Seattle Republican

Historical Society NORTHWEST THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE PUBLISHER'S NOTICE. The Seattle Republican is published on Friday of every week by Cayton Publishing Company Subscriptions, $3.00 per year; six months, $1.50 postage prepaid. Subscriptions to all foreign countries included in the Postal Union, $4.00 a year postage paid. Sample copies, free. Single copies ten cents. Advertising rates made known on application. Special rates to publishers. Entered a second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. Address all communications to The Seattle Republican 307 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. Make a checks, drafts, postal orders, etc., payable to "Cayton Publishing Company." CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. Telephone: Main 305. Publication office, 307 Epler Block. HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON - - - Publisher 3USIE REVELS CAYTON - - - Associate WHEN THIEVES FALL OUT Now that the investigating committee for the city of Seattle is nearing its reporting time things have begun to leak out, which make one think, that the thieves have fallen out and began to squeal on each other, and before the committee makes it final reports the cat will be completely out of the bag. First one person and then another, all of whom were more or less close to the heart of the Gill administration, has begun to tell what he knew about the graft game, and men conservatively estimated to be worth thousands of dollars with splendid business associations, are charged with being just as keen for their cuts of the graft pie as those worth nothing but their daily graft. Where there is so much smoke there is bound to be some fire, and where so many are testifying that this and that man was getting large sums of graft money there must be some truth somewhere about it. Before this investigating committee began its work this paper would no more have thought the editor of the Seattle Daily Times was mixed up in the various forms of graft that the Gill administration has been fostering than it would have thought the editor of the Times would have been connected with a gang of chicken thieves; and it does not at this time say that the editor of the Times got his out of the graft that is alleged to have been practiced in the city under the Cill administration, but it does say that the editor of the Times has been so indiscrete in his association with those on whom the major part of the graft charges have fallen that his name has bobbed up in a thousand and one different places since the investigation began, and so often and so unmistakably has the footprints of the editor of the Seattle Daily Times shown themselves that, the members of the committee seem unanimous in the opinion that either Col. Blethen got his or somebody that greatly resembles the colonel got it. Then again, the way the Colonel has hollered in the Times, ever since the investigating committee began, against the workings of the committee was of itself ample proof that he was afraid of something. The honest man has no fear of the light of day being turned on his transactions. He has done no wrong and if any one desires to take the time and trouble to investigate what he has done, he will render them all the assistance within his power to do so. On the other hand, the dishonest man will use every effort within his power to prevent an investigation and if the investigation goes on in spite of his protest then he starts in to discredit it just as Colonel Blethen in the Seattle Times has done since the investigating committee began its work some six weeks ago. The Times editorially has branded Blaine and Kellogg, not exactly murderers, but so near it that, it would take a Philadelphia lawyer to distinguish the difference between them. Summing all of the charges and counter charges up, it looks as if it were a nasty nest of poisoned pups, and for the good of the city and the state in general the whole bunch ought to be cleaned out. WASHINGTON AND ITS CONSTITUTION It is claimed that the state of Washington has almost reached its constitutional limit in its number of SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. FRIDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1910 senators and representatives in the legislature and that the next apportionment will have to deprive some of the smaller counties of a senator and representative in order to keep within the bounds of the constitution. Members of the legislature are paid by the state and do not rightly belong to any county, and we, therefore, suggest that the next legislature, instead of killing time trying to give this or that country more or less representation begin at Vancouver and lay off the entire state into districts, and that too, without any regard to the county, in which the district falls. It should be the object of those having charge of it to keep in mind the population unit without regard to the amount of territory in which such unit is to be found. Such a division might deprive Pierce, King, Spokane or some other county of a representative or it might add to what it already has, but that should not enter into the situation. When the various members meet at the legislature owing to the fierce contention between the counties half of the time allotted to the sessions of the legislature is generally fritted away over one or a combination of counties getting together to prevent some larger county from hogging something that she is not, from their viewpoint, entitled to. The constitution is explicit as to the base of representation and, so far as the legislature is concerned, all county lines should be be blotted out and the state arranged in senatorial and representative districts without regard to the county they may happen to fall upon. It will be argued that the state is already laid off into senatorial and reprdsentative districts, which is more or less true, but the districts were laid off from a county and not from a state standpoint. In every county that is admitted it has been taken for granted that such county is entitled to at least a representative in the legislature, when, according to the constitution, it is not unless it happens to have its pro rata of population. That the readers hereof may refresh their memory on the base of representation as fixed by the constitution the sections referring to the same are herewith quoted: ARTICLE II—Legislative Department Legislature. Section 1 The legislative powers shall be vested in a Senate and House of Representatives, which shall be called the Legislature of the State of Washington. Limited Membership. Sec. 2 The House of Representatives shall be composed of not less than sixty-three nor more than ninety-nine members. The number of Senators shall not be more than one-half nor less than one-third of the number of members of the House of Representatives. The first legislature shall be composed of seventy members of the House of Representatives and thirty-five Senators. State Census. Sec. 3 The legislature shall provide by law for an enumeration of the inhabitants of the state in the year one thousand and eight hundred and ninety-five, and every ten years thereafter and at the first session after such enumeration made by the authority of the United States, the Legislature shall apportion and district anew the members of the Senate and the House of Representatives, excluding Indians not taxed, soldiers, sailors and officers of the United States army and navy in active service. Yakima county's judicial grist has grown too large for one judge to grind, say local lawyers. Therefore the coming session of the legislature will be asked to give us a second judge to assist Judge Preble, who is undeniably an overworked man, although that genial and modest official would scarcely admit it, since he is endowed with an inordinate capacity for work. However, we doubt if the judge's work would be so hard if a more common sense system of jurisprudence were in vogue in this state. Lawyers too frequently kill time in court and through delay. Then again, too much of the court's valuable time is consumed in hearing petty cases mostly of the criminal class that the law should allow the court commissioner to hear and finally dispose of.—Yakima Democrat. VOLUME XVII. NUMBER 28 PERSONS IN THE PUBLIC EYE James W. Maxwell will be unanimously re-elected president of the Seattle Commercial Club. He has made an ideal officer and has pushed the affairs of the club forward at a lively gait since he has been at the helm. Eugene Lorton, a well known daily newspaper publisher, issued his first number of the Saturday Review of Seattle last Saturday and it was a splendid review. It is proposed by the new publishers to make the review the weekly paper of the state. J. L. Douglas, secretary of the Metropolitan Building Company of Seattle, has recently returned from a six weeks' visit in the East in connection with the affairs of the company. Mr. Douglas has been instrumental in bringing a vast amount of capital to the city. Jacob Furth, president of the Seattle Electric Company and one of the heavy stock holders of the Seattle National Bank, has returned from a trip to the Orient, whither he went as a representative of the Chamber of Commerce of Seattle for the purpose of interesting the Chinese government in the commercial enterprises along the Pacific Coast. 0 Senator Wesley L. Jones has declined the federal judgeship of Eastern Washington, which was tendered him by President Taft last Monday. There was quite a number of applicants for the position, but it is the concensus of opinion among the wise ones that, State Supreme Judge Frank H. Rudkin of North Yakima will be named and confirmed. 0 James Wickersham, delegate to Congress from Alaska is preparing to urge statehood for the territory by the present Congress. Alaska is about as much prepared for statehood as Timbuctoo. The "interests" of Alaska are finding it hard to steal the natural resources with it as a territory and for that reason they hope to make it a state, when they can get there Eli with both feet. 0 It is rumored about the streets that, the Hon. John L. Wilson is to succeed Secretary Ballinger in the cabinet. No man in the state or the whole country for that matter is better posted on the affairs of the interior department of the government than Senator Wilson, and if he does succeed Mr. Ballinger the department will lose nothing by the change. ---0--- Kenny Beaton has been indirectly accused of having been the man to get the money of the sheriff's office and now it is claimed he was mixed up in the Gill administration as being one of the men to get the money. If Kenny got all the money he has been accused of having gotten he must have a good deal of it salted away just now. Yes, he must have enough salted away to live comfortably on the balance of his days. --- If James D. Farrell retires from the active management of the affairs of the Oregon and Washington railroad in the Northwest the Harriman system will find it has lost a most valuable man. He is now in California on the sick list and is getting strength preparatory to going to Europe for a long rest. While away it is said Charley Chaimberlan will look after things. Chairman E. L. Blaine of the Seattle Lexow committee will be ready to make a complete report of the findings of the committee next Monday evening. Already relays of the evidence are reaching the office of the mayor and by the aforesaid date all of it will be ready to become public property. It is said that the report will either make or break Blaine, Kellogg and Revelle from a political standpoint. ae eT i = SSS ‘ES ANSON NUS Sec Ve ee Pee SZ NMRA OTe eer cen RT Qe g ee FT wre PEAS ee i EG Vanity SSS 5g NaS EC SRC e y «| NMI SSS NGS QWs PSSST SF Ss BORO RE AR OO a i nn ROR MoD \y ‘i CN AOS HIROSE eee HAMAS NN Se Boa NY it MeN NIE eet BREET SS Ha aay FEARS WIA LS 297) ~~ Gy ee Pat Ney) | ea Ve ae ee ie Se ne a Wal Ze ANNAN AI F227 SN BANS 771// (acs NS Yy ee S y \ / ie eo WH Hy ieee Ze Vy, ran F i i Pay ttt Wey a sae F | eal Seca B Yi 4G een aa oy aD yy Rut it H VNR , f ¥Y Pye oa a RUAN ee Gene / PON ANI ATA a ‘ ian An Pea RNY IN IH\{fTE " ANN eae Se! NE) TR NN KAR AACR \a SRY A" BES AS Brey FRIDAY December9 , 1910 the government, and in many respects is probably the most complete and the clearest statement of the kind issued in recent years.”’ Themessage may be strictly to Congress, but the members of Congress are also members of citizenshiv of this great republic and are amenable to the wishes of those who are not in Congress, as it was by their suffrage that they are in Congress, and the people should interest themselves* in the message by letving the members of Congress understand that, it would be well for them to set up and take notice of what the president has said on these important subjects and act accordingly, or they will not remember of ever going back to Congress. The Republican party has permit- ted special interest men to beoome entirely too prominent in the affairs of this government and es- pecially the legislative end of it, and that was largely responsible for the rebuke the party was administered last November, and the sooner the party reverses it- self and gets back to its old teachings the sooner will it be restored to power. The message has been boiled down to present the following pertinent facts: THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. Cease passing laws regulating corporations until present statutes are given trial. Direct goyernment’s activities to economy in admin- istration, enforcing laws, enlarging foreign trade. Provide some form of ship subsidy. Don’t attempt any new tariff legislation at present. Make tariff board permanent. Appropriate $19,000,000 to fortify the Panama canal. Make appropriations for rivers and harbors only on reports of commission of experts. Pass anti-injunction law. Readjust mail rates to make magazines pay more thrn at present. Provide new banking and currency system. Add two battleships and several auxiliary vessels to the navy. Dispose of coal and oil lands and water power sites by lease. Report estimates for next year cut to $630,494, 013.- 12, which is $52,964,887.36 less than current year. _ Extend civil service to diplomatic and consular aer- vice. ae os SOSA ote Increase officers of army and engineer corps. Rush fortifications at Corregidor and Pearl Harbor. Give president authority to fix Panama canal toll rates, with limit of $1 per ton. Prevent railroads owning ships trading through ca- nal, Revise court procedure to cheapen litigation, Reommends parcel post on rural deliveries. Extend civil service to all postmasters, . Prosecute vigorously all census padders. Establish bureau of health, Impose heavier fines on steamship companies for violating immigration laws. Make provision for retiring superannuated goyern- ment clerks, Reimburse Southern Pacific fcr its expenditure in fighting Imperial valley floods several years ago. Amend law to enable interstate commission to ad- vance railroad valuation and fix responsibility in the issuance of bills of lading. | Give some fitting recognition to Commander Peary for his North Pole discovery. 4 RELIABILITY OF THE COLORED SOLDIER The adjutant general of the army has issued his annual report, and finds occasion therein to make comparison of the records of desertions of white and colored soldiers. He finds that the percentage of desertions of white soldiers during the year was about two and one-half times as great as the percentage of desertions of colored soldiers. In explanation of what appears to be evidence of the greater loyalty of the colored soldier, the general reason is offered that, "to the colored man the service offers a career; to the white man, too often, only a refuge." Without evident intention, this explanation seems to carry a tinge of injustice. While the colored recruit, as a rule, does not turn to the army as a "refuge," either from lack of industrial opportunity or from evil ways and demoralizing companionships, it is equally certain that no rosy dreams of a "career" of satisfying brilliance determine his enlistment. The white soldier's opportunities in the latter direction, particularly for service in the field, are actually better than those of the colored soldiers, whose reward for conspicuous bravery seldom reaches higher than the honor of a non-commissioned officer of paltry rank. The few colored men who have graduated from West Point and who have thereby won the legitimate rank of lieutenant, have been invariably shifted from the regular service to special branches of military work, where promotions and "careers," in the military sense, have not followed with sufficient swiftness to make them an example for the emulation of the ambitious of their race. To rise from the ranks to the office of a corporal measures the average height of the "career" to which the enlisted man of color may aspire. The colored soldier endures all the hardship, in barracks or field, that the white soldier endures, and, in his own country, at least, is subject to certain social limitations to which the white soldiers are total strangers. As an all-round proposition, therefore, the service is not so much of a trial to the white soldier as it is to the colored soldier. But the truth of the matter is that the colored man likes the elementary pomp, the discipline and the careless freedom of the army life, and sticks to it, enlisting again and again, until primary loyalty becomes an indelible habit and his calling a settled fixture, up to the periord of retirement. If this is a career, it is a very simple one, which, in the record of the army, is made illustrious by the evidence of a most commendable loyalty to the country's cause more than by anything else. Not only do few colored soldiers desert, but a larger percentage of them reenlist than is the case with white soldiers. And when they finally retire, even without the honors of commissioned office, as a rule they have money and a practical self education which insures them success in private life. The greater value of the military experience and training which these men acquire will doutless show its effects upon posterity as the years roll on and the limitations of the army decrease. For the colored man is a natural-born soldier.—Colorado Statesman. FOR BETTER NEGRO SOLDIERS The accidental killing of Joseph Harland by two recently enlisted men of the Twenty-fifth infantry brings to mind several facts which should, by proper authority, be placed before the war department. Without entering into the merits of the controversy that led to the present unfortunate state of affairs, we have been aware for some time of the fact of that recruiting officers throughout the country have not during the past five years exercised the proper caution in enlisting Negroes to the service. Unofficial statements gathered in the city of Washington, D. C., from parties in a position to know the facts and also from several retired members of the army are all of the same effect. The Citizen feels safe in asserting that there is within the ranks of the army and in the war department a very substantial opposition to the use of Negroes for army service and by some manner of means this element has gained control of the enlisting branch of the service. Their methods are subtle, they know that there is among the Negro race all classes of men; they know there is the good, bad and the indifferent. They know further that every time a bad man gets into the service it is one point in their favor and that the country can be made disgusted with the Negro as a soldier in no surer or swifter manner than to have bad men enter the service and commit offenses contrary to law, order and decency. From the statement of officers of the company from which these two unfortunate men come it is hardly true of them that they are bad men, but there is no denying the fact that the recruiting officers do not look into the character and past lives of Negroes to the extent that they do white men for the same service. The presence of this fact is a decided drawback to the Negro as a race and a stumbling block in the way of she good men already in the service who have the ambition to make the service all that it should be. Last summer when Secretary of War Dickinson was in Seattle investigating the conduct of the members of the Twenty-fifth with regard to certain charges, he took particular pains to inform the opposition to the presence of the regiment in those parts that there was but one way of getting rid of the Negro soldier and that was by petitioning members of Congress to abolish the entire service in so far as the Negro is concerned. This was very good advice for those who are willing to blot from memory the illustrious past of this valiant regiment, it was just the thing for those who can see absolutely no merit in the Negro as a soldier, but, on the other hand, why would it not be a proper thing for those who hold the opposite view, for those who remember the Negro's service in fighting Indians and protecting the homes of early settlers, for those who remember the events of the Spanish-American war, to petition Congress to see that the War Department gives through its recruiting office, the same careful attention to selecting a Negro soldier that it does in selecting white men for the same service. Alley rats, dive hangers-on and exconvicts are not the kind that make good soldiers for either the black or white races. The Citizen would assist in a movement that would bring this matter to the attention of our friends in Congress. The Negroes of this land would like to see the Negro regiments recruited by Negro recruiting officers. There are plenty of of capable Negroes in the service for this department.—Spokane Citizen. HONESTY IN OFFICE A great many persons labor under the belief that any person holding a political position is always ready and willing to take a piece of money if tendered them for services, for which they are paid to do by the government. There are still others, who are of the opinion that, the most of the public officials will not even do their sworn duties unless they are sugared on the side by those applying to them. There are still a few others, who think that all public officials will sacrifice the interest of the government, if the man with the money, will make it an object for him to do so. The question is, Is there an excuse for such an implied or open accusation against one's fellow men? How did such ideas get into circulation? An old adage runs, "where there is so much smoke there is bound to be some fire." Now does it follow that, where there are so many accusations there must be some truth? Legislators are charged with passing laws favorable to corporations because the corporations pay them big money for so doing. Members of the city councils are charged with granting city franchises to public service corporations, that rob the tax-payers because the charter seekers pay the councilmen large sums of corruption money. In fact all public officials are charged with catering and really favoring the wealthy men of the country to the detriment of the toiler, and are further charged with only being hirelings of the rich and put in office to look after their interest. If a hundreth part of what has been charged against public officials be true, then, the affairs of this country are in a deplorable state, and the day is not far distant, when anarchy will reign supreme. Instead of finding ing new diversions for the minds of the young folk on the boy scout order it would be a great deal better to instill more truth and honesty into the children even if they die a little sooner. CITY SHOULD OPERATE TELEPHONE The city of Tacoma should prepare itself to take over and operate one Telephone system. The Pacific Telephone Company has no franchise and is merely operating by a legal technicality. The present franchise expired in 1908, but being a foreign owned corporation they fled to the federal court where they hope to get a decision or an estopal of some sort which will permit them to further mulct the people with a maximum of charges and a minimum of service. This publication expects to spend a lot of time and enegry in showing the history of this corporation in the state. It will be worth reading. The Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company is a foreign owned corporation. Its Pacific coast headquarters is in San Francisco where its chief stockholders are waxing fat. Every time you pay a dollar for telephone service the bigger part of it is shipped to San Francisco to assist in building palaces for the holders of Sunset stock. There is no reasonable reason that can be advanced why this city should longer tolerate this foreign owned octopus. A telephone is a simple thing to operate. Proof of this can be found by visiting any one of their exchanges. The city can FRIDAY December 9. 1910 easily operate such a plant and the service would be better and rentals might be slightly reduced. Anyhow, the service would be improved for the reason that complaints could be taken up here and acted upon at once instead of being to San Francisco. Another important phase of a municipal owned telephone is that the money would stay in Tacoma in our banks—rather than being shipped to San Francisco—and that would help.—Tacoma Forum. SEATTLE BANK DIRECTORY FRIDAY. December 9. 1910 Frank H. Paul, Frederick W. Newell and Deitritch Hamn were re-elected members of the Duwamish waterway commission last Tuesday. Frank Paul is one of the best campaigners in King county and he seldom if ever loses a candidate that he goes out to elect. Richard Achilles Ballinger, Secretary of the Interior, has been found, not guilty, by a majority of the members of the investigating committee appointed by Congress to inquire into the affairs of that department under Mr. Secretary Ballinger. Now that he is no longer under fire the probabilities are he will resign before the winter is over. Among those who will aspire for one of the nominations for councilman next February is E. W. Way, at present councilman from the Second ward. Mr. Way has made a splendid councilman since he has been in office, which has been almost three years. So good did he do during his first term as councilman that he was without opposition both at the primaries and at the municipal election when it came time to elect a successor to him. That he will be bitterly opposed by the wide open policy advocates goes without saying, but in spite of them he should win the nomination and election in a walk. Austin E. Griffith is dead crazy for an office and he no sooner gets turned down for one than he is out for another. It is said that he is now a candidate for the nomination of councilman and will make an aggressive fight for the place. Will Mr. Griffith kindly state, why he is so thoroughly convinced that, the voters of Seattle want him to hold an important office? Has he ever got enough encouragement on previous attempts to break into office to justify him to try, try again? It is perfectly natural for the heirs of the late L. C. Smith to ask that J. W. Clise be made administrator of that part of the Smith estate in the state of Washington and King county as he knows more about its affairs than perhaps the heirs themselves. Giddeon Tupper and Charles H. Crawford, two notorious tenderloiners, is said to have opened a club house across the road from the Golf and Country Club and it is the supposition that, they are of the opinion that there will be some mighty rich pickings thereabouts during the winter season. It will be a joy ride that you read about, when things get under full head way, for the women of the town to flock out there by the automobile loads to spend a few hours in a resort conveniently close to the man with the money. State Bank Examiner J. L. Mohundro is working away on his bank report to Governor Hay, which will be ready soon after the legislature convenes. This has been a strenuous year in banking circles and Mr. Mohundro will doubtless have a great ITEMS MORE OR LESS INTERESTING deal to tell his excellency, when, "I take my pen in hand to write you a few lines." The bankers of the state are likewise very anxious to write the governor and the legislature a few lines, which they wish to have incorporated in the laws of the state, and to that end the committee of the bankers met last Wednesday to discuss the proposed laws. Rev. Robert H. Gowen, rector of Trinity parish of Seattle, introduced Ellen Terry at the Moore Theater last Wednesday evening to the vast concourse that had assembled to hear her give the Shakesperian readings. It was fitting tribute to a worthy woman to be introduced by so able a divine as Rev. Gowen, but did not some of the other goody goody preachers of the city drop dead the next morning when they read about it? Ole Hansen, of legislative fame, had the experience of being arrested one day this week on the charge of assault. Mr. Hansen got his man, but it was a clear case of mistaken identity, he, Hansen, believing the man was going to strike him, while the man had no intention of so doing, and therefore, received Hansen's fearful uppercut wholly unawares. The matter has been amicably settled. Frederick Carl Struve, the well known real estate man of the John Davis firm, has returned from a New York business trip, and is of the opinion that financial matters are picking up in the East. Mr. Davis, his partner, is now in Europe. P. P. Carrol, a well known Seattle attorney for a quarter of a century, is one of the organizers of a vast British Columbia lumber syndicate, in which a large number of English capilists are interested, and the company is making preparations to begin shipping lumber next year. The company has something like 800 acres, which is heavily timbered. It cost them when purchased some years ago something like fifty cents a thousand and for which the company was recently offered five dollars per thousand. When the Good Roads convention made Reginald H. Thomson of Seattle president of that body it put at its head one of the ablest engineers in the whole country and one of the best generally informed men in the Northwest. From a city building standpoint Mr. Thomson has few equals in the United States and that he is as well posted on road building throughout the country as he is on the affairs of the city is likewell known. PSALM 23 An editor with a penchant for saying real pointed things must have been responsible for the following credited "Exchange" which is a pity, as such good dope is entitled to closer credit. Peruse and paste in your bonnet, for Psalm 23 is out of the ginger jar of experience: THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN The politician is my sheperd. It shall not want for anything during his campaign. He leadeth me into the saloon for my vote's sake. He filleth my pockets with good cigars, my cup of beer runneth over. He enquireth concerning my family, even unto the fourth generation. Yea, though I walk through the mud and rain to vote for him, and shout myself hoarse, when he is elected straightway he forgetteh me. Although I meet him at his own house he knoweth me not. Surely, the wool has been pulled over my eyes all the days of my life, and I shall dwell in the house of a chump forever. — Exchange. THE REPUBLICAN LINES MUST CLOSE Republican dissension in 1910 did what it attempted to do in 1872 and failed. It defeated the Republican party. As in 1884 and again in 1892. Republican defection has placed the Democratic party in power. For the next two years Congress will be a divided house, the Republicans retaining the upper branch while the lower passed into Democratic hands. But while this is a Republican defeat, it is not, in any actual sense, a Democratic victory. There are as many Republicans in the country in 1910 as there was in 1908, when Mr. Taft had a plurality on the popular vote of 1,269,000. It was Republican apathy and treachery that defeated the Republican party in the recent election. But this does not inevitably mean that the country will elect a Democratic president in 1912. It is true that the Republican defeat for the House of Representatives in 1882 and in 1890 was, in each case, the prelude to a Republican defeat for president two years later. The Democratic reverse for president in 1896, too, was heraled by the reverse of that party for Congress in 1894. But the Republican defeat for Congress in 1874, in the middle of Grant's second term, did not work that way, for Grant was succeeded by Hayes. Moreover, the Democrats won the House in 1878, in the middle of Hayes' service, while the Republicans elected Gaafield in 1880. On the other hand, the Democratic victory for Congress in 1886, in the middle of Cleveland's first term, did not foretell a Democratic victory for president two years later, for Cleveland failed of election at that time and Harrison entered. The year 1854 furnishes a close parallel to 1910. Proportionately the majority for Pierce, Democrat, in 1852, was far larger than was that for Taft in 1908, for Pierce carried every state except four, which went to Scott, the Whig, and Pierce's party won a long lead in the House. But in 1854 the new Republican party swept the country and won a large plurality in the House of Representatives. Pierce was far more surprised at that setback than was Taft at the one which hit him a few weeks ago. He had a hostile House on his hands for the last two years of his service. But though the Republican party all over the coun- ry rejoiced at its victory of 1854, and many of its leaders predicted victory for 1856, the Democrats carried the country in that year, electing Buchanan and regaining control of the House and retaining its control of the Senate. There is a fair presumption that the 1854 sequel will repeat itself in the case of 1910. But this presumption will not transmute itself into fact unless the Republicans immediately bury their differences and resume their old-time unity. If they are to win in 1812, they must regain the harmony and enthusiasm which they displayed in 1900, in 1904 and in 1908. Mr. Taft has made an excellent president. No man in his place could have gone further in attempting to carry out the pledges of the platform on which he was elected than he has done. He has been honest, courageous and tactful. For the setbacks to his party in New York and Ohio and for the loss of the House of Representatives, he is not personally responsible. A Democratic wave has swept over all the North and West this year. This was one of those surges of hysteria which come periodically in every country possessing representative institutions but which are more prevalent in republics than in limited monarchies. The Republican leaders must look the situation squarely in the face and prepare for party rehabilitation before the next campaign opens. Having accomplished their purpose of defeating their party, the insurgent chiefs should now ask themselves wherein have they or the country been benefited by placing the Democrats in control of one branch of Congress and of the governments of many states. This piece of insurgent folly has dealt a hard blow to the country's prosperity at home and its prestige abroad. Having inflicted this disaster on their party and on the country, now let them make at least partial amends by getting back into the party, recognize its platforms as binding and talk and work as Republicans hereafter And an excellent time for them to make this new departure is in the short session of the Congress covering the three months in which their party remains in control of both branches.—Leslie's Weekly. His Choice "Yes," says the specialist, as he stood at the bedside of the miser millionaire, "I can cure you." "But what will it cost?" came from the lips of the sick man. The specialist made a swift mental calculation. "Ninety-five dollars," was the response. "Can't you shade your figure a little?" wailed the other. "The undertaker's bid is much less.—Lippincott's. "What shall we say of Senator Smugg?" "Just say that he was always faithful to his trust." "And shall we mention the name of the trust?"—Pittsburg Observer. WORLD IS GROWING BETTER Every issue of a newspaper which tries to record the most important events of the day seems tr be on its face an indictment of the human race and modern civilization. Stories of greed, oppression and crime often take up most of the space in its columns. The effect upon the reader is some times to make him think for the moment at least, that the world is growing more hard and cruel, and that society, as it is constituted, is a failure. But such a view is all wrong. and the thoughtful reader soon realizes it. The world is growing better all the time, and humanity is steadily advancing from one plane of life to another. The reason there seems more wickedness is that the people of the earth are in closer communication with one another than they were only a few years ago. Crimes which once remained unknown to all but a comparatively few are now revealed to the entire civilized world, that it may know the sort of men it must suppress, the extent of the harm they inflict and the manner in which they are dealt. Wrongs which once flourished because they were hidden are now dragged into the light of day and exposed in all their meanness in the pages of the newspapers. Modern civilization through its most powerful agency for progress, the public press, lays bare the hitherto hidden wounds inflicted upon society that they may be cured and their repetition prevented. No, the world is not growing worse. There is less of poverty, crime and suffering than existed only a few years ago. Life is easier, more profitable and more full of joy. The man with the shovel gets more out of it than did the man with the two-handed sword in his castle, a brief remove back in the life of the race.—Walla Union-Statesman. "I suppose the father gave the bride away?" "Not exactly. He gave a million away, and threw her in.—Philadelphia Ledger. Servant — Heavens, I have knocked the big flower pot off the window ledge, and it struck a man on the head." Mistress — What! My beautiful majolica? "Did you say you were a month in your last place?" "Yes, madam—a week with the family on the top floor, a week with the lady on the third floor, a week on the second, and a week on the ground floor. "So you intend to be a doctor when you grow up," said the good man. "Yep," replied Tommy. "And why have you decided upon the medical profession? "Well, a doctor seems to be the only man that keeps on gettin' paid whether his work is satisfactory or not." People's Savings Bank Edward C. Neufelder, Prest. R. J. Reekle, Vice Pres. Chestnut Greenleaf, Cashier Incorporated Dec. 19th 1888. Commercial Savings and Prest General Bank and Brothel Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King, 60-Day Summons. Carrie Hull, plaintiff, vs. Sarah Galloway and John Doe Galloway, her husband, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right- title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the complaint. Serein, and also any full unknown heirs, of the said defendants above named, defendants.—No. —. The State of Washington, to the above named defendants, Sarah Galloway and John Doe Galloway, her husband, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, est- ate, lien or interest in the real state described in the complaint herein, and also all unknown heirs of the said defendants above named: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty (60) after the 28th day of October, and defend the above entitled act, the above entitled court and answ the complaint of the plaintiffs and a copy your answer upon the designated attorneys for the court their office below stated, and in case of your failure to do, judgment will be rendered must you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought for the purpose of quieting title in the plaintiff to the following described property to wit: Lots 27 and 28, in Block 5, of Chilberg's Addition to West Seattle, situated in King County, State of Washington. REVELLE, REVELLE & REVELLE, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Postoffice address: 605-608 New York Block, Seattle, Washington. Oct. 28, Dec. 9, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, Summons by Publication. James Henry, plaintiff, vs. F. B. Huntley and Jane Doe Huntley, his wife, whose true Christian name is unknown, defendants.—No. 74840. State of Washington to the defendants, F. B. Huntley and Jane Doe Huntley, his wife. You and each of you are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit within sixty (60) days after the day of September, 1910 to defend the act and act in the above entitled court and answer r the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in will case to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff and complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to recover the sum of $105.95 together with costs and interest due from you to the court herein for goods, wares and merchandise sold under this action by you by the plaintiff in this action during the last past three years. A writ of attachment being issued out of this cause and court lots 26 and 37, block 8, of Green Lake Reservoir Addition to the clerk of Seattle have been attached thereunder. C. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- Louise Ashen, Plaintiff, vs. Lester Ashen, en, Defendant. No. — Summons for Publication. The State of Washington, to Lester Ashen, Defendant. You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above entitled court and defend the above entitled action within sixty days after the end of the first publication of this sums first publication, to-wit; within sixty days after the 7th day of April, 1910, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney of the plaintiff below named at the office, below stated, and due to your failure so do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint of the plaintiff which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of this action is to secure division of land and desertion for more than one year. for more than A. C. McDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address, 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Oct 7—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King Coun- ty. Summons by Publication. Maud A. Boschert, plaintiff, vs. Charles C. Boschert, defendant.—76217. The State of Washington to the said Charles C Boschert, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy your answer upon the undersigned at- torneys for plaintiff, at their office be- low stated; and in case of your failure to do judgment will be rendered again, you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with work of said court. the plaintiff Briley stated the object of this action is to dissolve the bonds of matri- mony existing between plaintiff and defendant and to grant the plaintiff divorce from the defendant and the ground of abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant for more than one year past, and for the failure of defendant to support the plaintiff and his family, and to award the cust- ody of their minor son, Robert Boschert, to the plaintiff. For further particulars reference is made to the complaint now on file in the office of the clerk of the above entitled court. BRADY & RUMMENS. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Postoffice address: Suite 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 7—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summar- Elizabeth J. Marston, plaintiff vs. Richard J. Marston, defendant.—No. Marston, defendant.—No. 76271. The State of Washington, to the said Richard K. Marston, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towl, within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the answer entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clef of the court. The object of the above entitled action is for an absolute divorce on the grounds of non-support, and custody of two minor children. JOHN R. WILSON, Plaintiff of Plaintiff's Attorney, P. O. address, 639 New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 7—Nov. 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Thos. Eaton, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property. Denouns. No. 75684. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the claimant of the real property, the certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April, 1910, and numbered B61750, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $1.65, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, tow- Beginning at a point 165 feet east and 33 feet south of the N. W. corner of the SW 1-4 of Sec. 10, Tp. 26 N., R. 5 E., W. M.; thence east 60 feet, thence S. 120 feet, thence west 60 feet, thence N. 120 feet to the place of beginning. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years be paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit. For the year 1907, the sum of $1.36; for the year 1908, the sum of 87 cent.'s; for the year 1909, the sum of 28 cent.'s. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum. You and each of you are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication,堡ton, for-will within 60 days after Sept. 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, together with interest and costs, will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as assessed, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King Saint, Summers by Publication. County, Summons by Publication. Catherine Lomas, plaintiff, vs. Harry Lomas, defendant—No. ____. The State of Washington, to Harry Lomas. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 28th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office, standing at noon, name of your failure so to say, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this complaint is to obtain an absolute divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant on the grounds of cruelty and nonsupport, and for the return of her malden name. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Blug, Seattle, Washington. Oct. 28—Dec. 9, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Preston Mill Co., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75685. Notice and Summons. State of Washington: To the above defendant's and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April 1910 and number 8010 in delinquent tax of the year 1905, in the amount of 90 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King county, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at S. E. cor. of N. E. 1-4 of Sec. 32, Tp. 24, N. R. 7 E., W. M., thence west 420 feet to School Dist. No. 76, thence north to N. P. Ry., thence easterly along Ry. to easterly line of sald section, thence S. 235 feet to the point of E. I. 1-4 (Part of N. E. 1-4 of the N. E. 1-4 Sec. 32, Tp. 24 N., R. 7 E., W. M.) Tnat the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon sald above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1906, the sum of 57 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of 72 cents; for the year 1908, the sum of 44 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 47 cents. Which of the six per cent sums must at the date of 16 per cent per annum from sald date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against sald real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within 60 days after Sept. 30, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to this undersigned attorney, for plaintiff at its offe below stance, pay the amount due together with interest and costs. When you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charge- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ed against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MacDONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 30—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County Wyman, Partridge & Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, defendants.—No. 74735. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said James Fitzgerald and Julia Fitzgerald, co-partners, as Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, defendants; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 2nd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copious sentence, for the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to recover a judgment against said defendants apposite to a plaintiff for plaintiff for bodily wares and merchandise sold and delivered to said defendants by said plintiff in the sum of Two Thousand One Hundred Twenty-seven and 10-100 Dollars ($2,127.10), with interest thereon from the 2nd day of May, 1910, besides the costs of suit, and in which said action an attachment has been taken out and levied. LEOPOLD M. STERN, and J. M. RUSSEIL. Attorneys for plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 705 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 2, Oct. 15, 1910. IN THE JUSTICE'S COURT BEFORE John E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Summons by Publication. Blossom-Provine Lumber Co. a corporation, plaintiff, vs. T. W. Williams and Jane W. Williams, his wife, whose true Christian Name is unknown, defendants.—No. 13472. To T. W. Williams and Jane Doe Williams, his wife, defendants. In the name of the State of Washington you are hereby notified that Blossom-Provine Lumber Co. has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Seattle, King County, Washington, to do its 29th day of November, 1910, at the 23rd day of November, 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m., and unless you appear and then and there answer the same will be taken as confessed, and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said claim is to recover from the defendants a balance due for goods, wares and merchandise, to-wit: lumber sold and delivered to said defendants by the plaintiff within the last past three years. Complaint filed September 29, 1910. JOHN E. CARROLL Justice of the Peace. Oct. 28—Nov. 18, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication. Frieda Marshall, plaintiff, vs. Joe Marshall, defendant—No. — The State of Washington to Joe Marshall. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 7th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the course entitled and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk said, said the jeopardy of the action in that the plaintiff, on the grounds of habitual drunkenness of the defendant and the neglect and refusal of the defendant husband to make suitable provision for his family, be granted an absolute divorce from the defendant herein and the custody and control of the child of the plaintiff and defendant herein, and such other and further relief as the court may direct. E. J. CARVER Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Oct. 7—Nov. 18, 1910. INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. IN PROBATE—In the matter of the estate of Emil Engelmann deceased, No. 10.408, Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. Paul G. Engelmann, administrator of the estate of Emil Engelmann, deceased, having filed in this court his final accession to the estate, the said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for disribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts of evidence, the curtains of the residue of said estate. It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Emil Engelmann, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washing-ton, a department of said court in Department No. 7 on the 5th day of December, 1910, at the hour of 10:00 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should no be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consonance weeks before the day of December 1910 in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 31st day of October, 1910. HODERT H. LINDSAY, C. C. John R. Wilson, a torney for said Estate 539 New York Block, Seattle. Nov. 4, 2012. 19.10. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Order Appointing Day for Settlement of Account. In the State of Washington, Estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased.-No. 11797. Hallie Burkholder, administratrix of the estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased, having this day rendered and presented for settlement and filed in this court of the State of Washington in administration of the estate of sold deceased. It is therefore ordered that Monday, the 28th day of November, A. D. 1910, at 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon be and the same is hereby appointed for the settlement of the said account; and that the clerk give notice thereof by causing individual bodies to be least public places in this county, one of which shall be at the place where this court is held, at least 14 days before said day of settlement and by publishing such notice in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper published and of general circulation in this county, once a week for two weeks prior to said day of publication. Done in open court this 9th day of November, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Notice of the Hearing on a Petition for Specific Performance. In the Matter of the Estate of Sarah E. T. Mitchell, deceased.-No. 11020. Notice is hereby given that E. B. Mitchell, the administrator in the above entitled cause, on the 3rd day of November, 1910, filed in the office of his son asking leave of the court to specifically perform a certain contract with Nellie M. Peterson upon the following described property, to-wit: Lots six (6), seven (7), fourteen (14), and fifteen (15), Block two (2), of the Second Addition to Adams Tracts, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the auditor's office of King County, Washington. And the court on said 3rd day of November, 1910, set the 12th day of December, 1910, at 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon, in Department No. 7, in the court house in Seattle, King County. Washington on the day for hearing saluted officers and all persons interested creditors, heirs, devisees or personal representatives are ordered to appear and present any objections to the granting of the said petition. Dated this 3rd day of November, 1910. E. B. MITCHELL, Administrator. F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Administrator. Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication. Blossom-Powell Lumber Co. coro- lation. A. A Watkins and Jane Doe Watkins, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown; L. D. W. Shelton and Jane Doe Shelton, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, defendants.—No. — The State of Washington, to A. Watt- kins and Jane Doe Watkins, his wife, whose true christian name is un- known; L. D. W. Shelton and Jane Doe Shelton, his wife, whose true christian name is unknown, defendants. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to foreclose a lien for materials furnished by the plaintiff to the defendants to be used upon lots 43 and 44 block 7. Greenwood Park Second Avenue to Seattle, King County, Washington. F. J. CARVER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address 114 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Daisy Voigt, plaintiff. vs. William E. Voigt, defendant. — No. Volst, defendant—No. The State of Boston, to William E. Volst, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff; in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be given to you, and the request to the prayer of plaintiff's complaint, which had been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you on the grounds of desertion and failure to support plaintiff, and for a restoration of the maiden name of plaintiff. HOWARD O. DURK. Attorney for Plaintiff. 535 Henry Building, Seattle. King County, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Surmptions for Publication Summons in publication. Adell Obituary, plaintiff. V. Joseph Toomire, defendant.-No. 32501. The State of Washington to the said Joseph Toomire, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled action, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure divorce and annul marriage of plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds of non-support. No allmony is asked. Date of first publication, November 11, 1910. FRED L. RICE. Attorney for, Plaintiff. P. O. address, 229 Burry Block. Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 17—Dec. 12, 1910. FRIDAY December 9, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Summons by Publication. William J. Clarke, plaintiff, vs. Nellie Clarke, defendant.-No. ____. The State of Washington, to Nellie Clarke, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first day of his summons, wit: within sixty days after the 11th day of November, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his address below, judgment will be rendered to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer of the plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you on the ground of de- 535 Henry Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Nov. 11—Dec. 23, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, notice of Settlement of Final Account. State of Washington, County of King, —ss. In the Matter of the Estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased.—No. 11797. Notice is hereby given that Hallie Burkholder, administratrix of the estate of J. A. Burkholder, and filed in said court her final account as such administratrix, and that the 28th day of November, 1910, at 9:30 o'clock, a. m., at the court room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle. In said King County, has been duly postponed the award of said account, ment of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said est- ate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. A. W. Frater, judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said court hereto affixed this 9th day of November, 1910. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. Nov. 11—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE JUSTICE'S COURT BEFORE John E. Carroll, Justice of the Peace, Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Summons by Publication. ington. Summons by Publication. R. J. Eichler, plaintiff, vs. Cora Lowe terial furnished and labor performed by this plaintiff for and on behalf of sald demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of this action is to recover the sum of $25,000. Dollars same will be taken as confesson, and ($12.00), being a balance due for ma- and John Doe Lowe, her husband, JOHN E. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace. Oct. 7—Oct. 28, 1910. REMOVAL NOTICE The Light and Power department of the Seattle Electric Company has moved to the Electric Bldg., Seventh avenue and Pine street. Street car tickets can be purchased and all bills paid in the Electrical Sales Room at the old location 907 FIRST AVENUE THE SEATTLE ELECTRIC CO ORDER A CASE OUT TO YOUR PLACE OF Rainier PALE BEER PHONE SIDNEY 526 A Free Trip to Seattle and Return. Let's Bust the State Dental Trust. P Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your牙护 on your dental work. Your dental work will cost $100 and the State Dental Monopoly will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established in Block 18 for 18 years. I do not compete with cheap dentists, but with the high-class dentists for half their price. Open evenings until 8 and Sundays until 4 for people who work. EDWIN J. BROWN, D.D.S. 713 First Avenue Seattle, Wash. Read my article in Sunday's P.-J. and Monday's Times and Star. GILHAM-LYSONS REALTY CO., General Offices: 411 Lowman Bldg. Loans, Investments, Insurance. H. E. Gilham. J. W. Lysona. Main 3044. Ind. 1588. BUY THE BEST If you want a safe which you know Has No Superior, buy one of the Hall Safe & Lock Co.'s, manufactured by the Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co., for which we are the sole agents. PURCELL SAFE CO. Prefontaine Bldg., Prefontain Place and Yesler Way DENNY-RENTON CLAY & COAL CO., Manufacturers of All Kinds of Clay Products. Main 2189—Phones—Ind. 5125. FRIDAY December 9. 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons by Publication. Charles Pfeffer, plaintiff, vs. Milile Ben- nett, Walter 'C. Bennett, her husband, Charles P, Newberry and “Jane Doe" Newberry, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown, William Brenner, D. A. Hatfleld and ‘Jane Doe” Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff! unknown, and Charles W. Fisk, F. M. Hatfield, Ida M, Barton and Aurora Land Com- Pany, a corporation, defendants.—No. 75263, The State of Washington to Charles P. Newberry and "Jane Doe” Newberry, whose true given name is unknown! D, A. Hatfield and Jane Doe Hatfield, his wife, whose true given name is unknown, You, and each of you, are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 16th day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled ac- tion’ in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and have a copy of your answer served upon the undersigned attorney for plain- tiff at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according fo the demand of the complaint whieh has been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘The object of this action is to fore- close a certain mortgage executed and delivered by the said defendants Millie Bennett and Walter C Bennett, her hus- band, to one S. Campbell and by. the said 'S, Campbeli assigned to this plain- Uff, dated the 28th day of January, 1909, and recorded on the same day in Vol. 407 of mortgages, page 89 of the record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, which mortgage was given to secure a’ promis- sory note of $500.00 with Interest there- on fat the rate of 8 per cent per annum and was given upon Lots 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22, Block 1, Gilman Park First Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, and to ‘obtain judgment for the sald $500.00 together With interest at the rate of 8 per_cent per annum from the 28th day of Janu- ary, 1910, and an attorney's fee of $76,00 and costs of suit and to fore- cloge and determing all right, title and interest of each and all of sald defend- ants in and to said premises and every part thereof, EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 16, Oct. 28,1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons. 4. "L. Weaver and Ella May Weaver, ‘husband and wife, plaintiffs, vs, Peter E, Nordin, defendant. ‘The State’ of Washington to the said Peter E. Nordin, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within six- ty days after the dato of the first pub- lication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 17th day of Sept., 1910, and defend the above entitled ac- tion’ in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs at his office below stated, and ip case of your failure so to do, judgment and decree will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demands of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk ‘of sald court. And all right, title and interest in the lands described in the complaint claimed by you likewise In the coztract, and payments described therein will be foreclosed, forfeited, and the title of the plaintiffs cleared as to all claims you may have or claim. J. W, BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiffs. 1824 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, Wash. ‘Sept, 16. Oct. 28. 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. \._H. Craver, Plaintinff, vs. Antone Kaas, and ‘all persons unknown, if any, ‘having or claiming an interest in and to. the hereinafter described real property, Defendants. No. 75305. Notice and Summons, State of Washington: ‘To the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an’ interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate is- sued by the Treasurer of King County, State cf Washington, dated the 5th cay of Novembe=, 1908, and numbered as fol- lows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the ‘real property situated in sald Hing County, described as follows, jo-wit: Went 260 feet of S% of S% of NEY of SE % Sec. 4, Tp. 21, N., R 4 E. W. M., certificate number B54644, year 1906, amount $1.23. ‘That the taxes for the following prior fnd subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property. to-wit: ‘Amount $1.40 for year 1907; 76 cents tor yaa 1908, Which Bosra piims bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from ald date of payment, ang are all the npald and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, You and each of you (including sald persons unknown, if any), are, hereby further notified and suminoned to be and appear within sixty days afver the date of frst publication of SBis notice, exclusive of the day of sai first pub- Falylieation, to-wit: within sixty days ‘Aug, 19, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of sala plaintiff nd serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for ple'=tift at his office below stated, or pay whe amount Que, together with Interest and costs. In case of your failure so to do, judg- ment will ve rendered herein. foreclos: ing. the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real pron- erty for the sums and amounts due upan and charged against each, for said taxes. ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the Sums charged and found against It re- Spectively as provided by law, and ar prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on filo In this cause and Court. L. H, CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. ‘Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Building, Se attle, Wash. Sept. 28—Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington, for the County ot King. Summons, Nellie Derry, Plaintiff. vs Herbert A ‘Derry, Defendant.—No. 75952. The State of Washington to the ss - Herbert A. Derry, Defendant: You ure hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit, within sixtr days after, the ‘agra day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the #vove en- titled court, and answer the vomplaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon ihe vadersigned at- torneys for plaintit. at their office be- low stated; and in-case of your failure 80 to do,’ judginent will be rendered against you according to the demas: of the complaint, which has been tie! with the clerk of said court ‘This action is instituted for the pur- pose of dissolving the houds of matrr Mony now existing between the plas ft and defendant, for the reason atd upon the grounds that said defendant hus’ failed, neglected and refused tv make suitable provisions for the sj: port and maintenance of said plainuf, and for the decree awarding (o sali plaintiff’ the following described teu! property situated in the County of Clal- lam, State of Washington, particularly described as follows, to-wit Lots twenty-two (22), twenty-three (28), twenty-six (26) and twenty-seven (27), In. section ‘seven (7), townsitip thirty (80), north of range nine ¢) west, Clallam County, Washington: and also’'the following property situated in King County, State of Washington: ‘The west half of lot twenty-five 124) and lot twenty-six (26), block eight 1) Buckius Addition to the City of Seat- tle; and for such other and further re- lief as to this sourt may seem just and equitable. REED & HARDMAN, Attorneys for Piaintift. Otfice and P. O. address: 960 Fmpire Building. Seattle, King County, Washington, Sept. 23—Nov. 4, 1910. IN, THE SUPERIOR COUR8, KING County, Washington. Elizabeth Turnbull, Plaintiff, vs. George ‘Turnbull, Defendant. No,——, Sum- mons. The State of Washington to the sald George Turnbull, defendant: You are hereby ‘summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 7th day of October, 1910, ‘and defend the above entitled action ‘in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintift and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of ‘said court. The complainant in this action prays for divorce and that the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved, H. B. FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintitt. P._O. Address: 606 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. ippate of first publication, October 7, Date of last publication, November +8, 1910. IN JUSTICE’ S COURT—BEFORE Fred C, Brown, Justice of the Peace, in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. California Wine and Cordial Company, @ corporation, Plaintift, vs. John Doe Matijasevich ‘and Richard Roe Gilo- vich, copartners, doing business under firm’name and style of Alaska Liquor Company, Defendants. No. ——. Sum- mons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King, ss The State of Washington: ‘To John Doe Matijasevich and Richard Roe Gilo- Vieh, copartners, doing business un- der ‘firm name ‘and style of Alaska Liquor Co: You, and each of you, are hereby no- tified ‘that California Wine and Cordial Company, a corporation, has filed a complaint against you ‘in said Court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 210, New York Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 20th day of October, A. D. 1910, at the hour of 8:30 o'clock’ a. m., and un- less you appear and then and there an- swer, the same will be taken as con- fessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. ‘The object and demand of said action is for the sum of Eighty- two Dollars and Twenty-five Cents (82.25), being a balance due the plain- tif on ‘account of merchandise sold and deliv+ ef to the defendants during the yea: 909. F .ed September 15th, A. D, 1910, FRED C. BROWN, Justice of the Peace. in and for Seattle Precinet, King County, Washington. TWOROGER & WINKLER, Attorneys for Plaintift. 10-11 Triangle Bldg., Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication Sept, 16. 1910 ‘Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: Rooms 603-6 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept, 28—Nov. 4,'1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Allen P. Mitten, Deceased.—No. 11658. By order of said court made herein on the 8th day of September, 1910, no- tice is hereby ‘given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouch- ers to the undersigned oxecutors of said estate, at 1308 Alaska Building, the place of business of said estate, in'Seat- tle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of frst publication of tis notice or same will be barred, rebate of frat rublication September 22, SARAH H. MITTEN, PRED W. WEST, HENRY BLACKWOOD, As Bxecutors of said Estate. BRADY & RUMMENS, ‘Attorneys for Sstate 1308 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept, 23—Oct, 32, 1010. JUSTICH COURT—BEFORD JOHN E, CARROLL, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle’ Precinct, King County, State, of Washington. Wim, Zehring, plaintiff, vs. Mrs. A. M. Simmons, defendant. State of Washington, County of King, BS, Phe State of Washington to Mrs. A. MS. Simmons, You and each of you are here- by notified that Wm. Zehring has filed a complaint. against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my of- fice in Itoom 210, New York building, Se- attle, King Count, Washington, on’ the 28th day of November A. D. 1910, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and’ unless you appear and then and there answer, the game will be taken as confessed and the demand of plaintiff granted. The ob- ject and demand of said, complaint is to recover the sum of 862,70, being a bal- ar.ce due for goods, wares and merchan- dise, sold and delivered to you by this plaintift within the last past three years. iscgmPlaint filed October 0th A. D. JOHN B. CARROLL, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Washington. Nov. 4-Nov. 25, 1910. INTHE SUPHRIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King, Summons for ‘Pub- ication. Laurentine B, Cole, plaintiff, vs. Anna ‘May Cole, defendant.—No,' 76580 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN n- ‘The State of Washington, to the said int Anna May Cole, defendant: of You are hereby summoned to appear st” within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this sum- 7 mons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days «1 after the 21st day of October, 1910, and “8 defend the above entitled action in the “above entitled court, and answer the complaint and serve a copy of your 'T- answer upon the undersigned attorney "- for plaintiff, at, his office below stated; \, and in case of your failure so to do, ‘| judgment will be rendered against you '\\ according to the demands of the com- ‘ plaint, which has been filed with the ‘clerk “of said court. ‘The object for ; which this action is brought is to ob- My tain a decree of divorce from the de- “) fendant, upon the following grounds: i, Because the defendant without, the ly plaintiff's fault, abandoned the plaintiff nc On the 9th of October, 1909, at Seattle, ‘© Washington, and that said abandonment “2 has been continuous for one year and ND more. a A. J. SPECKERT, 1 Attorney for Plaintitt. P, O. address, 309 Burke Bldg, 5) Second and Marion Streets, My Seattle, Wash. wy Oct. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Summons. Lillian Collins, plaintiff, vs. James Col- lins, defendant.—No. ——— Whe State of Washington, to the said James Collins, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, | to- wit, within sixty days after the '2ist day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action ‘in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at- torney for plaintiff at his office be- low stared; and in case of your failure so to do,’ judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court, ‘The object of this action is to secure a decree of divorce, dissolving the bonds of matrimony ‘existing between plaintiff and defendant, upon the grounds of desertion and fatlure to pro- vide for more than one year, H. E, SNOOK, Attorney for Plaintitt. Office and postoffice address, 537 Burke Building, Seattle, Washing- ton. Oct. 21—Dec, 2, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. In Probate. Inthe Matter of the Estate of Lorenz Sehweizer, Deceased, No. 12054. No- tice to Creditors, Notice is hereby given to the cred- itors of and al persons having claims against the deceased, or his estate, to present them with the necessary vouch- ers to the undersigned administrator of said estate at room No. 604 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, the place’ of the transac- tion of business of said estate, within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice or the same will be barred. Dated this 18th day of November, 1910. Date of first publication Noy. 18, 1910. EDWARD VON 'TOBEL, | Administrator of the Estate of Lorenz Schweizer, Deceased. Nov. i8—Dec, 16, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF, THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Frank B, Wlison, Plaintiff, ys. Emily W. Wiison, Defendant. ‘The State of Washington, to the said Emily W, Wilson, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit, within sixty days after the 19th day of November A. D., 190, and de- fend the above entitled ‘action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for plaintiff at his of- fice below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be ren- dered against you according to the de- mand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and 1s briefly stated as follows: Divorce suit on the grounds of drunkenness, JOHN H. PERRY, Attorney for Plaintift. P. 0, Address: Seattle, County of King, Washington. Nov. 19—Dee, 50, 1910 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty, 1 Probate. Administrator's Notice of Sale of Real Estate, In the Matter of the Estate of James J. Lynch, Deceased.—No. 10926. Notice is hereby given that under and by virtue of an order of sale of the Superior Court of King County, Wash- ington, dated October 8th, 1910, I will sell at private sale the following de- scribed real estate situated in King County, Washington: Lot $1, Block 7, Wallingford’s Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. Lot $2, Block’, Wallingford’s Division ot Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle. the court, Dated this 20th day of O-tober, 1910. wee ot publication, October 21, HARRY W. BRINGHURST, Administrator of the Bstate of James J. Lynch, Deceased. ‘Oct.’ 21—Nov, 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ‘State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons. Heien B, Phillips, plaintiff, vs. Park D. Phillips, defendant. The State of Washington, to the above named defendant, Park D. Phillips: You are hereby ‘summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the twenty- first day of October, 1910, exclusive of said twenty-first day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled ‘action in the court aforesaid, and to serve a copy of your answer or other pleading upon the undersigned attorney, for the plaintiff, at his hereinafter designated postoffice address, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be ren: dered in sald cause according to the demand of the complaint, which has heen. filed with the clerk of the above entitled court, The objent ‘of said action is to pro- cure a judgment and decree forever severing the bonds of matrimony. exist- Ing between the plaintift and ‘defend- ant, on the grounds of the failure, re- fusal and neglect of the defendant to provide for or contribute anything to- Wards the support or maintenance of the laintif® since their marriage on the Sth Ray of July, 1900, and on the further Gay ca that the defendant more than Our Season’s Offering —oF- EXCLUSIVE WOOLENS Are Now on Display A call willconvince the most skeptical of the Worth and Beauty of our slash. The established reputation of our tailoring assures you of satisfaction, Irving & Cannon, Tailors 2i1 COLUMBIA STREET Established 22 Years two years ago wilfully ana without just cause abandoned the plaintiff, and at all times since has so continued to abandon and live separate and apart from. plaintiff. LESTER §. WILSON, Attorney for Plaintim. Postoffice address, 833 Henry Building, Seattle. King County, Washington. Oct. 21—Dec. 2, 1910. PROBATH NOTICH—IN THE SUPER- ior Court of Wahington, for he Coun- ty of, King. : State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the Matter of the Estate of Allan Poole, Deceased. No, 7346. Notice of Settlement of iinal’ Account. Notice is hereby given that Phebe L. Poole, executrix of the last will and testament of Allan Poole, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in Said Court, her Final Account as such executrix,’ and that Thursday, the 15th day of Decem- ber, 1910, at 9:30 o'clock, a. m., at the Court Room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, has been duly appoinnted by said Court for the settlement of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and file his ex- ceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same, Witness, the Hon. A, W. Frater, Judge of said Superior Court, and the Seal of said Court hereto affixed this 18th day of November, 1910. D. Ik, SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. Nov. 26—Dec. 9, 1910, IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County, In Probate. In the “Matter of the Hstate of John E. Corbally, Deceased. No. 12024." No- tice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given that all per- sons having claims against the estate of John B; Corbally, deceased, are hereby required to present the ‘same, with vouchers in support, thereof, to Mary Corbally, executrix of said estate, at the office of Robert F. Booth, 811 Lowman Building, Seattle, Washington, that be- ing the place for the transaction of such business, within one year from the date of the first publication hereof, MARY CORBALLY, Hxecutrix of the Bstate of John E. 'Cor- bally, Deceased. ROBERT F. BOOTH, Attorney for Executrix. 811 Lowman Bullding, Seattle, Wash. Date of first publication November 25; last, December 28, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. May V. Russell, Plaintiff, vs. Jonh ‘'T, Russell, Defendant. No. 77203. Sum- mons by Publication, Whe State of Washington to the said John 'T. Russell, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: Within sixty days after the ‘25th day of November, 1910, and defend the above entitled action’ in the above entitled Court, and answer the com- plaint of the’ plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for plaintiff at his of- fice below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, ‘judgment will be ren- dered against you according to the de- mand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of’ said Court. The object of the above entitled ac- tion is to obtain a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and non-support. JOHN R.: WILSON, ‘Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. 0, Address: 539 New York Block, Seattle, Washington, Nov. 25, 1910—Jan. 6, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King Coun- ty. Summons by Publication. Daisy Houf, plaintiff, vs. John Francis Hout, iefendant.—No.— The State of Washington, to the said John Francis Houf, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, | to- wit: within sixty days after the 80th day of September, A. D. 1910, and de- fend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the file in this cause and Courg. State of Washington: ‘To the above de fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate Is- sued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of November, 1998, and numbered 854857, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.45, and pon the ‘real property situaced in sald IN THE SUPHRIOR COURT OF THE further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of sald frst pub- Julylication, to-wit: within sixty days Sept. 9, 1910, in the above entitled court ‘and action; and defend this action and answer tne complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his L. H. CRAVER, Plaintitt. 4. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintift.. Office Adéress: 524 Bailey Building, Se- attle, Wash. Sept. 30—Noy. 11, 1910. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. 1. _H, Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Caroline L, Burns, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and’ to the hereinafter described real property, Defendants, No. 75301. State of Washington: ‘To the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claim- ants or holders of an’ interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereoy notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate is- sued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the tnd day of September, 1909, and numbered complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under- signed attorney for plaintift at his of- fice below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be ren- dered against you according to the de- mand of the complaint, which has been King County, described as follows, to- wit, Lot 12,’ Block 5, Allentown Acres. That the taxes for the following sub- sejuent years have been paid by the plaintift upon sald above described real property, to-wit: You and each of you (including safd persons unknown, {f any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of tuis notice, exclusive of the day of safd first pub- Julylication, to-wit: within sixty days Sept. 80, 1919, in the above entitled court and ‘action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of sald plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersignedattorney for plaintiff at his utfice below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs In case of your failure so to do, jude ment will be rendered herein, foréclos- ing the len of said taxes ‘and costs L. H, CRAVER, Plaintift, A. C. MAG DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: 524 Bailey Bullding, Se- attle, Wash. ‘Sept. 9—Oct. 21, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ‘THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Walter S, Boxwell, Plaintiff, vs. Izola Lourine Boxwell, Defendant. No. 77821, Summons by Publication. The State of Washington: To Izoli Lourine Boxwell, Defenaant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 2nd day of December, 1910, and defend the above entitled action In the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at- torneys for plaintiff at their office be- low stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The ob- ject of this action is to secure an ab- Solute divorce from the defendant by the plaintiff on the grounds of deser- tion and for a decree declaring him to be the sole and separate owner of Lots 30 and 31, Block 11, Green Lake Reser- voir Addition to the city of Seattle. P, J. CARVER and JOHN SLATTERY, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & ‘Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington. DEC. 2, 1910—Jan. 3, 1911, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Winifred Jones, Plaintiff, vs. Frances J. Jones, Defendant. No. 77820. Sum- mons’ by Publication, ‘The State of Washington, to Frances J, Jones, Defendant: You are hereby summoned fo apear within ‘sixty (60) days after ‘the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty dags after the 2nd day of December 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintift and serve a copy of, your answer upon the undersigned at- torneys for plaintiff! at their office be- low stated; and in case of your failure soto do,’ judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The ob- ject of this action is to secure an ab- solute divorce from the defendant by the plaintiff on the grounds of drunk- enness and desertion, ¥, J. CARVER and JOHN SLATTERY, Attorneys for Paintiff. Office Address: 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington, Dec, 2, 1910—Jan, 13, 1911, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, Washington. Summons by Publication. Ella Croft, Plaintiff, vs. Harry W. Barrows, Defendant.—No. 75894. The State of Washington to the said Harry W. Barrows, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, so-called with sixty (60) days on the 23rd day of September, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of failure so so, the court will be bound against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filled with the clerk of said court. The complaint in this action prays for the annulment of a marriage ceremony entered into between the plaintiff and defendant on December 28, 1917, that the said marriage ceremony may be applauded and annulled, and for all proper relief. P. O. address, 606 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, September 22, 1910 28. 1910 Date of last publication, Nov. 4, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King, Order Directing Notice to Creditors Standard Oil Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Taxi Delivery Co., a corporation, defendant—No. 75872. In the above entitled matter it is ordered that all creditors of said defendant, and all parties interested in the estate, prosecute andigate this claims and demand against this defendant that court and in this cause so that end they are hereby notified and required to prove their claims before this court by filing same with the receiver, or his attorney, properly verified under oath, with itemized statements and other memoranda regarding same; and that said creditors set forth what, if any, security they have for the payment of same, said claims to be filed on or before the 19th day of December. And the said Ralph C. McAllaster, having asked for his discharge as receiver of the said defendant corporation, it is further ordered, and notice is hereby given to all creditors and parties interested in the estate, that the said Ralph C. McAllaster will move this court for the passing of his final account and his discharge as receiver of the said 19th day estate, since 1910. And the receiver is further ordered to give notice to be given to the creditors herein by publication in the SE² tors herein by publication in the St. TLE REPUBLICAN, once a week for two successive weeks during said period and by mailing to each of the known creditors at the last known postoffice address of said creditors, a copy of said notice. Done in Open Court this 3rd day of December, 1910. A. W. FRATER, Judge. LEOPOLD M. STERN, Attorney for the Receiver, 705 Lowman Building, Seattle, Washington. Dec 9—Dec. 16, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King. Standard Oil Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Taxi Delivery Company, a corporation, defendant.—No. 75872. I, D. K. Sickels, county clerk of King County, and ex-officio clerk of the perior Court of King, Washington County of King, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy with the original order directing notice to creditors in the above entitled cause as the same appears on file in my office, and the same is a true and perfect transcript of said original and of the same. Witness my hand and the seal of the said Superior Court, at my office in Seattle this 5th day of Dec. 1910. (Seal) By W. K. SICKELS, Deputy. NOTICE OF DISSOLUTION. Notice is hereby given that the partnership existing between Anton Aagaard and Scott I. Wallace for the manufacture of Aagaards Waterproof and Leather Preservative has this day been dissolved and that Anton Aagaard has assumed and agreed to pay all accounts against said partnership, said partnership having appeared under the name of the AAGAARD MANUFACTURING CO. The undersigned will not be responsible for any indebtedness incurred in the name of the above company hereafter. Dated Dec. 8th, 1908. SCOTT I, WALLACE. Dec. 9—Dec. 30, 1910. Notice is hereby given that there will be a meeting of the stock-holders of the Savings Investment Association, a corporation, on the 4th of February, 1911, at 1:30 o'clock p. m. at No. 809 with Avenue, for the purpose of considering the question of increasing the capital stock of said corporation from $25,000.00 to $50,000.00, and for the transaction of such business connected with said increase as may properly come before said meeting. EVELYN H. HALL, HARRIETT M. BISHOP, ANNA M. BROWN, RUTH FLAGLES, ELIZABETH MAHONEY, ADELAIDE POLLOCK, JOSEPHINE I. ATWOOD. Dec. 9, 1910—Jan. 28, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- dent Creditors. ty. Notice of the Estate of J. A. Burkholder, deceased.-No. 11797. By order of said court made herein on the 7th day of December, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against deceased or against said estate against the community estate of deceased and Burkholder, to present them with the necessary vouchers estate, at 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication December 9, 1910. Attorney for Estate. 314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg. Seattle, Wash. Dec. 9, 1910—Jan. 7, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Counto- Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Bertha Brown deceased—No. 12027 By order of said court made herein on the 22nd day of October, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrators of said estate, at 705 Lowman Building, the place of business of said estate, Sachetville, in business county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication Octo. 28, 1910. SAM BROWN, ISAAC BROWN, As Administrators of said Estate. LEOPOLD M. STERN, Attorney for Estate. 705 Lowman Blg., Seattle, Wash. Oct. 28—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Elijah Rash, Plaintiff, vs. John F. Rash, Defendant. No. 75369. Summons by publication. State of Washington to the said John F. Rash, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit within sixty (60) days after the 26th of August 1911, about entitled action, in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. This action is brought for the purpose of obtaining a decree of divorce from the said defendant on the grounds of abandonment, non-support and personal indignities, the same being causes of action specified in the laws of Washington, which services of summonsy publication may be made. PARKER & BROWN. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice Address: Room 25 Union Block, 713 1st Ave., Seattle, Washington. August 26—Oct. 6, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE Estate of Washington, for King County, Summons by Publication. Viola Estella Small, plaintiff, vs. Joseph Small, defendant.—No. ____. The State of Washington, to the said Joseph Small defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wait: within sixty days after the 14th day of January. A copy of the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; for plaintiff case, the judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in the complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the enactment of plaintiff for four years, and also your failure to make suitable provisions for plaintiff since said marriage. J. P. BALL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice and office address: 201-203 Burke Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 14—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. C. H. Boynton, plaintiff, vs. William B. Jenkins, defendant. No. 76276. The State of Washington to the said William B. Jenkins defendant: William B. Jenkins, defendant. You will be required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 14th day of October, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint your answer to upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the judgment against the defendant is judgment against said defendant for the amount due upon two promissory notes for $150.00 and $40.00, respectively, made by said defendant on the 30th day of July, 1907, and payable, the one, two months after date, and the other three months after date, respectively, together with the rest of the tax, besides the costs of this action, and to have an attachment issued and levied on the defendant's property. LEE Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address 705 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 14—Nov. 25, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show course why distribution should not be bad In the Matter of the Estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased—No. 5656. Malcolm K. MacRae, administrator of the estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be disposed for the sale of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said T. J. Riordan, deceased, be apperenced by the said Court of King County. State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle on the 14th day of October, 1910, at the hour of 9.30 o'clock A. M. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and pervious said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said session, and published in the four consecutive weeks before the said 14th day of November, 1910, in the ATTORNEYS, ATTENTION! THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN is looking for your legal publications, and if you are looking for your own business interests you will see to it that no publication is sent from your office without first talking with CAYTON about it. It is an indisputable fact that there are but two weekly publications in Seattle that publish lawyers' legal notices and give the lawyers no trouble on account of errors and prompt "returns" of publishers' affidavits, and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN takes the lead. In this day of busy, bustling activity, the lawyer's time is so much absorbed in the preparation of his voluminous cases that he has not the time to look the paper over every week to see if his notices are being regularly published, nor to read over his notices to see if they are absolutely correct. It often happens that even lawyers make errors in getting up their notices for publication, which errors are very annoying to the lawyers if not detected and corrected before going into the paper. If, therefore, the lawyer feels absolutely certain that the publisher gives his personal attention to notices or calls the lawyer's attention to them before going to press sent to his paper and either corrects small errors in notices it's a great relief to his mind. The publisher of THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN has had so much experience with legal publications that he can detect a faulty publication almost as readily as the lawyer himself, and, if not a grievous one, corrects it then and there, but if a grievous one, the lawyer's attention is called to the same before going to press. Returns on publications are promptly made, so that lawyers do not have to worry about the publisher's notice after his case has been called in court. 307 Epler Block Phone Main 305 Seattle - - Washington THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed in the county, and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 7th day of October, 1910. ROBERT H. LINDSAY, Court Commissioner. State of Washington, County of King D. K. Sickels, county clerk of King County and ex-officio clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court on the 7th day of November, 1910, in the matter of the estate of T. J. Riordan, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 7th day of October, 1910. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons by Publication Seattle Lumber Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Celestine J. Sullivan and Evelyn Sullivan, his wife, E. W. Andrews and Jane Doe Andrews, his wife, Fred G. Cutler and Mildred Cutler, his wife, Netherland American Mortgage Bank, a corporation. H. W. Fisher, Trustee, The National Bank of Commerce, of Seattle, Washington, a corporation, John Davis & Company, a corporation. Jahn Brooke & Company, Elliott Bay Mill & Lumber Company, a corporation, L. A. Borde, Crane Company, a corporation, Johnson, Scott and Richard Roe Gelser, a co-partnership doing business as Scutt & Gelser, Schwabacher Hardware Company, a corporation. V. D. Gossett, John Knapp and Richard Roe Lambert, doing business as Knapp & Lambert. (1) V.Funtz and W. J. Winters, defendants. Globe Electric Company, Cox & Gleason Company, and J. K. Witherspoon, intervenors.—No. _____ The State of Washington, to the said Celestine J. Sullivan, Evelyn Sullivan, his wife, and H. W. Fisher, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: sixty days after the 14th day of October, A. D. 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint in intervention of the Intervenor J. K. Witherspoon, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for intervenor at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said intervenor. The complaint of said intervenor has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint in intervention, is as follows: To foreclose a laborer's and materialman's lien upon lots 19 and 20, block 24, Edes & Knights' addition to Seattle, King County, Washington. C. H. WINDERS. Attorney for Intervenor, J. K. Witherspoon. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Lavina Christine Rudberg, deceased.—No. 11877. By order of said court made herein on the 4th day of October, 1910, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against sale declared or trust Bldg., for present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrix of sold estate, at 328 Northern Bank & Trust Building, Seattle, Wash., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication October 14, 1910. ELMA LOUISE RUDBERG, As Administrix of said Estate. GORDON McGAUVRAN, Attorney for Estate. 327-8-9 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg., Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Katherine Schulver deceased.—No. 11830. By other said court, the Clerkenal on the 128 day of October, 1910. Noice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY Block Phone Seattle - - Washington FRIDAY Decembe 9, 1910 said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 29 Burke Block, Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication Oct. 14, 1910. FRED L. RICE, As Administrator of said Estate. FRED L. RICE, Attorney for Estate. 229 Burke Block, Seattle, Wash. Oct. 14—Nov. 11, 1910. Send your legals to The Seattle Republican, 305 Epler Blk., Phone Main 305. Bonnev-Watson Co. Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. STETSON & POST LUMBER CO. BUILDING MATERIAL Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 ALBERT HANSEN. Eyes Carefully Examined and Properly Fitted With Glasses. Phone, Main 268. Seattle Washington First and Cherry.