Seattle Republican

THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE PUBLISHER'S NOTICE. The Seattle Republican is published on Friday of every week by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3.00 per year; six months, $1.50 postage prepaid. Subscriptions to all foreign countries included in the Postal Union, $4.00 a year postage paid. Sample copies, free. Single copies ten cents. Advertising rates made known on application. Special rates to publishers. Entered a second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. Address all communications to The Seattle Republican 307 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. Make a checks, drafts, postal orders, etc., payable to "Cayton Publishing Company." CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. Telephone: Main 305. Publication office, 307 Epler Block. HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON - - - Publisher USIE REVELS CAYTON - - - Associates IS SUPT. ARMS A CRININAL The story that is being bruited about the streets to the effect that Supt. R. M. Arms of the city municipal lighting plant has wilfully worked to destroy the usefulness of the plant in the interest of the Seattle Electric Company's plant seems almost prevostorous, and, until such has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, we will not believe it. We can understand how certain men in the employe of large corporations can and do work in the interest of those corporations, but we can hardly conceive of an employee of the city trying to destroy city property at the behest of a private corporation. If Superintendent Arms is guilty of the charges that have been laid at his door he doubttess did so at the instigation of the officers of the Seattle Electric Company, and of course they are equally guilty of having committed high crimes and misdemeanors against the city as Arms, and if they are guilty as charged, then all concerned are highway robbers, plunderers and free booters. We are loathe to believe that there are any grounds for such grave and reprehensible charges. PERSONS IN THE PUBLIC EYE The estate of Harvey Scott, former editor of the Oregonian, is valued at a million dollars. The man who said a newspaper man was doomed to poverty overlooked a bet. Theodore Roosevelt, it is predicted, like William Jenning Bryan, will gradually go off into innocuous desutde from a political standpoint. In other words he has outlived his day of usefulness and must go way back and sit down. Alexander S. Clay of Atlanta, Georgia, and United States senator from that state died at his home last Sunday. He was fifty-seven years of age and was serving his third term. It's up to Governor Smith to appoint a successor to him. Why not hand former Governor Brown a bunch, old sport? President William Howard Taft, his brother Charley Taft, and a number of other dignitaries, from their own view point, are visiting the Panama canal with a view of inspecting the progress the ditch is making. The president has always been more or less enthusiastic over the digging of the canal. Mrs. Emma Smith De Voe, one of the women who worked and labored so incessantly and evidently successfully for equal suffrage for women in the state of Washington, is contemplating going to California to begin a campaign of education there like unto the one she and her associates conducted in Washington which terminated in a two to one vote in favor of the women. In a public address before the American Federation of Catholic Societies at its ninth session in New Orleans, La. President Edward Feeney bitterly protested against the limited number of Catholics that were called upon to fill positions of trust with the state. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1910 It seems to us that a state officer should be chosen on account of his fitness and likewise his personal magnetism to rally his fellow citizens about him, and not on account of religious belief. No man should hold an office on account of his religion nor should he be denied the right to hold office for the same reason. In short the religious belief of the man should play no part in his office holding. The man who will vote for a man for office because he holds to certain religious beliefs is not himself a good citizen. Caleb Powers has been elected to Congress in spite of the fact that he was for ten years confined in a Kentucky county jail on a first degree murder charge, which the general public is now thoroughly convinced was trumped up on him. The Democrats of the state not content with having almost robbed him of his life, for he was thrice convicted to hang, are now seeking to have him denied the right to sit in Congress. Hell will never get its own until a majority of the Democrats of Kentucky are in its bottomless pit. Mrs. Della Totten, the woman who shot and killed James Sutton, both of whom lived near Cashmere, Washington, is on trial at Wenatchee charged with murder in the first degree. The woman warned Sutton to not cut her fence and he persisted in doing so on the grounds that the fence blocked up a public highway, which was in dispute. Just how the woman can be convicted of anything, is more than the average legal mind can figure out. In all such disputes the best way is to leave it to the courts for adjudication. State Senator J. W. Bryan, of Kitsattounty, Washington, who has been indicted before the Bar Association on the charge of impuning evil motives to Judge Yakey, has been refused a jury trial and the case will be heard by one of the superior court judges. The row between Judge Yakey and Senator Bryan is a disgraceful affair and both of them ought to be disbarred on general principles. It seems to have all emanated from politics and so far as they both are concerned neither of them is fit to be nominated and elected to an office on the Republiban ticket. F. W. Coder, a justice of the peace of Bremerton, Washington, has held that the law passed by the sixty-first Congress making it a crime for any one to wear the uniform of a United States soldier or sailor without being connected with the army or navy, is unconstitutional. The learned justice may have the right sow by the ear from a common sense standpoint, but his opinion would hardly stand the test of the higher courts. W. H. H. Green, for a number of years one of Seattle's foremost business men, returned one day this week from a year's European tour looking the picture of health. Though out of the business harness for a number of years he greeted his hundreds of old time business friends and acquaintances readily as well as warmly as he met them on the streets. Prof, Andreas Galle has come to the conclusion that Cemmodore Peeary is just as big a faker as was Dr. Cook and says, "when I will have exposed him the public will be of a like opinion." THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN has advocated all along that Commodore Peary's statement of having stood on the north pole was so thin that you could see through it. John Miller Murphy, editor of the Washington Stan dard, which he launched just fifty years ago, will celebrate his fiftieth anniversary of the paper tommorow (Saturday) night, and a great many members of the State Press Association will meet to help him celebrate. It will be the biggest day in the history of the weekly press of the state. Count Leo Tolstoy, who is the most remarkable writer of the age, has brooded over the condition of the Russian peasants to such an extent that he caused himself to be shut up in a monastary and refuses longer to mingle with the world, even denying his wife the privilege of seeing him. That's doing the peasants a whole lot of good in a horn. VOLUME XVII. NUMBER 25 EDITORIAL EDICTS So far as Teddy is concerned, mum's the word. The drop in the price of food is one of those things you only read about. Secretary Hitchcock flew so high that, we thought he'd never come back. When the Montana voters need the money they deadlock the legislature. Whether Gill is or is not recalled the agitation to an extent has cleaned out the Seattle dives. Why of course a woman for the school board of Seattle, and a woman that is for a square deal for the children. Seattle seems to be getting the election disease. She is in line for four more elections within the next ninety days. Supt. Arms is accused of not stretching forth the city's lighting arms and he retorts, that is no light task. In becoming estranged from her husband Ethel Barrymore is doubtless only seeking publicity for stage purposes. Friday Frye went to the Saturday market for Mayor Gill's constituents of Tenderloin township and got his eggs broken. A Seattle attorney having won a British estate valued at six million dollars we are evening up things on the Sullivan estate. It would take a flying machine to keep pace with Belle Elmore Crippen in her effort to keep out of sight till her husband is hanged. If Harry White gets pinched he should have no hesitancy in calling on President Taft for relief because he can say, "I nominated you." Tired of Teddy is heard on all sides. When he was in Africa Taft was constantly threatened with his return. What fools we mortals be. In discovering that sponge cake and lady fingers were made out of rotten eggs we now understand why those dainties are so light. The church of God has gone fluey by the order of an Everett judge. It was a big undertaken, but he got through with it right side up with care. American women may make their husbands fly, but a Paris woman would not permit her husband to fly. Husbands must be scarce articles in gay Paree. Spokane is to have an apple show this month. Spokane recently went Democratic making a show of herself and now she is to repeat the show business. Spokane is threatened with going dry and yet it would seem that the Spokane river has shown no signs of taking another course save by that city. If H. C. Henry continues doing things to help those in distress he will sooner or later announce, he will never die rich, and then he will be in for it. Montana has refused to be represented in the United States senate by a Carter for a living. Evidently she is getting fastiduovs in her old days. Texas has given an order for two million turkeys for Thanksgiving day. It begins to look as if she will get instead two million Mexicans for a hell of a day. In deeding $50,000 worth of property to his mother the day before he married, Mr. Wilhelm had an eye single to marrying on the probation plan, and made that little transfer as a matter of precaution in case a divorce became necessary. His judgment was good. CURRENT COMMENT WHAT WILL THE HARVEST BE We shudder to think of what would be the result, if within the next twenty years, the Negro of the United States would wake up from his long dream and turn against the whites of this country, who have burned them at the stake and otherwise treated them more as brutes than human beings, and start out on a war of retaliation such as the Mexicans have been engaged in for the past ten days. It would mean perhaps the immediate extermination of the Negro, but the hills and valleys would run blood while it was being done. As has already been told in these columns, a Mexican has been burned at the stake by the hotheded, savage Texan highbinders, and as a result of that rash act a number of American citizens have been killed and already thousands and perhaps millions of dollars have been destroyed by the Mexicans hoth in Mexican territory and in the United States. The Mexican desiring to prove to the Americans that he resented an insult to his nation boldly shot down a chief of the police in Oklahoma, and though he was pursued by hundreds of armed Americans, yet President Taft warned Governor Haskell against the lynching of the Mexican and implied that he, Haskell, would be held officially responsible for any lynching bees. Governor Haskell in turn warned the sheriff of the county that if the Mexican was handled other than the ordinary way of treating prisoners that the sheriff would be held officially responsible. The life of a Mexican is no more to the highbinders of the South than the life of a Negro, but the former has a country and the men of his country are ready to give up the last drop of blood in their veins in defense of their countrymen and that is a great pacifier to the hot bloods of the southern states. We truly hope that the Negro of the United States will never be goaded into feeling that he would just as soon die with the chill as the fever and follow in the wake of the Mexicans, but that the troubles between him and the Caucasian will be amicably settled and the two move on without friction. OBEY THE LAW The point raised by a Seattle attorney in a prosecution against a Jap that the speaker who signed the enactment was an alien at that time, even if true, possesses no merit in view of a former decision of our Supreme Court, to the effect, when the governor approves a bill it becomes a law, that prior records of legislative proceedings will not be considered in order to show the invalidity or the law. Our courts are, generally speaking, opposed to collateral attacks. If this is not collateral, what is it?—Washington Standard. If the constitution prescribes certain rules to be followed, and if the rules are not followed, and yet the acts are declared perfectly legal by the Supreme Court, then what's the use of having any constitutional convention or the assembling of any legislature? In the case of Speaker Meigs the mandates of the constitution were violated and yet our contemporary says the Supreme Court will take no cognizance of the flagrant violation but will, as has been in the past, declare the acts of the legislature valid. If the state has a law, then let her citizens either live up to the law or abolish it. If the Supreme Court is to make the laws then let us abolish the legislature. A SENATORSHIP FOR SALE A United States senatorship of the state of New York has been placed on the auction block and the bidders for the same are already gathering for the sale. For the past six years a Republican "interest man" has held the place, but recently the state elected a majority of the members to the next session of the legislature from the Democratic side of the house, and now a Democratic interest man will be elected for the ensuing six years. Among those who have been prominently mentioned are Alton B. Parker and Charles F. Murphy, the former has been a trust and corporation attorney the greater part of his life, while the latter has been the mouth piece for all that is low and vicious in the city of New York, he being the active leader of the notorious Tammany Hall for a number of years, and since a Democrat is to win we know of no more appropriate person for the job than the aforesaid. Who is elected is only a matter of the largest number of dollars, and since Murphy is also a pretty good corporation-trust man it seems that the interest would save money by naming him for the place without further effort. Oh, no, there is no more show for an honest man to be elected than for a snow ball to fly through hades. THE WILLIE ABBY SCHOOL DR. J. J. SMITH IS DEAD Though but in the prime of life, another Washington state history builder passed to the great beyond last Saturday after a brief illness, in the person of Dr. J. J. Smith of Enumclaw. Men of Dr. Smith's mental calbre are either enthusiastically admired or dangerously hated by his fellow men, but while his admirers and friends went their limit for him, yet his enemies were always respectful and never showed that intense bitterness against him that they did to others against whom seemingly they were as much opposed as were they to Dr. Smith. Since 1894 the [Picture of a man in a suit and bow tie]. DR. J. J. SMITH editor of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN has either supported or opposed measures and men advocated by him, but during all that time, despite the fact politics times grew exceedingly personal and even intolerant, not once was there ever an unpleasant word passed between us. He was a natural leader of men and no sooner had he connected himself with what for a long time was known as the old south district ring he became one of the leaders thereof and rose into political power like magic. In the last primaay campaign he was perfectly pacific, "because," said he, "the people want a new deal and my presence would simply make them think the old ring was at it again, and so its down and out for me." For years he has been one of the most substantial business men of King county and his death is mourned by almost every man in the county. MONTANA LEGISLATURE A DEAD LOCK It is often a long time between drinks, but it is a long that has no turn. Certain favored few in Montana have been able to accumulate multiplied millions of dollars at the expense of the common people, but periodically there comes a year of jubilee, when the common people at least get a part of their rightful dues. Another year of jubilee is rapidly approaching in Montana, if all reports be true, and it has been brought about by the legislature of the state being equally divided between the Republicans and Democrats, and that too, with a United States senator to be elected. Such a state of affairs simply means that the interests on both sides are prepared to spend vast sums of money to capture a majority of the members of the legislature, and that means a general distribution of the accumulated millions. It may be a sad commentary on our boasted civilization, but it is nevertheless a fact and so the ball has already been opened, the music begun, and the "waltz me around again, Willie," is in order. Glowing tributes were paid to the memory of the late John H. McGraw by Judge C. H. Hanford and former United States Senator George Turner at Walla Walla last Wednesday evening before the students of Whitman College. The former spoke from the standpoint of a friend and the latter from the standpoint of a political opponent. Both men had ample food for thought for such a memorial. Judge Hanford had no better friend on earth than was Governor McGraw to him, and George Turner had no more pronounced opponent in his political turns than was Governor McGrhw. While such post mortem meetings show the life and character of the lead to the best advantage, yet he would have enjoyed hearing some of those things. It is to be regretted that those who speak well of us after we are dead do not think it necessary to say some of those beautiful things about us before we die. That New York man who died instructing his friend to pay a debt which he owed, and for which the man had nothing to fhow, is another demonstration of the old saying, "the good die young." That Italian who gave up a janitor's job to become a banker, and who seemed to bank on the principle, "naught is naught, figure is a figure, all for me and nothing for the other dago." is experiencing a rough sea on his voyage. FR DAY Novmeber 18, 1910 N T WOMEN RETURNS THANKS All human beings are created equal and to our mind there is no more right or justice in one sect or class lording it over another than for one nation to lord it over another. We believe the black man should have the same governmental rights as the white man under like conditions. Neither should nativity give one any greater rights than one of a foreign birth, who has taken the proper course of law to become naturalized. In our opinion these broad principles are equally applicable to the women as well as the men. Taking that view of it we have always done all in our power to give women the same citizen rights as the men. How much we assisted in the late fight in this state for equal rights for women we refuse to state, but we heartily appreciate the following communications from the women: Seattle, Wash., Nov.. 7, 1910 Mr. Horace Roscoe Cayton, Editor of THE SEATTLE REPUBICAN. Dear Sir and Friend: One of your subscribers placed a copy of your paper of Nov. 4th in my hands this morning and I cannot refrain from sending you a word of thanks for your splendid advocacy of woman suffrage. I think that we will win, and if we do you will always be kindly remembered as a strong factor in bringing the desired result. I was born of abolition parents, my father being a member of the underground R. R., so I naturally believe in the cause of freedom and justice for every child of earth. Again I thank you. Very respectfully, EMMA SMITH-DEVOE At a special meeting of the Executive Board of the Seattle Suffrage Club on Nov. 11th, at the home of Miss Adele M. Fields, the following resolutions were adopted: Resolved, That the steady and able advocacy of equal suffrage by The Seattle Republican during the recent campaign in this city, has been an important aid in the enfranchisement of the women of this state, and that our greatful recognition be expressed to its editor for the generous giving of space and editorials to the furtherance of our cause. Resolved, That a copy of this resolutiton be forwarded to The Seattle Republican with request for publication therein. MRS. HARVEY L. GLENN, President of the Seattle Suffrage Club AMUSEMENTS-FABIO ROMANI The play is a very clever dramatization of Marie Corelli's famous story, "The Vendetta," one of the most graphic and gripping stories of absorbing interest that was ever written by this prolific writer. It deals with the supposed death of a wealthy Roman noble during the cholera epidemic of 1890, when the King of Italy became a tireless nurse and benefactor among his subjects. "Fabio Romani" was buried alive in the vault of his ancestors, to be awakened from the dead, as it were, by a band of robbers, who had their plunder stored in the vault. On his return to earth, after an escape from a living death, he discovers that his wife has maintained an intrigue with his best friend, and he introduces himself into into his own household and plans a systematic revenge upon the guilty couple. The play, like the story, maintains an interest unequaled throughout. Mr. George Webb will be "Fabio Romani;" Claire Sinclair, the Senori Romani, and O. M. Williamson, the false friend. The entire Russell & Drew Company will be seen in a sumptuous costume and scenic production all next week, with the exception of Monday and Tuesday evenings, Nov. 21st and 22nd, when the opera "Priscilla" will be given for the benefit of St. Mark's Church, but "Fabio Romani" continues the balance of the week. Mr. Schwab ascribes the depressian felt in steel to the agitation of politicians. Conversely, it might be said, the depression felt by some politicians is due to public agitation of steal. — Wall Street Jonrnal. It has been given out that Uncle Sam has no desire to annex Panama. Why of course not for he has the ssme privileges there with it un-annexed as he would have with it annexed and with no expense to him. FRIDAY vember 18.1910 POLITICS AND POLITICIANS The Seattle Republican would be pleased to get your legal notices for publication, and if you have one and will ring up Main 305, some one will call for the same. --- William Bishop the Republican nominee for joint senator from Jefferson and Clallam counties, will be among those who participated in the last legislature that could not come back. He was bitterly opposed by the anti-saloon leaguers and they are giving themselves credit for his defeat. It is a question among the politcians whether the gubernatorial announcement of Bob Hodge wns a josh or a stern reality. At the political table of the Bailey Lunch it is the consensus of opinion that, it was a huge joke althugh Hodge has taken it seriously. However, things said in a jest some times becomes a stern reality, and this may be one of the cases. --- Dr. J. J. Smith, one of the noted politicians of the state of Washington, died last Saturday evening and was burried Monday in the city of Trcoma. He was twice elected state senator and once elected a member of the house of representatives. He was candidate for governor, but wihdrew from the race in the interest of the senatorial candidacy of Samuel H. Piles. --- The contest for president of the senate will be between W. H. Paulhamus of Pierce county and P. L. Allen of King county. Both are strong men and both have their fights well in hand. If the fight develops into a bitter one it is more than likely that some compromise candidate will knock down the persimmon. Senator A. S. Ruth would like to be re-elected, but the odds are wholly against him. --- George Edward Dixon of Ellensburg, representative from that district, has announcece his candidacy for speaker of the house. Mr. Dixon has about the same show of being elected speaker as a snow ball has of flying through hades, and he is making that bluff in order to get himself placed on such committees as he has selected for himself. If he were to be elected speaker he would rattle around in the speaker's chair like a mustard seed in a kettle drum. Dixon is as near a false alarm as a political faker can get to be. After carefully going over the situation the various candidates for speaker of the next house of representatives of the Washington legislature withdrew from the contest and Howard Taylor of King county was given the right of way, which means he will be elected without opposition. Mr. Taylor has served as a member of the house for two sessions of the legislature and he has had a great deal of experience and it is predicted that he will make a most admirable presiding officer. --- The next election to be pulled of in Seattle will be the school election, that is to say, the election of the members of the school board. In the past little or no attention has been taken in such elections and as a result men have been elected to positions on the school board, who in turn elected teachers and school board officers, that should not have been and the best results have not always been secured. The names of a number of persons have been suggested for the places and some of them are right and proper and it is hoped they will be elected. The Seattle Republican strongly favors the electing of one woman on the board and gradually it is hoped that more women will be put on the board. --- The question now is, who will be the nine councilmen that will be elected next spring to serve the city of Seattle? Recently the subject was up for discussion and among those that were discussing it, it was thought that of the present ouncilmen the following stood a show of being elected next spring under the new order of things: Albert J. Goddard, E. W. Way, Frank P. Mullen, Max Wardall, Tom Revelle, (if he is candidate), W. H. Murphy, J. Y. C. Kellogg and E. L. Blaine. While these men are not cock sure of election, yet they stand well with the people and have a much better show than the man with no record to fall back on. It is reported that among the outsiders who will enter the contest will be found the names of James D. Hoge, the well known banker, and likewise Charley Horton of the Dexter Horton estate. Hoge would make a splendid run, but Horton would not get enough votes for him to remember "that he also ran." --- This paper has no hesitancy in endorsing William Piggott for one of the members of the school board to be elected in Decembar. Mr. Piggott has done well on the board and it is stated that he himself says he is willing to accept another term, and if he is, then he THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is the man to elect. The city has no more representative man he, and if he says he will give his time and attention to the school board work, he will do so in a manner that will be acceptable to the patrons and tax payers of the school district. He is not in the city at present and will hardly be before the election is pulled off, but the word has come from him and it is hoped that he will be unanimously elected. . . . Colonel Blethen was before the Lexow committee one day this week and in his own paper he said, "I was treated most courteously and I gave the lie to all that I had been accused of," When some one related the incident to a bunch of quasi-politicians, who were discussing the question later on, one was heard to remark: "The Colonel reminds me of a Kentucky gentleman (?) that was accused of a heinous crime and pas called before the grand jury. "How did you get out of it?" was esked him by a friend. "Why I swore out of it like a gentleman, sah." "How strange," chimed in the friend, "that you were not arrested for swearing out of it. [Name] HOWARD D. TAYLOR After a consultation on the part of the leading candidates for speaker of the house of representatives of the next legislature of the state of Washington, by comparing pledged support it was decided that Howard D. Taylor, of King county, lead and the other candidates withdraw from the contest, which, without the slip of a cog in the political wheel, assures his election. It is said that he is unpledged as to committee appointments and will be left to make those selections without interference or without the big stick pledge hanging over his head. In the death of Marion B. Baxter the poor of this city lose a true and faithful friend. She devoted the most of her life doing things, which to her mind, would relieve the sufferings of that part of the human family against whom everything seems to have gone wrong. Though in her work she was often criticized by scolds and pessimists, who were themselves moral preverts, yet she pursued her work without murmur or complaint and spoke as kindly of her critics as she did of her admirers. She was truly a noble woman and few there are to take her place and especially in the hearts of the poor and needy. A Walla Walla white woman got a divorce from her husband because his friends persisted in dubbing him Jack Johnson in honor of Champion Jack Jonhson. A Boston white woman has sued the champion because he won't let the public call her Mrs. Jack Johnson. Lil' Arthur's wife wraps herself in his ebony arms and exclaims, "God surely has been good to me." Now in this state of complications, Who is who? Judge John McCall of Tennessee has released the Standard Oil Company from paying that big fine taxed up against it by Judge Landis. Now if Judge McCall will just charge the United States government up with interest on the money that stood against the concern for so many months, he will be doing his whole duty as a corporation believer. Speaking about voting dead ones, H. C. Piggott tells a good story on a colored man of the First ward. The man in question was "Doc" Wright, who talked pretty loud and emphasized what he said with a long swing of his bony arms. "I want a piece of money, Mr. Clancy," he demanded of the ward boss, "and I will vote right and work right all day tomorrow at the polls. "No, I will not give you a cent because you will not vote tommorrow." "Well, I will vote if I live," he replied. "I will bet you ten dollars you do not vote tomorrow," came from Clancy. "I'll take the bet exclaimed the colored "Doc." and un went the money. The next day after a time "Doc" went to his voting place to cast his ballot, after giving his name called for a ticket. "Nothing doing," said the election judge, "because you were the first man that voted." "Me voted?" "Yes, you voted?" He was shown his name on the voting books. After thinking for a minute and declaring that that was the first time he had been near the voting place that day, he inquired of the election officers, "when I voted before was I a white or a black man?" "A white man," was the reply. He glanced at a convenient mirror and saw he had not changed in color and remarked, "I guess Clancy knew what he was talking about, when he bet me that I would not vote today. I am not only unable to vote, but have lost a ten spot in the bargain. This habit of voting dead ones seems to have left me out in the cold, unless I can get the boss to let me be a dead one later on today." After a year or more of planning to go to England and make a fight for a share of an estate, which he had been told about and importuned to make a fight for, and after pretty nearly a year on the grounds and moving inch by inch in the case, A. Garfield Harrison, a young Seattle attorney, who eked out a meager ex-existence in the practice of his profession, while in Seattle, feels sufficiently confident in his undertaking to wire those he represented [Name] A. GARFIELD HARRISON that he is almost certain of getting his client's share of the estate, which amounts to something like a million dollars. The presumption is that having been called to put up the necessary cash to conduct the case he made a contract for fifty percent of his client's share, and presuming that he had to split his half with the English barrister that looked after it for him, for his year's work he can smack his chops over $250,000, which is sufficient to make him independent for life. Mr. and Mrs. Harrison have resided in this city for the past eight years, he being a graduate of the Michigan Ann Arbor law school. While he has been looking after the case she has worked like a slave to supply him with sufficient funds for an existence, and therefore, she too, is deserving of almost as much praise as himself. EDITORIAL EDICTS No, Constant Reader, Will E. Humphrey was not defeated, and all because Seattle did not care to be left without some kind of representation in Congress. The question is, If you keep your stage decent will you keep the stage? Then again, it is easy enough to keep the stage decent, but of those on the stage, well, nit. Every man that has bought a piece of property from Hillman is now crying that he was robbed. If Hillman robbed his customers there are others in Seattle equally culpable. Democratic though it be the Arizona constitutional convention has reported unfavorably a bill for the education of the white and colored children in separate schools, and, the "world do move." Pantages has bought the Plymouth church site in this city for a permanent theater. When the theater has been opened and the angels drop in by mistake there will be danger of a bad mix up. Count Tolstoy, the noted novelist, has taken to the woods and swears he will never come back. Some folk want to come back and can't, while others absolutely refuse to come back. Queer old world. Colonel Blethen is said to have gotten funny with a newsboy not long since with the following result: "Times, Mister, shouted the urchin as he poked a copy of the colonel's sheet in his face. "Nope, I can't read," exclaimed the colonel. "Oh, well, you can smell, can't you? It's all the same——" RESOURCES LIABILITIES Loans coi eg BORO KdB Co CamitAl Stocks tee cacsscnetensee ote 1,000,000.00 U.S. Bonds... 1,413,077.38Surplus and Undivided Profits... 256,557.88 R. R. Bonds and Warrants............ 1,401,907.30Cireulation cc 500,000.06 Furniture and Fixtures.................. 81,728.54 Deposits ences cneeseeeeeseeeneeeeeeeenee 15,730,909.06 Cash and Exchange...................- 5,661,705.24 $17,487,466.88 $17,487,466.8 BE. W. Andrews, President s J. FURTH, Chairman Board Directors FE. G. AMES, Vice President J. W. MAXWELL, First Vice Pres. R. V. ANKENY, Cashier F. K. STRUVE, Vice President H. C. MacDONALD, Asst. Cashier C. L, LAMPING, Asst. Cashier WM. S. PEACHY, Asst. Cashier ' C. L. LaGRAVE, Asst. Cashier FRIDAY, November 18, 1911 which have been entered upon by the Reclamation Bureau, and I believe that all of them are to be commended for their excel- lent adaptation for the purpose for which they were erected, and for the speed for which the work has been done. It is said, however, that in the planning of a number of these improvements, the enthusiasm of the projectors has carried them to a point where they begin to feel embar- assed in the matter of resources with which to complete the pro- jects, and begin to show that prudence was not obsevred by those engaged in executing the act; that the projects were too many and more than could be completed in a resonable time after their beginning, because of alack of funds. The reclama- tion act provides for the expendi- ture of funds made up of the proceeds of the sale of public lands and reimbursed from time to time by the installments to be paid by the settlers who take up the irrigated land, and it also provides that no part of a pro ject is to be contracted for and begun until the money for the completion of that part of the project contracted for shall be in the reclamtion fund. Now it ap- pears that it will take $10,000, - 000 or more which is not avail- able in the reclamation fund at present fully to complete the yrojects, and it also appears that a great number of persons by reason of the beginning of the projects, have been led into the making of settlements, the ex- penditure of time and labor, with the hope and upon the -re- liance that such reclamation en- terprises would be carried through in a reasonable time. CONDENSED REPORT OF THE SEATTLE NATIONAL BANK November 10, 1910 Deposits under call Sept. 1, 1910 . $15,108,999.73 Deposits under Call Noy. 1, 1910...... 15,730,909.00 Deposits gain in 71 days ~.............$ 621,909.27 I think that there is no doubt that it was the intention of Con- gcess that projects should not be multiplied in such a way that they could not be com- pleted within a _ reasonable time out of the reclamation funds provided by the sale of public lands, and it probably would have been wiser to adhere strict- ly to the limitation thus constru- ed, even though the language of the act, by dividing up the pro- jects in terms permits the beginning of more projects than there was likely to be money enough to complete witnin a rea- sonable time. The pressure was doubtless very grea’, and the re- clamation service yielded to the pressure within the letter of the law, and now find themselves in the situation described. The work has been well done and re- flects great credit on the engi- neers who must have had charge of it. But something must be done to relieve the present situa- tion, which is one of disappoint- ed hopes to many of the settlers upon the arid lands, who count- ing upon an early completion of the projects undertaken, have invested"their money and spent their time and seemed to be no nearer the goal of satisfactory irrigation than they were when the projects were begun. I think it wise to apply to Con- gress for relief by urging the passage of an_ enabling act, which shall permit the Secretary of the Interior to issue bonds in the sum of $10,000,000 or more to complete all the projects now projected. These bonds should be redeemed from the money paid into the reclamation funds after the completion of the pre- jects. ‘ THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN From conservation with the senators who have visited much of the reclamation work and given an examination to its pro- gress, I infer that such a propos- alas this seems to them to be the best way out of the present difficulty; and I shall take pleas- ure in recommending the pass- age of such a remedial measure by the next Congress. No one can visit this Western country without being over- whelmingly convinced of the ur- gent necessity for the proper treatment of arid and semi-arid lands by the extension of sys- tems of irrigation. The results in the productivity of the soil when irrigated are marvelous. The mere fact that the reclama- tion service has gone ahead too fast ought not to prevent Con- gress from lending its aid to overcome the difficulty. We shall know better in the further treatment of the subject and in the use of the $50,000,000 fund how to avoid putting ourselves in a similar position again. Meantime, irrigation works un- der private auspices are being projected in every direction, and the prospect of reclaiming mil lions of acres from the deserts is most encouraging. The examples of government engineering and ingenuity in planning the structures in these various government projects for irrigation are of immense utility as models for private enterprise. One subject that is now being agitated in some quarters calls for notice. Payment for irriga- ted lands is required in annual instaliments. Suggestions are now being made that these should be lengthened into a longer term. I sincerely hope that Congress will not listen tc such appeals. It may be well tc make ten annual installments. Suggestions are nal, but after that time the installments should be large enough to pay the total amount due, upon which no in- terest is calculated, in ten years. Any other course will encourage a lack of thrift and industry and will greatly embarrass the extension and continuance of the work of irrigation. Third: Disposition of water sites, When the government became possessed of its public domain and took measures to-secure its settlement by the passage of the homestead act and other acts of- fering, after certain steps pre- scribed, to vest title to a specific part of the public lands in indi- viduals, the chief object of Con- gress seemed to be to secure de- velopment by inducing people to settle on public lands and acqnire it for themselves. The thought of conserving the resources which were thus opened to pri- vate acquisition hardly occcured to Congress. Its generosity to the Pacific railroads in offering the public lands in such exten- sive grants to them is an in- stance of the spirit which actu- ated Congress thirty and forty and fifty years ago I am not criticising congress in the slight- est for this polley. It certainly was necesary to make extensive grants to secure the construction of a railroad which should unite the Pacific coast with the Atlan- tic coast, and bring closer to the Eastern seaboard the far distant regions of this country. I mere- ly refer to it in a historical way toexplain the character of the statutes now upon the statute he he peep haeen * i Psat Aioe weer Sensi ie oro A ee ei ae = : pee ey ri can OM oe a 50 ee Stas SA gs books with reference to the sale of public lands and mineral iands. There has always been a distinec- tion made between agricultural lands and mineral lands, because it was recognized that mineral lands would probably be much more valuable, and a different method was required for the ac- quisition of the one from that of the other. But never until now has adequate provision been made for a classification of lands so as to show distinctly what are mineral lands and what are agri- cultural lands. The truth is, the needs of the country have devel- oped so, and the demand for land has so increased, that in or- der to seeure a sensible, business- like disposition of the lands re- maining in the public domain, there must be an authoriative classification of lands by the proper bureau so as to show whether they are agricultural lands, forest lands or lands avail- able for water power sites on the banks of rivers or streams, or mineral lands, coal lands, oil lands, or phosphate lands. Had this classification been made earl- ier it sould have saved a great amount of litigation and would have saved to the government millions of acres patened as one kind of land when in fact it was another. The classification so far as authorized is being rapidly executed by the Geological Bu- reau. After classification legis- lation should be, ard doubtless wil! be, directed to the means by which such lands should be dis- posed of and the restrictions specified in the interest of the public upon the tenure and use to which the owner is to put such lands. As to the lands which are purely agricultural, there would seem to be no reeson for depart- ing from the ordinary method of disposition under the homestead and other laws, including the reclamation acts, by which citi- zens acquire the title in them. With respect to the forest larids owned by the public, they should be surveyed and held by the government under the regu- lation of the Forestry Bureau permitting a sale of such timber as shall be necessary in the prop- er forestry preservation. As to water power sites there has been such a change in con- ditions that a special provision should be made in the interest of the public for their transfer to private control. (CONTINUED IN NEXT ISSUE) Physics Up to Date Teacher—What is a vacuum? Pupil — A thing one cleans with. —Town Topics. Exasperated Creditor to tailor — I’ll have no more of this dunning. If you don’t stop it, I’ll order another suit. -- Fliegende Blaetter. Blasted Hopes Uncle Gus—So this is the baby eh? Luse to look just like him at that age. What’s he erying about now? Niece Susie—Oh, Uncle Gus, he heard what you said.—Ch- cago News. People’s Savings Hank. Edward ©. Neuteider, Prest. i J. Heekie, Vice Prest. 1 sted Dea Teta ties” invorporat . Commercial Savings ‘and. ‘reat General Bank and: Dashenge. ‘or Second and Pike 8. Geattia Wase. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, va, J. A. MUs- IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. 60-Day Summation Carrie Hui plaintiff, Galloway and John Doe Galloway, her husband, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right-title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, and also any and all unknown heirs of the said defendants above named defendants, Sarah Galloway and John Doe Galloway, her husband, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, and also any and all unknown heirs of the said defendants above named: stated; and in case of you to do, judgment will be re-run according to the demos plaintiff, which has been clerk of court said. The object of the abolition is for an absolute grounds of non-support, two minor children. JOHN R. Plaintiff P. O. address, 539 New York Seattle, King County, Oct. 7—Nov. 28 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Washington, in and for the County of King. 60-Day Summation Carrie Hui plaintiff, Galloway and John Doe Galloway, her husband, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, and also any and all unknown heirs of the said defendants above named: stated; and in case of you to do, judgment will be re-run according to the demos plaintiff, which has been clerk of court said. The object of the abolition is for an absolute grounds of non-support, two minor children. JOHN R. Plaintiff P. O. address, 539 New York Seattle, King County, Oct. 7—Nov. 28 You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of first publication of this summons, to wit; within sixty (60) days after the 28th day of October 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case at their office are so to do, the summons will be rendered according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought for the purpose of quieting title in the plaintiff to the following described property to solicit a fee of 28 in block 5, of Chilberg's Addition to West Seattle, situated in King County, State of Washington. REVELLE, REVELLE & REVELLE, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Postoffice address: 605-608 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. Oct. 28, Dec. 9, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication. Jaros Henry, nlahtift, vs. F. B. Hunt. Court Jane Henry, plaintiff, vs. F. B. Huntley and Jane Doe Huntley, his wife, whose true christian name is un- known, defendants.—No. 74840. State of Washington to the defendants. F. B. Huntley and Jane Doe Hunt- 169, his. Were each of you are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait within sixty (60) days after the day of September 1910 to defend the above entitlement in the above entitlement and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case he do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to recover the sum of $105.95 together with costs and interest due from you to the plaintiff herein for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered you by the plaintiff action during the last past three years. A writ of attachment being issued out of this cause and court and lots 26 and 37, block 8, of Green Lake Reservoir Addition to the city of Seattle have been attached thereunder. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- Louise Ashen, Plaintiff, vs. Lester Ashen, Defendant. No. — Summons for Publication. The State of Washington, to Lester Ashen, Defendant. You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above enforced court and defend the above entitled action within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the date of the said publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney, the plaintiff below named, at his office, below stated, and in case of your failure so do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff which has been filed with the mark of the above entitled court. or contact. The object of this action is to secure a divorce on the ground of desertion or wrongdoing on the ground of for more than A. C. McDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address, 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Oct 7—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King Coun- lation ty. Summons by Publication. Maud A. Boschert, plaintiff, vs. Charles C. Boschert, defendant, to the 76217, The State of Washington, to the said Charles C. Boschert defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, today, within sixty days after the 7th of October, 1910, and defend the entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy your answer upon the undersigned at torneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and case of your failure so to do, andgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with work of said court. the clerk Briken stated the object of this action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant and to grant the plaintiff divorce from the defendant the ground of abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant for more than one year last past, and for the failure of the defendant to support the plaintiff and his family, and to award the custody of their minor son, Robert E. Beschch, to the plaintiff. For further particulars reference is made to the complaint now on file in the office of the clerk of the above entity, sent to MEMENS Poston Suite 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 7—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Elizabeth J. Marston, plaintiff, vs. Richard K. Marston, defendant.—No. 76271. The State of Washington, to the said Mergon, defendant. Richard K. Marscus You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below 6 stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for an absolute divorce on the grounds of non-support, and custody of two minor children. JOHN R. WILSON, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. address, 539 New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 7—Nov. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Thes. Eaton, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property Defendants. No. 75684. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants, and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the owner of the real property held for certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April, 1910, and numbered B61750, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $1.65, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, tow- Beginning at a point 165 feet east and 33 feet south of the N. W. corner of the SW 1-4 of Sec. 10, Tp. 26 N., R. 5 E., W. M.; thence east 60 feet, thence S. 120 feet, thence west 60 feet, thence N. 120 feet to the place of beginning. That the taxes for the following prior amounts be paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit. For the year 1907, the sum of $1.36; for the year 1908, the sum of 87 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 28 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from the sum of 15 per cent paid all unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, and of the day of the day after September 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the sale of each parcel of said real property each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. G. MONDALP. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication. County. Summons by Publication. Catherine Lomas, plaintiff, vs. Harry Brown. Olgas, The State of Washington, to Harry Lomas, defendant You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 28th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of the complaint to the defendant attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this complaint is to obtain an absolute divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant on the grounds of cruelty and for the return of her maiden name. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Oct. 28—Dec. 9, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Preston Mill Co., and all persons known, if any, having held an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants No. 75685. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April, 1910, and numbered B61756 for the delinquent amount, of the year 1905, of 90 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King county, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at S. E, cor. of N. E. 1-4 of Sec. 32, Tp. 24, N. R. 7 E., W. M., thence west 420 feet to School Dist. No. 76, thence north to N. P. Ry., thence easterly along Ry. to easterly line of said section, thence S. 235 feet to the place of beginning. (Part. of N. E. 1-4 of the N. E. 1-4 Sec. 32, Tp. 24 N. E. 7 E., W. M.) That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon sald above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1906, the sum of 57 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of 72 cents; for the year 1908, the sum of 44 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 27 cents. Which several sums been incurred at the rate of 5 per cent annually from sald rate of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and answer within sixty days after the date of publication, and to disclose of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Sept. 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff against the understood attorney for plaintiff at his offe below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien or said诉款 upon the amount of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charg- ed against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Wyman, Partridge & Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, defendants.—No. 74735. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, defendants; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 2nd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of your answer upon the undersigned atferneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to recover a judgment against said defendant for goods, warees and merchandise sold and delivered to said defendants by said plintiff in the sum of Two Thousand One Hundred Twenty-seven and 10-100 Dollars ($2,127.10), with interest thereon from the 2nd day of May, 1910, besides the costs of suit, and in which said action an attachment has been taken out and levied. LEOPOLD A. STERN, and J. M. RUSSELL Attorneys for plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 705 Low- man Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 2. Oct. 15. 1910. IN THE JUSTICE'S COURT BEFORE John E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Summons by Publication. Blossom-Provine Lumber Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. T. W. Williams and Jane Doe Williams, his wife, whose true Christian identity is unknown, defendants—No. 13472. To T. W. Williams and Jane Doe Williams, his wife, defendants. In the name of the State of Washington you are hereby notified that Blossom-Provine Lumber Co. has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Seattle, King County, Washington, to-wit: 210 New York Block, on the 23rd day of November 1900 at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a.m., and unless you appear and then and there answer the same will be taken as confessed, and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said claim is to recover from the defendants a balance due for goods, wares and merchandise, to-wit: lumber sold and delivered to said defendants by the plaintiff within the last past three years. Complaint filed September 29, 1910. JOHN E. CARROLL. Justice of the Peace. Oct. 28—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Summons by Publication. Frieda Marshall, plaintiff, vs. Joe Marshall, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington to Joe Marshall. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the date of above October 11th, find the above action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure to do so agree with the defendant against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is that the plaintiff, on the grounds of habitual drunkenness of the defendant and the neglect and misuse of the property, make suitable provision for his family, be granted an absolute divorce from the defendant herein and the custody and control of the child of the plaintiff and defendant herein, and such other and further relief as the court may direct. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg.. Seattle, Wash. Oct. 7—Nov. 18, 1910. INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. IN PROBATE—In the matter of the estate of Emil Engelmann, deceased, No. 10.408. Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Paul G. Engelmann, administrator of the estate of Emil Engelmann, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for disribution of the estate because the previous certified by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to an horize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Emil Engelmann, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County State of Washingto, the Washite Department of said court in Department No. 7 on the 5th day of December, 1910, at the hour of 10:00 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should no be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of salt este among the persons and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and consecutive weeks before the said 5th day of December, 1910, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 31st day of October, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, C. C. John R. Wilson, a torney for said Estate, 539 New York Block, Seattle. Nov. 4-Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for Kings County, Order Appointing Day for Settlement of Acquaint. In the Matter of the Estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased.—No. 11797. Hallie Burkholder, administratrix of the estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased, having this day rendered and presented for settlement and filed in this court her account of her administration of the estate of said deceased. It is therefore ordered that Monday, the 28th day of November, A. D. 1910, at 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon be and the same is hereby appointed for the settlement of the said account; and that the clerk give notice thereof by causing notices to be posted in at least three public places in this county, one which shall be at the place where this court is held, at least 14 days before said day of settlement and by publishing such notice in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper published and of general circulation in this county, once a week for two weeks prior to said day of settlement. Done in open court this 9th day of November, 1910. A. W. FRATER, Judge. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Administratrix. Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Nov. 11—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Notice of the Hearing on a Petition for Specific Performance. T. Mitchell, deceased—No. 11020 Notice is hereby given that E. B. Mitchell the administrator on the above entitled cause on the 3rd day of November, 1910 filed in the above entitled court his petition asking leave of the court to specifically perform a certain contract with Nellie M. Peterson upon the following described property, to-wit: Lots six (6), seven (7), fourteen (14), and fifteen (15), Block two (2), of the Second Addition to Adams Tracts, according to the plat thereof on file and the creditor's office of King County, Washington. And the court on said 3rd day of November, 1910, set the 12th day of December, 1910, at 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon, in Department No. 7, in the court house in Seattle, King County, Washington, as the time for hearing said petition; and all persons interested as creditors, heirs, devisees or personal representatives as owed to appear in any objections to the granting of the said petition Dated this 3rd day of November, 1910. E. B. MITCHELL, Administrator. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Administrator. Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publisher. Blossom-Poe Lawn Co. a corporation plantifft. is A. Watkins and Jane Doe Watkins, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown; L. D. W. Shelton and Jane Doe Shelton, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, defendants.—No. — The State of Washington, to A. Watkins and Jane Doe Watkins, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown; L. D. W. Shelton and Jane Doe Shelton, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, defend- You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer for the underigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to foreclose a lien for materials furnished by the plaintiff to the defendants to be used upon lots 43 and 44, block 7, Greenwood Park Second Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address 134 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Daisy Voigt, plaintiff, vs. William E. Voigt, defendant.—No. The State of Washington, to William E. Voigt, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, in case of difficulty set forth, and signify that will be rendered against you according to the prayer of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you on the grounds of desertion and failure to support plaintiff, and for a restoration of the malden name of plaintiff. HOWARD O. DURK, Attorney for Plaintiff. 535 Henry Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County Summons for Publication. Adell Toomilin, plaintiff, vs. Joseph Toomilin, defendant.—No. 32501, The State of Washington to the said Joseph Toomilin, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled contract to answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure divorce and annul marriage of plaintiff and defend upon the grounds of non-support. No allmony is asked. Date of first publication, November 11, 1910. FRED L. RICE. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 229 Burke Block. Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 17—Dec. 23, 1910. FRIDAY November 18, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Summons by Publication. William Clarke, plantiff, vs. Nellie Clarke, defendant. No. _____ The State of Washington, to Nellie Clarke, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court afforestation away the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his address below given; in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer of the plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed in the court of gold court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you on the ground of desertion. HOWARD O. DURK, Attorney for Plaintiff. 535 Henry Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. State of Washington, County of King. In the Matter of the Estate of I.A. Burkholder, deceased.—No. 11797. Notice is hereby given that Hallie Burkholder, administratrix of the estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased, has rendered to and sold in said estate her final account as such administratrix and that the 28th day of November, 1910, at 9:30 o'clock, a. m., at the court room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account and contest the name. Witness, the Hon. A. W. Frater, judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said court hereto affixed this 9th day of November, 1910. D. K. SICKELS, (Seal) Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. Nov. 11—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE JUSTICE'S COURT BEFORE John E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Wash- ington. Summons by Publication. R. J. Eichler, plaintiff, vs. Cora Lowe and John Doe Lowe, both of whom this plaintiff for and on behalf of said demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of this action is to recover the sum of Twelve Dollars ($12,000) and one and a half ($12,000), being a balance due for man, and John Doe Lowe, her husband. REMOVAL NOTICE The Light and Power department of the Seattle Electric Company has moved to the Electric Bldg., Seventh avenue and Pine street. Street car tickets can be purchased and all bills paid in the Electrical Sales Room at the old location 907 FIRST AVENUE THE SEATTLE ELECTRIC CO ORDER A CASE OUT TO YOUR PLACE OF Rainier PALE BEER PHONE SIDNEY 526 Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. Your dental work will cost $1,000 and the State Dental Monopoly will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My office is in the 10th Street First Ave, in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar and the State Monopoly will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established at 713 First Ave., in the Union Block, for 18 years. Monopoly with cheap dentists, but with the high-class dentists for half their price. Open evenings until 8 and Sundays until 4 for people who work. EDWIN J. BROWN, D.D.S. 713 First Avenue Seattle, Wash. Read my article in Sunday's P.I. and Monday's Times and Star. GILHAM-LYSONS REALTY CO.. General Offices: 411 Lowman Bldg. Loans, Investments, Insurance. H. E. Gilham. J. W. Lysons. Main 3044. Ind. 1538. BUY THE BEST If you want a safe which you know Has No Superior, buy one of the Hall Safe & Lock Co.'s, manufactured by the Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co., for which we are the sole agents. PURCELL SAFE CO. Prefontaine Bldg., Prefontain Place and Yesler Way DENNY-RENTON CLAY & COAL CO., Manufacturers of All Kinds of Clay Products. Main 2189—Phones—Ind. 5125. FRIDAY November, 18 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons by Publication. ty. Summons by Publication. Charles Pfeffer, plaintiff, vs. Millie Bennett, Walter C. Bennett, her husband, Charles P. Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, his wife, whose true name is to plaintiff unknown, William Brenner, D. A. Hatfield and "Jane Doe" Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown, and Charles W. Flisk, F. M. Hatfield, Ida M. Barton and Aurora Land Company, a corporation, defendants.—No. 75263. The State of Washington to Charles P. Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, whose true given name is unknown: D. A. Hatfield and Jane Doe Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is unknown. You, and each of you, are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 15th day of September, and to and from the day of publication in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and have a copy of your answer served upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment be furnished against you to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to foreclose a certain mortgage executed and delivered by the said defendants Millie Bennett and Walter C Bennett, her husband, to one S. Campbell and by the said S. Campbell assigned to this plan-ciff dated the 28th day of January, 1910, to the estate of Walter C Bennett in Vol 407 of mortgages, page 39 of the record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, which mortgage was given to secure a promissory note of $500.00 with interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent per annum and was given upon Lots 8, 18, 19, 20, and the Guild Grill, Franklin. Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to obtain judgment for the said $500.00 together with interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the 28th day of January, 1910, and an attorney's fee of $75.00 and costs of suit and to foreclose and determine all right, and degree of each and all of said defendants in and to said premises and every part thereof. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons. A. L. Weaver and Ella May Weaver, husband and wife, plaintiffs, vs. Peter Weaver. The State of Washington to the said Peter E. Nordin, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 17th day of Sept. 1910, and defend the above entitled accuser in the above lawsuit with an answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment and decree will be rendered against you accusing the plaintiff which has been filled with the clerk of said court. And all right, title and interest in the lands described in the complaint claimed by you likewise in the contract, and payments described therein will be foreclosed, forfeited, and the title of the plaintiffs clearly as to all claims you may have claim. J. W. BROWN. Attorney for Plaintiffs. 1324 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintintt, vs. Antone Kaas, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the afterlafter described real property. Defendants. No. 75305. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby declared the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of November, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in and holding County, described as follows, to-wit: West 260 feet of $1/2 of $1/2 of NE% of SE % 2/4. 4, Tp. 21. N., R 4 E. W. M., certificate number B54644, year 1906, amount $1.23. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property to-wit: Amount $1.40 for year 1907; 76 cents for year 1908. Which secalal sums bear interest at the rate of 16 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of sale first publ. Julyulication, to-wit: within sixty days Aug. 19, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend answer the complaint of said plaintiff against your answer on the underignedatterney for plea-tiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the saturation of the sums charged and against it, required as provided by law, and as served in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. in this L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC. DONALD. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Se- attle, Wash. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Summons. Nellie Derry, Plaintiff, vs. Herbert A. Derry, Defendant. 75952. The State of Washington to the said A. C. Derry, Defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of the 23rd day of September, days after the 23rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the gove entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of the complaint to the plaintiff, and a tortorney for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand the complaint has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is instituted for the purpose of dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant, for the reason and upon the grounds that said defendant has failed, neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the support and maintenance of said plaintiff, and for the decree awarding to said plaintiff the usable property situated in the County of Clallam, State of Washington, particularly described as follows, to-wit: Lots twenty-two (22), twenty-three (23), twenty-six (26) and twenty-seven (27), in section seven (7), township thirty (30), north of range nine (9) west, Clallam County, Washington; and also the following property situated in King County, State of Washington: The west half of lot twenty-nine (20) and lot twenty-six (26), block eight (8), Buckle Court, for sale; and for such other and further relief as to this court may seem just and equitable. Office and P. O. address: 960 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, sept. 23—Nov. 1, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COUR8, KING County, Washington. Elizabeth Turnbull, Plaintiff, vs. George Turnbull, Defendant. No. ——. Summons. The State of Washington to the said George Turnbull, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear in court on days of the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait; within sixty (60) days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complainant in this action prays for divorce and that the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved. H. E. FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 606 Marlon Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, October 7, 1910. Date of last publication, November 18, 1910. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE Fred C. Brown, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. John Doe Mattijasevich and Richard Roe Glovich, copartners, doing business under firm name and style of Alaska Liquor Company, Defendants. No. —. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King, ss The State of Washington: To John Doe Mattijasevich and Richard Roe Glovich copartners doing business under firm name and style of Alaska Liquor Co; You, and each of you, are hereby notified that California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, has filed a complaint against you in said Court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Building, Seattle, Washington. I urge you to attend on the 20th day of October, D. J. 1910, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock a. m., and unless you appear and then there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said action is for the sum of Eighty-two Dollars and Twenty-five Cents ($8.25), being a balance due the plaintiff on account of merchandise sold and delivered to the defendants during the year 909. Fed September 15th A. D. 1910. FRED C. BROWN. Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. TWOROGER & WINKLER. Attorneys for Plaintiff. 10-11 Triangle Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication Sept. 16. 1910 Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg, Seattle, Washington, Sept. 23-Nov. 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State, of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Allen P. Mitter, deceased in 1658. By order of said court made herein on the 8th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executors of said estate, at 1308 Alaska Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one month and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 23, 1910. Attorneys for Estate. 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Oct. 22, 1910. JUSTICE COURT—BEFORE JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Wm. Zehring, plaintiff, vs. Mrs. A. M. Simmons, defendant. State of Washington, County of King, ss The State of Washington to Mrs. A. M. Simmons. You and each of you are hereby notified that Wm. Zehring has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in room 2100 W. 2100 N. 10th St. King County, Washington, on the 28th day of November A. D. 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said complaint is to recover the goods, wares and merchandise, sold and delivered to you by this plaintiff within the last past three years. Complaint filed October 10th A. D. 1910. JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Nov. 4-Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Summons for Public Laurentine E. Cole, plaintiff, vs. Anna May Cole, defendant—No. 76580. Statement of The State Bank of Seattle Seattle, Wash., Nov. 10, 1910 E. L. GRONDAHL, President A. H. SOELBERG, JOHN ERIKSON, Vice President Vice President and Cashier A. C. KAHLKE, Assistant Cashier. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN n. The State of Washington, to the said Anna, Mav, Cola, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 21st day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the above demand and oppose your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk on said court. The object for which this demand has been made to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant, upon the following grounds: Because the defendant without the plaintiff's fault, abandoned the plaintiff on the 9th of October, 1909, at Seattle, Washington, and that said abandonment has been continuous for one year and more. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 309 Burke Bldg., Second and Marion Streets, Seattle, Wash. Oct. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Summons. Lillian Collins, plaintiff, vs. James Collins, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington, to the said James Collins, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, now within sixty days after the last day of October 1910 and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to answer the complaint, you are against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed The Sta Seattle RESOUR Loans and discounts..... Banking house, furni and fixtures ..... Other resources ..... U. S. and other high grade bonds .....$189,745 Warrants ..... 5,741 Cash on hand and due from other banks ..... 266,763 E. L. GRONDAHL, Pro JOHN ERIKSON, A. with the clerk or said court. The object of this action is to secure a decree of divorce, dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of desertion and failure to provide for more than one year. H. E. SNOOK, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 537 Burke Building, Seattle, Washington. Oct. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Summons. Helen B. Phillips, plaintiff, vs. Park D. Phillips, defendant. Phillips, derightheart: The State of Washington, to the above of Mark D. Phillips: named defendant, Park D. Phillips: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date the first prosecution of this summons, toower within sixty days after the twenty-first day of October, 1910, exclusive of said twenty-first day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and to serve a copy of your answer or other pleading upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his hereinafter designated postoffice address, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be deemed in said cause according to the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of said action is to procure a judgment and decree forever severing the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of the failure, refusal and neglect of the defendant to provide for support or maintenance of the plaintiff since their marriage on the 5th day of July, 1900, and on the further ground that the defendant more than ground that the Are Now on Display A call will convince the and Beauty of our slash. Our tailoring assures you of Irving & Car convince the most skeptic your slash. The establish ensures you of satisfaction. & Cannon, T A call will convince the most skeptical of the Worth and Beauty of our slash. The established reputation of our tailoring assures you of satisfaction. Irving & Cannon, Tailors 211 COLUMBIA STREET Established 22 Years Statement of State Bank of S e, Wash., Nov. 10, SCES LIABIL $ 756,509.10Capital stock p ature Surplus and u 12,500.00 profits 1,500.00Deposits .51 .05 .88 of of Seattle ov. 10, 1910 LIABILISIES total stock paid in.....$ plus and undivided profits ..... . . profits ..... . We Invite Your Account A. H. SOELBERG, Vice President stant Cashier. President A. H. SOK Vice President Vic C. KAHLKE, Assistant Cashi two years ago wilfully and without just cause abandoned the plaintiff, and at all times since has so continued to abandon and live separate and apart from plaintiff. LESTER S. WILSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address, 833 Henry Building, Seattle. King County, Washington. Oct. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, In. Probate In the Matter of the Estate of Lorenz Schwelzer, Deceased. No. 12054. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of and al persons having claims against the deceased, or his estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate at room No. 604 Mutual Insurance, Suite 10, King County, Washington, the place of the transaction of business of said estate, within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice or the same will be barred. Dated this 18th day of November 1910. 1910. Date of first publication Nov. 18, 1910. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Administrator of the Estate of Lorenz Schweizer, Deceased. Nov. 18—Dec. 16, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Frank B. Wilson, Plaintiff, vs. Emily W. Wilson, Defendant. The State of Washington, to the said Emily W. Wilson, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 19th --- $362,250.44 $1,232,759.54 OFFICERS Nov. 18—Dec. 16, 1910. most skeptical of the Worth The established reputation of satisfaction. eattle 1910 BILISIES paid in.....$1 100,000.00 divided 14,158.49 ..... 14,158.49 ..... 1,118,601.05 LBERG, the President and Cashier er. day of November, A. D. 1900, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: Divorce suit on the grounds of drunkenness. JOHN H. PERRY. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Seattle, County of King, Washington. Nov. 19—Dec. 30, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. 7. Probate. Administrator's Notice of Sale of Real Estate. In the Matter of the Estate of James J. Lynch. Deceased—No. 10926 Notice is hereby given that under and by virtue of an order of sale of the Superior Court of King County, Washington, dated October 8th, 1910, I will sell at private sale the following described real estate situated in King County, Washington: Lot 31, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot 32, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. the court. Dated this 20th day of October, 1910. Date of first publication, October 21, 1910. HARRY W. BRINGHURST, Administrator of the Estate of James J. Lynch, Deceased. Oct. 21—Nov. 4, 1910. 1 $1,232,759.54 ```markdown ``` IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, Washington. Summons by Publication. Ella Croft, Plaintiff, vs. Harry W. Barrows, Defendant.—No. 75894. The State of Washington to the said Harry, W. Barrows, defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 23rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the demand for the plaintiff and agree to copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filled, with the clerk of said court. The complaint in this action prays for the annulment of a marriage ceremony enforced against you by plaintiff defendant on December 28, 1907, and that the said marriage ceremony may be cancelled and annulled, and for all proper relief. P. O. address, 606 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, September 23. 1910. Date of last publication, Nov. 4, 1910. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Alonzo H. Jose, Decased—No. 11696 By order of said court made herein on the 7th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the under-signed adjoining of said court. 1908 Alaska Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Attorneys for Estate, 1808 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Oct. 22, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Leon- band Rohir deceased-No 11230. hard Reinig, deceased.—No. 11230. By order of said court made herein on the thirty day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate said deceased and Margarithe S. Reinig, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Margarete S. Reinig, executrix of said estate at 300 State Street Block, at the office A. J. Speckert her attorney, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 30, 1910. MARGARETHE S. REINIG, As Executrix of said Estate. A. J. SPECKERT. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Avard L. Morrison, plaintiff, vs. Sarah Morrison, defendant—No. — The State of Washington, to the said Sarah Morrison, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear with you on the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 21st day of October, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer to the arraigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the soungement therein is fully so forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the ground of your abandonment of plaintiff for more than two years. J. P. BALL Postoffice and office address: 201-203 Burke Bldg., Seattle County of King, State of Washington. Oct. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. M. J. Lutz, Plaintiff, vs. Charles W. Ingran, Administrator of the Estate of Richard Lehn, Deceased, and Mrs. A. Sjoequist, Defendants.—No. 721747. The State of Washington to Mrs. A. Sjoequist: You are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summon to证it: within sixty days after 23rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the entitled court and answer the complaint, of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case your failure so to do, the judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint herein which has been filed with the clerk of this court. the object of said action, as set forth in the complaint, is to foreclose two certain mortgages given by the said Richard Lehn in his life time to the said plaintiff, the first one being dated November 16, 1906, to secure the sum of $1,200.00, with interest and amount the rate of 7 per cent per annum from said date until paid and the second one dated October 8, 1907, to secure the sum of $300.00, with interest at the rate of 7 per cent per annum from said date until paid, and to recover judgment for said amounts and interest and $26.98 taxes paid by plaintiff, an torney's fee of $140.00 and costs of suit; both of said mortgages being on lots 1 and 2, block 3, John J. Goliver's Second addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to foreclose and determine all the right, title and interest of said defendants and each of them in and to said property. EDWARD VON TOBEL. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. Seattle. Wash. Sept. 30-Oct. 28. 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Counto. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Bertha Brown, deceased, No. 1807 Erown, deceased. - NO. 14027. Brown, deceased. - NO. 14027. On the 22nd day of October, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrators of said estate, at 705 Lowman Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, until the year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication Octo. 28, 1910. SAM BROWN, ISAAC BROWN, As Administrators of said Estate. LEOPOLD M. STERN, Attorney for Estate. 705 Lowman Bigg., Seattle, Wash. Oct. 28—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Edith Rasm. Plaintiff, vs. John F. Rash Defendant. No. 75369. Summons by Publication. State of Washington to the said John F. Rash Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of August (69) in the above specified court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you for the demand of such compaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought for the purpose of obtaining a decree of divorce from the said defendant on the grounds of abandonment, non-support and personal indignation to the court of Washington, for which services of summons by publication may be made. PARKER & BROWN. Office and Postoffice Address: Room 25 Union Block, 713 1st Ave., Seattle. Washington. August 26—Oct. 6, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE Estate of Washington, for King Coun- tury. Survives by Publication. Viola. Estella Small, plaintiff, vs. Joseph Small, defendant.—No. ____. The State of Washington, to the said Joseph Small, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the lapse of the A. A. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below the court, and for the defendant to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in the complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the grounds of your abandonment of plaintiff for four years, and also your failure to make suitable provisions for plaintiff since said marriage. J. P. BALL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice and office address: 201-203 Burke Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 14—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summits for Publication. C. H. Boynton, plaintiff, vs. William B. Jenkins, defendant.—No. 76276. The State of Washington to the said William B. Jenkins, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toow: within sixty days after the 14th day of October, 1910, and defend the actioe, a court above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the court of the above entitled action is to recover judgment against said defendant for the amount ae upon two promissory notes for $150.00 and $40.00, respectively, made by said defendant on the 30th day of July, 1907, and payable, the one, two months after date, and the other three months after date, respectively, together with the costs besides the costs of this action, and to have an attachment issued and levied on the defendant's property. Postoffice address 705 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 14—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be mad in the Matter of the Estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased—No. 5656. Malcolm K. MacRae, administrator of the estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the property thereof among the people entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said T. J. Riordan, deceased, be admitted to the said court of King County State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle on the 14th day of October, 1910, and the hour of 9.30 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should be allowed and an order of distribution of the estate of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for several four consecutive prior to said hearing and published to said four consecutive weeks before the said 14th day of November, 1910, in the ATTORNEYS, ATTENTION! THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is looking for your legal publications, and if you are looking for your own business interests you will see to it that no publication is sent from your office without first talking with CAYTON about it. It is an indisputable fact that there are but two weekly publications in Seattle that publish lawyers' legal notices and give the lawyers no trouble on account of errors and prompt "returns" of publishers' affidavits, and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN takes cases that he has not the time to look the paper over every the lead. In this day of busy, bustling activity, the lawyer's time is so much absorbed in the preparation of his voluminous week to see if his notices are being regularly published, nor to read over his notices to see if they are absolutely correct. It often happens that even lawyers make errors in getting or calls the lawyer's attention to them before going to press up their notices for publication, which errors are very annoying to the lawyers if not detected and corrected before going into the paper. If, therefore, the lawyer feels absolutely certain that the publisher gives his personal attention to notices sent to his paper and either corrects small errors in notices it's a great relief to his mind. The publisher of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN has had so much experience with legal publications that he can detect a faulty publication almost as readily as the lawyer himself, and, if not a grievous one, corrects it then and there, but if a grievous one, the lawyer's attention is called to the same before going to press. Returns on publications are promptly made, so that lawyers do not have to worry about the publisher's notice after his case has been called in court. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County, and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 7th day of October, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Court Commissioner. State of Washington, County of King—ss. D. K. Sickels, county clerk of King County and ex-officio clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court on the 7th day of November, 1910, in the matter of the estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 7th day of October, 1910. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons by Publication. Seattle Lumber Company, a corporation, plaintiff, v. Celestine j. Sullivan and Evelyn Sullivan, his wife, E. W. Andrews and Jane Doe Andrews, his wife. Fred G. Cutler and Mildred Cutler, his wife. Netherland American Mortgage Bank, a corporation. H. W. Fisher, Trustee, the National Bank of Commerce, of Seattle, Washington, a corporation, Davis & Company, a corporation. Jahn Brooke & Company, Elliott Bay Mill & Lumber Company, a corporation, L. A. Borde, Crane' Company, a corporation, John Scott and Richard Roe Gelser, a co-partnership doing business as Scutt & Gelser, Schwabacher Hardware Company, a corporation. V. D. Gossett, John Knapp and Rich- hon Kapp doing business as Knapp and Lambert J. J. Frantz and W. J. Winters, defendants. Globe Electric Company, Cox & Gleason Company, and J. K. Witerspoon, intervenors in the defense of Washington, to the said Celestine J. Sullivan, Evelyn Sullivan, his wife, and H. W. Fisher, defendants. They are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: sixty days after the 14th day of October, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint in intervention of the Intervenor J. K. Witherspoon, in the case of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for intervenor at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said intervenor's complaint in intervention which he upon his own court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint in intervention, is as follows: To foreclose a laborer's and materialman's lien upon lots 19 and 20, block 24, Edes & Knights' addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. C. H. WINDERS. Attorney for Intervenor, J. K. Witherspoon. Office and postoffice address: 712 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 14—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Lavina Christine Rudberg, deceased.—No. 11877. By order of said court made herein on the 4th day of October, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administratrix on said estate at 928 Northern Bank & Trust Building Seattle. Was the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication October 14, 1910. ELMA LOUISE RUDBERG, As Administratrix of said Estate. GORDON McGAUVRAN, Attorney for Estate. 327-8-9 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the letter of the State of Katherine Schulver, deceased—No. 11830. By order of said court made herein on the 12th day of October, 1910. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against FRIDAY Novembe 11, 1910 said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouch- sure, ununsigned administrator of said estate, at 299 Lake Block, Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication Oct. 14, 1910. FRED L. RICE As Administrator of said Estate. FRED L. RICE Attorney for Estate. 229 Burke Block, Seattle, Wash. Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. Send your legals to The Seattle Republican, 305 Epler Blk., Phone Main 305. Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13 STETSON & POST LUMBER CO. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 71) ALBERT HANSEN. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses. Phone, Main 268. Seattle Washington First and Cherry.