Seattle Republican

NORTHWEST THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Representative Edward B. Palmer Single Copies, 10 Cents THE PUBLISHER'S NOTICE. The Seattle Republican is published on Friday of every week by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3.00 per year; six months, $1.50 postage prepaid. Subscriptions to all foreign countries included in the Postal Union, $4.00 a year, postage paid. Sample copies, free. Single copies ten cents. Advertising rates made known on application. Special rates to publishers. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. Address all communications to The Seattle Republican, 307 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. Make all checks, drafts, postal orders, etc., payable to "Cayton Publishing Company." CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. Telephone: Main 305. Publication office, 307 Epler Block. HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON - - - Publisher SUSIE REVELS CAYTON - - - Associate EDITORIAL EDICTS Victor Murdock gives visible evidence of being a son of bleeding Kansas. Mr. Hard Times is hitting hard these days and promises even harder blows in the future than in the past. There is method in the madness of a young lady, who husbands her father's lights, especially when her lover is in the parlor with her. Any young man with a handsome young girl as a neighbor can afford to "love his neighbor as himself," and he never fails to do it. "A vote for Wilson is a vote against King county," says the Times. A vote, however, for Wilson will not be a vote for Poindexter as will be a vote for Burke. If the senatorial contest is between Burke and Poindexter, why does not the Times direct its chief fight against Poindexter instead of against Wilson? Umbrella Patton died at the Soldiers' Home a few days ago, but the Times still publishes his picture on its front page, showing that it never lets go a dead one. Ed Palmer has spent two months of his valuable time and lots of his hard-earned (?) cash to get an office that pays him $300. Where does Palmer get off at? In speaking of the men, who voted wrong in the last legislature as portrayed by the American issue, the names of Howard Taylor and Edward B. Palmer lead all the rest. The "fighting little cuss" from Kitsap county has no higher aims for being on the insurgent ticket than to keep his name before the public for two years' hence. What a shame! Our superior court has declared that George Piper is not entitled to be voted for for state senator from the thirty-fourth district. Then permit us to suggest that you vote for Claude C. Ramsey, who has had no trouble with the courts. A park in Ossawatimie, Kansas, has been dedicated to the memory of John Brown and the dedicatory services were held last Thursday at which Colonel Roosevelt spoke. The Kansas people are rather slow about getting round to this honor, but it is better late than never. Bloomington, Illinois, is said to produce more fish than any other state in the Union and her inhabitants eat less fish than those of any other. It seems an eagerness to ship to the outside takes nearly the entire catch from the prolific Illinois and other rivers. To disencourage this the inhabitants have inaugurated an annual fish fry. The last one was held on August 26th when over 30,000 persons were assembled to partake of the buffalo, croppies, cat and bass cooked to a queen's taste with the good bread that went with it. Farmers from far and near attend these frys and the merchants of Beardaton realize heavily on their annual donations used to make these fish fries a success. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 1910 If you be a law abiding citizen; if you abhor corruption in general and in public officials in particular; if you believe in the doctrines of our fathers, who founded the United States on the corner stone of liberty, that the people might rule, then in the senatorial contest in the thirty-seventh district vote for Frank C. Jackson as against Edward B. Palmer. The voters of the fourth ward years ago nominated and elected Edward B. Palmer a representative to the legislature of the state and he went there presumably an ambitious young lawyer to make an honorable name for himself, but has he done so? He had no sooner taken his seat in that body than he began to plan for his own personal aggrandizement at the expense of the people. Unsolicited he worked for and supported every corporation bill that was introduced that session and exacted no pay for his work. But when he came home he went to the corporations with his record. He was then and there appointed tax attorney for the Puget Mill Company at almost a fabulous yearly stipend especially in comparison to what he had been earning. Other mill companies poured in their business on him and soon he formed a great law firm with himself as senior partner and it was his duty to get the business and the other fellows to look after the court work. He again sought the nomination for the house and by the extravagant use of money succeeded in winning his fight. His record in the interest of the corporations and in the support of cinch bills was even more notorious than the previous. He then sought a seat in the senate and by the extravagant use of money, which was supplied him, he won in that fight. As Senator Palmer, and with two terms in the legislature ahead of him he became the leader of a lot of legislative looters who passed legislation that robbed the state of its rights and give the same to private individuals. The timber lands, the school lands, the oyster lands all more or less were caught in the drag ret of which he played a conspicuous part. His oyster land holdings at present are simply enormous, he has tracts of agricultural and timber lands scattered about over the state that are almost priceless in value especially to a person of moderate means. His Soap Lake holdings alone would make the average man independent for the balance of his natural life. All of the above Edward B. Palmer has accumulated within the past twelve years, he being practically penniless when he was first elected a member of the legislature of the state of Washington. Mr. Palmer's support of railroad measures while a member of the legislature should not be overlooked. In the senate he seems to have been the communicating organ to the legislature for Ben S. Grosscup, at that time chief counsel for the Northern Pacific, and for E. S. Cotton, the general counsel for the O. R. & N. It was not long before the local attorney for the Northern Pacific fell to Mr. Palmer's office and in order to deceive the people he formed a partnership with Judge Carrol B. Graves of Ellensburg and had him named as the Northern Pacific's Seattle attorney. This was done with view of permitting Mr. Palmer to continue doing politics and regularly going to the legislature to keep up the good work for the railroads. Milo A. Root, who was then a partner of Mr. Palmer's had been slated for the N. P. place, but a position on the supreme bench for Root more favorably impressed Mr. Palmer than the local N. P. attorneyship, and that secured it would be two instead of one stronghold. Mr. Palmer through his corporation influence was elected to the state central committee and in that position he handled thousands of dollars in electing Albert E. Mead governor of the state. The price Mead had to pay for his election, so far as Palmer was concerned, was that Meade would aid Palmer in having the legislature add two new members to the supreme court and that Mead would appoint M. A. Root and H. D. Crow to those positions. The program worked like a charm. In the mean time Graves' appoint ment as N. P. counsel and his admission into partnership with Edward B. Palmer were LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 VOLUME XVII. NUMBER 14 both held in abeyance until Mr. Palmer had his legislative supreme court program cinched, which was no sooner done than Graves moved to Seattle and the law firm of Graves, Palmer & Murphy was formed, with office space taking quite a third of one of the floors of the Lowman building. This partnership continued for some time. It finally dissolved, so rumor has it, because Palmer gave the most of his time to clients having business of a quasi political nature, and for which the firm never realized any reward, and yet Mr. Palmer, who was the sack holder of the firm, sa v o it that his share of the profits of the firm was always forthcoming. This transaction may have been on the square and in the open, but it does not look like it. We believe it can be said without fear of successful contradiction that Edward B. Palmer never supported a measure while in the legislature, from which he did not expect something for his own personal or selfish aggrandizement. For a number of terms he supported the prohibition cause in the legislature, and he did so until he saw an opportunity to make a combination with the whiskey advocates in the legislature with himself becoming one of the acknowledged leaders of the wets, when he became a violent saloon advocate. He no sooner forms such a combination in the house than he organizes the saloon forces into his own plans, aside from the liquor question, and more vicious legislation is undertaken and even passed and would now be a law had not Governor Hay vetoed the Beach oyster land steal. In the present campaign for the senate Edward B. Palmer is spending more money than all of [Picture of a man in a suit with a white shirt and a dark tie. The background is a solid black oval.]] the other legislative candidates in the county combined. He has his pegs set and if he is able to pull through all he will have spent for his election will be returned a hundred fold. No man can afford to spend multiplied hundreds of dollars to be nominated and elected to an office, the salary of which all told amounts to only $600 unless he expects toget it back by holding the office. Edward B. Palmer wants to go to the senate to see after the in- EDWARD B. PALMER The Interests' Candidate for Senator in the Thirty-Seve th District including the Third and Seventh Wards of Seattle wants to go to the senate to see after the interests of the lumber kings of the state, the electric lights concerns of Seattle, telephone lines of the state, oyster land syndicates and to prevent the legislature from placing the nomination of supreme court judges back into the primaries. And that is another point he has not failed to lookout for since he has been a corporation member of the legislature. The name of Ed Palmer is a hiss and a by word all over the state and the state press is almost unanimous in its condemnation of his legislative acts. Personally he is a greedy, avaricious soul that is for the other fellow only when he can successfully use him and the minute he fails to use such person to his personal advantage he throws him over and has nothing but abuse for him. It is the consensus of opinion of the men who know Edward B. Palmer that he is the most selfish man that ever came into public prominence in the state of Washington. If you vote for the man you stultify every spark of manhood in you, providing you have taken the trouble to look up his record in the legislature. And that you may not vote blindly so far as Edward B. Palmer is concerned his legislative record is being prepared and will be published herein in our next issue. It can be safely said he never cast a vote in the interest of the people, only that part of the people known as corporation kings. a ee a in CURRENT COMMENT THE PASSING THRONG i THE GORE INDIAN SCANDAL Among the notorious scandals of this age of muck- raking that precipitated by Senator Gore of Oklahoma caps the climax. Mixed up in the attempt to rob Lo, the poor Indian, are attorneys of national reputation, representatives in Congress, United States senators and even the vice president of the United States. Some one has written, ‘‘since man to man is so unjust its hard to say what man to trust.’”? The ig- norant, the innocent and the helpless are taken as mean advantage of by the learned lights of the age as persons of a like mind. So money mad is the spirit of the age that men will seemingly sacrifice the honor of his wife and daughters, if that will bring them the money. The injunction that was once attributed to an avaricious father on the return of his son from school, for which the old man had unwillingly paid was, ‘‘My son, get money. If you can’t get money honestly, my son, get money,’’ must have been direct- ed to the sons of the United States and they have been day by day and year by year, getting closer and closer to that teaching until today the man who does not get the money any way, just so he gets the money, is considered a person of little or no purpose or energy of life. UNCLE SAM AND LIBERIA Evidently France views with alarm the move being made by the United States to put the Liberian repub- lic on a firm financial basis and for Uncle Sam to take charge of her customs while itis being done, That European power thinks the United States is seeking territory in the far East that means sooner or later a wholesale territory grabbing in the black continent, a perogative heretofore considered for European powers exclusively. But the United States has no intention of land grabbing in Africa. She has already more for- eign territory than she can gracefully take care of. STRANGE THINGS YOU MEET In a great metropolitan city many things transpire that are not only amusing, butin many instances seem- ingly inexplainable and among them are the following: The white man is said to be bitterly opposed to the Japanese coming to America and mingling with the whites and his opposition to the black man 1s so well known, that, it would be a waste of time to go over it, and yet at Woodland Park last Sunday a game of baseball was played between a white and a Japanese team and to cap the climax of this strange combina- tion, a man as black as the ace of spades was chosen umpire and for the time he was lord of all he survey- ed. Are all men liars? Two city councilmen, both honorable gentleman, so far as the world knows, quarrelled and even fought over a matter of municipal fegislation. In looking fer the causus belli by the other members, the two combatants broadly intimated that the other was crooked and was growing rich at the expense of the city. Is ittrue? One of the leading papers of the city quoted one of the leading pastors of the city as delivering his fare- well sermon and delivering it in such a satirical way as to cause his parishioners to criticise their pastor. ‘The divine denies having preached any such sermon and states that his farewell sermon will not be preach- ed for two weeks or more. Do newspapers publish the truth? The Pacific States Telephone Company, which is said to be one of the richest and most formidable cor- porations in the whole west, recently advanced its service rates some twenty-five per cent, not because the company was in bad financial shape, but simply to get that much more money. The question is, why do the citizens stand for it? A leader of one of the leading churches of the city prays loud and long every Sunday, is at prayer meeting on Thursday evenings and yet in his business life he is one of the boys and do those things that he prays against at church and breaks the ritual of his chosen church six days in a week. Is sucha mana fool ora knave? If neither, is Christianity and its teaching a mere society formality? A dope fiend in Seattle, who, in his more sane mo- ments poses as a politician, was arrested last Satur- day for impersonating a federal officer. The Times, But if she succeeds in planting a prorperous republic in Africa controlled by black men of American birth or their descendants, it might mean that the corner stone of a black republic would te laid, which sooner or later, combined with the natives, would control the greater part of the Afrizan continent. Let Miss France with her frozks and frills not become excited over a friendly act t> a struggling republic because she will not have an opportunity to grab the republic of Liberia. Mrs. Bertha Crum Plummer who is running for Register of Deeds from Chase county, Kansas, adopt- edfa rather unique plan to further her nomination in a three cornered campaign which was both strenuous and exciting. Instead of using the customary cam- paign cigar which soon vanishes in smoke as does, in many cases, the thought of the giver, Mrs. Plummer had her appeal for votes and the date of election in- scribed upon thousands of lead pencils. She then hired a horse and buggy and with her six-year old daughter canvassed every farm and ranch in Chase county and presented these reminders to men, women, and children. She talked with the men at their work in the fields, not a thrashing barn escaped her atten- tion and at night she slept at the nearest farm house and next morning left the women of the housea strong advocate of her cause. She was elected. Just across the street from the state penitentiary in Trenton, New Jersey, lives a young woman who is thoughtless beyond her kind. She has been notified by the police that she must stop flirting with the con- victs. The prison authorities say that she has greatly interfered with the prison discipline by standing at the window and flirting with the prisoners who are employed in the shop. A woman who has developed along humane lines to any extent, whatever, would re- quire no notification from the police concerning such actions of hers as would thoughtlessly or needlessly in- Pn ioe Glee. ~N fae % ‘a 4 : « Bee, ey be 4 Los Es ea - a4 fi : ' a ) ' me = ase dy a WILLIAM H. MURPHY Councilman-at-large of Seattle who slapped Council- man Goddard’s face. in its despair to find something to injure Senator Wil- son, spenta couple of hundred dollars in trying to make him out as a part of the Wilson campaign ma- chine. The question is, Does the Times ever tell the truth? or, does the editor of the Times ever ‘‘do unto others as he would have them do unto him?’’ The Colored Citizens’ Club, more or less political in its make up, met in Seattle last Tuesday to endorse candidates for office. Among those it eudorsed was a Missouri Democrat, and that, too, when one of his op- ponents isa Grand Army man. The question is, are those colored men ungrateful or did they go on the presumption that, there is nothing in that old, ‘I freed you” racket? Under the alleged likeness of Erastus Brainard, editor of the Post-Intelligencer, the Times said: ‘‘The above isa fairly good likeness of Erastus Brainard, the John L, Wilson hireling, whois slandering respect- fa FRIDAY September 2, 1910 NT convenience her fellowmen. Most women even in the lower walks of life would scorn to take so mean an advantage of another under the attending unequal conditions. At Bronx Park near New York city in running the electric launches that ply from the boat house there on the Bronx river they have a fare system that avoids all mistakes and does away with any necessity of re- membering on the part of parents, whatever. On these boats the fares for adults and children over four feet in height is ten cents, for children under four feet in height, five cents. Railroad and street car conductors claim that it is curious, to say the least, how parents’ memories lapse at times about the age of their children. This Bronx Park system if gener- ally adopted would obviate forgetfulness and prove to be a time saver in general. The latest statistics issued in Berlin show that the population of Germany is now 64,750,000 and will be $5,000,000 when the next census is taken on Decem- ber 1. The increase of population has been about a million a year for a long time. Forty years ago France and Germany were about even in population. Now Germany has 65,000,000 people and France only 39,- 000,000. The economic and military effects of this dis- proportion of population in the two rival countries is obvious. Germany cannot proclaim of a tendency to race suicide among her people. The birth rate is de- clining but the death rate is declining more rapidly. Thirty years ago 200,000 Germans emigrated annually. This: figure has now been reduced to about 20,000. Germany seeins prosperous enough to make it of ad- vantage for Germans to remain at home. Money, it is said, makes the mare run, and when you owe the other fellow and are not able to pay him, it makes you run like the very devil. ‘ If the voters of the thirty-fourth senatorial district send Claude C. Ramsey to the senate he will be in his seat every day during the session and in his seat he will be himself and be able to vote intelligently on every subject that comes up. He will be no party to cinch bills introduced for the purpose of holding men and concerns up for blood money. He will be one of the able workers of the senate and King county will not be ashamed of either his work or of him. The editor of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN has seen every legislature in the history of this state and he knows when a legislator does his duty. When Mr. Ramsey ‘was a member of the house he did his duty and his whole duty and was on hand every moning at roll call and met his various committees promptly. In the coming session of the legislature Kine county needs men and not dummies, who, for the most part, are not aware of what is going on only after nightfall. The thirty-fourth senatorial districts is one of the heavi- est tax paying districts in the state and it does seem that such a district would select the best talent and strongest minded men it has as her representatives in the legislature. Vote for Ramsey for senator and you will have one of such men. Organized labor is for Burke, the Times has.been declaring for the past week or more, but from the re- cent expose of Charles H. Miller, who attempted to bribe the central labor council into the support of Judge Burke, its resentment of the attempt and its threatened expulsion of Miller, it begins to look as if organized labor is not for Burke. If half that was told by Harry Kildruff about Miller and Burke be true then Seattle is in the throes of the most corrupt and vicious campaign in the history of the Northwest, and Judge Burke will retire from the present contest not only a defeated man for the senatorial toga, but with his heretofore unsullied reputation badly be- smirched. Not only is organized labor being offered bribes, but it is said, and said without fear of success- ful contradiction, that men with money are offering men about the saloons $1.50 each if they will promise to vote for Burke and say a good word for him as they go about. If the victim consents he is given the money on the spot. | THOMAS BURKE AND THE SENATORSHIP COLORED CITIZENS’ CLUB ENDORSE JOHN L. WILSON WHO WANTS BURKE FOR SENATOR? Colonel Blethen, of course, because Judge Burke has the kind of stuff at his commard that always makes Colonel Blethen want a man fora prominent position: The Interests, of course, because Judge Burke has served them so long and well they know he will be a thousand times more useful in the United States sen- ate than he has been in the courts and that is saying a good deal; The politicians, because they know they will have things their way for the next six years with Burke in the senate. Burke having been a Democrat has been given to understand that in case he is nominated and elected to the senate the politicians will do the select- ing of office holders and he can lock after the interest of the Interests; The grafters in general want Judge Thomas Burke, because, if all reports be true, he has proved an Easy Mark for them and the grafter is always for any one right or wrong that has the money and will let go Riley. But do any of those qualifications recommend him to the real citizens of the county? Has Col. Blethen ever advocated doctrines that the rank and file of the Republican party considered for the best interest of the country? Has he not from time to time ad- voeated the election of the Democratic party and thereby the passage of a free trade bill by Congress, which would destroy the wage earner of this country? Did he not advocate with a blindness and a dare dev- eltry only equalled by his present ‘advocacy of Burke The Colored Citizens’ Club at its weekly meeting last Tuesday evening endorsed the Hon. John L. Wil- son for United States senator. In doing so its mem- bers demonstrated that they are for those men, who, to an extent at least, are for them. The actions of the local club onthe part of the Colored Citizens should meet the approval of the 4,000 colored voters of the state and every one of them should vote for senator Wilson. So far as they are concerned, and to be thoroughly consistent with themselves, they have no choice as between the aspirants for the senatorial toga. Their only alternative is to vote for Wilson, even though he may have done nothing directly for them. Miles Poindexter, the insurgent candidate is a Vir- ginia Democrat of the old school, which of itself is sufficient cause for all Negroes to vote against him, but in Congress he voted for a Jim Crow car law for Washington City. The act was defeated, but it was no fault of his. On that measure as in all others he voted with the Democrats. Judge Thomas Burke! Well, he has nothing in the world for a black man to do, if he can possibly find a Japanese that will half way doit. He will say nice things about colored folk and yet never turn his hand over in their interest. It was Johu E, Humphries that boasted of having drawn the Ghent bill that was introduced in the legis- lature of this state, but which died a borning. He should not get a single vote from them. But what has the Hon. John L. Wilson done? you ask. Since the Post-Intelligencer has been under the control of Senator Wilson it has always been fair as to its treatment of Negroes. When Senator Wilson controlled the federal patronage of the state he saw to it that his appointees named a number of colored men for positions in the service. Postmaster George M. Stewart started the ball to rolling by placing a number of colored men in the postoffice, which has gone steadily on until the Seattle postoffice now has more colored employes than of all the other postoffices combined west of the Missouri river. Superintendent Wing followed in his wake by plac- ing George Grose, Milton Roy and Frank Merguson in excellent positions in the assay office. Clarence Ide kept a man at the federal penitentiary the four years he was there, who drew as good a sal- ary as the other employes. The postmaster of Tacoma, Major Hayden, gave two colored men places in that office at the suggestion of Senator Wilson and the postmaster of Spokane named one in his office. Senator Wilson was largely instrumental in the ap- pointment of R. B. Scoot, of Spokane, as Chinese in- spector of Eastern Washington, which position. he held for a number of years. Bayi Be | em ng F BS yw THOMAS BURKE A life long Democrat, who became a Republican to go to the United States Senate to represent the Rail- road and other Corporation Interests. and vilification of John L. Wilson, the free and un- limited coinage of silver? Did he not repeatedly ad- voeate the election of that most dangerous demagogue the United States has ever had, William Jennings Bryan to the presidency? Locally, has he not abused and villified every Republican that has run for office in a manner more shameful than any other newspaper in the United States ever did to a fellow citizen? << ee) | =zZ \) ns} ZENO “24 \ i | INA 7BS JOHN LOCKWOOD WILSOM Candidate for the Republican nomination for United States Senator. He isa Republican without suffixes or affixes, Hundreds of other things, from a colored man’s standpoint, could be cited why they should vote for him in this coming primary election, even though they were thoroughly satified, he would only get their votes. The club will hold its final meeting next Tuesday at the Afro-American Hall, when it will complete its ros- ter of candidates that it will recommend to the colored voters for their suffrage at the primary election. At the polls it will have workers who will distribute ad- visory ballots of its make up. The club hopes to sufficiently concentrate the colored votes so that the vote will be beneficially felt by those in whose inter- est they will cast their ballot. Do the people of this state want the Interests to send one of their paid attorneys to the United States senate? Do you think, if you do, he will represent one thing in which you are interested? Do the common people want to senda man to the United State senate, who has been the local counsel and legal advisor of the railroads for the past twenty years? If you do, do you think he will advocate a sin- gle measure that will stop the railroad magnates from robbing you of your every vested right? Why should Republicans, because a man has money, swing in and elect a life-long Democrat to the highest office in the gift of the voters of the state? When and where did Burke ever declare he was a Republi- can until the day he announced he was a candidate for the United States senate? and he might have added in the common interest of the railroads and in the other interests of the state of Washington in particu- lar and the country in general. if Do the voters of King county and especially those advocating the election of Thomas Burke to the United States senate, believe the voters in the other counties, who on general principles are opposed to electing en Interest man to the senate, will sanction the election of Burke? Do the Burke men of King county not re- alize that Burke is not going to carry a single county in the state and that it will mean the utter defeat of King county having a representative in the senate? Do not let your enthusiasm to elect a man that is a multi-millionaire so completely warp your judgment, Mr. Seattle Voter, as to destroy your city and com- munity, which you will do, if you continue to follow blindly in the wake of Burke’s shining barrel at the behest of one Col. Alden J. Times, whose God is the Almighty Dollar. “T am for Senator Wilson because he has always been willing to share the loves and fishes with the members of my race, and secondly because his newspaper has always been fair to the colored man,’’—I. J. Walker, president of the club. “While in the past I have never been a howling advocate of Senator Wilson, yet I know when in power he never overlooked the black man, and that is more by a thousand times over than can be said of any of the other senatorial candidates.’’— J. E. Hawkins, attorney at law. “Tam an Insurgent in political temperament, but I recognize the fact that Senator Wilson was quite fair to my race, when he was in the senate, andI honor and respect him for that.’’—I. F. Norris, president and manager of the Southern Express Company, “Some time ago I learned from friends and rela- tives that Senator Wilson was as true as steel to his friends and always did what he could to help the black man along and for that reason I am for _ him for senator at this time.’’—Andrew R. Black, attorney at law. ‘While my sympathies are more or less Insurg- ent, yet personally I am for Senator Wilson. Be- ing a black man I cannot consistently be for any one else in the present contest.’’—Rev. J. M. Webb, the evangelist. I am always for the man that is for right on the broad principles of right and justice and from Sen- ator Wilson’s record I feel that he is one of those persons, and, for that reason, I am for him.””— Rev. W. T. Osborne, pastor A, M. E. Church, “The Citizens’ Club has endorsed Senator Wil- son and even if I were not personally for him I ill vote and work for his election because I propose to. re up to the obligations of the club.’’—John F, ‘agwell. “Whatever the club decides to do, whether in the se of Senator Wilson or any one else, every member ereof should live up to the agreement, whether it eets his personal approval or not, being secretary of e club, I mean to support its choice not only for U, Senator, bMt for all of the other offices.’’—John T, iyton. “Tam with the club and will vote for the candi- tes endorsed by it. It is the first time since I have en in Seattle that the colored voters have acted with y degree of unanimity and I propose to help the od work along.’’—P. A. De Bow, editor and publish- of the Searchlight. Charles S. Parker of Spokane sends greeting to e colored yoters of Seattle and adds, the colored cit- ns of Spokane will do as well by Senator Wilson will the colored citizens of Seattle, MURPHY REBUKES GODDARD Was the slap administered to Goddard by Councilman William ning of the end? Was that a from one end of Seattle to the slap that will prove the undoing? Will that slap bring into the po new politicians and perhaps a man will tell, but there are many firmly of the opinion that, all of come to pass. Whatever else may be said there is one thing certain, it can that he is a fool, and if he is well concealed. When, therefore, was getting rich out of the local on in Seattle, he almost knew about or that is the general suv voters. The lay citizen of Seattle recided in his own mind that, then on about the city hall and on a seemed impossible to locate it in Goddard, on a test, may not be anidence sufficient to convict, and a demonstrate that it is going on. tate owner on Third avenue relate he was stung when that thorough but he refused to call any name stung by a city official, "but," well as others, was stung and stung. Whether Councilman Murph doing as a member of the city this newspaper can say. Just who become so incensed at being by the man who called him such more than we can figure out. He been wrong in calling a fellow Was the slap administered to Councilman Albert J. Goddard by Councilman William H. Murphy the beginning of the end? Was that a slap that was heard from one end of Seattle to the other? Was that a slap that will prove the undoing of the city hall ring? Will that slap bring into the political arena of Seattle new politicians and perhaps a new party? Time only will tell, but there are many at this time, who are firmly of the opinion that, all of the above things will come to pass. Whatever else may be said of Albert J. Goddard there is one thing certain, it cannot be truthfully said that he is a fool, and if he is a knave he keeps it well concealed. When, therefore, he said some one was getting rich out of the local improvements going on in Seattle, he almost knew what he was talking about or that is the general supposition among the voters. The lay citizen of Seattle many months ago decided in his own mind that, there was grafting going on about the city hall and on a gigantic scale, but it seemed impossible to locate it and even Councilman Goddard, on a test, may not be able to produce the evidence sufficient to convict, and yet he will be able to demonstrate that it is going on. A prominent real estate owner on Third avenue related to the writer how he was stung when that thoroughfare was regraded, but he refused to call any names or even say he was stung by a city official, "but," he concluded, "I, as well as others, was stung and stung to the quick." Whether Councilman Murphy is guilty of wrong doing as a member of the city council is more than this newspaper can say. Just why, however, he should become so incensed at being branded as a liar, if he the man who called him such was himself a liar, is more than we can figure out. Mr. Goddard may have been wrong in calling a fellow member a liar in the A Husband's Errors of Life as Seen by Him To tell her how to run her club. To bank his money in her name. To expect her to like his female relatives. To forget to praise her. To expect to have the last word. To take her opinions too seriously. To forget that she will change her mind. To let her open his letters. To borrow her umbrella. To get mad because his bed is not tucked in at the foot. To tell her how his mother use to cook. To hesitate to tell her where he is going and where he has been. To work for her so hard that he has no time to devote to her. —Life. A Wife's Errors of Life as Seen by Her To ask a man where he is going when he goes out. To ask him where he has been when he comes back. To tell him what she wold do if she were in his place. To tell him everything and thus reveal her limitations. To ask him to put on her rubbers. To buy bargain neckties. To tell him that he is good looking. To expect to have the last word. To let him know how old she is. to Councilman Albert J. to H. Murphy the begin- slap that was heard the other? Was that a ring of the city hall ring? political arena of Seattle new party? Time only at this time, who are the above things will of Albert J. Goddard cannot be truthfully said a knave he keeps it more, he said some one al improvements going what he was talking supposition among the many months ago de- re was grafting going a gigantic scale, but it and even Councilman able to produce the ev- yet he will be able to A prominent real es- tated to the writer how highfare was regraded, yes or even say he was "he concluded, "I, as ung to the quick." Any is guilty of wrong council is more than why, however, he should granted as a liar, if he was himself a liar, is Mr. Goddard may have member a liar in the COU Who c to take it council c one right was doub ITEMS MORE OR LESS INTERESTING To tell him what her mother says. To allow him to edit her letters. To economize at the expense of her personal appearance. To expect him to like her best friend's husband. —Life. M. FRANK PIERCE For Congress—First District Who is after Humphrey's Reprepresentative Scalp. Mr. Pierce says: "I am not a newspaper candidate nor the candidate of any special or class interest. I insist upon riding my own horse in my own way. The newspapers insist on revising my principles. I will not forego them for their support and find comfort in the fact that they have been arraigned against the people an all vital issues. The Seattle water system issue for instance and have been beaten by the people. "They publish the preposterous effusions from the headquarters of other candidates, but [Name not visible in the image] Who called Councilman Murphy a liar and refused to take it back and was struck by the latter. council chambers; he was, but two wrongs never made one right, and if Mr. Goddard was wrong Mr. Murphy was doubly wrong, and the voters in Seattle are in no COUNCILMAN ALBERT J. GODDARD THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN CUNCILMAN ALBERT J. GODDARD called Councilman Murphy a liar and t back and was struck by the latter chambers; he was, but two wrongs s t, and if Mr. Goddard was wrong M only wrong, and the voters in Seatt E OR LESS I the extravagance of these effusions refute themselves. The latest of these is the possible election of Mr. Humphrey, speaker of Democratic or progressive Republican house. "Compassion is the source of his support—some people know it will break his heart if he should fail to get the salary and perquisites. He is suffering the tortue of the damned in fear of his defeat and loss of campaign expenses. "He knows in his heart he is a sneak and an ingrate to Cannon. His own assertion proves it when he says he has been against Cannon for a year. Can he deny that he has been the recipient of Cannon's favor within the past year? Why did he not vote with the progressives? He adds to his offense of being an coward in that he waits until others repudiate Cannon before he repudiates him. "His consistency is shown when he seeks an alliance with Poindexter." The case in question was a neighborhood quarrel. One side three witnesses, the other seven. The supposedly star witnesses was called to the stand by the lawyer for the accused. The witness was a laboring man of honest appearance, and after the customary questions as to his name, address, occupation and length of residence in the city, the lawyer, who relied on the man's testimony largely to clear the defendant, asked: "Do you know the defendant?" "Yes, sir." "You know of the trouble between Mr. A. here and the defendant?" "Yes, sir." "State to the court just what part of the trouble you saw." "Oh, I did not see any of it," replied the witness. "My wife humor to have one member of the council beat down another member twice his size because the smaller member seems to want to protect the interest of the tax payers. Word comes from Newport that Countess Thamara de Swirsky who gracefully portrays Russian and Slav dances in her bare feet and with but the minium of dress on has been taken up by the Smart Set and is now the latest craze with her class of society would be barefoot women dancers. Some marvel at what society women will "take up," but in defence of these dances it must be admitted that they develop a wonderful amount of grace which makes the possessor attractive for the present and apparently able to even defy the advance of Time. Think of how Ponce de Leone sought for the fountain of immortal youth, how men have marched and women have sighed for youth and grace from time immemorial, and censure not the fair ladies of Newport that they have adopted this new fad which will at least strengthen their bodies regardless of the fact that it exposes their dear little tootsies. The museum of King's College, London, has received quite an addition in the form of the mummy of an Egyptian woman of fashion who lived 7,000 years ago. She was discovered by Professor Naville in his excavations for the Egyptian Exploration Fund. Besides being valuable as a mummy of that age it established the fact that women of the prehistoric age were vain, that they painted their eyes and wore elaborate jewels and stones and hair combs. Strange to say her personal adornments would be the height of fashion today with scarcely the slightest change. One might place this evidence of vanity against the growth of dress reform but looked at on the other side it demonstrates that if mi lady is growing no better along those lines she is certainly growing no worse. saw it all. She was subpoeaned, but she couldn't come, so she sent me." Needless to say, the witness quickly was withdrawn, and if it had not been for the judge's sense of humor, it might have gone ill with the defendant. The judge decided that no damage had been done, except to the feelings of the respective sides, and he dismissed the case. Instead of The Outlook why not call it The Outlet.—Life. Dodging automobiles is a healthful exercise.—Toleda Blade Mr. Bryan holds the records for successful defeats.—St. Paul Dispatch. Really, Taft, wouldn't do so badly if Roosevelt and Aldrich would just let him be President. —Memphis Commercial Appeal. We've had the passing of the mule, the knitting needles, and the candlestick, and we are now about to witness the passing of William J. Bryan. By the time we have a new issue to deal with, at which he might faintly grab, he will doubtless be far away. If a man should confront a citizen in the streets, insult him and call him a liar before witnesses, that man could be arrested and tried before a judge, and yet think of the insulting language which the newspapers and public speechmakers use, knowing there is no redress for the other fellow. So many persons are hunting a good time, forgetful of the fact that such times have to be paid for just like good clothes and good food. Yea, and paid in full as surely as winter, with it's attending expenses follows each summer. THE ALHAMBRA THEATRE The crowd that attended the opening performances of "The Traveling Man," at the Alhambra Theatre last Sunday, was com- FRIDAY September 2, 1910 a member of the council beat down twice his size because the smaller want to protect the interest of the In Newport that Countess Thamara peacefully portrays Russian and Slav set and with but the minium of dress up by the Smart Set and is now with her class of society would be success. Some marvel at what sociie- like up," but in defence of these admitted that they develop a wontace which makes the possessor at-essent and apparently able to even of Time. Think of how Ponce de la fountain of immortal youth, how and women have sighed for youth the immemorial, and censure not the sort that they have adopted this at least strengthen their bodies act that it exposes their dear little King's College, London, has re- tion in the form of the mummy of of fashion who lived 7,000 years covered by Professor Naville in his Egyptian Exploration Fund. Be- le as a mummy of that age it es- sat women of the prehistoric age they painted their eyes and wore stones and hair combs. Strange adornments would be the height with scarcely the slightest change. Its evidence of vanity against the form but looked at on the other that if mi lady is growing no bet- she is certainly growing no worse. posed of the former patrons of the theatre that Russell & Drew controlled down town and an augmented clientele from the upper districts of the city. The theatre was packed at both performances, and it has been filled all week with an enthusiastic audience of people seeking recreation and amusement of the better sort. The play at the Alhambra Theatre this week is an excellent comedy drama, with the best cast that has ever been seen in a like play in Seattle. Mr. William C. Dowlan, the leading man, came in for a big ovation on his first appearance last Sunday, but every member of the troupe was given more than a cordial greeting. All the old favorites of the Russell & Drew Stock were found in "The Traveling Man," and the play seemed to please the audience as much as it is possible for a play to do. The success of the Alhambra Theatre as a popular family theatre is already an assured fact, and the people should congratulate themselves on having such a place of amusement to attend. The theatre is accessible by all street car lines in the city; it is a ground floor theatre, with only one balcony, no gallery and undoubtedly the safest theatre in the Northwest, being absolutely fireproof in every detail. Besides, the prices of admission are within the reach of whole families, and we understand it is the manager's intention to maintain the present scale of prices. Next week, starting Sunday matinee, for the second week of the stock company and Mr. Dowlan's engagement, the play will be "A Girl's Best Friend," a four-act melodrama, by Lillian Mortimer. It is one of the strongest Southern plays that has been offered for a long time. The play was once produced here by Emma Bunting and her original company. Miss Anita Allen will assay the character formerly played by Emma Bunting, and Mr. Dowlan will be seen as Steve Sterling, a young Southern gentleman. Every member of the Russell & Drew Company, old and new, will be in the cast next week, and the scenery will be produced specially for the play. --- FRIDAY September 2, 1910 MINERALS IN WASHINGTON While the combined yield in gold and silver in the state of Washington still continues less than $300,000 in the aggregate, yet the yield in 1907 was somewhat increased over that of 1606. Eight counties of the state yield gold, the most productive of which is Stevens county. In fact this county virtually doubled its product for the year, accounting for the increased yield and making up for losses in other counties. The ore in this county is from quartz mines. The main silver yield comes from the counties of Snohomish, Stevens and Ferry, named in order of output. The tonnage of the mines in the state increased in 1907, but average value per ton was lower in 1908. There are now between fifty and sixty productive mines in the state and several hundred idle ones, though some that have not yet made any yield are in process of development. The mining industry in the state is languishing because of lack of capital and lack of transportation facilities. Numbers of the districts are far from railroad lines and at a distance from smelters, and as much of the ore must be smelted, the mines are idle in consequence. Until railroad transportation is afforded these mines must remain inactive. Some districts, however, which made no yield in 1907 produced in 1908. A few new smelters and some new mills were constructed during 1907. Some concentrating plants have also been put up. At least two districts one in King county and the other in Okanogan county, were in 1907 for the first time furnished with railroad facilities. There are large numbers of known mines in the state which, under present conditions, cannot be made profitable, and until cheaper reduction costs and better transportation facilities are provided little improvement in the mining industry is to be expected. OREGON MINERALS Both quartz and placer mines in Oregon show a decreased yield of gold in 1907, though there is apparently a nominal increase in silver. The largest gold yield continues to come from Baker county, from both quartz and placer mines. The dredging, drift and surface placer mines of the state show some increase in output of gold, though the yield from hydraulic properties was lessened as compared with the previous year. In 1907 there were two dregdgers in operation in Oregon. The decrease in the amount of siliceous ore mined and milled accounts for the falling off of gold yield for the year 1907, although as stated, there was also some loss in placer yield as compared with the year 1906. The milling ores of the state, including the concentrates, averaged $7.33 per ton, gold, and 47 cents silver, per ton. The larger proportion of the silver was derived from the siliceous ores of Baker county, there being very little of this metal obtained in those ores. The water season in Oregon in 1907 was a poor one, and numbers of mines were idle which were formerly productive. There are upward of 200 productive mines of various classes in the state and, although 14 counties show a mineral yield, over half of the whole output was from Baker county. This county increased its tonnage of ores, and its placer yield was also much larger than in 1906. Some of the larger properties, like the United Elkhorn and the Uureka and Excelsior mines, were entirely idle in 1907. A new mill and concentrator are being built at Sparta, and there ia now a large concentrating mill at Quartzburg in Grant County. In the same county a large cyanide plant has been finished. An electric power plant to furnish several mines has been installed at Sanger. In addition to the producing in Oregon there are some which, while nonproductive, are in process of development, but the numbers of idle mines continues to be quite large. Most of these are held by annual assessment work only, awaiting the advent of capital to assist in their development. A few placers are being worked on the ocean beaches of the state, but the gold yield from this source is small. PHILLIPHINE ISLANDS The Phillipine Islands figured in the gold production of the United States, Territories, and dependencies for the first time in this year's report. The amount of gold recovered during the possession of the islands by the United States up to 1907 was too small to attract any special attention; but this year the result of investigation and development work of the mining sections of the islands, which had been going on for some time previous, began to show itself in a yield of over $64,000. The Islands have been producers of gold for many years, old government records showing that in the seventeenth century there was an annual output of $200,000 for a time. The greater part of this gold was recovered from lodes, which are thought to have been worked only a little below the water level. A correspondent of the London Mining Journal, dated August 23, 1908, says that these old workings can be traced for miles in the vicinity of Mambualo. According to this same authority, the greatest development in gold production in the islands will ensue through the introduction of the dredge system of mining. Reports have been published that there is a large section of ideal dredging ground on and adjacent to the Paracale River, and that one dredge at work on this river in the month of July, 1908, extracted 470 ounces of gold. The introduction of several dredges is contemplated, the ground having been tested and surveyed with this end in view. One company alone, having an option of 3,000 acres, will install ten dredgers if the tests of the ground prove satisfactory. The bedrock is said to consist of a soft, decomposed gneiss. The Paracale district is on the eastern coast of the island of Luzon, and is estimated to be something like 5 miles wide and 10 miles long. If Cannon is a blessing in disguise Kansas regards the disguise as perfect. —Chicago News. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ANTI-CANNON CANDIDATE For Congress KING, SNOHOMISH, SKAGIT, WHATCOM, SAN JAUN ISLAND AND KITSAP COUNTIES Subject to Republican Primaries Sep. 13, 1910 --- 6 State of Washington, in and for King County. Arthur W. Finch, plaintiff, vs. Francis Finch, defendant.—No. — Summons The State of Washington to the said Francis Finch, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 2nd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of answer paper upon the designated attorneys; plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to secure a decree of divorce, dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of desertion and abandonment. HOLZHEIMER, HERALD & HOLZ- Attorneys for plaintiff. 427-28-29 Lumber Exchange Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, September 2nd, 1910. Sept. 2, Oct. 15, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Goldie Skentzr, Plaintiff, vs. Samuel Skentzr, Defendant.—No. —. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to Samuel Skentzr, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 12th day of August, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at issue, stated, and of ease of your failure so no judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint herein, a copy of which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of said action as set forth in the complaint is to obtain a decree dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant upon the ground of neglect and failure of the defendant to support plaintiff. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office adn Postoffice Address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, August 12, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Oklahoma, in the County of Kingston, Proofsah. In the Matter of the Estate of Elizabeth George, Deceased.—No. 10233. Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause. Why Distribution Should Be Made. Mr. Frank Wood, administrator of the estate of Elizabeth George, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the resided estate by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. In probate. of King. In probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Maggie Loerke, Deceased.—No. 10481. Order to Show Cause on Sale of Real Estate. Milo A. Root, the administrator of the estate of Maggie Loerke, deceased, having died a petition in his court, duly filing for an order of this Court for the sale of all the real estate of which the said deceased died selzed, for the purposes therein set forth; And it appearing to the Court from said petition that the personal estate of the said deceased in the hands of said administrator is not sufficient to pay the claims against the said estate and the expenses of the administration thereof, and that it is necessary to sell all or a portion of the real estate of the said deceased to pay the said claims and expenses of the said petition. And appearance of the Court that said petition conforms to, and is in accordance with the requirements of law in such case made and provided. It is ordered by the Court that all persons interested in the estate of the said deceased appear before said Superior Court on the 20th day of September, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day at the court room of the Probate Department of old Superior Court, in the city of Seattle, in said King County, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of the Court should not be imposed to said administrator authorizing and empowering him to sell the said real estate of said deceased, or so much thereof as may be necessary to pay the aforesaid claims and expenses of administration. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before the said 20th day of September, 1910, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and issued by the House of King, and of general circulation therein. Done in open Court this 18th day of August, 1910. BOYD J. TALLMAN. State of Washington, County of King, ss, I, D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 18th day of August. In the matter of the estate of Maggie Loerk, deceased. D. K. SICKELS, Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 18th day of August, 1910. (Seal) D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. MILO A. ROOT, Administrator. 631-2 N. Y. Block, Seattle, Wash. Aug. 19—Sept. 16, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, F. H. Harkins, plaintiff, vs. Elizabeth Brunner, Benedict Brunner, her husband, James McNamara, William E. Holmes, doing business under the name of the Heating Co., H. C. Keller, doing business as Keller & Sons, and the American Luxer Prism Co., defendants.—No. 75397. Summons by publication. The State of Washington to the said defendant, Elizabeth Brunner, Benedict Brunner, her husband, and the American Luxer Prism Company, a sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Elizabeth George, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 10th day of September, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be made a notice of death made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and, for one month, for four months, executive weeks before the said 10th day of September, 1910, in the Seattle Republic, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 9th day of August, 1910. WILSON R. GAY, Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss. I, D. K. Sickles, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify, in the name of the County and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 9th day of August, 1910, in the matter of the estate of Elizabeth George, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said County is 9th day of August, 1910. (SEA1) D. K. SICKLES Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS. Deputy Clerk. Aug. 12—Sept. 9, 1910. REPUBLICAN Aug 10 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants—No. 74885. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You, and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of four years. In the following amount, and upon the real property situ- ated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Davis' Improved Addition to the City of Seattle, Lot 2, Block 2, Certificate No. B55369, year 1906, amount $0.79. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property do well. Lot 2, Block 2, Davis' Improved Addition to the City of Seattle, $1.07, for year 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby corporation: You, and each of you, are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait within sixty days after the second day of September 10, 2010, and be bound to action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the conditions contained in which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of said action is to recover a judgment against the said Elizabeth Brunner and Benedict Brunner, her husband, for the sum of Fifteen Hundred Dollars, together with interest thereon at the rate of seven per cent per annum from the 23rd day of October, 1907, less the sum of Fifty-four ($54.00) Dollars paid on good interest, and interest on deferred interest installments at the rate of ten per cent dollars; also the sum of sixteen dollars for insurance paid by plaintiff and the sum of $170.00 attorney's fee and costs and disbursements herein and to foreclose that certain mortgage given by the defendants, Elizabeth Brunner and Benedict Brunner, on the 23rd day of October, 1907, to Osner & Mehlhorn, Inc., to secure said amount upon lot 6, block 3, Market Street. Addition to the city of Seattle, the city of Washington and to depreciate all right, claim or utility of redemption of each and all of said defendants in and to said property. Said mortgage was recorded on the 23rd day of October, 1907, in Vol. 330 of mortgages, page 566, of the records in the auditor's office of said King County. The said mortgage, and the sum sequestered was on the 21th day of October, 1907, duly assigned, in writing, to said plaintiff. EDWARD VAN TOBEL. Attorney for plaintiff. Office and post office address, rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 2. Oct. 15. 1910. NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL ESTE BY the Treasurer of the City of Seattle, King County, Washington. You are hereby notified that the undersigned, L. H. Craver, is the owner and holder of one certain certificate of purchase, No. 934, on Lot 17, Block 2, of Columbia Terrace Addition, in said City, issued by the Treasurer of the said City on August 21st, 1908, for the sum of Seventeen and 30-100 Dollars ($17.30) under ordinance of the said City of Seattle, No. 13320. Said Certificate of purchase was recorded in the office of the Auditor of King County, Washington, on Nov. 9th, 1908, and the undersigned paid the said City's auditor fees therefor in the sum of $1.00. That since the said Auditor 21st, 1908, the undersigned has paid other taxes and assessments on said land as follows, tow: on October 26, 1908, the sum of $9.28 and May 12, 1910, the sum of $144.03. And you, the said Patrick O'Connor, are hereby further notified that at the expiration of Sixty days after the date of the first publication of this notice, he must cast his notice to wit: sixty days after August 26th, 1910, the said L. H. Craver will demand of the said Treasurer of the said City of Seattle, that he execute and deliver to him a deed to the said real property and unless you, the said Patrick O'Connor, receive a deed by paying to the said Treasurer the sums herebefore mentioned with in- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after August 12, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and the court, and comply with the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, owing, upon sale, parcel of parcel of property for satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. AURORA LAND CO., a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for, Plaintiff, Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg, Aug. 12—Sept. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming to have an interest in and to tape heiherafter described real Property, Defendants.—No. —, Notice and Summons. State of Washington. To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, have been notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, tow- ing. Davis' Improved Addition to the City of Seattle, Lot 28, Block 1, Certificate No. B55367, year 1906, amount $0.76. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 28, Block 1, Davis' Improved Addition to the City of Seattle, $1.07, for year 1907. Each several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, eiuscula, of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after August 12, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below said property and in another with interest, and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each for sale taxes, interest and cost, including said tax, and cel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found terest thereon at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said dates of payment, to the measurer who make and deliver to the undersigned a deed to the said property. Office and P. O. Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., P. E. Wash. (William) 6. 1910. State of Washington, for King County. Wyman, Partridge & Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. James Fitzgerald and Jula Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, defendants. No. 74735. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said James Fitzgerald and Jula Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 2nd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint by your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court, the object of the complaint is to recover a judgment against said defendants upon a claim by plaintiff for goods, warees and merchandise sold and delivered to said defendants by said plintiff in the sum of Two Thousand One Hundred Twenty-seven and 10-100 Dollars ($2,127.10), with interest thereon in the payday of the day the costs of suit, and in which said action an attachment has been taken out and levied. LEOPOLD M. STERN, and J. M. RUSSELL, Attorneys for plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 705 Low- man Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 2. Oct. 15. 1910. IN JUSTICES'S COURT. Before R. R. George Justice of the Peace, R. and H. Patrick Kenneth, K.C. Kenneth County State of Washington F. H. Hur, doing business as F. H. Hurd & Co., Plaintiff, vs. A. S. Graham and Jane Doe Graham, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, Defendant—No, 20223-4. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King, ss. The State of Washington, A. S. Graham and Jane Doe Graham, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown: You, and each of you, are hereby notified that F. H. Hurd, doing business as F. H. Hurd, does a complaint against you in said Court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 12th day of September, A. D. 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said plaintiff is to recover $65.65, a balance due for goods, wares and merchandise by the plaintiff herein; that a garnishment has been issued out of this cause against the Mutual Adjustment Co., and said Mutual Adjustment Co. answered against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. AURORA LAND CO., a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER Attorney for Plaintiff, Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. Aug. 12—Sept. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. ——. Notice and Sum- mary. State of Washington: To the above def- endants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the one certain delinquent tax is held for the sued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, towit: Davis' Improved Addition to the City of Seattle, Lot 25, Block 1, Certificate No. B55364, year 1906, amount $0.92. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 25, Block 1, Davis' Improved Addition to the City of Seattle, $1.43, for year 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the indeemed taxes upon and amount said realised? You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- vide of the day of said first publication, to-wit, with sixty days after August 12, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at this office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, to the court, so that the agreement will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfactory of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. AURORA LAND CO., a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. L. CARVER Attorney for Plaintiff, Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. Aug. 12—Sept. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, In the Matter of the Person and Estate of Evelyn E. Duckering, a Minor— No. _____ Order. The guardian of the person and estate of the above minor having filed his petition herein, asking for authority to sell at private sale the undivided one-eighth $14.75 due and owing to the defendant. Filed August 6, A. D. 1910. R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Aug. 12-Sept. 23. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Thomas D. Cain, Plaintiff, vs. Mary A. Good Cain, Defendant—No. 75405. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Mary A. Good Cain, defendant: Calm, derendant: You are hereby nominated to appear within sixty days after the day of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 19th day of August, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to do so, judgment will be rendered against according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to disqualify you from the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the ground of your abandonment of plaintiff for ten years last past. J. P. BALL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office and Office address: 201-203 Burke Bldg., Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Edith Rash, Plaintiff, vs. John F. Rash, Defendant. No. 75369. Summons by Publication. State of Washington to the said John F. Rash, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of August, 1910, in the above entitled action, in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought for the purpose of obtaining a decree of divorce from the said defendant on the grounds of abandonment, non-support and personal indignities, the same being causes action specified in the laws of Washington for such services of summons by publication may be made. PARKER & BROWN. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: Room 25 Union Block, 713 1st Ave., Seattle, Washington. August 26—Oct. 6, 1910. tion, to-wit: within 60 days after Aug. 19, 1910, in the above entitled court Jos. T. Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1888. Commercial Savings and Trust General Financial Manager Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash. RIDAY August 26, 1910 interest of the minor herein in and to the property hereinafter described; it is therefore Ordered, that all persons interested therein appear at the hour of 9:30 A. M. on the 9th day of September, 1910, before the Honorable R. H. Lindsay, Court Commissioner, at the King County Court House, in the King county, Washington, to show cause why said order should not be made. A copy of this order shall be published for at least four (4) successive weeks prior to said date, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in Seattle, King County, Washington. The real property involved herein, in which said minor has an undivided one-eighth interest is described as follows: Lots nine (9), ten (10), eleven (11) and twelve (12), of block two (2), of Bloom's Subdivision of Ayres Addition to Olympia, Washington. The east one-half (EI$_2$) of lots one (1) and two (2), of block three (3), of Henderson & Lyberger's Subdivision of block fourteen (14), of Ayres' Addition to Olympia, Washington. The northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of the NI$_2$ section twenty-six (26), township eighteen (18), north, of range one (1) west of the Willamette Meridian. Also a tract of land, being part of D. R. Bigelow's Donation Claim No. 39, in township eighteen (18) north, of range two west of the Willamette Meridian, more particularly described as follows, to-wit: Commencing one hundred and eleighty (180) feet west and one hundred fifty-four and five-tenths (154.5) feet north the northeast corner of land sold to Wesleyan University (132%) in Volume 22 of Deeds, page 91, records of Michigan County, Washington; thence north sixty (60) feet; thence east three hundred eighty-three and three-fourths (383¾) feet; thence south one hundred twenty-four and five-tenths (124.5) feet; thence west one hundred seventy-three and three-fourths (383¾) feet; thence north four and five tenths (4.5) feet; thence west sixty (60) feet; thence north sixty (60) feet; thence west one hundred fifty (150) feet to point of commencement. Done in open court, this 2d day of August, 1910. WILSON R. GAY, Judge. Aug. 12—Sept. 9, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, In the Matter of the Estate of Sarah E. T. Mitchell, Deceased.—No. 11,020. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 8th day of August, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons holding claims against said deceased on against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchsafed to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 314 Northern Bank & Trust Building, Seattle, Wash., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, 12th day of August, 1910. ELLIJAH B. MITCHELL, As Administrator of said Estate. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Estate, 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Aug. 12—Sept. 9, 1910. REMOVAL NOTICE The Light and Power department of the Seattle Electric Company has moved to the Electric Bldg., Seventh avenue and Pine street. Street car tickets can be purchased and all bills paid in the Electrical Sales Room at the old location 907 FIRST AVENUE THE SEATTLE ELECTRIC CO A Free Trip to Seattle and Return. Let's Bust the State Dental Trust. Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar and you will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established at 713 First Ave., in the Union Block, Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar. I make a dollar and the State Monopoly will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established at 713 First Ave., in the Union Block, for 18 years. Do not compete with cheap dentists, but with the high-class dentists for half their price. Open evenings until 8 and Sundays until 4 for people who work. EDWIN J. BROWN, D.D.S. 713 First Avenue Seattle, Wash. Read my article in Sunday's P.-I. and Monday's Times and Star. Rainier PALE BEER PHONE SIDNEY 526 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Florence H. Lutz, Deceased. No. 11821. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 9th day of August, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said deceased and husband to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executor of said estate, at 1211 American Bank Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, said countyman dated within one year from said after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. 1211 Attorney for Estate. Seattle, Wn. August 26—Sept. 23, 1910. FRIDAY September 2, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County.—Georgia, Cramblet, Plaintiff, vs. Edward Cramblet, Defendant. No. 74982. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Edward Cramblet. Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the 29th day of July, this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 29th day of July, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the case, under the order of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce on the ground of your failure and neglect to support your claim in the case to the commencement of this action, and for a restoration of the maiden name of plaintiff. HOWARD O. DURK, Plaintiff's Attorney, P. O. Address: 535 Henry Building, Se uttle, King County, Washington. N.J. NOTICE TO STOCKHOLDERS OF CANNEL COAL CO. To the creditors and stockholders of the Cannel Coal Company, of Washington, a corporation: You, and each of you will please take notice that on a Saturday, the 17th day of September, 1910, at the office of said company, No. 314 Colman Building, in the City of Seattle, Washington, at the hour of 1000 o'clock p. m., or as soon as as soon as possible, be taken up there will be held a meeting of the Cannel Coal Company, of Washington, for the object and purpose of reducing the capital stock of said Cannel Coal Company, of Washington, a corporation, from Five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00), which is its present capitalization, to the amount of Two hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($250,000). You are hereby notified to be present at such meeting and to cast your vote upon said subject and to present such objections as you may have, to any such reduction of capital stock aforesaid. Dated at Seattle, King County, Washington, this 29th day of July, 1910. Majority of Board of rTustees of Cannel Coal Co., Washington, July 29—Sept. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County: James B. Andrews, Plaintiff, vs. Lucy A. Andrews, Defendant. No. 74956, Summons—State of Washington to the said Lucy A. Andrews, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 23th day of July, 1900, in the above entitled action the inability of the plaintiff, court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said complaint, which has been filled with the clerk of said court. This action is brought for the purpose of obtaining the defendant on the grounds of cruelty and personal indignities, and that the parties cannot live together. PARKER & BROWN. Orfice and Postoffice address: Room 25 Union Block, 713 First Ave., Seattle Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King,—Emma Amelia McCandish, Plaintiff, vs. Robert J. McCandish, Defendant. No. ..... Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Robe Amelia McCandish, and You hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the appear of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 29th day of July, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff by timely and sound evidence upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be renedered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court by timely and sound evidence of the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows. To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the demand of plaintiff for more than one year, and also your failure to make suitable provisions for plaintiff for more than one year. Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice and Office Address: 201-203 Burke Bldg., Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. July 29th, Sept. 9, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75109. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of March, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, the following amount, along with the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, owait: Hillman's Meadow Garden Add. Div. NY 10210-85553, year 1907, amount 87 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 2 Block 44, Hillman's Meadow Garden A, Apt. Dv. No. 4, amount, $1.87, for year 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons if any) are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after August, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend plaintiff upon answer the court of said plaintiff and answer the copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged by the court, defining it treasuratively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CRAVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: Northern Bank & Trust Company Bldg. August 19, September 30, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. H. C. Bryson, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the helochafter described real property Defendants.—No. 75301. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above delinquent tax is the holder of the certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of November, 1908, and numbered B54, 892, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of 99 cents, and upon the real property situated in King County, described as follows, to-wit: LOLA BM MICHAEL HEIGHTS. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907 the sum of 60 cents. For the year 1908 the sum of 37 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from sailed and unredeemed taxes are on the impaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after August 19, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend the action and answer the summoning of said bailiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a slae of each parcel of said property of the satisfiers of the charges and charge and insist it respectively provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on now in this cause and court. Office address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. August 19—Sept. 30, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Knut Olaus Anderson and Bernard Halseth, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in land to the heir-in-law described real property, Defendants. No. 75304. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named delinquent tax is the holder of the delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 23d day of August, 1907, and numbered B48582, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1905 in the amount of $1.68, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows: West 260 feet of N. B. 5, E. W. M. ¼ of Sec. 13, Twp. 22, N. B. 5, E. W. M. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1906 the sum of $1.16. For the year 1907 the sum of $1.86. For the year 1908 the sum of $2.80. Which several sums have been incurred at the date of 5 per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid an dunredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after Aug. 19, 1940, move entitled to action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together wit interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, or sold upon interest and losses, or sold a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Aug. 19—Sept. 30, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Antone Kaas, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in the property described in the real property, Defendants. No. 75305. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby authorized to the one and only plaintiff the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of November, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in King County, described as follows, to-wit: West 260 feet of $ \frac{1}{2} $ of $ \frac{1}{2} $ of NE $ \frac{1}{2} $ of SE $ \frac{1}{2} $ Sec. 4, T21. N., R 4 E. W. M., certificate number B54644, year 1906, amount $ 1.23 $ . That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN sts. Amount $140 for year 1907; 76 cents will for year 1908. den Which several sums bear interest at ch, the rate of 15 per cent per annum from er-sal date, payment, and are all the impaid and foreminded taxes upon and ms against sald real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub-lyplication, to-wit: within sixty days Aug. 19, 1940. In the above entitled court answer; and an order to answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon the complaint against for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. Office Address: 624 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. August 19, September 30, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. H. C. Bryson, and all persons unknown, if any, having an interest in the property the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75306. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of November, 1908, and numbered B54991, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of 99 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 9, Block 10, Manhattan Heights Addition. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property to-wit: the year 1907, the sum of 60 cents; for the year 1908 the sum of 87 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from salt paid of payment, and are all the capital of taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- Julylication, to-wit: within sixty days Aug. 19, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and the charges of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the charged and bound against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Frank Renick, Anna Farmer and Hanna Farmer, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property. Defendants. No. 74379. Notice and Shipments. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, Day of Washington, day of the 19th day of October 1908, and numbered B54379, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.02, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, towit: $1/2 of NE¼ of SW¼ of SW¼ of NW¼ of Sec. 29 Tp. 24, N. R. 6 E., WW. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the su mof $1.78; for the year 1908, the sum of $1.24. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown and any), are hereby free from any charge, and are paid and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub-lylution, to-wit: within sixty days Aug. 19, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the deedignigature form, for plaintiff at his office how rated, or the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff A. C. MAC DONALD. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. J. A. Musgrove and James Musgrove, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75302. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of October, 1908, and numbered B54882 for the delinquent taxes of the King County in 1908, tax $3.54, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 6, Sec. 4, Tp: 21 N., R. 7 E., W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $2.96; for the year 1908, the sum of $6.08. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from sale of payment, and are all the amount paid deemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub-lylication, to-wit: within sixty days Aug. 19, 1910, in the above entitled court and obtain in the name of the answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property, for the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. August 19, September 30, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Caroline L. Burns, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.—No. 75301. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 2nd day of September, 1909, and numbered B61042, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of $4.86, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 5, Sec. 23, Tp. 22, N. R. 6 E. W. M. Right-of-Way C., M. & St. P. Rv. Co. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1906, the sum of $2.11; for the year 1908, the sum of $0.79. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from sale of the sums paid are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, on or after August 19, 1910, in the above entitled court, action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. A. C. MAC DONALD Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Jos, Allen, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75300. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of November, 1908, and numbered B54857, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.45, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, towit. Lot 12, Block 5, Allentown Addition. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $4.57; for the year 1908, the sum of $1.76. Which sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- Julylication, to-wit: within sixty days Aug. 19, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the court finding of said plaintif and underwrite a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the charged and against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. 1 A. C. M. C. DONALD. August 19, September 30, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. E. Kloydvig, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75299. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of November, 1908, and numbered B54871, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.21, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, tow- lot 2, Block 2, Hillman City, Division 1. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $1.78; for the year 1908, the sum of $5.15. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from salt rate of payment, and are all the taxes imposed on taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, or on the day of said first publication, to town hall, the office after Aug. 19, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judging with care proceed herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this公司之 Court. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. August 19, September 30, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in County of King. In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Jennie M French, deceased.—No, 10432. The Seattle Trust and Title Company, administrator of the estate of Jennie M. French, deceased, having filed in this court its final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient toize a distribution of the residue of said estate. It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Jennie M. French, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle on the 30th day of September, 1910, at the hour of 10 o'clock a.m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final order could be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 30th day of September, 1910, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 27th day of August, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, C. C. Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss: D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, to the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court on the 27th day of August, 1910. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 27th day of August, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, John Peterson, plaintiff, vs. Harry Laban, demand—Summons by publication. No. The State of Washington to said defendant Harry Laban: You are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the second day of September 20, and defend the above entitled action against the above court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you in the courts of the complaint herein which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of said action is to recover judgment against the said defendant for the sum of $199.65 and interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the 55th day of July 1900 the sum of $5.53 taxes paid by plaintiff attorney's fee and costs and disbursements herein and to foreclose that certain mortgage given by the said defendant to one Sidney H. Brown and by the salt Sidney H. Brown duly assigned, in writing, on lots 45 and 46, each amount, upon lots 45 and 46, each West Seattle Land & Improvement Company's Fourth Plat, King County, Washington, and to foreclose all right, claim or equity of redemption of said defendant in and to said property. Said in writing, on account on June 7th, 1909, in Vol. 468 of mortgage page 97 of the record of mortgages in the auditor's office of King County, Washington. EDWARD VAN TOBEL Office and postoffice address, rooms 305-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. Sept. 2. Oct. 15. 1910. eee OO ————————— OT ) ; ; ) ) i ) ) ) : ; ) ) ) ATTORNEYS, ATTENTION! _ Tse Szarrie Repustican is looking for your legal pub- lications, and if you are looking for your own business inter- ests you will see to it that no publication is sent from youn office without first talking with Cayton about it. It is an indisputable fact that there are but two weekly publications im Seattle that publish lawyers’ legal notices and give the lawyers no trouble on account of errors and prompt ‘‘retwrns’’ of publishers’ affidavits, and Tux Szartuxn Repusiican takes cases that he has not the time to look the paper over every the lead. In this day of busy, bustling activity, the lawyer’s time is so much absorbed in the preparation of his voluminous week to see if his notices are being regularly published, nor to read over his notices to see if they are absolutely correct. It often happens that even lawyers make errors in getting or calls the lawyer’s attention to them before going to press up their notices for publication, which errors are very annoy- ing to the lawyers if not detected and corrected before going into the paper. If, therefore, the lawyer feels absolutely cer- tain that the publisher gives his personal attention to notices sent to his paper and either corrects small errors in notices it’s a great relief to his mind. The publisher of Tue Suarritz Repustican has had so much experience with legal publica- tions that he can detect a faulty publication almost as readily as the lawyer himself, and, if not a grievous one, corrects tb then and there, but if a grievous one, the lawyer's attention is called to the same before going to press. Returns on pub- lications are promptly made, so that lawyers do not have to worry about the publisher’s notice after his case has been called in court. Of course Tae Sxarruz Repvustican is reliable, and read- able as well, for it has been published for exactly sixteen years without having lost an issue or at any time over two days late. It will require no great amount of reasoning to prove to you that it is readable, and one of the proofs is that many of the subscribers to Tum Searriz Rupusiican today have been subscribers almost ever since the paper was first issued, May 19, 1894. Tue Sxarriz Repusiican is quoted more by other publications throughout the state than any other weekly paper published in the state, and its political prognostications more often discussed by the politicians than those of any weekly paper in the state. Tur Szarrie Rerusiican has no hesitancy in saying that from the standpoint of readableness Tux Szarriz Repusrican has made good. CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY 307 Epler Block Phone Main 305 Seattle - - Washington ie 2 oe - ae a Cee oe ae ie ee ak he Cee ee a ae Ps See eas oe an ened AM Goran a sh etal i tel Cetera Og oe hee Pe es oy ise Bat ganar Se ae she ae tela THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Fou on ted ae [ ey oe Pe k oe ie a ee: aie, a pny ie : es oe Sele te FRIDAY September 2, 1910 oe eee Seeks . Oe ae oe pAaENe eae oe uae pens yet parties a ae ae oe aa ee veg oe ia eae oF an te ee ae oe aera ee eet ee ee ee eo ON oe ake Fe ae Bim te Oe ee aes aan ey Sea De ae. aera onesies eo cs Edie eet Re aes: Tnealiaaky ie eae RE Be a one eet os re eR a ie ee Sag Rare faa Brea: see se ie a ee Dae ae ee oe oe ae siccaine 2 agen Acie: aa at en ee mae eG ata eee es Pg a ee = aoe i ae 7 ele ee fia er: ney aS aes se Oe ee a ee Hs s eahines: ae i a es oes Ane ae eae Si ea see a th, ag aia Se aleve ay Nes es ee eee aa ae lk ao ey Toes re ris, Sa ee o nee, ee ee cnet Ie “ Ce eee fae a ee SCH Sra Bealee gets Resta sea abs os Gael hts eae ee bee ie ae oe Sy eS HG ern sae Sie Roa is cee pie Osea ae ae See eo eat eRe oie ae Je ee es ase ee ee ee ete Sears hele an ae ee me Ga ons oe ae ee ae Sek ea ae: ree ere ve Bote vi cp ae ee aie ee ae a Lee ee as oe oe - oe oe ee oes eee ee _ oe aaa a es ge Kee ue SA ys i ei ee Vie ai = i) a ee ees ne eh Bee yee are OEE eee)! ce oe eae Cree. We pea pes “Soe vine casoe a eee ie en ane Bye Pegi: eager os eee Set Oo ena Se ane Se die : oe, a ee Aah ae a oars et Steet te oe oe oe . et Hoe Bian ¥ ln: ae RES oe ce Pel Mea es eee Sour sa ees pee bacropec lees a US te ae ees 2 Lae a ety eure ae ee ic eek on es Beth Be a ie aes pies pa Se Magee t uence ee EA ae cae: ole ae: Pa nessenten! Poe Ai Seattle fe Re orn tae ete Pe ore OPENS ee oe ee Ce Sa eee ee oe ee Lees oo ee oe oe Pi cea ale ae oh © ee ea oe ee Se RTE ce es RES ees Pe ee eee eee per, eee nes ieee ce ene ee ‘er ie ‘Secenees ee ee ee eae SE Seay eee ee pe aN) Peano See Sie Se cA alt ici eas Bae Ween eee ate ane ome re i ee ei aene ae