Seattle Republican

Historical Society The Seattle Republican Single Copies, 10 Cents. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Is published every Friday by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3 per year; six months, $1.50; postage prepaid. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, Inc. Main 305 427 Epler Block HORACE ROSCOE CAYTON, - - - Publisher SUSIE REVELS CAYTON, - - - Associate It is said of a corporation lawyer that he neither inherits nor makes his money, and yet he always has plenty of it. Ech repeat. Judging from the human discharg at the depots and docks, Seattle has been the dumping grounds for the other sections of the country for the past week. We object. Of course the "shipping business for Seattle shows increase," and largely because the weather is warm enough to ship the hoboes, accumuated in the city during the winter, out to grass. With both Gil and Cotterill alleging fraud in the late election and the guardianship of the ballot boxes it begins to look as if the election in Seattle for mayor has to be all gone over again. Our natal day is to see another life and death struggle of a "white hope" of the land to wrest the championship of the fistic ring from the black hold, and with no hope of accomplishing the undertaking. Licking a "white hope" a week is going some, Mistah Johnsing, and we suggest you slow up and perhaps you will get more coin. Do not talk so much lest wise men whisper as you pass, "there goes that self-conceited ass." We have our suspicions that Will E. Humphrey is a candidate for re-election as he recently sent this office a copy of one of his speeches in congress, which is the first time he has thus remembered it since he was a candidate two years ago. "America for Americans," is a timeworn hobby, on which politicians with itching palms ride into office. It is not America for Americans that they want, but the offices in America for fellows who want to rob the taxpayers by unjust taxation. For a candidate it occurs to us Albert Johnson of Hoquiam is doing a whole lot of talking through his mouth. There is such a thing as talking too much Johnson, Albert, and you had better jar loose from Col. Alden J. Times. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, JUNE 14, 1912. According to a Times story Detective Burns got another "long black mark" down in Lewis county. If Burns had have gotten a bluffing black mark in Seattle last year justice would not have hit in spots as it did and Wappenstein would be less lonesome at the state prison. Neighboring property owners are asking the superior court to make an undertaking firm find another place to introduce its subjects to the inhabitants of the Great Beyond. Not that the subjects are unduly noisy, but because they smell bad. Perhaps hot baths would improve the situation. With Johnny Perry hurrying to Washington City to personally see that congress makes no istake in the Hanford investigation and Howard Cosgrove rushing to Chicago to personally see that the National Republican Central Committee makes no mistake in passing on the Washington delegation, the destiny of the Northwest seems to be in the hands of "Young America." That Chicago man that was relieved of $1,800 by the money multiplying machine operator, which he handed over with the hope that he would get in return $5,400 three times what he gave—is as much and more of a criminal than the "operator" and the government should have him arrested on the charge of aiding and abetting the manufacture of counterfeit money. No sooner than had Howard Cosgrove of Seattle arrived in Chicago the political atmosphere became clarified and the bitter contest was settled in Taft's favor, the Roosevelt contingent resignedly accepted the situation and quietly returned home declaring before leaving, undying loyalty to the party nominee. In Howard Cosgrove Seattle has a political wonder, but does not know it. Leaving the country in a demoralized state over questions of both national and international importance and concern, the United States Supreme Court quietly adjourned one day this week until next October. It will then be January before it gets down to business. Is there any wonder that there is a disposition to recall high salaried judges who do little or nothing except look wise? "If I am successful in unseating Mayor Cotterill I will resign at once and let the council elect a mayor to their liking," H. C. Gill is reported as having said. Perhaps he will, but in our opinion he will not. Gill needs the money. Alaska even boasts of the most magnificent as well as awe-inspiring earth quakes in the world. VOLUME XIV. NUMBER 10. PERSONS IN PUBLIC EYE. HANFORD If John H. Perry has spoken falsely of Judge Hanford there ought to be a law whereby he can be punished as severely as one who holds up a train or robs a bank. If there is no law through which he can be punished and the sons of Judge Hanford know that he has spoken falsely of their aged parent, then they should not be blamed if they armed themselves and on sight shot the life out of their father's maligner. The charges made by Mr. Perry are too grave to go unchallenged by those who honor and respect the man who has directed their destinies for lo these many years. They are either true or they are the most damnable lies ever told against one standing as high in a community as does Judge Hanford in this. If true, then the sooner he is driven from the honored position he now holds the better for the whole country. If false, then the sooner the community is rid of such character assassins as Mr. Perry the better for the whole country. This community should be made too hot for either Judge Hanford or Attorney Perry. It can hardly be said that the community is divided as to Judge Hanford's guilt or innocence, for search as you will or may, you can not find any one even among those who dislike him, who believe a word of the charges, with the exception of a few who, like Mr. Perry, have a personal grievance against the veteran jurist. There is no comment to make on the Perry charges until he has produced his evidence and this the friends and relations of the Judge should force him to do or make him pay the penalty for such a slanderous attack with his life blood. No one will deny but that Judge Hanford has always been an enthusiastic as well as patriotic advocate of the United States government; that he has always freely given his time, talent and his money to better the conditions of unfortunate humanity, and to have his past and the few days more he has to live blackened beyond recognition for political and selfish motives should be resented by every true lover of fair play and square deal. Joshua Wiestling, a G. A. R. member, who was recently made the head of a committee to look into the Olson case, which has given Judge Hanford more or less unpleasant notoriety, after thoroughly looking into every phase of the case, has reached the conclusion that Judge Hanford could not have done other than what he did—cancel Olsson's citizenship—the same having been obtained by misrepresentations. As to the Perry charges he was noncommittal, although he did venture the opinion that, it looked like personal pique on the part of Perry for having been indicted for the part he played in the meeting which hung Hanford in effigy. 2 REED Charles S. Reed was seen one day this week hurrying to the police headquarters just as he had been seen to do in times past, when he was either clerk or chief of the police, but however anxious he might have been to reach his former haunts, he met, "Hello Charley," as he is still known by the old timers, every few yards, and a friendship greeting had to be gone through with. When the man of irons, Baldy Rogers, retired from the office of chief of police of Seattle, he was able to name his successor and to the surprise of all he selected Reed, who was only a clerk in the department, over all the men in the ranks. Failure was freely predicted for the novice, but Reed seems to have had little of the iron stuff in him as well as Rogers, and the department was a success under his administration. Politics, after some years, forced him to retire, but he had made his mark and the reputation he gained therein made him superintendent of the state reform school at Chehalis, and his success there made him superintendent of the state prison at Walla Walla, and in that position he has made a world-wide reputation for handling moral perverts and unforunate men and women, who make false steps and are sent to state's prison. Even he some times gets deceived in a prisoner and shows mercy and even tenderness where the opposite should be, but it's rare incidents when he gets taken in. In speaking about Charles W. Wappenstein, he said, "Once in the prison and he was the same as any other prisoner. I try to treat them all alike. It's really best for the prisoner that I do or the other prisoners would seek to take the life of the favored prisoner. Wappenstein is in the root department and is getting on very well. He seems to take his confinement more philosophically by a great deal than you would imagine. While he holds himself a little off, yet he mingles to an extent with the other inmates, and it is well that he does or for that they might take a fall out of him. Neither I nor my subordinates talk of the whys or wherefores of any one being there, hence each one can forget his troubles and make preparations to start it all over when discharged. It's a great work." Reverdy C. Ramsom, D. D., who was recently elected editor of the African Methodist Episcopal Quarterly Review, is said to be the first real educated man that has ever had charge of that publication. Pull has been responsible too often for wood choppers being selected to fill positions that educated persons should. Andrew Carnegie got a skido onto himself and went to Skibo, his Scotland home, but he says, "I will be back in time to vote for Taft because I hate Teddy." It looks bad for Taft when captains of industry of the Carnegie brand will cross the ocean to increase his vote only one. Southern Sambo, who always rises and shines at National Republican Conventions, is being charmed almost beyond endurance by the soothing jingle of the Roosevelt band THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN wagon and despite the fact he was sent to Chicago as a Taft delegate he is almost persuaded to jump into the Roosevelt band wagon, as the money "sho looks good to me, and de music jist sounds mo's exasperatin'." And again he argues, "A felow who don't make money while he can is a darn fool." Francis J. M-Connell, Denver, W. O. Shepard, Kansas City, Richard J. Cooke, Portland, Oregon, and Naphtali Luccock, Helena, all elected bishops at the M. E. General conference, are men from the Golden West. It was a sad awakening of the conceited East of the fact that the West is rising. W. J. Cummings, of Iowa, is grooming himself to act as the Republicans' dark horse for presidential nominee. William J. Bryan says, "I do not expect to be a candidate for president again, but if the nomination is forced upon me nolens volens then I can play the dark horse act as well as the other fellow." Ben B. Lindsey, the Denver judge of more or less child court fame and notoriety, is at Chicago doing stunts for T. R. and it is said he has his lightning rod up on the side. Charles P. Taft says, "My brother, President Taft, stands for a great cause." In that opinion Charley does not differ from the President's opponents, who say, the President stands for the trusts and monopolies. Theodore Roosevelt says, "I have no one with me but the people." It never occurred to us that there were so many persons named Perkins before. Winston Churchill, First Lord of the British Admiralty, has gone on record as saying, "The increase of the British navy would be made to keep pace with the German navy. Recently the German Reichstag has added 15,000 men to its already 65,000 men navy, which means England will go and do likewise. Judge Albertson may be basing his rulings in the Gill-Cotterill contest case now before him on technical and far fetched legal facts, but the people are good and tired of so much election and political disturbances and don't give a tinker's damn about the technical law points—in fact, they have reached the conclusion that there is entirely too much "law" and not enough common sense put in practice and are anxious that, the whole darn thing be kicked out of court and permit the voters and tax payers to go their way rejoicing. Even those who supported Gill are good and tired at so much office juggling and prefer Mr. Cotterill to continue as mayor though somebody voted for him illegally rather than this incessant political agitation the town has become the victim of. NEWSPAPERS. On some point of controversy the South Bend Journal exhorts its readers to, "think it over," and yet from the editorial columns no one would suspect the editor of the Journal ever thought it over before he FRIDAY. JUNE 14. 1912 put it in print. Yea, it seems very doubtful if the editorials of the Journal were ever thought over before or after writing. A change of mayor in Hoquiam brought immediate prosperity to the community as the National Mill fired up the next day. It was Ben Butler that said, "the way to resume is to resume," and that seems to meet the ideas of the operators of that big lumber concern. What does ex-Mayor Ferguson think of Hoquiam with her new head? Until the Chicago trouble has been settled and the Baltimore bubble bursted the local campaign in Washington is editorially reported as, "industriously marking time." Marking time for practice is not only an easy job, and even entertaining, but, unless we miss our guess, none save the true and tried will be able to keep time when the real fighting begins. If to make a living the editor of a weekly publication has to work sixteen hours per day and 365 days per year, then such an editor had better seek a more profitable calling, "go plow corn, wash windows," or something of a like drudgery, for it is quite apparent that such a person is without sufficient brains to write editorial paragraphs or even local social notes in such a way as to make the publication a profitable investment. Having grown to maturity under Southern skies the editor hereof has heard a good deal about the "unwritten law," but after years of thinking it over, we have reached the conclusion that, a great many redhanded murderers go free by hiding behind the cloak of the unwritten law. If your wife is overpowered or in anyway taken advantage of, then the unwritten law should be freely used, but if she is as willing and frequently more so than her male consort to defile her home, then to put into effect the unwritten law is nothing short of cold blooded murder. Because the editor of the Cascade Miner was forgotten by the members of the graduating class of the local high school he editorially cited the fact that, the office had received invitations from all the leading schools of the state to be present at their closing exercises, except Roslyn, but in spite of not being present he had no hesitancy in saying, Roslyn had a high school that she should feel everlastingly proud of." That's turning the other cheek for you. "The Lord called me into politics," declared ex-Mayor Ferguson of Hoquiam, before the recall election. He should have remembered the injunction, "many are called, but few are chosen." We suspect he will hesitate about answering even the Lord's call in future, if it is for him to go into politics and especially in Hoquiam. Does the editor of the Pilot of South Bend contemplate murder, when he writes, 0 Old German Lager, which increases in popularity season after season, is surely a triumph for the old-time methods of beer making—a case of stepping a foot backward to gain miles forward in the production of the perfect beverage. Some claim magnitude of plant—we claim simplicity. Others claim pure water, some extra sanitation—we make all these claim, and challenge any and all as to quality—and the proof and the secret of our superiority will be found in the bottle that bears the label—Old German Lager. Old German Lager is a rare combination of Bohemian hops and selected malt, and is stored and properly aged by time—not forced artificially or mechanically—but aged only by natural methods, giving us a product that is pure and entirely lacking the bitterness so often found in bottled beers made largely of domestic hops, under modern methods. Our increasing patronage is due, we believe, to our superior product, and we have been compelled to double our storage capacity used for ageing Old German Lager. Those who wish to enjoy a table beer made under these ideal conditions, properly aged—or lagered—will find Old German Lager in pints or quarts at all liquor stores—or telephone the plant, Sidney 75. Case of Two Dozen Pints, $2.00, refund of 50c for bottles Cofe of Two Dozen Quarts, $3.20, refund of 70c for bottles TELEPHONE, SIDNEY 75 Seattle, - - - Washington FRIDAY. JUNE 14, 1912. "South Bend must make good?" How can she make good when the editor of the Journal of that city is still shuffling about her streets? Instead of committing murder, permit us to suggest the kidnaper's route for the disturbing scribe. Going the rounds of the country press is an article telling of a man calling on his neighbor with a monster petition, which prays for England to restore this country to the Indians in view of the fact that Roosevelt and Bryan may both be nominated by their respective parties for president. Since it's in a fair way of going to the dimnation bowwows why not give it to the "niggers"? They even have a Washington ready for the first presidency. Be game and say the word; they are willing. "Honest confession is good for the soul," so runs an old adage, which, perhaps, explains, why the Duwamish Valley News labels its supposed column of thought "Editorial Dope." We must confess that after reading a column of it we got up so very groggy that we have no hesitancy in pronouncing it some kind of dope with a very stupefying effect. "All roads lead to Rome," was an ancient epigram, but the Rainier Valley Record has the wrong sow by the ear in trying to make its readers believe, all Seattle improvements lead to the Rainier Valley. But a few days ago we heard a leading citizen declare all improvements in Seattle lead to ruination. Now did he mean the Rainier Valley? Should Editor Ruffner of the north commissioner's district and Hugo Kelley of the south both be nominated and elected we suspect "M. Quad" will be the high man in the commissioners' proceedings for the ensuing two years. If Dave McKenzie will only resign, Billy Carle might slide in from the first (Seattle) district and then there would be no doubt of it. "The biggest crops ever harvested in the country," is the prediction of the Dispatch for Columbia county, which is probably true of every county in that section of the state and likewise true of similarly situated counties in Oregon and Idaho. In fact, a "bumper crop" is expected all over the north, east and west and in spite of these brilliant prospects, Mr. Hard Times stalks around over the land with no fear whatever of being molested. An editorial writer says, "Some communities prosper and others decline, and, as a rule the prosperity of the one and the decay of the other is due not so much to natural causes as to the makeup of the citizens." In other words, the citizens in the thriving communities are greater prevaricators than the citizens of easy going communities. If one community is overrun with misinformed citizens other communities just as good suffer. The story of the farmer, who wanted to sell his farm because it was not his ideal, was told to describe it by the agent, which he did, and THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN what he said, was written down. The description was read to him to see that no mistake had been made. After listening to its reading he exclaimed, "Is that my farm? That's just the kind of farm I have been looking for all my life. It's no longer for sale." Let down your buckles where you are and the whole country will be more or less prosperous instead of in spots as it now is under the professional booster's rule. Mayor Gaynor has made a great discovery, which most New Yorkers find out in their youth. A Brooklyn salesman was recently arrested and locked up "with a lot of drunkards and ruffians in the Tombs for spitting on the Brooklyn stairways." The Mayor, in commenting on the case, says, "It seems to be impossible to get a little sense into the heads of some policemen." He wants also to know why men should have to expectorate more than women and girls. "What is the use of being so nasty," he asks. Why? The general disposition of men in public places is to be more filthy in habits and conversation than women. No man should be satisfied to be less refined in his manners and utterances than the average woman in public or in private.—N. Y. Age. A Triumpth for the A Fact--- "Es Giebt Kein Kopfweh" Old German Lager, which increases surely a triumph for the old-time method a foot backward to gain miles for beverage. Some claim magnitude of plant—water, some extra sanitation—we make and all as to quality—and the proof is found in the bottle that bears the label. Old German Lager is a rare commal t, and is stored and properly aged chanically—but aged only by natural pure and entirely lacking the bitterne largely of domestic hops, under mode. Our increasing patronage is due, we have been compelled to double Old German Lager. Those who wish to enjoy a table properly aged—or lagered—will find all liquor stores—or telephone the pla Old German Lager deliver Independent --- advance demanded and granted to the anthracite coal miners, the coal operators announced an advance, June 1, in the price of coal from $6.50 to $6.75 per ton. Of this advance, which amounts to $18,000,000 annually, the miners get $6,000,000, while the operators get a profit of $12,000,000. New York consumes one-sixth of the total output of the mines and is thus taxed $3,000,000 of the added $18,000,000. Local dealers say the price may be further advanced at the end of summer. Coal at $7 a ton is a very heavy tax, with the cost of everything else in the air. The Federal government since the establishment of the United States has expended more than $125,000,000 in improving the Mississippi River, while individual states and municipalities have spent nearly $50,000,000, while additional Federal expenditures upon the Missouri and Ohio rivers, bearing directly upon the problem presented by the Mississippi river, bring the sum up to more than $200,000,000. With this stupendous outlay of money, the floods work their own sweet will, and it yet remains to be seen what can be done to make levees able to withstand the Father of Waters. Old-Time Methods In popularity season after season, is method of beer making—a case of stepping ward in the production of the perfect We claim simplicity. Others claim pure like all these claim, and challenge any and the secret of our superiority will be —Old German Lager. Nationation of Bohemian hops and selected by time—not forced artificially or me- methods, giving us a product that is so often found in bottled beers made in methods. We believe, to our superior product, and our storage capacity used for ageing Beer made under these ideal conditions, Old German Lager in pints or quarts at t, Sidney 75. Prepared to all parts of the City Brewing Co. . 3 THIS IS FLAG DAY eee eens ae ee This paper is proud of the fact that it is being issued on flag day— June 14—which day, so far as the state of Washington is concerned, Goy. Myron HE. Hay has proclaimed to be a holiday that both old and young America may fix a more pro- found respect and reverence for the flag of the country in their respective bosoms. The anarchists, the revolu- tionist and the traitor are all correct in saying the flag is nothing more than a tri-colored rag. Old Glory, with all our love for it, per se is only a rag and after some of the many hard fought battles through which it has gone, it was a pretty dirty rag, but the things for which the Stars and Stripes stand make the wide world and all its fullness sit up and take notice, yea, not only sit up and take notice, but take its hat off, and what it now does will be nothing in comparison to what it will do, if the citizenship of the United States look upon the flag more loyally than many of them do. The flag is our country’s elixir of life, pinioned to a pole and if we would survive we must look up and live. Let the sight of our country’s flag be to each of us what it was to a Negro, who was bred, born and grew to manhood under her protecting folds, but who, after reaching ma- turity, felt it was not guaranteeing to him equal protection that it did to the Caucasion, and in a fit of despond- ency, as well as disloyalty, gathered up his personal belongings and took passage across the western ocean to a foreign land, where all men under like conditions are equal. For days the vessel skimmed the deep blue sea and each moment he felt happier as he got further away; but all of a sud- den another vessel hove in sight and the passengers and crew eagerly watched it draw nearer and nearer to learn of its home, and like magic Old Glory went fluttering to the mast- head. Our black hero was on a for- eign craft and when he caught sight of the flag of his country he was wild with delight and yell after yell of demonstrative approval went up from him. He afterwards admitted that it was the most beautiful thing he had ever looked upon. His disloyalty took the waves of the ocean and he re- turned to his native land at his first opportunity and was ever thereafter ready and willing to die for the flag. Go ye and do likewise. WHAT THE FLAG MEANS. Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth upon this con- tinent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposi- tion that all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedi- cated can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. But, in a larger sense, we can- not dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who strug- gled here, have consecrated it far above our power to add or to detract. The world will little note, nor long IS IS FLA remember, what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us, the living, rather to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us, that from these honored head we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion; that we here highly re- solve that these dead shall not have died in vain; that this nation under God, shall have a new birth of free- dom, and that government of the peo- ble, by the people and for the people shall not perish from the earth—Lin- coln’s Gettysburg Address. e 1 » er eng | LG sa Es lito el as of wy % -» * ‘ Lae i ~ a os \* nt he + es i * * oe 4 a ae Ran a » es In Order to Show Proper Respect for the Flag the Following Ceremony Should Be Observed: It should not be hoisted before sun- rise nor allowed to remain up after sunset. At “retreat,” sunset, civilian spec- tators should stand at “attention” and uncover during the playing of the “Star Spangled Banner.” Military persons are required by regulation to stand at “attention” and give the mili- tary salute, ‘When the National colors are pass- ing on parade, or in review, the spec- tator should, if walking, halt, and if sitting, arise and stand at attention and uncover, ‘When the flag is flown at half staff as sign of mourning it should be hoist- ed to full staff at the conclusion of the funeral. In placing the flag at half staff, it should first be hoisted to the top of the staff and then olwered to posi- tion, and preliminary to lowering from half staff, it should be first raised to the top. On Memorial Day, May 30, the flag should fly at half staff from sunrise is twenty feet by ten feet, and the re- cruiting flag nine feet nine inches by four feet four inches. The “American Jack” is the “union” or blue field of the flag. The Revenue Marine Service flag, authorized by act of Congress, March 2, 1799, was originally pre- scribed to “consist of sixteen perpen- dicular stripes, alternate red and white, the union of the ensign bear- ing the arms of the United States in dark blue on a white field. The six- teen stripes represented the number of States which had been admitted to the Union at that time, and no change has been made since. Prior to 1871 it bore an eagle in the union of the pennant, which was then sub- stituted by thirteen blue stars in a white field, but the eagle and stars are still retained in the flag. June 14, the anniversary of the adoption of the flag, is celebrated as Flag Day in a large part of the Union. Congress adopted the present flag as the emblem of the country 135 years ago and this holiday the anniversary of that act. At the time of its adop- tion it contained but thirteen stars rep- resenting so many states. FRIDAY, JUNE 14, 1912. n to THE STAR SPANGLED BANNER. 1. Oh say can you see, by the dawn’s early light, What so proudly we hail’d at the twilight’s last gleaming, Whose stripes and bright stars, thro’ the perilous fight, O’er the ramparts we watch’d, were so gallantly streaming; And the rocket’s red glare, the bombs bursting in air, Gave proof thro’ the night that our fiag was still there Oh, say does that star spangled ban- ner yet wave, O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave. 2. On the shore dimly seen thro’ the mist of the deep, Where the foe’s haughty host in dread silence reposes, What is that which the breeze, o’er the towering steep, As it fitfully blows, half conceals, half discloses? Now it catches the gleam of the morning’s first beam, In full glory reflected, now shines in the stream. ‘Tis the star spangled banner, oh long may it wave O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave. 3. And where is that band, who so vauntingly swore, ’Mid the havoc of war and the bat- tle’s confusion, A home and a country they’d leave us no more? Their blood has wash’d out their foul footsteps’ pollution; No refuge could save the hireling and slave From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave. And the star spangled banner in tri- umph shall wave O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave. 4, Oh, thus be it ever when free men shall stand, A Between their lov’d home and the war's desolation, Blest with vict’ry and peace, may the heav’n rescued land, Praise the Pow’r that hath made and preserved us a nation, Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just, And this be our motto, “In God is our trust.” And the star spangled banner in tri- umph shall wave, While the land of the free is the home of the brave. 5. When our land is illumined with liberty’s smile, If a foe from within strike a blow at her glory, Down, down with the traitor, that dares to defile the flag Of her stars and the page of her story! By the millions unchain’d who our birthright have gain’d, We will keep her bright blaze for- ever sustain’d. THE CHICAGO CONVENTION FRIDAY, JUNE 14, 1912 TAFT. Whether right or wrong the National Republican Central Committee has used the political steam roller so effectively that Teddyism has been so badly flattened out that it will be unable to make an effective fight next Tuesday when the Chicago convention opens for business. Irrespective of the final outcome the nomination of William Howard Taft is practically assured. The bolting of the party nominee for president seem to be just as practically assured, on the part of Theodore Roosevelt, which will either mean the election of a Democrat in November or the throwing of the election for president in the house of representatives. While the house is overwhelmingly Democratic as to actual members, yet by states it is Republican, and when an election for president is thrown into the house it is by states instead of by numbers that the president is elected. Should the house be called upon to elect a successor to President Taft and there would be no show of electing a Democrat, and there would not be if the Progressives stood pat, the chances of Colonel Roosevelt being elected would be mighty favorable. Certain it is that President Taft would stand little or no chance. If, however, Taft is nominated next Wednesday then it is more than probable that Bryan or Woodrow Wilson will be nominated by the Democrats, and if the former, all of his old-time 1896 Silver Republicans would come back and the chances are he would whip Mr. Taft at the polls in November and thus realize the dream of his ambitious life. On the other hand, if Wilson is nominated he would be looked upon by the conservative voters of the country about in the same light as was Bryan in 1896—a political visionist hoping to become president on a "paramount issue," the dimensions of which would be as badly unknown to him as to those voting for him. There is still another chance that the Democrats will nominate Champ Clark of Missouri, who has much following among the delegates. Clark's nomination would mean Taft's election in view of the fact that he, Clark, is from the South and the country is not yet ready to elect a president from those states, who boast of having tried to shoot the life out of the general government for four long years. There are still those who are inclined to the opinion that should Roosevelt run as an ism candidate that he would come pretty nearly getting more votes than the Republican and Democratic candidates combined and be elected in November. The digression to the contrary notwithstanding the Chicago convention next Tuesday begins to savory very largely of a Taft love feast. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN CHICAGO GO CON No national convention or assemblage in the history of our government has caused one thousandth part the intense political excitement that the Republican Convention, the delegates to which are now assembling in Chicago, and will convene next Tuesday. On its actions and final outcome may rest a new era for the United States government just as did the Convention in 1860, which nominated Abraham Lincoln. While Theodore Roosevelt uses the "people" as a political hobby, still it is very, very doubtful if he en- WILLIAM WILLIAM HOWARD TA [Portrait of a man in formal attire, facing slightly to the right, with a white mustache and a neatly groomed haircut. The background is a dark, solid color, providing a contrast that highlights the subject.] WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT CUBA'S POLITICAL DISPUTE. In the mind of the editor of the Post-Intelligencer there seems to be little doubt but that the blacks of Cuba have been taken advantage of and imposed upon by the whites. His editorial under the caption of, "The Cuban Negro Revolt," admits that, the whites were delighted to have the Negroes do most of the fighting for Cuba libre, but freedom gained and the country prosperous the gallantry of the black heroes was forgotten and when the time came around for the division of the spoils the door of hope The image provided is too blurry to accurately recognize any text. It appears to be a blank or heavily blurred document. Therefore, no text can be extracted from this image. ```markdown ``` CONVEN tertains legislative ideas any nearer the heart of the people—the great middle class—than does William Howard Taft. So far as the two candidates are concerned it seems that President Taft is being backed by the great manufacturing and industrial captains of the country while Col. Roosevelt is being backed by the money masters. In the mythological archives of ancient Greece we read of a fierce war that broke out among the gods, which almost resulted in the destruction of the earth. On a OWARD TAFT was closed against the men who did the fighting, and on that door was written, "This is a white man's country." The black men having grown to maturity fighting for human liberties would not submit and again went on the warpath. The white and black men of the island together fought for Cuba's freedom; they are now fighting among themselves over the spoils. Who is right or who is wrong the writer hereof refuseth to declare, but we do say, it's unfair, un-God-like and absolutely damnable for the United States to take sides with the The image provided is too blurry to accurately recognize any text. It appears to be a blank or heavily pixelated screen with no discernible content. Therefore, no text can be extracted from this image. 1 smaller scale history is repeating itself in the battle for office that is being waged in Chicago at present between those backing Taft and those fighting for Teddy, which may result in the complete overthrow and perhaps destruction of the present Republican party. Already the dignity of the office of president of the United States has been trailed through pools of political slime such as it has never before been subjected to and the man who thought he would live to see the day come in the United States when the office of president would seek the man is further from his ideal by a billion miles than his great great grand sires were. Whether or not this country is being legislated into the hands of the capitalistic class is an open question. If it is, then the capitalists should see that such legislation can but result in the disgraceful downfall of the country sooner or later. If it is not, then the thinking masses should see that this continuous political warfare will sooner or later prove the rock against which the government craft will founder and go to pieces. The government of Rome, the world's first great republic, was torn to pieces by the jarring factions, the one trying to get the political and financial advantage of the other, and the republic of the United States of America seems to have a similar tendency. It makes a lot of difference whose boss is gored.—Washington Post. Everybody is a liar, according to our most eminent authorities.—Chicago News. Roosevelt just can't break himself of that elephant-killing habit.—Columbia State. Just stop to think that Theodore Roosevelt is only one nine-hundred-and-forty-thousandth of 1 per cent of the population of the United States.—Albany Journal. whites and furnish to them sufficient arms and ammunition to completely exterminate the blacks that it may truly be a white man's government. Revolutions in the black man's government are no more common than revolutions in Mexico and throughout South America controlled by alleged white men, and therefore if the white and black citizens see fit to fight among themselves they should either be permitted to fight it out among themselves or Uncle Sam should step in and say to both sides, "There ain't going to be no core." 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Albert C. Hopkins, deceased.—No. 14015. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned, W. W. Eldred, administrator with the will annexed, of the estate of Albert C. Hopkins, deceased, to the creditors of and all persons having claims against the said deceased, to exhibit them with the necessary vouchers, within one year after the first publication of this notice, to-wit: within one year after the 12th day of April, 1912, to the undersigned administrator with the will annexed, as aforesaid, at suite 655 Colman Building, in the city of Seattle, county of King, state of Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of the business of said estate. W. W. ELDBED Administrator with the Will Annexed, of the Estate of Albert C. Hopkins, deceased. First date of publication April 12th, 1912. April 12—May 28, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. William Bornstein, plaintiff, vs. Sadie Bornstein, defendant—No. 89983. State of Washington to Sadie Bornstein, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear in the above entitled cause in the above entitled court within sixty (60) days after the date of first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 12th day of April, A. D. 1912, and defend said cause in said court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys of the plaintiff at their address below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the said complaint, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce between the plaintiff and defendant. HOLZHEIMER & HERALD, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 428-429 Lumber Exchange Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Judit Gazzelli, plaintiff, vs. Currado Gazzelli, defendant. Summons by publication. No. 87262. The State of Washington to the said Currado Gazzelli, defendant: THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN --- --- IMPORTANT TO LAWYERS. If you are a lawyer, you know in your publication notices. You at the last minute you find your art made, you rightly lose your temper sound well in Sunday School nor given the notice to The Seattle H. such worry and would not have right with your Creator. The painstaking, which means all of it until Friday noon, which means publications. When you have a notice lawyer, you know what it means to notices. You get ready for you to see you find your affidavit of publicity by lose your temper and say things on Sunday School nor look well in print to The Seattle Republican you would not have to go to confessional Creator. The Seattle Republic which means all of it in legal matters, which means a whole week over, you have a notice for publication. THE SEATTLE REP If you are a lawyer, you know what it means to get good service in your publication notices. You get ready for your day in court and at the last minute you find your affidavit of publication has not been made, you rightly lose your temper and say things that would neither sound well in Sunday School nor look well in print. If you had have given the notice to The Seattle Republican you would have had no such worry and would not have to go to confession in order to get right with your Creator. The Seattle Republican is prompt and painstaking, which means all of it in legal matters. It takes notices until Friday noon, which means a whole week over Saturday publications. When you have a notice for publication, call Main 305. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 26th day of April, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to procure a decree of divorce in favor of this plaintiff and against this defendant, on the grounds of non-support. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 405-406 Eilers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. Phone Main 1040. April 26—June 14, 1912. In the Matter of the Estate of Emma Catherine Pixley, deceased. By order of said court made herein on the 26th day of April, 1912, Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned executors of said estate, at 306 Epler Blk., Seattle, Wash., the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication May 3, 1912. M. F. PIXLEY, H. O. PIXLEY, ARISTINE M. P. JONES, As Executors of said Estate. E. L. SANDERS, Ald. Estate. Attorney for Estate. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. Josiah F. Redfield and Catherine C. Redfield, plaintiffs, vs. James R. Boldt and John Doe Kondo, defendants.—No. 87223. The state of Washington to the said James R. Boldt and John Doe Kondo, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 17th day of May, A. D. 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above en- --- --- M. F. PIXLEY, H. O. PIXLEY --- now what it means to get good service get ready for your day in court and offidavit of publication has not been ever and say things that would neither look well in print. If you had have a republican you would have had no to go to confession in order to get Seattle Republican is prompt and not in legal matters. It takes notices a whole week over Saturday publie for publication, call Main 305. SEATTLE REPUBLICAN, --- titled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiffs and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: for damages in the sum of $2,000 for personal injuries caused to the said Catherine C. Redfield on the 9th day of December, A.D. 1911, while in the employ of defendants as waitress in their cafe, in the City of Seattle, County and State aforesaid. Which is more fully and particularly described in the complaint in said cause on file in the aforesaid Superior Court. P. P. CARROLL & JOHN E. CARROLL Attorney for Plaintiffs. P. O. Address: 77 Starr-Boyd Bldg, County of King, State of Washington, Seattle. May 17—July 5, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Probate In the Matter of the Estate of Edward C. Heuss, Deceased. No. 14080. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against said deceased, or against his estate, to present the same, with the necessary vouchers, to the undersigned administrator, at the office of Edward Von Tobel, 604 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of the transaction of business of said estate, within one year from and after the date of the first publication of this notice, to-wit: within one year from the 17th day of May 1912. FRITZ H. HEUSS, Administrator of the estate of Edward J. Heuss, deceased. Date of first publication May 17, 1912. May 17—June 21, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Emma Chicoine, Plaintiff, vs. Louis Chicoine, Defendant. No. ——. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington, to the said Louis Chicoine, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 24th day of May, A. D. 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and --- 423 Epler Block. FRITZ H HEUSS FRIDAY, JUNE 14, 1912. ce d en er ve o et d es o- in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. The object of the said action and the relief sought to be obtained therein is fully set forth in said complaint, and is briefly stated as follows: An action for divorce on account of nonsupport and abandonment for more than one year. OLIVER ANDERSON, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 520-1 Lumber Exchange Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. May 24—July 12, 1912. SUMMONS ON APPLICATION FOR Registration of Land. State of Washington, County of King, ss. No. (54544). 102. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for King County. Lutie Metzler and Samuel H. Metzler, her husband, Plaintiffs, versus Fred J. Kerr, Jane Doe Kerr, his wife; Rosetta Bersch and the heirs of any of the above who may be deceased, and all other persons or parties, unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the application herein, Defendants. The State of Washington, to the above named defendants, greeting: You are hereby summoned and required to answer the application of the applicant plaintiff in the above entitled application for registration of the following land, situate in King County, Washington, to-wit: The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section Seven (7), Township Twenty-three (23) North, of Range Four (4) E., W. M., except the west 30 feet thereof conveyed to King County for Highway purposes, and to file your answer to the said application in the office of the Clerk of said Court, in said County, within twenty days after the service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of such service; and if you fail to answer the said application within the time aforesaid, the applicant plaintiffs in this action will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the application herein. Witness, D. K. Sickels, Clerk of said Court and the seal thereof at Seattle, in said County and State, this 24th day of May, A. D. 1912. (Seal) D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By W. K. SICKELS, Denyut. 502 Pioneer Blk., Seattle, Wn. Date of first publication May 24, 1912. Date of Last publication June 14, 1912. FRIDAY. JUNE 14. 1912 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Alexander Scott, Deceased, No. 1227. Order to Show Cause on Sale of Real Estate, Margaret Scott, the administratrix of the estate of Alexander Scott, deceased, having filed her petition in this Court, duly verified, praying for an Order of this Court for the mortgaging of certain real estate of which the said deceased died seized, for the purposes therein set forth: And it appearing to the Court from said petition that the personal estate of the said deceased in the hands of said administratrix is not sufficient to pay the claims against the said estate and the expenses of the administration thereof, and that it is necessary to sell or mortgage all or a portion of the real estate of the said deceased to pay the said claims and expenses of the administration. And it appearing to the Court that said petition conforms to, and is in accordance with the requirements of law in such case made and provided. It is ordered by the Court that all persons interested in the estate of the said deceased appear before said Superior Court on Monday, the tenth day of June, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said day at the Court-room of the Probate Department of said Superior Court, in the City of Seattle, in said King County, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why an order of this Court should not be granted to said administratrix authorizing and empowering her to sell the said real estate of said deceased, or so much thereof as may be necessary to pay the aforesaid claims and expenses of administration. It is further ordered that a copy of this order to show cause be published at least four successive weeks before the said 10th day of June, 1912, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said County of King and of general circulation therein. Done in open Court this 8th day of May, 1912. A. W. FRATER, Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss. I, D. K. Sickels, County Clerk of King County and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said Court on the 8th day of May, 1912, in the matter of the estate of Alexander Scott, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said Court this 8th day of May, 1912. (Seal) D. K. SICKELS, Clerk (Seal) D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By C. C. BURTIS, Deputy Clerk. May 10—June 7, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- Joseph Cass, Plaintiff, vs. Marian Pauline Cass, Defendant. No. ____. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Marian Pauline Cass, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 10th day of May, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce in favor of plaintiff and against defendant on the grounds of abandonment and desertion for more than two years. P. O. Address: 405-406 Eiler Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. May 10—June 28, 1912. REPUBLICAN LEGALS—May 31—noa IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun-Notice to Creditors. Notice to Creditors. In the Matter of the Estate of Clarasa Maxwell, deceased.—No. 14174. By order of said court made herein on the 29th day of May, 1912. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate or against the community estate of said deceased and William M. Maxwell, her husband, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned William M. Maxwell, administrator of said estate, at the office of Morris & Shipley, 55 Haller Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after May 31, 1912, the date of the first publication of this notice or same will be barred. or same WILLIAM M. MAXWELL, As Administrator of said Estate. MORRIS & SHIPLEY, Attorneys for Estate. 55 Haller Building, Seattle, Wash. May 31—June 21, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of Jacob Moeller, deceased.—No. 12490. Thos. H. Koldrup, administrator of the estate of Jacob Moeller, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a dis- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN tribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Jacob Moeller, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 1st day of July, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 1st day of July, 1912, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 28th day of May, 1912. A. W. FRATER, Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss: D. K. Sickles, county clerk of King County and ex-officio clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court on the 28th day of May, 1912, in the matter of the estate of Jacob Moeller deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 28th day of May, 1912. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. GEO. B. COLE, Attorney for Estate. 335-40 N. Y. Block. May 31—June 21, 1912. SUMMONS ON APPLICATION FOR Registration of Land. State of Washington, County of King, ss. In the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of King. (54544) 101 Samuel H. Metzler and Lutie Metzler, his wife, Plaintiffs, versus Harold H. Pipps and Jane Doe Pipps, his wife, if any; Jane Doe Stevens, wife of Lafayette S. Stevens; Leonard W. Kidd and Jane Doe Kidd, his wife, of Millville, Shasta Doe, California; Jane Doe Connaghan, wife of James Connaghan, if any; John Doe Reynolds, husband of Mary Reynolds, if any; Elizabeth Flickenger, and if deceased, her heirs; unknown heirs of Noah Flickinger; A. L. Weaver and Jane Doe Weaver, his wife, if any; the heirs of any deceased in above list, and all other persons or parties, unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the application herein. Defendants. The State of Washington, to the above named defendants, greeting: You are hereby summoned and required to answer the application of the applicant plaintiff in the above entitled application for registration of the following land, situate in King County, Washington, to-wit: Florentine Gardens one-acre Tracts, situated in the West half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section Six (6), Township Twenty-Three (23) North of Range Four (4) East, W. M., and to file your answer to the said application in the office of the Clerk of said Court, in said County, within twenty days after June 14, 1912, the date of last publication hereof and the date of the service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of such service; and if you fail to answer the said application within the time aforesaid, the applicant plaintiff in this action will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the application herein. Witness, D. K. Sickels, Clerk of said Court and the seal thereof at Seattle, in said County and State, this 24th day of May A. D. 1912. (Seal) D. K. SICKELS, Clerk. W. K. SICKELS, Deputy. JOSEPH R. ANDERSON, Attorney for Plaintiffs, 502 Pioneer Blk., Seattle, Wn. Date of first publication May 24, 1912. Date of last publication June 14, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication. Abby C. Bush, plaintiff, vs. James P. Bush, defendant. No. 87280. The State of Washington, to James P. Bush, Defendant: Bush, Deremer. In the name of the State of Washington, you are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the said first date, to-wit, within sixty days from and after the 26th day of April, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, the attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of the said Court. The objects of the said action set forth in the complaint are as follows: To secure a divorce from the defendant by the plaintiff, upon the ground of non-support, the custody of the minor child, for alimony, suit money and attorney fees, and other proper relief. J. M. WIESTLING. Attorney for the Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 314 Bailey Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. April 26—June 14, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King Mary L. Kennedy, plaintiff, vs. Milton G. Kennedy, defendant. Summons for publication.—No._____ To the said Milton G. Kennedy, defendant, greeting: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of April, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled Court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of the said court. The object and purpose of the above entitled action is to secure on the part of the plaintiff, a divorce, dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant herein, on the ground of non-support and incurable chronic mania and dementia existing more than ten years. H. O. DURK, Attorney for Plaintiff. 535 Henry Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. April 26, June 14, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. J. S. King, plaintiff, vs. M. Mickel, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 87073. State of Washington: To the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of thirteen certain delinquent tax certificates issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 24th day of September, 1902, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year, in the following amounts, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Lots one to nine inclusive, and lots 38 to 41 inclusive, all in block 39, River Park Addition to King County, Wash.; the numbers of the certificates being B14824 to B14836 inclusive; of the year 1900, for and upon each of the above described lots in the sum of ninety-one cents, the amount of taxes, interest and cost, on each of the above described and numbered certificates. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Upon each of said lots there was paid, including principal and interest to April 1, 1912, the sum of $18.49, excepting upon lot 1 there was paid principal and interest as above the sum of $18.82, and upon each of lots 40 and 41 there was paid the sum of $18.53. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from said 1st day of April, 1912, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, 60 days after the 19th day of April, 1912, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office address, 323 and 324 Alaska Building, Seattle, Washington. First publication dated April 19th, 1912. April 19-June 7, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of Henry Epting, deceased.-No. 12596. James T. Claque, administrator of the estate of Henry Epting, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Henry Epting, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle, King County, on the 25th day of May, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a.m. of said day, then and there to J. S. KING, Plaintiff. 7 State of Washington, County of King—ss. D. K. Sickels, county clerk of King ter of the estate of Henry Epting, deceased. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 15th day of April, 1912. D. K. SICKELS, Clerk, By PERCY F. THOMAS, Deputy Clerk. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Mary J. Weber, Plaintiff, vs. Otto O. Weber, defendant. No. 88138. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said above named Otto O. Weber, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 14th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney—for plaintiff — at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of the court dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and for the custody of their minor child, Erma. E. W. HOWELL, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 657 New York Blk., Seattle, King County, Washington. June 14—July 26, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of G. W. Carr, Deceased. No. 13948. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 6th day of June, 1912, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to William J. Carr, executor of said estate, at Gig Harbor, Mason county, Washington, the place of business of said estate, executor, or to the clerk of the above entitled court, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, June 14th, 1912. June 14—July 12, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. F. A. Calfee, Plaintiff, vs. Milo H. Sanders, his wife, C. P. Hosch and Nellie M. Hosch, his wife, Eugene T. Mort, and Lucetta Mort, his wife, and Frank Myers, and W. E. White, Defendants. No. ____. Publication Summits. The State of Washington, to Milo H. Sanders, and Alta M. Sanders, his wife; C. P. Hosch and Nellie M. Hosch, his wife; Frank Myers and E. W. White. Defendants; You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this summons upon you, to-wit: sixty (60) days after the 14th day of June, 1912, exclusive of the day of service, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, a copy of which is herewith served upon you. The objects of this proceeding are to foreclose the mortgage upon Lots eight (8) and nine (9), in Block twelve (12) of Petitt's University Addition to the City of Seattle, said mortgage given to secure a note executed by Alta M. Sanders and Milo H. Sanders, under date October 15th, 1912. REEVES AYLMORE, JR. Attorney for the Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 575 Colman Bldg., Seattle, Washington. June 14—July 26, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Mary Gray, plaintiff, vs. Nicholas Gray and Alaska Commercial Company, a corporation, defendants. Summons by Publication, No. 87286. The State of Washington, to Nicholas Gray, one of the defendants: Gray, one of the defendants. In the name of the State of Washington, you are hereby summoned to be and appear within sixty days from and after the date of the first publication of this summons, exclusive of the said first date, to-wit: within sixty days from and after the 26th day of April, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, the attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of the said Court. The objects of the said action set forth in the complaint are as follows: To obtain an absolute divorce for the plaintiff from the defendant Nicholas Gray, and to require the defendant company to pay out of the wages of the said husband $75.00 per month for alimony, $50.00 money and $100.00 attorney fee, and that the defendant husband be required to make such payments, and for other proper relief in the premises. Attorney for the Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 314 Bailey Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. April 26—June 14, 1912. "IT Makes The Mountain Smile" Rainier BEER Rainier BEER SEATTLE BREWING & MAITING CO., INC. ON MOUNTAIN OR LAKE YOUR SUMMER OUTING WILL NOT BE COMPLETE WITHOUT RAINIER. FREE DELIVERY MADE TO ALL PARTS OF THE CITY. PHONES SIDNEY 1; SIDNEY 526. 80 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons by Publication Elizabeth Sorge, plaintiff, vs. Frederick Sorge, defendant. The State of Washington to the said Frederick Sorge, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 3rd day of May, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of abandonment, non-support and drunkenness. NICHOLAS SCHMITT. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address and office, 412 Pacific Block, Seattle, King Co., Wash. May 3, June 21, 1912 REPUBLICAN LEGALS—June 7—noah IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. Order fixing time to hear final account and to show cause why distribution should not be made. In the Matter of the Estate of Everett Smith, deceased.—No. 13245. Chas. S. Follett, administrator of the estate of Everett Smith, deceased, having filed in this court his final account and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among persons entitled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribution of the residue of said estate; It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said Everett Smith, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington; at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 15th day of July, 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why said final account should not be allowed and an order of distribution be made of the residue of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, according to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hearing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 15th day of July, 1912, in The Seattle Republican, a newspaper printed and published in said King County and of general circulation therein. Done in open court this 6th day of June, 1912. A. W. FRATER. Judge. FRED L. RICE, Attorney for Administrator. 229 Burke Block, City. June 7—July 5, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. John Thomas, plaintiff, vs. Jessie Thomas, defendant—No. 88043. The State of Washington to the said Jessie Thomas, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 14th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action by the plaintiff is to obtain a judgment of divorce from the defendant, upon the grounds of cruelty, and defendant's desertion and refusal to live and cohabit with plaintiff. E. F. KIENSTRA. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 200 Epler Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Fax: 212-745-1100. Block 48, of South Park, King County, ing plaintiff owner thereof and that said defendanth have not, nor has any of the,many interest whatsoever in and to said lands and premises. EDWARD VON TOBEL. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, 604 Mutual Life Building, Seattle, Wash. April 12, May 24, 1912. Judge. State of Washington, County of King. ss. I, D. K. Sickels, county clerk of King county and ex-officio clerk of the Superior court of the State of Washington, for the County of King, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an original order to show cause, made by said court on the 29th day of April, 1912, in the matter of the estate of Julia Butler, an insane person. Witness my hand and the seal of said court this 29th day of April, 1912. (Seal) (Seal) D. K. SICKLES, Clerk. By C. C. Burtis, Deputy Clerk. May 2, May 31, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington., in and for the County of King. Revelle Rexelle & Revelle THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ship composed of G. H. Revelle, W. R. Revelle and T. P. Revelle, plaintiffs, vs. Carrie Hull, defendant. No. 87255. Summons. The state of Washington, to the said Carrie Hull, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towith: within sixty days after the 3rd day of May, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff, at their office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to recover for services performed and monies expended, on behalf of the said defendant, by the said plaintiff, and to attach real estate only. REVELLE, REVELLE & REVELLE, Attorneys for Plaintiff. 605 New York Block, Seattle, Wash. May 3, June 21, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons of Publication. No. 86761. Alfred Wilkinson, plaintiff, vs. Mamie Wilkinson, defendant. The State of Washington to the said Mamie Wilkinson, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to- wit: Within sixty days after the 29th day of March, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of desertion for five years and for incompatibility and cruelty. ALBERT J. ALLEN, Plaintiff's Attorney. P. O. Address, 405-406 Eiler Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. March 29—May 10. 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for the County of King. Summons. Hyman & Oppenheim, a Corporation, plaintiff, vs. Mrs. D. C. Robbins, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington to the said Mrs. D. C. Robbins, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 23rd day of February, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, ALBERT J. ALLEN, FRIDAY. JUNE 14. 1912 judgment will be rendered against you, according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the action is to recover the sum of Eight Hundred and 63-100 ($800.63) Dollars with interest at six per cent per annum, balance due over and above all payments for merchandise sold and delivered by plaintiff to said defendant at her special instance and request between March 11th, 1910, and February 16th, 1911, inclusive, and to subject Lot 7, Block 1, H. E. Orr's Park Division Two (2) in King County, Washington, to attachment and sale towards satisfaction of the judgment which plaintiff will recover in said action. LEOPOLD M. STERN. --- Bonney-Watson Co. Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly attended to. Telephone Main 13.