Seattle Republican

Friday, February 11, 1910

Seattle, Washington

8 pages

Page 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 2
Page 3
Page 3
Page 4
Page 4
Page 5
Page 5
Page 6
Page 6
Page 7
Page 7
Page 8
Page 8
Page text (machine-generated)
Historian and Societist THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Price One Year, $3.00. Single Copies, 10 Cents. WEEK'S CURRENT COMMENT. We opine that the people of Alaska are not only intelligent but patriotic, having much gumption of their needs and their best interests. Surely they do not see utter annihilation or slavery in a contemplated commission to be appointive for Alaska's government. The Congress of the United States never abjured its territories, nor legislated one into slavery, nor suppressed its ambition to become an honored participant of the rights enjoyed by other states of the Union. While the administration measure for Alaska is something less than perfect, it cannot be called coercive or degrading; nothing contained therein justifies a call for revolution. Congressman Sulzer of New York, formerly a spitfire from Ohio, is urging in vain for a revolt against accepting such a government in case the measure is enacted into law. To call upon American people to revolt as they did against the rule of George III, is a travesty upon constitutional advancements and even a roor-back of the most fossilized order ought to be ashamed of such advice. We want no revolt, or any spirit of it; our laws are made for strengthening the bonds of union. On the whole such an argument is as treasonable as the ubiquitous congressman intended it to be. The annual reopening of the hearts of the Nation occurs tomorrow—Feb. 12th—Lincoln's 101st birthday. With words most reverent will his name, life, and death be spoken by the millions who love the good, the true, the noble. A world character, without compeer, the ages will not see any decrease in the god-likeness of Abraham Lincoln. The highest ideal of man, the loftiest type of citizenship, the most distinguished example of human love is perpetuated in this martyr to human liberty. And with the voice of one person this now grateful nation, with speech and pen, with song and praise extols the grandest life, from the cradle to the grave, it has ever made. How appropriate it is; how loving, how unselfish the nation that thus uncovers itself, not to a hero, not to a war-god, not to an Alexander, but to the liberty-loving, the life-giving Emancipator! Many people were incredulous when the so-called Hook-worm disease was brought into publicity, some ridiculing the idea, others attributing the origin of it to one class of people and all along the line arguments pro and con were heard and written. But science does not lie; neither is it prejudiced. Every indication is that such a plague is existant and is increasing to the damage of the lives of men and needs to be attacked viciously to be eradicated. Research has discovered the early existence of such a disease affecting the human body among different races of different countries of the world. Not only is the health of a people endangered but the industries are curtailed and losses of financial character are sustained. It is proved that the parasite lays eggs which hatch and the larvae eventually finds its way to the alimentary canal of the human, there living SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 1910 upon blood and that this draws upon the vital fluid, weakens or destroys the blood's potency. It derives its name from the thought that it hooks itself to the intestinal walls. Of late discoveries have brought out the statement that the hook-worm is attached not by hooks, but it seizes the body's inner coats by its mouth. At the present time the investigations are being carried on in the South where the ravages are most appalling to the energies of the industrial workers, especially the mill workers. The Southern Health Conference which convened at Atlanta, Ga., recently, declared that the disease was not a theory but a dangerous reality and that its prevalence is bringing destruction upon the vitality of the South. This assembly voted thanks to John D. Rockefeller for his gift of $1,000,000 to aid in the arrest and cure the hookworm disease. Probably the process of eradication will take the form of an educational crusade in the teaching the people the necessity of more sanitary living. Fred Douglas, the American slave, who became most prominent in the political history of the country and whose ability was unquestioned at home and abroad, is to be remembered throughout various sections and cities through the means of celebrations, banquets, etc., Feb. 12th, that date being his birthday. Douglas cut no mean figure in his stand with the leaders of the Republic for with the courage of a John Hancock and the oratory of a Daniel Webster he worked for the principles of justice and liberty. Among the remarkable characters that have enlivened the history making period of the Union but few have excelled this man, who from an illiterate bonded slave, rose to take a stand with the great minds that formed our national policies after the great civil strife. BLACK, YET A HERO. The American people have long since recognized that a black face is not any more an index of cowardice than a white face and this recognition is every day or two more impressing itself because of various acts which are unmistakenly brave and unselfish being surrounded by risks and great danger of life. Fair play belongs to the mental capacities of every normal person and dastardly, indeed, is that one who fails to give credit when it is due even though the recipient wears a face of ebony hue. During the late freeze up of the Mississippi River at St. Louis, Mo., William Morrell, a young Negro, valiantly and amidst great danger went to the rescue of James McCarthy, white, age 13, who was caught in a break up of ice and unable to extricate himself. Crowds stood on the shore but no one offered assistance. The Morrell boy crept out upon the ice extended his hand, finally pulling the exhausted one to safety after leading him from block to block on the jagged and moving ice. The act was an unselfish one surrounded with many dangers to the life of the brave young Negro. UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 VOL. XVI. NUMBER 37. H. R. CAYTON. Publisher WHAT OF THE FUTURE OF THE AMERICAN NEGRO? What is the Negro question of the United States? What is the solution of the alleged Negro question at issue? When the Negro question will have been solved will the Negro still be a Negro? If the Negro succeeds in making himself an ideal citizen by attaining the highest degrees of culture and refinement and by the accumulation of vast wealth will he then be an acceptable citizen in its broadest and most liberal sense of this republic? Is the spirit of the brotherhood of man bridging the yawning chasm that has so long existed between the whites and the blacks of the United States? Is it possible for a white and black race to occupy the same territory at one and the same time? If not then, what of the future of the Negro of the United States? Religion, education and money have been recommended as panaceas to bring about a more perfect citizenship among the Negroes of the United States! When those will have been fully attained and the Negro become the equal of the Caucasian will that be the solution of the much mooted "race question" of the United States? When those qualifications will have been acquired will the two races then live in the United States without friction and as one happy family? And, if so, will it be a white or a black family? It is possible to legislate against the miscegenation of races? If the black man becomes the mental equal of the white man, and, if perfect peace and harmony exists between the two, is it possible to prevent social comingling? That there is a race question in the United States no sane may can deny. The white man is struggling to keep the black man in the position of a serf and the black man is striving to become in every respect the mental and social peer of the most favored white man, hence our race problem. An awful, but silent battle is being waged from Maine to Mexico and from the Atlantic to the Pacific and God only knows its outcome. A quarter of a century ago and there were scarcely a million Negroes in the United States outside of the old slave holding Southern states, but the next census will show that every Northern and Western state contains multiplied thousands of them. Further still, they are seeking homes in the isles of the sea, flocking to Central and South America and even to European countries. There is but one solution to the race question of the United States—Extermination of the blacks—which will be done either by violence or absorption, the frmer will never be tolerated by the more humane whites and the latter cannot be prevented, if the former is not tolerated. An hundred years hence and the American Negro will be found in every country of North and South America and his blood will, without reserve, mingle with that of the white man regardless of his station of life. THINGS ABOUT THE STATE OF WASHINGTON To settle a horticultural controversy it is suggested that a tax of half-a-cent be placed on each apple tree. Warm weather has caused rapid melting of snow in the mountains and floods are occurring throughout the state. Dates set for the various racing meets of the Northwest during the coming season are as follows: Everett, August 29—September 3; Portland, September 5-10; Salem, September 12-17; Walla Walla, September 19-24; North Yakima, September 26—October 1; Spokane, October 10-15. The state has received $10,900 from the Federal government allowed to the payment of the support of the inmates of the Soldiers' Home at Orting. Articles of incorporation have been filed with the auditor of state for The Mt. Hawkins Copper and Development Company to be at Sunnyside, capital stock, $2,000,000. Ortis Hamilton, while adjutant general of state, was found to be $37,692.47 short in his accounts. Much rejoicing is going on in Puyallup over the victory gained by the town "going dry." Mr. Worrel, of Wahkiakum County, received an average price of 32% cents per pound, or $1, 727.40 for butterfat during the year, an average of $115.16 per cow. He estimates that it costs him about $40.00 per year to feed a cow. A council of the Indians of the Yakima tribe was held at the Watson Homer ranch, Feb. 4th, presided over by Chief Charles Wesley. Grazing and government questions were discussed. The building inspector of Aberdeen issued 50 building permits in January. Protests to the county commissioners of Chehalis county are being signed by farmers against granting rights to interurban corporations. Richard Quinn, who is to executed April 15th, has been taken from Everett to Walla Walla and placed in prison to await execution. The Inland Herald published its first issue Feb. 8th at Spokane. It is daily and Sunday in its publication. The sheriffs of the state, who held a meeting at North Yakima lately, formulated plans for tracing criminals effectively through the means of mailing lists. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 1910. Henry Rohrbeck and John McDonell, of Willapa Harbor, have been members of the Odd Fellows fraternity for more than twenty-five years. The Tekoa Blade has been bought by Roy C. Irvine, formerly of the Reardon Gazette gelist, is to visit Everett in May to remain five weeks. Forty murders are laid at the feet of William Gohl, lately arrested at Aberdeen. School teachers of Spokane are demanding more wages and will put their demands before the Board at its next meeting. On Feb. 1st an advance of fir logs amounting to $2.00 on the thousand feet, was put into effect on Puget Sound. Mrs. Knight, county superintendent of schools of Mason county, has appointed a text book committee of five teachers to select school books to be used the next five years. STATE PRESS OPINIONS Colfax Gazette — "The high price of living is the price of high living," is the way James J. Hill puts it, and many are beginning to believe that a return to the ways of the simple life would be a factor in the solution of the vexed question. Mabton Chronicle—The packers are losing money so they assert. Wonderful is it not? For packers to lose money when they fix their own price and there is no one to say them nay—not even competition. No loubt they regard the welfare of the people so much that they will set a losing price upon their products. Wilbur Register—If the government is losing money in its mail service, why in the duce don't it remedy the leakage by raising the rate of first class matter, thereby putting the burden, (if it be burden) on the masses, and not on a few publishers? Buckley Banner The simple life is not known much about these days. People are living very fast in every phase of the question. They have advanced ideas beyond the limitations of their capacity to meet contingencies. Living is high in every particular. But most people incur expenses beyond their necessities and requirements. This is an age of living beyond the needs. People buy what they want and not what they need in many instances. They do not study economic principles. Food and raiment in these days are not on the same basis that they were a few years ago. Colton News-Letter-Every substantial citizen of the State of Washington who is interested in the good roads movement should attend the next meeting of the Good Roads Asociation, which will be held in Aberdeen February 23-24. Rockford Register-Every pioneer on the west side is predicting an early spring; if that proves true, the rush of settlers to the state should begin within the next six weeks. The railroads say that this spring and summer the state will begin to reap the benefit of last year's Seattle Exposition. Walla Walla Bulletin—The Republicans of the Senate are urging that the inquiry into the high prices be made as rapidly as possible in order that the report can be made before election. Aside from the political phase of the matter, the idea is good. The fact that inquiries usually drag for weeks causes people to pay little attention to them. A short, sharp inquiry that produces results, while the agitation that led to it is still fresh in the people's minds, is what counts. SEATTLE'S PRIMARY ELECTION. The results of the late primary election in Seattle for the most part are about as was predicted by The Seattle Republican in its last issue. Hiram Charles Gill easily defeated A. V. Bouillon for the Republican nomination for mayor, not only defeating Bouillon, but got more votes than all of the other candidates on all tickets aspiring for a similar nomination. The business men of the city rose to the gravity of the situation and gave Bouillonism such a black eye that it will be many moons before it will poke up its mug again for political preferment in Seattle. The Democrats nominated William Hickman Moore for mayor and should such a thing happen as he get elected he has been tried before and the citizens know they will get a sane and sound administration of public affairs from him. It would seem at this writing, however, that Mr. Moore has not a ghost of a show of being elected over Mr. Gill, but you can tell better about that after the general election has been pulled off. Ed L. Terry easily defeated Col. W. F. Prosser for the Republican nomination of city treasurer, as was predicted herein last week. H. W. Carroll went down to defeat before the all conquering forces of William J. Bothwell, which was something of a surprise to both Carroll and his 3 friends. Mr. Carroll, however, refused to do any political work for himself on the grounds of having a good political record to fall back on, which does not count for very much in a hot political fight. Scott Calhoun had no opposition and of course was nominated hands down. The Seattle Republican advised its readers to vote for F. H. Hurd for councilman at large, but felt almost certain that Frank P. Mullen would be nominated, and so it was Bullock and Mullen instead of Bullock and Hurd that were nominated for councilmen at large. Mr. Bullock lead the ticket in this particular and thereby demonstrated how really popular he is. The Democrats nominated E. F. Blaine for councilman at large, and it is here predicted that he will make a splendid run. He, owing to circumstances, will hardly defeat either of the Republican candidates, but he will make them set up and take notice. Blaine will, in the opinion of the writer, run ten thousand votes ahead of his running mate for a similar position. The following Republican nominees for ward councilmen are reported: First Ward—James Conway. Second Ward—Eugene Way. Third Ward—Joseph Schlumpf. Fourth Ward—Frederick W. Sawyer. Fifth Ward—J. Y. C. Kellogg. Sixth Ward—Arnold Zbinden. Seventh Ward—Thomas P. Revelle. Eighth Ward—E. L. Blaine. Ninth Ward—F. S. Steiner. Tenth Ward—George V. Gau. Eleventh Ward—W. H. Weaver. Twelfth Ward—Max Wardall. Thirteenth Ward—C. A. Schneider. Fourteenth Ward—Van R. Pierson. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN WOULD TAKE IT AS A PERSONAL FAVOR FOR YOU TO CALL UP ITS OFFICE—MAIN 305—IN CASE YOU HAVE A LEGAL NOTICE FOR PUBLICATION. IT WILL GIVE YOU GOOD SERVICE AND PROMPT ATTENTION. IF IT'S AN ORDINARY DIVORCE PUBLICATION CALL UP THE OFFICE AND GIVE TITLE OF THE CASE AND THE GROUNDS AND WE WILL DO THE REST. IF OTHERWISE, WE WILL COME FOR IT ON SHORT ORDER. LET US HEAR FROM YOU MR. ATTORNEY AND WE WILL NOT FORGET YOU MAIN 305. OFFICE, 307 EPLER BLOCK. Puget Sound National Bank. Seattle, the Queen City of the Northwest 4 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. Published Every Friday, 307 Epler Blk. Phone Main 305. H. R. Cayton.....Editor and Publisher Susie Revels Cayton.....Associate One Year ..... $3.00 Six Months ..... $1.50 Three Months ..... .75 Entered at the Postoffice at Seattle as Second Class Mall Matter. EDITORIAL Welcome, gentle spring! With a whoop and a shout the registration reached the 42,000 notch. Thefts, great and small, suicides, murders and accidents galore remind us that Seattle is going at some pace. The primaries having named the candidates let civic pride and party loyalty do the rest. The spirit of gambling is irrepressible. In spite of all ways that are devised to suppress it, the enchantment allures men to run the gauntlet of punishment. The battle between San Francisco and San Diego as to which one of them has a priority claim on the right to have a Panama exposition, shows how eager Pacific Coast cities are to get into the limelight a la Seattle. The unusually large number of mine disasters and the great lists of killed in each, brings to mind the dangers surrounding the underground toilers of our land. While it cannot be said that precautionary measures are not taken to guard against these calamities yet more serious thought must be given to the rapid rescuing of those caught in the traps of death. The slowness of rescue work is deplorable even though willing hands are ready to assume the hazardous undertaking. The duty of the law is to permit no occupation that is not absolutely safeguarded by every device for safety. It is not likely that any matured, experienced mind entertains the idea that the social evil can be stamped out or the evil be removed from the practice of mankind, yet to keep it within bounds, to prevent its evils from engulfing the nation, to preserve chastity, the family, is a duty of paramount importance which cannot and should not be overlooked. On March 1st the cheap rates on western travel will be inaugurated and predictions are that home-seekers will be largely in excess of any previous record. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 1910. J. W. Maxwell, cashier of the Seattle National Bank, is one of Seattle's most prominent as well as prosperous young business men. Within the past two years he has been promoted to the position he now holds in the bank. Recently he was elected president of the Commercial Club of Seattle and still more recently he was named by Mayor Miller as one of the members of the charter revision committee. Mr. Maxwell is eminently fair, in all transactions with his fellow man and likewise courteous and affable with those he comes in contact with. E. E. Teachnor, who, under the superintendency of the late Frank J. Barnard, was one of the prominent school teachers of Seattle, but now a Centralia merchant, recently spoke to the members of the Seattle Commercial Club advocating a closer alliance between the southwest cities and communities and Seattle. Lewis county is full of rich bottom lands, which can be had now at reasonable figures and the leading men of that county are trying to encourage men to get hold of five-acre tracts there and put the same in a high state of cultivation, which will yield greater returns than any five-acre farm in all Eastern Washington. * * * Howard G. Cosgrove, the elder son of the late Gov. Samuel G. Cosgrove, who played a conspicuous part in the nomination and election of his father as governor of the state, who is also the head of the Cosgrove political adherents, is now one of Seattle's rising young attorneys with offices in the Alaska Block. Mr. Cosgrove is one of the regents of the University of Washington and enjoys the distinctive honor of being the only graduate of the institution that subsequently became a regent thereof. * * * Eugene Lorton, founder and until recently editor and publisher of The Walla Walla Bulletin, has disposed of his interest in the paper at a handsome profit and he has severed all connections with the paper. Mr. Lorton is one of Washington's most sagacious politicians and his clever political work has been more than once demonstrated. t is rumored that he will locate in Seattle. *** Hiram C. Gill has been nominated on the Republican ticket for mayor of Seattle thus demonstrating that even the eccentricity of a human being is a valuable asset in seeking public and political preferment. William Hickman Moore, the successful candidate for the Democratic nomination for mayor of Seattle is at least lucky at the political game. Living in a county and city that is ten to one Republican he has been elected judge of the superior court, state senator and mayor of Seattle. He has been three times nominated by his party for mayor and should his political rabbit foot pull him through the 8th of next March, he threatens to run for governor of the state. Despite his political success he is a man with a cold and indifferent air about him. CITY NEWS. The York school building will cost $41,900 and the West Woodland school will cost $44,000. It is reported that Hillman City has a building boom in full blast. A very handsome sum of money has been realized from the carnival bazaar in aid of the Orphan Boys' Home and Training School. Charles A. Gunstead, a stranger in town, was murdered near the corner of Columbia and Post streets last week by hold-up men. John McMillan was seriously injured by the snapping of a cable near the canal, one end of the cable striking him on the head. The grand jury has indicted William Hurley and Frank E. Winchester for false registration. The date of hearing on a writ of mandate compelling the Seattle Electric Co. and the Seattle, Renton and Southern Railway Co. to issue interchangeable transfers, will be heard February 17th before Judge Wilson R. Gay. Contrary to expectations local dealers will be able to supply all customers with valentines, an ample supply having been laid in before fire destroyed the chief plant for their publication. Many soldiers are being discharged at Fort Lawton, their enlistments having expired. A few only, are re-enlisting for another service with Uncle Sam. More than 1000 people attended the centennial of the birth of Ole Bull, the Norwegian violinist, at Arcade Hall, Feb. 4th. There is much activity in Chinese circles, many new buildings being planned to be erected throughout the city. H. R. Thompson, a taxicab driver, out for a good time, was "touched" to the amount of $100 worth of valuables, last Sunday. Alfred Carlson, age 40, living at 1040 Columbia street, dropped dead Monday on pier No. 5, from heart disease. Optimistic feeling prevails among the real estate brokers. Plans are being laid for a big business during the coming spring. From all sides the cry for more factories is heard, and it looks as if the campaign for manufacturing business would result in great benefit to the city. John A. Ballatine, a promoter of the city, proposes to form a company, capitalized at $1,000,-000, to lease 5000 acres of the fuel deposits of the North. The city will pay $76,000 for the new city stable being erected at the corner of Charles street and Seventh Avenue South. Seattle's bank clearings and postoffice receipts for January, 1910, showed an increase over the same month of last year. Seattle clearing house showed a gain of more than $200,000 over the corresponding day of last year, and the net gain for the month over January, 1909, was $14,462,768, or an average daily increase of $600,-000. The total of clearings for January, 1909, was $35,301,248, as against $49,744,216 for January, 1910. The total of postoffice receipts for January, 1909, was $79,-296.87, as against a total for January, 1909, of $67,445, an increase of $11,851.87, with a percentage gain of 17.58 per cent. The Seattle Hotel Company has passed into the hands of a receiver, John Rex Thompson. The debts aggregate something like $100,000, variously distributed. The hotel has for several months lost money at the rate of $200 or more per day. Announcement of the candidacy for the succession of the official mantle of Miles Poindexter is made by A. E. Veatch, editor and publisher of the Statesman-Index of Colville. Mr. Veatch is a man high in the councils and esteem of the people and newspaper men of Stevens County and will enter the arena with a solid backing. He declares that the insurgent tactics of Poindexter in the lower house will be followed, believing "that the pledges of the Republican platform should be redeemed and that men should be upheld by the administration who are in sympathy with the promises of the Republican platform."—Okanogan Record. Let us show you Electric Cooking and Heating Devices of all kinds at our show room, 907 First Avenue. THE SEATTLE ELECTRIC CO. McGraw & Kittinger. Real Estate and Insurance 59 Colman Blk.. Phone Main 695 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 1910. THE JOHN L. WILSON SENATORIAL CLUB Dr. J. J. Smith, twice state senator from King county, spent last Saturday in Seattle shaking hands with old political friends. "I sniffed the battle from afar and ran down to see how it was done in the big city." Some senatorial politics are being talked out at Enumclaw and it is the consensus of opinion that, either Burke or Wilson should withdraw from the race and, Senator Wilson being better acquainted with the game, it seems that if King county really wants a United States senator she would demand of Judge Burke to withdraw from the contest and permit Senator Wilson to be elected hands down." James M. Vernon, after many years continuous service is still postmaster of Everett. He was in Seattle one day last week and in speaking about the senatorial situation in Snohomish county, said: "In my opinion Senator Wilson will carry Snohomish county by an overwhelming majority. If any one in the county is against him it's more than I have heard of. If he is elected he will get results for the state from Congress and that is what the state needs just now." P. L. Allen, state senator from the thirty-second senatorial district in King county for the past two legislatures, announces that since the retiring of Senator Piles from the field he is for the Hon. John L. Wilson for United States senator. Erastus Brainard, it is said, has resigned as editor in chief of the Post-Intelligencer, owing to differences arising between himself, Brainard, and the business management. If the good news be true then Senator Wilson stands a splendid show of being nominated for United States senator as Brainard on the P.-I. was a great handicap. L. H. Gray, president of the John L. Wilson Senatorial Club, says encouraging reports are coming in from all parts of the state concerning the candidacy of Senator Wilson. He believes that Mr. Wilson will win the fight by the largest majority of any one that has ever stood for office under the new direct primary law. The following letter is a sample that Mr. L. H. Gray has received from the "Columbia Chronicle," Dayton, Wash., the letter is self explanatory. Mr. Gray states the John L. Wilson Senatorial Club is receiving hundreds of communications similar to this one; in fact, every mail that comes to the office [Picture of a man in a suit and bow tie]. brings several letters expressing their willingness to support the Hon. John L. Wilson for our next U. S. Senator. COLUMBIA CHRONICLE, Dayton, Wash., Jan. 29, 1910. L. H. Gray, President J. L. Wilson Club, Seattle, Wash. Dear Sir:—It is with pleasure that I receive assurance that John L. Wilson will be a candidate for U. S. Senator. I have known him for more than 25 years and you will please express to him my desire that he will be successful and that the Chronicle will give him every assistance possible. I believe that he is the best man in the State for the position and that I will support him to the best of my ability without fear or favor from any source. I have found Mr. Wilson to be a man who will stand by his friends through thick and thin. I wish to be like him in this respect, as I am a friend to him. We publish twice a week, have a linotype machine and a first-class plant. There is no end to our capacity to get out matter. Send in what you want and it will be given publicity for the benefit of the public and for friendship for Mr. Wilson. Hurrah for John L. He is true blue all the time at this office. Yours respectfully, (Signed) R. E. PEABODY. Some weeks ago The Seattle Republican in discussing the politic senatorial situation in the state of Washington felt moved to remark that, the Seattle Daily Times was in a hell of a fix as to a candidate to support for the senatorial nomination. It was at outs with Senator Piles, John L. Wilson it considered a journalistic rival, and Humphries did not have its kind of money that moved it to lay too for. It labored long and hard and finally brought out Judge Burke because it believed that should he become a candidate for the senatorial nomination he would come through with the coin for the paper. Some weeks ago such campaigns, and now it is as Judge Burke announced his intention about Judge Burke's candidion of standing for the nomination as an Indian statue, thus detection, but ever since he has absoonstrating that, if some weeks lutely refused to come through ago he was in a hell of a fix that with the coin such as the Times fix was nothing in comparison to has been accustomed to getting in the fix it is now in. [Name not visible in the image] HIRAM CHARLES GILL. Republican Nominee for Mayor of Seattle. It is a pathetic story, one of two young hearts, lovers from infancy almost. Growing up in the same neighborhood children together, playmates on the play ground and schoolmates at school, and then sweethearts. Into each other they were welded. When separation came it weighed heavily upon them driving out the sunshine, the happiness of their lives. Twenty years only had been granted them but those were years of supreme joy, years of happiness. Occasional meetings added to the ties that bound them soul to soul. They thought as with but one mind—"No separation in death!" On his usual rounds a railroad man discovered two mutilated bodies on the track. A letter found on one explained that they were sweethearts, that they were unhappy and decided to die together. Such was the tragic career of Harry Moss, age 20, and Ellen Houldage, age 17, of Petersfield, England. E.W.WAY & CO. ANCHOR YOUR SAVINGS IN SEATTLE BAILEY BUILDING SEATTLE BEST BOARD COMPANIES REAL ESTATE-INSURANCE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Mabel Mitchell, Plaintiff, vs. J. B. Mitchell, Defendant. No. —. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the above named defendant. J. B. Mitchell: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 21st day of January, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiffs at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. That the object and purpose of said action is to cancel and annul the fraudulent marriage of the plaintiff and defendant herein. McCAFFERTY, ROBINSON & GODFREY, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Postoffice and Office Address: 902 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 21—March 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Elaine K. Oderkirk, Deceased. No. 8969. Notice of Sale of Personal Property. Notice is hereby given that the undersigned will sell at private sale, one hundred shares of the capital stock of the Sound Trustee Company, of the par value of $100.00, at his office, No. 604 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, Washington, on or after the 5th day of February, 1910; said sale to be made for cash. Dated January 15, 1910. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Administrator de bonis non of the Estate of Elaine K. Oderkirk, Deceased. January 21—February 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of James J. Lynch, Deceased. No. 10926. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given to the creditors and all persons having claims against James J. Lynch, deceased, or his estate, to present the same, with the necessary vouchers, to the undersigned administrator at the office of Edward Von Tobel, 604 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, the same being the place of the transaction of business of said estate, within one year from date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit: within one year from the 21st day of January, 1910. Dated Seattle, Washington, January 21, 1910. HARRY W. BRINGHURST, Administrator of the Estate of James J. Lynch, Deceased. January 21—February 18, 1910. NOTICE OF SHERIFF' SSALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington. County of King.—ss.—Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an Execution, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 10th day of January, 1910, by the clerk thereof, in the case of John Porter, Plaintiff, vs. Rachel Savery and John Doe Savery, her husband, Defendants, No. 70184, and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given, that I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit, at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 5th day of March, A. D. 1910, before the Court House door of said King County. in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendants Rachel Savery and John Doe Savery, her husband, and each of them, in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: The East forty (40) feet of Lots six (6), seven (7), and eight (8), Block five (5), of Smith & Burn's Addition to the City of Seattle, levied on as the property of said defendants Rachel Savery and John Doe Savery, her husband, and each of them, to satisfy a judgment amounting to One Hundred and Twenty-three and 10/100 ($123.10) Dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 18th day of January, 1910. BOBERT T. HODGE. January 21—February 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Flossie Ferguson, Plaintiff, vs. Thomas Ferguson, Defendant. Cause No. — Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Thomas Ferguson, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 21st day of January, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plain- tiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned atorneys for plain- tiff at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is divorce on the grounds of non-support and for the custody of the minor child, LeRoy Ferguson. LEONIA W. BROWNE, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: 446 Central Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 21—March 4, 1910. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN FRIEAY, FEBRUARY 11, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King.—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Elizabeth Heitzman, a minor, Deceased. No. 10790. Order to Show Cause on Sale of Real Estate. Joseph Kuenstle, the guardian of the estate of Elizabeth Heitzman, a minor, having filed his petition in this court, duly certified, praying for an order of this court for the sale of all the real estate of which the said minor owns for the purposes therein set forth; And it appearing to the court from said petition that the personal estate of the said minor in the hands of said guardian is not sufficient to pay the claims against the said estate and the expenses of guardianship thereof, that said minor is not a resident of the State of Washington, and owns only an undived one-twentieth interest in real estate that it is necessary to sell all or a portion of the real estate of the said min portion of the real estate of the said minor to pay the said claims and expenses of the guardianship and for her support. And it appearing to the court that said petition conforms to, and is in accordance with the requirements of law in such case and provided. It is ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said minor appear before said Superior Court on Saturday, the 19th day of February, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day at the Court-room of the Probate Department of said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this court should not be granted to said guardian authorizing and empowering him to sell the said real estate of said minor, or so much thereof as may be necessary to pay the aforesaid claims and expenses of guardianship and for the support of said minor. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before the said 19th day of February, 1910, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said County of King and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 15th day of January, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Court Commissioner. January 21—February 18, 1910. Seattle, Washington, January 19, 1910. Notice is hereby given that the first regular annual meeting of the stock- holders of the Alaska Northern Railway Company will be held at the principal office of said Company at Room 502 of the Burke Building on Second Avenue, Seattle, King County, Washington, on Tuesday, the 8th day of March, A. D. 1910, at two o'clock in the afternoon of saled day. JAMES A. HAIGHT, Secretary of Alaska Northern Railway Company. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Mary Clements, Plaintiff, vs. Patrick Clements, Defendant. Cause No. — Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Patrick Clements, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, tow- it, within sixty days after the 21st day of January, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of sald court. The object of the above entitled action is divorce on the grounds of non-support and abandonment, and for the custody of the minor children, Mabel Clements and Rosie Clements. BROWNE & HILBERT, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: 446 Central Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 21—March 4. 1910. NOTICE TO CREDITORS. Notice is hereby given that the undersigned has been appointed administratrix of the estate of Elias Shields, and all persons having any claim against said estate, should present the same, within one year, at 229 Burke Building, for allowance by said administratrix. Dated January 15th, 1910. LOUVINIA SHIELDS WARBURTON, Administratrix of the Estate of Elias Shields. January 21—February 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Gabella Hopkins, Deceased. No. 10890. Notice to Creditors. By order of sald court made herein on the 13th day of January, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against sald deceased or against sald estate or against the community estate of sald deceased and Paul Hopkins to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executor of sald estate, at Fourth Avenue West (Shilshole Avenue), Seattle, the place of business of sald estate, in Seattle, in sald county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, January 21, 1910. PAUL HOPKINS, As Executor of said Estate. JOHN E. RYAN, Attorney for Estate. 416 Globe Building, Seattle, Wash. January 21—February 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. J. C. McDonald and Katie McDonald, his wife, Plaintiffs, vs. Sarah A. M. King and James King, and all persons claiming to own or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 71714. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Sarah A. M. King and James King, and all persons claiming to own or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 4th day of February, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his (their) office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to quiet title to Lot Five (5), Block Two (2), Mills and Randall's Canal Addition to the City of Seattle, in King County, Washington. ELIAS A. WRIGHT. Attorney for Plaintiffs. P. O. Address: 629-631 Burke Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. February 4, March 18, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King.—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of John F. Yoho, Deceased. No. 9204. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not be Made. Jud F. Yoho, administrator of the estate of John F. Yoho, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said John F. Yoho, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 8th day of March, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be approved and an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in each of the three most public places in King County and published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 8th day of March, 1910, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 2nd day of February, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Swiss Investment Co., Inc., Plaintiff, vs. Coon Yen, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 71939. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B50165, on Lots 1 and 2 (less E. 33 ft.), Block 8, Claremont Addition to Seattle, for the year 1904, in the sum of $2.68. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of $2.08; for the year 1906, the sum of $1.46, for the year 1907, the sum of $1.50, and for the year 1908, the sum of $3.97, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Feb. 4, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. SWISS INVESTMENT CO., Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle. First publication dated Feb. 4, 1910. February 4—March 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE state of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Almond A. Merrill, Deceased.—No. 2400. Order to Show Cause. It appearing to this court by the petition this day presented and filed by Mamie A. Merrill, the administratrix of the estate of Almond A. Merrill, deceased, that it is necessary to sell the real estate described in said petition of said intestate to pay the debts of said intestate and the expenses and charges of administration, now, therefore it is Ordered by this court that all persons interested in the estate of said deceased appear before said Superior Court on the 28th day of February, 1910, at the hour of ten o'clock A. M. of said day at the court room of said court at the Court House in the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, and show cause why an order should not be granted to said administratrix to sell said real estate, and that a copy of this order be published for four successive weeks in the Seattle Republic, a newspaper printed and published in said King County. Done in open court this 27th day of January, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Court Commissioner. January 28—February 25, 1910. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 24th day of December, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the lerk of said court. The object of this action is to secure a divorce from the defendant above named for cruelty. WILLIAM C. KEITH, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 45 Starr-Boyd Bldg., Seattle, Washington. December 24, 1909—February 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King Hallie Jordan, Plaintiff, vs. Frank Jordan, Defendant, Summons. The State of Washington to the said Frank Jordan, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty days after the 28th day of January, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The object of said action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant herein on the ground of desertion, abandonment and non-support and the failure, neglect and refusal of the defendant to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff. P. O. Address: Rooms 36 and 37 Union Block, No. 713 First Ave., Seattle, King County, Washington. Jan. 28—March 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Emory Jones, Plaintiff, vs. Julia May Jones, Defendant—Summons. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 28th day of January, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce, dissolving the bonds of matrimony between the parties hereto on the grounds of cruelty and incompatibility of temper. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 503-504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Jan. 28th—Mar. 11th, 1910. NOTICE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the Matter of the Application of the Disincorporation of Shaw's Pharmacy. No. 71810. Notice is hereby given that Shaw's Pharmacy has applied to the Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, for an order declaring said corporation dissolved, which application will come on regularly to be heard on the 1st day of April, 1910. Date of first publication. Jan. 28, 1910. D. K. SICKELS E. B. PALMER. Attorney for Petitioner. Jan. 28—March 25, 1910. STOCKHOLDERS' MEETING. NOTICE OF MEETING TO INCREASE CAPITAL STOCK OF THE VITTUCCI IMPORTING COMPANY. Notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Stockholders of the Vittucci Importing Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Washington, will be held at the office of said Company at 406 Occidental Avenue, Seattle, Washington, on the 7th day of February, 1910, at 2 p. m. of said day, for the purpose of increasing the capital stock of the Vittucci Importing Company from Five Thousand Dollars to Fifty Thousand Dollars. JOSEPH VITTUCCI, Trustee. W. C. PARTRIDGE, Trustee. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Ida C. Johnson, Deceased. No. 11000. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 18th day of January, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said deceased and Erick Johnson to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 709 Lowman Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, Jan. 21, 1910. ERICK JOHNSON As Administrator of said Estate. E. B. PALMER, Attorney for Estate. 709 Lowman Building, Seattle, Wash. January 21—February 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Swiss Investment Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Anna Schlosstine and John Doe Schlosstine, her husband, and Anna Schlosstieve, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 71866. Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of January, 1907, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B47359, on Lot 29, Block 84, Replat of 3rd Plat of W. Seattle by W. Seattle Land & Improvement Co., for the year 1905, in the sum of $1.38. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1906, the sum of $1.23; for the year 1907, the sum of $1.42, and for the year 1908, the sum of $1.61, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 4th, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. SWISS INVESTMENT CO., a Corporation, Plaintiff. Office Address, 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. February 4—March 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Alice Browne, Plaintiff, vs. S. F. Browne, Defendant—No. .... Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, S. F. Browne: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 7th day of January, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said court. That the object and purpose of said action is to obtain a decree absolutely dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant, on the ground of abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant for more than one year. McCAFFERTY, ROBINSON & GODFREY Attorneys for Plaintiff. Post Office and Office Address: 902 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN FRIDAY. FEBRUARY 11. 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Gertrude Mary Russell, Plaintiff, vs. Samuel Russell, Defendant. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Samuel Russell: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 14th day of January, 1910, in the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorneys for the plaintiff, at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. In the foregoing action the plaintiff seeks to obtain an absolute decree of divorce from the defendant upon the ground of non-support and desertion. King County, Washington. Jan. 14—Feb. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King.—In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Mary A. Martin, Deceased. No. 9624. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. J. B. MacDougall, administrator of the estate of Mary A. Martin, deceased, having filed in this court his petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereo, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Mary A. Martin, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 14th day of February, 1910, at the hour of 1:30 o'clock P. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 14th day of February, 1910, in "The Seattle Republican," a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 11th day of January, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, (SEAL) Court Commissioner. Jan. 14—Feb. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. U. G. Moore and Pearl Teeple Moore, his wife; John Albert Moore and Margaret Moore, his wife, Plaintiffs, vs. H. C. Taylor and Jane Doe Taylor, his wife, and any other person claiming or having an interest in or to the property hereinafter described, Defendants. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to above named defendants, H. C. Taylor and Jane Doe Taylor, whose true Christian name to these plaintiffs is unknown, his wife, and to any other person claiming or having an interest in or to the property hereinafter described: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 14th day of January, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorneys for the plaintiffs, at their office below stated: And in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. This action is brought for the purpose of securing a decree in the above entitled court quieting the title in the plaintiffs to the following described property: Lots one (1) and two (2), in block two (2), of Rainier Boulevard Park Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington. REVELLE, REVELLE & REVELLE, Attorneys for Plaintiffs. Office of Once and P. O. Address: 646 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Jan. 14—Feb. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of David L. Smith, Deceased. Notice to Creditors. No. 10984. Under and pursuant to an order made and entered in the above entitled court in the above entitled cause on the 3rd day of January, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against the above named deceased or against his estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administratrix of said estate at Room 911 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, the same being the place of business of said estate; said claims must be presented within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice or the same will under the laws of the State of Washington and under the order of the above entitled court herein referred to, be barred. Date of first publication of notice, January 14th, 1910. LEONORE SMITH, Administratrix of the Estate of David L. Smith, Deceased. Jan. 14—Feb. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, In the Matter of the Estate of Virginia E. Rings, Deceased. No. —. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 3rd day of January, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 416 Globe Building, Seattle, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, January 14th, 1910. GEORGE A. RIGGS, As Administrator of said Estate. JOHN E. RYAN, Attorney for Estate. 416 Globe Building, Seattle, Wash. January 14—February 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. The State of Washington to the said Catherine Stuckenholz, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty (60) days after the 24th of December, 1909, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at the office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant upon the following grounds: Because the defendant has been guilty of many personal indignities so as to render plaintiff's life burdensome, said personal indignities consisting of quarreling, use of vile and bad names, cruelty and infidelity and also because the defendant abandoned the plaintiff in Chicago, Illinois, in the month of August, 1907, and because said abandonment has been continuous for one year and more. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. 500 Burke Bldg., N. W. Cor. 2nd and Marion, Seattle, Wash. December 24, 1909—February 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Etta Frances Roscoe, Plaintiff, vs. David Leslie Roscoe, Defendant, No. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington: to David Leslie Roscoe, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 14th day of January, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this complaint is for the plaintiff to be granted an absolute divorce from the defendant herein on the grounds of desertion and for such other and further relief as the court may direct. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Jan. 14—Feb. 25, 1910. No. 71533 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. William A. Ecton, Plaintiff, vs. Nellie Ecton, Defendant. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to Nellie Ecton, Defendant: In the name of the State of Washington, you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, exclusive of said first date, towit: within sixty days from and after the 14th of January, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, the attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of the said action set forth in the complaint is as follows: To secure a divorce from the defendant upon the grounds of cruelty and personal indignities and that plaintiff be given the exclusive custody of the minor daughter and other proper relief. FRANK B. WIESTLING, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 422 Boston Block, Seattle, King County, State of Washington. First date of publication Jan. 14, 1910. Jan. 14—Feb. 25. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Ruby Grossman, Plaintiff, vs. Paul Grossman, Defendant. No. 71436. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Paul Grossman, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 14th day of January, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint 7 of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain an absolute divorce from defendant Paul Grossman and for a decree and judgment granting the same to the plaintiff Ruby Grossman and for such other and for the order, judgment and relief as said court shall decree just and equitable. F. A. GILMAN, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 718-19 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Jan. 14--Feb. 25. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Henry Taylor, Plaintiff, vs. City of Seattle and John W. Hawkins and Jane Doe Hawkins, his wife; and H. J. Miller, and Jane Doe Miller, his wife, also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, Defendants. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said City of Seattle and John W. Hawkins and Jane Doe Hawkins, his wife; H. J. Miller and Jane Doe Miller, his wife, also all other persons or parties unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, Defendants. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 14th day of January, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of yuor failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to quiet title to Lot 21, Block 20, Lake Union Second Addition to the City of Seattle and for such other relief as to the court may seem just and equitable. EUGENE A. CHILDE, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Jan. 14—Feb. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Frederick J. Belsey, Plaintiff, vs. Bertha B. Belsey, Defendant. Summons for Publication. No. 71540. The State of Washington to the said Bertha B. Belsey, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 14th day of January, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure, so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to secure to plaintiff a decree of divorce forever dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant, on the ground of desertion. CHARLES R. CROUCH, Attorney for Plaintiff. Address: 627 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. Jan. 14—Feb. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Ross Cummings, Plaintiff, vs. Edna G. Cummings, defendant. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Edna G. Cummings, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: within sixty days after the 14th day of January, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The above entitled action is an action for divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony between the parties hereto on the grounds of abandonment and desertion for a period of more than one year immediately prior to the commencement of this action. E. T. SCHOFF, Attorney for Plaintiff P. O. Address 503-504 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Jan. 14—Feb. 25, 1910. NOTICE OF DISSOLUTION. Seattle, Wash., Jan. 12, 1910. NOTICE is hereby given that the partnership consisting of G. F. Altnow and Joseph A. Wolcott, conducting a general merchandise and meat market at No. 5006 First Avenue Northwest in the city of Seattle, is hereby mutually dissolved. That G. F. Altnow will continue the business formerly conducted by the partnership and will collect all debts due the said partnership, and will pay all claims against the said partnership. JOS. A. WOLCOTT, G. F. ALTNOW. Jan. 14—Feb. 4, 1910. CHILDREN’S FUNNY SIDE. CONS SOD, Was SILLINE OF LMC UVOF- step crying because the preachers whom his father had invited to dinner had eaten every morsel of the baked hen and other goodies that were on the table, when a little chicken, in search of food, pecked him on the toe. “Don’t be mad, and pecking me, little chicken,’’ he said, with a sob, ‘‘them ole preachers in the house am the ones that eat up your ma—I didn’t.” “‘Now, remember, my child, this whipping will do me more hurt than it will you,’’ said a man to his son as he was going to whip him. ‘All right,’’ said the boy, ‘‘if you will change places with me I’ll try to bear the pain.’’ Ef de ferryman ain’t dar w’en you gits ter de river an’ de steam- boat’s done blowed up think 0’ yo’ swimmin’ lessons an’ jump in, but fer de Lawd’s sake don’t hol- ler fer rope w’en you git halfway *eross or de world’ll laugh at you an’ make you mad enough ter wish you wuz lost in de wilder- ness.—Atlanta Constitution. It was in one of the colored schools of Baltimore, and the teacher was an inexperienced one. There was talking among the lit- tle negroes before her. “T want absolute silence,’’ she said severely. Still the talking continued. “‘T want absolute silence,’’ she repeated again. At the third demand one very small girl spoke up boldly. “‘Assalute Silence ain’t hyar,’’ she said. ‘‘She’s got de toof- ache.’’—Lippincott’s. A young lady applicant for a country school for the fall and winter term was asked the ques- tion: ‘‘What is your position on whipping children?’’ This maiden never hesitated and this was her answer: ‘‘My usual position is on a chair, with the child held firmly across my knees, facing down- ward.’? She was the unanimous choice of the directors.—Ex. Mother—‘‘Johnny, you said you’d been to Sunday school.’’ Johnny (with a far-away look) —‘*Yes, mamma.” Mother—‘‘How does it happen that your hands sinell of fish!’ Johnny—‘‘I carried home the Sunday school paper, an’ the out- side page is all about Jonah and the whale.’’—Western Christian Advocate. sy hE caps ce vrais alee hacen ta a State of Washington, County Of AIné- —s8. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an order of sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of Ring County: on the 10th day of De- cember, 1909, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of The Oriental Trading Com- pene. ‘Plaintiff, vs, Cascade Investment orty-three (43) of the plat of the town (now, city) ‘of Seattle, as laid out b: 10%, olty) OF Seat four (2), block THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 1910. fendant, Cascade Investment Company, People’s Savings Bank. in and to the following described prop- Wdward C. Neufelaer, Prest to-wit, at 10 o'clock a. m, on the 22na|K J. Reekie, Vice Prest. ._|day of January, A. D., 1910, before the Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cash Court House door of said King County, incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. | David $, Maynard, in King County, Commercial Savings and Trust Washington, levied on as the property of General Bank and HExehanye. s | aid defendant Cascade Investment Com- | Cor, Second and Pike Bt. Seattia, Wa: pany, to satisty a judgment. of a fore- | ——resreeneemenn eeene ee »|Glosure of a mortgage amounting to| S'ETSON & OST LUMBER UU. | Fifty-nine Thousand Nine Hundred ‘Thir- BUILDING MATERIAL f tcen and 27/100 ($59,913.27) Dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. “|Of all Kiitis, Uelivered on sie Ss Dated this 15th day of December, 1908, uolice # ROBERT T. HODGHR, Sheriff£& | . ..: . 2 suas bt Dec ce aera am IN THE JUSTICE COURT BEFORE John E, Carroll, Justice of Peace Se- attle Precinct, King County, Wash- ington. Leonard Settles, Plaintiff, vs. Fred Whist, Defendant. No, 10504, Notice by Publication. State of Washington, County of King—ss. ; To Fred Whist, the defendant in the above action: You are hereby notified that Leonard Settles has filed a complaint against you in the said court, which will come on to be heard in my office on the 14th day of March, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day, and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed, and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said com- plaint is to recover a judgment against you for $85.00 money loaned you by Leonard Setties. Complaint filed 21st day of January, A.D. 1910, JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of Peace Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. February 1i—-Macch 11, 1016. IN| THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Freida Grossman, Plaintiff, vs. Moses Grossman, Defendant. No, ——. Sum- mons by Publication, The State of Washington to Moses Grossman, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of February, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at the address be- low stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of said action, as set forth in the complaint, is to obtain a decree dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds of abandonment. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: Rooms 604-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb, ‘11—March 25, 1910. NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF BEAL ESTATE. STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY of King—ss. Sheriff's Office. By yirtue of an execution issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 9th day of February, 1910, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of Eyres Transfer Co. a corporation, plaintiff, versus B. R. Erdman and Jane ‘Doe Erdman, whose true Christian name is unknown, No, 71648, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby fy that I will provesd! to sell at publi cauction to the ighest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o’clock a. m. on the 26th ‘day of March, A. D. 1910, before the Court House door of said eae County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendants, B. R. Erdman and Jane Doe Erdman, in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot sixteen (16), Block eight (8), Green’s Addition to Seattle, levied on as the property of said defendants, HB, R. Erdman and Jane Doe Erdman, to satis- fy a judgment Pvedeert to fifty-eight and 45/100 ($58.45) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Done this 10th day of February, 1910. ROBERT T. HODGH, Sheriff. By BERT C. THOMPSON, Deputy. Feb. 11-——March 11. 1910. IN_ JUSTICE COURT BEFORE FRED C. Brown, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. * L. Stuckey, A. Farrington and J. Reed, co-partners doing business as Owl Restaurant, plaintiffs, vs. A. A, Haber- bush, defendant. No, 3049-50. Sum- mons for Publication, State of Washington, County of King—ss. The State of Washington to A. A. Heberbush: You, and each of you, are hereby no- tified that L, Stuckey, A. Farrington and J. Reed have filed a complaint against you in said Court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210 New_York Building, Seattle, King Coun- ty, Washington, on the 22nd day of March, A. D. 1910, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock a. m., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will he taken as confessed and the demand of ithe plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said complaint is to recover $9.00 and costs, being a balance due for meals furnished to said defendants by these plaintiffs within the last past three years. There has been a garnish- ment issued out of this cause against Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Rail- way Co, a COX BOTR MOE, in which the sere iguee defendant answered an in- lebtedness of $33.55. Filed Feb, 10, 1910. FRED C. BROWN, | Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Feb. 11—March 25, 1910. People’s Savings Bank. _ tdaward C. Neufelaer, Presi RK J. Reekie, Vice Prest. Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashie Incorporated Dev. 19th, 1889. Commercial Savings and Trust General Bank and Exehanse. Cor, Second and Pike St. Seattia Wash STETSON & FUST LUMBER UU. BUILDING MATERIAL Uf all kines. Welivered on sher uolice Established 1875 ‘Tel. Mam 711 Bonney- Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies tor shipinent » speeinity. Al! orders by telephon: or telegraph promptly attendec to. Telephone Main 13. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Lucinda Maud AUR Plaintiff, vs. William Orlando Allbright, Defendant. No, 71880. Summons by Publication. The State of, eRe oe to the said William Orlando Allbright, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 4th day of February, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court and answer the comnleae of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the Gaderstened attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint which: has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is that the plaintiff, on the grounds of cruelty and desertion, be granted an absolute divorce from the defendant herein and such other and further relief as the court may direct. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 314 Northern Bank & ‘Trust Bldg., Seattle, Nhat deen February 4—March 18, 1910. IN_ THE SUPPRIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Hstate of Mary Jane Mooers, Deceased. No. 11075. No- tice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 29th day of January, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said deceased and — Mooers to present them with the necessary vouchers to the un- dersignea Florance A. Mooers of said estate, at No. 625 and 626 New York Block, Seattle, Wash., the place of busi- ness of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. rppnte of first publication February 4, 0. FLORANCE A. MOOERS, As Administratrix of said Estate. SOLON T, WILLIAMS, ‘Attorney for Wstate. No. 625-626 New York Block, Seattle, Wash, February 4—March 4, 1910. IN_ THE JUSTICH’S COURT Before Fred C. Brown, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Harry Marcus et al, Plaintiffs, vs. John Doe Mercury et al, Defendants. No, 2972, Summons for Publication. ‘State of Washington, County of Kink. —ss. The State of Washington to John Doe Mercury and John Doe Nickerson: ‘You, and each of you, are hereby no- tified that Harry Marcus and Joseph Vineberry have filed an action against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210 New York Building, Seattle, King Coun- ty, Washington, on the 28th day of Feb- ruary A. D. 1910, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the de- mand of the plaintiff granted. The ob- ject and demand of said action is to recover the sum of thirty-five dollars ($35.00) for merchandize sold to the gofendante: Filed January 10th, A. D. FRED C. BROWN, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. TWOROGER & WINKLER, Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Prefontaine Bldg., Seattle, Wash, February 4--February 25, 1910. IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. J, F. Ware, Plaintiff, vs, M. Dishon, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, De- fendants.—No...... Notice and Sum- mons. State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as _ owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, are hereby noti- fied that the above named plaintift 18 the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate, B34995, issued by the Treas- urer of. Bing County, State of Washing- ‘ton, dated the 29th day of August, 1905, and numbered as follows, for the delin- quent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and pee ‘the real property situated in sald King County, described as follows, to-wit: Charles Add. to Seattle, B. 10 ft. of Lot 6, Block 3, certificate number B34995, year 1901, amount $0.95, That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon @ aforesaid above de- scribed real property, to-wit: E. 10 ft. of Lot 6, Block 3, Charles Add, to Seattle—41 cents for year 1902, 38 cents for year 1903, 34 cents for year 1904, 36 cents for year 1905, 90 cents for year 1906, $1.12 for year 1907, $1.33 for year 1908, Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against Said real property. You and each of you Cocina, said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclu- sive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: Within sixty (60) days after Jan, 7th, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plain- Uff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judg- ment will be rendered herein, foreclos- Ing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real prop- erty for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each pace of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provid- ed by law, and as fn in plaintiff's et AN now on file in this cause and court. J. F, WARB, Plaintiff. GEORGE F, VANDERVEER, ROBERT GRASS, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office Address: 400 Mehlhorm Bldg Seattle, Wash. 7 Jan. 7—Feb. 18, 1910. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Swiss Investment Co., a corporation, Plaintiff, vs, Anna Schlosstine and John Doe Schlosstine, her husband, and Anna Schlosstieve, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real Pore’ Defendants. No, 71865. No- ice and Summons, State of Washington to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate, issued by the Treasurer of aoe County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of January, 1907, and numbered as flolows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and myn the real property situated in'said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Certificate No. B47358, on Lot 28, Block 84, Replat_of 8rd Plat of West Seattle by West Seattle Land & Improvement Co., for the year 1905, in the sum of $1.38. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property to-wit: For the year 1906, the sum of $1.28; for the year 1907, the sum of $1.42, and for the year 1908, the sum of $1.61, which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publi- cation, to-wit, within 60 days after Feb. 4th, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and ans- wer the complaint of said plaintiff and Serve a copy of vour answer on the un- dersigned plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered here- in, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of safd real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided Ey law, and as prayed in plaintiff's com- pisint, now on file in this cause and court, SWISS INVESTMENT CO., a Corpora- tion, Plaintiff. Office Address, 457 Arcade Bldg., Se- attle, Wash. February 4—March 18, 1910, IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Summons by Publication, Effie Keene, plaintiff, ys, Albert Keene, Defendant. No. 71946, The State of Washington, to Albert Keene, Defendant: In the name of the State ‘of Washington, you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first pub- lication of this summons, exclusive of sald first date, to-wit: within sixty days from and after the 4th day of February, 1910, and defend the above entitled ac- tion’ in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, the attorney for the plaintiff, at his offices below, stated; and in case ‘of your failure so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of the above entitled court. The object of the said action set forth in the com- plaint, is as follows: To sccure a di- vorce from the defendant on the grounds of desertion and non-support, to give plaintiff the custody of the minor chil- dren, and for alimony and attorney fees, and other proper relief. FRANK B, WIESTLING, Attorney for the Plaintift. P.O. Address: 422 Boston Block, Seattle, King County, State of Washington. First date of publication, Feb. 4, 1910. Last date of publication March 18.