Seattle Republican

Friday, July 1, 1910

Seattle, Washington

8 pages

Page 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 2
Page 3
Page 3
Page 4
Page 4
Page 5
Page 5
Page 6
Page 6
Page 7
Page 7
Page 8
Page 8
Page text (machine-generated)
Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE PUBLISHER'S NOTICE. The Seattle Republican is published on Friday of every week by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3.00 per year; six months, $1.50—postage prepaid. Subscriptions to all foreign countries included in the Postal Union, $4.00 a year, postage paid. Sample copies, free. Single copies ten cents. Advertising rates made known on application. Special rates to publishers. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. Address all communications to The Seattle Republican, 307 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. Make all checks, drafts, postal orders, etc., payable to "Cayton Publishing Company." CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. Telephone: Main 305. Publication office, 307 Epler Block. HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON - - - Publisher SUSIE REVELS CAYTON - - - Associate THE STRUGGLE IS OVER Congress has adjourned and adjourned some twenty days earlier than some of the members thereof had anticipated, and the presumption is, it adjourned as early as it did in order to get to Reno to see the big fight. The Insurgents in the house of representatives managed to administer a number of knock out blows to Uncle Joe Cannon and the Stand Patters in all probability are anxious to see whether Insurgent Johnson can do the job to Stand Pat Jeffries as completely as it was to done Uncle Joe. It, however, has been a long and tiresome session for both sides, the Democrats having been lost in the shuffle and all concerned are glad to get away, whether for home or for Reno. President Taft started out with a bunch of legislation for Congress to do before it adjourned and while it looked for a time that nothing he wanted would be put through, yet everything he asked for, after a fashion, was given to him. Whether the members have pleased their constitutents remains to be seen and many of them are trembling in their boots for fear they have not. It is thought that the elections this fall will bring more changes to the house of representatives than any previous election almost in the history of the country. The Democratic party is confident that it will elect a majority of the members of the next house of representatives and that it will in turn elect Champ Clark of Missouri, speaker. The Republicans are hopeful that the legislation passed will save the day for them and the most of the members will either be returned or other Stand Pat Republicans will be elected in their stead. But the fight is up to the people and the spell binders. THE FINISH OF PUGILISM Next Monday at 1:30 p. m. one of the most memorable fistic combats in the history of the United States, if not of the world, will be pulled off at Reno, Nevada, between John A. Johnson and James J. Jeffries. It has attracted world wide attention and for the space of one hour the whole world will hold its breath while these two gladiators struggle to knock the breath out of each other. Although this fight in attracting the attention of the whole world, yet all classes agree that it is the end of pugilism for the next century or more. Public sentiment has killed the game and a great many of those who have crystalized public sentiment against the game would have no regret if both Johnson and Jeffries would die with the game. Every one has a favorite to win the fight, some from the standpoint of race and color and others from the fitness of the men, but we are glad to say, there are more of the latter school than the former. The best man should win, and, if the game is to die, let it die an honorable death. Despite the fact we have never taken any interest whatever in prize fighting, not caring a scintilla whether one man or the other won, in all previous fistic contests, yet we must confess in this instance we have carefully read every word we have seen published on the subject, and for that matter most every one else has done the same thing. Just how a game could die, when so much interest as has been shown in this, is taken in it is more than we SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. FRIDAY, JULY 1, 1910 can figure out; but the sports, the financiers, the boxers and the anti-prize fighting element of the country all agree that the halycon days of the gladiator's ring will be a thing of the past, when the battle between Johnson and Jeffries has been decided in one or the other's favor. It is the concensus of opinion that these two gladiators are the most powerful specimens of the genus homo that ever lived and it is perfectly natural that the battle between them will be the most wonderful in the history of pugilism, but with public sentiment running high against it as it is it is perfectly natural that the game will be forever abandoned by the sports. So promote it be. THE TIMES STUNG AGAIN A few days ago the Times was gloating over the alleged overthrow of John Cort in the theatrical world. Page after page of valuable space was wasted on it, at least so far as the general public was able to see, but they, in all human probability, were paid advertisements. It tried hard to bolster up a lost cause, but it finally succumbed and Cort's final victory was printed in an obscure part of the paper. The Times has lost another fight and like all of the others it has lost it crawled into into its hole and pulled it in after it. The Times is in line to lose another hot fight, but it is using more discretion in this than it did in the Cort fight, so it has already begun to go a little slow. Some time ago the Times undertook to force a Democrat on the Republicans of this state as their United States senator in the person of Judge Thomas Burke, but at the first skirmish the Times began to tuck its tail, preparatory to taking to tall timbers and leaving Burke and jim agnew, the two galvanized Democrats, to hold the bag. The Times has seen the hand writing on the wall and for once it has properly interpreted the meaning thereof, Thomas Burke is a good Democrat but a darn poor Republican, and no one knows that better than the editor of the Times, but Burke is a corporation attorney and the Times having grown fat on that kind of food could not go back on him. Whenever the Times advocates the election of a Republican it does so for one of two reasons, either to disrupt the Republican party or the money the man advocated has paid for the space. In every election since the Times has been in possession of the Blethens it has finally supported the Democratic nominee with the exception of the Gill election, and it does seem awfully strange that Republicans should want a blatant mouth Democrat to come into the Republican party and dictate to them what Republican is to be elected to office. For the sake of argument lets grant that, if a vote of King county was taken Judge Burke would lead all the other senatorial candidates, but it does not seem to occur to those making such a statements that King county is by no means the entire state of Washington and that though Judge Burke might get a big vote in King county he may not get enough outside of the county for him to realize "he also ran." If the Democrats should tire of George Cotterill, who in the past has been the whole show then he might consent to come over and run the Republican party as is Judge Burke trying to do at present. The Republicans must be kinder accustomed to having galvanized Democrats grabbing their best offices, and if they are not they will be, if all the galvanized Democrats get Republican offices in King county, that are seeking them. Whether notable or otherwise the whole world just now is talking about the Johnson-Jeffries fight that will be pulled off at Reno next Tuesday, simply because it will be the biggest thing of its kind that the world has ever witnessed. But unless we wrongly interpret the signs of the times it is the beginning of the end of prize fighting for a good many centnries to come. If Johnson wins there will be no one to fight him and if Jeffries wins there will be no one to fight him, and no one will want to fight Johnson. The game is pretty near all in for, and it will certainly all be in for if Johnson happens to whip the big boiler maker. U N I V E R S I T Y O F W A S H APR 29 1952 UBLI CAN VOLUME XVII, NUMBER 5 EDITORIAL EDICTS "Jeff Is The Only Man That Can Whip Johnson," says a headline, and even that is mere speculation. Corporations may have souls, but we fear no one has ever yet been able to find where they keep them. Spain has a woman bull fighter and, her gender to the contrary, she is rapidly becoming Spain's most popular toreador. No, constant reader, the colored soldiers will not go, but it begins to look as if there were others besides Bledser that will go to jail. Just what the sons of guns do their bloody murdering for, and as soon as suspected confess, is more than even they can explain. William Jennings Bryan is always wanting to regulate something beside his own mouth, which of all things needs regulating the most. That physician's examination graft in Seattle has been stopped by the superior court, which must be like gall and wormwood to the administration. A crook has been traced to Seattle, where he was arrested by the finding of a key to his cork leg. That was a true case of, the key to the situation. It is to be regretted that we are to have no Fourth of July this year on account of the Johnson-Jeffries figt being pulled off the day it ought to come. Two United Statds senators have died within the past week, McHenry of Louisiana and Daniels of Virginia. Is it God or the devil who is getting his own? "The latest from Reno," is on every tongue just as though there is or will be anything to hear from Reno especially from the ring side until the fight is pulled off. Jim Wickersham says he is certain the voters of Alaska will send him back to Congress, which very thing he would say, if he had not one chance in a thousand. A saloon porter in Helena, Montana, found ten cents and it tickled him so badly that he laughed himself to death. Can any one doubt that Mr. Hard Times is in the land? T. R. refuses to come to visit Seattle at this time and we suspect it is because he fears one Miles Poindexter would claim that he is coming to Washington in the interest of his campaign. If technicalities of an international nature prevent Porter Charleton from being hanged for the willful murder of his wife then lynch law should supply the lame places of the international laws. If it be true that the consumers are compelled to pay $1.25 for which the producer only gets 16 cents from the commission merchants in this city, there is certainly just cause for serious complaint. Edmonds went "dry," but Edmonds is very much "wet." If however, the warfare between the "drys" and the "wets" continue to rage as it has for the past few days Edmonds will get wet with blood. Without actual figures to verify the statement, yet it looks to us as if the June brides have kept pace with the June graduates, that is to say, just as many have married as have graduated. That's a nice way to treat your parents. Muck-raking has been pronounced "a child of Satan and an heir to hell," which may or may not be true, but one thing is certain, entirely too many tricks have been turned in the United States because those committing them believed they would not get muck-raked. Pretty nearly every municipal corporation in the United States could be more or less purified by giving them a muck-raking bath. Within the past twelve months something like 12,000 farmers of the United States have sold out their belongings and moved over into Canada, and if that thing goes on for a few more years Johnny Bull will find that Johnny Yank has swallowed Miss Canada without a struggle or without her realizing that there was any swallowing going on. --- THE PASSING THRONG “OLD GERMAN LAGER” No Medals, No Bells----Just Natural Aged LAGER ----- Beer in Bottles ----- Its made and aged under the Old World-Renowned GERMAN Method—no forcing process used in it manufacture—just “LAGERED” by long, natural storage. Lager means age. THAT'S WHY----Es “Giebt Kein Kopfwey” THE INDEPENENT BREWING COMPANY Seattle, Washington Independent 58 Sidney 75 2 Robert S. Terhune says he is still anxiously waiting for some of the opponents of his plan for selecting delegates to the state convention to come forward with a more feasible one and he will be all attention. Secretary of War Dickinson spent last Saturday in Seattle and while here received a local committee relative to the department removing the twenty-fifth Infantry and politely, but positively told the committee there was "nothing doing." William Bishop, the statesman from Chimacum, was among Seattle's passing throng this week. He has three times been elected a member of the house of representatives of the Washington legislature. He is now a candidate for the state senate. G. H. Parker, head of the local wireless alleged fraud, was arrested a few days ago and put under $10,000 bond. He was charged with having used the mails to advertise a fraudulent business. Mr. Parker has for his attorney Edward B. Palmer, and he has the right man. If Thomas P. Revelle should enter the congressional race, Representative Humphrey would have a fight on his hands such as he never before had. While Mr. Revelle has not formally announced his candidacy yet he has strong inclinations. Mr. Humphrey will be home next week. E. H. Holmes, of Spokane, editor of the Forum and grand secretary of the Masonic Grand Lodge of Washington, spent three days in Seattle this week on lodge business. "My paper is for Poindexter, but I must admit that John L. Wilson seems to have things coming his way," he remarked. It begins to look as if the senatorial scrap in the thirtysecond district will narrow down to a straight fight between Dan Landon and E. M. Williams. McMaster has withdrawn from the contest and is supporting Landon, which is a strong spoke in his wheel. Cotterill is laying dead for the winner. George R. Tennant, having made such a holy fright of himself as a member of the last legislature he will THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN not seek a re-election, but is boosting for his law partner F. E. Brightman for a legislative nomination, who, we predict, would do equally as well as Tennant. But why discuss an utter impossibility Edward B. Palmer wants to go to the state senate to succeed R. F. Booth. Mr. Palmer is a man that always wants something, and he is always wanting the other fellow to give it to him. His incessant want to go to the legislature seems always to be for the purpose of feathering his own nest. Think it over. Quite a few persons, some for slefish purposes and others because they are ignorant of the facts, are indulging in a good deal of criticism of Prosecuting Attorney George F. Vandevere just now, but when he will have retired from the office and the political atmosphere completely cleared, it will be found that a more able and just prosecutor never before filled the that office in King county. Claude C. Ramsey was the recipient of a candidate banquent a few evening ago at the Ranier-Grand hotel, which was given by a number of enthusiastic admirers for the purpose of more effectively launching his candidacy for state senator from the thirty-fourth senatorial district. Among those who responded to toasts in favor of Mr. Ramsey's candidacy were: Hon. Frank Hanford, W. T. Dovell, J. W. Head, Mr. Wynn, E. H. Shelley, Mike Malone and Mr. Gleason. Mr. Ramsey replied feelinly and to the point and a splendid meeting was the result. "It is a fact," said Fred J. Carver, the well known attorney, "that the Bolo Club has endorsed John F. Murphy for prosecuting attorney because the members thereof think he is the most efficient man of all the candidates that have announced themselves for nomination on the Republican ticket and the club proposes to make a valiant fight for his nomination and election. Mr. Murphy is a straight Republican and not of the half and half stripe as some of the candidates who have belonged to all of the political parties for the sake of getting an office. FRIDAY July 1, 1910 Rumor has it that the Gill machine has decided that it will back Frank Griffiths for prosecuting attorney. If nominated and elected that would mean that it would be utterly impossible for a citizen to get the office of prosecuting attorney to interfere with the notorious tenderloin district that Mayor Gill has established and that saloons would run wide open on Sunday the same as Monday. The Clancy's never do things by halves and they propose to again install themselves into the political power of this city and county and the Gill political machine has been formed for that self same purpose and Frank Griffiths is to play his part in it. John L. Wilson, one of the candidates for the United States Senate, loves an argument, and one of his pet subjects has been W. H. Cowles. He would stop anything to argue the merits and demerits of the publisher as he saw them and one story is told which shows the length to which he is wont to go. It happened right here in Spokane. Wilson, in company with a well known physician and a lawyer or two and several others of equal prominence, was engaged in the friendly and social American game of poker. Wilson drew two cards and filled an eight full on jacks. Just then some one mentioned W. H. Cowels. Wilson started in with an argument. As the debate became hotter and the poker game became less intering to the former senator, and he needed both hands to gesticulate. He slammed down the cards into the dead-wood and finished his argument in a blaze of oratory. The physician won the hand on a pair of jacks. John L. had been in the pot about $150 at the time the argument started and he threw down his hands. He scarcely believed his eyes when the "rubbernecks" fished his hand out of the deadwood and showed him what he had done. He "blew up" a mite, but finally commented that he would give up the $150 for the sake of the argument, which he carried off with honors.—Inland Observer. THOUGHTS FROM THE STATE PRESS FRIDAY July 1, 1910 THOUG Because the city of South Bend had decided to hold a lecture course the Journal of that city says, "Every self respecting town should have a lecture course." How prone is human nature to measure the other fellow's corn by his half bushel. For years and years South Bend has dragged along without a lecture course, but she no sooner adopts such a plan than she at once rises to remark, other towns that do not do likewise are not self-respecting. Last week this paper spoke about the Goldendale Sentinel saying that its space was valuable, and there must have been more truth than poetry in the allegation, for in its current number it says: "The Sentinel is installing a new Miehle press this week. Our next issue will be printed on the highest priced press that money can purchase." That's the milk in the cocoanut. The proof of the pudding is the eating thereof. Its space is not only valuable, but it has been taken by some one and the same paid for. Lucky dog. We suggest that the editor of the Citizen-Journal of Rosalia be considered in line for Uncle Sam's diplomatic service, when a successor to Senator Piles has been duly installed into office, because he managed to say so much on the senatorial situation in Washington, and yet said so little. He gave all the boys a touch of high life, and then sailed away to the mountain top and observed his work and exclaimed, "well done." What does the editor of the Patriarch mean, when he says, "He who inherits a desire for knowledge will get it (free from alloy) without losing a dozen of his best years in a diploma factory?" Yes, there is a certain kind of knowledge that you get from a gin mill, a dance hall, a house of ill fame and by associating with the degenerates that frequent such places, but those who get such knowledge grow up and are classed with those whom Roosevelt declared to be, "undesirable citizens." but the child who gets wisdom must lay the foundation in some school where certain fixed rules are followed until the mind is trained to shoot in the proper direction. In addressing the graduates of Pennsylvania, secretary Knox said "We have reached the point where it is evident that the future The Areoplane In Warfare realize a federation as real and as vital as that now existing between the component parts of a single state; when by deliberate international conjunction the strong shall universally help the weak, and when the corporate righteousness of the world shall compel unrighteousness to disappear and shall destroy the habitations of cruelty still lingering in the dark places of the earth." The thought is beautiful and many there are who believe that in some sense and degree this will surely be realized in accord with the dispensation of these moral times. Whether this is soon or ever realized the perfecting of the aeroplane and the advantages derived from its use will make warfare more cruel than ever. Experiments with dropping explosives or imitations thereof upon earthworks in other selected spots are being made by Hamilton the aviator. The thing has been tried in Europe and where it has been pronounced successful in a way, it is classed with the specially hazardous employment. Meanwhile the nations go right on spending more year after year for things which are necessary adjuncts of war. It has been recently published that the board of public utilities has hopes of introducing the use of some detachable metal device Strap Holders Makes Demands they can be cleaned and sterilized every day. The fact brings to mind the thoroughly packed Seattle cars where said dirty straps are much in demand at the rush hour in the mornings but more particularly in the afternoons. Such crowded cars often bring out trying situations and produce mirth or anger according to the disposition of the party under fire. As a rule, the greater the jam the greater the sense of the ridiculous, and hilarity reigns. Bad manners, however, are often in evidence and do not seem to wear off but are exhibit- --- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. HTS FROM THE STAT "Senator Piles will soon be home and then some politics will be enacted," says the Kent Advertiser. Do not be too sure about that, neighbor. You remember the same prediction was made about Senator Piles two years ago, when Ankeny was a candidate for re-election, but Piles came and while there was a little something doing, yet not enough to set the county on fire. Piles' political charm has been badly shattered and if he ever takes the stump for the election of a Democrat by Republicans there will be nothing left of it. Does it pay to raise a crop of boys? is a question that seems to be puzzling the Big Bend Empire. Through some medium that paper has learned that it costs $4,000 to care for a boy from the time of his birth until he is twenty years of age. Then it says: "If a family has six boys it represents an outlay of $24,000, which is an expensive luxury." That reminds us of the young fellow that figured out a plan to save a dollar a day, which he did. When he was twenty-one he figured up the number of dollars that he had saved, but asked himself, where is the money? The boy of the family after he reaches the age of ten always holds up his end and in most cases more than earns his living. A correspondent in the Washington Standard, who is a Socialist in politics declares: "There is absolutely no difference between Republican and Democrat politics," which may or may not be true, but there is one thing certain, there is a slight difference between the Republican and the Socialist, and like the old colored deacon who had listensd to his pastor declare from the pulpit that, "God made man and then he made woman with a slight variation," exclaimed, "Amen, and thank God for the slight variation." THE SEATTLE REUBLICAN feels like patting itself on the back after reading the following excerpt in the Seattle Trade Register: "It is time that the Seattle business men made a united protest against the absurd representations of this city's population each year by the Polk Directory The facts are good enough and the growth in every CURRENT COMMENT CURRENT COMMENT ed by the same parties day after day. One of the greatest nuisances is the man who sits with his legs crossed and his foot out so that first one woman's dress and then another's rubs the dust off of it. Then there is the man who insists upon extending his feet out till one either has to stumble over them or is forced to wait till he kindly draws them in for a second. The evening newspaper serves as a fortress behind which many men retain not only their seats but their manners as well, perhaps without even a prick of their conscience. These men hurriedly secure a seat, take out their paper and at once become absorbed. Old women, women with babies in their arms, and even pretty women, may hang to straps or stagger in the isles—these men never rise to give them a seat. Why should they when they do not see them? An annoying man on the street car is he who stares at each woman as soon as she steps in the car door, watches her find a seat and then, if she is seated near enough, proceeds to size her up from the top of her hat trimmings to the toe of her shoes. The inspected one often gives a sigh of relief when the next victim steps in at the door and his attention is directed into new channels. In one of the eastern cities they are having quite a run on fake fortune tellers, (and not only in that city but also in many others) three Fickle Public's Favorite Faker the general public would get over putting faith in these fakes they would of themselves die out. It is surprising what a great number of persons wish to have their fortunes told and will actually take time and spend money to hear it if they think it will not get out that they have done so. There was recently in this city a lady who had made all arrangements to have as a surprise for her guests, a gypsy tent and therein a fortune teller where they might wander in at will and hear what fate had in store for them. The woman who claimed to have ability in this line and who agreed to hire her services for that evening failed Madame at the eleventh hour and she had to fall back on her day woman who was gifted with gab but lacking in mytics matters. However, she was there at --- ```markdown ``` way is appreciated by citizens and fully realized by visitors from other states. To attempt to maintain a directory estimate as against a census return is nonsense that not even a childish pride should persist in. Neither the present nor the future of Seattle depends upon estimates, which are of value only as they are reasonable and are readily corroborated." This paper for the past year or more has taken the stand that the Polk Directory humbug is a disgrace, to not only Seattle, but every decent town in which it is published. In our mind the Wireless Telegraph fraud is mild in comparison to the vulgar humbugs that issue Polk's Directory. --- After reading and re-reading the Washington Saturday Review, of which State Senator Ruth is the editor, it occurred to us that, the Review might save time by having the Argus' stuff appear in its columns simultar eous with the Argus itself, by making arrangements with the editor to duplicate his slush and send a copy to the Olympia edition of the Seattle Argus. How easy it is to claim the world with a fence around it on white paper, even if you have no claim in the world whatever to it, for it costs nothing to claim. In the current issue of the Snohomish Tribune it makes use of the following, "Snohomish county is one of the richest agricultural regions in the state and has a lead on practically all of the counties west of the Cascades." In its mind that is the conclusion of the whole matter. It is so because it has said so and there is no room for argument. Snohomish is just like all of the other counties on Puget Sound, no better no worse. They are all good. --- "Is Governor Hay a Prohibitionist or anti-Probitionist?" asks the Weekly Observer of Spokane. This pertinent question is put to the governor because he is advocating the county unit on one hand and all day saloons, that is to say, to open and close with the sun for cities of the first-class. That would seriously interfere with the county unit idea, hence the question. For the edification of both the wets and the drys Governor Hay should answer the question. the appointed hour in a radiant gypsy costum rings and all. One after another the guests strolled in to have their fortune told, just for fun of course, and much was the day woman's surprise to find that the average one seemed to believe what she said and that a great many silver pieces crossed her palm unsought by herself. One gentleman who was accompanied by a lady when he heard his fortune, came back alone later in the evening, and slipping her a dollar said, "Here lady, take this, you certainly told me the truth and I appreciate it." The ladies did not seem to have their purses with them, but more than a dozen stopped to inquire "Would you kindly give me your address?" or "Madame, do you follow this as a business?" It is claimed that there are two ways by which the ordinary fortune-teller faker tells fortunes. One is clairvoyantly, where some guide in the spirit world shows the fortune teller symbols which she must interpret. The other is done by cards which are used as symbols, the interpretation coming by intuition. In both cases there is a surprising amount of true statements made and yet the very ones making them would not be willing to risk their all upon the strength of the utterance as it is all a groping in the darkness among the things little understood. OPPORTUNITY "They do me wrong, who say I come no more When once I come and fail to find you in. For every day I stand outside your door And bid you wake, and ride to fight and win. "Laugh like a boy at splendors that have sped To vanished joys be blind and deaf and dumb. My judgment seals the dead past with its dead; But never binds a moment yet to come. "Art thou a mourner? Rouse thee from thy spell. "Art thou a mourner? Rouse thee given. Each morning gives thee wings to flee from Hell Each night a star to guide thy feet to Heaven. —Selected Every ring champion for the past fifty years that now lives will be at the ring side to see the Johnson- Jeffries fight. The last to arrive is Fitzsimmons. ITEMS MORE OR LESS INTERESTING CORPORATION TAX RATE In 29 of the Leading Cities of the United States The following table was read before the Taxpayers League, of Seattle, at its last meeting and as soon as verified by the League will be presented to the city and county officials: Name of City Per cent of Actual Valuation Present Tax Rate Date of 100 per cent Basis Baltimore 1 00 2 16 2 16 Boston 1 00 1 65 1 65 Brooklyn 90 1 74 1 57 Buffalo 1 00 1 89 1 89 Chicago 33 7 66 2 53 Cincinnati 60 3 11 1 87 Cleveland 35 3 47 1 18 Detroit 1 00 1 81 1 81 Indianapolis 66 $ \frac{3}{2} $ 1 82 1 21 Jersey City 1 00 1 88 1 88 Kansas City 50 1 27 63 $ \frac{1}{2} $ Los Angeles 50 1 47 73 $ \frac{1}{2} $ Lonisville 80 1 75 1 05 Memphis 60 1 76 1 05 Milwaukee 50 2 56 1 28 Minneapolis 53 2 65 1 40 Newark NJ 1 00 1 91 1 91 New Orleans 75 2 80 2 10 New York City, Manhatttan and Bronx 90 1 60 1 51 Brooklyn 90 1 74 1 57 Queens 90 1 72 1 55 Richmond 90 1 77 1 59 Philadelphia 1 00 1 f0 1 50 Pittsburg 90 1 50 1 50 Portland 75 2 00 1 50 Providence 2 00 1 96 2 18 San Francisco 60 1 96 1 61 $ \frac{1}{2} $ Rochester 82 1 97 1 61 $ \frac{1}{2} $ Seattle 60 3 35 1 01 St. Louis 66 2 22 1 46 $ \frac{1}{2} $ St. Paul 50 3 30 1 60 Des Moines 25 3 74 93 $ \frac{1}{2} $ Galveston 50 1 88 94 Washington D C 66 $ \frac{3}{2} $ 1 50 1 00 BACK-TO-THE-SOIL COLONIES One difficulty with back-to-the farm movement, though perhaps not its chief one, is that those whom it is designed particularly to benefit lack a working plan, says the Cleveland Plain Dealer. They do not know how to go at it. Even assuming that a city man wants to go back to the soil and become a producer, how shall he go about it? This question is answered by the National Farm Homes Association, of which Gov. Hadley of Missouri is president, Hadley has become one of the foremost back-to-the-farm agitators. Perhaps his organization is thinking primarily of the development of Missouri and the southwest; yet could its plan be carried out its benefits would extend far beyond that. Hadley and his associates propose to establish in sections of the southwest where land is chep colonies each of thirty-two families. Each family is to have forty acres and in the center of the group of forty acre farms will be a central farm of 160 acres belong to the organization and be operated as a model for the rest. Not one cent of capital will be necessary for one to take advantage of this opportunity to get back to the soil. Each farmer will be given ten years to pay for his plot of ground, which, fully equipped with buildings and machinery, will be furnished him by the association. For the city man, the central model farm will be ready always to suggest methods and indicate results. If Hadley and his associates in their admirable movement have their dreams fullfilled there will be many such colonies scattered through the southwest. The plan, though rather Utopian in some of its details, is admisable in the objects sought to be accomplished. It is hoped it may succeed. -Yakima Herald. WISE AND OTERWISE The ctiy council of Milwaukee, Wis., is investigating the feasibility of providing gutter shower baths for the youngsters in the crowded districts. At very little expense inch pipes could be extended above the fire hydrants and sufficiently above the street to give the youngsters a chance to get themselves and their clothing gloriously soaked. The Sunset Telephone Company of Los Angeles, Cal., is giving its central operators voice culture under the belief that, sweetness of voice and refusing to argue or retort, when patrons become excited, will improve the service. Time will tell if the plan be a good one, but it does not make much difference to the busy man what kind of a voice says: "Your party does not answer," or "There's no one on the line. It is practically assured that the art of swimming is to be a part of the curriculum offered to boys attending the Chicago public schools. It is expected that the girls of the public schools will be offered the same advantage later. There is no question but that the step will broaden and better public school work, and every one must admit that, swimming is a most valuable adjunct to any person's physical accomplishments. The most progressive say, it is but a question of a short time when swimming tanks will be installed in all high school buildings. A smaller proportion of children go to the public schools now than went ten years ago. The number of students in college has increased. This is doubtless due to the high cost of living which takes the poorer children from the public schools and puts them to work. The pinch is not felt by the well-to-do, who in increasing numbers send their young folks to institutions of higher learning. Judging from what the National Magazine says, the president's cabinet has a trio of Beau Brummels. Conditions have changed from what they were in the colonial days if the public bets, speculation and opinions run high as to whether the postmaster-general, the attorney-general, or the secretary of the navy, dresses with the most elegance and style or in other words blows in the most money on his back. It is strangely out of keeping with the ideas which prompted early American immigration to read that the garb of a member of President Taft's cabinet may be called distinctively the latest fashion plate from New York. Yet a man has the right to spend his own money as THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN he pleases. Just among the odd things which time brings out. That's all. ITEMS OF INTEREST Henry Lake Slayton, who as head of a lecture bureau, is said to have brought out more prominent lecturers and to have supervised more concerts and lectures than any other man, recently died at his home in Chicago, Ill.. Mr. Slayton had managed lecture tours for William J. Bryan, Senator Robert M. La Follette, Senator Benjamin R. Tillman and other notables. One of the longest wharves in the world, almost a mile in length, is at Port Angeles, Cal. It extends into the Pacific in a long serpentine curve. The daughter of Phillip P. Randolph, a Philadelphia millionaire, created great interest in the Spring race meet held in South Carolina recently by riding as a jockey. Miss Randolph is a very popular young woman in her set and it is thought that some of the society women may adopt this strenuous fad. One of the newest amusements in the Courstel Prater, Vienna, is a water carousal. This consists of boats connected by chains and floating in a large circular basin with an island in the middle. An engine drives the water around at a high rate of speed and the boats are carried along with it. It was a woman who gave the world its first newspaper, The Courant, which made its initial appearance in London, March 11, 1702. The Chinese in Peneng, in return for the wrongs that their countrymen have during the last few years suffered at the hands of the Japanese, which includes the Japanese aggression at Antung, and the loss of prestige due to the apology and indemnity exacted over the Tatsu Maru affair, have inaugurated a boycott of all Japanese goods. In the I'anhandle of Texas alone there are fully 7,000,000 acres that only need the touh of the plough and the seed of the sower to produce millions of busels of good grain. Miss Job, of Queenstown, Tasmania, is said to be the only woman who has ever sat within the bar at a Wesleyan Methodist conference composed of ministers and laymen and Miss Job was seated on the position that women are included as laymen. Archbishop Blenk of the Roman Catholic diocese of New Orleans, has received several letters threatening him with death on account of the active part he is taking in the work directed against the revival of race track gambling in Louisiana. When the sun enters the sign of Leo at the summer solstice the highest temperature of the year is experienced. The king of beasts, the lion, is therefore placed in that part of the zoidac where the sun enters at the summer solstice. The constellation, which is called Leo, bears very little resemblance to the outline of a lion, yet it is so called, and to this constellation in the zodiac we owe the countless spewing lions' heads, which are found in the ancient and modern water fountains. In the latter part of July, while the sun is still in the sign of Leo, the Nile is at its level and a lion's open mouth is fitly emblematic of the rushing forth of strong waters JETSAM AND FLOTSAM Failure to Raise Hand While Taking Oath. A school teacher was convicted of perjury for having falsely made a statement under oath to procure a license to marry a feminine pupil under the requisite age. In State v. Day, 121 Northwestern Reporter, 611, his contention was that, although he had gone through the other ceremony usual in taking an oath, he had neglected to raise his hand. It having been convincingly shown that appellant knew the girl was less than 18 the fact that he knew the application contained the statement that she was over that age, and the fact that he signed it deliberately knowing it to contain such statement, dispensed with an exact following of the statutory form of oath. The Minnesota Supreme Court decided that, the particular formality never having been regarded as important, the essential thing was that the party taking the oath should go through some declaration or formality before the officer which indicates to him that the appellant consciously asserts or affirms the truth of the fact to which he testifies. Conviction affirmed.—Central Law Journal. "What's your name, prisoner?" "Mah name's Jashua, jedge." "Joshua, eh?" said the judge as he rubbed his hands. "Are you that same Joshua spoken of in Holy Writ—who made the sun stand still?" "No, jedge," was the hasty answer, "'twan't me. Ah am de Jashua dat made de moon shine." —Congressman Clayton of Alabama. FEDERAL PAINT AND WALL PAPER CO. 1314 First Ave., Arcade Annex close to the shopping center, but just outside of the high rents. We can give you better value for your money. A complete new stock of goods now in. We do satisfactory painting, papering, kalsomining, etc., at reasonable prices. Estimates cheerfully furnished on request. Use the phones— Main 2304 Ind. 3913 Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. GILHAM-LYSONS REALTY CO., Loans, Investments, Insurance. H. E. Gilham. J. W. Lysons. Main 3044. Ind. 1588. People's Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder. Prest. J. Reekle, Vice Prest. J. R. Greenleaf, Cashier. Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. Commercial Savings and Trust General Bank and Exchange. Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Waist McGraw & Kittinger. FRIDAY July 1, 1910 WM. H. FINCK, The Pioneer Jeweler. Birth Stones and Birthday Gifts. Phone Main 1909. 816 Second. Seattle, Washington. If you want a safe which you know Has No Superior, buy one of the Hall Safe & Lock Co.'s, manufactured by the Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co., for which we are the sole agents. PURCELL SAFE CO. Prefontaine Bldg., Prefontain Place and Yesler Way DENNY-RENTON CLAY & COAL CO. Manufacturers of All Kinds of Clay Products. General Offices: 411 Lowman Bldg. Main 2189-Phones-Ind. 5125. Let us show you Electric Cooking and Heating Devices of all kinds at our show room, 907 First Avenue. STETSON & POST LUMBER CO BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice Established 1875 Tel Main 710 PUGET SOUND NATIONAL BANK of Seattle. Capital Stock $300,000 Leysits $8,250,000. Jacob Furth, President. R. V. Ankeny, Cashier. F. K. Struve, Vice-President. O. W. Crockett, Asst. Cashier. We do strictly a commercial business. We solicit the accounts of individuals, firms and banks. ALBERT HANSEN. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses. First and Cherry. Phone, Main 268. Seattle, Washington. Phone For a Case of Rainier Beer Delivered to any Part of the City Phone Ind. 5668 Main 5668 NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King— ss. Sheriff's Office. ss. Sheriff Office. By virtue of an execution, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 23d day of June, 1910, and land thereof, in the case of Aurora Land and property plaintiff, versus D. A. Hatfield, defendant, No. 73333, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given. That I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheer's sales, to the highest bidder of August, A. D. 1910, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendant, D. A. Hatfield, in and to the following property, located in King County, State of Washington, ten Tract twenty-five (25) Harry White's replat of East Seattle, and block 166 C. D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle, Division 3, and an undivided one-half interest, the last one-half of the sweet one-quarter, one-south of one-quarter, section 35, township 26 north, range 5 east, and lags 18 to 22 inclusive, block one (1) Gillman Park First Addition, Seattle, all of said property being situated in King County, the Washoe Valley, one property of said defendant, D. A. Hatfield, to satisfy a judgment amounting to three hundred and seventy-seven and 47-100 ($277.47) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 28th day of June, 1910. ROBERT T. HODGE, Sheriff. By J. STRINGER, Deputy. July 1, July 29, 1910. A Free Trip to Seattle and Return. Let's Bust the State Dental Trust. Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar. Your dentist will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices are in the Union Block, First Avenue in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar and the State Dental Monopoly will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established at 713 First Ave., in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete with cheap dentists, but with the high-class dentists for half their price. Open evenings until 8 and Sundays until 4 for people who work. EDWN J. BROWN, D.D.S. 713 First Avenue Seattle, Wash. Read my article in Sunday's P-I and Monday's Times and Star. POLTICS AND THE POLITICIANS FRIDAY July 1 1910 From the Seattle Star it was learned that the fight in Spokane was between Wilson and Poindexter. On Friday evening the same authority declared the recent primaries in Spokane had broken even with Wilson and that no drastic "stand pat" resolutions would be passed. The next day, however, the Spokane county convention was held and the Poindexter men went to defeat before the all-conquering Wilson forces by something like two to one and since that time the Star has had nothing to say about Poindexter's chances in Spokane, nor has the Times had anything to say about Burke's chances of carrying Spokane county. The fact of the whole business is, John L. Wilson hae swept Spokane county and thereby drawn first blood in the battle of ballots that will be pulled off in September. Thomas Burke will not carry a county in Eastern Washington; Thomas Burke will not carry a single county in the state of Washington; Thomas Burke will not get enough votes to know that, he also ran. Every vote that Thomas Burke gets in the coming primary election, based on the expenses of his campaign, will have cost him in the neighborhood of twenty dollars each. Levy Ankeny's vote two years ago will be like the hosts of Satan incomparison. If King county desires to do herself proud she will go to Thomas Burke and say to him, "Get thee behind me, Satan." Miles Poindexter is a hundred times more formidable foe to Wilson than Burke and it looks as if Wilson will beat Poindexter in every county in the southwest and take from him all the larger counties in the eastern section of the state. He will beat him in the northwest, and that too, in spite of the fact that every Democrat in the state will vote the Republican ticket and vote for either Burke or Poindexter, both of whom are simon pure Demoorats. The Times is a Democratic newspaper trying to run Republican primaries for the money it gets for doing so; Judge Thomas Burke is a Democratic politician turned Republican to get an office; jim agnew, his manager, is a down and out political boss, which trio of political renegades are trying to run the Republican politics of the state. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is always for some Republican, but to hell with Democrats hiding behind a Republican garb for the sake of an office. "What has been said about Senator Wilson's reception in the southwest, during his recent visit there, has not been half told," said C. C. Dalton one day this week, who was with him. "I know the voters of that section and I know when they are for a candidate and when they are not. I have lived there and I have campaigned there. The southwest is for John L. Wilson and I believe he will get a majority over all down there. The banquet as Aberdeen was simply killing and it was more in the shape of an election ratification than a compaign gathering. The meeting at Hoquim was a surging mass of humanity and every inch of space in the opera house was taken and almost as many more were on the outside. Senator Wilson's speech to that vast audience was a masterly address, the echoes of which are being heard all over the state. I say unto you without exaggeration no other candidate in the history of the state ever received a more enthusiastic as well as flattering reception in the southwest than did the Hon. John L. Wilson on his recent tour of that locality. The papers are for him and all factions of the Republican politicians, and even Archer, of Aberdeen, is not so pronounced as was he a few weeks ago." Bearing out Mr. Dalton's statement about the newspapers the following from the Aberdeen Herald an old line Democratic organ will give you some idea of how the Republican papers stand down there: With true newspaper instinct, John L. Wilson, proprietor of the Seattle P.-I, and candidate for United States senator, is a believer of newspaper publicity, and, if his idea be correct, he has the other candidates faded to a frazzle in the southwest. At the banquet in this city Thursday night the Aberdeen World, the Aberdeen Tribune and Hoquim Washingtonian capitulated, and pronounced for Wilson, while the Grays Harbor Post admitted it was "open to conviction." As far as heard from, Wilson has, in addition to his own paper, the support of those named and one in Centralia, one in Chehalis, one in Bellingham and one in North Yakima, besides a number in the smaller towns, while Burke appears to have but one in Seattle, one in Spokane and one in Walla Walla. Poindexter has the largest newspaper support of any of the candidates among the country weeklies, besides the three leading papers in Spokane his home city, one in Seattle and one in Tacoma. It would perhaps be unfair to suggest mercenary motives to some of those papers, but we submit with all candor, the time, the place and the candidate were THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN not judicially selected for the Wilsonian conversions on Gray Harbor, if the support of those papers was to be accepted as patriotic—not commercial. The candidacy of Gen. Ashton, supported by the Perkins Tacoma press, is not taken seriously outside of Pierce county, if there. It is generally regarded as a shrewd Wilsonian movement to endeavor to head off the Poindexter vote in that county, by appealing to local pride in a section where he could hope for but light support. In fact the candidacy of Ashton is sized up with the other jokes—Humphries and Freeman—except in his case there is Wilson to be served, while t e others are but cases of exaggerated ego. The attitude taken by three papers on Grays Harbor in the senatorial contest places this section in a bad box as regards securing what it most of all needs a congressman. Speaking of a congressman, the most amusing, or amazing, thing so far in this campaign is the attitude of the Aberdeen World, in declaring for Wilson on Thursday night, and nominating Hon. Alex Polson for congress in the issue of the next day. Here was a case of refreshing innocence. No one keeps track of the trend of political events, outside of the World office, is ignorant of the fact that John L. Wilson and Walter W. McCredie have formed an alliance, offensive and defensive for the purpose of seating themselves in the upper and lower houses of Congress. Why, the formation of Wilson-McCredie clubs are now going on all over the second congressional district, a strong one being launched at Centralia the day before the Aberdeen Wilsonian banquet. The Herald ventures the assertion that the newspaper that attempts to support Wilson and oppose McCredie will quickly find itself in an impossible position, in which its influence for either will be represented by 0. This paper has always advocated the sinking of all political differences in favor of a congressman from Grays' Harbor, believing that a proper man in congress would hasten the day by many years when this will be one of the first-class harbors on the Pacific, and would be pleased to support Mr. Polson or any other honest, capable man with that view. But for many years, peanut politics and lust for petty office have controlled the dominant party in Chehalis county with the natural result that in national politics it has been an insignificant pawn in the game. The machine this year being divided between Burke and Wilson, may change this condition to some extent, but no permanent plteration may be looked for until the average voter is educated out of permitting tin horn politicians to deal in his vote and trade in his prejudices in national affairs while they skin him at home. JOHN L. WILSON AND COOLIE LABOR. When the Seattle Daily Times says "There was no Republican convention in 1888 in the territory now State of Washington it either wilfully prevaricated or the writer was grossly ignorant and too indolent to look up the facts. In 1888 the Republicans of the territory of Washington held a convention at Ellensburg and at that convention the Hon. John B. Allen was nominated for delegate to Congress. In that convention was the well-known politician, J. C. Haines, who was the only delegate from King county that voted for Mr. Allen, the others voting for Thomas Jefferson Humes. That was the last territorial convention. Of course the Hon. John L. Wilson met the Hon. John H. McGraw there because Mr. Wilson led the Spokane delegation, which went to the convention more or less pledged to the Hon. George Turner for delegate, but seeing that Allen would be nominated swung to Allen while Mr. McGraw was among the leaders of the King county delegation that voted first and last for Tom Humes, with the exceptions of Mr. Haines, who, as stated above, voted for Mr. Allen. Of course the Times will pay no attention to such a mistake as that, for it always manages to misstate things with the view of them having as much effect as they may on those who do not know the facts. *** Speaking about the attitude of the Hon. John L. Wilson on the Chinese and Japanese emigration to the United States the following extract taken from a speech made by him in Congress October 16th, 1893, will give the voters in this state, who are much agitated over this question at the present time, some idea of what they may expect of Senator Wilson if he is returned to the senate at the coming election: "Mr. Speaker, the question of emigration is a grave and important one, and especially that portion which relates to Coolie labor. Had the Chinese emigrated to the eastern shores of this country instead of its western, it is my judgment they would have produced a revolution long since, because you cannot place in any portion of this country a hundred thousand laborers who make their purchases from their own country, and what money they have left from every dollar they earn is sent to their 5 own country for an accumulation that they can return upon. And it has only been on account of the unexceptional conditions of the Pacific coast that we have been enabled to stand this drain for twenty years. And so I say this question is a grave one. We have to the east of us 300,000,000 of discontented people and to the west of us 400,000,000 of uneducated and unchristian races. "Upon this our native land meet these two great streams, the one white and the other yellow, and it has been said by someone they cannot flow peacefully upon parallel lines, but as the translucent waters of the Mississippi and the yellow flood of the Missouri mingle, the greater and clearer stream is stained and flows polluted to the sea.' Let us then perform our duty without regard to politics, with courage and with conscience in defense of the honest labor of this country. Let us do justice, and under no circumstances forget our duty and our obligations to our native land." (Applause.)—Congressional Record—House, pages 2560, 2561. He also said in this speech: "The people are intensely interested in this (Chinese) question, and, sir, they are interested in it without regard to party, for it is a battle of the white man against the Asiatic, of the American labor against the worse than pauper labor of Asia." Further on he said, "It is a battle that we are making for the labor of our section of the country; it is a contest between the cheap labor of the Orient and the more cultivated and civilized labor of the Anglo-Saxon. In the same speech speaking about emigration he said: "The importation of convict, coolie or other labor of that character is an unmitigated evil." "Speaking about that Burke club list, it is so spurious," said a well-known Seattleite, "that you can safely say that if it were made triplets of it would not be far out of the way. I really do not believe that there are over 5,000 bonifide voters on that list that will stand for Burke in the primaries, and those men did not sign the paper with the intention of being a member of a Burke club. Republicans hesitate before going on record to support a Democrat for the highest office in the gift of the voters of the state." There may be some Insurgent spirit among the voters of Seattle, but it is so slight that it is hard to find it. The voters of King county are for either Wilson or Burke. Outside of King county the Burke sentiment is just as slight as is the Insurgent spirit in Seattle. The voters and business men of Seattle, who want a United States senator, can figure it out for themselves. In Seattle, the race is between Wilson and Burke; outside of Seattle, the race is between Wilson and Poindexter. Wilson will come to the county line with sufficient votes for the vote of the county to overwhelmingly nominate him. Burke will leave the county with not half enough votes to nominate and will get practically no more. Now, Mr. Seattle Spirit, in your opinion, which of these two senatorial aspirants is it your duty to support? Representative Ed. Bradsberry of Sedro-Woolley, who was in Seattle one day this week, does not think it probable that Burke will cut much figure in Skagit. Henry McBride, to the contrary notwithstanding. "In my opinion," said he, "Senator Wilson will get as many votes as all of the other senatorial aspirants in Skagit county. Talk is cheap, but getting the votes is quite another thing. Skagit county has always been for McBride, when MeBride was for himself, but now that he has shifted his position and is fighting for the men that have always fought him, it's time for the Skagit county voters to do a little shifting for themselves, and in my opinion they will come pretty nearly doing it." "You say the southwest is in good shape for John L Wilson? Well, in my opinion it is utterly impossible for the southwest to be in one-half as good shape for Senator Wilson as is the northwest. Mark this prediction: the northwest will give Senator Wilson a majority over all, and if that is not going some, then excuse me," came from a prominent politician of Snohomish county one day this week. E.W.WAY & CO. ANCHOR YOUR SAVINGS IN SEATTLE BAILEY BUILDING SEATTLE BEST BOARD COMPANIES REAL ESTATE-INSURANCE 6 NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF Real Estate. Sheriff's Office. State of Washington, County of King, ss. By virtue of an Order of Sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 13th day of June, 1910, by the Clerk thereof, in case Aurora Land Co., corporation, Plaintiff, versus or with W. Plaintiff, Alta Wise, and John F. Shockey and Laura B. Shockey, his wife, Esther E. Hale, Defendants, No, 71290, to and as, sheer directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given. That I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 30th day of July, A. D. 1910, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all the right, title and interest in the said defendants Jerry Wilse and Alta Wilse, his wife, in and on the following described property rights in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: washing enriching at a point in the West line of Tract Eleven (11), Brighton Beach Acre Tracts, 170 feet (170) North of the Southwest corner of said Tract Eleven (11), thence East 100 feet, thence North 40 feet, thence West 100 feet, thence South on 46th Avenue South, 40 feet to the point of beginning, being a part of Tract 11, Brighton Beach, Tracts addition to the City of Seattle, levied on as the property of said defenders Jerry Will and Alta Wise, his wife to satisfy a judgment of a foreclosure to a mortgage amounting to Fifteen Hundred and no-100 ($1500.00), dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of wolffist June 17—July 15, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In Probate. No. 11323. In the Matter of the Estate of Ella E. Dryden, Deceased. Notice to Cred- tors. Uber and pursuant to an order made and entered by the above entitled court in the above entitled cause on the 13th day of June, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against the above named deceased or against her estate, to present their claims with the necessary vouchers, to the undersigned, the duly appointed and qualified executor under the last Will and Testament of E. Dryden, the above named deceased, at Room 911 Lowman Building, in the city of Seattle, Washington, being the place designated for the transaction of the business of said estate within King Washington. Said claims are to be presented, verified as prescribed by statute, within one year from and after the first publication of this notice or the same will be barred. same will be barred Date of first publication June 17, 1910. A. M. LEE. Executor of the Estate of Ella E. Dryden, Deceased. June 17-July 15, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King.—In Probate. In the matter of the Estate of Charles D. Brandes, Deceased. No. 10113. Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should be Made. N. F. W. Low, administrator of the estate of Charles D. Brandes, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue thereof in the estate is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Charles D. Brandes, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle on the 20th day of June, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. of said court, then and there to show cause, if they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an account should be made of distribution of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petitioned according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a riot of four weeks prior to hearing and a brief a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 20th day of June, 1910, in the Seattle Republic, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 17th day of May, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Court Commissioner. May 20—June 17, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the Count of King. The Silverton National Bank, of Sil- verton, Colorado, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. J. M. Elmer Defendant. Sum- mer Publication, No. 73156. mons. The State of Washington, to the said J. M. Elmer, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: sixty days after the fifth day of May, 1910, and defend the above entitled court, and accuse the above entitled plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their offices below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according the demand of the complaint has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to deliver judgment against the defendant for $2500, together with eight per cent interest from September 11, 1908, on a promissory note made by one Howell Hinds in favor of plaintiff or said amount of $2500, dated September 11, 1908, and bearing interest at eight per cent payment of which note was guaranteed by defendant by indorse- D. B. Attorneys for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 614-619 Colman Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington. May 6—June 17, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Seattle Electric Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Mrs. J. H. McLean also known as Fanny McLean and also known as P. M. McLean. Defendant— f. M. McLean. Sensors for Publication. The State of Washington, to Mrs. J. H. McLean, also known as Fanny McLean, and also known as F. M. McLean, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 24th day of June, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of your plaintiff, and serve your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at the office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filled with the clerk of the said court. The object of said action is to recover judgment against you for $171.80 and costs on agreement signed by you in favor of the plaintiff, and a writ of garnishment has been issued against the National Bank of Commerce, a corporation. WILLIAM WRAY, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address 657-8 P. Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. June 24-Aug. 5, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, J. L. Craib and Jesse Craib, his wife, Plaintiffs, vs. William West and Jane Doe West, his wife, Mary A. Deugan, William H. Dougan and Ella R. Dougan Revelle, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in and to the real estate described in this complaint herein. De- re- ants.—No. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said William West, and Jane Doe West, his wife, H. Dougan, and Ella R. Dougan Revelle and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien, or interest in and to the real estate described in this complaint herein. Defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 17th day of June, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs, and seize property at the answer upon the indigent attorney at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to do so, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to quiet title to Lot 8, Block 37 (less the west one foot thereof), in Bury & Atkins' Inning Court, City Seaside; that the subject of this action are property in King County, Washington, in which the above named defendants have or claim some interest actual or contingent, and the relief demanded in this action consists wholly in excluding the defendants from any interest in the said property, or lien or claim thereon. EUGENE A CHILDE, P. I. LAMBERT. P. O. Address, 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. June 17—July 29, 1910. IN JUSTICES COURT—BEFORE JOHN E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Charles Roberts, Plaintiff, vs. C. S. Crawford, No. — No. — Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King, ss. The State of Washington to C. S. Crawford: You, and each of you, are hereby notified that Charles Roberts has filed a verification of the evidence of the claim which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 25th day of July, A. D. 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear then and there answer, the defendant will be held liable for the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said verified claim and of this action is to enforce the claim of the plaintiff against the defendant for goods sold and delivered during the months of April and May, 1909, amounting to the sum of $9.92, filed June 23, JOHN E. CARROLL Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. EUGENE A. CHILDE. Attorney for Plaintiff. 457 Arcade Building. June 24—July 15, 1910. JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE JOHN E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. R. J. Eichler, Plaintiff, vs. Cora Lowe et ux., Defendant—No. 12248-9. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King, ss. The State of Washington to Cora Lowe and John Doe Lowe, her husband, whose true Christian name is unk- You, and each of you, are hereby notified that R; J. Eichler has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 27th day of July, A. D. 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said plaintiff is to recover a balance due to plaintiff of Twelve and no/100 Dollars for material furnished and labor performed by said plaintiff for said defendant. filed June 22, A. D. 1910. JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. June 24—July 15, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of Kling. Theresa Rowe, Plaintiff, vs. Alfred Russel Rowe, Deware, Defendant. No. — Surn- mofs by P. Washington. The State of Washington, to the said Pascal Rowe, Defendant: Arfred Russel. Very likely summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: within sixty days after the 13th day of May, A. D. 1910, and defend the abe entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgement will be rendered against the complaint, which the demand with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a divorce and dissolution of the marriage relations now existing between the plaintiff and defendant herein upon the ground of abandonment for more than one year last past. J. P. BALL. Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office and Office Address: 201-203 Burke Building, Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. May 13-June 24, 1910. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. August Van Schaalck, Plaintiff, vs. Ida Van Schalck, Defendant.—No. —, Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Ida, Vap Schaick, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit, within sixty days after the 20th day of May, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court Case, by the co-attendant the co-attendant, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of Court. You are hereby summoned to answer the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: Divorce on the ground of cruelty. Z. B. RAWSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address: 617 Pacific Block, Seattle County of King, Washington. May 20—July 1, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Sarah A. Sprague, Plaintiff, vs. G. H. Sprague, Defendant.—Summons No. 73.- 632. The State of Washington to the said defendant, G. H. Sprague: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of the summons, to appear by yaya safari 6th of May, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for said plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to the judge, will be required against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The object of said suit is to obtain a divorce from said defendant by said plaintiff on the grounds of cruelty and abandonment. R. W. FELGER, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. address, 27 and 28 Downs Block, Seattle, Wash. May 6—June 17, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Roger S. Green and C. D. Hillman, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter in the Courtry. Defendants. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above de- State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, dated December 5th day of February, 1910, and numbered B61734, for the delinquent taxes of the years 1904, 1905, 1906 and 1907, in the following amount, $4.92, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 19, Block 13, Hillman City Division No. 2. That the taxes for the year 1908 have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: $1.81. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, in which case no 9 days after May 20, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. If case is closed, do you, however, will be rendered herein, forecasing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. May 20 - July 1, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Charles E. Lowe, Plaintiff, vs. Desdemona Lowe, Defendant.-No. 73700. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Desdemona Lowe defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 13th day of May, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to do so, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed in the court. The object of said action is to obtain a decree dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant and divorcing the plaintiff from the defendant. Seattle, King County, Washington. WARREN H. LEWIS. With new for Plaintiff Office and Postoffice address. 634 Lumber Exchange Building, May 13—June 24, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, KING County, Washington. Herman C. Schneider, Plaintiff, vs. Dina M. Schneider, Defendant. No. — Summons. The State of Washington to the said Dina M. Schneider, Defendant: You will be required to appear with sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 13th day of May, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff at his office below stated, plaintiff and serve a copy of your attorney's statement and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said court. The complaint in this action prays for divorce and that the bonds of marriage between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved. H. E. FOSTER. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Marion Building, King County, Washington. May 13-June 24, 1910. PROBATE NOTICE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. State of Washington, County of King, ss. State of Washington, County of King, ss. Robert E. McCauley, Deceased—No. 10139. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Charles S. Follett, administrator of the estate of Robert E. McCauley, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said Court his final petition for the estate of Robert E. Tuesday, the 31st day of May, 1910 at 9:30 o'clock a. m., at the court room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said Court for the settlement of any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. Robert H. Llndsay, Court Commissioner of said Superior Court, and the seal of said Court hereto affixed this 12th day of January, 1910. (SEAL.) D. K. SICKELS. Clerk. BY PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. May 13—May 27, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Marie D. Tonjes, Plaintiff, vs. Paul Tonjes, Dependant—No. 74116. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Paul Tonjes, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 24th day of June, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and the case against you to answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a dissolution of the bonds of marmory now existing between plaintiff and defendant, on the ground of desertion and non-support of the plaintiff by defendant, and the care and custody of the infant daughter of plaintiff and defendant, and for an attorney's fee of $100, and costs and disbursements and general equitable relief. SMITH & COLE, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: 407-9 Boston Block, Seattle, Wash. June 24—August 5, 1910. NVOUJEDH IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County.—In probate. In the matter of the Estate of Emily M. Robinson, deceased.—Notice. Notice is hereby given. That letters of administration on the estate of Emily M. Robinson, deceased, were granted to the undersigned, on the 24th day of December, by the Superior Court of King County. All persons having claims against the said estate are required to exhibit them to me for allowance, at 811 Lowman Building, Seattle, Washington, within twelve months after the date of this notice, or they shall be forever barred. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, M. J. Lutz, Plaintiff, of Charles W. Ingram, administrator of the estate of Richard Jehn, deceased, and Mrs. A. Sloequist, Defendants—Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to Mrs. A. Sloequist: You are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of your publication of this summons, to-wit: with sixty days after the 6th day of May, 1910, and defend the above-entitled action in the above- entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaina herein which, is on file with the clerk of this court The object of said action as set forth in the complaint is to foreclose two certain mortgages given by the said Richard Jehn in his lifetime to the said plaintiff, the first one being dated November 16, 1906, to secure the sum of $1200.00, and the second one dated October 8, 1907, to secure the sum of $300.00, both of said mortgages being upon lots 1 and 2 book 3, John McGilva's Second Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, together with interest on said amounts and costs and disbursements herein. EDWARD VON TOBEEL Attorney for Plaintiff Office and Postoffice Address, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Arthur Lewis Smith, Plaintiff, vs. Amelia Sigler Smith, Defendant.—Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to Amelia Sigler Smith, Defendant: To be summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 24th day of June, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at its office below stated; and in case of your failure to do, adjourn will be rendered against you, by the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure a decree of divorce against the defendant upon the ground of cruel treatment and personal indignities rendering life burdensome, and that it is impossible for plaintiff and defendant to live together again, and that their married life is a mere semblance and a mockery. ROBERT W. REID, Attorney for Plaintiff P. O. Address: 614-618 Colman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. June 24-August 1, 1910. FRIDAY July 1, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. H. T. Traynor Plaintiff, vs. Araminta Wheeler and John Doe Wheeler, her husband; Edward Cudihie and Jane Doe Cudihie, his wife, and John W. Filkins, and all persons unknown, if any, having an interest in property, Defendants. No. 73746. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 14th day of December, 1904, upon a claim of a certain taxed taxes of the following year, 1903, in the following amounts, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: East Park Add. to Seattle, West 2 ft. East Park Add. to Seattle, West 2 ft. of N. ½ Lot 20, Block 9, certificate number B-31223, year 1903, amount 56c. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff or his assignor upon said above described real property, to-wit: West 2 feet of the North ½ of Lot 20, Block 9, East Park Add. to City of Seattle, in King County, Wash.: 1904, 16c; 1905, 10c; 1904, 4c; 1907 (local), 1905, 107; 17c; 1908, 25c. Which several sums bear interest at the rate 15 per annum from said date of payment, that are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the and of the day publication of this notice, exclusive of the said first publication, to-wit; within sixty days after the 13th day of May, 1910, in the entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below statement with interest and the amount due, together with interest and the amount due. I case you fail to so do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon charged against each, for sold taxes, interest and costs, ordering of each parcel of said property for the stated sums of the sums charged against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. H. T. TRAYNOR, Plaintiff. J. E. MGREW, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 419-20 Pioneer Block, Seattle Washington. May 13, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Emile Marx and Louis Marx, copartners, doing business under the name and firm style of Marx Bros., Plaintiffs, vs. I. Freedman, doing business under the firm name and style of I. Freedman & Co., Defendants. No. 74315. Summons. The State of Washington, to the said I. Freedman, doing business under the firm name and style of I. Freedman & Co., Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear, within sixty (60) days of the first publication of this summons, to-with: within June, 160 days after the 17th day of June, 1910, and above the above entitled action in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County, so asked; and answer the complaint of Plaintiffs, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for off at their office below stated; and in your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the command of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The above entitled action is a suit for the Defendant for the Hundred and Fifty-five dollars and Sister (75,15,16) due the Plaintiff from the Defendant for commissions for the sale of merchant TWOROGER & WINKLER 10 Prefontaine Triangle Building, Seattle, Washington, June 19, 1910. June 17-July 29, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUN State of Washington. Leigh Lumber & Manufacturing Co., West Seattle Branch, a corporation, Plaintiff, versus H. Ralston, otherwise known as C. E. Ralston, and one of Ralston, whose wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and G. V. Murray, doing business as the West Seattle Cabinet Shop, and J. S. Elliott, Defendants—No. 72143. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington: To H. F. Ralston, only known as C. E. Ralston, and Jane Dose Ralston, wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, and defendants. You and each of your hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 29th day, 1910, in the above entitled Court and action, and in this action and answer the complaint of said Plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the underwritten attorney for Plaintiff at his office below stated in case of your failure to do, judgment will be against you according to the demand of the clerk which has been filed with the clerk of said Clerk. The object of this action is to foreclose a lien real property situated in the County of King state of Washington, and that said Defendants and of them claim an interest in said real property. Office address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. April 29—June 19, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, W. C. Moore, Plaintiff, vs. Ella J. M. Moore, Defendant—Summons for Public. The State of Washington to the said Ella J. Moore, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the final publication of this summons, toowit: With sixty days after the 6th day of May, 1910, I will defend the above entitled action in the entitled court, and answer the complaint of plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and base your failure so to do, judgment, will be given against you according to the demand against the plaintiff, which has been filed with the court of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce and to dissolve and annul the marriage of matrimony now and herefore exist between the plaintiff and the defendant: MoLEAN & BALLIET Plaintiff's Attorneys. P. O. Address, 26 Haller Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. May 6—June 17, 1910 FRIDAY July 1, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King, In Probate In the Matter of the Estate of Elizabeth Detlofson, deceased.—No. 9087. Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Barney Detlofson, administrator of the estate of Elizabeth Detlofson, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appears to the court that the estate for which it is sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the said court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Elizabeth Detloffen, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County. State of Washington; at the date of the said court of said court in Seattle on the 5th day of July, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. The said court will copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published for four consecutive weeks before the said 5th day of July, 1910, in the Seattle Republic, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 1st day of June, 1910. (Seal) ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Court Commissioner. June 3—July 1, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of S. A. Leonard, deceased—No. 9571. Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. A. A. Leonard, administrator of the estate of S. A. Leonard, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sur- ficient to authorize distribution of the residue of said estate. It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said S. A. Leonard, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of Washington, Trobate on the fifth day of July, the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. of said Department of said court in Seattle, day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and portmanteau said petition to the court to pass law to order, other ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said fifth day of July, 1910, in the Seattle Publican, a newspaper printed and published in the county and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 2d day of June, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Niels Nielsen, deceased.—No. 10860. Notice of Sale of Real Estate. To whom it may concern. Notice is hereby given, that pursuant to an order of the above entitled Court made and entered this day in the above entitled matter by the Court Commissioner thereof, the undersigned will sell at public auction to the highest and best bidder for cash, at the front of Seattle King County, Washington, at the hour of ten o'clock A. M., of the 25th day of June, 1910, the following described real estate: Lots thirteen (13) and fourteen (14), in Block eight (8), of South Park, in King County, Washington, as per recorded plat; also Lots three (3) to six (6), both inclusive, in Block eight (8), in Seeley Addition, in Seattle, in said county, and as per recorded plat, subject to the confirmation of sare by the Court. Terms ten (10%) per cent cash down when bid is accepted, and the balance in cash when the sale is confirmed and the deed delivered. Dated at Seattle, Washington, May 27, 1910. FRANK B. WIESTLING, Administrator of the above Estate. 422 Boston Block, Seattle, Washington. June 2—July 1, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Mark Willsinki, Plaintiff, vs. A. B. Llewellyn, Jane Doe Llewellyn, his wife; Ida B. Mitchell, John Dae Mitchell, her husband; W. B. Hofus, Jare Dae Hofus, his wife, and all other persons or parties unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, Defendants. The State of Washington to the said above named Defendants: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-write within sixty days after the date of the Bldg. and entitled action in the entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the court of said court. You and each of you are entitled to file the title in the plaintiff in and Lots Thirteen (131) and Fourteen (14). Block Ons (1), Central Addition to West Seattle all in King County, State of Washington. Plaintiff's Attorney. JOSEPH R. ANDERSON. P. O. Address: 607 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. April 29—June 10, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Lola May Ellis, Plaintiff, vs. Mark Walter Ellis, Defendant. No. 73913. Publication Summons. The State of Washington, to Mark Walter Ellis, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the service of the plaintiff upon you, exclusive of the day of service, to-wit: within sixty days after the 27th day of May, 1910, the date of first publication, and defend the above entitled action in the Superior Court of King County aforesaid and answer the complaint of the plaintiff serve a copy of the complaint to the attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object for which this action is brought is to secure an order annulling the marriage of the above entitled parties and to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant herein. RENOVES AYLMORE, Jr., Attorney for the Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 200 Colman Building, Seattle, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Hannah Abbott, Plaintiff, vs. Joseph H. Abbott, Defendant. No. 73972. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Joseph H. Abbott, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 27th day of May, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below and the court of the district to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court giving divorce of plaintiff from you and dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the grounds of your abandonment of plaintiff for more than ten years, and also your failure to make suitable provisions for plaintiff for more than twelve years last past. Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office and Office Address: 201-203 Burke Building, Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. May 27—July 8, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Jeremy Buckley, Plaintiff, versus Bertha Buckley, Defendant—No. — Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Bertha Buckley, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixteen days after the date of the first publication of this summons, too-wit: within sixty days after the 29th day of April, 1910, and defend the above-entitled cause of action in the above-entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the Plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undergiven attorney for Plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this action is to secure a divorce from the said Defendant above named for desertion. WILLIAM C. KEITH, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 45 Starr-Boyd Bld., Seattle, Washington. April 27, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, State of Washington. Depart- State of Washington, to Joseph Aleks, the above-named defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 20th day of May, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the designated attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filled with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this suit is for plaintiff to obtain a divorce from defendant upon the grounds of non-support, deserth and abandonment, more than two years and to have awarded her the care and custody of the minor child, issue of the marriage of the parties to this suit, for alimony, costs of suit and other relief. J. E. McGREW, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address: 419-420 Pioneer Building, Seattle, Seattle, May 20-July 1, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Elva R. Baker, Plaintiff, vs. Thomas Baker, Defendant.-No. ——. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington To the said Thomas Baker, Defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the appearance D. A. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. In objection of the plaintiff, relief thought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you in good faith, without proof of temperament, cruelty, and failure to make proper provision, or any provision at all, for plaintiff's support and maintenance. J. P. BALL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office and Office address: 201-203 Burke Building Seattle, County of King, Washington. June 10—July 22, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, J. M. Enyear, Plaintiff, name of Defendants, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, defendants.—No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above declarations of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that of several certain delinquent tax certi- cates issued by the treasurer of the city of Seattle and tSate of Washington for King County, dated August 5, 1908, and number for the delinquent taxes for the years 1905 and 1906. Please refer to "in said city of Seattle in King County and State of Wash- ington," described as follows, to-wit: Lot Block 6. Rainier Boulevard, addition, amount, $1,911. 23 Block Block 7. Cedar Grove addition, $72.61. Block 3. Cedar Grove addition, $28.15. North 30 feet Lot 8. Block 40 Central THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Seattle addition, $56.88; Lot 13, Block 10, Byron addition, $28.73; Lot 4, Block 2, Rainier Valley addition, $15.41; Lot 1, Block 2, Fautenelle addition, $41.80; Lot 4, Block 4, Cedar Grove addition, $41.80; Lot 4, Block 5, Central Seattle addition, $21.73; South 12% feet Lot 3, Block 46, Central Seattle addition, $20.90; Lot 10, Central addition to Columbia, $29.72; Lot 8, Block 3, Central Seattle addition, $43.89; which the several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said persons of the county, unless unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after June 3, 1910, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your annotated notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after June 3, 1910, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, at his office, No. 1115 Madison Street, Seattle, Washington, or his post-office box, No. 403, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs; in case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the len of the amount due to the sums of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each for said taxes, interest and costs, as provided by law. Residence, No. 1115 Madison St., Seattle, Washington. Postoffice Box 403. June 3—July 15, 1910. NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF Real Estate. Sheriff's Office. State of Washington, County of King, ss. Sheriff's Office. By an Order of Sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 21st day of May, 1910, by the Clerk thereof, in the case of W. H. Willard, R. H. Steely et al., & Intervenors, Plaintiffs, versus Estella M. Anderson et al., Defendants, No. 70133-7029, to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: In the Matter of the Estate of Mattie J. Cole, Deceased. No. 9485. Order to the estate. Special seal of state of Wm. G. Cole, the administration of the estate of Mattie J. Cole, deceased, having filed his petition in this Court, duly verified, praying for an order of this Court to deed the estate of which the said deceased died seized, for the purposes therein set forth; And it appearing to the Court from said petition that the personal estate of the said deceased in the hands of said administrator is not sufficient to pay the claims against the said estate and empowering him to sell the said claims thereof, and that it is necessary to mortgage all or a portion of the real estate of the said deceased to pay the said claims and expenses of the administration. And it appearing to the Court that said petition conforms to, and is interested in, the case with the law in such case made and provided. It is ordered by the Court that all persons interested in the estate of the said deceased appear before said Superior Court on Saturday, the 11th day of June, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day at the door of the said room of said Court, the 11th day of said Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this Court should not be granted to said administrator authorizing and empowering him to sell the said real estate of said Court, and that such may be necessary to pay the aforesaid claims and expenses of administration. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before the election of the office of theattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said County of King and of general circulation therein. State of Washington, County of King, ss. I, D. K. Stickey, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original to show cause, made by said Court on the 11th day of May, 1910, in the matter of the estate of Mattle J. Cole, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 11th day of May, 1910. (Seal) D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. B. PEDEY F. HOMAS, Deputy Clerk. C. PEDEY F. HOMAS, Deputy Clerk. N THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Roger S. Green and C D. Hillman, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.—Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them. You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, and the applicant, who was born on of February, 1910, and numbered B61733, for the delinquent taxes of the years 1905, 1906, and 1907. In the following amount, $4.92, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 18. Block 18. Hillman City Division No. 2. The taxes for the year 1908 have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: in the sum of $1.81. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after May 13, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend the action and and answer of said plaintiff, with a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at this office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be given against you of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums and amounts due upon and charged as specifically as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER Plaintiff A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: Bailey Bldg. Seattle, Washington. May 13—June 24, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Frank D. Black, et ux, Plaintiffs, vs. Blanche A. Primrose, Defendant.—No. —Notice of Sale. To Blanche A. Primrose, and to Zellemma A. Primrose, as guardian of said Blanche A. Primrose, and to all other persons interested: You, and each of you, will please take notice that on Saturday, the 25th day of June, 1910, there will be sold at public auction at the front door of the King County of Washington, at the hour of 10 o'clock A. M., or as soon thereafter as said sale can be held on said date, a sale of the one-thirty- second (1/32) interest, alleged to be longsecond(13 w hi 5 shrdu hrdlupply long to Blanche A. Primrose, caused of that certain property known and described as Lot Ten (10) of Block Thirty-one (31) and Lot Ten (10) of Block (30), all in Seattle Homestead, Hugh McAleer, proprietor, city of Seattle, King County State of Washington, at which time the sal done-thirty-second (1/32) interest will be sold to the highest bidder for cash You, and each of you, are hereby notified to be present at sald sale to protect we have property you may have in and to save property you may purchase the same if you may so desire. Dated at Seattle this 19th day of May 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Disincorporation of The Oregon & Washington Navigation Company, a corporation. No. _____ Notice of Hearing to Disincorporate. Notice is hereby given that the Oregon & Washington Steam Navigation Company has filed with the above entitled court its petition to dissolve and disincorporate itself according to law which petition shows that the stockholders of come on for hearing at 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon on the 10th day of June, 1810, in the Equity Department of the above enclosed order of the above entitled court to an order of the abov3 entitled court said application to disincorporate will Witness the Honorable Mitchell Gillam, Judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said Court hereto affixed this 7th day of April 19, 1910. D. K. SICKLES, Clerk of said Court. By G. A. GRANT, Deputy. Date of first publication April 9, 1910. April 8—June 3, 1910. State of Washington, County of King—ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an order of sale, issued out of the honorable superior court of King county, on the 27th day of June, 1910, by the clerk thereof, in the case corporation, plaintiff, versus Fred J. Leonard and Olga P. Leonard, his wife, defendants, No. 73918, and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given, That I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed for sheriff's sales, to-wait: At 10 o'clock a. m. on the 13th day of August, A. D. 1910, before the courthouse door of said King county, in the state of Washoe, Addition to the title and interest of the said defendants, Fred J. Leonard and Olga P. Leonard, his wife, in and to the following described property, situated in King county, state of Washington, to-wait: The east fifty feet of feet thirteen and fourteen in block twenty, Sea View Park, West Seattle, Washington; also, lot six in block one hundred sixteen; Addition to the City of Seattle, division No. six, as the plat of same is now recorded in the office of the auditor of King county, state of Washington, levied on as the property of said defendants, Fred J. Leonard and Olga P. Leonard, his wife, of a foreclosure of a mortgage to satisfy a judgment amounting to two hundred eighty acre, addition 82767 dollars. Dated this 29th day of June, 1910. ROERT T. HODGE, Sheriff. By J. STRINGER, Deputy, July 1—July 29, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for 'e County of King. In the matter of the guardianship of Francis Baker, a minor, in probate, No. 19088. Notice is hereby given that pursuant to an order of sale made and entered herein by the said superior court in this proceeding on the 22d day of June, 1910, R. R. Rickert, undersigne<sup>1</sup> as guardian of the estate of said Francis Baker, a minor, will, on or after the 25th day of July, 1910, sell to the highest and best bldder, subject to confirmation by the said court, the real estate belonging to the said minor, to-wit, the south twenty-five (25) feet of the north half (½) of lots fifteen (15) and sixteen (16), in block five (5), of Madison Park Addition to the City of Seattle, King county, Washington; said property will be so far acquired, one-half of the balance not exceeding one-half to be secured by first mortgage on said premises, to run not more than three years. All bids should be in writing and may be presented to me at the office of John E. Carroll, Esquire, Room 210 New York Block, corner Second Avenue and Washington Street, Seattle, King County, Washington, being the place for the transaction of the business of said estate on or after ten o'clock a. m. of July 25, 1910. ington, this 24th day of June, 1910. J. B. RICKERT, As guardian of the person and estate of Francis Baker, Editor JOHN E. CARROLL, Attorney for Guardian. July 1, July 22, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Anna Shaughnessy, Deceased. — No. 11412. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 8th day of June, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executor of said estate, at 960 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of business of said estate in Seattle in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication July 1, 1910. CHARLES C. SMITH, As Executor of said Estate. REED & HARDMAN, Attorneys for Estate. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of John S. Kulp, Deceased.—No. 11624. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 24th day of June, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all patients of, the estate of said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said deceased and Zoe Worthington Kulp, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administratrix of said estate at Rooms 428-429 Lumber Exchange Building, the place of business of said State in State, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, July 1, 1910. ZOE WORTHINGTON KULR. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Elizabeth Heitzman, a minor.—No. 10790. Notice of Sale of Real Estate. Notice is hereby given that under and by virtue of the order of sale of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County, made February 26, 2014, the court will unify an undivided one-twentieth interest of an undivided one-half interest in the following described property situated in King County, Washington, to-wit: Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 7, Section 28, Township 24, North Range 4 East W. M., running thence east 16 rods, thence at right angles west 16 rods to section line, thence north on said section line, beginning the Sale will be made on or after the 18th day of July, 1910; bids will be received by the undersigned at the office of Edward Von Tobel, No. 604 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Terms of sale are cash, gold coin of the United States, 10 per cent of bid to accompany bid, balance to be paid on confirmation of sale by court. Guardian of the Estate of Elizabeth Heitzmann, a minor. July 1—July 15, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Hartt Wilcox, plaintiff, vs. Charles H. Wilcox, defendant.—No. —. —. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said defendant, Charles H. Wilcox, greeting; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty (60) days after the 1st entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to obtain a decree dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant by forcing the plaintiff from the defendant. Postoffice address, 310 Epler Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. July 1—August 12, 1910. NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King, ss.—Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an order of sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 24th day of June, 1910, which laid the record in the case of Bowes College in a plausible Plaintiff, versus J. A. Fraser and L. E. Fraser, his wife; J. A. McBee and Ella McBee, his wife; Paul Richards and Rowen Richards, his wife; and Charles Clarke and Alice Clarke, his wife, Defendants, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given. That I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to-wit; at 10 o'clock a. m. on the 13th day of January, 1910, the door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendants, J. A. Fraser and L. E. Fraser, his wife, in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit. All that portion of the property sold was laid out lot eight (8) in block three (3) in the Northern Addition to the city of Seattle, County of King, State of Washington, lying west of the new extension of Olympic Place, in said city of Seattle, levied on as the property of said defendant, to-wit. To satisfy his wife, to satisfy a judgment of a foreclosure of a mortgage amounting to eighteen hundred, eighty-one and 66-100 ($1881.60) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 6th day of June, 1910, RUBERT SHERFIELD, Sheriff. By J STRINGER, Deputy. July 1, 1910, 29.11.1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. A. B. Kauffman and J. A. Hudson, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants—Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: fendants and each of them: as praised plaited paint, now a white chiffon this time and count. Plaintiff. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. April 15—May 27. 19 eee REPRIBUTION: A FOURTH OF JULY STORY #4... and then paused and gazed dubi- ously at Wreck (so nicknamed because of the trail of disaster he usually left behind), ‘‘I—don’t —know. You remember last | fourth and the Fourth before. Now we don’t want anything of that sort repeated. But I'll tell you what,’’ more briskly, ANE you’ll agree to shoot off your noise at least a mile from the house, why, I think maybe I can fit you out.’’ “Now, as the Jakes house was the very last one in the village, with great open pastures on one side, and with high ledges that were delightfully dangerous, and a pond to which the most !ex- acting fisherman and the most daring swimmer could not object, this was a condition easy to keep. Wreck promised eagerly. “And remember,” severely, “all burned fences and destroy- ed property comes out of your pocket money.” Mr. Jakes gave an audible sigh of relief at the end of this per- functory admonition, and his fat, good natured face resumed its accustomed expresssion of genial serenity. “There.” taking five bright silver dollars from his pocket, and dropping them into the out- stretched hands; ‘‘ now scud away, and make all the noise you can.”” But with Wreck a promise was only a means to an end—to be forgotten as soon as the end was attained. Fire-crackers without horses and pedestrians to be startled, and without dogs and cats to be sought out by the hiss- ing explosives, were scarcely worth fooling with. He would use them near his own home, of zourse; for that would bring down the punishment of his father; but neither would he go off into the open fields, where there was nothing to intensify the fun. ; So, in spite of his implied » promise, he spent the early part of the Fourth in roaming the far — side of town, making women and girls on the sidewaalks jump and scream, bringing down angry — threats of punishment from gen- | tlemen whose dignity had been startled by sudden explosions be- tween their feet, causing horses to bound and prance almost to the verge of running away, and chasers and pinwheels and can- dles to the tails of the dogs and the ends of wagons, and even to the coats of unconscious pedes- trians. At lenth he worked his way round to the depot, where a freight train was waiting to pull ‘out, A giant cracker was light- ed and placed upon the coweatch- er, and another dexteriously tos- sed into the smokestack. Then he was about to follow these with a small cracker through the cab window, when he was caught by a brakeman and hustled uncere- moniusly from the platform. Be- fore he had recovered his breath and composure he was half-way down the train. Then he stopped and chuckled malici- Ew ee re a a ae a ie } ad \ Heed * re } a \ " Pied . * * % * i wh * aed \ em bed tal ” \ Or anaes ial Pea eis } Cea mat ; hE ware gets \ | et ine , Seu! | Be | ; : . NS Hu ' A Y . o half a bozen crackers. which were thrown toward them with unerring aim; then he sped on until he came to a cattle car, which was half full of calves and yearlings. Evidently they had just been watered or fed, for the door had been carelessly left opened six or eight inches. One of the calves was trying to fore itself through. Wreck glanced hastily about. No one appeare¢ to be watching, and witha quick spring he caught hold of the door and drew himself inside. His idea was to light an entire bunch of crackers in each end of the car, and then slip out and hide himself in the vicinity for the confusion which he knew would follow. But this time retribution was nearer than he thought. There was a sudden call, a hurrying of feet along the train, the sharp click of the car door being fasten- ed, and then a jerk and rumble, which told him the train was in motion. His first feeling was exultation. The brakeman had not seen him and he was in for a free ride to the next station at least. There he would slip out and ride back on some passing wagon, or per- haps he might be lucky enough to steal a return trip on the next train. But first he carefully extin- guished the two or three crack. ers he had alréady lighted. I would be fun to watch them ex plode among the cattle, but he did not care to be in the car ai the time. Faster and faster rumbled th freight, and he grasped the slat: of the car to keep from falling among the calves and yearlings which were now crowding about him inquiringly. Then a famil. iar building came rushing by, and in spite of the exultation of a free ride, his face lighted hope- fully. The village was but half a mile away. But the speed did not slacken, and the village rushed by, and ten minutes later another village joined in the dizzy flight of the telegraph poles. Wreck’s exultation .was now wholly lost in dismay and con- sternation, and by the timea third and fourth village had been passed he was sobbing and call- ing wildly to belet out. But the freight rumbled on, drowning all outside noises in its own roar. Other villages, and even a small city or two, rushed by, untll his head became too dizzy and con- fused to count. He pounded on the bars and yelled until his voice became weak; and the cattle, of which he had not at first been afraid, grew more and more for- midable as they crowded about him for recognition, When the train finally slack- ened, and a brakeman approach- ed, Wreck was crouched near the door, with white face and staring eyes. “Let me out!’’ Let me out!’ he implored pitifully. ‘‘ I want to go home.’’ “Hello! Who are you?’’ the brakeman asked, roughly. “Nothin’ but another tramp. Crawled into a car this time.’” “Well, fire him out mighty quick.’” So the brakeman caught Wreck by his shoulder, and, with a quick jerk and twist, sent him spinning and staggering down the steep, sandy bank, until he fell at full lengthinto the muddy ditch water below. When he crawled out and made his way back to the track the train was disappearing in the distance. There was now little left of the trim, handsomely dressed Wreck of the morning. His face was spotted and creased §with the ditch water, and his wet clothing, after plowing back through the wet loose sand of the bank, had lost all traces of its original appearance, A station was but a few rods away, and a group of loungers on the platform had been watch- ing the scene appreciately. “‘How’d ye like it sonny?’ asked one of them jeeringly. But Wreck was in no condition to notice the banter. There were people near him, and he hurried toward them eagerly. “I—T want to go home,” he in- quired imploringly. ‘‘Will you please tell me how to get there, and--and help me to go?’’ “Does it pretty well for so small chap, don’t he?’’ ohserved one of the loungers. “Tt’s to Cedarville,’ Wreck went on eagerly, his anxiety still keeping him oblivious of their searcasm. ‘If some of you'll get me a ticket back on the next train, my father’]l——”’ “Look here, you palaverin’ tramp,” interrupted a man who was evidently the station master, as he came forward threaten- ingly, ‘‘just you dry up now. This road is getting to be a reg- ular tramp line; every train and almost every car has them. I wasn’t a bit sorry to see you pitched down the bank, and if your whole tribe was served the same way ‘twould be a good thing for the road. If you want to go to Cedarville, why just go; there’s a clear track before you, and it’s only eighty miles. Only I advise you net to try any more train dodging. Now git!’ With the last word he raisd his hand menacingly, and Wreck turned and fled wildly toward Cedarville. * On the next ten days tramp he could never give a very connect- ed account. He remembered that he had begged and that he had sawed wood for his meals, and that he had very often gone hungry; and he remembered with a retrospective shudder that he had always hurried into the bushes when a train passed, and that he had never even thought of such a thing as attempting to board one.’ Mr. Jakes and his wife were aroused very early one morning by a timid knock. ‘“Who’s there? ’’ Mr. Jakes called. “Only me,’’ a weak apologetic, hungry, little voice answered; “may I come iu?” Of the meeting we say noth- ing, but of the days which folow- ed, Mr. Jakes’ own words are ex- pressive. “It’s wonderful,’’ he beamed, contentedly. ‘“‘All the switches in ten miles around wouldn’t have done Wreck as much good as that ten days’ tramp. He’sa good boy now, if I do say it;a real good boy.’’ SAFE AND SANE FOURTH OF JULY Just how to observe the Fourth of July in keeping with the new movement of a sane Fourth is puzzling more than one township. That the use of noisy fireworks should be abolished and the toy pistols and dangerous explosives be completely cut out the major- ity of the people fully agree. Yet there are those who disre- gard the list of yearly casualities and say, if I had a bunch of children I wouldhave a bunch of fire crackers and shoot them, ev- enifI had to take them to the country to do so. What troubles those, who realize that the time FRIDAY JULY 1, 1910 has come to teach the American children that the Fourth of July is the commemoration of a prin- ciple and not the celebrativn of an event, is just what to substi- for this old form of celebration. Following are a few suggestions for a safe and sane Fourth: Governor Sloan, of Arizona: ‘‘I think it entirely proper that the law should restrict the sale and use of fireworks to responsible persons who may make public or semi-public display of the same in places which may be designa- ted for that purpose’’’ Governor Shafroth of Colorado: “In my opinion picnics, public speaking, theatres and other amusements should be the order of the day, with public exhibi- tion of fireworks at evening.’’ Justice Brewer’s Solemn Warning Against Proceedings in Camera. The last utterances of any man are highly cherished; so should the words of a public servant be regarded by the people he has served. Among the last great utterances of Justice Brewer was his great address at Far Rockaway, New York, in which he severely con- demned the practice of granting deerees of divorce in camera, hay- ing reference, evidently, to the procedure in the famous Astor di- voree case in New York City. Justice Brewer said: ‘‘I believe that it is better to have no divorce than divorce obtained by secret processes. ’” A judge who allows himself to become a party to a secret judicial proceeding leading to a final judg- ment is no less excusable than the lawyer who represents his ability to secure such a procedure for his client. In the latter case the courts have disbarred attorneys for making such represetations (People vy. Goodrich, 79 Ill. 148; People v. MeCabe, 18 Colo. 186), on the ground that such repre- sentations reflected on the integ- rity of the court. ‘What shall we say, then, of the judge who deliberately permits such proceedings to take place, who invites public suspicion as to the motives influencing his actions, and who thus impairs the confi- dence of the people in the integrity of the judiciary? The condemnation of the pro- fession should rest upon such a judge. In these days, when trial by newspaper is fast taking the place of trial by jury, it is encouraging to meet with any evidence that the editorial mind takes a large and judicial view of social questions. Here, for instance, is a Missouri journal which lays down a broad principle, the equity of which few will be found to dispuate ; “Tf you are a married man,’ this editor declares, ‘‘your wife can compel you to support her, Tf you are not, she can’t.’? The former conclusion may be good law, although the enforce- ment of which is sometimes at- tended with great practical diffi- culties. * As to the second relation, our observation forces a contrary con- clusion. It costs more and besides it doesn’t require action by the courts to effect maintenance.— Ohio Law Bulletin,