Seattle Republican

Historical Society The Seattle Republican CURRENT COMMENT Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Is published every Friday by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3 per year; six months, $1.50; postage prepaid. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, Inc. HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON, - - - Publisher SUSIE REVELS CAYTON, - - - Associate In changing from Judge Main to Judge Ronald the Blethens are jumping out of the frying pan into the fire. Something for nothing is the father of graft and the heir apparent to the United States and its fulness thereof. In asking for separate trials the Blethens do not seem to take much stock in, "we must hang together or we will hang separately." Though the lumber business is badly shot to pieces in the Northwest the local dealer forgets all about it, if one wants enough lumber to build a home. "Laugh and the world laughs with you," is an old adage. It is barely possible the writer got mixed in the prepositions and used "at" instead of "with." Taft's reception in Portland is reported as being cooler than in Seattle. What an iceberg that Portland reception committee must have been up against. The cranks do not make Hitchcock's life no more, if as much, a burden than he does the men who desire to see Republicans represent the people instead of the trusts. Thirteen women jurors have been selected for court duties in Seattle for the month of November. With "13" petticoats hanging over their heads the culprits had better plead guilty and get off easy. If John D. Rockefeller has really discovered that he is a direct descendant of the early kings of England and Spain we thoroughly understand how he can now so heartlessly rob his fellow man and yet feel no remorse of conscience. Governor Hay made much of President Taft's visit to the state and did a few political stunts for himself. In other words, he did politics while Taft smiled. Is Senator Wilson responsible for Hay's fall in? It begins to look as if James A. Moore is up against the green-eyed monster because he was able to do things and would not cut up with the monster. Christian Science as taught by Mary Baker Eddy is having hard sledding just now, and if it does not wholly go to pieces the whole will soon be irreparably broken. If the spirit of Christopher Columbus was among those that visited America the 12th instant, it had to re-discover the land of flowers. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, OCT. 20, 1911. HE LOVED ALL MEN. In the death of Justice John M. Harlan, one of Nature's noblemen passes to the Great Beyond. Since he was able to distinguish right from wrong he has always been found taking a stand for right and the very last act of his public life was for the rights of his fellow man. Justice Harlan died last Saturday rather unexpectedly, though he had been more or less ill for some months. The Supreme Court of the United States never had a cleaner or more upright member than he and his life can be pointed to with pride by the nations of the world, and truly worthy of emulation by all manner of man. WOMEN WIN EQUAL RIGHTS. California has done herself proud and given the women thereof the right to vote the same as the men. It was a hard fight, but it came out all right in the end and all is well that ends well. The trend of the public mind all over the country just now seems inclined to the adoption of woman suffrage, the trial of the Henry George Single Tax theories, the complete thrashing out of the liquor question and the recall of judges. The adoption of these theories may for a time upset things, but they are coming and the sooner the business world gets itself in a position to receive them the easier will it be for it to bear them when they come. MAINE STILL DRY. Now you see it and now you do not, seems about the way the Maine vote has been since the late election on the Prohibition question. The official returns puts the state in the dry column by 748. "No," said George F. Cotterill, "it is not such a wonderful change in sentiment on the liquor question. Twenty-six years ago when Maine voted on the question the Republicans, owing to the fact Blaine was the Republican nominee for president, refrained from voting as the Democrats were trying to fasten Prohibition on his campaign in order to injure him in other states. It is estimated that 200,000 voters have left Maine since that vote was taken and their places have been filled with equally as many foreigners, who are always anti-Prohibition." IUDICIAL FARCE COMEDY. It is now estimated that the trial of the McNamaras will last nine months, and if it does it will be a disgrace to the government of the United States. Nine days should be an awfully long time for the case to be drawn out. As was pointed out in these columns last week this trial is a life and death struggle between capital and labor and the little thing of the lives of twenty-odd human beings being snuffed out cuts LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 11. VOLUME XVIII, NUMBER 33. COMMENT no figure in the game. In other words the prosecution is endeavoring to establish the fact that organized labor has no right to interfere with "scab" labor and the defense is hoping to set the precedent that scab labor must never take the place of striking union labor. What a judicial farce. PROPAGATING A REPUBLIC. A republic as a substitute for the Chinese empire, which has been in existence for, probably, a million years is the latest and perhaps the most extensive reform the people of a country have undertaken since the overthrow of the French dynasty. It begins to look as if the rebels in China will be successful in overthrowing the government and establishing a republic. If the republic does come and the Chinese wall, which has stood for centuries against all comers, is torn down and the new government throws open its doors to the commercial commodities of the world, China will soon see a different people than those who have been groping in the darkness of their superstition for all these years and centuries. IS LA FOLLETT A REPUBLICAN? Two hundred Progressives, national in scope, met in Chicago last Monday, and after a day of rejoicing among themselves, and led by James A. Garfield, the son of his father, they endorsed R. M. La Follett for the Republican presidential candidate. Just why the Progressives should demand that the Republicans nominate Senator La Follett is more than we can explain, in view of the fact it has been a good long time since Senator La Follett has been a Republican. Garfield's grandstand play is just like his father in advocating another candidate, but all the time supporting himself for the nomination. Mr. Garfield is supporting La Follett, but he knows that he himself is a candidate and at the crucial moment his name will be substituted for that of La Follett, who will gracefully withdraw from the contest. FACE TURNED HOMEWARD. President William Howard Taft has done the Pacific Slope, using the street vernacular, and has turned his face toward the White House, and the question is being generally asked, Has he done himself any good by his visit? While he was nowhere enthusiastically received, yet he was respectably received and carefully listened to, and what he said made more or less impression upon his hearers as well as those who read what he had to say. Whatever else may be said of the President there is one thing certain he is no demagog nor is he a trimmer, and the mere fact he is not a trimmer may account for lots of his present political 2 The People’s Forum By A. G. McBride rr creer rae troubles. His visit left the Progressive be- tween the devil and the deep sea, because he realizes that, Taft is way ahead of any- thing the Democrats can put up, both in sound views and practical politics. Wood- row Wilson is the only man the Democrats has could in any sense compare with Mr, Taft and even his ideas thus far all mere theories, which after being tried out might prove a farce. Taft at least left all of us something to think about and those of us who can think are seriously thinking about what he left us. CHURCHES AGAINST TAFT. Secretary Wilson of President Laits cabinet, true to his promise some weeks ago, was present at the International Brewers’ Association and presided over one of its sessions. President Taft and his cabinet were warned by the religious fraternities all over the country against Secretary Wil- son dignifying the meeting of the associa- tion by giving it United States presidential dignity, but instead of staying away he jested with their threats in his speech be- fore the association last Wednesday. This has been so generally denounced that it be- gins to-look as if President Taft has invited another attack on his administration, which will score heavily against him in his effort to succeed himself in the presidential chair. ate ae eres EDITORIAL PARAGRAPH. Unless Hoquiam loudly asserts hersell Aberdeen will soon make of her Greater Aberdeen. “Flee like a bird to yon mountains,” is the present hope of the Wright brothers, and we hope they are right. Daddy Clayson cheered for California too soon and. he has again been soundly spanked by the Susan B. Anthony doctrine, and she has some more for him. An independent Republican paper advo- cating stand-pat Republican principles strikes us as one trying to ride the get-the- money horse and the party-control pony at one and the same time. Praising former Secretary Ballinger and opposing the recall of judges will not popu- larize the declining days of former Senator John Lockwood Wilson. He is simply kicking against the pricks. Despite the fact that ten thousand jour- nalistic requiems have been sung over Till- man: dead, yet he still lives and voluntarily will neither die nor retire from politics. The good die young. Jeff Davis of Arkansas married the other day, which reminds us that even, “monsters of such hideous mein, that to be hated, need but to be seen,” find house mates if not soul mates. God pity the woman. In the breaking out of a fire in a grave- yard the occupants of the Silent City got on earth what the most of them expected to get in the Great Beyond. Let’s hope that a double dose will not be their portion. Even steel can be made brittle by con- stant hammering.—Wall Street Journal. With respect to trusts we are in a transi- tion period —The President. Aye, sir; and the great fear is that we are in more of a transition period than they are.—Indian- apolis News. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Re a aE ee Se Ree Ty ee of the city automobiles and it has been mak- ing it exceedingly uncomfortable for some of our city officials. Mayor Dilling denied some of the statements in The Times and that complicated the situation and: really, I was wondering whether the evening paper might not have been mistaken in part, at least. But now “old reliable,” the P.-I., has come to the rescue and says the mayor of Seattle is mistaken and stands by The Times. With these preliminary remarks, T wish to very freely and frankly express an opinion. In the twenty-one years that I have read the P.-I., I don’t believe that it ever did a more creditable act, than it did in standing with its enemy and rival in de- manding that the truth shall be known and such a course by the leading daily of the state can only result in public welfare. These two great papers could purify the state and make Washington the cleanest commonwealth in the union. While The Times was pumping hot shot into the city derelicts, I often wondered, “why don’t the P.-I. and Star take a hand in this matter and if The Times is wrong, expose it, if. right, stand by it?” That is what every municipality in the whole coun- try needs, a press that will stand shoulder to shoulder with each other in exposing wrong. We were promised an economical and reform administration when ex-Mayor Gill was turned out of office, and if the peo- ple are not getting it, no one knows it so well as the editors of our daily papers. I hope the Star, that sometimes shines so bright, will hereafter also come to the rescue. One of the youngest men to hold a most responsible position at the court house, is Allen Stark, the chief jailer under Sheriff Hodge. Every person who has occasion to visit the county jail will testify to the truth of my statement that a more thorough, painstaking and yet, courteous and obliging official cannot be found up in the “profanity hill” court house. Whether we like Sheriff Hodge or not, I must say for him that he has selected some awfully good mn for deputies. What’s the matter with Crawford? Rainier Boulevard is being raised and no injunction has been asked of our courts for two weeks or more. When Thomson gets his fills up to the established grade, the boulevard for six miles out will be one of the very finest streets in the city. When President Grover Cleveland made a tour of the country, his speeches, or rather those parts not taken from the English and American Encyclopaedia, advocated a great reduction of the tariff, which was character- ized as free trade by the Republicans. Pro- tection was more popular in those dys than in this progressive age. While he could look the consumer in the face and tell him he was attempting to save him from two his veto of schedule “K” will not permit him to look a consumer in the face without turning red behind the ears. Cleveland lost out in his second candidacy—will President Taft fare any better? I intended to speak of Judge George H. Morris last week. He was in the city and the lawyers are always glad to meet him. He received his appointment to the Supreme Court while serving on the Superior Court bench. There are few men in whom the judicial temperament is more highly de- veloped than it is in the judge. In my prac- tice, I never encountered a more pleasant and agreeable judge and if you got licked in his court, you felt good all over, because he was so fair, impartial and considerate. It wasn’t right to take “Our George” away from us. A grouchy, ill-tempered dyspeptic judge will do just as good work in the high- er court as the most polished Chesterfield, and it’s wrong—absolutely wrong to rob the nisi prius bench of one of its most polished gentlemen. It is reported that the first McNamara trial at Los Angeles will consume nine months, which is absurd. The question raised as to the competency of Juror Nel- son, was, if I correctly remember, first raised in this state in the Murphy case, which was prosecuted by Judge Miller and the writer, and defended by Ronald & Piles. Retain- ing one incompetent juror caused a reversal of the case. No, the labor union is not on trial in Los Angeles, neither is it a trial between labor and capital. Labor is just as essential as capital and capital is just as essential as labor. The man who thinks this country would be any good without labor unionism isn’t giving the subject the careful consid- eration, it deserves. If it were not for the combination of the labor element of the country, wages would be from $1.75 to $2.50 a day and wouldn’t the working man cut a figure on these wages? If the McNamaras killed those people in the Times building, hang them, but don’t blame the labor unions. I know lots of people will say that any- thing but the open shop is wrong in princi- ple, all of which is true. So is protection wrong in principle—it’s wrong to have cer- tain houses, it’s wrong to tell me that I can- not go to Victoria and bring back some clothes without paying a duty. Sumptuary laws are wrong, but from the standpoint of public policy, unionism, protection and sumptuary laws are tolerated and upheld. There are many things about unionism I do not approve, but take it as a whole, and how are you going to have a prosperous country without it? I will tell you what ought to be done, and what is coming. Be- fore long, the government will squeeze the water out of the stock of the corporations and they will be given from six to eight per cent on their investment and the balance of the profit will go to the working man re eb tel. gps. SEs ft SAT | Friday, October 20, 1911 Country Press and Comment id... Friday, October 20, 1911 take and only Democrats are worried about it. If it’s a mistake, then let the Democrats profit by the mistake and put forward their Champ Clark and his Missouri mules to win an easy victory. In describing the scene at the breakfast table with President Taft, while in Seattle, in which John L. Wilson, Alden J. Blethen, Sam A. Perkins, Governor Hay, Rev. M. A. Matthews and R. A. Ballinger gracefully posed about the President, the Centralia Chronicle says, “it was a symbolic poker hand, being a king, three knaves, a joker and a two-spot, with R. A. Ballinger in the discard.” Evidently the Chronicle is at outs with the whole world or it would not have written thusly of the men who control the politics and the religion of the state. The Record of Ferndale asks, “Will the grand old party get together next sum- mer?” In reply to its own question, it fur- ther says, “It is possible yet hardly prob- able.” There was never a presidential cam- paign in which all the jarring factions of the grand old party got together, and they will not do so next year, and yet enough of them will stay together to win the day just as they have done in years past, when it seemed that they were certain of losing. The Democratic party can not win and all because it is not right. It may preach the truth, but it practices a lie. The Independent of Olympia hits the bullseye when it says, “It will be a blessed day for our country when our elections are so far apart that we can have a chance to compose our equilibrium and do something else than talk politics.” The gospel truth, brother, preach it. One Bob Allen is quoted in the Sun of Sunnyside as saying, “a jack-rabbit is slow in comparison to an automobile on a race course.” The city officials of Seattle found that out some time ago, while out Sunday joy riding in the city machines, but what puzzles us is, how did Mr. Allen find it out since he drives his own machine and not one belonging to the city in which he re- sides? The Reporter of Konnewick is not satis- fied with the disposition of the local people in fighting outside capital and asks, “Can’t they get together?” And it further says, “it is quite easy to fight big corporations and it is also quite the proper procedure at the present time, but it is also quite pos- sible for a community to carry such a policy too far.” That’s another gospel truth, but you might have added,-it is also possible for a corporation to over do things when once the money begins to come its way, which is in ninety-nine cases out of a hun- dred responsible for the people beginning to fight the big corporations, THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN The Chronicle of Olympia says, “turn about is fair play. Some of the pure food officials are to be canned.” From the taste of the canned goods that we some times eat, it strikes us that, some of them have al- ready been canned and the goods are in the culinary departments of the eating houses. eae SCOTT CALHOUN who will retire from the office of Corpora- tion Counsel to accept the attorneyship of the port of Seattle. The Journal of Bellingham says, “Taft enthusiasm lax.” If that is true, and there is no reason to doubt it, then we must say the people of Bellingham did not keep faith with those, who were instrumental in get- ting the president to extend his-trip to that mining camp on the north. Taft was the first president of the United States that ever visited that berg and it promised to give him a royal reception, if he would come, and now one of the papers of the city declares the reception given to him was rather cool. What a pity some people will not keep their words over night. ' The Republican of Auburn takes a fall out of the Blethens in the following: “The Seattle Times has won another great vic- tory—for the man it was savagely trying to down! Reginald H. Thomson has been chosen chief engineer for the port of Seat- tle at a salary of $7,500.” The Times has won many such victories and it is in line to win many more of the same nature. Saw it in the Times? Damn lie. The Journal of Friday Harbor congratu- lates the poor man in the following words, “There is one good thing about the counter- feit $100 bill—the average man will never get stung by it.” Just now a counterfeit one-dollar bill is just as safe. The Forum of Tacoma greeted President Taft on his arrival to the city with a pic- toral isstie in which the mugs of a good manv fellows that might pronounce them- 3 selves representative men appeared, but who in fact are political parasites, who have earned but'few, if ever, a dollar outside of a public office. It seems almost time for such official time-servers to retire from the politital arena. Was the editor of the Spokesman of Van- couver speaking from personal experience when he says, “The man who tries to make his wife marry her affinity has less feeling than a horse trader.” He may have been a horse trader and he may have had affinity troubles. He at least talks like it. The women of Raymond take a lively in- terest in public matters, so it is learned from the Herald of that city. All women with ¢ommon sense in every city and community should do likewise. From the Observer of Chinook it is learned that, [waco is threatened with a Socialist daily paper. What sin of commis- sion or omission has the citizens of that community been guilty of that they are to be thusly punished? In our last issue we warned Seattle and Tacoma of the rapid rise of Kelso, and now we note from the Journal of that city that, the largest crowd between Centralia and Vancouver greeted the President at Kelso. Mr. Kelso, youse risen. “Tt will take more than an earthquake to jar the Guggenheims loose from Alaska,” declares the Davenport Tribune. It seems to us that public opinion is putting in some telling blows and while the Guggenheims still hold on Ballinger and his coal land grabbers are looking awfully sick in the face. BORROWED THOUGHTS. John D. Rockefeller got his first and only job fifty-six years ago and has just been celebrating the event. The men who lost their jobs because Mr. Rockefeller did not stick to his have not had their celebration yet.—New York World. ? As yet dissolution of the Steel Trust is confined to Wall Street—-Chicago News. La Follette says that party ties are vanish- ing. So are the collars—Philadelphia North American. The gun designed to kill aviators will have to hurry to get ahead of the regular meth- ods—Los Angeles Tribune. Some men’s love of country decreases in the same ratio as the protective tariff on the goods they manufacture—Puck. Wall Street acts as though the Roosevelt policies were at last being actually “clinched.”—Springfield Republican. It might be a good thing if the decline in prices on the Stock Exchange would hit the provision market—St. Louis Globe- Democrat. Artificial lumber is made from paper and paper is made from wood pulp. How’s that for conservation?—Wall Street Jour- nal. Tom Edison, we read, is being received in Europe like royalty, which leads us to ex- pect that he will cut Portugal and Russia from his itinerary——Washington Post. Perhaps the trusts would feel safer in jail—Wall Street Journal, | POLITICAL POT PIE Clarence Dayton Hillman has unsympathetic public. He is a he would soon become a walking either been given the wrong steer student of not only nature, but a encyclopaedia and be the most in dealing with the courts or he, student of affairs and in the posi- useful public servant in the whole on account of his unprecedented tion, which has been offered him, state. a ae. i a ere on account of his unprecedented success in selling real estate at fabulous prices, for which he paid little or nothing, has come to the conclusion that, what he can not do is not worth doing. While his former trial was on he at: tempted to bribe the jury and re: cently he tried to impress the judges before whom his appeal! had been taken of his super. human greatness by writing then letter and telling them of wha he had accomplished in the way of accumulating a million dollars If he thinks he can not in the fu ture control his actions so as tc act as other citizens do then we would advise him to employ such counsel as will give him the prop- er kind of instruction and give him to understand that, if he does not. live within the bounds of the law, he will be handed over to the courts. Already Hillman’s ap- peal has cost him thousands ‘of dollars and he is as certain of losing his case as he has appealed it, Joseph Blethen, the only decent Blethen of the ‘rather remarkable Blethen family, tts jieen selected president of the Golden Potlatch Association. The Seattle Repub- lican desires to go on record as predicting that Joe will give Se- attle as good if not the best show she has ever had. He will come pretty near getting the unani- mous support of the press of the city and county and that means much toward the success of the potlatch. Harold Preston has been of- fered the chairmanship of the state public service commission, which has the immediate control of the railroad rates of the state. If Mr. Preston accepts the posi- tion, and gives up his private practice fully and completely and devotes himself absolutely to the work, and not figure on what his political future may be, it can be said without fear of successful contradiction that, it would be al- most impossible for the governor to find another man, not only in the state, but in the entire North- west, that would come within a hundred miles of being his equal. But for him to divorce himself from his present lucrative law practice and his business relations would mean that instead of be- coming a millionaire he would re- main a man of modest means and perhaps destroy every hope of be- coming United States senator or Rr aise Me eee Wy ee! Se et ee THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN : ; ites ee Seen oh ff ess Bee aie eee ee en E ee a pes a j ee “a See wiles Fs - ge \ q ae Be tee : Ps ee Se eke i ee uae 4 a a SL TSS Aa ) “Ga es Op elit, i “ Peat " a ae i a es Sas Beh a ee : co Soe a ee 2 mee oe ae. i i ee Ai ele ~~ q CO de | aaa ia EB Ak a . ee : Pree SN ei aaa ee é te ia reer area al 3 i ae Se : re % Sie 2 ae Ce : i et ye A OS OR meres : rs : E 2 ORME Oe pe % 5 es ee eee ee wee OO ok Bee ie eee W. H. PAULHAMUS f State Senator from Pierce County, presi- dent of the last state senate, who will seek the Republican nomination for lieutenant governor to test his strength in the state prior to becoming candidate for United States senator to succeed Senator Wesley L. Jones. e Things Not What They . Things Not What They Seem “Mountain dew” may have been responsible for that young woman at Moxee City near North Yakima falling and break- ing her leg while ‘tripping the light fantastic toe at a wedding feast, but we fear the dew had been on the mountains so long that it had fermented. What fools mortals be. Champ Clark, down in Louisi- ana a few days ago, predicted in a public speech that a Democrat would succeed Taft as president of the United States. Louisiana has already gone on record as favoring the Democratic nomina- tion of Champ Clark, and he therefore virtually announced, “T am to be the next president of the United States.” What fools we mortals be. Conservation of Alaskan re- sources may be Pinchot’s public hobby, but his political hobby is for the nomination of La Follett by the Republicans for president of the United States, and that too despite the fact his candidate is not a Republican. What fools A San Francisco blind beggar, for the past thirty-five years, died a few days ago. After his death a careful search was made of his hovel and it was discovered from records therein that he had some- thing like $50,000 in the banks to his credit. That man had spent the major part of his life deceiv- ing the public in order to be able to die and leave a fortune to per- sons, who will lose no time in having the best time money can give them on it. What fools we mortals be. After years of living as man and wife a woman realized that, the man was paying court to an- other woman and further realiz- ing that she was slowly but sure- ly losing hold on the man she loved, she administers poison to him and then partook of the same fatal portion herself and they both breath their last together. Another chapter in life’s story is of a man who loved a woman, but finding she loved another man, and believing that she Friday, October 20, 1911 — See a ee ae ee ee | crashing through her brains and then administers the same fatal dose to himself. They die in each others arms. These are some of the ups and downs of the past week among the higher order of animal life. What fools we mor- tals be. S. Foster Kelley, well known in the banking circles of Seattle, and also pretty well known in the court circles of San Francisco, has permitted a cold $100 to be forfeited by the courts of that city rather than go back and face a trial. Kelley was doing well in Seattle once upon a time and should have been happy in his home, where a talented wife with bright eyed children always met him with smiles, but he was car- ried away by the goo-goo eyes of a pretty-faced woman, and in his excitement forgot .those who really loved him, and eloped with Miss Bright Eyes. After some bitter experience, he like the prodigal son, returned to his first love, and she received him as she had always done, and he was seemingly happy again, but lest he get bewitched once more he permitted the hundred to be bag- ged. What fools we mortals be. Representative Underwood is of the opinion that, the Demo- crats can win the next presiden- tial election on the tariff issue. Since the Buchanan administra- tion the Democrats have adyo- cated the same old thing, and on that issue they have won. only once. This present prophetic Democrat will find himself as badly under wood as all the other _ Democrats have found themselves for the past sixty-five years after the neyt presidential election. What fools we mortals be. She sued him for a divorce be- cause he squandered what she had accumulated before they were married. She was fifty and he twenty-eight years of age. He did what he married her to do and what she ought to have known he would do, owing to their desparity of years. Why did she marry her “grand son”? What fools we mortals be. The Seattle Republican is pub- lishing legal notices at bedrock prices, and if you desire to get in on the ground floor now is your time to make terms with the management. If you have a notice for publication call up Main 305 before sending it out to some other publication and see en working promoter and to have him Moore went dollars to left Seattle for the money engagements to about the best and it was surprise, so on the hands men and against put- Others fol- work among From New the villain all across the the brokers set the same is financial the city to- among other gentlemen for the proposi- and if you seek." This words, and ended small money. do him any succeeded holding a half plant until property is in completely East, is able JAMES THE INDUSTRIAL JOURNAL Business must obey the law, says Wickersham. What a cruel hardship!—New York American. Maine people seem to have the intelligence to vote, but to lack ability as counters. Los Angeles Tribune. New York is to spend $33,000,000 on education next year. It needs every cent of it. Philadelphia Inquirer. --- The elements in Seattle that have been working against James A. Moore, the well known promoter and builder, for the time being at least, seem to have him more or less bottled up. One year ago Mr. Moore went east for the purpose of raising ten million dollars to finance his plant at Irondale, and when he left Seattle he was so confident of his ability to raise the money within a few days that, he made all arrangements to be back in the city in less than thirty days, but the best laid plans of mice and men gang a glea," and it was seven months before he returned. On arriving in New York to his utter surprise, so he himself said, he met scores of telegrams in the hands of the money brokers from Seattle business men and some of them bankers, warning the brokers against putting their money into the Irondale plant. Others followed after his arrival and after months of work among the financiers he was forced to give it up. From New York he sailed for London and even there the villain still pursued him and cablegrams soon flashed across the waters to the London brokers like the ones the brokers in New York had received and here he met the same polite but positive "nothing doing." He returned to Seattle and realizing his financial predicament called the leading financiers of the city together and laid his case before them. Among other things, he said, "I am not asking you gentlemen for assistance, but I do ask you to quit knocking the proposition and put your stamp of approval on it, and if you do I will raise the money in less than a week." This they promised to do, but failed to keep their words, and to add insult to injury, those who had extended small favors began to press the concern for their money. Evidently those men, not being able to do him any great amount of hurt by pressing their claims succeeded in poisoning the minds of the company holding a half million dollars worth of securities against the plant until it called for a receiver and now the entire property is in the hands of the courts, where it will soon be completely dissipated unless Mr. Moore, who is in the East, is able to head it off. Friday, October 20, 1911 Be it said to the everlasting credit of James A. Moore, that he has brought more speculative capital to Seattle than any ten of the heaviest financiers in the city. Others have brought as much and more guaranteed capital, but there is a marked difference between speculative and guaranteed capital. Had Seattle had ten other men like James A. Moore, she would be at this time a city of smokestacks instead of a city of over-valued corner lots. To break James A. Moore is no more than the bursting of a bubble on the wide ocean, but to bring financial disaster to his enterprises and proposed commercial industries, so far as Seattle is concerned, is like killing the hen that lays the golden egg. For selfish motives he was threatened with financial ruin by leading business men of Seattle some months ago and causing his concern to be thrown into the hands of a receiver is the first step in carrying out their programme. Such men are fit only for treason, strategem and spoils—let no man trust them. S. A. Woods, who was announced herein last week as being a candidate for county clerk, is not a candidate for clerk, but for county auditor. He has never been donned with the title as deputy in the clerk's office, but he has been detailed on much of the very important work since he has been employed therein. The Seattle Republican has learned since it made the wrong announcement last week that Mr. Woods is even more popular than it gave him credit for. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Joseph L. Mohundro has been re-appointed state bank examiner, which means that Governor Hay has silenced an opposition that would have fought him as he had never been fought before. Even the appointment may not call off Harry Gillaham, who was at one time a member of the board of control, but who was invited by Governor Hay to step down and out. Harry is dead against him and Joe will have to work good and hard on him to bring him around. C. W. Whisler, a ten-cent barber, says he is out with a knife a yard long for the scalp of Governor Hay. Well, if Whisler was the only trouble Governor Hay has he would not even have to play the whistler act to keep his courage up. Packers utilize all the hog but the squeal. At least something is left for the consumer. —Wall Street Journal. Doc Wiley says the health of the nation JAMES A. MOORE. is worth $540,000,000,000. Is this an intimation for a raise in salary?—Dayton Journal. Attorney-General Wickersham must have his money invested in something outside the United States.—Albany Journal. Insurgent objection to Mr. Taft as a "middle-of-the-road" statesman is that he leaves very little room around the edges.—Philadelphia Telegraph. A Denver dog-catcher says he has been bitten 2,000 times. This is something like the experience of the chronic investor in gold mines.—Cleveland Plain Dealer. Mr. Carnegie should lose no time in sending one of his famous hero-medals to the editor of the New York Tribune, who is defending the Payne-Aldrich Tariff act.—St. Paul Pioneer-Press. Come to think of it, wasn't it a wise and statesmanlike precaution of President Taft to put Dr. Wiley firmly back on the job before going against all those western eatfests?—Pittsburg Gazette-Times. Eight barbers charged with violating a Sunday law, enacted in 1794, were convicted in an Eastern state the other day. The information may be useful to those who are trying to find out when they may expect convictions under the anti-trust law enacted in 1890.—New Orleans Times-Democrat. 5 "OLD GERMAN LAGER" 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THI State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of James J. Lynch, deceased.—No. 10926. Harry W. Binghurst, administrator of the estate of James J. Lynch, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said James J. Lynch, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle, Wash., on the 16th day of October, 1911, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue o said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 16th day of October, 1911, in the Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 12th day of Sept. 1911. Sept. 15—Oct. 9, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Murvel Keuhe, plaintiff, vs. William Muryel Keuhey, plaintiff, vs. William Keuhey, defendant—No. Keuley, defendant: No. The State of Washington, to the said William Keuhey, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 15th day of September, A. D., 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the grounds of your abandonment of plaintiff for more than one year, and also your failure to make suitable provisions for plaintiff since said marriage. J. P. BALL. Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice and office address: 201-203 Burke Building, Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. Sept. 15—27. 1911. Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment or specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN MAN LAGER" "time"— fashioned that's why Stein Ropfweh" ent Brewing Co. nd. 58 Sidney 75 ttle IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Minnie E. Foster, plaintiff, vs. Irwin Foster, defendant. The State of Washington, to the said Irwin Foster, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 22nd day of September, A. D. 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows. To obtain a judgment of said Court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the ground of nonsupport. J. P. BALL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice and office address: 201-203 Burke Building, Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. Sept. 22: Nov. 3, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. Ethel M. Little, Plaintiff, vs. Alfred G. Little, Defendant. No. ---. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Alfred G. Little, Defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 5th day of September, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of said action is to secure a divorce from said defendant on the grounds of non-support. WILLIAM WRAY. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address: 556 Empire Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE R. R. GEORGE, JUSTICE OF the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Nettie M. Taintor, plaintiff, vs. Octavio A. Stephenson, defendant. No. 24994-5. Summons for Publication. State of Washington, County of King, ss. The State of Washington to Octavio A. Stephenson and Josephine Cranston: You, and each of you, are hereby notified that Nettie M. Taintor has filed a complaint against you in said Court, which will come on to be heard at my office in Room 611 Prefontaine Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 30th day of October, A. D. 1911, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said complaint is to obtain judgment against you on a promissory note for $71.77, interest, costs and attorney fees. Complaint filed August 28, A. D. 1911. Dated Sept. 19, 1911. R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Wash. Sept. 22: Oct. 20, 1911. --- IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. In Probate. Order to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of James McCarthy, deceased.—No. 11951. Lottie McCarthy, administratrix of the estate of James McCarthy, deceased, having filed in this court her petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said James McCarthy, deceased, be and appear before the said Supreior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in the City of Seattle, on the 9th day of November, 1911, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m., of said day then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of distribution should not be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be published once a week for four successive weeks before the said 9th day of November, 1911, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 2nd day of October, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. Estella M. Smith, plaintiff, vs. William A. Smith, defendant.—No. The State of Washington, to the said William A. Smith, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 29th day of September, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the grounds of desertion and non-support. Attorney for Plantin. Postoffice and office address, 201-203 Burke Building, Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. Sept. 29, Nov. 10, 1911 NOTICE AND SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, J. W. Brown and Daisy Fern Brown, his wife, and Northwest Property Company, a corporation, plaintiffs, vs. Ben Hazeltine, Annie D. Hazeltine, his wife, Frances L. Hazeltine, as executrix of the will and estate of C. B. Hazeltine, deceased, J. Settle, Louise S. Washburn, R. C. Washburn, her husband, and all persons unknown having or claiming an interest or estate in the real property hereinafter described, defendants. The State of Washington, to the said Ben Hazeltine, Annie D. Hazeltine his wife, Frances L. Hazeltine as executrix of the will and estate of C. B. Hazeltine, deceased, J. Settle, Louise S. Washburn and R. C. Washburn her husband, and to all persons unknown having or claiming an interest or estate in the property hereinafter described, and to all persons claiming in any manner under, by, through or from any of the above defendants: You and each of you are hereby notified and summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: within sixty days after the 22nd day of Sept. 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiffs, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you and each of you including said persons unknown and all claimants, according to the demands of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court, and decree of partition entered and rendered, setting forth the specific portions of the South West Quarter (1/4) of the South East Quarter (1/4) of Section Twenty Four (24) Township Twenty Five (25) North of Range Four (4) East of the W. M. in King County, Washington, found and decreed to be the sole property of the plaintiff as prayed and granting the relief prayed which is the object of this action, and for costs. J. W. BROWN, Attorney for Plaintiffs. 1324 Alaska Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 22; Nov. 3, 1911. NOTICE TO CREDITORS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Victor Edwards, Deceased. No. 13161. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 13th day of September, 1911, Friday, October 20, 1911 notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administratrix of said estate, at 201-203 Burke Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 22, 1911. MATHILDA EDWARDS, As Administratrix of said Estate. J. P. Ball, Attorney for Estate, 201-203 Burke Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 22, Oct. 20, 1911. NOTICE TO CREDITORS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Etta C. Chapman, Deceased. No. 13220. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the day of September, 1911, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned administrator of said estate, at 663-4-5 Empire Building, Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. D. H. CHAPMAN, As Administrator of said Estate. McLean & Balliet, Attorneys for Estate, 663-4-5 Empire Building, Seattle, Wash. SUMMONS FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Carrie King, plaintiff, vs. Wm. Herbert, defendant. No. 83601. The State of Washington to the said Wm. Herbert King, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 20th day of October, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant on the grounds of habitual drunkenness and failure to support. GEO. McKAY. Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address, 450 Arcade Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 20, Nov. Dec. 1, 1911. SUMMONS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. No. 83606. Walter Winfield Ayer, plaintiff, vs. Elizabeth Ayer, defendant. The State of Washington to the said Elizabeth Ayer, the defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the 20th day of October, A. D. 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of the answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. Said action being for a decree of absolute divorce on the ground of desertion. HOWARD O. DURK, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. address, 535 Henry Bldg., Seattle, Washington. Oct. 20, Dec. 1, 1911. --- The SEATTLE REPUBLICAN wants your LEGAL NOTICES 427 Epler Blk. Main 305 --- Friday, October 20, 1911 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Grace M. Roberts, Fannie McLean and Fannie McLean, Fannie E. McLean, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. State of Washington, to the above de- You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 17th day of Oct., 1910, and numbered B67315, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1908, in the amount of $25.16, and upon real property situ- ated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 9, block 20, Law's Addition, less east $79½ feet. That the taxes for the following sub- sequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $38.90; for the year 1909, the sum of $65.18. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after September 1, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 1—Oct. 13, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. J. J. Lyson, J. M. E. Atkinson, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1911, and numbered B72911, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of $1.99, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: West 10 ft of lot 2, block 8, Wallingford's Division of Green Lake Addition. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1908, the sum of $2.52; for the year 1909, the sum of $8.41; for the year 1910, the sum of $18.19. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after September 1, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 1—Oct. 13, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. J. R. Seaborn, plaintiff, vs. Reliance Loan & Trust Co., and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter de- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication Myrtle Tronsrud, plaintin, vs. Alfred Tronsrud, defendant. The State of Washington to Alfred Tronsud, defendant.—No. 82616. In the name of the State of Washington, you are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days from and after the 8th day of September, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, the attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The objects of the said action set forth in the complaint are as follows: To secure a divorce from defendant on the grounds of cruelty and non-support, and to change the name of plaintiff to Myrtle Hanks. Attorney for the Plaintiff. Postoffice address, 314 Bailey Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 8—Oct. 20, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Mary S. Phease, May S. Phease, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the herein-after described real property, defendants. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of May, 1911, and numbered B69792, for the delinquent taxes of the years 1903 to 1908, inclusive, in the following amount of $9.01, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 12, block 17, Hillman City Division No. 2. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1910, the sum of $2.25; for the year 1909, the sum of $2.07. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit: within sixty days after September 1, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 1—Oct. 13, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. J. R. Seaborn, plaintiff, vs. Reliance Loan & Trust Co., and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: For the year 1903, the sum of 39 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 35 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 41 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 90 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of $1.09. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon each of said above described lots, to-wit: For the year 1903, the sum of 39 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 35 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 41 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 90 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of $1.09. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after September 8, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 8—Oct. 20, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. J. R. Seaborn, plaintiff, vs. Reliance Loan & Trust Co., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: For the year 1903, the sum of 39 cents; for the year 1904, the sum of 35 cents; for the year 1905, the sum of 41 cents; for the year 1906, the sum of 90 cents; for the year 1907, the sum of $1.09. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after September 8, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sum and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. J. R. SEABORN, Plaintiff Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 8-Oct. 20. 1911. unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after September 8, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 8—Oct. 20, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Stewart & Holmes Drug Co., a cor- poration, Plaintiff, vs. J. G. Ross, De- fendant. Summons for Publication. No. 83,288. The State of Washington to the said J. G. Ross, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 13th day of October, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment against you for the sum of Two Hundred and Twenty-eight Dollars ($228.00) with interest besides costs of suit and to reach by garnishment certain personal property and funds belonging to you in the hands of J. W. Reed. Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address, 705 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication Nov. 26, 1911. SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, David Forrest Welch, plaintiff, vs. Sarah Ellen Welch, defendant. The State of Washington, to the said Sarah Ellen Welch, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 22nd day of September, A. D. 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: To obtain a judgment of said Court granting a divorce to plaintiff from you and to dissolve and sever the marriage relations now existing between plaintiff and you upon the grounds of incompatibility of temperament, and personal indignities rendering life burdensome. J. P. BALL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice and office address: 201-203 Burke Building, Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. from the northwest corner of lot one (1), block thirty-seven (37), Maynard's Lake Washington addition, thence south one hundred (100) feet, thence east thirty-five (35) feet, thence north one hundred (100) feet, thence west thirty-five (35) feet to the point of beginning, being a part of lots one (1) and two (2), eleven (11) and twelve (12), block thirty-seven (37) Maynard's Lake Washington addition to the city of Seattle, in the county of King and state of Washington, of record in the auditor's office of said county. MONCRIEFFE CAMERON, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 323 Cen ORDER A CASE OUT TO YOUR PLACE OF Rainier PALE BEER PHONE SIDNEY 526 ne ‘ Rr: ee ecmcccmeccmnmememmmmmmmeer 8 IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF, THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Probate Notice. Notice of Settlement of Final Account. State of Washington, County of King —ss. In the Matter of the Estate of James McCarthy, deceased.—No. 11951. Notice is hereby given that Lotta Mc- Carthy, administratrix of the estate of James ‘McCarthy, deceased, has rendered to, and filed in said court her final ac- count as such administratrix, and that Thursday, the 9th day of November, 1911, at 9:30 o’clock a, m., at the court room of the Probate Department of our said Superior Court, in the City of Se- attle, in said King County, has been duly appointed by said court for the settle- ment of said account, at which time and place any person interested in said es- tate may appear and file his exceptions in writing to said account, and contest the same. Witness, the Hon. A. W. Frater, Judge of said Superior Court, and the seal of said court hereto affixed this 2nd day of October, 1911. D. K. Sickels, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk, Oct. 6—Nov. 3, 1911, TO THE ALASKA SOUTHERN RAIL- way Company, a Corporation—To the Bondholders of said Company, and to all Whom it May Concern: You and each of you are hereby noti- fied that the Washington Trust and Sav- ings Bank, heretofore known as_ the Washington Trust Company of Seattle, hereby makes and tenders its resigna- tion as trustee under and by virtue of certain indenture bearing date of July 14th, 1906, wherein the Alaska Southern Railway Company is party of the first part and the Washington Trust Company of Seattle is party of the second part, said indenture being a trust deed or mortgage to secure certain bonds to be issued by said Alaska Southern Railway Company. And you are further notified that said resignation shall take effect two months after the date of the last publication of this notice, to-wit, two months from the 13th day of October, 1911, or upon the appointment of a new trustee in place of said Washington Trust and Say- ings Bank, if such trustee shall be ap- pointed before the time limited by this notice. Dated this 4th day of October, 1911. WASHINGTON TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK, By J. H. EDWARDS, Vice-President. Oct. 6—Oct. 18, 1911. IN_| THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons for Publication. Jennie Smith, plaintiff, vs. George Smith, defendant.—No, —— The State of Washington to the said George Smith, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the 6th day of October, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court, The object of the above entitled action is to procure a divorce from defendant upon the grounds of desertion and non-support. J. E, HAWKINS, : Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice address, 424-5 Boston Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Oct. 6—Nov. 17, 1911, IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice to Creditors. In_the Matter of the Estate of Everett Smith, deceased.—No, 18245, By order of said court made herein on the 26th day of September, 1911. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said deceased to present them with the necessary vouchers to the under- signed administrator of said estate, at 229 Burke Bldg., Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication September 29th, 1911, CHAS. 8S. FOLLETT, As Administrator of said Estate. FRED L, RICH, Attorney for Estate. 229 Burke Block, Seattle, Washington. Sept. 29—Oct. 27, 1911. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons by Publication. Carrie Himelhoch and Isaac Himethoch, her husband, plaintiffs, vs. Henry F. Baker and Marie L. Baker, his wife, defendants.—No, The State of Washington, to the above named defendants: You, and each of you, are hereby sum- moned and required to appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the first day of September, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs herein and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN attorney for plaintiffs, at the address each parcel of said below stated; and in case of your fail- satisfaction of the ure so to do, judgment will be rendered found against it ré against you according to the demand vided by law, and 4 of the complaint which has been filed tiff’s complaint, now with the clerk of this court. and court. The object of this action is to quiet title to the following described land in King County, Washington, to-wit: Lot A. C. MAC DONALD 16, block 8 Jackson Street Addition to Attorney fc the City of Seattle, and to obtain a de- Office address, 514 cree decreeing that the said defendants Seattle, Wash. have no interest whatsoever in and to ‘Sept. 1—Oc' said lands or ay part. thereoF, OBmE, ee ‘Attorney for Plaintim, IN, THE SUPERIOR Office and postoffice address, rooms f{@te or, Wasim! 604-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King , ‘Y; Qence ott County, Weahtngton, "mer and Alfred] Sept. 1—Oct. 13, 1911. abi vinnie. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Notice and Summons. L. H, Craver, plaintiff, vs. Albert B. Smith, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.— No, 82474, State of Washington, to the above named defendants and each of them: You and each of you as owners, claim- ants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax centificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of May, 1911, and numbered B68787, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906 in the amount of $4.21, and upon the real property situated in the County of King, State of Washington, described as follows, to-wit: The east 421 feet of fie portion of Clarke’s First Addition to Kent, lying south of Temperance Street, between Jason and Hazel Streets. That the plaintiff has paid the follow- ing subsequent taxes on the said prop- erty: for the year 1907, the sum of $4.00; for the year 1908, the sum of $2.41; for the year 1909, the sum of ae for the year 1910, the sum of ‘Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against the said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and apnehe within 60 days after the first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to- wit, within 60 days after September 1, 1911, in the above entitled court and action, and defend this action and ans- wer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve @ copy of gore answer upon the attorney for plaintiff below named at his office below stated; and in case or your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of the said taxes and costs against the said above described real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against it for said taxes, interest and costs, and ordering a sale of the said property for the satisfaction of the sums found against it Ba povided by law and as prayed for in said plain- tift’s complaint on file in this cause and court. L, H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. McDONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. 614 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. ‘Sept. 1—Oct. 13, 1911. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of ee for King Coun- ty. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff vs. Jens Torineson, Jens Tonnson and Vashon College As- sociation, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants, fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, are hereby noti- fied that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 25th day of April, 1910 and numbered 261745, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of $2.29, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as fol- lows, to-wit: West 261 feet of East 5 acres of N. % of SW. % of SB, % of Sec. 18, Tp. 22 N, R. 2 H., W. M. That the taxes for the following sub- sequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real mrgperty. to-wit: ‘or the year 1908, the sum of $3.78; for the year 1909, the sum of $3.79. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear. within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- Heation, to-wit: within sixty days after September 1, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plain- tiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plain- tiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, fore- closing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said sane interest and costs, ordering a sale o! each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plain- tiff’s complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. CG, MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 1—Oct. 13, 1911. IN THE SUPHRIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Notice and Summons. L, H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. N. H. Lati- mer and Alfred HE, Heffner, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants, State of Washington, to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to ‘the hereinafter de- scribed real property, are hereby noti- fied that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of Nov., 1908, and numbered B54878, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount of $2.65, and upon the real property situ- ated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit. Lot 42, N. H, Latimer’s Lake Washington Plat, less S. % re- deemed. That the taxes for the following sub- sequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $1.88; for the year 1908, the sum of $8.65; for the year 1909, the sum of $13.12. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear Within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- lication, to-wit: within sixty days after September 1, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plain- tiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plain- tiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment. will be rendered herein, fore- closing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plain- tiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L, H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A, C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 514 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 1—Oct. 13, 1911. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of ang toe: for King Coun- ty. Notice and Summons, L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Mary Udell, Harry 8. Heath, and all persons un- _ known, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, defendants. State of Washington, to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, are hereby noti- fied that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 13th day of June, 1910, and numbered B65681, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the arnount of $1.31, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as fol- lows, to-wit: Beginning 16 feet west of SW. corner of lot 4, Sec. 18, Tp, 22 N., R. 8 BE, W. M.; thence west 150 feet; thence north 100 feet; thence east 150 feet; thence south 100 feet to beginning, being part of SE. 4% of SW. % of Sec. 18, Tp. 22 N., R. 3 B., W. M. That the taxes for the following sub- sequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: for the year 1908, the sum of 94 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 94 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- lication, to-wit: within sixty days after September 1, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plain- tiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plain- tiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, fore- closing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due et. and charged against each, for sai ee, interest and costs, ordering a sale each parcel of said property for the Friday, October 20, 1911 satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plain- tiff’s complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A, C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 614 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Sept. 1—Oct. 18, 1911. IN| THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show ee why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of Alfred Abrahamson, deceased.—No, 8345. Annie Abrahamson, executrix of the estate of Alfred Abrahamson, deceased, having filed in this court her final ac- count and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribu- tion of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Alfred Abrahamson, deceased, be and appear before the said Paeiee Court of King County, State of Wash- ington; at the court room of the Pro- bate Department of said court in Seat- tle, Washington, on the 30th day of October, 1911, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy, of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 80th day of October, 1911, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 29th day of September, 1911. A. W. FRATER, Judge. A See ee A ae ra this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 80th day of October, 1911, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 29th day of September, 1911. A. W. PRATER, Judge, Sept. 29—Oct. 27, 1911. IN THB SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Notice and Summons. James Price, plaintiff, vs. Vinci Sepsl, and all persons unknown, if any, hav- ing or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, defendants.—No. 82617. State of Washington: To the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King Coun- ty, State of Washington, dated the 30th day of June, 1909, and numbered as fol- lows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Fairmount Addition to City of Seat- tle, west one foot of lot 14, block 8, certificate No. B60535; year, 1907; amount, 7 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: West one foot of lot 14, block 3, Fair- mount Addition to the City of Seattle; amount, 26 cents; for year 1908; west one foot of lot 14, block 8, Fairmount Addition to the City of Seattle; amount, 28 cents; for year 1909. West one foot of lot 14, block 8, Fairmount Addition to the City of Seattle; amount, 35 cents; for year 1910. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- lication, to-wit, September 8th, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complain of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office be- low stated, or pay the amount due, to- gether with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property, for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found panna it re- spectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. JAMES PRICH, Plaintiff. J. M, WIESTLING, Attorney for Plaintiff, Office address, 814 Bailey Building, Seattle, Washington. Sept. 8—Oct. 20, 1911.