Seattle Republican

Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE PUBLISHER'S NOTICE. The Seattle Republican is published on Friday of every week by Cayton Publishing Company Subscriptions, $3.00 per year; six months, $1.50 postage prepaid. Subscriptions to all foreign countries included in the Postal Union, $4.00 a year postage paid. Sample copies, free. Single copies ten cents. Advertising rates made known on application. Special rates to publishers. Entered a second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. Address all communications to The Seattle Republican 307 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. Make a checks, drafts, postal orders, etc., payable to "Cayton Publishing Company." CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. Telephone: Main 305. Publication office, 307 Epler Block. HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON - - - Publisher 3USIE REVELS CAYTON - - - Associate STATE ELECTIONS NEXT TUESDAY Throughout the Northwest and especially in the state of Washington the election next Tuesday is of no great amount of interest. There are no national issues involved though in in the state three members of the house of representatives of Congress are to be elected and a legislature which will elect a United States senator. While the state is overwhelmingly Republican there is a general feeling of apathy throughout the entire state and there would be no great sorrow exhibited on the part of the voters if a solid Democratic delegation went to Washington for two years. As to whether Poindxter or Cotterill is elected United States senator the average voter is not much concerned. If it were a contest direct between Poindexter and Cotterill the odds would be in favor of Cotterill, but since it has to be settled by the legislature and for good and sufficient reasons it is better that the legislature be Republican instead of Democratic and Poindexter having been endorsed by the Republicans at the primary election the legislature if Republican should elect him, but should it be Democratic then it should elect Cotterill. In the first congressional district, which includes Seattle and the northwest counties, the contest is between Will E. Humphrey of Seattle and W. W. Black of Snonomish. So far as the Seattle voter is concerned there is but one reason for him voting for Humphrey over Black and that is the former lives in Seattle and the latter does not. If Black was a Seattle Democrat then Seattle could afford to vote solidly against the man that has spent eight years in Congress and can show nothing he has accomplished for all those years except stand by Joe Cannon all the time and then denounce him when he thought that it meant his defeat to praise him. Seattle should have at least one representative in Congress and for that reason Seattle voters should stay by Humphrey. From a state standpoint the only candidates that are before the voters are five candidates for the supreme bench. The Republicans nominated five candidates, who, for the most part, are very acceptable men, and would have been elected without opposition had not Rufus Wilson discovered that after the primary election he was jobless and he got busy to bring out five candidates on a non-partisan ticket for the purpose of having a job prolonged until Senator Poindexter got near enough to the pie counter to demand a slice for his man Friday. We therofore recommend the unanimous support of the five Republican candidates for the supreme bench. In King county there are two superior court judges to be elected and since Judge Main and Judge Ronald were endorsed at the primaries, and defeated their opponents by overwhelming majorities we trust the voters will elect both of them as they have made ideal judges, the attacks on Judge Ronald by organized labor to the contrary notwithstanding. The county ticket from a Republican standpoint is either in eminent danger or it is practically without opposition, and it is nearer the latter situation than the former. There is hardly any doubt but that Bob Hodge will beat Lew Nelson by a majority and then something like 5,000 over a majority. There is no SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1910 comparison between the two men as to fitness and Hodge should be elected. As to the other candidates there is little if any opposition except the county commissioners. A hard fight is being made against David McKenzie and Lafe Hamilton and the Republicans are divided in their support of other party nominees. McKenzie does not wholly suit us as a candidate nor does Hamilton, but their opponents suit us still less snd we suppose it is Hobson's choice. So vote for McKenzie and Hamilton if you will, and if you won't, then vote for John Schram. LEONARD O. MEIGS' NATURALIZATION In applying for his naturalization papers after he had served one term in the legislature of the state of Washinton and speaker of the house of representatives while a member thereof, it looks as if Leonard O. Meigs of North Yakima had either been directive to his duty or had wilfully perjured himself. In one oath he declared that he was born in the state of Maine, though it was understood his father was born in a foreign land; but when, however, he made application for naturaliation papers a few days ago he said that he was three years old when he came to the United States, but thought his father took out his naturalization papers. It was easy enough for him to not have known as to whether or not he was born in this country, and being ignorant of that fact assumed all the duties and responsibilities of a natural born citizen. Any wrong he may have committed in performing the duties of a citizen under such conditions would have been of the head rather than the heart and therefore excusable, but when he qualifies his former statement and says, "I was three years old when I came to the United States," and took up the duties of a citizen under the belief that his father had taken out his naturalization papers, then it is plain to be seen that he wilfully prevaricated at once place or the other. But all that is a matter for the courts to decide, but the question is, Are all the acts of the last legislature null and void on account of him not being a citizen of the United States as the constitution of this state provides for all persons performing the duties of speaker of the house of representatives? The question has been raised by Attorney Tworoger and will be threshed through the courts and, if it should be held by the highest tribunals that the acts of the last legislature are void on account of that defect, it would be an expensive blunder for the state of Washington and in order to warn others against making such blunders Mr. Meigs should be tried for perjury. SEEKING A MEDICINE TRUST When A. H. McCormick, representing the state medical board, caused a man to be arrested because he sold Mississippi sand to persons, who were to either swallow the same or just hold it in their mouths for a time, which, he declared, would cure them of their rheumatism, then the medicine men demonstrated that they, too, could play the damphool act just as well as others, and in discharging the man Justice Brown showed his usual good sense. The medicine men of the state are making desperate efforts to forge an iron clad medicine trust around the necks of the citizens of this state and they are spending more time completing the arrangements for this trust than they are in diagnosing the diseases of their patients. It is safe to say seventy-five per cent of the calls that physicians make are unnecessary. In pretty nearly every physician's office in Seattle you can find every day women lined up by the scores waiting to see the doctor. Every nonsensical ache and pain are taken to some physician and he looks wise and administers a little water and sugar, and then collects a big fee, with a parting injunction, "If you are no better soon come back." and he might have added, "because I need the money." Tacoma is to have a census recount on account of alleged frauds, and before it is all over, it is more than likely that Seattle will be clamoring for a recount. Your sins will find you out. LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 UBLICAN VOLUME XVII. NUMBER 23 LOCAL OPTION LOOKS WELL It is conceded by even prohibitionists that the present local option law in the state of Washington is one of the best in the whole country, and snice it is working well all over the state, it should be permitted to remain as it is until it has been fully tried and tested. A large number of the candidates for the legislature, who will be voted for next Tuesday, did not hesitate, when they were making the campaign for the nomination, to state that they were satisfied with the local option law, and, if nominated and elected, they would not seek to have the subject reopened, in fact would be against it. Any move made to reopen the question at the coming session of the legislature will be looked upon as a move to put the state of Washington into the prohibition column, which thing even Gov. Myron E. Hay thinks would greatly jeopardize the progress of the state at this time. As the law now stands any community can go dry or wet as a majority of the voters thereof desire and no one should object to the majority ruling, whether it be on the liquor or any other public question. A REAL ESTATE FABRICATION The story that the ground on which the Moran Company's plant stands has been sold by the company for two million dollars, but that the company will continue to occupy the ground space with its plant, may sound good, but it seems to be nothing more or less than a real estate fabrication. As an investment it would not pay one cent on the dollar with the plant remaining on it, and it would not pay but precious little more if permanent buildings were erected on the grounds. However, if the plant was taken off the grounds and the property improved with large docks it would soon become a paying property on the basis of a two million dollar investment. Now there is absolutely nothing to this story and nothing to it at the price alleged to have been paid for it. The man who would pay two million dollars for that piece of ground and then consent to rent it to a plant like the Moran Company is so foolish that the sooner his friends get him to an insane asylum the sooner will his neighbors be out of danger. A GILL MASS MEETING No time has been set by the Gill adherents as to when they will hold a mass meeting to counteract the meeting held in the Arcade hall last Tuesday evening, and in not hurrying such a meeting along it would seem that Gill and his thousand and one puguglies are sleeping on their rights and will wake up to find that the other fellows have run away with the cheese. Now wouldn't a mass meeting called by the adherents of Hiram Charles Gill, mayor of Seattle, make a spectacle to behold demanding the enforcement of the law and incidentally their rights as law abiding citizens? Would it not be a motley aggregation of social outcasts and human parrahs clamoring for liberty? But as reluctant as some people are to concede it, yet those people have some rights that law-abiding citizens are bound to give them, for example, the full limit of the law, and they should get it immediately if not sooner. Ashum Brown, formerly a Seattle newspaper man, has been made private secretary to Richard A. Ballinger. For the past year or such a matter "Brownie" has been correspondent for a number of daily papers in various sections of the country from Washington City and now that he has been made secretary to Secretary Ballinger, it looks as if things are coming his way. The T. R. party in New York is in a state of expectancy about now. Frank Gould's devotion to a fickle female cost him $10,000 and he gave another $10,000 for the letters. From the amount of cutting being done this fall it begins to look as if the next legislature of Washington will have Hay to burn. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, Washington, Summons by Publication, Ella Croft, Plaintiff, vs. Harry W. Barrows, Defendant—No. 75894 You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 23rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the underwriting attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complaint in this action prays for the annulment of a marriage ceremony entered into between the plaintiff and defendant on December 28, 1907, and that the said marriage ceremony may be cancelled and annulled, and for all proper relief. H. E. FOSTER Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 600 Marion Building. Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, September 23, 1910. Date of last publication, Nov. 4, 1910. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Alonzo H. Jose. Decased—No. 11696 By order of said court made herein on the 7th day of September, 1910. notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 1308 Alaska Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 23, 1910. N. H. JOSE. As Administrator of said Estate. BRADY & RUMMENS. Attorneys for Estate. 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Oct. 22, 1910. State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Leonhard Reinig, deceased.—No. 11230. By order of sold court made herein on the 29th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate—sold deceased and Margarithe S. Reinig, to present them the necessary notice, to the undersigned Margarhe S. Reinig, executrix of said estate, at 309 Burke Block, at the office of A. J. Speckert, her attorney, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 30, 1910. MARGARETHE S. REINIG, As Executrix of said Estate. A. J. SPECKERT. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington Coun- partment of Publication ty. Summons by Publication tv. Morrison for office, vs. Sarah Morrison for office, NO Morrison, defendant.—No. _____ The State of Washington, to the said Sarah Morrison, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first summons, within sixty days after the 21st day of October, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to do judgment, will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein are fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve the marriage to plaintiff and you existing between plaintiff and you upon the ground of your abandonment of plaintiff for more than two years. Postoffice and office address 201-203 Burke Bldg., Seattle County of King, State of Washington. Oct. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by, Publication. M. J. Lutz, Plaintiff, vs. Charles W. Ingran, Administrator of the Estate of Richard Lehn, Deceased, and Mrs. A. Sjoequist, Defendants.—No. 72747. The State of Washington to Mrs. A. Sjoequist: You are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this complaint; within sixty days after the 23rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case your failure so to do will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint herein which have been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of said action, as set forth in the complaint, is to foreclose two certain mortgages given by the said Richard Lehn in his life time to the said plaintiff, the first one being dated November 16, 1906, to secure the sum of $1,200.00, with interest thereon at the rate of 7 per cent from said date until paid, and the second one dated October 8, 1907, to secure the sum of $300.00, with interest at the rate of 7 per cent per annum from said date until paid, and to recover judgment for said amounts and interest and $26.98 taxes paid by plaintiff, an attorney's fee of $140.00 and costs of suit; both of said mortgages being on lots 1 and 2, block 3, John J. McNeil. Second addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to foreclose and determine all the right, title and interest of said defendants and each of them in and to said property. EDWARD VON TOBEL. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sent. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Counto. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the estate of Bertha Brown, deceased -No. 13027 By order of said court made herein on the 22nd day of October, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrators of said estate, at 705 Lowman Building, the place of business of said estate, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication Octo. 28, 1910. SAM BROWN, ISAAC BROWN, As Administrators of said Estate. LEOPOLD M. STERN, Attorney for Estate. 705 Lowman Blg., Seattle, Wash. Oct. 28—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Edith Rash. Plaintiff, vs. John F. Rash. Defendant. No. 75369. Summons by Publication. State of Washington to the said John F. Rash. Defendant: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE Etate of Washington, for King County, Summons by Publication. Viola Estella Small, plaintiff, vs. Joseph Small, defendant—No. ____. The State of Washington, to the said Joseph Small, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 14th day of the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the sale is that the sole agent to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the grounds of your abandonment of plaintiff for four years, and also your failure to make suitable provisions for plaintiff since said marriage. J. P. BALL Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice and office address: 201-203 Burke Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 14—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summits, for Publication. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 14th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the defendant in his own custody, or your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the judgment against you is to judge judgment against said defendant for the amount _ae upon two promissory notes for $150.00 and $40.00, respectively, made by said defendant on the 30th day of July, 1907, and payable, the one, two months after date, and the other three months after date, respectively, together with the costs of this action, besides the costs of this action, and to have an attachment issued and levied on the defendant's property. LEOPOLD M. STERN. Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address 705 Lowman Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 14—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be mad In the Matter of the Estate of T. J. Bliordan, deceased—No. 5656 Malcolm K. MacRae. 9690. administrator of the estate of T. J. Riordan deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appears that the estate is forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said T. J. Riordan, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior at the Long County, State of Washington, at the Department of the Bureau Department of said court in Seattle on the 14th day of October, 1910, at the hour of 9.30 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of tribunal be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said seal and seal should be posted four consecutive weeks before the said 14th day of November, 1910, in the ATTORNEYS, ATTENTION! THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is looking for your legal publications, and if you are looking for your own business interests you will see to it that no publication is sent from your office without first talking with CAYTON about it. It is an indisputable fact that there are but two weekly publications in Seattle that publish lawyers' legal notices and give the lawyers no trouble on account of errors and prompt "returns" of publishers' affidavits, and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN takes cases that he has not the time to look the paper over every the lead. In this day of busy, bustling activity, the lawyer's time is so much absorbed in the preparation of his voluminous week to see if his notices are being regularly published, nor to read over his notices to see if they are absolutely correct. It often happens that even lawyers make errors in getting or calls the lawyr's attention to them before going to press up their notices for publication, which errors are very annoying to the lawyers if not detected and corrected before going into the paper. If, therefore, the lawyer feels absolutely certain that the publisher gives his personal attention to notices sent to his paper and either corrects small errors in notices it's a great relief to his mind. The publisher of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN has had so much experience with legal publications that he can detect a faulty publication almost as readily as the lawyer himself, and, if not a grievous one, corrects it then and there, but if a grievous one, the lawyer's attention is called to the same before going to press. Returns on publications are promptly made, so that lawyers do not have to worry about the publisher's notice after his case has been called in court. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County, and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 7th day of October, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Court Commissioner. State of Washington, County of King—ss. D. K. Sickels, county clerk of King County and ex-officio clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause made by said court on the 7th day of November, 1910, in the matter of the estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 7th day of October, 1910. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. BY PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. V. D. Gossett, John Knapp and Richard Roe Lambert, doing business as Knapp & Lambert, J. J. Frantz and W. J. Winters, defendants. Globe Electric Company, Cox & Gleason Company, and J. K. Witherspoon, intervenors.—No. —. The State of Washington, to the said Celestine J. Sullivan, Evelyn Sullivan, his wife, and H. W. Fisher, defendants. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: sixty days after the 14th day of October, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint in intervention of the Intervenor, J. K. Witherspoon, in his case, and answer upon the undersigned attorney for intervenor at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said intervenor's complaint in intervention which he is liable to in the court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint in intervention, is as follows: To foreclose a laborer's and materialman's lien upon lots 19 and 20, block 24, Edes & Knights' addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. C. H. WINDERS. Attorney for Intervenor, J. K. Witherspoon. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Lavina Christine Rudberg, deceased.—No. 11877. By order of said court made herein on the 4th day of October, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons to whom the claimant said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrix of said estate, at 328 Northern Bank & Trust Building, Seattle, Wash., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication October 14, 1910. ELMA LOUISE RUDBERG, As Administrix of said Estate. GORDON McGAUVRAN, Attorney for Estate. 327-8-9 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR CURT OF THE STATE of Washington for King Coun- nell. No creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Katherine Schulver, deceased—No. 11830. erine Schulver, deceased.—No. 11830. By order of said court made herein in the name of the creditors, it is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against FRIDAY Novembe 4, 1910 said deceased or against sale estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 229 Burke Block, Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication Oct. 14, 1910. FRED L. RICE. As Administrator of said Estate. FRED L. RICE, Attorney for Estate. 229 Burke Block, Seattle, Wash. Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. Send your legals to The Seattle Republican, 305 Epler Blk., Phone Main 305. Bonney-Watson Co. Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. STETSON & POST LUMBER CO. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses. Phone, Main 268. Seattle Washington First and Cherry. CURRENT COMMENT The attention of the voters of the state of Washington or as many thereof as see THE SEATLE REPUBLICAN, this is the last of a series of articles that have appeared herein from time Woman Suffrage to time on woman suffrage, and if you, Mr. Vote Yes Voter, will give them a Woman Suffrage Vote Yes careful perusal we believe you will do just as the editor of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is going to do next Tuesday, vote for equal suffrage for women in the state of Washington. To the man who has any regard for his wife, mother and sisters its enough to make him hang his head in everlasting shame to see men as ignorant as the blue imps of midnight wabbling up to the polls and voting their property rights away, and not only are they ignorant, but in a great many instances so drunk they are hardly able to find the ballot box after they have been turned loose by the dirty ward heeler, who has piloted them to the voting booth. If you think women cannot cast a vote a thousand times more intelligently than such miserable drunken and debauched creatures, then you yourself are wrong under the hat. England is reducing her drink bill. In 1899 her people spent for liquor $900,000,000. Now that sum has been reduced to $780,000,000, rather a good-sized expenditure even now, Statistics of Drink however, when you In England think of what useful things and necessary Statistics of Drink however, when you In England think of what useful things and necessary things could be bought with that three-quarter of a billion dollars, especially in a land that for a number of years has been struggling with "hard times." which no amount of money spent for drink seems able to convert into "prosperity." The drink question, the public men of England aver, is the great issue in that land, and they are doing everthing they can to teach the English people to spend their money elsewhere than in the public houses. That they are meeting with some success if shown by the decreased drink bill. And figures show that they are saving in two ways. In England and Wales the number of convictions for crime have decreased within the last decade from 60.66 for every ten thousand people to 47.41. What these figures apparently make true is generally admitted, that the decrease in drink has brought about a corresponding decrease in crime. If there were no drink bill, Gladstone declared, there would be no bread and meat question in England. John Burns, labor leader, told the shipbuilders of Clyde that they need not come whining to him so long as they spend $20,000,000 a year for drink. —Everett Herald. Some interesting facts are shown by the Avgust immigration bulletin, just issued by the department of commerce and labor. It shows, among other things, Where Immigrants Come From that immigration is again at high tide and and that it is coming from the more unde- sirable quarter of Europe. In August the total was 78,547. while for the year ending June 30, 1910. the total is 1,041,570, more than for any year since 1907, and one of three years in a decade when the total has exceeded a million. It is shown that, whereas, in 1900 immigrants from Greece numbered 3,772, this year the total has reached 39,136. This large gain can be vouched for by any one who has noted the increase of these newcomers in Everett alone. Of the total number of immigrants, 12,218 declared their intention of coming to the state of Washington. In round figures in ten years the immigration from Scandinavia has increased from thirty to seventy thousand, Germany from thirty to seventy thousand, but all southeastern Europe shows much larger proportionate increases. Japanese immigration has dropped from 30,000 in 1907 to less than 3,000 this year, while East Indians (Hindus) have increased from 9 to 1,782 this year. Everett Herald. When the first census was taken in 1790, there were 1,903,332 persons living in the Southern States, of which 677,275, or 45.6 per cent were colored In 1850, the population in the seven southern states included in the original census had Negro Population in the seven southern states included in the United States the original census had grown to 5,851,201, of which the colored portion numbered 2,034,015 or 34.9 per cent. In other words, the ratio of the colored population in these states was still very nearly the same in 1850 that it had been at the first census, sixty years before. In the mean time there had been added to the seven original southern states six others including western Georgia. In several of these new states, the proportion of colored people to white was much larger than it was in the older slave states. For example, the population of Alabama was 44.7 per cent colored in 1850, and 48.2 per cent colored in 1900. In Mississippi, in 1850 colored people represented 51.2 per cent of the whole population; in 1900, 58.5 per cent. In Louisiana, in the same year, the colored population was 50.7 of the whole and in 1900, 47.1 per cent. In western Georgia, colored people made up 55.7 per cent of the population in 1850, and 43.9 per cent in 1900. Florida's population was 46.0 per cent colored. If given a fair and unbiased count by the census enumerators it is believed that the Negro population of the United States would almost reach the eighteen million mark, and of that nearly one half of them are of mixed blood. Some body is spending thousands of dollars distributing King county bond literature showing that some one has a personal interest, in seeing that the bonds are voted. A great majority of the tax payers are quite satisfied that King county does not King County Bonds NO! King County Bonds NO! need any more bonds voted at this time and all this hullabalco about voting bonds so that harbor sites may be purchased is all bond rot and advocated by interested parties for the purpose of pulling the wool over the the average voter's eyes and then hoodwink him into voting more bonds, out of which some one can make a big bunch of money. Out of every bunch of bonds that have been voted for Seattle or King county some one or two on the inside have realized many thousands of dollars on the sale of the bonds and still others have received large sums of money in the way they get the contracts for the alleged improvements. When you go to the polls next Tuesday do not be satisfied by not voting at all on the bond question, but vote NO! As was predicted in these columns it would be, when the Gill recall agitation first broke loose, a sufficient number of bona fide voters have signed the various petitions to compel Mayor Gill to Face the city council to order a recall election. A Fight Mayor Gill has no one but himself to blame for the predicament he has gotten himself into. Because he stated the kind of a town he intended to run in case he was elected mayor is no reason why he should become arbitrary, when the people tired of that kind of a town and clamored for a change. If the people do not seem inclined to stand for your way of doing things, and if you are living by the suffrage of the people, then do as they seem to want you to do. Had Mayor Gill, on his return from Alaska, called Chief Wappenstein into his sanctum and informed him that he seemed to be the cause of the municipal disturbance in Seattle and his retention meant the entire overthrow of the Gill administration and for that reason his resignation was then and there called for, there would have been no recall election. If Mayor Gill had have gone to Col. Alden J. Times and told him, "owing to your mix-up in the dead line rake off, I have to ask you to cut loose from my administration," then there would have been no recall election. But instead of doing the things that the people seem to want done, Mayor Gill in private and public has bellowed out, "to hell with the people, I am mayor of Seattle, and while I am mayor I will be mayor," all of which is quite true, but it begins to look that on account of his failure to do the things that might have kept him mayor of Seattle, he will be mayor for only a very short time longer. Even Great Caesar realized after Brutus had pulled a knife from under his third rib that, it matters not how important one man gets to be, there are others. Sarah Bernhardt is making another of her famous farewell tours through the United States and throngs of the lovers of the drama are flocking to hear her, Mme. Bernhardt At It Again they love to see and listen to her. She would doubtless draw just as big a crowd if she would have herself billed for the same places she is now playing six months afterwards and that, too, without any reference to either her return or her retirement. Those things that please the people those things will the people spend their money to have, to hear, and to see, FR DAY Novmeber 4.1910 and for that reason it seems a wilful waste of breath and energy for Mme. Bernhardt's manager to get off that old farewell chestnut every time she starts on a winter's tour. We expect Mme. Bernhardt will tour America just as long as she is able to draw good houses and she will make her farewell tour when the last one is profitless and the various audiences before whom she appears show no appreciation for her talent. When Judge J. T. Ronald of the superior court of King county declared in a public lecture last Sunday that a person once convicted of a crime was forever thereafter a hopeless criminal he either wanted to be sensational or to attract attention to Judge Ronald And Hopeless Criminals Judge Ronald And Hopeless Criminals himself for having said something, which after being diagnosed proved to be nothing at all. That person steeped in crime from childhood to maturity and then some, we believe is a hopeless criminal and to try to reform such a person is foolhardy, but the person who broke a law and was immediately caught and perhaps punished, he or she is no more a criminal at heart than the judge on the bench that sentences the offender to a term of imprisonment. Of course persons have different opinions as to what constitutes a criminal. Recently in discussing a certain man in the city of Seattle, who is quite wealthy, it was the concensus of opinion of those discussing him, that he would not commit murder for gain nor would he burglarize a house for the money, but he would willingly take stock in a Burglar-Murder corporation, if he thought it would pay good dividends. Such a man could be a member of some of the leading churches and be lionized by his fellow men and preach damphool sermons the same as did Judge Ronald last Sunday, and would be considered an angel in comparison to the man, who went out and stole something to dress his wife and children up like the man who was drawing big dividends from the Burglary-Murder company dressed his wife and little folk. If the poor fellow was apprehended and convicted, then Judge Ronald believes he is a hopeless criminal, but the fellow holding the stock in a company that is robbing and murdering his fellow men is a most desirable citizen. Prison life some times brings men to their proper senses and if a helping hand is only extended at the proper time the same persons may become as useful citizen as the man who never committed a crime against his fellow men. If Judge Ronald was not a member of the superior court of King county, and it would be a reflection on the intelligence of the community to have such a man on the bench, we would pronounce him, after having read his speech last Sunday, as the worst old fogey and the most consumit nonenity that ever broke out of the wilds of the Ozark mountains of Missouri. Mrs. Tom Thumb, a no less remarkable personage than Mme. Bernhardt, and who seems to make just as many farewell tours through Europe as Mme. Bern- hardt does through the United States, has recently returned from Europe where she made Mrs. Tom Thumb is Fifty-Nine one of her farewell tours and at Boston, Massachusetts, October 30th, celebrated her fifty-ninth birthday. Some how or other we old stagers are inclined to think Mrs. Tom Thumb is kinder smouging as to her age because the Tom Thumbs were conspicuous public characters in our early childhood, and while nine years make quite a difference between a man and a woman, yet if we were going to make a guess as to her age it would have been something like sixty-five. However, the age controversy to the contrary notwithstanding, Mrs. Tom Thumb is a most remarkable little woman and she atd her famous husband, a like midget, and from whom she obtained her name, took to the circus and then to the stage as a means of livelihood, not being physically able to otherwise make a living, and they accumulated a vast fortune. Tom Thum died some years ago and since that time she has been almost the whole show. The pair did the circus stunt for a number of years, which gave them their world wide publicity that served them so well on the stage. With Ruth and Clayson at their backs the "wets" of this state ought to be able to say, "you can't beat it." "Col. Alden J." Humphrey seems to be getting all the best of the war of words between himself and Judge Black, but out debating your opponent does not always mean that the voters will get a square deal because you did out debate your opponent. IS UNCLE SAM CONSERVATION MAD SUNSET TELEPHONE DEFYING OREGON LAWS Do you know that if the lands which have withdrawn by the government from public use grouped together they would comprise a ten greater than the combined areas of Maine, New Jersey, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Island, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, both Virginia, Ohio, Kentucky,ana and Illinois? And further, it attracts no particular attention, in a nation accustomed as we thinking in nine figures, to point to the fact that most 300,000,000 acres of land are now out of reach. There is hardly passing comment in the East the statement is made that virtually half of great tana is closed, with 42,000,000 acres withdrawn reckon New York a state of magnificent area, the west over 30,000,000 acres—a larger area than the Empire state—is withheld from the people of ho. That is fifty-seven per cent of the state. before she had 50,000,000 acres to offer newer Idaho now has 13,000,000—a tract barely the West Virginia. From the following table a reader may see glance the vast areas of land actually without Nor is this data guess work. Every figure has taken from official statistics furnished by the Government Office, Department of the Interior, at Washington: Lands Withdrawn by the Government Do you know that if the lands which have been withdrawn by the government from public use were grouped together they would comprise a territory greater than the combined areas of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, both Virginias, Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana and Illinois? And further, it attracts no particular attention, in a nation accustomed as we are to thinking in nine figures, to point to the fact that almost 300,000,000 acres of land are now out of settlers' reach. comprise a territory of Maine, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Delaware, Maryland, Ohio, Kentucky, Indies attracts no particulized as we are to the fact that alone now out of settlers' went in the East when nearly half of great Monies withdrawn. We significant area, but in larger area than all the people of Idaho of the state. Where to offer newcomers, yet barely the size of reader may see at a actually withdrawn. Every figure has been finished by the General Interior, at Washington. The Government The thou- cupy those ea- as any in the cause of the to 1909, thus our Northwest sturdy America nually. If it might be and hands of un- terbalanced the first lines of given each ways for the through wind worth billion is acknowledged out the railroad. Settlers k of the West, put in by se- clamation S covered that throughout the prospect of than even I one of the g There is hardly passing comment in the East when the statement is made that virtually half of great Montana is closed, with 42,000,000 acres withdrawn. We reckon New York a state of magnificent area, but in the west over 30,000,000 acres-a larger area than all the Empire state-is withheld from the people of Idaho. That is fifty-seven per cent of the state. Where before she had 50,000,000 acres to offer newcomers, Idaho now has 13,000,000-a tract barely the size of West Virginia. From the following table a reader may see at a glance the vast areas of land actually withdrawn. Nor is this data guess work. Every figure has been taken from official statistics furnished by the General Land Office, Department of the Interior, at Washington: Lands Withdrawn by the Government (Figures corrected to September, 1910) Per cent of Total Acreage of State Withdrawn Total Acreage Withdrawn from Public Use in State Arizona 23 16,646,477 Arkansas 9.5 3,189,781 California 32 32,030,838 Colorado 33 21,557,915 Florida 2.3 712,291 Idaho 57 30,603,393 Kansas .6 302,387 Louisiana 1.4 414,720 Michigan .4 163,373 Minnesota 2.2 1,204,486 Montana 45 42,009,943 Nebraska 2.2 1,085,152 Nevada 9.2 6,342,215 New Mexico 19.9 15,576,384 North Dakota 41.1 18,488,964 Oklahoma .2 108,880 Oregon 20 18,076473 South Dakota 9.7 4,805,127 Utah 27 14,309,006 Per cent of Total Acreage of State Withdrawn Total Acreage drawn from Use in Arizona 23 16,6 Arkansas 9.5 3,1 California 32 32,0 Colorado 33 21,5 Florida 2.3 7 Idaho 57 30,6 Kansas .6 3 Louisiana 1.4 4 Michigan .4 1 Minnesota 2.2 1,2 Montana 45 42,0 Nebraska 2.2 1,0 Nevada 9.2 6,3 New Mexico 19.9 15,5 North Dakota 41.1 18,4 Oklahoma .2 1 Oregon 20 18,9 South Dakota 9.7 4,8 Utah 27 14,3 of any mineral resource sites, timber al parks and withdrawn. in the reach mains in the unappropriate pointed out attractive or cludes the E deserts, barr try. The m private own Two-thirds s have never "It would tor Borah, o West to hold people of the pay tribute Total Acreage With- drawn from Public Use in State 1 16,646,477 5 3,189,781 1 32,030,838 1 21,557,915 3 712,291 3 30,603,393 3 302,387 4 414,720 4 163,373 2 1,204,486 42,009,943 2 1,085,152 2 6,342,215 9 15,576,384 1 18,488,964 2 108,880 18,076473 4,805,127 14,309,006 by the famous Dred Scott case. Many who read these lines are old enough to remember the awful consequences of the Dred Scott decision, and those who do not remember those times which "tried men's souls," know by the crimson marks on the pages of history of the National tragedy which occurred near the middle of the last century, and also of the vital connection that the Dred Scott decision had with the same. That the U. S. Supreme Court should have the power to precipitate another National catastrophe has given some anxiety to those acquainted with the facts. The situation is this: The plaintiffs in the above case will that the U. S. Constitution guarantees a Republican form of government to the states, and that Oregon, in so far as it uses the Initiative and Referendum, has not Republican form of government. The whole case will hinge on what is "a Republican form of government." We are familiar with what the popular dictionaries say. They have (evidently for convenience) evolved a line of distinction to the effect that a Democratic government is a direct government, while a Republican government is indirect, by means of elected representatives. However, when so much depends upon the use of a word, counsel and court will not be satisfied with a modern and super- --- --- FRIDAY November 4, 1910 The constitutionality of direct legislation under the Federal constitution will be submitted to the supreme court of the United States the coming winter the case being that of the Pacific Coast Telegraph and Telephone Co., agrinst the state of Oregon. Oregon, through the Initiative, enacted a law placing a tax upon the gross receipts of telegraph and telephone companies within the state. The company referred to, refusing to pay this tax, was sued by the state of Oregon. It was contended both before the lower court and the Supreme court of Oregon, that the law was unconstitutional in that legislativa duties were attempted to be performed by the whole body of the people instead of by a selected legislature according to the contentions of the company, by the Federal constitution. This contention, and all others presented, were overruled by both of the Oregon courts, and an appeal was taken to the Supreme court of the United States which appeal will be argued in the near future. The state of Oregon will be represented by A. M. Crawford, its Attorney-General, and Jackson H. Ralston, of Washington, D. C. [The above lines have been contributed at the Editor's request, by Mr. Ralston. This case before the U. S. Supreme Court is paralleled in political importance and possibilities only The thousands of settlers who would naturally occupy those enormous tracts of land, much of it as fine as any in the United States, are excluded. Largely because of these withdrawals, Canada, in nine years up to 1909, thus gained nearly 400,000 immigrants from our Northwest. At the present time 100,000 good, sturdy American farmers are leaving this country annually. If the land had not been withdrawn, there might be an occasional farm which would go into the hands of undersirable settlers, but this would be counterbalanced over again by bona fide residents. The first lines of railroads opened to the Pacific coast were given each alternating section along their right of ways for twenty miles at each side of the track through whole states. These grants of land are today worth billions of dollars, but the granting of the land is acknowledged as being more than justified, for without the railroads they could not have been developed. Settlers have been and are the all-important need of the West. Vastly more irrigatios plants have been put in by settlers and private capital than by the Reclamation Service. The Geological Survey has discovered that there are undreamed of deposits of coal throughout the Rocky Mountain states. There is the prospect of more coal in many of these western states than even Pennsylvania has yielded. It may prove one of the great coal regions of North America. The withdrawal of those coal lands stops the development of any mines upon them. So it is with the other natural resources—minerals, water power and reservoir sites, timber lands, etc. The forest reserves, national parks and like reservations have been permanently withdrawn. Other portions may be placed again within the reach of the people. The truth is there remains in the public domain 700,000,000 acres that are unappropriated and unreserved, and, as has been pointed out, only a small per cent of this residue is attractive or ever will be attractive to settlers. It includes the Bad Lands of the West, the irreclaimable deserts, barren summits and worthless mountain country. The most desirable lands that have not passed to private ownership are now held up by the government. Two-thirds of the land remaining in the public domain have never been surveyed. "It would be a magnificent scheme, indeed," Senator Borah, of Idaho, said, "to compel the whole great West to hold its vast resources in idleness, deprive its people of their enjoyment and use and compel them to pay tribute to those resources of which you have taken Washington Wyoming THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN SAM CONSERVATION Washington 35 Farming 30.9 The thousands of settlers who would natives of those enormous tracts of land, much of which lay in the United States, are excluded. Land of these withdrawals, Canada, in nineteen 109, thus gained nearly 400,000 immigrate Northwest. At the present time 100,000 American farmers are leaving this country. If the land had not been withdrawn it be an occasional farm which would get rid of undersirable settlers, but this would be balanced over again by bona fide residences of railroads opened to the Pacific coast each alternating section along their route for twenty miles at each side of the rough whole states. These grants of land are in billions of dollars, but the granting of knowledgeled as being more than justified, the railroads they could not have been dredged settlers have been and are the all-important West. Vastly more irrigatios plants have been by settlers and private capital than by station Service. The Geological Survey surveyed that there are undreamed of deposits throughout the Rocky Mountain states. The effect of more coal in many of these western Pennsylvania has yielded. It means of the great coal regions of North America, withdrawal of those coal lands stops the devilry mines upon them. So it is with the other resources—minerals, water power and timber lands, etc. The forest reserves parks and like reservations have been perma-drawn. Other portions may be placed against the reach of the people. The truth is that in the public domain 700,000,000 acres appropriated and unreserved, and, as is said out, only a small per cent of this active or ever will be attractive to settlers, uses the Bad Lands of the West, the irrigatios, barren summits and worthless mountains. The most desirable lands that have not a private ownership are now held up by the government of the land remaining in the public never been surveyed. It would be a magnificent scheme, indeed, Borah, of Idaho, said, "to compel the whale to hold its vast resources in idleness, due to their enjoyment and use and compete to those resources of which you have ficial definition of so important a word. The proceedings and debates of the constitutional convention have been examined to see what the framers of the U. S. Constitution meant by "a Republican form of government." It is evident that they understood a Republican form of government to be one not monarchial; one not made and administered by royalty nor nobility nor any privileged or hereditary class; but per contra, it should emanate from the people. That point being established—that a Republican form of government is one emanating from the people—it is for the people to decide how it shall emanate. In the old New England town meetings it emanated directly. Then, as a matter of convenience in times when postal facilities were very crude and before the telegraph existed, the delegate or representative system was anopted in all except local government, and frequently in that, also. But at no time did the people give up their right to act directly in government matters. In fact they frequently instructed their delegates (representatives). Indeed, the people cannot delegate a power that they do not they themselves possess. If they have not the right under the constitution to govern themselves directly, they cannot govern themselves indirectly, because they cannot delegate a --- possession here in the East and developed at your own free will." He said that the contention that natural resources in a state belonged to all the people in the United States was all right in theory, but that in practice it was utterly untrue. "Our power sites do not in any sense of the term belong to the people of New England or New York," he continued. "They are to be utilized by those who make themselves citizens of the state and join with the others in trying to build up a commonwealth. Every year in which thousands of feet of ripened lumber are permitted to rot and fall on the reserves you are stealing something from the human race that belongs to it, and every year that the great coal beds of the Pacific slope go undeveloped it costs this government its extra millions to send coal around to the Pacific, burdens every citizen in that part of the country with exorbitant freight charges." "Conservation does not mean forbidding access to resources that could be made available for present use," said James J. Hill, at the recent Conservation at St. Paul. "It means the freest and largest development of them consistent with the public interest and without waste. A bag of gold buried in the ground is useless for any purpose. So is an acre untilled, a mine unopened, a forest that bars the way to homes and human happiness." "I cannot agree that natural resourses are national resources, as some of those living in the east seem to hold," says Governor Norris of Montana. "They have eaten their cake, now they want some of ours." "I am a thorough believer in conservation and in the principles of conservation, but I am just as thoroughly convinced that we who are on the ground are competent to handle our own resources and say how they shall be developed." is the sentiment of Governor Hay, of Washington. "Whatever conservation may mean," President Taft is quoted as saying, "there is one thing it should never mean, and that is the mere tying up of resources." In his famous St. Paul speech, the President said that conservation as an economical and political term has come to mean the preservation of our natural resources for economical use, so as to secure the greatest good to the greatest number. "Real conservation involves wise, non-wasteful use in the present generation," Mr. Taft concluded. The problem is how to save, and how to utilize, how to conserve and to still develop; for no sane person can contend that it is for the common good that nature's blessings should be stored only for unborn generations. — Leslie's Weekly. power that they do not possess. And if that is true, then the delegate government that we have had all these years in Congress, legislatures and councils is all illegal—which is an absurdity. If the people have the power to govern themselves through delegates or representatives, they have the power to govern themselves without delegates or representatives. The essence is the power, and not the process of exerting it. It has been established by fact, by history since the establishment of this government, by custom, and by every other possible evidence, that, they have the power to govern themselves through delegates or representatives; therefore, that power granted, they have the power to govern themselves without delegates, for the power is the essence, and the delegate system only a form or process of exerting the power. In a republic the source of governmental authority and power is the people; in a monarchy the source of govermental authority is the monarch; and it was formerly held (and in some minds, in some places it is still held) that the monarch gets his authority "from heaven"—from God Almighty. That is the vital difference between a monarchy and republic; and that thought pervaded the U. S. constitutional convention; and that should be sufficient to ..... East and developed at your own that the contention that natural belonged to all the people in the right in theory, but that in prac- tue. "Our power sites do not in a belong to the people of New York," he continued. "They are who make themselves citizens with the others in trying to build Every year in which thousands per are permitted to rot and fall are stealing something from the keys to it, and every year that the Pacific slope go undeveloped it its extra millions to send coal burdens every citizen in that with exorbitant freight charges." It not mean forbidding access to the made available for present mill, at the recent Conservation is the freest and largest devel- estment with the public interest A bag of gold buried in the my purpose. So is an acre un- l, a forest that bars the way to business." At natural resourses are national those living in the east seem to Norris of Montana. "They know they want some of ours." Believer in conservation and in servation, but I am just as thor- we who are on the ground are our own resources and say how al." is the sentiment of Govern- nation may mean," President ing. "there is one thing it should it is the mere tying up of reus St. Paul speech, the Presi- ation as an economical and po- mean the preservation of our economical use, so as to secure the greatest number. "Real con- se, non-wasteful use in the pres- Taft concluded. The problem is to utilize, how to conserve and sane person can contend that it and that nature's blessings should unborn generations. — Leslie's LAWS establish clearly what the U. S. Constitution means by "a Republican form of government." When our constitution was formed, the "heaven" source of political authority was far more generally acknowledged and accepted than now. Hence the necessity of our constitution emphasizing recognition of the people as the source of political authority in contradistinction; and this constituted a republic, as distinguished from a monarchy. Monarchs distributed their authority to favored individuals, who then became lords and nobles, and when that privilege was once conferred, it was continued by inheritance, just as the royalty. Our forefathers changed all this in the new republic. If the supreme court should decide that Oregon, Maine, Missouri, South Dakota, Oklahoma and other states shall not use the Initiative and Referendum in their process of self-government, we fear that the political consequences would be serious. We not only hope that the supreme court will go to the bottom of this matter before rendering its decision, but that it will also realize that it would be a very seriaus thing, on whatever plea, to rob the people of nearly a dozen great states (and more rapidly following) of their privilege to govern themslives directly. To attempt this, even under the apparent forms of law, at the present stage of the devel- ment of goverment and recognition of human rights, would be to assume a grave responsibility. —Editor.] —Direct Legislation Record. --- The Seattle Republican is desirous of doing your legal publication work, Mr. Attorney, and if you will give it a trial there is no doubt out that you will be perfectly satisfied with its work. J. C. Marmaduke, who has represented a number of St. Louis capitalists in Seattle for the past seven years, and who has invested large sums of money for them, has assumed the management of the Washington hotel, the largest hotel in the Northwest. As was predicted in these columns, John A. Whalley has won his case and he goes on the ticket for state senator in the Thirty-sixth district, instead of McAvoy. Ramsey would have had the same results had he prosecuted his case against George U. Piper. Harry J. Welty, the Bellingham bank cashier, who a few weeks ago was convicted of having received deposits in the bank, when he knew it to be insolvent, has been sentenced to a term of from four to ten years in the penitentiary. He has appealed the case to the supreme court. An indictment has been found against Dr. F. J. Shadd, now of South Bend, Washington, for padding the census in Seattle, he being one of the enumerators. He has been arrested and is now out on $500 cash bail. He claims that he acted as he was directed by his superiors and it is the general belief that he is telling the truth. Councilman E. L. Blaine, who was viciously attacked by the Seattle Daily Times in its effort to befuddle the investigation of the police workings in the red-light district, is a man of the highest integrity and is so considered by the great majority of the citizens of Seattle, and especially by those who have known him from childhood. The Times is always on the defensive and it is always defending criminals and we have been told that "birds of a feather flock together." According to the Bothel Sentinel fourteen years ago Dan Landon, who is a candidate for the state senate from the thirty second district, was a corn husker in Nebraska. Well, neighbor, he is the same thing today only he took a leave of absence. This is the time of year that the various partisan papers are telling what bad citizens the other fellow's candidate has been for all these years and all because he is running for a measley little office. Money is no more the root of all evil than is office holding. It begins to look as if the higher-ups have been working some in the Alaska coal fields and it also begins to look as if the government officials have been subsequently going some themselves and as a result some heretofore considered "mighty big men" are now under arrest charged with having defrauded the government out of coal lands worth something like $200,000,000. Those of Seattle who were arrested last Thursday are Harry White, former mayor of Seattle, Donald A. McKenzie, a real estate dealer, who accumulated a fortune withing a few years; William I. Dunn and Raymond Brown of Spokane. Here is a bunch of men considered among the most honorable and upright in the country charged with robbing the general government out a property the value of which is simply astounding. It begins to look as if the average American citizen is so money mad that he would steal Jesus Christ off the cross to get the money. "THE PHANTOM DETECTIVE." The play that follows "The H next Sunday afternoon is a real and the Far East, dealing with th tells the story of a retired English service in India, becomes possesso royal crown of an India potentate. the crown, he loses his only child. He takes up a residence in New who has for a fiance, a notorious s gentleman. An ancestor of the h imthroughout the world, and in he murders the English officer and but is followed by the Phantom of the daughter and the jewels. in the play, and every member o hambra theatre will have many "The Phantom Detective." The play that follows "The Holy City" at the Alhambra theatre next Sunday afternoon is a realistic mystical play of New York and the Far East, dealing with the occult sciences of the East. It tells the story of a retired English army officer who, while in active service in India, becomes possessor of a famous tiara of jewels, the royal crown of an India potentate. At the same time that he obtains the crown, he loses his only child, who is carried off by the seapoys. He takes up a residence in New York with an adopted daughter, who has for a fiance, a notorious scoundrel, masking as a high-toned gentleman. An ancestor of the owners of the tiara has followed h imthroughout the world, and in order to re-obtain possession of it, he murders the English officer and carries off his daughter to India; but is followed by the Phantom Detective, who regains possession of the daughter and the jewels. There is a long cast of principals in the play, and every member of the clever company at the Alhambra theatre will have many opportunities for good acting in "The Phantom Detective." IMPORTANT NEW YORK CAMPAIGN Not only will the result in New York on November the 8th have a larger influence on the campaign of 1912 than will that in Ohio or any other state, but it has a far greater importance than the average voter realizes. The Tammany domination which has been shaken in New York City will get the whole state in its grasp if Boss Murphy's candidate for Governor, John N Dix, --- 4 NEWS MORE OR LESS INTERESTING Poly City" at the Alhambra theatre historic mystical play of New York the occult sciences of the East. It army officer who, while in active or of a famous tiara of jewels, the At the same time that he obtains who is carried off by the seapoys. York with an adopted daughter, soundrel, masking as a high-toned owners of the tiara has followed order to re-obtain possession of it, carries off his daughter to India; Detective, who regains possession There is a long cast of principals of the clever company at the Al-opportunities for good acting in should be elected. A Republican victory, with Henry L. Stimpson as governor, would give a staggering blow to the Wigwam, and at the same time it would place the remainder of the progressive measures of ex-Governor Hughes upon the statute book. New York would assume the leadership among the sanely progsessive commonwealths of the country. By the new apportionment which will be enacted by Congress in the coming session, --- RE OR LESS IN E. L. M. Chairman of the committee of Seattle which is investigating the of the police and his subordinates are said to be more or less involve of Seattle for the past fifty years cellent name. Recently, however by the Seattle Daily Times, but in the editor of the Times is likewise [Name] E. L. BLAINE Chairman of the committee emanating from the city council of Seattle which is investigating the graft charges, which the chief of the police and his subordinates as well as some of the higher ups are said to be more or less involved. Mr. Blaine has been a resident of Seattle for the past fifty years and has always borne a most excellent name. Recently, however, he has been viciously attacked by the Seattle Daily Times, but it is the concensus of opinion that the editor of the Times is likewise involved in the graft game. New York will gain many additional members in the popular branch of Congress and in the electoral college. The increase in population in New York City alone would entitle the state to seven additional members under the present unit of representation of one member to every 194,000 people. The unit will be increased, so as to preevent the House of Representatives from becoming so large as to be unwieldly; but whatever figure is decided upon, New York will make a far greater gain in representation than any other state. In the elections of 1904 and 1908, New York had almost a twelfth of the electoral college. Its weight in the scale will be increased in the election of 1912, when the apportionment enacted this winter will go into operation. The country will assume that, as New York goes in 1910, so it will go in 1912; and on this account the returns from the state will be watched with interest by the people from Portland, Me., to Portland, Oregon, and from San Francisco to St. Augustine, as they are presented on the bulletin boards of the big newspapers on the night of November 8th. Some of the older readers of Leslie's may remember the wave of gratification that swept over the whole of the free states in 1856, when the news came that the Republicans had swept New York by large majorities. Fremont, the Republican party's first presidential candidate, carried the state by over 80,000. John A. King, Republican, beat Amasa J. Parker, Democrat for governor by 65,000. A large majority of the state's Republican candidates for Congress and for the legislature were elected. --- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN All through the North and West there was rejoicing because the Empire state had enrolled itself in the new party of freedom. In the public affairs of New York and of the country this is also a critical year. Henry L. Stimpsom represents the cause of honest politics and of intelligent progress in 1910 just as emphatically as John A. King did in 1856. Victory for him this year would mean that New York, with the large increase in its electoral vote which is certain to come, would be safe for the Republicans in 1912. Often in the past the vote of New York turned the scale in presidential campaigns. It did this in 1844, 1848, 1880, 1884, and 1888. Except in 1868, when it was carried by Seymour through the wholsesale frauds perpetrated by Tweed, and in 1876, when it was won by Tilden, New York has been on the winning side in presidential campaigns for half a century. Cleveland would have carried the country in 1892 even if New York had gone against him. So would McKinley in 1896 and 1900. Roosevelt in 1903 and Taft in 1908. But the election of 1912 may be as close as were those of 1880, 1884 and 1888. The broad margins of the past four or five presidential canvasses need not be looked for two years hence. In 1912 New York will be decidedly an important asset for the party which carries it. And the result in 1910 will in a large degree, determine the side which it will take in 1912. A majority of at least 50,000 for Stimpson is what the situation demands. — Leslie's Weekly. FOOD OF THE WORLD FRIDAY November 4. 1914 farming with the ownership incentive to increase her agricultural output her agronoms, as the scientific exponents of cultivation style themselves, have complied a table of what fruits of soil are the principal foods of humanity. Bread grains, potatoes and rice form the sustenance of mankind. Two years ago, the date of the statistics, the leading countries of the world produced 129,000,000 tons of potatoes, 74,000,000 tons of wheat. 39,000,000 tons of rye and 30,000,000 tons of rice Germany is the land of potatoes and rye. In 1908 she raised 46,000,000 tons of potatoes, more than a third of the world's crop and more than any other single country, even Russia, whose crop in her European territory was 29,000,000 tons. Austria and France had each a 14,000,000 ton potato harvest. The inhabitants of celtic countries in north France and Ireland, and also Belgium and Holland are great potato eaters. On the other hand in England, Italy, Spain and America, and in Asia and Australia, the potato is a subordinate article of diet. Rice is overwhelmingly ahead of any other food in Asia. In Europe it is scarcely raised. Germany used in 1907 not quite 300,-000 tons. Millet was once the daily food of the masses in Europe, but has been gradually dropped and is eaten now mostly by the Slavs beyond the eastern frontiers of Europe and by the Negroes in Africa. REPUBLICAN krele JUSTICE COURT—BEFORE JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. The State of Washington to Mrs. A. M. Simmons. You and each of you are hereby notified that Wm. Zehring has filed a complaint against you in said court, and will come on to be heard at my office in Room 910, New York building, Seattle, King Count, New York, on the 28th day of November A. D., and the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of plaintiff granted. The objection demand of said complaint is to recover the $62.70, being a balance due for goods, and merchandise, sold and delivered to you by this plaintiff within the last past three years. Complaint filed October 10th A. D. 1910. JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Nov. 4-Nov. 25, 1910. INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in the County of King. IN PROBATE—In the matter of the case of EMBATE Englmann deceased. No. 10.409. During Time to Hear Final Account and to Ship Why Distribution Should Not Be Made Paul G. Engelmann, administrator of the estate of Emil Engelmann, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is now for disribution of the residue thereof and the persons entitled by law thereto, and its appearing to the court that said petition set forth facts sufficient to au horize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate be the said Emil Engelmann, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the courtroom of the Probate Department of said Court Department No. 7 on the 5th day of December, 1910, at the hour of 10:00 o'clock A. M. is said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should no be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the mos public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for consecutive weeks before the 5th day of December, 1910, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 31st day of October, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, C. C. John R. Wilson. A torney for said Estate, 539 New York Block, Seattle. Nov. 4-Dec. 2, 1910. GILHAM-LYSONS REALTY CO. General Offices: 411 Lowman Bldg. Loans, Investments, Insurance. H. E. Gilham. J. W. Lysons. Main 3044. Ind. 1588 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN EQUAL SUFFRAGE BENEFITS THE FAMILY RIDAY, November.4, 1910 No utterance from the woman suffrage states for years past has attracted so much attention or been so widely quoted as a recentt remark of Governor Bryant B. Brooks of Wyoming about the good influence of equal suffrage on the family. Written in a popular magazine, Gov. Brooks expresses himself as follows: "In the first place, let me say that nothing can be so far from the truth as that woman suffrage has the slightest tendency to disrupt the home. Indeed, it has the very opposite effect. As a result of it, politics is talked freely in the family circle, and political questions are settled by intelligent discussion. This has a great and good influence on the growing generation. The children grow up in an atmosphere that encourages intelligent consideration and debate of public problems, and are thus better equipped to deal with public questions when they reach voting age." Other prominent men in the states where women vote have noticed the same fact. Hon. W. E. Mullen, Attorney General of Wyoming, wrote to A. C. Thomas of Jefferson, Oregon: "I have your letter asking whethea equal suffrage has been a success in Wyoming. I must confess that when I first settled in Wyoming I was greatly prejudiced against it. I have observed the practical results, and have changed my mind. I am now convinced that woman suffrage is a rational principle and a benefit to the state. It stimulates interest and study, on the part of women, in public affairs. Questions of public interest are discussed in the home; more papers and magazines are read, and the interest of the state and the home are promoted. As the mother, sister or teacher of young boys, the influence of woman over the minds of the youth of the land, in the creation of wholesome ideals of citizenship, is very great. The more she knows about the obligations of citizenship, the more she is able to teach the boys." Hon. Hugh H. Lusk, a farmer member of the New Zealand Parliament, says: "The family is the foundation of the state. We find that equal suffrage is the greatest family bond and tie, the greatest strengthener of family life. It seemed odd at first to find half the benches at a political meeting occupied by ladies; but when the men have got accustomed to it, they do not like the other thing. When they found that they could take their wives and daughters to these meetings, and afterwards take them home and talk about it, it was the beginning of a new life for the family, a life of ideas and interests in common, and of a unison of thought." Sir Joseph George Ward, Premier of New Zealand, says that, far from creating antagonism between men and women, a comment called out by the practical working of equal suffrage is that, "it is useful to provide in this way intelligent topics for men and women to talk about from their private affairs." Lady Holder, wife of the late Sir Frederick W. Holder, Speaker of the House of Representatives of Federated Australia, says that, since Australian women were given the ballot, "they are as good wives, mothers and sisters as ever, and better companions for their men folk because of their widened interest and BENEFITS THE FAMILY the true equality in which they stand." Ex-Governor Albert W. McIntire, of Colorado, writes in the official publication of the Business Men's Association of Everett. Wash., for September, 1910: Actual experience proves that, where both vote, the added common interest in public matters between husband and wife helps amazingly toward making them comrades, because thereby the broadening influof his wider horizon is extended to her." "Professor Harry E. Kelly, formerly of the Iowa State University, now practicing law in Denver wrote to State Senator A. H. Gale of Iowa: Since I came to Colorado, you have frequently asked me to state my opinion of woman suffrage. I came here with very little interest in the subject, and perhaps with very little respect for it. Having resided in Colorado nearly seven years, and having observed the political and social conditions here, I have rather unconsciously arrived at an opinion. The great value in woman suffrage consists in this, that it gives dynamic force to a fresh and vital interest in the state. One of the arguments against it was that it would create discord in the family. Colorado has never heard of a case of family discord that was even alleged to have originated in woman suffrage. The members of a family are inclined to stand together upon political questions, much as they are upon religious questions; but woman suffrage broadens the family interest in public affairs, because women, disregarding the mere scramble for office, direct the family interest along in the line of social questions, in addition to the interest in partisan politics. Woman suffrage gives us an increased breadth of public interest in social welfare." Mrs. Helen Campbell spent three years in Colorado. After her return, she said in an address before the Brookline (Mass.) Equal Suffrage Association: "Before I went to Colorado I was sure of the justice of woman suffrage, but not of its expediency. I am now sure that it is a good thing for both men and women. When suffrage was granted, the women felt in duty bound to inform themselves about public affairs. One wise mother has been training her five sons for years to understand public questions. She had a weekly class of about thirty boys, her sons and their college mates, and she has taught them not only current events, but the duties of citizenship, and what a vote stands for, and how precious it is. Her eldest son cast his first vote at the last presidential election. He went with his mother. There were tears in his eyes as he said to her, 'If there is any good or noble thought in my mind about this act of citizenship, it came from you in the beginning. I am glad to be here with you!' I have not seen just that same feeling of sons toward their mothers anywhere else." Women are not only half the population, but are mothers of the whole of it, and are expected to train up the boys and girls to be good citizens. It seems almost self-evident then, that anything which will lead the mothers to inform themselves more generally upon public questions must be a good thing for the country and for the race- A. S. B. in Woman's Journal. ```markdown ``` OOO 6 IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King," 60-Day Summons. Cerrle Hull, plaintive. Sarah Gallo: way and John Doe Galloway, her hus- band, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right- Utle, estate, lien or interest in. the real estate described in the complaint herein, and also any and all unknown heirs ‘of the said defendants above named, defendants—No, —. The State of Washington, to the above named defendants, sarah Galloway and John Doe Galloway, her husband, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, es- tate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, and also any and all unknown heirs of the said defendants above named: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of first publication of this summons, to- wit: within, sixty, (00) days after the sth day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at- torneys for the plaintif at their office below stated; and in case of your fall- ure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought for the pur- pose of anieting title in. the plaintiff to the following deseribed property, to- wit; Lots 27 and 28, in Block, 5, of Chiibera’s , Addition “to West Seattle, situated in'King County, State of Wash- ington. REVELLE, REVELLE & REVELLE, Attorneys for Plaintitr Postoffice address: 605-608 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. Oct. 28, Dec, §, 1910. IN_THR SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication, James Henty, plaintif, vs, F. B. Hunt ley and Jane Doe Huntley, his wife, whose trie christian name Is un- Known, defendants.—No, 74840. State of’ Washington to the defendants, F. B, Huntley and Jane Doe Hunt- ley, his wife You and each of you are hereby sum- moned to be and appear within sixty (00) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty (60) days after ‘the 30th day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action In the above en- titled court and answe r the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer ppon the undersigned at- torney for the plaintiff at his office be- low. stated, and in case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintifes complaint which has been filed with the clork of said court. The object of this action fs to recover the sum of $105.95 together with costs and interest due from you to. the plaintif herein for gools, wares and merchandise gold and delivered to you by the pling tif in this action during the last past three years. A writ of attachment be- Jing issued out of this cause and court and lots 26 and 87, block 8, of Green Lake Reservoir Addition to the city of Seattle have been attached thereunder. F, J. CARVER, Attorney “for Plaintiff, Office and postofiice address, Northern Bank & Trust 'Bldg., Seattle, Wash, Ye ete 6a SOkn: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington, for King Coun- ty, Notice to Creditors, In ‘the Matter of the Esiate of James ‘MeCarthy, deceased.—No, 11951. By order’ of said court made herein on the. 2th day of September, 1910. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and. all. persons having claims Against. said deceased or against sald estate, to present them with the neces- sary vouchers to the undersigned ad- ministrator. of said estate, at 416 Glabe Building, the place of business of sald estate, in Seattle, in sald county and state, within one’ year from and after the date of first’ publication of this notice or Same will be barred, Date of first publication Sept. 20, 1910. LOTTA MeCARTHY. As AAministratrix of said Estate, H, R. CLISS, ‘Atiorney. for Fstate, 416. Globe, Building, Seattle, Wash ‘Sept, 30—Oct, 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE Biste of Washington, for King Coun- Ye Lowise Ashen, Plaintiff, vs. Lester Ash- ch, Defendant, No, ——. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington, to Lester ‘Ashen, Defendant. You are hereby notified and sum- moned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above en- titled action. within sixty days after the fate of the first publication of this sum= mons, exclusive of the date of the sald first’ publication, to-wit: within” sixty fave after the 7th day of October, 1910, and answer the complaint of the plain- fit’ and serve a copy of your answer Up- on the attorney for the plaintit® below amet, at his office, below stated, and fie easo of your fallure so do judgment Will be renicred against you according to the demand of the complaint of the fainti® whieh has heen filed with the Merk of the above entitled court. ‘he oblect of this action 1s to secure a divorce on the ground of desertion for more than one year. ‘A. C. MCDONALD, ‘Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. 0, Address, 524 Batley Building, Seattle, Wash. ‘et 7—Nov. 18,.1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King Coun- ty. Summons by Publication. Mana A. Boschert, plaintiff, vs. Charles G. Boschert, defendant—No. 76217, The State of Washington, to the said Charles C, Boschert, defendant: You are hereby sumomned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first. publication of this summons, to- wit, within sixty days after the 7th Gav. of October, 1910, and defend the fbove entitled action ‘In the above en- fitied court, and answer the complaint Of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of Sour answer upon the undersigned at- fornevs for plaintiff, at their office, be- fow stated; and in case of your fallure so to do, judgment will, be rendered Against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the ‘clerk of said court, Rriefly stated the object of this ac- tion is: to dissolve the bonds of matri- mony existing between plaintiff and de- fendant and te grant, the plaintit’ « divorce from the defendant on, the ground of abandonment of the plaintiff fy the defendant for more than one year last past, and for the failure of the defendant to support the plaintift and his family, and to award the cus- fody. of thelr ‘minor son, Robert 1. Boschert, to the. plaintift._ For. further particulars reference 1s made to the complaint now on file in the office of the clerk of the above entitled court. BRADY & RUMMENS, Attorneys for Plaintim. Postotfice addresis: Suite 1308 Alaska Bullding, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. T—Nov, 18,1910. IN, THH SUPERIOR COURT OF ‘THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons by Publication. Wilizabeth J, Marston, plaintitt, vs. Rich- ard." Marston, defendant—No. 76271. The State of Washington, to the sald Richard K. Marston, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to. wit, within sixty days after the’ 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action “in the above. en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at- iorney for plaintift at, his office below stated: and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk ‘of said court. The object of the above entitled ac- tion is for an absolute divorce on the grounds of non-support, and custody of two minor children, a JOHN R. WILSON, Plaintitt's Attorney. P, 0, address, 539 New York Bullding, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 7—Nov. 28, 1910, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of Charles Robinson, deceased,—No. 10075, Martha A, Robinson and Hatry T. Price, executrix and executor of the es- tate of Charles Robinson, deceased, hav- ing fled in this court ‘their final ac- count and petition setting forth that Said estate ig now in a condition to be closed and Is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appear- Ing to, the court that sald petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a dis- tribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons-interested in the es- tate of the said Charles Robinson, de- ceased, be and appear before the ‘said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle, King County, Washington, on the Sth day of November. 1910, at 9:30 o'clock A, M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why. sald final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons In. said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for @ period of four weeks prior to ‘sald hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the 5th day of November, 1910, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 6th day of October, 1910. ROBERT H, LINDSAY, Court ‘Commissioner. Oct. TenNov: 4. 1910, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King, Order fixing tme to hear final account and to show cause why Gs: trihution should not be made. In the Matter of the Bstate of Mary ‘Mountjoy, deceased—No, 10629. William L, Lovejoy, administrator of the estate of Mary Mountjoy, deceased, having Sled in this court his final ac- count and petition setting forth that Said estate fs now In a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and It appear- ing to the court that, said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a dis- tribution. of the residue of sald estate: Tt is therefore orfered by, the court that all persons Interested i the es- tate of the sald Mary Mountjoy, de- ceased, be and appear’ before the’ sald Superior Court of King County, State dt Washington; at the court room of the Probate Départment of, said court in Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 5th day of November, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., of sald fay, then and. there to show ‘cause, If any’ they have. why said final account Should not be allowed and an order of Gistribution be made of the residue of Said estate among the hetrs and persons tn sald’ petition mentioned, according to law, qt ls. further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places’ In. King. County, for a period of four weeks prlor to sald hear. Ing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks hefore the said 5th ‘ay of November, 1910, in the Seattle Republican, a. newspaper printed and published in sald King County and of general circulation therein, Done in open court this 6th day of October, 1915 ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Court ‘Commissioner, GartadAre eae: IN THE SUPPRION COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. LH, Craver, Plaintiy, vs, Thos. Baton, and all persons unknown, if any, hay- ing or claiming an Interest tn and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty Defendants. No. 73684, Notice and Summons, State of Washington: ‘To the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an. tnterest_ or estate in and to the hereinafter deserib- fa real. property, are hereby notified that the ‘above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax cer- tifeate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the Soth day of April, 1829, and numberen L172), for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $1.05, and lipon the ‘real property situated in’ said King County, deserihed as follows, to- wit Beginning at a point 185 feet east and 38 feet. south of the N, W, corner of the SW 1-4 of Sec, 10, ‘Tp. 26 .N.. R. 6 i. W. M.; thence’ east 0 feet, thence §," 120' feet, thence west 60 feet, thence N., 120 feet’ to the place of beginning, ‘rhat the taxes for the following prior and subsequent. vears ahve been paid by the plaintiff upon said above de- serived real property, to-wit. For the year 1907, the sum of $1.36; for the year 1908, the sum of 87 cents; for the year 1909, the sum: of 78 cents. Which severa?’sums bear interest at the rate of 15 ver cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the Unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. ‘You and each of you (including said persons unknown, Jf any), are hereby further notified and summoned to he and. appa” within sixty days after the te of first. publication of, this. notice, exclusive aie day of sald frst pub? THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Ucation, to-wit: within 60 days after « Sept, 30, 1910, In the above entitled court | and ‘action; and defend this action and 1 answer thé complaint of said plaintift ; and serve a copy of your answer on the | Undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount | due, together with interest and costs, | In case of you fail so to do, judgment. will be rendered herein, foreclosing the | lien ‘of said taxes and costs against | each parcel of said real property for. the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said’ property for the sat- isfaction of the sums charged and found — against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's com-— plaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H, CRAVER, Plaintift. A. C, MacDONALD, Attorney’ for Plaintift Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Se- attle, Wash, Sept, 30—Noy. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Summons by Publication, ‘Cait OG aod aoa, Daan ne cape e. Lomas, defendant.—-No, -—. The State of Washington, to Harry Lomas, defendant: You ate hereby summoned to appear within ‘sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this sum- mons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 28th day of October, 1910, and de- fend the above entitled action in the above entitled court -and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signet attorney for plaintift at his of- flee below stated; and in case of your failure so. to do, Judgment will oe ren- dered against you according to the de- mand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this complaint is to obtain an absolute diyoree by the plaintift from the defendant on the grounds of cruelty and Nonsupport, and for the return df her maiden name. FP, J, CARVER, Attorney for Plaintitt. Office address: 414 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Oct, 28—Dec, §, 1910, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THR State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs, Preston Mill ‘Co. aid_ali persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, Defendants No. 75685. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: ‘To the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, clatm- ants. or holders of an Interest oF estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff’ is the holder of ‘one certain delinquent tax certificate Is- sued by the ‘Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day Of April. 1910, and numbered BA1756 for the delinquent taxes. of the year 1908, in the amount of 90 cents, and upon the real property situated in sain King coun- ty. described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at S. EB, cor. of N. B. 1-4 of Sec._42, Tp. 24. N. R71 E,W. M. thence west 420 feet to Sehool Dist. No. 76, thence north to N. P. Ry.. thence easterly along Ry, to easterly” tne of said section. thence S23) feet to the place of beginning, (Part of $B. 1-4 of the N. E. 1-4 Sec. 32, Tp, 24 N., R. 7 Fas W, ML) ‘Phat the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff! upon said above deserihed real property. tn-wit Por the vear 1906, the sum of 47 cents: for the yeur 1907, the sum of 72 cents: for the year 108) the sum of 41 cents} for the venr 1999, tle sum of 27 cents, Which several’ sims bear Interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date ef payment, and are all the Unmpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including sald persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and ymrone within sixty dave after the date of firet publication of this “notice, ex- clusive of the day of sald first publica- tion. to-wit: within 60 days after Sept. 20, 1910, In the above entitled court and vetion; ‘und defend. this action and an swer ‘the complaint of said plaintitt And serve a copy of your angwer on the Hadorsigned attorney for platntit! at his offire helow stated, or pay the amount ine, together with Interest and costs. in éase you fail so to do, julament will he rendered herein, foreclosing the len of sald taxes and costs azainst each parcel of said real propert: or the Sums and amounts duecupon sma chara ed asninst each, for said taxes. interest and costs, ordering a saie of each par cel of Salil property for the satisfaction of the sims charged and found against It respectively as provided hy law, and as prayed In plaintift's eamplaint, now on file in this cause and Court, L. H_CRAVER, Plaintift, ALC. MacDONALD. Attorney for Plaintitt, Office Adress’ 524 Bailey Butiding, Se- attle,, Wash, Sept. 80—Nov, 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State af Washington for King County. F. H. Harkins, plaintiff, vs, Elizabeth Briinner, Benedict Brunner, her hus band, James McNamara, William PR. Holmes, doing “bustness wnder_ the name_of the Holmes Plumbing & Heat. ing Co. H.C. Keller, doing bnsiness as Keller & Sons, and the American Luster Prism Co. defendants,—No, 75397, Summons by publication, The State of Washington to the said defendants, Elizaheth Brunner, Rene- dict Brunner, her husband, and the American Luxfer Prism Company, a corporation: You, and each of you, are hereby summoned and required to’ apnear with- in sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit. within sixty days after the second day of September, 1910, and. defend the above entitled action In the above en- titled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersiened attorney for plaintiff, at his address be- low stated, and in ease af vour failure so to do, judgment will he rendered against von according to the demands ‘of the complaint herein which has been fled with the clerk of this court. ‘The ohlect of said action is to re- cover a indgment against. the sald Elizaheth Brunner and Renedict Rrun- ner, her hushand, fer the sum of Fifteen Hundred Dollars, together with interest thereon at the rate of seven per cent per annum from the 28rd day af Octo- ber, 1907, less the sum of Fifty-four (351.00) Dollars paid on xecount ‘of in- terest, and interest on deferred Interest instaliments at the’ rate of ten per cent per annum: Alaa she sh of Aisteey lollare for. insurances hy plain Goliare. for. insurance paid ty Dal gift and costs and disbursements herein and to forectoge that certain mortuge given by the defendants, flizabeth Brunner and Benedict Brunner, on the 23rd day of October, 1907, to Osner & Mehlhorn, Ine, to secure said amount upon lot 6, block 3, Market Street, Addition to the city of Seattle, King Couuty, Washing- ton, and to foreclose all right, claim or equity of redemption of, each and all of sald defendants in and to sald prop- erty. Said mortgage was recorded on the 28rd day of October, 1907, in Vol. 330 of mortgages, page 566, of the records in the auditor's office of sald King County. ‘The said mortgage, and the sum Secured thereby, was. on the 24th day of October, 1907, duly assigned, in writing, to sald plaintitt. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for plaintiff. Office _and post oftice. address, rooms 408-5 Mutnal Life Iidg., Seattle, Kins County, Washington. Sept. 2) Get. 15, 1910, NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL ESTE BY the Treasurer of the City of Seattle, King County, Washington. ‘To Patrick O'Connor: You are hereby notified that the un- dersigned, E. H. Craver, is the owner and holder of one certain certificate of purchase, No. 934, on Lot 17, Block £ of Columbia ‘Terrace Addition. in| said City, Issued by the ‘Treasurer of the said’ City on August 21st, 1908, for the sum of Seventeen and 0-100 Dollars (317.20) tinder ordinance of the said City of Seattle, No. 13320. Said Certif- cate of purchase was recorded In the of- fice of the Auditor of King County, Washington, on Nov. §th, 1908, and the undersigned paid the said Avditon his fees therefor in the sum of $1.00. ‘That since the said August 2ist, 1908, the undersigned has paid other’ taxes’ and assessments on sail land as follows, to- Wit; on October 26, 1908, the sum of $928 and May 12,’ 1910, the sum of $144.03. And you, the said Patrick ©’Connor, are hereby’ further notified that at. the expiration of Sixty days after the date of the frst publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of the first public cation, to-wit: sixty days after August 26th, 1910, the said L. H. Craver wil demand of the said ‘Treasurer of the sald City of Seattle, that he execute and deliver to him a deed to the said real property, and unless voit, the sald Pat- rick O'Connor, redeem the said property by paying, to the said Treasurer the sums herelnbefore mentioned with in- terest thercon at the rate of 18 per cent per annum from said dates of payment, the said ‘Treasurer will make and de- liver to the undersigned a deed to the said property. L. H. CRAVER, Office and P.O, Address: 624 Batley Bldg., Seattle, sash. August 26—Oct, 6, 1910, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ae Wriman, Partridge & Co, a corporation, plainti, vs. James. Fitzgerald and Julia Pitexerald. co-partners, as Fitz- kerala & Fitzgerald, defendants. —No, Summons for Publication, The State of Washington to the sald dames Fitzgerald and Julia Fitager- ald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fite- gerald, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the Qrst publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the’ 2nd day of September. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above eu- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy or your answer upon the undersigned ate torneys for plaintiff at their office be- Inw stated; and in ease of your failure so to do, Judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of Said court. ‘The object of the above entitled action Is to recover a. julzment. against said defendants upon a claim by plainti¢ for goods, wares and merehandise sold and. de- livered to sald defendants by sald plin- tir in the sum of Tivo Thousand One Ifundred ‘Twenty-seven and 10-100 Dol- lars (82,127.10), with interest thereon from the 2nd day of May, 1910, besides tho costs of suit, and in which said ac- tion an attachment has been taken out and levied. LEOPOLD “4. STERN, and J, M. RUSSELL, Attorneys for plaintitt, Office and postoffice address, 705 Low- man Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, Sept. 2, et: 15, 1910. IN THE JUSTICE’S COURT BEFORE Joh. 1, Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinet, ‘King County, Wash- Seton, Summons by Publication, Blossom-Provine Lumber Co., a corpora- tion. plaintiff, vs. T. W. Williams and Jane Doe Williams, his wife, whose true Christian Name is unknown, de- feadants.—No, 13472, Te 'T. W, Williams and Jane Doe Will- jams, Nits wife, defendants. In the name of the State of Wasning- ton you are hereby notified that. Blos- som-Provine Lumber Co. has filed a complaint against you in sald court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Seattle, King County, Washing- ton, to-wit: 210 New York Block, on the’ 22rd ay of November, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m., and unless you appear and then and there answer the same will be taken as confessed, and the demand of the plaintiff granted.’ The object and demand of said claim ts to ‘recover from the defendants a balance due for goods, wares and merchandise, to-wit: lumber’ sold and delivered to said defendants by the plaintiff within the last past three years. Complaint filed Sentember 29, 1910, JOHN BH. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace, Oct. 28—Nov. 18, 1910. NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL ESTATE by the Treasurer of the City of Seat- de, King County, Washington, To Charles MeDonald: You are hereby notified that the un- dersizned, L, H. Craver, is the owner and holder_of one certain Certifleate of Purchase, No, 1172, on Lot Nineteen (19) of Wheelar’s Third Addition to. the City of Seattle, in King County, Washins- ton, Issued by the ‘Treasirer of the said City on August 21th, 1908, to one Mrs, C, FL Weel, for the sum of Six Dollars and thirty cents ($6.30), under ordinance of the said city of Seattle, No, 13820. Said Certifieate of Purchase was recorded by the said Mrs. C,H, Weed. in_the office of the County Audi tor of King County, Washington. on October 19, 1908, in Vol. 631 of Deeds at page 127, and there was paid to the She Ruditor “Bie recs” therefor tae-the FRIDAY November 4, 1910 sum of of One Dollar ($1.00). ‘That since said last named date, to-wit: on Feb. 15th, 1910, there was pald by the undersigned to’ the County Treasurer of said King County for taxes on said property the sum of Ninety-four Dol- lars and forty cents ($94.40). That on Feb, 14th, 1910, the sald ‘Mrs, C. H. Weed, tora valuable consideration, sold and ‘assigned the said Certificate of Purchase to the undersigned L. H. Cra- ver and the said L. H. Craver is now the owner and holder of the sald Cer- tificate of Purchase, And you, the sald Charles McDonald, are hereby further notifled that at the expiration of Sixty days after the date of the first, publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of the said first publication, to-wit: sixty days after September th, 1910, the said L, H. Cra- ver will dmeand of the said treasurer of the said City of Seattle, that he ex- ecute and deliver to him a deed to the Sald real property. and unless you, the said Charles MeDonald, redeem the’ said property by paying to’ the sald ‘Treas~ Urer the Sums hereinbefore mentioned, together with interest thereon at) the rate of 15 per cent per annum, from said dates of payment, the sadi ‘Treas- tirer Will make and déliver to the sald L. H. Crayer a decd ty the said prop- erty. L. H. CRAVER. Office and P. O, Address: 524 Balley Building, Seattie, Washington, Sept. 9—Oet, 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THB State of Washington, in and for King County, Summons by Publication. Frieda Marshall, plaintiff, vs. Joe Mar- shall, defendant.—-No, — The State of Washington to Joe Mar- shall. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this sum- mons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and de- fend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office helow stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The ob- ject of this action is that the plaintiff, on the grounds of habitual drunkenness of the defendant and the neglect and refusal of the defendant husband to make suitable provision for his family, be granted an absolute divorce from the defendant herein and the custody and control of the child of the plaintift and defendant herein, and such other and further relief as’ the court may direct, F. J, CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 814 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash, Oct. T—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE JUSTICE’'S COURT BEFORE John W, Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinet, King County, Wash- ington. Summons by Publication. R. J, Hiehler, plaintift, vs. Cora Lowe and John Doe. Lowe, her husband, whose true christian name is un- known, defendants.—No. 18209. To Cora’Lowe and John Doe Lowe, her husband, whose true christian name Js unknown: In the name of the State of Washing- ton you are hereby notified, that R, J. Eichler has filed a complaint against you In said court whieh will come on to be heard at_my office in Seattle, in King County, State of Washington, to- wit, 210 New York Block, on the 4th dav of November, 1910, at the hour of 9:20 o'clock A. M., and unless you ap- pear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed, and the demand of the plaintiff granted. ‘The object and demand of this action ts to recover the sum of ‘Twelve Dollars (312.00), being a balance due for ma- terial furnished and laoor performed by this plaintiff for and on behalf of sald defendants within the last past three years. foTPMPUBint Aled September 14th, A. D. JOHN B, CARROLL, Justice of the Peace. Oct, 7—Oct. 28, 1910. REMOVAL NOTICE The Light and Power depart- ment of the Seattle Plectric Company has moved to the Electric Bldg., Seventhaven- ue and Pine street, Street car tickets can be purchased and all bills paid in the Electrical Sales Room at the old location 907 FIRST AVENUE THE SEATTLE ELECTRIC CoO ORDER A CASE OT TO YOUR PLACE OF @ ¢ ( PHONE SIDNEY 526 A kroe Prip wo Scattle and Retren. Let's Bust the State Deatal Trust. oe Take a tik wo Seattle anctier FRE, ma eave you the price of spur t "aes trip on yeur dental work, You SOR saven dollar, mare a dollar i ane in e Bias ee tal Mon Cy if ‘e will exe twodoliars wh. i {da YD PEF your dental work, Have sour gs. $F dental work’d ne soi while Bee 7" thedental war ison. Ay oft: s ite have been established at 712 - First Ave., in the Union Blook. for 18 years. Ldo not compete with cheap dentists, but with the high-cla s dent. ists forhalf their price, Openevenings until and Sundays until 4 for people who work. EDWIN J. BROWN, D.D.S. 7:3 First Avenue Sea*tle, Wash, Read my articie in Sunday's P.-L and Monday’t, ‘Times and Star. ~* IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ly, summits by Publication. Charles Pfeffer, plaintiff, vs. Millie Bennett, Walter C. Bennett, her husband, Charles P. Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, his wife, whose true given name is, plaintiff unknown, William D. A. Haffield and "Jane Doe" Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown, and Charles W. Fisk, F. M. Haffield, Ida M. Barton and Aurora Land Company, a corporation, defendants. No. 75263. The State of Washington to Charles P. Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, whose true given name is unknown, Ida Haffield and Jane Doe Haffield, his wife, whose true given name is unknown. You, and each of you, are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait: within sixty days after the 15th day of September, 1910, and defend the day of the entitled accuser, and the day of the title of the answer the complaint of the plaintiff and have a copy of your answer served upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to foreclose a certain mortgage executed and delivered by the said defendants Millie Bennett and Walter C Bennett, her husband, to one S. Campbell and by the said S. Campbell assigned to this plaintiff, dated the 28th day of January, 1909, and recorded on the 17th day of January, 1907. 67 mortgages, page 29 of the record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, which mortgage was given to secure a promissory note of $500.00 with interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent per annum and was given upon Lots 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23. Block 1 of the Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to obtain judgment for the said $500.00 together with interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the 28th day of January, 1910, and an attorney's fee of $75.00 and costs of suit and to foreclose and determine all right and interest of each and all of said defendants and to said premises and every part thereof. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. State of Washington, for King County, Summons. A. L. Weaver and Ella May Weaver, husband and wife, plaintiffs, vs. Peter E. Nordlin, defendant. The State of Washington to the said Peter E. Nordlin, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first pub- lication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 17th day of Sept. 1910, and defend the have certified ac- tion for the lawsuit entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment and decree will be rendered against you according to the demands of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. And all right, title and interest. In the lands described, therein will be foreclosed, forfeited, and the title of the plaintiffs cleared as to all claims you may have or claim. J. W. BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiffs. 1324 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF. THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Antone Kaas, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to have after described real property, Defendants. No. 15305. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the heresafter described real property, are hereby entitled to the holder of the one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of November, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, West. 60 feet of S% of S% of NE% of SE %2 Sec. 4, Tp. 21, N. R 4 E, W. M. certificate number B54644, year 1906, amount $1.23 That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property to-wit: Amount $1.40 for year 1907; 76 cents for year 1908. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, Summons You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons the day after January 23rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office before the court, and answer the complaint so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is instituted for the purpose of dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and the defendant upon the grounds that said defendant has failed, neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the support and maintenance of said plaintiff; and for the decree awarding to said plaintiff the following described real estate located in County of Clallam, State of Washington, particularly described as follows, to-wit: Lots twenty-two (22), twenty-three (23), twenty-six (26) and twenty-seven (27), in section seven (7), township thirty (30) north of range nine (9) west Clallam county of Washington; and the following property situated in King County State of Washington: The west half of lot twenty-five (25) and lot twenty-six (26), block eight (18) Bucklus Addition to the City of Seattle; and for such other and further relief as to this court may seem just and equitable. REED & HARDMAN Attorneys_for_Plauntjff Office and P. O. address: 960 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 23—Nov. 9, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COUR8, KING County, Washington. Elizabeth Turnbull, Plaintiff, vs. George Turnbull, Defendant. No. ——. Summons. The State of Washington to the said George Turnbull, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summon, 60 days after sixty (60) days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be imposed against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complainant in this action prays for divorce and that the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved. H. E. FOSTER. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 106 Monument Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication October 7, 1910. Date of last publication November 18, 1910. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE Fred C. Brown, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. John Doe Matijasevich and Richard Roe Glovich, copartners, doing business under firm name and style of Alaska Liquor Company, Defendants, No. —. Summons for Publication. State of Washington. County of King, ss The State of Washington: To John Doe Matijasevich and Richard Roe Glovich, copartners, doing business under firm name and style of Alaska Liquor Co. You, and each of you, are hereby notified that California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, has filed a complaint against you in said Court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 20th day of October, A. D. 1910, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock a.m., and unless you app art work on it, the object will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said action is for the sum of Eighty-two Dollars and Twenty-five Cents (82.25), being a balance due the plaintiff on account of merchandise sold and delivered to the defendants during the year 909. Fed September 15th, A. D. 1910. FRED, C. BROWN. Justice of the Peace in an area of Seattle Proclinet, King County, Washington. TWOOGER & WINKLER Attorneys for Plaintiff. 10-11 Triangle Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication Sept. 16, 1910 Attorney for Plaintiff Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Notice to Creditors. In the Matter with Estate of Allen P. Mitten, Deceased—No. 11558. By order of said court made herein on the 8th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to the Matter with Estate of Allen P. Mitten, Deceased—No. 11558. to the undersigned executors of said estate, at 1308 Alaska Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 23, 1910 Attorneys for Estate. 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Oct. 22, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Frank H. Renick, Anna Farmer and Hanna Farmer, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the heresafter described real property. No. 74379. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the herelnafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate is the Title of King of King State of Washington, dated the 19th day of October, 1908, and numbered B54379, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.02, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows: to-wit: Tt. 1906, Tt. 1907, Mf. Sec. 29, Tt. 24, N., R. 6 E., W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the su mof $1.78; for the year 1908, the sum of $1.24. At the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication to-wit: within sixty days Scranton 90) is entitled to action and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosure against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's plaintiff, now on file in this case and Court. A. C. MAC DONALD. Office Address, 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. traver Plaintiff vs. Candine L. Hirsch Plaintiff vs. Candine L. Hirsch, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.—No. 75301. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of an amount tax certified and signed by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 2nd day of September, 1909, and numbered B61042, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of $4.86, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 5, Sec. 23, Tp. 22, N., R. 6 E., W. M., less Right-of-Way C., M. & St. P. K. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1906, the sum of $2.11; for the year 1908, the sum of $0.73. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the sums due in taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub-lylation, to-wit: within sixty days Sept. 9, 1910, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and answer to the court. You serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of such property, with satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as proved in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Jos. Allen, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the heretofore described real property, Defendants. No. 75309. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasure of King County, in connection with the 19th day of November, 1908, and numbered B54857, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.45, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit, Lot 12 Block 5, Alentown Acres, sequent years, have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $4.57; for the year 1908, the sum of $1.76. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date, and are all the undeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication, June 14th, July 11th, within sixty days Sept. 30, 1910, in the above-entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. Any payment of such costs will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the charges imposed upon it, respectively, as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Courts. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. M. C. DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. Daisy Hour, plaintiff, vs. John Francis Hour, defendant.—No. The Court, to the said John Francis, Hour defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 30th day of September, A.D. 1910, and declare that you have above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your answer not being served, you are deemed against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been A call will convince the most skeptical of the Worth and Beauty of our slash. The established reputation of our tailoring assures you of satisfaction. filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a divorce of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the grounds of your abandonment of plaintiff for more than four years, and also your failure to make suitable provisions for plaintiff Postoffice and once address. 201-203 Burke Bldg., Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. Sept. 30-Nov. 11, 1910. "THE HOLY CITY." The remarkable biblical play, now current at the Alhambra theatre, is attracting the largest audiences that have ever assembled in that pretty playhouse within its history. The theatre has been filled to the last seat in the orchestra at every performance this week, and the management feel justified in continuing it another week. One of the remarkable features of the Alhambra production of "The Holy City" is the lavish expenditure of the management on scenery and costumes, for no play ever produced in Seattle at any price was better costumed and more appropriately scenically embellished. Clergymen of all religious denominations have visited the Alhambra this week, and pronounce "The Holy City" the best and most perfect religious drama ever offered in Seattle. The entire play breathes the spirit of Christianity in its highest and most holy aspect, while reciting the scriptural events at the time of the betrayal and crucifixion of the Divine Redeemer. The extremely low prices charged at the Alhambra theatre have, and doubtless will, encourage entire families to attend the performance, and parents can hot bestow a better lesson upon their children than to take them to see "The Holy City." The play will continue all next week at the Alhambra theatre. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. E. Kludvig, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property. Defendants. No. 75299. Notice and Mammals. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now or file in this cause and Court. TRVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC. DONALD. Sept. 9-Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons. Helen B. Phillips, plaintiff, vs. Park D. Phillips, defendant. The State of Washington, to the above named defendant, Park D. Phillings. named defendant, Park D. Phillips: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the twenty-ninth day of October 1911 and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and to serve a copy of your answer or other pleading upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his hereinafter designated postoffice address, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered in said cause according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court The object of said action is to procure a judgment and decree forever severing the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of the failure, refusal and neglect of the defendant to provide a nomination to the wards the support or maintenance of the plaintiff since their marriage on the 5th day of July, 1900, and on the further ground that the defendant more than two years ago wilfully and without just cause abandoned the plaintiff, and at all times since has so continued to abandon and live separate and apart from plaintiff. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Summons. Lilian Colbane plaintiff, vs. James Colb ney defendant. No. — The State of Washington, to the said James Collins, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 21st of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled court, in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and answer a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the court. The object of this action is to secure a decree of divorce, dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of desertion and failure to provide for more than one year. H. E. SNOOK, Attorney or Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: 537 Burke Building, Seattle, Washing- IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Summons for Publication. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 21st day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint and serve a copy of your answer upon the designated attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to do to judge, will be rendered against you according to the demands of the plaintiff, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain, a decree of divorce from the defendant, upon the following grounds: upon the defendant without the plaintiff's fault, abandoned the plaintiff on the 9th of October, 1909, at Seattle, Washington, and that said abandonment has been continuous for one year and more. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 309 Burke Bldg. Second and Marion IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Probate. Administrator's Notice of Sale of Real Estate. In the Matter of the Estate of James J. Lynch, Deceased.—No. 10926. is hereby given that under and by virtue of an order of sale of the Superior Court of King County, Washington, dated October 18, 1916, will sell at private sale the following described real estate situated in King County, Washington: Jigal M. Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot 32. Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot 33. Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot 7, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot 8, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot 9, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot 10, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot 24, Block 15, Mount Baker Park Addition. Lot 15, Block 9, Mount Baker Park Addition. Said sale to be made on or after the 10th day of November, 1910. Bids will be received by the undersigned at the office of Edward Von Tobel, No. 604 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Bids will be received for any of said parcels as above described for the terms of sale are cash, gold coin of the U.S. Ten per cent or bid to accompany bid and balance upon confirmation of sale by the court. Dated this 20th day of O tober, 1910. Date of first publication, October 21, 1910. HARRY W. BRINGHURST, Administrator of the Estate of James J. Lynch, Deceased. Oct. 21—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Crawford Plaintiff, vs. J. A. Musgrove and James Musgrove, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. M. MAC DONALD. August 19, September 3rd, 1910 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King, 60-Day Summons. Carrie Hull, plaintiff, vs. Sarah Galloway and John Doe Galloway, her husband, and also all other persons claiming any right-title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, and also any and all unknown heirs of the said defendants above named, defendants.—No. The State of Washington, in and for the defendants, Sarah Galloway and John Doe Galloway, her husband, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein and also all unknown heirs of the said defendants above named: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty (60) days after the 28th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of sald court. This action is brought for the purpose of quieting title in the plaintiff to the following described property, towit: Lots 27 and 28, in Block 5, of Chilberg's Addition to West Seattle, situated in King County, State of Washington. REVELLE, REVELLE & REVELLE. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Postoffice address: 605-608 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. Oct. 28, Dec. 9, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the thing of the day, by Publication James Henry, plaintiff, vs. F. B. Huntley and Jane Doe Huntley, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, defendants.—No. 74814. State of Washington to the defendants, F. B. Huntley and Jane Doe Hunt- You and each of you are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty (60) days after the third day of September, 1916; to defend the above complaint within the above court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case you fail so do, judgment will be rendered before you, providing the complaint of the plaintiff's complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to recover the sum of $105.95 together with costs and interest due from you to the plaintiff herein for goods, wares and materials sold and delivered in the action of the plaintiff during the last past three years. A writ of attachment being issued out of this cause and court and lots 26 and 37, block 8, of Green Lake Reservoir Addition to the city of Seattle have been attached under ARWV. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of James McCarthy, deceased. No. 1951. By order of said court made herein on the authority of September, 1910. The notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 155 Globe Building, the place of the estate, in Washington said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication Sept. 30 1910. LOTTA McCARTHY. As Adjunctratrix of said Estate. H. P. CUSS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Louise Ashen, Plaintiff, vs. Lester Ashen, Defendant. No. — — Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to Lester Ashen, Defendant. You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this mons, exclusive of the date of the said first publication, of the 7th day of October, 1910, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for the plaintiff below, at his office, below stated in case of your failure, so胶gment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of this action is to secure a divorce on the ground of desertion for more than one year. A. C. McDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address, 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Oct 7—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Surrey by Publication. Madden Boschert, plaintiff, vs. Charles C. Boschert, defendant—No. 76217. The State of Washington, to the said Charles C. Boschert, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this complaint, towit, within sixty days after the 7th day of entitled action in the above enclosed court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned atlow stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the court of said court. Briefly stated the object of this action is to dissolve the bonds of matriomy existing between plaintiff and defendant and to grant the plaintiff a divorce from the defendant on the ground of abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant for more than one year last past, and for the failure of the defendant, and for the failure of his family, and to award the custodian their minor son, Robert E. Boschert, to the plaintiff. For further particulars, reference is made to the complaint now on file in the office of the clerk of the above entitled court. BRADY & RUMMENS, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Postoffice address: Suite 1308 Alarm Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 7—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Elizabeth J. Marston, plaintiff, vs. Richard K. Marston, defendant—No. 7271. The State of Washington, to the said Richard K. Marston, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1919, an demand and love affection action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for an absolute divorce on the grounds of non-support, and custody of two minor children. JOHN R. WILSON, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. address, 539 New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 7—Nov. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King, Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of Charles Robinson, deceased.—No. 10075, Martha A. Robinson and Harry T. Price, executrix and executor of the estate of Charles Robinson, deceased, having court and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize the court to issue a said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Charles Robinson, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, the department of said court in Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 5th day of November, 1910, at 3:30 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution made by the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing no notice may be given for four consecutive weeks before the 5th day of November, 1910, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 6th day of October, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Court Commissioner. Oct. 7—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of Mary Mackenzie, 1662 William L. Lovejoy, administrator of the estate of Mary Mountjoy, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready to be disposed of, thereby among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate; It is therefore ordered by the court that as per sentence of the statute of the said Mary Mountjoy, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle, King County, Washington; at the court of November 810 at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County. For a period of four weeks prior to take off, it will be posted for four consecutive weeks before the said 5th day of November, 1910, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 6th day of October. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Court Commissioner. Oct. 7—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Thos. Eaton, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property Defendants. No. 75684. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April, 1910, and numbered B61750, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $1.65, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to- Beginning at a point 165 feet east and 33 feet south of the N. W. corner of the SW 14- of Sec. 10, Tp. 26 N., R. 5 E., W. M.; thence east 60 feet, thence S. 120 feet, thence west 60 feet, thence N. 120 feet to the place of beginning. That the taxes are prior and subtractive years alve been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit. For the year 1907, the sum of $1.36; for the year 1908, the sum of 87 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 28 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from sale and unredeemed taxes upon the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN licitation, to-wit: within 60 days after Sept. 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and petition and this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C, MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE The State of Washington, to Harry Lomas, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 28th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the understatement for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this complaint is to obtain an absolute divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant on the grounds of cruelty and nonsupport, and for the return of her maiden name. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg. Seattle, Washington. Oct. 28—Dec. 9, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver Plaintiff, vs. Preston Mill Co. and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants No. 75585. Notice and Summons. State of Washington; To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April, 1910, and numbered B67556 for the amount in the amount of 90 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King county, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at S. E. cor, of N. E. 1-4 of Sec. 32, Tp. 24, N. R. 7 E., W. M., thence west 420 feet to School Dist. No. 76, thence north to N. P. Ry., thence easterly along Ry, to easterly line of said section, thence S. 235 feet to the place of beginning. Thence S. E. 1-4 of the N. E. 1-4 Sec. 32, Tp. 24 N. R. 7 E. W. M.) That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the phaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1906, the sum of 57 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of 72 cents; for the year 1908, the sum of 14 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 72 cents. Which several sums been paid by the office of 1 per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unmaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and answer within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-write: within 60 days after Sept. 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer within sixty days after Sept. 30, 1910, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property, or the sums and amounts due upon such charged against each, for said taxes, interest, penalties, costs, or any other of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD. Attorney for Plantiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, F. H. Harkins, plaintiff, vs. Elizabeth Brunner, Benefect Brunner, her husband, James M. Namura, William E. Holmes, doing business under the name of the Holmes Publishing & Heating Co. H. C. Keller, doing business as Keller & Sons, and the American Luxer Prism Co., defendants. No. 75397. Summons by publication. The State of Washington to the said defendants, Elizabeth Brunner, Benedict Brunner, her husband, and the American Luxer Prism Company, a corporation of each of you, are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the second day of September, 1910, and defend the entitled claimer in the above titled complaint and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered in the form of the demands of the complaint herein which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of said action is to recover a judgment against the said Elizabeth Brunner and Benedict Brunner, her husband, for the sum of Fifteen Hundred dollars at the rate of seven per cent per annum from the 23rd day of October, 1907, less the sum of Fifty-four ($54.00) Dollars paid on account of interest, and interest on deferred interest installments at the rate of ten per cent per annum from the 23rd day of October, for insurance paid by plaintiff and the sum of $170.00 attorney's fee and costs and disbursements herein and to foreclose that certain mortgage given by the defendants, Elizabeth Brunner and Benedict Brunner, on the 23rd day of October, 1907, to Osner & Mehlhorn, Inc., to secure said amount upon lot 6, block 2, Market Street Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to foreclose all right, claim or equity of redemption of each and all of said defendants in and to said property. Said mortgage was recorded on the 23rd day of October, 1907, in Vol. 320 of mortgages, No. 666, of the records in the auditor's office of King County. The said mortgage, and the sum secured thereby, was, on the 24th day of October, 1907, duly assigned, in writing, to said plaintiff. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for plaintiff. Office and post office address, rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 2, Oct. 15, 1910. NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL ESTATE BY You are hereby notified that the undersigned, L. H. Craver, is the owner and holder of one certain certificate of purchase, No. 934, on Lot 17, Block 2 of Columbia Terrace Addition, in said City, issued by the Treasurer of the said City on August 21st, 1908, for the sum of Seventeen and 30-100 Dollars ($17.30) under ordinance of the said City of Seattle, No. 13320. Said Certificate of purchase was recorded in the office of the Auditor of King County, Washington, on Nov. 9th, 1908, and undersigned paid the said Auditor his assessment in the sum of $1.00. That since the said August 21st, 1908, the undersigned has paid other taxes and assessments on said land as follows, towit: on October 26, 1908, the sum of $9.28 and May 12, 1910, the sum of $144.03. And you, the said Patrick O'Connor, are hereby further notified that at the expiration of Sixty days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of the first publication, to-wit: sixty days after August 26th the said L. H. Crawer will demand of the said Treasurer of the said City of Seattle, that he execute and deliver to him a deed to the said real property, and unless you, the said Patrick O'Connor, redeem the said property by paying to the said Treasurer the sums hereinafter mentioned with interest, and unless you, the said Patrick O'Connor, pay per annum from said dates of payment, the said Treasurer will make and deliver to the undersigned a deed to the said property. L. H. CRAVER. Office and P. O. Address: 524 Bailey Bidg., Seattle, Wash. August 26—Oct. 6, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Woman, Partridge & Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitz- gerald & Fitzgerald, defendants.—No. 74735. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitz- gerald for Publication. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 2nd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled count, and answer the complaint in writing, and answer your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to recover the damages of a claim by plaintiff for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered to said defendants by said plaintiff in the sum of Two Thousand One Hundred Twenty-seven and 10-100 Dollars ($2,127,10), with interest thereon from the 2nd day of May, 1910, besides the costs of suit, and in which said attachment has been taken out and levied. Attorneys for plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 705 Low- man Building, Seattle, King County, Washington Sept. 2, Oct. 15, 1910. IN THE JUSTICE'S COURT BEFORE John, E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington, Summons by Publication. Blossom-Pravine Lumber Co., a corporation plaintiff vs. T. W. Williams and Jane Doe Williams, his wife, whose true Christian Name is unknown, defendants.—No. 13472. To T. W. Williams and Jane Doe Williams, his wife, defendants. In the name of the State of Washington you are hereby notified that Blossom-Provine Lumber Co. has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Seattle, King County, Washington to-wit: 210 New York Block, on the 23rd day of November, 1910 at the hour of 9:30 o'clock and unless you appear and then and there answer the same will be taken as confessed, and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said claim is to recover from the defendants a balance due for goods, wares and merchandise, to-wit: lumber sold and delivered to said defendants by the plaintiff within the last past three years. Complaint filed September 29, 1910. JOHN E. CARROLL. Justice of the Peace. Oct. 28—Nov. 18, 1910. NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL ESTATE by the Treasurer of the City of Seattle, King County, Washington. To Charles McDonald: You are hereby notified that the undersigned, L. H. Craver, is the owner and holder of one certain Certificate of Purchase, No. 1172, on Lot Nineteen (19) of Wheeler's Third Addition to the City of Seattle, in King County, Washington, issued on August 24th, 1908, to one Mrs. C. H. Weed, for the sum of Six Dollars and thirty cents ($6.30), under ordinance of the said city of Seattle, No. 13320. Said Certificate of Purchase was recorded by the said Mrs. C. H. Weed, in the office of the County Auditor, King County, Washington on October 1908, Vol. 10, at page 127, and there was paid to the Auditor his fees therefor in the FRIDAY November 4, 1910 sum of of One Dollar ($1.00). That since said last named date, to-wit: on Feb. 15th, 1910, there was paid by the undersigned to the County Treasurer of said King County for taxes on said property the sum of Ninety-four Dollars and forty cents ($94.40). That on Feb. 14th, 1910, the said Mrs. C. H. Weed, for a valuable consideration, sold the said valuable Purchase to the undersigned L. H. Craver and the said L. H. Craver is now the owner and holder of the said Certificate of Purchase. And you, the said Charles McDonald, are hereby further notified that at the expiration of Sixty days after the date of the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of the said first publication, to-wit: sixty days after September 9th, 1910, the said L. H. Craver will dmeand of the said Treasurer of the said City of Seattle, that he execlute audited property to the said real property, and unless you, the said Charles McDonald, redeem the said property by paying to the said Treasurer the sums hereinbefore mentioned, together with interest thereon at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said dates of payment, the said Treasurer will make and deliver to the said L. H. Craver a deed to the said property, L. H. CRAVER. Office and P. O. Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. Sent 9—Oct 21, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication. Frieda Marshall, plaintiff, vs. Joe Marshall, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington to Joe Marshall. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910 and declare that you have received an above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgmen will be rendered doubtful or withholding the benefit of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of sald court. The object of this action is that the plaintiff, on the grounds of habitual drunkenness of the defendant and the neglect and refusal of the defendant husband to take suitable care for or for the family be granted an absolute divorce from the defendant herein and the custody and control of the child of the plaintiff and defendant herein, and such other and further relief as the court may direct. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg. Seattle, Wash. Oct. 7—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE JUSTICE'S COURT BEFORE John E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Summons by Publication. R. J. Eichler, plaintiff, vs. Cora Lowe and John Doe, Lowe, her husband, whose true Christian name is unknown, defendants.—No. 13209. To Cora Lowe and John Doe Lowe, her husband, whose true Christian name is unknown: In the name of the State of Washington you are hereby notified that R. J. Eichler has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Seattle, to County State of Washington, to wit, 210 New York Block, on the 4th day of November, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed, and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of this action is to recover the sum of Twelve Dollars for the balance due for material furnished and labor performed by this plaintiff for and on behalf of said defendants within the last past three years. Complaint filed September 14th, A. D. 1910. JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace. Oct. 7—Oct. 28, 1910. REMOVAL NOTICE The Light and Power department of the Seattle Electric Company has moved to the Electric Bldg., Seventh avenue and Pine street. Street car tickets can be purchased and all bills paid in the Electrical Sales Room at the old location 907 FIRST AVENUE THE SEATTLE ELECTRIC CO ORDER A CASE OUT TO YOUR PLACE OF Rainier PALLE BEER A Free Trip to Seattle and Return. Let's Bust the State Dental Trust. Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your own. You save a dollar. I make a dollar and the State Dental Monopoly will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work d me now while the dental war is on. My other friends have been at First Ave, in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete Take a trit, to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar and the State Dental Monopoly will lose two dollars. Who do your dental work. Have no dental work dne now will be the dental war is on. My other have been established at 712 First Ave., in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete with cheap dentists, but with the high-els a dentists for half their price. Open evenings until 8 and Sundays until 4 for people who work. EDWIN J. BROWN, D.D.S. 7:31 First Avenue Seattle, Wash. Read my article in Sunday's P-L and Monday's Times and Star. FRIDAY November 4, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- tly. Summons by Publication. Charles Pfeffer, plaintiff, vs. Millie Bennett, Walter C. Bennett, her husband, Charles P, Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown. William D. A Hatfield and "Jane Doe" Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown, and Charles W. Fisk, F. M. Hatfield, Ida M. Barton and Aurora Land Company, a corporation, defendants.—No. 75263. The State of Washington to Charles P, Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, whose true given name is unknown: D. A Hatfield and Jane Doe Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is unknown. You, and each of you, are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 15th day of September, 1910, and then the day of October, 1910, the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and have a copy of your answer served upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to foreclose a certain mortgage executed and delivered by the said defendants Millie Bennett and Walter C Bennett, her husband, to one S. Campbell and by the said S. Campbell assigned to this plaintiff, dated the 28th day of January, 1909, by the same attorney. Vol. 407 of mortgages, page 39 of the record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, which mortgage was given to secure a promissory note of $500.00 with interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent per annum and was given upon lots 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of Glencairn First Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to obtain judgment for the said $500.00 together with interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the 28th day of January, 1910, and an attorney's fee of $75.00 and costs of suit and to procure and do the necessary title and interest of each and all of said defendants in and to said premises and every part thereof. Office and postoffice address; Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg.. Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons. A. L. Weaver and Ella May Weaver, husband and wife, plantiffs, vs. Peter E. North defend. The State of Washington to the said Peter E. Nordin, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 1st day of Sept., and within the allow entitled action, to the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, designate and be bounded against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. And all right, title and interest in the lands described in the complaint claimed by you likewise in the contract, and payments described thereto will be made and the title of the plaintiffs cleared as to all claims you may have or claim. J. W. BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiffs. 1324 Alaska Bldg. Seattle, Wash. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1916. IN: THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Antone Kaas, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. 'No. 75305. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of your owners, claimant and owner of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of November, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: less than 260 feet of $1% of $1% of NE4% of S. K. Sec. 4, Tp. 21, N. R 4 E. W. M. certificate number B54644, year 1906, amount $12. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property to-wit: Amount $140 for year 1907; 76 cents for year 1908. Which several sums bears interest at the rate of per cent per annum from sold title of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of sale, first publication, to-wit: within sixty days Aug. 19, 1910, in the above article and action, and the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of such property of said taxes, and satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. I. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, Summons You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons. You are hereby summoned to appear after the 23rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office before stated, at their office so that judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is instituted for the purpose of dissolving the bonds of matrimony by setting a tie between plaintiff and defendant, for the reason and upon the grounds that said defendant has failed, neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the support and maintenance of said plaintiff; and for the degree awarding to said plaintiff the following described real estate claim against Chilam, State of Washington, particularly described as follows, to-wit: Lots twenty-two (22), twenty-three (23), twenty-six (26) and twenty-seven (27), in section seven (7), township thirty (30) and county of rainy (4) west Chilam County, Washington; and also the following property situated in King County, State of Washington: The west half of lot twenty-five (25) and lot twenty-six (26), block eight (8). Bucklus Addition to the City of Seattle; and for such other and further relief as to this court may seem just and equitable. IN THE SUPERIOR COURS, KING COUNTY, Washington. Elizabeth Turnbull, Plaintiff, vs. George Turnbull, Defendant. No. ——. Summons. The State of Washington to the said George Turnbull, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the late judgment, upon publication of this summons, to-wait: within sixty (60) days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case it would be unwilling you, in judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complainant in this action prays for divorce and that the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved. H. E. FOSTER. P. O. Address: 606 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, October 7, 1910. Date of last publication, November 18, 1910. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE Fred C. Brown, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. California, State and Corral Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. John Doe Matljasevich and Richard Roe Gloivich, copartners, doing business under firm name and style of Alaska Liquor Company, Defendants. No. —. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King, ss The State of Washington: To John Doe Matljasevich and Richard Roe Gloivich, copartners, doing business under firm name and style of Alaska Liquor Company. You, and each of you, are hereby notified that California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, has filed a complaint against you in said Court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 20th day of October, A. D. 1910, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock a. m., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same demand of the plaintiff appealed. The object and demand of said action is for the sum of Eighty-two Dollars and Twenty-five Cents ($82.25), being a balance due the plaintiff on account of merchandise sold and delivered to the defendants during the year 909. F. ed September 15th, A. D. 1910. FRED C. BROWN Justice of the Peace: in and for Seattle Prectect, King County, Washington. TWOROGER & WINKLER. Attorneys for Plaintiff. 10-11 Triangle Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication Sept. 16, 1910 Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 23—Noy. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Allen P. Mitten, Deceased., No. 11658. By order of said court made herein on the 8th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons holding paid claims against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executors of said estate, at 1208 Alaska Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 23, 1910. 1310. SARAH H. MITTEN, FRED W. WEST, HENRY BLACKWOOD, As Executors of said Estate. BRADY & RUMMENS, Attorney for Estate. 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Oct. 22, 1310. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Frank H. Renick, Anna Farmer and Anna Farmer, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 74379. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants, and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate is issued by the State of Washington, dated the 19th day of October, 1908, and numbered B54379, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.02, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, witw: Tp. 29, N. R. 6, E. W. M. of Sec. 29, Tp. 24, N. R. 6, E. W. M. That the taxes for the law subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $1.78; for the year 1908, the sum of $1.24. Which several sums bear interest at the time of payment, and many from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the date of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days of publication, to have a written evidence of action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do judgment be rendered the list of taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. C. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. M. CADONALD, Office Address, 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Caroline L. Burns, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Dependants—No. 75301. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them; You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, dated the day of September 1904, and numbered B61042, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of $4.86, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, towit: Lot 5, See 23, Tp. 22, N., R. 6 E., W. M., less Right-of-Way C., M. & St. P. R. Do. The taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1906, the sum of $2.11; for the year 1908, the sum of $0.73. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the sums paid in taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub-lylation. to-wit: within sixty days Sept. 9, 1910, in the above entitled court and action, and defend of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as proved in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for Kni. g County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Jos. Allen, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. 75300. Notice State of Washington: To the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the herelafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of taxable interest in the property sued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of November, 1908, and numbered B54857, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $245, and, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of King County, described as follows, towit. Lot 12, Block 5, Allentown Acres. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $1.57; for the year 1908, the sum of $1.76. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the sum of interest taxes upon and protest said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of sale, July 14, 1910, within sixty days Sept. 30, 1910, in the above-entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, case of your answer so do, it will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and sound against re-entry and sound against by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Cour. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. M. C. DONALD. Attorney for plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. Daisy Hour, plaintiff, vs. John Francis Hour, defendant. The State of Washington, to the said John, Francis, Hour, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 30th day of September, A.D. 1510, and deceived an entitled action, above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to answer the complaint, deferred against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been A call will convince the most skeptical of the Worth and Beauty of our slash. The established reputation of our tailoring assures you of satisfaction. Established 22 Years filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a divorce of said court granting divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the grounds of your abandonment of plaintiff for more than four years, and also your failure to make suitable provisions for plaintiff Postoffice and office address. 201-203 Burke Bldg., Seattle County of King, State of Washington. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. The remarkable biblical play, now current at the Alhambra theatre, is attracting the largest audiences that have ever assembled in that pretty playhouse within its history. The theatre has been filled to the last seat in the orchestra at every performance this week, and the management feel justified in continuing it another week. One of the remarkable features of the Alhambra production of "The Holy City" is the lavish expenditure of the management on scenery and costumes, for no play ever produced in Seattle at any price was better costumed and more appropriately scenically embellished. Clergymen of all religious denominations have visited the Alhambra this week, and pronounce "The Holy City" the best and most perfect religious drama ever offered in Seattle. The entire play breathes the spirit of Christianity in its highest and most holy aspect, while reciting the scriptural events at the time of the betrayal and crucifixion of the Divine Redeemer. The extremely low prices charged at the Alhambra theatre have, and doubtless will, encourage entire families to attend the performance, and parents can hot bestow a better lesson upon their children than to take them to see "The Holy City." The play will continue all next week at the Alhambra theatre. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. E. Kudvig, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herelafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75299. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now or file in this cause and Court. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Helen B. Phillips, plaintiff, vs. Park D. Phillips, defendant. The State of Washington, to the above named defendant, Park D. Phillips: Mohamed dependant, Park D. Phillips; Omar probably summoned to appear within sixty-five days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: within sixty days after the twenty-first day of October, 1910, exclusive of said twenty-first day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and to serve a copy of your answer or other pleading upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his hereinafter designated postoffice address, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered in said cause to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of said action is to procure a judgment and decree forever severing the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of the failure, re-engage, neglect the defendant to provide for the court's jurisdiction to thewards the support or maintenance of the plaintiff since their marriage on the 5th day of July, 1900, and on the further ground that the defendant more than two years ago wilfully and without just cause abandoned the plaintiff, and at least since has so continued to abandon and live separate and apart from plaintiff. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Summons. Lilian John plaintiff, vs. James Colli- defendant, No. _____ "THE HOLY CITY." Sept. 9-Oct. 21. 1910. 833 Henry Building, Seattle. King County, Washington. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. The State of Washington, to the said James Collins, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit, with writtenity days after the 21st day of October, 1910 and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to secure a decree of divorce, dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of desertion and failure to provide for more than one year. H. E. SNOOK. Attorney or Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: 537 Purke Building Seattle, Washington. 937 Burke Building, Seattle, Washington. Oct. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Summons for Publication. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait, within sixty (60) days after the 21st day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled document and answer the complaint and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the office said court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant, upon the following grounds: Because the defender without the plaintiff's fault, abandoned the plaintiff on the 9th of October, 1909, at Seattle, Washington, and that said abandonment has been continuous for one year and more. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 309 Burke Bldg. Second and Marion Streets, Seattle, Wash. Oct. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Probate, Administrator's Notice of Sale of Real Estate. In the Matter of the Estate of James J. Lynch, Deceased.—No. 10926. Said sale to be made on or after the 10th day of November, 1910. Bids will be received by the undersigned at the office of Edward Von Tubel, No. 604 Mutual Life Building, Seneca King County, Washington. Bids will be received for any of sald parcels as above described. The terms of sale are cash, gold coin of the U. S. Ten per cent of bid to accompany bid and balance upon confirmation of sale by the court. Dated this 20th day of O tober, 1910. Date of first publication, October 21, 1910. HARRY W. BRINGHURST. Administrator of the Estate of James IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. J. A. Musgrove and James Musgrove, and all persons unknown, if any, having or detaining an interest in and to the summons State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. August 19, September 8th, 1910 1