Seattle Republican

Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE PUBLISHER'S NOTICE. The Seattle Republican is published on Friday of every week by Cayton Publishing Company Subscriptions, $3.00 per year; six months, $1.50 postage prepaid. Subscriptions to all foreign countries included in the Postal Union, $4.00 a year postage paid. Sample copies, free. Single copies ten cents. Advertising rates made known on application. Special rates to publishers. Entered a second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. Address all communications to The Seattle Republican 307 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. Make a checks, drafts, postal orders, etc., payable to "Cayton Publishing Company." CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. Telephone: Main 305. Publication office, 307 Epler Block. HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON - - - Publisher RUSIE REVELS CAYTON - - - Associate SEATTLE'S INVESTIGATING COMMITTEE'S REPORT The complete findings of the Seattle Lexow Committee will be reported to the city council next Monday evening, and while two of the members of the committee have not given very much attention to what has been going on, yet it is believed that they will bring in a minority report, and if they do they will be confronted with having voted for the partial report, which was submitted to the council a week from last Monday evening. It will be remembered that the unanimous committee made a report at that time recommending the dismissal of the chief of the police, and the same was received and adopted by the city council without a dissenting vote. If now the two members of the committee should bring in a minority report conflicting with their partial report, it will at least put them in a very awkward position and they will be called upon to explain by the council today. How much politics will be played in this report we verily do not know, but hope none at all. If there is anything wrong in the management of the affairs of the city, so far as the chief of the police and his underlings are concerned, every law abiding citizen should be ready and willing to see it rectified, but no law abiding citizen should want an innocent man injured. If there be anything wrong in any of the commercial departments of the city every law abiding citizen should be willing to see it rectified. No member of the city council should let any personal spleen enter into this investigation. If any member of the city council crooks or bends one way or the other for the sake of future political advantage, then the same councilman is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors, and, if he cannot be reached by a jury of his peers, then a majority of the voters of the city should pronounce him guilty next spring by voting him to stay at home. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN has no knowledge of any wrong doing in the city and is therefore free from bias in the matter. If on the other hand the committee of five after weeks of investigation is thoroughly convinded that the city has been made a robber's roost and has facts to prove what it alleges, then each and every citizen of the city should stand by the council committee and see to it that there is a change of administration in the affairs of the city as soon as possible. We do not know that Councilman Blaine is any more honorable than Councilman Conway, or that Coucilman Hart is any less reliable than Councilman Revelle or Kellogg, but a unanimous report was made two weeks ago, and now, if a majority and a minority report are made on the findings of the committee, it will smell a good deal like that there is a nigger somewhere in the councilmanic wood pile. We are taught in the Bible, if thy right hand offend thee cut it off; and if thine eye offend thee pluck it out. Now if the council committee finds that some of the boys have been doing wrong, report it so, even though it be your best friend, for two wrongs never make a right. In other words do not play politics when the tax payers have to foot the bills. To make a clean breast of the whole situatian may to your mind injure the commercial standing of the city by giving it a black eye to prospective investors, but such SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. FRIDAY, DECEMBER 2, 1910 a black eye will not prove a hundreth part as bad in the long run as for the investors to find out the city is in the hands of a lot of looters, who are not only robbing the tax payers, but are fostering and protecting all manner of vice in order for some one to get a rake off. We do not know as this is true, we do not even charge it, but we do say, if the members of the investigating committee have found such to be a fact, they should make a clean breast of it and tell it all—the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, is wanted. THE RENTON SOUTHERN OUTRAGE If ever the patrons of a railroad had a just cause for complaint and a just cause to become indignant the patrons of the Renton Southern, a semi-interurban road, have. The manager of this road has resorted to every cunning devise known to the art of a tricky lawyer to hold up and rob the patrons of the road in the shape of overcharges, and though the lower courts have decided against him, he takes advantage of an appeal to a higher court and further declares that he will take the case into the various federal courts going to the United States supreme court, and thereby delay and prevent the people from getting their rights for the next five years or more. In the mean time he is charging the increased fare and the patrons of the road will not only pay all the costs of the appeals, but the extra fare will likewise add very materially to the profits of the road. A majority of the members of the city council favor the aborogating of the franchise of the company immediately if not sooner, but it is very questionable if the attempt to do that might not bring on a law suit that could be inveighled into the federal courts and be kept dilly dallying along for the next five or ten years. However, the city council and the board of public works should hinder and hamper the actions of the company at every point and not grant it a single concession that it has not already granted, and if possible rescind the franchise. While Seattle is in need of men that will do things to bring more money to Seattle, yet the city is not in need of such men as W. R. Crawford, and the efforts of such men to get favors from the city should be rebuked. The chief stockholder of this road and his attorney have been in a row with the city ever since the company was given a franchise to enter the city limits, and if it requires that much contention to get along with a public service corporation it is better that it be denied the privilege of doing business in the city. It is very evident that Mr. Crawford is a greedy little human hog that is willing to take advantage of everybody and everything in order to gouge a dollar out of some helpless human being. We truly hope that the council will not lose a single minute in making life such a burden for the Renton Southern that it will be glad to leave the city. THE CITY COUNCIL FIGHT The liberal element among the male voters of the city is planning for the spring election, which, unless headed off by those opposing such a policy for Seattle, will result in that element electing a majority of the members of the next council, all of whom will be elected next spring. The program has been mapped out by one who ought to know and is as follows: James Conway of the First ward; a man yet to be named from the Second ward; Joe Schlumpf from the Third ward; Fred Sawyer from the Fourth ward; Henry A. Beck from the Fifth ward; Arnold Zbinden from the Sixth ward and Frank P. Mullen from the Seventh ward. These have already agreed to form an alliance and make a fight for the election of themselves. Each ward will line up as near a unit as is possible for those seven names and vote and trade as far as possible with other wards for outside support of them. There are nine councilmen to be elected, and of the selected seven if the combination lands right side up with five of them elected, it will be in absolute control of the city council and will be able to block any reform legislation that might be introduced in the body. If the above combination is carried out it will be next to impossible to beat it. W. H. Murphy of the Ninth ward is also in on this combination, but he wants to be a can- VOLUME XVII. NUMBER 27 didate for mayor at the expiration of the Gill term and under the charter he would not be eligible should he be one of the favored ones, but, if he will turn whatever strength he can to the seven names mentioned herein, he will be given the support of the combination for mayor one year later. . . . Discussing the individual chances of the various would be councilmen, the following can be said: James Conway would perhaps get fewer votes outside the combination than any of the others. Not because he is any worse or better, but simply because he hails from the First ward. He, however, would get every liberal vote in the city. Joseph Schlumpf of the Third ward outside of the combination would show up quite strong as he would get the most of the German votes of the other words and he stands well among the out door sportsmen and the business men. He would run well and with the united effort of the combination he would prove a very strong candidate. Without the combination as mentioned above Schlumpf would not be a strong man and would stand no show of election, but with the combination in full force and effect he would be almost certain of winning. Fred Sawyer if considered a very weak man by even members of the combination, because they do not believe it will be possible to hold the combination together on him. He will not be able to command any outside strength and is is figured by the combination that he is one of the seven that in all probability will be lost. Henry Beck of the Fifth Ward will get every vote in the combination and a few scattering votes in the other wards. It would be impossible for Murphy, Mullen or Schlumpf to do very much for Beck in their wards, and he is another the combination figures it is more than likely to lose. Any other man from the Fifth ward that would be suitable to the combination would receive the same treatment in the residence ward as Beck. Arnold Zbinden of the Sixth would get every vote in the combination, and he believes he will be able to command as many votes in the other wards as any other member of the combination, and for that reason feels absolutely certain of election. Frank P. Mullen is perhaps the very strongest one of the combination and he does about as he pleases in the council. While he is classed with the liberal element he some times does things that make them set up and take notice and shake their heads. It is very questionable whether or not Mullen would make any efforts to deliver to the combination, though the presumption is, if elected, he would lean to that side of the house on legislation. He is strong in every ward in the city and is almost sure of election whether favored by the combination or not. --- With the liberal element lining up for a ticket of seven as reported herein, if the reform elements of the city expects to beat them by sitting idly by and doing pulpit politics they are the same as elected now. While the women will vote, yet it will be a novelty to them and not many of them will turn out at the first election and then the most of them that do turn out will be guided for the most part by their husbands. They must be educated up to taking an active interest in campaigns and elections, which will be done by the leaders and by those men who will cater for their votes from time to time. There, however, has been so much said and done in the Gill recall that the women by the time the spring election rolls round may be worked up to the point to get out and make an open fight for their ideas and not give a whoop in Hades what their husbands think as to their actions. --- Another move on the part of the liberal element will be to get as many reform candidates in the field as possible. Take a ward where a strong reformer resides like Max Wardall, the liberals will strive to get as many reform candidates out from that ward as possible and such liberals as are located therein will select some one of them, perhaps Wardall himself, and support him with a vengeance. By those methods the reform vote will get badly scattered and after the election it will wake up to find that it has accomplished little or nothing in the fight. The liberals also propose to cajole as many prominent business men as pos ```markdown ``` that they appreciate the favors is shown by their increased orders every year. I know a lot of knockers have come down from Alaska and made such charges as were published in THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN a few weeks ago, and among the number, I regret to say, was Congressman Humphrey, but when he was put on the carpet by the Merchants' Association of Seattle he had to confess that he knew nothing directly, and what he had said had been prompted by hearsay, and when questioned as to his authorities for such hearsays, had to further admit that it came from persons interested in Portland and San Francisco and so with all the other against the merchants of Seattle. I have no hesitancy in saying that Seattle will continue to hold the trade of Alaska because no other coast town can compete with her and you can always trust the Seattle Spirit to take care of itself when it comes to competing with outside cities and towns. Do you think the merchants would deliberately walk into a trap of robbing the merchants of a community that are giving them the bulk of their trade, and that too, when the merchants of other cities are willing and waiting to take that trade and pay a high price to get it? If the Seattle merchants would do a ching like that it would simply mean suicide for themselves and I hardly think they are planning their own destruction. The business men of Seattle have the Alaska trade and they are anxious to hold it, and they have from time to time taken steps to hold it and there is no doubt in my mind but that they will hold it." Space is given to the above for the purpose of correcting any misleading statements that may have been made in a former number of The Seattle Republican, because it is the duty of every true Seattlelite to build up and not tear down the city. Having been, as we supposed, reliably informed that the merchants of Seattle were taking advantage of the merchants and miners of Alaska it was with the view of helping instead of hurting Seattle that the statement was made. It is often argued by enthusiasts that Seattle will never lag along commercial lines because of her varied resources, and it must be admitted that she has forged ahead with wonderful rapidity, but it is impossible for her to have too much of a good thing, and if in a single instance she seems to be abusing one of her avenues of wealth it is the duty of those who get such inside information to call attention to the abuse. It is claimed that two-thirds of all the goods that are shipped out of Seattle go to Alaska, and if that be true, it is the duty of every true Seattleite to see to it that that trade is fostered instead of abused, and we believe the wholesale merchants, after talking with many of them, are doing that very thing, the knockers to the contrary notwithstanding. WASHINGTON'S CHIVALROUS MEN The first legislation resulting from the adoption of the woman suffrage amendment to the Washington Constitution, was brought up six days after the election, when a bill was introduced in the ctiy council of Seattle to forbid smoking in polling places at general or special elections. The purpose of the proposed ordinance, we are told, is to make conditions about the election booths more attractive to women who may wish to vote, or who may preside as election officials. When Massachusetts granted school suffrage to women, in 1879, an ordinance was straightway passed in Boston, forbidding smoking at the poils. Far from destroying chivalry, equal suffrage promotes it.—A. S. B. in Woman's Journal. ARE MEN NATURALLY HONEST? The principle of the "quick" lunch, which has become familiar in most cities, is now to be tried on a large scale—in a general store, in fact. To offset, if possible, the prevailing high prices, the Farmere' Educational and Co-operative Union of Medical Lake, Wash., have formed a consumers' company. They have bought a general store, fully stocked with groceries and provisions and farm implements, the store being closed except to the hundred members of the union, each of whom has been supplied with a key. Each member helps himself to whatever he wants whenever he wants it, keeping account of his purchases and once a month turning in the amount due. The venture will doubtless prove a success, and will actually cheapen the price of all products by the cost of clerks, cashier, and advertising and the usual profit to the storekeeper. The farmers of the co-operative Union of Medical Lake constitute a closed corporation, and there is no reason why there should be any serious loss through the enterprise; but we incline to the opinion that honesty in general has not so far advanced as to permit the giving of a key to every member of the community or to leave the store doors altogether unlocked.—Leslie's Weekly. ```markdown ``` EDITORIAL EDICTS So many persons are giving "the real meaning of the Republican Waterloo," that no one is left to listen. From a gubernatorial standpoint things will move on in Ohio in the same old way which is along Democratic lines. An exchange says Colonel Roosevelt got the lions while in Africa, but when he returned to the United States the tigers got him. A recent map of Africa showing the possesions of the various European powers causes one to stop and think, where the black man comes in at and has he any country. "Mr. Speaker Clark" may sound good to the gentleman from Missouri, but it is very doubtful if it sounds even pleasant to a great majority of the voters of the United States, the recent political upheaval to the contrary notwithstanding. "Work For The Democratic Congress" is a headline. Quite right, but the chief work of the Democratic Congress will be in confusing things so as to get a Democratic president and a Democrat senate in the way it got a Democratic house of representatives. Senator Jones has his ear to the ground and believes he has heard a whisper from the people which sounds like a lower tariff, and he is anxious to have President Taft to have Congress meet and reverse itself immediately if not sooner. That is the way to do politics. California is going after the Panama canal exposition with a vengeance, and from a coast standpoint she should get it, but from an attendance standpoint thousands more persons would attend the exposition from all parts of the country if it were held in New Orleans. We suppose one of the stunts applicants for political positions in New Jersey under the next gubernatorial administration will be the double rule of three, the ponsasnorum, the Greek and Latin declinations of nouns and likewise the conjugation of the verbs in the same language, which may be termed college politics. Now that Dr. Frederick A. Cook has confessed that he lied as to reaching the north pole, Commodore Peary should go him one better and confess that he not only lied, but has wofully faked the public ever since. The Seattle Republican has maintained all the time that neither of the men was ever near the north pole, and it is still of that opinion. Is a lie ever justifiable is being discussed among the preachers of the city. Most assuredly. If by telling a lie you could prevent a mob or a person from committing some rash act then the telling of a lie is absolutely justifiable. The telling of a lie, however, to save yourself or some one else from deserved punishment is never justifiable. The person telling a lie for that purpose not only commits a crime but abets another. At the suggestion of President Taft the heads of the various departments of his administration have made a cut of fourteen million dollars in the running expenses of the country for the ensuing year, but even that cut did not satisfy the president and he ordered them to cut deeper yet. It's another case of locking the stable after the horse has been stolen, but in this case it's better for the tax payers for it to be locked late than not at all. Mr. Graft must be feeling awfully blue about now in and around Washington City. After spending a few evenings at the various council meetings of Seattle we are now wondering whether it is a deliberative or a perfunctory body or is it either? The president, to expedite things, moves, seconds and puts the various motions, and in most instances not a member of the body opens his mouth while the extraordinary performance is going on. Just how such a proceeding would stand the legal test, if any one should take it into the courts is more than we can answer. Frequently quite a few women visit the meeting of the council, and despite their presence in the lobby, a majority of the members of the council, the clerks and a great many spectators puff away at six inch cigars until an hour after the assembling of the council clouds of smoke float about the room like the fabled geniis, when the windows are opened and the spectators are almost frozen out. It occurs to us the council would do well to cut the smoking out. --- 1910 It is being talked in political circles throughout the east that Senator Nelson W. Aldrich is to be given a federal judgeship on retiring from the senate. "The reason why men fail is because they cannot borrow any more money," says Leslie's. In our opinion the reoson why men fail is because they have borrowed too much money. Joseph Riis says that in 1912 there will be a new political party in the field and at the head of that party will be Theodore Roosevelt, and its noominee for president will win in the general elections. A move has been set on foot to move the Orting Soldiers' Home to Port Orchard, which is a good move, but it will hardly be moved without a roar from Pierce county that will shake Mount Tacoma. A monument to the memory of Mrs. Mary Todd Lincoln is being talked of by some of the leading citizens of Lexington, Kentucky, the home of Miss Todd before she married the emancipator. The Todd family is famous throughout that section of the country. The Indians of Oklahoma have held a regular state fair and it was the first ever held by them or any other Indians in the history of the world, and it is said by those who visited it, that it was conducted just about as other fairs only with the Indians doing the honors. The corn crop for 1910 has touched the 3,000,000,-000 mark, which is the highest in the history of the country. The oat crop touches the 1,096,000,000 mark which is likewise the highest it has ever reached. The wheat crop has fallen off 45,000,000 bushels from the 1909 crop. The value of the 1909 farm product was $8,760,000,000 and for 1910. $9,000,000,000. On Thursday, Jan. 18th, the annual Workers' Conference of the Tuskegee Institute will be held. On this occasion an unusually large number of persons directly engaged in Negro education from the schools of the South especially, or interested in the uplift of the Negro are expected to be present. Among the subjects that will be taken up at the Conference is the following: How can ministers, teachers and business men assist the farmers to make agriculture more profitable, particularly by assisting in teaching farmers more efficient methods of farming and also to develop the business side of farming. Congress assembles next Monday for the dying days of the 61st Congress and for the retiring of the Republicans from the control of the government. They have had a long run and have done well for the most part, but they reached the conclusion that, they owned the people instead of the people owning them, and that accounts for their retirement. It is proposed by the leading Republicans that the present Congress correct some of the things that the people resented at the polls at the last general election and thereby go out of office with a better record than they went before the voters with last fall. AMUSEMENTS It is several years since "Uncle Tom's Cabin" was seen here, and a production of this famous old play, at the hands of the company at the Alhambra Theatre ought to prove more than acceptable to the clientel of the Alhambra and many others, for the Russell & Drew Company will give it such an excellent dramatic and scenic production that to compare it with the ordinary road company would be unjust. The play, when properly presented, is among the most interesting of all old plays, and a revival of it at this time is appropriate. E.W.WAY & CO. ANCHOR YOUR SAVINGS IN SEATTLE BAILEY BUILDING SEATTLE BEST BOARD COMPANIES REAL ESTATE-INSURANCE ecember 2. 1910 MEXICO FROM A NEGRO STANDPOINT A few weeks ago the anniversary of Mexican liberty was celebrated with pomp and splendor, the like of which, all things being considered, had not before been witnessed. The great powers sent ambassadors and representatives to join in the festivities, and to protest the respect and good will of the civilized nations for the jewel of western liberty. Our country was represented by a special commission, in addition to which ex-Gov. Curtis Guild, of Massachusetts, appeared as the especial representative of President Taft. High speeches and warm expressions of regard and hope for continued amity between the two great republics of North America were heard from Mexican patriots and American statesmen. It was all sincere and spoke well for the mutual desires of the two countries. Mr. Guild was especially enthusiastic in the reports he made of his trip, of the friendliness of Mexico, the level-headedness of Diaz, and the wonderful progress the republic has made in just government and developing its natural resources. Today we are seriously discussing how to avert war between the two countries. The present trouble is due to causes more than one, causes each of which is attributable to the bad behaviour of both the citizens of Texas and the Americans who live in Mexico, and, protected by citizenship under our flag, fleece the people as they can, scorn the traditions and customs of the people, and flaunt insults in the face of Mexican officials. The wonder is not that Mexico is now indignant but that it has endured in admirable silence the arrogance and insults of the Americans for so long a while. The Texans, of whom perhaps we should expect no other conduct, treat Mexicans as they treat their Negroes. Unlike their Negroes, Mexicans have not taken kindly to this treatment. The Americans sojourning in Mexico, if they have made any effort in that direction, have been unable to curb the exhibition of that contempt the American white man entertains not only for all colored peoples, but also for all his own progeny out of the bone and blood of women not of his race. Mexico is founded on liberty. There all men are free. No "color line" alarms the defenders of its civilization. No creed or race is helped or hindered by law of neglect or evasion, and caste is almost unknown. The Americans do not understand that doctrine, and are alarmed lest it crosses the Rio Grand and confuse and corrupt this nation, that has talked a great deal more of liberty and freedom than Mexico has talked of them. The Springfield Republican relates the immediate cause of the present situation with a caustic comment upon the hypocritical tendencies of our countrymen towards the Mexican Republic: "The violent attacks by Mexican rioters upon American residents and the insult to the American flag in Mexico City, much as they are to be deplored and condemned, were the natural sequel to the atrocious performances by our fellow citizen at Rock Springs, Texas, in burning a citizen of Mexico at the stake because he had murdered a ranchman's wife. Our white savages are a sorry nationrl asset. They have grown so accustomed to lynching Negroes, even by the slow torture of fire, that they recklessly use the method on foreigners who can justly claim the protection of treaty rights; and thus they bring upon the whole country serious international difficulties." Indeed they bring upon the country "serious international difficulties," and a continuance of the conduct that has followed Americans into Mexico will bring upon us something even worse than serious difficulties. It would be a perfectly proper thing if, in the interest of peace and decency, our government should establish in the State Department a Bureau of Manners, which would look after our citizens who may travel in lands where the inhabitants are not "white, with sun kissed curls of love and war. At any rate, we hope that some way may be devised by which Texas and American gold brick drummers cannot lead us into war with Mexico.—New York Age. THE SEATTLE SPIRIT AROUSED Some time ago an article appeared in THE SEATTLE REPUBICAN which to some extent put the merchants of Seattle on the darpet, which wss taken exception to by one of the leading wholesale grocers of the city. "Contradicting the story will do little or no good for what is is and even the all powerful journalistic world cannot change it. The fact, however, is that the merchants of Alaska treat the Alaska dealers a great deal better than they are treated in any other city on the Coast and 99 per cent of the Alaska merchants and miners are absolutely satisfied with the treatment accorded them. The wholesalers of Seattle have not only sold to the Alaska merchants and miners more cheaply than they could buy in any other Pacific Coast markets, but they have extended to them favors in the way of credits that have been the means of saving many of the Alaska merchants from utter ruin, and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is partially true of the United States is almost wholly true of the European countries. If possible the young men and women of all countries should stay on the farm. The farm should be made so attractive by the fathers and mothers of children that the city would have no charm for them. In many instances such is being done, and wherever it is done it is utterly impossible to get the young folk of such a farming community to live in the city. In the state of Washington the Wenatchee valley and the Orchard Tracts of the Sunnyside district are rapidly reaching that point, and it is hoped others will follow in the wake of these and make the entire country a place to be sought for instead of to be loathed as so many have done in the past. If that state of affairs come about then the Boy Scout idea will be hooted as being of no practical service. The cities are growing at the expense of the farming communities. Seattle, Portland and Tacoma are today in a warfare over a proper count of their inhabitants, each fighting for more inhabitants in order to boast of larger cities. To the few in the cities the idea is perfectly lovely, but to the masses it is absolute suicide. The immediate farming communities about each of the three cities mentioned herein are fully fifty years behind the cities as they now stand and no city can prosper very long without having a farming community to draw on, Seattle may be a slight exception to the rule, but even Seattle would do better, if the lands about her were in a high state of cultivation instead of platted for wildcat town lots. WHICH IS THE HAPPIER? As we sit in our office scanning the pages of the Spokane, Seattle, Tacoma and Portland dailies we always notice two want ad departments that tell the story as plainly as a printed newspaper page can talk. One is the "Help Wanted—Female" department and the other is the "Situation Wanted" department. In the first are many for general housework. Only two in family, $5 per week. Steady employment. In the other one finds many ads that read, Young lady housekeeper with experience wants situation in office. Wages $6. Can operate typewriter. Others tell about stenography, ability to meet people, and other accomplishments supposed to be a necessity in an office girl. The wages run about the same. The wages which are offered the girl for general housework include board and room, usually very fair bath and toilet priligileges and two afternoons out each week. The wages which the office girl offers her services for do not include anything but a chance to work and make good. She must board herself and provide her own room. Very often it is a cheap rooming house and her neighbors are people of all classes each struggling for an existence just like herself. Her bath privileges are not at all select. Many of them are absolutely filthy. There is a mingling of the sexes and a general air of cheap Bohemianism that one does not find in a private home. Both of these girls get up about the same time in the morning, the hired girl to prepare breakfast for employers; the office girl to make a hurried toilet, rush to the street, fight her way on to a car, grab a strap, land down town, eat a poor breakfast in a cheap restaurant and frantically try to get to the office on time. If she don't she is "docked" and also gets a cold look from the boss in the bargain. She has a bare hour for her noon lunch, which is either eaten from a lunch box or bolted in a cheap restaurant with a nondescript crowd each like a time machine that will stop only on the night of any day. The hired girl gets her three square meals under one roof and doesn't have to rub elbows with every Tom, Dick and Harry either. After dinner she can put on her hobble skirt and her dishpan hat and go shopping or calling. She isn't afraid of any cold looks for she is the boss herself. And all the while the hired girl and the office girl are working away in the crowded, dirty, noisy unwholesome cities while hundred of bright eyed intelligent, healthy, happy girls and women walk down country lanes from comfortable farm houses to little country school houses where they teach the little ones to enjoy life where life is as pure as the air itself. There is vigor and vim and health in the air they breathe, also is God's sweetest music in the songs of the birds that come around the school house; there are lessons in nature and humanity in the little ones that cluster around them for instruction. But even at that there are many school houses in which there is "no school because a teacher cannot be hired. It is impossibility to get teachers enough at any price. The girls have gone to the cities to be hired girls and office ladies. Lincoln County Times. According to recent army reports the deserters from the white companies amount to 3.77 per cent and from the colored troops 1.35 per cent. sible to enter the fight from the resident portions of the ward with the view of further splitting the reform vote and with that reform element all shot to pieces on a multiplicity of candidates it will be like rolling off a log to pull the combination through. It is almost a foregone conclusion that Max Wardall, E. L. Blaine, A. J. Goddard, W. H. Weaver and J. W. Bohlke at present members of the council, will be candidates for re-election, and Thomas P. Revelle may also enter the fight. BOY SCOUT TO CREATE MILITARISM The Boy Scout movement is attracting considerable attention not only in the United States but throughout England and continental Europe. For boys of large cities, it seems to be the very thing, in order to give them open air exercise, of which the boys are always sadly in need. Properly directed such an association means much in the developing of the young boy into a useful man and should be encouraged. On the other hand, it is argued that the whole scheme was hatched up in England for the purpose of creating a spirit of militarism in the boys and thereby making warriors instead of workers of them. Country boys are not in need of out door exercise, but the boys in over crowded cities are, and the idea is to have the city boy become a soldier while as many as will of the boys bred in the country remain on the farm and produce for the soldiers. Sir Baden-Powell discussing it from an English standpoint has the following to say about it: "Its purpose was distinctly militaristic, but in order to deceive the people and close their mouths about the military aim. a number of unobjectionable and even commendable features were put in, including many outdoor exercises which the boys are expected to perform. But these featnres did not blind the English pacifists to the fact that the central aim of the organization was to promote the militarizing of the English people and to open the way for universal conscription, just as were the rifle clubs and other similar things. The Scout movement was a distinct and cunning device of the military party. "The friends of peace in England say, however, that many of the features could be used in an opposite way, and so Peace Scouts have been organized, and we believe with considerable measure of success, just as were the Life saving Brigades, which were created in order to counteract the evils of the Boys' Brigades." The Advocate of Peace (Boston) in discussing the Boy Scout subject from an American standpoint has the following to say: "It is distinctly militaristic in its purpose. It means to catch the boys and fill their minds with the love of military performances before they are old enough to discriminate, and thus foster the war spirit in the nation and promote the further growth of the Navy and Army. "With the movement in this form peace workers can, of course, have nothing to do, except to expose it and oppose it at every turn. Nothing could be more deadly and disasterous than to have a whole generation of boys brought up to feel that war is still the same necessary and supposedly glorious thing that it was held to be in the past. The more prominent the unobjectionable and valuable features may be, the more insiduous the movement is sure to become. Our friends should not be led astray by the fact that ministers of the gospel are approving the movement and assisting in creating Scout Troops. The boy problem in the churches is an extremely difficult one, and the ministers often jump at the opportunity to introduce anything that seems to render its solution more easy. Many ministers did the same thing some two decades ago in regard to the Boys' Brigade movement, but most of them afterward discovered their error and were heartily ashamed of themselves. It will be so finally in this case, after however, a lot of irreparable mischief has been done. "Wherever the Scout movement is organized on a purely non-militaristic basis, with everything excluded that tends to cultivate the love of pomp and circumstance of war and through that the warlike spirit, with all that that means in perversion of the spirit of boys, there the friends of peace should lay hold to do something for the boys in directions which will attract and interest them, and at the same time lift and ennoble their spirits in truly Christian and humane ways." So long as the young men of the United States rush to the cities to find employment to the detriment of the farms just so long will the military spirit continue to increase. The average young man would a hundred times prefer to take a pollceman job or work at a political job even at much less wages than to work for some private concern, and all because he thinks he is getting nearer the ruling class, and what WORK FOR A DEMOCRA- TIC CONGRESS Now that the Democrats have their Congress they sro being asked what they expe: °» do with it. There seems ‘. bea general opinion that t'« party will be on its good behavior for the next two years, and give the voters some good reasons for entrusting it with full power in 1912. Mr. Champ Clark, of Missouri, who expects to be chosen successor to Speaker Can- non by a majority of at least 50, calls the landslide of Democratic votes a call for immediate tariff revision. Mr. Bryan, who was conspicuously absent from the campaigning this fall, expects the progressive Republicans to join with the Democrats and bring about the popular election of senators, With the help of the insurg- ent Republicans who will hold the balance%of power in the Sen- ate, the New York Tribune, (R.) sees almost no limit to the va- garies which may emanate from a Congress controlled by the Democrats. This paper has vis- ions of populistic financial legis- lation and the irrigation of west- ern and southern swamp lands at the expense of the federal treasury, which is likely to ap- peal with compelling force both to insurgents and Democrats, es- pecially to the latter, who will perceive in the chance to secure large federal expenditures in their territory an alluring oppor- tunity to make up for the four- teen lean years since last they held a key to the national treas- ury. While the Louisville Courier- Journal (D.) and other papers warn their party of the danger in tinkering with the tariff, and point to the fact that tariff-mak- ing parties have almost always been turned down by the people at the earliest opportunity, the Washington correspondent of the New York Evening Post (Ind.) is more optimistic. He says: “It seems reasonable to sup- pose that the tariff tax on nec- essaries might be reduced by the coming Democratic Congress making cheaper food, clothing and shelter, without bringing about another overturn and re- storing the Republicans to power. It hardly seems probable that any great outburst of popular in- dignation would follow if the in- defensible woclen schedules should be revised and reduced. Cotton goods, the ultimate con- sumer believes might be taxed less without causing a popular uprising.’’—Literary Digest. SOCIALIST IN CONGRESS Democratic Congresses, though somewhat rare of late, have ex- isted heretofore; the real novelty of theSixty-second Congress will be the first Social Representative to go to Washington—Mr. Victor L. Berger, of Milwaukee. While other papers are trying to ac- count for the great Democratic waye of this fall, the Socialist press are calling attention toa rising Socialist tide of no mean dimensions. The total vote is given out bya party leader as being over 720,000, an increase ITEMS MORE OR LESS INERESTING of 75 per cent since 1903. Ac- cording to the same authority, about 35 members of the legis- latures were elected in several states, about 40 cities and towns show a clean majority for the Socialist party, and five of these towns had local elections in which the Socialist candidates were vic- torious.’’ Charles Edward Rus- sell, running for governor of New York, doubled the vote polled by the candidate in the previous election, and ran ahead of W. R. Hearst on the Inde. pendence League ticket. Min- neapolis came within 1,000 votes of following M/‘lwaukee’s ex- ample and electing a Socialist mayor. Columbus, Ohio, and one of the New York city dis- tricts came equally near giving Mr, Berger Socialist colleagues in the House of Representatives. —Literary Digest. WISE AND OTHERWISE The motto of the state of Maine ist ‘‘Dirigo’’—“‘I lead.’”’ It did. —New York World. No aviator has yet been fined for exceeding the altitude limit. —Chicago Record-Herald. Foreign preponderance in Ar- gentine Republic shows there is no Monroe Doctrine for Euro- pean capital.—Wall Street Journ- al. We don’t have an aviator meet every day, but we can watch prices rise almost any day.—At- lanta Constitution. The Treasury Department has decided to print more dollar bills. It appears to he an unaminous opinion that they are needed.— Chicago Record Herald. Dr. Cook congratulates Well- man. Which seems to be about the most unkindest cut of all.— Cleveland Plain Dealer. A woman’s ‘‘no”’ in the mat- ter of a declaration of dutiable articles is often open to the usual affirmative construction, — New York World. Do you remember when certain newspapers kicked because Mr. Roosevelt gave the ‘‘fat and idle job’’ of collector of customs in New York to Mr, Loeb?—Cleve- land Leader. Nicaragua has formally recog- nized the Republic of Portugal. King Manuel’s last hope may now be supposed to be gone.— S. F. Chronicle. Tait to Force Up Magazine Postage. — Headline. Is this considered a blow to the Outlook and its Contributing Ed- itor?—N. Y. World. The South Dakota ballot was seven feet long in nonpareil type. How much of this was advertis- ing, and how much pure reading matter?—Cleveland Leader. It looks as is everything on wheels would go ona strike in New York. What adifference it would make if everybody with wheels in New York went ona strike! Syracuse Journal. Probably the burglar who stole the cardboard motto, *‘ Thou Shalt Not Steal’? from a home in | Allentown, Pa., felt that his own wme stood more in need of such | . reminder. — Louisville Courier ournal. 1 Bandits who held up a train in which a number of millionaires were traveling in New Mexico got $11.20. The porter had probably beaten them to it.—Chicago- Rec- ord-Herald. What’s the use of Judge Bald- win’s suing Mr. Roosevelt for slander? The colonel won’t ac- cept the decision of the court.— N. Y. World. Standard Oil’s market price having advanced twenty points since the price cut, perhaps offi- cers of other companies engaged in supplying the necessities will note the new method of booming their stocks. —Wall Street Journ- al. If you are tired of being just a plain citizen of ordinary accom- plishment and no reputation and are desirous of making the world look up to you, why not try avia- tion? — Southern Lumberman, Nashville. *Twas Ever Thus Voice over phone — Hello, is that you, darling? Miss Coquette — Yes, who is talking.—Life. The Natural Finish “What happened to Babylon?’’ asked the Sunday school teacher, “Tt fell cried the pupil. “And what became of Nine- veh?” “Tt was destroyed.’’ ‘And what of Tyre?” ““Punctured!’’? — Cleveland Leader. 3 A Fare Guess “Who originated the idea that the longest way round was the shortest way home?’’ “Some taxicab driver, I sup- pose.’’—Town Topics. Two Kinds of Fame “Yes,’’ admitted the author of a suczessful book, ‘‘I woke up one morning and found myself famous.”’ “Tt was different with me,” remarked the politician who had made an ill-advised speech. One morning I found myself famous —then I woke up. — Chicago News. Dyspectic Moses Percy—Miss Jane, did Moses have the same after dinner com- plaint my papa’s got? Miss Jane—Gracious me, Per- y! Whatever do you mean, my dear? Percy—Well, it says here the Lord gave Moses two tablets.— Lippincott’s. Those Stripes “Now, children, what is this?”’ asked the teacher, holding up the picture of a zebra. “It looks to me like a horse in a bathing suit,’’ answered a lit- tle boy.—Our Dumb Animals. His Last Chance Priscilla had just told John Alden to speak for himself. “T shall do it for you after we are married,’’ she added. Herewith he hastened to sieze the last chance. —New York Sun. Pie Cutters Old Aunt Sally, the highly es- teemed cook in a Southern fami- ly, was frequently praised for her culinary skill, and, on one ocaasion, when a number of guests had been to dine with the family, remark was made touch- ing the beautiful appearance of Sally’s-pie, which showed a very pretty scallop on its edge. Inquiry being made as to how the old lady managed to get such an even design, Sally was sum- moned to the dining room and the question was duly put to her. The emotion of the guests may be imagined when the old lady replied: “Oh, dat’s easy. I jest uses my false teeth.’’—Harper's Mag- azine. Rude Haste They were on their honeymoon. He had bought a catboat and had taken her out to show her how well he could handle a boat, putting her to tend the sheet. A puff of wind came, and he shouted in no uncertain tone: “Let go the sheet!’ No re- sponse, Thenagain: ‘‘Let go that sheet quick!”’ Still no movement. A few minutes after, when both were clinging to the bottom of the overturned boat, he said: “Why didn’t you let go that sheet when I told you to, dear?’’ “T would have,”’ said the bride, “if you had not been so rough about it. You ought to speak more kindly to your wife.’’—New York Evening Post. What Did They Know Archbishop Ryan was visiting asmall parish in a mining dis. trict one day for the purpose of administering confirmation, and asked one nervous little girl what matrimony is. “It is a state of terrible tor- ment, which those who enter are compelled to undergo for a time to prepare them for a brighter and better world,’”’ she said. “No, no,’’ remonstrated her rector, “‘that isn’t matrimony; that’s the definition of purga- tory.”” “Leave her alone,’ said the Archbishop; ‘‘maybe sheis right. What do you and I know about it?”’—Ladies’ Home Journal. His Object “'T notice said the young man’s employer, ‘‘that you are always about the first in the office in the mornings.’’ “Thank you, sir.’’ “Why do you thank me?” “For noticing it.’” —Chicago Record-Herald. How Britain Does It There isa lad in Boston, the son of a well known writer of history, who has evidently prof- ited by such observations as he may have heard his father utter touching certain phases of Brit- ish empire building. At any rate the boy showed a shrewd nution of the opinion not infrequently expressed in regard to the right- eousness of British occupation. It was he who handed in the fol- lowing essay on the making of a British colony: FRIDAY December 2, 1910 “Africa is a British colony. I will tell you how England does it. First she gets a missionary; when the missionary has found a specially beautiful and fertile tract of country, he gets all his people round him and says: “Let us pray.’”’ ; “Then when all eyes are shut® up goes the British flag.’’Har- per’s Magazine. The Provider Senator Bob Taylor, of Tenne- ssee, tells a story of how, when he was ‘‘Fiddling Bob,’”’ govern- or of the state, an old Negress came to him and said: “Massa Gov’na, we’s mighty po’ this winter, and Ah wish you would pardon mah old man. He isa fiddler the same as you is, and he’s in the pen’tentry,’”’ “What was he put in for?” asked the gevernor. “Stead of workin’ fo’ it that good- fo’- nothing Nigger done stole some bacon.’’ “Tf he is good for nothing what do you want him back for?” «, “Well, yo’ see, we’s all out of bacon ag’in,’”’ said the old Ne- gress innocently. —Cosmopolitan. Mrs. Hannah Beebe, mother of Mrs. Totten, who shot and killed James Sutton, who was tried and convicted of ee the first degree by a jury at Wenatchee, has been found guilty of manslaugnter. The penalty for Mrs. Totten’s crime is the gallows and the penalty for Mrs. Beebe’s is a term of im- prisonment in the penitentiary. Mrs. Beebe is seventy - three years of age. It can hardly be said of Wil- liam Worrison, who was killed in a place where he had repeatedly warned those under him to vever go, that a fool rushed in where angels dare not tread, for Mor- rison was aware of the fact that, it meant death to any one who went therein, but he seemed to have ina way went out looking for death, and found it. Mrs. Mary Arkwright Hutton of Spokane, proyoses to do all she can so prevent the president of the United States from nam; ing George Turner as a mem of the United States Supreme Court. She bases her opposition te Senator Turner on the grounds that he has always been hostile to equal sufferage for women. According to figures compiled by those who have kept tab on the situation, 118 persons have been killed this year during the’ open hunting season by either being mistaken for game or by stray snots. That is a pretty good record and even the the football season will not lead to an} great extent. The State Teachers’ Associa- tion will meet in Seattle, Decem- ber 27th, and already prepara- tions are being made to enter- tain them. People’s Savings Bank. Edward C. Neufelder, R J. Reekle, Viee Pres Tre Jou. T. Greenleaf, Incorporated Dee, 19th, 1880, Commercial Savings and Trast General Bank and Mashange Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wase. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN FRIDAY, December 2. 1910 Whom President Taft is seriously considering to be named as either a member of the U. S. Supreme Court or U. S. District Judge for Eastern Washington. His argument before the Hague tribunal is largely responsible for the consideration of his name in the above connections by President Taft. ————————————— IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ‘THE ‘State of Washington, in and for the County of King. 60-Day Summons. Carrie Hull, plaintift, vs, Sarah Gallo- way and John Doe Galloway, her hus- band, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right- title, estate, lien or interest in. the real estate described in the complaint herein, and also any and all unknown heirs ‘of the said defendants above named, defendants—No. ——. The State of Washington, to the above tamed defendants, Sarah Galloway and John Doe Galloway, her husband, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, es- tate, lien or interest In the real estate described in the complaint herein, and also. any and all unknown heirs of the said defendants above named: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of first publication of tits summons, to- wit: within sixty (60 7 "a after the Beth day of October, ~', “nd defend the above entitled act ~ the above entitled court and ansy _e complaint of the plaintiffs and 2 a copy of your answer upon the fersigned_at- torneys for the plaintit * thelr office below. stated; and in case of your fail- ure so to do, judgment, will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘This action is brought for the pur. pose of quieting title in the plaintiff to the following deseribed property, to- wit: Lots 2t and 28, in Block, 5, os Chiibers's AGaition to West Seattle, situated in King County, State of ‘Wash- ington. RSVELLE, REVELLE & REVELLE, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Postoffice address: 605-608 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. ‘Oct. 28, Dec, 9, 1910. IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication, James Henry, plaintiff, vs. F. B. Hunt- ley and Jane Doe Huntley, his wife, whose true christian name is un- known, defendants.—No, 74840. State of Washington to the defendants, F. B, Huntley and Jane Doe Hunt- ley, his wife: ‘You and each of you are hereby sum~ moned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 30th day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answe r the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at- torney for the plaintiff at his office be- low stated, and in case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered. against you according to the demand of. the plaintiff's complaint | which. has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to recover the sum of $105.95 together with costs and interest due from you to the plaintiff herein for goods, wares and. merchandise sold and delivered to you by the plain- tiff in this action during the last past three years. A writ of attachment be- ing issued out of this cause and court and lots 26 and 37, block 8, of Green {ake Reservoir Addition to the city, of Seattle have been attached thereunder. F. J. CARVER, ‘Attorney ‘for Plaintitt. Office and postoffice address, Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. ‘Sept. 30—Nov, 11, 1910. IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of ‘Washington, for King Coun- y: Louise Ashen, Plaintiff, vs. Lester Ash- en, Defendant, No.’——. Summons fot Publication. The State of Washington, to Lester ‘Ashen, Defendant. You are hereby notified and gum- moned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above en- titled action within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this sum- jnons, exclusive of the date of the said first. publication, to-wit: within sixty Aiea after the 7th day of October, 1910, and answer the complaint of the plain- fit and serve a copy of your answer up- on the attorney for the plaintiff below named, at his office, below stated, and fn ease of your failure so do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff. which has been filed with the Gierk of the above entitled court. ‘The object of this action is to secure a divorce on the ground of desertion for more than one year. ‘A. C. McDONALD, F ‘Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. 0. Address, 524 Batley Building, Seattle, Wash. ‘Oct. T—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington for King Coun- ty, Summons by Publication. Maud A. Boschert, plaintiff, vs. Charles %. Boschert, defendant.—No. 76217. The State of Washington, to the said Charles C, Boschert, defendant: Sou are hereby sumomned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first. publication of this summons, to- Wit, within sixty days after the 7th Yay of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action 'in the above en fitled court, and answer the complaint tf ‘the plaintiff, and serve a copy of Sour answer upon the undersigned St- forneys for plaintiff, at their office be- {ow stated; and in case of your failure 10" to do, judgment will, be rendered Against you according to the demand of fhe complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court, ‘Briefly stated the object of this ac- tion is to dissolve the bonds of matri- fhony existing between plaintiff and_de- fendant and ta grant, the plaintift | ¢ Sivoree from the defendant on, the ground of abandonment of the plaintiff fy the defendant for more than one Year last past, and for the failure of the defendant ‘to support the plaintift and his family, and to award the cus- fody of their ‘minor son, Robert | E. Boschert, to the plaintiff, For further particulars reference 1s made to the Romplaint now on file in. the office of the clerk of the above entitled court. BRADY & RUMMENS, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Postoffice address: ‘Suite 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, ‘Washington. ‘Oct. 7—Nov, 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington, for King Coun- ty.. Summons by Publication. pilzabeth. J. Marston, plaintiff, vs, Rich- ard, Marston, defendant.—No. The State of Washington, to the sald Richard K, Marston, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- Mit. within sixty days after the 7th Gay. of October, 1910, and defend the GBive entitled action ‘in the above en- fitied court, and answer the complaint Of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of Your anBwer upon the undersigned at- youny for plaintift at his office below stated: and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk ‘of said court. The object of the above entitled ac- tion is for an absolute divorce on the grounds of non-support, and custody 9f two minor children, JOHN R. WILSON, Plaintift’'s Attorney. P, 0, address, 589 New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. ‘Oct. T—Nov. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H, Craver, Plaintiff, vs, Thos. Baton, ‘and all persons unknown, if any, hav- ing or claiming an interest in ‘and to the “hereinafter described. real prop- erty. Defendants. No. 75684. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter describ- ed real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax cer- tificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April, 1910, and numbered B617£0, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1806, in the amount of $1.65, and upon the ‘real property, situated in aaid ing County, ‘described as follows, to- wit: Beginning at a point 165 feet east and 83 feet south of the N, W. corner of the SW 1-4 of Sec, 10, ‘Tp. 26 N. R. 6 E., W. M.; thence east 60 feet, thence S.'120' feet, thence west 60 feet, thence N. 120 feet’ to the place of beginning, ‘That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years ahve been paid by the plaintift upon sald above de- scribed real property, to-wit. For the year 1907,'the sum of $1.36: for the year 1908, the sum of 87 cen’s; for the year 1909, ‘the sum of 28 cen’. Which severa:’ sums bear interest ‘at tho rate of 15 ver cent per annuy, ‘trom said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes spon and against sald real property. ‘You and each of you (including sald pergons unknown, if any), are, hereby ‘urther notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- Heation, to-wit: within 60 days after Sept, 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and ‘action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintift and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, In case of you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for sald taxes, interest_and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the sat: isfaction of the sums charged and found against It respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintif's com- plaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H, CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C, MacDONALD, Attorney’ for Plaintift. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Se- attle, Wash. Sept. 30—Noy. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Summons by Publication. Catheriné Lomas, plaintiff, vs. Harry Lomas, defendant.—No. ——. The State of Washington, to Harry Lomas, defendant: You ate hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this sum- mons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 28th day of October, 1910, and de- fend the above entitled’ action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for plaintiff at his of- fice below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will pe ren- dered against you according to the de- mand of the complaint which nas been flled with the clerk of said court. The object of this complaint is to obtain an absolute divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant on the grounds of cruelty and nonsupport, and for the return of her maiden namie. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintift. Office address: 814 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Oct. 28—Dec. §, 1910, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs, Preston Mill Co,, and all persons ‘unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, “Defendants, No. 75685. Noties and ‘Summons. State of Washington: 'To the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an’ interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff Is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate ts- sued by the ‘Treasurer of King, County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April, 1910, and numbered B61756 for the delinquent taxes of the year 1905, In the amount of 90 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King coun- ty, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at 8, B. cor. of N. B. 1-4 of Sec. 82, Tp, 24 NRT EW. M thence west 420 feet to School Dist. No. 76, thence north to N, P. Ry., thence easterly along Ry, to easterly’ line of said section, thence §. 285 feet to the place of beginning, (Part of S. B. 1-4 of the N. E. 1-4 Sec. 32, Tp. 24 N., R 7B, W. M) ‘Tnat the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintift upon said above described real property, to-wit: ‘For the year 1906, the sum of 57 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of 72 cents; for the year 1908, the sum of 44 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 27 cents. Which several sums bear interest ‘at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unmpald and unredeemed taxes upon and against sald real property. ‘You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summorfed to be and annene within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- clusive of the day of said first publica- tion, to-wit: within 60 days after Sept, 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and an- Swer the complaint of said plaintift and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his offire below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the Sums and amounts due upon and charg- THR SBATTLE REPUBLICAN ed against each, for sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a saie of each par- cel of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against Yt respectively as provided by law, and as prayed In’ plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court, L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD. ‘Attorney for Plaintiff, Office Address: 624 Bailey Buliding, Se- attle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910, IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE eyete of Washington, for King Coun- ye Wyman, Partridge & Co., a corporation, plaintive. James Fitzgerald and ‘ulia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitz- gerald & Fitzgerald, defendants.—No. 74785, Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said James Fitzgerald and Julia Fiteger- ald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitz- gerald, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the 2nd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court. and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy ox your answer upon the undersigned at- torneys for plaintiff at their office be- low stated; and in case of your failure so to do,’ judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the Seno, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the ‘above entitled action is to recover a judgment against, ‘said defendants upon a claim by plaintiff for goods, wares and merchandise sold and de- livered to said defendants by said plin- tiff in the sum df Two Thousand One Hundred Twenty-seven and 10-100 Dol- lars ($2,127.10), with interest thereon from the 21d day of May, 1910, besides the costs of suit, and in which said ac- tion an attachment has been taken out and levied. LEOPOLD (4. STERN, and J. M. RUSSELL, Attorneys for plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 705 Low- man Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, Sept. 2, Oct. 15, 1910. IN THE JUSTICE’S COURT BEFORB John B, Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Wash- ington, Summons by Publication. Blossom-Provine Lumber Co,, a corpora~ tion, plaintiff, vs. 'T. W. Williams and Jané Doe Williams, his wife, whose true Christian Name is unknown, de- fendants,—No. 13472. To T, W. Williams and Jane Doe Will- jams, lils wife, defendants. In the name of the State of Wasning- ton you are hereby notified that Blos- som-Provine Lumber Co, has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Seattle, King County, Washing- ton, to-wit: 210 New York’ Block, on the’ 23rd day of November, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a, m, and unless you appear and then and there answer the same will be taken as confessed, and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said claim is to recover from the defendants a balance due for goods, wares and merchandise, to-wit: lumber sold and delivered to said defendants by the plaintif within the last past three years, Complaint filed September 29,1910. JOHN B. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace. Oct. 28—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THH State of Washington, in and for King County, Summons by Publication. Frieda Marshall, plaintiff, vs. Joe Mar- shall, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington to Joe Mar- shall. Fou are hereby summoned to, appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this sum- mons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 7th day ‘of October, 1910, and de- fend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his| office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of sald court. The ob- ject of this action is that the plaintim, on the grounds of habitual drunkenness of the defendant and the neglect and refusal of the defendant husband to make suitable provision for his family, be granted an absolute divorce from the defendant herein and the custody and control of the child of the plaintiff and defendant herein, and such other and further relief as’ the court may direct. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintift. Office address: 14 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash, Oct. 7—Nov. 18, 1910. INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of ing, IN PROBATE—In the matter of the estate of Emil Engelmann, deceased, No. 10,408. Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distri- bution Should Not Be Made. Paul G, Engelmann, administrator of the estate of Emil Engelmann, deceased, having filed in this court his final ac- count ‘and petition, setting forth that sald estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for dis ribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to au horize a distribu- tion of the residue of said estate: Tt is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Emil Enj,elmann, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Cour of King County, State of Washing- ton’ at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Department No, 7 on the 5th day of December, 1910, at the hour of 10:00 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should no be allowed and an order of distribu- tion be made of the residue of said es- tate among the heirs and persons in gaid petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the mos public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to sald hear- Ing and published once a week for, four consecutive weeks before the said bth day of December, 1910, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper, printed and published in sald King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this Sist day of October, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, C. C. John R. Wilson, A torney for said Es- tate, 639 New ‘York Block, Seattle, Nov. 4-Dec. 2, 1910, IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Order Appointing Day for Settlement of Account. In_the Matter of the Estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased.—No. 11797. Hallie Burkholder, administratrix of the estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased, having this day rendered and presented for settlement and filed in this court her account of her administration of the estate of sald deceased, It is therefore ordered that Monday, the 28th day of November, A. D, 1910, at 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon be and the same is hereby appointed for the settlement of the said account; and that the clerk give notice thereof by caus- ing notices to be posted in at least three public places in this county, one of which shall be at the place where this court is held, at least 14 days before said day of settlement and i, publish- ing such notice in the Seattle eae liean, a newspaper published and of general circulation in this county, once a week for two weeks prior to said day of settlement. Done in Set court this 9th day of November, 1910. A. W. PRATER, meer Seng ich = F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Administratrix. Northern Bank & Trust Bidg., Seattle, Washington. Nov. 11—Nov. 25, 1910. IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT. OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Notice of the Hearing on a Petition for Specific, Performance. In, the Matter of the Estate of Sarah P. ‘T. Mitchell, deceased.—No. 11020. Notice is ‘hereby given that E. B. Mitchell, the administrator in the above entitled cause, on the 3rd day of Novem- ber, 1910, filed in the above entitled court his’ petition asking leave of the court to specifically perform certain contract with Nellie M. Peterson upon the following deseribed praperty, to- wit: ‘Lots six (6), seven (7), fourteen (14) and fifteen (15), Block two (2), of the Second Addition to Adams ‘Tracts, ac- cording to the plat thereof on file and of record in the auditor's office of King County, Washington. ‘And ‘the court on said $rd day of November, 1910, set the 12th day of December, 1910, at 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon, in Department No. 7, in the court house in Seattle, King ‘County, Washington, as the time for hearing said petition: and all persons interested as creditors, heirs, devisees or personal representatives are ordered to appear and present any objections to the grant- ing of the said petition, Dated this 8rd day of November, 1910. B. B. MITCHELL, Administrator. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for ‘Administrator. Northern Bank & ‘Trust Co. Bldg., Seattle, Washington, ‘Nov. 11——Dec. 2, 1910. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication, Blossom-Provine Lumber Co., a corpora- tion, plaintiff, vs. A Watkins and Jané Doe Watkins, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown; L. D, W. Shelton and Jane Doe Shelton, his wife, whose trie christian name is unknown, defendants.—No. —, The State of Washington, to A. Wat- kins and Jane Doe Watkins, his wife, whose true christian name is _un- known; L, D, W. Shelton and Jane Doe Shelton, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, defend: ants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this sum- mons, to-wit: within sixty days after the ‘11th day of November, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plantiff and serve a copy of your answer on the under- signed attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be ren- dered against you according to the de- mand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to fore- close a lien for materials furnished by the plaintiff! to the defendants to be used upon lots 48 and 44, block 7, Green- wood Park Second Addition to ‘Seattle, King County, Washington. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address 814 Northern Bank & ‘Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. ‘Nov. 11—Dec. 23, 1910. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons by, Publication. Daisy Voigt, plaintift, ve, William x. Woigt, defendant No, ——, ‘The State of Washington, to William FP. Voigt, defendant: Fou ene beriy, Goumoned te appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, A. D. 1910, and de- fend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the com- plaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff; in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to. the prayer of plaintiff's complaint, which hat been filod with the clerk ‘of said court. ‘The object of the above entitled ac- tion is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you on the grounds of desertion and failure to support plain- tiff, and for a restoration of the maiden name of plaintiff. HOWARD 0. DURK, Attorney for Plaintiff. 535 Henry Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec, 23, 1910. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons for Publication. Adell ‘Toomire, plaintiff, vs." Joseph ‘Toomire, defendant.—No. 32501, The State of Washington to the said Joseph Toomire, defendant: You are hereby’ summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the ‘11th day of November, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at- torney for plaintiff at, his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of sald court. The object of the above entitled ac- tion is to secure divorce and annul marriage of plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds of non-support. No all- mony 1s asked. Date of first publication, November 11, 1910. FRED L. RICH, Attorney for Plaintiff. P.O. address, 229 Burke Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 11—Dee, 28, 1910. FRIDAY December 2, 1910 IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons by Publication. William J. Clarke, plaintiff, vs. Nellie Clarke, defendant.—No, ——. The State of Washington, to Nellie Clarke, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, A. D. 1910, and de- fend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the com- plaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his address below given; in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer, of the plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled ac- tion ts to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you on the ground of de- sertion, HOWARD O. DURK, Attorney for Plaintiff. 535 Henry Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 23, 1910. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Notice of Settlement of Final Account, State of Washington, County of King. —ss. In the Matter of the Estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased.—No. 11797, Notice is ‘hereby given that Hallie Burkholder, administratrix of the estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased, has ren- dered to, and filed’ in said ‘court her final account as such administratrix, and that the 28th day of November, 1910, at 9:80 o'clock, a. m., at the court room of the Probate Department of our sud Superior Court, in the City of Seat- tle, in “aid King County, has been duly appointed by sald court’ for the settle- ment of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said es- tate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account and contest the same. Witness, the Hon, A. W..Frater, judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said court hereto affixed this 9th day of November, 1910, D. K, SICKELS, (Seal) Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. Nov. 11—Nov. 25, 1910. IN_ THE, JUSTICH'S COURT BEFORE John B, Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Wash- ington, Summons by Publication. R. J. BHichler, plaintiff, vs. Cora Lowe terial furnished and labor performed by this plaintiff for and on behalf of said demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of this action ts to recover the sum of Twelve Dollars same will be taken as confessed, and the ($12.00), being a balance due for ma- and John Doe Lowe, her husband, JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace. Oct, 7—Oct. 28, 1910, i REMOVAL NOTICE The Light and Power depart- ment of the Seattle Electric Company has moved to the Electric Bldg., Seventh aven- ue and Pine street. Street car tickets can be purchased and all bills paid in the Electrical Sales Room at the old location 907 FIRST AVENUE THE SEATTLE .ELECTRIC CO ORDER A CASE OUT TO YOUR PLACE OF @ PHONE SIDNEY 526 A Free Trip to Seattle and Retarn. Let’s Bust the State Dental Trist. Brix ‘Take a trip to Seattle and let AED, macavoyou tha price of your Ppp isin on your dental work. You ig NAYS save a dollar, I make a dollar BoE the Stats Dental Monopoly BB will lose two dollars when Ide POF > WF sour dental work. Have your Frags SP dental work done now while thedental war ison. My offices = have ‘been established at 718 F Pirst Ave, in the Union Block, for 18 years. "Ido not compete with cheap dentists, but with the high-clars dent. ists forhalf their price. Openevenings until 8 and Sundays until d for people who work. EDWIN J. BROWN, D.D.S. 113 First Avenue Seattle, Wash. Read my article in Sunday's P.-I. and Monday'e ‘Times and Star. GILHAM-LYSONS REALTY CO., General Offices: 411 Lowman Bldg. Loans, Investments, Insurance. H. E. Gilham. J. W. Lysona, Main 3044. Ind. 1588. BUY THE BEST If you want a safe which you know Has No Superior, buy one of the Hall Safe & Lock Co.'s, manufactured by the Herring- Hall-Marvin Safe Co., for which we are the sole agents, PURCELL SAFE CO, Prefontaine Bldg., Prefontain Place and Yesler Way DENNY-RENTON CLAY & COAL CO., Manufacturers of All Kinds of Clay Products, Main 2189—Phones—Ind. 6125. FRIDAY December 2. 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Charles Pfeffer, plaintiff, vs. Millie Bennett, Walter C. Bennett, her husband, Charles P. Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown, William D. Bennett, D. A. Hatfield and "Jane Doe" Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown, and Charles W. Fisk, F. M. Hatfield, Ida M. Barton and Aurora Land Company, a corporation, defendants.—No. 75263. The State of Washington to Charles P. Newberry and "Jane Doe" Newberry, whose true given name is unknown; Charles W. Fisk, F. M. Hatfield and Jane Doe Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is unknown. You, and each of you, are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 15th day of September, 1814, and hence to beowed on evidence in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and have a copy of your answer served upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment for the insured and give evidence to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to foreclose a certain mortgage executed and delivered by the said defendants Mille Bennett and Walter C Bennett, her husband, to one S. Campbell and by the said S. Campbell assigned for this plaintiff dated 28 January 1909 did not endure in the same day in Vol. 407 of mortgages, page 39 of the record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, which mortgage was given to secure a promissory note of $500.00 with interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent per annum and was given upon Lots 15, 18 and 19 Gilman Kirk, First Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to obtain judgment for the said $500.00 together with interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the 28th day of January, 1910, and the attorney's fee of $75.00 and costs of suit and to foreclose and determine the interest of such and all of said defendants in and to said premises and every part thereof. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons. A. L. Weaver and Ella May Weaver, husband and wife, plaintiffs, vs. Peter Er Neddy defendant. The State of Washington to the said Peter E. Nordin, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 17th day of Sept. 1410, and defend the entitled court and the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment and decree will be rendered against you accusing the plaintiffs of foreclosed, forfeited, and the title of the plaintiffs as to all claims you may have or claim. J. W. BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiffs. 1324 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Sept. 16, Oct. 28, 1910. State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Antone Kaas, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and over the develafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75305. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby entitled to the above delinquent taxiff is the holder of certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of November, 1908, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, West 260 feet of $1% of $1% of NE1% of SE 1% Sec. 4, Tp. 21, N., R 4 E. W. M., certificate number B54644, year 1906, amount $1.23. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit; Amount $1.40 for year 1907; 76 cents for year 1908. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 5 per cent per annum on sold date 1907 and on unredeemed taxes upon and against sold real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of sale first publ. Julyification, to-wit: within sixty days Aug. 19, 1910, in the abate days and action; and action; and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and answer a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due and charged against each, for said taxes, ordering a sale of parcel of said property, and satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County King, Summons Neilie Derry, Plaintiff, vs. Herbert A. Derry, Defendant.—No. 75952. The State of Washington to the said Herbert A. Derry, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first day of this summons, today within sixty days after the 23rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office before the court, for the purpose of so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is instituted for the purpose of dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and the defendant upon the grounds that said defendant has failed, neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the support and maintenance of said plaintiff, and for the decree awarding to said plaintiff the following described real estate granting city of Chalam, State of Washington, particularly described as follows, to-wit: Lots twenty-two (22), twenty-three (23), twenty-six (26) and twenty-seven (27), in section seven (7), township thirty (30), north of range nine (9) west, Clallam County, Washington; and also the following property situated in King County, State of Washington: The west half of lot twenty-five (25) and lot twenty-six (26), block eight (8) Bremerton (26) the other (27) Seattle; and for such other and further relief as to this court may seem just and equitable. IN THE SUPPRIOR COUR8, KING County, Washington. Elizabeth Turnbull, Plaintiff, vs. George Turnbull, Defendant. No. —. Summons. The State of Washington to the said George Turnbull, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the defendant attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complainant in this action prays for divorce and that the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved. H. E. FOSTER Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 606 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, October 7, 1910. Date of last publication, November 18, 1910. IN JUSTICE' S COURT—BEFORE Fred C. Brown, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. John Doe Matijasevich and Richard Roe Glo- vich, copartners, doing business under the name and style of Alaska Liquor Company, Defendants, No. . . . Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King, ss The State of Washington: To John Doe Matijasevich and Richard Roe Glo- vich, copartners, doing business under first name and style of Alaska Liquor Company. You, and each of you, are hereby notified that California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, has filed a complaint against you in said Court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the hour of 8:30 o'clock a.m., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said action is for the sum of Eighty-two Dollars and Twenty-five cents (675) for the balance of Plaintiff's payment on account of merchandise sold and delivered to the defendants during the year. 909. Fried September 15th, A. D. 1910. FRED C. BROWN, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. TWOROGER & WINKLER, Attorneys for Plaintiff. 10-11 Triangle Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication Sept. 16. 1910 Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg.. Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of, Washington, for King Coun- l ty. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the estate of Allen P. Mitter, deceased No. 11658. Bitten, deceased No. 11658. On the 8th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against, said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the underigned executors of said estate, at 1308 Alaska Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 23, 1910. SARAH H. MITTEN, FRED W. WEST, HENRY BLACKWOOD, As Executors of said Estate. BRADY & RUMMENS, Attorneys for Estate. 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Oct. 22, 1910. JUSTICE COURT—BEFORE JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Wm. Zehring, plaintiff, vs. Mrs. A. M. Simmons, defendant. State of Washington, County of King, ss. The State of Washington to Mrs. A. M. Simmons. You and each of you are hereby notified that Wm. Zehring has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210. New York building, Seattle, King Count. Washington, on the 28th day of November, 1910, at the room 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said complaint is to recover the sum of $62.70, being a balance due for goods, wares and merchandise, sold and delivered to you by this plaintiff within the last past three years. Complaint filed October 10th A. D. 1910. JOHN E. CARROLL. Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Nov. 4-Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Summons for Publication. Laurentie E. Cole, plaintiff, vs. Anna May. Cole, defendant—No. 76580. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN The State of Washington, to the said Anna May Cole, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear with sixty (60) days after the date of the late publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 21st day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to do so, please with tendered agree to you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant, upon the following grounds: Because the defendant without the plaintiff's fault, abandoned the plaintiff over the 9th of October, 1910, at Seattle, Washington, and that said abdication has been continuous for one year and more. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Summons. Lillian Collins, plaintiff, vs. James Collins, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington, to the said James Collins, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, today of October twenty days after the 21st day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to secure a debt of matrimony dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of desertion and failure to provide for more than one year. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Lorenz Schweizer, Deceased. No. 12054. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of and al persons having claims against the deceased, or his estate, to present them with the necessary voucher to the understaffed administrator of said estate at room No. 604 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of the transaction of business of said estate, within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice or the same will be barred. Dated this 18th day of November, 1910. Date of first publication Nov. 18, 1910. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Administrator of the Estate of Lorenz Schweizer, Deceased. Nov. 18—Dec. 16, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Frank B. Wilson, Plaintiff, vs. Emily W. Wilson, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 19th day of November A. D., 1910, and defend the entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer, upon the signed attestor for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filled with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: Divorce suit on the grounds of dunlearness. JOHN H. PERRY, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Seattle, County of King, Washington. Nov. 19—Dec. 50, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Probate, Administrator's Notice and Sale, Estate. In the Matter of the Estate of James J. Lynch, Deceased.—No. 10926. Notice is hereby given that under and by virtue of an order of sale of the Superior Court of King County, Washington, dated October 8th, 1879, it is described that the following described real estate situated in King County, Washington: Lot 31, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot 32, Block 7, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. the court. Dated this 20th day of October, 1910. Date of first publication, October 21, 1910. HARRY W. BRINGHURST, Administrator of the Estate of James J. Lynch, Deceased. December 14, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Surmons. Eleanor D. Buss, plaintiff, vs. Park D. Phillips, defendant. Phillips, The State of Washington, to the above President Park D. Phillips; named defendant, Park D. Phillips. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the first within sixty days after the twenty-first day of October, 1910, exclusive of twenty-first day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and to serve a copy of your answer or other pleading upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his hereinafter designated postoffice address, and in case of failure so to do, judgment will be rendered in said cause according to the condition of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of said action is to procure a judgment and decree forever severing between the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant, on the grounds of the failure, fusal and neglect of the defendant to provide for or contribute anything towards support or maintenance of the plaintiff since their marriage on the 5th day of July, 1900, and on the further ground that the defendant more than Our Season's Offering OF EXCLUSIVE WOOLENS A call will convince the most skeptical of the Worth and Beauty of our slash. The established reputation of our tailoring assures you of satisfaction. Established 22 Years two years ago wilfully and without just cause abandoned the plaintiff, and at all times since has so continued to abandon and live separate and apart from plaintiff. PROBATE NOTICE—IN THE SUPERIOR Court of Washington, for he County of King. State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the Matter of the Estate of Allan Poole, Deceased, No. 7346. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. Notice is hereby given that Phebe L. Poole, executrix of the last will and testament of Allan Poole, deceased, has tendered to, and as filed in said Court, her Final Will, and as executrix of the said Court, that Thursday, the 15th of December, 1910, at 9:30 o'clock, a m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. A. W. Frater, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of Court herein affixed this 18th day of November, 1910. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. Nov. 25—Dec. 9, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of John E. Corbally, Deceased. No. 12024. No- tice to Directors. Notice is here given that all per- sons having claims against the estate of John E. Corbally, deceased, are hereby required to present the same, with vouchers in support thereof, to Mary Corbally, executrix of said estate, at the office of Robert F. Booth, 811 Lowman Building, Seattle, Washington, that be- ing the place for the transaction of such business without the date of the first publication hereof. MARY CORBALLY, Executrix of the Estate of John E. Corbally, Deceased. ROBERT F. BOOTH, Attorney for Executrix. 811 Lowman Building, Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication November 25; last, December 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. May V. Russell, Plaintiff, vs. Jonh T. Russell, Defendant. No. 77203. Sum- mary, Defendant. The State of Washington to the said John T. Russell, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 25th of November 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered on bringing to the command of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and non-support. JOHN R. WILSON. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. A. A. 1919 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. Nov. 25, 1910-Jan. 6, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King Coun- Daisy Hour, plaintiff, vs. John Francis Hour, defendant.—No.— The State of Washington, to the said John Francis, Hour, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 30th day of September, A.D. 1910, and defend the above entitled citation in the office of Court, and answer the file in this cause and Court. State of Washington: To the above de State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the oneene delinquent in six certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of November, 1908, and numbered B54857, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.45, and upon the real property situated in said IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE further notified and summoned to and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days Sept. 9, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and 833 Henry Building, Seattle. King County, Washington. Oct. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. Attorney for Executrix answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Caroline L. Burns, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Defendants—No. 75301. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 2nd day of September, 1999, and numbered compliant of the plaintiff and the owner of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been King County, described as follows, towit. Lot 12, Block 5, Allentown Acres. That the taxes for the following security service may be paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property to wit: You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, with written allowance days Sept. 30, 1910. In the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs L. H. GRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Walter S. Boxwell, Plaintiff, vs. Izola Lourine Boxwell, Defendant. No. The State of Washington: To Izola Louine Boxwell, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 2nd day of December, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to secure an absolute divorce from the defendant by the plaintiff on the grounds of desertion and for a decree ordered by the sole and entire owner of Lots 20 and 31 Block 11, Green Lake Reservoir. Addition to the city of Seattle. F. J. CARVER and JOHN SLATTERY. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 North Bank & Trust Blg., Seattle, Washington. DEC. 2, 1910—Jan. 3, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Winifred Jones, Plaintiff, vs. Frances J. Jones, Defendant. No. 77320. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to Frances J. Jones, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit; within sixty days after the 2nd day of December 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, demanding to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to secure an absolute divorce from the defendant by the plaintiff on the grounds of drunkenness and desertion. F. J. CARVER and JOHN SLATTERY, Attorneys for Paintif. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg. Blvd. Jacksonston. 1930-1940 Jan. 13, 1941 R and JOHN SLATTERY, Attorneys for Plaintiff. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, Washington, Summons by Publication. Ella Croft, Plaintiff, vs. Harry W. Barrows, Defendant—No. 75894. The State of Washington to the said Harry W. Barrows, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 23rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the civil action filed under the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filled with the clerk of said court. The complaint in this action pays for the annulment of a marriage ceremony entered into between the plaintiff and defendant on December 28, 1907, and that the said marriage ceremony may be cancelled and annulled, and for all proper relief. H. E. FOSTER, P. O. address, 606 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, September 23, 1810. Date of last publication, Nov. 4, 1910. Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- Nation to Creditors. ty. Notice to the Board In the Matter of the Estate of Alonzo the Court issued No. 11696. By order of said court made herein on the 7th day of September, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the under-signed administrator of said estate, Alaska Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 23, 1910. N. H. JOSE. As Administrator of said Estate. BRADY & RUMMENS, Attorneys for Estate, 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 23—Oct. 22, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- nies Notice to Creditors. in. The Matter of the Estate of Leon- tay. Notice to diseased. No. 11230. hard Reing, deceased.—No. 11230. By order of said court made herein on the 29th day of September, 2010, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against, and to all deceased or against said claim or against the community estate said deceased and Margarithe S. Reing, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Margarethe S. Reing, executrix of said estate, at 309 Burke Block, at the office of A. J. Speckert, her attorney, the place of business of said claim in theattle, in said county and state, within one year, and after the date ofpublication of this notice or same will be harred. Date of first publication September 30, 1910. MARGARETHE REINIG, As Executrix of said Estate. As Executrix of said Estate A. J. SPECKERT. Attorney for Estate. 309 Burke Block, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Oct. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Avard L. Morrison, plaintiff, vs. Sarah Morrison, defendant—No. The State of Washington to the said defendant. Sarah W. you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 21st day of October, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the object of said court. The object of the said action and the relief ought to be obtained therein are fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the ground of your abandonment of plaintiff for more than two years. J. P. BALL. Postoffice and office address: 201-203 Burke Bldg., Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. Oct. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Summons by Publication. M. J. Lutz, Plaintiff, vs. Charles W. Ingran, Administrator of the Estate of Richard Lehn, Deceased, and Mrs. A. Sjoequist, Defendants.—No. 7247. The State of Washington to Mrs. A. You are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 23rd day of September 1910, and defend the above cited action in the above written court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated, and in case your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, and to the demand of the complaint herein which has been filed with the clerk of this count. The object of said action, as set forth in the complaint, is to foreclose two certain mortgages given by the said Richard Lehn in his life time to the said plaintiff, the first one being dated the November 16, 1906, to secure the sum of $1,200.00, with interest thereon at the rate of 7 per cent per annum from dated October 8, 1907, to secure the sum of 8,100.00, with interest at the rate of 7 per cent per annum from said date until paid, and to recover judgment for said amounts and interest and $26.98 taxes paid by plaintiff, an torney's fee of $140.00 and costs of suit, both of said mortgages being 1 and 2, block 3, John J. McGilva's Second addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to foreclose and detest all the right, title and interest of said defendants and each of them in and to said property. EDWARD VON TOBEL. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sent 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Counto- t, Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Bertha Brown, deceased—No. 12027. By order of said court made herein on the 22nd day of October, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to pres- ent them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrators of said estate, at 56 Lowman Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication Octo. 28, 1910. SAM BROWN, ISAAC BROWN, As Administrators of said Estate. LEOPOLD M. STERN, Attorney for Estate, 705 Lowman Blg., Seattle, Wash. Oct. 28—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Edith Rasa. Plaintiff, vs. John F. Rash Defendant. No. 75369. Summons by Publication. State of Washington to the said John F. Rash. Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of August, 1910, in the above entitled action, in the above entitled affidavit to the plaintiff of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said com plaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. Plaintiff brought for the purpose of obtaining a decree of divorce from the said defendant on the grounds of abandonment, non-support and personal indignities, the same being causes of action specified in the laws of Washington, for which services of summons by publication may be made. PARKER & BROWN, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: Room 25 Union Block, 713 1st Ave, Seattle, Washington. August 26—Oct. 6, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE Estate of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Viola Estella Small, plaintiff, vs. Joseph Small, defendant.-No. — The State of Washington, to the said Joseph Small, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear with sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wait: within sixty days after the 14th day of the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of court. The objection to the action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the abandonment of plaintiff for four years, and also your failure to make suitable provisions for plaintiff since said marriage. J. P. BALL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice and office address: 201-203 Burke Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 14—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. C. H. Boynton, plaintiff, vs. William B. Jenkins, defendant, Nov. 7, 1910. The State of Washington to the said William B. Jenkins, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 14th day of October, 1910, and defend the law of the 1910 edition in the two titles cited court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to recover judgment against defendant for the amount due upon two promissory notes for $150.00 and $40.00, respectively, made by said defendant on the 80th day of July, 1917, and payable, one, two months after, and the other, one, two months after date, respectively, together with interest thereon at six per cent, besides the costs of this action, and to have an attachment issued and levied on the defendant's property. LEOOLD M. STERN Attorney for Plaintiff Postoffice address 705 Lowman Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 14—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be mad In the Matter of the Estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased—No. 5556. Malcolm K. MacRae, administrator of the estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled to the estate under the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of sale estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said T. J. Riordan, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the courthouse on the public Department of said court, Seattle on the 14th day of October, 1910, and the hour of 9.30 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of the estate among the holders and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said seal and published once four consecutive weeks before the said 14th day of November, 1910, in the ATTORNEYS, ATTENTION! THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is looking for your legal publications, and if you are looking for your own business interests you will see to it that no publication is sent from your office without first talking with CAYTON about it. It is an indisputable fact that there are but two weekly publications in Seattle that publish lawyers' legal notices and give the lawyers no trouble on account of errors and prompt "returns" of publishers' affidavits, and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN takes cases that he has not the time to look the paper over every the lead. In this day of busy, bustling activity, the lawyer's time is so much absorbed in the preparation of his voluminous week to see if his notices are being regularly published, nor to read over his notices to see if they are absolutely correct. It often happens that even lawyers make errors in getting or calls the lawyer's attention to them before going to press up their notices for publication, which errors are very annoying to the lawyers if not detected and corrected before going into the paper. If, therefore, the lawyer feels absolutely certain that the publisher gives his personal attention to notices sent to his paper and either corrects small errors in notices it's a great relief to his mind. The publisher of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN has had so much experience with legal publications that he can detect a faulty publication almost as readily as the lawyer himself, and, if not a grievous one, corrects it then and there, but if a grievous one, the lawyer's attention is called to the same before going to press. Returns on publications are promptly made, so that lawyers do not have to worry about the publisher's notice after his case has been called in court. CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY 307 Epler Block Phone Main 305 Seattle - - Washington THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed, and published in said King County, and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 7th day of October, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Court Commissioner. State of Washington, County of King—ss. D. K. Sickels, county clerk of King County and ex-officio clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court on the 7th day of November, 1910, in the matter of the estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 7th day of October, 1910. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. Seal Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons by Publication. Seattle Lumber Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Celestine J. Sullivan and Evelyn Sullivan, his wife, E. W. Andrews and Jane Doe Andrews, his wife, Fred G. Cutler and Mildred Cutler, his wife, Netherland American Mortgage Bank, a corporation. H. W. Fisher, Trustee, The National Bank of Commerce, of Seattle, Washington, a corporation, Davis & Company, a corporation. Jahn Brooke & Company, Elliott Bay Mill & Lumber Company, a corporation. LA. Borde, Crane Company, a corporation. John Scutt and Richard Roe Gelsler, a co-partnership doing business as Scutt & Gelsler, Schwabacher Hardware Company, a corporation. John Knapp and Richard Roe Lambert, doing business as Knapp & Lambert. J. J. Frantz and W. J. Winters, defendants. Rentals. Globe Electric Company, Cox & Gleason Company, and J. K. Witherspoon, intervenors.—No. —. the State of Washington, to the said Celestine J. Sullivan, Evelyn Sullivan, his wife, and H. W. Fisher, defendants. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: sixty days after the 14th day of October, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint in intervention of the Intervenor J. K. Witherpoon, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for intervenor at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, jiggers will be ordered against you according to the demand of said intervenor's complaint in intervention which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint in intervention, is as follows: To foreclose a laborer's and materialman's lien upon lots 19 and 20, block 24, Edes & Knights' addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. C. H. WINDERS. Attorney for Intervenor, J. K. Witherpoon. Office and postoffice address: 712 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 14—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Lavina Christine Rudberg, deceased.—No. 11877. By order of said court made herein on the 4th day of October, 1910, notice is hereby given to the guardian of to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administratrix of said estate, at 328 Northern Bank & Trust Building, Seattle, Wash., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one month and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication October 14 1910. ELMA LOUISE RUDBERG, As Administratrix of said Estate GORDON McGAUVRAN, Attorney for Estate. 327-8-9 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg. Seattle, Wash. Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Katherine Schulver, deceased—No. 11830. By order of said court the heirin on the 12th day of October, 1910. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against FRIDAY December 2, 1910 said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary wrothers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 229 Burke Block, Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication Oct. 14, 1910. FRED L. RICE, As Administrator of said Estate. FRED L. RICE, Attorney for Estate. 229 Burke Block, Seattle, Wash. Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. Send your legals to The Seattle Republican, 305 Epler Blk., Phone Main 305. Bonney-Watson Co. Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. STETSON & POST LUMBER CO. BUILDING MATERIAL Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 ALBERT HANSEN. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses. Phone, Main 268. Seattle Washington First and Cherry.