Seattle Republican

The Seattle Republican NEW YORK Spanish War Veteran. United States Marshal, Western Washington Single Copies, 10 Cents. COMMENT. Vaudeville Taking the Lead. Sarah Bernhardt of much theatrical fame, who has played in all of the high class houses of Europe and America, is to enter the vaudeville field and do her stunt the same as the "strong woman," all of which demonstrates that, the old time plays, which have come down the centuries are rapidly passing and giving way to the plays with varied programs. It is exceedingly taxing to follow the thread of an intricate play and the persons, who attend theatres, do so for amusement and entertainment rather than for thought and meditation, hence the passing of the old and the popularity of the new. Mme. Bernhardt is one of the world's most famous theatrical characters and she must be a woman of very progressive ideas or she would not have consented to forsake her long love to enter the vaudeville field at her advanced age. More Suckers Caught. W. E. De Larm, a real estate shark, has gone wrong and is now a fugitive from justice with thousands of suckers wishing they had their money back. De Larm after years of experience became thoroughly convinced that, a sucker is born every second in the United States, and the man with average "savy" that does not tage advantage of the opportunity to land them is himself a sucker. It seems almost preposterous that men and women would sell their homes to invest the money in a get rich quick scheme SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, FEB. 9, 1912. and yet they do it every day. The scheme represented by De Larm was so flagrant and flimsy that an insane person ought to have detected it at first sight. It is probably wrong for men to rob their fellow men as has De Larm, but the person who will bite at such a scheme does not deserve the pity of any one else even though the loss leaves him or her in absolute poverty. Every sucker that bit at De Larm's bait hoped to do just what De Larm did do, get something for nothing, but they failed and now they are hollering. The Foreigners Did It. "With millions of foreigners annually flocking to our shores bringing with them their varied and various standards of morality this government has had its hands full in establishing as high a standard of morality as she has," said Rev. A. W. Leonard of the First Methodist Episcopal church of Seattle in a recent sermon. The standards of morality in the countries of the old world could hardly be worse than the standard in the United States, and if they are then no moral standard is recognized between the sexes in those countries. To say nothing of the depraved conditions that are common to all the northern cities, the low moral status of the South is sufficient to make an African Hotentot hang his head in everlasting shame. Not less than three million mulattoes in this country are due to the illicit relations between the "southern white gentlemen" and their former female Negro slaves and the conditions have not improved since the R. H. JACOBY LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 VOLUME XVIII. NUMBER 49. emancipation. The dominant class of this country has been as beastly in its nature as human beings can possibly be, and their indiscriminate cohabitation with the women of a people they publicly declare, but a degree higher than the animal, prompted a Negro to retort to a Caucasian who twitted him with the threat that, African apes would be imported to take the places of the Negro as servants: "Well, if you do, I hope you will not miscegenate with the monkeys like you have with the niggers." If within the past score or more years the moral standard of the United States has been improved it is due to the foreigners who have settled in the country rather than to the natives. This is another case of seeing the mote in your brother's eye, but not being able to observe the beam in your own. Give Us Men Like These. Two as brave men as ever lived went over the Niagara Falls last Sunday and, if the prayers of the living can gain them any favor with their creator, then every man and woman throughout Christendom should make a special plea for them. The seventeen year old youth hardly realized his danger in giving up his opportunity to escape death to assist a similar unfortunate man and woman, but he made a magnificent effort to render them assistance and plunged to immediate death after making a desperate effort to save himself. Of the man, husband to the unfortunate woman, who scorned any opportunity to save himself and desert his wife, God never made a nobler creature. He who wrote "self preservation is the first law of nature," may have to an extent been correct, but this man totally disregarded self and died rather than desert his wife. Give us a race of men like these and the milennium will be with us immediately. A POLICE COURT ANGEL. There is a record of 1500 girls who have been brought before the magistrate's courts in New York, who, but for the probation officer, Miss Alice C. Smith, might be numbered among those of the lost. They are girls who had "departed by one step, and perhaps by many, from the narrow way;" but they were in sore need of being "mothered," and Miss Smith was the mother into whose keeping they were committed. This is the ten-years' record of the woman who has earned the picturesque titles of "The Angel Policeman," "The Friend of the Fallen," "The Torchlight of Jefferson Market Cavern." The latter title locates the field of her activities. The Jefferson Market court, says Miss Ada Patterson, in "The Continent" (Chicago), is "the one spot in the world where only women's offenses are considered and where the sessions are held at night." Many who come before the bar are not old, but first offenders. Most of the accused are young—many scarcely over school age. "The woman who stands always with- in hearing of every word uttered in the case by the cowering accused, by the witnesses, and by his honor, is tall, soft-eyed, and freshcheeked, her silver hair worn in rippling bands above a full forehead as free of lines as her thoughts are free of self." Her appointment was due to one of our millionaire philanthropists. THE PORT OF NEW ORLEANS FOR 1911. The port of New Orleans has the best year in its history. The total imports and exports handled in 1911 was $221,574,184, or an increase of $5,391,307 over 1910, which, in turn, outranked any previous year. The increase in imports for 1911 over 1910 was $6,824,437. The exports showed a decrease of $1,608,693. The total exports amounted to $153,561,532; the total imports to $68,-012,652. Records of 1906, the banner year in New Orleans's history for exports, was passed in general business by $10,060,378. In 1906 the exports amounted to $167,329,-307, or $13,767,775 more than was handled in 1911. The increase in imports of 1911, over 1906, however, was $23,162,400, giving a total increase of $10,000,000 over 1906. Cotton, of course, formed the chief article of export, to the amount of $91,644,405. Other items of cotton and cotton goods were: Cotton cloths, bleached, $117,908; unbleached, $36,155; cotton knit goods, $30,-312; cotton cloths, colored, $173,572; cotton wearing apparel, $219,797; cotton waste, $13,020; other manufactures of cotton, $203,994. The total of cotton and cotton manufactures was $92,435,157. Lumber and its manufactures formed the second largest item of export, logs, planks and boards, amounting to $9,949,515. In addition, staves, headings, doors, sash and blinds and furniture amounted to $5,843,713, making a total of $15,793,228. Leaf tobacco came as the third largest export, to the amount of 70,484,712 pounds, valued at $9,074,560. In addition New Orleans exported more than sixty-four millions of cigarettes, valued at $102,323. Lard and other hog products came fourth. Cotton-seed cake and meal more than two hundred and eighty-nine million pounds, was valued at $3,495,846. Cotton-seed oil amounted to $3,979,333. Coffee was an easy leader in the imports, a total of 263,310,886 pounds arriving here, valued at $31,004,378. A total of 424,746,168 pounds of sugar was received here, valued at $10,-504,954. Sisal grass was the third import, the total import of that product being 45,939 tons, valued at $5,156,852. Bananas formed the fourth item among imports, 15,000,000 bunches, being valued at $4,337,454. All other articles were valued at less than one million dollars. "DON'TS" FOR YOUNG MEN. The "Don'ts" series of prohibitions hitherto published have usually aimed at correcting social solecisms; but a minister of Brockton, Mass., the Rev. Dr. A. Marion Hyde, invents some that have a more serious purpose. They reach us by the somewhat roundabout way of the London Daily Mail: "Don't speak of an old gentleman or an old woman. Fathers and mothers are a necessary evil in the present system of things. They have spoken respectfully of you when outsiders could not see anything on which THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN they could hang a compliment. "Don't give all your attention to your education in sport. It is not sufficient training for life. "Don't invest your five cents in a glass of beer and then criticise the other fellow who invested his in the savings bank. "Don't expend the money of your tailor or laundress in guinea opera-seats or 8s. theater tickets. The tailor and the laundress may prefer to spend their earnings in some other way. "Don't try to 'get rich quick.' Smarter men than you have tried it and lost all they had. "Don't wrong a woman. Every woman is some mother's daughter. The white life you ask from your mother's daughter you have no right to take from the daughter of another. "Don't defile your tongue with profane and vulgar speech, revealing your ignorance and showing the coarseness of your soul. "Don't think you have sounded all the ocean of truth when you have let out all your little line in the ocean on whose shore Newton gathered only a few pebbles. It can never be all in your little tin cup. "Don't be a stranger at the church. Your father's old pew looks lonesome without you." BORROWED THOUGHTS T. R., R U or R U not?—New York American. China, of course, will expect something new under the Sun.—Toledo Blade. Turkey's new naval appropriation should be called a sinking fund.—Grand Rapids Press. Last year was a good one for aviation, but a bad one for aviators.—St. Louis Globe-Democrat. An Oregon baby held its breath for fifteen minutes and lived. Very few politicians could do that.—St. Paul Pioneer Press. The only reason that Rockefeller and Carnegie are both rich men is that they operated in different spheres.—Harrisburg Telegraph. If Woodrow Wilson once applied for a Carnegie pension, Judson Harmon once wrote a poem. This makes honors even.—Detroit News. The Manchus complain that Dr. Sun is too progressive. What the Manchus needs is a Joshua.—Nashville Southern Lumberman. Roosevelt jumped fifty feet on skis. But he has made a lot of other folks jump a good deal farther than that.—Philadelphia North American. We don't ever recall seeing such a heavy stand of Presidential timber. The stumpage will come after the nomination.—Nashville Southern Lumberman. Doubtless Standard Oil is the more easily reconciled to its dismembered state by the obliging behavior of the price of petroleum products.—Chicago News. It isn't so much the size of T. R.'s vocabulary. It's the knack he has of making common every-day words jump through the flaming hoops.—Detroit News. If the Democrats of the House are really going in for economy, why do they pay Andrew Carnegie $2 a day as a witness, when they can hear that other Scotch comedian, Harry Lauder, for a dollar?—Brooklyn Eagle. Mr. Carnegie believes that some sort of a government commission should fix prices every month. How long would it be before somebody would think it worth while to try to "fix" the commission?—New York Herald. There is no telling what under the Sun China will do next.—Chicago Advance. The Congressional Record is the one publication on earth that regards it as more important to please the contributors than the subscribers.—Washington Star. W. Clark Russell, who wrote sea-stories, left a fortune of $100,000. His seems to be the only practical way of extracting gold from ocean waves.—Denver Republican. The Beef Trust men are now making it appear that they killed the beef and distributed the meat as a philanthropy, and that the profits were merely a by-product.—New York World. The six-year-old Emperor of China has temporarily ceased his studies. They are making history so fast over there just now that the little fellow can't keep up with it. Binghamton News. "Colonel Roosevelt will not ask for a nomination," says Gifford Pinchot. Certainly not. If Colonel Roosevelt decides that he wants a nomination he will go out and take it.—St. Paul Pioneer Press. The Dunfermline idea of erecting a statue of Mr. Carnegie holding a book is by no means realistic. He should be shown holding a library-building in one hand, with a string to it in the other.—New York World. During the recent revival in Wichita the Rev. "Billy" Sunday converted two baseball players and several hundred fans, but there is no record that he led any umpires to see the error of their way.—Kansas City Star. When Mr. Hitchcock has his way, and the postoffice operates the telegraph, will newspapers be excluded from use of the wires whenever their advertising occupies more columns than their reading-matter?—New York Evening World. Madame Maeterlinck says Boston is the artistic center of America, and that it is surpassed nowhere for intelligence and discernment. Is that why Boston opera will be discontinued at the close of the present season? Philadelphia Record. Evidently the Seattle Port Commission does not intend the Bush terminals to make Bridges over their municipal docks. Has single tax ever been tried in any country? If not then we suggest Seattle be excused on this occasion from taking the initiative in more public innovations. I attended the meeting of the Commercial Club last Monday evening. The attendance was large and the fun immense. The Bush Termnal matter was up for discussion. Mr. Calhoun, former corporation counsel, spoke in favor of the issue of bonds. A letter from D. H. Gilman, a brother of L. C., was read. It was in opposition of Mr, Calhoun. It was germane to the subject. It was, and proba- bly always will be a classic. R. Windsor delivered a good strong talk against the terminal plans. Mr. Calhoun was given the opening and closing. When he got through he was licked to a frazzle. Three fourths of the crowd was against him. One thing was demonstrated. That a small minority can make a heap of noise, if put to it, even when they are licked. Mr. Wilshire presided with grace and dignity. He makes a fine presid- ing officer. The Commercial Club is one of the ‘‘big things’’ of Seattle. It has a big membership, and deserves even more. Join it. They treat you nicely and you are helping the city along in its fight for future greatness. County politics opens up three days after the city election. Candidates who are not subscribers to the Republican, are going to expect little, but miss much. Who is knocking the municipal car line? I want to pay my respect to him. The old Renton line is about swamped. It cannot do the business. There are two men who I would like to see on the Superior Court bench after the fall election. They are Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Robert M. Ingersoll, and James E. McGrew. If you can find a better pair to draw to in King county, let me see it. Some one told me the other day that the friends of Judge Ronald are trying to drag him into the race for governor this fall. You ean find me kicking on such a proposition for twenty out of the twenty-four hours of each day. Judge Ronald is needed’ on the superior court bench more than any other place, Should he conclude to run however, some one will ‘‘go some’’ to beat him. Mr. Parrish declares that if elected mayor, politics will be eliminated, and the city af- fairs will all be conducted on a_ business basis. Gee whiz!! Does he think anyone believes that? How long would he last if he undertook such a course. Ask Frank Black how long a mayor will last in Seattle who in- jects business principles in the conduct of affairs ? Word is passed around that Murphy will not be a candidate for re-election and that Deputy Kennedy will be the office candidate. Mr. Kennedy has been in court a great deal of late and is probably the strongest and best informed deputy in the office. Ex-lawyer, lecturer and magazine writer, Mr. Connelly, delivered a lecture at Arcade Hall last week, I paid fifty cents to hear it. Tt was worth two dollars. He must have THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN The Peoples Forum bY A. G. McBride a Poe dl Phillip Tindall. Who is seeking the nomination for corpo- ration counsel is one of the leading young attorneys of the bar in Seattle, and if elected will give the city a splendid administration. Mr. Tindall is a young man with progressive ideas all down the line and if nomi- nated and elected will be a credit to the city. He is broad-gauged and liberal in his deal- ings with his fellow men and is worthy of any honor that may be conferred upon him. read what I said of our Supreme Court in the Forum a few weeks ago, for he repeated my statement that our court was doing good work and turning out good decisions. He spoke of the past. I wish it could be forgot- ten. But not an unkind word against our present judges. All the lawyers will be glad of this. Oh! Lord, what can be done to get our Superior Court ona higher plane? The Supreme Court could do a world of good in this line. Why don’t it? Years and years ago, the City of Seattle entered into a contraect—a valid binding contract, with the Independent Telephone Company that permitted the latter to do a telephone business at certain fixed rates, and no more. The Public Service Commission issued an order permitting the company to violate this contract by raising its contract rates, <A man named Lawrence, a candidate for gov- ernor, was a member of the commission, and voted in favor of permitting the company to violate the contract it entered into with the city of Seattle. The city appealed to the Supreme Court and although by a divided court, the order of the commission was sustained. Judges Morris and Ellis dissented. I wish the ‘‘Old Roman’’ Judge Dunbar had joined them in protesting against this unjust judgment. All I know of the matter is what I saw in the papers and it was stated that the court declared that the right to lower rates car- ried with it the right to raise them. That is true, but what right has any one, court or commission, to say that a contract shall not be held sacred? If through bad management or otherwise, the telephone company is a loser, is that an yeause for annulling the con- tract with the people? Let it sell out or get a new superintendent—one who will be able to conduct the business under scientific man- agement. The right to lower the rates are as much in violation of the agreement as to raise them. I doubt not that the Supreme Court was referred to some decisions that sustained it, but there are many good reasons why they should not be followed. A decision that is not supported by fundamental. principles should be swept aside. The United States constitution prohibits the enactment of any law by any state im- pairing the obligations of contracts. Perhaps this s not intended to apply to the courts, who knows? In the opinion of Charles Dana Gibson his wife is the most handsome woman of his wide acquaintance, and from her picture she seems to be a genuine beauty. The wife of the editor hereof is not the most beautiful woman that we know, but, you bet your sweet life, she is the most noble woman that we know. It may all be in the interest of the dear people, but it looks as if there had not been a fat office in sight La Follette would devote very little of his time to driving out the spe- cial interest men and their ‘‘kept press.’’ Dollars to Doughnuts that that Denver white girl that popped the question to a Jap- anese to travel in double harness discovered that the Jap had a wad of gold hid away and she has an eye single to laying glad hands on it. Attorneys Attention! Send your Legal Notices to The Seattle Republican and be a Good Fellow CALL MAIN 205 423 EPLER BLOCK POLITICS AND POLITICIANS The mayoralty campaign is simmering down to a straight fight between Hyram Charles Gill and George F. Cotterill, Thomas A. Parrish having been practically eliminated from the fight. Every indication seems to point to the nomination of Cotterill and Gill and with Parrish and Wells out of the fight the question is, where will the strength of those candidates go. It is argued by the Cotterill men that not less than seventy-five per cent of the Parrish vote will go to Cotterill and it is argued on the other hand by the Gill men that sixty per cent of the Parrish vote will go to Gill. There is hardly any doubt but that the business element almost to a man will go to Gill, but the resident vote may go to Cotterill and especially the female end of it. Gill will undoubtedly lead in the primary and if he leads with a sufficient plurality then he will stand a splendid chance of being elected. If on the other hand Cotterill should lead in the primary, which would mean that Parrish would not get to exceed fifteen thousand votes, then Cotterill would in all probability be the next mayor. The Socialist vote for the most part will go to Cotterill as he is something of a Socialist advocate his own self. Gill's candidacy is becoming more popular every day, which has moved those pastors, who were supporting Parrish, to begin to swing to Cotterill, less they lose all by sticking to a dead one. The Seattle Republican has talked to many of the leading business men, who are supporting Parrish, and they make no bones in declaring that, if it comes to a choice between Gill and Cotterill they will swing to Gill. In seeking a renomination for a three year term to the city council A. F. Haas is seeking no more than he rightly deserves. No member of the city council has given the city better and more efficient service than Mr. Haas, and it is the concensus of opinion that, he will lead the councilmanic ticket. If there is one man out of the forty-four that The Seattle Republican can cheerfully recommend to the voters of this city for election it is Mr. Haas. Rev. Adna W. Leonard is a cracker jack at stump speaking the same as at preaching and after listening to him stump speak last Sunday evening we are inclined to believe that, he has missed his calling and he should be a politician instead of a minister of the gospel. Dr. Matthews may have had all of the other preachers of the city skinned a mile in doing political stunts in the past, but there is danger of Rev. Leonard beating him to it in the future. Paul Pohr was unanimously endorsed by the Central Labor Council for City Councilman and his many other friends are rallying to his support. Erastus J. Brainard will vote for Gill, so it is being bruted about the streets just now. Every vote counts, but if it is a fact that Brinard is out for Gill it will do him a great deal more harm than good. There are two men in Seattle that aspiring politicians should always steer clear of their personal political support and they are Erastus J. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Brainard and Alden J. Blethen. Mayor Dilling says it costs Seattle 445,000 in round numbers to police the city and for that amount she only got $62,796 in fines for the year 1911. Judging from this report civilization is an expensive luxury. Judge Hook of Oklahoma of jim crow decision fame has been turned down for supreme judge on account of his decision. This is one instance in which Judge Hook got the hook. Mr. McNamara, editor of the Union Record, has been endorsed by organized labor for the City Council. He has also been endorsed by the Citizens' Committee. H. C. Bolke, a former member of the city council, who lives in Ballard, is a candidate for one of the three-year terms, and his friends believe he will be one of the eight nominees. His official record was par excellent and the voters will make no mistake in nominating and electing him to one of the three three-year term councilmen. He is a prominent business man of Ballard and will get a unanimous vote in that section of the city. The effort that is being made to administer sleep powders to the municipal dock proposition should not be overlooked by the voters of Seattle. It is a fact that a municipal dock would prove to be a hundredfold more beneficial than even the Bush terminal proposition, for if that should go by the city could do the same thing a little later on. Vote "yes" for the municipal dock. May not have been endorsed by the Citizen's Committee for re-election, nevertheless he will be re-elected and that too by an over- [Name not visible in the image] Albert J. Goddard February 9, 1912. TICIANS whelming plurality, and we hope majority, and all because he has given the city valiant service since he has been a member of the city council. It can be said without fear of successful contradiction that Mr. Goddard has saved the city more in dollars and cents than any other member of the city council and all because he has agitated and called the hands of those, who were inclined to vote liberal appropriations for all public service. LOVE OF FELLOWMAN Abou Ben Adhem (may his tribe increase!) Awoke one night from a deep dream of peace, And saw, within the moonlight in his room, Making it rich, and like a lily in bloom, An angel writing in a book of gold. Exceeding peace had made Ben Adhem bold, And to the presence in the room he said: "What writest thou?" The vision raised its head, Answered, "The names of those who love the Lord." "And is mine one?" said Abou. "Nay not so," Replied the angel. Abou spoke more low, But cheerily still, and said, "I pray thee, then, Write me as one that loves his fellowmen." The angel wrote and vanished. The next night It came again with a great wakening light, And showed the names whom love of God had blest; And lo! Ben Adhem's name led all the rest. For the benefit of those who are discussing the issues of the present campaign the above poem is reproduced. Paid Advertisement JOHN G. PIERCE Candidate for Re-election as Councilman A. F. HAAS A. F. HAAS for Re-election As Councilman Primaries Feb. 20, 1912 Election March 5, 1912 H. J. PROBSTFELD Candidate for Councilman At Non-Partisan Primary Election, February 20, 1912 Clean, Efficient, Economic and Progressive Legislation and Administration. Primary Election, Feb. 20, 1912 Polls open from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. --- EO aoeereerererreNn_n_a—XeOOwe gg. | cs , F aus a ne th ae ene) AMS > UC RI aad I eal A i nS ee ERR REZ a al iy a aii a adn Ga laa SN This is the picture of a man for whose nomination as one of the eight councilmanie nominees a great majority, if not all, of the G. A. R. veterans of the city and every mem- ber of the Spanish war veterans are working like dicknailers. He was elected a member of the council some two months ago to fill out an unexpired term and he now hopes to stand for an election at their hands. As said above, he has only been a member of the city council for two months, but, if re- ports be true, he has done things since he has been in the harness and will even do more if nominated and elected. Mr. Pierce may not be a politician in his work in the council, but he is on the square and in the open and does not change his mind every few minutes, when he has taken a stand be- cause he learned while out to lunch that the way he voted was not popular among the bankers or the corporation magnets. He, however, believes that the corporations should be treated just as squarely as the in- dividuals and vice versa. If nominated and elected he will continue to follow out that policy. Despite the fact that he is a Span- ish war veteran and is unanimously endorsed by that organization, individually and col- leetively, yet he does not expect to be elected February 9, 1912. SEES cutee Spec one arta os ieee aad eee ceil ait canis. bit oP 2a eater oe are bal Seg THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN on account of that, but on his merit and the record he has made in office. He is a civil engineer by trade and is well posted on the city improvements now contemplated or under construction. If nominated and elee- ted he will endeavor to make the city’s as- phaltum plant, which has lain idle for so long, useful as well as ornamental, and there- by save to the city thousands of dollars an- nually, which, as things are now going, fa- vored contractors are getting. He is safe and sane on all public questions and his nomination would’be a most meritorious one. Throughout the Southern states the Re- publican party is badly divided between President Taft and Colonel Roosevelt, and, strange to say, the blacks are for Roosevelt with the whites for Taft. This is a great change of front on the part of the blacks for when Roosevelt retired from the presidency he was a more despised man among the blacks all over the United States than was Jeff Davis, Tillman or. Vardeman, all due to his attitude toward the Negro soldiers, who were charged with shooting up Brownsville. Roosevelt has had no change of heart on that subject, and yet those blacks are sup- porting him in preference to Taft, who JOHN G. PIERCE pr RAT tere bri a SEA ag rien oe Ok BF rei HELA (et Baie QIU? Pine hE cas, COTE. MT XG. VanOs. Laut played no part in it. Their apposition to Taft is on account of him refusing to appoint colored men to federal positions in the South where they would meet the opposition of the whites. He, however, has appointed more Negroes to high official positions than any other president of the United States of America, but with them that counts for naught, as his appointees have for the most part come from Northern states. Should La Follette retire from the race for the presidential nomination and should Roosevelt signify his willingness to accept the nomination, if tendered him, all hades could not prevent him from getting a solid delegation from the state of Washington, and not only from the state of Washington, but from every state in the West. The Se- attle Republican is not very much enamored with the Insurgent spirit and certainly takes no stock in the personnel of the Progres- sives, who are directing the affairs of that cult in this state, but a blind man can see that Roosevelt is the ideal of the West and if he says the word every state west of the Mssissippi river will be unanimously for him. We hate the idea of hero worshipping, but our opposition to it does not seem to stop it, and so we withdraw our objections. Should Resign at Once. Bob Bridges should resign, is a P. I. edi- torial caption. He should never have been elected and when he was a candidate the P. I, failed to do its duty and defeat him. Bridges was not persona non grata to the P. I. until he refused to favor some proposi- tion that the P. I. advocated and that too without regard to the merit of the case, and therefore it at once called on him to resign. We, however agree with it that he should resign, and if the P. I. will go after him as it should do he will resign, but in the future we suggest to the Post-Intelligencer that it do its duty and not slobber over such things for the sake of harmony and it will better serve the whole community. A new richmond has entered the race for the Democratic presidential nomination in the person of Wm. J. Gaynor, mayor of New York City. Despite the fact he will be backed by Charles F. Murphy, boss of Tam- many Hall, yet he will be quite popular from the very outset. Mr. Gaynor was elected mayor of New York with the great dailies denouncing him as a tool of Tammany Hall, but since he has been mayor he has driven graft and corruption from the departments and today, on aecount of his stand for right, New York is cleaner, officially speaking, than she has been for a half a century. If Gaynor 'should go to the Baltimore conven- tion with a solid New York delegation he would make all of the other aspirants feel like thirty cents all sot full of holes. Speaking about the Democratic nomina- tion for president reminds us that Billy Bry- an is still on the job and if Woodrow Wil- son does not keep his eyes on the gun he will get a ball sent through his boom that will wind it up forever. Judson Harmon is still making a noise, and any one with as much money as is behind him could make equally as much noise. The Democrats on the whole seem to be about as badly in the air as the Republicans, rr 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs, Unknown’ Owners, and all persons uninown, if any, having or claiming an Interest in ‘and to. the hereinafter described real property, defendants. Notice and Summons. No. 84333. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, are hereby noti- fied that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon’ the real property situated ‘in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: ‘West Green Lake addition to the City of Seattle, Lot 4, Blork 2, Certificate No. B55381, 1906, $0.73. ‘That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above de- seribed, real property, to-wit: Lot 4, Block 2, West Green Lake Ad- dition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, $1.78, 1907. Lot 4, Block 2, West Green Lake Ad- dition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, $0.91, 1908. Lot 4, Block 2, West Green Lake Ad- dition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, $1.19 1909. Lot 4, Block 2, West, Green Lake Ad- dition to the Gity of Seatle, King County, Washington, $1.78, 1910. ‘Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per, annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. ‘You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this, notice, exclusive of the day of said first publi- cation, to-wit, sixty (60) days after Dec. 15, 1911, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and an- swer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and_ costs, fn ‘case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of ‘said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for fhe sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, {Interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plain- tif’'s complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. ‘AURORA LAND COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, Attorney ‘for Plaintiff. Office address Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. Dec. 15, 1911—Jan. 26, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs, Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants, Notice and Summons. No, 84335. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, are lrereby noti- fied that the above named plaintiff ts the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the Ist day of June, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: ‘West Green Lake addition to the City ef Seattle, Lot 4, Block 34, Certificate 2. _B55375, 1906, $0.73, ‘That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above de- seribed real property, to-wit: Lot 4, Block 34, West Green Lake Ad- dition to the City of, Seattle, King County, Washington, $1.78, 1907. Lot 4, Block 34, West Green, Lake Ad- dition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, $0.76, 1908. Lot 4, Block 34, West Green Lake Ad- dition to the City of, Seattle, King County, Washington, $1.00, 1909. Lot 4, Block 34, West Green Lake Ad- dition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, $1.78, 1910. ‘Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. ‘You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the fate of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publi- cation, to-wit, sixty (60) days after Dec. 15, 1911, in the above entitled court and action and. defend this action and an- swer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and_ costs. In ‘case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and. costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of sald property for the THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN satisfaction of the sums charged and bate Department of found against it respectively “as pro- attle, King County, vided by law, and as prayed in plain- 22nd day of January. tiff's complaint, now on file in this of 9:30 o'clock a. m., cause and Court. and there to show \ AURORA LAND COMPANY, a have, why said final corporation, be allowed and an or F. J. CARVER, Plaintiff, be made of the resi orn ttorney ‘for Plaintift. among the heirs an ice address pel yn mentioned, at oon. Northern Bank & Trust Petition mentioned, a Dee. 15, 1911—Jan. 26, 1912, this order be posted i IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Aurora Land Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Unknown Owners, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. “Notice and Summons. No. 84336. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, are hereby noti- fled that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the Ist day of June, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: West Green Lake addition to the City of Seattle, Lot 3, Block 3, Certificate No. B55384, 1906, $0.73. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above de- scribed real property, to-wit: Lot 3, Block 3, West Green Lake ‘Ad- dition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, $1.78, 1907. Lot 3, Block 3, West Green Lake Ad- dition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, $0.91, 1908. Lot 3, Block 3, West Green Lake Ad- dition to_the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, $1.19, 1909. Lot 3, Block 8, West Green Lake Ad- dition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, $1.57, 1910. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 po cent. per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeenied taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publi- cation, to-wit, sixty (60) days after Dec. 15, 1911, in the above entitled court and action and defend this action and an- swer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and_ costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as pro- vided by law, and as prayed in plain- 2—REPUBLICAN legal ads—Dec 14, sa tiff’s complaint, now on file in this cause and Court. AURORA LAND COMPANY, a ‘corporation, Plaintiff, F. J. CARVER, Attorney ‘for Plaintiff. Office address Northern Bank & Trust Co. Bldg. Dee. 15, 1911—Jan. 26, 1912. emeating of the stockholders of” A meeting of the stockholders of Bd- win London Company, a corporation, is called and will be held on Monday, ‘the 26th day of February, 1912. at the ‘hour of 10:00 o'clock in the forenoon, at 742 New York Block, in the City of Seattle, King County, State of Washington, for the purpose of considering and passing upon a proposition to increase the amount of the capital stock of sald cor- poration from Sixty-thousand ($60,000.- 00) Dollars, divided into Six-hundred (600) shares, of the par value of One- hundred ($100.00) Dollars each, to One- hundred twenty-five thousand ($125,000.- 00) Dollars divided into Twelve-hun- dred fifty (1,250) shares of the par value of One-hundred ($100.00) Dollars each, and for the purpose of doing any and ‘all things necessary or proper to effect said proposed increase of the cap- ital stock of said corporation. Dated, December 28, 1911. EDWIN LONDON, Y. H. ATKINSON, A, M, LONDON, H, H. WOLFE, Being all of the trustees ‘of said corporation. Dec. 29, 1911—Feb. 23, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cours why distribution should not be made, : In the Matter of the Estate of John Mather, deceased.—No, 10342. F. M. Caldwell, administrator of the estate of John Mather, deceased, pavieg filed in this court his final account an petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said Rernon sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said John Mather, deceased, be and appear before the ‘said Superior Court of King County, State of Wash- ington, at the court room of the Pro- bate Department of said court, in Se- attle, King County, Washington, on the 22nd day of January, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m., of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, peeprniee to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hear- ing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 22nd day of January, 1912, in the Seattle Re- fabloen: a pewspangr printed and pub- ished in said King County and of gen- eral circulation therein, Done in open court this 19th day of December, 1911. A. W. FRATER, Judge. Dec. 22, 1911—Jan. 19, 1912. IN_THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING County, State of Washington. Notice to Creditors. In_the Matter of the Estate of Peter Harvey, deceased.—No. 13572. By order of said court made herein on ‘the 14th day of December, 1911. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said deceased and Kate Harvey, his widow, to present them with the neces- sary vouchers to the pacer ines exe- cutrix of said estate, at 817 17th Ave- nue, Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the 22nd day of Decem- ber, 1911, the date of the first publica- tion of ‘this notice or same will be barred. KATE HARVEY, As Executrix of sald Estate. McLEAN & BALLIET, Attorneys for Bstate. 660 to 665 Empire Building, Seattle, Wash. Dec, 22, 1911—Jan. 19, 1912. ING. Notice is hereby given by the under- signed, constituting a majority of the trustees of the Seattle Mattress & Up- holstery Co. a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the jaws of the state of Washington, that a meeting of the stockholders of said corporation will be held at the office of said corporation at its place of busi- ness, No. 1717 Sixth Avenue South, in the city of Seattle, King County, Wash: ington, on Tuesday, the 20th ‘day of February, 1912, at the hour of 2 o'clock p.m. of said day. The object of said stockholders’ meet- ing {s to consider and determine whether or not the capital stock of sald cor- poration shall be increased from_ the present. amount thereof, to-wit, Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00), "to the amount of One Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000.00), to which latter amount it 1s ‘proposed to increase the capital stock of sald cor- poration, ‘All stockholders are requested to be present at sald meeting. ‘Dated at Seattle, King County, Wash- ington, this 18th day of December, 1911. J._W. EFAW, ARTHUR G.' FOSTER, A majority of the Trustees of the Se- ‘attle Mattress & Upholstery Co. Date of first publication, December 22, 1911. Dec. 22, 1911—Feb. 16, 1912. Notice is hereby. given that the third Regular Annual Meeting of the stock- holders of the Alaska, Northern Rail- way Company will be held at the prin- cipal office of said company at_ room 1215 of the Alaska Building on Second Avenue, Seattle, King County, Wash- ington, on Tuesday, the 12th day of March, A. D. 1912, at 2 o'clock in the afternoon of said dav. JAMES A. HAIGHT, Secretary of Alaska Northern Railway Company. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King Coun- ty.. Summons of Publication, David Kaufman, plaintiff, vs. San Juan ‘Investment Company, a corporation; Charles, M. Farrar; Florence Maude Farrar; John W. Todd; Minnie A. Todd; George Winston; Emma _ Winston; Edward Van de Vanter; Annie Van de Vanter; A. G. Worthington; Loran Grinstead; Wesnersin y= Company, 4 corpora- on; W. H. B. Thomas; Aurora Land Co., a corporation; A, G, Ellis; Frank D, Black; Kate Black; Lewis Littlefield & Company, a cor- poration; Mrs. Sadie Hornbeck, defendants.— No, 84932. The State of Washington to the said W. H. B. Thomas, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: Within sixty days after the 26th day of January, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the somplatat of the plaintiff, and serve a Soy of your answer upon the undersigne attorney for plaintiff at his office elow stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the élerk ‘of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to foreclose a mortgage on Lot seven (7) in Block Fifty-four (54) in C. ©. Terry's First Addition to the town now city of Seat- tle, according to the recorded plat there- Cee aici sortgese is réonsied ta yol- ume of mortgages on page 94. Gio, McKAY, Plaintiff's Attorney. P.O, Address, 450 Arcade Building, Seaitle, King County, Washington. January 26—March 8, 1912. ae ar ee ee ee See eg eee et eee eee eee above entitled action ‘in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at- torney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, Judgment will be rendered against you ‘according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk ‘of said court. The object of the above entitled ac- tion is to recover judgment for $1549.13 for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered to defendant between Nov. Ist, 1910, and Jan. ist, 1912. EUGEND A. CHILDE, Attarney for Plaintiff. P. 0. Address, 457 Arcade Building, Seattle, King County, ‘Washington. Feb. 2—Mar. 15, 1912. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons for Publication. Nellie A. Decker, plaintiff, vs. Joseph M. Decker, defendant.—No. 85540. You are hereby summoned to appear in the above entitled action in the above entitled court within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this summons, exclusive of the date of first publication, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after January 26th, 1912, and defend said action in’ said court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plain- tiff at their address below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you ac- cording to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. ‘This action is for the pur- pose of obtaining a divorce between the plaintiff and defendant, and to establish plaintiff's title to certain real and per- sonal property. HOLZHEIMER & HERALD, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice address: 428-429 Lumber Exchange Building, Seattle, Washington. January 26—March 8, 1912 IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons, Niel Victor Johnson, plaintiff, vs. Mat- tie A. Johnson, defendant.—No, 85518, The State of Washington to the said Mattie A. Johnson: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the 26th day of January, 1912, and defend the above entitled ‘action ‘in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure to do so, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk ‘of said court. The object of this action is to secure a decree of divorce from defendant on the ground of desertion. H. H, EATON, Attorney for Plaintif. Postoffice address, $23 and 324 Alaska Building, Seattle, King County, Wash- ington. January 26—March 8, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. Aurora Land Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. unknown’ owners and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in ‘and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No, 84337. State of Washington, to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, are hereby noti- fied that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the first day of June, 1909, and num- bered as follows, for the’ delinquent taxes of the following year, in the fol- lowing amount, and upon the real prop- erty situated in said King County, de- seribed as follows, to-wit: West Green Lake Addition to Seattle; lot 8, block 9; certificate No. B55386; year, 1906; amount, 78 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above de- scribed real property, to-wit: Lot 8, Block 9, West Green Lake Ad- dition to Seattle, King County, Wash- ington; $1.78, for year 1907; 76 cents, for year 1908; $1.00, for year 1909; $1.57, for year 1910. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, ‘You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the ii a a TE LEGAL NOTICES 427 Epler Bik. Main 305 exclusive of the day of said first pub- lication, to-wit, sixty (60) days after Jan. 26, 1911, in the above entitied court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judg- ment will be rendered herein, foreclos- ing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real prop- erty for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plain- tiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court, AURORA LAND COMPANY, a Cor- poration. Plaintiff. F, J. CARVER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, Northern Bank ana Trust Co. Bulding. Jan, 26—March 8, 1912, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. Aurora Land Company, a Corporation, plaintiff, vs unknown owners and ali persons’ unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in ‘and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 84342. State of Washington, to the above de- fendants and each ‘of them: You and each of- you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, are hereby noti- fied that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the ist day of June, 1909, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amount, and upon the real property situ- ated in’ said King County, described as follows, to-wit: ‘West’ Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle; Lot 2, Block 2; certificate No. B55379; year, 1906; amount, 75 cents. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above de- scribed real property, to-wit: Lot 2, Block 2, West Green Lake Ad- dition to the City of Seattle, King Coun- ty, Washington; $1.78 for year 1907; 91' cents for year 1908; $1.19 for year 1909: $1.78 for year 1910. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. ‘You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, ex- clusive of the day of said first publica- tion, to-wit, sixty (60) days after Jan. 26, 1911, in'the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and ans- wer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs and costs against each parcel of said real property for the ums and amounts due upon and charged againt each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it re- spectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. ‘AURORA LAND COMPANY, a. Cor- poration, Plaintiff. F. J. CARVER, ‘Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address: Northern Bank and trust Co, Building. Jan, 26—March 8, 1912. IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Ida N. Miller, and all persons unknown, if any, hav- ing or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, defendants.—No. 84580. State of Washington, to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, are hereby noti- fied that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 1st day of June, 1909, and numbered B56332, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of $6.53, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 11, Block 2, Hick's Addition to the City of Seattle. That the taxes for the following sub- sequent years have been paid By the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C, MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 508 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Dec. 8, 1911—Jan. 19, 1912. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN IN| THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Summons for Publication. The Hardman Estate, a_ corporation, plaintift, vs. F. L, Allen, James A. Me- ‘air, and S. H. McCallum, defendants. —No, 84442, The State of Washington, to the said F. L. Allen, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within ‘sixty days after the first pub- lication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 12th day of Janu- ary, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in’ the above entitled court; and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their offices below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of’ said court. ‘This action is instituted for the pur- pose of collecting rent at the rate of twelve hundred and thirty-five ($1,- 285) dollars per month, for the hotel premises located on lot’ one (1), block sixty-four (64), of A. A. Denny's Addi- tion to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, from September 1, 1911. REED,& HARDMAN, Attorneys for Plaintif. Office and Postoffice Address: 960 Empire Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Jan. 12—Feb. 24, 1912. IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Summons by Publication, Schwabacher Bros, & Co. Inc, a Cor- poration, plaintift, vs, Charles G. Hu- er, defendant; Seattle National Bank, garnishee, defendant.—No. 84,737. The State ‘of Washington ‘to the’ said Charles G, Huber, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: within sixty days after the 22nd day of December, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at- torney for plaintiff at, his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has bee nflled with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled ac- tion Is to secure a judgment against defendant, Charles G. Huber, for goods sold and delivered amounting to $168.44, with interest from July 27th, 1911, ‘to- gether with all costs of suit, and to reach by garnishment certain’ moneys belonging to defendant, Charles G, Hu- ber, on. deposit in the hands of the Seattle National Bank, of Seattle, Wash- ington. - LEOPOLD M, STERN, Plaintiff's Attorney. P, O. Address, 705 Lowman Building, Seaitle, ‘King County, Washington. ‘Dec. 22, 1911—Heb. 2, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Geo. Winston, Bank of B. C., and all persons un- known, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter de- on real property, defendants—No. 4575. State of Washington, to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- scribed real property, are hereby noti- fied that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of Sept., 1907, and numbered B48630, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount of $8.04, and upon the real ere situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Undivided % of N. % of NE. 4% of SH, % of Sec. 20, Tp. 21 N. R. 6 E. W. M, That the taxes for the following sub- sequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 190*, the sum of $1,752 for the year 1906, the sum of $2.88; for the year 1907, the sum of $3.96; for the year 1908, the sum of $6.48; for the year 1909, the sum of $6.32; for the year 1910, the sum of $3.53. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby urther notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- lication, to-wit, sixty days after Dec. 8, 1911, in the above entitled court and defend this action and answer the com- plaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned at- torney for plaintiff at his office below Bonney-Watson Co. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment » specialty. All orders by telephom or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephene Main 138. stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plain- uff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court, L, H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C.. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 508 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Dec. 15, 1911—Jan, 26, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. L._ H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Wm, Gould, Emily L. Shipman et al, and all per- sons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 84586. State of Washington, to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- seribed real property, are hereby noti- fied that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 6th day of eee 1911, and numbered B73000, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount $5.51, and upon the real property situ- ated in King Countw, described as fol- lows, to-wit: Undivided % of SE. 4 of NW. % Sec. 34, Tp, 24 N,, R. 5 HL WwW. M. That the taxes for the following sub- sequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1909, the sum of $5.01; for the year 1910, the sum of $6.12. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property, You and each of aa (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and Spee within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- lication, to-wit, sixty days after Dec. 15, 1911, in the above entitled court and defend this action and answer the com- plaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned at- torney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sumsrand amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plain- tiff’s complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C., MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 608 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Dec. 15, 1911—Jan. 26, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Geo. Winston, and all persons unknown, if any, hav- ing or claiming an interest in ‘and to the hereinafter described real prop- erty, defendants.—No. 84585. State of Washington, to the above de- fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de- seribed real property, are hereby noti- fied that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 19th day of Aug., 1909, and numbered B60369, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, in the amount $1.78, and upon the real property situ- ated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Undivided % of N. % of NE. % of SE. % Sec. 20, Tp. 21 N., R. 6 E,W. M. That the taxes for the following sub- sequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum. of $1.72 for the year 1908, the sum of $2.23; for the year 1909, the sum of $2.11; for the year 1910, the sum of $1.17. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub- lication, to-wit, sixty days after Dec, 15, 1911, in the above entitled court and defend this action and answer the com- plaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned at- torney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs, In ‘case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parce of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 508 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Thomas K. Ensminger, deceased.—No. 13719. By order of ‘said court made herein on the 29th day of January, 1912, no- tice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against sald deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouch- ers to the undersigned executor and executrix of sald estate, at either 320 Epler Block or 1207 American Bank Building, Seattle, Washington, the place of business of said estate, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred, WM, F. EPLER, As Rxecutor ‘of Said Bstate, KATHERINE D. ANDERSON, As Executrix of Said Estate. Feb. 2—Mar. 1, 1912. IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication, Catherine Fritz, plaintiff, vs. William Fritz, defendant.—No, _— The State of Washington to the said William Fritz, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: Within sixty days after the’ 2nd day of February, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com- plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to secure a divorce by the plaintiff from the defendant, on the grounds of drunkenness, cruelty and failure to sup- port. GHO, McKAY, Plaintiff's Attorney. « Postoffice Address, 450 Arcade Build- ing, Seattle, King County, Washington. Feb. 3—Mar. 15, 1912. JUSTICE’'S COURT, BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle’ Precinct, King County, State of Washington.’ Summons for Pub- lication. George W. Wilt, plaintiff, vh, Maude Poole, “defendant.—Nos. 26616 and The State of Washington, County of King—ss: The State of Washington to Maude Poole, defendant above named. You, and each of you, are hereby noti- fied that George W. Wilt, plaintiff, has filed a claim and demand against you in said court, which will come onto be heard at my office in Room 611 Pre- fontaine Bldg. Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 4th day of March, A. D. 1912,'at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m., and’ unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and de- mand of said claim and demand is to recover balance of forty dollars due on commission on sale of a rooming house, together with the costs of suit, Complaint filed Jan, 13th, 1912, R, R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Wash. J. M, WIESTLING, Attorney for Plaintiff. 314 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Feb, 3—Mar, 1, 1912. IN_ THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. ‘Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made, In the Matter of the Estate of Josiah H. Sanford, deceased.—No, 12343, Clinton C," Sanford, administrator of the estate of Josiah H. Sanford, de- ceased, having filed in this court, his final account and_ petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribu- tion of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that sald ‘petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said es- tate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Josiah H. Sanford, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Wash- ington; at the court room of the Pro- bate Department of said court in Seattle, Wash., on the 11th day of March, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m., of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law, It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most publie places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hear- ing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 11th day of March, 1912, in The Seattle Re- publican, a newspaper printed and pub- lished in said King County and of gen- eral circulation therein, Done in open court this 1st day of February, 1912. A. W. PRATER, Judge. J, BE, MeGREW, Attorney ‘for Administrator, 132 Pioneer Block, Seattle, Wash, Feb. 3—Mar. 1, 1912, 8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County, Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Geo. Winston, Bank of B. C., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 84582. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 11th day of July, 1906, and numbered B42432, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount $6.00, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Undivided $/ of SE. $/ of NE. $/ of Sec. 20, Tp. 21 N., R. 6 E. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of $3.65; for the year 1906, the sum of $5.52; for the year 1907, the sum of $7.92; for the year 1908, the sum of $12.00; for the year 1909, the sum of $11.69; for the year 1910, the sum of $8.64. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, sixty days after Dec. 8, 1911, in the above entitled court and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff Office Address, 508 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Dec. 8, 1911—Jan. 19, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. L. H. Craver, plaintiff, vs. Geo. Winston, Bank of B. C., and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 84581. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of one certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 11th day of July, 1906, and numbered B42434, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1904, in the amount $6.00, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit; Undivided % of NE. ½ of NE. ¼ of Sec. 20, Tp. 21 N., R. 6 E. W. M. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1905, the sum of $3.65; for the year 1906, the sum of $5.52; for the year 1907, the sum of $7.92; for the year 1908, the sum of $20.92; for the year 1909, the sum of $20.39; for the year 1910, the sum of $16.57. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear with sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, sixty days after Dec. 8, 1911, in the above entitled court and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for ORDER A CASE OUT TO YOUR PLACE OF Rainier PALE BEER PHONE SIDNEY 526 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. L. H. CRAVER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 508 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Dec. 8, 1911—Jan. 19, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE of Washington for King County.— Summons. To the above named defendants, and to each of you. You are hereby notified and summoned to be and appear in the above entitled Court and defend the above entitled action, within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, said first publication made within 60 days after Jan. 19, 1912, exclusive of the date of service, if served upon you within the State of Washington, and within sixty days after the service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the date of service, if served upon you outside of the State of Washington, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for plaintiff below named at his office below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the prayer of the complaint of plaintiff which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled Court, a copy of which is herewith served upon you. The object of this action is to quiet title to lots 24 and 25. block 2, Hicks addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Wash. A. C. MAC DONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 506 Bailey Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. January 19—March 1, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Blanche R. Martin, plaintiff, vs. Roy M. Martin, defendant.—No. 85433. The State of Washington to the said Roy M. Martin, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 19th day of January, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a divorce from the bonds of matrimony on the grounds of abandonment for over one year. GEO, McKAY, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address, 450 Arcade Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. Jan. 19—March 1, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. Geo. Simmonds, plaintiff, vs. H. Bird, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 85428. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of 2 certain delinquent tax certificates issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 2nd day of June, 1911, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1906, and each in the amount of $3.52, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: In Block 5 of Steel Works Addition to the city of Seattle. Delinquent tax certificate No. B 52687 on Lot 5. Delinquent tax certificate No. B 52688 on Lot 6. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon each of said lots, to-wit: For the year 1907, the sum of $3.09; for the year 1908, the sum of $5.24; for the year of 1909, the sum of $6.53; for the year of 1910, the sum of $6.15. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid The State of Washington: and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after January 19, 1912, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on life in this cause and court. GEO. SIMMONDS, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 508 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. R. H. Wilson, plaintiff, vs. J. and C. C. Strong, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereafter described real property, defendants.-No. 85429. State of Washington, to the above de- treatments, and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of 1 certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 14th day of September, 1908, and numbered B 53680, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1899, in the amount of $3.63, and upon real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Beg. 214.5 feet west and 364 feet north of S. E. corner of Sec. 28, Tp. 24, N. R. 6 E. N. M.; thence north 25 feet, west 165 feet, south 25 feet, east 165 feet, to beg. That the taxes for the following subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property to-wit: For the year 1900, the sum of $3.57; for the year 1901, the sum of $4.26; for the year 1903, the sum of $3.24; for the year 1904, the sum of $3.49; for the year 1905, the sum of $3.38; for the year 1906, the sum of $2.28; for the year 1907, the sum of $2.40; for the year 1908, the sum of $2.02; for the year 1909, the sum of $1.79. year 1905, the sum of Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after the 19th day of Jan., 1912, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. A. C. MAC DONALD, R. H. WILSON, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Fidman. Office Address, 508 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. January 19th—March 1. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Nation and Summons. Notice and Summons. Reva Jacobson, plaintiff, vs. Eva M. Shafer, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 85430. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of 1 certain delinquent tax certificate issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 2nd day of May, 1911, and numbered B 68716, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, in the amount of 99 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lot 41, Block 39, East Seattle Replat Blocks 39 and 40. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: For the year 1908, the sum of 79 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 64 cents; for the year 1910, the sum of $1.16. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent. per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after the 19th February 9, 1912. day of Jan., 1912, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. REVA JACOBSON, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 508 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. Jan. 19—March 1, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. G. F. Mayer, plaintiff, vs. A. L. Irish, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 85431. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of 30 certain delinquent tax certificates issued by the Treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 16th day of January, 1910, and numbered B 65413 to B 65442, inclusive, for the delinquent taxes of the year 1907, and each in the amount of 68 cents, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lots numbered 1 to 30, inclusive, in Block 4, Merlin Park. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon each of said above described lots, to-wit: For the year 1908, the sum of 27 cents; for the year 1909, the sum of 20 cents. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you, (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within 60 days after the 19th day of Jan., 1912, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fall so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. G. F. MAYER, Plaintiff. A. C. MAC DONALD, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office Address, 508 Bailey Building, Seattle, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Susie Lonnen, plaintiff, vs. Louis Lonnen, defendant. Summons for Publication. No.——. To the said Louis Lonnen, defendant, greeting: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 29th day of December, 1911, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said Court. The object and purpose of the above entitled action, is to secure on the part of the plaintiff, a divorce, dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant herein, on the ground of abandonment and desertion. NICHOLAS SCHMITT. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. address, 412 Pacific Block, Seattle, King County, Wash. Dec. 29, 1911—Feb. 9, 1912. Notice of Dissolution of The Cyrus F. Clann Estate Company. Notice is hereby given that The Cyrus F. Clapp Estate Company, by its proper officers, has duly filed in the Superior Court of King County, Washington, a petition for the dissolution of said corporation, and that said Court has duly entered an order fixing Saturday, the 2nd day of March, 1912, at 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon, at the court house of said King County, Washington, as the time and place for the hearing of said petition, and directing that due notice of said hearing be given as required by law. All persons are hereby notified then and there to appear, and show cause, if any they have, why said corporation should not be dissolved. Witness my hand and official seal this 27th day of December, 1911. (Seal) D. K. SICKLES, Clerk of said Superior Court. By W. K. SICKLES, Deputy. Dec. 29, 1911—Feb. 23, 1912.