Seattle Republican

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON APR 29 1952 The Seattle Republican Single Copies, 10 Cents. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, AUGUST 16, 1912. VOLUME XIV, NUMBER 25. A STRAIGHT REPUBLICAN [Name] WILL E. HUMPHREY chison Globe. It is understood that the British Prime Minister looks under the bed every night to see if there is a suffragette there.—Pittsburg Gazette-Times. After reading a few newspapers one is led to believe that the New York police force divides its time between Olympic games and manslaughter.—Milwaukee Sentinel. The Treasury Department assures us we have never before had so much money in circulation, but takes no note of the fact that we never before had so much need of it.New York World. An anxious correspondent wishes to know whether the plural for "bull moose" is "bull mooses" or "bull meese." There is no plural for bull moose. There is but one bull moose.—Chicago Record-Herald. The seditious literature they found on Oleson, the Seattle Socialist, was The Literary Digest. Good thing for him it wasn't The North American Review of The War Cry.—Sault Ste. Marie News. About all there is of the Roosevelt bandwagon so far is the tongue.—Cleveland Plain Dealer. "IT Makes The Mountain Smile" Rainier BEER Rainier BEER SEATTLE BREWING & MALTING ON MOUNTAIN OR LAKE YOUR SUMMER OUTING WILL NOT BE COMPLETE WITHOUT RAINIER. FREE DELIVERY MADE TO ALL PARTS OF THE CITY. PHONES SIDNEY 1; SIDNEY 526. SEATTLE BREWING & MALTING CO. 8 Paid Advertisement. ERNEST B. HERALD JUDGE OF SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Non-Partisan Judiciary Ballot Primary Election, September 10, 1912 Paid by C. W. Ide Experience Counts in Congress WILL E. HUMPHREY CANDIDATE FOR CONGRESS Subject to Primaries on September 10, 1912 A STRAIGHT REPUBLICAN Paid Advertisement. J. Henry Denning Prosecuting Attorney KING COUNTY Republican Primary Sept. 10, 1912 Paid Advertisement. Kenneth Mackintosh CANDIDATE FOR Judge of Superior Court Paid Advertisement. JOHN B.WRIGHT CANDIDATE FOR JUSTICE OF THE PEACE FOR SEATTLE Republican Primaries, September 10, 1912 Office: 623 New York Block Paid Advertisement. Wm. H. Anderson, M.D. CANDIDATE FOR CORONER Subject to Republican Primaries, September 10, 1912 --- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN PERTINENT. Startling headline in morning newspaper—"Ohio man declines office."—Boston Transcript. The best news France has heard lately is the decrease in the German birth rate. Buffalo Enquirer. The electors may as well understand that if they vote for Taft they are no longer a college, but an Ananias club. Washington Star. Gamblers in New York say they can't make an honest living owing to the prevalence of the graft habit among policemen. —Pittsburg Post. The new era of Taisel, "Great Righteousness," has begun in Japan. New York needs an era of that kind in its Police Department.—New York World. Fierce contest for the Presidency may perhaps be partly accounted for by the fact that the Treasury just now contains nearly $100,000,000.—Madison Wisconsin State Journal. The Father of Waters is the mother of appropriations.—Boston Transcript. The only thing we can suggest to Lorimer is that he start another party.—At- FRIDAY. AUGUST 16. 1912. 2 THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Is published every Friday by Cayton Publishing Company. Subscriptions, $3 per year; six months, $1.50; postage prepaid. Entered as second-class matter at the postoffice at Seattle. CAYTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, Inc. Main 305 427 Epler Block Seattle, Washington HUMPHREY THE MAN. Even newspaper publishers some times sit down and think it over and the editor of The Seattle Republican has actually done that very thing, and as a result he is going to have this paper support the candidacy of Will. E. Humphrel to succeed himself in Congress. We live in the state of Washington and more accurately speaking in the First Representative district of the state and are therefore deeply interested in the commercial development of both state and district, which can not be done unless she has representatives in Congress capable and qualified to prevent the representatives from the more populous sections of the country from steam rolling the Northwest. Years of experience in Congress and parliamentary diplomacy fits Mr. Humphrey for the position as no other person claiming the Northwest as his home. With practically a new Congress for the ensuing two years a man with Humphrey's experience would be able to get for the Northwest considerations that a half dozen members with no legislative experience in Congress could possibly get. Whether the next Congress be Republican or Democratic, and whether the next president be President Taft, Woodrow Wilson or Theodore Roosevelt, Mr. Humphrey would be able to do things in Congress for Seattle and the Northwest; and they need Congressional things done for them too badly at this time to depend upon novices. It can be said without fear of successful contradiction that Representative Humphrey holds more important committees in the house of representatives than any other man from the Pacific Coast, the alleged influence of California in Washington to the contrary notwithstanding. Theoretical physicians look fine, but when one is sick unto death it is the experienced physician that is wanted. The great Northwest is now in a course of evolution from a jungle to one of populous prosperity and Congress can and will help it along, if she will elect representatives to Congress, who know how to do things. It is not a question of whether you personally like or dislike Mr. Humphrey, but it is a question of, this section being forged to the front, and as he has done more to assist her along the lines of commercial activity than any other man ever sent from this state, because he has been kept at his post until he is thoroughly familiar with all the ins and outs, he should be continued. Those citizens of this district who personally dislike Mr. Humphrey may be in the position of the old lady, who was praying for bread and was overheard by some bad boys, who threw a large loaf into her door while she was yet at prayer. Suspecting that a joke was being played upon her she immediately exclaimed, "the Lord THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN sent it if the devil brought it." Representative Humphrey in the past has brought to the Northwest the desired loaves and he will continue doing so, if returned to Congress, and the citizens of the district should be as grateful to him for what he has done as if he were a personal friend of theirs. He is now in Washington City doing yeomen service for his country and he should not be knifed behind his back. The Seattle Republican will give Will E. Humphrey's candidacy to succeed himself a loyal support not only in the primary contest, but in the general election. STRAIGHT REPUBLICAN. The Seattle Republican is and will be straight old fashion Republican in politics and whatever falacies or abuses it may seem to see among the Republicans it will endeavor to correct them by fighting within the party lines. There are just as bad men in the Republican party as in other parties and just as good men, and it will fight to get the good men to the front and kick the bad men either out of the party entirely or force them to go way back and sit down. As in the past The Seattle Republican will endeavor to be Regular, Reliable, Readable, Republican without any qualifications. There is no excuse for a third party and it is only being urged by men of the stripe of its chief clackor hungry for public office. Every leader of the Bull Moose party has an ax to grind and hopes to grind it while the people are drunk with the new party spirit. The true spirit of patriotism is lost sight of when men will spend four and five times as much money to get an office as the office pays, not only the true spirit of patriotism is lost sight of, but the true spirit of honesty is lost sight of and the persons spending such sums of money to be elected to office are doing so to get an opportunity to filch the tax payers. There are entirely too much scramble for office for the good of the country. If the Associated Press can be believed, and it can, a most remarkable baby was born over in New York one day this week. The baby has two eyes, two ears, a head, a nose and a mouth. It has a body with two arms on each of which there is a hand with five fingers; it has two legs and on each of these there is a foot that has five toes. The body of the child has other strange marks and features. So remarkable is the baby that it has been named John Jacob Astor. There is no doubt but that this baby is one of the most remarkable human monstrosities that has ever been born in the United States or there would not be so much talk about it. But serious, the publicity given to the birth of this Astor baby shows that the American people see no greatness in any one unless such an one has multiplied millions of dollars to spend at will. In other words, the average citizen of the United States places the Almighty Dollar above every other accomplishment one may have, it is Lord and Master. The demand for lumber in the Northwest at present is unprecedented and every mill in the state of Washington is now FRIDAY, AUGUST 16, 1912 over run with orders, which will take two years or more to fill. The mills are buying thousands of dollars worth of new machinery preparatory to begin to turn out the orders and experienced men for the mills are being sought in every direction. It is predicted that in less than two months every lumber and shingle mill in the state will not only be running at full capacity, but will be running two shifts a day. That will mean that the logging camps will have to get mighty busy to keep the mills in material, the transportation lines will simply have to work over time to take the product away, all of which will mean that thousands of idle men will get work at splendid wages. It will thus be seen that this section of Uncle Sam's domain is on the threshold of a most prosperous era, which is very gratifying to every one. It looks as if Chief Stetson of the fire department of the city of Seattle thinks he can get what he wants from the city council by using the same methods on the members that he does on the fires. Owing to your unusual amount of physical strength, Mr. Stetson, you may be able to lick every member of the city council at one and the same time, but even then, it is very doubtful if you can make them pass the measures that you would like for them to do. You may not go "joy riding" as used in the vulgar application of that term, but "believe me" the city pays for a whole lot of gasoline used in your department that is not burned in taking the fire fighters to conflagrations. Parading the prospective marriage engagements of millionaires by the leading daily papers is a tendency on the part of such papers to lionize the man with the money, which accounts for the men with the money seeking to corrupt and clog the wheels of legislation when it seeks to make any move that will curtail their money making projects. Who Mr. Vanderbilt will marry should be of no more interest to the general public than who Mr. Hod Carrier Brown will marry and deserves no more space in the daily papers. Having been barred out of the United States, and Korea and Manchuria not proving lucrative fields for Japanese emigrants, a move is being made to send large numbers of them to Brazil and if they do well there other South American republics will be sent large quotas of Japanese emigrants. There is a great demand for labor in Brazil and the Japanese consul there says there is no prejudice against his countrymen, yea not only no prejudice, but the republic is anxious to have them come and supply the crying demand for labor. Citizens of the state of Washington will realize this year millions of dollars from their wheat crops, millions from their fruit crops, millions from their hay crops, millions from their vegetable crops, millions from other cereal crops, multiplied millions from their lumber and shingle mills, millions from their fish takes and multiplied millions of dollars from their mines, and if all those millions do not bring unheard of prosperity to the whole state then money can not bring prosperity. A Triumpth for the Old-Time Methods Old German Lager, which increases in popularity season after season, is surely a triumph for the old-time methods of beer making—a case of stepping a foot backward to gain miles forward in the production of the perfect beverage. Some claim magnitude of plant—we claim simplicity. Others claim pure water, some extra sanitation—we make all these claim, and challenge any and all as to quality—and the proof and the secret of our superiority will be found in the bottle that bears the label—Old German Lager. Old German Lager is a rare combination of Bohemian hops and selected malt, and is stored and properly aged by time—not forced artificially or me- chanically—but aged only by natural methods, giving us a product that is pure and entirely lacking the bitterness so often found in bottled beers made largely of domestic hops, under modern methods. Our increasing patronage is due, we believe, to our superior product, and we have been compelled to double our storage capacity used for ageing Old German Lager. Those who wish to enjoy a table beer made under these ideal conditions. properly aged—or lagered—will find Old German Lager in pints or quarts at all liquor stores—or telephone the plant, Sidney 75. Old German Lager delivered to all parts of the City Case of Two Dozen Pints, $2.00, refund of 50c for bottles Cofe of Two Dozen Quarts, $3.20, refund of 70c for bottles Ind dent Brewing C ndependent Brewing Co. TELEPHONE, SIDNEY 75 : ° Seattle, - - - Washington i eR ra RS A a FRIDAY, AUGUST 16, 1912. “There never was a time in the history of the Northwest when there was the de- mand for farm’ hands as at present,’’ said Charles Chaimberlain one day this week, “and this demand extends from British Columbia to the extreme southern part of California. The voters in the city may be considerably agitated over polities, but the men that own farms have little or no time to discuss politics. Times may seem to be hard in the cities just now, but Mr. Hard Times has got to vamoose and that too at no very distant date.’” In these days of rapid transit as well as easy locomotion the person who walks from his home to his office or up three flights of sairs is put down as being a more or less human curio, the not doing of those things, however, is largely re- sponsible for the most of the aches aad pains common to the human family now, but what of aches and pains, if one can be looked upon as a person able to take life easy? Mountain climbing is a most fascinating game, but to risk one’s life as is often done to stand on the pinacle of some sky kissing peak, with the only benefit arising therefrom the satisfaction of having been there, the game is not worth the candle. The lives that are yearly sacrificed in mountain climbing are entirely too nu- merous and a move should be made to dis- courage such foolish practices. In backing and filling on whether to or not to retire from the fistie ring Jack Johnson is displaying the same weakness of all other prize fighting champions. That money does come so easy that it is hard to turn it down even though you get licked and lose your championship in try- ing to get it. Pretty nearly a whole month has passed since Lorimer was kicked out of the sen- ate and the country has moved on in the even tenor of its way the same as if he had not been, the dire predictions of Lorimer that the country would go to the dimna- tion bowwows to the contrary notwith- standing. Tf the sugar trust thinks it can shut off the present investigation by temporarily reducing the price of sugar it is sadly mis- taken, but it would be well for the house- holder to lay in enough sugar while the reduction is on to sweeten the homes for the next twelve months. There are entirely too many elements of chance in being elected either president or vice-president of the United States for either Woodrow Wilson or Hiram J. John- son to let go the governorship jobs they now hold. <A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Passing vicious tariff measures on the part of Congress in order to put President Taft in a compromising political position may be putting him in the hole alright, but there is one thing certain, he has the nerve to stand by his guns and he may yet THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN get them unspiked in time to give his en- emies a very disastrous retreat. When it is remembered that, the talking machine companies pay out to singers a trifle over a million dollars annually to sing to their machines for reproduction, it is plain to be seen that to possess a rich cultivated musical voice is per se a fab- ulous fortune. Few cities in the world possess such beautiful lakes within their limits as does Seattle, but Seattle pays very dearly for the beautiful lakes within her gates with scores of human lives every year. .The lake route has been extensively patronized this year. Congress is playing politics bang up these days, which may result in the defeat of William Howard Taft, but the political game that is being played by Congress may result in a knock-out blow to the people when the game has run its course. And now comes the report that the Christian population in China has doubled within the last decade, which must ex- plain why crime has beeome so common in China within the last few years. If it be true that Andrew Lang, the noted literary artist, who recently died, “was never in bad humor,’’ we can thor- oughly understand why he died—‘‘the good die young.’’ Both members of the firm of Wood & Reeber were married last week, which must be an indication that, the firm is doing well and the ladies found it out and took them in. Nothing Counts Like Good Service LESS WORK BETTTER COOKING A CLEAN KITCHEN CLEAN FOOD LESS COST FOR FUEL USE A GAS RANGE A Small Payment with Your Order Will Place One In Your Home Seattle Lighting Co. 1314 Fourth Ave. Main 6767 POLITICS AND POLITICIANS The advent of a third party in the state simplifies the heretofore vexed political situation and the Republican party will not be troubled with a lot of blood-suckers, who are knifing one end of the ticket and boosting for the other. Whether the Republican party wins or loses, it will still have its organization in tact and go down to defeat rejoicing in the fact that, it is in a more healthy condition than to have won with a lot of traitors hanging on to it. So far as the gubernatorial fight is concerned, the Republicans will now nominate Myron E. Hay and a whole state ticket equally as loyal to the party as Gov. Hay, and will meet both the Democrats and the Bull Moosers in the open and on the square. In such a three-cornered fight the odds will be more in Hay's favor than in the favor of the candidate of either of the other two parties with the Democrat a close second. *** Owing to the mad rush to the Bull Moose party on the part of the hungry office-seekers there is bound to be a world of dissatisfaction after the convention has made its nominations and the disappointed ones are more than likely to sneak back into the Republican party and thereby greatly jeopardize the success of the movement. A bitter fight for the gubernatorial nomination will be waged from the very beginning, and with Lawrence, Paulhamus, Case and Hodge in the field seeking the same, the convention is going to leave as many sore spots as there are to be found on a leper's back. Lawrence thinks he has the inside track and so does Paulhamus and that crazy Bob Hodge, "gist knaws I has." Although Governor Teats is the first to announce his candidacy for the lieutenant-governorship, yet it is more than likely that that nomination will be given to one or the other of the gubernatorial aspirants as a compromise and thereby freeze Teats out, which will leave another awfully sore spot. If Dan Landon withdraws from the Republican party as he doubtless will, there is an element among the Bull Moosers who will try to defeat him for the nomination of representative to Congress, and if it succeeds, Dan will not do much for the ticket. With a united party, Dan had only a passing chance to defeat Humphrey, and with a divided party Humphrey will beat him at the general election by 5,000 plurality. For every nomination on the ticket there will be a wild scramble and, "believe me," that scramble will leave so many ugly wounds that it will take all the balm in Giliad soothing syrup in the United States to calm the smarting. * * * That anything to get an office, J. W. Bryan of Bremerton, has likewise joined the third party movement and the Republican party can congratulate itself of a good riddance of bad rubbish. Bryan has never been anything but a Southern Democrat of the most despicable type, who became a Republican because there were no THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Democrats in the state for him to work for an office, and he no sooner sees what he thinks an opportunity to get an office in another party when he forgets the deceptive pledges he made to the Republican party. Politically speaking, Bryan is a monster of such hideous mein that' to be hated he needs but to be known. *** Among the many who are aspiring for the Republican nomination of county coroner is to be found the name of Dr. G. H. T. Sparling, of Newcastle. He is well and favorably known among the old-timers of the county and it is here predicted that he will get a large per centage of their votes. He is also quite well known among those who have more recently come to the county and among them, too, he will get a large vote. In the famous north commissioner district he will get a very large vote and coming to the city gates with such a large country vote ought to give him the inside track on the nomination and election. *** Despite the fact the Republicans named no one against him for the nomination, it is safe to predict that Bill Hanna will get fewer votes by half than either the Bull Moose or the Democratic candidates for county treasurer. The Seattle Republican suggests to Bill Hanna that he apply for his old place in the city treasurer's office at once if not sooner, inasmuch as he seems unable to make a living at anything else, save feeding at the public crib. It can be said without fear of successful contradiction, that no man that ever held an office in the county left it as generally disliked as will Bill Hanna. He seems to never have learned the first principle of common politeness and has acted well his part. *** Ernest B. Herald, one of the non-partisan candidates for superior court judge of King County, is well and favorably known, and if selected will give a good account of himself. He was four years deputy prosecuting attorney under Kenneth Mackintosh and was noted while in the office, for his efficiency as well as ability to do the work assigned to him. * * * There is no one seeking the judicial nomination for the superior court in King County that The Seattle Republican can give a more cordial and heartfelt support than to Kenneth Mackintosh, and it truly hopes that he will not only be one of the high nine, but be one who will get a majority of all the votes cast and thereby avoid a second trial for the place. He is a native son and a native son that all of us can feel proud of, and if selected for the bench, as he will be, we will all be even more proud of him than we are for what he has done in a public way. He is a graduate of Stanford University of California and the Columbia Law School of New York, and therefore has both the educational and FRIDAY. AUGUST 16. 1912 legal groundwork, as well as the practical experience to make of him one of the ablest judges that ever presided over a court in the Northwest. *** Bill Wray, the justice of the peace pettyfogger, who desires to return to the legislature to finish up some of his cinch bills, which will more completely rob the women and children of their meat and bread, is getting uneasy about his chances of success. Three Republicans have filed in the district and Bill is the most unpopular one of the three. Victor Zednick and Eugene W. Way will each get two votes to Bill's one. . * * * Among those who have filed for the Republican nomination for representative in the legislature is Eugene W. Way, who is one of the most popular men in the city. Mr. Way was a member of the legislature some years ago and was twice elected a member of the city council of Seattle and in each place he made a most admirable record and his record will elect him for the place he seeks as a represenetaitve from the Forty-third representative district. * * * JOSEPHINE PRESTON, one of the most remarkable women of the Northwest, and yet one of the most unassuming, has been campaigning in Western Washington for the past ten days in the interest of her candidacy for the nomination of Superintendent of Public Instruction, subject to the Republican primaries, and has made a most favorable impression and in case she is nominated and elected it can be said without fear of successful contradiction that that office will not be made a breeding ground for budding politicians. She is thoroughly familiar with the duties of the office and would give the state an ideal administration. For the past nine years she has been connected with the office of superintendent of schools of Walla Walla county and her work has been so unqualifiedly satisfactory that she has the absolute confidence of the whole people of that county, and, it is safe to say, she will get 99 per cent of the votes cast in that section of the state. She is backed by the leading educators of the state, and, as said above, if nominated and elected her office will not be a wheel in a great political machine at the expense of the boys and girls of the state. To talk with Mrs. Preston is convincing that, she will give the state the best administration that that office has ever had. It looks as if the interest of our little folk is to be looked after when such broad gauged liberal minded educators as Mrs. Preston seek the superintendency. Mrs. Preston ought to get every true father's and mother's vote in the whole state, yea, her election ought to be unanimous. Despite the fact that there is an aspirant in King County for the same office, it looks as if she will get more votes even in King County than her opponent. The teaching of Young America to FRIDAY, AUGUST 16, 1912. Ee Ee ese See Pome rate gee ee Rae Pee ear ton there is a golden opportunity to break away from such a state of affairs and every mother and father should eagerly grasp the opportunity. Much is now being said in the news- papers about the absolute necessity of good roads in this state. A system of good highways is beyond peradventure a state’s best assets. Attorney H. E. Foster was the first one to advocate a state bond issue for the purpose of constructing a system of highways throughout the state and at the last session of the Legislature he in- troduced a bill providing for such bond issue for the purpose of constructing a system of highways. This became H. B. No. 519. Mr. Foster is a candidate to succeed himself in the Legislature and promises to urge the passage of his measure. This measure provides for a permanent highway from Puget Sound by way of Snoqualmie Pass to Eastern Washington and would give to the people of the state just what the newspapers are clamoring for, a per- manent highway with an easy grade con- necting the eastern and western parts of the state. All persons agree that the Sno- qualmie Pass is the most feasible route for a permanent highway across the moun- tains. This highway should have easier grades than any other route through the mountains and along this route the snow fall is less than on any other pass through the mountains. Mr. Foster’s measure pro- vides for a trunk line running north and south in western Washington; one up the Columbia River, starting in the neighbor- hood of Vancouver; the Snoqualmie Pass route, or Washington Highway, from Pu- get Sound to Eastern Washington by way of Spokane, with branches from Cle Elum to Ellensburg, North Yakima, and Pasco; a north and south braneh from North Port through Spokane to Walla Walla. This plan would. give the state an elegant system of trunk lines and would thus enable the counties to connect up the county highways and would make each portion of the state accessible. A water level highway would be established from Puget Sound to Spo- kane by way of Vancouver and the Colum- bia River. It will also be remembered that Mr. Foster wrote the plan for the Pa- cifie Highway at a conference of rep- resentatives from British Columbia, Califor- nia, Oregon and Washington held in this city in August, 1910. This highway ex- tends from British Columbia to Mexico in the United States, and north through Brit- ish Columbia to Alaska. Austin E. Griffith got so angry the other day because the other members of the city council would not do as he wanted them, that he said he would never again be a member of the council. Great minds do run in the same channel, the people made up their minds some time ago that he would not, THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN PERSONAL. J. A. Falconer has withdrawn from the Republican ticket with the view of being nominated for Congress at large on the Bull Moose ticket. It is a weakness of Fal- eoner to forget his friends. Dan Landon is going to Bull Moose and though he should succeed in his under- taking he will never again see his father’s face in peace. The man who goes off on a tangent never manages to get back into the regular orbit. R. R. George, who has been justice of peace in Seattle since the year one, and who was police judge for a number of years, has filed for non-partisan judge of the superior court- He is quite popular and will make a good run. John B. Wright, who won his political spurs in ward politics many years ago, when the old Fifth ward was a power in every city and county convention, is a can- didate for the Republican nomination of justice of the peace of Seattle and is mak- ing a most interesting campaign. Among the old timers he has a host of friends and he is not letting the grass grow under his feet in getting round among the new com- ers. ‘A. W. Frater, who desires to again be elected one of the superior court judges, it is predicted, will run ahead of the ticket and get a majority of the votes cast in the primary election. Albert Johnson, who was running for Congress at large is now a candidate for Congress from the second district, and will make it very interesting for Stanton War- burton whether the latter Bull Mooses or stays regular. John Lockwood Wilson, of Washington senatorial fame, does not seem to be mix- ing in the present political upheaval. His paper is moving on as if nothing unusual was taking place. W. H. Paulhamus, the Sumner berry king, says, ‘‘my hat is in the ring for gov- ernor,’’ which is interpreted to mean, ‘‘T propose to make Hay hard for Lawrence to catch in the final wind-up. Jack Stringer will doubtless be nomi- nated by the Bull Moosers for sheriff of King county. Though the Bull Mooser should sweep the state it is not thought Jack would win his fight. He just does not take with the voters. Frank L. Crosby, who has spent an or- dinary life time as deputy U. S. Marshall, located in Tacoma, has been named by Judge Cushman as clerk of the U. S. court of this district. Crosby has handled thou- sands of federal prisoners. George W. Dilling, a former Seattle meverenag AChA WwW. LeOhara Nas JUSt returned from Alaska and unless he has changed his mind he will open up on the crooked work in Seattle municipal affairs, and, if reports be true, there is plenty of it. Philander C. Knox, secretary of state, who is on his way to Japan to see that the dead emperor is laid away, wires he will not have time to be wined and dined by the new Chamber of Commerce of Seat- tle. More money saved. The Seattle Republican would like to get your legal publications . It will give you good service and immediate attention. Telephone Main 305, and it will do the rest. There will bea new Way of doings things in the next legislature of this state and Eugene W. will engineer its construction. Taling Teddy told the tale that took the tomally. _ PUGET SOUND TRACTION COMPANY Is selling the Most Reliable Light and at a Reduced Cost. Carbon Lamps Are Supplied Free to consumers of our current. Call at the ELECTRIC BUILDING, Seventh Avenue and Olive Street, Or phone Main 2680 - - - - Independent 208 BONNEY-WATSON CO. UNDERTAKERS Preparing bodies for shipment a specialty. All orders by telephone or telegraph promptly at- tended to. Telephone Blliott 13. 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. In the matter of the Estate of Matthew Dow, Deceased. No. 14230. In Probate. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned, administrators of the estate of Matthew Dow, deceased, to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against, the said deceased, to exhibit them with the necessary vouchers within one (1) year after the first publication of this notice, to the said administrators, at No. 913, Northern Bank & Trust Building, corner of 4th Avenue and Pike St., in the City of Seattle, County of King, State of Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of all the business of said estate. AMES R. STIRRAT, JOHN KYLE, Administrators of the Estate of Matthew Dow, Deceased. Aug. 16, 1912—Sept. 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Effie Sheldon, Plaintiff, vs. Chas. R. Sheldon, Defendant. No. ——. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Chas. R. Sheldon, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 16th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of non-support for more than one year and for extreme cruelty. ALBERT J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 405-406 Eilers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Aug. 16—Sept. 27. 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons. Henriette Mauvais, plaintiff, vs. Romeo Mauvais, defendant—No. The State of Washington to the said Romeo Mauvals, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 9th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure to so do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complaint in this action prays for divorce and that the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved. H. E. FOSTER. Attorney for Plaintiff. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 708 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. Date of first publication, Aug. 9, 1912. Date of last publication, Sept. 20, 1912. JUSTICE'S COURT, BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Summons for Publication. E. M. Brouillette, plaintiff, vs. C. P. Rollins, defendant.-No. 28064-56. State of Washington, County of King ss: The State of Washington to C. P. Rollins: You, and each of you, are hereby notified that E. M. Brouillette has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in room, 611 Prefontaine Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 12th day of September, A. D. 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said E. M. Brouillette is to recover a judgment against you for services rendered you as attorney in the case of Bernard Murray vs. C. P. Rollins et al in the Superior Court of Washington for King County and numbered 77066 in said court, which said complaint demands judgment for $99.95, interest and costs. Complaint filed June 26, A. D. 1912. Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Wash. August 9—September 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Summons for Publication. Nettie May Heater, plaintiff, vs. Guy H. Heater, defendant,—No. —, The State of Washington to the said Guy H. Heater, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 9th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the com- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN KENNETH M Candidate for Judge of the Sup [Name] Candidate for Judge of the Superior Court of King County. plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant, because the defendant without plaintiff's fault ever since the 27th day of February, 1912, has failed and neglected to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family and that he still fails and neglects to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family. Plaintiff also seeks the restoration of her maiden name, Nettie May Gregory, A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address, Stevens' Dancing Academy, Fourth Avenue, near Pine Street, Seattle, Washington. August 9—September 20, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Olive Burchett, plaintiff, vs. Clinton T. Burchett, defendant.-No. 89145. The State of Washington to the said Clinton T. Burchett, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 9th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for the purpose of obtaining a divorce from this defendant and in favor of this plaintiff, on the grounds of desertion and non-support for a period of more than one year. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address 405-406 Ellers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. August 9—September 20, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Elmira L. Stone, Deceased. No. 14311. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 8th day of July, 1912, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Administrator with the will annexed of said estate at 405 New York Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, July 12th. 1912. WASHINGTON TRUST & SAVINGS BANK. By J. H. EDWARDS, Vice-Prest. As Administrator with the Will Annexed of said Estate. H. R. CLISE. Attorney for Estate. 405 New York Bldg., Seattle, Wn. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Julia E. Siebe, Plaintiff, vs. Harry R. Siebe, Defendant. No. ---. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington: To the above named defendant, Harry R. Siebe: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the first pub- lication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 12th day of July. --- Attorney for Estate. MACKINTOSH, Superior Court of King County. 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is: That the plaintiff be divorced from the defendant on the grounds of (1) desertion and abandonment for one year and more, and (2) nonsupport, and (3) that the minor child be awarded plaintiff, almony and costs. Date of first publication July 12, 1912. FRANK H. KNAPP. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Room 219 Epler Block, 813 2nd Ave., Seattle, King County, State of Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons. Harry N. Bentley, plaintiff, vs. Beatrice Young Bentley, defendant.—No. 88910. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, Beatrice Young Bentley: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment wil be rendered against you according to the demand of the compaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce by plaintiff from defendant, on the grounds of desertion and abandonment by defendant of plaintiff, without cause, for more than one (1) year. GEO. H. BAILEY. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 1220 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, Washington. July 26—Sept. 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Seth H. Morford, Plaintiff, vs. Albert J. D'Aoust, and the West Coast Securities Company, a corporation; H. L. Green, Defendants. No. ——. Publication Summons. State of Washington, to the said Albert J. D'Aoust and West Coast Securities Company, and H. L. Green. NOTICE: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this summons upon you, to-wit: sixty (60) days after the 5th day of July, 1912, exclusive of the day of service, and answer ahe complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which is filed with the clerk in the above entitled court, a copy of which is hereby served upon you by publication. The object of this suit is to foreclose a mortgage given by Albert J. D'Aoust to H. L. Green on the 26th day of May, 1911, on Lot three (3), in Block forty-three (43) of H. E. Orr Park Division number four (4). REEVES AYLMORE, Jr., Attorney for the Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 575 Colman Building, Seattle, Washington. July 5—August 16, 1912. FRIDAY. AUGUST 16, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. John Thomas, plaintiff, vs. Jessie Thomas, defendant - No. 88043 as, defendant—No. 88043. The State of Washington to the said Jessie Thomas, defendant. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action by the plaintiff is to obtain a judgment of divorce from the defendant, upon the grounds of cruelty, and defendant's desertion and refusal to live and cohabit with plaintiff. P. O. address, 200 Epler Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. June 28—August 9, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. German Savings, Building & Loan Association, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. F. F. Travis, Maud E. Travis, his wife; William Jensen, Hulda Jensen, his wife; P. H. Ammidown and Jane Doe Ammidown, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dyer, the General Hauling Company, a corporation, Defendants. No. 87755. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to P. H. Amidown, Jone Doe Amidown, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dyer; You, and each of you, are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 19th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at the address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment from said court in favor of the plaintiff, against the said defendants F. F. Travis, and Maud E. Travis, and Maud E. Travis, and Maud E. Travis, his wife, for the sum of Ten Hundred Sixty-one Dollars and Twelve Cents ($1061.12), together with interest thereon at the rate of 12 per cent per annum, and interest, attorney's fees, costs and disbursements, and to foreclose that certain mortgage made by the said defendants on the 28th day of February, 1906, for the sum of $1650 (Sixteen hundred and fifty dollars) upon Lot 6, Block 5, Westlake Boulevard Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, which mortgage is of record in Vol. 285 of Mortgages, page 358, record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, and for the sale of said lands to satisfy the amount that may be adjudged by the court to the plaintiff and to bar and foreclose all right, title and interest of each and all of said defendants in and to said lands and premises and every part thereof and for general relief. Date of first publication July 19, 1912. EDWARD VON TOBEL. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 604-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. [Image of a man in a suit with a tie and a serious expression. The background is plain and light-colored. There are no other discernible elements or text.]] A. R. UPRIGHT Candidate for State Land Commissioner. FRIDAY. AUGUST 16, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. K. Winslow, plaintiff, vs. Lascar P. DuBoise, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 89050. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of eleven certain delinquent tax certificates issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 8th day of April, 1912, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year 1908, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 3, block 38, certificate No. B76931, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 4, block 38, certificate No. B76932, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 5, block 38, certificate No. B76933, year 1908, amount $0.66. Lot 6, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Lot 7, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 Lot 7, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910 Lot 7, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Lot 8, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909. Lot 8, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910 Lot 8, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 Lot 9, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 Lot 9, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 9, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Lot 10, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909. Lot 10, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 10, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 1911. Lot 11, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 Lot 11 block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910 1910. Lot 11, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Lot 12, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909. Lot 12, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 12, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Lot 13, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Lot 13, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 13, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after the 2nd day of August, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at this office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- The State of Washinton to the said Ellen Parry, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action by the plaintiff is to obtain a judgment of divorce from the defendant upon the grounds of desertion and refusal to live and cohabit with plaintiff. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 200 Epler Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. June 28—August 9, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Edith Buckwell, Plaintiff, vs. Cyril D. Buckwell, Defendant. No. 88605. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Cyril D. Buckwell, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 5th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated! and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce of this plaintiff from this defendant on the grounds of desertion and non-support. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 405-406 Eiler Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. July 5—August 16, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Ida L. B. Hewlett, Plaintiff, vs. Ralph F. Hewlett, Defendant. No. 88539. Summons for Publication Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the Defendant, Ralph F. Hewlett: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 5th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action, answer the complaint of the complainant, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of the above entitled action is a dissolution of the bonds of marri-mony, and the restoration of the plaintiff's malden name of Ida L. Burnard. Postoffice and Office Address: 307 Lowman Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. July 5—August 16, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Mary J. Weber, Plaintiff, vs. Otto O. Weber, defendant. No. 88138. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said McLEAN & BALLIET. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Lottie Wickstrom, plaintiff, vs. A. P. Wickstrom, defendant—No. Wickstrom, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington to the said A. P. Wickstrom, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of non-support for more than three years last past. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 405-406 Eilers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. June 28—August 9, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. Edwin A. Huntley, plaintiff, vs. Marie Baxter Huntley, defendant.—No. Baxter Huntley, defendant. No. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, Marie Baxter Huntley: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer on plaintiff's attorney at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for the purpose of dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff, Edwin A. Huntley, and the defendant, Marie Baxter Huntley, upon the grounds of cruelty and desertion. WILSON R. GAY, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, suite 720 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. July 26—Sept. 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons by Publication. Maud M. Peugh, plaintiff, vs. Frank J. Peugh, defendant—No. _____ The State of Washington to the said Frank J. Peugh, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 2nd of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been nied with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant for the following reasons: First. Because, without plaintiff's fault, the defendant abandoned the plaintiff at Bakersfield, California, in April, 1909, said abandonment being continuous for one year and more. Secon. Because, without the plaintiff's fault the defendant since April, 1909, has neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family and still neglects and refuses to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family. Plaintiff also seeks the restoration of her maiden name, Maud M. Burgua. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address, Steven's Dancing Academy, Second Floor, Fourth Avenue between Pike and Pine Streets, Seattle, Washington. August 2—September 13, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for publication. ty. Summons for publication. Mabel Nex, plaintiff, vs. Albert Nex, defendant.—No. 88972. The State of Washington to the said Albert Nex, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 2nd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and non-support for a period of more than three years. Attorney for Hamth. P. O. Address, 405-406 Ellers Bldg, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 2—September 13, 1912. IN TH E SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. German Savings, Building & Loan Association, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. F. F. Travis, Maud E. Travis, his wife: William Jensen, Hula D, Jensen, Attorney for Plaintiff. 中 his wife; P. H. Ammidown and Jane Doe Ammidown, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dyer; the General Hauling Company, a corporation, defendants.—No. 87754. The State of Washington to P. H. Ammidown, Jane Doe Ammidown, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dyer; You and each of you are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 19th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at the address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment from said court in favor of the plaintiff, against the said defendants, F. F. Travis, and Maud E. Travis, his wife, for the sum of Ten Hundred Sixty-one Dollars and twelve cents ($1,061.12), together with interest thereon at the rate of 12 per cent per annum, and interest, attorney's fees, costs and disbursements, and to foreclose that certain mortgage made by the said defendants on the 28th day of February, 1906, for the sum of $1,650.00 (Sixteen Hundred and Fifty Dollars) upon Lot 5, Block 5, Westlake Boulevard Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, which mortgage is of record in Vol. 285 of Mortgages, page 360, record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, and for the sale of said lands to satisfy the amount that may be adjudged by the court to the plaintiff and to bar and foreclose all right, title and interest of each and all of said defendants in and to said lands and premises and every part thereof and for general relief. Office and Postoffice address, 604-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Minnie A. Reay, plaintiff, vs. John Reay, defendant No. _____ derendant.No.—— The State of Washington to the said John Reay, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against your according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of desertion and non-support for a period of two years. A. J. ALLEN. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 405-406 Ellers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. June 28—August 9, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons. Orva Anderson, plaintiff, vs. James B. Anderson, defendant.—No. 88911. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, James B. Anderson: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce by plaintiff from defendant, on the grounds of non-support and desertion and abandonment by defendant of plaintiff, without cause for more than one year. Office and postoffice address, suite 1220 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, Washington. July 26—Sept. 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Bert E. Bailey, Deceased. No. 14109. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 29th day of June, 1912. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned, Minnie Bailey, Administratrix of said estate, at 703 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, July 5, 1912. MINNIE BAILEY, As Administratrix of said Estate HENRY S. NOON, Attorney for Estate, 703 New York Blk., Seattle, Wn. July 5—August 16, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for King County. In the matter of the Estate of Matthew Dow, Deceased. No. 14230. In Probate. Notice to Creditors. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned, administrators of the estate of Matthew Dow, deceased, to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against, the said deceased, to exhibit them with the necessary vouchers within one (1) year after the first publication of this notice, to the said administrators, at No. 913, Northern Bank & Trust Building, corner of 4th Avenue and Pike St., in the City of Seattle, County of King, State of Washington, the same being the place for the transaction of all the business of said estate. AMES R. STIRRAT, JOHN KYLE, Administrators of the Estate of Matthew Dow, Deceased. Aug. 16, 1912—Sept. 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Effie Sheldon, Plaintiff, vs. Chas. R. Sheldon, Defendant. No. ——. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Chas. R. Sheldon, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 16th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of non-support for more than one year and for extreme cruelty. ALBERT J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 405-406 Ellers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Aug. 16—Sept. 27, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons. Henriette Mauvais, plaintiff, vs. Romeo Mauvais, defendant.—No. The State of Washington to the said Romeo, Mauvais, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 9th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated, and in case of your failure to so do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The complaint in this action prays for divorce and that the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved. H. E. FOSTER. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 708 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington Date of first publication, Aug. 9, 1912. Date of last publication, Sept. 20, 1912. JUSTICE'S COURT, BEFORE R. R. George, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, State of Washington. Summons for Publication. E. M. Brouillette, plaintiff, vs. C. P. Rollins, defendant.—No. 28064-56. State of Washington, County of King —ss: The State of Washington to C. P. Rollins: You, and each of you, are hereby notified that E. M. Brouillette has filed a complaint against you in said court, which will come on to be heard at my office in room, 611 Prefontaine Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington, on the 12th day of September, A. D. 1912, at the hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M., and unless you appear and then and there answer, the same will be taken as confessed and the demand of the plaintiff granted. The object and demand of said E. M. Brouillette is to recover a judgment against you for services rendered you as attorney in the case of Bernard Murray vs. C. P. Rollins et al in the Superior Court of Washington for King County and numbered 77066 in said court, which said complaint demands judgment for $99.95, interest and costs. Complaint filed June 26, A. D. 1912. Dated July 15, 1912 R. R. GEORGE, Justice of the Peace in and for Seattle Precinct, King County, Wash. August 9—September 6, 1912 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Summons for Publication. Nettie May Heater, plaintiff, vs. Guy H. Heater, defendant.—No. — The State of Washington to the said Guy H. Heater, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 9th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the com- THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN ```markdown ``` [Name] KENNETH MACKINTOSH. Candidate for Judge of the Superior Court of King County. plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object for which this action is brought is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant, because the defendant without plaintiff's fault ever since the 27th day of February, 1912, has failed and neglected to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family and that he still fails and neglects to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family. Plaintiff also seeks the restoration of her maiden name, Nettie May Gregory. A. J. SPECKERT. Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and P. O. Address, Stevens' Dancing Academy, Fourth Avenue, near Pine Street, Seattle, Washington. August 9—September 20, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Olive Burchett, plaintiff, vs. Clinton T. Burchett, defendant.-No. 89145. The State of Washington to the said Clinton T. Burchett, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 9th day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for the purpose of obtaining a divorce from this defendant and in favor of this plaintiff, on the grounds of desertion and non-support for a period of more than one year. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address 405-406 Ellers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. August 9—September 20, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In the Matter of the Estate of Elmira L. Stone. Deceased. No. 14311. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 8th day of July, 1912, notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned Administrator with the will annexed of said estate at 405 New York Building, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state, within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of first publication, July 12th. 1912. WASHINGTON TRUST & SAVINGS WASHINGTON TRUST & SAVINGS BANK. By J. H. EDWARDS, Vice-Prest. As Administrator with the Will Annexed of said Estate. H. R. CLISE. Attorney for Estate. 405 New York Bldg., Seattle, Wn. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Julia E. Siebe. Plaintiff, vs. Harry R. Siebe, Defendant. No. ---. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington: To the above named defendant, Harry R. Siebe: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the first publication of this summons. to-wit: within sixty days after the 12th day of July, Attorney for Estate. M. T. K. 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is: That the plaintiff be divorced from the defendant on the grounds of (1) desertion and abandonment for one year and more, and (2) nonsupport, and (3) that the minor child be awarded plaintiff, almony and costs. Date of first publication July 12, 1912. FRANK H. KNAPP. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: Room 219 Epler Block, 813 2nd Ave., Seattle, King County. State of Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons. Harry N. Bentley, plaintiff, vs. Beatrice Young Bentley, defendant.—No. 88910. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, Beatrice Young Bentley: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment wil be rendered against you according to the demand of the compaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce by plaintiff from defendant, on the grounds of desertion and abondment by defendant of plaintiff, without cause, for more than one (1) year. GEO. H. BAILEY. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 1220 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, Washington. July 26—Sept. 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. Seth H. Morford, Plaintiff, vs. Albert J. D'Aoust, and the West Coast Securities Company, a corporation; H. L. Green, Defendants, No. — Publication Summons. State of Washington, to the said Albert J. D'Aoust and West Coast Securities Company, and H. L. Green NOTICE: You and each of you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the service of this summons upon you, to-wit: sixty (60) days after the 5th day of July, 1912, exclusive of the day of service, and answer ahe complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned, attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which is filed with the clerk in the above entitled court, a copy of which is hereby served upon you by publication. The object of this suit is to foreclose a mortgage given by Albert J. D'Aoust to H. L. Green on the 26th day of May, 1911, on Lot three (3), in Block forty-three (43) of H. E. Orr Park Division number four (4). REEVES AYLMORE, Jr. Attorney for the Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 575 Colman Building, Seattle, Washington. July 5—August 16, 1912. FRIDAY, AUGUST 16, 1912 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. John Thomas, plaintiff, vs. Jessie Thomas, defendant.—No. 88043. The State of Washington to the said Jessie Thomas defendant Jessie Thomas, you are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit: Within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action by the plaintiff is to obtain a judgment of divorce from the defendant, upon the grounds of cruelty, and defendant's desertion and refusal to live and cohabit with plaintiff. E. F. KIENSTRA. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 200 Epler Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. June 28—August 9, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. German Savings, Building & Loan Association, a corporation, Plaintiff, vs. F. F. Travis, Maud E. Travis, his wife; William Jensen, Hulda Jensen, his wife; P. H. Ammidown and Jane Doe Ammidown, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dyer, the General Hauling Company, a corporation, Defendants. No. 87755. Summons by Publication. The State of Washington to P. H. Ammidown, Jone Doe Ammidown, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dyer. You, and each of you, are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 19th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at the address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment from said court in favor of the plaintiff, against the said defendants F. F. Travis, and Maud E. Travis, and Maud E. Travis, his wife, for the sum of Ten Hundred Sixty-one Dollars and Twelve Cents ($1061.12), together with interest thereon at the rate of 12 per cent per annum, and interest, attorney's fees, costs and disbursements, and to foreclose that certain mortgage made by the said defendants on the 28th day of February, 1906, for the sum of $1650 (Sixteen hundred and fifty dollars) upon Lot 6, Block 5, Westlake Boulevard Addition to the city of Seattle, King County, Washington, which mortgage is of record in Vol. 285 of Mortgages, page 358, record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, and for the sale of said lands to satisfy the amount that may be adjudged by the court to the plaintiff and to bar and foreclose all right, title and interest of each and all of said defendants in and to said lands and premises and every part thereof and for general relief. Date of first publication July 19, 1912. EDWARD VON TOBEL, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Post Office Address: 604-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. [Name] A. R. UPRIGHT Candidate for State Land Com missioner. FRIDAY. AUGUST 16. 1912 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. K. Winslow, plaintiff, vs. Lascar P. DuBoise, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants.—No. 89050. State of Washington, to the above defendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter described real property, are hereby notified that the above named plaintiff is the holder of eleven certain delinquent tax certificates issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dated the 8th day of April, 1912, and numbered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year 1908, in the following amount, and upon the real property situated in said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 3, block 38, certificate No. B76931, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 4, block 38, certificate No. B76932, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 5, block 38, certificate No. B76933, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 6, block 38, certificate No. B76934, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 7, block 38, certificate No. B76935, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 9, block 38, certificate No. B76937, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 10, block 38, certificate No. B76938, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 11, block 38, certificate No. B76939, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 12, block 38, certificate No. B76940, year 1908, amount $0.66. 1906, and Grove Addition to Des Moines, lot 13, block 38, certificate No. B76941, year 1908, amount $0.66. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 3, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents., for year 1909. Lot 3, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910 Lot. 3, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Lot 4, block 38, Grove addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909. Lot 4, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 4, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 Lot 5, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 Lot 5, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910 Lot 6, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1910 1910. Lot g, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 Lot 6, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 6, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Lot 7, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 1913. Lot 7, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 7, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 1911. Lot 8, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 1963. Lot 8, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910 1910. Lot 8, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 Lot 9, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1000 1909. Lot 9, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910 1910. Lot 9, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 1911. Lot 10, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1000 1909. Lot 10, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910 1910. Lot 10, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. 1911. Lot 11, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 Lot 11 block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910 1910. Lot 11, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 1911. Lot 12, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 Lot 12, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910 Lot 12, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 1911. Lot 13, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Lot 13, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 13, block 38, Grove Addition to Des Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from date of payment, and are all the unpaid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first publication, to-wit, within sixty days after the 2nd day of August, 1911, in the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the complaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at this office below stated, or pay the amount due, together with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be rendered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each parcel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each parcel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. K. WINSLOW, Plaintiff Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office address 663-4-5 Empire Building, Seattle, Washington. August 2, September 13, 1912 August 2—September 13, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. William J. Parry, plaintiff, vs. Ellen Parry, defendant. No. 88502. The State of Washington to the said Ellen Parry, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action by the plaintiff is to obtain a judgment of divorce from the defendant upon the grounds of desertion and refusal to live and cohabit with plaintiff. E. F. KIENSTRA, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 200 Epler Block, Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Edith Buckwell, Plaintiff, vs. Cyril D. Buckwell, Defendant. No. 88605. Sum- mmer of Publication. mons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Cyril D. Buckwell, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 5th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated! and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce of this plaintiff from this defendant on the grounds of desertion and non-support. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address: 405-406 Eller Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. July 5—August 16, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Ida L. B. Hewlett, Plaintiff, vs. Ralph F. Hewlett, Defendant. No. 88539. Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the Defendant, Ralph F. Hewlett: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit: within sixty days after the 5th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action, answer the complaint of the complainant, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiff at their office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demands of the complaint herein, which has been filed with the clerk of the above entitled court. The object of the above entitled act is a dissolution of the bonds of matrimony, and the restoration of the plaintiff's malden name of Ida L. Burnard. Dated at Seattle, Washington, June 29, 1912. TUCKER & HYLAND, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Postoffice and Office Address: 307 Low- man Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. July 5—August 16, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- tury. Mary J. Weber, Plaintiff, vs. Otto O. Weber, defendant, No. 88138. Sum- mons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said McLEAN & BALLIET, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Lottie Wickstrom, plaintiff, vs. A. P. Wickstrom, defendant.-No. -. Wickstrom, defendant.—No. ____. The State of Washington to the said A. P. Wickstrom, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, tow- it, within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judg- ment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of non-support for more than three years last past. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 405-406 Eilers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. June 28—August 9, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. Edwin A. Huntley, plaintiff, vs. Marie Baxter Huntley, defendant—No. — You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the court aforesaid, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff herein and serve a copy of your answer on plaintiff's attorney at his office below stated, and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of said complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for the purpose of dissolving the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff, Edwin A. Huntley, and the defendant, Marie Baxter Huntley, upon the grounds of cruelty and desertion. WILSON R. GAY, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, suite 720 Alaska Bldg, Seattle, King County, Washington. July 26—Sept. 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons by Publication. Maud M. Peugh, plaintiff, vs. Frank J. Peugh, defendant.—No. ____. The State of Washington to the said Frank J. Peugh, defendant; You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 2nd of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been fled with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant for the following reasons: First.—Because, without plaintiff's fault, the defendant abandoned the plaintiff at Bakersfield, California, in April, 1909, said abandonment being continuous for one year and more. Secon.—Because, without the plaintiff's fault the defendant since April, 1909, has neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family and still neglects and refuses to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family. Plaintiff also seeks the restoration of her maiden name, Maud M. Burgua. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address, Steven's Dancing Academy, Second Floor, Fourth Avenue between Pike and Pine Streets, Seattle, Washington. August 2—September 13, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for publication. Mabel Nex, plaintiff, vs. Albert Nex, detendant—No. 88372. defendant.—No. 88972. The State of Washington to the said Albert Nex, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, towit, within sixty days after the 2nd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and non-support for a period of more than three years. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 405-406 Ellers Bldg, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 2—September 13, 1912 IN TH E SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons by Publication. German Savings, Building & Loan Association, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. F. F. Travis, Maud E. Travis, his wife: William Jensen, Hula D, Jensen, Attorney for Plaintiff. 中 his wife; P. H. Ammidown and Jane Doe Ammidown, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dyer; the General Hauling Company, a corporation, defendants.—No. 87754. The State of Washington to P. H. Ammidown, Jane Doe Ammidown, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dyer; You and each of you are hereby summoned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 19th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at the address below stated, and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment from said court in favor of the plaintiff, against the said defendants, F. F. Travis, and Maud E. Travis, his wife, for the sum of Ten Hundred Sixty-one Dollars and twelve cents ($1,061.12), together with interest thereon at the rate of 12 per cent per annum, and interest, attorney's fees, costs and disbursements, and to foreclose that certain mortgage made by the said defendants on the 28th day of February, 1906, for the sum of $1,650.00 (Sixteen Hundred and Fifty Dollars) upon Lot 5, Block 5, Westlake Boulevard Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, which mortgage is of record in Vol. 285 of Mortgages, page 360, record of mortgages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, and for the sale of said lands to satisfy the amount that may be adjudged by the court to the plaintiff and to bar and foreclose all right, title and interest of each and all of said defendants in and to said lands and premises and every part thereof and for general relief. Office and Postoffice address, 604-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King County, Wash. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County, Summons for Publication. Minnie A. Reay, plaintiff, vs. John Reay, defendant.No. _____ The State of Washington to the said John Reay, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 28th day of June, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against your according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is for divorce on the grounds of desertion and non-support for a period of two years. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. address, 405-406 Ellers Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. June 28—August 9, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons. Orva Anderson, plaintiff, vs. James B. Anderson, defendant.—No. 88911. The State of Washington to the above named defendant, James B. Anderson: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty (60) days after the 26th day of July, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned attorney for the plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce by plaintiff from defendant, on the grounds of non-support and desertion and abandonment by defendant of plaintiff, without cause for more than one year. GEO. H. BAILEY, Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and postoffice address, suite 1220 Alaska Bldg., Seattle, Washington. July 26—Sept. 6, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. In Probate In the Matter of the Estate of Bert E. Bailey, Deceased. No. 14109. Notice to Creditors. By order of said court made herein on the 29th day of June, 1912. Notice is hereby given to the creditors of, and to all persons having claims against said deceased or against said estate, to present them with the necessary vouchers to the undersigned, Minnie Bailey, Administratrix of said estate, at 703 New York Block, Seattle, King County, Washington, the place of business of said estate, in Seattle, in said county and state within one year from and after the date of first publication of this notice or same will be barred. Date of same WN Date of first publication, July 5, 1912. MINNIE BAILEY, As Administratrix of said Estate HENRY S. NOON, Attorney for Estate, 703 New York Blk., Seattle, Wn. July 5—August 1912.