Seattle Republican

Historical Society Tacoma NORTHWEST LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE PUBLISHER'S NOTICE. The Seattle Republican is published on Friday of every week by Cayton Publishing Company Subscriptions, $3.00 per year; six months, $1.50 postage prepaid. Subscriptions to all foreign countries included in the Postal Union, $4.00 a year postage paid. Sample copies, free. Single copies ten cents. Advertising rates made known on application. Special rates to publishers. Entered a second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. Address all communications to The Seattle Republican 307 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. Make a checks, drafts, postal orders, etc., payable to "Cayton Publishing Company." CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. Telephone: Main 305. Publication office, 307 Epler Block. HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON - - - Publisher BUSIE REVELS CAYTON - - - Associates A DEMOCRATIC VICTORY The Republican party from a national standpoint met the most disastrous defeat that has over taken it since 1892 and even Republicans are not very much sorry about it. Republican leaders had become drunk from continued success and had legislated and unlegislated in the interest of a few to such an extent that the people rose in open rebellion, and for a while at least, turned the rascals out. Senator Jones of Washington attributes the defeat to radicalism within the party, which to an extent is true, but the cause of the case of radicalism that is responsible for the outbreak was the thousand and one legislative abuses that the Republican leaders in both houses of Congress as well as in many of the state legislatures had permitted to go through. What did Cannon or Aldrich care for the interest of the poor man? So far as the laws of the land are concerned the poor man stood about in the same light as did Dred Scott when Judge Tawney declared, "the Negro has no rights that the white man is bound to respect." And so also, with the poor man, he had no rights that the Republican leaders in Congress ever thought of respecting. We, however, do not look for relief on account of Democratic success, but we do believe that Democratic success will bring the Republicans to their senses and new leaders with new ideas will forge to the front. Theodore Roosevelt knew that there was something rotten in Republican circles and he made a desperate effort to straighten things out, but his methods were too strenuous, and instead of helping he hurt. The men who make up the leadership of the Democratic party for the most part are not only narrow and biggoted but intolerant, and if they do as they have in the past, when they were victorious, they will not survive their two year term; but they have given the Republicans a severe jolting and it is hoped that the latter, as in the past, will profit by the experience. MEXICO ANTI-UNITED STATES Last Tuesday saw a wild mob surging and swaying through the streets of the City of Mexico seeking Americans and the property of Americans, to do the former bodily harm and to destroy the latter. An American flag flying in front of a candy store was not only torn down but was trampled upon the ground, spat upon and then torn into shreds. The police made some feeble efforts to quell the rioters, but did so in a way that only encouraged them to go on. Those Americans that did not seek some safe retreat were roughly, and in many instances, badly handled. On the whole, if the associated press reports are to be believed, the insult offered to the United States government was sufficient to justify the government officials to begin to mobilize troops on the Mexican frontiers at once to be ready to march against the Mexican outposts at the first tap of the drum unless the Mexican officials make the proper apology and re-emburse those Americans for the goods, wares and personal injuries they sustained during the progress of the riot. Hon. Henry Lane Wilson, whose portrait appears in another column hereof is Ambas- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 1910 sador to Mexico and during the time of the riot he made vigorous protest and demanded protection for the Americans and repeatedly wired to Washington City for further instructions. The Mexican government, or at least a great majority of the Mexicans have been hostilely inclined against the Americans for some time and the post has proved unusually trying to Ambassador Wilson. 4 HARRY LANE WILSON Ambassador to Mexico, who fearlessly demanded protection for citizens of the United Ststes during the recent Anti Ameriean riots. Ambassador Wilson is a citizen of the state of Washington, his home being in Spokane. BURNED A MEXICAN AT THE STAKE To be sure there's a cause for the actions of that Mexican mob and the cause is, the burning at the stake of a Mexican citizen down in Texas, November 3rd, on the part of the white citizens of that state. The Americans on account of their refined, cultured and effete accomplishments have selected the punishment of burning at the stake persons, who do things contrary to their code of ethics, and especially if the offending person be of a dark skin, which to others is a bit inhuman. That kind of punishment was all right as long as it was confined to burning American Negroes at the stake, but it was a different story when a Mexican subject was similarly punished, and while the Mexicans did not try to make any demonstration against those, who did the dirty deed, they did remember that, retaliation had always in the past proved to be one of the most effective panaceas for recalcitrant opponents to law and decency, and they therefore made a demonstration against the Americans living among them as a retaliation. Before Uncle Sam makes any great demands on Mexico for those insults of the mob he should voluntarily apologize to the Mexican government for the burning of one of her citizens at the stake by the Texas barbarians and pay a heavy indemnity for the same. In their rage the Mexicans styled the Americans "the giants of the dollar, pigmies of culture, barbarious whites of the North," with a conclusion, "Where is the boasted Yankee civilization?" When the cool and calculating American stops and thinks for a minute, it is more than probable that, he, too, will conclude, the civilization of which the United States makes such boasts is but a hollow pretext and guarantees no one protection in the country unless such person is backed by a government that will plunge the United States into immediate war and cause them to spend a few of the almighty dollars that have been made the god of the land unless proper redress is made. And viewing it from that standpoint the question is, Are the Americans an aggregation of cowards and bluffers? VOLUME XVII, NUMBER 24 EDITORIAL EDICTS Teddy didn't come back. Taft lost his golden smile. Kansas is still beset with Stubbs. Billy Bryan is no longer a Democratic star. Joe Cannon! Well, the name sounds familiar. Washington state seems to be safely Republican. Will Billy Humphrey be the only pebble on the the beach? Oklahoma continues to be a center of political dam- phooldom. Harmon and Dix sounds good for Democratic success for 1912. Last Tuesday was a very wet day and yet a drouth hit the Sound country. "Somewhere the sun is shining," exclaimed the Sage of Sagmore Hill last Wednesday. Teddy will ask for a return fight and he has already gone into training for the same. After all Indiana is to send Congress a Beverage that will keep its spirits up for the next six years. It is barely possible that the reason the Times is supporting Wappy is because it pays to do so. There is nothing to indicate from the late election returns that there are any Democrats in King county. If President Taft could have only foreseen the land slide he could have saved his railroad fare by playing sick. Those typewriter girls that headed a ten million dollar coal syndicate were evidently preparing to keep warm. Wisconsin has sent a Socialist to Congress, which fully explains why the people made the next Congress Democratic. It would be hard to find a man in the state now that has not been for equal suffrage of women for all these years. Mayor Gill may be all wool and a yard wide as to the city government, but, if he is, he keeps awfully bad company. Democrats are enjoying a victory feast, the first since 1892. It's been a long time coming, but got here just the same. Representative Wickersham is going to ask statehood for Alaska. Is Uncle Sam keeping too close behind the fellows as a territory? Woodrow Wilson must have invoked the assistance of the double rule of three, by which he won his gubernatorial victory in New Jersey. Some one has asked, "Do cats kill mice by instinct?" No, indeed, they kill them by main force and violence and more by the former than by the latter. It will be a long time before the fellows who voted "no" on the equal suffrage amendment in the legislature last winter, will seek to be elected to another office. If you do not think the moral standing of Seattle is being murdered then you are invited to carefully peruse the Seattle Sunday Times. Its blood curdling cartoons and articles are enough to make decent persons kick themselves for two hours each day for having ever come to a town that permits the publication of such a disreputable sheet. CURRENT COMMENT comes the coal land exposes of Alaska in which some of the most prominent men offthe Northwest are impli- cated. Already a number have been arrested and it is hiated in government circles that the half has not been told. The men already arrested on account of the mix up are men worth vast sums of money, who took their regular European tours, and yet they were not satisfied with what they had honestly earned, but they must take a flyer in an expedition set out to rob the government, and thereby add multiplied thou- sands of ill-gotten dollars to their already gigantic for- tunes. Let us hope that every man that is guilty of trying to rob the government will be found guilty and sent to the penitentiary for a period of years. Punish the rascals and it will deter other rascals. The last of the trio that was recently inicted in con= nection with the coal land frauds is Donald A McKen- zie, a first cousin to Charles A. For a number of years he was collector of Don A. McKenzie customs of Seattle and Leads The Bunch bore a splendid reputa- tion. He went North in the early Alaska boom days and so far as the average Seattleite was concerned dropped out of sight. Not being able to find gold in quantities he desired he turn- ed his attention to coal lands and began at once to de- vise ways and means to get as much of the govern- ment coal lands as possible and once he got started was too greedy to stop. It is the concensus of opinion that he roped the Seattle men into going into the scheme to rob the government out of vast acres of coal lands. For the past three or four years he has done nothing but keep the road hot between Alaska and Washington City, and it was surmised even be- fore this recent trouble became publie property that, “there wasa nigger in the woodpile,’? which has proven true. Don McKenzie knew and he knew good. and well that he was taken advantage of the govern- ment in getting the coal lands in bunches as he was, and he should be punished for it as should be all of those foolish enough to get roped into the robbery. Of the Seattle men that were recently arrested in connection with tne Alaska cval land frauds it would not be out of places to peep for a minute into their life and history in Seattle. Harry White Harry White has been a An Old Stager resident of Seattle for the past twenty-five years and during all that time he has been, what is termed a dealer or trader. He was elected mayor of Seattle and its said that he got mixed up in some things during his short career as mayor that did not look well in print, and when he refused to do the bid- dings of L. S. J. Hunt, his record was sprung on him and he was given twelve hours to resign, and he took advantage of the opportunity and resigned in one hour and thereby had eleven hours of grace. Since that time he has galavanted allover the country and is said to have done a great deal of dealings that would not stand the searchlight of public opinion turned on them. His real estate dealings in Seattle have always been moce or less in the lime light. If, therefore, he is not guilty of the Alaska coal land frauds, it is the consen- sus of opinion that he is none too good to be, and it will be hard for him to escape conviction. Charles A. McKenzie, a Seattle real estnte dealer, another of the indicted men, has lived in Seattle equal- ly as long as Harry White, and he, too, has been a real estate dealer for the Charlie McKenzie most of the time he has Took a Flyer been here. In the last Seattle real estate boom Charlie McKenzie pulled out with something like a m'llion dollars to his credit, but unlike Harry White no scandal ever besmirched his ermine. He bears a splend'd reputation in this community, and it is the consensus of opinion that he would not take a mean advantage of any man, and, yet, since the property of the general zo ernment is considered by most men as legitimite prey, itis believed that through the influ- Fike, ew ed Art Oia and dollars into a proposition of the nature, which he has been indicted, if he thought by so doing he would pull out another million. When such men as Charley McKenzie permit themselves to become in- volved into questionable transactions, there seems to be not very much left to hold up to the rising young men to become men of high ideals—for what’s the use. use. “Why The Times Supports Wappy,’’ is the caption toa long double column. speckled-faced editorial in the Times, and the ten year old school boy that would not smile on reading it Did Blethen isso dense that he does Get His Share not know, why boys play hookey from school. The Times supports Wappy because the Times is edited by Alden J. Blethen and, it rumor be true, because Wap- py has made it a financial object to Editor Blethen for the Times to support him. We believe the investiga- ting committee will get hold of sufficient evidence to make out a strong circumstantial case against the Times Publishing Company as being a part and parcel to the great graft system that has heen operating in Seattle during the Gill administration. Once upon a time we did not believe the mayor knew anything about the graft practiced in Seattle under his admin- istration, but we now believe that, the mayor either knew all about it and got his, or he is too ignorant to try to walk to the city hall without a guide. It use to be said that Tom Humes never got any of the graft that was pulled off when he was mayor of Seattle, but the circumstances when you begin to study them out will not bear out the allegation. If there has been any grafting we believe that Mayor Gill, Chief Wap- penstein and the Times Publishieg Company got theirs. The Spokane men indicted at the same time as were the Seattle men are both men of vast wealth and had no more excuse for trying to rob the government then would have a mod- Spokane Men ern Croesus. As, how- Roll in Riches ever, has been so fre- quently said in these col- umns, the average American citizens, and especially those of the United States, is money mad, and will take a chance at most any kind of a game to get the money. We do not believe a majority of the citizens of this country would be guilty of burgarly in order to get rich, but we do believe that a majority of them would take stock in a Burglar Corporasion, if they thought it would pay heavy dividends on the capital stock. The stock holders in the gigantic corporations of the United States know nothing of the workings of the institution, but trey do know they have stock in some one or all of them and they want them to pay big dividends, and to that end they see toit that only managers that will in turn employ helpers and under- lings that will resort to all kinds of questionable practices to get the money for the stockholders, be put in absolute charge. They do not need the money, for most of them have more money than any ordinary per- son could spend in a life time, but they want to pile up the money for big estates. The fearless editor may offend and lose asubscriber, but if he is right, in the end he will gain five. He may lose an advertiser, butif he is right he will gain two thereby. If he la- Consult Others bors not to displease any Editors Not Infallible one, he will please no one, If he tries to ride all the horses in the field he will be unhorsed by each of them. The editor should follow his honest, well- considered convictions, and the man he should labor to please is himself; if he does this with ability and with- out fear or favor, he will have a great following and better support, though he be wrong half the time, than he who trims his sail to every change of the breeze, and without chart or compass, principles or purpose, drifts aimlessly with every shifting tide.— Chinook Observer. — An editor is not to always trust his own mind on matters of publicimportance. It is his duty to con- sult with others, who have given the matter at issue considerable thought and consideration, thus getting the opinions of many cn the point and exploit the sub- ject from the view point almost of a disinterested per- son. The editor who does not consult others on impor- tant subjects,is more likely to go wrong than the fel- low who tries to please everybody. The most editors are aware of the fact that an editor is only a human being and is no more infalllble than the daily toiler. Summing it all up the editor who does not dig is either a bump on a log or a cheap grafter. FR DAY Novmeber 11, 1910 After many years of exclusive controlcf the Alaska trade Seattle in the future is to have a more than sharp competitor in San Francisco and perhaps Port- land, Oregon. The trad- San Francisco Also ers of Seattle have no Seeking Alaska Trade one but themselves to blame for this state of affairs. The merchants and miners of Alaska have been complaining for years over the exorbitant rates they htd to pay to the Seattle merchants and dealers for supplies and to this the Seattleites snickered in their faces and, if not in so many words by intimation, told them to help themselves. Persons outfitting for Alaska declare they could go to Portland and pay all extra expenses over buying ir Seattle, and still save some twenty-five per cent over the Seattle market. The Alaska people continued to talk this among them- selves until they finally talked it so loud that San Francisco merchants heard it—now Miss Seattle has to make the fight of her life to hold even a share of the trade. Summing it all up, the Seattle merchants play- ed the hog when they had the other fellow foul and now they are in line to have to takea dose of the same kind of medicine they administered to the other fellows, and it serves them right. A CURE FOR MUNICIPAL ILLS The American city does uot stand as a failure in democracy because democracy has never been tried in the American city. The cure for all the ills of the American city is more democracy. This was the note struck by Mayor Brand Whitlock of Toledo in his speech at the Institute of Municipal and Social Service in Milwaukee, October 17th. “There is a great difference between a private cor- poration and a municipal corporation,’’ he said. ‘‘A private corporation is for the purpose of making prof- its. A municipal corporation is for the purpose of ren- dering service, and it should have all the functions as they arise.’’ Referring tu the community idea that is beginning to change the character of our cities, Mayor Whitlock said: ‘“‘A city doesn’t exist just because a great num- ber of people congregate together. A city exists when all those people develop a sense of oneness, a sense of solidarity, what Frederic C. Howe has called a city sense. “We can’t build a city in a business like manner so long as every city in the land presents these extremes —the slum and the districts of vice, on the one hand, and the marbled avenues, on the other. We can’t have the ideal city as long as we take from the many to give to the few.”’ Mayor Whitlock said {there are ‘‘three over lords’’ whom the people must eliminate. They are the politi- cal bosses of the cities, the state legislatures, and the public service corporations. —La Follett’s Weekly. DOES IT MEAN PROHIBITION ? Is the state of Washington slowly but surely drifting into the Prohibition column? Is the all absorbing question among the voters and business men of the state at present. At the iate election towns and communities went dry that even the the anti-saloon workers never dreamed that they would do at this time, and it is a fact that, the wets registered no signal victories. A legislature was at the same time elected, and, it is claimed by those who have kept in touch with thesituation, that an overwhelming majority of the members will support the county unit idea, if it ever comes before the legislature, and that if carried it will be but another long step in the direc- tion of state wide prohibition. But these are ques- tions for the coming legislature to settle and they will be bitterly contested by both the drys and the wets. It is predicted that the next legislature of the state will do little else but squibble oyer the liquor question. With Governor Hay favoring any kind of a radical anti-saloon legislation it looks as if the drys havea shade the better of the fight and yet it is hoped by the business interest of the state that no legislation will be passed in the direction of state wide prohibition. mi: The secret of the whereabouts of the final resting place of the remains of Jchn Wilkes Booth, the slayer of President Lincoln, belong- ed to Thomas T. Eckert, who died a few days ago without divulging the knowledge of ittoany ore. An American citizen must be mighty low down to even want to know where the remains of such a cowardly brute rests. It is to be hoped that they do not rest any place, but are kept constantlyon the go. FRIDAY November 11, 1910 POLITICS AND POLITICIANS George F. Cotterill played both ends against the middle and lost out inspite of his maneuvers. Daniel Landon defeated him for state senator and Miles Poin- dexter defeated him for United States senator. Sena- tor Cotterill, however, is one of the most brilliant speakers of the Northwest and his presence will be missed in the coming state legislature. oo. Charles G. Heifner threatens to contest the elec- tion of State Senator George U. Piper because the regularly selected judge was not permitted to act in one of the down town districts. That would be a will- ful waste of time and money, Mr. Heifner and unless you have both of those to burn, it is suggested that you refrain from entering into any such nonsensical contest as you would not get three votes in the senate. eee United States Senator Wesley L. Jones gave out an interview ai his home in North Yakima last Tues- day evening tothe effiect that, under no circumstances would he seek or accept the nomination of district judge for Eastern Washington. While his term as senator does not expire for four years, yet it is safe to say that he will be opposed for er-election in case he is a candidate, by a great many persons who warmly supported him two years ago. wees State Senator Pliny L. Allen, of King county, who aspires to the presidency of the senate, which will give him powers like unto that enjoyed by a lieutenant gov- ernor of the state, in view of the fact the state has no such official at present, is being groomed by a number of his friends for the gubernatorial nomination two years hence. Senator Allen would be a compromise between 2 wet anda dry candidate and would draw heavily from both factions. eee Will H. Lewis, who for many years has been more or less prominent in the political arena of King county, and, to an extent, in the state of Washington, is seri- ously contemplating moving his family to Portland, where he has extensive business propositions that will take him two years or more to work out. The Lewis- Wiley Company has purchased a large tract of land near Portland and they are now sluicing a hill down onto the lands and making of it very desirable resi- dent property, and it is said that it will make those in- terested a fortune. eee Wilson Butner has been arrested in California charged with defrauding a woman in Aberdeen, Washington, out of a few hundred dollars. Butner is said to be an attorney atlaw. Is this the same W. H. Butner, who organized the German American Land Company in Seattle some years ago, who was quite prominent in political circles, but had to leave between two suns? If he is the same Butner, it will be remembered that he was arrested and taken back to Wisconsin, where he was tried on a similar charge and was convicted and sent to state prison for a short term. If itis the same Butner it would seem that a charge of being a habitual criminal could be proven against him, as it is said he has twice before been sent to prison on similar charges. THE WOMEN GOT JUSTICH Equal suffrage for women won a signal victory at the polls of the state of Washington last Tuesday and those women, who would nat take ‘‘no’’ for an answer can pat themselves on the back and say, ‘“‘we did it,”’ for they certainly did. We are. at a loss for words to comment on the victory because it was so unreasonable to have ever denied the women the right to vote or do anything else they want to do that is not an open violation of some law, that when the privil- ege is given them one hardly knows what to say in vindication of the denied rights in the past. The ‘women are as much a part and parcel of this great re- public as the men and they verily hath done more to keep it in the straight and narrow path, even without a vote, than have the men. The virtue of the land the men expect a majority of the women to maintain. The proper directing of the boys and girls into good citizens the men expect the women to do. The relig- ious beliefs of the family the men expect to be instill- edinto the children by the women. In short every principle of right, jnstice and good breeding the men look to the women to teach to the sons and daughters, and yet they argue, women have not sense enough to go the polls and vote to the best interests of all con- cerned, The argument that the women will come into contact with unsavory characters at the polls does not speak much for the men, who stay out all night, even after the polls have been closed, with those unsavory characters. We rejoice in the fact that a majority of the voters of the state of Washington had sense enough to vote for equal suffrage for women. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. EDITORIAL EDICTS Democrats, who have been Republicans for the past twelve years, have begun to crawl out of their holes and announce themselves. They have begun to scent federal jobs from afar. It looked so much like that Dr. Crippen was being railroaded to the gallows that the time of his execu- tion has been extended to the 23rd of November, and it is hinted that he may be pardoned. If you think you can be a successful preacher with- out newspaper publicity then you have not kept up with the spirit of the times and instead of, ‘‘Go preach Christ, you had better go plow corn.’ “Ts Uncle Sam Conservation Mad?” is a head line. He may be, but he seems to be a whole lot madder at the timber and coal land thieves that are operating in his domain than the anti conservationists. According to the P.-I. John Cort defeats the BE. & XK. theatrical trust, but according to the Times the lat- ter defeats Cort. After all it must be a row between the newspapers instead of between the theatrical magnates. Two of the most successful Negro playrights and actors this country has ever produced are now insane in the city of New York. The black man seems as big a fool as the white man and goes crazy on just as slight a provocation. Asa parting shot the Republicans of the present Congress might help their cause by reducing the rep- resentation to Congress, from the South, but being cowards they will do nothing of the kind, and if they did the president would not sign the bill. The women of this state may favor prohibition, but if they do its more than they do in any of the states already enjoying equal suffarge. Neither Colorado, Utah nor Idaho has prohibition, and the woman vote controls the political destinies in all of them. THE PASSING THRONG The new building for the Providence hospital of Seattle is verging onto completion and when finished, it will be the largest and most commodious hospital building in the Northwest, if not on the Pacific coast. Its estimated cost is something like a million dollars. ee Arn S. Allen, the local manager of the Young Men’s Christian Association, returned last Sunday from an extended trip throughout the East, whither he went on business connected with the Association. Seattle is the most important point for the Association in the Northwest if not on the Pacific Coast. So The supreme court dissolved the injunction against those digging the Lake Washington canal and as re- sult the pent up water of the lake has been turned loose and is flowing into the Sound, which will prevent the usual winter overflow about the lakes and up the rivers that run into the lake. Who said the supreme court was worthless? oes It begins to look as if the students of the Univer- sity of Washington will soon become a public nuistnce. They begun the scholasistic year as hoodlums and it looks as if they propose to keep it up throughout the year. If those young whelps were sent to the bastile instead of played with by the police and the other of- ficials of the law there would be less of their con- founded develtry in the city. eas onae Tiring of life James A. Kellogg committed suicide last Friday in his office in the Bailey block, For four years he was state senator from Columbia county. He was a Republican candidate for state auditor in 1896 and with the balance of the ticket was defeated. He moved to Seattle soon thereafter, where he engaged in the insurance business, with the practice of law as aside, He was more or less successful, but of recent years he took to excessive drink and that doubtless was the causeof his rashact. His remains were ship- ped to Dayton, Washington, wherej§he formerly resided. eae Those who believed that L. C. Smith, of typewriter fame, would keep his word and grace{Seattle with a forty-two story building, regretted to learn of]the sud- den death of Mr. Smith at his home in Syracuse, New York, last Saturday. It is, however, reported that the building wiil go up just the same.$§The realty holdings of Mr. Smith in Seattle are said to be valued at something like four million dollars, all of whichjis nnder the direction of J. W. Clise, the well known promoter and builder. The gas explosion at Black Diamond causing the death of fifteen miners last Sunday, calls to mind the number of deadly explosions that have occurred at Black Diamond and Franklin within the past eighteen years. franklin lost thirty-nine at one time and eight at another besides one and two periodically. A few years ago twelve were killed in a Black Diamond ex- plosion in the same mine of the recent horror. Miners take their lives in their hands when they go below to dig coal and for that reason they should have the best of wages. WISE AND OTHERWISE A company is known by the men it keeps. — Wall Street Journal, eee Many a financial upset is due to a small tip.—Wall Street Journal. coe Looks as if those New York art dealers believed in the art that conceals art.—Boston Transcript. eee Now we know what’s the matter. The Colonel’s equilibrator is out of gear. —New York World see Bourke Cockran reverses himself so often that he may soon begin to wear out at the hinges. — Wali Street Journal. soe It is believed now that what Mr. Taft really meant was that it is the best tariff ever drafted by such a crowd. —Los Angeles Express, ee If Roosevelt should turn out to be another Julius Caesar, we nominate Judge Parker for Mare Anthony —Indianapolis Star. eee Senator Burton is so sure that he’s really a pro- gressive that we should think he’dsue The Congres- sional Record for libel. Ohio State Journal. eee A consular report says that there is a great demand jn Mexico for wooden legs. Bewildering are the va- garies of fashion.—New York American. eee Attempt to organize an old-home week in Pittsburg has failed. Her prominent citizens won’t come back. Wall Street Journal. see You only drop three letters to change Braganza to Braga, but otherwise the difference is rather far- reach.—Indiahapolis News. eee Secretary Ballinger was slightly shaken up ina railroad wreck the other day but managed to cling to his seat, possibly frcm force of habit.—Ohio State Journal. eee Colonel Roosevelt no doubt enjoyed his airship trip. It put him in a position where he didn’t have to ex- plain anything about the tariff. —Philadelshia Press. eee A test case seems to bea suit brought to court to decide whether there is enough init to justify the lawyers in working up similar cases,—Southern Lum- berman, Nashville. eee Well, there is at least one man, Hoxsey, the avia- tor, who dared to tell the Colonel to keep quiet and quit waving his hands at the crowd.—Washington Herald. eee “T regard this contest in this state as far more than amere party contest,’’ says the Colonel. So did the Republicans who voted against the Colonel. — New York World. eee From the pictures we have seen of King Manuel we judge that he would be a success behind the glove counter of a Chicago department store. —Toleda Blade. eee A young woman of Massachusetts is nearly six feet four inches tall, weighs 189 pounds, and is always in perfect training. Whata recruit for the woman suf- fragettes. New York American. eee “After Coal—What?”’ asks an eastern contempor- ary ina headline. In this part of the Mississippi val- ley at the present time the bill isn’t far behind. —Keo- kuk Gate City. eee A girl in New York killed herself because her mil- lionaire lover turned out to bea waiter. She should have given him time. He would have gotten there.— Washington Herald. ere The continued silence of Chancellor Day, under ex- treme provocation, ean perhaps best be accounted for on the theory that he finds no words adequate to ex- 4 POLITICAL CONTROL BY THE PEOPLE For some years the trend of political control has been toward the people. Over the greater part of our country where the movement has been most marked. the chief agency has been the direct party primary. Direct legislation has done even more to put the affairs of the people directly under the control of the people; but the territory where direct legislation is now in vogue is so much less than that where the direct party primary is the only agency by which the people may directly manifest their sentiments, that the phenomenal victories of the people this year are chiefly the fruits of direct party primaries. If the old-fashioned delegate convention system were still in vogue as it use to be, no one will claim that there would have been the "slaughter of the bosses and the disconcerting of the politicians that we have seen durlng the past few months. All this augurs well for the future, for the people like their new found power, and the politicians have a suddenly increased regard for the wishes and the needs of the people. And it does not require a phrophet to foresee an extension of the direct primary system into new territory, and also its extension to embrace officers to which it does not apply; for example, governors and other state officers, delegates to national conventions, and in some quarters it has been suggested that candidates for president and vice president be chosen by direct party primaries. The most promising new territory into which the new direct party primary system is most likely to extent in the near future is New York state. And no one can doubt that only in a few years more this system of selecting party candidates will extend to every part of our great country, thus relegating permanently to the past the boss controlled primary, held usually in some back room, at which were selected boss-controlled delegates and these made up the boss-controlled convention; and these conventions (of both parties) nominated candidates from which the people were compelled to choose on election day. The powers which chooses the candidates can easily control the government. Theoretically it was supposed that each party convention would endeavor to put forward the best possible candidates in order to thus aid party victory at the poll; but that beautiful theory was ruthlessly smashed by the bosses and politicians times without number; and too frequently there was an underground community of interest between the bosses of the different parties, to which the people were some times the unwitting, and always the helpless victims. It will be observed that during the past few months the people have made the most conspicuous and impressive use of the direct party primaries in the selection of national candidates- that is in the selection of candidates for the national legislature - Con. NEWS MORE OR LESS INTERESTING gress. It is here that old leaders of both senate and house, particularly of the dominant party, have been firmly set aside by the voters of their own party. The direct party primary is an intermediate step between the old not-responsible-to-the people system, and direct legislation; and as much as we always welcome it where we cannot get the pure article—or until we can get pure direct legislation. However, the latter does not necessarily take the place of the former, as they work very well together; but the direct party primary is not much needed where direct legislation exists. But where we cannot get the real thing we welcome the direct party primary as the first step toward direct legislation. Hence we appreciate the efforts of Gov. Hughes and ex-president Roosevelt to get to the direct party primary in New York state. The direct party primary is a development of party government while direct legislation is direct people's government, which tends to break up parties and weaken party government. Equity Series. IMPORTANT DECISIONS Contracts - Services during meretricious relationship. The rule quite strictly enforced is that a contract in itself lawful and violating no rule of policy or morals may be enforced, notwithstanding performance is associciated, or at least contemporaneous, with some illicit relation between the contracting parties. For example, the Oklahoma supreme court follows a well defined line of cases, which rule, that express contract for services to be rendered by a woman for a man as his housekeeper is valid and enforceable, though the parties entering into it live together in a state of concubinage during the time the services are rendered, provided the contract be not made in contemplation of there being such relationship. Emerson v. Botkin, 100 Pac. 531. See also Lytle v. Newell, Ky., 68 S. W. 118. Cooper v. Cooper, 147 Mass., 372, 17 N. E., 892 9 Am. St. Rep. 721; Succession of Pereuilhet, 23 La., Ann. 294, 8 Am. Rep. 595. Of course it might be difficult for one performing the services to establish clearly the contract and its complete dissociation from the illicit relationship. And at all events the course of decision seems quite generous to the woman in distinguishing between cases where the illicit relationship is contemplated ab initio and where continuance therein is contemplated after the services have begun to be performed. The Louisiana court in one of the cases above referred to expresses the reason of this generosity by saying that: "An employer cannot pay off a female employe by robbing her of her virtue. If concubinage had been alleged and proved to have been the motive and cause of the parties living together in the same house in the first instance, and the services in question to have been merely incidental to such a state of living, our conclusion might be different." Yet it seems to be, that, if a man STATE. GOVERNOR. PLURALITY. Alabama. Emmet O'Neal, D. 50,000 California. Hiram Johnson, R. 20,000 Colorado. John F. Shafroth, D. 15,000 Connecticut. Simeon E. Baldwin, D. 3,500 Idaho. James H. Hawley, D. 300 Iowa. B. F. Carroll, R. 16,000 Kansas. Walter R. Stubbs, R. 14,000 Massachusetts. Eugene N. Foss, D. 33,000 Michigan. Chase S. Osborn, R. 45,000 Minnesota. A. O. Eberhart, R. 50,000 Nebraska. C. W. Aldrich, R. 5,000 Nevada. Tasker L. Odie, R. New Hampshire. Robert P. Bass, R. 7,000 New Jersey. Woodrow Wilson, D. 30,000 New York. John A. Dix, D. 66,000 North Dakota. John Burke, D. 1,000 Ohio. Judson Harmon, D. 90,000 Oklahoma. Lee Cruce, D. 25,000 Oregon. Oswald West, D. 3,000 Pennsylvania. John K. Tener, R. 31,000 Rhode Island. Aram J. Pothier, R. 900 South Carolina. Coleman L. Blease, D. 60,000 South Dakota. R. S. Vessey, R. 12,000 Tennessee. B. W. Hooper, R. 18,000 Texas. O. B. Colquitt, D. 130,000 Wisconsin. F. E. McGovern, R. Wyoming. John M. Carey, D. To the Sixty-second Congress the Democrats have elected 226 members; Republicans, 163; Socialists, 1. This is a net gain of 51 for the Democrats, and gives them a working majority of 30 in the House. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN RE OR LESS I wants to get out of being held to his contract to pay his concubine for services, he must first debauch her and then have her for his concubine under an arrangement to pay her as his housekeeper. The rule may sometimes have about it more of technicality than justice.—Central Law Journal. A Job For Job Wanted at once.—Two fluent and well-learned persons, male or female, to answer the questions of a little girl of three and a boy of four; each to take four hours per day and rest the parents of the said children. Apply at the Neepawa (Manitoba) Register. A Starter Millionaire—Doctor, is it absolutely necessary to remove my appendix? Doctor—Not absolutely, but it is safer to begin with some simple operation like that.—Life. An Authority "Do men like blonde hair or brown best?" "Ask your friend Emma. She was once blonde, then brunette, and now her hair is coal black. She ought to know. — Fliegende Blaetter. The difference between a dirigible and a non-dirigible is that the former at least makes a bluff at answering its helm. Mind Reading Red—Have a cigar? Greene — No; I promised my wife I wouldn't smoke. Red—Then you don't mind if you do." —Yonkers Statesman. Giving Herself Away "What makes you think she is uncultured?" "She thinks Ibsen's plays are stupid." "Well, a lot of people think so." AMUSEMENTS Next week at the Alhambra for the first time in the West, Owen Davis' immensely successful big eastern sensation, "Jack Shepard, the Bandit King." will be the play. It will be a strong contrast to the play this week. It tells the story of two orphan boys, who, left to shift for themselves at a tender age, are separated in their youth, one becoming a criminal through cirstances, the other a veritable enemy against criminals. The one is a leader of mountain bandits in the early days of California, who prey upon the villages, and who is noted for his bravery, chivalry and deeds of kindness to the poor, who admire and venerate him. He was led into his first crime through the false accusation of a fellow clerk in a bank, and thus driven unjustly to prison, he became a parah on society. During the midst of his criminal career, he falls in love with a wealthy miser's niece, and to save her from the cruelty of her uncle, abducts her to his mountain retreat. He is hounded throughout by the party who sent him to prison to shield himself, and to run down Jack Shepard and his gang, the most noted secret service detective in the United States is employed, only to find, when he captures his criminal, that it is his own brother. After many startling situations, the brothers are reconciled and virtue triumphs, ending the play in an unusual manner. KING COUNTY LEGISLATORS. FRIDAY November 11. 1910 People's Savings Bank. People's Savings Bank Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R J. Reekle, Vice Prest. Jos T. Greenleaf Cashie Incorporated Dec 19th 1889 Commercial Savings and Trust General Bank and Exchange Cor Second and Pike St. Seattle, W. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. J. A. Mus- WHAT DOES THEODORE ROOSEVELT THINK FRIDAY. November 11. 1911 He who has used the "big stick" from New York to Wyoming on Republicans, who differed from his way of thinking. He who seems to have thought the Republican party was made for him. He who promised to, and verily did whip the old line Republicans to a frazzle in the state convention of New York, and succeeded in naming a man for governor of his own selection, played his last trump at the Tuesday's election and lost. Now that the agony is all over the question is, What does Teddy think about it? Drunk from the ovation and tribute paid to him at home and abroad and arrogant over the fondlings of the alleged Insurgents, Theodore Roosevelt returned to his native land and immediately plunged into state and national politics, opened headquarters at his home in Oyster Bay, where he received the weary pilgrimagers who sought wisdom from him and sent them home rejoicing. We have no serious complaint to make of the things that he advocated, in fact he was more right than wrong, but he assumed the, "none mightier than I," attitude and the American citizens are not so constituted to admit any one is greater than the other fellow. Mr. Roosevelt seems to have thought he had solved the long perplexing problem, what will we do with our ex-presidents? by showing his fellow country men better than by telling them. He tried to show them, but they showed him and the question is yet to be answered. Republicans from New York to Seattle were threatened with being Roosevelted unless they did as his alleged henchmen wanted them to do and, in many instances, they were Roosevelted in the primaries, but nomination is not always election, and the the worm turned, and as a result Rooseveltianism has been so badly crushed that it is a question as to whether or not it will ever come back. Theodore Roosevelt may have cleaned out the stables of his own party, but in doing so he made room for the entering of the Democratic steeds, worse a thousand times over than the Republicans and especially in the state of New York, where Tammy Hall has been placed in control of the politics of Greater New York, it looks as if our own and only Teddy had jumped out of the frying pan into the fire. Last Tuesday's elections, which swept John A. Dix, the Democratic candidate, into the gubernatorial chair of the state of New York by 68,000 plurality, and therby reversing a Republican plurality of 70,000 given to Governor Hughes two years ago, and that, too, despite the fact that ex-President Theodore THE SEATTLE REPUBLIC. DES THEODO EODORE ROO T. R. THEODORE ROOSEVELT Roosevelt worked with all his might and main to pull the Republican gubernatorial candidate through, gives one some slight idea of the political upheaval the country is undergoing. The late election and its unexpected victory brings to mind the political history of the state of New York, which is briefly given as follows: In the election of 1854 all elements opposed to the Democrats fused on the whig candidate, Myron H. Clark, and he was elected. He was the last whig and the first Republican governor. John A. King, elected in 1856, was the first straight-out Republican governor. In 1858 Edwin D. Morgan, long one of the big figures of the state, and in many respects the Mark Hanna of the time, was put up by the Republicans. The Democrats nominated Amasa J. Parker, of Albany. Morgan was elected by 17,440 votes. In 1860 the Democratic party being badly split over slavery, Governor Morgan was re-elected by a plurality of 90,460, which stood for years as one of the record plu- --- --- E ROOSEVELT ralities. In 1862 the Democrats again rallied around their old chief Horatio Seymour, and elected him over James Walsworth by 10,752. The victories of Gettysburg and Vicksburg did much to help the Republicans elect Reuben E. Fenton over Seymour in 1864. It was a victory won after a bitter struggle, and by a margin of only 7,293. Fenton had another hard struggle to win re-election two years later. The Democrat candidate was John T. Hoffman, a Tammany Hall man. Hoffman tried again in 1868 and defeated John A. Griswold, the Republican candidate, by a plurality of 27,946. Hoffman was re-elected in 1870 over Stewart L. Woodford by a plurality of 33,-066. He was the last simon-pure Tammany Hall governor. It was under his administration that Tweed reached the height of his power. The election of John A. Dix over Francis Kernan in 1872 put the Republicans in power again. His plurality was 53,451. Dix tried for re-election in 1874, and was defeated by 50,000 by Samuel J.Tilden. The Republicans named Edwin D. Morgan again in 1876. But the Democratic national ticket of Tilden and Hendricks swept Morgan's opponent, Lucius Robinson, into office 30,-460. Two years later Robinson was defeated for re-election by the Republican candidate, Alonzo B. Cornell. The row between President Garfield, Senators Conklin and Platt led to a great Republican deflection and the result was the election of the Democratic candidate, Grover Cleveland, then mayor of Buffalo over Charles J. Folger, the Republican candidate, by the tremendous plurality of 192,854. the next election marked the return of most of the voters to their former party allegiance. David B. Hill who had become governor in place of Grover Cleveland, who had been elected president, was elected for a full term, receiving 501,465 votes to 490,331 received by Ira Davenport, the Republican candidate. The beginning of the long and bitter struggle between Grover Cleveland and David B. Hill marked the contest for the governorship in 1888. Hill was reelected over Warner Miller, Republican, by a plurality of 19,171. In the next election Roswell P. Flower, Democrat, defeated J. Sloat Fassett, Republican, by 47,937. Flower was the last Democratic governor. In 1894 Senator Hill was nominated by the Democrats. The Republicans named ex-Vice-President Morton, who was elected by a plurality of 166,108. The record plurality was rolled up in 1896. The Democrats split over the silver question and Frank S. Black, the Republican candidate, was elected by 212,-092. One of the greatest surprises came two years later, when Theodore Roosevelt defeated August Van Wyck by the small plurality of 18,894. In 1900 the McKinley ticket carried Benjamin B. O'Dell, Jr., Republican into the governor's chair by a plurality of 111,126. His Democratic opponent was John B. Stanchfield. One of the most remarkable upsets was that of 1902, when O'Dell, seeking re-election, defeated Bird S. Coler by only 9,752, giving him the second narrowest victory in all the battles for the governorship of New York between the Democrats and Republicans. In 1904 Frank W. Higgins, Republican, defeated D. Cady Herrick by a plurality of 80,560. In 1906 Charles E. Hughes defeated William R. Hearst, candidate on the Democratic and Independent League tickets by 57,807. Two years ago Governor Hughes was re-elected over Charler, the Democratic candidate by a plurality of 69,462. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King, 60-Day Summons. Carrie Hull, plaintiff, vs. Sarah Galloway and John Doe Galloway, her husband, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right-title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, and also any unknown heirs of the said defendants above named, defendants.—No. ———. The State of Washington, to the above named defendants, Sarah Galloway and John Doe Galloway, her husband, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, and also any and all unknown heirs of the same defendants above named; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty (60) days after the 28th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys upon the plaintiff at their office stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought for the purpose of quieting title in the plaintiff to the following described property to wit: Lots 27 and 28, in Block 5, of Chilberg's Addition to West Seattle, situated in King County, State of Washington, REVELLE, REVELLE & REVELLE, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Postoffice address: 605-608 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. Oct. 28, Dec. 9, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Summons by Publication. State of Washington to the defendants. F. B. Huntley and Jane Doe Hunt- tlely key, this document. We and each of you are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait within sixty (60) days after the day of September, 1910 and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled answer r the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to recover the sum of $105.95 together with costs and interest due from you to the plaintiff herein for goods, wages and the kindisease sold and delivered you by the plaintiff in the action during the last past twelve years. A writ of attachment being issued out of this cause and court and lots 26 and 37, block 8, of Green Lake Reservoir Addition to the city of Seattle have been attached thereunder. CARVER Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address. Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Louise Ashen, Plaintiff, vs. Lester Ashen, Defendant. No. ____. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington, to Lester Ashen. You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the titled action in the twenty days after the date of the first publication of the this sumfirst publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the 7th day of October, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the act, to the plaintiff below, at his office, below stated, and in case of your failure so do judgment to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff which has filed with the entitled court. clerk of the a The object of this action is to secure a divorce on the ground of desertion for more than one year. A. C. McDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address, 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Oct 7—Nov 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King Coun- publication. ty. Summons by Maud A. Boschert, plaintiff, vs. Charles C. Boschert, defendant.—vs. Charles The State of Washington, to the said Charles, Boschert, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, owed, within sixty days after the 17th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at- torneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the said court. the clerk of the court. Briefly stated the object of this action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant and to grant the plaintiff a divorce from the defendant the ground of abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant for the plaintiff year last past, and for the failure of the defendant to support the plaintiff and his family, and to award the custody of their minor son, Robert E. Bossetto to the plaintiff. For further particulars reference is made to the complaint now on file in the office of the clerk of the above entitlement. Post Office Suite 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 7-Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- lation. Publication. ty. Summons. Elizabeth J. Marston, plaintiff, vs. Richard K. Marston, defendant.—No. 16271. The State of Washington, to the said Richard K. Marston, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of the summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 7th day of October 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint to the plaintiff, and serve a copy your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for an absolute divorce on the grounds of non-support, and custody of two minor children. JOHN R. WILSON, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. address, 539 New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 7—Nov. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Thos. Eaton, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property Defendants. No. 75684. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants, and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest on estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate, County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April, 1910, and numbered B61750, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $1.65, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at a point 165 feet east and 33 feet south of the N. W. corner of the SW 1-4 of Sec. 10, Tp. 26 N., R. 5 E., W. M.; thence east 60 feet, thence S. 120 feet, thence west 60 feet, thence N. 120 feet to the place of beginning. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the delinquentftiff is said above described real property, to-wit. For the year 1907, the sum of $1.36; for the year 1908, the sum of 87 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 28 cents. Which several, sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from sale date to payment, are all the paid and deemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, and of the day of the day of the day of Sept 30, 1970, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of you fail so to do, judgment be made against you for the loss of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Summons by Publication. Catherine Lomas, plaintiff, vs. Harry Lomas defendant. No. _____ The State of Washington, to Harry Lomas defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 28th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and give to your attorney upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this complaint is to obtain an absolute divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant on the grounds of cruelty and misappropriate for the return of the widow. Office address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Oct. 28—Dec. 9, 1910. State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Preston Mill Co., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the after described real property. Defendants No. 75885. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: the owner of an on, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April 1910, and numbered BK 7575 in the amount of 1905, in the amount of 90 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King county, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at S. E. cor. of N. E. 1-4 of Sec. 32, Tp. 24, N. R. 7. W. M. wence west 420 feet to School Dist. No. 76, thence north to N. P. Ry., thence easterly along Ry. to easterly line of said section, thence S. 235 feet to the place of beginning. (Part of S. E. 1-4 of the N. Y. 1-4 Sec. 32, Tp. S. E. 4, R. 7. W. M.) That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1906, the sum of 57 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of 72 cents; for the year 1908, the sum of 44 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 27 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified if amended to be and within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Sept. 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his offire below stated, or pay the amount due, together with the judgment will. In case you fail to do judgment will, you need herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charg- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ed against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and on such charges as the FCC now on file in this cause and Court. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Wyman, Partridge & Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, defendants.—No. 74785. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, defendants; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 2nd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The judgment against the plaintiff is to recover a judgment against said defendants upon a claim by plaintiff for goods, warees and merchandise sold and delivered to said defendants by said plintiff in the sum of Two Thousand One Hundred Twenty-seven and 10-100 Dollars ($2,127.10). With interest thereon from the 2nd day of May, 1910, the court of suit, and in which said action an attachment has been taken out and levied. LEOPOLD M. STERN, and J. M. RUSSELL, Attorneys for plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 705 Low- man Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 2, Oct. 15, 1910. IN THE JUSTICE'S COURT BEFORE John E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Summons by Publication. Blossom-Provine Lumber Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. T. W. Williams and Jane Doe Williams, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, defenders—No. 13472. To T. W. Williams and Jane Doe Williams, his wife, defendants. In the name of the State of Washington you are hereby notified that Blossom-Provine Lumber Co. has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Seattle, King County, Washington. I will be the plaintiff, Block, the 23rd day of November, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m., and unless you appear and then and there answer the same will be taken as confessed, and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said claim is to recover from the defendants a balance due to them, and to withhold lumber sold and delivered to said defendants by the plaintiff within the last past three years. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication. Frieda Marshall, plaintiff, vs. Joe Marshall, defendant—No. — The State of Washington to Joe Marshall. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summer, defendant—No. — The 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure to do so, defendant—No. — Against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of sald court. The object of this action is that the plaintiff, on the grounds of habitual drunkenness of the defendant and the neglect and refusal of the defendant husband to make payment for a blueberry he has granted an absolute divorce from the defendant herein and the custody and control of the child of the plaintiff and defendant herein, and such other and further relief as the court may direct. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Oct. 7—Nov. 18, 1910. INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. IN PROBATE—In the matter of the estate of Emil Engelmann, deceased, No. 10.408. Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Paul G. Engelmann, administrator of the estate of Emil Engelmann, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for disribution of the personal charge of among the personal entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to an horize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Emil Engelmann, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Wash. State at the Wash. State Department of said court in Department No. 7 on the 5th day of December, 1910, at the hour of 10:00 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should no be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published on a said notice of the works before the said 5th day of December, 1910, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 31st day of October, 1910. OBERTH H. LINDSAY, C. C. John R. Wilson, a torney for said Estate, 539 New York Block, Seattle. Nov. 4, Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Order Appointing Day for Settlement of Account. In the Matter of the Estate of J. A. Burkholder deceased - No. 11797, Halle. Burkholder, administratrix of the estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased, having this day rendered and presented for settlement and filed in this court her account of her administration of the estate of said deceased, it therefore ordered that Monday, the 28th November, A.D. 1910, at 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon be and the same is hereby appointed for the settlement of the said account; and that the clerk give notice thereof by causing notices to be posted in at least three public places in this county, one of these public places being the court is held, at least 14 days before said day of settlement and by publishing such notice in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper published and of general circulation in this county, once a week for two weeks prior to said day of settlement. Done. Open court this 9th day of November. 1910. A. W. FRATER. Judge. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Administratrix. Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Nov. 11—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Notice of the Hearing on a Supreme Court Decision. Petition for Specie Performance. In the Matter of the Estate of Sarah E. Nellie (Born in Missouri No. 90) Notice is hereby given that E. B. Mitchell, the administrator in the above entitled cause, on the 3rd day of November, 1910, filed in the above entitled court his petition asking leave of the court to specifically perform a certain contract with Nellie M. Peterson upon the following described property, to-wit: and six (6), seven (7), fourteen (14), and fifteen (15), Block two (2), of the Second Addition to Adams Tracts, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the auditor's office of King County, Washington. And the court on said 3rd day of November, 1910, set the 12th day of December, 1910, at 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon, in Department No. 7, in the court house in Seattle, King County, Washington an the hearing, hearing, and all persons interested as creditors, heirs, devisees or personal representatives are ordered to appear and present any objections to the granting of the said petition. Dated this 3rd day of November, 1910. E. B. MITCHELL. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington by King and Publisher Blossom-Provine Lumber Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. A. Watkins and Jane Doe Watkins, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown; L. D. W. Shelton and Jane Doe Shelton, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown; defendants. — No. The state of Washington, O. A. Watkins and Jane Doe Watkins, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown; L. D. W. Shelton and Jane Doe Shelton, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown; defendants. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first pleaded guilty this summer, to withe within sixty days after the 11th day of November, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered and remanded to the head of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to foreclose a lien for materials furnished by the plaintiff to the defendants to be used upon lots 43 and 44, block 7, Greenwood Park Second Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. F. J. CARVER Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Daisy Voigt, plaintiff, vs. William E. Voigt, defendant. No. — The state of Washington, to William E. Voigt, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your fessor upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff; in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you on the grounds of desertion and failure to support plaintiff, and for a restoration of the malden name of plaintiff. HOWARD O. DURK Attorney for Plaintiff. 535 Henry Building, Seattle. King County, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Adell Toomire, plaintiff, vs. Joseph Toomire, defendant.—No. 23501. The State of Washington to the said Joseph Toomire, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this commons, wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the committee which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure divorce and annul marriage of plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds of non-support. No alimony is asked. Date of first publication, November 11, 1910. FRED L. RICE Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 229 Burke Block. Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 23, 1910. FRIDAY November 11, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Summons by Publication, William J. Clarke, plaintiff, vs. Nellie Clarke, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington, to Nellie Clarke, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney of the plaintiff at his address below given; in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer of the plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you on the ground of desertion. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. State of Washington, County of King. —ss. In the Matter of the Estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased —No. 11797 Burkholder, deceased.—No. 11797. Notice is hereby given that Halle J. Burkholder administers the estate of J. Burkholder, deceased has rendered to, and filed in said court her final account as such administratrix, and that the 28th day of November, 1910, at 9:30 o'clock, a. m., at the court room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle. In said King County, has been duly appointed to the management of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. A. W. Frater, judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said court hereto affixed this 9th day of November. IN THE JUSTICE'S COURT BEFORE John E, Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington, Summons by Publication. ington. Summons by Publication. R. J. Eichler, plaintiff, vs. Cora Lowe terial furnished and labor performed by this plaintiff for and on behalf of said demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of the action is to recover the Tweed Dollar, some will be taken as confessed, and the ($12.00), being a balance for ma- and John Doe Lowe, her husband, JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace. Oct. 7—Oct. 28, 1910. REMOVAL NOTICE The Light and Power department of the Seattle Electric Company has moved to the Electric Bldg., Seventh avenue and Pine street. Street car tickets can be purchased and all bills paid in the Electrical Sales Room at the old location 907 FIRST AVENUE THE SEATTLE ELECTRIC CO ORDER A CASE OUT TO YOUR PLACE OF Rainier PALE BEER PHONE SIDNEY 526 A Free Trip to Seattle and Return. Let's Bust the State Dental Trust. Take a trip to Seattle and me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You will have two dollars and the State Dental Monopoly will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My other 18 friends will have the 18 First Ave, in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar and the State Dental monopoly will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established at 713 First Ave., in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete with cheap dentists, but with the high-cla s dentists for half their price. Open evenings until 8 and Sundays until 4 for people who work. EDWN J. BROWN, D.D.S. 713 First Avenue Sea'tle, Wash. Read my article in Sunday's P. L. and Monday's Times and Star General Offices: 411 Lowman Bldg. Loans, Investments, Insurance. H. E. Gilham. J. W. Lysons. Main 3044. Ind. 1588. BUY THE BEST If you want a safe which you know Has No Superior, buy one of the Hall Safe & Lock Co.'s, manufactured by the Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co., for which we are the sole agents. PURCELL SAFE CO. Prefontaine Bldg., Prefontain Place and Yesler Way DENNY-RENTON CLAY & COAL CO., Manufacturers of All Kinds of Clay Products. Main 2189—Phones—Ind. 5125. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Symposium by Publication. Charles Pfeffer, plaintiff, vs. Millie Bennett, Walter C. Bennett, her husband, Charles P. Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown, William Benner, D. A. Hafield and "Jane Doe" Hafield, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown, and Charles W. Fisk, F. M. Hafield, Ida M. Barton and Aurora Land Company, a corporation, defendants.—No. 75263. The State of Washington to Charles P. Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, whose true given name is unknown; Hafield and Jane Don Hafield, his wife, whose true given name is unknown. You, and each of you, are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the ninth day of September, and the date of the above petition in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and have a copy of your answer served upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you, and in the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to foreclose a certain mortgage executed and delivered by the said defendants Millie Bennett and Walter C Bennett, her husband, to one S. Campbell and by the said S. Campbell assigned to this plaintiff on the 28th day of January 1909 and recorded on the same day in Vol. 407 of mortgages, page 39 of the record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, which mortgage was given to secure a promissory note of $500.00 with interest thereon at the rate of 8 per annum from the 21 and 22 Block 1 Gilman Park First Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to obtain judgment for the said $500.00 together with interest at the rate of 8 per annum from the 28th day of January, 1910, and an annuity fee of $75.00 and costs of suit and to enforce the order of deed of the suit title and interest of each and all of said defendants in and to said premises and every part thereof. EDWARD VON TUBEL Attorney, for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons. A. L. Weaver and Ella May Weaver, husband and wife, plaintiffs, vs. Peter Andrew Adkins. The State of Washington to the said Peter E. Nordin, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 17th day of Sept. 1910, and defend the entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment and decree will be rendered against you accordingly, in the court of the plaintiff, which has been filed with the glerk of said court. And all right, title and interest in the lands described in the complaint claimed by you likewise in the contract, and payments described therein will be foreclosed, forfeited, and the title of the plaintiffs as to all claims you may have or claim. J W. BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiffs. 1324 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Antone Kaas, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described property interests. No. 75305. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax of the State of Washington, the holder of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of November, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: West 260 feet of the $1/2 of $1/2 of NE1/4 of SE1/2 Sec. 4, Tp.21, N. 4 R 4 E. W. M. certificate number B54644, year 1906, amount $1.23, and taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property to-wit: Amount $1.40 for year 1907; 76 cents for year 1908. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of sale, first publication, to-wit: within sixty days Aug. 19, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defendant's account and the complaint of said plaintiff and the complaint of your answer on the uninsigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said property ordering a sale of each of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as praved in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of the memorial to the memorial of the 23rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office before the court, and answer the complaint so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is instituted for the purpose of dissolving the bonds of matrimony and defending the seven the plaintiff and defendant, for the purpose upon the grounds that said defendant has failed, neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the support and maintenance of said plaintiff; and for the decree awarding to said plaintiff the degree described real property situated in the County of Cham, State of Washington, particularly described as follows, to-wit: Lots twenty-two (22), twenty-three (23), twenty-six (26) and twenty-seven (21), in section seven (7), township (8) township mith of range nine (9) west Clallam County of Wingham, and also the following property situated in King County, State of Washington: The west half of lot twenty-nine (25) and lot twenty-six (26), block eight (8) Bucklus Addition to the City of Seattle; and for such other and further relief as to this court may seem just and equitable. REED & HARDMAN, Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE SUPERIOR COUR8, KING County, Washington. Elizabeth Turnbull, Plaintiff, vs. George Elizabeth Turnbull, Plaintiff, vs. George Turnbull, Defendant. No. —. Summons. The state of Washington to the said George Turnbull, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and acknowledge answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complainant in this case may pay for divorce and that the bonds of marriagency between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved. H. E. FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 606 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, October 7, 1910. Date of last publication, November 18, 1910. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE Fred C. Brown, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. John Doe Matijasevich and Richard Roe Glo- vich, coparimers, doing business under the name and style of Alaska Lau- rure Company, Defendants, N. J. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King, ss The State of Washington: To John Doe Matijasevich and Richard Roe Glo- vich, copartners, doing business under first name and style of Alaska Laurure Co. You, and each of you, are hereby notified that California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, has filed a complaint against you in said Court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210. New York Building, Scatena Building, A. D. 1910, 20th day of October, A. D. 1910, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock a. m., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said action is for the sum of Eighty- thousand dollars and the sum of (82.25), being a balance due the plaintiff on account of merchandise sold and deli- ved to the defendants during the year: 909. Fed September 15th, A. D. 1910. FRED C. BROWN, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. TWOROGER & WINKLER. Attorneys for Plaintiff. 10-11 Triangle Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication Sept. 16. 1910 Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle King County, Washington. Nov. 29, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- l In the Matter of the Estate of Allen P. Mitten. Deceased—No. 11658 By order of said court made herein on the 8th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executors of said estate, at 1308 Alaska Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first mention of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 23, 1910. 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle. Wash. Sept. 23—Oct. 22, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Frank H. Renick, Anna Farmer and Hanna Farmer, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 74379. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants, each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the King of Washington, dated the 19th day of October, 1908, and numbered B54379, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1908, in the amount of $2.02, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: $7,000 for So. 29, Tp. 24, N, R, G, E, W, M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the su mof $1.78; for the year 1908, the sum of $1.24. For the year 1909, the sum of $1.44 at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and SEATTLE REPUBLICAN against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- jylication, to-wit: within sixty days Sept. 9, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and demand a copy of your answer and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes, and sale of each parcel of said property for the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. Office Address. 624 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. I. George Plainfield, vs. Carolina Burns, and person unknown if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants.—No. 75301. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate is issued to the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, filed on the 10th of September, 1909, and numbered B61042, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of $4.86, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 5, Sec. 23, Tp. 22, N., R. 6 E., M. less Right-of-Way C., M. & St. P. Ry. Co. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1906, the sum of $2.11; for the year 1908, the sum of $0.73. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from sold date of payment, and are all the taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub-lylation, to-wit: within sixty days Sept. 9, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and property against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property, the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plantin. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75300. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above de fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby described and the bob name the holder of the holder one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of November, 1908, and numbered B54857, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.45, and upon the property status in said King County, as follows, with Lot 12, Block 5, Allentown Acres. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $4.57; for the year 1908, the sum of $1.76. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any) are hereby free from any and all taxes and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- Julylication, to-wit; within sixty days Sept. 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his hearing. You and each of you due together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the tax, for the satisfaction of its specively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. Attorney For Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE INSTITUTE OF THE SUPERIOR COUNTY. Summons by Publication Daisy Houf, plaintiff, vs. John Francis Houf, lefendant.—No.— The State of Washington, to the said John Francis Hout, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wait: within sixty days after the 30th occasion set forth in this clause, to defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to answer, you are deemed against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been Our Season's Offering OF EXCLUSIVE WOOLENS Are Now on Display A call will convince the most skepti and Beauty of our slash. The establish our tailoring assures you of satisfaction Irving & Cannon, T 211 COLUMBIA STREET A call will convince the most skeptical of the Worth and Beauty of our slash. The established reputation of our tailoring assures you of satisfaction. Established 22 Years filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly suited as follows. To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the grounds of your abandonment of plaintiff for more than four years, and also your failure to make suitable provisions for plaintiff since said marriage. 201-203 Burke Blug, Seattle, County of King, State of Washington, Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. REPUBLICAN . . . krellе JUSTICE COURT—BEFORE JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. With Zehring Shifft, vs. Mrs. A. M. Simmons, defendant State of Washington, County of King, ss. The State of Washington to Mrs. A. M. Simmons. You and each of you are hereby notified that Wm. Zehring has filed a complaint against you in said court, with the same of the heard office in Room 210, New York building, Seattle, King Count, Washington, on the 28th day of November A. D. 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of plaintiff granted. The object and demand of sake complaint is to balance due for goods, wares and merchandise, sold and delivered to you by this complaint within the last past three years. Complaint filed October 10th A. D. JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Nov. 4-Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County L. H. Craver, Plaintic, vs. E. K. Ludvig, and all persons under any ing or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75299. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons. Helen B. Phillips, plaintiff, vs. Park D. Phillips, defendant. The State of Washington, to the above named defendant, Bark D. Phillips. named defendant, Park D. Philips: You are hereby summoned to appear in court on Friday of this day, the first publication of this summons, toowit: within sixty days after the twenty-first day of October, 1910, exclusive of said twenty-first day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and to serve a copy of your answer or other pleading upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his hereinafter designated postoffice address, and in case of your failure so in said judgment will be rendered in said cause according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of said action is to procure a judgment and decree forever severing the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of the failure, refusal and neglect of the defendant to provide for the continuation of the wards the support or maintenance of the plaintiff since their marriage on the 5th day of July, 1900, and on the further ground that the defendant more than two years ago wilfully and without just cause abandoned the plaintiff, and at all times has since so continued to abandon and live separate and apart from plaintiff. LESTER S. WILSON, Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Summons. Lillian Collins, plaintiff, vs. James Collins, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington, to the said James Collins, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 21st day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer up the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed REPUBLICAN . . . . krelle most skeptical of the Worth The established reputation of satisfaction. annon, Tailors CABBIA STREET d 22 Years with the clerk of said court The object of this action is to secure the decree of divorce, dissolving the bond of marriency existing between the plaintiff and defendant, upon the plaintiff and desertion to provide for more than one year. H. E. SNOOK. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address. 537 Burke Building, Workman IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Summons for Publication. Laurentine E. Cole, plaintiff, vs. Anna May Cole, defendant.-No, 76580. The State of Washington, to the said Anna May Cole, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within six (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 21st day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitlement action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you ordering to the demands of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant, upon the knowing grounds: Because the defendant without the plaintiff's fault, abandoned the plaintiff on the 9th of October, 1909, of Seattle, Washington, and that said abandonment has been continuous for one year and more. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 309 Burke Bldg. Second and Marion Streets, Seattle, Wash. Oct. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. 7. Probate. Administrator's Notice of Sale of Real Estate. In the Matter of the Estate of James J. Lynch, Deceased.—No. 10926. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, claiming an interest in and to the Summons. State of Washington: To the above de- grove and James Musgrove, and all persons unknown, if any, having or tendance and each of them. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seat- tle, Wash. August 19, September 8, 1910. PUGET SOUND NATIONAL BANK of Seattle. Capital Stock $300,000 Deposits $8,250,000. Jacob Furth, President. R. V. Ankeny, Cashier. F. K. Struve, Vice-President. O. W. Crockett, Asst. Cashier. We do strictly a commercial busi- ness. We solicit the accounts of in- dividuals, firms and banks. --- IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, Washington. Summons by Publication. Ella Croft, Plaintiff, vs. Harry W. Barrows, Defendant.—No. 75894. The State of Washington to the said Harry W. Barrows, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 23rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the under-signed attorney for the plaintiff his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complaint in this action prays for the annulment of a marriage ceremony entered into between the plaintiff and defendant on December 28, 1907, and that the said marriage ceremony may be cancelled and annulled, and for all proper relief. H. E. FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O, address, 606 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, September 23, 1910. Date of last publication, Nov. 4, 1910. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty., Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Alonzo H. Jose, Deceased—No. 11696. By order of said court made herein on the 7th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned admonition of said court in 188 Alaska Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from an after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. 1308 Attorney for Estate, Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Oct. 22, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Leon- hard Retnik deceased. No. 11220 hard Reining, deceased. No. 1230. By order of said court made heilen on the 10th of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said deceased and Margarithe S. Reining, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the S. Reining Secutrix of said estate at 309 Burke Block, at the office of A. J. Speckert, her attorney, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 30, 1910. MARGARETHE S. REINING, As Executrix of said Estate. A. J. SPECKERT, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Avard L. Morrison, plaintiff, vs. Sarah Morrison, defendant—No. The State of Washington to the said Sarah Morrison, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, today, within sixty days after the first day of October. A above written action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of failure of the agreement will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein are further set forth in the complaint, and is briefed as follows. To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the ground of your bondment of plaintiff for more than two years. J. P. BALL. Postoffice and office address: 201-203 Burke Bldg., Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. Oct. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. M. J. Lutz, Plaintiff, vs. Charles W. Ingran, Administrator of the Estate of Richard Lehn, Deceased, and Mrs. A. Sjoequist, Defendants-No. 12747. The State of Washington to Mrs. A. Sjoequist: You are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days of the 23rd day of September 1910, and defend the above court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint herein which has been filed with the clerk of this county. count. The object of said action, as set forth in the complaint, is to foreclose two certain mortgages given by the said Richard Lehn in his life time to the said plaintiff, the first one being dated the November 16, 1906, to secure the sum of $1,200.00, with interest thereon at the rate of 7 per cent per annum from said date until paid, and the second one dated October 8, 1907, to secure the sum of $240.00, with interest at the rate of 7 per cent per annum from said date until paid, and to recover judgment for said amounts and interest and $26.98 taxes paid by plaintiff, an torney's fee of $140.00 and costs of suit; both of said mortgages being 1 and 2, block 3, John J. McGilva's Second addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to fore-close and determine all the right, title and interest of said defendants and each of them in and to said property. EDWARD VON TOBEL. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sent. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- to. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the estate of Bertha Brown, deceased—No. 12027. By order of said court made herein on the 22nd day of October, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased or against estate, to pre- tender them necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrators of said estate, at 705 Lowman Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication Octo. 28, 1910. SAM BROWN, ISAAC BROWN, As Administrators of said Estate. LEOPOLD M. STERN, Attorney for Estate, 705 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Oct. 28—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Edith Rash, Plaintiff, vs. John F. Rash Defendant. No. 75369. Summons by publication. State of Washington to the said John F. Rash, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear with sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of August, 1910, in the above entitled action, in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated, and in case of your office below stated, theignment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said complain which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought for the purpose of obtaining a decree on the grounds of abandonment, non-support and personal indignities, the same being causes of the complaint in lieu of Washington, by publication may be made. Office and Postoffice Address: Room 25 Union Block, 713 1st Ave., Seattle, Washington. August 26—Oct. 6, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE Estate of Washington, for King Coun- t. Summons by Publication. Vioia Estella Small, plaintiff, vs. Joseph Small, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington, to the said Joseph Small, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, today, October 1, 2015, by way of a day of October, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office, before the judge of your court, to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in the complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the grounds of your abandonment of plaintiff for four years, and also your failure to make suitable provisions for plaintiff since said marriage. J. P. BALL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice and office address: 201-203 Burke Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 14—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- publication. ty. Summons for Publication. C. H. Boynton, plaintiff, vs. William B. Jeikins, defendant, 1769 The Court of Washington to the said William B. Jeikins, defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: within sixty days after the 14th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled complaint and answer to the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said defendant with the above entitled action is to recover judgment against said defendant for the amount: _ae upon two promissory notes for $150.00 and $40.00, respectively, made by said defendant on the 30th day of July, 1907, and payable, the one, two months after date, and the other three months after date, respectively, together with the costs of this action, besides the costs of this action, and to have an attachment issued and levied on the defendant's property. Postoffice address 705 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 14—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be mad. In the Matter of the Estate of T. J. Briordan, deceased—No. 5656. Malcolm K. MacRae, administrator of the estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among persons owing there to it and its appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said T. J. Riordan, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court Station of Kingston; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle on the 14th day of October, 1910, at the hour of 9.30 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons of said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said event, and that a copy be posted four consecutive weeks before the said 14th day, of November, 1910, in the ATTORNEYS. ATTENTION! THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is looking for your legal publications, and if you are looking for your own business interests you will see to it that no publication is sent from your office without first talking with CAYTON about it. It is an indisputable fact that there are but two weekly publications in Seattle that publish lawyers' legal notices and give the lawyers no trouble on account of errors and prompt "returns" of publishers' affidavits, and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN takes cases that he has not the time to look the paper over every the lead. In this day of busy, bustling activity, the lawyer's time is so much absorbed in the preparation of his voluminous week to see if his notices are being regularly published, nor to read over his notices to see if they are absolutely correct. It often happens that even lawyers make errors in getting or calls the lawyer's attention to them before going to press up their notices for publication, which errors are very annoying to the lawyers if not detected and corrected before going into the paper. If, therefore, the lawyer feels absolutely certain that the publisher gives his personal attention to notices sent to his paper and either corrects small errors in notices it's a great relief to his mind. The publisher of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN has had so much experience with legal publications that he can detect a faulty publication almost as readily as the lawyer himself, and, if not a grievous one, corrects it then and there, but if a grievous one, the lawyer's attention is called to the same before going to press. Returns on publications are promptly made, so that lawyers do not have to worry about the publisher's notice after his case has been called in court. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Seattle Republic, a newspaper printed and published in said King County, and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 7th day of October, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Court Commissioner. State of Washington, County of King—ss. D. K. Sickels, county clerk of King County and ex-officio clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court on the 7th day of November, 1910, in the matter of the estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 7th day of October, 1910. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. (Seal) Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons by Publication. Seattle Lumber Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Celestine J. Sullivan and Evelyn Sullivan, his wife, E. W. Andrews and Jane Doe Andrews, his wife, Fred G. Cutler and Mildred Cutler, his wife. Netherland American Mortgage Bank, a corporation. H. W. Fisher, Trustee, The National Bank of Commerce, of Seattle, Washington, a corporation, John Davis & Company, a corporation, Jahn Brooke & Company, Elliott Bay Mill & Lumber Company, a corporation, L. A. Borde, Crane Company, a corporation, John Scutt and Richard Roe Gelser, a co-partnership doing business as Scutt & Gelser, Schwabacher Hardware Company, a corporation, V. D. Gossett, John Knapp and Richard Roe Lambert, doing business as Knapp & Lambert J. J. Frantz and W. J. Winters, defendant. Globe Electric Company, Cox & Gleason Company, and J. K. Witherspoon, intervenors.—No. ____. The State of Washington, to the said Celestine J. Sullivan, Evelyn Sullivan, his wife, and H. W. Fisher, defendants; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: sixty days after the 14th day of October, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint in intervention of the Intervenor, J. K. Witherspoon, and save a claim of an answer upon the undersigned attorney for intervenor at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said intervenor's complaint in intervention when the case is filed with the court of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint in intervention, is as follows: To foreclose a laborer's and materialman's lien upon lots 19 and 20, block 21, Eles & Knights' addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. C. H. WINDERS. Attorney for Intervenor, J. K. Witherspoon. Office and postoffice address: 712 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 14—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Lavina Christine Rudberg, deceased.—No. 11877. By order of said court made herein on the 4th day of October, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to passionate the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administratrix of said estate, at 328 Northern Bank & Trust Building, Seattle, Wash., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication October 14, 1910. ELMA LOUISE RUDBERG, As Administratrix of said Estate. GORDON McGAUVRAN, 327-8-9 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Katherine Schulver, deceased.—No. 11830. By order of said court, made begin on the 12th day of October, 1910. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against FRIDAY Novembe 11, 1910 said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to them assigned administrator of said estate, at 239 Burlington Street Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice, or same will be barred. Date of first publication Oct. 14, 1910. FRED L. RICE, As Administrator of said Estate. FRED L. RICE, Attorney for Estate. 229 Burke Block, Seattle, Wash. Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. Send your legals to The Seattle Republican, 305 Epler Blk., Phone Main 305. Bonnev-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. STETSON & POST LUMBER COA BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 71) ALBERT HANSEN. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses. Phone, Main 268. Seattle Washington First and Cherry.