Seattle Republican

State Library THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE PUBLISHER'S NOTICE. The Seattle Republican is published on Friday of every week by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3.00 per year; six months, $1.50—postage prepaid. Subscriptions to all foreign countries included in the Postal Union, $4.00 a year, postage paid. Sample copies, free. Single copies ten cents. Advertising rates made known on application. Special rates to publishers. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. Address all communications to The Seattle Republican, 307 Epier Block, Seattle, Washington. Make all checks, drafts, postal orders, etc., payable to "Cayton Publishing Company." CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. Telephone: Main 305. Publication office, 307 Epler Block. HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON - - - Publisher SUSIE REVELS CAYTON - - - Associate ELECT MILES POINDEXTER Republicans of the state of Washington, who are advocating the election of George Fletcher Cotterill or some other Democratic candidate to the United States senate, in case the next legislature is Republican, rather than the election of Miles Poindexter, the regular nominee for the United States senate, are advocating the total annihilation of the Republican party in this state and thereby cutting off their noses to spite their faces. Whether Mr. Poindexter is the kind of Republican that you and I desire elevated to such an exalted political position it is not ours wholly to say. He has been made the party choice for senator by an overwhelming majority of the voters of the state of Washington and it can be said without fear of successful contradiction that he has been named for senator by even a majority of the Republican voters. Mr. Poindexter received something like 58,000 votes in the late primary election, and grant some 20,000 Democrats voted for him, that would leave him 38,000 Republican votes and add the votes the other Republican candidates received to those received by Poindexter and you will find that Poindexter received a majority of the Republican votes cast in the late primary election, and whatever a majority of the voters of a party express a desire to have, it is the duty of the representatives of that party to act accordingly. The primary election law has made it possible for partisans to settle their differences within the party and if we are to continue as partisans it is the unqualified duty of each and every voter in the party to stay by the choice of the party. It is wrong for Democrats to participate in the selection of Republican candidates for nomination and that should be remedied if such a thing be possible, but when you are convinced that your party choice has won out and won even if no Democrats had have voted for him, then it is the duty of all to be good loosers and stay by the man. Miles Poindexter not only carried the other counties of the state, but he bearded the Seattle spirit in its den and won King county over Burke by nearly 7,000 majority and received a majority over all of nearly 6,000. The Republican, who argues that the Democratic vote did all that, is too silly to roam at large. It is the duty of every Republican member of the next legislature to vote for the election of Miles Poindexter for United States senator and, if the legislature be Republiban, see to it that he is elected without a dissenting vote. If the members of the next legislature do their duty as to voting for United States senators the Republicans will vote for Miles Poindexter and the Democrats will vote for George F. Cotterill. They will not be men if they do otherwise. NON PARTISAN JUDICIARY Whether or not the non-partisan supreme court judiciary nominated by the Insurgents and endorsed by the Democrats would prove a whit bit better than those selected by the late Republican convention on the supreme bench of this state is a question for each voter to ask himself and for him to answer the same for his own satisfaction, but the non-partisan stamp placed upon them makes the thing sound a whole lot better. We believe the courts should be absolutely divorced from partisan politics, but even with that we SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 1910 are not ready to admit that in order to get a non-partisan judiciary that it is necessary to nominate so many Republicans and so many Democrats. A non-partisan judiciary from our view point simply means a judiciary selected without defining the former political affiliations of the candidates and selected at a time when partisan candidates are not being selected. Some of the nominees of the Republican party for the supreme bench, yea, a majority of them, are ideal men and should be elected almost without a dissenting vote and yet two of them should be whipped to a frazzle and driven from the bench, and The Seattle Republican will do all it can to bring it about. The non-partisan nominees for the supreme bench are: Charles E. Shepard, Seattle; William Hickman Moore, Seattle; Warren O. Tallman, Spokane; P. M. Troy, Olympia; Judge Grimshaw, Conconully. Republicans nominees: Mark A. Fullerton, Colfax; Frank H. Rudkins, North Yakima; Max F. Gose, Pomroy; George E. Morris, Seattle; J. N. Parker, Tacoma. CARSON GOT HIS TOO Prior to the late primaries in advocating the nomination of Claude C. Ramsey for state senator from the thirty-fourth district along with many other things THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN said in behalf of Ramsey's selection, "If Ramsey is nominated and elected to the senate he will be in his seat at every roll call and will be able to vote intelligently on every subject that comes up." Senator Piper took exceptions to the statement for some unexplainable reason and proceeded to administer a tirade of abuse upon the editor hereof, and went so far as to declare that the paper had intimated, without calling any names that he. Piper, was not at roll calls, and when he was in his seat, he was so drunk that he could not vote intelligently on the subjects that came up for disposal, when in fact nothing of the kind was said, but perhaps the old, old story of "a guilty conscience needs no accuser" preyed upon his mind. So incensed did Senator Piper become over it that he induced one Carson to assault the editor hereof and he, like Piper, got more than he bargained for and his friends were obliged to pull the editor off of his carcass. WHY WAS HE INCENSED? Speaking about the above rather disgraceful episode after it had been related by an eye witness, H. C. Pigott told a story that made the other fellows smile pretty broadly even though it may have had no bearing on the controversy in question: "A few days ago I read of a German policeman that overheard two fellow countrymen talking and one used the vile term, 'son of —— of somebody, whose name the policeman did not catch, but the officer at once arrested the man and charged him with cursing the emperor. The man protested, but to no avail he was compelled to go to court. In court, he again protested his innocence and when the court asked the officer to explain, he said: "I heard him use the term and I knew there was no other s. b. in the empire except the emperor and that is why I arrested him.'' If the shoe did not fit the Hon. George U. Piper, why did he wear it? The wicked flee when no man pursueth. But without beating round the bush it is most remarkable that the voters of even the district that Senator Piper has represented in the legislature would re-nominate him and perhaps re-elect him in the face of the record he has made in the senate. It is safe to say that he was absent from roll calls more than any other legislator that did not go home before the session was over. Even when he managed to get to roll calls he got excused a few minutes thereafter and that would be the last that would be seen of him that day. It would be unfair to say he was drunk or even drinking, but if he were not then he acted very much like it. The thirty fourth senatorial district must be hard up for legislative timber when the voters select a George Piper on the record he has made in the legislature to again represent them. If he ever accomplished anything as a legislator it would take a Philadelphia lawyer to figure it out. Even this district might select a man to represent it in the legislature. VOLUME XVII. NUMBER 18 Seattle Soundings Did the tenderloiners get hooked in the Gill? The boy councilman became the man mayor. Always count on the Seattle Daily Times as being againg law and decency. Judge Burke's $18,000 campaign account made even the Indian smile. Whalley has gone and done it and it looks like McAvoy is up against the real thing. It did not take the "bad mans" long to get busy as soon as Mayor Gill got out of reach. How many of the "higher ups" had an interest in the Arcade dance hall? Just one at a time, please. Where did Rufus Rastus Wilson get his if it only cost Poindexter $1,000 for primary campaign expenses? Congressman Humphrey is very popular in King county and the late primary election returns prove it. Seattle is the most notorious city in all the world, for her chief executive has told us so, and he ought to know. If Billy Hickman Moore should be elected supreme judge he can very consistently say, it's better to be born lucky than rich. A Piper voter has been sent to state prison for voting falsely and Promoter Pincus is undecided where he will spend the winter. Senator Piper is said to be sick. Is it possible that the work in securing his nomination was so raw that it caused his gall to break? Of course the Seattle Insurgents will support the local candidate for Congress and support him just as enthusiastically as they did judge Burke. "Lives of great men all remind us" that it is dangerous to leave "fools" behiud us in charge. Why, oh, why, did you go, Mr. Mayor? Ole Hansen is drunk from too many real estate sales. The babies may cry for Castoria, but it does not follow that the voters will cry for Ole to be governor. Mr. Hard Times may be annoying some of the merchants of Seattle, but he seems to have a delicacy in showing up at the Bon Marche, Seattle's leading mercantile establishment. Like Shomo's joint the Newport Cafe finds itself without a license the same having been denied by the city council last Monday night. Work, you sons of guns, or you will not have a peep in next winter. Illiterate Southern Negroes might not have run Seattle as stylishly as has Mayor Gill and Chief Wappenstein, but the taxpayers would still own the municipal corporation if they had have run it for six months. A committee composed of D. Zewek, L. E. Kirkpatrick, L. J. Colman, A. E. Flagg, T. S. Lippy, W. D. Wood, O. L. Miller, John E. Price and W. B. Bebb, will cause petitions to be circulated for the recall of Mayor Gill and we believe it will win. There is no longer any doubt as to the telephone merger in Seattle, which has been done in order to more systematically rob the telephone users. The franchise O. K.'d by Corporation Counsel Will E. Humphrey, who is now a candidate to succeed himself in the house of representative of Congress is the one the telephone users are to be robbed by. Profits from gambling games during the time Hiram Charles Gill has been mayor of Seattle are estimated to amount to $540,000, out of which the Push got a 25 per cent cut, amounting to $123,750. These figures do not include the thousand and one side grafts, such as men getting robbed and thieves being protected. There is no doubt of this being a "white man's government." Oh, joy and gladness! Gill is back! Oh, peace and plenty, Gill is back! Ring out the old, ring in the new, Gill is back! Turn on the lights, take the news to the tall timbers, Gill is back! Allamen right and let near beer flow—Gill is back. Let the feast be spread and the relief gang be invited to get busy to make up for lost time, for Hiram Charles Gill, Mayor of Seattle, Washington, is home again. bw Fis tee tld Rae Oto FRIDAY September 30, 1910 COUNTRY PRESS CURRENT COMMENT Ce SOMETHING IN A NAME After all there must be something more in a name than the cynic implied in his question, ‘‘What’s ina name?” In the current issue of the Big Bend Empire the following editorial appears: “Tt is quite evident that the fact that he bore the name of La Follette and is a cousin of the Wisconsin senator led to the nomination in Whitman county of La Follette for state representative.” Its not bad to have relatives to whom you can point with pride and especially when you want a fat office. If La Follette of Washington will only do as well in public life as La Follette of Wisconsion, the Washing- ton voter like the Wisconsin voter will have “no kick to register. Not that the Washington voters are such ardent admirers of the political tactics of the Wiscon- sin La Follett, but they believe he is right in a major- ity of his public measures and that is the big end of the battle. ————— ee: IS SOCIALISM INSANITY There is, perhaps, ‘‘a heap sight more’’ in Social- ism as preached than opponents of the cult are willing to admit, but when one posessing common sense reads such slush as quoted below its a question, if all per- sons advocating Socialism are not more or less weak under the hat. The Washington Standard is respon- sible for the following: “A Scocialist from Snohomish county while on his way to the Harbor country, last Wednesday, stopping here for a few hours remarked he had heard canvass- ed among some of the prominent members of the party jn this state that when nominations shall be made for officials, especially judges, who draw large salaries, a gentleman’s contract should be made in case of suc- cess at the polls, the amount of the salaries are to be divided between the incumbents and the party execu- tive committee with which to defray expenses and carry on the propaganda work. The method proposed is some what different from the practice generally pursued by political party machinery in making heavy assessments during the campaign before the date of election. How- ever, things new are now on the programme.” Living in hope of some one else making something and by some contrivance be forced to divide the same up with you is entirely too common, and all such per- sons are simply too lazy to fight their own battles. “I WANT A FARM” , _ When one reads of the fruit crop reports in East- ern Washington and then remembers the almost fabu- lous prices persons, who do not, own a well bear- ing orchard, have to pay for the home fruit consump- tion, it is heart-sickening. In its news columns the Colfax Cazette says the following: “Orchardists are beginning to gather the early fall apples, of which the trees are heavily laden of all va- rieties. This holds goods throughout the Palouse country—there is one report, good crops. This in the absence of rain.’” To think about those bearing orchards brings to mind the story of the fellow taking a jug of whiskey home, which he had frequently sampled on his way. He came to an old-fashioned worm fence and being too tired to climb over he threw the jug over, but when it hit the ground the stopper flew out and as the whiskey ran out with the “‘good, good sound,’’ he looked at it wistfully and exclaimed, ‘‘I know you are good, but I can’t get to you."” VOTE AS YOU PLEASE This thing of measuring other men’s corn by your half bushel seems to be a weakness of the human fam- ily. Listen to the following rythmie jingo from the Lincoln County Times: “Qne sweetly solemn thought Comes o’er us as we work— Had all men voted as they ought “Twould be Ashton or Tom Burke.”’ Why ought they to have voted for either of the men mentioned above? They ought to have voted for that man that they were convinced in their own minds would give them the best account of his steward- ship. The day of the party whip driving men to the polls and daring them to vote other than the way they are commanded isa thing of the past and may the good God see to it that such days never come again, HE LEADS ALL THE REST When the Kent Advertiser delivered itself of the following questionable compliment it was not aware of the fact that there were more real grounds for the editorial that showed on the surface. It says: “George W. Williams made an heroic fight for wreck master and if he keeps up his oft-repeated prom- jses to retrench when he is inaugurated he may yet become a full-fledged statesman. It is needless to say that thus far there have been no receipts or ex- penditures in the office.”” In the last campaign Mr Williams occasionally got so oratorical that it required the whole audience to cool him.off. That he is an economist is shown by his sworn statement of his campaign expenses, he having spent all of a dollar in the campaign. He was nomin- ated and he will be elected and he willdie happy, hay- ing realized his life ambition. But seriously, George W. Williams willbe the first Negro in the history of the state of Washington to be nominated and elected to a county office. THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN From the tone in the leading ediiorial in the Satur- day Review of Olympia, it’s a case of Hobson’s choice as to whom will b2 elected to the United States senate to succeed Senator Piles. The Review is edited and published by A. S. Ruth, who is also state senator from Thurston county, and who will have a vote in the election of the next United States senator from Washington. The Review says: “Whether Mr. Poindexter or Mr. Cotterill is elected United States senator the Democrats have won, there- fore they have acinch on the United States senator- ship.” Evidently State Senator Ruth does not feel like bowing to the will of the people as does U. S. Senator Wesley L. Jones. A majority of the Republicans of this state have promised Poindexter a good enough Republican for them and Sena- tor Ruth ought not to want to go behind the verdict of a majority of the Republicans of the state, even though their verdict does not meet his personal approbation. Vox populi, vox dei. RED LIGHTERS OPPOSED HIM Some persons really rejoice on account of the ene- mies they have made as much as others do on account of the friends tney have made. The following ex- cerpt from the Sun of Sunnyside would seem to indi- cate that a candidate for state senator in that neck of the woods is delighted with the enemies he has made, and that, too, despite the fact they defeated him for a nomination. Here it is: “The supporters of Hon. Lee A. Johnson in the re- cent campaign for state senator looks with consider- able satisfaction upon the fact thatin the red light dis- trict in North Yakima their candidate did not receive asingle vote. On the other hand, the successful can- didate, Frank Allen, received 50 out of 70 votes cast.’ Lee A. Johnson, who for many years was a Metho- dist divine; gave up the pulpit for politics, but it seems that he still holds some allegiance to the teachings of religion, which accounts for his defeat. He is one of the best self-made men the Northwest boasts of, and has no regrets at not getting the votes of such cattle as mentioned above. JONES WILL GET HIS From Senator Jones’ comment on the late primary election you would think he, instead of Burke or Ash- ton, had been defeated for the U. S. senatorial nom- ination. The Yakima Democrat has the following to say: “Senator Jones says that he bows to the will of the people. Well, we thought he would. But the people had to threaten him with a club first.’” We had alwrys suspected that Senator Jones would bow to the will of the people and if he is cor- rectly quoted, he will be given another splendid op- portunity to bow to the will of the people, when he comes up for re-election four years from now. The people’s will must be bowed to and the people will will that the Yakima statesman bow down and out, and unless we are mistaken he is going to get his at the proper time. a eel Seattle’s boomers making a five days’ tour of the state couldn’t loose because they had been told the Way before they left. FARMER LIKEWISE HAS REVERSES To own a farm does not mean that all your troubles are ended as the city advocates of ‘‘return to the soil’”’ would have you believe, as may be seen from the fol- lowing from the Mabton Chronicle: “The nerve to be a good loser has been fully dem- onstrated by the hill farmers this fall. One cannot but admire these men as they continue to drive into town, bringing with them only the remnant of what at one time last spring promised to be the bumper crop of years. With their two, four, eight and ten horse teams they come daily from over the hill to our warehouses. While they are receiving good prices for whatever quantity they bring, it must require grit of the finest kind to make the long drives, thinking of “what might have been’’ their portion, Such men deserve to win and we believe that they will—that the day will come when they will look back to these days, of long dusty drives and be glad they stuck. Such is the grit of the Washington Farmer. Yes, the farm life has its trials and tribulations the same as the city life and especially to the poor person, but on the whole the farmer is more independent even though he some times has less money and means than the city chap. BUT IT GOT THE MONEY The ‘‘country press’’ of the state of Was’ ington entertains a very poor opinion of the Seattle Daily Times and the opinion the press entertains of the Times fully reflects the opinion it has of the editor of the Times. The following from the Davenport Trib- une is a fair sample: “There are fears that the Seattle Times was so in- tent on keeping its ear to the ground that its foot slipped.”’ “There is no doubt but so far as principle is con- cerned its foot, yes, its feet, badly slipped, but in fall- ing the colonel grabbed the dough and once he shut his claws on toit nothing but death could jar him loose, and even death would have a devil of a time do- ing it. STATE TAXES State taxes will not be reduced in the near future unless there is a marked and decided change along in- telligent lines from present conditions. Just now there is a lull owing to the fact that many tax payers who settled up with the treasurer in the spring are over their grouch, but with the second half payment duesoon vehement objections to the high taxes de- manded will probubly be resumed. The time to pro- test about high taxes is not after the levy has been made and when the taxes are being paid, but before the money has been spent, And just solong as tax payers and communities continue to believe that any state appropriation they can get for their own community is coming from some one else’s pocket; that the larger appropriations that can be secured by their senators and representatives the more worthy such legislators are of support and encouragement, just so long will taxes continue to be onerous, oppressive and burdensome. Careful investigation would probably disclose that no county in the state has received the best of it nor the worst of it when it has come to grafting from the state treasury, Grafting as used in this connection, does not mean in any way to imply either an illegal nor improper use of such moneys, nor that any per- son connected with the expenditure thereof personally profited in any way. The term is used to distinguish such appropriation bills as might better be termed ex- travagant. Itis a positive fact that that there has been in the past no extravagance in the appropriations for the necessary conduct of state administration. By that is meant absolutely no office has been created nor salary paid to the officer or employe in excess of an extremely reasonable compensation for the services faithfully performed; nor have appropriations been made for repairs and improvements at state institu- tions, except such as is necessary to meet the absolute needs of the institutions, with the sole exception of the appropriation for the new jute mill at Walla Walla prison. High taxes in Washiugton have been due en- tirely to the extravagant appropriations, appropria- tions for matter and tnings meritorious in themselves but largely and purely local in their benefits. Theex- penditures were perfectly proper if the state and its tax payers are financially able and willing to ‘‘pay the piper.”” The general and widespread complaints of high taxes would seem to indicate such is not the con dition. WARDALL MAKES WAR ON CITY GRAFTERS FRIDAY September 30, 1910 The next legislature will be more extravagant than the last. unless the announced plans of popular candidates for election to that body are changed. In many of the counties of the state these candidates are making their campaign chiefly on promise that they will secure for their district large appropriations of state money. Such appropriations never have been secured and probably never will be secured, except as a result of a trade. The only way these appropriations can be made is for the man who wants a large appropriation to agree to support equally extravagant appropriations sought by legislators from oteer districts and communities. Each legislator when he finds the pork barrel being opened will insist upon a slice for his community irrespective of whether it is needed or not, and his community bear in mind, will be forced to pay hlgher taxes to meet the expense. For instance, if King county comes down to Olympia pledged to secure large appropriations for certain improvements in that county, the King county taxpayers will do well to bear in mind that to secure such appropriations King county tax payers finally will probably be called upon to pay as much to the state to meet the entire appropriations as if they had done the work out of the county funds. The argument that improvements of Seattle's waterfront and aids to commerce will benefit the whole state, will not win the votes of the legislators from other counties unless they can also secure their own little private appropriation bills. And further every special appropriation made by the state is but a precedent for future demands of other communities along the same or similar lines. The legislators that are pledged to oppose every extravagance, to oppose if need be their own pet county appropriation scheme, are the ones who alone can reduce the state taxes. but do the tax payers want that kind of legislators? It is for them to decide.—J. H. Brown in State Capitol Record, Olympia. WOOD ON THE COUNTRY PRESS It can be said without fear of successful contradiction that Lovett M. Wood, publisher of the Trade Register of Seattle, is the most successful publisher of a weekly paper in the Northwest. He spent three days of last week at Wenatchee with the annual meeting of the State Press Association and furnished The Seattle Republican with the following thoughts on the Country Press, which is becoming such an important factor in the affairs of the state: Is Seattle honeycombed with graft of the kind that is robbing the tax payers of millions of dollars every year and sapping the foundation of her civic fabrica- tion? Is the excehquer of the city the legitimate prey of every one that has any dealings with the city? Do one set of officials get rich out of the city and then retire in order that another set may do likewise? What about all these rotten regrade contract rumors? What about all these reports of police protection of criminals? What about all this fuss of the higher ups falling out over the division of spoils? Is the HARVARD MAX WARDALL vision city of Seattle the seat of grafters? While no specific charges have been made against any particular official, yet enough has been intimated to make every city official either offer his resignation or demand a complete investigation. Whatever may have prompted Acting Mayor Wardall to begin this expose that's now on the tongues of the world it is hoped that he will have the nerve to keep it up even if its costs his friend, Mayor Gill, his position. It has been repeatedly bruited about the streets that the gamblers and sure thing men spent thousands of dollars in electing Hiram Charles Gill mayor of Seattle. If such be a fact they must have had some tangible reason for doing so. Has Max Wardall found out why they did it? If you have, then let the public have the reasons and you will be remembered in the future for your frankness. At present you look good to the tax payers. Mr. Mayor Wardall, but you must not prosecute your work with the view of future political reward, but from the stand point of right and justice. Do the square thing by the people and you will always get your reward THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Replying to your request for my views of the Washington State Press Association, it gives me pleasure to say that the annual meeting just closed in Wenatchee gave unmistakable evidence that the weekly newspapers especially are seriously studying, as are the new dailies, every feature that will increase their [Name] LOVETT M. WOOD value to their readers and their advertisers, and adopt business system in so doing to their own profit. The meeting just closed was the best the press of this state has ever held. Questions of business import were discussed and little time devoted to the reading of addresses of general interest, which received proper consideration in the columns of the papers of even if it is only in the form of a satisfied conscience that you have done right. No man that does right ruins his future and those who say you are killing yourself politically are simply sore because you are killing them and their henchmen. What will be the end of the present city shake up man is not able to say, but many of us, who have been watching things go from bad to worse since Hiram Charles Gill has been mayor of Seattle, would like to know, what precipitated all this hullakaloo? Was it caused by the thieves or the higher ups falling out? Who has gotten the worst of the deal? Was Wardall left by Mayor Gill in charge of affairs for the express purpose of getting rid of the chief of police? If so, was Wappy too cute for them and likewise jumped the town during Gill's absence in order that as much blame would fall on "His Honor" as himself? Rumor hos it that Mayor Gill tried to get W. H. Murphy to do the job for him, but Murphy refused and took to the woods before Gill could get away. Then he turned to Wardall, who said he would undertake the job, but Wappenstein got out of town before Wardall got into action, but being in the mood to do things he started in with the view of uncovering a few things, but when he got started to pulling the cover off he could not stop, and so a world of rottenness was exposed to the public eye. The question is, What will Gill say when he returns? When he has his say, then what will the voters say? Will a recall petition be sufficiently signed to force the authorities to issue a recall election? If so, how many votes, in Heaven's name, will Hi Gill get? Are there really any higher ups, who have been sharing in the rotten game that has been played in the city since Gill has been mayor? If there are, why are not their names exposed the same as the little devils? What newspapers, if any, has got a cut out of this rake off, if any, that the thieves have paid as a royalty for police protection? Of course things are so rotten in Seattle that the stench almost reaches the top of Mt. Ranier, but why is not the rottenness exposed and the guilty parties, whether common criminals or higher ups, arrested and charged with having been responsible for the rottenness? Will that committee state. The officers elected are bright, forceful men and the 1911 meeting at Hoquiam may be look forward to as one that will be even more profitable. To my mind the principle need of the weekly press is to study service in advertising as well as in news, so that those who desire to convince the consumers of the merits of their goods will realize that they buy more than space and will lose by not patronizing the columns of the papers that make the space valuable, by co-operative service and deliver messages cheaper than any other known method of publicity. Giving an address on advertising, which Professor M. J. Thorpe of the State University and others were pleased to compliment and desired me to repeat in the near future, but the news service, the increasing of circulation, system in business operation, and modern co-operation to the profit of the whole press, were ably dealt with by other editors. I anticipate marked improvement as to the result of the recent meeting to the profit of both advertisers and publishers, and as the Trade Register has for some time been calling the attention of the merchants of the state to the profitable use of the country papers, and the latter are preparing to give them their best service, my faith in results, I believe, will be shared by all concerned. The corner grocery has become quite a feature in the financial world. Seeking out a busy corner in a thickly settled neighborhood the corner grocery opens up quietly but serenely. Every child whose mother sends it to "the store" eventually stops in at the corner grocery, for children have their share of curiosity as well as those of older growth, and the crafty salesman deals to each of them a winning smile by a highly colored morsel of candy. He may fail in some respects, but there is one thing upon which he can rely, those children will return again and once the habit is established the tempting bits of sweet meats can stop. Then to the mothers who call he accomodatingly intimates that their credit will be good at his store for one week, if they so desire, well knowing that the average woman who can write out an order and send it over by her children or call up and give it in over the telephone will order much more than if she came herself and paid cash for it. Of course the failure of one week's pay will not break him and he can stop the supply if the pay is not forthcoming every Saturday evening. Their rent is less, and yet, strange to say, everything is five to ten cents higher than would have to be paid down town. become a truly Lexow committee and expose things so thoroughly before "His Honor," the mayor, returns that he will find the mayor's office a burning hell for him. WHALLEY'S NOMINATION CONTEST Senator John A. Whalley has instituted contest proceedings against Charles E. McAvoy and alleges incompetency, drunkenness and apparent fraud on the part of some of the judges and inspectors who handled the ballots in his complaint. If reports be true Senator Whalley is almost certain of being able to show that he, instead of Charles E. McAvoy was nominated for state senator in the thirty-sixth district. While Claude C. Ramsey of the thirty-fourth senatorial district has made no apparent move toward contestant proceedings against George U. Piper, the alleged nominee of that district, yet he has even more grounds for a contest than Senator Whalley if all reports from the various voting precincts be true, and he in deference to right and decency should enter a contest against Piper. It is a fact that a number of the judges and inspectors in the First ward were not only not residents of that ward, but at the time were not registered voters, and yet they acted, in that capacity at the behest of the Clancy followers, who are friends of the successful candidate. It's time for the strong arm of the law to step in and to see to it that elections are conducted on the square and in the open. An aspirant for an office is perfectly willing to bow to the will of the voters and go down and out with a smile, if he thinks he has gotten a square deal from those who acted as judges in reporting the registered will of the people, but he does not feel good when he knows he has been jobbed by a lot of criminals in order to keep a man of their liking in office. Let Mr. Ramsey follow in the wake of Senator Whalley and for the good of the future contest the Piper nomination. Alden J. Blethen, editor in-chief of the Daily Times, is so busy trying to keep his skirts clean of the nasty mess that Acting Mayor Wardall uncovered that he cannot hear himself think. Theodore Roosevelt, the strenuous, has routed the old guard in New York horse and dragon and at the late state convention he was lord of all he surveyed. It may have been a serious problem in the past to figure out what we would do with our expresidents, but Roosevelt has set the pace, and in the future they will do for themselves, and that, too, without the aid and assistance of their fellow citizens. Roosevelt's success at the state convention may give New York state over to the Democrats, but it is better by far that the old guard be whipped out of existence than that it win and continue its rule of corruption in the public affairs of the state. The old guard made its last stand in New York and having lost there it no longer has a leg to stand on and the Progressives are in control of the party machinery from the Atlantic to the Pacific and from the Gulf to the Lakes. This is an age of move on and the old guard, who think they will be permitted to spread themselves over the affairs of the land and do nothing except those things that they receive orders from the higher ups to do now find themselves in a bad boat. Roosevelt has asked nothing unreasonable. He is not running things with a high hand. No, no; he has only asked that the interest of the common people of the United States be given some attention, which the higher ups would not permit their representatives in Congress to do. Vice President Sherman, the man selected by the old guard for the last stand, now knows that people, the voters, are not with him and how could they consistently be? Has not the men that he represented at that convention been always against the voters? With Roosevelt as the leader the voters have begun to turn the scales on the Interests, and lets hope that every mother's It is claimed that in the course of time the pecan will become one of the best revenue producers in the state of Georgia. Maynor Gaynor writes between sixty and seventy letters a day. He reads the communications sent in, dictates the answers, reads the answers when they are type written and then signs them. Tigers, lions, and big cats of Africa which for the most part dwell in the wilderness and roam the outskirts of the desert in search of food are examples of the protective coloration among animals. The effect is to enable them the more easily to obtain their food and also to afford them concealment from their carnivorous enemies. An undertaker in the city of New York who had been having trouble with his union drivers employed non-union men to daive for a funeral and fearing the union drivers would attack his men appealed to police headquarters. A sergeant and several policemen escorted and protected ROOSEVELT ROUTS THE OLD GUARD THEODORE ROOSEVELT ITEMS MORE OR LESS INTERESTING his man at the stable, at the home of hhe dead man and at the church. When they had passed to another section of the city they were met by another detail of policemen who estorted the cortege to the cemetery. A will left by one Charles Hastings of Ashburnham, near Worcester, Mass., leaves real estate holdings valusd at several thousand dollars and transfers the title of the same to the Lord Jesus, appointing himself trustee of the property. The will was drawn more than a quarter of a century ago. Dynamite is used in place of the plow for the tilling of clay land in Kansas and by a planter in Spartanburg, S. C. The dynamite ia exploded with red hot irons and the explosion throws the clods of soil thirty feet into the air. Clay land when once disturbed to the depth of four or five feet is said never to revert to its former solid condition. This does away with the usual pnddling and holding of waver on the surface common to such lands. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN T ROUTS THE THEODORE ROOSEVELT Mayor Samuel Crawford of East Liverpool, Ohio, is making a unique experiment for the reformation of men convicted of drunkenness, A register has been placed in the city hall in which the sentenced person must set forth his condition at seven o'clock each evening and he must also attend services on Sunday Refusal results in the carrying out of the jail or work house sentence imposed. Two wamen of Hoboken who had fish lines looped around their belts inside of their decidedly anti-hobble skirts have been arrested for shop-lifting. While looking over goods on the counters they would drop something which they had taken a fancy to on the floor with something else which they did not want, leaning over they would hook a pin into the desired article, give the working end of the fish line a pull and then place the undesired article upon the counter. The police believe they have been doing well with this mode of shop-lifting. ```markdown ``` AMUSEMENTS "Young Buffalo, King of The Wild West" is the title of the play that will be staged at the Alhambra Theatre next Sunday matinee and those who contemplate attending had better secure their seats in advance, because this play comes here with the record of having scored the biggest triumph of any melodrama ever produced by Mr. Blaney in New York, and the largest theaters in the East have never been big enough to accommodate people who wanted to see this biggest of all wild west plays. The story is different in every respect from any other in a western play. "Young Buffalo" is sheriff of Angel Gulch, Arizona, and the real villain of the play is an English lord. Mr. George Webb will be "Young Buffalo" and Miss Claire Sinclaire, "Wild Nell" his sister. The Baker Stock Company has secured the new Seattle Theatre under a five year lease and for every week of the theatrical sea- FRIDAY September 30, 1910 son of them will be driven from the party councils. PARAGRAPHING ROOSEVELT'S SPEECH Roosevelt whipped the old guard to a frazzle as he promised. Out of 1011 votes cast for temporary chairman Roosevelt got 568 and Sherman 443. Vice President Sherman, who was a delegate, voted for John Doe. He seems to have forgotten Sunny Jim. Chairman's Woodruff's plea was to say the least piteous, but the convention was too much Roosevelt to listen. It was Taft against Teddy and Teddy, unlike Jeffries, was able to come back. "We have a right to appeal to the people in the light of the past," which he did and the people heard him. There is no need of the cry, "Turn the rascals out," for we have turned our own rascals out. I believe in the party to which we belong because I believe in the principles for which the Republican party stood in the days of Abraham Lincoln. Corruption in every form is the arch enemy of this republic, the arch enemy of free institutions and of government by the people, an even more dangerous enemy than the open lawlessness of violence, because it works in hidden and furtive fashion. We are against corruption in politics; we are against corruption in business, and above and with all our strength we are against the degrading alliance which adds strength to the already powerful corrupt boss and to the already powerful head of big business, and which makes them in their dual capacity enemies against whom every patriotic man should stand with unwavering firmness. son will present a new play. These plays will be selected from the most recent New York and London successes. The week commencing September the 18th, witnessess John Drew and Billie Burke's New York success, "My Wife." Commencing Sunday matinee September 25th, the New York melodrama success will be presented for the first time upon the Pacific Coast by the Baker Company. "Are You a Mason" will follow "Via Wireless" for the week of October the 2nd. Other plays to be announced later will be selected from "Brewster's Millions," "The Roundup," "Burning Daylight" by Jack London, "The Honor of the Family," Sweet Kitty Bellairs," etc., etc. Every Wednesday afternoon during the Baker Stock Company's five year lease on the Seattle Theatre a "bargain matinee" will be given. DENNY-RENTON CLAY & COAL CO., Manufacturers of All Kinds of Clay Products. Main 2189—Phones—Ind. 5125. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN FRIDAY September 30, 1910 [Name not provided in the image] Despite the fact that some twenty thousand of the progressive Democrats voted with the Republicans in the late primary election, yet George Fletcher Cotterill, who was a candidate for the Democratic endorsement for United States senator to succeed Senator Piles, carried every county in the state over his oppinent and is now the Democratic candidate for United States senator, and in case the Democrats succeed in electing a majority of the members of the next legislature they will be morally bound to elect him. Mr. Cotterill is a Seattle man and since all of the Republican candidates for United States senator from King county were defeated, he stands today as Seattle's only hope of getting representation in the senate of the United States congress. So chagrinned are the Seattle merchants and business men over the prospects of not having a representative in the senate for at least four years, that many of them have openly advocated the election of Mr. Cotterill by even Republican members of the legislature, regardless of the fact a majority of the Republicans of the state have endorsed another candidate. It can be said of George Fletcher Cotterill that, if elected to a seat in the United States senate, he would soon take rank among the able men of that august assembly, and would under no circumstances become a blind partisan in his actions, and yet he would not forget that he owed his election to the Democratic party. As a member of the state senate of Washington he ranked among the leading members thereof and succeeded in having as much, if not more, legislation passed than any of the Republican members. He counted among his friends on the floor of the senate such men as A. S. Ruth, president of the senate, W. H. Paulhamus, J. A. Falconer, also leading Republicans, and many others. He is a native son of King county, having been born in the district in the northern part of the county and his life in every respect is an open book. He is a civil engineer by profession and has followed that work since reaching his majority. 6 State of Washington, in and for King County. Arthur W. Finch, plaintiff, vs. Francis Finch, defendant—No. — Summons. The State of Washington to the said Francis Finch, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, tow, within sixty days after the 2nd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve copy of your answer upon the underigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below and in case of your failure as to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to secure a decree of divorce, dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of desertion and abandonment. HOLZHEIMER, HERALD & HOLZHEIMER. Attorneys for plaintiff. 427-29-29 Lumber Exchange Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, September 2nd, 1910. Sept. 2, Oct. 15, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Goldie Skentzr, Plaintiff, vs. Samuel Skentzr, Defendant.-No. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to Samuel Skentzr, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summary of the case, on days after the 12th day of August, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at the address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you to the demand of the complaint herein, a copy of which has been filled with the clerk of this court. The object of said action as set forth in the complaint is to obtain a decree dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant upon the ground of neglect and failure of the defendant to support plaintiff. EDWARD VON COBEL. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office adn Postoffice Address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, August 12, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of James J. Lynch, Deceased. No. 10927. Order to Show Cause on Sale of Real Estate. Harry W. Bringhurst, the administrator of the estate of James J. Lynch, deceased, having filed his petition in this Court, duly verified, paying for an Order to buy for the sale of all or portion of the real estate of which the said deceased died seized, for the purposes therein set forth; And it appearing to the Court from said petition that the personal estate of the said deceased in the hands of said administrator is not sufficient to pay the claims against the said estate and the expenses of the administration thereof, and that it is necessary to sell all or a portion of the real estate of the deceased to pay the said claims and expenses of the administration. And it appearing to the Court that said petition conforms to, and is in accordance with the requirements of law in such case made and provided. It is ordered by the Court that all persons interested in the estate of the said deceased appear before the Superior Court on Saturday the 8th day of October and on the hour of 9:30 o'clock the foreon of said day at the Court room of the Probate Department of said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this Court should not be granted to said administrator to authorize and empowering him to sell his real estate of said deceased, or so much may be necessary to pay the aforesaid claims and expenses of administration. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before the said 8th day of October, Just in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said County of King and of general circulation therein. Done in open Court this 7th day of September, 1910. A. W. FRATER, Judge. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Summons by Publication. James Henry, plaintiff, vs. F. B. Huntley and Jane Doe Huntley, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, defendants.—No. 74840. State of Washington to the defendants. F. B. Huntley and Jane Doe Hunt- You and each of you are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the day of September, 10th, we defend the act in the above entitled court and answer r the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case you fail so do, judgment will be rendered in you according to the demand of the filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to recover the sum of $105.95 together with costs and interest due from you to the plaintiff herein for goods, wares and goods sold and this motion by you the plaintiff three years. A writ of attachment being issued out of this cause and court lots 26 and 37, block 8, of Green Lake Reservoir Addition to the city of Seattle have been attached to the sender. CARVER IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. Dalsey Houl, plaintiff, vs. John Francis Houl, defendant.—No.— The State of Washington, to the said John Francis Houl, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: withing sixty days after the 30th day of September, A. D. 1910, and de- fend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his offence, and pass on the failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filled with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the grounds of your abandonment of plaintiff for more than one year, and your failure to make suitable provisions for plaintiff since said marriage. 201-203 Burke Bldg., Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Leonhard Reinig, deceased.—No. 11230. By order of said court made herein on the 29th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate said deceased and against Margaret the S. Reinig, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Margarethe S. Reinig, executrix of said estate, at 309 Burke Block, at the office of A. J. Speckert, her attorney, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 30, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of James McCarthy, deceased.—No. 11951. By order of said court made herein on the 29th day of September, 1910. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the underigned administrator of said estate. At 16 Globe Building, place business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice, or same will be barred. Date of first publication Sept. 30, 1910. LOTTA McCARTHY, As Administratrix of said Estate. H. R. CLISS. Attorney for Estate. 416 Globe Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. — Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, owners, claimants or holders of interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above-named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit. Davis' Improved Addition to the City Municipality of New York No. 8855644, year 1907, amount $0.92 That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 25, Block I, Davis' Improved Addition, the City of Seattle, $1.43, for year 1907 Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from said date of payment, and are all the sums due on taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of first publication, and within sixty days after August 12, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at this office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest costs. In case you have an judgment when you are ordered herein, forecloses against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged for the found against it respects as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. AURORA LAND CO., a Corporation. Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. Aug. 12—Sept. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Thos. Eaton, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property Defendants. No. 7564. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above de- fendants of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above amount and off of the certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April, 1910, and numbered B61750, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, tow- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Beginning at a point 165 feet east and 33 feet south of the N. W. corner of the SW 1-4 of Sec. 10, Tp. 26 N., R. 5 E., W. M.; thence east 60 feet, thence S. 120 feet, thence west 60 feet, thence N. 120 feet to the place of beginning. For the year 1907, the sum of $1.36; for the year 1908, the sum of 87 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 88 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, and of the day of publication of Sept. 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the sums charged against you, each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Relinda Higdon, Plaintiff, vs. Ira Higdon, Defendant. No. —. Summons for Publication The State of Washington, to the said Ira Higdon, Defendant: We are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit; within sixty days after the 10th day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of non-support, drunkenness and cruelty, and care and custody of minor child. ELIAS A. WRIGHT, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address. 629 Burke Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 9—Oct. 21; 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Preston Mill Co., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the debtor after described real property. Defendants. No. 75685. Notice and summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the day of April 910, an act of the 61756 tax in the amount of 90 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King county, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at S. E. cor. of N. E. 1-4 of Sec. 32, Tp. 24, N. R. 7 E., W. M., thence west 420 feet to School Dist. No. 76, thence north to N. P. Ry., thence easterly along Ry, to easterly line of said section, thence S. 235 feet to the place of beginning. (Part of S. E. 1-4 of the 1-4 Sec. 32, Tp. 24 N. R., W. M.) That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1906, the sum of 57 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of 72 cents; for the year 1908, the sum of 44 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 27 cents. Which secretes the interest at the date of 16 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and answer within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Sept. 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint in the form and serve a copy of your answer on the notice, for payment for plaintiff at his office, below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon an charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the sums charged and found against it responded to, and provided by law, and is placed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L, H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, F. H. Harkins, plaintiff, vs. Elizabeth Brunner, Benoliet Brunner, her husband James McNamara, William E. Holmes, doing business under the name of the Holmes Plumbing & Heating Co., H. C. Keller, doing business as Keller & Sons, and the American Luxer Prism Co., defendants.—No. 75397. Summons by publication. Sunday The Trust of Washington to the said defendants, Elizabeth Brunner, Benedict Brunner, her husband, and the American Luxer Prism Company, a corporation: You, and each of you, are hereby summoned and required to appear in sixty days after the date of the first publication of sixty days after to-wait, sixty days after the second day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint herein which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of said action is to recover a judgment against the said Elizabeth Brunner and Benedict Brunner, her husband, for the sum of Fifteen Hundred Dollars, together with interest thereon at the rate of seven per cent per annum from the 23rd day of October, 1907, less the sum of Fifteen Hundred Dollars (64.00) Dolars paid account of interest, and interest on deferred interest installments at the rate of ten per cent per annum; also the sum of sixteen dollars for insurance paid by plaintiff and the sum of $170.00 attorney's fee and costs and disbursements herein and to foreclose that certain mortgage given by the defendants, Elizabeth Brunner and Benedict Brunner, on the 23rd day of October, 1907, to Osner & Mehlhorn, Inc., to secure said amount upon lot 6, 9 Market Street, Addition to the city of Seattle King County, Washington, and to foreclose all right, claim or equity of redemption of each and all of said defendants in and to said property. Said mortgage was recorded on the 23rd day of October, 1907, in Vol. 330 of mortgages, page 566, of the records in the auditor's office of said King County. The said mortgage, and the sum secured thereby, was, on the 24th day of October, 1907, duly assigned, in writing, to said plaintiff. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for plaintiff. Office and post office address, rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bidg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 2, Oct. 15, 1910. NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL ESTE BY the Treasurer of the City of Seattle, King County, Washington. To Patrick O'Connor: You are hereby notified that the undersigned, L. H. Craver, is the owner and holder of one certain certificate that purported to be on Oct. 17, Block 2, of Columbia Terrace Addition. In said City, issued by the Treasurer of the said City on August 21st, 1908, for the sum of Seventeen and 30-100 Dollars ($17.30) under ordinance of the said City of Seattle, No. 13320. Said Certificate of purchase was recorded in the office of the Auditor of King County, Washington, on Nov. 9th, 1908, and the undersigned paid the said Auditor his fees therefor in the sum of $1.00. That since the said August 21st, 1908, the pursuant paid other taxes and assessments on said land as follows, towit: on October 26, 1908, the sum of $9.28 and May 12, 1910, the sum of $144.03. And you, the said Patrick O'Connor, are hereby further notified that at the expiration of Sixty days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of the first publication, to-wit: sixty days after August 26th, 1910 the said L. H. O'Connor will demand of the said Treasurer of the said City of Seattle, that he execute and deliver to him a deed to the said real property, and unless you, the said Patrick O'Connor, redeem the said property by paying to the said Treasurer the sums hereinbefore mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said dates of payment, the said Treasurer will make and deliver to the undersigned a deed to the said property. L. H. CRAVER, Office and P. O. Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wash. August 26—Oct. 6, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Wyman, Partridge & Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, defendants. No. 747385 Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 2nd anniversary of January 19, 1858 above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy or your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the court of the State of Washington. The object of the above entitled action is to recover a judgment against, said defendants upon a claim by plaintiff for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered to said defendants by said plaintiff in the sum of Two Thousand One Hundred Twenty-seven and 10-100 Dollars ($2,127.10), with interest thereon from the 2nd day of May, 1910, besides the cost of suit, and in which said action an attachment has been taken out and lewed. Attorneys for plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 705 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 2, Oct. 15, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Empire Furniture Manufacturing Company, a corporation, duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Washington, Plaintiff, vs. Thomas F. Lee, Defendant, No. 75667. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington, to Thomas F. Lee, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to attend the Washington trial days, 9th day of September, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his offices below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the compa The object of this action is to foreclose a certain chattel lien for $375 on personal chattels described in plaintiff's complaint located 1400 Ewing street, Suite 100, Washington, DC 20004, plaintiff, the subject matter of this action, in which defendant has or claims an interest and in wholly excluding defendant from any interest therein. HENRY S. NOON Award for plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 703-4 New York Block, Seattle, King County, State of Washington. FRIDAY September 23, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County or King. Thomas D. Cain, Plaintiff, vs. Mary A. Good Cain, Defendant.-No. 75406. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Mary A. Good Calm, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit, within sixty days after the 19th day of August, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be satisfied therein is fully set forth in the summons and is briefly stated in follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the ground of your abandonment of plaintiff for ten years last past. Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office and Office address: 201-203 Burke Blidge, Seattle, County of King, State of Washington, Aug. 19—Sept. 30, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Edith Rash, Plaintiff, vs. John F. Rash, Defendant. No. 75369. Summons by Publication. State of Washington to the said John F. Rash: Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of August, 1910, in the above entitled action, in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and send the answer for your answer to the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought for the purpose of challenging a degree of divorce from the said defendant on the grounds of abandonment, non-support and personal indignities, the same being causes of action specified in the laws of Washington, for which services of summons by publication may be made. PARKER & BROWN, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: Room 25 Union Block, 713 1st Ave., Seattle, Washington. 26-Oct-1910 6:10 State of Washington, for King County, In the Matter of the Estate of Florence H. Lutz, Deceased. No. 11821. No- tice by Order of the said court made herein on the 9th day of August, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said person, and to preserve them with the necessary vouchers for the designed executor of said estate, at 1211 American Bank Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year and after the date of first public publication of this notice or same will be barred. H. E. LUTZ. Attorney for Estate. 1211 American Bank Bldg. Seattle, Wn. August 26-Sept. 23, 1910. REMOVAL NOTICE The Light and Power department of the Seattle Electric Company has moved to the Electric Bldg., Seventh avenue and Pine street. Street car tickets can be purchased and all bills paid in the Electrical Sales Room at the old location 907 FIRST AVENUE THE SEATTLE ELECTRIC CO ORDER A CASE OUT TO YOUR PLACE OF Rainier PALE BEER PHONE SIDNEY 526 A Free Trip to Seattle and Return. Let's Bust the State Dental Trust. Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar. Your dental work will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established at 1830 and 1840, for 18 years. I do not compete Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar and the State Dental Monopoly will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. You save your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established at 713 First Ave, in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete with cheap dentists, but with the high-class dentists for half their price. Open evenings until 8 and Sundays until 4 for people who work. People's Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R J. Reekle, Vice Prest. Joe Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889. Commercial Savings and Trust General Bank and Exchange. Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash. FRIDAY September 30, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Survival, by Publication. ty. Summons by Pufnitz Charles Pfeffer plaintiff, vs. Millie Bennett,ALTER Carver,annether her husband, Charles R. Newberry, and "Jane Doe" Newberry, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown, William Brenner, D. A. Hatfield and "Jane Doe" Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown, and Charles W. Flisk, F. M. Hatfield, Ida M. Barton and Aurora Land Company, a corporation, defendants.—No. 75263. The State of Washington to Charles P. Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, whose true given name is unknown; D. A. Hatfield and Jane Doe Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is unknown. You, and each of you, are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 18th day of September, 1910, and defend the case entitled to the tenured entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and have a copy of your answer served upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to foreclose a certain mortgage executed and delivered by the said defendants Millie Bennett and Walter C Bennett, her husband, to one S. Campbell and by the said S. Campbell assigned to this alarm, dated 28th day of January, 1909, recorded on the same day in Vol. 407 of mortgages, page 39 of the record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, which mortgage was given to secure a promissory note of $500.00 with interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the 19th, 19, 20, and 22, Block 1, Gilman Park First Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to obtain judgment for the said $500.00 together with interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the 28th day of January, 1910, and an attorney fee of $20.000 for each of the loans and to obtain and determine all right, title and interest of each and all of said defendants in and to said premises and every part thereof. EDWARD VON TOBEL Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Summons. A. L. Weaver and Ella May Weaver, husband and wife, plaintiffs, vs. Peter The State of Washington to the said Peter E. Nordin, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 17th day of Sept., 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above committed court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment and decree will be rendered against you according to the demands of the plaintiff, which has been fulfilled with the cleak of said court. And all right, title and interest in the lands described in the complaint claimed by you likewise in the contract, and payments described therein will be foreclosed, forfeited, and the title of the plaintiffs cleared as to all claims you may have or claim. J. W. BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiffs. 1324 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Notice 11. In the latter of the Estate of Theodor Schmidt, deceased.-No. 11007. By order of said court made herein on the 15th day of September, 1910. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, andnd all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigne executrix of said estate, at the office, Edward W. Wan, 64 Mutual Life Bldg., castle Wan, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said city and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication Sept. 16. ```markdown ``` Attorney for Estate. Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Sept. 16, Oct. 14, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75109. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington dated the 25th day, of March, 1809, and numbered as follows for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit. Hillman's Meadow Garden Add., Div. No. 4, Lot 2, Block 44, Certificate number B55533, year 1907, amount 87 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 2, Block 44, Hillman's Meadow Garden Add., Div. No. 4, amount, $1.87; for year 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- tensive of the day of said first put- on, to-wit: with fee of $400 August, 1910, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer to the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sale property for the foreclosure of the alimony charged and found against it, respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CRAVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: Northern Bank & Trust Company Bldg. 'August 19, September 30, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. H. C. Bryson, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property Defendants.—No. 75303. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defenders and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, on the 19th day of November, 1908, and numbered B54-892, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of 99 cents, and upon the real property situated in King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 10, Block 10, Manhattan Heights. For the taxes the deceased subsequent tax have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907 the sum of 60 cents. For the year 1908 the sum of 37 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after August 19, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and answer, a sweeping complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a slae of one parcel of property, a satisfaction of the sums shewed and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. Office address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. August 19—Sept. 30, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Knut Olaus Anderson and Bernard Halseth, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75304. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 23d day of August, 1907, and numbered B48582, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906 in the amount of $1.68, the real property status issued King County of N. W. % of N. E. % of Sec. 13, Twp. 92, N. B. 5, E. W. M. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wait: For the year 1906 the sum of $1.16. For the year 1907 the sum of $1.86. For the year 1908 the sum of $2.80. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid an dunredeemed taxes upon and above the rate. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after Aug. 19, 1910, in the above entitled court and action, and defend and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, for the purpose of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together wit hinterest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale, transfer of said property or satisfaction of the amount ordered and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Aug. 19—Sept. 30, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Antone Kaas, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest for the property and defendant after described real property, Defendants. No. 75305. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate and to the herelafter described real property, are hereby required to one of the treasurer is the holder of a certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of November, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, grants: West 260 feet of $1/2 of $1/2 of NE1/2 of SE 1/2 Sec. 4, Tp. 21, N., R 4 E. W. M., certificate number B54644, year 1906, amount $1.23. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ats. Amount $1.40 for year 1907; 76 cents will for year 1908. den Which several sums bear interest at ch, the rate of 15 per cent per annum from per-sale of payment, and are all the unpaid and unreimbursed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub-lylication, to-wit: within sixty days Aug. 19, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and property against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property, the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. H. C. Bryson, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Detain plants. No. 75306. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above, hereinafter is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 19th day of November, 1908, and numbered B54891, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of 99 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 9, Block 10, Manhattan Heights Addition. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of 60 cents; for the year 1908 the sum of 37 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the sums unpaid taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub-lylication, to-wit: within sixty days Aug. 19, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, under the warranty of any duty at the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and sound against it, for the sums provided by law, and prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. August 19, September 30, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Frank H. Renick, Anna Farmer and Hanna Farmer, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 74379. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants, and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of October 1908, and numbered B54379 for the delinquent date of September 1906, in the amount of $2.02, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: $ 1% of NE 1% of SW 1% of NW 1% of Sec. 29, Tp. 24, N. R. 6, W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the su mf $1.78; for the year 1908, the sum of $1.24. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 10% from the amount from said rate of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub-lylication, to-wit: within sixty days Sept. 9, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and answer to a complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering sale of said taxes for the satisfaction of the sums charred and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. J. A. Musgrove and James Musgrove, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75302. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of October, 1908, and numbered B54382, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the following amount of $3.54, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 6, Sec. 4, Tp. 21 N., R. 7 E., W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $2.96; for the year 1908, the sum of $6.08. 1919 year 1919, the first. Which real cash bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days to obtain publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publylication, to-wit: within sixty days Aug. 19, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount, however deemed, and costs, in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the charged and amount, it aspectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. August 19, September 30, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Caroline L. Burns, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.-No. 75301. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of the Washington and of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 2nd day of September, 1909, and numbered B61042, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of $4.86, and upon the real property situated in, and King County assigned it has follows, owit: Lot 5, Sec. 23, Tp. 22, N, R. 6 E, W, M, less Right-of-Way C., M. & St. P. Rv. Co. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1906, the sum of $2.11; for the year 1908, the sum of $0.79. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 65 per centum from said due of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- julylication, to-wit: within sixty days Sept. 9, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and action, according to complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property and satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Jos. Allen, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants. No. 75300. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, Signed on December 14, 1908, the day of November, 1908, and numbered B54857, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.45, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, towit. Lot 12, Block 5, Allentown Acres. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, described as follows, towit. For the year 1907, the sum of $4.57; for the year 1908, the sum of $1.76. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from salded sums of payment, and are all the sums of money which takes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publi- lylication, to-wit: within sixty days janoo paittiae aloque equi 0161 '0162 '0163 and action; and defend and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the sums and amounts charged and found against it, respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Cave, Plaintiff, vs. K. Kludwig, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75299. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above de- fendants, each of them. You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of November, 1908, and numbered B54871, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.21, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, tow- Ln. 2, Block 2, Hillman City, Division No. 7. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $1.78; for the year 1908, the sum of $5.15. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, or for the sixty days after September 9, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosure of the life, estate and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this court and Court. A. C. MAC DONALD Attorney for Plaintiff Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in County of King. In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Jennie M French, deceased, No. 10433. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. The Seattle Trust and Title Company, administrator of the estate of Jennie French, deceased, having filed in this case petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to allow distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Jennie M. French, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle on the 30th day of September, 1910, of said day, then and there show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public Paces in King County for a period of weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 30th day of September, 1910, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 27th day of August, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, C. C. Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss: D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for the County of King, do hereby identify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court on the 27th day of August, 1910. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 27th day of August, 1910. Sept. 2, Sept. 30, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. John Peterson, plaintiff, vs. Harry Laban, defendant.—Summons by publication.—No. The State of Washington to said defendant Harry Laban: You are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the second day of September, and the date of the book entitled action in the above titled complaint and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, in case of your rendered against you according to the terms of the complaint herein which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of said action is to recover judgment against the said defendant for the sum of $199.65 and interest thereon as he rate of $8 per cent per annum from the 65th April to the sum of $5.53 taxes paid by plaintiff, attorney's fee and costs and disbursements herein and to foreclose that certain mortgage given by the said defendant to one Sidney H. Brown and by the said Sidney H. Brown duly assigned, in amounts, upon lots 15 and 46 booked West Seattle Land & Improvement Company's Fourth Plat, King County, Washington, and to foreclose all right, claim or equity of redemption of said defendant in and to said property. Sale of mortgage is recorded on June 4th, 1909, in Vol 488, mortgage page 97 of the record of mortgages in the auditor's office of King County, Washington. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Office and postoffice address, rooms 603-2 futurist Life Bldg, Seattle, King County, Washington Sert 2, Oct. 15, 1910. IDAHO'S THIRTY DAY WAR 图 The United States has just ended its latest war. It has not been a complete victory. Although over 10,000 men in the states of Idaho, Montana and Washington have finally brought under their control the fiercest forest fires in the history of the country, the loss has been severe. Over 200,000,000 feet of the finest body of white pine timber in the world has been ruined. Including the non-combatants, the dead will number over 200, and scores are hovering between life and death in the field hospitals that have sprung up but a short distance back from the fire line. Worst of all the plague of sickness which follows all wars have set upon the stricken district. The unburied dead and contaminated water have infected the survivors, and typhoid and smallpox have come to ravage the stricken territory. It has not been a thirty years' war, but one of tbirty days. In that time the United States government threw nearly 600 regular soldiers into the fire swept Coeur d'Alenes. The quickest system of conscription on record took 5,000 raw volunteers and added them to the army. These were recruited, officered and commanded by United States forest rangers. Over 1,000 guerrillas were enlisted and commanded by the Coeur d'Alene Timber Protective Association and lumber companies. And last but by no means least, were the hundreds of settlers, battling desperately against the fire demon, literally to save their homes and firesides. Thy war, brief as it was, had all the elements that attend the life and death struggle of nations. There were the eager volunteers, enlisting for the adventure, the bronzed veterans, so her because they understood the gravity of the situation. There were the volunteer nurses' organizations, the subscriptions and shipments for the boys at front, and all of the heroic, the patriotic and the harrowing incidents connected with the system of warfare waged with rifle and cannon. Nearly all of the regular troops were Negroes. Some were members of the regimeut that took part in the notorious Brownsville affair. When Negro troops were last in the Coeur d'lene they were cursed, reviled, sneered at. It was not the fault of the miners that more did not go to eternity by the dynamite route. That was in the days of the "bull pen" following the assassination of Governor Stuenberg of Idaho, When the Negroes went to the Coeur d'Alenes in August, 1910, they were hailed as angels of mercy, rather dusky and perspiring angels, but angels for all that. Not once, while they worked side by side with the miners they had once herded into the bull pen, did race animosity flare up, and when they finally withdrew from the fire swept district, the Coeur d'Aleners agreed that the men of the Twenty-fifth were "white clear through, even if their skins were dark." The excellent discipline under which the dusky "dough boys" worked commended itself to all. Although they were sent on the most dangerous missions, not one lost his life or suffered serious injury. Four were long counted as dead. They were detailed soon after arriving to fight the fire, on a man hunt after a white maurauder, name unknown, who had shot a man to death in a saloon row in Colfax Washington, July 4, and who had ranged the district since that time, occasionally appearing to hold up one man for food and to rob another of his weapons. The four were sent away with a guide. A few hours after they left a seething wall of flame swept across their track. Three days went by — nothing was heard from them; and the officers of the company began to have doubts of their safety. The fourth day passed, and the fear that they were lost grew. When they did not appear on the sixth day, they were officially counted as dead. But on the seventh day four Negroes, tattered, scratched, singed and with their belts tightened several notches, marched up to headquarters with the same cheerful smile with which they had left. They had not caught the fugitive slayer, but as he has not been heard of since it is presumed that the sweeping fire line meted out justice. They had, however, worked their way out of a labyrinth of flame, dodged walls of fire which sprang up and seemed to block every path of escape, and had at last worked their way back to camp. Nearly every employment agency in Eastern Washington, northern Idaho and western Montana was made a recruiting station for the volunteers. Men were offered 25 cents per hour and their board. There were no medical examinations, but agencies were advised that no weaklings would be accepted. Although nine hour jobs paying $2.75 and $3 a day were plentiful, there was no dearth of volunteers from the first. They were a motley crew that faced the rangers for their enlistment. Many were of the wandering variety of laboring men classed as hoboes. Some of these same hoboes are numbered as heroes by those who fought beside them. There was a goodly scattering of college men, mostly young fellows with the love of excitement running like wine in their veins. There were two or three British younger sons from across the Canadian line; there were Scotchmen and Negroes, Italians and Danes, "Micks, Macks and Scandahoovians," as one of the employment agencies put it. The heroes of this strange army of vagabonds, college men, clerks, laborers and soldiers of fortune, were not confined in any one class. At the "headquarters hospital" at Wallace, where white capped Catholic sisters of charity and Protestant volunteer nurses work side by side, G. D. Krause, still hovers between life and death. If he lives he will will be decorated with the Carnegie medal, for his officers have already started a movement to this end. If he dies no one will claim the Carnegie pension on his account, for prior to August he had neither kin nor friends. —Collier's Weekly. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Oxford University has under consideration a new scheme of reform which is both extensive and interesting. The abolition of compulsory Greek, the establishment of a curriculum for a business career, and further provides for poor student, are the proposals of most general import. The scheme must be ratified by both houses of the university parliament before it can be carried out. There is a cannon on the front lawn at Oyster Bay; but we violate no confidence when we say it is not Joseph G.—Washington Herald. Send your legals to The Seattle Republican, 305 Epler Blk., Phone Main 305. NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL ESTATE by the Treasurer of the City of Seattle, King County, Washington. To Charles McDonald: You are hereby notified that the undersigned, L. H. Craver, is the owner and holder of one certain Certificate of Purchase, No. 1172 on Lot Nineteen (19) of Cheeler's Third Addition to the City of Seattle, in King County, Washington. ton, issued by the Treasurer of the said City on August 24th, 1908, to one Mrs. C. H. Weed, for the sum of Six Dollars and thirty cents ($6.30), under ordinance of the said city of Seattle, No. 13320. Said Certificate of Purchase was recorded by the said Mrs. C. H. Weed, in the office of the County Auditor of King County, Washington, on October 1908 in Vol. 631 of Deeds at page 127, and there was paid by said Auditor his fees therefor in the sum of of One Dollar ($1.00). That since said last named date, to-wit: on Feb. 15th, 1910, there was paid by the undersigned to the County Treasurer of said King County for taxes on said property the sum of Ninety-four Dollars and forty cents ($94.40). That on Feb. 15th, 1910, the said Mrs. C. H. Weed, for a valuable consideration, had assigned the said Certificate of Purchase to the said L. C. Grover and the said L. H. Craver is now the owner and holder of the said Certificate of Purchase. And you, the said Charles McDonald, are hereby further notified that at the expiration of Sixty days after the date of the first publication of this notice, the delivery of days of the said publication to-wit: sixty days after September 9, 1910, the said L. H. Craver will dmand of the said Treasurer of the said City of Seattle, that he execute and deliver to him a deed to the said real property, and unless you, the said Charles McDonald, redeem the said property by paying to the said Treasurer 10 thousand dollars together with interest thereon at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said dates of payment, the said Treasurer will make and deliver to the said L. H. Craver a deed to the said property. L. H. CRAVER. H. O. and R. O. CRAVER. Office and P. O. Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, In Probate. of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Gertrude Aude. In Deceased—No. 8708. Order to Show Cause Vhy Distribution Should not be Made John Edwards, administrator of the estate of Gertrude A. Edwards, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appears that the estate is now in a condition forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Gertrude A. Edwards, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Oklahoma, on April 11th, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be approved and an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate against the said Gertrude A. said petition mentioned, according to the order. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in each of three most public places in King County and published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 11th day of publication. A newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 7th day of September, 1910. A. W. FRATER. Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss. I. D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, so hereby certify that the deceiving is full true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 7th day of September, 1910, in the matter of the estate of Gertrude A. Eifhards, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 7th day of September, 1910. (SEAL) D. K. SICKELS. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE Fred C. Brown, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. John Doe Matijasevich and Richard Roe Gilovich, copartners, doing business under firm name of Alaska Liquor Company, Defendants No. —, Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King, ss The State of Washington: To John Doe Matijasevich and Richard Roe Gilovich, copartners, doing business under firm name and style of Alaska Liquor Co: Each of you, are hereby notified that California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, has filed a complaint against you in said Court, which will come on to be heard at my E.W.WAY & CO. ANCHOR YOUR SAVINGS IN SEATTLE BAILEY BUILDING SEATTLE BEST BOARD COMPANIES REAL ESTATE-INSURANCE office in Room 210, New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 20th day of October, A. D. 1910, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock a. m., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said action is for the sum of Eighty-two Dollars and Twenty-five Cents ($2.25), being a balance due the plaintiff on account of merchandise sold and delivered to the defendants during the year 909. Fried September 15th, A. D. 1910. FRED C. BROWN. Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. TWOROGER & WINKLER. Attorneys for Plaintiff. 10-11 Triangle Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication Sept. 16. 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, Washington, Summons by Publication. Ella Croft, Plaintiff, vs. Harry W. Barrows, Defendant.-No. 75894. The State of Washington to the said Harry W. Barrows, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 23rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complaint in this action prays for the annulment of a marriage ceremony entered into between the plaintiff and defendant on December 28, 1907, and that the said marriage ceremony may be cancelled and annulled, and for all proper relief. H. E. FOSTER. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 606 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, September 23, 1910. Date of last publication, Nov. 4, 1910. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. M. J. Lutz, Plaintiff, vs. Charles W. Ingran, Administrator of the Estate of Richard Lehn, Deceased, and Mrs. A. Sjoequist, Defendants.—No. 72747. The State of Washington to Mrs. A. Sjoequist: You are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 23rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment to be rederied against your acquiring to the demand of the complaint herein which has been filed with the clerk of this court The object of said action, as set forth in the complaint, is to foreclose two certain mortgages given by the said Richard Lehn in his life time to the said plaintiff, the first one being dated November 16, 1906, to secure the sum of $12,000.00, with interest thereon at the rate of 7 per cent per annum from said date until paid, and the second one dated October 8, 1906, to secure the sum of $12,000.00, with interest at the rate of 7 per cent per annum from said date until paid, and to recover judgment for said amounts and interest and $26.98 taxes paid by plaintiff, an attorney's fee of $140.00 and costs of suit; both of said mortgages being on lots 1 and 2, block 3, John J. McGilvra's Second addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to foreclose and determine all the right, title and interest of said defendants and each of them in and to said property. Other Offices Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg. Seattle King County, Washington. 1919-1920. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- l ty. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Allen P. Mitten, Deceased.—No. 11658. By order of said court made horsing on the 8th day of September, 1910, not the 8th day given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the underigned executors of said estate, at 1308 Alaska Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 23, 1910. 1308 Attorneys for Estate. Attorney for Estate, Wash. Sept. 23—Oct. 22, 1910 FRIDAY September 30, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Alonso H. Jose. Deceased.—No. 11696. By order of said court made herein on the 7th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 1308 Alaska Building, pres. successor said estate, in Seattle, in said annuity and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 23, 1910. N. H. JOSE, As Administrator of said Estate. BRADY & RUMMENS, Attorneys for Estate, 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Oct. 22, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, Summons. Nellie Derry, Plaintiff vs. Herbert A. Derry, Defendant—No. 75952. The State of Washington to the said Herbert A. Derry, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 23rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys of plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is instituted for the purpose of dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant, for the reason and upon the grounds that sald defendant has failed, neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the support and matrimony sald plaintiff; and for the decree availing such plaintiff the following described real property situated in the State of Washington, particularly described as follows, to-wit: Lots twenty-two (22), twenty-three (23), twenty-six (26) and twenty-seven (27), in section seven (7), township thirty (30), north of range nine (9) west, Clallam County, Washington; and also the following property situated in King County, State of Washington: The west half of lot twenty-five (25) and lot twenty-six (26) block eight (8). Bucklus Addition to the City of Seattle; and for such other and further relief as to this court may seem just and equitable. REED & HARDMAN, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. address: 960 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 GILHAM-LYSONS REALTY CO., General Offices: 411 Lowman Bldg. Loans, Investments, Insurance. H. E. Gilham. J. W. Lysons. Main 3044. Ind. 1538. BUY THE BEST If you want a safe which you know Has No Superior, buy one of the Hall Safe & Lock Co.'s, manufactured by the Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co., for which we are the sole agents. PURCELL SAFE CO. Prefontaine Bldg., Prefontain Place and Yesler Way ALBERT HANSEN. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses. Phone, Main 268. Seattle Washington. First and Cherry.