Seattle Republican

The Seattle Republican Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE PUBLISHER'S NOTICE. The Seattle Republican is published on Friday of every week by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3.00 per year; six months, $1.50; postage prepaid. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. Publication office, 427 Epler Block. Telephone Main 305. HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON, - Publisher. SUSIE REVELS CAYTON, - Associate. Seattle, May 15, 1911. Editor Seattle Republican, Dear Sir: Having noticed your very just comment on the way that the contractors for the Catholic hospital attempted to hold up the sisters by skinning the building, I will say that it is only one of the regular methods that some contractors have in their dealings with people who build. I am one of the unfortunate sufferers from contractors methods, having invested my hard earnings in a building in this city that was skinned by the contractors with the aid of an architect who took my money and was said to be in collusion with them. I took a bond given by a surety company to comply with specifications, for some thousands of dollars, but the company refused to make good, in fact they never intended to, but hired the most expensive corporation attorney in the state for the purpose of beating me. The lawyer was hired because of his pull with certain judges to which such cases are assigned. Now I am a poor man and the cost of an appeal to the supreme court is enormous, in fact it is prohibitory, and I must be satisfied with the decision of the judge which I think was obtained by corrupt means. If I had the money I could appeal to the supreme court, which I believe is now honestly constituted and administered, but not being able to do so on account of insufficient funds, I have to stand for the corrupt practices of corporation lawyers with a pull and the decision of a dishonest judge and the illegal methods of contractors and dishonest bonding companies. Yours very truly, W. J. C. JOHNSON. A few of the leading business men of Seattle declared before that body one day this week that the present council is rapidly gaining the reputation of favoring freak legislation, and if it is persisted in, it will injure the commercial standing of the city. The street car smoking bill was cited as one instance as well as the reduction of resident electric light bills. If the city can afford to reduce the cost of lighting residents, as has been argued, why not do it? Why not give the tax payer the full benifit of their money? It seems to us that no gentleman would want to smoke in a street car that would discomode, perhaps, two thirds of the passengers, and yet there are human hogs, who will do so, and seem to rather enjoy puffing the tobacco fumes in the faces of those to whom it is the most objectional. It may cost the street car company a few extra dollars to make smoking compartments in their cars, but it would be a great accommodation to the general public. Freakish legislation should not be indulged in, but persons, who do not smoke, should have some rights that the persons who do smoke are boud to respect. Don M. Dickinson, secretary of war, in President Taft's cabinet, has resigned and resigned without explanation and without receiving one of those Ballinger compliments from the president. The resignation of this southern Democrat is the bursting of another political bubble, which had for its object the breaking up of the Solid South. Dickinson had no more business in President Taft's cabinet than did Aguinaldo, the Fillipino rebel, and it was foolhardy in the president to ever name him for the place. He is not only a Democrat and at absolute variance with the Republican administration, but he, nor no other genuine southener, is wholly in harmony with the United States government. So long as a trace of the old rebel blood is prevalent in the South so long will it be at outs with the National government and the thing for the Republicans to do is to let them go their way and forget them. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. FRIDAY, MAY 19, 1911 Because an army officer was refused admission to a skating rink down in Arizona he has brought suit against the parties and has even threatened to have them arrested. Old fort Walla Walla was broken completely up because some drunken soldiers were denied admission to a skating rink and the government threatened all kinds of trouble. The officers of a man of war refused to premit the men thereon to come ashore in Seattle because Mayor Dilling would not put on a full dress suit and receive in honor of the fool officers thereof. In the above instances all concerned were Anglo-Saxsons, but listen to life's other side. The Negro soldiers in Seattle and Spokane are denied the right to take a meal in a decent restaurant or a drink in a fashionable saloon. They are denied every civil right and yet they wear the uniform the same as the white soldier and fight just as hard when on the firing line. Is the Negro getting a square deal? Why does Editor Clayson want the public to keep its eye on Bob Hesketh and Austin E. Griffith because they advocated the appointment of police women? The fact is the old scavanger is devoting his declining years too villifying those women, who do not stay home and watch the babies, while their husbands, of the Clayson stripe, spend their evenings around saloons and other places chewing the rag and spending the money in carousing that ought to be spent on the wife and children. The removing of Col. Lamping and Col. Case from the National Guard it is hoped will be the means of settling the long standing disputes and premit things to move on in a business like way. It is rather remarkable that every one that has been connected authoritively with the National Guard has been reported more or less short in his accounts with the state. It must be a tempting place to put your hands in the other fellows pocket. While La Follet may be the choice of the progressive for the Republican nomination for president, yet it will give him little if any strength outside of that particular clan, for it is a well known fact, La Follett is nothing more or less than a political disturber, and as president of the United States he would do little else but go round picking quarrels with first one department of the government and then another. It should not be a question of the Chamber of Commerce and the Seattle Commercial Club of Seattle working harmoniouslw together, but their unqualified unifications. The expense of keeping these two commercial bodies running and the natural rivally between the two means the expenditure of money and efforts, which, if concentrated, would be ten fold more effective than the individual efforts of each. Thomas A. Edison has threatened to live until he is one hundred and fifty years of age, and if he does and continues his electrical research as in the past he will probably make it possible to go out and stick two wires in the ground and from them light your home and cook your meals, and also run an electric car indefinite without recharging the thing. This wizzard seems to be a mystery even to himself. Judging from the tone of the daily press it is next to a crime for a millionaire to marry a person that is poor. No one is wholly responsible for being rich and if you are rich and want to get real happiness out of it then marry some appreciative person that is in poor circumstances, battling for a living, if you please, and then again it is a splendid way to distribute ill gotten gains as most riches are. In Lincoln Nebraska, when a woman wants the saloons to not sell her husband boose, she has to accompany the written demand with a photograph of the toper. It, however, would be hard for even a bartender to recognize a fellow that has been on a high lonesome for a few hours from the photograph of him that might have been taken as he was on his way to get married. There is hardly any doubt, but all of the war talk between rival nations is being fostered by great armory trusts for the purpose of furnishing the various government with more fighting implements. The day will come when the trusts will have to take a back seat and VOLUME XVII. NUMBER 51 the governments will look after their necessities without interference of captains of alleged industries. Councilman Kellogg was born in Seattle and yet he is declared not to be a native son because his parents were not citizens of the state at the time he was born. He certainly was not born any where else and if he were not born in Seattle then he never was born at all, and the fighting little cuss now in the city council, is after all a delusion and a snare. Hatfield, the Seattle convict, awaiting a hearing in the supreme court, almost persuaded many who heard his reasons, why sentence should not be pronounced upon him, to believe that he was more sinned against than he had sinned, but since his desperate attempts to break jail they have rapidly changed their minds. Recently a local paper advised the business men of the city to start something, just so it was not a riot, a family fuss or a funeral, the same paper must have taken a tumble to itself for it has started to improve evidently with the view of giving Hearst a warm reception when his Seattle American makes its innicial bow. Lady Decies, better known as George Gould's daughter, that paid a million or more dollars for the English title she now bears, has attracted general attention in Europe by being operated upon for appendicitis and that too just a few weeks before the cornation humbug is pulled off. It pays to advertis- "Deeds are better than words," Col. Theodore Roosevelt is quoted as having said. The deed to a piece of property is better than the words of another that the property will be the other fellows, but William Jennings Bryan has made a great deal more out of words than he ever has out of deeds. Lumber kings of the Northwest having tired of seeing the persons desiring to build comfortable homes get the lumber at reasonable rates have formed a trust and will curtail the out put of lumber to the tune of 600,000,000 feet per year. Get off the earth you poor devils. "The peek-a-boo waist was designed in hell, cut in Paris and worn by some of our lovely women," says a Spokane preacher. Since the preacher does more getting next to peek-a-boo waists than any other class of male citizens he ought to know what he is talking about. It occurs to us that there is unnecessary friction between the chief of the police and certain members of the city council. If both of the officials have the desire to do the right thing it seems to us that it can be accomplished without friction between them, Anglo-Saxon archiologists of England are reported as having stolen the Ark of Convenant from Jerusalem and the Turks are threatening to go on the war path about it, not because the Turks give a whoop in -- for it but because the other fellow got it. Mrs. Anna Bessant is out with the prophecy, Christ will come back, and it will not be long before He does. Business must be getting dull for the Theosephast and she has sprung this sensation to get in the necessary dollars to keep things gingling. When the Ranier Valley Record remarks, "it is time for Seattle to begin planning for a sane Fourth of July," it doubtless over looks the fact that. Seattle has decided to have no Fourth of July, but a Senteenth of July instead. A fellow's wife would not cook beans for him and he sued her for divorce, while the most men want to sue for divorce because their wives do cook beans. To satisfy the average man seems next to impossible. "Millionaire Banker With a Broken Neck Dies," was a Star head line. You dont say so? Did you expect for him to live? These are the kind of foolish news items that the little twinkler subsists on. It looks as if there must be a joker in the Standard Oil decision in as much as Standard Oil stock went up both in America and Europe a few hours after the decision became public property. 2 PERSONS TALKED ABOUT FRANK AND JOHNNY CLANCY, who were recently arrainged in court and pleaded not guilty, it is said, is not locking out after their defence in a manner to warrant the belief that, they are very much interested in the outcome of the criminal case now pending against them, and rumor has it, they make no bones of saying, they are not guilty, but that higher ups are, and its up to them to see to it that they are never convicted. "I lost something like forty thousand dollars in the deal and thats all that I am going to drop." said one of the Clancy boys not long since. Just who he meant when he spoke of the higher ups that were interested in the outcome of his and his brother's case seems to be something of a secret, and yet it is declared, they did not even employ the attorney that is now defending them. It begins to look as if Dr. M. A. Mathews was not talking through his hat, when he recently declared, before the present grand jury adjourns all of the lawyers would have work to do in the defense of persons, who profited from the Gill mal-administration. It is also rumored that the Clancy boys were given an opportunity to come through to the grand jury and escape indictment and even now the opportunity is open in the shape of turning states evidence. M. B. KAUFMAN of Lewis county in a speech before the commercial Club recently declared that Seattle had estrangsd herself from the other sections of the state by her avariciousness. There may be something in the story, but there are always two sides to every question. While Seattle has at times showed the disposition to hog everything in sight, yet the small counties of the state have always shown a willingness to combine against King county and prevent her from getting even justice. The representativs from the small counties of the state in the last legislature combined and prevented the state from being apportioned according to the wording of the constitution simply because King county had grown more rapidly than any of the other counties and would get the bulk of the increased representation. This paper always advcated the state ought to be districted without regard too counties so far as the legislature and the judiciary are concerned. Every foot of Washington should be Washington and one section has no right to seek to take any advantage over the other sections. The tax payer that will seek to build up his own community at the expence of the other communities of the state deserves to be disfranchised and disquilified from holding property in the state. DAVID McKENZIE, commissioner from the first commissioner's district of King county, is fighting a combination of the other two commissioners, in which he should have some assistance from the general public. If the reports of the bills presented to him to sign as chairman of the board are any ways near correct, then the other commissioners are running things with a high hand and the sooner their hands are called the better for the tax payer. The Seattle Republican did not favor the election of Mr. McKenzie, but it now believes he is making a conccientious commissioner and he is being opposed by the other commissioners for no other reason than that, he will not stand for the high handed grafting that seems to be going on. The idea of picking out your personal friends and giving them some kind of employment in order to get their names on the county's pay roll has been done entirely too much in King county and it should be stopped immediately if not sooner. UGENE E. WAGER, a prominent attorney of Ellensburg and exceedingly prominent in the Democratic circles of the state, spent a few days in the city last week, and while here became a benedict. Mr. Wager, though a Democrat, was twice elected prosecuting attorney of Kittitas county and is at present attorney for the Milwaukee in the central section of the state. Just a few days prior to his marriage he sold to James D. Lowman of Seattle two tracts of land, for which he received something like $40,000, which must have been an incentive in his making up his mind that he was about able to take care of a wife. Mr. Wager is one of the most popular professional men in that section of the state and some day we would not be surprised to see his name heading the Democratic ticket for United States senator. C. F. CLAPP, formerly state senator from Jefferson county, but at present capitalist in Seattle, who recently purchased the elegant home of C. F. White on Capitol Hill, will not move to the same for some little time, as Mr. White was given the privilidge of remain in the house until he was ready to leave for Europe, which will be in the very near future. Mr. Clapp has been one of the most successful real estate dealers that ever operated in Seattle, and that is saying a good deal. He operated on the plan, when he got an opportunity of making a handsome profit on a piece of real estate to sell regardless of the flattering prospects of a THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN fabulous rise in the price of that particular piece of property and as a result today he has the money while a good many others have the property, but greatly depreciated in value. EUGENE LORTON, for years prominent in the newspaper circles of Walla Walla, subsequently connected with the ill-fated Inland Herald and more recently owner of the Saturday Review, has launched the Vancouver Review at Vancouver Washington, the innital number appearing May the 10th. The paper is issued by the Spokesman Printing Company with Eugene Lorton as editor. Gene made a hit for himself when he started the Bulletin at Walla Walla in opposition to the Ankeny machine and staid by it until Levi Ankeny was driven to the wall politically, when he took advantage of an opportunity and sold at a handsome profit. If there is any field for an afternoon and Sunday morning paper in Vancouver Gene will find it. JOHN W. CONSIDINE, the Orpheum King of the Northwest, threw open the doors of his new play house, which by the way is the most elaborate of its kind in the world, last Monday night and it was taxed to its standing room capacity for the opening. Mr. Considine was the recipient of many heartfelt congratulations for the enterprise and it was voted by the entire audience a great advertisement for Seattle. Mr. Considine's rise in the theatrical world has been phenominal and he is to be congratulated not only for the New Orpheum, but for the circuit he has built up with Seattle as its headquarter. He is a real Seattle builder and all honor is due him. B. D. MINKLER, former state senator from Skagitt county, died in the city hospital last Wednesday evening while on a visit to Seattle. He had retired from politics and largely from business some years ago on account of poor health and was taking life easy but while out for a pleasant stroll he was attached with heart failure and died soon after. He was eight years a member of the state senate and factionally speaking always trained with Senator Sumner of Everett and his political friends. Last year he spent quite a season in the canal zone and on his return was able to explain to his friends many interesting features of the Pannama Canal. ROBERT T. HODGE, sheriff of King County, it is currently reported, has begun to take a course in school text book trying to over come his grose illiteracy so that he can both write his name and read it when some one else writes it. He hopes to be able, in case he is elected governor, to at least be able to read typewriting well enough to stand up before the legislature and read his message, which will have been prepared for him by Kenny Beaton, and if he is not and any one smiles at his ignorance he will lay the paper down and shead himself and show the natives what a prize fighting governor can do in the way of making impressions on a legislature. F. A. HAZELTINE in a recent lecture before the journalistic craft of the state University advised the coming newspaper owners to fill the columns of their papers with personal mention with the view of gaining new and holding old subscribers. In other words, Editor Hazeltine argues, in order to get persons to subscribe for your paper, you must flatter them. Hazeltine is not only the editor of a weekly paper himself, but he is also one of the regents of the University of Washington, and yet he openly advocates flattery to the students thereof as the sure way of getting the attention of your fellowman, while you pull his leg. OLIVER HALL, state senator from Colfax, has spent the most of the week in Seattle attending the session of the grand lodge of the Knights of Pythia. "I have heard no politics since I left the state house and I probably will not hear any in my section of the state before two or three months prior to the next primary election. We simply forget it until it is time to elect some one. I am a bit surprised to hear of Lee A. Johnson being in the gubernatorial race, but there is room for them all so let all who will get in and go to it." Senator Hall is one of the large land owners of eastern Washington. D. E. DUGDALE, the Seattle base ball magnate, may be a first class money getter at the gate, but he seems to be rather poor in selecting a team to win games. It will be remembered that his team last year lead all the rest at the bottom of the box and went out with flying colors. While some of the other teams are leading his in the present downward run by a few paces, yet his is doing its best to catch the low team. If Dug does not improve his team his trade will fall off in Seattle more than it did last year and that is saying quite a bit. HENRY DICKINSON, of the Henry Dickinson Lumber Company of Seattle, gave out an interview while in Spokane a few days ago to the effect that his father was not forced to resign from President Taft's cabinet. Perhaps Henry is correct, but he will have a hard time making any body believe it. It was up to the president to keep Mr. Dickinson and see all the other members of the cabinet resign, and so, the "gentermon from the sauth, sah," had to go. HOWARD D. TAYLOR, representative from the forty second representative district, who is a candidate for governor, will not get the support of Dr. Ghent representative from the forty fourth district. That settles your gubernatorial hash, Howard, and you had as well keep on sawing wood. A. A. TOZIER of Everett has been named by Gov. Hay as state oil inspector. Evidently the governor over looked the fact that the editor of this paper is in need of drawing a regular salary from the state. EDITOR Goss, of the Saturday Review, promises to have something to say on the failures of the Hay administration. Is it possible that even Goss wanted something which he did not get from Gov. Hay? MILLER FREEMAN, who jumped into fame through a circular letter, has returned from California and it is hinted he hurried home to help circulate the circular letter. R. R. GEORGE, the well known Seattle lawyer and justice of the peace, has left his court and will be absent therefrom until late in August. LAW NOTES. Uncle Sam has had things coming his way the past week, he having won two important cases before the highest court of the land. The U. S. Supreme court affirmed the sentence imposed upon C. W. Wilson, head of the United Wireless Telegraph Company for refusing to open his books to the grand jury for inspection. The United Wireless Company has been under suspicion for some time and the grand jury desired to investigate the standing of the company and Wilson refused to permit it to go through the books and was of course fined by the lower court and the sentence affirmed by the higher court. The effect of this opinion makes it possible for the books of any concern to be opened for the inspection of a grand jury or any authorized government official. The Standard Oil Company, which the general public long since decreed to be a menace to the country has been declared by the U. S. supreme court to be a trust and a monopoly in restraint of trade, and its dissolution ordered. This is the largest trust concern in the United States and has done more to crush out small competitors than any other trust in the country, and that is saying a good deal. John D. Rockefeller holds almost half of the entire stock of the company and with his relatives and intimate friends, controls more than a majority stock. He is perhaps the richest man in the world. The Standard Oil Company has ramified itself throughout every state in the Union and it is next to impossible to get a gallon of oil without paying tribute to its magnates. What effect its dissolution will have on the price of oil remains to be seen. The U. S. supreme court has freed Samual Gompers, John Mitchell and Frank Morrison, organized labor leaders, who by a lower court were judged in contempt, for continuing to boycott a manufacturing concern after they had been ordered by the court to refrain therefrom. Jail sentences were imposed upon each of them, but they appealed to the higher courts and won out. It is the consensus of opinion that the court erred. Every man and every organization should have the right to boycott or refuse to trade with any concern that it or they feel so inclined not to, and no law should prevent them from expressing themselves on the subject in the shape of advising their friends not to trade with such concerns or persons. Lifting the wreck of the Maine is nothing more or less than sickly sentiment as it will not be fit for anything but old junk when it will have been lifted. This is a graft of another form. "Let Seattle Stand by Alaska is a Times head line," which we hope she will do, but not in a manner that the coal fields of Alaska be appropriated by the Guginheims and their attorneys. Mayor Dilling vetoed the jim crow ordiance aimed at "segar" smokers and now the "bys" can continue to puff vile smoke into the faces of those to whom it is the most objectional. Jack Lester, another of the "white man's hope," has met his waterloo and Jack Johnson continues to roam at large as long as he stays away from California in his benzine buggy. The Seattle Republican is desirous of publishing your legal notices and will do it, at reasonable rates.. Let it hear from you before sending your notices out. Having consigned Dietz to life imprisonment the lumber trust of Wisconsin has made an example of a human dog that attempted to defy its commands. When is a Caucasian not a Caucasian? (From the New York Independent.) This is a conundrum which is no joke. It is a very serious matter with many of the first Creole families of Louisiana. To us outside who look on it is absurdly amusing, as the antics of those who make fools of themselves always are no matter how serious to the participants. Louisiana was settled by the French. The French used to have less fear of race admixture than English settlers. Many Creoles, like Cubans, have a dark complexion, and have been suspected of Negro blood, which they angrily deny. Louisiana has an elaborate terminology for the successive dilutions, from the mulatto and the quadroon downward—or upward—which we printed some weeks ago. When the dilution reaches the sixteenth fraction it is almost indistinguishable, and at the sixty-fourth no test can discover it. For all practible purposes the man is a Caucasian—but not for Louisiana law. Of all States, Louisiana ought to be the last to enact a law forbidding inter-marriage of a white person with any one who has the least infusion of Negro blood. There is no knowing where it might hit, for in Louisiana beyond doubt many pass for white in whose genealogy research would discover a few drops of Negro blood. Such a case has lately stirred up the State. A young woman of good family, a graduate of a fashionable laidies' seminary in New Orleans, was killed by being run over in the street. A news paper'spoke of her as colored. That was a moral offence. Her brother brought suit for slander, and the editor, by referring to ancient records, showed that one of her ancestors was recorded as colored. That put the whole family into a horrible plight. They had always thought of themselves as white, and had associated only with white people. Now no body would associate with them. They must sink, tho visibly white, to the rank and caste and associations of Negroes. Hitherto they had been good enough to associate with any body. Now, with no fault of their own, and no change in themselves, they were thrust, with all their whiteness, into the outer blackness. The dead girl had a sister happily married to a man of German origin. There was no question that he was a full Caucasian. But he had imbibed the Louisiana prejudice and terror of invisible and infinitesimal nigritude. He discovered—and his wife did—from the newspaper account that she had this bar sinister. He could not continue to live with such a banned woman. Besides, the law fobade it. He was liable to imprisonment for maintaining marital relations with her. He appealed to the court to have his marriage annulled, and the court could do no less. So she was sent adrift with the rest of the family. Thus in this case two legal maxims had illustrations, one by its truth, "Summa lex, summa injuria," and the other by its extreme contradiction, "De minimis lex non curat." The law does care a great deal for the smallest things. It cares in Louisiana for what is so attenuated as to be invisible. Now such a law and such enforcement is barbarous beyond expression. It puts a suspicion in multitudes of families. It is against all common sense as against all Christianity. Who knows where, through personal malice, it may strike next? The story is told in the Sun—very likely so—of a similar case in one of the parishes. A suit for slander was brought for calling a family colored. The sheriff looked up the records and found the charge sustained. As the investigation anused him, he looked farther and found one of his own ancestors recorded as colored—but a fortunate fire soon after destroyed the proof. Now what should be done? If Louisiana must maintain its infamous law against intermarriage, it should at least set a line where the prepotent Negro blood is to be held as washed out. Set it at one-eighth or one-sixteenth, or one-thirty-second, or one-sixty-fourth, but at least set it somewhere. South Carolina has such a law. It is adding stupidity to allow the taint to go on forever. And once more, we advise all white Negroes in Louisiana, or anywhere else in the South to change their residence and leave their pedigree behind. There is such a case now in Baltimore, where the doctors can't tell whether a girl is white or black. Let them live as white people and be received as white people. We do not doubt there are thousands of such people, both North and South, who have by changing their home, changed their race and color. We have known such cases, and not all Creoles. Thus, as the bleaching process goes on, the conundrum will cease to concern them. When is a Caucasian not a Caucasian? IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the Matter of the Application of Helen G. DeVoe, to register title to certain land therein described, Plaintiff, vs. Rose Bauman, and Rose Bauman as Executrix of the Estate of Ulrich Bauman, the parties, unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the application herein, Defendants. Number 54544-75. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the above You, and each of you, are hereby summoned and required to answer the application of the applicant plaintiff in the above entitled application for registration of the following land, situate in King County, WV, with a to-wit: The Southeast Quarter (¼) of the Northwest Quarter (¼) of the Northwest Quarter (¼) of Section Thirty-six (36) in Township Twenty-six (26) North, Range Three (3) East, W. M., excepting the Southwest two acres therefrom sold to Lucy M. Adams, to the said application in the office of the Clerk of said Court, in said County, within twenty-one days from and including the date of the first publication, to-wit: within twenty-one (21) days from and including the 19th day of May, 1911, and if you fail to answer the said application in this action the applicant plaintiff in this action will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the application herein. Witness, D. K. Sickles, Clerk of said Court and the seal thereof at Seattle in said County and State this 16th day of May, 1911. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk JOHN R. WILSON Attorney, for Plaintiff, 539 New York Block. May 19—June 3, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Homer R. Burgess, and all persons unknown, if any, having cr claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—N.Y. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are the owner of the one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 24th day of December, 1910, and numbered B67769, for delinquent taxes the year 1909 in the owner of the one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 11. Block 2, Lawrence Central Addition to West Seattle. That taxes for subsequent years have been paid by plaintiff upon land, to-wit: For which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against land. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of payment. You and each of you are notified of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after May 12, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint. You are answer on the under- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN signed attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against said real property, for the amounts due upon it for sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of sald property for the satisfaction of a sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailley Building, Seattle, Washington. May 12-June 30. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Octavia Emma Wheeler, Deceased. No. 12757. By order of said court made herein on the 26th day of April, 1911, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said deceased, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executor of said estate, at No. 745 New York Block, Seattle, Wash., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be Attorney for Estate. No. 745 New York Block, Seattle, Wash. April 28—May 26, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, KING County, Washington. Lulu Leighton, Plaintiff, vs. Albert Leighton, Defendant. No. 80229. Summons. The State of Washington to the said of the first publication of this summons, published on April 28. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 28th day of April, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in th above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plea that the above state and in case of your failure so do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complaint in this action prays for divorce and that the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address. 606 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication April 28, 1911. Date of last publication June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Carrie S. Erne, Plaintiff, vs. Anna Ford Johnson, Defendant. No. — Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Anna Ford Johnson, Defendant: Your are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit within sixty days after the 28th day of April, 1911, and defend the above entitled cause of action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the oplaintiff as a cause of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk, so said Court. The object of this action is to foreclose a mortgage on the following described real estate, to-wit: The Northwest Quarter (NW¼) of the Northwest Quarter (NW¼) of Section Thirteen (13), Township Twenty-six (26), North of Range Four (4) East of W. M. WM. C. KEITH, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office and Office Address; 326 Leary Building, Seattle, Washington. April 28–June 9, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice. Washington & Susitna Mining and Development Company, a Corporation.—No. 80026. To Whom It May Concern: Ta notice that the petition for the dissolution and disincorporation of the Washington & Susitna Mining and Development Company, a corporation by certificate by proper officers, setting forth that its management of the stockholders of said corporation called for the purpose, it was decided by a vote of more than two-thirds of all the stockholders of said corporation to disincorporate and dissolve said corporation, have been filed in the court of Appeal on the 32nd day of June, 1911, at the hour of 9:30 a. at the court room of Department No. 4, of the above named Superior Court, have been fixed by said court as the time and place of the hearing of said petition, and that the application of said petition, and that the dissolution and disincorporate will be heard at said time, at the place and such order will be made thereon as the court, upon hearing, shall deem proper. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 19th day of April. 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and summons. L. H. Oliver, plaintiff, vs. Homer R. Burgess, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, defendants.—No. 80103. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 5th day of February, 1910, and numbered BD7197, for the sum of $1,344, and upon the 14th and situated in the said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 25, Block 2, Lawrence Central Addition to West Seattle. The treasurer for subsequent years have been paid by plaintiff upon said land, to-wit: For 1905, $2.79; for 1909, $2.77. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said land. as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAYER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. May 5—June 16, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Homer R. Burgess, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. 80020. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them. You and each of you, as owners, claimants or the heirs of interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated June 1910, and numbered B61718, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the sum of $1.34, upon land in said King County, described as follows, to lot: 24, Block 2, Lawrence Central Addition to West Seattle. That taxes for subsequent year have been paid to the same, to wit: For That taxes for subsequent years have been paid by plaintiff upon said land, to-wit: For 1908, $2.79; for 1909, $2.77. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said bank. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, within twelve days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest, payable you fail to pay, until the amount will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against, as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21-June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Robert Knife, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the heretoafter described real property, defendants.—Namely, State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to heretoafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 24th day of December, 1910, and numbered B77677, for the property of $4.69, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: North half of Fractional Tract 32 of Kellogg's Tracts. That taxes for subsequent years have been paid to the plaintiff to-wit; above described real property to-wit: For the year 1908, the sum of $4.26; for the year 1909, the sum of $4.10. Which several shares bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of safe notice, to certify with the day of said publication to-wit, within 60 days after May 12, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below the interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs ordered by the attorney for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on now in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. May 12—June 23, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Jos. Allen, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, defendants. — No. 509. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th day of June, 1910, and numbered B66143, for the defendant, sums of the above real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 16, Block 14, Allentown. That taxes for subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, sums of 36 cents; for the year 1908, the sum of 92 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 92 cents. Which several sums bury at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said land. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication of this notice, within sixty days after April 21, 1911. In the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below the interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against sald real property for the amounts due upon it, for sald taxes, interest and costs ordered a sale of sald for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21—June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Supplement. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. R. C. Washburn, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the heretofore described real property, defendants.—No. 80015. State of Washington: To the above defendants are of them: You and your son, you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are the holders of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 15th day of October, 1906, of the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of 80 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 32, Block 55, Kirkland. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1908, the sum of 35 cents; for the year 1908, the sum of 41 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 39 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the complaint, if any, and to appear within sixty days after the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after May 5, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the complaint, if any, in the office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien on said taxes and costs against said plaintiff, and ordering the plaintiff to pay for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plainest complaint, now on file with the court. in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff, A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Halley Building, Seattle, Washington. May 5—June 16, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. C. D. Hillman, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 80019. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, for the last day of April, 1909, and numbered B55537, for delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.54, and upon real property situated in king County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 5, Block 5, Hillman's Meadow Garden Div. That taxes for subsequent years have been paid by plaintiff upon said land, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $2.57; for the year Which several sums bear interest at the rate of $2.57; per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said sum of $3.17. 1908, the sum of $2.80; for the year 1909, the land. and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above notice, and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. in case you fail so to do, the plaintiff may answer the complaint and the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against us as provided by law, and in this case against the complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21-June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Emma C. Ketcham, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders, are as owners in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, described as to-wit: Holson, Sole, 1911, numbered B67514, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of 58 cents, and upon real property situated said King County, described as follows, to-wit: second class shore lands at the I.R. 4, Lakem, Holson, Sole, 1911, numbered B67514, for the delinquent taxes for subsequent years have been paid by plaintiff upon said land, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of 11 cents; for the year 1908, the sum of $3.03; for the year 1909, Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said land. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of thirty-fourth day of this notice, excluding of day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to the unauthorized complaint for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien taxes and costs and property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21—June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Bessie Isaacs Savage, Deceased. No. ____. Notice to Credi- By order of said court, made herein, on the 27th day of March, 1911, notice is hereby given to the creditors of and to all persons having claims against said deceased, or against her death, deceased and George Marvin Savage, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executor of said estate at his residence, 212 Twenty-third Avenue North, Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of business of George Marvin Savage, within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice, or same will be barred. Date of first publication, April 22, 1911. GEORGE MARVIN SAVAGE, sold to Executor and Estate. Date of first publication, April 21. Date of last publication May 26, 1911. Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. 4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Lucy M. Morey, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herein-after described real property, defendants.—No. (100) 101. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of three certain delinquent tax certificates issued by the treasurer of the State of Washington, State of the 17th day of October, 1910, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of 64 cents each, and upon real property situated in Block 14, Mercer Park, in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Delinquent tax certificate No. B67533, on Lot 13, Delinquent tax certificate No. B67534, on Lot 14, Delinquent tax certificate No. B67535, on Lot 15. That taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon each of said lots, real property, to-wit. For the year 1907, the sum of 15 cents on each of 37 lots; for the year 1908, the sum of 15 cents on each of said lots 13 and 14; for the year 1900, the sum of 30 cents on each of said lots 13 and 14; and on said lot 15 the sum of 54 cents for the year 1908; and the sum of 44 cents for the year 1908. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said land. And each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above case, and answer and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail to so request, the attorney will proceed by closing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the lien provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21-June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for King County, Summons. Anna F. Casey, plaintiff, vs. T. D. Casey, dee fendant-No. 80257. The State of Washington to the said T. D. Casey, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this complaint, and within sixty days after the 5th day of May, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action set forth in the complaint is as follows: To obtain a decree of divorce from said defendant upon the ground of desertion, abandonment and non-support for more than two years; for the care, custody and control of the minor plaintiff; for the defense of the minor plaintiff he allowed to resume her former name, and for general relief. HERCHER MOHNSTON. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by Publication. Gertrude E. Wheeler, plaintiff, vs. Frederick Wheeler, defendant.—No. 80320. The State of Washington to the said Frederick You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days sixty days after May 5, 1911, in the above court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case the plaintiff is to judgment against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the said defendant on the grounds of desertion and non-support, the same being causes of action in which service of summons may be made by publication. HERBERT BROWN, Plaintiff's Attorney. Postoffice address, Room 25, Union Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. May 5—June 16, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Walter Brooks, plaintiff, vs. Celeste Brooks, attorney. The State of Washington to the said Celeste Brooks, defendants. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons against沛什, with sixty days after May 5th, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the ground stated, and the attorney below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk said court. The objection to the entitled action is to obtain a decree dissolving the bonds of matrinity existing between plaintiff and defendant on the ground of extreme cruelty. Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address 625-626 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. May 5—June 16, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR Court OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Summons Dell Owens Schultz, by Male Owens Estes, her guardian ad litem, plaintiff, vs. Ben Schultz, Defendant. No. — The State of Washington to the said Ben You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after May 5th, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer your question and claim of a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to. judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, has been dealt with the office, and said court, the object of the above entitled action is for a decree declaring void the marriage existing between plaintiff and yourself on the ground of the minority of plaintiff at the time of the solemnizing of said marriage. SOTO, WILLIAMS. Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address 625-626 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. May 5—June 16, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Nellle Phinney, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—N. 1914. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain property of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of October, 1910, and numbered B67507, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of 80 cents, and upon real property situated in Lot 20, Block 50, Kirkland. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1909, the sum of 30 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 30 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the summons, and are hereby summoned to the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and the defendant, in the absence of signed attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing on the real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against, as provided by law, and an attorney for plaintiff, complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21-June 2, 1911. IN THE HIERENIC COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Hannah Peasley and C. A. Nelson, and all persons unknown, if any, have an interest in and to the her里henie described real property, defendants.-No. S0013. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: Noy and other von, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the里henie described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, and the hereinafter described the 22d day of May, 1906, and numbered B42049, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904 in the amount of $7.82, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, tow: SE. 1/4 SW. 1/4 Sec. T. 3p. N. R. 5 That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit, in the amount of $7.00; for the year 1907, the sum of $8.44; for the year 1908, the sum of $4.04; for the year 1909, the sum of $4.10. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 4 per cent. from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said land. You and each of you (including said persons unknown to you) have hereby summoned to be paid by the bear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after May 5, 1911, in the above entitled court and account, for the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below, or pay the amount due, together with payment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interests and costs incurred in the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRUVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, attorney, for Plaintiff. Office address, 113 Valley Building, Seattle, Washington. May 5—June 16, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and summons. L. J. Barnhart, plaintiff, vs. D. P. Merritt and Sam'l Barnhart, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, defendants.-No. 80012. To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and the hereinafter described property, be hypothetically the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 19th day of October, 1908, and issued by B51652, for the amount of the year 1900, in the amount of $2.01, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to wit: West % of SE. % of NW. % of NE. of Washington. N. K. E. W., M. L., less % foot strin of south end That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $1.48; for the year 1908, the sum of $1.85; for the year 1909, the sum of 39 cents. Which several salts bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said law. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of sale, after sixteen days after May 6, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff on the undersigned attorney for the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of salts taxes and costs against said real property for the amounts due upon it, and the lien of salts taxes and costs against sale of salts property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on file in this cause and court. L. H. GRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Balley Building, Seattle, Washington. May 5—June 16, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and L. H. Draver, plaintiff, vs. H. K. Arnold, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 80011. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the older of the two claimants, the tax certificates issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of October, 1910, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of 80 cents each, and upon real property unauthorized, in and upon real King County, described as follows, to-wit: Delinquent tax certificate No. B67508, on Lot 21; delinquent tax certificate No. B67509, on Lot 22. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said land, and the amount of the sum of said lots the sum of 41 cents for the year 1908; one each of said lots the sum of 39 cents for the year 1909. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said land. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above law and actia; and defend this question and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgement or judgment of said taxes and costs against said real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on now file IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Christina McDougal, plaintiff, vs. Alexander McDougal, defendant.—No. The State of Washington, to the said defendant, Alexander McDougal. Wrote the summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 31st day of March, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court case against the plaintiff herein, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint herein, which will be filed with the clerk of this court. The object of this action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant upon the grounds of abandonment and desertion of plaintiff and defendant, and failure of defendant to support plaintiff. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: 604-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. March 31-May 12, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Albert C. Wheaton, Plaintiff, vs. Hilda Wheaton, Defendant. No. 80382. Sum- mings by Publication. The State of Washington, to the above named defendant, Hildah Wheaton: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 12th day of May, 1911, and defend the above entitled action, in the above enclosed notice, in the presence of the plaintiff herein, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of the above entitled Court. The object of this action by the plaintiff is to obtain a judgment of divorce from the said defendant, upon the grounds of defendant's adultery, and defendant living and residing in a house of prostitution, and upon the further ground of defendant's cruelty to the plaintiff, and also the custody of the two minor children of plaintiff and defendant be awarded plaintiff. E. F. F. KIBENSTRA. Attorney for Plaintiff. 233 Epler Block, Seattle, Wash. May 12—June 23, 1911... NOTICE OF PUBLICATION—NOTICE is hereby given that the annual meeting of the stockholders of the Consolidated Gold Mines Company of Washington, will be held June 6th, 1911, 1811, at 7:30 p.m. in the office of the Company of Seattle, Washington, for the election of directors for the ensuing year and for the transaction of any other business that may come regularly before the stockholders. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Probate. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Frederick Carlson, deceased.—No. 12549. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against the estate of Frederick Carlson, deceased, to present the same, with the necessary vouchers, to the undersigned IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice of Sale of Real Estate. In the Matter of the Estate of Elaine K. Oderkirk, deceased.—No. 8969. Notice is hereby given that under and by virtue of an order of sale in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County, dated December 8, 1909, I will sell at private sale the following described real estate situated in King County, Washington: Lot eight (8), block five (5), Webster's Madison Street Addition to the City of Seattle; Also lot six (6), and the north forty (4) feet of lot five (5), block fourteen (14), Yoshi's Second Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington. The sale will be made on or after the 11th day of March, A. D. 1911. Bids will be received by the undersigned, at his office, to 604 Virtual Life Building, Seattle Kounty Court, Washington. Terms of sale are cash, gold coin of the United States, 10 per cent of bid to accompany bid, balance to be paid upon confirmation of sale by court. Dated this January 1911. EDWARD VON TOBEL. Administrator de bonis non of the Estate of Elaine K. Oderkirk, deceased. Feb. 24—April 24, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Notice to Creditors. Epeting, deceased—No. 12996 By order of said court made herein on the 30th day of March, 1911. Notice is herewith issued by officers of, and to all persons having claims against, said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned James T. Clague of said estate, at the office of Chas. K. Jenner, 328 Central Building, Seattle, Wash., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication April 7, 1911. JAMES T. CLAGUE, As Administrator of said Estate. CHAS. K. JENNER. Attorney for Estate. 328 Central Building, Seattle, Wash. April 7—May 5, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons. Alta Carlson, plaintiff, vs. Edwin Carlson, defendant.—No. 79733. The State of Washington, to the said Edwin Carlson, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 7th day of April, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office before stated: do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action is to secure a divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant, on the grounds of abandonment and failure to support. GEO. McKAY, Plaintiff's Attorney. Postoffice building, 450 Arcade Building, Seattle, Wash. April 7—May 19, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, KING County, Washington. T. W. Hansen, Plaintiff, vs. Marcus Nelson, Defendant. No. 79905. Summons. The State of Washington, to the said Marcus Nelson, Defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the hearing, to give an oral argument to wit; within sixty days after the 14th day of April, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complain of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of failure to answer the complaint to be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. (Action for money only; amount claimed: Thirteen Hundred Ninety and 47-100 ($1,390.47) Dollars.) H. E. FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 606 Marion Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, April 14, 1911. Date of last publication, May 26, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. P. C. Ellsworth, Plaintiff, vs. J. G. Moyer, P. C. Ellsworth, Plaintiff, vs. J. G. Moyer, Catherine Moyer, his wife, Northwestern Mercantile Agency, a corporation; Minnie Townsend, Mina McIntyre, Wallace C. Meacham and Edith Meacham, his wife, Defendants. No. 79645. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said J. G. Moyer and Catherine Moyer, his wife. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 14th day of April, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, and he will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to recover judgment for plaintiff against J. G. Moyer and Catherine Moyer, his wife, on a promissory note dated September, 7, 1914, for $700, 75 attorney's fees, costs of suit, expenses of insurance and abstract and to foreclose the mortgage securing the payment of said note, on Lots 3 and 4, in Block 11, of Hillman's Lake Front Add. to Seattle, Division No. 1, in King County, Wash., which mortgage is duly recorded in Vol. 336 at page 185 of Mortgages, Records of King County, Wash. J. E. McGRBW, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 432 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. April 14—May 26, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF the State of Washington, for King County. W. M. Zimmerman, Plaintiff, vs. E. S. Smith and E. E. Parsons, Defendants. No. 80081. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said E. S. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 21st day of April, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under-signed attorney, for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which court has been appointed to handle the object of the above entitled action is one to recover judgment against you according to the terms of one (1) certain promissory note, dated January 2nd, 1911, in which you agreed to pay one E. E. Parsons, the sum of Three Hundred and Seventy-five dollars, ninety days (90) after date with interest at the rate of eight (8) per cent per annum together with a reasonable sum as attorney's fees in case of suit upon the said note, which plaintiff alleges to be the sum of Seventy-five ($75.00) Dollars; and in which action the plaintiff has sued you out in technology against the demand of Washington, and described as follows, to-wit: Lot Five (5), Block Eighteen (18), Glilman's Addition to the City of Seattle, and the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of the City of Seattle (34), Township twenty-six (26), North of Range Six (6) East, W. M., and also the west forty-two (2) feet of Lot One and the west forty-two (2) feet of the North one half of Lot Two, Block seven, Comstock's Addition to the City of Seattle. ELIAS A. WRIGHT. Palintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address 623-631 Boree Building, Seattle, King County, April 21—June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Homer R. Burgess, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 80104. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: No. 80104: John Lyon, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certifier, and upon such notice the State of Washington, dated the 24th day of December, 1910, and numbered 807768, for delinquent taxes of the year 1908, in the sum of $1.42 and upon the real property situated in the State of Washington, dated the 24th day: Lot 10, Block 2, Lawrence Centre Addition to West Seattle. That taxes for subsequent years have been paid upon said land, to-wit: For 1908, $3.41; for 1909, $1.58. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said land. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after May 5, 1911, in the above FRIDAY May 19, 1911 entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and cost. In case you fail to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. May 5—June 16, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Summons by Publication. M. H. Ring, plaintiff, vs. C. E. Remsberg, as executor of the last will and testament of George E. Hall, deceased; C. E. Remsberg, and "Jane Doe" Remsberg, his wife, whose true given name is to plaintiff unknown; Fremont State Bank, Cork, Seattle Local Bank, Wood Company, a corporation; Humane Society, a corporation; Charles P. Hall, Joseph F. Hall, Lucy Irene Hall Leach and Carrie G. Hall, defendants.—No. 78885. The State of Washington to Charles P. Hall, Joseph E. Hall, Lucy Irene Hall Leach and Carrie G. Hall, defendants above named: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 24th day of February, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the cross complaint of the defendants C. E. Rems- Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 Rainier PALE BEER A Free Trip to Seattle and Return. Let's Bust the State Dental Trust. Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar, you save a dollar, I will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established at 718 and 720, and for 18 years, I do not compete. Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar and the State Dental monopoly will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established at 713 First Ave., in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete with cheap dentists, but with the high-clas's dentists for half their price. Open evenings until 8 and Sundays until 4 for people who work. EDWIN J. BROWN, D.D.S. 713 First Avenue Seattle, Wash. Read my article in Sunday's P.L. and Monday's Times and Star OVER 65 YEARS' EXPERIENCE PATENTS TRADE MARKS DESIGNS COPYRIGHTS & C. Anyone sending a sketch and description may quickly ascertain our opinion free whether an invention is probably patentable by companies, that is particularly confidential. HANDBOOK on Patents sent free. Oldest agency for securing patents. Patents taken through Munn & Co. receive special notice, without charge, in the Scientific American. A handsomely illustrated weekly. Largest circulation of any scientific journal. Terms, $3 a year; four months, $1. Sold by all newsealers. MUNN & Co. 361 Broadway, New York Branch Office, 655 F St. Washington, D.C. Our Ton Always Weighs 2,000 lbs. Insist on having the Genuine —you can easily detect a substitute. If such is delivered send it back. J. W. BULLOCK DEALER IN COAL AND WOOD 609 TENTH AVE. Seattle, Wash. BUNKERS: Rear James St. Power House, Telephones: Sunset East 87 Independent 87 Twenty-Sixth Ave. and Dearborn St. Telephones: Sunset East 102, Ind. 8170 Second Ave. No. and Boston St. Telephones: Sunset Queen Anne 1885 Ind. 7538 711 Western Ave. between Yesler and Columbia. Telephones: Sunset Main 3873 Independent 289 ---