Seattle Republican

Friday, July 8, 1910

Seattle, Washington

8 pages

Page 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 2
Page 3
Page 3
Page 4
Page 4
Page 5
Page 5
Page 6
Page 6
Page 7
Page 7
Page 8
Page 8
Page text (machine-generated)
THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Single Copies, 10 Cents THE PUBLISHER'S NOTICE. The Seattle Republican is published on Friday of every week by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3.00 per year; six months, $1.50—postage prepaid. Subscriptions to all foreign countries included in the Postal Union, $4.00 a year, postage paid. Sample copies, free. Single copies ten cents. Advertising rates made known on application. Special rates to publishers. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. Address all communications to The Seattle Republican, 307 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. Make all checks, drafts, postal orders, etc., payable to "Cayton Publishing Company." CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. Telephone: Main 305. Publication office, 307 Epler Block. HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON - - - Publisher SUSIE REVELS CAYTON - - - Associate SEATTLE A WIDE OPEN TOWN Seattle's chief executive has cut loose and Seattle is now a wide open town of ye olden days' stripe. Saloons run all day and night without cessation, gambling is running in full blast both down and up town. There was never a time in the history of Seattle when more gambling dives were being operated than at the present time. Gambling, the legislature has declared, is a felony and he or she who operates a gambling game has committed a crime against the peace and dignity of the state, the punishment for which has been fixed by an indeterminate sentence in the penitentiary, and yet gambling is being carried on in Seattle in an hundred and one different places, and all of them of a public character, and that too, despite the fact that Seattle is the county seat of King county and all of the peace officers of the county are located in the town, and also, despite the fact that the city has hundreds of police officers and some thirty are more extra, who are guarding the gates of the army post to make sure none of the criminal soldiers break away from their moorings. But as has been said herein on other occasions, Seattle must be a commonwealth within itself and does not have to take cognizance of the state laws. Seattle at present is the property of the Hon. Hiram Charles Gill and has evidently been exempt from obeying the state laws. "Under no circumstances will I, if elected mayor of Seattle, permit wide-open gambling resorts to be opened up or saloons to open their doors on Sunday or in any way break the laws of the state, if the police can prevent," declared his excellency, Mayor Hiram Charles Gill, on the stump when campaigning for the Republican nomination. Whereupon the Reverend Major shouted to the top of his voice: "I told you so," but Johnny Clancey, who stood on the other side of the platform, simply looked at his fellows and winked the other eye. Johnny Clancy knew what he was doing and the Reverend Majors did not. "If I am elected mayor of Seattle," continued Gill, "I will start the town to booming and it will keep the good house wives on the hills busy washing the soot off of their clothes as the result of the smoke stacks operating industrial concerns," You have been elected a good many months now, Mr. Gill, and the smoke stacks have been shutting down instead of opening up, what have you to say? In fact Seattle is in worse financial condition than any other town in the Northwest just now, what have you to say? She does not hold a candle to Portland, is a hundred miles behind Vancouver, even lags way in the rear of Tacoma and is no comparison for Spokane, what have you to say, Mayor Gill? Of the group of towns mentioned above none of them have open gambling or permit saloons to run day and night and Sundays included as does Seattle. The question then arises, does wide-open gambling and twenty-four hour per day saloons, including Sundays, pay a city even of the first-class and of the cosmopolitan stripe? Hard times came to the city with the change of administrations and that gentleman refuses to abdicate, importuned as he will or may be, and no other conclusion can be reached save that, he remains on account of the mayor's wide-open policy. If gambling and its attending evils bring money to SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. FRIDAY, JULY 8, 1910 a community, why do they not bring money to the relief of the business men of Seattle? Business men al up and down the business streets of Seattle are crying hard times, yes, so hard that it seems next to impossible for them to even pay their store and office rents, and yet open gambling stalks about over the city as though there never was a peace officer within her limits. Contemporary cities have completely tabooed gambling and its attending evils and the thieves and thugs have been driven out from their corporate limits and the merchants of those cities are enjoying an unprecedented era of prosperity. Why is Seattle in the bad financial condition that she is, Mr. Mayor Gill? You promised to segregate vice, that is, drive it to a certain locality, which for the most part you have done, but in doing so you have broken faith with a large majority of voters of the southern end of the city and placed the restricted district in their very mouths, and in the very locality where your smoke stacks should have been erected. Instead of opening up industrial concerns you have driven them away, because business men know that a city that throws open its doors to the gamblers, thieves and thugs as has Seattle under your administration, is not the place in which to locate an industrial concern and risk their money. You are building up a political machine, by which you hope to perpetuate yourself and your friends into public office, and these criminal degenerates that are flocking to Seattle are your lieutenants and you expect to have them vote for no one who does not bow down and worship at the shrine of criminality. The sheriff of King county, who is seeking re-election, seems as totally deaf and blind to the awful crimees being daily committed in Seattle, as you yourself, and there seems to be no doubt but that he too, is now a part of your political machine. With the starting announcement that, the Gill machine is favoring Hodge for sheriff and Griffith for prosecuting attorney, the average law abiding citizen does not see much show of having the law enforced, if these men are successful in their undertaking for another two years or more. If Mayor Gill is doing just what he said he would do prior to the primaries, which nominated him, then a great many who voted for him, thinking that they knew what he said and meant, are poor interpreters of the English language. Business men voted for Mr. Gill in preference to his opponent, because they believed he was the least of two evils, and even yet they reasoned well, because Gill's evil can be readily remedied, but the other man's could not have been, at least from their way of thinking at the time. But as has already been pointed out the business men seem to be suffering just as much under the Gill way of doing things as they would have under the Buillion way. They may reason to themselves that capital took flight over the prospects of Bouillon being elected and flew so far away that it has not been able to get back as yet, but whatever may be said of it, there is one thing certain and no one will deny it, Mr. Hard Times is having things his own way during the wide open period in Seattle. THE STATE PRESS It has been reported that the Walla Walla Union-Statesman is for Judge Burke in the coming senatorial mix-up, but, if it is, it has given no visible evidence of that fact as yet, but it will in all human probability line up for Burke on account of the hearty support Burke's friends gave (?) Ankeny two years ago. Southeast Seattle already has a number of healthy weekly publications, of which she is justly proud, but the more the merrier, and laboring under that belief Gay & Lanaway have launched the Seattle Ledger and the first issue thereof is a very creditable number. Aside from looking after the local business of that part of the city they propose to grab a bit of the business of the city proper. A few weeks ago in the columns of this paper much was said about the Orchard Tract in Sunnyside and from the Sun of that valley the following excerpt is taken, "It is estimated that from 5,000 to 10,000 workers will be needed to pick the apple crop here LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 PUBLIC VOLUME XVII. NUMBER 6 this year," and in spite of this men and women will hang about the large cities of the Northwest looking for jobs at less wages than they would get in those apple orchards and at treble the living expense rather than go to the country and earn enough in a few weeks to keep them comfortably the most of the hard winter months. Perhaps the Tacoma Forum stretched its imagination, when it said: "Tacoma and Chicago are on a par," but it is the duty of a newspaper to boost the town in which it is published and the Forum would not being doing its duty, if it did not put its home town by the side of the biggest and best in the country, and yet we some times wonder if it really pays to try to deceive ourselves. From a news item in the Tribune of Port Angeles the following has been clipped: "A popular estimate of Negroes in the United States is 10,000,000. That is far from correct. There are not fewer than 18,000,000 today in this country and there are 4,600 colored babies born every day." If the above figures are correct then its only a question of a very short time before the Negroes of the United States will be wondering "what will we do with the Caucasian race problem that confronts us?" Does it mean that the once busy, bustling little town of Buckley is going backward instead of forward, when the Banner sounds the following editorial lament, "Cows and horses seem to be getting pretty numerous on the streets of Buckley. It is difficult to keep them out of the gardens, not only difficult but impossible." Does it mean that the owners of the stock have quit the town and the animals are foraging around for something to eat or does it mean, the people are letting their beautiful little city go to the dimnation bow wows? EDITORIAL EDICTS Jack Johnson. That's all. Oh, for the love of Moses, shoot the "I told you sos." Fourth of July always brings its pains as well as its blows. With Senator Wilson in perfect condition Vancouver was there with the goods. Black vomit editorials a la Wilson may now be looked for in the Daily Times. It must kick some body. Wide Open Gambling seems to have been given the key to Seattle. Does it pay even financially, Mr. Mayor Gill? The question is, which was the more important, the Battle of Bunker Hill or the battle of Johnson-Jeffries at Reno. Millions of dollars changed hands as a result of the fight, but its all Uncle Sam's and the loser will soon have it back again. "The white man's hope" got an awful drubbing last Monday, and that too, on the white man's Independence day. "T. R. Is With Poindexter," says a Star head line, and yet the short article following the caption says nothing in the world to indicate that he is. If Roosevelt is with everybody he talks to on the political situation, then he is with a good many persons and is on all sides of the political fence. No, Constant Reader, the "Awgus" of Seattle will not suspend publication as a result of the late unpleaseness at Reno, because the Burke Campaign Committee has paid for it to run for two months more and is insisting that it keep its agreement. In a saloon row on First avenue Independence day one man was killed almost instantly and the man who did the killing says, the other fellow picked a fuss with him. It seems to us after reading the full account of it the gun player was dead anxious to have a fuss picked with him, for an opportunity to use his gun. --- THE TLE NATIONAL of Business June THE SEATTLE NATIONAL BANK At Close of Business June 30, 1910 Capital Stock ..... $ 1,000,000.00 Surplus and undivided profits..... 277,112.34 Circulation ..... 500,000.00 Deposits ..... 15,847,736.26 73,397.93 $17,624,848.60 March 29th, 1910, we have completed the consolidat tal has been DOUBLED and deposits show an increase completed the consolidation with the $17,624,848.60 Puget Sound deposits show an increase of Since our statement of March 29th, 1910, we have completed the consolidation with the Puget Sound National Bank. Our Capital has been DOUBLED and deposits show an increase of $6,563,521.77 Long experience, wide acquaintanceship with the Pacific Northwest and Alaska, combined with Large Working Funds And the most improved banking methods, enable J. FURTH, Cha E. W. Andrews, President. E. G. AMES, Vice-President. F. K. STRUVE, Vice-President. J. W. MAXWELL, Vice-President. W. S. PEACHY REPORT OF THE FIRST SCANDINAVIAN Located at Seattle, N. At the Close of Bu RESOURCES Loans and discounts..... $ 7,301,595.85 Real estate..... 76,957.93 Furniture and fixtures..... 35,000.00 Warrants, stocks and bonds..... 1,295,239.85 Cash and exchange..... 2,633,814.92 $11,342,608.55 banking methods, enable us to offer unusual facilities. J. FURTH, Chairman Board Directors. A.nt. R. V. ANKENY, Cas B.ident. C. L. LAMPING, As C. president. H. G. MacDONALD, D. President. C. L. LaGRAVE, As W. S. PEACHY, Assistant Cashier. OF THE FINANCIAL CON INAVIAN AMERICAN d at Seattle, State of Washin e Close of Business June 30, 1 RCES LIABIL $ 7,301,595.85 Capital 76,957.93 Surplus 35,000.00 Undivided profits 1,295,239.85 Demand deposits 2,633,814.92 Time and savings deposits $11,342,608.55 OFFICERS to offer unusual facilities for handling business. Board Directors. R. V. ANKENY, Cashier. C. L. LAMPING, Assistant Cashier. H. C. MacDONALD, Assistant Cashier. C. L. LaGRAVE, Assistant Cashier. FINANCIAL CONDITION AMERICAN BANK State of Washington Business June 30, 1910 LIABILITIES Capital ... $ 500,000.00 Surplus ... 350,000.00 Undivided profits ... 249,962.91 Demand deposits ... $4,888,841.03 Time and savings deposits 5,353,804.61 $11,342,608.55 And the most improved banking methods, enable us to offer unusual facilities for handling business. J. FURTH, Chairman Board Directors. E. W. Andrews, President. R. V. ANKENY, Cashier. E. G. AMES, Vice-President. C. L. LAMPING, Assistant Cashier. F. K. STRUVE, Vice-President. H. C. MacDONALD, Assistant Cashier. J. W. MAXWELL, Vice-President. C. L. LaGRAVE, Assistant Cashier. W. S. PEACHY, Assistant Cashier. REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL CONDITION SCANDINAVIAN AMERICAN BANK Located at Seattle, State of Washington At the Close of Business June 30, 1910 7,301,595.85 76,957.93 35,000.00 1,295,295.85 2,633,814.92 L. H. WOOLFOLK, Assistant Cashier. H. V. V. BEAN, Assistant Cashier. F. P. SEARLE, Manager Ballard Office. OTTO S. J. PEDERSEN, Cashier Ballard Office. A. CHILBERG, President. J. E. CHILBERG, Vice-President. THOS. B. MINAHAN, Second Vice-President. J. F. LANE, Cashier. DIRECTORS ERG, nt. J. E. CH Vice-Pr PERRY J. E. CHILBERG, Vice-President. PERRY POLSON, President Polson Implement Co. H. C. EWING, Of Calhoun, Denny & Ewing. JAFET LINDEBERG, President Pioneer Mining Co. THOS. B. MINAHAN, Vice-President. ALFRED BATTLE, Of Roberts, Battle, Hulbert & Tennant, Attorneys. W. H. METSON, Of Campbell, Metson & Campbell, Attorneys at Law, San Francisco, Cal. to invite additional accounts from banks and bankers, be accorded courteous treatment and every accom-oved city property. Applications are particularly On the basis of real banking service, we are pleased to invite additional accounts from banks and bankers, firms, corporations and individuals, to each of whom will be accorded courteous treatment and every accommodation that is consistent with conservative banking. On the basis of real banking service, we are plea firms, corporations and individuals, to each of whom modation that is consistent with conservative banking We have money to loan on First Mortgage on invited from those desiring amounts of $1,000 to $5, laxing service, we are pleased to invite additional account individuals, to each of whom will be accorded courteous trust with conservative banking. on First Mortgage on improved city property. Approx amounts of $1,000 to $5,000. We have money to loan on First Mortgage on improved city property. Applications are particularly invited from those desiring amounts of $1,000 to $5,000. A. CHILBERG President. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN 9,649,351.37 1,421,937.15 1,558,256.37 4,921,905.78 73,397.93 FRIDAY July 8. 1910 500,000.00 350,000.00 249,962.91 $11,342,608.55 Ge: i THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. FRIDAY July 8, 1910 Report of the Condition o. the ° of Seattle, Washington June 30, 1910 RESOURCES ; LIABILITIES Loans and discounts .......-ssesccsccsesseeeeeeseee2,049,653.84 Capital stock ..--..- seseseeceeccceeeeseeseescsseeeesseeefh 800,000.00 U.S. DOME. ceecesseessenssnseensereeseneeesectnseteeee 100,000.00 SUTPIUS anereeeesrserctnrerneetnetene seeteeaeeeeee 60,000.00 Other bonds, warrants and stocks............_ 373,040.80 Undivided profits ccs 17,319.26 Real estate, furniture and fixtures.......... 39,202.00 Circulation: -sceoeieuerneeneerene 99,400.00 Gash and exchange ..cceanrecsss-esecrssseuneome 1,145,518,20 Deposits a. tecessserssesseersnterseresstsneccruneee 85730, 690,58 $4,207,409,84 $4,207,409.84 OFFICERS M. A. ARNOLD, President. D. H. MOSS, Vice-President. M. MeMICKEN, Vice-President. J. H. HALL, Vice-President and Cashier. ©. A. PHILBRICK, Assistant Cashier. DIRECTORS a M. A. ARNOLD, 0. D. FISHER, President. Manager Grandin Coast Lumber Co. : THOMAS BORDEAUX, o J. A. HALL, President Mason County Logging Co. Vice-President and Cashier. JOHN H. McGRAW, PATRICK McCOY, McGraw Kittinger & Case, Real Estate. Lumberman. MAURICE MeMICKEN, H. W. ROWLEY, Hughes, MeMicken, Dovell & Ramsey, Att’ys. Capitalist. W. D. HOFIUS, D. H. MOSS, President Hofius Steel and Equipment Co. Vice-President. “OLD GERMAN LAGER” No Medals, No Bells--Just Natural Aged LAGER ---- Beer in Bottles ----- ane WHY----Es “ Giebt Kein Kopfwey ” THE INDEPENENT BREWING COMPANY Seattle, Washington _ ITEMS MORE OR LESS INTERESTING OO EE eee count of what the Anti-Saloon League has accomplished since it first came into existence. Whether the statement is an ex- aggeration of the factsisa matter of inquiry, but in order that both the ‘“‘wets’’ and the ‘‘drys’’ may see it the same is herewith re- produced: The Anti-Saloon League came into existence on May 24, 1893. Seventeen years of organized work on the part of the Anti-Sa- loon League in the United States has made a vast change, both in the amount of public sentiment against the liquor traffic, and in the crystalization of public senti- ment into laws and provisions which have brought tangible re- sults in the fight against the sa- loon. Whenthe Anti-Saloon League came into existence in 1893, the liquor traffic was growing by leaps and bounds. The number of retail liquor saloons through- out the United States was in- creasing with marked rapidity every year, and the amount of intoxicating liquors of every char- acter produced and consumed, was enlarging at. an astonishing rate. In fact so great was the growth of the liquor traffic at that time, that if, during the past seventeen years, the Anti- Saloon League movement had been able to do nothing more than to stop the increase, it would have been a tremendous yictory. The Anti-Saloon movement, however, has been responsible for more than simply stopping the increase in the production and consumption of intoxicating liquors. During the past few years, the number of retail liquor establishments throughout the United States, (according to of- ficial reports) has, been on the decline. The internal revenue report for 1908 showed the num- ber of retail liquor dealers to have been 230,51% as against 246,448 for the year 1907, while the report of 1909 shows the number to have been 228,504, thus showing a decrease of al- most 13,000 in the number of re- tail liquor dealers throughout the the United States in two years. These figures, however, insig- nificant as they are, do not begin to show the real number of sa- loons that have been put out of business in the United States. The number of saloons in most of the large cities in the country has been on the increase. The number of drug stores in all the laege cities has been on the in- crease, and the number of man- ufacturing and other establish- ments in the great centers of population, where intoxicating liquors are used, has been on the increase. Hence, these increases in the large centers of population have offset to a certain extent, the large number of saloons which have been put out of busi- ness in the rural communities, villages and smaller cities. A very conservative estimate of the reduction of saloons in the enteen years ago, the white spots on the anti-liquor map of the United States were few and far between. Today nine states are entirely white, and approximate- ly 65 per cent of the entire area of the United States is under no- license. In 1898 there were only a few ‘‘dry’’ counties outside of the prohibition states; today, of the 2,885 counties in the United States, there are 1,733 without a single legalized saloon. There are, furthermore about 200 “dry’’ cities in the United States having a population of 10,000 or more. Seven of these have a population of 100,000 or more. There are, at the present time in all the states 41,500,000 people living in prohibition territory, and the greater part of the pop- ulation in licensed territory throughout the United States is living in the in the few cities, The history of the Anti-Saloon movement on the American con- timent has been most remarkable; for it is safe to say that nev- er before in the history of the world has a reform move- ment of any character been able to accomplish somuch in the way of tangible results in so short a space of time. The first seventeen years of the Anti-Saloon Seague’s exist- ence has witnessed the route of of the liquor traffic from the vil- lages, the rural districts and from most of the small cities of the country. The fight which the Anti-Saloon League now faces is one against the liquor traffic in the large centers of population; and if the next sev- enteen years witness as great progress in saloon annihilation as have the past seventeen years, the thirty-fourth anniversary of the Anti-Saloon Leagne will also be a jubilee, celebrating as well, the banishment of the liquor traffic from the United States. ITEMS OF INTEREST Vasilicos Vergades a Greek, who came to America three years ago, ignorant of a word of Eng- lish, won the prize for the best English oration at Beloit Acad- emy, Wisconsin. He had twelve native Americans as competitors. Mrs. Glendora Decker, fifteen years old, who married her step- grandfather at Lawrence, Kans,, last May is now seeking a divorce on the grounds of incompatabil- ity. When she married her own step-grandfather she _be- came her own step-grandmother. Hunting wolves by motor car is the newest sport. Yet in western Texas a party from Wichita Falls, Texas, captured one big, black wolf after an ex- citing chase. The dogs were carried in a car until the wolf country was reached. Mrs. Harborough Sherad, a Virginia woman now living in England has formed an associa- tion of young people interested in birds called tde ‘Uncle Dick Society.’”’ The purpose ot the society is to furnish food and water for wild birds, especially in the winter. Thousands of birds flock to the bird parties where children act as hosts, The organization has more than five thousand members. Graceful effects may be devel- oped in foregrounds, in drives through glades, and in many other positions by the bold use of the larger hardy ferns. Few people seem to give much atten- tion to the hardy ferns, and in most gardens, if thore are any at all they are usually planted in some out of the way spot where no one sees them. Workmen while excavating on the site of the old Carmen Con- yent near Pueblo, Mexico, discov- ered ten earthen jars containing $500,000. They appropriated the money contrary to the law re- quiring such finds to be paid into the state treasury, and disappear- ed. Twoof the workmen have been captured and part of the money recovered. It is thought the jars had been buried more than 150 years ago. Levi Summe, former trustee of Burlington township, Carroll county near Flora, Eng., has just broken fast which lasted for for- ty days and fourhours. He first began the diet treatment asa cure for rheumatism, fasting ten and again twenty-seven days. He claims abstinence from food relieves him of the disease. Dur- ing each fast he partakes of tea three times a day. COMPARATIVE TAX RATE In 29 of the Leading Cities of the United States The following table was read before the Taxpayers League, of Seattle, at its last meeting and as soon as verified by the League will be presented to the city and county officials: Name of Per cent of Present Rate on City ‘Actual ‘Tax 100 per cent Valuation Rate Basis Baltimore 100 $216 $216 Boston 100 165 4165 Brooklyn 90 174 157 Buffalo 100 189 189 Chicago 33 7 66 253 Cincinnati oo OST Far Cleveland 8 3837 118 Detroit 100 181 181 Indianapolis 66 182 121 Jersey City 100 188 188 Kansas City 50 127 634 Los Angeles 50 147 ‘734 Louisville 80 «175 140 Memphis 60 176 105 Milwaukee 50 256 128 Minneapolis 53 2 65 140 Newark NJ 100 191 191 New Orleans 75 280 210 New York City, Manhattan and Bronx 60 ee TGR a Be Brooklyn 90 174 LB Queens 90 172 155 Richmond Oe Lipo) Philadelphia 100 150 150 Pittsburg 90 138 124 Portland 7 200 150 Providence 100 165 165 San Francisco 60 196 118 Rochester 82 197 1614 Seattle 60 335 201 St. Louis 66 222 1 464 Washington 668 150 100 St. Paul 50 ©3820 ©6160 Des Moines 25 374 934 Galveston 50 188 94 AMUSEMENTS “The Corner Grocery’’ in its day probably one of the most fa- mous of all American plays—that in which Daniel Sully won a great part of his wonderful rep- utation—is to be presented at NOTICE TO TAXPAYERS. Notice is hereby given that the King County Board of Equalization will be in session three (3) weeks, commencing MONDAY, AUGUST 1st, 1910, At the Auditor’s office at the King County Court House, for the purpose of equalizing the tax roll of 1910, All tawpayers claiming abatement of tax are hereby notified to appear on or before SATURDAY, AUGUST 20th, 1910, or be forever barred. OTTO A. CASE, County Auditor and Ex-officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of King County, Wash- ington. Dated at Seattle, this 2nd day of July, 1910. Lois next week in a production wherein special efforts will be made to achieve a splendid suc- cess. The play deals with the very human adventures and mis- adventures of old Daddy Nolan, a plain, workaday old chap, his son Tom, a chipper but true hearted young rascal, Jennie Burke, the strong willed, high principled sweetheart of Tom and Henry Budweiser, a mear, scheming German grocer chiefly. Each of these is a great charac- terization, particularly the parts of Tom and the old man. For Tom the Lois management has specially engaged popular Harry Cummings, the capable young actor who once enjoyed high pop- ularity here and whose abilities particularly fit him for this part. “The Corner Grocery” fulfills many demands as a theatrical treat, being a combination of much rare comedy, fine touches of homely realism, delicate shad- ing of the dramatic and as pretty a love story as could be asked. “The Hidden Hand’ will be the play at the Seattle Theatre next week. The play is a clever dramatization of Mrs. E. D. N. Southworth’s widely read story, and oneof absorbinginterest. It deals with the adventures of a young Southern heiresa whose father dying, leaves her heiress to an immense fortune; but an immense fortune; but an unscru- pulous uncle determines to pos- sess himself of the property rightfully belongine to the girl and has her, when a mere child, taken to New York where she becomes a waif of the streets and finally a newsboy. An old friend of her father’s, Col. Hur- rican, determines to find the heiress if alive, and bring her home and put her in possession of her fortune, finally finds Cap- itola Black and brings her to Hurrican Hall, Virginia. Her unscrupulous uncle, Col. Victor LeNoir, determines to get rid of her, the one who stands between him and fortune, and endeavors in every possible manner to get her out of the way; finally em- ploying Black Donald, an outlaw, to abduct her and take her to his cave situated in the mountains. The play affords plenty of oppor- tunity for good acting and un- limited scope for dramatic sen- sation. Capitola is the life of the play. and her tormentors find themselves foiled by her wit and ability to turn the tables on them at every hand. The play is literally filled with splendid comedy, and the Russell & Drew Company at the Seattle Theatre ean be relied upon to give ita splendid production. Miss Jane Tyrrell will be Capitola and Mr. True Boardman will be back in the element he revels in—Black Donald the outlaw. The oppor- FRIDAY July 8, 1910 tunity for scenic effects and at- mospere will be taken adyantage of. ‘Hidden Hand’’ will prove a great favorite with the ladies. en If you want a safe which you know Has No Superior, buy one of the Hall Safe & Lock Co.’s, manufactured by the Herring- Hall-Marvin Safe Co., for which we are the sole agents. PURCELL SAFE CO, Prefontaine Bldg., Prefontain Place and Yesler Way TO OUR CUSTOMERS. 30 days FREE trial of an Electric Flat Iron. Let us show you Electric Cook- ing and Hecting Devices of all kinds at ou. i.ow room, 907 Firs} Avenue. THE SEATTLE ELECTRIC CO STETSON & POST LUMBER LU. - BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on shore notice. Established 1875 Tel Main 71; DENNY-RENTON CLAY & COAL CO., Manufacturers of All Kinds of Clay Products, General Offices: 411 Lowman Bldg. Main 2189—Phones—Ind. 5126. Phone For a Case of et ‘ Rainier Beer Delivered to any Part of the City Phone Ind. 5668 Main 5668 GILHAM.LYSONS REALTY CoO., Loans, Investments, Insurance. H. E. Gilham. J. W. Lysons. Main 3044. Ind. 1588, People’s Savings Bank. Sine ugier Fru Lene cash incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. inpareia a Dieu teas General Bank and Exchar se Cor Second and Pike St Seattle, Wash McGraw & Kittinger Rea! Estate and Inaurance 59 Colman BIk., Phone Main 695 NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King— ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an execution, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 284 day of June, 1910, by the’ Clerk thereof, in the case of Aurora Land Company, a corporation, plaintiff, versus D. A.’ Hatfield, defend- ant, No. 78883, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given, ‘That I will Proceed to sell at public auction to the ighest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for sheriff's sales, to- wit, at 10 o'clock a, m. on the 18th’ day of August, A. D. 1910, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, alr of the rights, title and interest of the said defendant, D. A. Hatfield, in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of ‘Washington, to-wit: Tract ‘twenty-five (25) Harry White's replat of Hast Seattle, and block 166 ©. D. Hillman's Lake Washington Gar- den of Eden Addition to Seattle, Divi- sion No. 3, and an undivided one-half interest in’ the east one-half of the southwest one-quarter of the southeast one-quarter, section 35, township 26 north, range 5 east, and lots 18 to 22, inclusive, block one (1) Gillman Park First Addition, Seattle, all of said prop- erty being situated in King County, State of Washington levied on as the property of said defendant, D, A. Hat- field, to satisfy a judgment amounting to three hundred and seventy-seven and 47-100 (3877.47) dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this 28th day of June, 1910, ROBERT _T. HODGE, Sheriff, By J. STRINGER,’ Deputy, July 1, July 29, 1910, JACK JOHNSON VICTORIOUS FRIDAY July 8. 1910 The times and customs, how changed. Our latter day civilization wants what it wants and it knows what it wants, but it is a peculiar turn of nature's wheel that demands the news of a prize fight shall take the precedent of the death of the chief justice of the United States, the next person of importance to the president himself, and yet that is just what happened last Monday afternoon and Tuesday morning when Jack Johnson, the champion prize fighter, was given precedent in the newspapers to Chief Justice Fuller who died the same day that Johnson won his famous victory. The country, perhaps, is not going to the dimnation bow wows on account of it, but, we repeat, it is a strange turn of nature's wheel. Had the death of Chief Justice Fuller occurred any other day than the one on which the fight was pulled off, it would have been the cause for extras of all of the newspapers of the land, and yet in the evening papers it was only found in an obscure corner and in the morning papers it was side tracked almost as badly. Human nature is no worse than in former times on account of this strange turn of nature's wheel, but it is quite plain that the man of today lives while he lives, and it further demonstrates that, all he incongruities and misfits among men and nations are rapidly being dovetailed together and as man lives for today so will he meet his fellow man as he finds him without regard to race or color. "The world do move." What could have been more senseless than all the talk indulged in by many of the newspapers of the country as well as by many of the citizens that "the hope of the white race was with Jim Jeffries." Jeffries lost and lost like a man and no one has heard as yet of the hopes or the energies of the white race either losing cast or failing to respond when duty calls it. Johnson won and won like a man and he is admired as much by the white man as he is by the blacks, and knowing the petty strifes so common among the blacks, it is barely possible that Johnson has more real sympathizers and admirers among the whites than among the blacks. These two men met in the arena and the better man whipped and the white race has lost nothing nor has the black race gained anything that will lift it as a race in the scale of life to a higher and greater people. Prize fighting is a brutal and barbarous performance and whether the victor be white or black he is simply a heartless brute. As the great surging mass of humanity stood breathless for the reports of the rounds between the two contestants in front of the Post-Intelligencer, two dogs of the street got into a fierce row, and strange to say, one was white and the other was black; they fought viciously for a minute, when they were separated. Two dogs fought and no one gave a tinker's dam whether the white or the black dog won. Nor would it have been a case of color, if the dogs had been permitted to fight it out, but a case of the better dog winning. Thus should it be with the prize fighters. If the hope of a civilized nation rests in the hands of a beastly prize fighter such a nation has reached a very low stage and so low that its flickering light will soon be snuffed out. Rioting in many places in the United States between black and white folk were reported by the Associated Press the evening of the fight, which, to say the least, showed that one or both sides were damphools. These two men fought on the square and showed no disposition to take any advantage of each other and Johnson was even magnaimous to his fallen foe and refused to punish him unnecessarily. If the principals in that contest could act towards each other as they did, outsiders who went into hysterics over it and murdered each other, evinced that they wanted an excuse to fight any way. Hundreds and thousands of men and women stood about the bulletin boards in Seattle and among the great mass we failed to hear a single unkind word one way or the other. If a fellow desired to cheer for Johnson no one objected, and that too, with a great bulk of the assemblage favoring Jeffries. The black or white man, who would permit himself to be taunted into plunging into a mad race riot as a result of that pugilistic combat, was himself more brute than human. When you were convinced that both men were getting a square deal there was no argument or dispute coming. Sooner or later white and black folk will find it profitable to cease always trying to array the one against the other in a deadly conflict. John A. Johnson, the world's fistic champion, now occupies a field of his own, and in the arena no one is to be found to measure arms with him. He occupies THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN a relatives position to Alexander of old, who after he had conquered the world so far as he or any one else of that age knew, wept for more worlds to conquer. Johnson now weeps for more athletes to beat down, but when he has wept and then wept no one will have been found to meet his prowess. Time may bring an equally powerful man to the arena, but time will have taken Johnson by that time out of the fighting arena. He may be foolish enough to do as did Jeffries, wait six years for an opponent to grow up to meet him, but if he does he will be compelled to travel the same defeated road that Jeffries did last Monday. Johnson, his color to the contrary notwithstanding, is the most popular man in the world just now, save our own and only Teddy Roosevelt, and the two trot in the same class. He will show his good sense by treating the various challenges sent him with gentlemanly contempt, and go on being a good fellow, doing good to mankind in general and the black race in particular. Jack Johnson, though a prize fighter, showed that he was a gentleman and his clever talks from time to time, when he was not training for the fight, showed that he had been a student and there is no reason why he cannot become an ideal man and live an exemplary life. James J. Jeffries did not come back and he knew he could not come back when he was training, but he kept that fact to himself and thereby grossly imposed upon the public. He refused to box with his trainers and thereby hiding even from them the fact he could not come back. In doing all this Jeffries imposed upon the public and deceived his friends and admirers in a manner that caused them to lose millions of dollars. Jeffries deserves the everlasting censure of the sporting world and their scorn should drive him into the fastness of the mountains never to return. There is still another class of human hogs that deserve the everlasting criticism of the public, and they are none other than those newspaper correspondents that wrote poisoned race prejudice articles that made the large per cent of the reading public believe that the failure of Jeffries to lick his opponent meant the utter collapse of the white race and the supremacy of the black race. Had Johnson put up no better fight than did Jeffries it would have been evidence conclusive of his yellow streak. The public has been gold-bricked once more. THE PASSING THRONG Frank H. Rennick says, "so far as the nomination for state senator in the thirty-fifth district is concerned, there is nothing to it. Jeffries will be skinned 400 votes and Jo. Collins will not get 200 votes in the district." Jeffries says, "Rennick has been talking through his hat." Now, who is who? J. W. Maxwell, the well known Seattle banker and incidentally president of the Seattle Commercial Club, in a recent speech quoted at length passages from the Bible. Did he learn that prior to May 13th when he had misgivings as to what would happen to Mother Earth when she bumped into Uncle Halley? David T. Ham, the well known Spokane Republican politician, who was chairman of the late county convention of that county, is out with a declaration of, "I favor a West side man for United States senator to succeed Senator Piles." Which means, there is nothing for Poindexter to do and Burke has not a peep in. John Lockwood Wilson delivered the Fourth of July oration at Vancouver last Monday and he says, "I had a record breaking audience." The poor devils were not to blame for that as it is more than likely the managers of the show never made the fact known that Senator Wilson was going to speak until the crowd was all there. Mary Lahan is the name of a full blood Creek Indian woman, the mother of twenty children, all of whom are accompanying her. This wonderfully productive woman tells fortunes for a living for herself and children. The father of all these children has not been mentioned and it is barely possible that she told his fortune many years ago. Will H. Morris was among those who made a pilgrimage to Reno and while its against his principle to ever bet on a prize fight, yet the editor of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN felt called upon to pawn his watch a few days ago to send to Reno in order that there would be no delay in Big Bill's criminal case, for which he has made such a reputation of winning. Thomas Burke, who has been winning big cases for the Great Northern railroad for so many years, is taking a much needed rest and he has adopted a nove 图 way of spending his vacation. He has a big touring automobile and he has a bunch of congenial spirits with him and they are visiting the various towns of the state to see if he can find any of the men that he knew when he first came to the territory now state of Washington. Its an expensive trip, but he has the money and it having come easy and why not spend it in the same way. Bill Hanna promises, if nominated and elected county treasurer, to save the tax payers $75,000 a year in the way of employes. Lets see, was it not Bill Hanna that permitted Captain Head to default his accounts from time to time without reporting the same to his superior officer? Before this great economizer is given control of the county funds he should explain this official oversight. Henry McBride says, "Burke is sure to win the senatorial nomination and if he (Burke) does not then Miles Poindexter will do so." Always count Henry McBride having his way in the Republican party and if he does not then bolting to the Democrats. Even the alleged Republican that McBride is now supporting for senator is only a veneered Democrat that is a Republican for no higher aim than for the office in sight. William O'Donnell, former state senator from Chehalis county, whose home is in Elma, was a Seattle visitor last Saturday and in speaking about the southwest and the senatorial election said: "In my opinion Senator Wilson will sweep that section of the state, that is all the workers seem to be for him. The lumbermen seem to be for him all down the line and the laboring men are not fighting him, all of which prompts me to say, Wilson will sweep the southwest." "Edward B. Palmer is a hard worker in the legislature when he is to profit therefrom, which doubtless prompted him to switch from the local option cause to the cause of the whiskey men, but I always expected to hear of him flying the coop every day and if he had I would have known he expected more from the "drys" than he was getting from the "wets." Mr. Palmer is so thoroughly selfish that he is indiscrete," came from a well known anti-local optionist one day this week. George Hazzard, he of doubtful political stamina and still more doubtful party affiliations, though sailing under the guise of a simon pure Democrat, who migrates from the state of Washington, especially in times non-political, to (perhaps) pastures more green, but who returns when grazing is good, and this being senatorial year in Washington, the candidates numerous and with money to burn, he George Hazzard, showed up on the streets of Seattle last Monday fresh and fine from nowhere, but headed for Burkeville. Frank Jackson is the quintesence of political inconsistency, though an avowed prohibitionist he worked for the nomination and election of Hi Gill, who has made of Seattle a dive town and he did so for the sake of getting Gill support for his candidacy for the Republican nomination for state senator from the thirty-seventh senatorial district. In supporting Gill he surrendered every spark of political consistency that might have abided with him because he wanted an office and he is today vieing with Palmer for the whiskey vote which is controlled by Mayor Gill. Dr. J. J. Smith, a former statesman from Enumclaw, was in Seattle last Saturday and talked politics for a few minutes. "The county commissioner fight for the south district is the thing that is agitating the minds most of the voters of that district just now. It will be a close, hard fight between Carle and O'Brien. The vote for United States senator is going to be pretty well scattered. I am inclined to think Wilson has the best of it, but you cannot tell a thing about the outcome of a direct primary contest. But tell me, what about all this clean town Hi Gill was going to have. I have never struck a worse place." To the asylum went the editor of the Davenport Tribune the Fourth of July for he himself told us so, and it is reported that, Davenport had a safe and sane Fourth. He denied that it was by an order of the court that he went, but he got there just the same. Whether the keepers of the institution felt called upon to take the law in their own hands and lock him up the report from Davenport verily doth not say. We, however, hope that the hallucination that put him in the awkard predicament was of short duration and that he is again grinding out Republican (?) editorials as of yore. In speaking about the good work being done by Mayor Gill in Seattle the Kent Advertiser says, "He is one of the few honest, upright officials," all of which may be absolutely correct, but it certainly sounds a good deal more like fiction than facts. 6 NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF Real Estate. Sheriff's Office. State of Washington, County of King, ss. By virtue of an Order of Sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 13th day of June, 1910, by the Clerk thereof, in case Aurora Land Co., a corporation, Haltiff, versus Jerry Haltiff, his wife, and F. Hockey and Laura E. Hockey, his wife, Esther E. Hale, Defendants, No. 71290, anu to me, as Sheriff directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given, That I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, to wit: at 10 o'clock A. M. on the 30th day of July, A. D. 1910, before the County house door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all the right, title and interest of the said defendants Jerry Wilse and Ulta Wilse, his wife, in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of to wit: Washington. Committing at a point in the West lincoln of Tract Eleven (11), Brighton Beach Acre Tracts, 170 feet (170) North of the Southwest corner of said Tract Eleven (11), thence East 100 feet, thence North 40 feet, thence West 100 feet, thence South on 46th Avenue South, 40 feet to the point of beginning, being part of Tract 11, Brighton Beach Acre Tracts addition to the City of Seattle, levied on as the property of said defendants Jerry Wilse and Alta Wilse, his wife of satisfy a judgment of a piece of a mortgage amounting to Fifteen Hundred and no-100 ($1500.00). Dollars, and costs of suit, in favor of plaintiff. dated this 15th day of June, 1910. Dated ROBERT T. HODGE, Sheriff. By J. STRINGER, Deputy. June 17—July 15, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In Probate. No. 11323. In the Matter of the Estate of Ella E. Dryden, Deceased. Notice to Creditors. Under and pursuant to an order made and entered by the above entitled court in the above entitled cause, on the 13th day of June, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors, and to all persons having denied or against her estate, to present their claims with the necessary vouchers, to the undersigned, the duly appointed and qualified executor under the last Will and Testament of Ella E. Dryden, the above named deceased, Room 911 Lowman Building, in the city of Seattle, Washington, being the place designated for the transaction of the business of the estate within King to Washington. Said claims are to be presented, verified as prescribed by statute, within one year from and after the first publication of this notice or the same will be barred. same when first publication June 17, 1910. Date of first publication J6.17, 1910. A. M. LEE, A. M. LEE, Executor of the Estate of Ella E. Dryden, Deceased. June 17—July 15, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King—In Probate. In the matter of the Estate of Charles D. Brandes, Deceased. No. 10113. Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should be Made. F. W. Low, administrator of the estate of Charles D. Brandes, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said is now in a condition to be used and is read in a portion of the residue among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts the sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate. It is therefore ordered by the court that said petition be interested in the estate of the said Charles D. Brandes, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Department of said court. Seattle on the 20th of October, 1910, at the hour of oclock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons who hold peti- tion mentioned, and it is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of five weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 20th day of June 1910, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. lation there. Done in open court, this 17th day of Mei 1810. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Court Commissioner. May 20—June 17, 1810. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the Count yof King. The Silverton National Bank, of Sil- verton, Corp. a corporation, Plain- tiff, vs. J. M. Elmer, Defendant. Sum- mons for Publication, No. 73156. The State of Washington, to the said J. M. Elmer, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first petition of this summons, to-wait within sixty days after the date of May 1910, and defend your above entitled action, in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their offices below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the court, which has been filed in the clerk of said court. is to recover judgment against the defendant for $2500, together with eight per cent interest from September 11, 1908, on a promissory note made by one Howell Hinds in favor of plaintiff, for said amount of $2500, dated September 11, 1908, and bearing interest eight per cent, payment of which note was guaranteed by defendant by indorsement. Attorneys for Plaintiff P. O. Address: 614-619 Colman Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington. May 6—June 17, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Seattle Electric Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Mrs. J. H. McLean, also known as Fanny McLean, and also known as Jeff McLean, of the firm —firmers for Publication. The State of Washington, to Mrs. J. H. McLean, also known as Fanny McLean, and also known as F. M. McLean, Defendant You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 24th day of June, 1910, and defend the above entitled answer to the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at the office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the detailed information furnished with the clerk of the said court. The object of said action is to recover judgment against you in the sum of $171.80 and costs on agreement signed by you in favor of the plaintiff, and a writ of garnishment has been issued by the National Bank of Commerce a corporation. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, J. L. Craib and Jesse Craib, his wife, leaintiffs, vs. William West and Jane Doe West, his wife, Mary A. Dougan, William H. Dougan and Ella R. Dougan Revelle, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in and to the real estate described in this complaint herein, De- lants.—No — Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said William West, and Jane Doe West, his wife, Mary A. Dougan, William H. Dougan and Ela R. Dougan, William and auco all other persons or parties unknowing claiming any right, title, estate, lien, or interest in and to the real estate described in this complaint defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixti; days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 17th day of June, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve the complaint you must answer the undersignal attorney for plaintiffs at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to do so, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to quiet title to Lot 8. Block 37 (less the west one) of the property Addition to the City of Seattle; that the subject of this action is real property in King County, Washington, in which the above named defendants have or claim some interest actual or contingent, and the relief demanded in this action consists wholly in excluding the defendants from any interest in the said property, or lien or claim thereon. IN JUSTICES COURT—BEFORE JOHN E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Charles Roberts, Plaintiff, vs. C. S. Crawford, Defendant.-No. —. —. Simmons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King, ss, The State of Washington to C. S. Crawford: You, and each of you, are hereby notified that Charles Roberts has filed a verification that you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 26th day of July, A. D. 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said verified claim and of this action is to enforce the claim of the plaintiff against the defendant for goods sold and defended in the months of April and May, 1909, amounting to a sum of $99.92, filed June 23, D. 1910. Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle, District, King County, Washington. EUGENE A. CHILDE, EUGEN Attorney for Plaintiff, 457 Arcade Building. June 24—July 15, 1910. JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE JOHN E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. R. J. Eichler, Plaintiff, vs. Cora Lowe et ux., Defendant.—No. 12248-9. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King, ss. The State of Washington to Cora Lowe and John Doe Lowe, her husband, whose true Christian name is un- You, and each of you, are hereby notified that R. J. Eichler has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210. New York Building, Suite 100, King County, Washington, on the 27th day of July, A. D. 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted the no object and demand of the plaintiff is to recover a欠款 due to plaintiff of欠款 and no/100 Dollars for material furnished and labor performed by said plaintiff for said defendant, filed June 22, A. D. 1910. JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. June 24—July 15, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Theresa Rowe, Plaintiff, vs. Alfred Russel Rowe, Defendant. No. — Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Alfred Russel Rowe, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summon, to wit: within sixty days after the 13th day of May A.D. 1910, and defend the hoe entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the court. This has been filed by the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a divorce and dissolution of the marriage relations now existing between the plaintiff and defendant herein upon the ground of abandonment for more than one year last past. J. P. BAY, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office and Office Address: 201-203 Burke Building, Seattle. County of King, State of Washington. May 13-June 24, 1910. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. August Van Schaick, Plaintiff, vs. Ida Van Schalck, Defendant.-No.—, Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Ida, Vap Schaik, defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit, within sixty days after the 20th day of May, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and answer of your suwer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and do so be determined, that is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: Divorce on the ground of cruelty. Z. B. RAWSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address: 617 Pacific Block, Seattle, County of King, Washington. May 20—July 1, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Sarah A. Sprague, Plaintiff, vs. G. H. Sparague, Defendant.—Summons No. 73.- 632 The State of Washington to the said defendant, G. H. Sprague: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 6th day of May, 1910, to deliver the above article in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for said plaintiff at his office below, stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court, and served on the grounds of suit it is totaled a divorce from said defendant by said plaintiff on the grounds of cruelty and abandonment. W. W. FELGER, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. address, 27 and 28 Downs Block, Seattle, Wash. May 6—June 17, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Roger S. Green and C. D. Hillman, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claim- ing an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated October 1, 1909, for the delinquent taxes of the years 1904, 1905, 1906 and 1907, in the following amount, $4.92, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 19, Block 13, Hillman City Division No. 2. That the taxes for the year 1908 have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: $1.81. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of the bill of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after May 20, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, on behalf of you pay the interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, or sale taxes, of the sums and amounts due upon each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. H. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MACDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 52*4* Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. May 20—July 10. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Charles E. Lowe, Plaintiff, vs. Desdemona Lowe, Lowe, No. 73700 Summon for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Desdemona Lowe, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summon, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the fifth day May (60) day and end the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to do so, judgment will be rendered against you coming to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of said action is to obtain a decree dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant and divorcing the plaintiff from the defendant. Seattle, King County, Washington. WARREN H. LEWIS. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice address, 634 Lumber Exchange Building, May 13—June 24, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, KING County, Washington. Herman C. Schneider, Plaintiff, vs. Dina M. Schneider, Defendant. No. — Summer. The State of Washington to the said Dina M. Schneider, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 13th day of May, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff at his office below stated, plaintiff and serve a copy of your annotated complaint to the court and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said court. The complaint in this action prays for divorce and that the bonds of marriage between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved. H. E. FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address; Marion Building, King City, Washington. May 13-June 24, 1910. PROBATE NOTICE. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the matter of the Estate of Robert E. McCaulley, deceased, has notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Charles S. Follett, administrator of the estate of Robert E. McCaulley, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said Court his final account as such administrator, and that he has been appointed to, and at the court room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place he will appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. Robert H. Lindsay, Court Commissioner of said Superior Court, and the seal of said Court hereto affixed this 12th day of January, 1910. (SEAL.) D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. May 13—May 27, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Marie D. Tonjes, Plaintiff, vs. Paul Tonjes, Defendant—No. 74116. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Paul Tonjes, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 24th day of June, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon request of the attorney for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a dissolution of the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant, on the ground of desertion and non-support of the plaintiff by defendant, and the care and custody of the infant daughter of plaintiff and defendant, and for an attorney's fee of $100, and costs and sebumsements and general equitable relief. SMITH & COLE, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: 407-9 Boston Block, Seattle, Wash. June 24—August 5, 1910. NVOUCHEN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County.—In probate. In the matter of the Estate of Emily M. Robinson, deceased.—Notice. Notice is hereby given. That letters of administration on the estate of Emily M. Robinson, deceased, were granted to the undersigned, on the 24th day of December, by the Superior Court of King County. All persons having claims against the said estate are required to exhibit them to me for allowance, at 811 Lowman Building, Seattle, Washington, within twelve months after the date of this notice, or they shall be forever barred. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, M. J. Lutz, Plaintiff, vs. Charles W. Ingram, administrator of the estate of Richard Jehn, deceased, and Mrs. A. Sloequist, Defendants—Summons by publication. The State of Washington to Mrs. A. Sloequist: You are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the 6th day of May, 1910, and defend the above-entitled action in the above-entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you going to the demands of the complaina herein which is on file with the clerk of this court. The object of said action as set forth in the complaint is to foreclose two certain mortgages given by the said Rich-lander to the said plaintiff, the first one being dated November 16, 1906, to secure the sum of $1200.00, and the second one dated October 8, 1907, to secure the sum of $300.00, both of said mortgages being mortgages of the City of McGilvra's Second Addition to the city, Seattle, King County, Washington, together with interest on said amounts and costs and disbursements herein. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Arthur Lewis Smith, Plaintiff, vs. Amelia Sigler Smith, Defendant.—Summons for Publicatic. The State of Washington to Amelia Sigler Smith, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear with sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 24th day of June, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorny for plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of any further action against you, rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure a decree of divorce against the defendant upon the ground of cruel treatment and personal indignities rendering life burdensome, and that it is impossible for plaintiff and defendant to live together again, and their married life is a mere semblance and a mockery. ROBERT W. REID, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 614-618 Colman Building Seattle, King County, Washington. June 24—August 5, 1910. FRIDAY July 8, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, H. T. Traynor Plaintiff, vs. Araminta Wheeler and John Doe Wheeler, her husband; Edward Cudihee and Jane Doe Cudihee, his wife, and John W. Filkins, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in property, Defendants. No. 73745. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above def- fendants of each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the herenafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, date the 1st of December, 1904, and numbered as follows, for delin- quent taxes of the following year, 1903, in the following amounts, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: East Park Add. to Seattle, West 2 ft. North Park Add. to Seattle, West 2 ft. B-12232, ys#12232, amount$ That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff or his assignor upon said above described real property, toowit: West 2 feet of the North ½ of Lot 20, Block 9, East Park Add. to City of Seattle, in King County, Wash.: 1904, 18c; 1905, 10c; 1906, 4c; 1907 (local), 55c; 1907, 17c; 1908, 25c. Which several sums bear interest at the rate 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, with respect to the day of said first publication, to write to the said person days after the 13th day of May, 1910, in the entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with the costs. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said property and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sold taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property against the satisfaction of the sums charged against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. H. T. TRAYNOR, Plaintiff. J. E. McGREY, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 419-20 Pioneer Block, Seattle, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Emile Marx and Louis Marx, copart- ners, doing business under the name and firm style of Marx Bros., Plain- tiffs, vs. I. Freedman, doing business under the firm name and style of I. Freedman & Co., Defendants. No. 74315. Summon: The State of Washington, to the said I. Freedman, doing business under the firm name and style of I. Freedman & Co., Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear, within sixty (60) days of the first publication of this summons, to-with: within sixty (60) days after the 17th day of June, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the Superior Court of the State Washington for King County aforesaid; and answer the complaint of the Plaintiffs, and serve a copy of your answer upon the begeared attorneys for Plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The above entitled action is a suit for the recovery of One Hundred and Fftfive dollars and Sixteen cents ($155.16), due the Plaintiff from the Defendant as admissions for the sale of merchandise. TWOROGER & WINKLER 10 Prefontaine Triangle Building, Seattle, Washington. June 17—July 29, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUNTY, State of Washington. Leigh Lumber & Manufacturing Co., West Seattle Branch, a corporation, Plaintiff, versus H. N. Ralston, otherwise known as C. E. Ralston, H. N. Ralston, his wife, whose true Christian name is John Ralston, Murray, doing business as the West Seattle Cabinet Shop, and J. S. Elliott, Defendants—No. 72143. Summons by Publication. State of Washington: To H. F. Ralston, otherwise, E. Ralston, and Jane Doe Ralston, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, Defendants; You and each of you are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this notice exclusive of the plaintiff's said first publication, to-wait: within sixty (60) the 29th day or April, 1910, in the above courtship Court and action, and defend this action and answer the complaint of said Plaintiff and serve my answer on the undersigned attorney for Plaintiff at his office bounded, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed of said Court. The object of this action is to furnish an lien or real property situated in the County of King and State of Washington, and that said Defendants and each of them claim an interest in said real property. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Blidge. Seattle, Washington April 29—June 19, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, W. C. Moore, Plaintiff, vs. Ella J. Moore, Defendant—Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Ella J. Moore, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: W. 1910, sixty days after the 6th day of May, 1910, to defend the above entitled action in the above court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and case, with your failure so to do, judgment according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce and to dissolve and annul the bonds of matrimony now and hereofore exist between the plaintiff and the defendant. McLEAN & BALLIET. Plaintiff's Attorneys. P. O. Address, 26 Haller Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. May 6—June 17, 1910. FRIDAY July 8, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Elizabeth Detlofson, deceased.—No. 9087. Order Fixing Time to Bear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Barney Detlofsen, administrator of the estate of Elizabeth Detlorsen, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the estate of the estate. It is therefore ordered by the said court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Elizabeth Detlofsen, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle on the 5th day of July, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and then to show cause, if any they have, why said sold an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, That a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published in community weeks before the sale of 5th day of July, 1910, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 1st day of June, 1910. (Seal) ROBERT H. LINDSAY. Court Commissioner. June 3—July 1, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of S. A. Leonard, deceased—No. 9571. Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Not Be Made. Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. A. A. Leonard, administrator of the ton be made of the residue of said estate of S. A. Leonard, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and Done in open court this 2d day of now in a condition to be closed and is IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Franklin L. Powell, Deceased. No. 10308. Order to show cause with distribution account to be made, fixing time for hearing final account and giving notice thereof. Maud E. McLeod, formerly Maud E. Powell, executrix, and Edward Von Tobel, executor of the estate of Franklin L. Powell, deceased, having this day rendered, presented, and received in account as such executrix and executor of said estate and their petition for account setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution to the persons entitled by law thereto. An it appearing that the facts set forth are sufficient to authorize the distribution of said estate. It is now therefore ordered by this court that Saturday, the 6th day of August, 19*0, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the inforoon of said day be, and the same is, hereby appointed as the time for hearing the settlement of said said account and an announcement for distribution at our court house of the probate department of said court, at the court house in the city of Seattle, in said King County, and it is ordered that all persons interested in said estate appear be fore said court, at said time, and place, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be approved and why an account should be made of the residue of said estate to the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned according to law. It is further ordered that notice of the time and place of hearing said final account and petition for distribution be given by posting a copy of this order in three of the most public places in King County, Washington from least the sait 6th day of August, 1910, and further that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before said 6th day of August, 1910, in the "Seattle" Republican, a newspaper printed and published in King County, Washington, and of general circulation therein and the court notices therein that the filing and publishing of this notice as set forth is proper and adequate notice in the premises. Done in open court this 8th day of July. 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Mark Wilskiak, Plaintiff, vs. A. B. Llewellyn, Jane Doe Llewellyn, his wife; Ida B. Mitchell, John Dae Mitchell, her husband; W. B. Hofus, Jare Dae Hofus, his wife, and all other persons or parties unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein. The State of Washington to the said above named Defendants: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty days after the 29th day of April 1910, and defend the action in court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the said court of justice, and you are entitled to quiet title in the plaintiff in and to Lots Thirteen (131) and Fourteen (14). Block One (1), Central Addition to West Seattle all in King County, State of Washington. P. O. Address: 607 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. April 29-June 10, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Lola May Ellis, Plaintiff, vs. Mark Walter Ellis, Defendant. No. 73913. Publication Summons. The State of Washington, to Mark Walter Ellis, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the service of the court of common law, exclusive of the day of service, to-wit: within sixty days after the 27th day of May, 1910, the date of first publication, and defend the above entitled action in the Superior Court of King County aforesaid and answer the complaint of the plaintiff serve counsel on the case upon the unregistered attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court The object for which this action is brought is to secure an order annulling the marriage of the above entitled parties and to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant herein. REMES AYLMORE, Jr. Attorney for the Plaintiff. Post Office Address: 200 Colman Building, Seattle, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Hannah Abbott, Plaintiff, vs. Joseph H. Abbott, Defendant. No. 73972. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit; within sixty days after the 27th day of May, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the Company which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the grounds of your admission and plaintiff is more than ten years, and also your failure to make suitable provisions for plaintiff for more than twelve years last past. J. P. BALL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office and Office Address: 201-213. Burke, Building District-201 of King, State of Washington. May 27—July 8, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. James Buckley, Plaintiff, versus Bertha Buckley, Defendant—No. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Bertha Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, too-wit: within sixty days after the 29th day of April, 1910, and defend the above-entitled cause of action in the above-mentioned Court and answer the complaint of the Plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for Plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. Object or this action is no excuse at divorce from the said Defendant above named for desertion. WILLIAM C. KEITH, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 45 Starr-Boyd Bldg. Seattle. Washington. April 29—June 10, 1010. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, State of Washington. Department, No. Josephine Aleks, Plaintiff, vs. Joseph Aleks, Defendant—No. 73784. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, to Joseph Aleks, the above-named defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the first pubi- cation of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 20th day of May. 1910, and defend the above enclosed in the above Court, and answer and answer a complaint of the plaintiff, and answer a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be re- rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filled with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this suit is for plaintiff to obtain a decree of defendant upon the grounds of non-support, desertion and abandonment, lasting more than two years, and to have awarded her the care and custody of the minor child, issue of the marriage of the parties to this suit, for alimony, costs of suit and other re- lief. J. E. McGREW. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address: 419-420 Pioneer Building, Seattle, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Elva R. Baker, Plaintiff, vs. Thomas Baker, Defendant.—No. ——, Summons by Publication. The State of Washington To the said Thomas Baker, Defendant. You are hereby requested to appear with three days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 10th day of June, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve you with answer upward, and unresigned attorney with complaint at his office, below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of said action and the rule of search to be met therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the ground of non-payment of the property, cruelty, and failure to make proper provision, or any provision at all, for plaintiff's support and maintenance. J. P. BALL, Attorney for Plaintiff Post Office and Office address: 201-203 Burke Building Seattle, County of King, Washington. June 10—July 22, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, J. M. Duvant. Plaintiff, vs. name of Defendants, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, defendants.—No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington to the above deed of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the herein described tax certificates issued by the treasurer of the city of Seattle and tSate of Washington for King County, dated August 5, 1908, and number for the delinquent taxes for the years 1905 to 1908, are hereby issued in said city of Seattle in King County and State of Washington, described as follows, to-wit: Lot Block 6. Rainier Boulevard, addition, amount $1,211. Lot Block 7. Cedar Grove addition, $28.15. North 30 feet Lot 8. Block 40 Central THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF Real Estate. Sheriff's Office. State of Washington, County of King, ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an Order of Sale, issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 25th of May, 1910, by the Clerk, Proof of the of W. H. Willard, R. H. Steely et al, & Intervenors, Plaintiffs, versus Estella M. Anderson et al., Defendants, No. 70138- 70276, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given, that I will will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest cash, cash, hours, posscribe by law or Sherl's sales, to wit: at 10 o'clock a.m. on the 9th day of July, A. D. 1910, before the Court House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendants Estella M. Anderson, Acme Building Co., a corporation et al., and to the fol- ing described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, to wit: Lot (11), Block (3), H. S. Turner's Park Addition to the City of Seattle, levied on as the property of said defendants Estella M. Anderson, Acme Building Co., a corporation, et al., to satisfy a judgment of a closure of a mortgage and liens amounting to One Thousand Nine Hundred and Thirty-four and 19-100 ($19481.9) Dollars, and costs of suit of $10,000. Dated this 27th day of May, 1910. ROBERT T. HODGE, Sheriff. By A. HUTCHESON, Deputy. May 27-June 24, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Mattie J. Cole, Deceased. No. 9485. Order to Show Cause on Sale of Real Estate. Wm. G. Cole, the administrator of the estate of Mattie J. Cole, deceased, having killed his property in his Court, willing for an order of this Court to mortgage real estate of which the said deceased died seized, for the purposes therelin set forth; And it appearing to the Court from said petition that the personal estate of the said deceased in the hands of said administrator is not sufficient to pay the claims against the said estate and to oppose the application thereof, and that it is necessary to mortgage all or a portion of the real estate of the said deceased to pay the said claims and expenses of the administration. And it appearing to the Court that said petition conforms to, and is interested in the case in the law in such case made and provided. It is ordered by the Court that all persons interested in the estate of the said deceased appear before said Superior Court on Saturday, the 11th day of June, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the foreground of the Probate Department of said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this Court should not be granted to said administrator authorizing and empowering him to sell the said real estate of the deceased. It may be necessary to pay the aforesaid claims and expenses of administration. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before the election of the chair of the battle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said County of King and of general circulation therein. ROBERT H. LINDSAY. Court Commissioner State of Washington, County of Washington, I. D. K. Stickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original to show cause, made by said Court on the 11th day of May, 1910, in the matter of the estate of Mattie J. Cole. deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Conch this 11th day, deed. D. K SICKELS, Clerk. BY PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. V THE SUPERIOR CLOUR OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Roger S. Green and G. D Herman and persons unaware of any having a claim of interest in and to the hereafter described real property. Defendants—Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them. You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the one certain plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of February, 1910, and numbered B61733, for the delinquent taxes of the years 1905, 1906, and 1907, in the following amount, $4.92, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described in the following form, Block 13, Hillman City Division No. 2. That the taxes for the year 1908 have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: in the sum of $1.81. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after May 13, 1910, in the above entitled court and case, in the absence of a swerer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at this office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be made against you for the amount of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums and amounts due, respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for King County. Frank D. Black, et ux, Plaintiffs, vs. Blanche A. Primrose, Defendant.-No. —Notice of Sale. To Bunny A. Primrose, and to Zellemma A. Primrose, as guardian of said Blanche A. Primrose, and to all other persons interested: You, and each of you, will please take notice that on Saturday, the 25th day of June, 1910, there will be sold at public auction at the front door of the King Court, Curry County of Suffolk, King County, State of Washington, at the hour of 10 o'clock A. M., or as soon thereafter as said sale can be held on said date, a sale of the one-thirty- second (1/32) interest, alleged to be longsecond(13 w hi5 shrdu hrdupply long to Blanche A. Primrose, defendant, who owned a citadel of which that certain property known and described as Lot Ten (10) of Block Thirty-one (31) and Lot Ten (10) of Block (30), all in Seattle Homestead, Hugh McAleer, proprietor, city of Seattle, King County. State of Washington, at which time the sal done-thirty-second (1/32) interest will be sold to the highest bidder for each You, and each of you, are hereby notified to be present at said sale to protect your property. You have in and to said property and to purchase the same if you may so desire. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Disincorporation of The Oregon & Washington Navigation Company, a corporation. No. N.Y. Court of Appeals disincorporate. Notice is hereby given that the Oregon & Washington Steam Navigation Company has filed with the above entitled court its petition to dissolve and disincorporate itself according to law which petition shows that the stockholders of the corporation had the foremonon on the 10th day of June, 1910, in the Equity Department of the above entitled court. to an order of the above entitled court said application to disincorporate will Witness the Honorable Mitchell Gillam, Judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said Court thereto affixed this 7th day of April, 1910. D. K. SICKLES, Clerk of said Court. By G. A. GRANT, Deputy. Date of first publication April 9, 1910. April 8—June 3, 1910. NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King— ss. Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an order of sale, issued out of the honorable superior court of King county, on the 27th day of June, 1910, by the clerk thereof, in the case of Sschwabacher Bros. & Co., Inc., a corporation plenum, Fred J. Leonard, gna. P. Leonard, his wife, defendants, No. 73918, and to me, as sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given. That I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed for sheriff's sales, to-wit: At 10 o'clock a.m. on the 13th day of August, A. D. 1910 before the courthouse door of King County, sixteen to the title and interest of the said defendants, Fred J. Leonard and Oiga P. Leonard, his wife, in and to the following described property, situated in King county, state of Washington, to-wit: The east fifty feet of lots thirteen and fourteen in block twenty, Sea View Park, West Seattle, Washington; also, lot sixteen and forty-five feet of King County, Hillman's Pacific City Addition to the City of Seattle, division No. six, as the plat of same is now recorded in the office of the auditor of King county, state of Washington, levied on as the property of said defendants, Fred J. Leonard and Oiga P. Leonard, his wife, of a foreclosure of a mortgage to satisfy a judgment of $70,000 for a hundred eamed, 70-100 ($280,750) Dated this 20th day of June, 1910. ROERT T. HODGE, Sheriff. By J. STRINGER, Deputy, July 1—July 29, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In the matter of the guardianship of Francis Baker, a minor, in probate, No. 10988. Notice is hereby given that pursuant to an order of sale made and entered herein by the superior court in this proceeding on the 22d day of June, R. Robert K. undersigner, as guardian of the estate of said Francis Baker, a minor, will, on or after the 25th day of July, 1910, sell to the highest and best bidder, subject to confirmation by the said court, the real estate belonging to the said minor, to-wit, the south twenty-five (25) feet of the north half (½) of lots fifteen (15) and sixteen (16), in block five (5), of Madison Park Addition to the City of Seattle, King county, Washington; said property will be not proceeded for one-half to the balance not proceeding one-half to be secured by first mortgage on said premises, to run not more than three years. All bids should be in writing and may be presented to me at the office of John E. Carroll, Esquire, Room 210 New York Block, corner Second Avenue and Cherry Street, Seattle, King County, Washington, said office being the place for the transaction of the business of said estate on or after ten o'clock a. m. of July 25, 1910. Dated at Seattle, King County, Washington, this 24th day of June, 1910. J B. RICKERT, As guardian of the person and estate of Francis Baker, a minor. JOHN E. CARROLL, Attorney for Guardian. July 1, July 22, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, In the Matter of the Estate of Anna Shaughnessy, Deceased.—No. 11412. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 8th given to June, 1910, notice is hereby given to the estate or to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executor of said estate, at 960 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of business of said estate, the livestock, it said and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication July 1, 1910. CHARLES G. SMITH. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of John S. Kuip, Deceased.—No. 11624. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 6th day of June, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said deceased and Zoe Worthington Kulp, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administratrix of said estate at Rooms 428-429 Lumber Exchange. In the same place of deceased estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, July 1, 1910. ZOE WORTHINGTON KULP, As Administratrix of said Estate. HOLZHEIMER, HERALD & HOLZ- HEIMER, Attorney for Estate. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Elizabeth Brown, for the County of 10790. Notice of Sale of Real Estate. Notice is hereby given that under and by virtue of the order of sale of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County, made February 26, 1910, I will sell, at private sale, an undivided one-half interest in the following described property situated in King County, Washington, to-wit: Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 7, Section 28, Township 24, North Range, East, M., running thence 46 rods on residence of N. King, 40 rods, thence at right angles west 16 rods to section line, thence north on said section line to place of beginning. The sale will be made on or after the 18th day of July, 1910; bids will be received by the undersigned at the office of the King County Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Terms of sale are cash, gold coin of the United States, 10 per cent of bid to accompany bid, balance to be paid on confirmation of sale by court. Dated this 25th day of June, 1910 Guardian of the Estate of Elizabeth Heitzmann, a minor. July 1—July 15, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY of King Hattie Wilcox, Plaintiff, vs. Charles H. Hattie Wilcox, No. —, Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said defendant. Charles L. Wilson, creating fendant, Charles H. Wilcox, greeting: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty (60) days after the 1st day of July 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled tort, and serve a complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The act of said action is to obtain a decree dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant and divorcing the plaintiff from the defendant. Seattle, King County, Washington. Seattle, King County, Washington. July 1—August 12, 1910. NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL ESTATE. State of Washington, County of King, ss.-Sheriff's Office. By virtue of an order of sale issued out of the Honorable Superior Court of King County, on the 24th day of June, 1910, by the clerk thereof, in the case of The Bowles Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, versus J. A. Fraser and L. E. Fraser, his wife; J. A. McBee and Ella McBee, his wife; Paul Richards and Roweno Richards, his wife; and Charles Clarke and Alice Clarke, his wife. Defeefcharr- No. 71806, and to me, as Sheriff, directed and delivered: Notice is hereby given. That I will proceed to sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, within the hours prescribed by law for Sheriff's sales, toow; at 10 o'clock a.m. on the 13th day of January, 1910, at the House door of said King County, in the State of Washington, all of the right, title and interest of the said defendants, J. A. Fraser and L. E. Fraser, his wife, in and to the following described property, situated in King County, State of Washington, so that portion of land owned by him (9) and the said tenant lot eight (8) in block three (3) in the Northern Addition to the city of Seattle, County of King, State of Washington, lying west of the new extension of Olympic Place, in said city of Seattle, levied on as the property of said defendant, A. Robert Hodge, his wife, to satisfy a judgment of a foreclosure of a mortgage amounting to eighteen hundred, eighty-one and 66-100 ($1811.66) dollars, and costs of sult, in favor of plaintiff. Dated this day of June, 1910, Robert Hodge, Hodge, Sheriff, By J. STRINGER, Deputy, July 1, July 29, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. A. B. Kaufman and J. A. A. Hudson, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants—Notice and Summons. To the above- State of Washington: To the above defenders and each of them: "each of you" norm as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. Office Address: 457 Arcade Bldg., Seattle, Wash. April 15—May 27, 19 THE BLUE AND THE GRAY MAKE PEACE 8 "I wonder where Ed Carson can be," Maria Simpson fretfully observed as she alternately wielded the lemonade ladle with the asr of a martyr or pield additional sandwiches to an already towering pile. Graniteville was in its annual throes of patriotic merry-making and as the presiding genius of the occasion, Maria felt a not unnatural anxiety that the order of exercises proceed without a hitch. 'He's never missed a Fourth of July celebration since the war,' she went on, still in an aggrieved tone, "but there's no knowing what new-fangled notions he's got into his head from this New York trip. For my part, I think when a man's reached the three score and ten limit, it's about time he settled down quietly at home instead of galavantin' 'rounn the globe. I told him pretty plain what I thought of it. "But Maria," says he, "you don't begrudge my visiting Grant's Tomb before I die, do you? Seein' as I fought in the Army of the Potomac myself? And there's Fraunce's Tavern, too, says he," "where Washington took leave of the army—" "Fraunce's Tavern?" I interrupted, "I don't like the sound of it. To my way of thinking, a man that's voted the straight Prohibition ticket for years ain't no call to visit no taverns, even if the Father of His Country may have disgraced himself by entering one." The monologue was cut short by the appearance of the offender himself. Maria's severity of expression relaxed somewhat in spite of herself at sight of the spare figure erect despite its burden of years and clad in the blue army coat that was an honor only two others in Graniteville were left to claim. As usual Mr. Carson's speech was regarded as the address of the day. With ungrudging admiration his old friends and neighbors invariably accorded him the place of honor, and as for the younger members of the community, "Gramp" Carson (as he was called) and a Fourth of July celebration were inseparable. To them he was the concrete expression of all the civic virtues. "Well, boys," he began in his characteristic, familiar way, "I'm goin' to ask you to sit up and take notice today. It ain't my purpose to preach a sermon. I'll leave that to the dominie. And I ain't goin' through the manoeuveres of the Army of the Potomac. That story's been told so many times that I guess you know it all by heart. And I ain't goin' to give you my opinion again about Sherman, McClellan, and Burnside. 'Now to come down to what I am goin' to say, comrades. You know that I've just come from New York City. Great place that! Wicked? P'raps. And yet 'tain't always the most pious people that learn us the most valuable lessons. And the man who thinks he's too old to learn had better quit the business of livin' right away. The old earth has lived millions of life times the length of yours and mine, and yet it keeps on movin' just the ```markdown ``` same. Why should you and I stand still? "Well, to get on with my story. One day while I was away, I went up on Riverside Drive to that great, splendid pile of granit where they laid our general. If ye ain't never been in that place, ye can't imagine the mighty hush that comes over you when you step out of the sunlight into its quiet gloom. It's a silence you can almost touch and to try to describe what a feller feels, why ```markdown ``` you jes' can't do it. After I'd looked down at the polished coffin and read its simple inscription, I began looking at the war relics in the glass cases. And there along with the other tattered banners was the old flag of my own regiment, the very same that cost Jimmy Hart his life at the battle of the wildnerness, yes, the one we came within an ace of having snatched from us at Spottsylvania. My, but how the few poor rags brought back the mory of them days! It seemed like I was back there again on that awful May day at Spottsylvania pushing, struggling, fighting against the Confederate tide that had kept us at bay since daylight. Ahead were the stars and stripes, around me the groans of dying men and the sweating, panting mass of living ones, but above all the fierce joy of battle. The picture the old flag brought back was so real I clean forgot where I was and with every drop of soldier blood afire. I cried aloud: "Soak the rebs, boys! Soak 'em!" "You big Yank—What do you mean?" "It was a voice at my elbow. I turded to meet one of the 'rebs' face to face. My, but wasn't that man all-fired mad? He Jes' glared me through and through. "I reckoned," he said sternlike, "the war was over, but it don't look like it was. I'll wager, if given half a show, you'd be jes' as ready to fly at my throat as ever you was.' He was right --- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN GRAY MAKE too. Like a flash it came to me that without realizing properly what I'd been doin', down deep in my heart I'd been holdin'a mean, dirty, little grudge against the South ever since the war. Nearly half a hundred years- "And you talk about a united country," he went on bitterly. "Ain't ye never goin' to give the under dog a chance—" "But if the under dog begun the fight' —I started to say. 'Listen.' he interrupted. And ```markdown ``` then I heard the story from his side, the side that I'd never took the trouble to consider before. He told me all about it, how he was jes' as sure he was right as I thought I was, and about the pretty young wife he left to join the boys in gray. Well, when he went back home weary, and sad, and broken down, she wan't there to welcome him. No, the neighbors said the worry and not havin' proper vittles to eat and all had killed her. Well, before he got through, I calculated our judgment had been a bit stiff.necked and as for Robert Lee, p'rhaps he had a right to live after all. I found myself crying—yes, I'm not ashamed to say it—and they was tears of true sympathy and repentance, hope. I ain't gone back on my country. Don't you think it. But from now on I mean to love the whole of it and notjes' my own little piece. 'Comrade,' I said at last, holdin' out my hand, 'put it there if you can forgive and forget. Well, to cut a long story short, we formed a peace society then and there. And afterwards, if you will believe me, as we stood with clasped hands there in the tomb of our general, a gohstly whisper seem to go 'round the walls saying over and over, 'Peace—peace—peace.' I swear I heard it as plain as anything, as well as the echo that came fainter-like 'Peace — peace — peace—' When we finally left the tomb—for we stuck together that day—and turned "to look --- back for a last glimpse of it, there on the front the last thing we saw was the words, 'Let us have peace.' You see even our great leader never said anything wiser. "Well, our peace society has decided to have a reunion now and then, though we won't probably have to hold many. But next September, Gcd willin', I'm goin' to tend out the first one. It's going to be held at Arlihgton, the home of General Lee. My story is over comrades, but Ijes' want to ask you if you won't change the program a little bit today. After we sing My Country 'Tis of Thee, as we always do, then instead of Marching Through Georgia, would you mind singing a verse of Dixie in honor of the other member of the peace society." No second plea was needed, and as the stirring words poured from the throats of those who were familiar with them they were whistled with shrill fervor by those who were not, the peace society of two received the unqualified endorsement of Graniteville. — American Boy. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Fanny V. De LaVill, Plaintiff, vs. Paul V. De LaVill, Defendant. State of Washington to Paul V. De LaVill, Defendant. No. 74510. Sum- You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 5th day of July, A. D. 19.10 and defend the objection cited in the court affidavit, said, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer thereto upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his address below stated; in case of your failure so to judge judgment in the case, to do so according to the prayer of plaintiff's complaint (which has been filed with the clerk of said court). The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you on the grounds of failure, to render plaintiff and cruel treatment, rendering life of plaintiff burdensome. Date of first publication, 8th day of July, 1910. HOWARD O. DURK, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice and office address: 535 Henry Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. July 8, August 19, 1910. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, That on Tuesday, July 19, 1910, at 2:30 p. m. I will sell to the highest bidder eleven thousand, two hundred fifty shares of Union Coal and Development Company stock. Sale will take place at 1009 American Bank Blg, Seattle, Wash. This stock has been left with me by Leonard P. Spear as collateral security for a loan. July 8, July 15, 1910. SCOTT I. WALLACE. PUGET SOUND NATIONAL BANK of Seattle. Capital Stock $300,000 Deposits $8,250,000 Jacob Furth, President. R. V. Ankeny, Cashler. F. K. Struve, Vice-President. O. W. Crockett, Asst. Cashler. We do strictly a commercial busi ness. We solicit the accounts of in dividuals, firms and banks. Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. ALBERT HANSEN. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses. First and Cherry. Phone. Main 268. Seattle Washington A Free Trip to Seattle and Return. Let's Bust the State Dental Trust. Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar. You save a dollar, I make a dollar. You will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established by the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar and the State Dental Monopoly will keep two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established at 713 First Ave., in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete with cheap dentists, but with the high-class dentists for half their price. Open evenings until 8 and Sundays until 4 for people who work. EDWIN J. BROWN, D.D.S. 713 First Avenue Seattle, Wash. Read my article in Sunday's P.I. and Monday's Times and Star. FRIDAY JULY 8, 1910 Statement of THE STATE BANK OF SEATTLE. Seattle, Washington, June 30, 1910. Resources Loans and Discounts.....$ 728,191.06 Banking House, Furniture and Fixtures.....12,500.00 U. S. and Other High Grade Bonds.....$164,763.87 Warrants.....7,933.00 Cash on Hand and Bank Capital Stock Paid in. ..... $ 100,000.00 Surplus and Undivided Profits. ..... 14,714.77 Dividends Unpaid ..... 45.00 Deposits. ..... 1,120,057.88 $1,234,817.65 Deposits June 30, 1908 ..... $ 667,695.32 Deposits June 30, 1909 ..... 901,087.09 Deposits June 30, 1910 ..... 1,120,057.88 Deposits made in our Savings Department and including Saturday, July 9th, draw interest from July 1st at the rate of 4 per cent per annum. We Invite Your Account OFFICERS E. L. Grondahl, President. John Erikson, Vice-President. A. H. Solbert, Vice-Pres. and Cashier. Arthur C. Kahlke, Assistant Cashier. Report of NORTHWEST TRUST AND SAFE DEPOSIT CO. Seattle, Washington. Statement at Close of Business June 30, 1910. Resources Loans and Discounts.....$ 781,980.16 Municipal Bonds.....117,498.78 Other Bonds.....12,850.00 State and King Co. Warrants.....18,480.97 Stocks.....2,450.00 Safe Deposit Equipment.....14,800.00 Furniture and Fluxtures.....15,500.00 Real Estate and Other Re- sources.....809.10 Government a. d Railroad Bonds.$82,969.90 Cash on Hand and 781,980.16 17,498.78 12,850.00 11,000.00 2,450.00 14,800.00 15,500.00 Resources WM. H. FINCK. 816 Second. Seattle, Washington IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County State of Washington. Mutual Adjustment Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Weber Chimney Company, a Corporation, Defendant. No. 787. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, number of King, ss. The State of Washington, Weber Chimney Company, a corporation. You, and each of you, are hereby notified that Mutual Adjustment Company, a corporation, has filed summons and complaint against you in said court which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Building, Washington, on the 1st day of August, A. D. on the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object of the said summons and complaint is to cover Thirty-seven and 50-100 ($37.50) for storage. Complaint filed June 14, A. D. 9:10. R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Georgetown Mercantile Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. W. R. Murphy, Defendant.—No. 19782. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King, ss. The State of Washington to W. R. Murphy. You, and each of you, are hereby notified that Georgetown Mercantile Co., Inc, has filed summons and complaint against you in said case. You come on to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 1st day of August, A. D. 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the demand will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff's object and demand of said complaint is to recover Ten ($10.00) Dollars due for meals and board. Complaint filed June 13, A. D. 1910. B. B. GEORGE GEORGE, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Dated June 30, 1910.