Seattle Republican

Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE PUBLISHER'S NOTICE. The Seattle Republican is published on Friday of every week by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3.00 per year; six months, $1.50 postage prepaid. Subscriptions to all foreign countries included in the Postal Union, $4.00 a year, postage paid. Sample copies, free. Single copies ten cents. Advertising rates made known on application. Special rates to publishers. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. Address all communications to The Seattle Republican, 307 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. Make all checks, drafts, postal orders, etc., payable to "Cayton Publishing Company." CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. Telephone: Main 305. Publication office, 307 Epler Block. HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON - - - Publisher SUSIE REVELS CAYTON - - - Associate IS ORGANIZED LABOR GUILTY? That the perpretrators of the dastardly and cowardly act of blowing up the Times building and the killing of something like three score men and women, and maiming for life as many more, in the city of Los Angeles, is the work of organized labor or the sympathizers thereof, is a foregone conclusion, and, it is hoped, that every person, who even previously knew of the diabolical conspiracy, to say nothing of the ones who committed the act, will be apprehended, convicted and sentenced to have every joint in their bodies severed one by one and finally their lifeless carcasses fed to the swine. It is the most reprehensible crime of the age and justice is unable to devise a punishment sufficiently severe to administer to the perpetrators thereof. When a set of men for selfish ends will resort to the wholesale slaughtering of their fellow men and without warning, as was the case in the blowing up of the Times building in Los Angeles, then they become so badly beastilized as well as brutalized that they have no rights that the human family should respect, and human sympathy for such cowardly curs would be like unto finding an excuse for the wild beast of the jungles that lay in wait for the unsuspecting human victims. It has not been proven that either organized labor on the sympathizers of that institution committed the diabolical act, but suspicion points strongly in that direction. For the past decade or more the owners of the Times have been in a life and death struggle with organized labor and violent threats have been repeatedly made by the more reckless against the Times, and it is therefore the concensus of opinion that some member or members of organized labor have turned this trick. If organized labor did commit the act it selected a time to do so when it would be able to kill two birds with one stone. First, to destroy the Times building and its plant, the arch enemy of organized labor, and thereby intimidate the proprietors of the institution in further opposing union labor. Secondly, to kill as many of the employes of the Times as possible as a punishment for working on the job and finally to intimidate others from taking the places of the dead men and women. If organized labor committed the deed it did so with the view of likewise teaching the general public a lesson to the effect, that it would not be safe for any man or concern to undertake to do business without employing union help, and the rules for conducting the business would be fixed by the executive council of organized labor and the business run in the interest of the employees rather than in the interest of the employers. Every man should have the right to use his money and brains as he sees fit so long as it does not conflict, discommode or interfere with his fellow men. If a certain class of persons do not care to work for such person or concerns there should be no law to compel them to do so. On the other hand if such persons or concerns do desire to employ union labor or any specific class of labor there should be no law to compel them to do so. But above all things both capital and labor should have an equal show before the law and the denial of this right to either side should result in open rebellion on the part of the other. Private institutions bear no relations to either public or quasi public insti- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. FRIDAY, OCTOBER 7, 1910 [Picture of a man in a suit with a bow tie]. Who with others acquired title to large tract of British Columbia Coal Lands. tuoions and the public has no right to interfere in the manner the individuals put in operation for the conduct of them. If organized labor does not wish to work for such institutions it is its privilege to not only not do so, but to not even patronize the output of such concerns. Organized labor has no grievance when such concerns decide they do not want union help. Non-union men and women have as much right to live and make a living as union men and women and every person should have the right to refuse to join a union labor organization, if he or she so desires, and should not in any way be maligned therefor. Therefore, if organized labor has played any part in the blowing up of the Times building, it is guilty of murder, arson and treason and death should be the portion of the one guilty of the act. We know that capital often controls the courts, the legislatures and even Congress and in a thousand and one ways through the above mediums oppress the laboring man, but two wrongs never made one right and the owners of the Times had neither impartuned the aid of the legislatures nor the courts to prevent union labor from working for them, they had simply refused to comply with the request of organized labor, and for that refusal this diabolical act is probably the result. The owners of the Times and organized labor differed, as said above, some ten years ago and since that time the paper has employed non union help and it has been the eye sore of union labor. Every effort and energy has been put forth on the part of organized labor to cripple the Times, but it has grown fat and strong under fire and stands today as the only newspaper concern on the Pacific Coast that has successfully defied organized labor. Other metropolitan dailies on the coast have very seriously contemplated following the wake of the Times, but hesitated and finally concluded that discretion was the better part of valor and they would not invite an endless conflict on their paper and perhaps personal violence to themselves. The Times, however, has whipped organized labor to a frazzle and nothing should prevent it from enjoying its well earned victory unless the rules anarchy, such as the recent blowing up of the plant, should be brought into practice and in that case civilization would be utterly helpless to put an end to such lawlessness. ANSWER. COLONEL BLETHEN In view of the fact that the editor of the Daily Times of Seattle is making such a strenuous defense of Chief Wappenstein and the proprietors of record of LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 VOLUME XVII. NUMBER 19 the Arcade Dance Hall the following pertinent questions naturally come to the thinking man's mind: Have you any financial interest in the Arcade Dance Hall, Colonel Blethen? If you answer no, then, why are you trying to prevent an investigation of the alleged condition of affairs in the restricted district? Did you agree to support Hi Gill for the mayorality nomination, if he would agree to appoint Charles W. Wappenstein chief of the police in case he was nominated and elected? If you answer yes, then how could you take so much interest in the prospects of another man without having some hope of financial reward? Are you trying to shield the Gill administration? If you answer no, then why does the Times pronounce Gill and Wappenstein innocent before they have even been tried? We know it is the presumption of the law that every one is innocent until proven guilty, but is it not the duty of great metropolitan papers to carefully weigh both sides of all disputes and contentions and then give their readers the unbiased findings of the editorial and reportorial investigations? Have you, in this case done that, Colonel Blethen? Is it not exceedingly remarkable that you would put yourself and your paper in a questionable light in the eyes of the citizens of this community by trying to hold up the hands of the men, who seem to be loaded down with dark and foreboding suspicions? Is it not perfectly natural for men of worldly experience to say, you are doing it because you are being hit in the pocket book? When it was first whispered about the streets that you owned a third interest in the Arcade Dance Hall, some of the men you have assailed so unmercifully in your paper, would not believe it, and denounced it as a baseless fabric of a vision, but like Banquo's ghost, the rumor will not down, and it is more common talk today than when Wardall first broke loose. Where there is so much smoke there is bound to be some fire, and, if that be true, it is repeated, Colonel Blethen, Have you any financial interest in the Arcade Dance Hall? Remember, Colonel Blethen, you are on your oath now and must tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, or the reading public will believe what THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN has so often printed. "Saw, it in the Times? Damn lie." We know that men and women have broken the moral law ever since they have been created, but do you think a great metropolitan newspaper is doing its duty to the community, in which it is published, by encouraging vice in holding up the hands of those who are endeavoring to force notorious dance halls on the community for the sake of the dirty dollars they make out of it? If the pulpit and the press are to condone crime, then how long will it be before anarchy will take the place of partial law and order? You, Colonel Blethen, may be guilty of no wrong doing, but it looks like you have been caught with the goods on you. "Wipe out the saloons of a community and dance halls will fall of their own weight," declared Dr. Leonard in his last Sunday sermon. "I think I make no mistake in saying that more than seventy-five per cent of all criminals that have come before me can consistently place the saloons as the cause of their downfall." declared a distinguished jurist. "I am by no means a Prohibitionist, but I am thoroughly convinced that the open saloon, which encourages the treat habit is the key note to the most of the crimes committed in the United States," was the conclusion of another noted criminal jurist. "I am thoroughly convinced if the saloons were closed at six o'clock, as are other places of business, three-fifths of the crimes committed in the United States," was the opinion of one of the judges of Seattle. We do not look to see Prohibition in this state and city and we do not think we want to see it, because we believe it would be interfering with the personal rights of the individual, but we do want to see the saloon be made not only obey the law, but the business conducted in a decent and respectable manner. It is its gilded saloon with its open doors day and night that gives the human family the worry and trouble that courts and juries have been called upon to ferret out and to punish the perpetrators. Through out the whole country no more difficult problem is met than the saloon problem. It however, is the rarest instance for a person to become a drunkard unless a place can be found where a number of persons can become "jolly good fellows." CURRENT COMMENT EDITORIAL EDICTS Col. Billy Bryan is no longer a drawing card writes a correspondent. Horror of horrors, just to think that our great and only Teddy may come to the same place. The Clancies are reported as having given up the gambling games for good, and yet it has not been reported that, the Clancies have been arrested for insanity. In abolishing the office of court commissioner of King county a good man is knocked out of a worthless, and, so far as the tax payers are concerned, an expensive position. Bogus mining stock to the extent of seventy-three million dollars have been sold in New York to persons trying to get something for nothing. Its the old, old story. "a fool and his money soon part." It is simply sacrilege to even think that the Hon. Geo. U. Piper ever got drunk, why the man is desperately in love with the white ribbon bunch and he is the embodiment of all that is pure and holy. J. M. Wiestling announces the removal of his offices from the Boston block to 335 Bailey block. He and his son F. B. Wiestling have been officeing together and now F. B. will occupy the suit in the Boston block. In traveling 59,000 miles around the world we wonder if Col. W. M. Ridpath of Spokane was chasing the gubernatorial bee of Washington, which has been humming in his ears for so many years. No, Constant Reader, Colonel Thompson did not call Mayor Gill and Chief Wappenstein liars, but it would take a Philadelphia lawyer to figure out the difference between what he did call them and what he did not call them. Men and women are responsible for a red light district, declared Dr. Matthews. It is the men's greed for gold, and that kind of greed that prompts them to sacrifice their mothers and sisters to the lusts of fiends of their own stripe in order to get the money. Judge Thomas Burke is said to have a special agent out looking for the most choice bunch of native cactus for a boquet for him to present to the editor of the Argus of Seattle for having relieved him of a bunch of money and then roasting him when he could get no more. Judge W. W. Black, the Democratic nominee for representative in Congress from the first district, is laying close to Seattle just now. In other words, so far as his opponent is concerned, he is taking the war into Africa. Whether he does or does not win at the polls one thing is certain he has Colonel Alden J. Humphrey on the run. You are mistaken, Mr. Admirer of Judge Boyd J. Tallman, of Seattle, he is not running for the supreme bench, but Warren W. Tallman, of Spokane is, and he is a Democrat, while Judge Tallman is a Republican. The point that we are seeking to bring out is, that you must not vote for Tallman for supreme judge believing you are voting for Judge Tallman of Seattle, for he is not a candidate. Thomas D. Page, brother-in-law of Miles Poindexter, the nominee of the Republican party for United States senator, and who, it has been given out, is to handle the federal patronage of Western Washington, is again in legal entanglements, he being charged with having taken an undue advantage of a client. How much truth there is in the allegation is hard to say at this writing, but after listening to the man's story Judge Ronald thought it warranted consideration by the bar association and so J. C. Higgins was sent for. After Mr. Higgins had listened to the story, he, too, came to the conclusion that it warranted an investigation by the bar association, and an investigation is therefore on tap. Tom Page is always in some kind of entanglement and sooner or later he is going to get it good and hard. It may not be now or tomorrow, but it is coming. --- ```markdown ``` From the amount of undue interest the editor of the Times has displayed in the discharge of Chief Wappenstein one would think that the doughty old colonel has gotten badly hit in the hip. James A. Moore, the well known promoter and builder, is one of a company that has acquired 43,000 acres of valuable coal lands on Queen Charlotte Island from the British government. The company is capitalized at one million dollars. The Republicans have opened up state headquarters in Hotel Seattle and the Democrats have opened headquarters in the Butler hotel only a block apart. In the mean time the voters are thinking for themselves and care very little if anything as to where either one is. As rotten as things seem to be in official circles not much is going to come out of the investigation prompted by the city council as one side is obstructing and the other side is hesitating lest it gives the city a bad reputation, about which the latter need not worry as the city already has a reputation as black as the blue imps of hades. There is no doubt but that the First Methodist Episcopal church has a live wire in Dr. Leonard, the new pastor. In his last Sunday sermon he took a fall out of those who are responsible for the redlight district, and he did it in language that actually brought rounds of open applause from the audience. That he will get busy at once, if not sooner, is a foregone conclusion. Clarence D. Hillman's methods of selling real estate may be rather questionable, yea, even criminal, technically speaking, but after all he has made it possible for more poor people to get good homes in and around Seattle than all of the other real estate dealers in the community combined. A majority of those who bought of him are today happy for having done so. Both Hillman and the purchaser have made money and therefore both should be satisfied. A city ordinance making it a misdemeanor for a passenger on one of the street cars of the city to enter and stop at the entrance door, compelling every one else, who either enters or leaves the car, to pull over them, should be passsed by the city council. Even nicely dressed women will do the dirty deed and have the effrontery to scowl at any one who disarranges their head gear in trying to squeeze out. Go to the front of the car and save being annoyed as well as annoying others. Portugal has gone Republican, but it has cost the country a good many lives and the destruction of a great deal of valuable property to turn the trick. Surely this is an off year for Republicanism. But in Portugal going Republican a new form of government was born to that country and instead of a kingdom a republic is in vogue. King Manuel and his court have fled and are now under the protection of the British flag, while the rebels hold high carnival in the royal palace. Everything seems to point to a similar coupe d'etat being pulled off in the very near future in Spain. Both the Spanish and Portugese governments have been ripe for revolution for the past two years and the spirit of rebellion has lain smoldering for months only awaiting for a man of nerve to apply the torch and off she goes. Portugal rebels have done their stunt and those of Spain are daily if not hourly expected to do theirs. Now that it has been decided that the investigation of the police affairs of the city of Seattle is to be with open doors and that the chief is to be represented by counsel, the committee should lay down the rule in the very outset that, in view of the fact that the chief is not being tried on a criminal charge, and that if found guilty it will only mean his discharge from the public service and not deprive him of either his life or liberty, that technicalties must be cut out on the part of the attorneys. If the evidence seem to point to the probable guilt of the official even though it could not be proven, to the satisfaction of a judge and jury the official should be dismissed, for such suspicions destroys the usefulness of the official as well as casts odium on the administration responsible for his actions. The people must be satisfied or they will rebel and the chief executive that does not keep his ear to the ground to catch what the people are murmuring for, will find himself out of a job at the first opportunity the people get to register their objections to him. FRIDAY October 7. 1910 THE WEALTH OF THE NORTHWEST There is only one answer to the question: "What is the greatest single resource of the Northwest?" Water. And the same word will answer the question, "What is the least utilized resource?" When one begins talking about the resources of the Northwest his reputation may as well be placed on the chopping block—unless he goes cautiously and sifts into his remarks, convincing statistics and familiarly sounding names and titles. The suspicious reader immediately recollects all of the booster, and boom and brag and fish stories that he ever heard from the West or about the West and then crowns the "water story" king of them all. Nor is the suspicious reader—who has nineteen to one, never traveled through the great northwestern corner of his native land, or carefully studied a map of the United States—so much to be blamed. Many and many of the residents and the natives of the Northwest do not know or appreciate the water wealth and water possibilities of their home land; possibilities that spell opportunities for capitalists, for home builders, for hydraulic engineers, for town makers and city dwellers. A recent report of the United States Geological Survey tells us that the total water horse power now utilized in the United States is a little more than 5,000,000. The same report says that it is possible to develop in the Pacific Northwest 25,000,000 water horse power. Nailed down still more closely, the government statistician asserts that the Columbia river alone, exclusive of its tributaries, is capable of developing more water horse power than is now being used in the entire United States. Generalizing the water power possibilities of the Northwest, the figures compiled from late reports and estimates of all the departments of government at Washington, D. C., show that nearly one-half of the total undeveloped water power of the United States is found in the Pacific Northwest Nor is water power without its use in all parts of the Northwest. Fifteen hundred and fifty-three water wheels are in operation in Washington, Oregon and Idaho, developing a total of 472,165 water horse power. Compared with the total power possibilities, these figures of course look almost as small as a rain drop, being something less than one and one-half per cent of the total possible water power of these three Pacific Coast States. Egypt and India have boasted in time past—and possibly do yet—that they were the home of the largest single irrigated tracts of land in the world. Their claims are now vociferously disputed by a shout from the Northwest—from Idaho. A few years ago Southern Idaho was a broad, uninteresting, desolate, sage brush growing and coyote breeding plain. The only break in the monotony was the high rugged cliffs of the Snake River, and the dashing waters far below. Today the Snake River and its tributaries are reclaiming to wonderful fertility several million acres of the former desolation of Southern Idaho. The Columbia river and the Snake river are not exceptional in the Northwest. Only a pinch of their power and a dipperful of their water, as it were, have yet been used. The same can be said of the Deschutes and the Williamette and the Rogue rivers in Oregon; and the Yakima, the Pend d'Oreille, and the Snoqualmie rivers in Washington; and concerning the smaller streams in Idaho. Some of the most cheaply harnessed power sites nearest the largest cities have been and are being developed. Also streams have been diverted for irrigation at points where they can be with the expenditure of a reasonable amount of capital. In many sections this water that has been diverted for irrigation is very valuable, as would be presumed where water is the difference between aridity or semi-aridity with its small and uncertain crops and orchards worth from $1,000 to $4,000 an acre. The early settlers in the inland Northwest naturally followed the streams and selected a homestead with running water. The value of irrigation was gradually learned and ditches were extended to the bench lands which often proved to be more valuable for agriculture than the bottom lands. Communities of farmers joined in building still larger ditches. Then the National Reclamation Service came with its millions and constructed great storage reservoirs and long ditches to reclaim thousands of acres of land in a body. The Reclamation Service set the example for private capital and now many of the greatest reclamation projects of the Northwest have been and are being constructed by private companies, mainly under the terms of the Carey Act.—Randall R. Howard in Spokane Opportunities for September. THOUGHS FROM THE COUNTRY PRESS FRIDAY October 7. 1910 The state fair at North Yakima, according to the press of that city and county, was the best this year that it has ever been and was more largely attended. The Yakima valley has become famous for its fruits and vegetables and now that it is likewise becoming famous for its live stock the fairs over there will continue to attract more and more every year. It is being advocated by the Democrat of North Yakima that the city of North Yakima remain a city of the third class until special legislation can be enacted to enable it to vote on a commission form of government. The commission form of government is becoming exceedingly popular even before it seems to have been thoroughly tried out. The people want a change. The Sun of Sunnyside recently issued a special Orchard and Fruit number in the interest of the orchards in and around Sunnyside and it gives a splendid account of fruit growing in that section. Sunnyside City is only a short distance from the famous Orchard Tracts, which were platted and planned by E. F. Blaine of Seattle. It has been estimated that the apple crop around Wenatchee will bring the owners thereof in the neighborhood of two million dollars. The orchards are about six years old. Sixty per cent of the lumber mills of the Puget Sound country are idle and the other forty per cent are only running at half capacity. When the mills are idle it is always safe to figure that hard times prevail in the Puget Sound country. The Pierce County Pioneer Society held its annual meeting at the Puyallup fair last Wednesday and was largely attended. The Puyallup annual stock show and fair is one of the interesting annual meetings of the Northwest and attracts thousands of people every year. Thomas Harlan, editor of the Oaksville Cruiser, a G. A. R. man, and one of the old stalwart Republicans, is canvassing the first Congressional district in the interest of W. W. Black, the Democratic candidate for representative in Congress against W. E. Humphrey, the Republican candidate. The fruit cannery at Shelton is said to be working over time just now and has contracted all the fruit that it has the capacity to put up. An increase of both the plant and the fruit trees might mean a good deal more money for that community. The Olympia Chronicle is of the opinion that Representative Humphrey is in danger of losing his seat in Congress and the same be filled by Judge Black, who is making a vigorous campaign for the election. From the publications of Davenport it is learned that a $10,000 hospital will soon be on the highway to completion, that is if the plans mature as rapidly as they are giving evience of doing at this time. There should be a well equipped hospital in every large city of the state and most assuredly one in every county of the state and until that has been done it will be impossible to care for the sick of the respective communities as they should be. But a few days ago the editor of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN informed the editor of the Seattle Daily Times that his name is Cayton and not Clayton and that he was not colored but born that way; and now the editor of the Lincoln County Times has to be posted on the very same points. Did you think your readers would be more inclined to believe the reproduction from THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN by you discussing the personality of the editor? We know all about ourselves and so do a majority of your readers. Cut it out. With its last issue the Colfax Gazette began its thirty-fourth year. It is one of the strong weeklies of the state and is well patronized by the business men and farmers of Whitman county. While the Gazette is a pretty good weekly it has room for improvement, and if it expects to continue to get the patronage of the men of the community it had better add some new features to its pages. The farmers of Whitman county are said to have more cash money on deposit in the banks of the county than in any other community in the Northwest and, an up-to-date weekly paper will run some of the "befo de wah" publishers out of the field unless they get a move on themselves. After a hot fight between the drys and the wets Coulee City by a majority of one decided to abolish the saloon. The dry and wet proposition has been playing a great game of hide and go seek in the state of Washington for the past year. The Trade Register of Seattle speaks as follows of the apple crop: "The yield in Washington is estimated at from 3,-500,000 to 3,600,000 boxes as against 2,414,261 boxes THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. in 1909, when the average wholesale price was $1.40 per box. Oregon is second with more than 2,000,000 boxes as compared with 750,000 boxes in 1909, and 1,800,000 boxes in 1907. Idaho will have about 650,000 boxes, an increase of more than 100 per cent over last year and as against 540,000 boxes in 1908, while Montana should harvest 250,000 boxes, a gain over 1909, when 180,000 boxes were marketed. Montana's best previous crop was 225,000 boxes in 1908. When men and women become content with life in the country then, and not until then, will the country become equally as inviting and perhaps attractive as is the glare of the city. Briefly we are going to tell you of a country newspaper publisher, who is content to remain in the country, and being content he has been able to realize more out of the publishing business than his city contemporary, with perhaps much more money invested. The publisher of the Bothell Sentinel is J. C. Gregory, who is seeking to give those residing in and about Bothell a regular. PETER H. HARRIS readable and reliable weekly newspaper, which, like all community papers, fills a field peculiar to itself, and cannot be robbed of it, even by the invasion of the metropolitan dailies. The local weekly paper of any community is always essential to the happiness and convenience of said community, if not in many instances, its commercial growth, and this is especially true when the local paper becomes thoroughly identified with the community and each week gives the news of the community fair and impartially. Mr. Gregory is endeavoring to give Bothwell just such a paper, and he is making a brilliant success of the undertaking. For years he was the publisher of the Argus at Auburn and it is recorded that he made as high as $2,500 net in one year out of the paper, which sum meant more than twice that amount, made by a city publisher. In his new location he owns a splendid home with an acre and a half of rich soil about it and on this he raises all the vegetables his family can use. He has a sufficient number of chickens to give him the necessary eggs he needs for his household and a cow in the barn furnishes the milk. His printing office is on one corner of the property and he is therefore without house or office rent. He not only publishes a paper, but he does the job work of the community and also gets some work from the great city. Being almost without living expenses all he takes in from the paper and the job office can be laid away after the necessary expenses for running the same have been paid. Being of the Roosevelt type he has children and is able to give his children lucrative employment at home, out of which they can realize more than if they were in the city working for big wages. Mr. Gregory may not at this time be realizing as much money out of his business as he did out of his Auburn plant, but if he is able to realize only $40 per month above his running expenses, owing to the status of his living expenses, he is able to put away more for a "rainy day" than the city publisher who realizes $150 per month over and above his running expenses. At a recent sessions of the State Press Association plans were put on foot to have the association celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of the launching of the Washington Standard by John Miller Murphy at Olympia, which will take place November 17th. It can be said without fear of successful contradiction that The Standard is the very best country paper published in in the state of Washington. When the Bottell Sentinel tells us of a Mr. Snell, who has green strawberries in his patch and hopes to see them ripen before snow flies, it occurs to the editor hereof that, Editor Gregory has not only abandoned his white ribbon vows, but is even mixing his drinks. Perhaps the South Bend Journal actively supported the Hon. Miles Poindexter for senator, but if it did its readers were compelled to read of its activity between the lines. Editor Hazletine, it occurs to us, was afraid to be for any one for a long, long time and after the Tacoma convention he shyly endorsed Poindexter, but now he comes out and says he was an active supporter. He supported Poindexter when he got a promise from Poindexter that he, Hazeltine could handle the federal patronage of the Southwest. When Otto A. Case, auditor of King county, refused to issue a marriage license to a Japanese man and a white woman that they might be married honorably, he neither acted within the bounds of the laws of the nation nor the laws of his state, and it makes the proverbial Indian smile to read the following alleged justification of his acts in a local weekly paper: The Gazette-News takes its hat off to County Auditor Otto A. Case for refusing to issue a marriage licenfe for the marriage of a Japanese and a white girl—or a couple of them for that matter. The minister or magistrate who would perform the marriage ceremony in such a case must be financially embarrassed and sadly in need of the fee, or else he has lost all sense of right and wrong. It is high time the legislature of the state of Washington enacted a law prohibiting marriage between the white and colored races. It is nothing short of a crime for such ill-mated parents to bring children into the world. Hurrah for Case! That the writer of the above is a miserable hypocrite and strains at a gnat but swallows without effort a camel is evidenced by the mongrel class of citizens in the United States known as mulattoes, who now number over four million, the greater part of which are the results of illicit relations between white men and black women, to which he seems to have no objection. The white woman who loves a Japanese and marries him is a thousand times more honorable than the skulking male skunk with a white skin, who hangs about the quarters of black folk and is responsible for a string of half caste children, who, after maturity, dares to point to no man as their father and they themselves being living monuments of their mother's shame and disgrace, have no desire to hold her up as a mother. Better a thousand times over to marry a monkey than to cohabit with one and set adrift a number of human crafts that are parentless, the father refusing to own them and knowing of the disgrace that it brings on both them and the mother, they refuse to acknowledge any woman as a mother. God created five distinct races and doubtless intended for them to remain so, but they have wilfully and in many instances wofully broken the law, but if there is to be a mingling of races, then it should be along honorable lines and not along the lines so common in the United States. Set your own house in order before looking after others. Charged with failing to provide for his wife and three children, and especially one in tender years, former Councilman Alex McKinnon from the Ninth ward in Seattle was summoned to appear before Judge Frater one day this week to explain. The charge seems almost preposterous, and yet the cold facts say it is absolutely true. Strong drink is said to be the cause of Mr. McKinnon's downfall, but to see him on the street one would not think he had fallen very far. TO FIGHT TALKING TRUST Reeves Aylmore, a well known attorney, has decided te cross swords with the Pacific States Telephone company and fight its new rate for telephone service, which for the most part, the company is forcing its patrons to sign for or the removal of their phone is ordered. The agent for the telephone company made a new explanation for the new raise and it was that, it is more expensive for the company to serve a large number of customers than a limited number and in raising the rate the company was simply hedging to prevent itself from going into bankruptcy. Reasoning along that line the telephone company must be bitterly opposed to the future greatness of Seattle, and instead of wanting her to have a population of 750,000 in 1922, as its district superintendent has advocated in the Pacific Northwest Commerce for October, the company really desires the city to lose some of the population it now has, that its plant will enhance in value. If the company is losing money by having to serve a city of 240,000 and to keep it from going into bankruptcy is compelled to increase the rate of all phones twenty-five per cent, by the time the population of the city reaches the expected 750,000 in order to maintain a telephone system, the customers will have to be charged in the neighborhood of thirty dollars per month for telephones. With the prospects of getting so large a sum of money for its rentals, we agree with District Superintendent Peter J. Lynch that the Pacific States Telephone company looks forward to the day, when the population of Seattle will be 750,000 with a good deal of satisfaction. It will be remembered that the same men own the stock of both companies and a merger of the two may be expected at any time and the middle aged man in Seattle may live to see the day when his local telephone costs him thirty dollars per month. Under the franchise of the Pacific States company $100 per month may be charged if the company so deires. 4 THE AIRSHIP IN WAR Will air men help in war? Would an observer be safe from fire? And in order to escape the fire of the enemy would not air ships have to fly so high that it would be impossible to take accurate observations from them? These are questions now stirring the minds of the army folks. Some of the most optimistic claim that the war problem is solved. The aeroplane has proved itself a marvellous means for transmitting orders. It has also shown itself a formidable engine for reconnoituring, but there are conditions which, at its present stage, would greatly impair this. Already there has appeared in the press a picture of the latest type of airship and aeroplane gun designed by the Krupps. It is mounted upon a high power speed automobile which should be able to keep up with the swiftest airship. It is intended for both defensive and offensive use. Trials of the gun have recently taken place. It was fired at dummy balloons and nearly every shell hit and the gas in the bag exploded. As the case now stands the aeroplane would make a splendid scout if the enemy were content to sit supinely down and be spied upon but there are no enemies like that. It would make a splendid carrier of messages providing the wind did not suddenly become strong, and as no one can vouch for the behavior of the winds, there remains some forceable drawbacks which will doubtless require considerable time to overcome. HOBBLE SKIRT PASSING FAD One writer says: "A year ago the hobble skirt donned by $\varepsilon$ star on the stage would have earned many laughs and sold many seats. Today it gets the laugh and nobody has to pay for the seats." One could stand the appearance of the hobble skirt, and indeed the hobble effect skirt is far from repelling, but it is the hampered effect which condemns it. The swinging, graceful stride which has become a muchly discussed characteristic of the American woman would be in danger if the style became general. Children some times in play bind their ankles and "see who can get to the corner first." Amid shrieks of laughter they fall, roll but rise again and hobble on as before. When grown ups bind their ankles and walk out on the streets for inspection a few impertinent ones laugh outright, many are the smiles blended with curiosity and contempt, but the feeling which largely predominates is one of pity. Pity that women of today are content to bow down to the god of fashion regardless of the paths they must follow in order to obey her mandates. There is one attending feature to the hobble skirt which will prove its undoing when it comes to that class of women who have reached the piece wnere their individual opinion must sanction a fashish before it is adopted; that is, in order to cross a street, step to the curb from the crossing, or climb upon the street car, one ITEMS MORE OR LESS INTERESTING must hop as would a kangaroo with bound petticoats on or pull her skirts so high that an unwomanly display of hosiery is made. No, the strong current is on the other side where freedom of movement is secured and the hobble skirt after bringing its wearers, who are extremists in most things, into ridicule will soon be among the things which have passed. One writer claims that boys and girls should not be imprisoned for gambling, pitch-and toss, rowdyism, stone throwing, swearing, football in the streets, breaking lamps, sleeping out or piling obstructions, as such offenses are merely the result of high animal spirits which properly trained may prove the best assets these youngsters can have in moulding their destinies. Such an argument fifty or sixty years ago would have met a most tremendous volly of disapproval, but these are days of new times and in many instances past our understanding. DIFFERENT BOOKS What is the proper length of a novel? is a late questions going the rounds among prominent authors and publishers. What many authors term hard headed and unimaginative publishers seem inclined to argue that public taste and business reason fix the standard at about 100,000 words. Of course the makers of fiction usually resent the idea that the product of their brains be measured as is carpet, by the yardstick. The reasons why people read are various: There are those who read because they hunger and thirst as it were, to hold communion with other men's thoughts; reading to them is a mental tonic which puts aroma into their thoughts and refreshes them. Others read because they feel that it is something which ought to come in the summed up duties of life, they plod through their books methodically and in the end actually realize some benefit if not much enjoyment for there are thoughts which cling and climb even to almost impossible persons; and then there are others who read because they consider it quite the thing to be able to say they have read the latest books. "Is this a good book?" asked one of the patrons of the city library of the clerk at the desk with whom she had often discussed the merits of different productions. "I have not read that one," was the reply. "It must be good, if I may judge by the number of times it has been taken out," continued the subscriber. "You cannot always depend upon that," answered the clerk. There are many persons who take out books simply because they are new, and so some of the poorest books are the greatest travelers" However, it is an unexpressed but mutually felt understanding among readers that bad books cannot be too short nor good books too long. "How do you like that book?" asked one reader of another. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN "So well that I am going to turn right back to the beginning and read it all over again just as soon as I finish it," was the reply. It is easy to know what that meant for the book. And there are books which are re-read every year or so. Those are the kind which live, those are the kind which it is worth while to write, and such kind could never be measured and sold by the pound. PEOPLE IN PUBLIC President Taft reached his fifty-third mile stone on the 15th of September last. Susan Hale, artist and author, sister of the late Edward Everett Hale, died on September 17th aged seventy-six at Matunuck, Rode Island. The record for altitude, 6,692 feet is claimed by Leon Morane, the French monoplane manipulator. This ascension passes the mark set by J. Armstrong, the American aviator. Rear Admiral Corwin P. Rhees, who began military service at the age of sixteen and who has fought in more battles than any other living man, has retired for active service. Anderson Redding, a Negro farmer residing at Juliet, Ga., has invented a stalk puller which he has patened and for which he is now offered $5,000. He has received handsome sums from other inventions. The Rev. Thomas Bowman, oldest living bishop of the Methodist Episcopal church, recently celebrated his ninety-third birthday. Rev. Bowman was chapplain of the United States senate when President Lincoln was assassinated. Rose Pitonoff, who is but fifteen years of age, holds a medal for long distance swimming championship of the world In every contestwhich she has participated she has won a prize, generally the first. At present she is doing theatrical work, performing swimming feats before large audiences. W. E. Clark, of Chicago University claims that in prehistoric days women were the heads of families and the directors of local government. The men were wanderers but when they found the women making such a good thing of ruling they settled down and took matters into their own hands. E. A. Johnson, of Yakima, Wash., has proven himself to be quite a walker by defeating a horse in a walking race of eighteen miles. The horse was ridden by its owner but broke its walk several times. Judges followed in automobiles. When Johnson finished the horse was more than a mile behind. Horace White now lieutenant governor, who will succeed Mr. Hughes as governor of New York state, is a man of but forty-five summers. He was born at Buffalo, N. Y. Graduated from Cornell University and from Columbia University law school. Practiced law in Syracuse. He served a six year term in his state legislature after which he became lieutenant governor, and is said to be the most popular officer of the state. Senator Chauncey M. Depew of New York has recently returned from a trip abroad. The senator looks well and wears a good coat of summer tan which he says was not gotten with a fish hook in his hand nor with a gun over his shoulder. Mr. Depew says that nothing on earth gives him a greater sense of pleasure than going abroad and talking with persons of strong character, wit and culture, who control governmental policies and create public sentiment. SOME DONT'S Don't be afraid of your tradesman. Don't understand cheapness for economy. Don't buy in small quantities if you can avoid it. Don't be ashamed or too proud to do your own purchasing. Don't buy in a careless manner. Always ask for whatever the commodity is by a known weight or measure. Don't allow your groceryman or dairyman to weigh in the wooden butter dishes when he is weighing your butter. Don't let the fancy package goods fascinate you, because you are frequently paying very heavily for the fancy package. Don't gossip with your merchant while he is weighing your purchases unless you are absolutely sure of your tradesman. Don't be afraid to carry a bundle unless you are prepared and willing to stand the expense of having it delivered at your door. Some one down East has given the subject of housekeepers dealing with grocers, and has caused to be published the following don'ts for them to observe: Don't neglect to test the weight of package goods at home and compare them with the weigut of the same commodity purchased loose. When you purchase vegetables by the dry measure be sure to examine the measure the merchant uses before making your purchase to be sure that it has not a false bottom. The British government, after thorough investigation at home and abroad, is preparing to inaugurate sweeping changes in dealing with youthful offenders. At present 5,000 English youths are sent to prison each year for minor offenses. Hereafter, no youth between the years of sixteen and twenty-two will be committed to a prison for punishment, which has not a definite aim for discipline and education. This system has been most markedly typified by the New York method of dealing with the vicious and erring classes. Send your legals to The Seattle Republican, 305 Epler Blk., Phone Main 305. FRIDAY October 7. 1910 THE STATESMAN He felt too tired in summer To rise and weed at dawn. He never felt quite equal To the mowing of the lawn. He felt too tired in winter To shovel off the snow. He never stoked the furnace Nor raked the ashes low. He never pushed the carriage When baby took the air. He never beat the carpets Nor helped out anywhere. And yet despite his record In things that are not great He has a firm conviction That he can sweep the state. —McLandburgh Wilson. HUMOR OF THE LAW Judge John H. Miller, of Birmingham, Alabama, tells the following amusing anecdote of one of that interesting branch of the administration of law known as the justice of the peace: "A certain rural justice had heard a great deal of the manner of Judge Henry A. Sharpe on the bench of the city court of Birmingham, and resolved to come to town and witness his trial methods. "It happened that on the day the justice visited the court Judge Sharpe was trying a non-jury case. The apparent ease with which the judge announced his rulings on points of law and law and procedure while he sat back comfortably in his chair with his head resting on one hand delighted the country justice immensely. "At the close of argument by the attorneys, Judge Sharpe announced that he would take the case under advisement and announce his decision next Monday. "The justice came down from the court thoroughly delighted with Judge Sharpe's wisdom and methods. He returned home with his head full of new ideas for the conduct of his own court. "A few weeks later he had a case of considerable local importance. It was fought out with zeal by the opposing attorneys. During the introduction of evidence and the argument of attorneys the justice imitated Judge Sharpe as far as possible, even to resting his head on his hand in an easy, indifferent manner. "At the close of the argument he said: 'Gentleman, I will take this case under advisement and next Monday I will announce my decision in favor of the plaintiff." GILHAM-LYSONS REALTY CO., General Offices: 411 Lowman Bldg. Loans, Investments, Insurance. H. E. Gilham. J. W. Lysons. Main 3044. Ind. 1588. BUY THE BEST If you want a safe which you know Has No Superior, buy one of the Hall Safe & Lock Co.'s, manufactured by the Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co., for which we are the sole agents. PURCELL SAFE CO. Prefontaine Bldg., Prefontain Place and Yesler Way DENNY-RENTON CLAY & COAL CO., Manufacturers of All Kinds of Clay Products. Main 2189—Phones—Ind. 5125. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN FRIDAY October 7. 1910 It is still being talked in political circles that the Hon. George Turner of Spokane will enter the race for United States senator before the coming legislature, not so much as either a Democrat or a Republican, but a compromise between the two. It is reported that a number of hold over Republicans have already announced their willingness to vote for Senator Turner, if a sufficient number of new members will likewise indicate their willingness to do the same. George Turner was for many years a leading Republican politician of the state of Washington, but when the party took refuge under the gold standard in 1896 he became a free silver Republican and joined issues with the Democrats and Populists which combination captured the entire State. He was elected to the United States senate by the legislature of 1897 and served for six years. He became one of the leading members of Congress and gained quite a reputation as a thinker and debater. In Congress he affiliated exclusively with the Democrats. On his retirement from the senate he was repeatedly honored by President Theodore Roosevelt to important government appointments and he has but recently returned from Europe where with Senator Root he represented the United States government in the fisheries dispute between this government and England, which appointment was handed him by President Taft. Senator Turner is still very popular in the state of Washington and if he decides to enter the race for United States senator under the present state of affairs he will make it exceedingly interesting for his opponents. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, In Private. In the Matter of the Estate of James J. Lynch, Deceased. No. 10927, Order to Show Cause on Sale of Real Estate. Harry W. Bringhurst, the administrator of the estate of James J. Lynch, deceased, having filed his petition in this Court, duly verified, praying for a Order of this Court for the sale of all or a portion of the real estate of which the said deceased died seized, for the purposes therein set forth; And it appearing to the Court from said petition that the personal estate of the said deceased in the hands of said administrator is not sufficient to pay the claims against the said estate and the expenses of the administration thereof, and that it is necessary to all or a portion of the real estate of the deceased to pay the said claims and expenses of the administration. And it appearing to the Court that said petition conforms to, and is in accordance with the requirements of law in such case made and provided. It is ordered by the Court that all persons interested in the estate of the said deceased appear before said Superior Court on Saturday, the day of October 10, the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the foremento of said day at the Court room of the Probate Department of said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this Court should not be granted to said administrator authorizing and empowering him to sell the real estate of said deceased for such therein may be necessary to pay the desired claims and expenses of administration. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before the said 8th day of October, 1910, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said County of King and of general circulation therein. Done in open Court this 7th day of September. 1910. A. W. FRATER. Judge. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication. James Henry, plaintiff, vs. F. B. Hunt- ley and Jane Doe Huntley, his wife, whose true christian name is un- known, defendants. No. 74340. State of Washington to the defendants, F. B. Huntley and Jane Doe Hunt- ley. You and each of you are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait: within sixty (60) days after the 30th day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the behalf of the court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case you fall so do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the date of the plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to recover the sum of $105.95 together with costs and interest due from you to the plaintiff herein for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered to you at the time of action during the last past three years. A writ of attachment being issued out of this cause and court and lots 26 and 37, block 8, of Green Lake Reservoir Addition to the city of Seattle have been attached thereunder. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- trol In the Matter of the Estate of James McCarthy, deceased.—No. 11951. By order of said court made herein on the 29th day of September, 1910. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate. 416 Globe Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within the year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication Sept. 30, 1910. 1014 LOTTA McCARTHY, As Administrator of said Estate. H. B. COSS. Attorney for Estate. 416 Globe Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Louise Ashen, Plaintiff, vs. Lester Ashen, Defendant. No. —. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington, to Lester Ashen, Dependent. You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action within sixty days after the endate of the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the date of the first publication, to-write within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and answer a complaint of the plaintiff and save a copy of your answer upon attorney for the plaintiff below named, at his office, below stated, and in case of your failure so do judgment to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court and is to secure The object of this action is to secure a divorce on the ground of desertion for more than one year. A. C. McDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address, 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Oct. 7—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King Coun- publication ty. Summons on Maud A. Boschert, plaintiff, vs. Charles C. Boschert, defendant—No. 76217 The State of Washington, to the said Charles C. Boschert, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the wit, within sixty days after the 7th above entitled action in the above en titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and seize a copy your answer upon the undersigned at torneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and case of your failure to do augment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with clerk of said court. Briefly stated the object of this action is to dissolve the bonds of matri-fendant and to grant the plaintiff a divorced wife from the defendant on the behalf of abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant for more than one year last past, and for the failure of the defendant to support the plaintiff and his family, and to award the custody of their minor son, Robert E. Boschert, to the plaintiff. For further particulars reference is made to the complaint now on file in the office of the clerk of the above entitled court. Suite 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 7—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- tx., Summons by Publication. Elizabeth J. Marston, plaintiff, vs. Richard K. Marston, defendant.—No. 76271. The State of Washington, to the said Richard K. Marston, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear with her by days after the date of the first publication of the summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, that your failure to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for an absolute divorce on the grounds of non-support, and custody of two minor children. JOHN R. WILSON, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. address, 539 New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 7—Nov. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of Charles Robinson, deceased.—No. 10075. Martha A. Robinson and Harry T. Price, executrix and executor of the estate of Charles Robinson, deceased, having filed in this court their final account and petition setting forth that such account in addition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: 9:30 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior a week for four consecutive weeks before the 5th day of November, 1910, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. In enclosed court this 6th day of October, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distri- tion should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of Mary Mountjoy, deceased in 1629. William L. Loejoy, administrator of the estate of Mary Mountjoy, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law to claim the estate. In the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the Mary Mountjoy, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of New York at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 5th day of November, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed, and a final district hearing of the residue of idustrial among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law; It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks preceding the said final hearing, since a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 5th day of November, 1910, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 6th day of October, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Court Commissioner. Oct. 7—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Thos. Eaton, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. No. 75684. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are entitled to a notice that the amended plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April, 1910, and numbered B61750, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $1,000 upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, tow Beginning at a point 165 feet east and 33 feet south of the N. W. corner of the SW 1-4 of Sec. 10, Tp. 26 N., R. 5 E., W. M.; thence east 60 feet, thence S 120 feet, thence west 60 feet, thence N 120 feet, thence east 60 feet. The taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said described real property, to-wit. For the year 1907, the sum of $1.36; for the year 1908, the sum of 87 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 88 cents. Which several sums been paid for the annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to the court by mail with six days' payoff of the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Sept. 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Relinda Higdon, Plaintiff, vs. Ira Higdon, Defendant, No. —. Summons for Publication The State of Washington, to the said Ira Higdon, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 10th day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled action in the above entitled action of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the court of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from you on the ground of non-support, drunkenness and cruelty, and care and custody of minor child. ELIAS A. WRIGHT, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address. 629 Burke Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 9—Oct. 21; 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Preston Mill Co., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property claims. No. 76585. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April, 1910, and numbered B61756 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1905, in the amount of $10,000 upon the one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, described as follows: to-wt: Beginning at S. E. cor. of N. E. 1-4 of Sec. 32, Tp. 24, N. R. 7 E., W. M., thence west 420 feet to School Dist. No. 76, thence north to N. P. Ry., thence easterly along Ry. to easterly line of said section, thence S. 235 feet to the place of beginning. (Part of S. E. 1-4 of the N. E. 1-4 Sec. 32, Tp. 24 N., R. 7 E., W. M.) That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1906, the sum of 57 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of 72 cents; for the year 1908, the sum of 44 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 27 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Sept. 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office now tated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as found by law, and as prayed that plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L, H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A, C. MacDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 80—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. F. H. Harkins, plaintiff, vs. Elizabeth Brunner, Benedict Brunner, her husband, James McNamara, William E. Holmes, doing business under the name of the Holmes Plumbing & Heating Co. H. H. C. Keller, doing business as Keller & Sons, and the American Luxer Prism Co., defendants.—No. 75397. Summons by publication. The State of Washington to the said defendants, Elizabeth Brunner, Benedict Brunner, her husband, and the American Luxer Prism Company, a corporation: You, each of you, are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the second day of September, 1910, and defend the answer entitled action in the attorney's defense and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered to the court of the complaint herein which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of said action is to recover a judgment against the said Elizabeth Brunner and Benedict Brunner, her husband, for the sum of Fifteen Hundred Dollars, together with interest thereon at the rate of seven per cent per annum from the 32d day of January, less the sum of Fifty-four ($54.00). Dollars paid on account of interest, and interest on deferred interest installments at the rate of ten per cent per annum; also the sum of sixteen dollars for insurance paid by plaintiff and the sum of $170.00 attorney's fee and costs and disbursements herein and to foreclose that certain mortgage given by Washighshi Brunner and Benedict Brunner, on the 23rd day of October, 1907, to Osner & Mehlhorn, Inc., to secure said amount upon lot 6, block 3, Market Street Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to foreclose all right, claim or equity of redemption of each and all of said defendants in and to said property. Said mortgage was recorded on the 23rd day of October, 1907, in Vol. 330 of mortgages, page 566, of the records in the auditor's office of said King County. The said mortgage, and the sum secured by October, was on the 24th day of October, 1907, duly assigned, in writing, to said plaintiff. EDWARD VON TOBEL. Attorney for plaintiff. Office and post office address, rooms 603-8 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 2, Oct. 15, 1910. NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL ESTE BY the Treasurer of the City of Seattle, King County, Washington. To Patrick O'Connor: You are hereby notified that the undersigned, L. H Craver, is the owner and holder of two certain certificate of purchase No. 934, Lot 17, Block 2, of Columbia Terrace Addition, in said City, issued by the Treasurer of the said City on August 21st, 1908, for the sum of Seventeen and 30-100 Dollars ($17.30) under ordinance of the said City of Seattle, No. 13320. Said Certificate of purchase was recorded in the office of the Auditor of King County, Washington, on Nov. 9th, 1908, and the undersigned paid the said Auditor his fees therefor in the sum of $1.00. That since the said August 21st, 1908 the undersigned as an agent taxes and assessments on said land as follows, towit: on October 26, 1908, the sum of $9.28 and May 12, 1910, the sum of $144.03. And you, the said Patrick O'Connor, are hereby further notified that at the expiration of Sixty days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of the first publication, to-wit: sixty days after August 26th, 1910, the said L. H. Craver will demand of the said Treasurer of the said City of Seattle, that he execute and deliver to him a deed to the said real property and unlease the said Patrick O'Connor, redeem the said property by paying to the said Treasurer the sums hereinbefore mentioned with interest thereon at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from the dates of payment, the said Treasurer will make and deliver to the undersigned a deed to the said property. L. H. CRAVER, Office and P. O. Address: 524 Bailey Bidg., Seattle, Wash. August 26—Oct. 6, 1910. State of Washington, for King County. Wyman Partridge & Co., a corporation, plaintiff vs. James Fitzgerald and Injury Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, defendants. No. 74735. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzgerald and Injury Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, defendants; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 2nd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint within sixty days after the 2nd day of September, 1910, to answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to recover an judgment against you after possession upon a claim by plaintiff for goods, warees and merchandise sold and delivered to said defendants by said plintiff in the sum of Two Thousand One Hundred Twenty-seven and 10-100 Dollars ($2,127.10), with interest thereon from the 2nd day of May, 1910, besides the costs of suit, and in which said action an attachment has been taken out LEOPOLD M. STERN, and J. M. RUSSELL. Attorneys for plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 705 Low- man Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 2, Oct. 15, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Empire Furniture Manufacturing Company, a corporation, duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Washington, Plaintiff, vs. Thomas F. Lee, Defendant. No. 75667. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington, to Thomas F. Lee, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 9th day of September, A. D. 1910, and defend the plaintiff in a case in which a aforesaid and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his offices below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complete case, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to foreclose a certain chattel lien for $375 on personal chattels described in plaintiff's complaint located 1400 Ewing street, Seattle, Washington, in possession of plaintiff, the subject matter of this action, in which defendant has or claims an interest and in wholly excluding defendant from any interest therein. HENRY S NOON Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 703-4 New York Block, Seattle, King County, State of Washington. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Edith Rash, Plaintiff, vs. John F. Rash. Defendant. No. 75369. Summons by Publication. State of Washington to the said John F. Rash, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of August, 1910, in the above enclosed petition to the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated: FRIDAY October 7. 1910 and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said complaint which has been filed with the clerk of sald court. This notice is brought for the purpose of obtaining a decree of divorce from the sald defendant on the grounds of abandonment, non-support and personal indignities, the same being causes of action specified in the laws of Washington, for which services of summons by publication may be made. PARKER & BROWN, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: Room 25 Union Block, 713 1st Ave., Seattle, Washington. August 26—Oct. 6, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication. Frieda Marshall, plaintiff, vs. Joe Marshall defendant.—No. — The State of Washington to Joe Marshall. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above titled action in the above entitled petition and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed of the plaintiff said court. The object of this action will be on the grounds of habitual drunkenness of the defendant and the neglect and refusal of the defendant husband to make suitable provision for his family, be granted an absolute divorce from the defendant herein and the custody and control of the child of the plaintiff and defendant herein, the plaintiff and further relief as the court may direct. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Oct. 7—Nov. 18, 1910. 1-REPUBLICAN-Oct 6-noph IN THE JUSTICE'S COURT BEFORE John E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Summons by Publication. R. J. Eichler, plaintiff, vs. Cora Lowe and John Doe Lowe, her husband, whose true Christian name is unknown, defendants.—No. 13209. To Cora Lowe and John Doe Lowe, her husband whose true Christian name is unknown: In the name of the State of Washington you are hereby notified that R. J. Elchler has filed a complaint against you in said court which will come on to be heard at my office in Seattle, in King County, State of Washington, toowit, 210 New York Block, on the 4th day of November, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed, and the sound of the plaintiff will be the object and demand of this action is to recover the sum of Twelve Dollars ($12.00), being a balance due for material furnished and labor performed by this plaintiff for and on behalf of said defendants within the last past three years. Complaint filed September 14th, A. D. 1910. JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace. Oct. 7—Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, In the Matter of the Estate of Florence H. Lutz, Deceased. No. 11821. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 9th day of August, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said deceased and husband to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executor of said estate, at 1211 American Bank Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. 11. E. J. 1892, Attorney for Estate. 1211 American Bank Bldg. Seattle, Wn. August 26-Sept. 23, 1910. The Light and Power department of the Seattle Electric Company has moved to the Electric Bldg., Seventh avenue and Pine street. Street car tickets can be purchased and all bills paid in the Electrical Sales Room at the old location 907 FIRST AVENUE ORDER A CASE OUT TO YOUR PLACE OF Rainier PALE BEER PHONE SIDNEY 526 Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar and the State Dental Monopoly will lose two dollars when I do the dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established at 713 First Ave, in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete with, but with the high-class dent- Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar the State and the Sunny will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established at 713 First Ave., in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete with cheap dentists, but with the high-class dentists for half their price. Open evenings until 8 and Sundays until 4 for people who work. EDWIN J. BROWN, D.D.S. 713 First Avenue Seattle, Wash. Read my article in Sunday's P-I and Monday's Times and Star. FRIDAY October 7, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- Ly. Summons by Publication. ty. Summons by Publication. Charles Pfeffer, plaintiff, vs. Millie Bennett, Walter C. Bennett, his husband, Charles P. Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, his wife, whose true given names is to plaintiff unknown, William Brenner, D. A. Hatfield and "Jane Doe" Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown, and Charles W. Fisk, F. M. Hatfield, Ida M. Barton, Aurora Land Company, a corporation, defendants.—No. 75263. The State of Washington to Charles P. Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, whose true given name is unknown; D. A. Hatfield and Jane Doe Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is unknown. You, and each of you, are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 16th day of September, 1899, and after the above accorded action, the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and have a copy of your answer served upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered to you by way accorded to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to foreclose a certain mortgage executed and delivered by the said defendants Millie Bennett and Walter C Bennett, her husband, to one S. Campbell and by the sald S. Campbell assigned to this plaintiff, dated the 28th day of January, 1909, by the judge on appeal in Vol. 407 of mortgages, page 89 of the record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, which mortgage was given to secure a promissory note of $500.00 with interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent per annum and was given upon lots in 1909 by Rock Glenn Park First Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to obtain judgment for the said $500.00 together with interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the 28th day of January, 1910, and an attorney's fee of $75.00 and costs of suit and to determine the degree of interest of each and all of said defendants in and to said premises and every part thereof. EDWARD VON TOBEL. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. State of Washington, for King County. Summons. A. L. Weaver and Ella May Weaver, husband and wife, plaintiffs, vs. Peter The State of Washington to the said Peter E. Nordin, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 17th day of Sept. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment and decree will be rendered against you according to the demands that he accord with which he has filed with the clerk of said court. And all right, title and interest in the lands described in the complaint claimed by you likewise in the contract, and payments described therein will be foreclosed, forfeited, and the title of the plaintiffs cleared as to all claims you may have or claim you for plaintiffs. Attorney for plaintiffs. 1324 Alaska Blide., Seattle, Wash. Sept. 16. Oct. 28. 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Theodor Schmidt, deceased—No. 11907. By order of said court made herein on the 15th day of September, 1910. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and add all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executrix of said estate, to the executrix of Edward V. Tubel, 604 Mutual Life Bldg. Seattle, Wash., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication Sept. 16. Attorney Mutual Life Bldg. Seattle, Wash. Sept. 16, Oct. 14, 1910. State of Washington, for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Unknown owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75109. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued to the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of March, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Hillman's Meadow Garden Add., Div. No. 4, Lot 2, Block 44, Certificate number B55533, year 1907, amount 87 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 2, Block 44, Hillman's Meadow Garden Add., Div. No. 4, amount, $1.87; for year 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the date of said first publication, within 60 days after August 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the factual effect of the sum charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. AURORIA LAND COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CRAVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: Northern Bank & Trust Company Bldg. August 19, September 30, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. H. C. Bryson, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property Defendants—No. 75303. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the herelinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate is issued by the State of Washington, dated the 19th day of November, 1908, and numbered B54-892, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of 99 cents, and upon the real property situated in King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 10 Block 10, Manhattan Heights. The ten years since the subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907 the sum of 60 cents. For the year 1908 the sum of 37 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from the unpaid and unredeemed taxes are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said publication, to-wit, within sixty days after August 19, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount together with the applicable costs, case you fail so do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a slae of each parcel of said property to be paid for the wounds charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. August 19 - Sept. 30, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COUR8, KING County, Washington. Elizabeth Turnbull, Plaintiff, vs. George Turnbull, Defendant. No. ——. Summons. The state of Washington to the said George. Turnbull, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney the plaintiff at his office beheld stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complainant in this action prays for divorce and that the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved. E. FOSTER. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 606 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication October 7, 1910. Date of last publication November 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Knut Olaus Anderson and Bernard Halseth, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants.—No. 75304. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the City of Oyster State of Washington dated the 23d day of August, 1907, and numbered B48552, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1905 in the amount of $1.68, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows: West 260 feet N. 1/4 W. E. 1/4 Sec. 13, Twp. 22. N. R. 5 W. M. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Antone Kaas, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75305. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and do you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of November, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, including the amount and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit. West 660 feet of S$_{1/2}$ of S$_{1/2}$ of NE$_{1/4}$ of SE$_{1/4}$ Sec. 4, Tp. 21, N, R 4 E, W, M, certificate number B54644, year 1906, amount $1.23$. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ts. will ill for year 1908. en. ch. which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the paid and presented taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- Julylication, to-wit: within sixty days Aug. 19, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff a slave in the case of an owner under signedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it res- tensive as provided in law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. H. C. Bryson, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defects. No. 75306. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the bona fide claimant is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 19th day of November, 1908, and numbered 5B4991, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of 99 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lois Block 10, Manhattan Heights Addition. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property to-wait: for the year 1907, the sum of 60 cents; for the year 1908 the sum of 87 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from the unpaid and unpaid taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub-Julylication, to-wit: within sixty days of the above entitled court and action; and action this action answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a judgment for said taxes, said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 624 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. August 19, September 30, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Frank H. Renick, Anna Farmer and Hanna Farmer, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 74379. Notice and commons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of October, 1908, and numbered B54379, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.02, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, tow-ing the sum of SW. of W. of Sec. 29, Truck. 24, N. R. 6 E. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the su mof $1.78; for the year 1908, the sum of $1.24. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from sale of payment, and are all the sums due on taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- julylication. to-wit: within sixty days Sept. 9, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff under the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prevailed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. J. A. Musgrove and James Musgrove, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herelafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75302. Notice and summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants, and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of October, 1908, and numbered B54882, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the following amount of $3.54 and upon the real property situated said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 6, Sec. 4, Tp 21 N., R. 7 E, W, M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $2.96; for the year 1908, the sum of $6.08. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- Julylication, to-wit: within sixty days Aug. 19, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff under signedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums and found against it re-atively as provided, and be prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. August 19, September 30. 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Caroline L. Burns, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and the hereinafter described real property. Defendants. No. 76301. State Wash., Washington, D. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of the obsequent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of the State of Washington, dated the 2nd day of September, 1909, and numbered B61042 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of $4.86, and upon the real property situated in said King County described as follows, to 1. 5, Sec. 3p. 22, N. R. E. W. M., less Right-of-Way C., M. & St. P. R. Co. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1906, the sum of $2.11; for the year 1908, the sum of $0.73. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby free from any and all charges and be appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub-lylation, to-wit: within sixty days Sept. 9, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned, for plaintiff at his office, below stated, in the case of the due together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of the sums charged and found against it, respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Jos. Allen, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75300. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above de fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, state of Washington, dated the 19th of November 1908, and B54857, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.45, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, towit, Lot 12, Block 5, Allentown Acres. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property. For the year 1907, the sum of $4.57; for the year 1908, the sum of $1.76. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from sald date of payment, and are all the sums due on taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, the day of said first publication, two weeks after the date, Sept. 30, 1919, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of cowardice so to do judgment, be rendered to forgive the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided in law, and as provided in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. E. Kludwig, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75299. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them; You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of November, 1908, and numbered B54871, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.21, and upon the real property situated in said King City, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 2, Block 2, Hillman City, Division No. 7. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $1.78; for the year 1908, the sum of $5.15. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from the 14th payment, and all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, September 9, 1910, in the above written account and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the life of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this case. Court. L. H. GRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in County of King. In Probate. In the matter of the estate of Jennie M French deceased. No. 10432. Order fixing time for final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. The Seattle Trust and Title Company, administrator of the estate of Jennie M. French, deceased, having filed in its court's final account and petition settling forth the estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that it sets forth facts sufficient to authorize distribution of the residue of said estate; It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Jennie M. French, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Kentucky, at the court room of the Probate Department of said Court in Seattle on the 30th day of September, 1910, at the hour of 10 o'clock a.m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the estate of said estate among the heirs and persons said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for consecutive weeks before the said 30th day of September, 1910, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 27th day of August, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, C. C. Judge. State of Washington, County of King, D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washing-on, Court of the County of King, do hereby certify that one going is a full, true and correct record, a original order to show cause, made by said court on the 27th day of August, 1910. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 27th day of August, 1910. By BERRY SICKEL, Clerk. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. John Peterson, plaintiff, vs. Harry Laban, defendant—Summons by publica- tion. The State of Washington to said defendant, Harry Lahan: You are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the second day of Septembril and defend the above entitled action in the course of the court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the hands of the complaint herein which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of said action is to recover judgment against the said defendant for the sum of $199.65 and interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent per annum the sum of $65.65 June 1999 the sum of $5.53 taxes paid by plaintiff attorney's fees and costs and disbursements herein and to foreclose that certain mortgage given by the said defendant to one Sidney H. Brown and by the said Sidney H. Brown duly assigned, in plaintiff to secure said amounts, upon block 12, West Seattle Land & Improvement Company's Fourth Plat, King County, Washington, and to foreclose all right, claim or equity of redemption of said defendant in and to said property. Sale mortgage recorded on June 7th, VW 446 of mortgages, page 97 of the record of mortgages in the auditor's office of King County, Washington. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Office and postoffice address, rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington, Oceans 10, 1910. ATTORNEYS, ATTENTION! THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is looking for your legal publications, and if you are looking for your own business interests you will see to it that no publication is sent from your office without first talking with CAYTON about it. It is an indisputable fact that there are but two weekly publications in Seattle that publish lawyers' legal notices and give the lawyers no trouble on account of errors and prompt "returns" of publishers' affidavits, and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN takes cases that he has not the time to look the paper over every the lead. In this day of busy, bustling activity, the lawyer's time is so much absorbed in the preparation of his voluminous week to see if his notices are being regularly published, nor to read over his notices to see if they are absolutely correct. It often happens that even lawyers make errors in getting or calls the lawyer's attention to them before going to press up their notices for publication, which errors are very annoying to the lawyers if not detected and corrected before going into the paper. If, therefore, the lawyer feels absolutely certain that the publisher gives his personal attention to notices sent to his paper and either corrects small errors in notices it's a great relief to his mind. The publisher of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN has had so much experience with legal publications that he can detect a faulty publication almost as readily as the lawyer himself, and, if not a grievous one, corrects it then and there, but if a grievous one, the lawyer's attention is called to the same before going to press. Returns on publications are promptly made, so that lawyers do not have to worry about the publisher's notice after his case has been called in court. # AMUSEMENTS It will be a genuine novelty to nine-tenths of the people who go to see "The Girl and The Detective," and the other tenth will know all about it. The first scene and act takes place in the editorihl room of a big metropolitan newspaper, just at the witching hour that the Los Angeles Times was blown up, viz., a few moments before one o'clock, when they are holding the presses for a story. The foreman is wild at the delay, and he has ahalf dozen reporters watching the telephone and telegraph instruments to write the copy. It is regarding a government contract, that is, an English government contract with an American gun factory. In the meantime complicated incidents have prevented the newspaper from getting the dope for a "scoop," and they have assigned their star reporter to the case. He obtains some valuable data, but the girl who arrives on the scene, and who has been a newspaper street waif, has the most valuable report of a murder that took place, which proves to be the English diplomat. The star reporter is disgraced, but the girl knows that he is innocent of wrong, and when the detective undertakes to place the crime at his door, she befriends him and out-wits the detective at every turn. In the end, it is found that the owner of the gun plant is the real murderer, but before the play leads up to this, there are a number of very startling incidents, and the play will appeal to lovers of the sensational, clean and wholesome melodrama, quite as much as anything Russell & Drew ever offered. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Arthur W. Finch, plaintiff, vs. Francis Finch, defendant. No. — Summons. The State of Washington to the said Francis Finch, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 2nd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer to upfit the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff their low stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to secure a decree of divorce, dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of desertion and abandonment. HOLZRIMER, HERALD & HOLZ-HEIMER. Attorneys for plaintiff. 427-23-29 Lumber Exchange Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, September 2nd, 1910. October 15, 1910. Sept. 2, Oct. 15, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. Daley Houf, plaintiff vs. John Francis Ouf of Washington, No. 1018. The State of Washington, to the said John Francis Houf, defendant: John Francis Houl, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-day with sixty days after the 30th day of January 2018, and defend the above entitled action in above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be remanded against you according to the demand of the complaint of the oblates be filled with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the grounds of your divorce upon the grounds of mowing four years, and also your failure to make suitable provisions for plaintiff since said marriage. 201-203 Burke Bldg, Seattle, County of King, State of Washington, Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. y. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Leon- hard hard Reinig, deceased.-No. 11230. By order of said court made herein on the 29th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors against all persons having claims against said deceased or against estate or against the community estate of said deceased and Margarithe S. Reinig, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Margarethe S. Reinig, executrix of said estate, at 600 Burke Block, at the office at J. Spencer Court, the place of business of said estate, in St.attle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 30, 1910. MARGARETHE S. REINIG, As Executrix of said Estate. A. J. SPECKERT. NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL ESTATE by the Treasurer of the City of Seattle, King County, Washington. To Charles McDonald: You are hereby notified that the undersigned, of the owner and holder of one certain Certificate of Purchase, No. 1172, on Lot Nineteen (19) of Wheeler's Third Addition to the City of Seattle, in King County, Washington, issued by the Treasurer of the City on August 24th, 1908, to one Mrs. Wheeler, of King County, Washington, to Dollars and thirty cents ($6.30), under ordinance of the said city of Seattle, No. 13320. Said Certificate of Purchase was recorded by the said Mrs. C. H. Weed, in the office of the County Auditor of King County, Washington on October 12th, Vol. 60, on page 127, and there was paid to the said Auditor his fees therefor in the sum of One Dollar ($1.00). That since said last named date, to-wit: on Feb. 15th, 1910, there was paid by the undersigned to the County Treasurer of King County for property the sum of Ninety-four Dollars and forty cents ($94.40). That on Feb. 14th, 1910, the said Mrs. C. H. Weed, for a valuable consideration sold and assigned the said Certificate of Purchase to the undersigned L. H. Craver and the said L. H. Craver is now the owner and holder of the said Certificate of Purchase. And you, the said Charles McDonald, are hereby notified that at the expiration of Sixty days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of the said first publication, to-wit: sixty days after September 9th, 1910, the said L. H. Craver will dmand of the said Treasurer of the said City of Seattle, that he execute and deliver to him a deed to the said real property, and unless you, the said Charles McDonald, redeem the said property paying the sum to the Treasurer the sums hereinbefore mentioned, together with interest thereon at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said dates of payment, the said Treasurer will make and deliver to the said L. H. Craver a deed to the said property. L. H. CRAVER. Office and P. O. Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of Milwaukee, in Probat. In the Matter of Estates of Gertrude A. Edwards, Deceased—No. 8708. Order to Show Cause Why Distribution Should not be Made. John Edwards, administrator of the estate of Gertrude A. Edwards, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue of said estate entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth acts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate. It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Gertrude A. Edwards, be deposited in the Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, on the 11th day of October, 1910; at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be approved and an order of distribution should not be made among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in each of three most public places in King County and published once a week for four successive weeks, before the said day of October, 1910, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 7th day of September, 1910. A. W FRATER. Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss. I, D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the county of King, do certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 7th day of September, 1910, in the matter of the estate of Gertrude A. Ephraim, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 7th day of September, 1910. SEAL) D. K. SICKELS. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE Fred C. Brown, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. John Doe Matjasevich and Richard Roe Glovich, copartners, doing business under firm name and style of Alaska Liquor Company, Defendants. No. —. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King, ss The State of Washington: To John Doe Matjasevich and Richard Roe Glovich, copartners, doing business under firm name and style of Alaska Liquor Co. You, and each of you, are hereby notified that California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, has filed a complaint against you in said Court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 20th day of October, A. D. 1910, at the hour of 8:00 a.m. and unless you appear and then and then answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said action is for the sum of Eighty-two Dollars and Twenty-five Cents ($2.25), being a balance due the plaintiff on account of merchandise sold and delivered to the defendants during the year 909. Fired September 15th, A. D. 1910. FRED C. BROWN. Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. TWOROGER & WINKLER. Attorneys for Plaintiff. 10-11 Triangle Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication Sept. 16. 1910 Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State Court, fashing for King Coun- trol. Notice here. In the Matter of the Estate of Allen P. Mitten. Deceased—No. 11658 By order of said court made herein on the 8th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executors of said claim, and to the Jackson Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 23. 1910. Attorneys for Estate. 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Oct. 22, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, Washington, Summons by Publication. Ella Croft, Plaintiff, vs. Harry W. Barrows, Defendant.—No. 75894. The State of Washington to the said Harry W. Barrows, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the day of September, 1910, and defend the case of the cited action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- FRIDAY October 7, 1910 signed attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complaint in this action prays for the complaint of a marriage ceremony entered into between the plaintiff and defendant on December 28, 1907, and that the said marriage ceremony may be cancelled and annulled, and for all proper relief. Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, September 23, 1910. Date of last publication, Nov. 4, 1910. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. M. J. Lutz, Plaintiff, vs. Charles W. Ingran, Administrator of the Estate of Richard Lehn, Deceased, and Mrs. A. Sloquit, Defendants.—No. 72747. The State of Washington to Mrs. A. Sloquit: You are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 23rd day of September, 1910, and have entitled action in the above entitled complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the word of the complaint herein which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of said action, as set forth in the complaint, is to foreclose two certain mortgages given by the said Richard Lehn in his life time to the said plaintiff, the first one being dated November 14, 1866, to secure the sum of $12,000.00, with interest thereon, the rate of 7 per cent per annum from said date until paid, and the second one dated October 8, 1907, to secure the sum of $300.00, with interest at the rate of 7 per cent per annum from said date until paid, and to recover judgment paid amounts and interest and $26.98 excess by plaintiff an attorney's fee of $140.00 and costs of suit; both of said mortgages being on lots 1 and 2, block 3, John J. McGilvra's Second addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to foreclose and determine all the right, title and interest of said defendants and each of them in and to said property. EDWARD VON TOBEL, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. H. Jose, Deceased.—No. 11696. By order of said court made herein on the 7th of September, 1910, notices of the day given to courtors of, and to all persons having, claim against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 1308 Alaska Building, the place of business of in office in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 23, 1910. N. H. JOSE, As Administrator of said Estate. BRADY & RUMMENS, Attorneys for Estate, 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Oct. 22, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Summons. Nellie Derry, Plaintiff, vs. Herbert A. Derry, Defendant.—No. 75952. The State of Washington to the said Herbert A. Derry, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 23rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under-signed attorneys for plaintiff, at their office beheld; and in case of your failure so to do, you may be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is instituted for the purpose of dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant, for the reason and upon the grounds that said defendant has failed, neglected and refused to make table provisions for the support and malleable provisions of said plaintiff; and for the decree awarding the said plaintiff the following described real property situated in the County of Clallam, State of Washington, particularly described as follows, to-wit: Lots twenty-two (22), twenty-three (23), twenty-six (26) and twenty-seven (27), in section seven (7), township thirty (30), north of range nine (9) west Claiming County, Washington; and also the following property situated in King County, State of Washington: The west half of lot twenty-five (25) and lot twenty-six (26), block eight (8), Buckius Addition to the City of Seattle; and for such other and further relief as to this court may seem just and equitable. REED & HARDMAN, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. address: 960 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. STETSON & POST LUMBER CO. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 ALBERT HANSEN. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses. Phone, Main 268. Seattle Washington. First and Cherry.