston, Spokane. "Permit me to congratulate you on your splendid edition, the Northwest Negro Progress Number."—E. F. Myer, Bremerton. "Your Northwest Negro Progress Number never had an equal so far as the Negro is concerned."—J. R. Hawkins, Winlock. "If the colored folk do not appreciate a publication like your Northwest Negro Progress Number, it is quite evident that they are sadly lacking in appreciation."—Jas. A. Moore, of Moore Investment Company. Selma Herman The Seattle Theatre has the best star actress and stock company of associate players that has ever been brought to Seattle for a lengthy engagement. Miss Selma Herman is an actress comparable with no stock leading woman that has ever played here, if her Gloria Quayle in "The Christian" this week is not a pace-maker, and she says it is not. The lady doubtless knows her capacity and prefers PROGRESS OF NORTHWEST NEGRO TO BE EXPLOITED PROGRESS OF NORTHWEST NEGRO TO BE EXPLOITED THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ```markdown ``` other parts, but how the part she is playing this week could be improved upon by any other actress is difficult to imagine. If there is any defect in it they are visible to the seasoned critic. So many things have been said about Miss Herman that the patrons of the Seattle Theater expected her to be out of the ordinary. She is. She is in a class with the best star actresses now playing in this country, and she possesses youth, good looks and intelligence that will lead her high up in the archives of fame if she PROGRESS OF NORTHWEST ERO TO BE EXPLOIT continues before the public. "The Christian," the play this week, is more of a man's play; that is the men of the company have more prominent parts than the women. Mr. McCullough, the leading man, plays quite as good a John Storm as any other actor ever seen here in the part. Mr. Otto, who plays Lord Robert Ure, and Robert T. Holden, in the character of Horatio Drake, come to the front quite prominently as the star does this week. Miss Herman's company is not only the biggest and best stock company west of Chicago, but to compare it with any other would be like comparing a diamond brooch with a lead one. "The Christian" continues all this week. Next week commencing Sunday matinee, Miss Herman and her associate players will produce for the first time outside of New York City that great artistic success from the Garrick Theater last season, "The Little Gray Lady." The play deals with semi-official life in Washington, D. C., i, e., with the employes of the Redemption Department, and the audience will have the first opportunity to view the inner workings of Washington, D. C., boarding house society, not as it was but as it is today. As Anna Gray (the little gray lady), Miss Herman will have a better part than she has this week. He—I wonder how long you could live without money? She — Oh, until you needed something. FRIDAY. APRIL 16. 1909 W. H. FINCK Pioneer Jeweler and Watch Maker. Our Holiday Specials Unequaled. 816 Second Avenue, Seattle, Wash. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE CONNECTION Business Office, Third and Spring People's Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R. J. Reekle, Vice Presst. Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. Incorporated by Trust General Bank and Exchange. Cor Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance 259 Colman Blk., Phone Main 695 BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty: All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. The Comfort. Newly furnished rooms. Walking distance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. I. ISRAEL WALKER, 1101-1103 Jackson Street. Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Electric Fixtures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. Choice 7 per cent First Mortgages on Improved Seattle Property Made by the bank and containing all the little safeguards that are so often overlooked by the inexperienced investor. Call or write. The Scandinavian-American Bank Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Brooks Co 1331 Second Ave., Arcade Bldg. Hatters and Men's Furnishers, Puget Sound National Bank. OF SEATTLE JACOB FURTH ... President J. S. GOLDSMITH ... Vice-President R. V. ANKENY ... Cashier CORRESPONDENTS IN ALL THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE. DRAFTS ISSUED ON ALASKA AND THE YUKON TERRITORY. Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. Phone For a Case of Rainier Beer Delivered to any Part of the City. Phone Ind. 5668. Main 5668.