Seattle Republican

Historical Society NORTHWEST The Seattle Republican Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE PUBLISHER'S NOTICE. The Seattle Republican is published on Friday of every week by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3.00 per year; six months, $1.50; postage prepaid. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. Publication office, 427 Epler Block. Telephone Main 305. HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON, - Publisher. SUSIE REVELS CAYTON, - Associate. "Yes," said A. G. McBride, the criminal prosecutor, "libel suits are becoming popular, but it will be a long time before the courts strike anything as rare and racy as the Bridges case. Bob Bridges came to the office one day while I was chief deputy under Judge Miller, and the boss filed an information in the superior court charging a publisher of a local paper with libel. I do not remember his name, but anyhow, the article charged Bob with being a "political prostitute." Of course during the four years I was with Judge Miller, he occasionally deemed it proper to punish me for some errors on my part, and while he "had it in for me," this libel suit was assigned to me for trial. He wanted to even up some score, and the judge did it. Humes, "Tom" as we used to call him, presided at the trial. I introduced my evidence on behalf of the state and then it was that the fun began. I should say the defense plead the truth of the libelous matter and a host of the witnesses testified that Bob was very much inclined to political flirtation, in fact, the defense made out a very strong case. In the course of the introduction of the evidence for the defense, Abe Spring, the versatile and irrepressible Abe, was put on the stand as an expert to define the term, "political prostitute." He acquitted himself nobly. Bob stood the ordeal quite well until it came to the argument of the case, and then he flew, and I did not see him again for months. I never was more completely whipped in a criminal case, and I always thought Judge Miller enjoyed my discomfiture more than any one else. In order that Attorney Darrow may familiarize himself with the California laws the trial of the McNamaras have been continued until July 1st. In other words, Darrow wants to study out all the technicalties in order that he may take due advantage of every one that may present itself in the case, in order to prove that his clients did not blow up the Times building though, perhaps, it may have been blown up by dynamite previously but there. If the McNamaras were in any way connected with that dastardly crime they are guilty of murder in the first degree and should be punished accordingly, and it does not require a course of law on the part of Clarence Darrow, their quibbling and hair splitting attorney to prove their innocence. The burden of proof in is on the state and if the accused men are innocent it will be an easy matter for them to explain away every allegation set out by the state. It is reported that Darrow is to receive $50,000 for defending those men and $100,000 if he acquits them, all of which proves that the men furnish ing the fabulous sums for this trial are themselves convinced that he has a hard job ahead and will have to resort to every trick and piece of chicanery known to the criminal lawyer to save the men from conviction. Is it right to turn such red handed murderers loose on the public? Mayor Seymour of Tacoma has set out to fight the Japanese gardeners, who supply Tacoma with fresh vegetables, and from our view point he has an up hill undertaking, not that he will not find public sentiment sufficiently crystalized to help him successfully fight the little brown men, but that the white folk have found other business more lucrative, and left the gardening business to the Japanese, and it is now a case of Hobson's choice, buy the vegetables offered by the Japanese or go without vegetables. The Japanese seeing the condition things had drifted into have systematically advanced the price of fresh vegetables until for the Tacomaite to have those delecacies on his table is like eating grains of gold. Though denied the rights SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. FRIDAY, JUNE 2, 1911 of citizenship the Japanese have slowly but surely gained a foot hold in the Northwest that will be next to impossible to dislodge them, apply all the race prejudice the whites will or may to the situation. If the white man is too proud and haughty to raise vegetables for each other to eat he has no kick coming when the Japanese or any other nationality does so and then charge big prices for them. They have only an understanding among themselves as to prices and have oranized no company in the form of a trust hence they can not be prosecuted. Again the United States Supreme court goes on record in opposition to the legality of trusts, last Monday it decided the tobacco trust was illegal. The Northern Security trust was first declared illegal, then the Standard Oil trusts was ordered dissolved and now the tobacco trust is likewise ordered dissolved. In the mean time the stocks and bonds of all of those trusts are selling for as much or more than before any of the decisions were rendered and the question is asked, what relief has the supreme court given the people? If a thing is illegal, it seems to us that the thing to do is to quash it immediately, if not sooner, but if it continues to thrive the same as before it was questioned at all then it has been done no injury. James W. Maxwell, president of the Commercial Club, and more or less prominent in the affairs of the city, who lost his position in the Seattle National Bank last January, has come back, and he is now at the head of National City Bank which has a capital stock of $500,000. Mr. Maxwll is very popular in banking circles and it was a seven day wonder when he lost his position with the Seattle National, and to this day it has never been explained, and friends of his say that he is as ignorant of the cause of the change as outsiders and did not know that the change would be made two hours prior to getting a notification that it had been made. He has succeeded in organizing a strong institution and it is the consensus of opinion that, it will soon become one of the leading banking houses of the city. When the original Seattle Press Club disbanded and reorganized for the purpose of eliminating the editor of The Seattle Republican, we felt inwardly chagrined, but with the editor of the Star already convicted, the editor of the Times under four grand jury indictments and the editor of the Post-Intelligencer out of jail on a $5,000 bail, all of whom are members of the latter day Seattle Press Club, it looks as if the bunch were opposed to having editors as members of the club that are on the square and in the open. Hence our deposement develops into a blessing into disguise. In the future we will select our associates with more discretion. Prosecuting Attorney John F. Murphy by quibbling over the Blethen indictment has brought upon himself a lot of criticism that he need not have gotten. It is Mr. Murphy's duty to become absolutely blind when crime has either been committed or supposed to have been committed and punish alike the rich and the poor. If Blethen had have been his father he should not have quibbled when a majority of the members of the grand jury voted to indict him. Former President Diaz of Mexico is now on the high seas headed for Spain, where he will perhaps spend the remainder of his days, an exile from home. Others have done the same, but regardless of the wealth one may possess it must be a heart breaking moment to look upon the land that gave you birth for the last time owing to the fact that the conditions have so changed that it is no longer safe for you to remain in the country. In big criminal cases days are spent in impanneling a jury and generally the prospective jurymen is put through a big stunt as one of the witness in the case, which, to our mind, is all rot. Any twelve honest men will try any case that comes before them and render just as fair and impartial verdict as if they had been asked a thousands and one useless questions about things with little or no bearing on the subject. Trying to solve the question, who blew up the Maine, is just as foolish as to try to figure out, why Thompson's colt swam the river to get a drink. Some- VOLUME XVII. NUMBER 53 body hostile to the United States did the dirty deed and Spain having been charged with it Uncle Sam whipped her to a perfect stand still for it and that should have closed the unpleasantness. How many men in line of the parade Prosperity day that would willingly contribute to the financiering of an infant industry? The proof of the pudding is the tasting it and if they want prosperity in Seattle do something that will bring a continuous golden stream to the city and quit trying to sell corner lots at fabulous sums with nothing to back up the proposition. The Japanese dwellers in Seattle, who have been the victims of numerous holdups and robberies for the past month, appealed to Mayor Dilling for protection, and were told to protect themselves, and they have determined on doing so, and the holdups had better look to th eir laurels or some of them will get what the Russia got a few years ago. Whether or not the few day warm weather in Seattle was due to the Wappenstein trial, which has been waxing warm for the past ten days, the writer verily doeth not know, but it gives one that impression. The jury having been selected the betting is slightly against Wappy just now, but the wise guys say, Big Bill will skin out. Tacoma's census enumeration, which has been investigated by a federal grand jury, promises to disclose one of the most gigantic frauds ever perpetrated in any community of this government. Seattle had a slight touch of the same kind of frauds and it is hoped that every one connected with them will be sent to the penitentiary. If ex-mayor Schmitz of San Francisco, who is now in Mexico broke, should grab his old violin and play like it, and if he did he, may perhaps, would not be broke very much longer. His half million ilgotten gains brought on an over dose of swell head and he does not seem to want to get down to business again. Ashum Brown, better known in Seattle as "Brownie," is coming back to the Puget Sound country from Washington City, whither he has been for the past two years, and is going to live in Olympia. It was thought for a time that Brownie woule get a "big job," but some how or other he did not land. The daily newspaper of the city are making desperate efforts to try the Wappenstein case in its columns and if the jurymen are premitted to read the papers every day it looks very much like they will succeed, in which case, it will be for the paper with the most influence to win out. Five aces in one deck of cards resulted in three men getting shot to death. Some men seem to take mortal offence at such little things. Just to think of three men getting killed because a deck of cards had an extra ace in it, as though it could do any harm. It is advocated that men should marry at nineteen and women at sixteen, that they may become grand fathers in their early fifties and great grand fathers in their first seventies. That would be splendid stuff if there was no such thing as a divorce mill. The Seattle Republican desires to get your publications and it promises, if you will do so, to give you a square deal and print them just as cheap as any other publication. Before sending your notice out call up Main 305 and get terms. Seattle has never seen a more impressive or beautiful parade than the one that marched through her streets Memorial day. The weather was perfect and every feature about the parade was a winner. Thirty nine years' married life has not brought a anamity of action between a Seattle couple and so a legal seperation is being asked for by them. It is said, there is no fool like an old fool. Bryan's count me out of the presidential race was so feeble that even a deaf one could hear a whisper, 'I am always in the hands of my friends if there is anything like a cinch.'' If there is anything in the decision of the U. S. supreme court dissolving the tobacco trust, it looks as if somebody else besides the trust will be able to smoke. 2 PERSONS TALKED ABOUT WILL H. WRIGHT, a son of a Seattle pioneer, and himself for many years more or less prominent in Seattle banking circles, and also among others, who met him, is dead and four children and a wife mourn his loss. Will Wright, in his own quiet way, was one of God's noblemen and every one who ever had any dealings with him will verily testify to the same. He was one of those human beings that tried to say or do something that would make the other fellow feel better. Though reticent when it came to meeting his fellow men, yet when a helping hand was needed his was always extended, nor did he stop to see the who, but if a human being needed a hand of sympathy the one got his as readily as did the other. He leaves a wife no less noble in her make up than himself and it is hoped the children will follow in the wake of their parents. Somebody did a golden deed, Somebody proved a friend in need, Somebody sang a beautiful song, Somebody smiled the whole day long, Somebody thought, "tis sweet to live," Somebody said. "I am glad to give," Somebody fought a valiant fight, Somebody lived to shield the right, — Was that somebody you? WILLIAM BISHOP, the veteran law maker from Jefferson county, was a Seattle visitor this week, and talked willingly. In speaking about the gubernatorial race he said: "Unless the opposition to Gov. Hay concentrates its force on some man there will be no need of Hay making a campaign for the other fellows will elect him. I do not know whether I will be a candidate for representative next year or not. I am inclined not to be though I may get in it for the fun." Mr. Bishop was defeated for state senator last year by a Democrat and he was defeated before he knew that those he naturally expected to work for him, were working against him. In other words he acknowledges that they caught him napping. He is one of the heaviest fine stock breeders in the state and makes a specialty of selling fine cattle for breeding purposes. He has a large farm in Jefferson county and Irondale is platted up to his line, which means that he will be one of the wealthiest men in a few years in the Northwest, if Irondale continues to grow, and he thinks it will. MARK ANTHONY is an employee of the Seattle Lighting Company, and if he does not hold his position on account of the things he does favoring the company as against the patrons of the company then a great many persons so think. For an example, if you mail a check to the office for the payment of your account and if it can be side tracked so as to let it run over a day, then the customer loses the rebate and if you appeal to Anthony, with his studied corporation impudence he shows you no more consideration or courtesy than he does a yelping cur. If he can succeed in getting the bill beyond the rebate time the company is ahead that much and perhaps Anthony gets his share of the extra amount the customer has to pay. It is the fact that corporations keep such human misfits as that snarling human hyena in their employ who seem to not possess a single spark of gentlemaness, accounts for corporations getting scored at every turn of the road and will finally result in municipal ownership for all public utilities. ROBERT EVANS, a deputy in the office of the prosecuting attorney of King county, appeared before the supreme court to defend King county's right to assess the Metropolitan Building Company of Seattle, and the members of the state tax commission are as sore as men can possibly be over it, and all for the reason that it is common talk about the state house, that Evans had made no preparations to care for the case and had little or no knowledge of the real merits of the county's case and for that reason the supreme court held with Court Commissioner R. H. Lindsey, which caused the county to lose a vast amount of tax money that it should have had. "These are the kind of things that are driving this country into a Socialistic mood and if it continues there will be a great political eruption in every county of the state," one of the leading state officials was overheard to remark one day this week. JACOB FURTH, the well known banker and promoter of Seattle, does not take much stock in the talk that Seattle is on the bum. "The town is about as good as it has always been, barring the demoralized condition of the lumber trade. Seattle has always depended on the lumber industry for her good times, and she has always suffered when there was a lull in the lumber business. She is at present experiencing a lull in the lumber trade and of course is having a period of financial depression. There is no doubt in my mind that this is temporary and as soon as the lumber begins to move, which promises to be at an early date, things will move on in Seattle as they have always THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN done. There is plenty of money for legitimate business and on the whole there is no excuse to complain of the business conditions in Seattle under the present circumstances." JOHN A. WHALLEY, state senator from the thirty-sixth district, is not an advocate of the Employer's Liability law, which will soon go into effect in the state of Washington. He thinks that before the commission will have been operating a year it will prove the biggest fiasco ever attempted by a state. It will simply mean more clerks and helpers than are now employed by all of the other state officials and commissions put together and likewise a lawyer, a doctor and clerks in every city of any size in the state, and finally the whole will collapse like an egg shell. He is of the opinion that the remedy for the present law will be for the adjustment of all cases to be made by the courts of the various counties in which the accident may occur. ADNA W. LEONARD, D. D. L. L. D., pastor of the First Methodist Episcopal church of Seattle is about to publish a book and verily will do so, if 500 subscribers to the same can be had prior to putting the material for the book, which has already been written, in the hands of the printers. Dr Leonard's father was something of a book writer and he seems to be determined to follow in the wake of the father, both leaving their foot prints on the sands of time. FRANK S. SOUTHARD, brother-in-law and law partner of Will H. Morris, the well known criminal lawyer, passed to the Great Beyond Memorial day. He leaves a host of warm personal friends to mourn his loss. He was a ripe scholar, a perfect gentleman and a man totally devoid of demoralizing habits. His remains will be cremated next Sunday after the funeral services will have been held over them, by the Rev. J. D. O. Powers the Seattle Unitarian pastor. D. N. HOLDEN, who committed suicide one day this week, was for a time one of the best known men in Seattle. He was one of the proprietors of a furniture concern known as Seater & Holden and made a barrel of money out of the business. The editor of The Seattle Republican talked with him last Saturday and he seemed to have been in the best of spirits though he claimed times were rather close. W. H. DUMPHY, the well known Walla Walla attorney and old Democratic war horse, has announced his candidacy for the Democratic gubernatorial nomination, which means that the little Democratic snipe, better known as Hugh C. Todd will not have a look in with Dumphy in the field. THE TRIAL JURY. Among the venerable traditions concerning the jury, none has been more pertinently criticized than the custom of putting a premium of ignorance by preferring jurors whose minds are as devoid of contents as a vacuum. On the trial of a murder case in South Dakota, not long since, the attorneys found a juror who, from the customary point of view, was an ideal specimen. He had not read any newspaper accounts of the murder,—he "never took no interest in newspapers." He had never heard of President Taft and he did not know the meaning of the word "tariff." He believed he "had heard tell" of Roosevelt; sort of thought Roosevelt was a soldier, but had "most forgot" what it was he had heard about him. Of cours such a juror was accepted. He did not have any opinions about the case at bar nor apparently about anything else. A few months ago Judge Shelton, of Macon, Missouri, had the courage to declare that men who do not read the newspapers are not calculated to make good jurors. If this idea were adopted it would expedite trials, reduce the cost of trying murder cases, insure the selection of a better type of jurors, and matterially aid the cause of justice. Can an accused person be said to be tried by a jury of his peers if the box is filled by men whose minds are closed against all the influence of enlightenment exercised by the press of to-day? Fortunately the number of men who do not read newspapers grows smaller every year. You could not discover, in both the Dakotas, twelve men of the type of the juror mentioned. But, if that were possible, it were better that it be left undone. There is no more deplorable jest than a jury which is itself a joke bringing the law into ridicule and trifling with the rights of litigants or prisoners. The juries of the future will be composed of intelligent men, unwilling to play the part of the clown of the law. The obstinate man who "hangs" the jury will never be popular. Whether he ought to be praised or condemned depends upon his motive. If he is true to his conviction and has reasonable grounds for them; if he manfully refuses to concur in a shameful comprom- ise verdict,—he is a hero. If he is actuated by personal spite or blind prejudice, or worse still has succumbed to the wiles of the "jury fixer," he is a traitor to his trust and an enemy to society. "Women suffragist everywhere," says the New York Evening Post, will note with interest the news that a jury of men in Wyoming acquitted a woman of the murder of her husband, because, according to the foreman of the jury, "we couldn't bear to think of sending a sobbing, shrieking woman to the gallows." One of the favorite arguments against the suffragette is that, with women on juries, sentiment would control; that tender feminine hearts, and not reason, would dictate the verdicts. It is a matter of interest that a chief justice of the territory of Washington declared that in his experience, with mixed juries, this was not the case; that women were not to be imposed upon by a pretty but artful dodger in the criminal's box, ready to make effective use of her handkerchief in moving the jurors. In this Wyoming case, the evidence was plain, but, as the judge had instructed the jurors to find a verdict calling for the death penalty or to aquit, the jury set free the woman who shot her husband as he lay asleep. Of course, women jurors might have connived at a miscriage of justice like this. But the incident clearly shows that neither all the wisdom of the world, nor all the hard-heartedness in matters criminal, rest with the sterner sex, and will embolden those who argue that, until women sit on juries, a woman criminal will not be tried by her peers." WAPPENSTEIN FLASH LIGHTS. Big Bill Morris is the center of attraction though Judge John F. Main occasionally cuts in. Ed Been, the Aberdeen heavy weight, both politically and otherwise, has no fears of the outcome of the case. "Wappy has them skinned two to one," he declared. The death of Southard just as the case began, who was a member of the firm defending Wappy, is considered by the superstitious as an evil omen, which forbodes no good for the defendant. Shiply is said to be doing the brain work for the defence, and he may be doing his share, but to a man up a tree it looks as if the brain of Morris is working over time just now. "I am going to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth," declared Gerald before going on the witness stand, and after he had testified all agreed that he kept his word. If the cashier of the Canadian Bank of Commerce told the truth Wappenstein must have found a lucrative source from which to get money a few days after he became chief of the police or he must have sold lots of real estate and deposited the money in relays. Alden J. Blethen, editor-in-chief of the Seattle Daily Times, was in the court room one day this week, and it is alleged for the space of a minute the whole court room was struck speechless, when his lordly appearance swung into the room. Before the present year passes into history the "wets" and the "drys" of the United States are slated for some spirited tilts and among them are the following: West Virginia will vote on state-wide prohibition in November, 1912. Utah votes, state-w de on county option, June 27, 1911. Texas votes on state-wide prohibition July 25, 1911. Maine votes on the repeal of the constitutional prohibition amendment in September, 1911. Prosperity day has come and gone and it seems to us that, it left no more prosperity in the city than it found, and God knows that is not saying very much. At The Seattle Theatre. During the past year the policy of the Seattle theatre has been the production of comedies and dramas. The four years previous melo-drama and comedy drama had been presented. Starting next Sunday afternoon Ed L. Drew will again assume the management of the Seattle and for the summer season the old favorites will again be installed melo-drama and comedy drama. This class of plays always met with much favor with the clientel of the Seattle Theatre and from week to week a series of the best plays to be obtained will be offered to its patrons. The Pringle Company, an organization of well known excellence, will open an engagement at the Seattle Theatre, starting next Sunday afternoon, and their opening bill will be a delightful play of the South entitled "The Sweetest Girl In Dixie." It abounds with plenty of wholesome comedy and good dramatic situations, and is a bill well calculated to please all theatre goers. "OLD GERMAN LAGER" aged with "time"— in the old-fashioned way, and that's why "Es Giebt Rein Ropfweh" The Independent Brewing Co. Phones (Ind. 58 Sidney 75 Seattle The Seattle Republican Publishes Legals Dirt Cheap That's All 427 Epler Block Phone Main 305 FRIDAY, June 2, 1911 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Department No. 7. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of N. N. Fladland, Dec. 18, 1854. Order Fladland to the Hearing Petition of Widow for Homestead, and Directing Notice to Heirs and Creditors. The petition of Carrie Fladland, widow of N. N. Fladland, having been filed herein, asking that certain real estate returned by the administratrix in said estate as the property of said deceased, be set off to her as a homestead under the laws of Washington: It is hereby ordered that the above petition be heard in this Court and cause in Department No. 7, at the County Court House in Seattle, Washington, on the 26th day of June, 1911, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock of the forenoon of said day; and all persons interested in the property sought to be set off as a home-steed to said Petitioner, namely, in Lot twelve (12) and West half (W₂) of Lot thirteen (13), Block 34 of Henry Hoyt's Addition to the City of Seattle, Washington, or in the Estate of N. N. Fladland, deceased, as heirs or creditors, or otherwise, are hereby notified to appear at said hearing and urge any objection, if any there be, to the granting of said petition. It is further decreed that this order be published at least four (14) weeks in some weekly newspaper of general circulation in King County, Washington, prior to the time fixed for the hearing of said Petition. Done in open Court this 17th day of May, 1911. A. W. FRATR. Judge. May 26—June 23, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the Matter of the Application of Helen G. Doe, to register title to certain land therein described, Plaintiff, vs. Rose Bauman, and Rose Bauman as Executrix of the Estate of Ulrich Bauman, Deceased, and all other persons or parties, unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the application herein. Defendants. Number 54544-75. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington by the above颁发的 Greeting: You, and each of you, are hereby summoned and required to answer the application of the applicant plaintiff in the above entitled application for registration of the following land, situate in King County, Washington, (4) of the Northwest Quarter (4) of the Northwest Quarter (4) of Section Thirty-six (36) in Township Twenty-six (26) North, Range Three (3) East, W. M., excepting the Southwest two acres therefrom sold to Lucy M. Adams, April 18th, 1911, and file your answer the 18th of April, 1911, and file your answer the Clerk of said Court, in said County, within twenty-one days from and including the date of the first publication, to-wit: within twenty-one (21) days from and including the 19th of May, 1911, and if you fail to answer the said application within the time aforesaid, and if you fail to answer the action which apply to the court for the relief demanded in the application herein. Witness, D. K. Sickles, Clerk of said Court and the seal thereof at Seattle in said County and State this 16th day of May, 1911. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. JOHN R. WILSON, Attorney for Plaintiff, 539 New York Block. May 19—June 3, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Lyde Collison, plaintiff, vs. Peter W. Cownover, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Myrtle Cownover, deceased; Ralph Mason and Lewis W. Bradley, defendants.—No. 80612. The State of Washington to the said Peter W. Cownover, individually and as administrator of the estate of Myrtle Cownover, deceased; Ralph Mason and Lewis W. Bradley, defendants. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, toowit: Within sixty days after the 2nd day of June, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer to the complaint. Answer the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to foreclose a mortgage made and executed by Peter W. Cownover at the Counter his wife, Mrs. Collison, on the following described premises. Commencing at a point sixty feet west of the northeast corner of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 4. Township 25 north, Range 4 east W. M.; thence running south 198 feet; thence west 60 feet; thence north 198 feet; thence east 60 feet to the point of beheading; and saituring them recorded in King County Auditor's office on the 22nd day of August, 1908, in book 356 of Mortgages, at page 228. Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address 705 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. June 2—July 19, 2011 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Homer R. Burgess, and all persons unknown, if any, having cr clients interested in and to the herenafter described real property, defendants.—No. 80021. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: York, each of Ivy, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax cer- tainly issued by the King County. State of Washington, dated the 24th day of December, 1910, and numbered B67769, for delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the sum of $1,000,000. The tax described as follows, to-wit: Lot 11, Block 2, Lawrence Central Addition to West Seattle. That taxes for subsequent years have been paid by plaintiff upon said land, to-wit: For 1908, $3.41; for 1909, $3.29. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said land. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of that见见 within notice, of the见见 of notice published within within 60 days after May 12, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the understated notice of the see see amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said property for the amount due, if for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on now in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailley Building, Seattle, Washington. May 12—June 30. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Octavia Emma Wheeler, Deceased. No. 12757. Notice to Creditors. By order of court made herein on the 26th day of April, 1911, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said deceased, to present them with the neces- sary vouchers to the undersigned exe- cutor of said estate, at No. 745 New York Block, Seattle, Wash., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publica- tion of this notice or same will be Attorney for Estate. No. 745 New York Block, Seattle, Wash. April 28-May 26, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, KING County, Washington. Lulu Leighton, Plaintiff, vs. Albert Leighton, Defendant. No. 80229. Summons. The State of Washington to the said of the first publication of this summons, Albert Leighton, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date to-wait; within sixty (60) days after the 28th day of April, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in to above entitlement to the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complete claim has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complaint in this action pays for divorce and that the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved. Date of first publication April 28, 1911. Date of last publication June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Carrie S. Erne, Plaintiff, vs. Anna Ford Johnson, Defendant, No. ——. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Anna Ford Johnson, Defendant: Your are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit within sixty days after the 28th day of April, 1911, and defend the above entitled cause of action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney, the plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case a reward so to do, judgment will be rendered you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of this action is to foreclose a mortgage on the following described real estate, to-wit: The Northwest Quarter (NW¼) of the Northwest Quarter (NW¼) of Section Thirteen (13), Township Twenty-six (26), North of Range Four (4) East of W. M. WM. C. KEITH, Attorney for Plaintiff. Post Office and Office Address: 326 Leary Building, Seattle, Washington. April 28—June 9, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice. In the Matter of the Dissolution of Washington, a Sustina Mining and Development Company, to Whom It May Concern: Ta notice that the petition for the dissolution and disincorporation of the Washington and Sustina Mining and Development Company, a corporation, was set forth by certificate by its proper officers, setting forth the purpose of the stockholders of said corporation called for the purpose, it was decided by a vote of more than two-thirds of all the stockholders of the disincorporate and dissolve said corporation, have been above entitled corporation and that the 23rd day of June, 1911, at the hour of 9:30 a. m., at the court room of Department No. 4, of the above court, of the time court, have been fixed by said court as the time court, have been fixed by said petition, and that the application of said corporation so to dissolve and disincorporate will be heard at said time and place and such hearing, shall deem thereon as the court, upon hearing, shall deem thereon as the court. Witness my hand and the seal of said court Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 19th day of April, 1911. D. K. SICKLES, Clerk of said Superior Court. T. O. H. SPRINGER, Deputy. April 21—June 16, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Homer R. Burgess, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 80103. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, calamants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff has been issued a tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of February, 1910, and numbered BG1719, for deprived taxes, tax year 1906, in the sum of $34, upon the and situated the King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 25, Block 2, Lawrence Central Addition to West Seattle. The tax for subsequent years have been paid by plaintiff upon said land, to-wit: For 1908, $2.79; for 1909, $2.77. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said land. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication, within sixty days after May 5, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or pay the sums case you for the satisfaction you to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a judgment for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on now file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. May 5—June 16, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Homer R. Burgess, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—Namely State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are the holders of the one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 5th day of February, 1910, and numbered B67187, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1900, in the King County, State of Washington, delinquent tax, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 24, Block 2, Lawrence Central Addition to West Seattle. That taxes for subsequent years have been paid by plaintiff upon said land, to-wit: For 1908, $2.79; for 1909, $2.77. While it is not necessary at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said land. You and each of you (including said persons unknown) if any have been hereby summoned to be appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer that you have been summoned against plaintiff for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, possessing real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21—June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Hawker, plaintiff, vs. Robert Knipe, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. 80017. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff has delivered a tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County. State of Washington, dated the 24th day of December, 1910, and numbered 867767, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $420.00. For the year 1908, said King County, described as follows, to-wit: North half of Fractional Tract 32 of Kellogg's Tracts. That taxes for subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1908, the sum of $4.20; for the year 1900, the sum of $4.10. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the judgment, and are hereby summoned to the day of said first presentation, to-wit, within 60 days after May 12, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and the judgment of the court, in the signed attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing on the real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against, as provided by law, and as prayed for, in compliance, on now file cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address. 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. May 12—June 23, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County, Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, Plaintiff, vs. Jos. Allen, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. — No. 508. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them. No one will pay you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issue, the treasury of King County, state of Washington, dated the 13th day of June, 1910, and numbered B66143, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of 70 cents, and upon real property situated in said King County, designated as follows, to-wit: That taxes for subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of 36 cents; for the year 1908, the sum of 32 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 92 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication court, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay costs. In case you fail to do to judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and cost of ordering a sale of the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on now file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Balley Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21—June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. R. C. Washburn, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the aftereater described real property, defendants.—No 9808. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest, or estate in and to the aftereater described real property, hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of October, 1910, and based on the treasurer's report the year 1906, in the amount of 80 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 32, Block 55, Kirkland. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1908, the sum of 35 cents; for the year 1908, the sum of 41 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 39 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of per cent, per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said land. 3 You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, dewit, within sixty days after May 5, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below the said court, for publication of the interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the costs due upon said tax, interest and costs, order a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Balley Building, Seattle, Washington. May 5—June 16, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, ss. C. D. Hillman, and an person unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 80191. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You are the Yon, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasury of King County. State of Washington, dated the 1st day of April, 1909, and numbered B55337, for delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.54, and upon real property, situated in King County, described below, in lot 5. Block 5, Hirth Meadow Garden Div. No. 1. That taxes for subsequent years have been paid by plaintiff upon said tax, to-wait. For that purpose, the King County district attorney in lot 5. Block 5, Hirth Meadow Garden Div. No. 1. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said sum of $3.17. The sum of $2.80; for the year 1900, the land. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of the summons, and are hereby summoned to the day of the day said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court action and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff in the case of the summons, and signal attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing on the real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against, as provided by law, and the plaintiff's complaint, on now file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21-June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Emma C. Ketcham, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, defendants.—No HW. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or owners or owners in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County. State of Washington: To the above defendants, 1910, and numbered B67514, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of 58 cents, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: second class shore fronting lands of Lakeholm, Sec. 10, B.W. M. That taxes for subsequent years have been paid by plaintiff upon said land, to-wit: for the year 1907, the sum of 11 cents; for the year 1908, the sum of $3.03; for the year 1909, Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against sald land. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after April 21. The court will action and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, in case you fail to do judgment required herein, foreclosing the lien of sald taxes and costs against said real property for the amounts due upon it, for sald taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on now file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address: 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21—June 11, 2011 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Bessie Isaacs Savage, Deceased. No. — Notice to Creditors. For order of said court, made herein, on the 27th day of March, 1911, notice is hereby given to the creditors of and to all persons having claims against said deceased, or against her estate, or against the community estate of said deceased and George Marvin Savage, to present them with the necessary voucher, under the executor's notice at his residence, 212 Twenty-third Avenue North, Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of business of said estate in Seattle, in said County and State, within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice, or same will be barred. Date of first publication, April 22, 1911. GEORGE MARVIN SAVAGE. As Executor of Said Estate. Date of first publication, April 21. Date of last publication May 26, 1911. Preparing bodies for shipment specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. Phone this office---Main 305 for all kinds of Job Printing Brief work a specialty. 4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and summons. L. J. Oliver, plaintiff, vs. Lucy M. Morey, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, defendants.—No. 8010. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff and the hereafter described real property, are tax certificates issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of October, 1910, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent tax of the year 1906 in the amount of 44 cents each, and tax property situated in Block 14, Mercer Park, in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Delinquent tax certificate No. B67533, on Lot 13; delinquent tax certificate No. B67534, on Lot 14; delinquent tax certificate No. B67535. That taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon each of said lots, real property, to-wit. For the year 1907, the sum of 15 cents on each of said lots; for the year 1908, the sum of 13 cents on each of said lots 13 and 14; for the year 1900, the sum of 30 cents on each of said lots 13 and 14; and on said lot 15 the sum of 54 cents for the year 1908; and the sum of 44 cents for the year 1900. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said land. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the days usual for publication, govern, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated or sold said tax document due, foreseeing with costs. In case you fail to do to judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a judgment for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on file in this cause and court. L. H. GRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21-June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for King County. Summer No. Amy F. Noley, plaintiff, vs. T. D. Casey, defendant—No. 80257. The State of Washington to the said T. D. Casey, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons in the case of May, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his hearing in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action set forth in the complaint is as follows: To obtain a decree of divorce from sald defendant upon the ground of desertion, abandonment and non-support for more than two years, the decree of divorce from the child of plaintiff and defendant and that plaintiff be allowed to resume her former name, and for general relief of the debt, HERCHMER JOHNSTON, HELLO Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, in and for King County. Summons by publication. Gertrude E. Wheeler, plaintiff, vs. Frederick Wheeler, defendant.—No. 80320. The State of Washington to the said Frederick Wheeler, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the date of the first petition to the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of failure to do so, answer the complaint against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said court. The object of the above certified action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the said defendant, and support, the same being causes of action in which service of summons may be made by publication. PARKER & BROWN, Plaintiff's Attorney Postoffice address, Room 25, Union Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. May 5—June 16, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Walter Brooks, plaintiff, vs. Celeste Brooks, defendant, for the State of Washington to the said Celeste Brooks, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, within sixty days after May 5th, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your memorandum to his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been made by the Court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant on the ground of extreme distress. SOPHIA WILLIAMS. Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address 625-626 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. May 5—June 16, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Deil Owens Schultz, by Male Owens Estes, her guardian ad litem, plaintiff. vs. Ben Schmitz, Derenham. NO. The State of Washington to the said Ben Schmitz, defend him. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after May 5th, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the court of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for a decree declaring void the marriage existing between plaintiff and yourself on the ground of the minority of plaintiff at the time of the solemnizing of said court. SOTON W. WILLIAMS. Postoffice address 625-263 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. May 5—June 16, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Nellie Phinney, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.— State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You, as owners, alamants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that that above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate, and that the above named State of Washington, dated the 17th day of October, 1910, and numbered B67507, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1908, in the amount of 50 cents, and upon real property situated in the State of Washington, as follows, to-wit: Lot 20, Block 50, Kirkland. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1908, the sum of 30 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 39 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first notice, and are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first notice of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after April 21, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, signed attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed for the complaint, on now file interest and court. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Hannah Pesley and claimant, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. S0013. State of Washington: To the above defined defendants and each of them. Witness: Mr. Aven, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, for the 1904, the 23rd day of May, 1906, and numbered B42049, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904 in the amount of $7.82, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, tow: $1.4% SW. 1/4 Sec. 3. Tp. 21, N. R. 5 E. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of $4.04; for the year 1906, of $7.00; for the year 1907, the sum of $6.44; for the year 1908, the sum of $4.04; for the year 1909, the sum of $4.10. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, the receipt of the day of cost of publication, to-wit, within sixty days after May 5, 1911, in the above entitled court action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or cost of pay. In case you fail to do judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and cost ordering a sale of the lien for the satisfaction of the claims found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on now file in this cause and court. L. H. CRÄVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. May 5—June 16, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. D. P. Merritt and Saml's Barnhart, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants: 80121. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are notified that the certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of October, 1908, and numbered B45482, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1900, in the amount of $2.01, and upon the real property of King County, the following delinquent tax: West $1/2 of SE. 1/4 of NW. 1/4 of NF. of Sec. 10, Tp. 24, N. R. 5 E., W. M., less 20 foot strip off south end. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said property to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $1.48; for the year 1908, the sum of 37 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 39 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of that first publication, the exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after May 6, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer to this office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said property for the amounts due for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on now in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address in Valley Building, Seattle, Washington. May 5—June 16, 1911 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. H. K. Arnold, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. No. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are the holder of two certain delinquent tax certificates issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of October, 1910, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1909, the delinquent taxes of the year 1910, the property situated in Block 50, Kirkland, in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Delinquent tax certificate No. B67508, on Lot 21; delinquent tax certificate No. B67509, on Lot 22. That the taxes for the following subsequent years are described as the plaintiff's delinquent described real property, to-wit: On each of said lots the sum of 41 cents for the year 1908; one each of said lots the sum of 39 cents for the year 1909. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from date of payment, and are all the delinquent taxes against said land. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after the date of first publication, to-hit, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this section and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, in case you will be relied upon, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against said real property for the amounts due upon it, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it, as provided by law, and the sums found against it as provided by law, complaint, now on file in this case and cause. L. H. CRAVER. Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. April 21-June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Albert C. Wheaton, Plaintiff, vs. Hildah Wheaton, Defendant. No. 80382. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the above named defendant, Hildah Wheaton: Notwithstanding the complaint to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 12th day of May, 1911, and defend the above entitled action, in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed by the Clerk of the above entitled Court. The object of this action by the plaintiff is to obtain a judgment of divorce from the said defendant, upon the grounds of defendant's adultery, and defendant living and residing in a house of prostitution, and upon the further ground of defendant's cruelty to the plaintiff, and also the custody of the two minor children of plaintiff and defendant be awarded. E. F. KIENSTRA. Attorney for Plaintiff. 233 Epler Block, Seattle, Wash. May 12—June 23, 1911... NOTICE OF PUBLICATION—NOTICE is hereby given that the annual meeting of the stockholders of the Consolidated Gold Mines Company of Washington, will be held June 6th, 1911, 1911, at 7:30 p. m. at the office of the Company of Seattle, Washington for the ensuing year and for the transaction of any other business that may come regularly before the stockholders. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, KING County, Washington. T. W. Hansen, Plaintiff, vs. Marcus Nelson, Defendant. No. 79905. Summons. The State of Washington, to the said Marcus Nelson, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons to the defendant days after the 14th day of April, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complain of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which he filed with the clear of said (Action for money only; amount claimed: Thirteen Hundred Ninety and 47-100 ($1, $90.47) Dollars). H. E. FOSTER, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 606 Marion Building, Se- attle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, April 14, 1911. Date of last publication, May 26, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, P. C. Elsworth, Plaintiff, vs. J. G. Moyer, Catherine Moyer, his wife; Northwestern mercantile Agency, a corporation; Minnie Townsend, Mina Mcintyre, Wallace C. Meacham and Edith Meacham, his wife, Defendants. No. 79645. Summons by Publication. The plaintiff vs. the said J. G. Moyer and Catherine Moyer, his wife, Defendants. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 14th day of publication, the plaintiff action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the rules of the law which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to recover judgment for plaintiff against J. G. Moyer and Catherine Moyer, his wife, on a promissory note dated Sept. 7, 1907, payable to plaintiff in sum of $40,000 for Muit, expenses of insurance and abstract and to foreclose the mortgage securing the payment of said note, on Lots 3 and 4, in Block 11, of Hillman's Lake Front Add. to Seattle, Division No. 1, in King County, Wash., which mortgage is duly recorded in Vol. 336 at page 195 of Mortgages, Records of King County, Wash. J. E. McGRWD, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address: 432 Pioneer Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. April 14—May 26, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of the State of Washington, for King County, W. M. Zimmerman, Plaintiff, vs. E. S. Smith and E. E. Parsons, Defendants. No. 80081. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said E. S. Smith, Defendant. Via the summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 21st day of April, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above Lot Five (5), Block Eighteen (18), Gilman's Addition to the City of Seattle, and the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section thirty-four (34), Township twenty-six (26), North of Range Six (4), East, W. and also the west i-ty-two (42) of Lot ten, the west ten (20) feet of the North one-half of Lot two, LOCK seven, Comstock's Addition to the City of Seattle. ELIAS A. WRIGHT, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address 629-631 Burke Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. April 21-June 2, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. I. H. Cower, plaintiff, vs. Homer R. Burgess, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herenafter described real property, defendants. No. 80104. State of Washington: To the above defendants You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the her;after described real property, are hereby notified that the above named property is held in the tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 24th day of December, 1910, and numbered B7708, for delinquent taxes the year 1900, in the sum paid upon the real property stated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 10, Block 2, Lawrence Central Addition to West Seattle. For subsequent years have been paid by plaintiff upon said land, to-wit: For 1905, $3.41; for 1909, $3.29. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid taxes against said You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of publication, within sixty days after May 5, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the under signed attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or may the cost of the satisfaction of the sums found against it as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, on file in this cause and court. L. H. GRAVER. Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Balley Building, Seattle, Washington. May 5—June 16, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. M. H. Ring, plaintiff, vs. C. E. Remsberg, as executor of the last will and testament of George E. Hall, deceased; C. E. Remsberg, and "Jane Doe" Remsberg, his wife, whose true given name is George E. Hall, a State Bank, Charles J. Clark, Seattle Coal & Wood Company, a corporation; Humane Society, a corporation; Charles P. Hall, Joseph F. Hall, Lucy Irene Hall Leach and Carrie G. Hall, defendants.—No. 78858. The State of Washington to Charles P. Hall, Joseph F. Hall, Lucy Irene Hall Leach and Carrie G. Hall, defendants above named: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 6th day of February, 911, and after the above entitled solicitor, and the above entitled court and answer the cross complaint of the defendants C. E. Rems- IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Emma C. By order of said court made herein on the 31st day of May, 1911. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate of Emma C. Kellogg, deceased, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Da K. Butterfield, exegete of the will of Emma C. Kellogg, deceased, at the law office of J. E. McGrew, at Nos. 430-433 Pioneer Block, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication June 2nd, 1911. IDA K. BUTTERFIELD, As Executrix of the Last Will of Emma C. Kellogg. J. E. McGREW. Attorney for Estate. 430-33 Pioneer Block, Seattle, Wash. June 2—July 6, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Statutes at Publication The State of Washington to the said defendant. Harry K. Du Bols: You are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 2nd day of June, 1911, and defend the court of the court of the titled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his address below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the plaintiff. The complaint has been filed with the clerk of this court. The object of this action is to dissolve the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant, on the ground of the failure and neglect of the sale defendant to support plaintiff, and also of the customer to support minor child of plaintiff and defendant awarded to the plaintiff. EDWARD VON TOBEL. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address. Rooms 603-5 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. June 2—July 20, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. Stacy Shown, plaintiff, vs. Frank Mulligan and Jane Doe Mulligan, his wife, whose Christian Name to the plaintiff is unknown, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 80877. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them. Wife. To the above of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the herinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued, by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 11th day of September, 1911, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following in the form appointed and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Addition, Palatine Hill Addition to the FRIDAY June 2, 1911 City of Seattle; Lot, the West 100 feet of Lot 11, Block 3; certificate number B60073; Year, 1907; Amount, $5.61. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff and his assignors upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot, the West 100 feet of Lot 11, Block 3; Palatine Hill Addition to the City of Seattle; for year 1908, $11.28; for year 1509, $13.53; for year 1910, $11.96. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: sixty days after the 2nd day of June, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plainance and the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sums charged and found against the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. STACY SHOWN. Plaintiff. H. H. EATON. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address 323 Alaska Bldg., Seattle. June 2—July 20, 1911. STETSON & POST LUMBER CO. BUILDING MATERIAL Of all kinds. Delivered on short notice. Established 1875. Tel. Main 711 ORDER A CASE OUT TO YOUR PLACE OF Rainier PALE BEER PHONE SIDNEY 526 A Free Trip to Seattle and Return. Let's Bust the State Dental Trust. Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip. Won't you want to save a dollar, I make a dollar and the State Dental Monopoly will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been closed at First Ave, in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete Take a trip to Seattle and let me save you the price of your trip on your dental work. You save a dollar, I make a dollar and the State will lose two dollars when I do your dental work. Have your dental work done now while the dental war is on. My offices have been established at 713 First Ave., in the Union Block, for 18 years. I do not compete with cheap dentists, with the Highland dentists for half their price. Open evenings until 11 and Sundays until 4 for people who work. EDWIN J. BROWN, D.D.S. 7:3 First Avenue Seattle, Wash. Read my article in Sunday's P. L. and Monday's Times and Star OVER 65 YEARS' EXPERIENCE PATENTS TRADE MARKS DESIGNS COPYRIGHTS & C. Anyone sending a sketch and description may quickly ascertain our opinion free whether an invention is probably patentable. Communication across confidential HANDBOK on Patents suit free, Oldest agency for securing patents. Patents taken through Munn & Co. receive special notice, without charge, in the Scientific American. A handsomely illustrated weekly. Largest circulation of any scientific journal. Terms, $3 a year; four months, $1. Sold by all newdealers. MUNN & Co. 361 Broadway, New York Branch Office, 625 F. St., Washington, D. C. Our Ton Always Weighs 2,000 lbs. Insist on having the Genuine —you can easily detect a substitute. If such is delivered send it back. J. W. BULLOCK DEALER IN COAL AND WOOD 609 TENTH AVE. Seattle, Wash. BUNKERS: Rear James St. Power House, Telephones: Sunset East 87 Independent 87 Twenty-Sixth Ave. and Dearborn St. Telephones: Sunset East 102, Ind. 8170 Second Ave. No. and Boston St. Telephones: Sunset Queen Anne 1885 Ind. 7538 711 Western Ave. between Yesler and Columbia. Tele- phones: Sunset Main 3873 Independent 289 ---