Seattle Republican

Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE PUBLISHER'S NOTICE. The Seattle Republican is published on Friday of every week by Cayton Publishing Company Subscriptions, $3.00 per year; six months, $1.50 postage prepaid. Subscriptions to all foreign countries included in the Postal Union, $4.00 a year postage paid. Sample copies, free. Single copies ten cents. Advertising rates made known on application. Special rates to publishers. Entered a second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. Address all communications to The Seattle Republican 307 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. Make a checks, drafts, postal orders, etc., payable to "Cayton Publishing Company." CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. Telephone: Main 305. Publication office, 307 Epler Block. HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON - - - Publisher 3USIE REVELS CAYTON - - - Associates A BIG SEATTLE INDUSTRY Some time ago THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ran a series of articles about the big things in Seattle, but in doing so, it overlooked one concern that is not only one of the big things of the city as to volume, but is one of the big things that is advertising Seattle throughout the commercial world more than almost any other manufacturing concerns in the city, and it is none other than the vulcan Iron Works, one of the big machinery plants of the Northwest. It is said that there is but one other plant in the Northwest larger than the Vulcan, but for completeness, by men who are thoroughly posted on such topics say, it has not an equal on the Pacific Coast. While the plant is not nearly completed, yet it is far enough along to make any Seattle man feel proud of the progress his home city is making after giving the plant a thorough look over. The completeness of this plant is getting noised abroad and strangers from all sections of the United Staes and even foreign countries are daily asking permission to look it over, and disinterested parties are constantly receiving letters from such persons on their return home, who recently visited Seattle and got an opportunity of seeing the Vulcan Iron Works plant, of the high state of perfection it has reached, and lauding Seattle to the skies for sustaining such an institution. It was early in the present year that the Vulcan Iron Works was forced to leave its old quarters, which it did without losing any great amount of orders. The owners have gone steadily on perfecting the plant, and the writer was shown over it from top to bottom one day this week and it does not seem to be lacking in a single detail. Aside from the gigantic machinery, the huge forges and furnaces, which are manned by hundreds of skilled operators, the conveniences for the employes were as carefully looked after in the construction of the whole as the machinery rooms themselves. The rest room, the dressing rooms and the lavatories are fashioned and furnished as elaborately as well as completely as those of the most expensive hotels. A school room too, is fitted up in which all apprentices are required to attend school three nights a week and even the regular journeymen are expected to take some interest in the night school. The manager's office is simply a thing of beauty, and it can be said without fear of successful contradiction that it is the most elegantly fitted up office room in the Northwest. The Vulcan Iron Works is sending it wares to more ports just now than any manufacturing plant in this section, so those in a position to know declare, and it is therefore one of the very strong advertising mediums of not only Seattle, but of the entire state of Washington. When the Irondale plant will have been completed as its directors now hope to soon have it, it will be the means of furnishing such plants as the Vulcan Iron Works with material right at home, and they in turn will be able to supply the trade with great- er ease and facility and at less cost than at present. The time is not far distant when the Vulcan Iron Works will be able to furnish everything necessary for the erection of the most gigantic sky scraper and at prices that eastern concerns cannot meet. For this magnificent manufacturing plant the President-Manager and Secretary-Treasurer H. P. Strickland, who in street parlance is It, is to be congratulated and likewise given a world of praise. SENATOR JONES AND THE JUDGESHIP During the past ten days considerable political curiosity has been aroused over statements made by the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, the Oregonian, the Hoquim Washingtonian and other papers throughout the state that there was some probability, in view of the vacancy in the United States district court of the eastern district of Washington, of the designation of Senator Jones to this position by the president. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is of the opinion that there is a good deal of a tempest in the tea-pot in this respect. At this time no one knows what may be the President's views in regard to filling this vacancy; no one knows whom the senators and the delegation in Congress may endorse; no one knows whether Senator Jones would accept such a position; in fact, there is but little information on the subject. Senator Piles has given out an interview that, if his colleague, Senator Jones, desired the position he would recommend him, and that is about all there is of this story. If, however, we were called upon for advice for Senator Jones we would very frankly say to him, that, if the President desires to designate you for the position, don't hesitate to accept it. It takes you away from the storms of politics, gives you a position for life with ample compensation, places you in a position of equal dignity, and surrounds you in a measure with influences that are as peaceful as any that come in this world. We do not take much stock as to whether the governor would appoint this or that man to succeed Senator Jones should he be appointed, as he seems disposed to do his own thinking. The dispatches indicate that the president will not make any appointment until Congress convenes, and should such prove the case any appointment by the governor would amount to very little as the legislature would assemble in a very short time, probably within ten or fifteen days after the appointment was made, and from the day they commenced to ballot for United States Senator by expression of the constitution the appointment becomes vacant and the legislature must proceed to elect, and in the failure of the legislature to make a selection during its term there is no power in the governor to appoint. Such has been the decision by the senate upon several occasions. But so far as King county is concerned, in case Senator Jones is appointed to the judicial vacancy and thereby create a senatorial vacancy, she would then have a hope of landing right side up with care by her legislative delegation giving Senator John L. Wilson a unanimous endorsement for the short term senatorship. Outside of King county Senator Wilson can command more support than any one else in the county. In short, it is an undeniable fact that he is the only King county man that would get any votes at all from the other counties of the state. It is a fact that an overwhelming majority of the hold over senators would vote for him. We do not know that there will be any vacancy, but, if Seattle wants a United States senator, and there is a vacancy, John L. Wilson can lead her to victory. OUR SUPREME COURT The unmasking of the supreme court of this state by the Seattle Star exposes to public view nine human beings similar in every respect to any other nine citizens of the state of Washington. The object of the Star in unmasking the supreme court in a body is for its readers to compare its personnel with five other citizens that are trying to get on the supreme bench of this state, and after having compared them the voter can see no good and sufficient reason for voting the "ins" out just to get the "outs" in. If what the Star says about the supreme court as a whole be true then the editor of the Star is almost criminal for not calling public attention to the situation long ago. Prior to the attacks on the supreme court by the Star we had thought of opposing at least two of the regular Republican nominees for the supreme bench purely on VOLUME XVII. NUMBER 22 personal reasons, but the attacks being so devoid of truth, we now declare that, that the whole five should be elected, if for nothing else than to rebuke the caluminous lies of the Star. Every charge it has made is without foundation and made on inference. The newspaper that has nothing but heresay evidence on which to base its attacks on public men is a sensation monger and its readers should pay no more attention to it for truth an veracity than they do to the shifting winds. What man in Seettle would vote for Billy Moore in preference to George Morris? Or what reasonable man would vote for Charley Sheppard, who is so deaf that he can hardly hold a conversation with you, in preference to Parker of Tacoma? Is there a man with common sense in all the state of Washington that would vote against Mark A. Fullerton for any like candidate? And who is so ignorant of the law that would vote for Tollman instead of Frank H Rudkin, who has developed into one of the ablest judges on the bench? The members of the supreme bench, who are seeking reelection had nothing to do with the taking of the nomination of the supreme court judges out of the direct primary and we suspect every one of them preferred it to remain as it was and why not vote for them in view of the fact that the other men show no superior qualifications over them. EDITORIAL EDICTS William Bowman, who is charged with being a white slaver is in reality a black slaver. It does not help much to try to booze off the worry brought on by the high cost of living. Yes, of course the Seattle Daily Times prints all that is fit to print for a red light organ. Teddy and Tammany are having a hard fight over the political spoils of New York and it looks as if Ted is on top. Victoria may have been a more cr less sleepy old town in the past, but that two million dollar fire woke her up for a while. It took a jury but three minutes to acquit Dr. Crippen's stenograpeer, which was doubtless due to her being a British subject. A wife sixty-nine is seeking a divorce from a husband seventy-one years of age. Time has not softened things for them to any great extent. An outbreak in the Phillipines has caused Uncle Sam to rush troops to the infested district. After all, are those islands worth the price? The Sunset Telephone Company is doing some great stunts in order to get itself in a position to rob the citizens of Seattle, but it is being watched. Have you stopped to think that none of the theaters Klaw and Erlanger built last summer on white paper have not been so much as started on terra firma. The aviators of America II flew further than any other bird men and then they walked further after they quit flying, but it was fun while they were flying. Back to the farm is the thing to do, but with farm lands $1,000 per acre the city chap that goes back, will only be able to get a farm the size of a city lot. The nearer the investigation gets to the higher ups in Seattle's graft game the louder Col. Alden J. Times hollers to detract the investigators from the true course. Yesterday, Thursday, October 27th, Theodore Roosevelt celebrated his fifty-second birthday. At the age that most men start out to seek the presidency he has gone from the foot to the head and in his fiftieth year he had stood head for eight years. He voluntarily went to the foot again and has begun to work his way toward the head. Teddy is a mighty pert goer CURRENT COMMENT LL If only some deciple of Edison could have been on hand to have caught the dramatic announcement of Dr. M. A. Matthews to the effect that, he would re- main in Seattle and not Mark A. Matthews accept the $10,000 salary ‘Won't Leave Seattle offered him in Pittsburg, and then had the whole scene and sound been reproduced throughout the east it would have been the biggest advertisement Seattle could have put out for the next five years. Perhaps a more sensational scene has before occurred in a church organization than the one following the announcement of Dr. Matthews that he would not leave Seattle, but it is seriously doubted. If Dr. Matthews designedly lead his audience up to the high pitch, in which it found itself last Sunday morning, then he did so for the purpose of holding the big stick over its head so long as he desired. If on the other hand the audience and membership of the First Presbyterian church are as devoted to their pastor as that demonstration would seem to indicate, then Dr. Matthews above all other pastors is to be congratulated for a right loyal membership. Barney Oldfield is now the savior of the “‘white man,” he having defeated Jack Johnson in an auto- mobile race last Tuesday. We had not heard that the white folk of this coun- Johnson and Oldfield try prior to the race, Poor Race Hopes looked to Olfield as the “hope of the race,’’ but after he had defeated Johnson he gave out an in- terview that he looked upon his victory over Johnson as the redemption of the white race and that was why he struggled to defeat him so decisvely that Johnson would not be able to get an audience with any more yace promoters to question the title of the white man as being the fastest autoist in the world. If the av- erage white man had been told that Barney Oldfield was the hope of the race to which he belongs, he would immediately have exclaimed, ‘‘well, it was a darn poor hope.”? When the hope of a race or a peo- ple is centered in a pug fighter or an automobile dem- onstrator then it looks as if that race had better take a new start and get a few higher hopes, if it hopes to become a progressive race. Neither Jack Johnson nor Barney Oldfield, two tin horn rounders, should be considered the type of man that the black man or the white man look to as either its hope or its re- deemer. In the United States of America the conviction and hanging of Dr. Crippen would be considered a tray- esty on justice, in view of the fact that no direct evi- dence was ever pro- American Attorneys duced to prove that Astounded at Conviction the body found in the basement of his home was that of his former wife or that it was even the body of a woman. But, the unaccountable disappearance of Mrs. Crippen, the mutilated body found in the cellar, the flight of Dr. Crippen accom- panied by his stenographer, with whom he was accus- ed of being criminally intimate before the disappear- ance of his wife, were all circumstances which weigh- eda great deal heavier with the jury tnan the bald statement of Dr. Crippen, ‘‘Lam innocent.’’ But those are only incidents in the trial; the thought that promp- ted this article was the quickness with which Dr. Crip- pen was apprehended, brought to trial and convicted, and the short space of time between his conviction and the time set for his execution are all, it is repeat- ed, sufficient to take the breath of the average Ameri- can attorney and his client charged with murder. As aresult of this certain punishment England suffers from fewer gun plays than the United States. The frontis piece of last Sunday’s Seattle Daily ‘Times was the climax of damnable and pernicious journalism, and if such journalistic outbreaks become common then legisla- The Daily Times’ tures cannot be blamed, Damnable Journalism if they begin a whole- sale muzzling of the press. It was not damnable because the Hon. John L. Wilson was brutally attacked by being cartooned as murdering a human being, but because such produc- tions, in widely circulated daily papers incite men to commit murder, to run riot and to precipitate rebel- lion, and that, too, without serving any one any good purpose. When a leading business man criticised the production, while visit'ng one of the prominent social clubs of the city, one of the proprietors of the Times excused himself from the odium by saying ‘‘I knew Re BLLULE Ari bud nothing about it.”” He, one of the editors, the busi- ness manager and a part owner of the paper, and did not know that an inflamatory article like that was go- ing to be piaced on the front page of the Sunday pa per. Well, Annanias was struck dead for telling a thousand per cent less dangerous lie than that, and if it were not a lie then the man is too ignorant to car- ry guts to a bear much less edit a daily newspaper. Senator Wilson may or may not have a selfish motive in opposing the graft that is so common in Seattie just now, but many of the citizens entertain a like view and all who are of that opinion might be cartooned as red-handed murderers, as was Senator Wilson in last Sunday’s Times. Lf _ JAMES Y. C. KELLOGG “Some men are born great and some have great- ness thrust upon them,” is an old quotation, and its this latter class that James Y. C. Kellogg, the junior member of the Seattle City council, seems to come under, and yet no reflection is meant to be cast upon his inherited greatness. Regardless of his motive Kellogg is doing manly ‘work in trying to clean Seat- tle of the human vultures and scavangers that have flocked thither under the Gill administration, and for that the Seattle Daily Times is making him the tar- get of the most vicious and venomous attacks the edi- tor of that paper is capable of doing when his pocket- book is touched, and that is saying a good deal. It cannot be said at this time that the editor of the Times is tarred with the same stick as Wappenstein, Gerald and others are said to be, but Kellogg and his com- panions in the council say, ‘‘Give us time enough and we will prove to your satisfaction that |e is just as deep in the muck as they are in the mire.’’ If their prognostication be true then there is plenty of reasons for the editor of the Times traducing the good name of Kellogg, It is theold, old story of shouting, ‘‘Stop thief!” in order for the real thief to get away. Astounding as seem the figures, yet they are given out as absolutely correct by Henry Parsons, a New York politician, who declares over his own signature that, it takes $200,000 Campaign Slush to run a campaign in Simply Awful New York county, which is the city of New York. What could so vast a sum of money be used for unless to corrupt voters? But he itemizes the things for which the money is expended and no graft bill is found among the sundry accounts. It is safe to say that’a majority of the voters of New York and ev- ery other county inthe United States read the news- papers almost daily and on the whole are just as well informed as to the political situation as they are after having received tons of campaign literature which for the most part is immediately consigned to the waste basket or the garbage can. It is said that in Seattle one candidate had fifty automobiles hired for use on election day, and it is safe to say he did not get a single vote more than if he had not hired a sin- gle one. Unless the citizens of the United States are all of tte corruption order a hundreth part of the’sum expended in New York in campaigning would serve just as well. FR DAY October 27, 1910 PERSONS IN THE PUBLIC EYE R. Higgins of the London Stock Exchange in his will, directed that his violin, dated 1736, Antonius Straviduaris, shall not he sold for less than $2,000. Scenes Miss Eva E. Bean, of the state of Maine, was rec- ently admitted to practie law in the United States courts and she is the first woman that has ever been granted that privilege. eee Alfred Tennyson Dickens, the eldest surviving son of the noted novelist, who has lived in Australia the past forty-five years, has returned to England, his mother country, and is preparing to lecture on the life and work of his father. He is sixty-five years of age. Margaret Illington Bowes, formerly Margaret Fro- hman, is not darning socks as she promised her be- trothed she would do before she married the Tacoma real estate man, but she is making a hit on the stage and Mr. Bowes seems to be enjoying being her business manager. ges James Gordon Bennet, the son of the founder of the New York Herald, spends{most of his time in Eu- rope, but keeps in almost as close touch’with the work- ings of his paper asif he were in the city of New York. : eee Mrs. Frank W. Cheeney has been elected to a life membership in the Sixteenth Regiment of the Connec- ticut Volunteers of the Civil War in honor of her de- ceased husband who was late commander of the regi- ment. eins Oakland, California, is taking the lead in giving women positions of trust and responsibility. Dr. Pauline Nusbaumer, a noted [woman physician, has been appointed bacterolgist and Miss Jessie Berry is city chemist. Miss Gertrude Jordan is county treasurer of Cherry county, Nebraska, and is the first woman in the Unit- ed States to be electes to sucha position. In her cam- paign she traveled something like 900 miles on horse- back to see voters. eons Theodore Roosevelt, so goes the report, was in- censed at Governor Hughes for leading him into the direct primary fight. He was told by the governor that it was a popular measure among the people of New York, but much to Roosevelt’s astonishment he found such to not be the case and the fight has given the Colonel consideral annoyance, and may result in his complete rout at the polls in November. Jacob Furth, William Piggott and E. F. Blaine, rep- resenting the Seattle Chamber of Commerce, are the representatives from other coast cities, who with visiting Chino with the view of stimulating closer re- lations with the United States. They report a favor- able outlook. Other Seattle men who have spent years in China and Japan make no hesitancy in saying, the Chinaman is as far superior to the Japanese in honor and business dealings as day is ahead of night in the way of light. Seattle is ably represented in those she has sent over there, and if any good can be gotten out of the visit for Seattle or the Pacific Coast they will do their part in bringing it about. FRIDAY October 28. 1910 THE COUNTRY PRESS "Can it be that the dynamiters of the Los Angeles Times building were not union men, but Mexican revolutionists?" comes from the Unlon (Seattle) Record. They may have been Mexican revolutionists, but we believe they were sailing under the guise of organized labor. Organized Labor may not have turned that trick, but, being from Missouri, you will have to "show me." "There are a number of men who are ready to die for the flag that would not swing the parlor carpet in the breeze for wifey for love or money," says the Olympia Chronicle. Since the only true study of man is man, the editor of the Chronicle must be judging other men by himself. When the Tacoma Forum laconically remarks, "Census Expert a cheerful Liar," it doubtless knows what it is talking about, so far as language is concerned, and it is truly hoped so far as facts are concerned, it is equally well informed, but that is fighting talk in our native state, and it should be anywhere else unless it is the truth. Dr. Matthews Commended They have a minister in Seattle, the Rev. M. A. Matthews, who besides being an able preacher, with a reputation that is national, commends himself to the good wishes of the public by taking an active interest in the sociological and ecomic affairs of his city. He is at present heading a move to provide a hotel for working girls where rooms can be had at reasonable rates, and proper environments thrown around those who are without relatives or friends to look after their welfare. And a long letter to the P-I, by the reverend gentleman contains some of the best ideas and thoughts we have seen as to the best methods of promoting the welfare and prosperity of Seattle. It would be better were there more citizens in every town, possessing the enthusiasm and interest in the upbuilding of their communities. - Island County Times. ---0--- The License Question The question of whether or not saloons should be allowed in Kent is one the people are divided upon. Nearly, if not all, are anxious to do what is for the best interests of the city. Kent, from its very location, is one of the very hardest places in the state in which to test this problem for the dry element. Having saloons to the north and to the south, with cheap fares, makes it impossible to keep liquor out of the city. The fact of the matter is that there is considerable change in the attitude of the people on the question since the last election. Instead of the "wets" being on the defensive it is the "drys." The new order of things has failed to claim the drunkarks, it has failed to fill up the business houses and residences. In fact it has failed to materially reduce drunkenness or drinking. With more money being spent for public improvements than ever before in the history of the city. times have been hard. Collections have been tight. The dry element claims that there is a stringency in the money market all over and that times are no worse here than at other places. But the very fact that times are not so good, as they have been hereto that times are not so good as they have been heretofore puts them on the defensive. It appears to us that it would be a step in the right direction to limit the number of saloons and place restrictions on them so that they would be compelled to conduct their places according to law or have their licenses revoked. -Kent Advertiser. 0 Militarism Rampant There is a scheme on foot in the West that may have ramifications in the East, to place the National Guard on the army salary list at rates of from 5 to 25 per cent of the regular wages. To that end a conference of National Guard officers has just been held at St. Louis. General Leonard Wood was present and declared: "I would ut-German the Germans by instituting compulsory military education in all of the schools. Every boy 13 years of age or more should be compelled to use a rifle as a part of his school course." This militaryism is the result of a large increase in the army under Republican legislation, and it is time to nip in the bud any further increase unless we would be a nation of soldiers and saddled with the support of an army that would exceed even that of Germany. But General Wood was not satisfied with turning all the boys of our country into soldiers, far he further declared; "Our standing army of 80,000 men is far too small, and congress should provide for its increase to at least 140,000." Who wants to see the United Ststes an armed camp? What service or help to the people would such an army THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. be? Whom would it fight? Consider the expense: It now cost $101,195,983 for the support of the present army, and it is proposed to more than double that enormous sum, if the scheme to pay the officers and men of the National Guard is added to the cost of nearly doubling the regular army. It is time for the mothers and the fathers of the United States to decide whether they want their boys to be enlisted in the army without their consent, and that of course means their being subject to the call for service. It is unlikely that the ranklng major-general of the army would publicly advance this army program unless the president and the war department were back of it. Colfax Commoner. POLITICAL POT-PIE With the P. I. constantly pounding him on the back it begins to look as if Stanton Waburton will be given a hard run by Maurice Langhorn in the second congressional district. James H. Calvert, for many years quite conspicuous in the political arena of Seattle, died at his home on Boren avenue last Sunday. He had been in poor health for some time, but rallied during the summer only to relapse in the fall. Dollar to doughnuts that Bob Hodge will beat Lew Nelson so badly that he will not realize that, "he also ran." A new hat that Hodge will get 5,000 over a clear majority. That is to say, if Nelson gets 10,000 votes Hodge will get 20,000 and then 5,000 more. Miles Poindexter, the chief insurgent in the state of Washington, advises those insurgents that elected him to stand by the regular Republican ticket from top to bottom, which of course includes the supreme court nominees. What does the Star think of that? * * * Kenneth Macintosh is said to be trimming his sail for the nomination to Congress two years from now, from the Seattle district. It is rumored that W. E. Humphrey contemplates leaving Seattle and settling in some city in the Northwest where he thinks he has more friends. ```markdown ``` If the state of Washington and King county are in the throes of a red hot campaign in which national issues are more or less involved, the average Republican politician is not aware of it, and in fact, when he thinks of previous campaigns and compares the present to them he says, it is not a fact. The local option fight in Everett is waxing hot and it begins to look as if it will be the hottest fight yet on that subject. Despite the fact that the anti-saloon workers are working like trojans to win the day, yet, owing to the large mill hand vote, who are inclined to the drink side of the question, it is not thought that local option will win. Whether you are a Republican, Democrat, or a What Is It, THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN will be delighted to publish your legal notices at reasonable rates. If you have a notice for publication and will call Main 305, some one from the office will come for it at once, and see to it that no mistake in the publication is made that will cause delay. Should you desire to come to the office, you will find it at 305 Epler Block. * * * Who will be the councilmen-at-large is already beginning to agitate the minds of the voters of Seattle, and it is argued that, partisan politics is not going to cut any ice in the matter. The most of the present councilmen will be candidates as well as a graat many more. It will be the object of the present councilmen to get as many in the fight as is possible in order to make it all the more easy for them to pull through. Some of the present members stand a mighty good show of being re-elected while others will have no show in the world and had as well save their money. Some will fall short of election for lack of publicity and others on account of their reputations in the past. Governor Hay is outspoken in the interest of the Republican nominees for supreme judge as is Miles Poindexter and with all the papers of the state for them with the exceptions of the Seattle Star it appears that they will win in a walk. Poindexter was nominated because the press of the abused him. Otherwise he would not have been known. If Freeman could have gotten the newspapers of the state to abuse him he would have been nominated.—Northwest Farm and Home. Watson C. Squire, a terrritorial governor of Washington and twice elected to the senate from the state, still resides in Seattle, and while he has grown rather feeble within the past few years, yet he is still quite vigorous and active. He looks after his business for the most part and may be seen every day on the busy streets of the city hurrying to and fro the same as men forty years his junior. WISE AND OTHERWISE A man "higher up" generally stays out of reach. — Wilmington (N. C.) Star. Portugal is now a republic. So is Mexico. — Milwaukee Journal. The Vanderbilt cup seems to be the kind that inebriates. — Washington Times. Guilt is always personal, especially in campain speeches. — Ohio State Journal. High food prices have probably cured many a case of indigestion. — Wall Street Journal. As between a king in Europe and a boss in America, the advantage seems to be all on this side. —Wall Street Journal. Vice President Sherman is our idea of the center of gravity. —Philadelphia Inquirer. The safest way to get over the Alps still seems to be to go around them. —Philadelphia Inquirer. There are 80,000 people in the United States who don't care what bread costs. They're in jail. —Cleveland Leader. The New Nationalism seems to have taken hold among the Republicans of Lisbon with a vengeance.—Newark Star. As a dangerous sport automobile racing is not going to give way to aviating without a struggle.—Chicago News. John Hays Hammond says that Roosevelt's whisper is heard round the world.—And when did he whisper?—Boston Herald. Insurgent Republicans, by the way, appear to be making a great deal of trouble in Portugal.—Chicago Tribune. "After Cannonism—What?" inquires a writer in the New York Independent. Well, the Insurgents are after it, for one thing.—Chicago Advance. China now has its senate; bribery investigations may begin without further delay.—Springfield Republican. As the South is just recovering from its encounter with the old nationalism it will hardly care to join violent issue with the new nationalism.—Indianapolis Star. Hardly has the government begun the laundering of paper money than up goes the price of soap.—Washington Herald. If the right of recall could only be made to apply to some other things besides unsatisfactory officials, it would save a lot of emtarrassment.—Washington Post. Dr. Cook has told a reporter of the New York World that he is in London. Apparently the reporter believes him.---Boston Journal. An exchauge says that Colonel Roosevelt is not the sort of a man who turns over and goes to sleep again after the alarm clock rings, Well, hardly. He's the alarm clock----Seattle Argus. The spiritualists say that Mr. Roosevelt is "controlled" by Abraham Lincoln and an Indian Chief, with assistance from Caesar and Napoleon. Here's betting that they all have their hands full.----San Francisco Chronicle. "Seems to me winter is backward this year." "Yes, I haven't seen a Christmas magazine yet."--- Pittsburg Post. TELEPHONE OUTRAGE CONTINUES TO OUTRAGE Fun Fast and Furious 4 Tom—Is your engagement a secret? Ted— No; thegirl knows it.—New Orleans Picayune. “Miss Jones isn’t looking at all like herself this evening.’’ “Oh, no — she never does.’’— Cleveland Leader. Customer—I want to get some gloves for my wife. Salesgirl— What kind sir? Customer—Very cranky.—Life, “Did he have any luck on his fishing trip?’”? Enough to keep him in conversation for several weeks.’’—Detroit Free Press. Disgusted fisherman (empty- ing his bait into the stream)— Hanged if I’ll wait on you any longer. Here! Help yourselves. —Life. The Friend—Your wife doesn’t appear to bein very good humor. Husband— No; she thinks I’ve invited you to dinner. — Jean Qui Rit. Mrs.‘A.—Didn’t her constant singing in the flat annoy you? Mrs. B.—Not so much as the coastant flat in her singing. — Boston Transcript. She—Did I understand you to say that your friend Brown was thirsting for glory? He—Well, not exactly. I said hehad a glo- rious thirst!—Tid-Bits. First Doctor—I’ve secured a sure cure for a rare disease. Second doctor — Great! Now, how can we make the rare dis- ease prevalent? — Cleveland Leader. First Surburbanite— We've got a baby grand in our house. Sec- ond Ditto—We can go you one Business phone, unlimited ser- vice, $7.50 per month; former price $6.50 per month; increase per year, $12.00 Residence phones, $2,50 per month; former price, $1.50 per month; increase per year, $12.00. Net result, several hundred thousand dollars taken from the pockets of the people of Seattle annually. What may result, municipal telephone system. “Grafititis’’ seems to be ram- pant in the corporation that owns the principal telephone system, and as a result men are working the city in the interest of the company and by threats of re- moving the instruments from the place of business of subscribers are compelliag them to enter in- to new contracts at the increased rate, This is done when the company is aware of the fact that the state railroad commission has under consideration the validity of the new rate. Itis stated b3 those who have given the matter some consideration that in case the de- cision of the commission is ad- verse to the company the in- creased rate could not be charg- ed under the old contracts, and if paid by the patrons the ad- vance would have to be refunded, but that if the new contracts are signed up, the increased rate would have to be paid regardless better. We’ve got a grand baby in ours.——Baltimore American. Doctor (to typhoid patient ) Do you remember when you drank water? Patient (an actor) Oh, yes! It was on the dear old farm—twenty years ago. Puck. Singleton, I cannot under- stand why a man’s wife is called his better half. Wedmore, You would if you had to divide your salary with one. Boston Tran- script. Nell That Miss Copleigh is an awfully cold sort of a girl, Belle Mercy, yes. Why, she’s so frigid that wherever she goes on rainy days it snows. Boston Transcript. Lord Hubert (motoring) Now there is no traffic about get up a “fine” turn of speed for a few miles. Chaffeur Yes, my lord, five or ten pounds fine, my lord? Family Herald. Seaside Visitor (admiring a seagull) How nice and clean he looks. Boatman Oh, ma’am if you spent as much time in the water as he does, you’d look clean too. Punch. Blobbs I’don’t know what to make of that boy of mine. He’s never around when he is wanted. Slobbs Why don’t you try and get him a job on the police force? Philadelphia Record. Chief editor Louk here, Sharp, here’s an editor been hanged for murder. How shall I headline it? Musical Editor How would “Difficult Execution. on One String’ do?—St. Louis Times. “T’ve just been reading about the power of the will. It’s a THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN of the findings of the commis- sion. This seems to bea case where a public service coropration is able to monopolize the streets and public highways by reason of the character of the business done, and at the same time the corporation seems to be above and beyond all law. The plea is made at all times that the raise is necessary in or- der that a dividend may be real- ized for the stockholders, but we believe a careful examination will show that when extensions are made the cost is charged up to the operating department. In other words the companies seek tomake their patrons not only pay a dividend on the money act- ually invested, but they want them to pay. for the improve- ments as well. In this part of the city there isa feeling among the patrons of the telephone company that they are being robbed; that the old rates were too high and that the new rate is robbery pure and simple. It is stated on pretty good au- thority that ai understanding was reached some time ago be- tween the Sunset and the Inde- pendent telephone companies and that the latter is now the prop- erty of the former, and for that reason the Sunset company felt that it could rob the people with wonderful thing.’’ ‘‘Yes; a mil- lionaire friend of mine left a will that makes six children and sev- enteen grandchildren be good.’’ Louisville Courier-Journal. Famous Painter I hear, sir, that you’re boasting that you studied art under me? New Painter (calmly) And so I did sir, so I did—Why I occupied a room under your studio for nearly a month! New Orleane Picayune. Rusty Rufus Say, Tom, would’ nt it be great ef youse could git all de eat an’ drink youse wanted by jist pressin’ a ’lectric button? Tired Thomas It shore would, ef I had somebody to press de button for me. Chicago Daily News. “Hello, Johnny,’’ says the vil- lage blacksmith, ‘‘I hear your paw has gone into politics.’’ “Sure.’’ ‘‘How’d that happen?’ “Well, my uncle left him a silk hat anda Prince Albert coat in his will, and paw had todo some- thing with them.’? Washington Star. Grouty See here, you have had my lawn mower a whole hour. Do you think I ought to be kept standing around all day wasting my time waiting for it? Prouty Certainly not. I’d be glad to have you rake my lawn in the meantime, old man. Bos- ton Globe. Mr. Newlywed This paper says there are 50,000,000 babies born every year. Mrs. Newly- wed Oh, darling, doesn’t that make you proud? Mr. N. Why should it? Mrs. N. Why, just to think that our baby is the impunity. Little faith is placed in the hearing before the state railroad commission, and if a fa- yorable decision is rendered there is no doubt that the com- pany would take the matter to the courts where it would linger for years before the matter could be adjudicated. The outlook for relief is not bright for the simple reason that the corporations are bigger than the people—whose caeature they are—and that is the reason that there is insurg- eney in the landtoday. The peo- ple are getting tired of being sys- tematically and persistently rob- bed by the corporations that are permitted to exist, and who get their powers from the people and from nowhere else. A movement is now on foot to get the city government to take up the matter of municipal tele- phones, and unless relief is grant- ed in other ways there will be a municpal owned and operated telephone system in the city of Seattle inside of three years. Representatives of the Sunset company stated to the Gazette- News that they were not afraid of this for the reason that plac- ing the wires of a municipal sys- tem under ground would be too expensive for the city to under- take. They feel securely en- trenched and believe that they ean plunder at will. But ‘‘we shall see what we shall see!’’— Georgetown Gazette-News. smartest and prettiest in fifty million. Cleveland Leader. Inquisitive Press Representa- tive (to stage doorkeeper) And do you happen to know the iden- ity of that heavily veiled lady who is seen so frequently in the famous actor’s company? Door- keeper Well, it is just depends on how you mean. You see, on the boards she is the daughter; in private life she’s his mother Liverpool Mercury. HOW EDITORS GET RICH It is not gvod policy to give business secrets away, but as many people wonder how editors get rich so quick. we give out the following information, re- marks the editor of the Paxton, (Ill.) Register, hoping that every one of our readers will not take advantage of this and engage in the newspaper business. A fellow terming himself “Ganderbone’s Forecast”’ located at St. Louis, offers to furnish us alot of poetry and other silly stuff, if we will only run his ad- vertisement each week. A fellow out west wants us to do alot of advertising for him for nothing, and if it brings results he may become a customer. A gun firm ‘wants us torun $19 worth of advertising and then send them $10 in exchange for a shotgun. Such a gun would re- tail at about $6. For running $17 worth of locils we can geta $1 magazine telling how to do dress- making athome. By running $50 worth of advertising and send- ing $25 to an Atlantic City firm, we will be given a deed to a lot. When the tide isin the lot stands six feet under water, A Kansas real estate firn will FRIDAY October 27, 1910 ee te ate Stennett ft ert sage a pees BMRateS ers heute 0s OE s Peale pohb aaa ae Pe air his af die P Da tata ae tae gE rea a eee EXCL eS AG anita ote Rea Sa IERIE NI ays er ge mothe avis a aan Rey MIO — See Be oe ya ait mere eee Dae fat et COS lads aD eterna abode vie Suan, ai peinl ecg : re Gea antic te pate 3} eee ‘ set Sti at, el gs ed eae Lago ond Ee nics riieg Wee Ue ob fet ay lis coat oe a ae Reha eB i en 7a ta Pur is ME ee Site eile | co aa EE 3 Coae i ee Many Beene: a eras! ae fone Sey Ae an ee FEAR Ea ae ph ce oes ee Fs Sr Eesin > RON CRdS fa a a give us a deed to a lot 22x60 feet for $40 worth of advertising and $25 cash. We wrote to a fellow who knew of the lots offered and he replied that they had no cash value, but a trading value of about $5. If we can run a column write up of a doings to be held in North Dakota this fall, amount- ing to about $7, we will be sent two $l tickets. Ourrailroad fare up there and back, for two, would be about $60. We can have almost any Chicago daily paper sent us free. The sub- scription rate is about $4, but all we have to do is torun $36 worth of locals. for $40 worth of advertising and $25 cash we can own a bicy cle. The wheel sells at just $12. About a dozen firms are wanting to give us shares in gold mines for advertising. A nursery firm will give us a 25-cent rosebush for only $5 worth of advertising. For running a 6-inch adyertise- ment one year we get a gross of pills. -Western Publisher. GILHAM-LYSONS REALTY CO., General Offices: 411 Lowman Bldg. Loans, Investments, Insurance. H. E. Gilham. J. W. Lysons. Main 3044. Ind. 1588. —— BUY THE BEST If you want a safe which you know Has No Superior, buy one of the Hall Safe & Lock Co.'s, manufactured by the Herring- Hall-Marvin Safe Co., for which we are the sole agents. PURCELL SAFE CO, Prefontaine Bldg., Prefontain Place and Yesler Way DENNY-RENTON CLAY & COAL 0O., Manufacturers of All Kinds of Clay Products. Main 2189—Phones—Ind. 6125. JURY OF SIX HUNDRED FIND FOR WOMAN SUFFRAGE FRIDAY, October 28, 1910 Outside of the woman suffrage states there is dispute as to whether equal suffrage there works well or ill. Meanwhile, the people of those states go their way serenely, and show no more inclination to abolish woman's ballot than to abolish railroads or public schools. The weightiest testimony that has yet been gathered as to the practical working of votes for women is to be found in the hundred of letters received in answer to a circular of inquiry lately sent out by the late Mrs. Julia Warde Howe to the ministers of the equal suffrage states. It asked the following questions: 1. Has equal suffrage demoralized the women? 2. Has it made less good wives and mothers? 3. Do the immoral women control the elections? 4 Has the possession of the ballot caused women to be treated with less courtesy and respect? 5 It is often asserted that woman's influence in securing good objects is stronger without the ballot, because while she cannot vote her influence is nonpartisan, but if enfranchised her influence would lose its non-partisan quality and have less value. Do you find this to be the case? 6 Has it made it harder for women to secure desired legislation? 7 Has it any other bad results, such as increasing the corruption of politics, multiplying divorces, lessening women's personal influence, making them coarse and masculine, leading them to neglect their home duties or causing city or town affairs to be mismanaged owing to women's comparative inexperience in business? 8 Do women show more or less tendency than men to "scratch" bad candidates? 9 Has woman suffrage led women to take more intelligent interest in public affairs, thus tending to broaden their minds? 10 Has it had any other good results, such as making elections more orderly, making it harder for notoriously corrupt candidates to secure nomination and election, making it easier to obtain liberal appropriations for school purposes and for humanitarian objects, and rendering women more intelligent companions for their husbands and better able to instruct their children? 11 Is there any likelihood that woman suffrage will be repealed? This circular letter was sent to ED FIND FOR all the Episcopal clergymen in Wyoming, Colorado, Utah and Idaho; also to the Presbyterian, Congregational, Methodist and Baptist ministers, to all the Congregational Sunday School Superintendents (the other denominations do not publish the names of their superintendents in their religious year books), and to the editors of the newspapers. The answers have just been tabulated; and the outcome ought to set at rest the doubts of all who have honestly feared that woman suffrage would demoralize either women or public affairs. From Wyoming where women have had the full ballot for forty-one years, to Idaho, where they have have only had it for fourteen, all four of the enfranchised states give an overwhelming majority of favorable answers. The replies from Utah were awaited with some misgivings, because of the peculiar conditions existing there; but the Christian ministers of Utah seem to be as generally convinced as those of the other states that equal suffrage it all right. Taking the four states together the replies from the Episcopal clergymen were favorable, more than two to one; those of the Baptist ministers, seven to one; those of the Congregationalists, about eight to one; of the Methodists, more than ten to one; and of the Presbyterians, more than eleven to one. In each denomination there were a few "on the fence." These doubters were most numerous among the Presbyterians, yet the Presbyterians gave the largest proportion of positive replies in favor. Of the Sunday School Superintendents, one was opposed and one was in doubt; all the rest were favorable. The editors were also canvassed, in order to get the views of an intelligent class of laymen. Here again, a few of those replying were in doubt, but those who expressed themselves with positiveness either way were in favor, more than eight to one. This is the first effort on a large scale to find out the opinion of the ministers and editors who have had a chance to see the actual results of woman's ballot. Mr. Amos R. Wells, editor of the Christian Endeavor World, several years ago sent a letter of inquiry to twenty-five ministers of different denominations, most of them Doctors of Divinity. He chose their names at random from among his subscribers in the enfranchised states, and asked them whether woman suffrace was working $ ^{\circ} $ 8 well, fairly well or poorly. One answered that it was working poorly, and three that it was working fairly well, while all the others were positive, and some of them enthusiastic, in declaring that it was working well. He published a summary of their replies, under the title "A Double Jury on Woman Suffrage." Mrs. Howe's letter brought out a verdict from a jury of more than six hundred. In all, 624 answers were received. Of these 62 were opposed, 46 in doubt, and 516 in favor. No Prospect of Repeal The last question, as to whether there was any prospect that woman suffrage would be repealed, was answered in the negative almost unanimously. L. E. Howard, Superintendent of the People's Tabernacle of Denver, answered, "When the pyramids are obliterated." Rev. Duncan Ramont, of Colorado City, wrote, "None whatever. There would be a revolution were it attempted." Rev. Geo. L. Boroughs of Sterling, Colo., said "Not the least. Only those who are ignorant of its workings object to woman suffrage. Rev. N. F. Milliken, of Fort Collins, replied, "Not in the least. We know a good thing when we have it." Such statements might be multiplied indefinitely. One of the few opponents, answers, dolefully, "No such luck!" Rev. Moses Micham of Boulder, Colo., a Baptist minister nearly 86 years old, says in answer to the question whether equal suffrage coarsens women: "Association everywhere, with decent people refines both sexes," and he signs himself, "Yours for religion that saves and politics that do not damn." A Striking Contrast Contrast the testimony of these 516 ministers and editors with the few and mostly discredited witnesses that are all the other side has been able to get together in its many years of effort, Ellis Meredith, president of the reform Election Commission of Denver, has said that she would like some time to write an article on the various people who have declared that equal suffrage has had a demoralizing effect in Colorado. Among them she mentioned the keeper of a gambling house, a prize fighter, a man who had been horse-whipped by an indignant husband for annoying his wife, and a church treasurer who had run away with the church funds.—A. S. B. in Woman's World. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King, 60-Day Summons. Carrie Hull, plaintiff, vs. Sarah Galloway and John Doe Galloway, her husband, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right-title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein and also any and all unknown heirs of the said defendants above named, defendants.—No. —. The State of Washington, to the above named defendants, Sarah Galloway and John Doe Galloway, her husband, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, and also any and all unknown heirs of the said defendants above named: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty (60) days after the 25th day of October 1998, the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought for the purpose of quieting the plaintiff to the follower described property, towit: Lots 27 and 28, in Block 5, of Chilberg's Addition to West Seattle, situated in King County, State of Washington. REVELELLE REVELELLE & REVELELLE Attorneys for Plaintiff Postoffice address: 605-608 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. Oct. 28, Dec. 9, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication. James Henry, plaintiff, vs. F. B. Huntley and Jane Doe Huntley, his wife, whose true christian name is un- known, defendants.—No. 74840. State of Washington to the defendants. F B Huntley and Jane Doe Huntley You and each of you are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 30th day of September 1910 and defend the title of the plaintiff in the above titled court and answer r the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case you fail to do, judgment will be renewed against you, ordering the filing of the plaintiff's complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to recover the sum of $105.95 together with costs and interest due from you to the plaintiff herein for goods, wares and merchandise in this action during the last past three years. A writ of attachment being issued out of this cause and court and lots 26 and 37, block 8, of Green Lake Reservoir Addition to the city of Seattle have been attached thereunder. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of James deceased No. 11951. By order of said court made herein on the 29th day of September, 1910. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate at 416 Globe Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication Sept. 30, 1910. LOTTA McCARTHY, As Administratrix of said Estate. H. R. CLISS. Attorney for Estate. 416 Globe Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Louise Ashen, Plaintiff, vs. Lester Ashen, Defendant, No. — Summons for Publication. The State of Washington, to Lester Ashen, Defendant. You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the date of the said first publication, within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for the plaintiff below named, at his office, below stated, and in case of your failure so do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff which has filled with the object of above entitled court. The object of this action is to secure a divorce on the ground of desertion for more than one year. A. C. McDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address, 524 Bailley Building, Seattle, Wash. Oct 7—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King Coun- ty. Summons by Maud A. Boschert, plaintiff, vs. Charles C. Boschert, no. vs. Charles The State of Washington, to the said Charles Boschert, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, tow, within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at torneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and a copy of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against your according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with a said court. the clerk Briefly stated the object of this action: to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant and to grant the plaintiff divorce from the defendant on the ground of abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant for more than one year last past, and for the failure of the defendant to support the plaintiff and his family, and to award the custody of their minor son, Robert E. Boschert, to the plaintiff. For further particulars reference is made to the complaint now on file in the office of the clerk of the above entitled court. BRADY & RUMMENS, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Postoffice address Suite 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 7—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons by Publication. Elizabeth J. Marston, plaintiff, vs. Richard K. Marston, defendant. No. 76271. The State of Washington, to the said Richard K. Marston, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below state: 4179 New York failure to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for an absolute divorce on the grounds of non-support, and custody of two minor children. JOHN R. WILSON, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. address, 539 New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 7—Nov. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. Order fixing time to hear fair court order to show cause why distribution should not occur. distribution of In the Matter of the Estate of Charles advertised. No. 10075. Kobinson, deceased. No. 1017. Martha A. Robinson and Harry T. Price, court and executor of the estate of Charles Robinson, deceased, having filed in this court their final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: it is therefore by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Charles Robinson, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 5th day of November, 1910, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any, they have, why said final account should not be answered and an order of distribution of the estate of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the 5th day of November, 1910, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in each county and of general circulation therein. In done in open court, this 6th day of Done in open court this 6th day of October, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Court Commissioner. Oct. 7—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King, Order fixing time to hear final account to show cause why dissolution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of Mary Mortality deceased—No. 10639 duluth court, Walter L. Lovejoy, administrator of the estate of Mary Mountjoy, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by daw thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons entitled in the case of the said Mary Mountjoy, deceased be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 5th day of November, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an distribution be made to the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the sale 6th day of November. In the Seattle Republican newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 6th day of October, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Court Commissioner. Oct. 7—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Thos. Eaton, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants. No. 75684. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff holder has an entitlement tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April, 1910, and numbered B61750, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $1.65, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to- Beginning at a point 165 feet east and 33 feet south of the N. W. corner of the SW 1-4 of Sec, 10, Tp. 26 N., R. 5 E, W. M.; thence east 60 feet, thence S. 120 feet, thence west 60 feet, thence N. 120 feet to the place of beginning. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit. For the year 1907, the sum of $1.35; for the year 1935, the sum of 87 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 28 cents. Which severa, sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown and many), are hereby further unpaid and summoned to be appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN location, to-wit: within 60 days after Sept. 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each of said legal property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication. California court of trial, vs. Harry Lomas, defendant.—No. The State of Washington, to Harry Lomas, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this sum- ment; to appear within sixty (60) days after the 28th day of October, 1910, and fend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for plaintiff at his off- ice below at the courthouse. The case of failure to do so, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this complaint is to obtain an absolute divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant on the grounds of cruelty or insult to the person and for the return of her maiden name. Office address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Oct. 28—Dec. 9, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Preston Mill Co., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants No. 75685. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants and the owner or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April, 1910, and numbered B61758 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1905, in the amount of 90 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King county, described as follows, to-wit: You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Sept. 30, 1910 in the above entitled court and action; and handle this action and an appeal of the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his offre below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property or the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sale of each interest and costs, on a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. A. C. MacDONALD, L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR CURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, F. H. Harkins, plaintiff, vs. Elizabeth Brunner, Benedict Brunner, her husband, James McNamara, William E. Holmes, doing business under the name of the Holmes Plumbing & Heating Co., H. C. Keller, doing business as Keller & Sons, and the American Luxer Prism Co., defendants.—No. 75397. Summons by publication. The State of Washington to the said defendants, Elizabeth Brunner, Benedict Brunner, her husband, and the American Luxer Prism Company, a corporation: Witness each of you, are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the second day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above enclosed complaint against the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered to you, and the complaint of the complaint herein which has been filed with the clerk of this court The object of said action is to recover a judgment against the said Elizabeth Brunner and Benedict Brunner her husband, for the sum of Fifteen dollars, but the amount thereon at the rate of seven per cent per annum from the 23rd day of October. 1907. less the sum of Fifty-four ($54.00) Dollars paid on account of interest, and interest on deferred interest installments at the rate of ten per cent per annum for insurance paid by plaintext dollars for insurance paid by plaintext and the sum of $170.00 attorney's fee and costs and disbursements herein and to foreclose that certain mortgage given by the defendants, Elizabeth Brunner and Benedict Brunner, on the 23rd day of October, 1907, to Osner & Mehlhorn, Inc., to secure sale amount upon 10,6 block 2 Market Street. Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to foreclose all right, claim or equity of redemption of each and all of said defendants in and to said property. Said mortgage was recorded on the 23rd day of October, 1907 in Vol. 330 of mortgages, 1667, of the records in the auditor's office of said King County. The said mortgage, and the sum secured thereby, was on the 24th day of October, 1907, duly assigned, in writing, to said plaintiff. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for plaintiff. Office and post office address, rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bidg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 2. Oct. 15, 1910. NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL ESTE BY You are hereby notified that the undersigned, L. H. Craver, is the owner and holder of one certain certificate of purchase, No. 934, on Lot 17, Block 2 of Columbia Terrace Addition. In said City, issued by the Treasurer of the said City on August 21st, 1908, for the sum of Seventeen and 30-100 Dollars ($17.30) under ordinance of the said City of Seattle, No. 13320. Said Certificate of purchase was recorded in the office of the Auditor of King County, Washington, on Nov. 9th, 1908, and the undersigned paid the said Auditor a prefer in the sum of $1.00. That since the said August 21st, 1908, the undersigned has paid other taxes and assessments on said land as follows, towit: on October 26, 1908, the sum of $9.28 and May 12, 1910, the sum of $144.03. And you, the said Patrick O'Connor, are hereby further notified that at the expiration of Sixty days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of the first publication, to-wit: sixty days after August 26th, him the said L. H. Chavar, will demand of the said Treasurer of the said City of Seattle, that he execute and deliver to him a deed to the said real property, and unless you, the said Patrick O'Connor, redeem the said property by paying to the said Treasurer the sums hereinbefore mentioned with interest per annum from said dates of payment, the said Treasurer will make and deliver to the undersigned a deed to the said property. L. H. CRAVER, Office and P. O. Address: 524 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wash. August 26—Oct. 6, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Wyman, Partridge & Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, defendants. No. 74735 Summons for Publication The State of Washington to the said James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to the day of September, 1910, and to the day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy or your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the court, and the object of the above entitled action is to recover a judgment against said defendants upon a claim by plaintiff for goods, warees and merchandise sold and delivered to said defendants by said plintiff in the sum of Two Thousand One Hundred Twenty-seven and 10-100 Dollars ($2,127.10), with interest thereon from the 2nd day of May, 1910, besides the costs of suit, and in which said acquisition of attachment has been taken out and levied. J. M. RUSSELL. Attorneys for plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 705 Low- man Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 2. Oct. 15, 1910. IN THE JUSTICE'S COURT BEFORE John, E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Summons by Publication. Blossom-Provine Lumber Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. T. W. Williams and Jane Doe Williams, his wife, whose true Christian Name is unknown, defendants. No. 13472. To T. W. Williams and Jane Doe Will- liams, wife of residents In the name of the State of Washington you are hereby notified that Blossom-Provine Lumber Co. has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Seattle, King County, Washington, to-wit: 210 New York Block, on the 23rd day of November, 1910, at the hour of 9 o'clock a.m. and unless you appear and then and there answer the same will be taken as confessed, and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said claim is to recover from the defendants a balance due for goods, wares and merchandise, to-wit: lumber sold and delivered to said defendants by the plaintiff within the last past three years. Complaint filed September 29, 1910. JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace. Oct. 28—Nov. 18, 1910. NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL ESTATE by the Treasurer of the City of Seattle, King County, Washington. To. Charles McDonald: You are hereby notified that the undersigned, L. H. Craver, is the owner and holder of one certain Certificate of Purchase, No. 1172, on Lot Nineteen (19) of Wheeler's Third Addition to the City of Seattle, No. 1172, on Lot Nineteen (19) of Wheeler's Third Addition to the City of Seattle, No. 1172, on Lot Nineteen (19) of Wheeler's Third Addition to the City of Seattle, No. 13320. Said Certificate of Purchase was recorded by the said Mrs. C. H. Weed, in the office of the County Auditor, by the office of the County Auditor, October 19, 1908, in Vol. 631 of Deeds at page 127, and there was paid to the said Auditor his fees therefor in the FRIDAY October 28, 1910 sum of of One Dollar ($1.00). That since said last named date to-wit: on Feb. 15th, 1910, there was paid by the undersigned to the County Treasurer of said King County for taxes on said property the sum of Ninety-four Dollars and forty cents ($44.40). That on Feb. 14th, 1910, the said Mrs. C. H. Weed, for a valuable consideration, aid and assigned the said Certificate of Purchase and assigned the said Oliver and the said L. H. Craver is now the owner and holder of the said Certificate of Purchase. And you, the said Charles McDonald, are hereby further notified that at the expiration of Sixty days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of the said first publication, to-wit: sixty days after September 9th, 1910, the said L. H. Craver will commence and of the said Treasurer of the said City of Seattle, that he execute and deliver to him a deed to the said real property, and unless you, the said Charles McDonald, redeem the said property by paying to the said Treasurer the sums hereinbefore mentioned, together with interest thereon at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said dates of payment, the said Treasurer will make and deliver to the said L. H. Craver a deed to the said property. L. H. CRAVER. Office and P. O. Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication. Frieda Marshall, plaintiff, vs. Joe Marshall, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington to Joe Marshall. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the受理的 attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is that the plaintiff, on the grounds of habitual drunkenness of the defendant and the neglect and offusal of the defendant and the need to make suitable provision for his family, be granted an absolute divorce from the defendant herein and the custody and control of the child of the plaintiff and defendant herein, and such other and further relief as the court may direct. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg. Seattle, WA Oct, 19. Nov. 18, 1910 IN THE JUSTICE'S COURT BEFORE John E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Summons by Publication. R. J. Eichler, plaintiff, vs. Cora Lowe and John Doe Lowe, her husband, whose true Christian name is unknown, defendants.—No. 13209. To Cora Lowe and John Doe Lowe, her husband, whose true Christian name is unknown: In the name of the State of Washington you are hereby notified that R. J. Eichler has filed a complaint against you in said court which will come on to be heard at my office in Seattle, in King County State of Washington to wit 210 New York Block on the 4th day of November, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed, and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of this action is to recover the sum of Twelve Dollars ($120) being a balance due for material furnished and labor for this plaintiff for and on behalf of said defendants within the last past three years. Complaint filed September 14th, A. D. 1910. JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace. Oct. 7—Oct. 28, 1910. REMOVAL NOTICE The Light and Power department of the Seattle Electric Company has moved to the Electric Bldg., Seventh avenue and Pine street. Street car tickets can be purchased and all bills paid in the Electrical Sales Room at the old location 907 FIRST AVENUE THE SEATTLE ELECTRIC CO ORDER A CASE OUT TO YOUR PLACE OF Rainier PALE BEER A Free Trip to Seattle and Return. Let's Bust the State Dental Trust. Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar and you will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established at 713 and in the Union Block for 18 years. Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar. I make a dollar and the State Dental Monopoly will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established at 713 First Ave., in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete with cheap dentists, but with the high-che-a dentists for half their price. Open evenings until 8 a.m. Sundays until 4 for people who work. EDWIN J. BROWN, D.D.S. 713 First Avenue Seattle, Wash. Read my article in Sunday's P.-L. and Monday's Times and Star. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons by Publication. Charles P. DuPont, diplomat of Dale Bennett, Walter C. Bennett, her husband, Charles P. Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown, William Brenner, D. A. Hatfield and "Jane Doe" Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown, and Charles V. Fisk, F. M. Hatfield, H. B. Barton and Aurora Land Company, a corporation, defendants. No. 75263. The State of Washington to Charles P. Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, whose true given name is unknown, D. A. Hatfield and Jane Doe Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is unknown. You, and each of you, are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 16th day of September, 10th and end of October, in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and have a copy of your answer served upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be remanded against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to foreclose a certain mortgage executed and delivered by the said defendants Millie Bennett and Walter C Bennett, her husband, to one S Campbell and by the said Campbell assigned to this planmate dated 28th January 1009 and recorded on the same day in Vol. 407 of mortgages, page 39 of the record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, which mortgage was given to secure a promissory note of $500.00 with interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent per annum and was given on lots 21 and 22 Block 1, Gilliam Park First Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to obtain judgment for the said $500.00 together with interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the 28th day of January, 1910, and an attorney's fee of $75.00 and costs of suit and to the order of a deed and all the rights of interest of each and all of said defendants in and to said premises and every part thereof. EDWARD ROBEL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons. A. L. LOWE, and Ella May Weaver, husband and wife, plaintiffs, vs. Peter E. Nordin, defendant. The State of Washington to the said Peter E. Nordin, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within twelve months after the date of Sept. 1910 and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his office below stated, and in case of your failure to answer, that description will be reordered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. And all right, title and interest in the lands described in the complaint claimed by you likewise in the contract, and payments described to you will be for collateral, and the title of the plaintiffs cleared as to all claims you may have or claim. J. W. BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiffs. 1324 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Antone Kaas, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herelafter described real property. Defendants. No. 75305. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named delinquent tax holder is filing delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of November, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: When 960 feet of $1/2 of $1/2 of NE/2 of SE/2.4 of Tp.21. N. R.4 E. W. M. certificate number B54644, year 1906, amount $1.23. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon above described real property, to-wit: Amount $1.40 for year 1907; 76 cents for year 1908. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 5 per cent per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of sale first publication, to-wit: within sixty days Aug. 19, 1910, in the above enactment and action; and after enactment action and complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for sale taxes, ordering a sale the terms of sale of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as praved in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, Summons. Nellie Derry, Plaintiff, vs. Herbert A. Derry, Defendant.—No. 75952. The State of Washington, the said Derry, Defendant; * You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons. This summons may last for 28rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office before the court, and so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is instituted for the purpose of dissolving the bonds of matrimony by dividing between the plaintiff and defendant for reason upon the grounds that said defendant has failed, neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the support and maintenance of said plaintiff; and for the decree awarding to said plaintiff the following described real estate warranted by the claim, state of Washington, particularly described as follows, to-wit: Lots twenty-two (22), twenty-three (23), twenty-six (26) and twenty-seven (27), in section seven (7), township thirty (30), north of range nine (8) Clayton, state of Washington; and also the following property situated in King County, State of Washington: The west half of lot twenty-five (25) and lot twenty-six (26), block eight (8) Bucklus Addition to the City of Seattle; and for such other and further relief as to this court may seem just and equitable. REED & HARDMAN, attorneys for Plaintiff Office and P. O. address: 960 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1810. IN THE SUPERIOR COUR8, KING County, Washington. Elizabeth Turnbull, Plaintiff, vs. George Turnbull, Defendant. No. ——. Summons. The State of Washington to the said Turnbull, defendant. George Burbil, denominal You are required to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney of the plaintiff at this date below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complainant in this action prays for divorce and that the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defender be dissolved. H.E. FOSTER Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 606 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, October 7, 1910. Date of last publication, November 18, 1910. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE Fred C. Brown, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King State, State of Washington. California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. John Doe Matijasevich and Richard Roe Glovich, coppartners, doing business under firm name of Alaska Liquor Company, Defendants No. —. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King, ss The State of Washington: To John Doe Matijasevich and Richard Roe Glovich, coppartners, doing business under first name and style of Alaska Iverson Co. You and each of you, are hereby notified that California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, has filed a complaint against you in said Court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the hour of 8:30 o'clock a.m., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said action is for the sum of Eighty-two Dollars and Twenty-five Cents (8.25) in cash and balance the fee in on account of merchandise sold and delivered to the defendants during the year 2009. Fried September 15th, A. D. 1910. FRED C. BROWN. Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. TWOROGER & WINKLER. Attorneys for Plaintiff. 10-11 Triangle Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication Sept. 16. 1910 Rooms of Washington College, Seattle, King County, Washington, Seattle, 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Allen P. Mitten, Deceased.—No. 11658. By order of said court made herein on the 8th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby made to creditors of all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executors of said estate, at 1308 Alaska Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 23, 1910. BRADY & RUMMENS, Attorneys for Estate. 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Oct. 22, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Frank H. Renick, Anna Farmer and Hanna Farmer, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 74379. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Court of Washington, dated the 18th day of October, 1908, and numbered B54379, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.02, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: W. 4, M. 4, M. 4, M. of Sec. 29, Tx. 24, N. R. 6 E. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the su mof $1.78; for the year 1908, the sum of $1.24; for the year 1909, the sum of $1.24 at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN against said real property. against said real property. You and each of you (including said plaintiff) may be any and are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub-lyplication, to-wit: within sixty days Sept. 9, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his due overseeing the cases and costs, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it re-warded as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Office Address, 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. I, a traver Plaintiff, vs. Caroline L. Burns, having all persons known any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.—No. 75301. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, and the plaintiff is the holder of the September, 1909, and numbered B61042, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of $4.86, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, towit: Lot 5, Sec. Tp, 22 N, R. 6 E, W. M., less Right-of-Way C., M. & St. P. Rv, 20. For the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1906, the sum of $2.11; for the year 1908, the sum of $0.73. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from sale date, payment, and are all the same and unreduced takes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said firm, publication of your firm's sixty day Sept. 9, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due together with interest and costs. If the sums and amounts due upon payment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums and amounts due against it, thereby is provided by law, and as pursued in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. 9-Oct. 1, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Jos, Allen, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75300. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of the delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of November, 1908, and numbered B54857, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.45, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, tow-wait, tow-wait, tow-wait, tow-wait. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $4.57; for the year 1908, the sum of $1.76. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from sale of the property, are all paid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days Sept. 10, 1900; above, entitled art action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the len of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said财产 for the sums incurred and paid upon and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. Daisy Houf, plaintiff, vs. John Francis Houf, defendant—No. The State of Washington to the said Francis Houf, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 30th day of September, A. D. 1910, and defend the A. D. 1910 against a written titiled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your answer to the complaint, and in case of your derected action you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been Our Season's Offering OF EXCLUSIVE WOOLENS Are Now on Display A call will convince the most skept and Beauty of our slash. The establish our tailoring assures you of satisfaction Irving & Cannon, 211 COLUMBIA STREET A call will convince the most skeptical of the Worth and Beauty of our slash. The established reputation of our tailoring assures you of satisfaction. Established 22 Years filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the grounds of your abandonment of plaintiff for more than four years, and also your failure to make suitable provisions for plaintiff since said marriage. 201-203 Burke Bld., Seattle, County Washington State, Sept. 16 The remarkable biblical play, now current at the Alhambra theatre, is attracting the largest audiences that have ever assembled in that pretty playhouse within its history. The theatre has been filled to the last seat in the orchestra at every performance this week, and the management feel justified in continuing it another week. One of the remarkable features of the Alhambra production of "The Holy City" is the lavish expenditure of the management on scenery and costumes, for no play ever produced in Seattle at any price was better costumed and more appropriately scenically embellished. Clergymen of all religious denominations have visited the Alhambra this week, and pronounce "The Holy City" the best and most perfect religious drama ever offered in Seattle. The entire play breathes the spirit of Christianity in its highest and most holy aspect, while reciting the scriptural events at the time of the betrayal and crucifixion of the Divine Redeemer. The extremely low prices charged at the Alhambra theatre have, and doubtless will, encourage entire families to attend the performance, and parents can not bestow a better lesson upon their children than to take them to see "The Holy City." The play will continue all next week at the Alhambra theatre. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. E. Kludvig, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75299. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. A. C. MAX DONALD Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons. Bloom B. Burris, plaintiff, vs. Park D. Phillips, defendant. The State of Washington, to the above named defendant, Park D. Phillips: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: within sixty days after the twenty-first day of October, 1910, exclusive of said twenty-first day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and to serve a copy of your answer or other pleading upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his hereinafter designated postoffice address, and in case of your so so so do judgment. We be rendered in said cause according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of said action is to procure a judgment and decree forever severing the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of the failure reusal and neglect of the defendant provide for or contribute anything towards the support or maintenance of the plaintiff since their marriage on the 5th day of July, 1900, and on the further ground that the defendant more than two years ago had and still must obey sanctioned the plaintiff, and at all times since has so continued to abandon and live separate and apart from plaintiff. LESTER S. WILSON. Attorney for Plaintiff. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons. Lillian Collins, plaintiff, vs. James Collins, defendant.—No. "THE HOLY CITY." Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. most skeptical of the Worth The established reputation of satisfaction. annon, Tailor BIA STREET d 22 Years The State of Washington, to the said James Collins, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 21st date of October, 2010, and defend the above entitlement action in the above entitled court, and answer the plaintiff of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure against you, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to secure a decree of divorce, dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of desertion and failure to provide for more than one year. H. H. SNOOK, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 537 Burke Building, Seattle, Washing- IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Summons for Publication. Laurentine E. Cole, plaintiff, vs. Anna Mayke, to defendant—No, 75580. The State of Washington to the said Anna May Cole, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 21st day of October, 1910, and the above entitled action in the above entitled action, and answer the complaint and serve copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant, upon the following grounds: Because the defendant without the plaintiff's fault, abandoned the plaintiff on the 9th of October, 1909, at Seattle, Washington, and that said abandonment has been continuous for one year and more. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 309 Burke Bldg., Second and Marion Streets, Seattle, Wash. Oct. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Count- ry, In Probate, Administrator's Notice of Sale of Real Estate. In the Matter of the Estate of James J. Lynch, Deceased—No. 10926. 1926. Notice is hereby given that under and by virtue of an order of sale of the Superior Court of King County, Washington, dated October 8th, 1910, I will sell at private sale the following described real estate situated in King County. Washington; Lot 31, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot 32, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot 33, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot 7, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot 8, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot 9, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot 10, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot 24, Block 15, Mount Baker Park Addition. Lot 15, Block 9, Mount Baker Park Addition. Said sale to be made on or after the 10th day of November, 1910. Bids will be received by the undersigned at the office of Edward Von Tobel, 604 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Bids will be received for any of sald parcels as above described. The terms of sale are cash, gold coin of the U.S. Ten per cent or bid to accompany bid and balance upon confirmation of sale by the court. Dated this 20th day of October, 1910. Date of first publication, October 21, 1910. HARRY W. BRINGHURST, Administrator of the Estate of James J. Lynch, Deceased. Oct. 21—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, and A. Musgrove and James Musgrove, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the Summons. State of Washington: To the above detendants and each of them: August 19. September 30. 1910. 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, Washington, Summons by Publication. Ella Croft, Plaintiff, vs. Harry W. Bar- rows, Defendant.—No, 75894, The State of Washington to the said Harry W. Barrows, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this sum- mons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 23rd day of Eee er 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for the een at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be Ten- dered against you according to the de- mands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complaint in this action prays for the annulment of a marriage ceremony en- tered into between the plaintiff and de- fendant on December 28, 1907, and that the said marriage ceremony may be cancelled and annulled, and for all prop- er relief. H. EB, FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O, address, 606 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Bees first publication, September Date of last publication, Nov. 4, 1910. Sept. 283—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Notice to Creditors. Inthe Matter of the Estate of Alonzo H. Jose, Deceased.—No, 11696, By order of said court made herein on ‘the 7th day of September, 1910, notice Is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the neces- sary Vouchers to the undersigned ad- ministrator of said estate, at 1308 Alae- Ka Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and aft- er the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 23, 1910. N, H. JOSE, As Administrator of said Estate. BRADY & RUMMENS, Attorneys ‘for Estate, 1808 Alaska Building, Seattle,’ Wash Sept. 23—Oct. 22, 1910, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Notice to Creditors. In ‘the Matter of the Bstate of Leon- hard Reiniz, deceased.—No. 11230. By order of said court made herein on the 29th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against sald esiate or against the community estate of said deceased and Margarithe S. Reinig, to present them with the neces- sary Vouchers to the undersigned Mar- garethe S, Reinig, executrix of said es- tate, at #09 Burke Block, at the office of ‘A. J. Speckert, her’ attorney, the place of business of said estate, In Se- attle, in said county and state, within one ‘year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred, 20 4G 908 fst Publication September MARGARETHE §. REINIG, As Wxecutrix of said Ustate. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Estate. 309 Burke Block, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Oct. 28. 1910. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons by Publication. Avard L. Morrison, plaintiff, vs. Sarah Morrison, defendant.—No. —— ‘The State of Washington, to the said Sarah Morrison, defendant, You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, | to- wit, within sixty days after the ‘21st day of October, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action In the above entitled court, and answer the com- plaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office be- low stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk bf said court. The ob- ject of the sald action and the relief Bought to be obtained therein are fully set forth in said complaint, and is brief- ly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintift from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plain- tiff and you upon the ground of your abandonment of plaintiff for more than two years. J, P. BALL. Postoffice and office address: 201-208 Burke Bldg., Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. Oct. 21-—Dec, 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King Coun- ty. Summons by. Publication. M. 4. Lutz, Plaintiff, vs. Charles W. In- gran, Administrator of the Estate of fichard Lehn, Deceased, and Mrs, A. Sjoequist, Defendants.—No. 72747. he State of Washington to Mrs. A. Sjoequist: You are hereby summoned and _re- quired to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this Summons, to-wit: within sixty davs aft- Sr'the 2ird day of September, 1910, and fefena the above entitled action in the Gove. entitied court and answer the gomplaint. of the. plaintife herein and sore Gopy of your. answer upon the Ondersianed attorney for plaintiff, at hig Address below stated, and in case of four failure so to. do, judgment will felvendered against you according to the femand of the complaint herein which ihae'been’ fled with the clerk of this court. the object of sald action, as set forth In the complaint, is. to foreclose two in itain. mortgages given by the sald ittara, Tenn in his life time to the ir plaintift, the first one being dated Bale Piner 16, 1906, €0 secure the sum NPvgr200.00, with’ interest thereon at or vate of 7 per cent per annum from tera tate until pald, and the second one Gated October ‘8, 1907, to secure the dated | Pe$300.00, with interest at the sum ot'7 per cent per annum from sald rate ontil paid, and to recover Judgment for, sald Jamounts, and snterest 4a! {25.08 taxes paid by plain: ry: torney’s fee of $140.00 and. cote NR: forney'¢ ‘Said mortgages being on lots Poe ae, “block 3, John J. MeGilvra's Lary addition to the City of Seattle. 662 Gounty, Washington, and to fore- King coddetermine all the right, title Cloke terest of said defendants and each Sf them im an’ te sald, property. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Office and postofiice, address: Koams bos-8 Mutual Life Building, Bectie, King County, Washington, the, Ke—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- to, Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the sstate of Bertha Brown, deceased.—No. 12027. By order of said court made herein on the 22nd day of October, 1910, notice ig hereby given to the creditors ‘of, and all persons having claims against’ said deceased or against said estate, to pre- sent them with the necessary Vouchers to the undersigned administrators of said estate, at 705 Lowman Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county, and state, within one vear from and after the date of. first, publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication Octo. 28, 1910, SAM BROWN, ISAAC BROWN, As Administrators of said Estate. LEOPOLD M. STERN, Attorney for Estate, 705 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, Wash. ‘Oct. 28—Nov. 26, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Edith Rash, Plaintif, vs. John F. Rash Defendant. No. 75369. Summons 03 Publication. State of Washington to the sald John F, Rash, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this ‘summons, to-wit. within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of August, 1910, in the above en- titled action, in the above entitled court, and answer ‘the complaint of the plain- tift and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintift at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said com. plaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘This action is brought for the pur- pose of obtaining a decree of divorce from the said defendant on the grounds of abandonment, non-support, and per- sonal indignities, the same being causes of action specified in the laws of Wash- ington, for which services of summons by’ publication may be made, PARKER & BROWN, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and_Postoffice Address: Room 26 Union Block, 718 ist Ave. Seattle, Washington. "August 26—Oct. 6, 1910. IN |THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE: Etate of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons by Publication, Viola Estella Small, plaintiff, vs. Joseph Small, defendant.—No. —. ‘The State of Washington, to the said Joseph Small, defendant: You are heréby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: Within sixty days after the ‘14th day of October, A. D, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plainti, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at- torney for plaintiff’ at, his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has. been filed with the clerk’ of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: ‘To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the grounds of your aban- donment of plaintiff for four years, and also your failure to make suitable pro- visions for plaintiff since said mar- riage. J. P, BALL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice and office address: 201-203 Burke Building, Seattle, . King County, Washington. ‘Oct. 14—Nov. 25, 1910. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty, Summons for Publication, C,H. Boynton, plaintitt, vs, William B. Jenkins, defendant—No. 76276. The State of Washington to the said William B. Jenkins, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the ‘14th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action ‘in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of, your answer upon the undersigned at- torney for plaintiff at, his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk’ of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to recover judgment against said defendant for the amount ae upon two, promissory, notes for $150.00 and $40.00, respectively, made by Said defendant on the 30th day of July, 1907, and payable, the one, two months’ after date, and the other three months after date,’ respectively, together with Interest thereon at six ‘per cent, besides the costs of this action, and to have an attachment issued and levied on the defendant's property. LEOPOLD M. STERN, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address 705 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 14—Nov. 26, 1910. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show caure why distribution should not be may In_the Matter of the Estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased.—No. 5656. Malcolmn K, MacRae, administrator of the estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased, having filed in this court his final ac- count and petition setting forth that sald estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appear- ing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a dis- tribution of the residue of said estate: it is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said T. J. Riordan, deceased, be and appear before the. sald Superior Court of King County, State of Wash- ington; at the court room of the Pro- hate Department of said court in Seat- fip_on the 14th day of Opteber, 1910, the hour of 9.80 o'clock A, M. of said @y, then and there to show cause, if any’ they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and per- sons in said petition mentioned, accord ing to law. it Is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most publig places In King County, for a period of four weeks prior to ‘said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 14th day of November, 1910, in the ATTORNEYS, ATTENTION! Tue Searrie Repustican is looking for your legal pub- lications, and if you are looking for your own business inter- ests you will see to it that no publication is sent from youn office without first talking with Cayton about it. It is an indisputable fact that there are but two weekly publications in Seattle that publish lawyers’ legal notices and give the lawyers no trouble on account of errors and prompt ‘“‘returns”’ of publishers’ affidavits, and Tae Suattix Repustican takes cases that he has not the time to look the paper over every the lead. In this day of busy, bustling activity, the lawyer’s time is so much absorbed in the preparation of his voluminous week to see if his notices are being regularly published, nor to read over his notices to see if they are absolutely correct. Tt often happens that even lawyers niake errors im getting or calls the lawyer’s attention to them before going to press up their notices for publication, which errors are very annoy- ing:to the lawyers if not detected and corrected before going into the paper. If, therefore, the lawyer feels absolutely cer- tain that the publisher gives his personal attention to notices sent to his paper and either corrects small errors in notices it’s a great relief to his mind. The publisher of Tux Szarrie Repusuican has had so much experience with legal publica- tions that he can detect a faulty publication almost as readily as the lawyer himself, and, if not a grievous one, corrects tt then and there, but if a grievous one, the lawyer’s attention is called to the same before going to press. Returns on pub- ications are promptly made, so that lawyers do not have to worry about the publisher’s notice after his case has been called in court, Of course Tur Searrie Repusuioan is reliable, and read- able as well, for it has been published for eaactly sixteen years without having lost an issue or at any time over two days late. It will require no great amount of reasoning to prove to you that it is readable, and one of thz proofs is that many of the subscribers to Tue Szarrie Rerusiican today have been subscribers almost ever since the paper was first issued, May 19, 1894. Tue Srarrie Repusiican is quoted more by other publications throughout the state than any other weekly paper published in the state, and its political prognostications more often discussed by the politicians than those of any weekly paper in the state. Tur Srarrie Repusiican has no hesitancy in saying that from the standpoint of readableness Tue Srarris Repusrican has made good. CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY 307 Epler Block Phone Main 305 Seattle - - Washington THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN 1 Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County, and * of general circulation therein. Pone in open court this 7th day of 1 October, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, 1 Court Commissioner. : State of Washington, County of King —88, 1D. K. Sickels, county clerk of King - County and ex-officio clerk of the Su- 3 perior Court of the State of Washing. t ton, for the County of King, do hereby , certify that the foregoing is a ful , true and correct copy of an original ; order to show cause, made by said 3 court on the 7th day of November, 1910, r in the matter of the estate of 'T. J. Riordan, deceased. . Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 7th day of October, 1910. D. K, SICKELS, ; Clerk, ‘ By PERCY F. THOMAS, «Seal) ‘Deputy Clerk, Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910, N_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons by Pub- aftie Lumber © eattle Lumber Company, a_corporation, plaintife, vs. Celestine 3." sulllvan and velyn ‘Sullivan, his wife, B. W. An- arews and Jane Doe Andrews, ‘his wife, Fred G. Cutler and Mildred Cutler, his wife, 3 Netherland ‘American Mortgage Bank, a, corporation, H. W. Fisher, Trustee, The National Bank ‘of Commerce, of Seattle, Wash- ington, a corporation, John Davis & Company, a corpora- on, Jahn Brooke & Company, Elliott Bay MIN’ & Lumber Company, a corpora: ion, L, A, Borde, Crane Company, a cor. poration, John Scutt and Richard Roe Gelser f& co-partnership doing. business a: Scutt & Gelser, Schwabacher Hard: ware Company, corporation, V._D. Gossett,’ John Knapp and Rich afd Roe Lambert, doing business ai Knapp, & Lambert, J. J, Frantz and W. J. Winters, de- fendants. Globe Blestric Company, Cox & Glea- son Company, and J. K. Witherspoon, intervenors.—No, ——. he State of Washington, to the said Gelestine J. Sullivan, Evelyn Sullivan, his wife, and H, W. Fisher, defend: ants: You are hereby summoned to appear ithin sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, t Bat tt, teas Sates. ia tbe Bas 08 October, “A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action’ in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint in intervention of the Intervenor J, K. Witherspoon, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for intervenor at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said inter- venor’s complaint in intervention, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint in interven: tion, is as follows: TQ foreclose a laborer’s and maverial- man's lion, upon lots 19, and 20, block 24, Edes & Knights’ addition to Seat- Uc, King County, Washington, ©. H. “WINDERS, Attorney for Intervenor, J. K. Wither- spoon, Office and postoffice address: 712 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, ‘Washington. “ Oct. 14—Nov. 25, 1910. IN| THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty, Notice to Creditors, In the Matter of the Estate of Lavina Christine Rudberg, deceased.—No. By order of said court made herein on the 4th day of October, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors ‘of, and to. all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouch- ers to the undersigned administratrix of said estate, at 828 Northern Bank & ‘Trust Building, Seattle, Wash., the place of business of safd estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be_barred, apite of first publication October 14, ELMA LOUISE RUDBERG, As Administratrix of said Estate. GORDON McGAUVRAN, ‘Attorney for Estate. 827-8-9 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg,, Seattle, Wash. Oct, 14-—Nov. 11, 1910, IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King Coun- ty, Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Kath- ‘rine Schulver, deceased.—No. 11880. By order of said court made herein on the 12th day of October, 1910. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against FRIDAY October 28, 1910 sald deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouch- ers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 229 Burke Block, beonee§ ‘Washington, the place of business ot said estate, in Seattle, in said eee and state ‘within one’ year from. ani after the date of first publication of or. red. : ‘Date of first Dubiication Oct. Las 1910. FRED L. RICE, As Administrator of said Estate, FRED L, RICE, Attorney for Estate. 229 Burke Block, Seattle, Wash, Oct. 14—Nov, 11, 1910, Send your legals to The Seat- H tle Republican, 305 Epler Blk., ~ Phone Main 305, Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 18, STETSON & POST LUMBER CO. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 71) ALBERT HANSEN. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses. Phone, Main 268. Seattle Washingtun. First and Cherry.