Seattle Republican

Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE PUBLISHER'S NOTICE. The Seattle Republican is published on Friday of every week by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3.00 per year; six months, $1.50 postage prepaid. Subscriptions to all foreign countries included in the Postal Union, $4.00 a year postage paid. Sample copies, free. Single copies ten cents. Advertising rates made known on application. Special rates to publishers. Entered a second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. Address all communications to The Seattle Republican, 307 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. Make a checks, drafts, postal orders, etc., payable to "Cayton Publishing Company." CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. Telephone: Main 305. Publication office, 307 Epler Block. HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON - - - Publisher USIE REVELS CAYTON - - - Associate CAMPAIGN COMMITTEES SUPERFLUOUS Are campaign committees any longer necessary? is a question that politicians in the state of Washington are asking each other since the last election. In other words are two campaigns the desideratum for the political ills and complaints? The primary campaign in most of the counties of this state was a hot one and those seeking Republican nominations were active in their own interests. So hot was the Republican campaign that all of the Democrats in the state for the time being became Republicans. In King county after the primary contest was over the newly elected central committee organized and set about to conduct an old fashion campaign between the two paties, but the nominees did not see it that way and absolutely refused to give any funds to the committee and as a result the individual members of the committee were compelled to dig down in their own pockets and pay for rent of the headquarters and such other expenses as the committee dared to incur. So incensed were most of the members of the committee at the treatment accorded them that pretty nearly all of them selected some one of the regular Republican nominees and went after him hard with the view of defeating him and electing his Democratic opponent, but even that did not move the candidates to put any money into the campaign. As a result the one hundred dollar per week chairman and secretary got nothing for their work. The day before the election it was predicted by one of the members of the committee that the major part of the Republican ticket would be defeated, but he was mistaken. It is barely possible that the average campaign committee seldom if ever changes a vote and the money spent by them is absolutely thrown away so far as the candidates are concerned. The voters read the papers and they occasionally get out and listen to a spell binder, but if no spell binder puts in his appearance the voter would vote his sentiments just the same. The time will yet come and many of us now living will see it, when the people will elect the men they desire to hold office and not go through with the nomination process. Parties do some good in shaping the politics of the country to the best advantage, but as the parties of this country have been conducted for the past quarter of a century, it is the concensus of opinion that, they do more harm than good. Measures, however meritorious they may be are opposed by first one party and then the other for the sake of party advantage, and often they are absolutely killed because the minority power is not willing for the majority party to get the credit or vice versa. The voters of the state of Washington have almost reached the conclusion that, the old central committee idea is as useless in these latter days of party reform as the old torch light procession. In the last campaign in King county it is safe to say that not to exceed five per cent of the voters heard a single campaign speech. Campaigning as it was conducted a few years ago is almost a thing of the past. The United States will never again see a Mark Hanna presidential campaign. Nor will the state of Washington ever again see an Albert E. Mead gubernatorial campaign. While it may be putting a great deal of power into the hands of the news- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1910 papers, yet men are going to read the newspapers as to who are the candidates and then they are going to decide for themselves whom they intend to vote for. The candidates will simply get their publicity in the papers, but even that will not assure their election for after going over it in their minds the voters may conclude they are not the proper persons to vote for though advocated by the leading papers. All over the country a new order of things from a political standpoint is coming into play and since the people have been robbed by all parties to such an extent the sooner it comes the better for the tax payers. IS INSANITY ON THE INCREASE If a certain insanity expert is to be believed the rate at which the human family is going crazy is simply astounding. "This is a subject that requires more thought," he concluded, "than the tuberculosis horror, to head off which men are giving up their hundreds and thousands of dollars. An eminent physician that has given the insanity disease his life study has declared that, at the rate the human family is going crazy at present, within the next 150 years there would be one insane person to every 300, and if the same ratio is maintained for the next 150 years then there would not be a sufficient number of sane persons to make bread for the insanes." Then this alienist began to discuss the insanity subject for a minute and was not long in reaching the conclusion, that even now almost one-half of the people in the world are more or less crazy. The heretofore easy going Englishman is becoming just as excitable as the hot blooded Spaniard, who have for centuries enjoyed seeing a man and a bull put in a ring and fight each other until the one or the other met his death, and it mattered very little to them which one was killed. Today the mad populace of civilized countries is damning some one, tomorrow, perhaps, the same ones are lionizing the damned ones of yesterday. The whole human family, especially the so-called civilized class isas restless as a caged tigeress roving hither and thither for some new excitement. Such a person is only partially crazy, but he or she frets and fumes in that semi-crazy condition until the real thing comes upon him and then to some mad house he must go. In his meditation the man of medicine ended by suggesting, that if some of the millions of dollars that are being expended on tuberculosis be used in preventing the spread of the disease of insanity, which is becoming just as fatal as the former. This is a subject which no one seems inclined to talk about, lest some one else thinks that the reason he is trying to do something to prevent the spread of insanity some relatives of his is crazy. There is perhaps more truth than poetry in the suggestion, but that's all the greater reason why something should be done. Unfortunately for the citizen of the United States he is money mad and his whole life is spent in trying to devise ways and means whereby a fortune may come to him before death overtakes him. The man in his seventies with a sufficient amount of wealth, if properly conserved, to not only last him the balance of his life, but his children and perhaps his children's children, is still fighting for the money the same as the man only twenty-one years of age and just starting out to make enough to maintain himself or perhaps a family in its incipency. It is argued that, the man that has been active in business lines until he is sixty years of age will die in five years' time if he should suddenly retire from business. He need not suddenly retire, but he can begin to retire when he is fifty-five and slide off by degrees. But the man who has accumulated a moderate fortune can always find plenty to do on reaching the age of sixty until the grim reaper appears, besides continuing to horde up dollars to be fought over when he is gone. Think about it, do you know a single man, however wealthy they may be, that is willing to quit cutting coupons. He may give thousands of dollars to charity or to elymonisianary institutions, but he goes to his office the next day with a double determination to make good the amount he has given away. Most every person with as high as a hundred thousand dollars will give considerable for the poor and needy, but if you will watch him he will take twice as much as he LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 UBLICAN 1910 VOLUME XVII. NUMBER 26 gave from some one else almost as needy as those he has given to. There is a certain man in Seattle, who, when asked why did he continue to make money as he was now in his seventies, replied: "I may not need the money, but I am unable to resist the temptation to make a dollar when I see the opportunity, and, I am afraid I never will cease to make a dollar until life is extinct." There are others equally avaricious for a dollar as this multi-millionaire. EDITORIAL EDICTS When the Davenport Tribune in its last week's issue said, "Teddy fizzled to a frazzle," we by intuition held our nose. "What will the Republicans do for Presidential timber with Taft and Teddy both knocked out by the people on the first round? It is hardly correct to say, all Democrats are brainless, but it seems a great majority of them are and the one or two that are not furnish the brainless ones with the dope for the press. Who is tho Democratic dopster for the weekly papers of that faith of the state of Washington? There must be such personage as the following excerpt is to be found in all of the papers last week: It is a drag and a draw between the fool with a gun out hunting for deer and the fool with a football out looking for game, as to which is the more suitable for him the insane asylum or the penitentiary. If it be true that Lake Chelan is more than 1,500 feet deep the farmers of the surrounding country can afford to vote the community dry because the lake has water enough to wet up things whenever it is wanted. Br'er Clayson of the Patriarch is awful sore over the state voting for woman suffrage. Do not get uneasy, old man, the women will not treat you as you tried to treat them. In other words, they are quite a forgiving bunch of humanity. "Prohibition and woman suffrage mongrel twins," growls Daddy Clayson; but in those states where woman suffrage has been in operation for some years, the records do not bear out the charge. Prohibition does not prevail in a single state where woman suffrage exists. "Will Women Vote?" is a White River Journal head line. Women in Washington can vote, but whether they will vote, remains to be seen. Let's hope, however, after all the worry they have given their friends to give them an opportunity to vote, that they will vote. Say, Lue Vernon! Who the devil are you? Are you male or female? Are you crazy or cranky? You say some rather cute things, but on the whole, you are rather crude. This will hurt your feelings and it's hoped it will hurt them bad enough to make you disclose yuor identity. Stand right up and speak out in meeting. If in any way organized labor is fighting the contracting and building firm of Stone & Webster, the firm has not been made preceptibly aware of it. In other words, the efforts that are being put forward to cripple the firm of Stone & Webster are so feeble that a gnat on the back of an elephant would annoy it more than the fight of organized labor against the firm is annoying it. Such a fight is so foolish that it becomes the act of fools. In Franklin county, Ohio, within the past two years Socialism has increased a thousand per cent, taking from the Republican party about 40 per cent and from the Democratic party something like 30 per cent. There is evidence to prove that the Socialists all over the United States are growing in numbers and awfully fast. For the first time in the history of the party a member of Congress was elected from its ranks in the recent election. It might happen, too, that T. R. in the near future will be doing the Socialist stunt. --- "Guggy Gone Again," is a Times headline. And from the stunts he pulled off in Seattle he has doubtless gone to the asylum. After all Mrs. Totten, the Wenatchee woman, did kill her neighbor, for the jury found it out after seveneen hours' deliberation. Corbett says, "Jack Johnson can't feint," which is a good failing in a prize fight, but he can and does make the other fellow faint, and that's the mik in the cocoa nut. If the Times is satisfied that Seattle is being financially injured by adverse publicity, then why in the duce does not the Times desist from doing it. Make a noise like quitting yourself, Colonel, and the big end of it will be cut out. After all the only sure remedy to cure the drink habit is to keep the stuff out of your mouth, and that any one can do if he or she only has the will to do so. Senator Bourne says, "Orogon is the best country in the world," and he must be correct as hundreds and hundreds of persons have been able to steal themselves rich in Oregon from Uncle Sam and there are still golden opportunities in the state for the man whose heart and hand are not in the right place. Dr. Crippen was hanged last Wednesday morning and thus ends one of the most sensational murder cases that has ever stirred the social equilibrium of England and America. Miss Leneve, who was arrested as an accessory, was acquitted and is now on the high seas headed for the United States where she will try to forget it. Mexico is almost in a state of revolution and if things continue as they now are within the next ten days the whole country will be involved in a civil war. Evidently the revolutionists hoped to get the United States mixed up in a scrap with Mexico when they would have been able to have carried out their plans more succesively than it now looks they will be. Appeal to Reason, a Socialist paper published at Gerard, Kansas, will have to appeal to the cell for copy, as the editor thereof has been found guilty and sentenced to six months in the federal prison at Fort Levenworth for sending scurrillous letters through the mails. The editor of the Patriarch of Seattle tried a trick along similar lines some years ago, and had it not been for the leniency of the presiding judge, he, too, would have had to done time in a federal prison, but he was only fined and admonished to be more careful in the future, and he has been. WAS THE EDITOR CRAZY Judge Miles Poindexter made a magnificent fight before the September primary. He was the choice of the people by the largest majority ever accorded a choice by the people for senator. And now the late election may defeat the wish of the people. The voters at the November election were not consistent. In one case the people voted for Mr. Poindexter as their choice for United States Senator, and then deliberately elect a Democratic legislature which lessens Mr. Poindexters' chance of being the next senator. This action of the voters will probably land Mr. Cotterill of Seattle, the Democratic nominee, in the senate. In this county the Democratic nominee for the legislature was elected over the Republican, on a county division platform, while the Republican was pledged against division and to support Judge Poindexter. The Democratic nominee was not pledged to anything. This must certainly be a very bright outlook for the real Poindexter adherent.—Brewster Herald in issue of November 19, 1910. The above is reproduced that you may be able to see what is some times palmed off on the unsuspecting public as a weekly newspaper. Barnum, the circus king had among his curios an animal for which no one had a name and he labeled it, "Barnum's What Is It?" After reading the above it occurs to us that perhaps "Mr. What Is It" had gotten loose and gone into the newspaper business. Contradictory comment would be as much out of place as the article in question. What strange things we see when we happen to not have our guns. PERSONS IN THE PUBLIC EYE S. A. Calvert, a former member of the legislature of the state of Washington from Whatcom county, subsequently for four years state land commissioner and since retiring from office more or less active in the political arena, died in Tacoma last week after a protracted illness. ```markdown ``` State Senator A. S. Ruth of Thurston county, president of the senate two years, ago and quite a factor in the politics of the late election through the columns of his paper, the Saturday Review, as well as on the stump, is reported in very poor health and has gone to California to recuperate in order to be in a condition to go through the legislative grind beginning January next. That he might have no responsibilities he has sold the Review to Eugene Lorton, who for a brief time was a member of the state board of control, and he will move the plant to Seattle, from which place the paper will be issued. Mr. Lorton has an idea that Seattle is in need of a good strong, healthy weekly paper and he proposes to supply a long felt want. Henry F. Jackson, a former councilman of Seattle, is of the opinion that the municipal lighting plant has done some good in an indirect way, but it has not justified or warranted the amount of money expended upon it. While the advent of the plant in the lighting and power arena may have caused the Seattle Electric Company and likewise the Snoqualmie to cut their lighting rates in twain, which saved the taxpayers many dollars personally, yet the city could have forced those companies to have furnished her juice and she in turn furnished it to the consumers for less than the maintaining of the same will ever cost them. The interest on the bonds that have been voted for the municipal lighting plant would have bought from the Snoqualmie all the power the city is furnishing at the present time to the consumers. That is a beautiful theory, but it would not work in practice. Once there was a merchant named Berry. He sent in his bill before it was due, and the person who received it wrote in reply: "Berry you have sent in your bill before it was due-Berry. Upon my feelings you are a rasp-Berry. Your father, the elder-Berry, would not have been such a goose-Berry. But you needn't look so blue-Berry, for I don't care a straw-Berry, and if you write again before June-Berry, I'll maul you until you are black-Berry. He was a lawyer and his wife was a great Sunday school worker. He was going away on a trip and his wife wanted him to get a Christmas banner for the Sunday school, but forgot to tell him what she wanted on the banner and how large she wanted it. After he had departed his wife hastened to the telegraph office and supposing that he would know that it was about the banner, merely wired: "Unto us a child is born, eight feet long and two feet wide. Your wife." The lawyer suddenly departed for parts unknown, and who could blame him. SUGGESTIONS FOR NEW CHARTER The following communication from one who has given municipal governments a great deal of thought has been addressed to the members of the charter revision commission and they have the same under consideration: First, and probably the most important, is the legislative department of our city government, which in my humble judgment should consist of not more than nine commissioners or councilmen at large. If the commission form of government is to be adopted, of course, that would do away with the Board of Public Works, which I want to refer to later in this letter. Should the plan of having nine councilmen at large be decided upon by your committee, then I wish to suggest the idea of having the city divided into three districts and three of said councilmen nominated from each district, but elected by the people at large. The second matter I wish to suggest is, that if we are to have a board of public works at all the said board should not consist of the heads of the different departments, which we now have in the city, our superintendent and engineer should be under some board of public works or directly under the legislative department of the city or under some executive board consisting of members other than the heads of the different departments. The third matter that I wish to suggest to you is the authority that the people have or lack in the matter of granting franchises and licenses for saloons and perhaps for other matters. The people do not have enough authority in this matter and whatever we incorporate in the new charter will have to be ratified by some succeeding legislator and I do not believe that this matter can be finally adjusted with entire safety to the city until there is a charter amendment to the state constitution allowing cities of the first-class full authority, without any hinderance on the part of the legislature of the state, to grant franchises and licenses as the people deem wise. FR DAY Novmeber 25.1910 Again for the purpose of reducing the cost of improvement in this city, I believe that the mayor of the city or some other official should have the authority to bid upon all contracts to be awarded by the city for the local improvement. This will at least fix the maximum cost of said local improvement. I enclose herewith, a weights and measure bill under which the city of Chicago is operating and which is proving very satisfactory; something very much needed in this city and with a hope of having such an ordinance passed in this city, a little over two years ago, I was instrumental in havinh our enarter amended with regard to this matter. I suggest that this be reincorporated and if you deem wise, more fully set forth the purposes and the method of operation. I believe that the secretary of the Retail Dealers' Association, will bear me out in the statement that there are altogether too many short weights and measures perpetrated by jobbers and wholesalers to the great loss of the consumer, but my purpose in this whole matter was to put some check upon dealers in coal and other commodities in bulk. I also enclose a part of the City Bulletin from the city of Chicago and I want to suggest that a more satisfactory way of notifying the people of the business transacted by the city would be by the daily or weekly Bulletin and I believe that we would save money by this means and could place the Bulletin into the hands of each tax payer who would file his name with the mailing department of the city. Another matter perhaps of minor importance that I wish to suggest is, that consumers of water should be credited for the money assessed against their property for the laying of water mains. As you are aware we charged abutting property owners $1.25 a foot for water mains and then charged them for the water. Our water department is on a paying basis, and a good deal of the money is now and then, at least, temporarily diverted to other uses. I believe that we could in the near future rt least credit these consumers with the cost of pipe or a certain percentage of the cost on their water bills. Finally, I wish to suggest, whether or not it would be a good idea to separate the office of city clerk from city comptroller. This latter suggestion has been brought to me by some of the persons in the city hall. I do not know much about it personally, but like the rat hole in a lawyer's office, concerning whom Abraham Lincoln wrote. "it is worth looking into." HI GILL ON WRONG TRACK Hi Gill is trying to create an issue, so that the attention of the public may be diverted from a certain investigation which is now in progress in the Queen City. The Seattle P.-I. has been making it tolerable uncomfortable for Hiram and to get away from a trying ordeal he has taken the initiative by calling a conference as he claims of the executives of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th class cities. Just what he intends to do is not quite clear, but whatever it is, he will fail. The citizenship of this state will have nothing to do with Mr. Gill, until he cleans house at Seattle and clears his own skirts. With the chief of police at Spokane suspended, with two of his detectives dismissed for receiving bribes, with both Gill and Wappenstein on trial, with talk of a recall of Roys in this city, it begins to look like the cities are incapable of governing themselves, and instead of passing laws giving cities more power the reverse should happen. The state should exercise more power. The recall should be in vogue and should apply to every officer from governor to the constable.—The (Tacoma) Forum. It is evident that neither work nor worry break down or wreck the health of those human beings who are properly constituted or who take care of themselves. Last Monday Hetty Green, the well known Wall street female operator, celebrated her seventy-fifth birthday and is reported in good health and will perhaps live to see at least twenty-five more summers roll arouud. While Mrs. Green has not done a great deal of worrying over financial matters, yet being the richest woman in the United States, the most of which she herself made by her own ingenuity, she must have had her share of worry, when the bulls and the bears were rushing each other out and in the pit. However, Mrs. Green was not so much a Wall street speculator as she was a Wall street scavenger, that is to say, to sit on the fence and watch the bulls or the bears rush each other and inflict dangerous financial wounds, when she would go to the injured ones and offer salve for the wounds providing they paid her a tremendous price for the same. The most of her millions it is said were made by her furnishing money to some fellow almost down and out and taking as high as a ten to one security. Her life has been one for which no one will shed a tear of regret when she passes in her checks. [Portrait of a man in a suit with a tie, facing forward, set against a dark background. The portrait is framed with an ornate decorative border.]] It is being whispered among the political quid nuncs that W. H. Paulhamus will be named as president of the sentate. The grounds for this persistent rumor are based on the fact that Governor Hay has decided to support him. The Hay forces in the senate throughout Eastern Washington are reported active in the interest of Paulhamus and they claim already a sufficient number of votes to assure his election. At a meeting of the King county senators and R. D. Nichols pledged themselves to support Senator Allen. Senator Allen had been given to understand, if not by the governor himself, by some one close to him, that the governor would keep his hands off the fight so long as it was between Allen and Paulhamus, but it begins to look as though the governor had been misquoted or that the east side senators are using his name without authority. There is hardly a doubt now but that county unit and prohibition are going to be the big issues in the coming legislature and that the anti-saloon forces are taking no chances in selecting a man for the president of the senate and will therefore name a man that went down the line two years ago on every prohibition measure. It will be remembered that in that fight Paulhamus voted right from an anti-saloon idea on every question and it will be further remembered that in that fight Allen voted wrong and though he subsequently worked on other measures in perfect harmony with the governor and his legislative forces, the mere fact that he voted with the wets and defeated the county unit idea stuck in their craws and they are going to punish him for it. Regardless of his local option ideas Senator Paulhamus will make one of the ablest and perhaps one of the fairest presiding officers in the history of the state senate of Washington. He is a progressive farmer and resides near Sumner in Pierce county. FRIDAY. November 25. 1910 DECLINE IN RURAL POPULATION The census figures for Missouri, announced recently, show a marked falling off in the rural population of the state. The state as a whole, showed a gain of approximately 187,000, or six per cent over the figures of 1900. But in the two largest cities, St. Louis and Kansas City, the gain was 197,000. So there was a net decrease of 10,000 in the population of the state outside of these cities. Missouri has been a prosperous agricultural state in the last decade, and the director of the census, Dr. E. Dana Durand, expresses the belief that conditions there are typical of those of other agricultural states of the Middle West. Several explanations have been offered for this decline. Undoubtedly cheap land in the Southwest has attracted thousands of families from the older states. Land has steadily advanced in value, and the farmer, who would have expected his sons to settle on adjacent farms a generation ago, is apt to now advise them to go into the newer country of Oklahoma and Texas, where farm land is much cheaper. The enormous increase in population made by these two states in the last decade has been due chiefly to immigration from the Middle West. The older states have emptied their surplus population into them. The constant improvement in farm machinery probably has some effect. The farmer can get on now with fewer hands than was possible formerly, so the "hired" men have drifted away to some extent from the rural districts. But more far-reaching than this has been the general drift to the cities of the farm population, due partly to the desire for larger opportunities to make money, partly to dissatisfaction with the hardships and loneliness of farm life and desire for the lights, the theaters, and the attractions of the city. A letter sent out by Department of Agriculture a year ago asked the question, "What changes would make farm life more attractive for women?" Three hundred and fifty of the six hundred replies received said, "Water in the house." Others spoke of the desirability of gas. People no longer are satisfied with conditions that once they accepted as a matter of course. The absence of conveniences is noticed much more than a few years ago. The result has been to drive the young people to the cities. The Kansas City Star reports one country lawyer who said that he had written perhaps a hundred letters in the last ten years to a friend connected with the Kansas City street railway company recommending young men for employment as motormen and conductors. He had invariably advised them not to go to the city, but his counsel was unavailing. The lure was too strong. Another exceedingly important factor, which will be possible of analysis only after fuller census figures are available, is the decline in the size of families. In one important agricultural county for instance, a staff correspondent of the Star found that the school population had fallen from 7,800 in 1890 to 6,4000 this last year. In 1890 the school children constituted thirty-one per cent of the population. This year they are twenty-six per cent. The number of marriage license has fallen off since the early eighties. This correspondent found a general expression of opinion that the number of large families was much smaller than fifteen or twenty years ago. If the Missouri states are typical of other states, as seems likely, the census is going to furnish much in interesting material for sociological investigation.—New York Outlook. A committee of five named by the president of the city council after weeks of investigation declared in a partial report that sufficient evidence had been picked up against the chief of police to ask him to come before them and explain, but he flatly refused to do so, and the committee reported the situation to the general council and it unaminously recommended that Mayor Hiram Charles Gill dismiss the chief from the service of the city. Whether right or wrong we verily do not known, but five men declared it was so and seventeen others voted to sustain their findings, and yet one of the largest papers published in the state came out the next day and said the council found Wappy not guilty. It is said by some that it is a newspafer fight, but if it is the courts, the city council, the improvement clubs and every civic organization that has had the matter under advisement has voted against Mayor Gill and his chief of police. Whose right, all of those institutions or the editor of the Seattle Daily Times, who has been driven out of every town in which he has published a newspaper, and if he had his just deserts he would be run out of Seattle immediately if not sooner is a question for the people to settle. A statement was made a few days ago by a prominent railroad man in a public speech that, the railroads of the state of Washington are being called upon to pay more taxes than the same railroads are paying dividends to those holding the stocks and bonds, but in It is being whispered among the hamus will be named as president of persistent rumor are based on the fief support him. The Hay forces in the ton are reported active in the interest a sufficient number of votes to assis King county senators and R. D. port Senator Allen. Senator Allen is the governor himself, by some one he keep his hands off the fight so long as but it begins to look as though the great side senators are using his name doubt now but that county unit and sues in the coming legislature and the chances in selecting a man for the fore name a man that went down the bition measure. It will be remembered right from an anti-saloon idea on even membered that in that fight Allen quently worked on other measures and his legislative forces, the mere defeated the county unit idea stuck punish him for it. Regardless of him will make one of the ablest and perhaps in the history of the state senate farmer and resides near Sumner in I spite of this fountain head statement the railroads are not paying in proportion a tenth part as great taxes as the man who owns a little home, and the owners of small homes are compelled to pay their taxes, while the railroads beat about the bush and make it cost the county about much as to collect the taxes assessed against them as the money they pay in amounts to. Barring the amount the official grafters get the money paid in for the taxes on the part of corporations and individuals all go to the maintenance of the county, state and general government and no patriotic and law abiding citizen should hesitate to pay whatever taxes are assessed against the property owned by him. The country cannot run unless you pay your taxes and this applies to each and every person or corporation owning property. In adopting the township system of government the Everett Herald is of the opinion that, Whatcom has taken a backward step. What a pity that the voters of Whatcom did not know of the great wisdom of the editor before they voted and thereby saved them taking this backward step. Now before another county of the state takes such a backward step you get out an " 'spress yourself, " and may perhaps it won't do it. Unless some strong couuter evidence is produced by the lighting department there is grave danger of it losing its strong Arm of alleged destruction. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. PULHAMUS In political quid nunc that W. H. Paul- lated the sentate. The grounds for this attest that Governor Hay has decided to senate throughout Eastern Washing- of Paulhamus and they claim already be his election. At a meeting of the Nichols pledged themselves to sup- pede been given to understand, if not by close to him, that the governor would it was between Allen and Paulhamus, Gernor had been misquoted or that the without authority. There is hardly a prohibition are going to be the big is- tat the anti-saloon forces are taking no president of the senate and will there- line two years ago on every prohibi- d that in that fight Paulhamus voted by question and it will be further re- voted wrong and though he subse- perfect harmony with the governor that he voted with the wets and in their craws and they are going to local option ideas Senator Paulhamus los one of the fairest presiding officers of Washington. He is a progressive perce county. W. H. PAULHAMUS A copy of White's Sayings was recently sent to the "Colored Republican," and for some unaccountable reason it was put with the mail of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. Since the last election shake up we were surprised to find that there were either any white or colored Republicans left, but White's Sayings were always both foolish and fickle. E.W.WAY & CO. ANCHOR YOUR SAVINGS IN SEATTLE BAILEY BUILDING SEATTLE BEST BOARD COMPANIES REAL ESTATE-INSURANCE --- (ane deveiopment of cleus’ appliances and the transfer of power through electric lines for long distances has made the use of water power to produce elec- tricity one of the most import- ant sources of power that we have in this country, and it will So affect the cost of production in all the fields of manufacture and production of the necessities of life as to require the government to retain control over the use by private capital of such power when it can only be exercised upon sites which belong to the government. Such sites can be properly parted with under con- ditions of tenure, use and com- pensatian, consistent on the one hand with reasonable profit to the private capital invested and onthe other with the right of the public to secure the furnish- ing of such power at reasonable rates toevery one. Thereshould be a condition of forfeiture if the owner of the power site does not within a certain time expend capital sufficient to develop the power and after the develop- ment. shall charge rates to the public beyond what is a reasonable profit on the cap- ital invested in the improvement to be regulated by the govern- ment. The amount of compensation that ought to be charged by the government for the use of the water power sites might perhaps be left to readjustment every ten or fifteen or twenty years. The compensation to be charged at the outset might well be pure- ly nominal, but after the project has become a complete success and the profit has grown toa considerable percentage of the amount invested, then there would seem to be no reason why the public might not be benefited by sharing in the profits of the transaction to an amount to be fixed upon by arbitration or in some other method at the end of a stated period of fifteen or twenty years. This is an ar- rangement toward which the ten- ure of all public utilities is tend- ing, and I know of no reason why it ghould not be introduced into the governmental disposi- tion of such sources of continu- ous power as th2 water sites upon public lands are likely to be. I know that it has been the course in the past under the bounteous and generous disposi- tion of the government to give these water sites away under ex- isting inadequate acts, but we have reached a time now when the importance of these water power sites has greatly increased and there would seem to be no reason why it would interfere with a speedy development of the country to impose restric- tions upon the use of such water sites equitable as between the public and the investor. This is a matter which Congress must take up. The water power sites are now generally disposed of under the same kind of proced- ure as that by which agricultur- PRESIDENT TAFT AND COSERVATION amounting W upwards Of f0uUr | million acres were temporarily withdrawn from settlement in order to prevent the acquisition of water power sites under the general land laws. This amount has been reduced under the pres- ent administration to 450,000 acres, which include even more ascertained water power sites than the original withdrawals. It should be understood that these withdrawals are tempor- ary, and can only be justified as made in order to permit Con- gress to legislate on the subject of water power sites. Should Congress conclude not to do so, it would be difficult for the Exe- cutive to find the authority in- definitely to withhold these lands from settlement under the gen- eral laws on the ground that they contain water power sites. The legislative power is vested in Congress and not in the Execu- tive. I shall, therefore, urge upon Congress at its next session the passage of a law authorizing the dispooition of such water power sites upon terms to be agreed upon by the Secretary of the Interior with the proposed purchaser of the character al- ready indicated. It may turn out that restrictions of this sort are so burdensome as to discour- age the investment of capital, and it may be necessary to modi- fy the requirements on this ac- ; count. But my own impression is that the demand for water power is going to be so great | that these restrictions will not - prevent the investment of capi- - tal, but will ultimately bring to _ the public coffers a reyenue from _an entirely proper source and - willsecure the development of a power for manufacturing indus- tries that will probably in time exceed the utility and value of coal and become a substitute for it. Fourth: I now come to what should be the proper disposition of coal lands, oil lands and phos- phate lands, The anthracite coa strike evoked a great deal of discussion in respect to the evils of ownership by private persons of a monopoly of the country, and led Mr. Roosevelt to declare the necessity of pre- serving from acquisition by mo- nopolizing syndicates the public eaal lands still udisposed of. The truth is in Alaska the de- posits of coal are so great that when they are developed they will doubtless furnish coal to the entire Pacific coast. They have been reversed from filings since 1906. Therearesome 900 claims, but it is probable that under the evidence adduced most of these clims will prove to be defective. With such an immense tract of coal land at a place near the sea as this is, from which coal can be easily furnished b3 water to the entire coast, it becomes high- ly important to settle, before this land shall be disposed of un- der present laws, whether we are to retain any different con- trol over these lands from those SEE WVU, Se Vive wee lease the right to take coal from the land at a specified compensa- tion per ton, that is, to provide a system of royalties, or to sell the deposits of the land outright to the coal miner. In ever case, restriction by way of forfeiture ought to be included to. prevent a monopoly of ownership of the coal land in any one set of men so as to enable them to control the price of coal, This is the great object of a change in their method of disposition. Some provision should be made with the reference to the dispo- sition of phosphate land. This land, which is found in Wyom- ing and Idaho, contains the won- derful fertilizer which it will soon be necessary to use on much of the land in the United States, and as the need for the use of this fertilizer on much land is growing, we should see to it, if possible, that the product be not subject to this monopoly or sold outside the United States. The oil lands of Colifornia as well as the phosphate lands, and practically all the coal lands, have been withdrawn from set- tlement in order to await the ac- tion of Congress; and ! expect to recommend to Congress legisla- tion on the lines above indicated, with the general purpose of en- abling the Secretary of the In- terior in the administration of the land laws to secure more ben- efit to the public and greater -_certainity in the security against the monopoly of resources. What however, I wish to make as plain as possible is that these purposes cannot be accomplished unless Congress shall act, and that the burden of carrying out the policy of the conservation of our re. sources, in respect to the matters that I have discussed is upor Congress. The executive car recommend, but the legislature must enact. After the enact- ment of general authority it is easy for the executive to make proper regulation to carry out in detail the general purpose which Congress had, but the first duty in respect to the conservation of resources falls upon Congress, There has been a good deal of discussion in the newspapers as to the attitude of the present ad- ministration toward the general policy of the conservation of re- scources, and some very unfair and altogether unfounded infer- ences have been drawn. The truth is my administration is pledged to follow out the policies of Mr. Roosevelt in this regard, and while that pledge does not involve me in any obligation to carry them out unless I have Congressional authority to do so, itdoes require that I take every step and exert every legitimate influence upon Congress to enact the legislation which shall best subserve the purposes indicated. Ido not think that Congress, if properly approached, will object to adopting legislation of the general character which a ee Eo ae esas ne But the difficuly is that when- ever everybody is prosperous, when everybody is comfortable, then is the time our old friend, Satan, steps in and helps along the evil cause. Then is the time when we are apt to be inert and enjoy the things we have with- out looking forward to the fu- ture and seeing that the evils which will grow and ultimately swamp us. It is to the people we must look for an enforcement of these principles. You should select your representatives and have them know tkat you are watching them in Congress and see that they follow the line of enforcement. Of couase we want prosperity, but we wish prosperity in such a way that there shall be an equity of oppor- tunity among the individuals, so that everybody shall get his share, and that it shall not be confined toa few who monopo- lize the means of production or the means of transportation, and thus prevent that equality of dis- tribution which we like to see. It isa question of the enforce- ment of the law. I think Mr. Roosevelt’s course impressed upon the business community and those gentlemen who were prone to take the means of mo- nopoly the necessity for observ- ing a higher standard in business and that they were willing to lay down those other methods, The truth is that money and wealth contribute nothing tc ' make ourselves better unless ' they unable us to think some. thing of others and to helt | Others — those who are down— ' onward in the progress of life. | We cannot all be altruists ir the sense that we devote our at ' tention to somebody else all the ' time, for we have to look after ourselves and our families; but | am sure that in the last genera ation there has been an improve- ment throughout our country with reference to a charitable feeling toward all on the part of each to help all.—Wm. Howard Taft in The Columbian. y = CC : te Fe / i VICTOR M. PLACE Among those who have an- nouncek their candidacy as a member of the seaool board for the ensuing three years is Victor M. Place, one of Seattle’s lead- ing attorneys. Should he be elect- ed he would by no means bea novice in school work. He isa graduate of Dartmouth College with a degree of A. B., and is alsoa graduate of the Harvard Law school. While in College FRIDAY November 25, 1910 he was the college coach for the football team and for three years coached the team at the Ohio Weslyian College. He was made physical director of the Univers ity of Washington in 1906-7-8, He gave up that work to follow his prefession and is now one of the practicing attorneys of Seat- tle with offices in the Northern Bank Block. It is safe to say that should he be elected he will be one of the most valuable ac- quisitions the city school board has had for many years. He is being supported by some of the active school workers of this city. PROBATE NOTICE—IN THE SUPER- jor Court of Wahington, for he Coun- ty of King. State of Washington, County of King, as. In the Matter of the Estate of Allan Poole, Deceased. No, 7346. Notice of Settlement of inal’ Account. Notice is hereby given that Phebe L. Poole, executrix of the last will and testament of Allan Poole, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said Court, her Final, Account as such executrix,’ and that Thursday, the 15th day of Decem- ber, 1910, at 9:30 o'clock, a. m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in sald King County, has been duly appoinnted by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his ex- ceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same, Witness, the Hon. A. W. Frater, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto affixed this 18th day ot November, 1910. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. Nov. '25—Dee. 9, 1910, IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of John E. Corbally, Deceased. No. 12024, No- tice to Creditors, Notice is hereby given that all per- sons having claims against the estate of Jokn B. Corbally, deceased, are hereby Tequired to present the same, with vouchers in support thereof, to Mary Corbally, executrix of said estate, at the office of Robert F, Booth, 811 Lowman Building, Seattle, Washington, that be- ing the place for the transaction of such business, within one year from the date of the first publication hereof, MARY CORBALLY, Executrix of the Wstate of John B.’Cor- pally, , Deceased. ROBERT F. BOOTH, Attorney for Executrix, $11 Lowman Building, Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication November 26; last, December 23,1910.” IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. May V. Russell, Plaintiff, vs. Jonh ‘T. Russell, Defendant. No. 77203. Sum- mons by Publication, The State of Washington to the said John 'T. Russell, Defendant: You are hereby’ summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the ‘25th day of November, 1910, and defend the above entitled action’ in the above entitled Court, and answer the com- plaint of the’ plaintiff, and. serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for plaintiff at his of- fice below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be ren- dered against you according to the de- mand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of’ said Court, ‘The object of the above entitled ac- tion is to obtain a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and non-support. JOHN R, WILSON, ‘Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 539 New York Block, Seattle, Washington, Nov. 25, 1910—Jan. 6, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE August 19, September %’ 1910. State of Washington, for King County. IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintic, vs, B. Kludvig, and all persons unknown, if any, hav- ing or claiming an interest in and to tho herelnafier described, real prop- erty, Defendants. No. 75299. Notice and’ Summons, State of Washington: To the above de~ fendants and each of them: Sept. 9, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this uction and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an’ interest or estate prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on fle in this cause and Court, L. H. CRAVER, Plaintift. A. C, MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintifr. People’s Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, Preat. R J. Reekte, Vico Prest. incorpnt Seetanatto neo) . Commercial Savings and Trust General Bank and Exchan,e. Cor Second ant Pike 8 — Seattle, Wase 1. H, Craver, Plaintiff, vs. J. A, MUs- ee ee ee PUGET SOUND NATIONAL BANK of Seattle. Capital Stock $300.0ne Lepwsits $8,250,000. Jacob Furth, President, R. V. Ankeny, Cashier. F. K. Struve, Vice-President. O. W. Crockett, Asst. Cashier. We do strictly a commercial bust- ness. We solicit the accounts of in- dividuals, firms and banks. WHAT SOME WERE THANKFUL FOR ```markdown ``` THAT OLD GLORY STILL LEADS Despite the alleged hard times throughout the Northwest it is safe to say 90 per cent of the citizens of Seattle were able to sit down to a first-class turkey dinner yesterday (Thanksgiving Day), and say, 'Bless the Lord oh my soul.' The school children had been looking forward to the day with bulging eyes and empty stomachs and out of the fourteen-pound turkey that graced the Thanksgiving table not much save the bones was left, if there happened to be four or five children around the festal board. Those little fellows in their childish way were thankful especially for the turkey, cranberry sauce and the accompanying delicacies. As to the older heads we are inclined to think many of them were exceedingly thankful, and among those who have come under the observation of the editor hereof, it might not be out of order to let the readers of The Seattle Republican know for what they were personally thankful. J. W. Maxwell, president of the Seattle Commercial club, was thankful that either his good looks, his master mind or his cuteness has, within the past year, made him one of the foremost men in Seattle. Not quite a year ago he was elected president of the Commercial club, in the reorganization of the bank he was made one of the vice-presidents and likewise one of the important men of the institution and subsequently he was named as one of the members of the charter revision committee. \* \* \* Charles W. Wappenstein, chief of police of Seattle, like the colored deacon, who arose in prayer meeting and said, "My brothers and sisters, I know I took a chicken, I knows I have not always paid by hones' debts, I knows I has visited places where I ought not, but thank God, my brothers and sisters, amid all dat, I have never lost my religion, and I am also thankful that He has said, "He that is faithful to the end will eventually sit in glory by the side of the Crucified One." Jacob Furthe, president of the Seattle Electric Company, at the time he was on the high seas returning from China and was first of all thankful that he had had a safe and sane trip. He is thankful that the desire to make money is no longer his ambition and that he has decided to never die rich, and to that end distributed a large bunch of wealth this year and has splendid prospects of relieving himself of another big bunch next year. James A. Moore, the well known builder and promoter, is thankful that he is just as handsome this year as he was last, that the ladies all smile when he enters and that his smiles at them are all doubly reciprocated. Incidentally, that as he grows older it seems doubly easy for him to put off big deals, which, barring mishaps, will make him one of the wealthiest men in the Northwest in the near future. Otto A. Case, that he was no longer a 'tin soldier.' FRIDAY. November 25. 1911 *** * * * THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN J. D. Lowman, president of the Chamber of Commerce, builder and promoter, was thankful that the members of the Chamber of Commerce had liberally responded to his financial appeals and as a result the fame of the city is being spread throughout the civilized world. He was thankful that he was able to devote his time to the Chamber's wants and that his work is telling. Reginald H. Thomson was thankful that the North-west was taken from British Columbia, in which he could build Seattle, and was also thankful that an allwise Providence directed him to place the city, unlike the great Roman capital of seven hills, but on seven times seven hills that he might wash them down and fashion a city after his own heart. L. H. Gray was thankful that the last Thanksgiving festival found him just as able to contribute immense boxes of those things that make the poor and the needy think, God has made us all, as on former occasions and as he sat by his fireside he was further thankful that the love of a dollar did not make hi mhold on to it until the eagle screamed in his hand, and to make others happy likewise made him happy. Hon. John. L. Wilson, former United States senator and senatorial aspirant at the hands of the last primary election, is thankful that he was able to look into the future and see what was coming; and that he had the good sense to pull the other fellow between himself and the fire, which, to say the least, was a great stunt. Who under the circumstances wouldn't be thankful? That Judge Thomas Burke, like the preacher that had one of the deacons to pass his hat through the congregation for a free will offering after he had pawed the air for an hour, which on being returned to him, was without a single cent, exclaimed, "I am thankful that I got my hat back." Judge Burke really got his hat back from his campaign manager, but it had a narrow escape. Dr. Mark A. Mathews is thankful that he stands head and shoulders above all Seattleites and that for those bickering at him to make him hear what they have to say each will have to carry a wireless telegraph contrivance and likewise supply him with one. He was thankful for the things he had not heard. William Pitt Trimble was thankful that women had been given the ballot and he ended his Thanksgiving prayer with, "I'll show them a thing or two from now on." H. P. Striekland was thankful that the Vulean Iron Works was making Seattle famous throughout Christendom. *** --- *** 图 Gen. George B. Lamping was thankful that army shoulder straps and epilets were invented for him. Incidentally he was thankful that Gov. Hay has a good stiff backbone and that the governor has implicit confidence in him, and, viewing it from the standpoint of a fat salary, he had just cause to be thankful. --- Hiran Charles Gill is thankful that the opposition to him in the spring election got only centered on Bouillion, which put the average business man in the position to either vote for him and municipal viciousness or Bouillion and crankiness. It made him mayor and of course he was very thankful. --- H. C. Henry was thankful that he had reached the conclusion that the teachings of a sainted mother, after all, was the kind to die by, and each human being is his brother's keeper, all of which within the past year has moved him to contribute large sums of money and his time to the cause of the afflicted. . . . J. E. Chilberg doubtless thanked "me and God" for the success of the A. Y. P. and it was not a bad prayer as God does not generally give much time to the details of such things, but the weather was all that could be expected and there was where He shined and little Eddie did the rest. --- Charles H. Frye, the Seattle packing house king, is thankful that pork and beef are soring downward and that he will get time enough to put his money away as fast as it accumulates, a thing he has not been able to do for the past twelve years. Matt H. Gormley, the King county treasurer, was thankful of nearing the station when he can be relieved of the body of this dead man, to which he had been tied for the past six years. He sees a chance to make a piece of money next year and was thereby very, very thankful. --- Bob Hodge, sheriff of King county, is thankful for the wonderful genius he has developed into within the past year, which is of such a gigantic proportions that he wonders to himself, "Why did God put all the sense of the human family in me." Col. Alden J. Blethen is thankful that, "Mayor Gill has made ME and Wappy the whole show in his administration, which has enabled us to do things to our liking. He perhaps has closed his thanksgiving prayer with, "the Lord certainly takes care of His own. --- W. R. Crawford, owner of the Renton Southern Railway company, was thankful that he had the bulge on the residents along his line and that he had an opportunity to treat them like so many cattle and was making good use of the opportunity. . . . George F, Vandervere, prosecuting attorney of King county, was wondering for what he could be thankful when it occurred to him that Hodge would be a candidate for governor and then he would not do a thing to him. J. P. Agnew, that Judge Burke had no more political judgment than to turn over the distributing of his campaign slush to him. E. W. Andrews, that though bank consolidations come and go, the Seattle National bank goes on and on in the even tenor of its way. Will E. Humphrey, that my opponent was as weak as water, thereby affording me an opportunity to slip in once more. Scott Calhoun, that I got from under hotel load and didn't do "so worse" in the trade. God takes care of His own. L. J. Colman, that the Welfare League has done good work and cock sure of getting the Gill-Wappy scalp. The Seattle Republican is thankful that it has enjoyed the confidence of the business men of this community and takes this opportunity to thank them for the same, and to add in conclusion that, it is doing business at the old stand and in case you have a legal notice for publication it will do the same for you at a reasonable rate and with perfect accuracy. Telephone Main 305 and we will do the rest. 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King, 60-Day Summons. Carrie Hull, plaintiff, vs. Sarah Galloway and John Doe Galloway, her husband, and also any and all unknown or presumed claiming any right-title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, and also any and all unknown heirs of the said defendants above named, defendants.—No. The State of Washington to the above of the defendant, Sarah Galloway and John Doe Galloway, her husband, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, and also any and all unknown or presumed claiming any rights of the defendants above named: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of first publication of this summons, to wit; within sixty (60) days after the 28th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at the undersigned office stated; and an issue of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the bank of said court. This action is brought for the purpose of quieting title in the plaintiff to the following described property to wit: Lots 27 and 28, in Block 5, of Chilberg's Addition to West Seattle, situated in King County, State of Washington. REVELLE, REVELLE & REVELLE, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Postoffice address: 605-608 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. Oct. 28, Dec. 9, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication. James Henry, plaintiff, vs. F. B. Hunt- County James Henry, plaintiff, vs. F. B. Huntley and Jane Doe Huntley, his wife, whose true christian name is known, defendants.—No. 74840. State of Washington to the defendants, F. B. Huntley and Jane Doe Huntley. ley, his wire: You and each of you are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 30th day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer r the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned as torney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case you fail so do, judgment will be rendered against the plaintiff against the demand of the plaintiff with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to recover the sum of $105.95 together with costs and interest due from you to the plaintiff herein for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered to you by the plaintiff in this action during the last past three years. A writ of attachment issued out of your office and court lots 26 and 37 block 8, of Green Lake Reservoir Addition to the city of Seattle have been attached thereunder. F. E. CARVER. Attorney Office and postoffice address. Northern Bank & Trust Bldg.. Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- t. Louise Ashen, Plaintiff, vs. Lester Ashen, Defendant. No. — Summons for Publication. The State of Washington, to Lester Ashen, Defendant. You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above sentenced court and defend the above entitled action within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the date of the said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 106, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for the plaintiff below named, at his office, below stated, and in case of your failure so do judgment to the rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff which has been filed with the court of the above entitled court. clerk of the office. The object of this action is to secure a divorce on the ground of desertion for more than one year. A. C. McDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address, 524 Bally Building, Seattle, Wash. Oct 7—Nov 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. Maua A. Boschert, plaintiff, vs. Charles Pacey, defendant—No. 76217. The State of Washington, to the said Charles C. Boschert, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear first publication of this summons, today, within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above enquiry in the above end of the plaintiff, and answer the complaint your answer upon the undersigned at low stated; and in case of your failure against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with said court. the plaintiff. Briefly stated the object of this action is to dissolve the bonds of matriony existing between plaintiff and defendant and to grant the plaintiff divorce from the defendant on the ground of abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant for more than one year last past, and for the failure of the defendant to support the plaintiff and his family, and to award the custody of their minor son, Robert E. Boschert, to the plaintiff. For further particulars reference is made on the complaint now on file in the office of the clerk of the above entitlement court. Suite 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington Oct. 7-Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, or King Coun- dency Collection. ty. Summ. elibates J. Marston, plaintiff, vs. Richard J. Marston, defendant—No 76271. The State of Washington, to the said Richard K. Marston, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixteen days after the date of the first publication of this summons, today, within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of sale court. The judge of the above entitled action is for an absolute divorce on the grounds of non-support, and custody of two minor children. JOHN R. WILSON. Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. address, 539 New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 7—Nov. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Thos. Eaton, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants. No. 75684. Notice of Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants, and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 23rd of October, 1988, membered B61750, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $1.65, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, towit: Beginning at a point 165 feet east and 33 feet south of the N. W. corner of the SW 1-4 of Sec. 10, Tp. 26 N., R. 5 E., W. M.; thence east 60 feet, thence S. 120 feet, thence west 60 feet, thence N. 120 feet to the place of beginning. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit. For the year 1907, the sum of $1.35; for the year 1908, the sum of 87 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 28 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said institution, to write within 40 days after Sept. 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, to each of the parties, will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the amount obtained and found it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD, A. C. MacDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 624 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Summons by Publication. County, Summons by Publication. Catherine Lomas, plaintiff, vs. Harry Lomas, defendant—No. — The State of Washington, to Harry Lomas. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 28th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your warrant to the unsealed attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this complaint is to obtain an absolute divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant on the grounds of cruelty that he has been and for the return of her maiden name. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Oct. 28—Dec. 9, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver Plaintiff, vs. Preston Mill Co. and all persons known, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75685. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April, 1910, and numbered BE1754 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1905, in the amount of 90 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King county, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at S. E. cor. of N. E. 1-4 of Sec. 32, Tp. 24, N. R. 7 E., W. M., thence west 420 feet to School Dist. No. 76, thence north to N. P. Ry., thence easterly along Ry. to easterly line of said section, thence S. 235 feet to the place of beginning. (Part of N. E. 1-4 of the N. E. 1-4 Sec. 32, Tp. 24 N., R. E. W. M.) That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1906, the sum of 57 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of 72 cents; for the year 1908, the sum of 44 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 77 cents. Which several sums been based on the date of 5 per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and answer within sixty days after the date of the notice, and not the notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Sept. 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said salaried person as a defense you answer in the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his offre below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, forecosing the leniency of said real property for the parcels of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charg- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ed against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Wyman, Partridge & Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, defendants.—No. 74736. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 2nd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled complaint and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The judgment against you is to recover a judgment against said defendants upon a claim by plaintiff for goods, warees and merchandise sold and delivered to said defendants by said plintiff in the sum of Two Thousand One Hundred Twenty-seven and 10-100 Dollars, the 22,000 dollars from the 2nd day of May, 1910, besides the costs of suit, and in which said action an attachment has been taken out and levled. LEOPOLD M. STERN, and J. M. RUSSELL, Attorneys for plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 705 Low- man Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 2, Oct. 15, 1910. IN THE JUSTICE'S COURT BEFORE John E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Summons by Publication. Blossom-Provine Lumber Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. T. W. Williams and Jane Doe Williams, his wife, whose true Curse-Name is unknown, defendants, No. 13472. To T. W. Williams and Jane Doe Williams, his wife, defendants. In the name of the State of Washington you are hereby notified that Blossom-Provine Lumber Co. has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Seattle, King County, Washington, to-wit: 210 New York Block, on the 23rd day of November, 1910 at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a.m., and unless you appear and then and there answer the same will be taken as confessed, and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said claim is to recover from the defendants a balance due for goods, wares and merchandise, to-wit: lumber sold and delivered to said defendants by the plaintiff within the last past three years. Complaint filed September 29, 1910. JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace. Oct. 28—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication. Frieda Marshall, plaintiff, vs. Joe Marshall, defendant.—No. The State of Washington to Joe Marshall. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1914 and determined the appropriate action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand below stated and in case of your failure with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is that the plaintiff, on the grounds of habitual drunkenness of the defendant and the neglect and refusal of the defendant husband to make suitable provision for his family, be granted an absolute divorce on or before the commencement of the custody and control of the child of the plaintiff and defendant herein, and such other and further relief as the court may direct. F. J. CARVER Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Oct. 7—Nov. 18, 1910. INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. IN PROBATE—In the matter of the estate of Emil Engelmann, deceased, No. 10.408. Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Paul G. Engelmann, administrator of the estate of Emil Engelmann, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for the distribution of the property of among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to au horize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Emil Engelmann, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of Washington at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Department No. 7 on the 5th day of December, 1910, at the hour of 10:00 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should no be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of escrow among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published in the newspaper before the said 5th day of December, 1910, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 1st day of October, 1910. J. BUBERT H. LINDSAY, C. C. John R. Wilson, A torney for said Estate, 539 New York Block, Seattle. Nov. 4, Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Order Appointing Day for Settlement of Account. In the county the Estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased.-No. 11797. Hallie Burkholder, administratrix of the estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased, having this day rendered and presented for settlement and filed in this court of the county and for administration of the estate of said deceased. It is therefore ordered that Monday, the 28th day of November, A. D. 1910, at 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon be and the same is hereby appointed for the settlement of the said account; and that the clerk give notice thereof to the public be held of least three public places in this county, one of which shall be at the place where this court is held, at least 14 days before said day of settlement and by publishing such notice in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper published and of general circulation in this county, once a week two weeks prior to said day of settlement. Done in open court this 9th day of November, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. "Notice of the Hearing on a Petition for Specific Performance. In the Matter of the Estate of Sarah E. T. Mitchell deceased—No. 120 November, in that that E. B. Mitchell, the administrator in the above entitled cause, on the 3rd day of November, 1910, filed in the above entitled court his petition asking leave of the court to specifically perform a certain contract with Nellie M. Peterson upon the following described property, tow- lots six (6), seven (7), fourteen (14), and fifteen (15). Block two (2), of the Second Addition to Adams Tracts, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the auditor's office of King County, Washington. And the court on said 3rd day of November, set the 12th day of December, 1910, at 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon, in Department No. 7, in the court house in Seattle, King County, Washington, as the time for hearing said petition; and all persons interested as creditors, heirs devises or personal representatives are ordered to appear in court where bieds to the granting of the said petition. Dated this 3rd day of November, 1910. E. B. MITCHELL, Administrator. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Administrator. Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication Blossom-President Barber Co., a corporation plaintiff, vs. A. Watkins and Jane Doe Watkins, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown; L. D. W. Shelton and Jane Doe Shelton, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, defendants.—No. — The State of Washington, to A. Watkins and Jane Doe Watkins, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown; L. D. W. Shelton and Jane Doe Shelton, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, defendants. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve copy of your witness on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to foreclose a lien for materials furnished by the plaintiff to the defendants to be used upon lots 43 and block 7. Greenwood Park Second Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address 314 Northern Bank & Trust Blvd., Seattle, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Daisy Voigt, plaintiff, vs. William E. Voigt, defendant—No —. Voigt, defendant—No. — The Washington, to William E. Korke, defendant—No. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you on the grounds of desertion and failure to support plaintiff, and for a restoration of the malden name of plaintiff. HOWARD O. DURK Attorney for Plaintiff. 535 Henry Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Adell Toomire, plaintiff, vs. Joseph Toomire, defendant.—No. 32501. The State of Washington to the said Joseph Toomire, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of the complaint witt: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure divorce and annul marriage of plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds of non-support. No allmony is asked. Date of first publication, November 11, 1910. FRED L. RICE, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 229 Burke Block. Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 17—Dec. 23, 1910. FRIDAY November 18, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Summons by Publication. William J. Clarke, plaintiff, vs. Nellie Clarke, defendant—No. ____. The State of Washington, to Nellie Clarke, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear with sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned proposed by the court, and hold the below given; in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer of the plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you on the ground of de HOWARD O. DURK, Attorney for Plaintiff. 535 Henry Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR Court OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. State of Washington, County of King. as In the Matter of the Estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased,—No. 11797. Notice is hereby given that Halle Burkholder, administratrix of the estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said court her final account as such administratrix, and that as such day of November, 1910, at 3:30 o'clock, m. at the court room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. A. W. Frater, judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said court hereto affixed this 9th day of November, 1910. D. K. SICKELS, (Seal) Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. Nov. 11—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE JUSTICE'S COURT BEFORE John E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Wash- ington. Summons by Publication. R. J. Eichler, plaintiff, vs. Cora Lowe terial furnished and labor performed by this plaintiff for and on behalf of said demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of this action is to recover the sum of Twelve Dollars same will be paid to the court ($12.00), being a balance due for ma- and John Doe Lowe, her husband, JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace. Oct. 7—Oct. 28, 1910. REMOVAL NOTICE The Light and Power department of the Seattle Electric Company has moved to the Electric Bldg., Seventh avenue and Pine street. Street car tickets can be purchased and all bills paid in the Electrical Sales Room at the old location 907 FIRST AVENUE THE SEATTLE ELECTRIC CO ORDER A CASE OUT TO YOUR PLACE OF Rainier PALE BEER PHONE SIDNEY 526 A Free Trip to Seattle and Return. Let's Bust the State Dental Trust. Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar. You save a dollar, I make a dollar. You will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices are in the First Ave. in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You have a dollar dollar and the State Dental Monopoly will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work with the dental war ision. My offices have been established at 713 First Ave, in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete with cheap dentists who lack the class dentists for half their price. Open evenings until 8 and Sundays until 4 for people who work. General Offices: 411 Lowman Bldg. Loans, Investments, Insurance. H. E. Gilham. J. W. Lysons. Main 3044. Ind. 1588. BUY THE BEST If you want a safe which you know Has No Superior, buy one of the Hall Safe & Lock Co.'s, manufactured by the Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co., for which we are the sole agents. PURCELL SAFE CO. Prefontaine Bldg., Prefontain Place and Yesler Way DENNY-RENTON CLAY & COAL CO., Manufacturers of All Kinds of Clay Products. Main 2189—Phones—Ind. 5125. FRIDAY November 25, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Charles W. Feffer, plaintiff in *Willie Bennett*, W. C. Cottett, her husband, Charles P. Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown, William Brenner, D. A. Hatfield and "Jane Doe" Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown, and Charles W. Fisk, F. M. Hatfield, Ida M. Barton and Aurora Land Company, a corporation, defendants.—No. 75263. The State of Washington to Charles P. Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, whose guilty name is unknown, D. A. Hatfield and Jane Doe Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is unknown, You, and each of you, are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 16th day of September, to appear before the judge in the court in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and have a copy of your answer served upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment to the rendered against the plaintiff to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to foreclose a certain mortgage executed and delivered by the said defendants Millie Bennett and Walter C Bennett, her husband, to one S. Campbell and by the said S. Campbell assigned to this plaintiff, recorded the 28th day of January 1910, and the same in Volt 407 of mortgages, page 39 of the record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, which mortgage was given to secure a promissory note of $500.00 with interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent per annum and was given upon Lots 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of Glimberly Farm. Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to obtain judgment for the said $500.00 together with interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the 28th day of January, 1910, and an attorney's fee of $75.00 and costs of suit and to foreclose and determine all right, title and interest of each and all of said defender's and to said premises and every thereof. EDWARD Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: Room 101, Building Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. State of Washington, for King Coun- try... Summons. A. L. Weaver and Ella May Weaver, husband and wife, plaintiffs, vs. Peter E. Nordin, defendant. The State of Washington to the said Peter E. Nordin, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first pub- lification of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 17th day of Sept. 1910, and defend the move entitled ac- tion in the lawsuit entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment and decree will be rendered against you acco- ding to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. And all right, title and interest in the lands described in the complaint claimed you likewise in the contract, and payments described therein will be foreclosed, forfeited, and the title of the plaintiffs cleared as to all claims you may have or claim. J. W. BROWN. Attorney for Plaintiffs. 1324 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, ff. v. Antone Kaas, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75305. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of the State of Washington dated the 5th day of November, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: West $60 feet of S$1/2 of N$1/2 of SE $1/2 Sec. 4, Tp. 21, N. R 4 E. W. M. certificate number B54464, year 1906, annum 11.23 That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Amount $1.40 for year 1907; 76 cents for year 1908. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 5 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of sale, first pub- Julyification, to-wit: within sixty day Aug. 18, 1910, in the notice, content and action; and in the action, content and answer; and in the complaint of said plaintiff who serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plea-iff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes ordering a sale of said property, or the satisfaction of said charges and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, Summons. Nellie Derry, Plaintiff, vs. Herbert A. Derry, Defendant.—No. 75952. The State of Washington to the said Herbert A. Derry, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the publication of this summons, towf. within sixty days after the 28rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office because you have been denied the right so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is instituted for the purpose of dissolving the bonds of matrimony between you and the defendant, for the reason and upon the grounds that said defendant has failed, neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the support and maintenance of said plaintiff, and for the degree awarding to said plaintiff the awarding described real property situated in the County of Chlam, State of Washington, particularly described as follows, to-wit: Lots twenty-two (22), twenty-three (23), twenty-six (26) and twenty-seven (27), in section seven (7), township thirty (30), north of range nine (9) Chlam County, State of Washington; and also the following property situated in King County, State of Washington: The west half of lot twenty-five (25) and lot twenty-six (26), block eight (8). Bucklus Addition to the City of Seattle; and for such other and further relief as to this court may seem just and equitable. REED & HARDMAN Attorney for Plaintiff Office and P. O. address: 960 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURS, KING County, Washington. Elizabeth Turnbull, Plaintiff, vs. George Elizabeth Turnbull, Plaintiff, vs. George Turnbull, Defendant. No. ——. Summons The State of Washington to the said George Turnbull, defendant. george. burbank, denver. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney of the plaintiff, the filing date below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complainant in this action prays for divorce and that the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defendant be disclosed. H.E. FOSTER Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 606 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, October 7, 1910. Date of last publication, November 18, 1910. IN JUSTICE'S COURT—BEFORE Fred C. Brown, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. John Doe Matijasevich and Richard Roe Glo- vich, copartners, doing business under firm name and style of Alaska Liquor Company, Defendants No. — Summer Willingham. State of Washington, County of King, ss The State of Washington: To John Doe Matijasevich and Richard Roe Glo- vich, copartners, doing business under firm name and style of Alaska Liquor Co: To each of you, are hereby notified that California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, has filed a complaint against you in said Court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the sixth day of January, on the hour 8:30 o'clock a.m., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said action is for the sum of Eighty-two Dollars and Twenty-four Cents (8.25) in cash and the plaintiff on account of merchandise sold and deliv ed to the defendants during the year: 909. Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Prescinct, King County, Washington. TWOROGER & WINKLER. Attorneys for Plaintiff. 10-11 Triangle Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication Sept. 16. 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Allen P. Mitten, Deceased.—No. 11658. By order of said court made herein on the 8th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given, theeded, and to be paid for having claims against sold deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executors of said estate, at 1308 Alaska Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 23, 1910 Attorneys for Estate. 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Oct. 22, 1910. JUSTICE COURT—BEFORE JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace in and Seattle, Washington, King County, State of Washington. Wm. Zehring, plaintiff, vs. Mrs. A. M. Simmons, defendant. State of Washington, County of King, ss. The State of Washington to Mrs. A. M. Simmons. You and each of you are hereby notified that Wm. Zehring has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be set at my office in Room 210 at New York Public Library, Seattle King Court, Washington, on the 28th day of November A. D. 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of plaintiff granted. The object and demand of sale complaint is recover the sum of $2,325.00 balldise, wares and merchandise, sold and delivered to you by this plaintiff within the last past three years. Complaint filed October 10th A. D. 1910. JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Nov. 4-Nov. 25. 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Summons for Public. Lakewood E. E. Cole, plaintiff, vs. Anna Mav. Cole defendant—No. 76580. Statement of The State Bank of Seattle Seattle, Wash., Nov. 10, 1910 E. L. GRONDAHL, President A. H. SOELBERG, JOHN ERIKSON, Vice President Vice President and Cashier A. C. KAHLKE, Assistant Cashier. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN n: The State of Washington, to the said nt: Anna, Mav, Cole, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 21st day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be assigned against according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant, upon the following grounds: Because the defendant without the plaintiff's fault, abandoned the plaintiff on the 9th of October, 1909, at Seattle, Washington, and that said abandonment has been continuous for one year and more. A. J. SPECKBERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 309 Burke Bldg., Second and Marion Streets, Seattle, Wash. Oct. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons. Lillian Collins, plaintiff, vs. James Collins, defendant.—No. The Supreme Court, to the said James Collins, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 21st day of October, 110, and defend the entire action, to the same title court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to answer the complaint, you are enjoined against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed The State Seattle, W RESOURCES Loans and discounts.....9 Banking house, furniture and fixtures ..... Other resources ..... U. S. and other high grade bonds .....$189,745.51 Warrants ..... 5,741.05 Cash on hand and due from other banks .. 266,763.88 E. L. GRONDAHL, President JOHN ERIKSON, Vice A. C. E. with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to secure a decree of divorce, dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of desertion and failure to provide for more than one year. H. E. SNOOK, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 537 Burke Building, Seattle, Washing- IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons. Helen B. Phillips, plaintiff, vs. Park D. Phillips, defendant. The State of Washington, to the above named defendant, Park D. Phillips: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date the first pillow of this summons, within sixty days after the twenty-first day of October, 1910, exclusive of said twenty-first day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and to serve a copy of your answer or other pleading upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his hereinafter designated postoffice address, and in case of failure so to do, judgment will be rendered in sale cause, according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of said action is to procure a judgment and decree forever severing the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of the failure, refusal and neglect of the defendant to provide for or contribute anything towards the support or maintenance of the plaintiff since their marriage on the 5th day of July, 1900, and on the further ground that the defendant more than Are Now on Display A call will convince the and Beauty of our slash. Our tailoring assures you of Irving & Car convince the most skeptic your slash. The establish ensures you of satisfaction. & Cannon, T A call will convince the most skeptical of the Worth and Beauty of our slash. The established reputation of our tailoring assures you of satisfaction. Irving & Cannon, Tailors 21 ICOLUMBIA STREET Established 22 Years Statement of State Bank of S e, Wash., Nov. 10, SCES LIABIL .....$ 756,509.10Capital stock p ature Surplus and u .....12,500.00 profits ...... .....1,500.00Deposits ...... .51 .05 .88 of of Seattle ov. 10, 1910 LIABILISIES total stock paid in.....$ plus and undivided obits ..... . . . posits ..... . . 756,509.10Capital stock paid in.....$1 100,000.00 Surplus and undivided 14,158.49 12,500.00 profits 14,158.49 1,500.00Deposits 1,118,601.05 We Invite Your Account A. H. SOELBERG, Vice President instant Cashier. President A. H. SOE Vice President Vic C. KAHLKE, Assistant Cashi two years ago wilfully and without just cause abandoned the plaintiff, and at all times since has so continued to abandon and live separate and apart plaintiff Postoffice address, 833 Henry Building, Seattle. King County, Washington. Oct. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, In Probate. In the case of the Estate of Lorenz Schwizer, Deceased. No. 12054. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of and al persons having claims against the deceased, or his estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of sald estate at room No. 604 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of the transaction of business of said estate, with one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice or the same will be barred. Dated this 18th day of November, 1910. Date of first publication Nov. 18, 1910. EDWARD VON TOBEL. Administrator of the Estate of Lorenz IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Frank W. Wilson, Plaintiff, vs. Emily W. Wilson, Defendant. The State of Washington, to the said Emily W. Wilson, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 19th --- $362,250.44 $1,232,759.54 OFFICERS most skeptical of the Worth The established reputation of satisfaction. eattle 1910 BILISIES paid in.....$1 100,000.00 divided 14,158.49 ..... 14,158.49 ..... 1,118,601.05 LBERG, the President and Cashier er. day of November, A. D. 1900, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Court of South Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: Divorce suit on the grounds of drunkenness, JOHN H. PERRY, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Seattle, County of King, Washington. Nov. 19—Dec. 30, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR CITY OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Probate. Administrator's Notice of Sale of Public Land. In the Matter of the Estate of James J. Lynch. Deceased—No. 10926 Notice is hereby given that under and by virtue of an order of sale of the Superior Court of King County, Washington dated October 8th, 1910. I will sell at private sale the following described real estate situated in King County, Washington: Lot 31, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot 32, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle the court. Dated this 20th day of October, 1910. Date of first publication, October 21, 1910. HARRY W. BRINGHURST, Administrator of the Estate of James J. Lynch, Deceased. Oct. 21—Nov. 4, 1910. --- $1,232,759.54 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, Washington, Summons by Publication. Ella Croft, Plaintiff, vs. Harry W. Barrows, Defendant.—No. 75894. The attorney in court told the said Harry W. Barrows, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 23rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the under-signed attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated and case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filled with the clerk of said court. The complaint in this action prays for the annulment of a marriage ceremony entered into between the plaintiff and defendant on December 28, 1907, and that the said marriage ceremony may be cancelled and annulled, and for all proper relief. H. E. FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 606 Marlin Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, September 23, 1910. Date of last publication, Nov. 4, 1910. Sert. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Alonzo H. Jose, Deceased.—No. 11696. By order of said court made herein on the 7th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the under-signed administrator of said estate at 1508 Alaska. State, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 23, 1810. Attorneys for Estate, 1808 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Oct. 22, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- sellors. In the Matter of the Estate of Leon- hardt, deceased—No. 11230. hard Reing, deceased. By one of said court made herein on the 29th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said deceased and Margarithe S. Reing, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Margarethe S. Reing, executrixate, at 30 Burke Block, at the office of, J. S. Skorker her attorney, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. W. Date of first publication September 30, 1910. MARGARETHE S. REINIG, As Executrix of said Estate. A. J. SPECKERT, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Avard L. Morrison, plaintiff, vs. Sarah Morrison, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington, to the said Sarah Morrison, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of the summons, today, within sixty days after the 21st day, within sixty days after the 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk, said court. The object of the said action and the relief ought to be obtained therein are fully not forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the ground of your abandonment of plaintiff for more than two years. J. P. BALL. Postoffice and office address: 201-203 Burke Blge., Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. Oct. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Summons by Publication. M. J. Lutz, Plaintiff, vs. Charles W. Ingran, Administrator of the Estate of Richard Lehn, Deceased, and Mrs. A. Sjoequist, Defendants.—No. 72147. The State of Washington to Mrs. A. No question. You are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 23rd day of September, do defend the above entitlement in the above entitlement and answer the entitlement to the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judge not will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint herein which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of said action, as set forth in the complaint, is to foreclose two certain mortgages given by the said Richard Lehn in his life time to the said plaintiff, the first one being dated the November 16, 1906, to secure the sum of $1,200.00, with interest the rate of 7 per cent per annum from said date until paid and the second one dated October 8, 1907, to secure the sum of $200.00, with interest at the rate of 7 per cent per annum from said date until paid, and to recover judgment for said amounts and interest and $26.98 taxes paid by plaintiff, an atorney's fee of $140.00 and costs of suit: of said mortgages being in lots 1 and 2, block 3, John J. O'Gilvys Second addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to foreclose and detain all the right, title and interest of said defendants and each of them in and tc said property. EDWARD VON TOBEL. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sent 23—Nov. 4, 1910. State of Washington, for King Counto. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Bertha Brown accessed No. 12027 By order of said court made herein on the 22nd day of October, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrators of said estate, at 705 Lowman Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, until the next year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication Octo. 28, 1910. SAM BROWN, ISAAC BROWN, As Administrators of said Estate. LEOPOLD M. STERN, Attorney for Estate, 705 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Oct. 28—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Edith Rash, Plaintiff, vs. John F. Rash. Defendant. No. 75369. Summons by Publication. State of Washington to the said John Rash. Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of August, 1910, in the above entitled action, in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff upon within sixty (60) days after the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This case is brought for the purpose of obtaining a decree of divorce from the said defendant on the grounds of abandonment, non-support and personal indignities, the same being causes of action specified in the laws of Washington, for which services of summons by publication may be made. PARKER & BROWN, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: Room 25 Union Block, 713 1st Ave, Seattle, Washington. August 26—Oct. 6, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE Estate of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Via. Washington, printiff, vs. Joseph Small, defendant—1. The State of Washington, to the said Joseph Small, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 14th day of enactment, entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so do, judgment will be rendered against the plaintiff, the plaintiff of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the grounds of your abandonment of plaintiff for four years, and also your failure to make suitable provisions for plaintiff since said marriage. J. P. BALL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice and office address: 201-203 Burke Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 14—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR Court OF THE State or Superior Court for King Coun- sumy. Publication. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 14th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint in the above court, and answer your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above action is to judge judgment against said defendant for the amount due upon two promissory notes for $150.00 and $40.00, respectively, made by said defendant on the 30th day of July, 1907, and payable, the one, two months after date, and the other three months after date, respectively, together with interest thereon at six per cent, due on the date of the action, and to have an attachment issued and levied on the defendant's property. Postmaster, New York, New York. Blog, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 14—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE HUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show concrete why distribution should not be bad In the Matter of the Estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased—No. 5656. Malcolm K. MacRae, administrator of the estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled to presto, appearing to the court that said petition was forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said T. J. Riordan, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Wash. to come from the State of Ohio to theocate Department of said court, Seattle on the 14th day of October, 1910, at the hour of 9.30 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of each person among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said death and all such persons be taken for four consecutive weeks before the said 14th day of November, 1910, in the ATTORNEYS. ATTENTION! THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is looking for your legal publications, and if you are looking for your own business interests you will see to it that no publication is sent from your office without first talking with CAYTON about it. It is an indisputable fact that there are but two weekly publications in Seattle that publish lawyers' legal notices and give the lawyers no trouble on account of errors and prompt "returns" of publishers' affidavits, and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN takes cases that he has not the time to look the paper over every the lead. In this day of busy, bustling activity, the lawyer's time is so much absorbed in the preparation of his voluminous week to see if his notices are being regularly published, nor to read over his notices to see if they are absolutely correct. It often happens that even lawyers make errors in getting or calls the lawyer's attention to them before going to press up their notices for publication, which errors are very annoying to the lawyers if not detected and corrected before going into the paper. If, therefore, the lawyer feels absolutely certain that the publisher gives his personal attention to notices sent to his paper and either corrects small errors in notices it's a great relief to his mind. The publisher of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN has had so much experience with legal publications that he can detect a faulty publication almost as readily as the lawyer himself, and, if not a grievous one, corrects it then and there, but if a grievous one, the lawyer's attention is called to the same before going to press. Returns on publications are promptly made, so that lawyers do not have to worry about the publisher's notice after his case has been called in court. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County, and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 7th day of October 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Court Commissioner. State of Washington, County of King —ss. K. Sickels, county clerk of King County and office of clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court on the 7th day of November, 1910, in the matter of the estate of T. J. Riverman assesed. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 7th day of October, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons by Publication. Seattle Lumber Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Celestine J. Sullivan and Evelyn Sullivan, his wife, E. W. Andrews and Jane Doe Andrews, his wife, Fred G. Cutler and Mildred Cutler, his wife. Netherland American Mortgage Bank, a corporation. H. W. Fisher, Trustee, The National Bank of Commerce, of Seattle, Washington, a corporation, John Davis & Company, a corporation Jahn Brooke & Company, Elliott Bay Mill & Lumber Company, a corporation. L.A. Borde, Crane Company, a corporation. John Scutt and Richard Roe Gelser, a co-partnership doing business as Scutt & Gelser, Schwabacher Hardware Company, a corporation. D. John Knapp and Richard Roe Lambert, doing business as Knapp & Lambert. J. J. Frantz and W. J. Winters, defendants. Globe Electric Company, Cox & Glea- nson, J. K. Witerspoon, interne- rporters.—No. The State of Washington, to the said Celestine J. Sullivan, Evelyn Sullivan, his wife, and H. W. Fisher, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: sixty days after the 14th day of October, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint in intervention of the Intervenor, J. K. Witherpoon, in the case of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for intervenor at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said intervenor's complaint in intervention which has been filed in the clerk of said court. The object of the said court set forth in the complaint in intervention, is as follows: To foreclose a laborer's and maerialman's lien upon lots 19 and 20, block 24, Edes & Knights' addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. C. H. WINDERS. Attorney for Intervenor, J. K. Witherpoon. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- lors In the Matter of the Estate of Lavina Christine Rudberg, deceased.—No. 11877. By order of said court made herein on the 4th day of October, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administratrix of said estate, at 328 Northern Bank & Trust Building, Seattle, Wash., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said County and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication October 14, 1910. ELMA LOUISE RUDBERG, As Administratrix of said Estate. GORDON McGAUVRAN, Attorney for Estate. 327-8-9 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Nov. 11, 1910 Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Katherine Schulver, deceased—No. 11830. Receiving notice made herein on the 12th day of October, 1910. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and so all persons having claims against FRIDAY Novembe 25, 1910 said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouch-same to the deceased and forrorr of said estate, at 229 Burke Block, Seattle Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication Oct. 14, 1910 FRED L. RICE. As Administrator of said Estate. FRED L. RICE. LID LANDING Attorney for Estate. 229 Burke Block, Seattle, Wash. Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. Send your legals to The Seattle Republican, 305 Epler Blk., Phone Main 305. Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. STETSON & POST LUMBER CO. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 ALBERT HANSEN. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses. Phone, Main 268. Seattle Washington. First and Cherry.