Seattle Republican

Historical Society THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Price One Year, $3.00. Single Copies, 10 Cents. ATTORNEY ROBERTS PROTESTS John W. Roberts, a prominent attorney of Seattle, and legal representative of the National Surety Company, writes the TEE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN to the effect that, it was in error so far as the company making any protests one way or the other as to the paying of the Ortis Hamilton bond. He says the company has made no statement whether it would or would not pay the bond and declared that he was misquoted in the Seattle Daily Times, and of course there is no doubt of that, for, "Saw it in the Times? Damn lie," is a well known fact to every one, and if THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN had have seen it in the Times it would feel like censuring itself for giving it any consideration, but it was the country press that prompted us to comment on the proposition. We are glad that thus far the company has shown no disposition to not meet its obligations. In closing his letter, however, Mr. Roberts says, "I have refused to state to every reporter who has interviewed me whether the company would or would not contest the bonds." Is the general public to understand from this that there is no probability of the company refusing to pay the bonds? If the surety company wants to do the perfectly square thing, in view of the fact that it has already gotten its money for furnishing the bonds, let it come to the front at once and say, "Gentlemen, of the state of Washington, just as soon as you have checked up the Hamilton accounts the amount of the shortage to the limit of our bond for Hamilton will be forwarded you." Why assume a sphinx like attitude on the subject? What has the company up its sleeve that it refuses to make a free and frank statement of meeting its obligations when the state officials will have shown the company officials? If the company would come forward with a statement like this then its attitude could not be contorted, and it would mean an increase of business for it in the state of Washington. There is no doubt but that the state has lost money by the peculations of Ortis Hamilton and whatever company or individual that is on his bond should make good as much thereof as it or he is on the bonds for, and that too, without quibbling and splitting hairs. TAKE SCHIVELY TO COURT --- "If the legislature is being called together ostensibly for the purpose of impeaching John H. Schively, why not an information filed against him in the courts and have him tried for malfeasance in office, and if convicted that would have vacated the office under the constitution. If to drive a bad man from office is the ultimate aim of having the legislature to assemble then Gov. Hay could have saved the state the vast expense that will naturally follow the convening of the legislature by the simple plan of using the courts instead of the legislature," came from a well known politician one day this week. If the legislature is being assembled for the ostansible purpose of having Mr. Schively tried for malfeasance in office and if the governor has no other object fer assembling the members of the legislature then there is no doubt but ThaT it is a financial mistake, but it occurs to us that, there are bigger fish to fry than Schively, despite the fact the fire of the investigation has been directly chiefly at him. The tax payers for the most part are of the opinion that there are more rotten places in the state government than in the office of the state insurance commissiener and they want the legislature to probe into all of them and make a wholesale cleaning out of the political stables. Senator Hutchinson is still sticking to his text that the Medical Lake insane asylum management is rotten, that the building recently completed there has the ear marks of graft connected with it and it too should be looked into. There are hundreds of men in the state of Washington that have no doubts in their minds but that the Washington State College at Pullman is in bad shape financially and whether or not the investigating committee reports anything wrong the belief is firmly fixed in the minds of the tax payers and they want to see it thoroughly overhauled. It is even hinted that the University of Washington is not just what it should be and an overhauling there might not be out of place. Suppose the extra session does cost the state $30,000 and it saves to the state multiplied thousand of dollars it would be cheap at that. We insist that Schively is not the only pebble on the beach. SEATTLE. WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, JUNE 18, 1909 M. H. JOSIAH COLLINS "SAWCIETY" COLLINS CENSURED Will the Seattle "400" boycott the exposition? is the all absorbing question in local "sawciety" circles just now. Under the directorship of the Hon. Josiah Collins the receptions and the entertainments that are to be and have been held in honor of distinguished personages that have and will visit the exposition Mr. Collins has handled to suit himself, and persons that are in a position to make such entertainments a huge success have either been snubbed outright, so goes the story, or have been given but little if any consideration. Elaborate spreads are being given in the Washington state building, so it is reported, at either the expense of the state or the exposition management to persons of but little or no consequence, and yet when funds are asked for the entertainment of really distinguished persons, who are expected to attend the exposition, Mr. Collins bluntly retorts, "there is no money for their entertainment." "I do not think I ever saw power so badly abused as it is in the hands of Mr. Collins," declared a lady, who is way up in the social affairs of the city. "It occurs to me that the leading ladies of the city are preparing to leave the city for the summer this year just as though the exposition was not running and expecting some of the most distinguished persons of the country from time to time in Seattle, which persons should be entertained by the self-same leading ladies of the city," is reported to have come from President Chilberg in talking the situation over with one of the society ladies and she is reported to have retorted, "with clerks' wives taking the places of business men's wives, who furnished the money for the exposition under the direction of Mr. Collins, what more could you expect? I am not interested and I suspect there are others." This did not sound good to Mr. Chilberg and he has begun to look into the matter with the view of straightening out the tangled web if possible. Josiah Collins seems to think he has the opportunity of his life and he proposes to pay off old political and social scores at the expense of the exposition. SULLIVAN ESTATE DISTRIBUTED After ten years of strenuous litigation the estate of John Sullivan, who, it is claimed, died intestate, has been divided between the lawyers and the sharks that furnished the money to work the scheme. From appearances all are satisfied and the incident, so far as litigation is concerned, is closed. Old man Sullivan to all intents and purposes before he died was so afraid that some body would get his estate that he refused to name a beneficiary, and no sooner was he dead than the war for his money began. In the struggle the attorneys, if no mistake is made, has gotten about eighty per cent of the entire estate, and if the story is true, the other twenty per cent has gone to illegitimate heirs. Even the prosecuting attorney's office makes no bones in declaring that Edward Corcoran is as far from being the rightful heir to the estate as any of the others that have made application for it on the grounds of being relatives of the late John Sullivan. LIBRARY Volume XVI, Number 4. H. R. CAYTON, Publisher SEATTLE DAY Speaking about the tempest in the teapot that is now raging among the "400," reminds the writer that, Seattle Day, which the women of the city had decided to help make a howling success, has been changed to September 14th. Now if this social war continues and the leading women of the city decide to boycott the fair in a social way then the exposition management can put it in their pipes and smoke it that Seattle Day will not come within fifty percent of being the success that it would with the women taking an active interest in it. There is no doubt but that the success of Seattle Day depends on the work the women do toward pushing it along. More than one woman has already felt the power of Mr. Collins' chastening hand and it is falling so thick and fast these days that it is becoming very galling. Mr. Collins, it is said, desired Seattle Day set for August 24th and succeeded in having it so set, but the women protested and it went over until Sept. 14th, which was something of a victory for them, which has given them some hopes that the management will not be controlled wholly by Mr. Collins as to the social side of the show, while others of them have despaired of being able to accomplish anything in the fight and have decided to go to their summer camps and homes at an early date. Not only does Mr. Collins propose to monopolize the distinguished guests that visit the city during the life time of the exposition while on the grounds, but he has come even to the city and named the homes and hours that these guests may be entertained, and in most every instance he has selected some person wholly unprepared to entertain, and expect the other ladies to come forward and make it a success despite the fact they have been snubbed, rather than have the good name of the city socially besmirched. "Some of them may be so foolish as to do so, but excuse me," came from one lady, and from the look of contempt that came over her face it was plain to be seen that in a few weeks more she would be quietly resting in her summer camp, not giving a snap of her finger whether the exposition was a social success or not. PILES IN POLITICS The men who ran for the Republican nomination of county treasurer last year, but who were beaten by George F. Russell, who entered the race at the eleventh hour, are now asking themselves it is a trick of ledgerdemain in a political box that was played on them. The supreme court has confirmed the lower court in declaring that Matt H. Gormerly should hold over for two ensuing years, despite the fact that his term ended last January, and it is this latter decision that has caused the other fellows to set up and take notice. The other candidates for the nomination are now asking each other what part did Senator Piles play in the game? and who did he desire to punish when he threw Russell in the fight at the last minute, but subsequently named him postmaster before it was possible for him to qualify for the office to which he had been duly elected by the voters of the county. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN never doubted for a single minute, but that Capt. Gormley would hold office for another two years and Sen. Piles is too much of a lawyer not to only believe that he would, but actually know it. Whether or not he was a party to the affair is not known to the average citizen and to not even those who were candidates against Mr. Russell, but they are beginning to feel that he did and they are making dire threats against him at this time. The county commissioners named Pete Smith for the job and Pete is a part of the south district combination and his failure to become county treasurer has but forged another link in the political chain that will yoke Senator Samuel H. Piles with Political Defeat. From the Howard Gould divorce trial persons unacquainted with the ways and means of that particular sect or class of citizens that the United States is rapidly becoming burdened with, known as the "400," can get a brief insight of their corruption and immoralities. It is declared by those who ought to know whereof They speak That as in the Gould household so also is it in a great majority of The households That boast of being millionaires. It is The consensus of opinion of Those not in The "400" sect That That particular circle of American citizens are unfit To be classed as citizens and yet They control The government in one way or another. ut rir es Pr ee We Ssepiar es ai ; <4 MMSE cand as aomeeann aia IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. George Michael Schweizer, Marle Wiedtemann, Regina, Jakobing Frei, Jae top Schweizer, Katherine Kolb, Jacob Schweizer, Christina Kasper, Plaintiffs, vs. Lorenz Schweizer, M. Schultz, agent of Lorenz Schweizer, and the unknown heirs of the said Lorenz Schweizer, if he be deceased, and also all other per- sons or parties unknown, claiming any Tight, ttle, estate, Men ‘or interest in the Feal estate described in_ the com- pisint herein, Defendants. No. ———~ jummons by Publication. ‘The State of Washington, to the above named defendants Lorenz Schweizer and the unknown heirs of the said Lorenz Schweizer If he be deceased, and also all. other persons or, parties unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, Hen or {interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein: ‘You, and each of you, are hereby sum- moned to appear within sixty days after date of the first publication of this sum- mons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 18th day of June, 1908, and defend the above entitled action, in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs, at, his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you, and each of you, according to the demand of the complaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘The object of said action, as set forth in the complaint, is to partition the East forty-four feet ‘of Lots Two (2) and ‘Three (3), Block Two (2), Dean's Addi- tion to the City of Seattle, King County, ‘Washington, between the parties to said action, who'are the owners thereof, and for the sale of the said property If the partition can not be made without great prejudice to. the owners. ‘EDWARD VON TOBEL, ‘Attorney for Plaintiffs. Office and Post Office Address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg, Seattle, King County, Washington, June 18—July 30, 1909. SR BRAS COS ee ee Mee Ser State of Washington for King County. Lewis Wohlman, Plaintiff, vs. Lea Wohlman, Defendant, No. 67743, Sum- mons by Publication, ‘The State of Washington to Lea Wohl- man, Defendant: é ‘You are hereby summoned to, appear within sixty days after the daté of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the 18th day of June, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your Answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and'in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint herein which has been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘The object of said action, as set forth In the com- plaint, is to obtain a decree of divorce Uissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff! and defendant upon the ground of desertion and aban- donment that has continued for more than six years last past. EDWARD. VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintift. Office and Post Office Address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. June’ 18—July 30, 1909, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs, Thos. J. Edwards and Jane Doe Edwards, his ‘wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all per- sons unknown, if any, having or claim- ing an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 64718—Notice and Summons. State-of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an’ interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate is- sued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 27 day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the ‘delinquent taxes of the follow- ing year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in sald King County, deseribed as follows, to- wit: Lot 14, block 25, Carmode & Adsit's First Addition to ‘Kirkland, Certificate No, ,B49410, for the year 1004, amount ‘That the taxes for the following and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 14, block 25, Carmode & Adsit's First Addition ‘to Kirkland: $0.68 for the year 1905; $0.71 for the year 1906; $0.87 for the year 1907. ‘Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon. and against said real estate. You and each of you (including safd persons unknown, if any, are hereby fur- ther notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclu- sive of the day of first publication, to- wit: within sixty (60) days after May 28, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and an- wer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your. answer on the un- dersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount Gue, together with interest and costs. Tn case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the len of said taxes and costs against each pareel of said real property for the sums And amounts due upon and charged Against. each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each par- cel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against ft respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a corpora- tion, Plaintiff. FJ. ‘CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, Northern Bank & Trust ‘Co, Bldg., Seattle. Wash. IN JUSTICE’S COURT.—Before R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. George 8. Bartels, plaintiff, vs. Detroit “Robacco Company, defendant. No. ee Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King—ss. ‘To Detroit Tobacco Company: "you are hereby notified that George s, Bartels has filed a complaint against Sou in said court which will come on to te'heard at my_office in room 210 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 14th day of June, XD. 1509, at the hour of 8:80 o'clock a. m;, and’ unless you appear and then & J ithers answer, the same will be tak- Northwest Negro Pro- cress Number Tat wh Ot ees THE SEATTLE REPULICAN Promises to be the most Attractive Number of any magazine ever issued in the United States and certainly in the West Make thiszedition contain facts and figures as to the Actual Progress the Negro is making in this section of the United States, which you can by reporting such holdings among the Afro-Americans that you are personally aware of Business Men Interested Just as in a similar number issued in 1907 by THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN the business m of Seattle are much interested and are taking advertisement space to be inserted there which is greatly appreciated. It is the duty of every Negro in the Northwest to have some kind of an advertisement inserted therein in order that this section of the country make a good showing. THE SEATTLE REPUBL CAN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON en as confessed and the demand of the plaintit granted. ‘The object and de- mand of said complaint is to recover commissions earned by plaintiff in act ing as your agent in selling clears ani tobaceos in September, October and No= vernber, 1908, Filed May ‘7th, A. D. 1909, R._R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. WATKINS. & JOHNSTON, Attomeys ‘tor Plaintitt, 425 New York Bldg., Seattle, Wash. May 14—June 26, 1909. INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Ethel Carruthers, Plaintitt, vs. Charles 1, Carruthers, Defendant. ' No. 67,264. ‘The State of Washington to the ‘said Charles L. Carruthers, deefndant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 2ist day of May, 1909, and defend the above entitled aciion in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your ans- wer upon the undersigned attorney for Plaintift at his ome below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘The object of said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To obtain a decree of divorce upon the ground of abandonment for one year; also for the failure of defendant to make suitable provision for his family. JESSE. A. WILLIAMS, Attorney for Plaintitt, Office and Post Office Address: 2i7- 218 Hinckley Block, Seattle, King Cour- ty, Wash. May 21—July 2. 1909. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In Probate, In the Matter of the Estate of Hlenora Morris, deceased. No. 8291. Order on Fixing ‘Time for Hgaring on inal Ac- count and Petition for Distribution, L. B. Morris, the administrator of the estate of Wlenora Morris, deceased, hav- Ing this day rendered and presentéd for settlement and filed in this Court and cause his final account of his adminis- tration of the estate of said deceased: It is ordered that Thursday, the 15th day of July, A, D. 1909, at the hour of 2:00 o'clock in the afternoon of said day, in Department No. 7 of the above entitled Court, at the ‘Court House in the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, be and the same is hereby fixed and appointed as a time and place for a hearing and settlement of said account, at which time and place any and all ‘persons interested in said estate may be and appear then and there to file their exceptions in writing to said account and contest the same, and to show cause, if any they may haye, why said account should not be settled and approved, and said L. B. Morris, as administrator of said estate of said deceased, having filed a petition praying for an order of distribution of the rest, residue and remainder of said estate ainong the persons entitled there- 0: It 1s ordered that all persons inter- ested in the estate of said Elenora Morris, deceased, be and appear before Are You In Business? Let Everybody Help the above entitled court at the time and place hereinabove designated as a time and place for hearing on the final account of said administrator, then and there to show cause, if any, they may have, why an order of distribution should not be made of all of the rest, residue and remainder of said estate among the heirs of said deceased ac- cording to law. It is ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four suc- cessive weeks before the aforesaid date of hearing on said final account in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published inthe City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, and that the Clerk of said Court shall’ post notices thereof in three of the most public places in King County at least twenty days before the said date of said hearing, The real estate described in said final account and in the petition for distribution is as follows: An undivided one-half interest of, in and to the North half (N. 4) of ‘the Northeast quarter (N. ©. %) of the Northwest quarter (N. W. %) of Sec- tion sighteen, (18), ‘Township twenty, two (22) North, Range five (5) East, of the Willamette Meridian; also the North half (N, %) of the Northwest quarter (N. W.'%) of the Northwest quarter (N. W. 44) of Section eighteen (18), Township twenty-two (22) North of Range five (5) East of the Willamette Meridian, King County, State of Wash- ington. Done in open Court this 9th day of Tune, 1909. ED, B, HARDIN, Judge. June 11, July 9, 1909. INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County ot King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Mary BE. McIntyre, deceased. No, 4212. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. James McIntyre, the administrator of the estate of Mary E, McIntyre, de- ceased, having filed in’ this court his petition jsetting xorth “that, sald eatate js now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law. thereto, and it apeparing to, the court that said petition sets forth facts Sumleient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: Tt'is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Mary 1, Melntyre, deceased, he and appear before the sald Superior Court of King County, State of Wash- ington, at the court room of the Pro- bate Department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 15th day of July, 1909, “at the hour of 2 o'clock p.m! of said day, then and there to show Cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition men- tioned, according to law. Tt is further ordered, that a copy of this order be publishgg, once (a week for, four successive weeks before the sald 15th day of July, 1909, in the Se- attle Republican, @ newspaper printed and. published in’ sald King County and of general circulation therein, Done in open court this 4th day of June, 1909, ED. B, HARDIN, Judge. State of Washington, County’ of King. ss I, D. K. Sickles, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Su- perior Court of the State of Washing- on, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true ‘and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by, said, Court on the 4th day of June, 1909, in the matter of the estate of Mary H, Mc- Intyre, deceased. ‘Withness my hand and the seal. of said Court this, 4th day. of June, 1908, (Seal) -D. K, SICKELS, Clerk, By PERCY F. ‘THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. FRANK WIESTLING, 422 Boston Block, Seattle, Attorney for Administrator. . June 11, July 9, 1909. INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in ana for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs, Unknown Owners, and all persons’ unknown, if any, having or Claiming an interest in and’ to the here- fafter described real property, defend- ants. No, 64548, Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, are hereby noti- fied that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one delinquent tax certif- cate issued by. the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 16th day of September, 1908, and num- dered as follows, for the ' delinquent taxes of the following year, in the fol- lowing amount, and upon the real prop- erty situated in said King County, de- scribed as follows, to-wit: Lot Forty-six (46), Block One (1), Kirkland Park, King ‘County, Washing: ton, being Certificate No. B64316, for the. year 1903, Ninety-six cents (96). ‘That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent. years have been paid by the plaintift “upon said above de- Seribed real property, to-wit: Lot. Forty-six (46), Block One (1), Kirklind Park, for thé year 1904, ‘Thirty cents (300); for the year 1905, Forty- three cents’ (43c); for the year 1906, Fifty-three cents '(58c); for. the year 1907, Forty-eight cents’ (48e); for the year’ 1908, Forty cents (40c). ‘Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 18 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and gre all the Unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, ‘You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby farther notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the first date of publication of this notice exclusive of ‘the day of publication, to-wit, sixty days after June 11, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and ‘answer the complaint of sald plaintife and serve a copy, of. your answer on the under- signed attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with Interest and costs. In ease you fail so to do, judgment will he rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said. taxes and costs against each parcel. of said real property for the Bums and. amounts due ‘upon and charged. against each parcel of sald real property. for the.sums and amounts due uopn and charged against each, for Sala taxes, interest. and costs, ordering A ante. of each parcel of said, property jon the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as Provided "by “law, and as , prayed | in plaintiff's complaint, now on‘file inthis éause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Conpora- tion, Piaintitt. F. J, CARVER, ‘Attorney for Plaintift, Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & ‘Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash, June 11, July 28, 1909, a dente co Ulnakin wink fae Wie Coe ‘State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, plaintin, ve FB West’ and Jane Dos fest, his. wife, whose true ‘Christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an Interest In and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, defendants. No, 64562. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- Scribed Teal property, are hereby noti- fled that the above nained plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of August, 1908, and num= bered as follows, for the gelinauent taxes of the following year, ih the fol- lowing amount, and upon the real prop~ erty ‘situated in sald King County, de- scribed as follows, to-wit: ‘White Bros.’ Addition to Kirkland, lot 5, block 7, certificate number B52920, year 1904, amount 90 cents, That the taxes for the following. prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintif upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 6, block 7, White Bros.’ Addition to Rirkiand, amount 36 cents, for year 1905; amount 50 cents, for, year 1906; amount 60 cents, for year 1907, Which several sums bear Interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sala date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said Teal property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned, to be and appear within sixty days after the Gate of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publi- cation, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after June 11, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plain tit and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintift at his office below stated, or pay. the Amount due, together with’ interest and costs. In case you fail so ta do, judg~ ment-will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sims and amounts due up and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel Of said property for the satisfaction of fhe sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed In plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, « Conpora- tion, Plaintife. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff office Adaress:- Northern Bank & ‘Trust Co. Bldg, June 11, July 23, 1909. IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington for King Gounty. In Probate. In the Matter of the Guardianship of Mark Robert Morris, a minor. | No, 10369, Order to Show Cause on Sale of Real Estate. W, H. Vincent, guardian of the estate of Mark Robert Morris, a minor, having filed his petition herein praying for an order of the court for the sale of all the Fight, title and, interest “of the said minor of, in and to the following de~ Seribed lands and premises situate, ly~ ing and being in the County of King, State of Washington: ‘The North half (N. %) of the North east quarter (N. FE. %) of the Northwest quarter (N. W. %4) of Section, eighteen tig), ‘Township twenty-two (22) North, Range five (5) Hast of the Willamette Meridian; Also the North half (N- %4) of the Northwest quarter (N. W. %4) of the Northwest quarter (N. W. %4) of Section eighteen (18), Township Twenty two (22) North, Range five (5) East of the Willamette’ Meridian. ‘And it appearing to the court from said petition that suffictent cause exists for the sale of said real estate in order to prevent waste thereof, and In order that the form of the investment thereof may be changed and that money may be Tealized therefrom to support, maintain and educate said minor, and ‘that it is necessary that said reai éstate and the Whole thereof be sold for such purposes, and it appearing to the court, that sald petition conforms to, and is in accord- Ance with the requirements of the law in such case made and provided, it is therefore ordered that Thursday the 22nd day of July, 1909, at the hour of 1:30 O'clock in’ the afternoon of said day, at the Court House In the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, in Department No, 7 thereof be and ‘the same is hereby fixed as the time and place when and where all_persons_ inter ested In the estate of said Mark Robert Morris, a minor, may be and appear then and there to show cause, if any they may have, why an order shall not be granted to the said guardian to sell all Of the right, title and interest of the Said minor in and to the said real estate and the whole thereof, at, private sale, Tt is further ordered that a copy of this order shall be published for four successive weeks in the Seattle Repub- lean, a, newspaper printed and published in the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, before the time of such hearing. ‘Done in open court this 17th day of June, 1909, JOHN B, YAKEY, Judge. June 18—July 16, 1909. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Inga Marle Eddy, plaintiff, vs. Peter Body, defendant. ‘summons’ by’ nubli~ cation. is ‘The State of Washington, to the sald Peter Eddy, defendant: ‘You are hereby summoned to appear wihtin sixty days after the date of the first publication of, this summons, t wit Witun sixty days after April 80, 1909, and defend the above entitled ac- tion’ in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office at 214 City Hall; and in case of your failure so to do Judgment, will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the sald action set’ forth in said complaint {s as follows, to-wit: To obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant herein on the ground of de- sertion. JOHN SLATTERY, Attorney for Plaintitt. P. 0. Address: Room 214 City Hall, Seaitle, King County, Wash. ‘April 30-June 11, 1909, FRIDAY, JUNE 18, 1909 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of Burlington. In the Matter of the Estate of Birdsey Wetmore, deceased. No. 10200. No. 10201. Notice is hereby given to all persons having claims against said deceased and against said estate, and to all creditors of sal destate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Excident deal of said estate, at room 625 New York Block, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice or the same will be barred. ROY D. WETMORE, As Executor of said Estate. HIRAM J. JACOBS, Attorney for Excident, No 625 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. Date of first publication May 14, 1909. May 14-June 11, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of Seattle, O'Brienovech, Plaintiff, vs. George W. Hall, Mary V, Hall, Olive J. Stewart; and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, or interest in the real estate, or complaint herein, Defendanta—No 6733. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 740 New York Block, Seattle, Wn. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. George Brazier, Plaintiff, vs. Mona Brazier, Defendant. No. —. Notice. The State of Washington, to the above named plaintiff. You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of first filing, ninety two days from the 7th day of May, 1909 in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer or the undersigned attorney's day of plaintiff at his office, be stated and in case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which will be filed with the clerk of this action is to obtain an absolute divorce from the defendant. of said court. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: Northern Bank & Trust Building, Seattle, Wash. May 7—June 18, 1909 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation,财产权, vs. Unknown Owners, and all person, vs. Unknown Owners, and all person, claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. 64548. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim the delinquent debt of an interest on estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, and the holder of the 9th day of September, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-write: Kirkland Park, King County, Washington, being certificate No. B54315, for the year 1902, One and 4/100 Dollars ($1.04). That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described Lotty Forty-five (45), Block Two (2), Kirkland Park, King County, Washington, for the year 1903, Flfty-one cents (51c); for the year 1904, Thirty cents (30c); for the year 1905, Forty-three cents (30c); for the year 1906, Thirty three cents (35c); for the year 1907, Forty-eight cents (48e); for the year 1908, Forty cents (40e). Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from salded sums of payment, and are all the sales of unpaid taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear upon the request of publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication, to-wit, sixty days after June 11, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer to the complaint of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you answer to the complaint will be herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each parcel of said real property for the sums and costs against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by aw and as requested by the plaintiff,令原 on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corpora- AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation. Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff Honorary Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Co Blg., Seattle, Wash. June 11, July 23, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Liggett Lumber & Manufacturing Co, West, Seattle Branch, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Thomas Barker and Jane Doe Barker, his wife, whose true Chris- Being an active attorney and from time to time having legal notices for publication, it is perfectly natural for you to want to get acquainted with those newspapers that do your kind of business. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Is just your size in this respect. It already has some notices for publication, as may be seen herein, but it needs more of them, and to that end your business is earnestly solicited. Your notices are promptly called for; handled with care and accuracy. Affidavits delivered without delay. Charges reasonable from a hard times standpoint; everything done in a jam-up manner. TELEPHONE MAIN 305 When you have a publication, and if it happens to be a Divorce Summons or a Notice to Creditors, give us the facts and we will do the rest. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN 307 Epler Block. Main 305. Notices Received Up to Friday Noon. tian name is unknown, defendants, No. 67241. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington: To Thomas Barker and Jane Doe Barker, his wife whose true Christian name is unknown, defendants: You and each of you are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the publication of this notice, exclusive of the publication of this notice, on witt. Sixty days after the 11th day of publication, you above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned for publication. You below stated and in case you fail so do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complaint against you on an account disbursement against you on account disbursement from you to the plaintiff herein in the sum of $141.80, with costs and attorney's fees, out of which cause an attachment has issued against Lots Nineteen and Block Sixty-nine (69), West Seattle Land and Improvement Co.'s 3rd Replaint of West Seattle. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg., Seattle, Washington June 11, July 23, 1909. PROBATE NOTICE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, State of Washington, County of K ss. In the Matter of the Estate of Mary E. McIntyre, deceased. No. 4212. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that James McIntyre, administrator of the estate of Mary E. McIntyre, deceased, has rendered to, and, filed in, said court his sentiment and sentiment with administrator and that Thursday, the 15th day of July, 1909, at 2 o'clock p. m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has applied by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same: Attness, the Hon. Ed. E. Hardin, Judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said Court hereto affixed this 4th day of June, 1909. (Seal) D. R. SICKLES, Clerk. B. D. PRCY, PATRIMS, Deputy Clerk IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. - In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Franklin Owell well deceased. No. 10308. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given to the creditors, and all persons having claims against the said deceased by the warrant to the same with the necessary vouchers, and to the undersigned executrix and executor at the office of Edward Von Tobel, 604 Mutual Life Building, in the City of Seattle, King Washington, to the being the place of transaction of business of said estate, within one year from the date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit: within one year from the 11th day of EDWARD VON TOBEL, Executor of the Estate of Franklin L. Powell EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for said Estate. Dated Seattle, Washington, June 11, 1909. June 11, July 9, 1909. NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King, ss. Sheriff's Office. Purpose of an order of sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 7th day of June, 1909, by the Clerk thereof, in the case THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN an active attorney and from time to time ing legal notices for publication, it is natural for you to want to get with those newspapers that do your k usiness. TTLE REPUBLI your size in this respect. It already notices for publication, as may be se but it needs more of them, and to th business is earnestly solicited. notices are promptly called for; ha care and accuracy. Affidavits deliv out delay. Charges reasonable from its standpoint; everything done in a jaz er. TELEPHONE MAIN 305 in you have a publication, and if it ha be a Divorce Summons or a Notice , give us the facts and we will do t EATTLE REPUBLIC Block. Main 305 Notices Received Up to Friday Noon. THE COMPANY OF THE BLOCK ATTORNEYS of Florence A. Sanderson, plaintiff, versus Chas. Brebner and Janet Brebner, his wife, and Lucille Emmons, a widow, defending her 1944 conviction and to me, as Seriff, directed and defended. Notice is hereby given that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for seriff's sales, to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours of July, A. D. 1909, before the Court House Door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendants Chas. Brebner and Janet Brebner, his wife, to satisfy the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot seven (7), in block three (3), of Coulter's Addition to the City of Seattle, to the property of the tenants and appurtenances thereto, belonging or in anywise appertaining, levied on as the property of said defendants Chas. Brebner and Janet Brebner, his wife, to satisfy a judgment of a treasurer of the City of Seattle, two hundred sixty-three and 88-100 ($263.80) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 9th day of June, 1909. By JOHN STRINGER, Deputy. June 11, July 23, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County.—In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Peter Marten Nevius, deceased.—No. 10211. Notice to Creditors. Pursuant to an order of the above entitled Court, notice is hereby given to the creditors of and all persons having claims against Peter Martin Nevius, deceased. He is his present same with the necessary vouchers attached to the undersigned administrator of the estate of Peter Martin Nevius, deceased, with one year from and after the date to-wit; within one year from June 1, 1909, at Room 10 Haller Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, said place being designated as the place for the transaction of the business of said est- ate, or said claims to be barred. WILLIAM E. BARTON, Administrator of the Estate of Peter Martin Nevius, Deceased. E. E. SIDPSON, B. E. OSER, Attorneys for said Administrator. June 11, July 9, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. May Gourley, Plaintiff, vs. Eldred R. Gourley, Defendant. No.... No.... Summ- mended. The State of Washington to the said Eldred R. Gourley, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to within sixty days after the date of day of June, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your an- wareness to the best field with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from the above named defendant upon the grounds of his des- ertion of said plaintiff for a period of one year last past and for his failure to suitably provide for the plaintiff herein. PETERS & CARR. Plaintiff's Attorneys. P. O. Address: 1263-64 Empire Buil- ding, Seattle, King County, Washington. June 11, July 23, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE THEATER, Kingston, in and for the County of Kink Susie Kirby, Plaintiff, vs. Jacob A. Kirby, Defendant.—Summons. The State of Washington to the said Jacob A. Kirby, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to appear before the judge at the date the day of June, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will not be denied against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and non-support. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 503-504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. June 11, July 23, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Probate. In the case of the Estate of Elbridge Gilchrist, Deceased. No. ... Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 10th day of June, 1909, notice is issued to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned, Adaline F. Gilchrist, said estate, at Lowman Bldg, the place of interest of state in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice, or same will be barred. Date of first publication, June 12, 1909. ADALINE F. GILCHRIST. As Executrix of said Estate. C. H. WHITEFRIES. Attorney for Estate, 911 Lowman Bldg., Seattle. Wash. June 11, July 9, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Regina B. Gromes, Plaintiff, vs. John Gromes, Defendant.—Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said John Gromes. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of June, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above enclosed answer to answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and 100 days answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, with been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object of the above entitled action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of abandonment for one year and failure to pro HERBERT E. SNOOK. P. O. Address: 637 Burke Block, Seat- lake, King County, Washington. NOTICE AND SUMMONS In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King_County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Blueland, vs. Gustava Nydall and John Blueland, in a husband, whose true Christian name is husband, whose persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. Southern Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above delinquent is the holder of two certain delinquent by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following years, in the following amounts, and for the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Southern Addition to Seattle—Lot 41 Block 24: Certificate No. B50104; year 1908 Southern Addition to Seattle—Lot 42 Block 24: Certificate No. B50105; year $ 1900; amount, 99 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff up said above described real property. Lot 41. Block 24, Southern Addition to Seattle—44 cents for year 1901; 44 cents for year 1902; 38 cents for year 1903; 36 cents for year 1904; 34 cents for year 1905; for year 1906; 23 cents for year 1907. Lot 42. Block 24, Southern Addition to Seattle—44 cents for year 1901; 44 cents for year 1902; 38 cents for year 1903; 36 cents for year 1904; 34 cents for year 1905; 24 cents for year 1906; 23 cents for year 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the sums due to taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, and to appear within sixty days afterlication to-wit: sixty days after June 11, 1909, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and the interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it respectively as provided by and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff. F, J. CARVER, Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg., Homney for Plaintiff. Office Address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. June 11—July 23, 1909. TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF THE West Seattle Land & Improvement Company: You and each of you will please take notice that the annual meeting of the West Seattle Land & Improvement Company, organized and existing under and by virtue of the law of the State of Washington, will be held at the office of the company in West Seattle in King County. Washington, on the 12th of October on a day, at 12 of clock noon, on a day, at which time you will be present if you wish to take up anything of a business nature concerning the affairs of the company. MEROVE WEST SEATTLE LAND & IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, By DANA W. BROWN, Secretary, June 11, July 9, 1909. Notice of Sheriff's Sale of Real Estate. STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY of King—ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an execution, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 14th day of June, 1909, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of Theodore Dahlen, Plaintiff, versus C. Burdick Smith, Defendant, No. 66251, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and de- Notice is hereby given. That I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for inking the sheets to be sold. On the 24th day of July, A. D. 1909, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendant in and to the following described property situated in King County, of Washington, to-wit: Lot eight (8), block twenty-one (21), H. L. Yester's First Addition, levied on as the property of said defendant to satisfy a judgment amounting to five hundred and twenty-seven ($527.00) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 17th day of June, 1909. ROBERT T. HODGE, Sheriff. BY BERT, C. THOMPSON, Deputy. • June 18—July 16, 1907. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Louis N. Musgrave, Plaintiff, vs. Laura A. Musgrave, Defendant. No. — Summons by publication. The State of Washington to the said Laura A. Musgrave, Defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 18th day of June, A. D. 1899, and defend the complaint of the titled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you coevident with the complaint, which has been filed in the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To obtain a decree of divorce on the grounds of abandonment. HOMER E. TURRER. P. O. address: 745 New York Blk, Seattle, County of King, Washington. June 18—July 30, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. W. T. Gaffner, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners and all persons, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the before described real property. Defendants. No. —. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants and in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon such amount as is indicated in said *Cm5* County, described as at the time. W. 285 feet of W ½ of N. W. ½ of N. W. ½ of Section 12, Tp. 21 N. of P. E. W. M.; Certificate Number B521071 you fall so to do, judgment will be rem demanded before you are issued February 26, 1999, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintaxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and costs understood by the undersigned plaintist at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, to, teach, for said taxes, interests and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintist's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. W. T. GAFFNER. Plaintiff. Office Address, 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Washington. First publication, February 26. Last publication, April 9. 4 SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Published Every Friday, 307 Epler Blk. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton.....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton.....Associate SUBSCRIPTION RATES. One Year .....$3.00 Six Months .....1.50 Three Months .....75 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mall Matter. Legal Publications a Specialty. NEGRO RAFIST IN THE SOUTH Living as we are in an age of civilization it is surprising beyond expression to find a man even in the state of Texas that would make use of language as did a publication styling itself "K. Lamity's Harpoon," a few days ago. It is even more surprising that such coarse, vulgar language should be reproduced by a man in the North, who was born in Maine and has lived in the extreme Northwest since he has been a man, or we should say since he has been in the garb of a man, for no real man would ever countenance even reading such brutal language, to say, nothing of reproducing it, in his own publication. K. Lamity's Harpoon is greatly exercised over the alleged growing tendency of the Negro of that section raping innocent white women, and, if that were really true, it might have grounds for complaint. As has been frequently said in these columns we have nothing but the severest condemnation for the wretch, who will outrage a woman, whether she be black or white, and such a wretch is deserving of the most damnable death that the law makers of any state can put on the statute books as a punishment for his crime. No Southern state, however, has put on its statute books a punishment for the raper as the K. Lamity Harpoon has advocated that should be meted out to the Negro rapist, because the members of the legislature know good and well about the first man that would be caught by such a law would be a white man. We would not be afraid to wager our title to the pearly gates that white men rape one hundred colored women in and about Austin, Texas, and for that matter, in every state south of Mason and Dixon line, to every white woman raped by a black man. From personal experience in the South we have no doubt in the world but that the editor of K. Lamity Harpoon has a colored woman for his paramour. It is a well established fact in the South that the white man who leads the mob to lynch some black man charged with having raped a white woman, himself cohabits with one or more colored women and generally speaking has both a white and half caste Negro family of children, and to show what a state of degradation this has reached, it often happens that the white sons grow to manhood and then cohabit with their half caste sisters and excuse themselves and their actions by saying, "she is only a nigger." It cannot be expected of half caste children with such parentage to be anything but the lowest types of criminals and if they do not rape their fathers as well as their half white sisters we are all the more surprised. Throughout the South the colored girl is considered the legitimate prey of the white man's brutal passions and if the father and brother of the colored girl register even a mild protest they are lynched for "insulting a white man." At the time of the Lincoln emancipation there were not a million mulattoes in the United States, but at the present time there are nearly four millions, almost as many as there were emancipated Negroes, We hardly think even K. Lamity's Harpoon is prepared to say or willing to admit that this great increase of mulatoes is due to the raping of white women by black men. If, however, it will tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth, it is prepared to say and to admit that the increase is due to the cohabit of white men with colored women. When criminal white men beget offsprings by ignorant colored women, then what more can be expected than that the child to have. implanted in it the deepest and most damnable germs of criminality. Go, if you will, to a gathering of Negroes in any of the Southern states and you will observe persons in the audience by the scores so white that, we of the North feel convinced they are mpostors when they claim to be Negroes. Who in Heaven's name is responsible for such a state of race miscegenation? Surely not the white women of the South. Is it not perfectly natural to expect those white Negroes to be just as criminal as the criminal white fathers? Yes, the Negro for the most part is rather docile and little if any of the dangerous elements are ever seen in him and his docility goes a long way toward counteracting the criminal blood of the white man, but strong as it is, it is not wholly able to overcome it, hence it occasionally happens that some of these degenerate offsprings break out and do things that death in its most torturing forms is entirely too good as a punishment. All Negroes become "fiends" when they cohabit with white women, but all white men are expected to have as many comely colored girls as his concubines as he can bribe or intimidate into submitting to his bestial passions and neither the white women nor the white men think any the less of him for his associations and especially if they are carried on at night and behind closed doors, but if such white man is seen on the streets with those colored women he is warned to desist, and if he does not, a punishment no less severe than if it were a white woman and colored man is meted out to him, white though he is. That a most deplorable condition exists all over the South so far as the colored women and the white men are concerned is a well known fact and so long as that condition does exist just so long will a fresh supply of criminals be born from the unholy alliances which will continue to keep the whole country in a state of upheaval. Now just a word for the journalistic skunk of Seattle that reproduced the article from the Texas publication. He has run a paper in Seattle for the past sixteen years, which paper, it is said has feasted and fattened by blackmail since the very first issue thereof. But a few days THE SATTLE REPUBLICAN ago, while discussing the weekly papers of the city a well known business man said, "Of course the Argus gets the money, despite the fact it apparently has no visible business to show for it, but blackmailing sheets always get the money and it occurs to me the Argus is no exception to the rule." Seattle and King county have not a thousand colored men as citizens within their gates and there is no excuse for local papers reproducing vicious and inflammatory articles. The white and colored folk of this section of the country are at perfect peace with each other and editors of newspapers and periodicals should do or say nothing that would disturb these amicable relations. Of course the editor of the Argus fears lest some Aunt Dinah steal him some night from his bed room and rape him, and she might really get in his room and start away with him, but one look at him and she would take him back and don sackcloth and ashes for the balance of her natural life for the grievous mistake she had made. —Brother, your face is your everlasting protection from the black female rapist, calm yourself. WISE AND OTHERWISE Speaking about climate, Seattle has it and of the best variety. It is of the Puget Sound production. Just imagine the nicest balmy weather from the month of May to December. The ever welcome gentle breeze from the giant Pacific through the aromatic pine forests greets the average Seattleite with exquisite pleasure. Health-giving, invigorating, it incites vitality, health and longevity. Moreover the atmosphere here is always on the best behavior. No cyclones here, no hurricanes, no storms, no high winds; just a gentle breeze to waft the germs of disease from the presence of our happy people. It keeps them healthy and contented. The air portion of our climate is above par. It is a serious question the way city matters are running as to whether we would be better off by being controlled by a sensible commission. By a non-partisan commission politics would be eliminated and the commission would have an eye and ear single to business. The idea of elevating a man to an important position simply because he is a good Republlcan or a good Democrat without having the necessary qualifications of the office is not what the average taxpayer wishes. In municipal matters we want business performed in business methods. Honor should be given to whom honor is due. Several years ago the service of the Seattle electric company was vexatiously bad. The people remonstrated, petitioned and prayed for better service, but to no avail. Finally an election was held for the purpose of inaugurating another franchise under the municipal ownership plan and it nearly carried under a hot tempature campaign. This little warm incident awoke Messrs. Stern and Webster of Boston, Mass., to the fact that the people out here had what was called the "Seattle Spirit;" and stood on their met- tle and rights and could not be fooled. The S. E. Co. began from thenceforth to improve in all ways, until now there is no better street car service anywhere than in Seattle. The Roosevelt snake story published in a certain newspaper accompanied with a picture of a huge boa constrictor just in the act of swallowing a man is a boomerang of the first water. It was in a dense forest with underbrush that scarcely a man could crawl through. The huge monster fell upon the unfortunate man from a tree and was in the natural act of making an appetizing meal of the victim when Roosevelt lassoed the huge reptile around the neck and choked him thus saving the man's life. The feat of throwing the lasso amidst the thickest underbrush with such success is amazing. No other American could perform such a difficult stunt. The idea of stopping local improvements in the city while the World's Fair is going on is uncalled for. If there is no improvements going on the visitors will say the city is dead and that they have inaugurated this World's Fair to revive it. Whereas, if thousands of laorers were at work improving the city the visitor would say, "My, isn't this a live town, its going to be a Chicago." No, don't stop the improvements, let them go on and show the people that this is the busiest city in Uncle Sam's domain, and thousands of people will return to their effete eastern homes, sell out and break their necks to locate in this the Queen City of the West. The city of Seattle is bound to become one of the world centers. Situated as it is on the Pacific coast where the whole world is open to it, there is nothing to prevent it. In the course of time, London, New York and Seattle will be the three great world centers. It is inevitable there is China with her four hundred million of people; India with three hundred millions and Japan with forty millionss all lying practically within a short distance from the Queen City. This is already indicated by the growth of the business transactions during the last few years. Japan's business has increased with us ten fold, while China is becoming much more liberal in her business transactions with us. Also, India is now looking toward us with an anxious business eye. These indications point most surely to the fact that Seattle shall become one of the world centers. The state legislature has been called together to commence June 23rd instant for a certain definite purpose. They have the right under the constitution to transact any other business which they may desire, but from a moral and financial view they should transact the business for which they were called and adjourn. The taxpayers of this fair commonwealth will not approve of the expenditure of several thousand of dollars of their hard earned money in tom foolery of political wrangles. When the legislature meets it should spend just ten minutes in re-electing the old officers, and then FRIDAY, JUNE 18. 1907 proceed to the business for which they were called, then immediately return to their several quiet domiciles. The people were clamoring for the direct primary law for the purpose of eliminating some of the evils of the old political convention system, and now they are not so certain that it is an improvement. The disadvantage is that the masses of the voters cannot learn about the character of the candidate, and the man that is the most active and plausible and vigorous in the campaign corrals the most votes, although he may be the only rogue of the whole bunch. This has been exemplified in our direct primary election last September. There were quite a number of candidates for a certain county office, all but one well known, honest men. The one received the nomination through the influence of so-called business men—was elected at the direct primary and after serving five months two serious charges are laid at his door. The convention system of nominating officers has its serious objections but the delegates are more acquainted with the character of the candidates and if bad men are nominated in nine cases out of ten they do it premeditatedly. Where care is taken in the selection of the delegates, good men will be selected as candidates. Had the last nomination of candidates in this county been made by convention at least two of the nominees would have been left off. The idea which seems to prevail to some extent among the members of the city council that each councilman should absolutely control the business pertaining to their respective wards is pernicious. Councilmen were not elected to represent their own ward only, but to transact business for the whole city to the best advantage possible. The subdivision of the city into petty divisions or governments is radically wrong and smacks of graftitis. The county commissioners have been proceeding upon that unlawful line until a stop came suddenly upon a certain proposition and the county saved thereby many dollars. Neither the county or city is made up of petty governments but as a whole. The doctrine of state rights has disappeared forever and should not be attempted in a municipality. That the A. Y. P. Exposition is a monumental success cannot now be denied. All honor is due to the men who took hold of the scheme with an iron will and a determination to succeed. Although the pessimist stood aloof and said, "you can't do it," the optimistic men who inaugurated the scheme said, "we can and will," and they did, and now Seattle has within her boundary the very best exposition in the way of a world's fair that the United States ever had, and moreover the indications are that it will pay a dividend to the stockholder. Sheriff Hodge and Commissioner Carrigan are at outs. Hodge says Carrigan falsified his word, and Carrigan says Hodge is trying to assume a portion of the commissioners business. Hodge says Carrigan has also THE CITY COURT FRIDAY. JUNE 18. 1909 been absent a length of time on private business at the county's expense and also that he is an Anaias de facte. We believe in publicity, so the people may be fully advised of some latent matters ere many moons are passed. The undue acts of Commissioner Carrigan in several matters should be explained to the people of the county. THE STATE PRESS The Tribune believes that Governor Hay is worthy of public confidence, it believes that he is striving to do his duty. It believes, further, a debt of gratitude is due from the people of this state for the service he has already given them. It does not believe however, that he is a man peculiarly qualified for his position. He is not a man of any breadth or depth of knowledge or of any experience which fits him for his office. It is to be doubted whether he has ever read, much less studied any standard work on civics or economics. It is to be doubted whether he is even vaguely acquainted with the political history of his own country. It is to be doubted if he knows who wrote the "Wealth of Nations," or whether he could quote a line from the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution of the United States. His knowledge of government must therefore be very limited, his range of vision exceedingly circumscribed. -Puyallup Tribune (Independent.) Hay's Hit Hay has made his hit and is now bowing right and left to the screaming grandstand. He has called the legislature to a special session and when they have exercised their power the government of the state of Washington will be run as honest as the municipality of the New Jerusalem. The Republicans elected about a dozen officials last fall and they did it knowing that they were two-thirds rotten, but the voters were sharp, they elected Hay so that he could oust all the rest. There is not a charge to be brought before this special session that was not rumored during the regular session last winter. They killed it then and what assurance have we that they won't kill it again. Now the Republicans will spend $30,000 of the people's money for the doing of something that they were aware of and knew should have been done last winter, but refused to do. What do you think of that for a system of running a state? Of course you like it, because you said you did when you voted last fall. Land Commissioner Ross, one of the suspects, has not submitted a report since he has been in office. Hamilton, who has stolen thousands, didn't submit his report till the last day of the legislature, and it was not examined. Nice work. A thorough investigation is necessary in order to save the state from ruin, and if they don't prevent it, let it hit the bottom and all sides.—Davenport Tribune (Dem.) Governor Hav has called the Washington legislature to meet in special session on June 29rd sor an unlimited discussion of the scandals that have been discovered in the various state offices. Poor Washington! What has she done to be thus afflicted?—Goldendale Sentinel. Duly Considered Governor Hay has evidently deeply considered the matter and chosen the lesser of two evils in calling the legislature together again to act in the matter of the insurance commissioner and any other officers who may need attention. There seemed no other way to rid the state of an officer whose grafting has become notorious. Here is a great opportunity for the legislators to redeem themselves from an odor almost as bad, profligacy with the taxpayers' money, but it is doubtful if many have profited by the after-view of the late session. Already there is talk of re-organizing both bodies, repealing the local option law and opening up a score or more of old scraps, apparently in the attempt to evade the main issue which calls them together. As masters of the situation will they equal to the occasion?—Mason County Journal (Rep.) Has Assurances It is to be presumed that Governor Hay has assurances from at least a majority of the members of the legislature that they are in sympathy with his views on the matters which he will call to the attention of the law-makers when they convene. Unless he has this assurance the governor is going up against a proposition that will tax his political sagacity to its utmost if it does not enriely discredit him politically. It is a well known fact that the governor has some bitter enemies in the legislature, and the majority of them are men of considerable influence and are known to be scrappers of the sort that neither ask nor give quarters.—Willapa Harbor Pilot. Serious Proposition Governor Hay has called an extra session of the legislature to convene at the state capitol on June 23rd. The primary object of the extra session is to take action regarding several of the state officials who are under more or less suspicion, the principal one being State Insurance Com- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN THE CITY COURT STATE CAPITOL, OLYMPIA missioner J. H. Shively. This calling of an extra session of the legislature, is a serious proposition, as it will involve an expenditure of state funds approximating $30,000, which this northwestern commonwealth is in no position to expend needlessly. On the other hand it would appear as though there is occasion for a house cleaning at the capital. It can be safely predicted, however, that there will be things doing at the coming session, and no one need be surprised if several sensations are sprung during the next six weeks — Georgetown Gazette-News. The Extra Session Governor Hay has called the legislature in extra session to act on the findings of the investigation committee appointed by the last legislature to investigate the charges of graft made against some of the state officials. It is, it must be, a source of joy and pride to see one of Wilbur's former citizens as chief executive endeavoring to set a precedent in establishing a moral makeup of the official rostrum of our state. Grave charges have been made against the insurance department of the state government, and not only been made, but to an extent been proven against the official at the head of this department. Several other officials also are in the lime light, as well as charges of irregularities made against the directors of some of the state institutions. In calling this special session Governor Hay did the right thing at the right time. He has meditated upon it deeply and earnestly—it has taken entire possession of his mind, and will hold it until every rascal in official garb of the state of Washington found guilty of graft, irregularities or malfeasance, is placed behind the bars or ousted from office. The governor is not looking for the shallow and treacherous popularity which is to be courted by subserviency, and purchased at the expense of principal and duty. Instead he feels that this great renovation move is not to be carried as a triumph of a party or a sect, but to be pur- ```markdown ``` sued as a great measure of public good, as well as a saving to the taxpayers of the state who are obliged to make up the deficiency out of their own pockets. On the other hand it is the duty of the governor to inquire whether injustice is offered to those against whom unwritten charges are made, and if so, to correct it. An act of the legislature is the only sane source by which justice can be secured, if met by the fair force of deliberation without rudeness or violence.—Wilbur Register. Has Its Opponents On the 23rd of this month the state legislature is to convene in special session at the call of Governor Hay, to probe the public acts of the various state officials and to consider the impeachment of Mr. Schively. There are a great many who oppose a special session and especially those who have have had a hand in the pie. When it is clearly shown that there have been no irregularities practiced in public matters it shows poor judgment to oppose any reasonable movement to clear our state of corrupt officials. If there is one place in our government where stringent laws are needed more than another, it is to guard against the use of public funds or the use of the political influence a certain official position affords, for private gain, to the detriment of the public. Our laws should be made so stringent that no one who has once violated his trust can a second time have the opportunity to do so, and his punishment should be made so great as to outweigh the strong desires for lust and gain.—Mabton Chronicle. A Democrat's Views Governor Hay has called an extra session of the legislature to convene June 23rd for the purpose of receiving and acting upon the report of the committee appointed to investigate the state officials. As there is no limit to the length of the session, there is danger that it may be protracted indefinitely. Already there is talk of reconsidering many of the bills passed at the regular session and of introducing new measures. The Commoner would suggest that the members confine themselves to acting upon the report of the committee and to such legislation as may be needed to remedy existing abuses in the conduct of state offices and to guard against their repetition in future. Among such legislation would be the recall system. If the people had the power to recall public officials at any time they saw fit it would not be possible for these officials to hang on to their jobs in defiance of the general demand for their resignation. The knowledge that neglect of duty, incompetency or petty grafting might result in their prompt removal from office, would have a wholesome effect upon men who figure that once elected they can do as they please without danger of having their salaries cut off until their term of office has expired. The people are in no mood to tolerate the expense of a long session nor to have the members fritter away their time in playing politics and venting their personal spites. The legislature should perform the duty for which it is called in extra session thoroughly and quickly and then adjourn. The shorter the time in which the work is accomplished the better the taxpayers will be pleased-Colfax Commoner. Something Doing It is rumored that there may be a great deal doing at the special session of the Washington legislature which is about to convene. There are many reports to the effect that some of the most important legislation of last winter will be taken up and threshed over. There is no guessing what may occur in the way of new legislation. It is possible the legislature will spend considerable time on other legislation than for which it was called. Whatever the legislature may do it is hoped that it will not be barren of needful acts. — Buckley Banner (Rep.) Hostess — But you're eating nothing. Mr. Floor. Mr. Floor — Oh, I never eat much at the best of times. — Punch. a garnishment you from the been attached ment. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office address 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg, Seattle, Wash. June 4, July 16, 1969. IN THE SUPERIOR CURTOR OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King—In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Olivia Slettengren, Deceased—No. 8852. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Hugo Slettengren, administrator of the estate of Olivia Slettengren, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is sufficient to satisfy the distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to satisfy the distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Olivia Slettengren, deceased, on the one hand, and the Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in the City of Washington, on the other hand, at the hour of 3:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and assons, petition mentioned, according to law. —TWO LEGALS—REPUBLICAN so it is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for sale in the newspaper before the said 8th day of July, 1909, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 2nd day of June, 1909. ED. E. HARDIN, Judge. June 4, July 2, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE In the matter of the estate of James Elmer Gailey, Lillian Gailey and Edith Gailey, Minors.—No. 10083. Order to Show Cause on Sale of Real Estate. At the Court of James Elmer Gailey, Lillian Gailey and Edith Gailey, minors, having filed his petition in this court, duly verified, praying for an order of this court for the sale of real estate of which the said minors seized, for the ownness therein set forth; And it appearing to the court from said petition that the personal estate of the said minors in the hands or said claims is is held in the hands of the claims against the said estate and the expenses of the guardianship thereof, and that it is necessary to sell all or a portion of the real estate of the said claims to the court that all persons interested in the penses of the guardianship, and it appearing to the court that said petition conforms to and is in accordance with the requirements of law in such case court that all persons interested in the estate of the said minors appear before said Superior Court on Thursday, the 5th day of July, 2009, at the hour of 9:00 clock at the court room of the Probate Department of said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, then and there to show cause, if any such claims should not be granted to said guardian authorizing and empowering him to sell the said real estate of said minors or so much thereof as may be necessary to sell the said claims and expenses of guardianship. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before the said 8th day of July, 1999, in The Seattle Republic, a newspaper printed and published in said County of King and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 2nd day of June, 1999. ED. E. HARDIN, Judge. June 4, July 2, 1999. Notice of Meeting of Stockholders of the Pacific Coast Rubber Company, to Be Elected to the Office of the Company on the 28th Day of June, 1999, at the Hour of 10 O'Clock A. M. Notice is hereby given that there will be a meeting of the stockholders of the Pacific Coast Rubber Company, on the 28th day of June 1909, called for the purpose of increasing the amount of incorporation, increasing the number of trustees from the present number of five to the number of six trustees, for the purpose of ratifying and confirming the action of the trustees in increasing the capital stock from $200,000 to $500,000 and for the purpose of preferring stock, and further for electing a new trustee in accordance with said amended articles, said meeting held on the 27th day of April, 1909, and further providing for the confirmation of the action of said meeting in conjunction with those of the trustees as to Article 10 thereof, and that further at said meeting there will be considered the question of further amending Article 10 o fsaid by-laws with reference to the amendment thereof. And notice is hereby further given that there will be a meeting of the trustees immediately following the adjournment of the stockholders' meeting and at the hour of 10 o'clock A. M., to consider each and every of the matters and things above set forth. At Seattle, Washington this 4th day of June 1909. FRANZ RICHTER, President. June 4—July 23, 1909. State of Washington for King County. In probate. In the matter of the estate of Corliss P. Stone, deceased. No. 7500. Notice. Notice is hereby given that the Washington Trust Company of Seattle, as administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Corliss P. Stone, deceased, has do not present and filed with the Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County, its 2—REPUBIlican legals—Tomy first annual and petition asking that the widow's portion of the said estate be segregated and distributed to house owners. The 29th day of April, 1909, at 2:00 o'clock p. m. at the Court of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court in the City of Seattle, King County. Judge has been appointed by a Court for the settlement of said account and the hearing of said petition, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and contest the same. Judge is Honorable A. W. Frater, Judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said Court hereto affixed this 1st day of April, A. D. 1909. Clerk By PERCY F. THOMAS. Deputy Clerk April 2-April 29, 1909. FRANK WIESTLING, Attorney for Executrix. June 4, July 2, 1909. PROBATE NOTICE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the matter of the estate of Olivia Slettengren, deceased, has notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Hugo Slettengren, the administrator of the estate of Olivia Slettengren, deceased, has rendered O, and died in said court his final will on Thursday, the 8th day of July, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock a. m., at the court room of the Probate Department of our said Supperior Court, said King County, has been duly appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may be served with notice of said account, and contend the same. Witness the Hon. A. W. Frater, Judge of said Superior Court and the seal of said court hereto affixed this 2nd day IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Ada M. Moran, Plaintiff, vs. J. H. Moran, Defendant.-No. 67487. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said J. H. Moran Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 4th day of publication, within sixty days after the 4th day of publication in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated; on a late day, at your office below stated; judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said court. Briefly stated, the object of this actuary is to relieve the bonds of marriety existing between the plaintiff and defendant and to grant the plaintiff a divorce from the defendant on the ground of abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant for more than one year and defendant to support the plaintiff and to make suitable provisions for his family. BRADY & RUMMENS, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address; Suite 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. June 4, July 16, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King—In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Ralph Cook, deceased—No. 8948. Oorder to show why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Mary Hayes, executrix of the estate of Ralph Cook, deceased, having filed in this court her petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be disposed of. In order to show the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate; that all persons interested in the estate of the said Ralph Cook, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department, on the 8th day of July, 1909, at the hour of 2 o'clock p. m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate; that all persons interested in the petition mentioned according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 8th day of July, 1909, in the Seattle Republic, a newspaper printed and published in the County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 29th day of May, 1909. MITCHELL GILLIAM, Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss. 24, D. G. Sickels, County Clerk of King County, county clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court on the 29th day of May, 1909, in the matter of the estate of Ralph Cohn, deceased, who Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 29th day of May, 1909 (Seal) D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS. Deputy Clerk. FRANK WIESTLING, Attorney for Executrix. June 4, July 2, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. J. G. Probeck Co., a corporation, Plaiiff, vs. Louis Bypassing, trading as the Fort Manufacturing Co., Defendant—No. 67060. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to Louis Devinean, trading as the Federal Manu- facturing Company. Defendant: You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the publication of this notice, exhibited in the notice, and within sixty days after the 4th day of June, 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below for the complaint of your judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to recover judgment against you on an account due from you for the complaint of $161.28 with interest from March 1st, 1909, and costs and attorney's fees, out of which cause has issued and $156 due D. S. Johnston Co. has by said writ of garnish- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 1st day of April, 1909, in the matter of the estate of James Wilbur Jones, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 1st day of April, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Ed. Bleth and Jane Doe Bleth, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unk nown, if any, having or claiming an alien right to the hereafter de- scribed real property. Defendants. No. 64 716. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the heretofore notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of three delinquent tax certificates issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington dated April 29th, 1908, numbered as follows. For the delinquent taxes of the heretofore notified that the real property situated in said King County described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B49521 on Lot Five (5), Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. B49524 on Lot Five (5), Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle; B49527 on Lot Eleven (11), Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff on the above described sales lots for the year 1905, Forty-six cents (46c); 1906, Fifty-nine cents (59c); 1907, Fifty cents (50c), which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and unredeemed sales upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the day of the first publication, to-wit 60 days after April 23, 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the complaint of said plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against the sums charged against you for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, property for the sums charged against you for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporat- F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 314 Northern Bank & Treasury Cash. April 23, 2004, 4, 1000. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, which owns the Unkowns Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants, No. 64,533. Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above number of you, and you and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 16th day of September, 1908, and numbered as follows for the delinquent taxes of one certain delinquent tax certificate amount and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot Thirty-five (35), Block One (1), Hutchinson Co.'s 5th Addition to Kirkland, King County, Washington, being certificate No. B54308, for year 1903, one and 1-00 dollars ($1.01). That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the treasurer and above described real property, to-wit: Lot Thirty-five (35), Block One (1), Harry White & Co.'s 5th Addition to Kirkland, for the year 1904, Thirty cents, fifty-five cents, Forty-eight cents, Fifty-three cents (53c); 1907, Forty-eight cents (48c), which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment and are all the unpaid and undeemed taxes You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and sumoned to be and appear within sixty days after the publication of this notice exclusive of the first fifteen days of sixty days after April 23, 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for inquiries into the office warranted the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property charged against each parcel of said real taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against as respectively as pro bono law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint now on file in this cause and court. been appointed and hereby used at the time, and at the court room of Department No. 4 of the Superior Court of the State of Washington in and for the County of King of Essex at the place at which application is to be heard. In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the Superior Court aforesaid this 20th day of April, 1909. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk of the Superior Court. (Seal). By MAURICE THOMPSON, Deputy Clerk of the Superior Court. McCAFFERTY & GODFREY, Attorneys for Petitioner. April 23—June 18, 1909. The stockholders' meeting of the Consolidated Gold Mines Company will be held at the office of the Company, 312 Craiy building, Seattle, Wash., on June 1st, 1909, for the purpose of closing place for the closing year and to transact any other business that may come before the stockholders. N. A. THOMPSON, Secy. 23d. May 1923. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Lucas Schmidt and Jane Schmidt, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and or all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. 67.197. Notice and Summons. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F J. CARVER, Attorney A, Plaintiff. Office Address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Building. May 21- July 2, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. John Best and Jane Doe Best, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown and all persons un- known in his hand are interested in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 67,202. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them, their names, and the names of as-suppers, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate, issue of Washington, dated the 18th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to- wit. 13, Block 9, East Seattle; Certificate No. B49,278; for the year 1904, in the sum of 87 cents; that the taxes for the property described in said have been paid by the plaintiff upon said described real property, to-wit; Lot 13. Block 9. East Seattle; for the year 1905, the sum of 45 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 33 cents, and for the year 1907, the sum of 34 cents, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum sum said, and the sums are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of said tax, and the exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, sixty days after May 21st, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and the dersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien or said taxes and costs against the sums and dersigned attorney for the sums and due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and orders, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums and dersigned attorney against respectively as provided by law, and prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Building. 1000 May 21—July 2, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King-County. Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of John Nicklas, Deceased. No. 9028. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not be Made and Fixing Time for Hearing Final Account and Giving Notice Thereof. Magdalena Nicklas, executrix of the estate of John Nicklas, having this day rendered, presented and filed in this county as a petition for security. said estate and her petition for distribution thereof, setting forth that said FRIDAY JUNE 18, 1909 estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution according to the provisions of the will of the deceased. And it appearing that the facts set forth are sufficient to authorize the distribution said estate. It is now ordered by the court that Thursday, the 24th day of June, 1909, at 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day be, and the same is, hereby appalled as be the order for these and settling of said final account and petition for distribution at the court room in Department No. 7 at the Court House of King County, in the City of Seattle, Washington. In ordered that all persons interested in said estate appear before said court at said time and place then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be approved and why an order of distribution should not be made for the residue of said estate in the manner provided by law. It is further ordered that notice of the time and place of hearing said final account and petition for distribution be given by posting a copy of this order in the Court in said Public Place in King County at least four weeks before the said 24th day of June, 1909, and further that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before said 24th day of June, 1909. In the Seattle Republican, a newspaper published in said Public Place in general circulation therein and the 2—REPUBLICAN LEGALS hub court now finds and adjudges that the posting and publishing of this order as above set forth is a proper and adequate notice in the premises. Done in open court this 20th day of May, 1909. A. W. FRATER, Judge. May 21—June 18, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Milton N. T. Seymour, Plaintiff, vs. Margaret R. Seymour, Defendant. No.—Summons by Publication. Margaret R. Seymour, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear in sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 21st day of May, A. D. 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your memorandum, and demand for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been lodged with the office of said court. The judge of said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: Incompatibility of temper and cruel and inhuman treatment, as set forth in plaintiff's complaint. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Seattle, County of King, Washington. May 21-July 2, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Edna Gertrude Hart, Plaintiff, vs. Edward R. Hart, Defendant. No. 67,253. Stephen W. Plaintiff. No. 67,253. The State of Washington to the said Edward R. Hart, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 21st edition, by the date of the entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, demand the payment according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. Briefly stated, the object of this action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant and demand the payment of the voice from the defendant on the ground of non-support and failure on the part of the defendant to make suitable provisions for his family. BRADY & RUMMENS, attorneys for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: Suite 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. May 21-July 2, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. The Southern Bank & Trust Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. W. H. Hile and Margaret Hile, his wife, Defendants, AshIHassllocher Co., Inc., Garnishee Defendant.—No. 66226. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to W. H. Hile and Margaret Hile, his wife, defendants; You and each of you are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the publication of day of publication, to-wit: sixty (60) days after the 21st day of May, 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a yearly fee for the plaintiff's skinned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the deed of plaintiff, which the plaintiff has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to recover judgment against you on a promissory note issued by you, in connection with the sum of three hundred and twenty-one dollars ($321), with interest from June 10th, 1908, and costs and attorney's fees, out of which cause a garnishment fee issued to the stock of the Ash-Hassolcher Co., Inc. attached by said writ of garnishment. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address, 214 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. May 21—July 2nd. —ONE REPUBLICAN LEGALS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County—In Probate. In the matter of the Last Will and Testament of Abbie Kennedy, Deceased.—No. 10208. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 17th May, 1909, notice is hereby given to the address of all persons having claims against said deceased or against estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Adolph Behrens, ex-tenant will or said deceased, at Room No. 518 New York Block, Second Avenue, Seattle, King County, State of Washington, the place of business of said executor, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be billed. Date of first publication, May 21, 1909. ADOLPH BEHRENS, As Executor Last Will and Testament of Abbie Kennedy, Deceased. S. D. KING, Attorney for Executor. 517 New York Block, Seattle, Wash. May 21—June 18. complaint or said plan on a copy of your answer on the under- and charged against each, for said taxes, scribed real property. FRIDAY JUNE 18, 1909 NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE—Sheriff's Office. State of Washington, County of King, ss. By virtue of an order of sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Curse of May 1909, by the Clerk therein, in the case of W. & J. Sloane & Company, a cor- poration, versus Roy Allen Roszell and Margaret C. Roszell, his wife; Frances A. Morgan, Dresden Investment Co., a corporation; Bertha Basye and J. K. Basye, her husband, Emma Casee and J. Casee, her husband, Defendants, No. 62657, and to her husband, Defendants, No. 62657, and to her Sheriff, directed and delivered; Notice is Hereby Given, That I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bldder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 10th day of July, A. D. 1909, before the court house door of sold King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the defendants W. Emanuel and H. J. Clausen, H. J. Clausen, hershdrump en, her husband, Roy Allen Roszell and Margaret C. Roszell, his wife, in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot 1 and North half of Lot 2, Block 1, Young's addition to the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, levied on as the property of said defendants, Emma Clausen and H. J. Clausen, her husband Roy Ammon, C. Roszell, his wife, to satisfy a judgment of a foreclosure of a mortgage amounting to five hundred ($$000.00) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. PROBATE NOTICE—IN THE SUPERIOR Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the matter of the estate of Gerard J. L. de Bruyn. No. 8383—Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Charles C. Pierce, Jr., Executor of the estate of Gerard J. L. de Bruyn, deceased, has rendered to, and accepted, the Court his account as such executor, and that Thursday, the 1st day of July, 1909, at 2 o'clock, p. m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account, time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his execution, writing to said account, and contest the same; Witness, the Hon. A. W. Frater, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of Said Court hereto affixed this 27th day of May, 1909. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy. May 28-June 25, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. In Probate. In the matter of the Estate of Gerard J. L. de Bruyn, Deceased. No. 8383—Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Charles C. Pierce, JR., Executor of the estate of Gerard J. L. de Bruyn, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons by law thereto, and according to the court that final petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate; It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Gerard J. L. de Bruyn, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said Court in the City of Seattle, on the 1st day of July, 1909, at the hour of 2 o'clock, no of day said then and there to show cause, if any they have an order of distribution could not be made of the rest of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the 1st day of July, 1909, in the publican, a publican, a printed and publishe said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 27th day of May, 1909. A. W. FRATER. Judge. State of Washington County of King, ss. I. D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County of Milofo Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order show cause, made by said judge on the 27th day of May, 1909, in the matter of the estate of Gerard J. L. de Bruyn, de Witness my hand and the seal of sad court this 27th day of May, 1909. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy. May 28-June 25, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff vs. Ed Bleich and Jane Doe Bleich, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in the headliner after description in the property. Defendants. No. 479-Notice and Summons. $4141-$No.101 The to the of Washington, to the above defendants, and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that above named plaintiff is the holder of two certain tax certificates issued by the Treasurer of King County, Shore of Washington, dated April 29th, 1908, numbered as follows, to-wit: B49536 on Lot Twenty (20), Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, King County Washington, and B49539 on Lot Twenty-three (23), Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle. Each That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff on the above described property as follows: On each of forty-six salds (46c); 1905 forty-six salds (46c); 1906 fifty-nine salds (59c); 1907 fifty cents (50c), which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real prop- You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the location of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication, sixty (60) days after the day of May, 1999, in the above notified court and action and issued this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the under- signed attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of original property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided law and as prayed in plaintiff's plaintiff now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 544 Northern Bank & Trust Blvd., Seattle, Wash. May 28-July 9, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Ed Blethin and Jane Doe Blethin, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and of the described property, Defendants. No. 65108, Notices and Summons. The State of Washington to the above You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named Plaintiff in the holder of the described certificates issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 29th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year in the following amounts and upon the real property situated in said King County described holdings, (o-wit: (1) 9, Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, being certificate No. B49525 for the year 1904, amount ninety-eight cents (98c). Lot Twelve (12), Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate Second Addition to Seattle, being certificate No. B49528, for the year 1904, amount ninety-eight cents (98c). That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real estate property: Lot Nine (9), Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, year 1905, forty-six cents; 1906, fifty-nine cents; 1907, sixty cents. Lot Twelve (12), Block Four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, for the year 1905, forty-six cents; 1906, fifty-nine cents; for the year 1907, sixty cents. Which several sums bears interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the publication of this notice, except on a day of publication, 60 days after the date of May, 1909, in the above enacted court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or the amount due to you, ordered arrest and cause you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering each parcel of said taxes for the sat- against it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff. F. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Attorney Office. Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. May 28-July 9, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff v. Ed Bletham and Jane Doe Bletham, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 65106—Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in or to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of two delinquent tax certificates issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 29th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows: the delinquent taxes of the following year in the following amounts and upon the real property situated in said King county, described as follows, to-wit: Lot eighteen (18), block four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, being certificate No. 49534; for the year 1904, amount ninety-eight cents (80). Lot twenty-one (21), block four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, being certificate No. B40537; for the year 1904, amount ninety-eight cents (80). That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real estate property: Lot eighteen (18), block four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, year 1905, amount forty-six cents (46c); year 1906, fifty-nine cents (59c); year 1907, fifty cents (50c). Lot twenty-one (21), block four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's First Addition to Seattle; year 1905, forty-six cents (46c); year 1906, fifty-nine cents (59c); year 1907, fifty cents (50c). Which seven cents bear interest at the rate of one cent per annum from sale of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and upon said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days of the date of publication, to-wit: 60 days after the 28th of May, 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and answer the complaint of the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said plaintiff against the said real pronounced for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satis- faction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's com- plaint, now on file in this cause and court. AUXORA LAND COMPANY, a corpora- tion, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. May 28-July 9, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Ed Blethr and Jane Doe Blethr, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate and or to the herein-described real property Dependants. No. 65105—Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hershatter described real property, that the above named plaintiff is the holder of two delinquent tax certificates issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 29th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, real property situated in said King County described as follows, to-wit: Lot ten (10), block four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, being certificate No. B49256, for the year 1904, amount ninety-eight cents (98c). Lot thirteen (13), block four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, being certificate No. 49259, for the year 1904, amount ninety-eight cents (98c). That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real estate property: Lot ten (10), block four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, year 1905, forty-six cents (46c); year 1906, fifty-nine cents (55c); year 1907, fifty cents (50c). Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 percent per annum from said settlement, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication, do not take theaft of it, for 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due together with said costs and costs. If the fall so to do, agreement will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property or sale of itself of sums charged and found in it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. RURR, R. RURR. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. May 28-July 9, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners and all plaintiffs unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. 64547-Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, plaintiffs or holders of an interest in estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 16th day of September, 1908, and numbered as follows for the delinquent taxes of the following year in the following amount and upon the real property situated in said King County described as follows, to- Lot forty-three (43), block two (2), Kirkland Park, King County, Washing- ton, being certificate No. B54213 for the year 1902, one and 4-100 for the following, prior to the axes of the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by real estate property: Lot forty-three (43), block two (2), Kirkland Park, fifty-one cents (51c) for the year 1903; for the year 1904 thirty cents; for the year 1905, forty-three cents (43); for the year 1906, fifty-three cents (58c). Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid balances upon and in real, real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the first date of publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication, to w-60 days after May 28, 1909, in a shot-identified court and action and defend this action and answer a complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff's his office below stated or pay amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, fore-against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction that the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. court AURORA LAND COMPANY, a corporation F. J. CARVER, attorney for Plaintiff. Attorney for Office Address 214 Northern Bank & Trust Blvd., Seattle, Wash. May 28-July 9, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Ed Bleth and Jane Doe Bleth, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, and all persons un- known, if any, are claiming an interest and to the hereinafter de- ferred real property. Defendants. No The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ment, and in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of two certa- tin delinquent tax certificates issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 29th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes for filing the tax amounts and upon the real property situated in said King County described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B49633 on Lot seventeen (17), block four (4), Kirkland Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington, 89c, and B49522 on lot six (6), block four (4), Kirkland S Syndicate's Second Addition to Seattle, 98c. That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property: On each of said lots for the year 1905, fifty-nine cents (46c); 1906, fifty-nine cents (59c); 1907 fifty cents (50c). Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, may) are hereby free from and summoned to be held appear within sixty days after the publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication, to-wit: 60 days after the 28th of May, 1909, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due to him with interest. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forecasing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as paid, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. May 28-July 9, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Auping Land Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 64544—Notice and Summons. The State of Washington to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of the interest or estate, to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington and dated the 16th day of September, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year in the real property amount and upon the real property situated in said King County described as follows, to-wit: Lot thirty-four (34), block one (1), Kirkland, Harry White & Co.'s Fifth Addition, being Certificate No. B54307, for the year 1903, one and 1-100 dollars ($1.01). That the taxes for the following, prior and subsequent years have been paid by the trust upon said above described real estate property: Lot thirty-four (34), block one (1), Harry White & Co.'s Fifth Addition to Kirkland, for the year 1904, thirty cents (30c); for the year 1905, forty-four (44c); for the year 1906, fifty-three cents (53). Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from sale and rent, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and reinstat real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication, to-wit: 60 days after the 28th of May, 1909, in the above entitled court and action, and the action and answer to the complaint of saffiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of saffiff taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the sathe of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Attorney for Plaintiff, Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. May 28-July 9, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE King County. State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Geo. M. Miller and Jane Doe Miller, his wife, whose true tian name is unknown to persons if any having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No 64712. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of your owners, claiming or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notif- ied that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Washington, King County, State of Washington, dated 22th May of April 1908, and quartered as follows, for the delin- quent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to the Next Add. Kirkland, Carmode & Adults' 1st Add. lot 1, block 1, number 1049, 1049, amount $1.26. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, and that the tax for Rock 24, Kirkland, Carmode and Adsit's 1st Add.; 69 cents for year 1905; 71 cents for year 1906; 87 cents for year 1907; 60 cents for year 1908. Which seized the interest at the date of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and 2 against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of publication of the notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, 60 days after June 11, 1909, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and seize all copies of your summons to the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of each said taxes and costs each of the said taxes and profits for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: Northern Bank and Trust Building. June 11, July 23, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, plumbing and electrical contractor. Doe Miller, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, defendants. No. 65511. Notice and Summons. The shore State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them; dependants and each of them. Must be married to each of the owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of two certain delinquent properties owned by the date of King County, State of Washington, dated the 27th day of April, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, 1904, in the following sums, and upon the real property of the County, described as follows, to-wit: Lots two (2) to (four), block twenty-four (24), Carmode & Adsit's 1st Add. to Kirkland, lots 2 to 4, block 24, certificate number B449402, year 1904, amount $1.26, block 24, bill number B449402, mode & Adsit's 1st Addition to Kirkland, lots 8 to 14, block 24, certificate number B449402, year 1904, amount $1.26. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff and the above delinquent property to-wit: You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be appointed to the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, sixty days after June 11, 1903, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and amends it, in the event that you serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, to be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in his cause and court. PROBRA CORPORA A. a Corpora- AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. June 11, July 23, 1909. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Aurora Land Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the here- ward estate of the unidentified owners. No. 64551. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in the land of the unidentified real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 16th day of September, 1908, and num- ber of taxes of the following years, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Kirkland Park Add., lot 48, block 1, court block B54318, year 1903; amount 46 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: tow-boat 30 cents for year 1904; amount 43 cents, for year 1905; amount 53 cents, for year 1906 amount 48 cents, for year 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said debt, payment, and are all the same until unpaid taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, and to appear within sixty days after cation, to-wit, sixty days after June 11, 1909. In the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount of the sums due upon him. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, or ordering sale of the sums due upon him for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. THE CAYTON HOUSE 2107 EAST JAMES STREET 8 The Special Session Our accidental governor has at last made good his threat to call a special session of the legislature. The solons are therefore called to meet at Olympia June 23rd. The ostensible purpose of the governor in calling the special session is to impeach and bounce Schively, the petty grafter in charge of the state insurance department. The real purpose of the governor is believed to be his desire to secure legislative endorsement of his questionable scheme of cabinet government for the state and to secure the submission of his plan in the form of a constitutional amendment. A secondary purpose of the governor is undoubtedly to demand a thorough investigation of the office of state land commissioner, presided over by his political rival, Ross. The pretext that Schively is about to be tried at Spokane on a criminal charge and if convicted, as he probably will be, the governor would then have the power to declare his office vacant and to name his successor. The opinion appears to be generally held that the governor has acted unwisely to call a special session at this time. The present legislature has forfeited the confidence of the people because of the record it made for incompetence and extravagance at the regular session that ended in March. Yakima Democrat. Henderson—It is some times better to have loved and lost than— Henpeck—To have loved and won.—Philedelphia Star. Hundreds of inquiries are being made as to the treatment accorded Afro-Americans on the grounds of the A. Y. P. Exposition. while it is impossible to make personal replies to all such inquiries THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is in position to state for the benefit of such persons that the Negro fares just as well as the white man on the grounds In most of the expositions that have been held in this country there is no denying the fact the black man was discriminated against, but that is not true of the Seattle Exposition The managers and the citizen desire to make the Big Show at success and all propose to see that every visitor is given a square deal. There are about 200 Afro-Americans employed on the grounds and if they are not being accorded proper treatment, they are keeping quiet about it, and black folk do not do that way very long. Seattle does not do things by halves and if you feel like coming to see the show Seattle will welcome you. How about accommodations in the city? There will be no more trouble about that than your reception on the grounds Thus far we have heard none of the larger and more expensive hotels closing their doors against the Negro, if you have the price—this is said advisedly—you can get a room in the best hotel in the city. Thinking that a majority of the Afro-Americans would prefer to stop with people of their 1 own class, a number of the local Afro-Americans have prepared themselves to accommodate the visitors and thus make it possible for them to visit the fair and spend a week or so in Seattle, and yet not pay exorbitant prices. Among those who have done so are Mrs. Susie Revels Cayton and Mrs. M. A. Teister, who have fitted up a number of rooms at the corner of Twenty-first Avenue and East James Street—2107 East James—which they have styled "The Cayton," and they are ready to accommodate you by the day or week at living rates. The rooms are all outside rooms and of course well lighted and ventilated. They are furnished with new furniture and everything in connection made as comfortable as home itself. Both of the proprietors have had considerable experience The evidence had shown that the brick which a careless workman had dropped from a scaffolding twenty feet above the ground had fallen on a man's shoulder and broken a bone, but the jury decided that the victim had no cause for action—the falling of the brick had no connection with the accident. "Gentlemen," said the judge, I never heard of such a verdict. You utterly ignore the existence of the law of gravitation." "That law your honor," answered the foreman of the jury, "is so old that we decided not to consider it. It's obsolete." They were trying an Irishman charged with a petty offense in an Oklahoma town, when the judge asked: "Have you any one in court who will vouch for your good character?" "Yis, yer Honor," quickly responded the Celt, "there's the sheriff there. whereupon the sheriff evinced signs of great amazement. "why, your Honor." declared he, "I don't even know the man." "Observe, your Honor," said the Irishman triumphantly, "observe that I've lived in the county for over twelve years an' the sheriff doesn't know me yit! 'Ain't that a character for ye?'—Harper's weekly. "what do you think is the real mental attitude of college men towards frivolous girls?" "I rather think it is sentimental."—Exchange. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN' The Deserter "Do you desire to have it understood," asked the judge, addressing the lady who wanted the divorce, "that your husband deserted you?" "Yes, sir." Please tell the court as concisely as you can how he deserted you." "Two month after we had completed our wedding trip he scolded me because he thought I was extravagant in the matter of getting clothes, and I went home to my people." "well, I waited and waited for him to come and beg me to return to him, and he never did." Chicago Herald. "Where did you steal that mat from?" demanded the policeman as he seized the tramp. "I didn't steal it," said the tramp. "A lady up the street gave it to me and told me to beat it."—Judge. "I hear that this corporation intends to increase its rates to the public." "It was to be expected now that its president has to pay dividends on two titled European sons-in-law."—Judge. "why do women wear such large hats?" "It is necessary. If fashion says hats must be large, then hats must be large." "Suppose fashion should decree that shoes must be large?—Journal. Phone Main 305 for legal work. Scandinavian American Bank Choice 7 per cent First Mortgages on Improved Seattle Property Made by the bank and contain- ing all the little safeguards that are so often overlooked by the inexperienced investor. Call or write. The Scandinavian-American Bank, Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. 1331 Second Ave., Arcade Bldg. Hatters and Men's Furnishers, Puget Sound National Bank OF SEATTLE JACOB FURTH .....President J. S. GOLDSMITH .....Vice-President R. V. ANKENY .....Cashier CORRESPONDENTS IN ALL THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE FRAFTS ISSUED ON ALASKA ANI THE YUKON TERRITORY. Albert Hansen. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses 706 First Avenue. Phone For a Case of Rainier Beer Delivered to any Part Phone Ind. 5668. Main 5668. FRIDAY, JUNE 18, 1909 W. H. FINCK Pioneer Jeweler and Watch Maker. Our Holiday Specials Unequaled. 816 Second Avenue, Seattle, Wash. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE CONNECTION Business Office, Third and Spring People's Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R. J. Roekie, Vice Prest. Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. Commercial Savings and Trust General Bank and Exchange. Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance 259 Colman Blk., Phone Main 695 STETSON & POST LUMBER CO. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. The Comfort. Newly furnished rooms. Walking distance; rent reasonable; rooms by the day or week. L. ISRAEL WALKER, 1101-1108 Jackson Street. Seattle Electric Co. Secure our prices on Electric Fixtures before letting your contract. Latest Designs Exclusively. The Seattle Electric Company, 907 First Ave. USE in dealing with the public and for that reason are well prepared to serve those who take up their quarters. at their house with consideration and care. Mrs. Cayton has been a resident of Seattle for the past fourteen years, while Mrs. Teister has only been in the city for a short time, hailing from Crawfordsville, Indiana, where she served the public as a school teacher so long that she is widely acquainted throughout the Middle west. while weekly roomers are solicited, yet a number of rooms will always be held in reserve for transients thus making it possible for delegations desiring to visit the fair to get accommodations at the same place. Directions: At the Union Depot take Twenty-Third Avenue Car and get off at the corner of 23rd and Jefferson, two blocks west, one block north If you are down town take the James Street car and transfer to Madrona. Get off at 21st and James and there you are. The Cayton 2107 E. James St ```markdown ```