Seattle Republican

Historical Society The Seattle Republican Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE PUBLISHER'S NOTICE. The Seattle Republican is published on Friday of every week by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3.00 per year; six months, $1.50; postage prepaid. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. Publication office, 427 Epler Block. Telephone Main 305. HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON, - Publisher. SUSIE REVELS CAYTON, - Associate. HONESTY THE BEST POLICY. There are those who do not take much stock in the above caption so far as getting the money is concerned and instead of thinking and acting along the line of honesty the best policy they rather seem to advocate, get the money, it matters not how you get it just so you get it, and let the consequence be what they will or may. Many who work on this principle often accumulate vast fortunes, may, perhaps some of them retain it to their dying days, and their souls go to the God who gave it with a guilty conscience, and there suffer a thousand times more than any punishment that could be inflicted upon them by their fellow men, but as to that we are unable to say, we, however, do know that the most of the dollars dishonestly gotten in this life sooner or later bring trouble, dishonor and often prison confinement to the getters. We do not, dear reader, mean in this connection to try to preach you a sermon nor to try to plsy the roll of a mollpcoddle, but we do mean to tell you of a few things that have transpired in an about Seattle within the past month among some of the leading and influential men that will convert you to the theory of, "honesty is the best policy." Recently Charles Hyram Gill was recalled as mayor of Seattle and retired to private life with his political career in the state of Washington absolutely ruined. We do not propose to say to you that Mayor Gill shared in any of the ilgotten gains that were taken by the go betweenens of his adminstration, and yet he did not act on the principle of, honesty is the best policy, because he promised before he was elected, under no circumstances would he permit wide open gambling. He was elected and instead of living up to his promise gambling opened up the very day he was inaugurated, Mayor Gill was not honest to himself and he deceived the voters and as a result, he is now in political disgrace. It looked for a long time that there would be no retribution, but there was and terrible was its blow. Charles W. Wappenstein who the past four Saturday mornings has had to occupy a seat in criminal row in the superior court, has for many years been a conspicuous figure in the affairs of Seattle. He did not wholly run the town, but he made a big bold stagger in that direction, and to defy the wishes of Mr. Wappenstein meant your undoing unless you stood almost at the top. Time and time again he has been accused of official grafting and that too on a wholesale plan, but no one could be found to make a move to bring him to justice, if guilty. Time moved on and whether moved by selfish and sinister motives or for purifying the community we are unable to answer, but the alleged facts were laid before the grand jury by some one for some cause and after weeks of investigation the once powerful Wappenstein was legally indicted and will have to spend all he is alleged to have gotten to save himself from a prison cell, and even if not guilty then he will have to spend, what he has honestly earned to save his pacon. We do not propose to try Mr. Wappenstein in the columns of this paper, but if he is not guilty then he has had some awfully bad associates and old dog tray has been caught in bad company. We would prefer to have lived the life of a simple farmer boy and ended all in peace' than to have had his power and in the end under go the ordeal that he now is. Mr. Wappenstein may and verily does argue that he has been honest, but public sentiment does not agree with him, but had he lived so as to have the public agree with him that his has been SEATTLE. WASHINGTON. FRIDAY. APRIL 21, 1911 a life of pure motives, he would not now be found in criminal row in a court of justice. Recently a number of civil service clerks in the employ of the government were arrested on a charge of raising the price of articles purchased for the government. They had gone about the business systematically, and they evidently thought themselves immune from detection. If reports be true their peculations have covered many years and the government has lost something like a half million dollars thereby, but they were detected and now they are all facing long terms in the penitentiary for their misdeeds. Even if they are found not guilty they will never again hold government positions and their careers have to an extent been badly blighted. It is alleged that they lived like millionaires and the most of the money has gone down the stream of Come Easy, Go Easy, and whatever is left it will take the most of it to pay the expenses of their trials. With men of the superior qualifications these men must be, who will deny that, so far as they are personally concerned, honesty would have been the best policy? Seattle may have had more powerful political bosses than Frank and John Clancy for short periods of time, but there is one thing certain she has never had two political bosses that have held the reins of government so long as have they. Those brothers have named city, county and even state officials for the past twenty-five years and the Republican or Democrat in King county, who aspired to office, and did not make his peace with the Clancy brothers did not stand much show of ever being elected to any kind of office. It is verily said that even Prosecuting Attorney John F. Murphy made his peace with that political diumvirate before the election, and while he may not have promised to become subservient to their wishes, yet it is said, he promised to give them some consideration, but whether any overtures at all were made, certain it is that one of the Clancy brothers was enthusiastically for Murphy while the other was for another man. These men have been accused for the past twenty odd years of being red handed criminals and who ran the lower end of Seattle for selfish gains. Elections in the First ward were mere farces as the ward went as they wanted it regardless of the election laws. They had a long run for their money, but last Saturday the two men stood as meek as lambs while the prosecuting attorney charged them with running a gambling game, which under the law is a felony. They may not go to the penitentiary, but they will come pretty near it. The same amount of energy and effort that they have used to control the First ward, if put into legitimate business channels would have doubtless many years ago made of them millionaires and they would have been honorable and useful men to the community. But why longer drawl this lecture out for as in the above cases so with the most persons who strive to live by their wits instead of by their manliness. Its a long lane without a turn and sooner or later not a guilty one will escape. Hundreds of persons die rich, who should die poor, but on the other hand thousands of persons die in disgrace who should have died respected citizens and all because they got, what they had at the time of their deaths, dishonestly. THOUGHTS FROM THE COUNTRY PRESS. The Davenport Tribune is responsible for the story of a farmer, "that walked 521 miles to plant his eighty acres of wheat. He sold the wheat and moved to town and has walked 900 miles trying to find a job and is still walking." It is not always so bad as that, but you can rest assured that it is bad enough. It is argued that farmers have to bear the greater part of the expenses of running the government and to make the greater part of the produce, from which the trusts horde up millions of idle dollars, and the farmer himself having realized this has left the country and moved to the city. Whether that or something else is responsible for the men and women living comfortably on farms moving to the city, we verily doeth not know, but something is responsible for it and whatever that something is it shonld be remedied. LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 ublican VOLUME XVII. NUMBER 47 In commenting upon the proposed candidacy of Howard Taylor for governor to succeed M.E. Hay the Willapa Harbor Pilot says, "Whether it will be Howard Taylor or some other good man we do not know, but we do know that Pacific county has had quite enough of the czar like rules of the Wilbur grocer. "You may not like the man now in the gubernatorial chair of the State of Washington, but, to a man up a tree, it looks as if he will come pretty nearly succeeding himself, though some other good man may give him a strong run for his money The Yakima Independent quotes Champ Clark to the effect, "He serves his party best, who serves his country best," and adds, this may go down in history by the side of Cleveland's, "a public office is a public trust," all of which may be true, but even then it would mean very little. Champ Clark is by no means trying to serve his country best now, but he is trying to make capital, which can be used to the advantage of electing him or some other Democrat president of the United States next year. We had alwas been under the impression that the Standard Oil Company was a very powerful institution, but we had never thought it so powerful as is indicated by the Olympia Chronicle, when it says, "The Standard Oil Company is preparing to make Centralia its distributing point for southwest points." To distribute its goods from Centralia should be a very easy matter, but to make Centralia do so nolens volens would seem to be a pretty big undertaking for even Standard Oil Johnny. It is learned from the Lincoln County Times that, "something like forty per cent. of the population of Lincoln county live in the towns," which seems to be quite a disappointment to the editor of the Times. Just what practically half of the residents of any agricultural county could find to do in the towns of such county is the burning question all over the United States just now. "What fools we mortals be." In a spirit of complaint the Sun of Sunnyside says, "any town that does not adequately support its local press is short sighted and lacking in public spirit." Does the Sun advocate such policy because it needs the money for its coffers or does it do so because it merits the support of the residents of that town? It often happens that those who do the least to merit support scold the most for not getting it. It remained for the Brewster Herald to be the only paper of the state to editorially declare, "State Land Commissioner Ross is an angel without wings, and all that has been said against him was said in a spirit of malace and trying to blacken the good reputation and character of this angel without wings." How much did you get for the article Mr. Editor? Was it in cash or in patronage? From the Sumas News the following significant paragraph is clipped: "Where crops never fail and the cow is queen, Sumas." Its news to us to learn that Sumas ever raised anything except hadese Saturday nights and that she even had enough cows to furnish milk for the little berg that the News is doing so much hollering about these days. If what the Buckley Banner says concerning the school teachers of North Yakima be true, we must agree with it, "cupid has been doing a most marvelous stunt over there as twenty of the shemale teachers are to resign next June for the purpose of getting married." Wonder if this is another instance of fools rush in where angels dare not tread? We had always understood the Aberdeen Herald was a moss back Democratic sheet, and yet in its last issue it declared, "Theodore Roosevelt stimulates good citizenship." Surely, surely, "the world do move," when a Democrat is moved to say a Republican stimulates anything looking to the good of the country. Of course Joe Folk of Missouri believes a Democrat will win the next presidential election because he is planning to be that lucky Democrat and the office seeker has never been found but that believed the people were always with him. 2 PERSONS TALKED ABOUT. CHARLES S. REED, superintendent of the state prison at Walla Walla, has gone to India to look into the jute industry, with a view of using it more extensively at the penitentiary to make grain bags for the farmers of the state. As a prison reformer Charley Reed has few equals in the United States. Persons of ten years residence in Seattle remember him well, as a member of the police force, and C. S. REED. finally when he was chief of the police, and while his conduct on the force was excellent, yet it never occurred to anyone that he had the stuff in him that he has subsequently developed. He developed the wonderful talent he seems to now possess, the taming of the unruly, while superintendent of the state reform school at Chehalis. So successful was he in taming the boys and girls sent to that institution that he soon had it changed from a reformatory to an industrial institution and it can be said without fear of successful contradiction that few institutions of the country, where the parents of the children are paying regular tuition for them, that are doing any better industrial work than the Chehalis industrial reformatory. Be it said to the everlasting credit of Charley Reed that he built the foundation for the good work that is going on there now and his good work there resulted in the legislature building a maturity industrial reformatory at Monroe. He has taken his prison reformation ideas to the walls of Walla Walla, behind which so many of the hardened criminals of the country now rests, and he is accomplishing wonderful results there. The paroling system now generally practiced in the state is due largely to his work among prisoners. It is hoped that he will find what he wants in India and on his return not only be able to give lucrative employment to the prisoners, but his idea prove a source of industrial revenue to the whole Northwest. In his prison evolution it is hoped that he will see his way clear to advocate that the state put prisoners at remunerative employment and the excess of their earnings above what it takes to maintain them be sent to the families of the prisoners or be held on deposit until such time as they are discharged and thereby start them on a new life with a dollar in hand. It is always the family of the prisoner that suffers on account of his absence and the men should be made to do a sufficient amount of remunerative work to partially maintain them while in prison. TOM MURPHINE, who loomed into political prominence in the Poindexter senatorial campaign, is said to be a candidate for something that will guarantee him a regular salary. It is ever thus with the man who seeks to get at the head of the political affairs, he simply does so for the purpose of feathering his own nest. Prior to the election he tells the dear people he is striving to protect their interest and if they will but vote for the man he is advocating they will no longer suffer from graft, extortion and all of short comings of the other fellows. His man is elected and then it immediately transpires that he himself means to protect the dear people by rooting the other fellow out and stepping into his shoes. The average reformer is a reformer for no higher aim and purposes than to work himself into a place where he can soon fall into the same old ruts as the fellow he rooted out. Its another case of, "I move to Jack's shop and Jack moves to mine." Gov. M. E. HAY is making up his political slate and in doing so he is not overlooking those men who have stood by him in the past. He has refused to call an extra session of the legislature because it was not pleasing to the wishes of those he politically trains with, especially in legislative matters. "In my opinion Hay has the call on the Republican gubernatorial election and I feel almost sure of it, if he can get the P. I. for him. However, I am told, the Governor does not stand so well at the P. I. editorial office as he would like to, as the editor of that paper is seldom ever in to the governor. Should the P. I. change hands the well laid plans of the governor will to an extent be upset as Hearst would make the paper an independent publication. With even the most of the daily papers of the state against Gov. Hay he would still have a fairly good show of capturing the nomination," said a well known politician. WILLIAM WALLACE CHAPIN, business manager of the Post-Intelligencer, has gone East and persistent rumor has it, for the purpose of conferring with former Senator John L. Wilson, the real owner of the paper, as to the advisability of selling the same to William R. Hearst who says, if he cannot buy the P. I. he will start a rival morning paper. It is said among the wise ones of the city that Hearst has offered $750,000 for the paper and the owners are holding out for a round million and all in cash. If the deal goes through it will doubtless be pulled off during the next week. Senator Wilson and Mr. Chapin own the entire stock and it is said Senator Wilson owns 72 per cent. while Mr. Chapin owns 28 per cent. Senator Wilson gave $325,000 for the paper some ten years ago. THOMAS A. PARRISH's name has been very persistently mentioned in connection with the Republican gubernatorial nomination, and while The Seattle Republican does not speak authoratively, yet it feels certain, from what Mr. Parrish has said to the editor hereof, that he under no circumstances will seek the nomination and especially so if Governor Hay is a candidate. Mr. Parrish is quite popular in King county on account of the record he made as county assessor and should he be a candidate he would get a big vote in the county. F. W. GRANT, who has been looked upon more in the light of an obstructionist than a constructionist and builder, is no longer superintendent of buildings in Seattle and there is no body sorry for the change except Grant. Chronick Kickers should avoid taking positions where the general public is to be dealt with because if they do the public will soon find out that they are, so far as the public is concerned, damphools, and those troubled with that weakness should try to hide it ratper than advertise it. RICHARD A. HUTCHINSON the Spokane Capitalist and politician who recently purchased a valuable piece of income property in Seattle, is talking of moving his home to Seattle where he is very heavily interested in reality holding. At present he has four pieces of in come property in Seattle easily worth $250,000 and if he decides to move his family here he will doubtless build a $100,000 home in which to reside. He is one of Eastern Washingtons big reality owners in both wheat lands and city property. ANGELO V. FAWCETT, Mayor of Tacoma, after a fierce recall battle went down for the count last Tuesday and W. W. Seymour was elected. Mayor Fawcett has been a contending factor in the politics of Tacoma for many years and he has repeatedly tried to break into state politics with no success, but it looks now as if his last bout with the political game will hold him for a while if not for all time to come. He has belonged to every political party. JOSEPH W. FOLK, a former governor of Missouri, lectured and spoke in Seattle a number of times within the past week and at most places he drew a fair sized audience. He is a Missouri political reformer and since he has retired from the gubernatorial chair he has lectured all over the country for so much per. In other words he played the reform act in Missouri and now he is charging the people for having done so. BEN H. MORGAN, twice elected a member of the house of representatives of the Washington legislature from Snohomish county has just returned from a two year stay in Mexico, where he and others are interested in realty investments. On account of the revolution now in operation down there the Americans sojourning in the country are taking a vacation. JUDGE BEN B. LINDSAY, of Denver, Colorado, has been a guest of the city for the past week and while here has repeatedly spoken on what to do with the bad boys. He was for many years judge of one of the courts of Denver and is quite an authority on the handling of so called unruly children that fall into the clutches of the law. The illness of Foreman Corliss of the King county grand jury may be painful to him, but it is balm of gillead to the members of the Uneasy Club. Driving the dual telephone system out of Seattle sounds good, but it means a telephone trust and for which the people will have to pay very heavily. Prayers in future are to be printed in the congressional record. If they are to take the place of Humphrey's subsidy speeches the public will be greatly relieved. It begins to look as if the Democrats are going to pass President Tafts Canadian reciprocity bill and thereby make the first move toward the presidential chair. In ordering an investigation of the department of justice congress must have a bunch that justice is a misnomer for the legal department of the government. Harvard College has a blcak man for the white man's hope, which might lead the student of nature to suspect, Harvard will emerge from the scrimage a complete black and tan. FRIDAY. April 21. 1911 VALUE OF A WOMAN'S HEART. What is the value of a woman's heart? What balm may be applied to wounded feelings of a tender soul who discovers suddenly that she is not as much engaged as she thought she was? Ten thousand dollars is the current market quotations on heart balm, as disclosed by two verdicts for that amount rendered by sympathetic jurors in New York this week. In the first case, that of Miss Henriett a French, a South Dacotah girl, who sued David H. Decker, Jr., a civil engineer of this city, for breach of promise of marriage. Justice Erlanger announced that he would entertain a motion to set the verdict aside as excessive: But when we consider that the young women, who must possess at least normal intelligence, had to receive and answer letters beginning "My ownty donty darlingest, sweet honey bunchums," we may not agree with the view of the learned court. The other blighted young woman is Miss Fanny Libenau, to whom a jury in the city court awarded $10,000 for injuries to her affections inflicted by Joseph Krauss. The question of whether or not Miss Bertha Grunspan, who is suing the millionaire, William English Walling, for $100,000 for a similar wound to her heart and hopes will receive a large financial poulice, is still to be determined by the jury which has heard her case. But the problem involved in these three suits is a most interesting one. Undoubtedly the strictly logical aspect of the breach of promise suit was pnesnted Justice Erlanger in the Frenh Decker case. Not a dollar of damages has been shown, except that naturally arising from the alleged breach. Not a dollar on wardrobe, wedding preparations, or any thing else." But what have the scridid questions of wardrobe, preparations, etc., to do with a broken heart? How may the damages to a seared soul be assessed? The average women, of course, does not feel a broken engagement so poignantly that she seeks or even thinks of financial balm. But the logic of the breach of promise suit is irresistible. To a certain too frequent type of female, marriage in itself is a goal, an achievement irrespective of the individuality or personality of the husband. The conjugal state seems to be essentially more honorable and dignified than spinsterhood. Once having the goal in sight she does not forego it without a death struggle. From being assured of an easy livelihood, earned by some one else, she faces the prospects of a future of struggle and perhaps self-support. What is more natural for her than to seek to capitaize love's wounds. After all, marriage as it is viewed at present by the majority of persons has as its basis the financial dependence of woman. A deserted wife asks and receives financial balm in the shape of alimony. Why should not a deserted fiancee have similar redress if she chooses to avail herself of it? For those who take the view that women should be supported by men, the justice of the breach of promise suit seems inevitable. But should the extent of the damage be left to a susceptible jury to fix? Damages based on wardrobe purchased or wedding cake ordered are not adequate or reasonable. One can wear the clothes and eat the cake even though the faithless bridegroom should disappear. But what can one do with a broken heart except to ask for balm for it? It seems to me that a fair basis of settlement would be the man's inome. That is what fixes the amount of alimony. One of the verdicts of $10,000 rendered this week was against a painter and decorator who has nothing but his trade by which to live. Yet he mulcted for an amount that he cannot possibly pay, and a young man of some wealth, the defendent in the French case, gets off with damages for the same amount. A man would give his heavenly bliss And all his worldly worth for this; To taste his whole heart in one kiss Upon her perfect lips. is the poetic as opposed to the legal view of what a woman's love is worth. But perhaps if the highly respectable British poet who wrote that glowing estimate has ever been sued for breach of promise he would have become as practical and matter-of-fact as Justice Erlanger. Perhaps, after all, the only moral to be deduced from the week's crop of breach of promise cases is that now is a good time to sue.—N. Y. World. The boss owes the employee some thing more than money, and the employee owes the boss something more than work. when people complains of ennui they merely confess that they are tired of resting and are too lazy to do anything. FRIDAY, April 21, 1911 The Seattle Theatre. The Landers-Stevens Company will present the Lion and the Mouse at the Seattle theatre. This is one of the most attractive and interesting performances yet presented by that well known company. It will run all the week with the usual matinees. In all the great West there will be no other comedy entertainment to compare with "His Absent Boy," in which Mr. Clark and Miss Owen will open tomorrow afternoon. The farce is in three acts, by Sydney Rosenfeld, and deals whimsically with a certain Mr. Pennie, who marries a rich widow, and who obtains from her a large monthly allowance for the support of a mythical son who is the result as he tells her, of his former marriage. There is in reality no son, and Mr. Pennie shrewdly devotes the money to having a general good time all by himself. The desire of his second wife to see her long absent step son, and the complications which ensue, form a frame work of enough strength to support a dozen farces. As a curtain raiser Mr. Clark and Miss Owen will be seen in "The House Divided," a clever playlet in which Mr. Clark will offer a series of impersonations of himself in his various noted comedy creations. Alhambra audiences are enjoined to be in their seats on time next week so as not to miss any of the big harvest of laughs that are coming to them. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for King County. Notice. 24. Whom To ensure that the petition for the dissolution and disincorporation of the Washington & Susitna Mining and Development Company, a corporation, accompanied by certificate by its office of the treasurer, the office of stockholders of said corporation called for the purpose, it was decided by a vote of more than two-thirds of all the stockholders of said corporation to disincorporate and dissolve the corporation above entitled court and that the 23rd day of June, 1911, at the hour of 9:30 a.m., m., at the court room, Courtroom 20 have been fixed by said court as the time and place of the hearing of said petition, and that the application of said corporation so to dissolve and disincorporate the corporation and that such order will be made thereon as the court, upon hearing, shall deem proper. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 19th day of April, 1911. D. K. SICKLES, Clerk of said Superior Court. T. O. H. SPRINGER, Deputy. April 21—June 16, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craig, plaintiff, vs. Homer R. Burgess, and persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, defendants.—No. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of February, 1910, and numbered 87179, for dequentant taxes, year 1909, in this sum. Upon the said and situated king County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 25, Block 2, Lawrence Central Addition to West Seattle. For subsequent years have been paid by plaintiff upon said land, to-wit: For 1908, $2.79; for 1909, $2.77. Which several shares bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication, and will exclure of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of the complaint to the underwriter for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the amount due upon for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21-June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Homer R. Burgess, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. — No. 80020. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You, for you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff has been notified by the treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 5th day of February, 1910, and numbered BG1718, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the sum of $134, upon and in said King County tax, for the amount of $24,224, for 24 Black 21, Lawrence Central Addition to West Seattle. That taxes for subsequent years have been paid by plaintiff upon said county, to-wit. For 1910, the amount was $24,277. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said land. You and each of you (including said persons unknown if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said plaintiff's death, sixty-four days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the understated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said plaintiff, and demanding the amount stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on now file copies of the court. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Balley Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21-June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Homer R. Burgess, and all persons unknown, if any, having cr claiming an interest in and to the heren- cifer described real property, defendants.—No. 20021. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants on holders of an or estate in and to the tenderer described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 24th day of December, 1910, and number 1807760. For delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the sum of $142, and upon land in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 11, Block 2, Lawrence Central Addition to West Seattle. That taxes for subsequent years have been paid by plaintiff upon said land, to-wit: For Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said land. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said freshman's graduation, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the fee for the satisfaction of which pursuant to plaintiff. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and cost ordering a sale, or payment for the satisfaction of the funds against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on file in this cause and court. L. H. GRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21—June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Homer R. Burgess, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, defendants.—Nn State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the above described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 24th day of December 1906, and inherited 180778, the late taxes of the year 1906, in the sum of $1,42, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 10, Block 2, Lawrence Central Addition to west Seattle. These late years have been paid by plaintiff upon said land, to-wit: For 1908, $3.41; for 1909, $3.29. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication, not exceeding the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the question of said plaintiff, who will be rendered to your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale or said property to the satisfaction of the lien as it was provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailley Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21-June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for King County. Notice and L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. R. C. Washburn, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—Nex. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of October, 1910, and numbered B07510, for the year 1908, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, towit: Lot 22, Block 55, Kirkland. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above property, and upon the real property situated in said King County, the sum of 35 cents; for the year 1908, the sum of 41 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of 39 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the summons, and are hereby summoned to the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer to the court. You may also copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do the action, you may be required to pay the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a lien of said taxes and costs against the sums found against it as provided by law, and the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, in the answer of the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be taken to your behalf, the liability of taxes and costs against said real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff complaint, now on file in this case under court. L. H. CRAYBER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building. Seattle, Washington. April 21-June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Jas. Allen, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. — No. 80106. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, have incurred the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th day of June, 1910, and numbered B66143, for the delinquent taxes of the year, and the above named property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 16, Block 14, Allentown. That taxes for subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, twenty-one of the 36 cents for the year 1908, the sum of 92 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 92 cents. Which several bills bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication, the exclusive of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the under written complaint of said plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs, real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on now in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, under Plaintiff Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21-June 2, 1911. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN and it is going to get them if bed count for anything with you. There is an attorney is concerned in hand- price and the punctuality. We take this is publication day. prices. ..... $1.50 ..... 2.00 ..... 2.50 actuality. Some one will call immediately for m will be made as soon as the time after Block—convenient to the office do the rest. Main 305. wants your legal publications and it is going to get them if bed rock prices and yet good service count for anything with you. There are two essential things so far as an attorney is concerned in handling legal publications. The price and the punctuality. We take notices until Friday noon, which is publication da. Telephone to Main 305 and some one will call immediately for the notice. Proof of publication will be made as soon as the time expires. Our office is 427 Epler Block-convenient to the office district. Telephone us and we will do the rest. Main 305. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Nellie Phinney, and all the others unknown if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 80014. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them. You are the victim, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of April 1906, by the 80375 of delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of 80 cents, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 20, Block 50, Kirkland. That the taxes for the following subsequent year be paid by the plaintiff upon said described real property, to-wit: For the year 1908, the sum of 41 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 30 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said land. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the days of said first publication. Go-wit, with sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned to the plaintiff at this office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the sale of taxes and costs against said property for the amount due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on now in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21—June 1, 1911 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, v. Hannah Peasley and C. A. Nelson, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to that interest an unrestricted real property, defendants—No. 80013. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: To the above defendant, Y. Kearns, ifon, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certainquent interest to the property in and to the hereinafter described County, State of Washington, dated the 23rd day of May, 1906, and numbered B32049, for the delinquency taxes of the year 1906, the property amount in said King County, real property in said King County, described as follows, to- --- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN as prayed in plaintif's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. GRAVER. April 21—June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summary. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. C. D. Hillman, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, defendants. No. 1001. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby entitled to the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of April, 1909, and numbered B55337, for delinquent taxes of the year 1909, in the amount of $54.54, that that above named plaintiff said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lift, 5 Block, 5 Hillman's Meadow Garden Div. No. 1. That taxes for subsequent years have been paid to the treasurer of land, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $2.57; for the year 1908, the sum of $2.80; for the year 1909, the sum of $3.17. Which several sums bear the sum of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the summons, and to appear within sixty days after the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff in the case of the summons, and to sign the attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing on the real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on now on file documents in the court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: Rayley Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21—June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Ketcham, plaintiff, vs. Emma C. Ketcham, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herena- fter described real property, defendants.— No. 60185. State of Washington: To the above defens- and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to their property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of March, 1906, of the amount of $2.35 delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of 58 cents, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Second class shore lands fronting the shore of the Bay of Fundy, 5 E. W. M. That taxes for subsequent years have been paid by plaintiff upon said land, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of 11 cents; for the year 1908, the sum of $.03; for the year 1909, the sum of $2.35. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the first court action, and the first of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court action and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and answer the complaint of said plaintiff in the attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing on the property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintext, complaint, on now file the complaint, court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21-June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Robert Knipe, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. 6177. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are the sole owners of the plaintiff. The holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 24th day of December, 1910, and numbered B67767, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1900, in the amount of $4,260. The plaintiff is situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: North half of Tract 2 of Kellogg's Tracts. That taxes for subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1908, the sum of $4.26; for the year 1909, the sum of Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against salaries. You and each of you (including salaried persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be deposited in the Depositary of first publication of this notice, exclusive of L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. L. H. CRAVER. Plainiff. 3 wit: SE. 1/4 SW. 1/4 Sec. 3, Tp. 21, N. R. 5 E., W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1015, the sum of $4.75; for the year 1006, the sum of $7.90; for the year 1907, the sum of $6.44; for the year 1908, the sum of $4.04; for the year 1909, the sum of $4.10. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a notice of the complaint to the attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed for, compliant, on now on file causes and court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $1,485; for the year 1908, the sum of $1,605; for the year 1909, the sum of 39 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication of this notice, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff in the amount due, office below with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the amounts due upon it, a sale of said taxes and costs, office below a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on now in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Balley Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21-June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. H. K. Arnold, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are the owner of the land acquired by the holder of two certain delinquent tax certificates issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of October, 1910, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of 80 cents each, and upon real property of the land acquired by the holder of King County, described as follows, to-wit: Delinquent tax certificate No. B67508, on Lot 21; delinquent tax certificate No. B67509, on Lot 22. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said sale of said lots, the sum of 41 cents for the year 1908; one each of said lots the sum of 39 cents for the year 1909. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to wit, with sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the understated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the mounts, upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on now in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 544 Baller Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21—June 2, 1911 IN THE SUPEIRI ROURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Bessie Isaacs Savage, Decased. No. — Notice to Creditors. By order of said court, made herein, on the 27th day of March, 1911, notice is hereby given to the creditors of and to all persons having claims against said deceased, or against her estate, or against the community estate of said deceased and George Marvin Savage, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executor of said estate at his residence, 212 Twenty-third Avenue North, Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of said estate in Seattle, in said County business, State within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice, or same will be barred. Date of first publication, April 22, 1911. GEORGE MARVIN SAVAGE, As Executor of Said Estate. Date of first publication, April 21. Date of last publication May 26, 1911. STETSON & POST LUMBER CO. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and summons. L. L. plaintif, plaintif, vs. Lucy M. Morey, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 8001. State of Washington: To the above defendants in each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff the holder of three certain delinquent tax certificates issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of October, 1910, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent tax the year 1506, in the amount of 14 cents certain, and upon rat is said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Delinquent tax certificate No. B67533, on Lot 13; delinquent tax certificate No. B67534, on Lot 14; delinquent tax certificate No. B67553. That taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon each of said lots, real property, to-wit: For the year 1007, the sum of 15 cents on each of said lots; for the year 1008, the sum of 14 cents on each of said lots 13 and 14; for the year 1009, the sum of 30 cents on each of said lots 13 and 14; and on said lot 15 the sum of 54 cents for the year 1908; and the sum of 44 cents for the year 1909. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said land. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication, to wit, with sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the underwriting form for the case, before it be stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against said real property for the sale of it, all taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of sald property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on now in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 544 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21—June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Summons by Publication. Peter E. Brown, plaintiff, vs. Harry Henton, defendant.—No. 78993. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 10th day of March, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, Peter E. Brown, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to answer, and in case the demand against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the action is to set aside and cancel a certain deed bearing date June 6th, 1910, filed in said King County and recorded in Volume 744 of Deeds at page 402, in which the said plaintiff was induced by fraudulent representations to convey to a friend the right to sell southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter in Section 28 of Township 26 North, Range 5 East W. M., in King County, State of Washington. Also cancel and avoid certain option or contract of sale between said parties describing said real property of like date which said right county is recorded in said King County, Washington, in Volume 738 of Deeds at page 577. T. B. McMARTIN, Attorney for Plaintiff. 1323 Alaska Bldg, Seattle, King County, Washington. March 10—April 21, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Isabella Badere, Plaintiff, vs. Frederick Badere, Defendant. No.—Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Badere, Badere. You are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the third day of March, 1911, and before the fourth day of March, 1911, in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at the address below stated and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the decree of the plaintiff herein, which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of this action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds of cruelty and failure of defendant against plaintiff. EDWARD VON TOBEL. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. March 4—April 14, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Chas. W. Herrod, Plaintiff, vs. Mary Herrod, Defendant. No. — Summons The State of Washington to Mary Herrod Defendant. You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above entitled Court and defend the above entitled action within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons exclusive of the date of the said test after the seventy days after the tenth (10th) day of March, 1911, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for the plaintiff below named at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the defendant of the plaintiff which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of this action is to obtain a divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant on the ground of the abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant for a period of more than a year. A. C. MA DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Schwabacher Hardware Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Joseph Schuster, Fredericka Schuster, James A. Snoddy, Richard G. Hutchinson, J. O. Goodwin and Louis J. Stover, defendants.—No. 78457 The state of Washington to the said Joseph Schuster and J. O. Goodwin: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit, within sixty days from the 17th day of March, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- mmer, who is filed with the clerk of said court. This suit is brought for the foreclosure of a mortgage given to plaintiff by defendants Joseph Schuster and Fredericka Schuster. LEOPOLD M. STERN, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. address, 705 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, Washington. March 17-April 28, 1911. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT Court, Western District of Washington, Northern Division. Order requiring Chelsea E. Spangler and Jane Doe Spangler, wife of Chelsea E. Spangler, to appear, etc. Nelson W. Parker, as Trustee in Bank- ruptcy of I. Hodes, Bankrupt, complainant, vs. Chelsea E. Spangler, Jane Doe Spangler (wife of Chelsea E. Spangler), and Hannah Hodes (wife of I. Hodes).—No. 4538. It appears that the court upon the affidavit of Nelson W. Parker, trustee in bankruptcy of I. Hodes, bankrupt, plaintiff in the foregoing action, that Chelsea E. Spangler and Jane Doe Spangler (wife of the said Chelsea Spangler), whose true name is unknown, are not inhabitants of and cannot be found within afordsaid Western District of Washington, and that the personal service of this order upon the said Chelsea E. Spangler and Jane Doe Spangler, his wife is not practicable. And it further appearing that the action aforesaid is an action to remove an encumbrance or cloud upon the title to real property located wholly within the said district, now, therefore. It is hereby ordered, that the said Chelsea E. Spangler and his Doe Spangler, in this court and plead, answer or demur to the bill of complaint heretofore filed in the foregoing cause on or before the 1st day of May, 1911. And it is further ordered, That this order be published once a week for six consecutive weeks in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper of general circulation published in the District. And it is further ordered, that upon the failure of said Chelsea E. Spangler, and Jane Doe Spangler, his wife, to appear and plead, answer or demur on or before the date hereinabove specified, the court will entertain jurisdiction of said cause, and proceed to the heading and adjudication thereof, in the same manner as if the said Chelsea E. Spangler and Jane Doe Spangler, his wife, had been served with process within the said district. Done at Seattle, Washington, this 8th day of March, 1911. NOTICE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING of the United Cities Trustee Company. To the Stockholders: The regular annual meeting of the stockholders of the United Cities Trust ee Company, held at the office of the Company, No. 1011 American Bank Building, Seattle, Washington, on Thursday, May 4th, 1911, at one o'clock p. m., for the purpose of electing trustees for the ensuing year, and for such other business as may properly come before said meeting. RICHARD STEVENES ESKRIDGE, President. Attest: J. R. WHEAT, Secretary. March 31—April 28, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Margaret M. Briggen, Plaintiff, vs. John Briggen, Defendant. No. — Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said attestant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: Within sixty days after the date of the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to answer with kindly and devoid against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of absolute divorce on the grounds of cruelty and hatutual drunkenness. JOHN R. WILSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 539 New York Bldg., Seattle, Washington. March 24—May 5, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Washintong, for King County. W. S. GREENE, Plaintiff, vs. Dora B. W. Greene, Defendant. No. ——. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Dora B. Greene, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 24th day of march 10, D. O. H. and defend above entered action. In defense, entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below state: In case of conviction, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: set forth in complaint, to-wit, incompatibility of parties to such an extent that the parties can no longer live together. ROBERT F. BOOTH, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 911 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, King Co., Washington. March 24—May 5, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Probate. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Frederick Carlson, deceased.—No. 12549. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and also to having claims against, the estate of Frederick Carlson, deceased, to present the same, with the necessary vouchers, to the undersigned administrator of said estate at the office of Edward Von Tobel, No. 604 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of the transaction of business, sale of property, the estate of first publication of this notice, to-wit: within one year from the 31st day of March, 1911. AUGUST SANDGREN, Administrator of the Estate of Frederick Carlson, Deceased. 1911 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Christina McDougal, plaintiff, vs. Alex. ander McDougal, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington, to the said defendant, Alexander McDougal: You are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first day of March in sixty days after the 31st day of March, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the order of the complaint herein which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of this action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds of abandonment and desertion of plaintiff and the failure of defendant to support plaintiff. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: 604-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. March 31—May 12, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to bear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of Andrew Schillestad, deceased. No. 11284. Ole Schillestad, administrator of the estate of Andrew Schillestad, deceased, having lived in this court his final accession and petition of the estate said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Andrew Schillestad, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Texas, and be appointed by the Probate Department of said court in Seattle on the first day of May, 1911, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m., of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of the estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most important periods of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said first day of May, 1911, in The Seattle Rehabilitation Center and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 28th day of March, 1911. A. W. FRATER, Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss. D. K. Sickels, county clerk of King County and ex-officio of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court on the 28th day of March, 1911, in the matter of the estate of Andrew Schillestad, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 28th day of March, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Carl Carlson, Deceased.—No. 10826. Notice to Creditors. Nate Harely given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the vouchers to the undersigned, administrator of said estate, at the office of Homer E. Turner, in the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of business of said estate from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication March 31, 1911. HOMER E. TURNER, Administrator of the Estate of Carl Carlson. March 31—April 28, 1911. In the Matter of the Estate of Elaine IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Nate Oderick given to the creditors of Notice is hereby given that under and by virtue of an order of sale in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County, dated December 8, 1909. I will sell at private sale the following described real estate situated in King County, Washington: I am sight (8), block five (5), Webster's Anderson Street Addition to the City of Seattle; Also lot six (6), and the north forty (40) feet of lot five (5), block fourteen (14), Yesler's Second Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington. The sale will be made on or after the 11th day of March, A. D. 1911. Bids will be received by the undersigned at once. Place of purchase: Buildings, Seattle, King County, Washington. Terms of sale are cash, gold coin of the United States, 10 per cent of bid to accompany bid. balance to be paid upon confirmation of sale by court. Dated this 17th day of February, 1911. EDWARD VON TOBEL. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State, Washington, or King Coun- tury. Notation: WASHINGTON In the Matter of the Estate of Henry Epeting, deceased.—No. 12596. By order of said court made herein on the 30th day of March, 1911. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and personal benefit of, persons against said deceased, or against said estate to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned James T. Clague of said estate, at the office of Chas. K. Jenner, 328 Central Building, Seattle, Wash., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication April 7, 1911. JAMES T. CLAGUE, As Administrator of said Estate. CHAS. K. JENNER. Attorney for Estate. 328 Central Building, Seattle, Wash. April 7—May 5, 1911. IN THE SUPEROR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons. Alta Carlson, plaintiff, vs. Edwin Carlson, defendant.—No. 79733. The State of Washington, to the said Edwin Carlson, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 7th day of April, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff as his own below stated case in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action is to secure a divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant, on the grounds of abandonment and failure to support. GEO. McKAY, Plaintiff's Attorney. Postoffice building, 450 Arcade Building, Seattle, Wash. April 7—May 19, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, KING County, Washington. T. W. Hansen, Plaintiff, vs. Marcus Nelson, Defendant. No. 79005. Summons. The State of Washington, to the said Marcus Nelson, Defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 14th day of April, 1911, and defend the above enclosed document, the above enclosed document and answer the claim of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the terms of the contract furnished with the clerk of said court. (Action for money only; amount claimed: Thirteen Hundred Ninety and 47-100 ($1,390.47) Dollars.) H. E. FOSTER Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 606 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, April 14, 1911. Date of last publication, May 26, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, P. C. Ellsworth, Plaintiff, vs. J. G. Moyer, P. Caterain Moyer, his wife; N. Westernmost Mercantile Agency, a corporation; Minnie Townsend, Mina McIntyre, Wallace C. Meacham and Edith Meacham, his wife, Defendants. No. 79645. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said J. G. Moyer and P. Caterain Moyer, his wife, Defendants. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 14th day of April, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated. The judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to recover judgment for plaintiff against J. G. Moyer and Catherine Moyer, his wife, on a promissory note dated February 14, 1915, for the sum of $700, $75 attorney's fees, costs of suit, expenses of insurance and abstract and to foreclose the mortgage securing the payment of said note, on Lots 3 and 4, in Block 11, of Hillman's Lake Front Add. to Seattle, Division 0. King County, Washington, which mortgage is fully recorded in Vol. 336 at page 195 of Mortgages, Records of King County, Wash. J. E. McGRWD, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 432 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. April 14—May 26, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Edwin R. Buffington, plaintiff, vs. J. B. Cook, Mabel Cook, his wife, and Fred and Mabel Cook, his wife, defendants. In the name of the State of Washington, you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days from am and before the said date of February 1911, exclusive of said first date, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, the attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your answer to the above demand, you will be ordered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of the said action set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To recover judgment against defendants Cook and wife for $2,000, with interest, costs, charges, attorney fees memorial, damages, mortgage charges in Vol. 486, Mortgages, page 480, Records King County Auditor's Office, and to divest defendants of all interest in the premises therein described and quiet title thereto and general relief; said property is described as north 10 feet from the property at 15. Maynard's Lake Washington Addition to Seattle, King County, Washington, as per recorded plat. FRANK B. WIESTLING, Attorney for Plaintiff Postoffice address 202 Fern Block, Postoffice address 202 Fern Rock, Washington. First date of publication February 34. Feb. 24—April 7. 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of New York Count- y Statutes by Publication M. H. Ring, plaintiff, vs. C. E. Remsberg, as executor of the last will and testament of George E. Hall, deceased; C. E. Remsberg, and "Jane Doe" Remsberg, as executor of the last will; is to plaintiff unknown; Fremont State Bank, Charles J. Clark, Seattle Coal & Wood Company, a corporation; Humane Society, a corporation; Charles P. Hall, Joseph F. Hall, Lucy Irene Hall, teach and N. H. Hall, defender. No. 6885. The State of Washington to Charles P. Hall, Joseph E. H, Hall, Lucy Irene Hall Leach and Carrie G. Hall, defendants abaya named: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 24th day of February, 1911, and within sixty days after the above entitled court and answer the cross complaint of the defendants C. E. Remsberg and "Jane Doe" Remsberg, his wife, and Fremont State Bank, and serve a copy of your answer upon the defendant's account, the salaries at their offices below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will FRIDAY April 21, 1911 be rendered against you according to the demands of the cross complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of the action is to foreclose mortgages upon real estate mentioned and described in the cross complaint. HUMPHRIES & COLE, Attorneys for Cross Complaintants C. E. Remsberg, "Jane Doe" Remsberg and Fremont State Bank. Postoffice address 602 Mutual Life Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb. 24—April 7, 1911. STATE OF WASHINGTON, FOR THE County of King. Margaret Brooks, plaintiff, vs. William S. Brooks, defendant. The State of Washington, to the said William S. Brooks: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wait within sixty days after the date of February 11, 1914, and to the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce on the grounds of abandonment and non-support. JAS. M. EPLER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office: 320-321 Epler Block, Seattle, Washington. Feb. 24—April 7, 1911. Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. ORDER A CASE OUT TO YOUR PLACE OF Rainier PALE BEER PHONE SIDNEY 526 A Free Trip to Seattle and Return. Let's Bust the State Dental Trust. Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You will have a free appointment and the State Dental Monopoly will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done for you. Your dental appointment, my offices have been established at 713 First Ave. in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar. I make a dollar with the Star Monopoly will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established at 713 First Ave., in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not come with cheap dentists, with the Blanchard dentists for half their price. Open evenings until 8 and Sundays until 4 for people who work. EDWIN J. BROWN, D.D.S. 713 First Avenue Seattle, Wash. Read my article in Sunday's P-L and Monday's Times and Star. OVER 65 YEARS' EXPERIENCE PATENTS TRADE MARKS DESIGNS COPYRIGHTS & C. Anyone sending a sketch and description may quickly assert our opinion free whether an invention is probably patentable. Communications strictly confidential. HANDBOOK on Patents sent free. Oldest agency for securing patents. Patents taken through Mum & Co. receive and distribute directly. A handsomely illustrated weekly. Largest circulation of any scientific journal. Turus, $1 a year; four months, $1. Sold by newsellers. MUNN & Co. 361 Broadway, New York Branch Office, 625 F St., Washington, D.C. Our Ton Always Weighs 2,000 lbs. RENTON COAL Insist on having the Genuine you can easily detect a substitute. If such is delivered send it back. J. W. BULLOCK DEALER IN COAL AND WOOD 609 TENTH AVE. Seattle. Wash. BUNKERS: Rear James St. Power House, Telephones: Sunset East 87 Independent 87 Twenty-Sixth Ave. and Dearborn St. Telephones: Sunset East 102, Ind. 8170 Second Ave. No. and Boston St. Telephones: Sunset Queen Anne 1885 Ind. 7538 711 Western Ave. between Yesler and Columbia. Telephones: Sunset Main 3873 Independent 289