Seattle Republican
Friday, January 20, 1911
Seattle, Washington
Page text (machine-generated)
Historical Society
The Seattle Republican
Single Copies, 10 Cents.
THE PUBLISHER'S NOTICE.
The Seattle Republican is published on Friday of every week by Cayton Publishing Company Subscriptions, $3.00 per year; six months, $1.50 postage prepaid. Subscriptions to all foreign countries included in the Postal Union, $4.00 a year postage paid. Sample copies, free. Single copies ten cents. Advertising rates made known on application. Special rates to publishers. Entered a second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. Address all communications to The Seattle Republican 307 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. Make a checks, drafts, postal orders, etc., payable to "Cayton Publishing Company."
CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC.
Telephone: Main 305. Publication office, 307 Epler Block.
HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON Publisher
$USIE REVELS CAYTON Associate
Champ Clark's publicity man certainly knows his business and that is just why Champ employed him.
Had Senator Aldrich got his financial scheme out a bit sooner a different story might have been told as to his successor in the senate.
Japan seems to have done the proper thing by Korea. She has killed it and is now preparing to serve it to those fond of the Korean fowl.
Men about town are asking each other the question, "If it be possible for the Seattle Daily Times to tell the truth?" No one up to going to press had been found to vouch for it.
The fellows that have been telling ugly things about Judge Rudkin had better get some other kind of rubbish to the president pretty soon or Judge Rudkins will be fixed for life.
Poison seems to be a new way of settling the dispute among relatives, and yet it must be admitted, judging from the number of successful cases that have been recently reported, it is working well.
Colonel Blethen's 10,000 Gill Club sounds a good deal like that 10,000 Burke Club that the Times wasted so much white paper and black ink on, which proved to be a myth of the most delusive type.
THE SEATTLE REPUBICAN wishes to commend the selection of the Dilling campaign committee as it seems to have been done with an eye single to at least getting the kind of votes that Dilling prefers to vote for him.
Ole Hansen for the past week or more has been quarantined at his home and that, too, when talking time is on us. It must be like gall and wormwood to that man of mouth not to be able to use it on every passerby.
In reply to a question, "What makes more noise than a pig under a gate?" some one answers, the sugar trust under the law. It certainly looks as though the sugar trust is in line for all and more than is coming to it.
"Japan cannot afford war," sagely remarks the Argonaut of San Francisco, and unless we are very much mistaken, the United States cannot afford to have Japan wage war on her just now lest she get licked clean out of her boots.
Yes, dear reader, the state of Washington, is in need of thousands of men of the Dr. Ghent stripe, who find it burdensome to provide for a wife and children, as they make the most ideal citizens, and their desire to protect the women is so keen and noteworthy.
Buying votes in the state of Ohio at the last general election was operated on the wholesale plan and yet among the hundreds that were bought and sold the black man was censipicuous for his absence. Is that another "white man's" luxury, in which black men are not permitted to share?
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. FRIDAY, JANUARY 20, 1911
[Name not provided]
LOVETT M. WOOD The weekly press of Seattle has been honored by the president of the United States in naming Lovett M. Wood as commercial agent of the department of labor and commerce in the Orient. The appointment is one of much importance to the United States government though it has not been generally sought after by the politicians.
For the past eighteen years Mr. Wood has published the Trade Register of Seattle, which publication reflected the views of the mernantile institutions of the the Northwest. He has been eminently successful in the publication of the same and made for himself a standing in the community that is equal that of any of the owners of the larger and more pretentious daily papers. In his own quiet way few men have done more toward the buildidg up of Seattle than Mr. Wood, who has been a delegate to most of the trade conventions all over the United States and even in other countries for the past fifteen years. The newspaper property that he has built up is perhaps the most valuable weekly publication in the Northwest and it is all due to his untiring work. As a representative of the United States government in the Orient it is the consensus of opinion of those who know him best that he will do much toward fostering and stimulating trade between the United States and that section of the world. The merchants of this country after all have not gotten their share of the trade of the Orient, and it is all due to the fact that the trade relations have not been carefully looked after by some man with the business at heart.
"Just sparring for time to get my political organization ready for action," was the laconic answer. Mayor Gill gave to the question of, why he abandoned all of his law proceedings against the recall, but most any one would have done likewise.
Registering the tenderloiners by the wholesale is charged up to the Gill machine. Well, everybody and his brother knew at the time the recall move was taken up that every tenderloiner within a 500-mile radius of Seattle would be brought here to vote if the recall ever came to a vote and those opposed to a wide open town will just have to prepare to counteract the votes of those outcasts with votes from the respectable element, and if they cannot do that, then Gill is certain of election, for there is no way to reach those fellows with the strong arm of the law.
LIBRARY
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
APR 29 1952
publican
VOLUME XVII. NUMBER 34
The political row that has been raging among the women in the state of Washington demonstrates that, they have already learned how to scrap over the spoils of the game.
The registration in Seattle is not moving on as rapidly as it should and unless those opposed to Gill and Wappy get a good deal busier than they have been in the past there will be no use holding the election.
We shall never forgive the woman prosecutor in the case, in which the first woman jury in Seattle sat, for not letting the case go to the jury just to see how many of the six came out with as much hair as they went in with.
Dr. Brown, the well known dentist, has been named by the Socialists for mayor of Seattle in the recall election. Dr. Brown ought to be able from his extensive experience to extract the fangs from the octopus of Wappyville.
From the number of endorsements State Highway Commissioner H. W. Bolby is getting just now it begins to look as if all of the opotition to him in the past had been murged into an Admiration society organized in his interest.
If A. S. Glover is successful in completely establishing his legal right to that immense English estate, which has been accumulating for the past 150 years, he need not be a glover any longer, but for the balance of his life be a bloated bond holder.
Senator Piles gives out the statement that the Alaska coal fields and mines must be opened up for development. Of course the coal mines of Alaska belongs to Senator Piles personally and for them to be opened up he has only to say the word.
James D. Hoge, the well known Seattle banker has returned from a California trip, and is of the opinion there has not been many days during the present winter that Seattle folk have not spend $1,000 in the Palace hotel of San Francisco. Does that explain the hard times situation in Seattle?
Senator Ruth kept his word and did not vote for Miles Poindexter for United States senator. It seems to us Senator Ruth is no bigger than his party and when his party said he should vote for Poindexter or any one else it was his duty to do as he had been commanded or throw up his job.
Bat Nelson having failed to make any showing with the professional is now doing a monologue stunt in the New York vaudevilles and at the end of it challenges all comers in the audience for a bout to a finish. Bat always was a "has been" and he is even worse now than in his more palmy days.
If reports be true Governor Hay is seriously considering Harold Preston as Judge Rudkin's successor on the supreme bench. While in another column hereof the name of John F. Main has been suggested, yet we are inclined to think no better man could be found for the place than Harold Preston if he will accept.
The slush fund for the re-election of Gill is said to be considerably larger for the coming election than it was before and that is saying a good deal. Come to think this is a splendid time to work the slush fund racket for votes as it is said there are 5,000 unemployed in Seattle at present. Votes ought to come pretty cheap just now.
It is said of Senator Tillman, of South Carolina, that when he started out in politics he was hailed as the Moses of the Negro race in that section, and to a man it rallied to his standard, but no sooner had he succeeded and got beyond their gunshot, he turned his guns on the men that gave him life and vitality in his inception. Unless we are very much mistaken Representative William Wray from the forty-third representative district of Washington has been reading the life and times of Senator Tillman and from it learned how it was done.
---
PERSONS AND FACTS IN THE PUBLIC EYE
2
Among the recommendations of Governor Hay to the legislature now in session was one that prisoners be allowed fifty cents per day after they have served out their minimum sentence, and the same be sent to their families, who were dependent on them for maintenance before being sent to prison, or the amount be left in the office, in case they had no such dependents, and be given them when they will have been finally discharged from prison. The recomendation, to our mind, was good as large as it went, but did not go far enough. Every one convicted of a felony and sent to state prison should be placed at some kind of labor if nothing more than state road work, and for which such convict should be paid not less than one dollar per day, and two, if the work being performed will warrant such pay, and the same be sent to his family. It often happens that men are convicted of a felony and sent to the state prison and leaves a wife and a number of children to shift for themselves and before the father has served out his sentence his boy is likewise sent to the same institution for having stolen, which was the resultof a lack of the necessities of life. The state in trying to reform one person has made criminals out of many more. If on the other hand that father had been put at labor, from which he could have earned two dollars per day, the same would have enabled the mother to have supported and schooled the children and made good men and women of them.
Placing a number of convicts in cells and then hiring their labor out to a lot of men, who speculate on their earnings, because they get it for a little or nothing, is criminal on the part of the state. In the state of Washington every man convicted of a felony could be put at labor that would be sufficiently remunerative to the state to pay such a convict wages that would keep the wolf from his family door, and yet the man be punished for the criminal act he had been found guilty of. The man found guilty of murder in the first degree, and sent to prison for life, should not be freed from the responsibility of maintaining either his wife and children or his aged mother and father that he, if not in prison, would be expected to support. He, too, should be given the same pay as if he expected to leave the walls at some time, and the same placed at the disposal of those whom he should support.
While, we do not argue that convict labor should be put in competition with the labor of law abiding citizens, yet those convicts have to be supported, and if they have a wife and children, their children are entitled to the labors of their father the same as if a citizen and at large. If convict labor be placed at road building it need not come into contact with outside labor, but it can make things easy for the citizen to make even more money than he would under different circumstances. There are many things that convict labor can be put to doing that would make such institutions not only self-sustaining, but sufficiently remunerative to pay the families of the convict living wages.
ANTI-RACE MARRYING
It is perhaps a written law in every one of the Southern states, and if not a written law, a social law, almost involving the death penalty for a white and a black person to legally marry or to even co-habit in such a way as to show a social mingling of the races, but in spite of all that quite half of the "colored population" of those states are half breeds, the result of illicit relations between white men and colored women. There maybe isolated cases of the opposite sexes mingling, but if discovered the black man is always summarily lynched and as an excuse for the rash act he is charged with having outraged a white woan. In spite of that fearful punishment, halfbreed children occasionally come from that direction, but such children are at once given to some black mammy and its real mother is the same pure angel she was before the false step was made, and the child is said to be the offspring of some black woman with a white man. But these are facts so well known to every one who has lived in the South that they are not only ancient history, but not worth going over in this connection.
If all of the southern states have made such masterly efforts to prevent the social mingling of the white and darker races and still the whole country is over run with half caste children does it not seem absolutely foolish for the legislature of the state of Washington to pass laws against the darker races intermarrying with the white race? The man that desires to go out of his race for a female companion will do so in spite of statutory laws, and when the legislature of the state makes it a felony for white persons to
THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN
marry colored persons, then it simply puts a premium on wholesale licentiousness. There have not been enough intermarrying between the whites and the darker races in this state to cause any alarm one way or the other. Until one or two white girls married Japanese, this question was never thought of, and that, too, in spite of the fact that hundreds of white men lived with Indian squaws, Japanese and Negro women, not only as their concubines, but as their legal wives.
[Name not visible in the image]
ALBERT J. GODDARD You and each of you know of Albert J. Goddard end you know of him because he has waged a relentless war on those men in a pool to rob the city of Seattle and the taxpayers out of thousands and perhaps millions of dollars. From time to time Mr. Goddard made the grafters uncomfortable and though he has not been able to wholly eliminate the graft system from the city, his relentless war on it has to an extent made it seek cover. His face was slapped on the floor of the city hall, yea in the council chamber and by the president of that body, because he made charges that seemed to involve the higher ups in the graft game that had been going on year in and year out.
That Mr. Goddard was absolutely correct in making graft charges against the hundred and one regrade contracts that have been let in the city a great majority of the tax payers now verily believe, but it has been handled with such care and consideration that it is hard to get hold of the right end to start to unraveling the ball. He is still working on the knotty proposition and in the course of time it is firmly believed by those he has taken into his confidence that he will be able to show up the whole matter and expose the real grafters.
Thousands and thousands of dollars have been expended by the city in the purchase of expensive automobiles which instead of being used in the interest of the city were used for joy riding by the city employees. Tuis form of graft and extravagance Mr. Golddard has for the past two years made war on and finally succeeded in having the city automobiles to an extent labelled so that they could be spotted when out joy riding.
On the moral issues Albert Goddard has always been right and is therefore highly deserving of the support of the law abiding citizens of the city for the nomination and election that he is seeking in the coming primary and general election to be pulled off next March. He has made more than good for the three years he has been a member of the city council and he invites you to look carefully into his record berore casting a vote against him.
How strange that it was not a dangerous practice for the races to mingle as man and wife as long as it was the white men seeking the colored women. The white women of this state are just as intelligent as the white men and they do not need any guardians to tell them who they shall marry, any more so than the white men. It is the rarest instance that you see in the state of Washington a black man seeking to be-
FRIDAY, January 20, 1911
come the wife of a white woman for they a thousand times over prefer the woman of their own class and complexion, at least, partially so, although the white man has made it almost impossible in some instances for them to know whether they are marrying a white or a colored woman.
If you prevent the marrying of the races by statute then at once concubinage between them will become common. One of the authors of the proposed law of preventing intermarrying in the state of Washington has argued in the legislative halls and likewise on the political stump against passing prohibition liquor laws and uses as an argument that when you say to a human being he or she shall not drink, then such person immediately decides to drink. In other words, it is impossible to legislate a human being into the practice of temperance. If this argument holds good in that one instance it will hold good in the race marrying instance.
It does seems to us that the majority of the members of the legislature of the state now in session are men too broad in principle and too far removed from the dark ages of race into.lerance to burden the statute books with such a ridiculous and obnoxious law as the one proposed.
So far as the Negro is concernrd he is a patriotic citizen of the United States and hopes to live peaceably by the side of his white neighbor and await the solution of this mooted race question by Him who has held the destinies of all mankind in the hollow of His hand since the mind of man runneth not to the contrary. This eternal stirring up animosity between the whites and the blacks has a most depressing effect upon the black folk and must be to the better element of the white folk and there is no good and sufficient reason for the question being injected into the affairs of this progressive state.
If a white woman desires to marry a Japanese and finds it impossible to get a license in this state or some neighboring state the couple will at once hike to British soil where all races are permitted to marry as suit their own fancy, and the act will be done. How solicitious some of the members of the legislature seem to be about the offsprings coming from a white woman and a Japanese or Negro man, and yet the thousands and thousands of offsprings from white men and black women are looked upon as the strong men of the Negro race throughout the United States and are invariably selected as the leaders. It is a fact that the president of the United States rarely ever appoints a cold black man to a public office. It is said that 95 per cent of the Negroes employed in the various departments at Washington City are mulatoes and quadroons and even octoroons, thus showing that the whitos themselves give those halfbreeds the preference. To pass such a law would simply be an idiotic move and we hope it will not be done.
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT
Capital punishment is being vigorously attacked in the state of Washington just now and if the legislature acts favorably upon an enormous petition that will be sent to it in the very near future recommending that the capital punishment law be repealed, no more wilful murderers will be swung in the state for some time to come. As a precedent for this petition and prayer against the law the promoters cite the fact that the state of Kansas many years ago abolished capital punishment, and since that time the records do not show that any more murders have been committed in that state than in states where capital punishment is rigidly enforced.
He, who so far loses control of his temper to want to take the life of a fellow being, will do so as quickly with the gallows hanging over his head as he would with only life imprisonment staring him in the face. Hanging does not deter one from taking human life. We rather sympathize with the efforts of having the legislature repeal the law, but we would like to see the person thereafter convicted of wilful murder sent to state prison for life and beyond the pardoning power of the governor or any pardoning board, unless it transpired that said person was not guilty of the crime. No human being, in our opinion, with or without the sanction of the law, has the right to take that which he cannot give, but the person who commits murder should have no rights of freedom among his fellow beings, and it should not be in the power of any one save by legislative act to restore such a moral cutcasts to those rights.
Capital punishment is not only barbarous, but it does not lessen the number of murders committed. But a few days ago a girl grieved herself to death on account of the coming hanging of her father in the
state of Oregon; while that is no very great argument against capital punishment, as she might have grieved herself to death over some other criminal act of her father, which would have incarcerated him in a prison cell for life, yet two lives will have been taken when the father is hanged, and still no one will be deterred from doing the same thing the father has done that brought this creat calamity upon himself and his children.
As has already been said herein, we believe a person convicted of wilful murder should be sent to prison for the balance of their natural life, and that in repealing the capital punishment law another be enacted fixing life imprisonment on the guilty one and that such person shall never be pardoned by any governor or board of pardons unless some one is able to establish the absolute innocence of the party beyond a reasonable doubt. The mere fact that said person committed the act while temporarily insane or because insanity was common to the family or because said person was absolutely insane should be no reason for the said guilty person being pardoned or paroled from the state prison. If the deed was committed in a fit of violent passion then the person might the very next day have a similar attack and commit a like crime and to prevent the repition of it he should be placed in a prison cell, where the proper restraint would always be over him. If the person is of an insane family and the mania to kill showed itself in one instance it is perfectly natural for it to show itself in other instances, and such a person is always not only mentally irresponsible for his acts, but a real menace to those among whom he resides, hence life imprisonment should be his portion.
COUNTY OPTION
Superintendent Boyd P. Doty of the Anti-Saloon League no longer disguises the fact that, it his intention to place the state of Washington in the prohibition column, and he will be eminently satisfied to have the legislature pass the county unit law. State wide prohibition may prove to be the panacea for all the financial ills of the state, but it is seriously doubted, not by men who belly up to some saloon bar sixteen hours every day, but by real business men, who seldom if really ever take a drink of liquor in any shape, and all because it has been tried in other states and has not proven wholly successful. Six years ago the state of Oregon voted for the county option law and tried it for six long years, but at her last state election she voted down the county option law and the people adopted the municipal option law and the same is a part of their constitution. That law is now in operation in Oregon, but we are not going to say how well it is operating, because that is almost an unknown question just now, but men in other states, who are interested in the growth of their respective states, are watching it with a great deal of interest and among the citizens of other states that are watching it are to be found the real business men of the state of Washington.
Now while Washington is watching the Oregon law go through its experimental stage, would it not be just as well to let her local option law go on as it is? Thus far is it not a fact that the Washington local option law is working very smoothly and nicely? Has it not made wet communities dry, and though it has made dry communities wet, yet the drys have had all the better of the contest and really they have no fault to find of the present law.
For some reason just now there is a general complaint of hard times all over the state and just what to attribute the cause is more than the shrewdest business men can figure out, but it is. Now if the state by the present legislature is placed in the prohibition column it seems to us that it will further demoralize business and almost result in a general panic all over the state, which added to the present unsettled business conditions, would come very near bankrupting every man doing business in Washington. Sentiment is one thing and fact is another, and when you put sickly sentiment in the opposite scale of a balance against fact sentiment makes a mighty poor showing.
There is no doubt in the eyes of every sensible man that the drink evil is greatly abused, not only in Washington, but all over the United States, and men, who have sense enough to know and do better, drink to an excess and make fools of themselves and paupers of their families, but we have known of men and families who ate in the same excessive manner and never had anything except what they ate at their meals, and so it is with anything that is taken to an excess.
While Kansas may be getting along all right now with the state wide prohibition, yet even Superintendent Doty must admit that she underwent a long siege of hard times, when the state went dry. Every state that has adopted the prohibition law has swung to and fro on the subject and many that did adopt it, are
THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN
not either in the absoultely wet column or they have the local option law, such as is in existence in the state of Washington. In our opinion every community and municipality should have the right to decide by a majority of those living therein as to whether intoxicant liquors should be sold or not. The present local option law makes it possible for even Seattle to go dry if a majority of the voters of the community so desires, and that is our version of pronibition. But for one community, dry though it be, to say another community shall be dry because it is dry, is in our opinion, an intolerant idea and has no place in this age of liberal interpretation of right and wrong. If the constant agitation of any one subject is going to disrupt the business of the community, then such agitation should be stopped immediately if not sooner.
[Name not visible in the image]
EUGENE W. WAY Few if any members of the city council have done more effective work in that body than Eugene W. Way, who three years ago was elected a member thereof from the Second ward, and who was returned to the body one year ago without opposition at either the primary or the general election. Mr. Way is again seeking the nomination for a return to the same body and in doing so he invites the voters to look into his record as a member of the city council and if it does not justify them to vote for him at the coming primary and general election then he does not ask them to vote for him.
Of course Mr. Way is to an extent opposed by the Gill administration and for no greater reason than because he has sought to prevent the city from being made a vice resort, where men were robbed by day and by night and the spoils divided up among those on the inside of the municipal game. Mayor Gill himself cannot deny that Mr. Way has made war against his wide open town policy from the very beginning of his administration and he has not let up a single day since that time, and therefore when the adherents of the Gill administration declare that Mr. Way only made war on the Gill wide open town policy, after Gill would not make him a part of the graft gang, it is so thin that one can see through it without even an x-ray machine. The fact of the matter is the Gill gang would have willingly divided up the spoils with Councilman Way, if he had shown any willingness to accept a divy.
We some times tell a falsehood so often and with such vociferousness that we sooner or later make ourselves believe that it is a real truth, and that seems to be the case with the Gill gang in telling this Way falsehood. Mr. Way lead the fight on the restricted district and repeatedly said, "Why have a restricted district for fallen women any more than to have a restricted district for fallen men, such as ex-convicts and murderers." THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN verily believes that if the good citizens of Seattle will look carefully into the record that Mr. Way has made both in the city council and in the civic welfare organization, in which he has always been an active member they will give him their votes.
C2
BANK DIRECTORY
CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK—1317 Second and Madison; capital stock $1,000,000; surplus $1,037,000; President, M. F. Backus; Cashier, J. A. Swalwell. First million dollar bank in Seattle.
DEXTER HORTON NATIONAL BANK—Second avenue and Cherry; W. M. Ladd, President; R. H. Denny, Vice President; M. W. Peterson, Cashier; N. H. Latimer, Manager.
BARTO & SON'S BANK—No. 7 Crown Block; H. B. Barto, President; L. B. Barto, Vice President; Joseph A. Barto, Cashier.
CANADIAN BANK OF COMMERCE—602 Second avenue; Grange V. Holt, Manager. Telephone Main 753.
COMMERCIAL STATE BANK—Second avenue and Columbia; Lester W. Lewis, President; Frank W. Baker, Vice President; W. B. Shoemaker, Cashier. Telephones Main 2560; Ind. 4760.
FIRST MORTGAGE & SAVINGS BANK—40 Haller building; W. P. Harper, President; Paul C. Harper, Secretary and Treasurer.
FREMNOT STATE BANK—3414 Fremont avenue; Charles E. Reinsberg, President; Samuel P. Dixon, Vice President; J. H. Morris, Cashier.
GERMAN AMERICAN BANK—822 Third avenue; Ernest Carstens, President; J. E. Ostrom, Vice President; Isaac J. Riley, Cashier. Telephones Main 7596; Ind. 2304.
GREEN LAKE STATE BANK—7120 Woodlawn avenue; George W. Lear, President; George W. Hill, Vice President; Lee S. Forbes, Cashier. Telephones Green 68; North 384.
JAPANESE COMMERCIAL BANK—216 Second avenue south; M. Furuya, President; W. L. Gazzan, Vice President; M. Matseemoto, Cashier. Telephone Main 639; Ind. 639.
RAINIER VALLEY STATE BANK—4850 Rainier avenue; Simeon T. Toby, President; Thomas S. Toby, Cashier.
SPECIE BANK—120 Fourth avenue south; H. Ohrick, President. General banking.
NORTHERN BANK & TRUST CO.—Fourth and Pine street; capital $100,000; surplus $16,500; J. G. Pierce, President; F. J. Martin, Vice President; W. J. Collier, Cashier. Safe deposit.
NORTHWEST TRUST & SAFE DEPOSIT CO.—801 First avenue; Ebenezer Shorrock, President; J. P. Hartman, Cashier; Alexander Myers, Secretary and Treasurer. Safe deposit vaults. Insurance.
ORIENTAL AMERICAN BANK—424 Main street; C. T. Takahashi, President; K. Hirade, Vice President; T. Aral, Cashier. Telephones Main 1845; Ind. 680.
PEOPLES SAVINGS BANK—Second and Pike; established 1889; E. C. Neufelder; R. J. Reekie, Vice President; J. T. Greenieaf, Cashier. Commercial and savings. Interest
SEATTLE TRUST & TITLE CO.—Second floor Alaska building; J. H. Edwards, President; A. T. Bailey, Jr., Cashier; E. S. Osborne, Secretary; Edward L. Blaine, Assistant Secretary and Treasurer.
SCANDINAVIAN AMERICAN BANK—622 Second avenue; avenue A. Chilberg, President; J. E. Chilberg, Vice President; J. F. Lane, Cashier. Telephones Main 2947; Ind. 919.
MERCANTILE BANK—900 Second avenue; W. M. Redfield, President; Martin Henchan, Vice President; C. S. Harley, Cashier. Commercial and savings.
TITLE TRUST CO.—Second avenue and Columbia; Charles S. Wiley, President; Frank W. Baker, Vice President; Warren Wilson, Secretary and Treasurer. Telephones Main 2560; Ind. 4760.
UNIVERSITY STATE BANK—Fourteenth avenue N. E.; J. C. Norton, President; Harry B. Lear, Cashier. Telephones Green 52; North 56.
WASHINGTON TRUST & SAVINGS BANK—1001 First avenue; J. W. Clise, President; C. J. Smith, Vice President; S. F. Rathburn, Cashier. Telephones Main 546; Ind. 3553.
METROPOLITAN BANK—White building; H. S. Henry, President; C. F. White, Vice President; J. T. McVey, Cashier. Telephone Main 8143; Ind. 4905.
SEATTLE NATIONAL BANK—Second and Columbia; capital stock $1,000,000.00; surplus $200,000; deposits $17,000,000; Jacob Furth, Ch. of Directors; E. W. Andrews, Pres.; R. V. Ankeny, Cashier.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK—First and Yesler; capital stock $300,000.00; surplus $100,000; M. A. Arnold, Pres.; J. A. Hall and C. A. Philbrick, Cashiers; prompt and efficient service for patrons.
UNION SAVINGS & TRUST CO.—Second and Cherry; James D. Hoge, President; J. D. Lowman, Vice President; N. B. Solner, Cashier. Branches, Ballard and Georgetown. Telephones Main 413; Ind. 468.
STATE BANK OF SEATTLE—Yesler Way and First avenue; capital $100,000.00; E. L. Grondahl, President; A. L. Solberg, Vice President; A. G. Kahlke, Cashier. Money to loan on Seattle real estate.
AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK & TRUST CO.—Second avenue and Madison; James A. Murray, President; Michael Earles, Vice President; M. M. Murray, Cashier. Only exclusive for savings in state. Pay 4 per cent. O. H. LaFarge, Secretary.
Massachusetts has a bran new Lodge organized, not exactly a bran new one, but the old one re-babtized. Senator Lodge after getting the scare of his life has been finally re-elected United States senator.
POLITICS AND THE POLITICIANS
MAYOR GILL'S COMMUNICATION
If Mayor Gill was preparing a campaign doc in his answer to the findings of the investigating mittee, which filed its report some weeks ago, tha has succeeded most admirably. The mayor's re
campaign document go before he investigating come weeks ago, then he his court The mayor's rejoind in the air
If Mayor Gill was preparing a campaign document in his answer to the findings of the investigating committee, which filed its report some weeks ago, then he has succeeded most admirably. The mayor's rejoind-
er was read before the city council last Monday night, and while it may have been mostly fiction and fabrications neverthless it sounded good and it will be the means of a good many of the recall advocates setting up and taking notice. From start to finish it was full and overflowing with
pers of the city council, not think as does he. Some that it almost be-ly become vulgar it will, who is a man that one than would a person middle and wagged at take forty-five minutes the mayor and it was the lobby of the council on with the advocates and when it had been quite a bit of applause stopping to discuss the suggest to the oppo- sons made by him in it be Councilman Kellogg action, but he had been and had gotten affidavits branding the at-As did Kellogg do so out it in the right way the communications of relations cut going and former friend or foe if the move to oust May- We repeat, the alle- mat official communica- tions interested, and hard time beating him
mered the cases in court withdrawn as I propose like a clean fight on my one day this week. If in the very outset we writes for his cause. In the federal court as a opinion was or was not the fact the Gill adher- chestnuts out of the fact that then they began the cases dismissed. It and the other Gill attor-
E. L. either ser- yard or re- dorsed, ha- of the eight
satirical references to the members of the city, cil, and especially those that do not think as do. So satirical at times did it become that it almost came vulgar, but if it had actually become vulgar would have been just like Hi Gill, who is a man has no more control of his tongue than would a whose tongue was tied in the middle and wagged both ends. It took something like forty-five miles to read the communication from the mayor and read at an opportune time as the lobby of the city was packed to almost suffocation with the adv of the West Seattle boulevard, and when it had finished the document received quite a bit of ap from those present. Without stopping to discuss document one way or another we suggest to the sition to see to it that the points made by him is fully explained to the people. Councilman Kellogg was attacked in the communication, but he had appraised of the coming attack and had gotten vits from the official stenographers branding attacks as false and malicious. As did Kellogg should others, and if they go about it in the right they may succeed in shearing the communication its ugly horns. The communications cut going and protected neither former friend or they had in any way sided with the move to oust or Gill from his official position. We repeat, the gations made by Mayor Gill in that official commission, should be counteracted by those interested if they do not they will have a hard time beating with George W. Dilling.
"It is a fact that I have ordered the cases in against the recall move to be withdrawn as I put to go before the people and make a clean fight, record," came from Mayor Gill one day this week the mayor had have done this in the very out believe he would have made votes for his cause bringing his suits he has used the federal court's paw, and whether the opinion was or was good law, there is no denying the fact the Gill ents used that court to pull their chestnuts out of fire and they had no sooner dane that then they to make preparations to have the cases dismissed is said that Attorney Blewitt and the other Gill
satirical references to the members of the city council, and especially those that do not think as does he. So satirical at times did it become that it almost became vulgar, but if it had actually become vulgar it would have been just like Hi Gill, who is a man that has no more control of his tongue than would a person whose tongue was tied in the middle and wagged at both ends. It took something like forty-five minutes to read the communication from the mayor and it was read at an opportune time as the lobby of the council was packed to almost suffocation with the advocates of the West Seattle boulevard, and when it had been finished the document received quite a bit of applause from those present. Without stopping to discuss the document one way or another we suggest to the opposition to see to it that the points made by him in it be fully explained to the people. Councilman Kellogg was attacked in the communication, but he had been apppraised of the coming attack and had gotten affidavits from the official stenographers branding the attacks as false and malicious. As did Kellogg do so should others, and if they go about it in the right way they may succeed in shearing the communications of its ugly horns. The communications cut going and coming and protected neither former friend or foe if they had in any way sided with the move to oust Mayor Gill from his official position. We repeat, the allegations made by Mayor Gill in that official communication, should be counteracted by those interested, and if they do not they will have a hard time beating him with George W. Dilling.
"It is a fact that I have ordered the cases in court against the recall move to be withdrawn as I propose to go before the people and make a clean fight on my record," came from Mayor Gill one day this week. If the mayor had have done this in the very outset we believe he would have made votes for his cause. In bringing his suits he has used the federal court as a cat's paw, and whether the opinion was or was not good law, there is no denying the fact the Gill adherents used that court to pull their chestnuts out of the fire and they had no sooner dane that then they began to make preparations to have the cases dismissed. It is said that Attorney Blewitt and the other Gill attor-
script used is the one used here years ago by McKee Rankin and George Osborne. The Alhambra Theater has a splendid cast for this great play, for it ranks at the best of Western dramas. Miss Emma Bunting is in her happiest vein as "Bess," the part she plays next week, and she literally revels in the character, which is an ideal comedy one. Every member of the Alhambra company appears in "The Golden Giant Mine."
SEATTLE THEATER
"The Three of Us." This magical title has percolated into the home circle of every fireside and become a household word. New York accepted it with open arms when Rachel Crothers the author, hitherto unknown, leapt into fame in a single night. All the states of America and Canada followed suit with New York in accepting "The Three of Us" as one of the most realistic and touching of western mining
---
---
4
MAYOR GILL
BORROWED THOUGHTS.
The morning salutation in Brazil might well be: "Navy, navy, who's got the navy?"—Columbus Dispatch.
The trouble with a great big army is that it is either useless or used.—Brooklyn Standard Union.
Doubtless the thrift of the voters in Adams County accounts for the large increase in bank clearings reported by all the Ohio cities.—New York World.
AMUSEMENTS
"The Golden Giant Mine" will be the play at the Alhambra Theatre next week, starting Sunday, with Miss Emma Bunting in the character of Bess Fairfax, the sister of Alex Fairfax, "The Golden Giant" who becomes the bride of the gentleman gambler, Jack Mason. The play was presented here before by Miss Bunting, under the title of "The Gambler." The version next week will be more complete than the former, for the manu-
neys were running around for two days offering some disinterested attorney $100 to appear in the case and go before Judge Hanford and ask for a dismissal and all because they feared the judge would conclude that his court had been used as a convenience, and go up in the air and give the whole outfit a ripping up such as they never before received. There is no doubt but that the Giil advocates were sparring for wind when they went into the federal court for relief and they meant to tie up the matter in the courts regardless of what Judge Hanford's decision might have been. But the boys are ready for the scrap now and it is said the largest purse that has ever been raised in the West for the election of a mayor is now in hand and those favoring a wide open town are ready to meet the nominee of the Welfare Legue in the arena, believing they will be able to beat him even at his own game. It was thought first that they would try to head off the legislation that has recently passed the legislature for relief in nominating an opposing candidate, but they concluded that too, might prove another boomerang for them and they like the court cases dropped it, and as said above are ready for the battle as soon as the opposition is ready to pull it off.
[Name]
E. L. Blaine, of council investigation fame, will either send Hiram Gharles Gill to the political bone yard or return him to the mayor's chair doubly endorsed, has announced his intention of standing for one of the eighteen nominations for councilman, and win-
THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN
there running around for two days interested attorney $100 to appear before Judge Hanford and ask for cause they feared the judge would hurt had been used as a convenient chair and give the whole outfit a day never before received. There the Gill advocates were sparring sent into the federal court for to tie up the matter in the court Judge Hanford’s decision might laws are ready for the scrap now and purse that has ever been raised election of a mayor is now in a wide open town are ready to the Welfare Legue in the arena able to beat him even at his thought first that they would tryition that has recently passed the nominating an opposing candidate that too, might prove anom and they like the court cases above are ready for the battle as is ready to pull it off.
E. L BLAINE
L. Blaine, of council investiga tion, send Hiram Gharles Gill to the or return him to the mayor's c o, has announced his intention of s eightcen nominations for counc
M. H. H.
FRIDAY. January 20, 1911
will seek to be one of the nine elect. He is done in the city council in the state and crime protected by the min-
nown to every man, woman and Washington much less Seattle, needs no great introduction to the amount of boosting even by those support him. His record is not only in the hands of every one in most of the voters know at this time, but warranted their support for the nation he is now seeking.
At the Seattle Daily Times editori-
proposes to drive Mr. Blaine out of the house he has spent the greater part of his where no man can rightfully acco-
done any man a wrong, is suffici-
fule law abiding citizens to give some how or other Colonel Bleth-
Times, has found it convenient in which he has lived and in some after hurriedly leaving he did not in less the minions of the law a comfortable place for him to rest that, too, without either cost to his Publishing Company. In some or a time "run the town," just as Seattle, but it did not last long and on. Evidently that thing hap-
so often that he has concluded to drive E. L. Blaine out of the mistake the temperament of the of Seattle, he will not defeat him nation or the election to the city.
Quest of Senator Allen that Presi-
not name him on more committees writes this office and says: "My momently satisfactory to me and as committee on State Granted School we all the committee work I can
over any doubt but that the Elkins call on the Republican party of the governor of that state has just reason of the old man, as United succeed his father, thus making the old the position.
-at-law are trying to prevent the what Mrs. Eddy left for it and by getting its own as it was the her all she had. These heirs are seeing that did not rightly belong to or to themselves.
Minnesota has introduced a bill the government to lease the coal we suppose he will see to it that lands will not pay to exceed three same. The coal barons need the Nelson is averse to them suffer-
ning that, of course will seek to be one of the nine elect. What Mr. Blaine has done in the city council in the way of exposing vice and crime protected by the minions of the law is known to every man, woman and child in the state of Washington much less Seattle, and he, therefore, needs no great introduction to the voters nor any great amount of boosting even by those papers inclined to support him. His record is not only an open book, but it is in the hands of every one in the city, and the most of the voters know at this time whether or not he has warranted their support for the nomination and election he is now seeking.
The mere fact that the Seattle Daily Times editorially declares that it proposes to drive Mr. Blaine out of the town where he has spent the greater part of his life, and the town where no man can rightfully accuse him of having done any man a wrong, is sufficient excuse for peaceful law abiding citizens to give him their support. Some how or other Colonel Blethen, the editor of the Times, has found it convenient to leave every town in which he has lived and in some of them for years after hurriedly leaving he did not dare to show his face in less the minions of the law unsolicited provide a comfortable place for him to rest his weary bones, and that, too, without either cost to himself or the Times Publishing Company. In some of those places he for a time "run the town," just as he is now running Seattle, but it did not last long and he was soon moving on. Evidently that thing happened to the colonel so often that he has concluded that he will be able to drive E. L. Blaine out of the city, but, unless we mistake the temperament of the law abiding citizens of Seattle, he will not defeat him for either the nomination or the election to the city council.
It was at the request of Senator Allen that President Paulhamus did not name him on more committees than he did. He writes this office and says: "My assignments are eminently satisfactory to me and as chairman of the committee on State Granted School and Tide Lands I have all the committee work I can look after."
There is no longer any doubt but that the Elkins family has a strong call on the Republican party of West Virginia as the governor of that state has just named Dave Elkins, son of the old man, as United States senator to succeed his father, thus making the third generation to hold the position.
Mrs. Eddy's heirs-at-law are trying to prevent the church from having what Mrs. Eddy left for it and yet the church is only getting its own as it was the church that gave her all she had. These heirs are trying to get something that did not rightly belong to neither Mrs. Eddy nor to themselves.
Senator Nelson of Minnesota has introduced a bill in the senate for the government to lease the coal lands of Alaska and we suppose he will see to it that those leasing the lands will not pay to exceed three cents per acre for the same. The coal barons need the money and Senator Nelson is averse to them suffering. Pass the bill.
In it is depicted with the simplicity of genius the struggles of a young sister to care for her two brothers, retain possession of a mine, amongst a hotbed of sharks, and eke out an honorable existence.
A compromising position places her in a false light and some scenes of tremendous strength are enacted.
Ethel Clifton was originally engaged by Walter Lawrence the manager of "The Three of Us," in New York to play this role, and made a splendid impression in the part. Joseph Galbraith has a strong, rugged and manly part and will make a splendid impression in it. Frank Denithorne has one of the best heavy roles of his season at the Seattle, and other members of the Baker Company are happily placed.
"The Three of Us" has been selected from quite a few plays as the most desirable to follow "On the Quiet" and opens at the customary Sunday matinee, Jan. 22nd.
FRIDAY. January 20. 1911
EDITOR SEATTLE REPUBLICAN: I have with considerable interest followed the comment of the paper concerning the ruling of Judge Handford, and I am led to believe that an injusctice has been done to an able, upright judge and a most worthy and loyal citizen.
If I understand the conditions correctly, a petition or complaint was filed in Judge Hanford's court praying for an injuncting to restrain the payment of money to defray the expense of a recall election. Numerous grounds were alleged by the petitioner, but from my view of the case, became immaterial except only the sufficient facts charging fraud and illegality were set forth. On this petition, Judge Hanford issued an order for the defendants to show cause why a temporary injunction should not be granted and a date was set for hearing.
Now when the case was called to be heard on the "show cause" order, the attorneys for the defendants filed a general demurer. Now a demurrer may be proper in such a case, but the attorney who files one in such a case takes desperate chances and the only safe practice is to do as defendants were ordered, show cause why the temporary injunction should not be granted.
Judge Hanford held, and very prpoperly, too, that whether the allegations be true or not, they showed as stated, sufficient matter to require an investigation.
Such being the case, demurrer was overuled, the defendants were in default. They were ordered to show cause and showed nothing. Defendants were wholly in default and if courts are to follow the recognized practice, Judge Hanford could do nothing else but grant a temporary injunction and when the defendant's attorneys saw fit to show cause as ordered, then the whole matter would be investigated.
The truth of the matter is that the attorneys for the defendants, like Casey in the football game at Mudville, "went the wrong way." They should set up their claims of legality and in the same return they could have properly told the court that the allegations in the complaint were not sufficient and then Judge Hanford would have fixed a day for hearing and I doubt not would refused a temporary and finally a permanent injunction.
It is wrong to criticise Judge Hanford for the negligence of the attorneys for the defendant, and that is just what was done in this case. A. G. McBRIDE.
ADVOCATES PROBATING CONVICTS
The spirit of a newer justice is abroad in the state of Washington which in its adoption in the courts of about thirty states of the Union, has fully justified its faith by its work. The system of probation, as a substitute for punishment, has taken root, and is being advocated by some of the most brilliant jurists of this state and was recently taken up briefly in a lecture given here by Judge A. W. Frater cf Seattle. The latest move in favor of its
HE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN
NCH AND BAR--
D BAR---LEG
BENCH AND BAR---LEGAL NOTES
[Picture of a man in a suit with a bow tie, facing left. The background is plain and light-colored. The man's face is clearly visible, with a mustache and a serious expression. The portrait is oval-shaped with a thin border.]]
JUDGE FRANK H. RUDKINS
In declining the appointment as federal
ington was finally prevailed upon by Pres-
name and his name has been sent to the
be confirmed without opposition, as both
has urged his appointment. Judge H.
reme bench is considered one of the strong
er occupied that position. The attorn-
imous in declaring him to be a man of e
assessing one of the strongest judicial mi-
ne ever tried a law case. He has twice be-
ne the state supreme court and has just
term. Whether a private citizen, a sup-
of justice of the state supreme court he
Rudkin, and success has never made him
assumed to be. In the state courts he
and in the federal courts it is the consensu-
l be equally successful.
ointment as federal judge for
vailed upon by President Taft
has been sent to the senate and
it opposition, as both Senator
pointment. Judge Rudkins on
red one of the strongest legal
position. The attorneys of Sem
to be a man of exceptional
strongest judicial minds before
se. He has twice been elected
court and has just begun to
private citizen, a superior court
supreme court he has always
has never made him any more
the state courts he has made
arts it is the consensus of opinl.
Who after declining the appointment as federal judge for Eastern Washington was finally prevailed upon by President Taft to accept the same and his name has been sent to the senate and will doubtless be confirmed without opposition, as both Senator Jones and Piles have urged his appointment. Judge Rudkins on the state supreme bench is considered one of the strongest legal minds that ever occupied that position. The attorneys of Seattle are unanimous in declaring him to be a man of exceptional abilities and possessing one of the strongest judicial minds before whom they have ever tried a law case. He has twice been elected a member of the state supreme court and has just begun to serve his second term. Whether a private citizen, a superior court judge or a chief justice of the state supreme court he has always been Frank H. Rudkin, and success has never made him any more than he always assumed to be. In the state courts he has made an ideal judge and in the federal courts it is the consensus of opinion that he will be equally successful.
JUDGE JOHN F. MAIN
---
---
[Name]
adoption has been in the circulation of a vast number of petitions which will be presented to the state legislature which convened Tuesday, and asking for the amendment of the present criminal code to include this newer jutice. Many a mere delinquent has been sent to the state prisons and later turned out as a hardened criminal, through association with the criminals incarcerated in the jails and from the host of replies said to have been received by the circulators of the petition the system appears to be the proper method of dealing with these offenders and should, at least be given a fair trial. Odessa Record.
LEGAL NOTES
Making Patented Inventions
It is a wide spread idea that one has a right to make a patented invention without the consent of the patentee, for his personal use only, and not for sale to others. This is entirely incorrect. The patent law grants to the patentee and those holding under him the exclusive right to the manufacture, use, and sale of the patened invention. No one has the right to make a patented thing for his own use. As a matter of fact, it has been held an infringement to make a patented article, although it was never used by the maker. The courts have gone so far as to hold that a devise constructed originally not to infringe, but with the intent that by the wear
When Judge Rudkin retires from the state supreme bench The Seattle Republican rises to suggest that Governor Hay name Judge John F. Main of the King county superior court as his successor. Judge Main gives evidence of being possessed of equally as strong a legal mind as that of Judge Rudkin and the two men seem to work along similar lines. Judge Main is perhaps the hardest student of the entire superior court bench of Seattle and his opinions always show the care and precision he has run down every legal phase of the case. On the state supreme bench King county has but one member and in view of the fact that she has one-third of all the cases that that court is called upon to decide it seems that it would not be out of order to give her a larger representation on the bench.
5
ing of its parts it should become an infringement, is an infringement.
X-Ray Evidence
An entirely new use has been found for the X-ray machine, namely in acquiring evidence. The case was that of Browder versus Commonwealth, 123 Southwestern Reporter, 328. A Negro was on trial for shooting and killing a white man. He did not deny the shooting, but claimed he had shot in self-defense. The deceased after the shooting had a pistol. Defendant claimed that he had been shot in the breast by the decaased, which was the beginning of the difficulty. It would necessarily follow that if the defendant was shot, and if he could affirmatively prove it, then a case of self-defense would be clearly established. Accused moved for a continuance in order that he might be examined with the X-ray by a physician to show that he was snot in the breast and that the bullet had lodged in his back. The court on appeal held that defendant on return of the case might be taken from jail to an X-ray machine and examined; for this fact, if proved, would strengthen his testimony as to what occurred at the time of the homicide.
Bleached Flour Process Held Illegal
Shawnee Milling Company versus Temple, 179 Federal Reporter 517, is a suit in equity to restrain certain United States officials from seizing complainant's flour in interstate shipments under the national pure food law. The allegations are that the same is not harmful, but is more nutritious, wholesome, and attractive for making bread, and does not come under the ban of the pure food law. The flour was found to have been bleached by the agency of nitrogen peroxide gas under a patented process. The result is that new wheat and of an inferior quality is converted into flour with the appearance of flour from a better wheat that has been aged by time. Two processes are patented to produce this result, the Andrews and the Alsop. Under the Andrews the nitrogen peroxide gas is produced by combining nitric acid with a metallic compound. Under the Alsop it is produced by subjecting atmospheric air to a flaming electric arc. It is claimed by some that nitrogen peroxide is the agent for bleaching under both patents, while others claim that it is the ozone that does the effective work, while the nitrogen peroxide is a by-product when the ozone is thereby created. Whatever the truth as to what does the bleaching, it is both claimed and denied by chemists who ought to be able to agree that the flour is poisoned by such process. But if it is known that, after the air is thus subjected to continuons flaming electrical discharges, the resultant gas is conveyed by means of pipes to a compartment, and there is conningling with the flour agitated or in a cloud, and thus subjected to such treatment it becomes dry and white.—Scientific American.
EE EE
THOMAS P. REVELLE A CANDIDATE
Thomas P. Revelle, the man who beat Representa-
tive Humphrey nearly two to one in King county for
congress, and who has twice been elected a member
of the city council, is announcing his candidacy for
another nomination and election at the coming prim-
ary and general election in March. It was Tom Re-
velle that fathered the first public market in Seattle
that has proved to be such a saving to the citizens of
the whole city and community. Every man and wom-
an, who visits the public market, where they can buy
vegetables and hundreds of other necessities at quite
less than half what the same articles are sold for in
the various corner grocercies and stores, should be
ready and willing for that and for that alone to give
him their vote.
You and all of us know that it has been a God send
to the city and we should not hesitate to give honor to
those whom honor is due for the goods the gods pro-
vide. From time to time the vice advocates have
taken pleasure in trying to have a bit of fun at
Mr. Revelle’s expense for him having quit the minis-
terial work and gving into politics just as though the
political profession was one of highway robbery. As
a preacher he was upright and honest and as a politi-
cian he has likewise been honest and he defies the hu-
man being to point his finger to one questionable
act he has done since he was a member of the coun-
cil.
Because Mr. Humphrey accused him of being the
tool of the Seattle Electric Company in the city coun-
cil cost Mr. Humphrey the loss of King county; even
persons in the Seattle Electric Company, always ar-
dent supporters of Mr. Humphrey, worked against
him on account ot the villainous accusation. Mr. Re-
velle’s work on the investigation committee was thor-
ough and consistent, and though he was prevailed
upon by thousands of persons to at least temper the
final report of the committee so as to exonerate Gill
and his chief of police he unqualifiedly refused and
said he would make a report in keeping with the facts,
which had been told tothe committee. It is to be
hoped that Mr. Revelle will get the vote of every dec-
ent man and woman in the city in both elections.
“Are you an experienced avi-
ator?’’ ‘* Well, sir, I have been
at it six weeks and I am all here.”’
—Life,
Blabb—Why do large women so
often marry small men? Crabb—
They can’t intimidate the big ones,
—Boston Transcript.
“Has the doctor a large prac-
tice?’ ‘So large that when peo-
ple have nothing the matter with
them he tells theme so.’’—Pitts-
burg Post.
“Thrifty, is she?’? “Thrifty? I
won’t go into a long diseourse. I
merely tell you that she banks
money in December.’’—Washing-
ton Herald.
“Do you prefer beauty «or
brains?”’ ‘‘Does not the fact that
T have proposed to you repeatedly
prove that I prefer both ?’’"—Hons-
ton Post.
“Mamma, is a honeymoon a va-
eation?’’ ‘It may be, my dear;
and it may be the beginning of a
long period of _ servitude.’’—
Youngstown Telegram.
‘Was your chafing dish party a
success?’’? ‘‘Great.. We spoiled
all the food early in the evening
and then went. to a regular restau-
rant.’’—Washington Star.
«What kind of Christmas pres-
ents-does Balder give?”’? ‘‘Excel-
lent. Why, some of those he gave
ten years ago are still going the
rounds as bridge prizes.’’—Life.
ITEMS MORE OR LESS INTERESTING
‘What party does that member
of the legislature belong to?’’ “‘T
don’t know,”’ replied the lobbyist.
“T’m one of several parties who
are bidding for him.’’—Washing-
ton Star,
“Yes, it was George’s idea to
give me a silver spoon for every
birthday.’”’ ‘‘How many has he
given you?’ ‘Why, twenty-two.”
“Why did he stop?’’—Cleveland
Plain Dealer,
Carr-—That fellow, Motorton, is
a pretty decent sort, isn’t he?
Chugley—One in a thousand!
Why, he never allows his victims
to wait for an ambulance—always
utilizes his own ear.—Puck.
“I’m thinking of getting mar-
ried.’’ ‘‘Then you will be. Con-
gratulations.’’ ‘‘But how much
will it cost us to live?’’ ‘‘That’s
simple. Add about $5 a week to
what you get.’’—Cleveland Lead-
er,
Mr. Ghout—All my money ean
not give me health, doctor. Dr.
Bolus—No, perhaps not; but it is
of inestimable value nevertheless.
It gives your physician great con-
fidence.-New York Evening Post.
“Now, my boy, you say you do
not know what the head of a regi-
ment is called? Your papa is a
soldier, isn’t he?’? ‘Yes, ma’am.’’
“Well, who makes him mind?’’
‘‘Mamma.’’—Baltimore American.
“T am to meet the duke at the
dock.’’ ‘But he has never seen
Bae SRN ee ee ik ARI ERI i as Re EM TE SL NARS ch RAC BT
eee ‘ a ae * oo ce a au Oe
x
bet — . ‘ ni
oe nae :
RON aaa eas oe, é ‘ .
cS ae
coca hee
es ee me
i 4 pees oe ey i 5 i ve
F is a ate
i iN ce is a "
“ty Be a
on ee
ea 4 & eee beta. |
ene ; 2 ie oe 5 Baie.
a ee ‘s \
3 es ae \ Cae
pene eg a pr ;
THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN
you, girl.’”’ ‘‘For means of identi-
fication he is to wear a red carna-
tion and I am to carry $1,000,000
in my left hand.’’—Washington
Herald.
“How did you make your neigh-
bor keep his chickens in his own
yard??? “TI went out every night
and hid a bunch of eggs on my
lawn. Then I let him see me gath-
ering them in the morning.’’—
Cleveland Leader.
Mrs. Crawford—Your husband
seems to be a confirmed pessimist.
Mrs. Crabshaw—Indeed he is, my
dear. He isn’t satisfied with his
Christmas present even when he
buys it. himself.—Lippineott’s
Magazine.
“Tm going to wake ’em up
when Ivget into office,’’ said the
enthusiastic young politician.
“Well, son,’? replied Senator
Sorghum, ‘‘an alarm clock may
be useful, but. it isn’t very popu-
lar.’’—Washington Star.
“What is the difference be-
tween firmness and obstinacy???
asked a young lady of her finance,
‘*Pirmness,’ was his gallant re-
ply, ‘‘is a noble characteristic of
women; obstinacy is a lamentable
defect in men.’’—Stray Stories.
“Does your wife want to go to
the polls and vote?’’ ‘‘No, sir,’’
replied Mr. Meekton. ‘“‘If Hen-
rietta casts a vote it’ll be impor-
tant. enough to have the polls
brought around to the house
when she sends for ’em.’’—Wash-
ington Star.
Seymour—Young Ticor looks
like a cautious man. Ashley—He
is cautious. He’s so cautious that
he wouldn’t ask the prettiest girl
in all the world to let him see her
home unless he had learned how
far away she lived—Chicago
News.
Ruffon Wratz—Is they any-
thing in this yere socialism, d’ye
reckon? Saymold Story (having
had an unusually generous hand-
out)—Not fur us, ole scout.
We're gittin’ our share right
along, ’thout havin’ t’ work fur
it—Chieago Tribune.
“‘Look out, Hi,’? shouted the
farnier’s wife, as the big balloon
soared over the farm, with , the
trailing anchor. ‘‘Them thar ary-
naughts ‘will hook yeou up like
a fish if yeou don’t watch out.’’
“Gosh, Mandy!’’ gasped the old
farmer, as he dropped his rake.
“Yeou don’t think they’d try to
do sech a thing purposely, do
yeou?”? ‘‘Wouldn’t trust them,
Hi.. That tall chap looking down
here with the spyglass is one of
them thar Indiana. writer folks,
and he’s working on a book called
‘The Uplifting of the Farmer.’
Reeckon yeou better keep yeour
eye on that anchor.’’—Chicago
News.
FRIDAY January 20, 1911
“*You know Mrs. Van Gilder’s
family portrait gallery that she
started last year?’? ‘‘Yes.”?
“‘Well, that great criminal detec-
tive officer who guarded the wed-
ding presents when Frostie Van
Gilder married the oldest De
Graft boy told me that he recog-
nized seven of the portraits, and
they had all done time—whatever
that means.’’—Cleveland Plain
Dealer,
pep
‘What good does England’s great
navy do? It can not be used on
the suffragettes—Omaha Bee.
‘War news from Mexico brings
Diaz to notice not only as a great
general but as a very energetic
editor-in-chief—Washington Star.
INTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington for the County
of King. Summons,
W .R. Augustine, plaintiff, vs. Dora
Augustine, defendant—No. 78261.
‘The State of Washington, to said. Dora.
Augustine, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days from the date of the
first publication of this summons, that
is to say, within sixty days from the
20th day ‘of January, 1911, and defend
the above entitled action in the above
entitled court and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your
answer upon the undersigned attorney
for the plaintiff at his office below
stated; and in case of your failure so
to do, judgment will be rendered against
you according to the demands of said
complaint, which hag heretofore been
filed’ with’ the clerk of said court.
The object of said action is to obtain
an absolute divorce from the bond of
matrimony heretofore existing between
yourself and the said plaintiff, said
divorce being asked upon the ground of
abandonment,
LEOPOLD M. STERN,
Attorney for Plaintitr.
Office and postoffice address,
705 Lowman Building,
Seattle, Washington. :
Jan. 20—March 8, 1911.
FRIDAY, January 20, 1911
REPORT
of Condition of the
AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK & TRUST CO.
at the Close of Business
January 7, 1911.
Resources
Loans. $1,421,317.26
Overdrafts 5,038.20
Bonds and Warrants 310,166.17
Other Securities. 12,125.42
Bank Building 596,522.34
Other Real Estate 3,345.31
Furniture and Fixtures 10,576.37
Safe Deposit Vaults 17,440.29
Cash and Due from Banks. 532,007.15
$2,728,538.51
Liabilities
Capital. $ 200,000.00
Surplus and Undivided Profits 290,456.07
Deposits. 2,238,082.44
$2,728,538.51
OFFICERS
A. MURRAY, President
J. P. GLEASON, Manager
MICHAEL EARLES, Vice-President
J. C. FORD, Vice-President
M. MURRAY, Cashier
HARRY WELTY, Secretary
H. J. SCHAEFFER, Assistant Cas
THE MEN
"The special edition of The Seattle Republican, entitled "Building Seattle," was issued January 1, and every one who pronounce it one of the most attractive as well as instructive members ever published in the Northwest. Here are some of it are discussed therein:
OFFICERS
J. A. MURRAY, President
J. P. GLEASON, Manager
MICHAEL EARLES, Vice-President
J. C. FORD, Vice-President
M. M. MURRAY, Cashier
HARRY WELTY, Secretary
H. J. SCHAEFFER, Assistant Cashier
The special edition of The Seattle Republican, entitled, "Men Building Seattle," was issued January 1, and every one who has seen it pronounce it one of the most attractive as well as instructive holiday numbers ever published in the Northwest. Here are some of the subjects that are discussed therein:
The illustrations:
Birdseye View of Seattle
Thomas Burke (Drawing), Diplomat
James A. Moore, Builder and Promoter
Jacob Furth, Banker, Builder, Promoter
Reginald H. Thomson, City Engineer
James E. Chilberg, Banker and Promoter
E. G. Ames, Millman and Banker
427 Epler Bloo
427 Epler Block THE SEA
THE MEN BUILDING SEATTLE
The Seattle Spirit
Seattle's Really Big Things
Who Is Who In Seattle
The Seattle U. S. Assay Office
Seattle As Others See Her
Seattle, A Show Place
Opportunities In Seattle
Facts and Figures About Seattle
Banks in Seattle
Seeing Seattle
Lake Washington Canal
Why Seattle Grows
Curtiss Photographing the Indians
Seattle's Chamber of Commerce
Seattle, A Theatrical Center
Seattle's Manufacturing Outlook ...
Seattle and The Orient
Seattle's Pioneer Builders
Seattle, Where Sail Meets Rail
Duwamish Waterway
Anti-Tuberculosis Work in Seattle
Seattle's Public Schools
Your friends in the other sections of the country could get a splendid insight into the real facts about Seattle if you send them a copy of this number. It will be delivered to you neatly enclosed in an envelope ready for mailing, and its costs FOUR CENTS to take it to its destination.
THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN
421,317.26
5,038.20
310,166.17
12,125.42
596,522.34
3,345.31
10,576.37
17,440.29
532,007.15
728,538.51
200,000.00
290,456.07
238,082.44
728,538.51
Assistant Cashier
EN BUILDING
Polican, entitled, "Men
every one who has seen
as instructive holiday
are some of the subjects
Horace
James
Cornel
John
Rev.
Mount
James
Chest
Charl
Frank
Ed. S
William
Samu
Louis
Edward
John
Elbert
James
Louis
John
James
Rudol
Anti-
William
Claud
Freder
Denny
John
The W
Your friend
did insight into
of this number
envelope ready
its destination
THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN
STATEMENT OF THE STATE BANK OF SEATTLE
Seattle, Washington, January 7, 1911
Resources
Loans and discounts..... $ 784,368.00
Banking house, furniture and fixtures..... 12,500.00
Other resources..... 1,500.00
U. S. and other high-grade bonds. $190,045.18
Warrants. ..... 8,590.05
Cash on hand and due from other
banks ..... 249,223.83— 447,859.06
$1,246,227.06
Liabilities
Capital stock paid in.....$ 100,000.00
Surplus and undivided profits.....15,063.60
Deposits.....1,131,163.46
$1,246,227.06
$1,246,227.06
es
$ 100,000.00
15,063.60
1,131,163.46
$1,246,227.06
Account.
We Invite Your Account.
OFFICERS
E. L. GRONDAHL, President
John ERIKSON, Vice President
A. H. SOELBERG, Vice President and Cashier
A. C. KAHLKE, Assistant Cashier
NG SEATTLE
---
Horace P. Strickland, Manufacturer and Builder
James D. Lowman, President Chamber Commerce
Cornelius H. Hanford, Federal Judge and Historian
John Lockwood Wilson, Journalist
Rev. Mark A. Mathews, Presbyterian Divine
Mount Rainier and Lake Washington
James W. Maxwell, President Commercial Club
Chester F. White, Millman and Builder
Charles H. Frye, Packing House King
Frank McDermott, Merchant Prince
Ed. S. Curtiss, Photographer and Historian
William Pigott, Manufacturer and Builder
Samuel Hill, Builder and Promoter
Louis Hemrich, Brewer and Builder
Edward W. Andrews, Banker
John W. Considine, Theatrical Magnate
Elbert F. Blaine, Builder and Promoter
James D. Hoge, Banker and Builder
Louis H. Gray, Steamship Magnate
John C. C. Eden, Manufacturer and Promoter
James P. Gleason, Banker and Builder
Rudolph G. H. Nordhoff, Merchant and Builder
Anti-Tuberculosis Office
William P. Trimble, Builder
Claude C. Ramsey, Builder and Promoter
Frederic Carl Struve, Banker
Denny Clay Factory
John Cort, Theatrical Magnate
The Walker Building
our friends in the other sections of the country could get a splice right into the real facts about Seattle if you send them a copy number. It will be delivered to you neatly enclosed in the ready for mailing, and its costs FOUR CENTS to take it on theination.
country could get a splen e if you send them a copy you neatly enclosed in an OUR CENTS to take it to Telephone Main 305
---
---
7
8
State of Washington, in and for the County of King, Sixty Day Summons. John Richard Hope, plaintiff, vs. Florence K. Hope, defendant.—No. 77914. The State of Washington, to Florence K. Hope, above defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 6th day of January, 1911, in the above entitled action in the above entitled complaint answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court.
In the foregoing action the plaintiff seeks to obtain an absolute decree of divorce from the defendant upon the ground of adultery.
ground or admittance
REVELLE, REVELLE & REVELLE,
Attorneys for Plaintiff.
Office and postoffice address:
605-8 New York Block, Seattle,
King County, Washington.
Jan. 6—Feb. 17, 1911.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King County.
In Probate. Notice to Creditors.
In the Matter of the Estate of Samuel Hammett, deceased.—No. 12263.
To Whom It May Concur.
Early May 1917 having been duly appointed by the above entitled court as administratrix of the estate of said Samuel Hammett, deceased, and said court having duly made an order directing notice to creditors herein, now, therefore, notice is hereby given to persons having claims against said Samuel Hammett, to present said claims, with the necessary touchers, to the undersigned administratrix on or before one year from the date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit, on or before one year from the 6th day of January, 1911, at room 45 Star-Boyd Bldg., Seattle, Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of the business of said estate, or such claims will be barred by law.
EMILY A. HAMNETT,
As Administratrix of the Estate of
Date of first publication January 6th, 1911.
Jan. 6—Feb. 3. 1911.
NOTICE OF DISSOLUTION.
Notice is hereby given that the partnership existing between Anton Aagaard and Scott I. Wallace for the manufacture of Aagaards Waterproof and Leather Preservative has this day been dissolved and that Anton Aagaard assumed and agreed to pay all accounts against said partnership, said partnership having appeared under the name of the AAGAARD MANUFACTURING CO. The undersigned will not be responsible for any indebtedness incurred in the name of the above company hereafter. Dated Dec. 8th, 1908. SCOTT I. WALLACE. Dec. 9—Dec. 30, 1910.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Grote-Rankin Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. D. C. Brownell and F. W. Winters, doing business as Hotel Corlew, and Mrs. Gertrude Corlew and John Doe Corlew, her husband, whose true Christian name is unknown, Defendants. No. —. Summons by Pub-
The State of Washington. To the defenders, Mrs. Gertrude Corlew and John Doe Corlew, her husband, whose true Christian name is unknown, Desi-
You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 23rd day of December, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and waive the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a notice on answer to the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to recover the possession of certain goods, wares and merchandise sold by the plaintiff and defer all other contracts under he conditional sale contract on which there is a balance due of $595.75, together with interest at the legal rate from the 7th day of October, 1910, or the value of said goods, if same can not be returned, and that the plaintiff has had issued out of this cause and court a writ of attachment and has levied in certain property of the defendants in this county, to-wit: (5), in Block Three (6) of C. P. Stone's Home Addition to the city of Seattle.
F. J. CARVER & JOHN SLATTERY,
Attorneys for Plaintiff.
314 Northern Bank & Trust Building,
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King County.
A. Biswanger Plaintiff, vs. W. T. Gaffer,
and all persons unknown, if any,
having or claiming an interest in and
to the hereinafter described real property,
Defendants. No. —. Notice
and Summons.
State of Washington: To the above defenders and each of them:
You and each of you, as owners, claiman-
d holders of an interest or estate
in and to the hereinafter described real
property, are hereby notified that the
above named plaintiff is the holder of a
certain delinquent tax certificate issued
by the Treasurer of King County, State
Washington, dated the 25th day
October, 1910, and numbered as follows,
for the delinquent taxes of the following
year, following amount, and
the real property situated in said
King County, described as follows, to-wit:
Bothell's 1 Add. to Bothell, lot 1,
block 1, certificate number B-67341, year
1904 to 1907 $4.63, 1908 $2.50.
That the taxes for the following prior
and subsequent years have been paid by
the plaintiff will be. The said above de-
scribed property to-wit:
Lot 11, block 1, Bothell's 1st Add. to Bothell, amount $2.62, year 1909. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against the property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby
further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication being December 23rd, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of you ranswer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office, stated, or pay and bound together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and Court.
A. BISWANGER, Plaintiff.
W. M. C. KEITH.
Dec. 23, 1910—Feb. 3, 1911.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, STATE of Washington, in and for the County of King.
Henry Store Coon, Plaintiff, vs. Ida N. Coon, Defendant. No. 77713. Summons for Publication.
The State of Washington, to the said Ida N. Coon, Defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this Summons, toowit: within sixty (60) days after the 23rd day of December, 1910, and defend the above entitled action in the above court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for Plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court.
The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the Defendant, upon the following grounds:
Because the Defendant, without Plaintiff's fault, has been guilty of personal indignities to such an extent as to render Plaintiff's life burdensome; said personal indignities consisting of frequent quarrels upon the part of the Defendant towards the Plaintiff and also that the defendant frequently and often called plaintiff bad and vile names, abused him and threw dishes at him and threw dishs around him and broke them and tried in every way possible to make life unpleasant for plaintiff.
A. J. SPECKERT,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
P. O. Address: Fourth Ave., Between Pike and Pine Streets, Second Floor Stevens Academy, Seattle, Washington.
Dec. 23, 1910—Feb. 3, 1911.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun-
tv. Summons by bishop John
Mary Minnery, plaintiff, vs. Thomas A. Murphy, defendant—No. 75150.
The State of Washington, to Thomas A. Murphy, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 16th day of December, A. D. 1910, and defend the A.D. law, the aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff; in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer of plaintiff's complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court.
The objectman of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce from you on the grounds of desertion and failure to support plaintiff, and for habitual drunkenness.
EDWARD BARCLIN,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
29 Scheureman Building, Seattle,
King County, Washington.
Dec. 16, 1910—Jan. 27, 1911.
Notice is hereby given that there will be a meeting of the stock-holders of the Savings Investment Association, a corporation, on the 4th day of February, 1911, at 1:30 o'clock p. m., at No. 809 Fifth Avenue, for the purpose of considering the question of increasing the capital stock of said corporation from $25,000.00 to $50,000.00 for the transaction of such business connected with said increase as may properly come before said meeting.
Dated December 7, 1910.
EVELYN H. HALL,
HARRIETT M. BISHOP,
ANNY M. BROWN,
RUTH FLAGLES,
ELIZABETH MAHONEY,
ADELAIDE POLLOCK,
JOSEPHINE I. ATWOOD.
Dec. 9, 1910—Jan. 28, 1911.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication.
Ben Huber, plaintiff, vs. Sina M. Adams, the Empire State Surety Co., John A. Ames and L. G. Heinz, defendants.—No. 7872
The State of Washington to the said defendant Sina M. Adams:
You are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days the above entitled court, 104 defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at the address below stated and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the order of the complaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of this court.
The object of said action, as set forth in the complaint, is to foreclose those two certain mortgages heretofore given by you, the first one executed and delivered on the 18th day of May, 1909, to secure the sum of $400.00 with interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from said date until paid, and the second one dated July 30, 1910, to secure a note for the sum of $400.00 with interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from said date until paid, and to recover judgment for said debt, and to an attorney's fee of $100.00 and both of said mortgages being on the following described real property in King County, Washington, to-wit:
Lot 13, block 12, Gilman Park, as per map recorded in Vol. 3 of plats, page 40 records in the auditor's office of King County, Washington, to-wit, and to foreclose and determine all the right title and interest of the said defendants, and each and all of them, in and to said property.
EDWARD VON TOBEL
Attorney for Plaintiff
Office and postoffice address
Rooms 604-5, Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington.
Dec. 16, 1910—Jan. 27, 1811
THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King t County. Summons by Publication. Oscar E. Jensen & Co., Inc., plaintiff, vs. a Fred B. Jewell and Emma J. Fair, de
Fred B. Jowell and Emma J. Fair, defendants. No.
Tennessee to Washington to Fred B.
The State of Washington to Fred B. Jewell and Emma J. Fair, defendants: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first session of this session within sixty and the 13th day of January, 1911, and defend the above entitle. I action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filled with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to foreclose a chattel mortgage on a white mare known as "Babe," a $ sorrel horse known as "Dick," and two deliveries of cattle. JOHN SLATTERY
F. J. CARVER and JOHN SLATERY,
Attorneys for Plaintiff.
314-15-16 Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg., Corner Pike and Westlake, Seattle, King County, Washington, Jan. 1—Feb. 24, 1911.
IN THE SUPERIOR CORT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. 60 Day Summons. Ella Von Wasmer, plaintiff, vs. J. D. Hendricks, sometimes known as and Minnie Hendricks, his wife; and Joe Slatton and Jane Doe Slatton, his wife, and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, Hen or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, and also any and all unknown heirs of the said defendants above named, defendants—No. 7993.
The State of Washington, to the above named defendants, J. D. Hendricks, sometimes known as and written John D. Hendricks, and Minnie Hendricks, his wife, and Joe Slatton and Jane Doe Slatton, and Joe Slatton, also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein, and also any and all unknown heirs of the said defendants above named:
You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after date of first publication of this summons to-wit, within sixty (60) days after date of death of Maxine 1911 and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the company which has been filled with the clerk of said court.
ostoffo address:
605-608 New York Block,
Seattle, Washington.
Jan. 13—Feb. 24, 1911.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King County.
Notice to Creditors.
In the Matter of the Estate of J. A.
Burkholder, deceased.—No. 11797.
By order of said court made herein
on the 7th day of December, 1910, notice
is hereby given to the creditors of, and
persons being taken claims against
deceased in the against said estate or
against the community estate of said
deceased and Hallie Burkholder, to present
them with the necessary vouchers to
the undersigned executrix of said estate,
at 311, Northern Bank Trust
Bldg., Seattle, Washington, the place
of business of said estate, in Seattle,
in said county and state, within one year
from and after the date of first publication
of this notice or same will be barred.
Date of first publication December 9,
Attorney for Estate.
314 Northern Bank & Trust Bldg.
Dec. 9. 1910—Jan. 7. 1911
Seattle. Wash.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Order to show cause why distribution should not be made, fixing time for hearing final account and giving notice thereof.
In the Matter of the Estate of Fred Scholpp, deceased.—No. 10793, Louise Scholpp, the executrix of the estate of Fred Scholpp deceased, having this day rendered and filed in this court her final account as executrix of said estate and her petition for distribution setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution;
And it appearing that the facts set forth are sufficient to authorize the distribution of said estate,
It is now ordered that Monday, the 13th day of February, 1911, at 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day be, and the same is, hereby appointed as the time for hearing and settlement of said estate, and petition for distribution in the court room of the Probate Department of said court in the King County Court House in the city of Seattle. In said county.
It is ordered that all persons interested in said estate appear before said court at said time and place then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be approved and why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the devisees mentioned in the will of the deceased.
It is further ordered that notice of the time and place of hearing said final account and petition for distribution be given by posting a copy of this order in three of the most public places in King County, Washington, at least four weeks before said 13th day of February, 1911, and further that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before said 13th day of February, 1911. In the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in King County, and of general circulation therein.
by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: 1. 027, block 1, Davis improved addition to lot of Seattle, amount $1.07, for year 1807. Which several sums year interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from sale of payment, and are all the apartments taxes upon and against said real property.
You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, the value of the war of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days of December 30th, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest in the case, fail so to do, judgment will be condemned therefore closing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the sums charged and found against it, the sums provided by law, and as praised in plaintiffs' complaint, now on file in this cause and court.
AURORA LAND COMPANY, A CORPORATION, Plaintiff.
F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff.
Office address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Building.
Dec. 30, 1910—Feb. 14, 1911.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors.
In the Matter of the Estate of John J.
Blaine deceased-No. 12213
By order of said court made herein on the 21st day of December, 1910. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at room No. 214 Alaska Building, Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred.
Date of first publication December 30, 1910.
E. L. BLAINE,
As Administrator of said Estate.
J. H. TEMPLETON,
Attorney for Estate.
No. 16 Starr-Boyd Building,
Seattle, Washington.
Dec. 30, 1910—Jan. 27, 1911.
NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND STOCK-HOLDERS OF CANNEL COAL CO. OF WASHINGTON.
To the creditors and stockholders of the Cannel Coal Company of Washington, a corporation:
You, and each of you, will please take notice that on Saturday, the 18th of March, 1911, at the office of sold Company, No. 314 Colman Building, in the City of Seattle, Washington, at the hour of 2 o'clock P. M., or as soon thereafter as sold matter may be taken up, there will be held a meeting of theannel Coal Company of Washington, for the object and purpose of buying the capital stock of sold Cannel Coal Company of Washington, a corporation, from five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000), which is its present capitalization, to the amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). You are hereby notified to be present at such meeting both upon said subject or present such objections as you may have to any such reduction of capital stock aforesaid.
Dated at Seattle, King County, Washington, this 7th day of January, 1911.
D. B. TREFETHEN,
ANDREW KENNEDY,
LORI NEFEAD,
Majority of Board of Trustees of Cannel Coal Company, Washington.
Jan. 13—March 10, 1911
Preparing bodies for shipment specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13
ALBERT HANSEN.
Eyes Carefully Examined and
Properly Fitted With Glasses.
Phone, Main 268. Seattle Washington
People's Savings Bank.
Edward C. Neufelder, Prest.
R J. Reekle, Vice Prest.
Joe Prest, Cashier
Incorporated Dec. 19th, 1889.
Commercial Savings and Trust
General Bank and Exchange.
Cor. Second and Pike St. Seattle, Wash.
Rainier PALE
A Free Trip to Seattle and Return.
Let's Bust the State Dental Trust.
Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar and the State Dental Memorial will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established at 713 First Ave., in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete with cheap dentists, but with the high-class dentists for half their price. Open evenings until 8 and Sundays until 4 for people who work.
EDWIN J. BROWN, D.D.S.
713 First Avenue
Seattle, Wash.
Read my article in Sunday's P-I and Monday's Times and Star.
The court now finds and adjudges that the posting and publishing of this order, as above set forth, is a proper and adequate notice in the premises. Done in open court.this 11th day of January, 1911.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King County.
Notice and Summons.
Aurora Land Company, a corporation,
plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all
persons, if any, having or claiming an
interest in and to the hereinafter described
real property, defendants.—
No. State of Washington to the above de-
dentents and each of them:
You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the infidle of the State of Washington, issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in and holding County, described as follows; tow:
Davis improved addition, to the City of Seattle, lot 22, block 1, certificate No. B55361, year 1906, amount $0.76.
That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit:
Lot 22, block 1, Davis improved addition to the City of Seattle, amount $1.24, for year 1907.
While the total sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and, unredeemed taxxs upon and against said real property.
You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, with within 60 days after December 30th, 1910, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at this office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case, the amount due will be tendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums and amounts due upon it, especially as provided by law, and as prayed for in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court.
AURORA LAND COMPANY, A CORPORATION.
F. J. CARVER,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Office address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Building.
Dec. 30, 1910—Feb. 14, 1911.
IN THE SUPERJOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons.
Aurora Land Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herelafter described real property, defendants.
State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them:
You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County. Issue of Washington dated the 1st day of June, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Davis improved addition to the City of Seattle lot year block 2, certificate No. B5544 dated 1908 and amount $0.94. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said described real property, to-wit: Lot 1, block 2, Davis improved addition to the City of Seattle, amount $1.43, for year 1907. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said delinquent taxes, and are till the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property.
You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after December 30, 1910, in the above attendant court and in the complaint of said answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with in trests and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs ordering property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court.
AURORA LAND COMPANY, A CORPORATION, Plaintiff.
F. J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff.
Office address: Northern Bank & Trust Co. Building.
Dec. 30, 1910—Feb. 14, 1911.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons.
Aurora Land Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defense—State of Washington to the above defendants and each of them:
You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, descrive as follows to-wit: Davis' improved addit to the City of Seattle, lot 27, block 1, certificate No. B55366, year 1906, amount $0.77. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid
FRIDAY January 20, 1911
Bonnev-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS
First and Cherry.
Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar the dental work will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices are in the First Ave, in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete